Speaker 1: On scone Wuds Australia. This is the Winder Paney Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panecky Show. Coming
Speaker 2: up tonight. An indigenous leader who declared non Aboriginal people
Speaker 2: should go back to where they came from or face extermination.
Speaker 2: Appointed co chair of taxpay funded Reconciliation Victoria Patrick Carline
Speaker 2: will be here to discuss that and more, including the
Speaker 2: latest wacky political ads flooding social media, and one of
Speaker 2: those is a plagiarized effort from Tilminique Ryan. We'll look
Speaker 2: at the latest so called hate speech laws and the
Speaker 2: assault against free expression with Stephanie Bastian. The always droll
Speaker 2: Army Horowitz will have the latest from the US, and
Speaker 2: later in the hour we'll look at some of the
Speaker 2: mad activism happening on university campuses. We never forget left
Speaker 2: He is losing it tonight featuring Democrat Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 3: You know, you know we don't pick and kit.
Speaker 1: We are you can't pay us enough to find a plantation.
Speaker 2: But first, last night's debate between Anthony Albineazy and Peter
Speaker 2: Dutton almost didn't occur after the opposition leader's father suffered
Speaker 2: a heart attack and was rushed to hospital just minutes
Speaker 2: before the start of the debate. Here is Peter Dutton
Speaker 2: on Nova Radio this morning.
Speaker 4: I have something like that, actually go down just before
Speaker 4: you have a huge debate like that.
Speaker 3: You did very well to go out there and actually
Speaker 3: do it.
Speaker 5: Payton.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Look, I thought, do I pull out of the debate.
Speaker 5: But anyway, my sisters were up there with him and
Speaker 5: giving me regular reports, which was good.
Speaker 6: But yeah, he's a great man. I love him very much.
Speaker 2: Joining me now for more on This is News. Collp
Speaker 2: senior writer Patrick Carline. Patrick, Peter Dutton held up quite
Speaker 2: well considering how did you see the debate?
Speaker 4: Look, I think it was sort of a nil oral draw.
Speaker 4: I think that fact about Peter Dutton's father has become
Speaker 4: sort of more resonent if you like, today, as the
Speaker 4: day has gone on, because most people, no one would
Speaker 4: have knocked him for not going on. Most people would
Speaker 4: have been in a position where a family member is
Speaker 4: ill or ailing, where it is very difficult to perform publicly.
Speaker 4: At the same time, I thought he performed admirably in
Speaker 4: the circumstances. I thought as a debate, as a political debate,
Speaker 4: it was probably a nil orld draw. It didn't really
Speaker 4: change anyone's frame of reference for the for the election.
Speaker 4: I think a lot of people would have been disappointed
Speaker 4: that there were no grand of visions, but that puts
Speaker 4: aside the fact that Peter Dutton did actually turn out,
Speaker 4: which in itself was a win.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I guess that is something to be said for
Speaker 2: turning up under those circumstances. Now Greens Lead Out and
Speaker 2: Banned has handed Labor a list of non negotiables in
Speaker 2: order for the Greens to back Labor in forming a
Speaker 2: Minorish government, God forbid. The demands include getting rid of
Speaker 2: negative gearing, limiting the fifty percent capital gains tax discount
Speaker 2: to only one current investment property, and they also want
Speaker 2: a rental freezing caps Patrick. So they seem determine not
Speaker 2: to destroy the not just to destroy the energy sector,
Speaker 2: but also the housing sector. I mean, what do you
Speaker 2: think is going to happen if you remove all incentives
Speaker 2: for investors, including negative gearing, capital gains discount and also
Speaker 2: put a cap on rental increases. You're going to have
Speaker 2: a smaller and smaller pool of rental properties and that's
Speaker 2: not going to be good for renters.
Speaker 4: And where does it end. I mean they want fifty
Speaker 4: public transport fares, they want free teeth for everyone, they
Speaker 4: want no coal or gas. I'm not sure how you
Speaker 4: turn on the light at that point. There is just
Speaker 4: this wish list that has no relationship with reality in
Speaker 4: so many of these cases. We saw Bill Shorten push
Speaker 4: for negative gearing changes in twenty nine and the electorate
Speaker 4: said no in a massive way. And I think about
Speaker 4: the Greens, I mean, they might get a fingernail on.
Speaker 2: The levers of power here.
Speaker 4: They represent probably ten to fifteen percent of the electorate
Speaker 4: and they've got these crazy ideas. It is terrifying to
Speaker 4: think that they're going to be close to the wheels
Speaker 4: of power.
Speaker 2: Well, they've already succeeded in pulling Labor significantly left because
Speaker 2: Labor do fear the Greens in certain seats. And yeah,
Speaker 2: their influence even across the liberal side is worrying. Now
Speaker 2: a lot of Conservatives have been wondering where Senator just
Speaker 2: Into Namba jimp Price has been. She's been largely absent
Speaker 2: from the coalition's campaign so far. She was instrumental in
Speaker 2: prosecuting the case for the Voice referendum, the coalition's case
Speaker 2: against the voice and Patrick. She is undoubtedly one of
Speaker 2: the most effective, one of the most popular politicians in
Speaker 2: the country. We will see more of her this week,
Speaker 2: but listen to the security requirements. A large team compromised
Speaker 2: of Australian federal police, state police and private security specialists
Speaker 2: will be protecting Senator Price during her visit to the
Speaker 2: West Australian city of Bumbrey on Friday. This is after
Speaker 2: threats of protest and follows Price being the target of
Speaker 2: aggressive and abusive behavior when visiting a number of Indigenous communities.
Speaker 2: I really do hope that is not the reason behind
Speaker 2: her absence from the campaign. I just think it's a
Speaker 2: strategic mistake from the coalition not to be capitalizing on
Speaker 2: such an effective politician.
Speaker 4: Look, it's a difficult one. She's very popular and she
Speaker 4: has been threatened in the past. I mean, fears for
Speaker 4: her safety are not totally unfounded. In this world, a
Speaker 4: new paradigm of protests that we now live in, you know,
Speaker 4: since October seventh, it's not it's okay to actually be aggressive,
Speaker 4: to threaten, to be violent, to menace people, and that's
Speaker 4: happened to her. And I mean these measures that need
Speaker 4: to be put in place, or are being put in
Speaker 4: place for a political engagement off the charts. I mean,
Speaker 4: it really does show how far Australia has shifted in
Speaker 4: the last eighteen months. And it's really not good.
Speaker 2: No, it hasn't been for the better. We reported yesterday
Speaker 2: about the Liberals in disendorsing their candidate for the seat
Speaker 2: of Whitlam, Benjamin Breton, and discussed how ridiculous that was. Well,
Speaker 2: it's not getting any better for the new candidate. Britain
Speaker 2: will now be replaced by former New South Wales State
Speaker 2: Liberal MP Nathaniel Smith, and he is already facing attacks.
Speaker 2: The Guardian has done a bit of an attack piece
Speaker 2: outlining new Liberal candidate for Whicklam claimed Marxist brainwashing happened
Speaker 2: at Australian schools. God forbid. Apparently that is a highly
Speaker 2: controversial point of view in the eyes of The Guardian,
Speaker 2: who went on to report Smith's maiden speech to the
Speaker 2: New South Wales Parliament back in twenty nineteen. This is
Speaker 2: what he had to say. He said, political correctness in
Speaker 2: this country has gone too far. I believe childhood is
Speaker 2: a period of innocence. I want to see schools teach
Speaker 2: core skills, not agendas. I want my children to learn
Speaker 2: about history, geography, mathematics, Western civilization, science and the arts,
Speaker 2: not safe schools, gender fluidity and other forms of Marxist brainwashing.
Speaker 2: Patrick I would have thought that's a fairly mainstream view,
Speaker 2: maybe not of the Guardian, but for most of us.
Speaker 2: What he said there is that whether you're labor or liberal,
Speaker 2: I think most parents would agree with that absolutely.
Speaker 4: Look, it's not controversial at all. He said political correctness
Speaker 4: has gone too far. Well, I think most Australians really,
Speaker 4: let's be honest, A majority of Australians thought we reached
Speaker 4: the limit of that a long time ago, well before now.
Speaker 4: And to suggest that this is somehow dangerous or controversial,
Speaker 4: it's ridiculous. It's hitting right into the strike zone for
Speaker 4: the Coalition vote. That's the sort of people they want
Speaker 4: to tap, those sorts of feelings. Those feelings are very
Speaker 4: tangible and very strong.
Speaker 2: Absolutely now t LMP Monique Ryan's campaign has set up
Speaker 2: its own youth branch, Youthful Mode, they call themselves, and
Speaker 2: they've posted this add to their Instagram page. We really
Speaker 2: need a Mitra Malvin a pmhenomenon. I think I've heard
Speaker 2: that before. We really need.
Speaker 3: Get it hot like Papa John.
Speaker 2: Yes, let's borrow from that brilliant campaign. Now let's have
Speaker 2: a look at what's going on over at the Green's headquarters.
Speaker 7: Authorized by J McColl Australian Greens Camera.
Speaker 2: That's that's the grains. When they're not just being complete
Speaker 2: near Marxist, they're doing that. Labor's also been hard at work.
Speaker 2: We've played plenty of their ads this week. Have a
Speaker 2: look at this one.
Speaker 8: I wasn't able to cut everyone I wanted to. I
Speaker 8: have cut a lot of you. Wenderley's cut, Rudy is cut, Jennie,
Speaker 8: you're going, Stephen. I like your hustle. That's why it
Speaker 8: was so hard to cut you. Congratulations. The rest of
Speaker 8: you made it, Jeem except you, You and you authorized
Speaker 8: p Erricks and ALP Camera.
Speaker 2: Interesting both the Liberals and Labor have used the Simpsons
Speaker 2: for the social media ads. I don't know what the
Speaker 2: copyright arrangements are there. I don't know how they're getting
Speaker 2: away with it, but they are. What do you make
Speaker 2: of that? It's some of it's funny, some of it
Speaker 2: cringe worthy. But how effective will it all be?
Speaker 4: I think if I was Lady Gaga's people. I'll be
Speaker 4: getting on the phone to the Green straight away. I mean,
Speaker 4: that's a beautiful song. It's just been ruined.
Speaker 2: By cease and desist immediately.
Speaker 4: Yes, infantile sort of politicking. Look, social media has got
Speaker 4: a place in this campaign that it hasn't had before.
Speaker 4: The big worry with it is that the fake news
Speaker 4: thing where you can put a premise and it's not challenge.
Speaker 4: It actually stands alone in isolation. Look, some of those
Speaker 4: ads can be funny. I think those Simpsons ads are good.
Speaker 4: There's some creativity there. You can actually watch it and smile.
Speaker 4: But when you're sort of looking at very basic, very
Speaker 4: juvenile type sort of we don't like Peter Dunn. He's
Speaker 4: Voldemort in effect, it really does bring down the whole
Speaker 4: tone or something that sort of starts at a low base. Anyway,
Speaker 4: at the best of.
Speaker 2: Times, there's just so much more you could do. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's the best the Greens could manage. Now, before you go, Patrick,
Speaker 2: The Herald's son is reporting that an indigenous leader who
Speaker 2: declared that non Aboriginal Australians should go back to where
Speaker 2: they came from or face extermination, has been appointed to
Speaker 2: help lead Victoria's reconciliation efforts. Glenn Lowry, the newly appointed
Speaker 2: Aboriginal co chair for the taxpayer funded Reconciliation Victoria, said
Speaker 2: that because we don't want to misquote him, so let's
Speaker 2: read directly from what he wrote. We, the first peoples
Speaker 2: of this land, who have given this country every opportunity
Speaker 2: to do the right thing, now declare that those who
Speaker 2: are not first people are unworthy of welcome and residence,
Speaker 2: and demand that you go back where you came from
Speaker 2: so we can heal country and ourselves. He went on
Speaker 2: to also right, if you fail to do so, then
Speaker 2: further steps to exterminate you as you did and continue
Speaker 2: to do to us may be implemented. He wrote that
Speaker 2: back in February and has since apologized. But February, we're
Speaker 2: not talking about some foolish, little teenage tantrum. This was
Speaker 2: only a couple of months ago.
Speaker 4: Sometimes you can't will back what you've said. This is dreadful.
Speaker 4: You can't Where am I supposed to go back to
Speaker 4: the eastern suburbs of Melbourne or what?
Speaker 2: No, I don't know. You would probably have to go
Speaker 2: back to England. Just some sort of genealogy, yes, four
Speaker 2: or five generations I'll go back to England.
Speaker 4: Yes, look that is ludicrous and the idea that he
Speaker 4: actually has a purge, a senior one is outrageous. You
Speaker 4: can't will back some comments. Sometimes you've got to be
Speaker 4: accountable for what you say, and that is ridiculous.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, Patrick, Carly and thanks for your jack. Thanks joining
Speaker 2: me now is Women's Forum Australia's head of advocacy is
Speaker 2: Stephanie Bastian. Stephanie. New hate speech laws have just passed
Speaker 2: the Victorian Parliament, making the vilification of LGBTQAA plus plus
Speaker 2: people and women and people with disabilities based on their
Speaker 2: protected attributes punishable by up to five years in jail.
Speaker 2: Now this includes posting what are considered offensive comments, memes
Speaker 2: or photos online but offensive to who's Stephanie? Well, that's right.
Speaker 9: There are a number of issues with this piece of legislation.
Speaker 9: I think it's very dangerous for free speech. There's no
Speaker 9: minimum threshold to prove harm. You just have to be
Speaker 9: able to establish that it could harm could happen. But
Speaker 9: I think probably the most sinister aspect was a late
Speaker 9: night amendment moved by the Greens accepted by Labor called
Speaker 9: the Sam Kirk Clause now you remember in the UK,
Speaker 9: Sam was charged with racially aggravated harassment. I don't make
Speaker 9: the rules on what should be considered hate speech. The
Speaker 9: left have done that, but she called a policeman fing
Speaker 9: white and stupid and was consequently cleared. But this amendment
Speaker 9: was to deter protected minorities from being prosecuted under these laws.
Speaker 9: And our concern is that when it comes to women
Speaker 9: and women's rights, it means that activists, as we know
Speaker 9: women are being disproportionately taken to prison so to court
Speaker 9: by activists for so called offensive comments by speaking the truth.
Speaker 9: But this clause will deter women from using these laws
Speaker 9: to protect themselves. As we know happens say through the
Speaker 9: Let Women Speak Raley, women are con subjective to online
Speaker 9: abuse by transwrightes activists for speaking out about sex space rights.
Speaker 9: So this clause is meant to suppress and protect these
Speaker 9: people from being prosecuted. Yet it's an open slather on women.
Speaker 9: So it's very concerning.
Speaker 2: Can you see these laws being targeted towards anybody who
Speaker 2: is outspoken on this issue? We've seen all sorts of
Speaker 2: women drag through different tribunals and courts. Are the moment
Speaker 2: I think Jasmine Sussex is facing some sort of a
Speaker 2: tribunal over comments she's made about men not being able
Speaker 2: to breastfeed, something that I would have thought was a
Speaker 2: fairly obvious statement of facts, but apparently hugely controversial and harmful.
Speaker 2: And perhaps if you say that in Victoria, now, could
Speaker 2: you be accused of vilifying someone in the LGBTQ community.
Speaker 9: Absolutely, But the other aspect of these laws is you
Speaker 9: don't even have to be in Victoria to be prosecuted.
Speaker 9: I mean, people can, people who want to make claims
Speaker 9: against women like Jasmine can jurisdiction shop and decide that
Speaker 9: they want the case heard in Victoria if they think
Speaker 9: they can get a better outcome. So I think that
Speaker 9: these laws certainly will be weaponized more. We've already seen
Speaker 9: the Human Rights Tribunal rule that lesbian groups can't meet
Speaker 9: without including trans identified males who identify as lesbians. I mean,
Speaker 9: if they were to go ahead and do that, there
Speaker 9: would certainly be a claim against that organization.
Speaker 2: So absolutely again absurd. I mean, lesbians are lesbians because
Speaker 2: they don't like penises, So to have someone there who
Speaker 2: has a penis who identifies as women, it is kind
Speaker 2: of defeats the entire purpose of a I don't know,
Speaker 2: a lesbian dating night or speed dating or whatever event
Speaker 2: they're wanting to hold. I mean, the whole thing would
Speaker 2: be comedic if it wasn't actually serious. Now, Stephanie two,
Speaker 2: a transgender women that is again a biological man who
Speaker 2: identify as women, faced each other for a women's championship
Speaker 2: title at the Ultimate Pool Women's Pro Series event in
Speaker 2: Wigan in the UK. These two dudes beat all the
Speaker 2: female competitors in the sport to reach the final. We're
Speaker 2: told this sort of thing never really happens, that it's
Speaker 2: all just hysteria from the activists. But on the same day,
Speaker 2: The New York Post also reported that a transend track
Speaker 2: athlete won a varsity high jump competition at an Oregon
Speaker 2: high school. Now, this athlete finished first in the female
Speaker 2: category just two years after finishing last competing against junior boys. Stephanie,
Speaker 2: that says it all why we've got different categories for
Speaker 2: men and women, and why it's so grossly unfair to
Speaker 2: allow male bodies into women's sport.
Speaker 9: Absolutely, it's peak insanity that the top two competitors in
Speaker 9: the poor competition are both male. I mean, it just
Speaker 9: says it all, really and what's grossly unfair is that,
Speaker 9: particularly in Australia, you can't call this out anymore. I
Speaker 9: mean we're talking about the vilification laws just before, but
Speaker 9: Ciraly Smith's off to court on Monday for calling out
Speaker 9: the fact that the top football goalscorer for New South
Speaker 9: Wales in the state AFLW was a biological male. It's
Speaker 9: absolute insanity. And we know that the science is there,
Speaker 9: the male puberty, the data on that, and the fact
Speaker 9: that they have a stronger capacity in height and jumping
Speaker 9: in strength. It's all there and it's just ridiculous that
Speaker 9: this conversation is being suppressed at the disadvantage to women.
Speaker 2: Now, just before you go, Jennifer Malay, a Black Christian,
Speaker 2: a senior nurse at San Hell Hospital in the UK
Speaker 2: who addressed a transgender pedophile as mister, has been suspended
Speaker 2: despite this transgender pedophile calling her the N word three times.
Speaker 2: This is a convicted sex offender who also lunched at
Speaker 2: her and Stephanie, she's the one who's paying the price.
Speaker 2: She is the one who's suspended from her role.
Speaker 9: It's just extraordinary. A woman who's been not only physically threatened,
Speaker 9: racially abused, and somehow the pedophile is the is the victim.
Speaker 9: It just makes me so angry. But in you know,
Speaker 9: the e Safety Commissioner just last year, under questioning from
Speaker 9: Claire Chandler, wouldn't deny that it was considered online cyber
Speaker 9: abuse to refer to male sex offenders in prison by
Speaker 9: their correct pronouns. I mean these things matter. If she
Speaker 9: said a woman lunged at her, obviously the the safety
Speaker 9: risk is very different. This is a man that's abused children.
Speaker 9: It's just it's horrendous and it's unfair. But it just
Speaker 9: shows how how far this ideology's gone, that they will
Speaker 9: protect every aspect of these criminals at the expense of
Speaker 9: women every single time.
Speaker 2: It's a huge injustice, absolutely, Stephanie Bastian, thanks for your
Speaker 2: time tonight. Still to come Left, He's losing it. Plass
Speaker 2: hundreds of thousands of dollars raised for a killer who
Speaker 2: stabbed a teenage boy to death. Army Horowitz is up next.
Speaker 2: You're watching the Reader Pany Show and it's time for
Speaker 2: Lefti's losing it. Let's hear from the Democrats rising star
Speaker 2: Jasmine Crockett. Here she declares she wants illegal immigrants in
Speaker 2: the country because who else is going to pick the cotton?
Speaker 10: Y'all go around the country educate people about what immigrants
Speaker 10: do for this country, or the fact that we are
Speaker 10: a country of immigrants.
Speaker 3: Right. The fact is, ain't none of y'all trying to
Speaker 3: go in farm right now? Okay, So I'm like, raise.
Speaker 2: Your hands, you not, you not?
Speaker 3: We don't picking kit.
Speaker 10: We are.
Speaker 3: You can't pay us enough to find a plantation.
Speaker 2: So to be clear, she sees immigrants as some subservient class.
Speaker 2: Just in case you were wandering, She wants to import
Speaker 2: an underclass to do the work she considers beneath her
Speaker 2: now to lift us. Activist Kylie Brewer explaining common ways
Speaker 2: white people are racist.
Speaker 7: Hi, my name's Kylie, And here are some things that
Speaker 7: white people say without realizing they're being racist. Number one,
Speaker 7: coming in hot, we have when a white person is
Speaker 7: telling a story and they mention the race of the
Speaker 7: person for no reason. That waitress and then mentioned how
Speaker 7: she was Hispanic, as if that's somehow has something to
Speaker 7: do with her character.
Speaker 2: Wait, what so telling a story and mentioning the race
Speaker 2: of the people involved is racist, but only for white
Speaker 2: people do it. But if I'm telling a story as
Speaker 2: a woman of color and mentioned, for example, a silly
Speaker 2: white girl called Kylie delivering dart lectures about racism, that's
Speaker 2: perfectly okay. Let's get some more wisdom about racism from Kylie.
Speaker 7: Number two telling a story about someone from a different
Speaker 7: race and then doing an accent to make the story
Speaker 7: come to life. Number three saying the N word in
Speaker 7: rap music or other songs because it's going too fast
Speaker 7: to skip it.
Speaker 2: One. Doing accents is awesome and funny. And if you
Speaker 2: like rap songs and sing the lyrics that the artist
Speaker 2: has written, that does not make you racist. I mean,
Speaker 2: come on now. This next guy shows how you deal
Speaker 2: with these lefties. He encounters a woman in traffic in
Speaker 2: a Make America Gay Again cap. Hilarity ensues.
Speaker 3: I like your maga hat Yeah Trump? Who is this gay?
Speaker 11: Oh?
Speaker 1: I know?
Speaker 7: Trump fan Trump?
Speaker 2: No, it says big America gay.
Speaker 11: Again, great again gay? I know, but we love Trump?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 2: That is? That is just so amusing. Now his alleged
Speaker 2: comic John Oliver, one of the unfunniest ninkham poops to
Speaker 2: ever call himself a comedian. Here he goes on some
Speaker 2: bizarre rant arguing that males really don't have an advantage
Speaker 2: in sport. I don't know why even have men and
Speaker 2: women's categories.
Speaker 12: Then John, bigger and stronger bodies are not automatically advantaged
Speaker 12: in every scenario. But the degree of difference here matters
Speaker 12: because we expect a certain amount of difference in athletics.
Speaker 12: Tall about small players are expected to compete against shorter ones.
Speaker 12: Faster soccer players compete against slow ones. Michael Phelps was
Speaker 12: allowed to compete with other swimmers despite being part dolphin.
Speaker 12: And crucially, none of the studies I've mentioned so far
Speaker 12: bear much relevance to what these new laws target, which
Speaker 12: is youth sports usually of all ages, and the research
Speaker 12: there is even more scant. We have no research about
Speaker 12: how being trans or undergoing gender firming treatment impacts athletic
Speaker 12: performance in teens.
Speaker 2: Yes, he really is that stupid and pathetic? Are sad?
Speaker 2: Sounds like a laugh track accompanying lies, half truths and
Speaker 2: gas lighting masquerading as comedy. Pathetic, But if you think
Speaker 2: that was the worst of it, well brace yourself, because
Speaker 2: when this lefty loses it, he really loses it. Here
Speaker 2: he claims it's not the women being injured we should
Speaker 2: care about. It's the transactivists so are having their feelings hurt.
Speaker 13: Just to be clear, I'm not happy to watch women
Speaker 13: exp who is injury, humiliation and a lot of sporting opportunities,
Speaker 13: but that includes trans women and kids and they seem
Speaker 13: to be getting hurt on most right now.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but they're not getting injured though, are they? John?
Speaker 2: And Funny? If there is no physical advantage, then why
Speaker 2: are we not seeing a whole bunch of women identifying
Speaker 2: as men competing in men's competition. If you think there
Speaker 2: is no difference between the sexes, then let me read
Speaker 2: out this one stat that brings it home. Even for
Speaker 2: the biggest simpleton among us, and I'm talking to you,
Speaker 2: John Oliver. The fastest female sprinter in the world is
Speaker 2: American runner Alison Felix, a woman with more gold medals
Speaker 2: than Usain Bolt. Her lifetime best for the four hundred
Speaker 2: meters is forty nine point two six seconds Based on
Speaker 2: twenty eighteen data. Nearly three hundred high school boys in
Speaker 2: the US alone could beat it. Now, that was from
Speaker 2: back in twenty twenty one, and I can tell you
Speaker 2: the sexes haven't changed that much since then. You know,
Speaker 2: even a broken clock is right twice a day, and
Speaker 2: even CNN occasionally allows truth and Data to intrude on
Speaker 2: its twenty four to seven anti Trump hysteria.
Speaker 11: I think there was this concern among some folks that
Speaker 11: Donald Trump would come in for a second term and
Speaker 11: kind of be a lame duck. He ain't no lame duck.
Speaker 11: If anything, He's a soaring eagle. What am I talking
Speaker 11: about here? Let's talk about Trump executive orders in twenty
Speaker 11: twenty five. He's already signed one hundred and eleven so far.
Speaker 11: That is the most at this point in a presidency
Speaker 11: and at least one hundred years. In fact, it's the
Speaker 11: most in any single year. We're only in April.
Speaker 2: Oh wow. The teeny tiny CNN audience doesn't want to
Speaker 2: hear that. The host I don't want to hear it either,
Speaker 2: So naturally the question had to be asked, Does Trump
Speaker 2: have too much power with all those executive orders? Surely
Speaker 2: a big majority of Americans are worried about that. Turns
Speaker 2: out they're not.
Speaker 3: Take it a step further.
Speaker 11: Do the people think he has too much He's taken
Speaker 11: too much power? Yeah, this, I think is the real question. Right,
Speaker 11: you can believe that he's doing stuff completely differently, But
Speaker 11: do you think that he has a little too much
Speaker 11: power or not? And this is interesting. So Trump's presidential
Speaker 11: power is too much, the right amount, too little. Well,
Speaker 11: forty seven percent say too much, but then you get
Speaker 11: thirty six percent who say the right amount. Then you
Speaker 11: get seventeen percent who say too little.
Speaker 6: So you're essentially.
Speaker 11: Dealing with a majority of the American public fifty three
Speaker 11: percent who do not say that Trump has too much power.
Speaker 11: They either says he has too little power or the
Speaker 11: right amount of power. So the idea, that argument that
Speaker 11: Donald Trump is quote unquote a king, that I don't
Speaker 11: think holds with the American people does hold maybe with
Speaker 11: forty seven percent, but with the majority of folks. They
Speaker 11: believe Donald Trump's doing something completely differently, and they don't
Speaker 11: believe he has too much power. And the executive orders
Speaker 11: he as signed certainly suggests he's no lame duck. He is,
Speaker 11: as I said at the beginning, a soaring eagle.
Speaker 2: Fifty three to forty seven percent. Funny how that works. Now,
Speaker 2: let's talk about Bill Burr. The once funny Bill Burr
Speaker 2: has gone from being hilarious to being a hysteric and
Speaker 2: he's now backing away from his newly acquired lefty views.
Speaker 2: It was only a couple of weeks ago where he
Speaker 2: was railing against corporates and saying to free murderer Luigi MANGIONI,
Speaker 2: you know what.
Speaker 5: I mean, because some corporate had to give himself a
Speaker 5: bonus check at the end of the year. What if
Speaker 5: we made it worse but made it look the same,
Speaker 5: then could our pools be bigger?
Speaker 3: Free Luigi?
Speaker 2: But showing all the courage and consistency of a typical celebrity,
Speaker 2: Burr is now backing away from that sort of position.
Speaker 2: Despite going on The View and railing against Donald Trump
Speaker 2: old mask, he now says he's not political.
Speaker 5: Oh well, no, I'm not going to just have some
Speaker 5: controversial moments he can get clicked.
Speaker 2: I'm not doing that.
Speaker 5: I mean, I'm here for Conan.
Speaker 2: I'm not doing all of this. What do you gonn
Speaker 2: bring up next to the middle least.
Speaker 5: I went to summer school three out of four years
Speaker 5: in high school. I'm not qualified to talk about this.
Speaker 4: What do you just get all the warming you said
Speaker 4: about Elin that he was ruining ear if they saw
Speaker 4: on the View you're critical of him. What do you
Speaker 4: think of all the boycotts, even the violin.
Speaker 5: I don't watch y'ell knows. I don't watch the news,
Speaker 5: no idea what's going on. I watch Instagram. I watch
Speaker 5: people wipe out on motorcycles. I watch lions and hyenas
Speaker 5: fight each other. This is the things that I do.
Speaker 5: And I don't think you should be asking a comedian.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, he doesn't know anything about politics. It's not political,
Speaker 2: but he chose to go on the view and rail
Speaker 2: against the Trump agenda. Well done. Now, if you want
Speaker 2: to see real racism, then watch this. And sadly it's
Speaker 2: not just this woman. More than two hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: thousand dollars has been raised for this killer, Carmelo Anthony,
Speaker 2: who murdered an innocent, unarmed teenager. His name's Austin Metcalf
Speaker 2: at a track event. Watch this woman justify Austin's murder.
Speaker 2: This is Ashley sick.
Speaker 10: Y're not gonna make me believe or feel any kind
Speaker 10: of sympathy for Austin Metcalf at all. He put his
Speaker 10: hands on that young man when he should have kept
Speaker 10: them hands to himself, when the young man told him
Speaker 10: touch me and see your bet, not touch me. That
Speaker 10: meant that I don't want you in my space. I
Speaker 10: don't want you touching me. Rosa Park Days is over.
Speaker 10: You cannot think that you can move somebody out of
Speaker 10: a seat that you don't own and think that it's
Speaker 10: gonna be okay. And you can't determine how I'm going
Speaker 10: to retaliate on you when you put your hands on me.
Speaker 3: In an aggressive manner.
Speaker 10: Austin Metcalf got exactly what he deserved.
Speaker 2: Let's bring in journalists and filmmaker Army Horowitz. Army that
Speaker 2: is just Ashley is sick. That poor kid was murdered
Speaker 2: at a sporting event. He died in his twin brother's
Speaker 2: arms after being stabbed to death, and people are raising
Speaker 2: hundreds of thousands of dollars for his kill.
Speaker 14: Yeah, or Carmelo Anthony. And I'm not talking about the
Speaker 14: Kamalo Anthony who stabbed that student death. I'm talking about
Speaker 14: NBA offensive legend and defensive liability Carmelo Anthony, who was
Speaker 14: recently elected to the Hall of Fame. But if you
Speaker 14: look up Carmelo Anthony all again is the other guy
Speaker 14: whose family was a big enough fan of Melos to
Speaker 14: name him after the NBA legend with a weird enough name,
Speaker 14: but not weird enough for them. They had to change
Speaker 14: the name from Carmelo with a C to Carmelo with
Speaker 14: the K. We're not here to talk about that. We're
Speaker 14: here talking about the pathology of the left to raise
Speaker 14: money for this kid. But that's that's in line with
Speaker 14: the normalization and defense of violence that we've seen from
Speaker 14: the left over the last few years. Right, I mean
Speaker 14: Mangioni also raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for his
Speaker 14: defense after he murdered a healthcare executive. Or people going
Speaker 14: out and defending the left who have been burning down
Speaker 14: Tesla dealerships and burning Tesla cars. This is what we're
Speaker 14: finding from the left. This is unfortunately not abnormal, but
Speaker 14: it is sick. It is disgusting.
Speaker 2: Now, I've played in lefties this week, footage of these
Speaker 2: protests across the country and how old many of the
Speaker 2: participants appear to be. Gen Z seems to have better
Speaker 2: things to do.
Speaker 3: Where the is gen Z?
Speaker 7: These people are cheering, they're talking like it's just the sixties.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, that's a gen Z who did show up
Speaker 2: and was wondering where the other young people? Where are
Speaker 2: they are? We why are so many of these protests
Speaker 2: seem to be full of older Americans.
Speaker 14: Yeah, but the way I'm assuming you say gen Z,
Speaker 14: I mean gen Z, I don't know.
Speaker 3: I can't.
Speaker 14: I don't speak Australian, I speak American.
Speaker 2: It's the English language. Johnny plays, Yeah, I don't know what.
Speaker 1: You're talking about.
Speaker 14: Yeah. So look, let me push back a little bit
Speaker 14: in the sense that there's no question that gen Z
Speaker 14: is the most supportive of the Palestinians of all the generations. Right,
Speaker 14: A majority, a clear majority of gen Z support the
Speaker 14: Palestinians over the israelis a first time we've had that flip.
Speaker 14: In fact, more than almost a quarter, actually more than
Speaker 14: a quarter of gen Z feel that the war against
Speaker 14: Hamas is not justified, a fifty percent increase than the
Speaker 14: rest of the population.
Speaker 4: Of the United States.
Speaker 14: So they are supportive of the Pastinian cause. But why
Speaker 14: are they not out there as much of older people
Speaker 14: is very is an interesting question and we don't really
Speaker 14: have an answer. I can posit a couple of theories
Speaker 14: that I have. So, first of all, with gen Z,
Speaker 14: there is a significant gender gap. So there are if
Speaker 14: you go out there, the younger people, you do see
Speaker 14: out there are all female, none of the male, which
Speaker 14: kind of comports with what's happening with gen Z politically generally,
Speaker 14: where there is a split politically, and you see gen
Speaker 14: Z men, gen Z boys men are actually a majority
Speaker 14: of them. For the first time, in fact thirty six years,
Speaker 14: I have moved decisively to the Republican side of the Ledger.
Speaker 14: And I'll also give you this theory that I came
Speaker 14: up with is that gen Z was born or came
Speaker 14: to work right, came to adulthood and a time of
Speaker 14: great job uncertainty, that they hit the job market when
Speaker 14: COVID hit right. They're in the job market when inflation
Speaker 14: unemployment out of control under Joe Biden. I think they
Speaker 14: feel a lot of uncertainty with their job security and
Speaker 14: don't feel comfortable going out and protesting when they've got
Speaker 14: better things to do, like work and try to make
Speaker 14: a living.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, and I was talking there about the anti Trump
Speaker 2: protests across the country. Interesting that you thought I was
Speaker 2: talking about the anti Israel protests, because I think there's
Speaker 2: pretty much the same crowd of people. So with that,
Speaker 2: it's the one circle, exactly the same ones we see
Speaker 2: every single time. The pussy hat brigade, the BLM marches.
Speaker 2: It's the same crowd. Now, let's talk about the real East.
Speaker 2: The Kafia is Yeah, well, it's becoming a common occurrence
Speaker 2: at these left wing protests, whether they're for the environment
Speaker 2: or whether they're from Middle East politics. Now, President Trump
Speaker 2: has said that US and Iran will hold direct talks
Speaker 2: later this week. Army, where are these negotiations for a
Speaker 2: new nuclear deal? Is Iran hopeful of getting one? Because
Speaker 2: if they don't come to the negotiating table, things could
Speaker 2: get ugly with what Israel and America have been talking that.
Speaker 14: Yeah, it's really fascinating. And of course he talked about
Speaker 14: that while Nata Yawho was sitting next to him. And now,
Speaker 14: unlike Zealinsky, certainly didn't make the mistake of pushing back
Speaker 14: against President Trump, certainly not there in public. But I
Speaker 14: think there are a number of very significant differences between
Speaker 14: what these talks might look like and the talks that
Speaker 14: Obama had before. First of all, I'll give you a
Speaker 14: quick story that when the negotiations with Obama were being
Speaker 14: done with the Iranians, I was in Vienna during those talks,
Speaker 14: and first of all, I want to let you know
Speaker 14: that the US and Irani negotiators were at the most
Speaker 14: expensive hotel in Vienna that cost over one thousand dollars
Speaker 14: a night. I thought that was kind of interesting US
Speaker 14: taxpayer dollars. I stated, the Marriott across the street that
Speaker 14: was less than one third of that price, but they
Speaker 14: chose not to stay there with me, and I spent
Speaker 14: a weekend speaking with the Iranian and US nuclear negotiators
Speaker 14: and over drinks with the US negotiators. I found it fascinating.
Speaker 14: And this is kind of the crux of the problem
Speaker 14: here is that they were in La La Land when
Speaker 14: we're when we were having a frank talk about Iran
Speaker 14: pursuing a nuclear weapon. They looked at me and they said,
Speaker 14: we're experts in this. You're a no one, and we
Speaker 14: don't know that Iran has made a decision to pursue
Speaker 14: a nuclear weapon. How do you know that. I was
Speaker 14: looking at them saying, is the sky blue? I do
Speaker 14: I really that out of it that you're negotiating with
Speaker 14: the Iranians and you're not even sure they're pursuing a weapon.
Speaker 14: That's first of all. Second of all, so I trust Iran.
Speaker 14: The US Trump negotiators certainly way more than the Obama negotiators.
Speaker 14: These are the same people who brought to you the
Speaker 14: Abraham A Corps, so they have a track rod of
Speaker 14: a success. But also I think that this negotiation is
Speaker 14: also giving a certain amount of cover that negotiations don't
Speaker 14: end well. That I believe there's a credible threat of violence,
Speaker 14: and that may come from night States attacking Iran, but
Speaker 14: rather giving Israel the green light to do so. Having
Speaker 14: said we negotiated, we went to the table with good faith,
Speaker 14: they rejected it. So I think that's also part of.
Speaker 3: The play here.
Speaker 14: I'll also note that Nata Yahoo is the second time
Speaker 14: he sat in the Oval Office with the President who
Speaker 14: announced negotiations with the Iranians. This time he was told
Speaker 14: in advance of this from the beginning before they began,
Speaker 14: as part of the process, a silent partner, if you will,
Speaker 14: as opposed to twenty thirteen, when he sat there and
Speaker 14: Obama announced it totally blind signing NATA Yahoo, which only
Speaker 14: found out then that they had five months of seecret
Speaker 14: negotiations without Israeli inputs. So there are two very very
Speaker 14: different things. I certainly trust the Trump team way more
Speaker 14: than Biden or Obama on negotiating with the Iranians.
Speaker 2: Well, one thing you can say about the Trump team,
Speaker 2: they're not going into these negotiations being dangerously naive. And
Speaker 2: the Obama team, from what you've said and what others
Speaker 2: others have observed, they were just completely played, Army, they
Speaker 2: were completely played, and it shows they had kave Iran
Speaker 2: a very very advantageous still and we know Iran is
Speaker 2: the chief sponsor of hermas Hezbullah all sorts of Mayhem
Speaker 2: caused because of the Iranian regime beyond Iran's borders. Army Horowitz,
Speaker 2: it's always always a pleasure. Thanks for your time tonight.
Speaker 2: We mind still to come. Well, look at some of
Speaker 2: the mad activism happening on university campuses. Corey DeAngelis joins
Speaker 2: me next, welcome back. Joining me now is American Culture
Speaker 2: Project senior fellow and school choice advocate Corey DeAngelis. Corey,
Speaker 2: let's start in the once great state of Colorado, which,
Speaker 2: in the lead up to the twenty twenty four election
Speaker 2: try to remove Donald Trump from the ballot. Talk about
Speaker 2: threats to democracy. Well, the mad Colorado Democrats are at
Speaker 2: it again. Let's hear from Republican Javis Caldwell explain what's happening.
Speaker 6: And what they want to do with this bill is
Speaker 6: say that if they confuse your children and you don't
Speaker 6: affirm that confusion, they will take your child from you.
Speaker 6: That bill passed the House Representatives on party lines today.
Speaker 6: It's now going to the Senate. So you need to
Speaker 6: reach out to your senators. You need to reach out
Speaker 6: to the governor of Colorado and let them know that
Speaker 6: you're not okay with this.
Speaker 2: So Corey, let me get this straight. House Democrats have
Speaker 2: passed a bill that classifies mis gendering your own child
Speaker 2: as child abuse.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly right. It's straight out of nineteen eighty four.
Speaker 3: It's Orwellian.
Speaker 1: The Colorado Democrats have just lost their minds, and now
Speaker 1: you have the inmates running the asylum. Asylum they pushed
Speaker 1: through this bill, and they also voted to invoke something
Speaker 1: called Rule sixty, which silences all debate from descent. So
Speaker 1: they just rammed this through. They know it's an unpopular
Speaker 1: issue for them. They didn't want viral clips to go
Speaker 1: around of them trying to defend this defenseless position. They
Speaker 1: basically think they own your kids. They even have one
Speaker 1: Democrat from Colorado in Committee on this same bill, a
Speaker 1: representative compared parent groups to the KKK and called them
Speaker 1: hate groups. This just shows you they don't respect frontal
Speaker 1: rights and they I hope they lose some seats on
Speaker 1: this issue because they've gone so far left. It's basically
Speaker 1: socialist takeover of parents, and parents aren't going to stand
Speaker 1: for it.
Speaker 2: It is crazy. So you could have a little I
Speaker 2: don't know, a nine year old come to you and
Speaker 2: say I want to be a boy, and if you
Speaker 2: don't respect that choice and you miss jinda that child
Speaker 2: and cool a girl who's a girl a girl, then
Speaker 2: that is classified as child abuse. I mean, I just
Speaker 2: don't know how this is going to work. I'll be
Speaker 2: interesting to see what Pam Bondi makes of this. Here
Speaker 2: is the Attorney General explaining that the state of Maine
Speaker 2: will face the consequences of allowing men in women's prison,
Speaker 2: and those consequences are going to be costly.
Speaker 15: We pulled all nine es central funding from the Department
Speaker 15: of Corrections in Maine because they were allowing a man
Speaker 15: in a woman's prison, A giant six foot one, two
Speaker 15: hundred and forty five pound guy who committed a double
Speaker 15: murder with a knife stabbed his parents to death and.
Speaker 2: The family dog.
Speaker 15: And he identified as a woman, so they were letting
Speaker 15: him be housed in a female prison. No longer, we
Speaker 15: will pull your funding. We will protect women in prison,
Speaker 15: we will protect women in sports, We will protect women
Speaker 15: throughout this country.
Speaker 11: No more of that.
Speaker 2: It may seem crazy that could be happening in a
Speaker 2: civilized country, but Corey, it may be interested to now
Speaker 2: it's happening right here where I am in Victoria, in Australia.
Speaker 2: We've got a sexual predator with a male body that
Speaker 2: identifies as female in our biggest women's prison, right here
Speaker 2: in Melbourne. This madness has to stop. And it's good
Speaker 2: to see Pam BONDI take a stand.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm thankful for her leadership. I'm thankful for the
Speaker 1: leadership from President Trump. He ran on parental rights, he
Speaker 1: ran on there only being two genders, male and female.
Speaker 1: He ran on reality, not on insanity. And he's leading
Speaker 1: the way. And you think Maine is bad, you think
Speaker 1: places like California are bad. When it comes to the
Speaker 1: socialist takeover Colorado, politicians are basically saying, hold my beer,
Speaker 1: We're going to try to one up you.
Speaker 3: They passed that bill on a Sunday.
Speaker 1: They also rammed through taxpayer funded abortions and some other
Speaker 1: bills as well that are just totally indefensible, and they
Speaker 1: got to lose seats over this.
Speaker 3: I mean, just the.
Speaker 1: Boys playing girl sports issue. That is an eighty twenty issue.
Speaker 1: People want to understand real biology and to respect women's sports.
Speaker 1: But the Democrats here in the US and the Senate,
Speaker 1: they all voted against protecting women's.
Speaker 3: Sports just a couple of weeks ago. It's they've gone
Speaker 3: totally looning tunes.
Speaker 2: They haven't. They keep doubling down on this eighty twenty issue.
Speaker 2: In fact, I reckon it's probably ninety ten. I think
Speaker 2: there's the rest of those who pretend to be on
Speaker 2: site with the radical gender ideologues. I think are just
Speaker 2: doing it to I don't know, to seem like they're
Speaker 2: progressive or to be backing their side when it really
Speaker 2: comes to the crunch. They don't believe that you can
Speaker 2: change genders. Now, Corey, I played some footage last week
Speaker 2: of a university lecturer overturning at table set up by
Speaker 2: college Republicans or the University of Wisconsin. I think it
Speaker 2: was tell me what happened there. The cher the English
Speaker 2: department of that university has been placed on administrative leave.
Speaker 2: We understand has he made admissions or apologies for what
Speaker 2: happened there.
Speaker 1: I haven't seen anything since he's been put on administrative leave.
Speaker 3: He basically is hiding under a rock at this point.
Speaker 3: But look at this.
Speaker 1: I mean, these are the people who are trying to
Speaker 1: educate young adults at school. I actually looked up at
Speaker 1: this guy. He is the chair of the English department.
Speaker 1: He has been put on administrative leave after throwing a
Speaker 1: temper tantrum because those students were the college Republicans tabling
Speaker 1: for the Republicans who were running for office that day.
Speaker 3: He did this on an election day.
Speaker 1: That's a threat to democracy if I ever saw one.
Speaker 3: He's interfering with elections.
Speaker 1: And he also is a big proponent of critical race theory.
Speaker 1: This is the obvious results of these kind of Marxist
Speaker 1: ideologies where they tell you that your opponents that disagree
Speaker 1: with you are e and so they resort to violence
Speaker 1: all too often. It's part of their ideology, and it's
Speaker 1: why we need to root this dangerous ideology out of
Speaker 1: schools at the K twelve level and also the colleges,
Speaker 1: and Trump has ran on defunding DEI initiatives, they're already
Speaker 1: starting to do it, and he's also started to pull
Speaker 1: funding from different universities, and so it's a good first step.
Speaker 1: This University of Wisconsin needs to clean up their act too,
Speaker 1: and not have professors like this running the show.
Speaker 2: Well, let's have a look at another university and how
Speaker 2: the lefties behave there. This is UC Davis, University of
Speaker 2: California Davis. Last week, they attacked and destroyed a Turning
Speaker 2: Point USA display and also attacked conservative students. Get in there,
Speaker 2: get Corey. As you saw there in that footage, the
Speaker 2: police just stood around watching the display being destroyed and
Speaker 2: students being attacked. Is that a fairly common occurrence on
Speaker 2: university campuses?
Speaker 1: I mean, those Antifa dorks must have been educated in
Speaker 1: government schools where they learned critical race theory ideas that
Speaker 1: everyone that they disagree with must be evil people that
Speaker 1: they had to engage in violence with.
Speaker 3: I mean, that's part of the story here.
Speaker 1: But yes, the security or police officers weren't doing a
Speaker 1: dang thing to protect the Turning Point USA students. Either
Speaker 1: those officers were told to stand down or they disagreed
Speaker 1: with the turning point USA students, or maybe they're just
Speaker 1: protected by a union that you know protects the least
Speaker 1: common denominator. Do you see the same kind of issues
Speaker 1: with the teacher unions in the public school system.
Speaker 3: Maybe there's a simil problem.
Speaker 1: With the government police officers that aren't facing accountability. I mean,
Speaker 1: these guys should be held accountable. They're on camera not
Speaker 1: doing their job. I mean, there's got to be some accountability.
Speaker 1: I respect police, especially when they're doing a good job.
Speaker 1: They keep our community safe. But when you have evidence
Speaker 1: of something like this happened where they're just not doing
Speaker 1: a bunch of anything, you've got to draw the line
Speaker 1: somewhere and they need to.
Speaker 3: Do a better job.
Speaker 2: You've said it. Well there, Corey Deangelus, Thanks for your
Speaker 2: time tonight, and that's all the time we've got. I'll
Speaker 2: see you tomorrow at eleven. Newsnight is up next.