WEBVTT - The Media Show | 13 December

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the Media Show with Jack houting Hello and

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the final media show of the year. I'm

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Jack Houghton, and tonight we'll discuss Times new Person of

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the Year, a war between labor and big tech, and

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>much more. But first, last week we discussed a radical

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>leftist journalist who justified the murder of a health insurance CEO.

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Former Washington Post journalist Taylor Lorenz made headlines around the

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>world for saying, people wonder why we want these executives dead.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>But since then, the alleged killer, Luigi Mangioni, has been caught,

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>so surely, now that there is a face to the crime,

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>reporters are starting to treat it for what it is, murder.

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Why would you be in such a celebratory mood about

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 2>the execution of another human being. Aren't you supposed to

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 2>be on the caring sharing left, where you know you

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>believe in the sanctity of life.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 3>I do believe in the sanctity of life, and I

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 3>think that's why I felt, along with so many other

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Americans joy. Unfortunately, you know, because.

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Seriously, I mean execution.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Maybe not joy, but certainly not no, certainly not empathy.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 3>Because again, we'll.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Watching the footage, How can this make you joyful? This

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 2>guy's a husband, is a father, and he's been dumb

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 2>down in the middle of Manhattan.

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Why did that make you joy?

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 5>For the Americans?

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Remember when the Left used to be about compassion and nuance. Well,

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>when given a chance to walk back her comments about

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>feeling joy, Lorenz doubled down. Now watch the eyes in

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>this clip. They give a whole new meaning to the

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>word crazy.

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 6>Should they all be killed?

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 7>Then?

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Should they all be killed these healthcare executives? Would that

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 2>make you even more joyful? I?

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 3>No, that would not. And uh I think because yours?

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Because it does, It wouldn't fix it. To find the

0:01:55.120 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 3>whole thing hilarious, I find your your questions.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Be murdered in this. I don't find it funny at all.

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't find it funny that tens of thousands of

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Americans die every year and because they are denied life

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 3>saving healthcare from people like.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>This year, Taylor Lorenz, seemingly advocating for murder as a

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>solution to societal issues, came at an awkward time for

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>our ABC here in Australia. Remember a few weeks ago

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>when their dopey chair Kim Williams attacked podcast to Joe

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Rogan as a repulsive extremist.

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 8>I personally find it deeply repulsive, and to think that

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 8>someone has such remarkable power in the United States is

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 8>something that I look at him disbelief.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.839
<v Speaker 1>The ABC sought to cover that story in a podcast,

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and they decided to lean on the expertise of old

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Crazy Eyes Taylor Lorenz to inform viewers at the taxpayer's expense,

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, why Joe Rogan was so dangerous.

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 9>I mean it, look, I do think that he's that

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 9>Joe Rogan has tapped into something, and I do think

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 9>it's fair to say at this point that he does

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 9>prey on people's vulnerabilities and sort of fear. Joe Rogan

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 9>has pushed a lot of sort of extreme rhetoric and

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 9>a lot of the episodes of his show are built

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 9>around sort of fomenting fears. He's pushed a lot of

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 9>dangerous conspiracy theories about immigrants and other things. And then

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 9>he also just you know, has a lot of kind

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 9>of kooky people on a show, like putting forward conspiracy

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 9>theories about aliens and stuff like that.

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>How humiliating for the ABC. The ABC's tech expert in

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this case, says that Joe Rogan is dangerous and spreading fear,

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and then she went on to say she felt joy

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>when a man was gummed down in the street. Now,

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>this is why people are losing trust in legacy media,

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is why the ABC is quickly making itself irrelevant. Well,

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>joining me on the panel this week is Sky News,

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>contributed to James Bolt and Louise Roberts. Louise, and start

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>with you, obviously, and I don't want to gloss over

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that America has this horrific problem in their

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>healthcare industry. Surely the solution is to tackle that legislatively

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>with debate. And we got these supposedly serious journalists taking

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this quite reprehensible position.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 4>What are your thoughts?

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 7>Well, Tanner goes after Joe Rogan, saying that he's spreading

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 7>conspiracy theories in dangerous messages, but he's not going out

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.239
<v Speaker 7>in the street and saying it's okay for a CEO

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 7>of a healthcare company to be gone down because somehow

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 7>vindicates the trauma of thousands of Americans and maybe not

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 7>their health claims.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Through as if it would impact the industry, as if

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to be replaced tomorrow by somebody else,

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>as if it would have any kind of impact whatsoever.

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 7>That's right, and peace absolutely skews her brilliantly because this

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 7>man was a father, and he was a husband, and

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 7>he ran a company. So if you don't agree with

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 7>the way the company deals with healthcare, the solution is

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 7>not to murder him in the street, but to for

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 7>her to indicate that and say that that's somehow a

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 7>great message and American supporter, which.

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 5>They clearly don't.

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 7>Americans were horrified by what she said, and they were

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 7>horrified by what happened to the CEO.

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, completely agree.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And the other element to this is our taxpayer dollars

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>have gone to getting this person, propping her up as

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a tech expert. And the irony of

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>this is that she says that Joe Rogan is dangerous.

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so let me tell you who Taylor the Rends is,

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 10>because there's probably a lot of people watching that have

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 10>thankfully never heard of her.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 5>And now we've had to break the eye.

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 10>So she had already left the Washington Post by the

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 10>time this interview aired, and she has also this month

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 10>lost her podcast with Box. She doesn't have her mask

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 10>head to her name, So clearly she's not a.

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 5>Big mover and shaker in the industry.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 10>And if we go back a couple of years, she's

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 10>also the woman that docks the libs of TikTok So

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 10>libs of TikTok Twitter account creator she rocked up at

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 10>her house, says to creator, knocked on her door and said,

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 10>I've got some questions to ask Now, she says, there

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 10>Joe Rogan for men's fear, What could be more fearful

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 10>than if you're an anonymous account user a journalist knocking

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.679
<v Speaker 10>at your door and saying, we're some questions, so I

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 10>have I'll take my like she walks around with a

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 10>mask when there's no pandemic on because she's so terrified

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 10>of getting a cold.

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, there's nothing more fear.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 10>It does strike that the ABC journalist the book than

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 10>was more interested in just getting a yes and just

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 10>carrying on rather than thinking of themselves. Did I get

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 10>someone good to talk about that?

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, But just what they're saying is here's some very

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>vocal left wing person to talk about this evil conservative podcast.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Joe Rogan isn't even you know, an

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>orthodox conservative podcast. He started off on the left. He

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>endorsed Bernie Sanders film community. You know, he's someone that

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>was driven to endorsing Trump because of this absurdity that

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing playing out.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 7>In an eating hours and hours interviewing him, and that

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 7>was one of the key factors, as we know, apart

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 7>from obviously what happened in when Trump was shot, in

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 7>actually getting him into back into power, getting him back

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 7>into the White House. People listen to the nuanced interviewing

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 7>that Joe Rogan did with Trump and thought, actually, I'm.

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Going to vote for this.

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's why Kim Williams, who's supposed to be the

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>head of a media organization him not understanding that point,

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how he's fit. I think he's far

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.559
<v Speaker 1>too daton to be running an organization. If he doesn't

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>understand that point, he doesn't understand why people interested in

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Jie Rogan. But let's move on, because Elon Musk has

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>hit out at the CEO of Axius Media, who had

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a meltdown a few weeks ago, angry about the rise

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of citizen journalism. Now, if you missed the comments, have

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a listen.

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Everything we do is under fire.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 11>Elon Musk sits on Twitter every day or X Today,

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 11>saying like we are the media, you are the media.

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 11>My message to Elon Musk is both, you're not the media.

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 4>You having.

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 11>You, having a blue check mark, a Twitter handle in

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 11>three hundred words of cleverness doesn't make you a reporter.

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 11>You don't do that by popping off on Twitter. You

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 11>don't do that by having an ape. You do it

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 11>by doing the hard work.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>The clip was lapped up by MSNBC's Morning Joe, which

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>gave it a round of applause.

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Come on, so clap.

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 12>First of all, I've got to say extraordinary content.

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 5>It needed to be said. It continues to need to

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 5>be said when all of.

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 12>The garbage is flying around on social media, lying about reporters,

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 12>lying about the hard work they do, lying about the

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 12>hard work editors do, lying about everything up and down

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 12>about not only their alternative set of facts, but alternative

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 12>set of facts about.

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:46.599
<v Speaker 4>What people like you do. Or if social media people lying.

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 12>Every day, every hour, every minute about the news, what

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 12>you do matters.

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>If you say it confidently enough, maybe it becomes true.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Responded to that video this week, saying you are the media.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Now they are the past. Let's bring the panel back

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>into discuss. Luise Musk obviously has made his position with

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the legacy media very clearly. He's also a bit of

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a troll in good fun and good jest agitate.

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 4>But the thing is it works.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So this axious CEO going up there and having a

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>temper tentrum or put Joe Scarborough, the host of Burning

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe and his little tantrum to one side. Why how

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing to let the trolling impact you when you're a

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>professional boss, when you're a CEO and you're swearing on

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>stage and having a meltdown about citizen journalism.

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 7>This is where maybe sat an older subset of trained

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 7>journalists really present themselves as dinosaurs and not willing to

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 7>adapt to the new media and the way people are

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 7>consuming media. I mean, citizen journalism is fantastic user generated content, whatever.

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 5>You like to call it.

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 7>It really resonates with the community people. That's how they

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 7>communicate with it.

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>A lot of reporters are also quoting things that are

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>said on X. You know, there is that reverse paradigm

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>as well, where here's reporters. I bet if you go

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to their website you can find a lot of instances

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of content which has been generated on that platform by

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>these citizen job.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 7>I members of the publicer'll talk about, and certainly John

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 7>the pandemic, we found it super useful where people were

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 7>swapping information with each other globally about how coronavirus was

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 7>affecting us. So I think that panel should be embracing

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 7>it and getting citizen journalists on their show rather than

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 7>shooting them down and saying, oh woe betide us, our

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 7>industry is in decline.

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Completely agree.

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean more communication between people the better. But what

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think of this story?

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 5>What James Vander heis the actually as guy you played.

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 10>He said, journalism isn't about having three hundred words of

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 10>cleverness and an opinion.

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 5>That is what it is like at the end of

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 5>the day. That's what it's been for six hundred years.

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 5>I thought.

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a ten word headline, like we

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>don't pick up anvils and go to war, Like we

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>just sit there and we come up with words of

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>clever list and the irony of MSNBC going on a

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>rand saying what we do matter is well like hemorrhage

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>viewers every single show is hilarious. Yeah, I think there's

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:01.839
<v Speaker 1>definitely a little bit in that which is like, I

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>think we still matter. I think there's a little bit

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>about please do we still matter? Anyway, let's move on,

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>because Time magazine has a new Person of the Year.

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump graces the cover for the second time,

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and they write for ninety seven years, the editors of

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Time have been picking the person of the year, the

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>individual who, for better or for worse, did the most

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to shape the world and the headlines over the past

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve months. In many years, that choice is a difficult one.

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty four, it was not. It definitely was

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>not a difficult choice. In this Saul and his political comeback.

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>If you loathe him, if you love him, it was

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>incredible the way that he was able to galvanize a

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 1>country around his policies, in his position, when you had

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>all of these institutions trying to tear him down, How

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>could he not be the most impactful person?

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 7>I agree, And it was great to see the editor

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 7>of Time, Sam Jacobs actually make that point that there

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 7>was no other choice, and the story of redemption and

0:11:58.360 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 7>victory is fabulous. And I thought there was a really

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 7>nice piece in that where he talked about Trump being

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 7>almost wistful because he's won the fight. So what's next

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 7>for Trump? Because he's very comfortable as a pugelist, He's

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 7>very comfortable taking things on, as we know when he

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 7>was shot and he said fight, fight, fight. That's been

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 7>his mant since then, make America great again. So it'd

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 7>be interesting to see where he goes from that. But

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 7>I thought it was a great piece. I'm very relief

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 7>they didn't stitch him up. I'm glad that actually made

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 7>him out.

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>To be was a rare case of balance, right, it was, yes, James,

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts?

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I was going to say, I know John's already

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 10>won in twenty sixteen. But does it seem that there's

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 10>less anger at the Trump victory from the left than

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 10>there was in twenty sixteen?

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 5>Less outpouring.

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 10>I haven't seen as many people threatened to move to Canada.

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 10>I haven't seen plans for a women's march on Washington

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 10>as we did in.

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Twenty Well, the outrage doesn't match the pre election rhetoric, No,

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>which is really weird as genuine Well, you must have lied, Yes,

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you're lying now?

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 5>Did you lie?

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Then?

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 10>If you genuinely thought you had just lost to Hitler,

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 10>you wouldn't be taking it as line down as the

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 10>left ear and.

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 5>So they knew all.

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 10>But also are they going like, hang on this kind

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 10>of clown show, cartoonish outrage At every single step of

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 10>the way, people switch off, like it's good for the

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 10>coastal leads, and it's good at dinner parties. And I

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 10>told Trump this, and I tweeted out that. But for

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 10>the people in you know, Wisconsin, Michigan, Philadelphia, the places

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 10>you need to win, they just zone out and they go, Actually,

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 10>the other guy, it seems more fun.

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Well said, well, we're going to take a quick break,

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>but when we return. Inside Labour's war with big tech,

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>welcome back. The Labor government has made another move in

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>its war against big tech.

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 13>Well, it's a big day for the Australian media landscape today,

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 13>with the federal government set to announce plans to force

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 13>big tech companies to pay local publishers for news now.

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 13>Under the planned companies such as Meta, owner of Facebook

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 13>and Instagram could face financial penalties for breaches.

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Media organizations were fast to back in moves by Labor,

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>making the point that these platforms have become an intrinsic

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>part of how Australians consume news.

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 14>Imagine, at the height of the bushfire season, property being destroyed,

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 14>lives being threatened, and the news bullets that so many

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 14>rely on through their phones and tablets.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 15>What is the latest there this evening were suddenly blocked

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 15>by the big social media companies. That's what happened in

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 15>Canada last year after the government demanded Facebook pay for

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 15>news content.

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>And the ABC was quick to point out that the

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>disruptive presence social media has had on regional newsrooms.

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 6>After printing for more than one hundred and twenty five years,

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 6>Broken Hills independent newspaper Barrier Truth close down this year. Sadly,

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 6>it's a common sight in regional Australia as vital advertising

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 6>money is lost to social media platforms.

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring the panel back into discuss Lewis. It's obviously

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a second stage. The Coalition brought in the News Media

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Bargaining Code, which would have involved having to designate these

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>platus forms, which is this whole other process. But this

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting tactic because this is hitting them with

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>tax dollars and offering incenters. How do you think Labor's

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>done on this, Oh, pretty well.

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 7>I think if they can get it through and actually

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 7>get big tech to pay, because if they're in the

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 7>space and using our content, then they should be paying

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 7>for it. And I don't like their argument. I don't

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 7>buy it when they say, well, we amplify your content,

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 7>but the fact is that they're not journalists themselves. All

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 7>they are is a kind of an amplifier, as they say.

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 7>So if the federal government can actually push you through,

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 7>I think it'd be a great idea, because you know

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 7>social media, we know. What we don't want is a

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 7>situation like we've had in Canada where they have a

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 7>blackout and people's lives are impacted.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, definitely.

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>And look, the way that I view this from a

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>digital perspective is you've got these companies that are scraping

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>up eighty percent of the AD revenue in Australia and

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not really giving back in the way that other

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>companies or other industries have to when they have this

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>exceptional influences on resources or people's lives. Here, for example,

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>mining companies, when they have to pay royalties. It's a

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>very clever way to go at it though from a

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>tax point of view, because it will be very difficult

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for them to avoid it. Either they pay the tax

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>or they get fine.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 10>I just think the bigger issue here is that the

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 10>dance between big tech and Australia is always going to

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 10>be a pretty ugly one. Until we have a government

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 10>more committed to freedom speech. I can't imagine that a

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 10>lot of Meta and the other social media companies reaction

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 10>to Australia over the last year hasn't been informed by

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 10>what was in Labour's Misinformation Bill or what they said

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 10>they wanted to do. If you're a tech company and

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 10>you're going to be responsible for what people post on

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 10>your website, from media companies or even from individuals, you

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 10>are going to make sure your model is less eliciting

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 10>the ability for people to write and spread news. And

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 10>until we have a government that says, you know what,

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 10>we're not doing that anymore freedom of speech, going to

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 10>do Misinformation Bill, I don't think big tech is going

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 10>to look at Australia as a company as a country

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 10>that wants.

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 5>To do business with.

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the other unknown here is what will Donald

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump do. He could see this, perceive this to be

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 1>an attack by Australia on these great American companies, and

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>he is in the middle of slapping tariffs on a

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of different countries, and that could be something which

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>ends up giving the government a bit of pause. But

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 1>let's move on, because Moira Deeming, a victim of relentless

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and a false slur campaign, had a major victory this

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>week after Victorian opposition leader John Persudo labeled her a

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Nazi sympaviser for campaigning in favor of women's.

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 4>Sex base rights.

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Now, Pursuna was found to have defame Deeming, which was

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>obvious to anyone who knew the facts, and Deeming spoke

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>outside the courthouse about the pressure she faced.

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 16>This judgment is a public acknowledgment that there was never

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 16>any justification legal, moral or political for what was done

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 16>to me and to my family. One Liberal party value

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 16>was honored or furthered in Victoria by this relentless and

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 16>remorseless campaign to discredit me and everybody who stood by me.

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 16>But I was never going to let it go unchallenged

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 16>in this state.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's bring the panel back in Luiz.

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got this situation here where yes Pursudo put out

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>these statements saying that she was a Nazi sympathizer.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 4>Absurd that he did it.

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>He partly fell for a trap that the likes of

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the Guardian and the ABC set by letting them. You've

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>got a man there who, instead of fighting it and

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>defending his people, threw her under the bus, listened to

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the media which was.

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Lying about this, and he's lost.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.239
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing that has gone unset in all

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of this is all the journalists that republished that, all

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the journalists that looked at that, and you know, she's

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>not a Nazi. She's there talking about the transgender issue,

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and they deceptively pushed that through. There hasn't been accountability

0:18:59.640 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for that.

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 7>No, and I think anyone who uses that term to

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 7>describe some it is such a less lazy, lazy and abhorrent,

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 7>and particularly in the current climate that we've experienced the

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 7>last two or three weeks as well. And he's the

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 7>leader of the opposition and he makes comments about this

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 7>and about this a Liberal Party.

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Colleague in intellectually bankrupt and mature cruel.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 7>I mean, she's able to campaign and talk about whatever

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 7>issues she's want, she's an MP. But for him to

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 7>use the Nazi word, it was just disgusting. And it's

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 7>good that he's you know.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't believe they haven't kicked it.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 7>Well he's refusing to resign, of course, but I mean,

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 7>would you vote for him again in the next st election?

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely not. There's no integrity there.

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, James, let's bring you in because this issue

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously is a political issue. But I do strongly think

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that the media played a role in this, and a

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>very deceptive role some outlets and the way that they

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>amplified that message. What do you think do you think

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>there's been enough accountability there?

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 10>I just think that, yeah, as we say, the word

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 10>Nazi is just such a go to insult to discredit

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 10>itself one and it loses a lack of like the

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 10>absolute power that that word should have when describing someone.

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 10>And yeah, if this is something that says to the

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 10>media eight just because you disagree with them doesn't make

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 10>them a Nazi, doesn't make them a fascist, doesn't make

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 10>them a communist, then we're.

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 5>Getting to a good place in the world.

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 10>But to John Pursuto, because this is a political point,

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 10>I mean, he put all of his chips into the

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 10>middle of the table when he went on more redeeming

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 10>like that, he said, this is someone I want to

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 10>get rid of. I know the parties against it, but

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 10>here is my big play. He's now completely lost. I

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 10>don't see how he can hold on. I don't think

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 10>people want to vote for him, even though in polling

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 10>the coalition is ahead.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 5>Because labor is that toxic. They need to get rid.

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 10>Of and replace him with someone that can people can

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 10>vote for, and we might actually have a Victorian Liberal government,

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 10>which no one would have thought of five years ago.

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, couldn't agree more. Let's move on there now. Stories

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of the week, what do you have for us?

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 7>I was interested in the story about the McDonald's employee,

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 7>the one who found Luigi Mangioni in the restaurant, the

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 7>McDonald's restaurant in Pennsylvania, who actually phoned in nine one

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 7>one to say, I think we've actually found the man.

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 7>Apparently he's in line for a massive reward. I think

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 7>it works out at about ninety five thousand dollars Australian. Wow,

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 7>it's a massive reward. It's when I say here, we

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 7>actually don't know whether who the identity of the McDonald's

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 7>employee is. It could be a woman, it could be

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 7>a man, or we just don't know. And that's a

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 7>joint reward between the NYPD's crime stoppers and also the FBI,

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 7>but it does.

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 5>Depend on a conviction.

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 7>Luigi has to be convicted in order for this employee.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>To get That's difficult.

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 7>No, no, but I thought that was a great thing.

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean that you go to work just flip burgers

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 7>and then the next thing you've found a suspect and

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 7>you may be in line for a life change.

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Very strange that he's carrying all that stuff with him.

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and in such a public place and men and

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 7>McDonald's where people are going to be milling around and

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 7>go yeah in a way, yeah, yeah, just.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 10>On that while he is heroic and the actions of

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 10>speaking up and seeing what he saw. I can't believe

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 10>that the McDonald's itself got review bombed by the internet.

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 10>It's a place of snitches, they really, It's got yeah

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 10>one star reviews like terrible McDonald's.

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Like the interest is weird defense for this killer. Yes,

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it's very cult around talents a show.

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 10>Because I've got this whole thing about this that could

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 10>go on forever. But in the interests of the producers,

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 10>I will move on to my story of the week,

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 10>which is the Queensland government has said that they're not

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 10>they're banning any debate on abortion for the next parliament

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 10>a couple of years, four years.

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 5>And look, I'm.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 10>Someone that doesn't want to see the Catterparties reforms get through,

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 10>but you can't ban elected representatives from debating something.

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 5>We have enough.

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 10>We don't have any good protections on freedom of speech

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 10>in the public square for people to debate in society.

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 10>But now we're seeing people that we elected to represent

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 10>our interests being told they can't represent our interests on

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 10>one particular issue because it's a thawn for the government.

0:22:58.440 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 5>That's disgusting.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>James Bolt, Luise Roberts, thank you so much for joining me.

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>That's all the time that we have for tonight. Thank

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you for joining us the media show. We'll be back

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>next year.