Speaker 1: You can listen to the Front on your smart speaker
Speaker 1: every morning to hear the latest episode. Just say play
Speaker 1: the news from the Australian. From the Australian, Here's what's
Speaker 1: on the Front. I'm Kristin Amiot. It's Thursday, June twentieth.
Speaker 1: Lisa Wilkinson is headed back to court. Wilkinson claimed the
Speaker 1: judge in the deformation action brought by Bruce Laman against
Speaker 1: Wilkinson and her employer Network ten made more than fifty
Speaker 1: mistakes in his judgment handed down in April. You can
Speaker 1: read that story right now at the Australian dot com
Speaker 1: dot au. Anti Semitic attacks are ratcheting up across Melbourne,
Speaker 1: but local police aren't treating them as related incidents. Victoria
Speaker 1: Police confirmed no dedicated task force has been established in
Speaker 1: response to a spate of attacks that have occurred since
Speaker 1: a deadly invasion of Israel by Hamas on October seven.
Speaker 1: The revelation comes after Vandal's set fire to the Saint
Speaker 1: Kilda office of Jewish MP Josh Burns in the early
Speaker 1: hours of Wednesday morning. Peter Dutton has vowed to establish
Speaker 1: publicly owned nuclear power reactors at seven sites around the
Speaker 1: nation if the Coalition wins the next election not too
Speaker 1: far away. The federal government responded in real time at
Speaker 1: the Australian's Energy Nation Forum in Sydney, and the position
Speaker 1: of Treasurer Jim Chalmers couldn't be more clear. In today's episode,
Speaker 1: we're bringing you excerpts of the fiery and fascinating conversations
Speaker 1: heard over the course of the day.
Speaker 2: We know that the government has a renewables only policy
Speaker 2: which is just not fifth purpose.
Speaker 1: This is Peter Dutton sending the energy debate nuclear.
Speaker 2: No other country in the world can keep the lights
Speaker 2: on twenty four to seven with the renewables only policy.
Speaker 2: We need to make sure that hospitals can stay on
Speaker 2: twenty four to seven. We need to make sure that
Speaker 2: cold rooms can stay on twenty four seven. We need
Speaker 2: to make sure that our economy can function twenty four
Speaker 2: to seven, and we can only do that with a
Speaker 2: strong baseload power.
Speaker 1: In Sydney on Wednesday, the opposition leader made a major
Speaker 1: announcement about the coalition's long term energy plans and it's
Speaker 1: something we can expect to hear a lot about in
Speaker 1: the run up to the next federal election. Nuclear power.
Speaker 1: It comes just days after mister Dutton unveiled a radically
Speaker 1: newsstands on energy policy that could see the government's legislated
Speaker 1: twenty thirty the emissions productions targets scrapped if his party
Speaker 1: wins government. Just down the road. At the Australian's Energy
Speaker 1: Nation Forum in Sydney, Treasurer at Jim Chalmers didn't mince
Speaker 1: his words.
Speaker 3: Today we are expecting to hear a bit more about
Speaker 3: the coalition's nuclear road to nowhere. Nothing could be more
Speaker 3: economically irrational or fiscally irresponsible. It might be the dumbest
Speaker 3: policy ever put forward by a major political party. It
Speaker 3: is the worst combination of economic and ideological stupidity. And
Speaker 3: to make matters worse, our opponents would tear up the
Speaker 3: twenty thirty targets that give investors the certainty that they need.
Speaker 1: The Energy Nation Forum brought together major players and thinkers
Speaker 1: in the energy sector, from politicians and policy makers to CEOs,
Speaker 1: regulators and engineers. One of them was Shadow Minister for
Speaker 1: Climate Change and Energy Ted O'Brien, fresh out of the
Speaker 1: press conference where the nuclear announcement was.
Speaker 4: Made, Hello, everybody has a nice fee with you, and
Speaker 4: sorry my fault. The Diaries changed. It's only because Nick
Speaker 4: and other Use Cork journalist kept us in questions at
Speaker 4: a press conference.
Speaker 1: What the coalition is proposing is this a mix of
Speaker 1: smaller modular nuclear reactors and full size facilities will be
Speaker 1: built on the sites of existing power stations from Queensland
Speaker 1: to New South Wales and Western Australia. Those potential locations
Speaker 1: are Queensland's Collide Power Station and Tarrong power Station, New
Speaker 1: South Wales Old Ladell power Station and Mount Piper Power Station,
Speaker 1: Victoria's Latroe Valley, Western Australia's Collie Power Station and South
Speaker 1: Australia's Northern Power Station. Mister Dutton stopped short of a
Speaker 1: commitment to release the financial details of the nuclear power
Speaker 1: plan before the next election, and O'Brien echoed that.
Speaker 4: Position they will be released in due course.
Speaker 1: The Australians Resources reporter Nick Evans pressed O'Brien on.
Speaker 2: This, will you going to the next election presenting the
Speaker 2: Australian people with a cost and plan?
Speaker 1: So Nick, a couple of things.
Speaker 4: Firstly, you're right, Peter made it very clear today that
Speaker 4: we're not releasing information today on the costs, on the economics.
Speaker 4: We contained today's conversation really to be about the locations,
Speaker 4: the community benefits, the process and so forth. I won't
Speaker 4: go further than that in this conversation today.
Speaker 1: One of the government's biggest criticisms of nuclear power is
Speaker 1: how long it'll take to become operational. Even if the
Speaker 1: Coalition was to put its nuclear power plan into motion
Speaker 1: on its first day in government, if it wins the
Speaker 1: next election, power from those nuclear generators wouldn't be available
Speaker 1: for about a decade, maybe longer. And that's assuming the
Speaker 1: legislation sails through Parliament and the Greens are deeply opposed.
Speaker 1: But as coal fire power stations are retired, the government
Speaker 1: of the day will be under pressure to keep the
Speaker 1: lights on in how households and businesses around the country.
Speaker 1: Here's Nick Evans.
Speaker 2: What happens in that gap period?
Speaker 1: How is that covered?
Speaker 4: Gas? Gas?
Speaker 1: It's the one thing the two major parties can agree upon.
Speaker 1: Labor likes gas to prop up renewables, the Coalition likes
Speaker 1: it to prop up nuclear. Let me unpack a bit
Speaker 1: of jargon for you energy botens. Talk about base load power.
Speaker 1: That's the major power stations operating traditionally on fossil fuels
Speaker 1: like coal and sometimes gas and in future on sources
Speaker 1: like wind and hydro. Then there's peaking power plants that
Speaker 1: can be turned on when demand is high, like in
Speaker 1: winter at five PM, when everybody in the country turns
Speaker 1: the heater on at the same time. That's why gas
Speaker 1: is also useful in so called peaking plants that kick
Speaker 1: in when there's a huge strain on the grid.
Speaker 4: If you look at the fact that yet ninety percent
Speaker 4: a base load power exits the greed in ten years,
Speaker 4: there is Buckley's chance that labor is going to be
Speaker 4: able to build out its renewables plan in time, so
Speaker 4: we're running out. So basically we don't support premature closure
Speaker 4: on base load power stations. But as they do come
Speaker 4: out of the grid, then we will see zero mission's
Speaker 4: nuclear energy coming into the grid. So will we need
Speaker 4: more renewables yes, will we need more gas yes? And
Speaker 4: as coal comes out, nuclear comes in. The risk is
Speaker 4: the lights going out. That's the big risk. And as
Speaker 4: part of that, it's recognizing the importance of a source
Speaker 4: of twenty four to seven based load power. Coal has
Speaker 4: done that historically for Australia. As we look to the future,
Speaker 4: I believe it'll be zero emission's nuclear energy.
Speaker 2: That does it.
Speaker 1: O'Brien said it might look like a gamble now, but
Speaker 1: the vision would come into focus in the coming months.
Speaker 1: As for our plan, you're also right in saying, Nick,
Speaker 1: you didn't hear today, and that is because today we
Speaker 1: haven't released our renewables policy, we haven't released our gas policy,
Speaker 1: we haven't released other aspects of our policy, and so
Speaker 1: you'll have to forgive me that we're not revealing all today.
Speaker 1: We've come out with a large part of our policy
Speaker 1: with respect twenty four to seven base load power, in
Speaker 1: particular zero missius nuclear energy, as we have been doing
Speaker 1: it similar to two years now. We've been very open
Speaker 1: with the Australian people and we will continue to be open,
Speaker 1: but we haven't revealed our entire policy today. Coming up,
Speaker 1: the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, Chris Bowen, sits
Speaker 1: down with The Australian's chief political correspondent, Jeff Chambers. Subscribers
Speaker 1: to The Australian get access to special events like this
Speaker 1: one all year round, as well as breaking news alerts,
Speaker 1: newsletters and lively commentary and analysis. Check us out at
Speaker 1: the Australian dot com dot au and we'll be back
Speaker 1: after this break. Chris Bowen is Labour's most fiery performer.
Speaker 1: He's a political warrior. Remember in the election of twenty
Speaker 1: nineteen when he told voters who didn't like Labour's policy
Speaker 1: not to vote for them. True to form, when he
Speaker 1: took to the stage at the Australian's Energy Nation Forum
Speaker 1: in Sydney on Wednesday, Bowen dialed Labour's criticism of the
Speaker 1: coalition's new nuclear energy policy up to eleven. He was
Speaker 1: asked by The Australian's chief political correspondent, Jeff Chambers if
Speaker 1: Labour's missing a trick by breaking from the US and
Speaker 1: the UK in choosing not to embrace nuclear power.
Speaker 5: And I hear this said, I'll wrestle worlds doing nuclear well. Actually,
Speaker 5: the world is adding more renewable capacity every couple of
Speaker 5: weeks than it is in a year of nuclear capacity.
Speaker 5: There is absolutely no comparison. All the world is adding
Speaker 5: many more multiples of renewable capacity than those countries that
Speaker 5: are adding some nuclear. So it's a first ye to
Speaker 5: say the world's moving to nuclear. The world is adding many,
Speaker 5: many more gigawatts of renewable on any time period you
Speaker 5: choose to mention than nuclear.
Speaker 1: Bowen clarified that he's not actually opposed to nuclear power
Speaker 1: in principle. He just doesn't think it's the right fit
Speaker 1: for Australia's energy transition.
Speaker 5: That's not a moral or philosophical objection. It is a practical,
Speaker 5: evidence based rejection for Australia. It is not the right
Speaker 5: answer for Australia. Obviously, I interact with a lot of
Speaker 5: ministry or counterparts around the world, even those who are
Speaker 5: contemplating nuclear so to me, wouldn't be doing it if
Speaker 5: I had your renewals.
Speaker 1: On the topic of the day, the coalition's freshly minted
Speaker 1: nuclear power plan, Bowen didn't hold back.
Speaker 5: No costings, no modeling, not even a number of megawats
Speaker 5: or gigwats. And they haven't even confirmed that they will
Speaker 5: release those things pre election. They say in due course.
Speaker 5: And when asked will it be pre or post election,
Speaker 5: they say indue course.
Speaker 1: Jeff.
Speaker 5: If with that in opposition, you would tear us apart,
Speaker 5: and you would be right to Our credibility would be
Speaker 5: shredded on the front page, not just of your newspaper,
Speaker 5: but if the others as well.
Speaker 1: Bowen pointed out that the majority of the possible nuclear
Speaker 1: sides identified by the opposition. Five of the seven are
Speaker 1: situated in states where nuclear power is banned. If the
Speaker 1: coalition is dead set on pushing ahead with the plan,
Speaker 1: and as it currently stands, a lengthy legal process would
Speaker 1: be required to overturn those bands, potentially blowing out Dutton's
Speaker 1: already ambitious timelines. Just as his opposition counterpart arrived at
Speaker 1: the Energy Nation Forum from a press conference, the Climate
Speaker 1: Change and Energy Minister dashed out to a presser of
Speaker 1: his own after his conversation with Jeff Chambers ended. There,
Speaker 1: he implored Australian voters is to stay the course at
Speaker 1: the next election.
Speaker 5: So what we know is that nuclear power is risky.
Speaker 5: It's risky because it undermines investment in renewable energy. It's
Speaker 5: risky because it means relying on aging coal fire power
Speaker 5: stations for longer. It's risky because it would mean relying
Speaker 5: on coal fire power, which is increasingly unreliable, for longer
Speaker 5: than we otherwise need to. We know that nuclear is
Speaker 5: too expensive, too slow to build, and too risky for
Speaker 5: energy reliability. Now, the alternative is to stick with the
Speaker 5: plan to get to eighty two percent renewables. To stick
Speaker 5: with the plan for the cheapest form of energy, which
Speaker 5: is renewables. Plan for cheaper bills, Not more expensive energy
Speaker 5: that's slow to build, but renewable energy that can be
Speaker 5: delivered more quickly and more cheaply than this nuclear fantasy,
Speaker 5: this scam that mister Dutton is trying to sell to
Speaker 5: the straighted people.
Speaker 1: You can read our experts analysis of all the action
Speaker 1: from the Energy Nation Forum right now at the Australian
Speaker 1: dot com dot au