Speaker 1: Lo this is outside. Good morning and happy New Year,
Speaker 1: and welcome to Outsiders.
Speaker 2: The show that is to woke.
Speaker 1: Idiocy, anti Semitism on an industrial scale, and political correctness
Speaker 1: on steroids.
Speaker 2: What left wing celebrity.
Speaker 1: Clementine Ford is to fostering multicultural goodwill, tolerance and harmony
Speaker 1: towards Australian Jews.
Speaker 3: To snooze the alarm and snooze it again. Say free Palestine.
Speaker 3: For I need a drink cold the ice. Say free Palestine.
Speaker 3: Enter your six digit pin here, then say free Palestine.
Speaker 3: For are you seeing someone say free Palestine? If for
Speaker 3: anything pumpkin spice, say free Palestine.
Speaker 4: But I don't know what If I want to do
Speaker 4: something more personal, like I don't know, wish somebody happy birthday.
Speaker 3: Don't you say happy birthday? Say free Palestine. Definitely don't
Speaker 3: say Australia days. Say Land back and free Palestine.
Speaker 5: But Rowan and James surely not all left wing Australian
Speaker 5: celebrities are quite so deranged.
Speaker 6: Wearing the badge throughout the press tour. In the last hour,
Speaker 6: ceasefire has been announced.
Speaker 7: Y cease fire, yeah yeah, So thankfully all those people
Speaker 7: in Gaza can go back to their homes and live
Speaker 7: freely like they did on October the sixth.
Speaker 1: Yes, that that was Australian actor guy Pius displaying a
Speaker 1: truly mind numbing level of ignorance and stupidity, not to
Speaker 1: mention breath taking insensitivity to the girls and women who
Speaker 1: were raped, mutilated and murdered by the evil butchers of
Speaker 1: her mass in the October seventh pogroms. We'll have more
Speaker 1: of guy Peus's words woke wisdom later in the show
Speaker 1: if we can stomach it or him, But first let's
Speaker 1: grab the ladist outside his news well, Caroline and James,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's been really disturbing. A great friend of
Speaker 1: this show, Alex Rivchen, had his previous home targeted by
Speaker 1: anti Semites, vile anti Semites who are destroying the social
Speaker 1: fabric of this nation. And you should be behind bars
Speaker 1: or deported in my opinion, Caroline.
Speaker 5: These are domestic terrorists, and let's not mince out words
Speaker 5: anymore because that's what they need to be called. Now,
Speaker 5: this was a fire bombing attack on the former home
Speaker 5: of an Australian Jewish leader. It's just taken up the
Speaker 5: temperature a few notches here, and the anti Semitism, Crissis
Speaker 5: was already at boiling point.
Speaker 6: We can't stand for it, Rowan.
Speaker 5: It's just it is absolutely terrifying for the Australian Jewish
Speaker 5: community and this.
Speaker 6: Needs to stop.
Speaker 5: But it has begun with the people very much at
Speaker 5: the top, and that's Anthony Albanesi and Penny Wong and
Speaker 5: their ministry.
Speaker 1: They are an absolute disgrace. Wong is an absolute disgrace.
Speaker 1: Albanizia disgrace. I'm sorry, I think Mins's a disgrace. I
Speaker 1: think you lot should be hanging your head in Shane.
Speaker 1: I never thought in my lifetime that I would see in.
Speaker 2: Australia, my beloved Australia.
Speaker 1: I would see this sort of evil taking place, the
Speaker 1: sort of evil that we read about in the history books.
Speaker 2: James, it sickens me.
Speaker 4: Well, row And I think you're probably being a little
Speaker 4: bit unfair to New South Wales Premier Chris Mins, who
Speaker 4: I think has done a much more out rule was
Speaker 4: where were.
Speaker 1: The arrests from fifteen months ago when people were yelling
Speaker 1: on the steps of the opera house, gas the Jews,
Speaker 1: f the Jews. Where's the Jews? Whatever they were yelling at?
Speaker 1: Who cares all? We got was some police semantics or
Speaker 1: audio expert.
Speaker 4: Where are the arrest Well, there were some arrests around that,
Speaker 4: and there has been one arrest at least on another attack,
Speaker 4: So there are arrests.
Speaker 2: So it's so so.
Speaker 4: Well doing a much better nd boss. The state level
Speaker 4: is doing a better job than the federal level. The
Speaker 4: federals falling job here. But there are some really disturbing
Speaker 4: things about this here. Number one, they found where Alex
Speaker 4: Rivkin used to live. Now, thank god they didn't find
Speaker 4: where it lives currently, but you know, the fact that
Speaker 4: they were able to do that suggests that this is
Speaker 4: more than just random criminals who are going through random
Speaker 4: anti semits, going through heavily populated Jewish areas of the
Speaker 4: city and just randomly attacking, you know, like we've seen
Speaker 4: in Wallara in places like that in recent weeks.
Speaker 2: So this suggests, you.
Speaker 4: Know, a level of planning and forethought and possible inside
Speaker 4: information about things that I think is really disturbing now
Speaker 4: that I think needs to be examined. Number two, the
Speaker 4: next thing is this attack here. Remember this happened Rowdan
Speaker 4: and Caroline after that as a ceasefire, and remember that
Speaker 4: was when Anthny Albanisi, you know, in his just utter
Speaker 4: clueless naivete about this whole situation, said well, hopefully this
Speaker 4: dials down the temperature. Well no it doesn't, because this
Speaker 4: brings me, guys to the third point here, there is
Speaker 4: this attempt on some people on the left, including Anthny
Speaker 4: alban Easy, to act like there are two separate phenomena here,
Speaker 4: you know, anti Zionism, anti what Israel is doing to
Speaker 4: secure its own piece. But oh but that's not anti
Speaker 4: sempittism and actual rank antisempitism. And I'm sorry, but the
Speaker 4: two are completely co mingled and you cannot separate one
Speaker 4: from the other end.
Speaker 2: So this is why I.
Speaker 4: Think the real shame has to be put on the
Speaker 4: Federal Labor government. It is because at every single turn,
Speaker 4: despite mouthing good words about oh, this is not the
Speaker 4: sort of thing we do in Australia, as Anthony albany
Speaker 4: To keep saying, you know, from the start of his
Speaker 4: career he has been against Israel's security. He was one
Speaker 4: of the founders of Parliamentary Friends of Palestine. He has,
Speaker 4: through his Foreign Minister Petti Wong, driven an incredibly activist
Speaker 4: and hostile foreign policy against Israel, voting against in the
Speaker 4: un condemning Israel for doing things like going into Rapha.
Speaker 4: You know, Israel would have never had the success against Iran,
Speaker 4: against Sindwar, against all of these seven fronts that Israel
Speaker 4: is fighting on right now had it taken the advice
Speaker 4: of the Albanezi government.
Speaker 2: Absolute is the crucial.
Speaker 4: Point here, and then all of that he's backed into
Speaker 4: feeds back into what we're seeing on the streets.
Speaker 6: Yes, I'll have a lot more.
Speaker 2: Ya, Carolina.
Speaker 1: You want to see later in the show, Caroline, we'll
Speaker 1: be talking about this. Absolutely, must watch that later in
Speaker 1: the show. But let me just say we need leadership
Speaker 1: in Australia. This is a very dark and ugly period
Speaker 1: where Australian Jews are now increasingly terrified.
Speaker 2: Where is the leadership? Albanesi and Wong deserve to.
Speaker 1: Be thrown on the scrap heap of history, never to
Speaker 1: be mentioned again. We need proper leadership in this country
Speaker 1: to put an end to this disgusting behavior.
Speaker 2: And people like Clementine Ford, Guy Pierce and the rest
Speaker 2: of you. You sicken me. You're repulsive, you are an Australian.
Speaker 4: Sorry, there's one more thing on this. When the police
Speaker 4: do make arrest there wasn't arrest the other day for
Speaker 4: another separate attack.
Speaker 2: Find police. The police need to release the names.
Speaker 1: Of the people, shall respond their communities and you can't
Speaker 1: not if possible, deport them, deport them or put them
Speaker 1: behind bars and shame the community because we have the
Speaker 1: individuals who have enabled this to happen, because they are there,
Speaker 1: We know where they are, we know where they're living, we.
Speaker 2: Know the groups that their parts of.
Speaker 1: Put them behind bars or deport them and get on
Speaker 1: with it and do.
Speaker 2: A proper job. Now, let's on quickly.
Speaker 4: We hear so much about social cohesion, you know, and
Speaker 4: all of this hiding behind the shadows, but what's really
Speaker 4: going on here is the worst thing.
Speaker 1: For it absolutely. Now let's talk briefly about the Liberal Party.
Speaker 1: We need the Liberal Party in power. There was a
Speaker 1: priest selection yesterday. Warren Mundine sadly failed to win the
Speaker 1: pre selection.
Speaker 2: There.
Speaker 1: I say failed because Warren Mundane is an Australian hero.
Speaker 1: We need we have eleven Indigenous Australian parliamentarians.
Speaker 2: Let's have more. Warren Mundane would have been terrific. He
Speaker 2: did fail.
Speaker 1: You know, the Liberal Party still seems to be pursuing
Speaker 1: this bizarre strategy whereby they think that the way to
Speaker 1: defeat the Teals is to copy the Teals. And I'll
Speaker 1: quote Warren Mundine there, who was saying that you don't
Speaker 1: win popular don't win politics political contests by mimicking your opposition,
Speaker 1: and I agree with that point, Caroline, any thoughts.
Speaker 5: On it, Well, Look, Bradfield was always going to be
Speaker 5: quite a difficult seat. It was the only Liberal held
Speaker 5: seat that voted Yes at the referendum, and of course
Speaker 5: Warren Munden was one of the No that the main
Speaker 5: faces of the No campaign. However, having said that, I
Speaker 5: agree with you Rowin because unless you offer a real
Speaker 5: alternative to voters, they're basically voting for a teal wearing
Speaker 5: Liberal colors.
Speaker 6: So what difference is that you need.
Speaker 2: Would make, James, is that if you ran.
Speaker 1: There was this ridiculous argument put forward by Joe Hockey
Speaker 1: last week and others that because Warren Mundine was the
Speaker 1: front of the No campaign and that this electorate had
Speaker 1: voted Yes, therefore you couldn't put him up.
Speaker 2: What absolute rubbish.
Speaker 1: Joe Hockey doesn't know what he's talking about. Not for
Speaker 1: the first time, I might add, but James, you win
Speaker 1: elections by putting forward, as Caroline says, an alternate vision.
Speaker 1: And I guarantee if you put the referendum to the
Speaker 1: people of Bradford Bradfield today, they would.
Speaker 2: Vote no to the referendum.
Speaker 1: So you know, you win elections by arguing Warren Mundine
Speaker 1: fought a terrific battle.
Speaker 2: If he could win the no vote, just.
Speaker 1: Imagine what he could have done for you and the
Speaker 1: electric Peter Dutton.
Speaker 4: Well, yeah, I mean the other insesting thing here is
Speaker 4: that the Till candidate Noel she has been running almost
Speaker 4: as a shadow since the last election. She has set
Speaker 4: up an electorate office essentially in that in that electorate.
Speaker 4: So the politics of this one are very very odd
Speaker 4: and I think different to almost anywhere else in Sydney.
Speaker 4: I mean, it's going to be really interesting to see
Speaker 4: where some of these other Teal seats go. You know,
Speaker 4: what happens with Roe, Knox and Wentworth, what happens with
Speaker 4: some of these other seats, because you know, the Liberals too,
Speaker 4: they've got an issue here. They've got an issue because
Speaker 4: they still have it fully committed to the strategy of
Speaker 4: you know, we've lost these seats and we're going to
Speaker 4: campaign heavily on the rest of the rest of the country.
Speaker 2: But the problem too is.
Speaker 4: That in Australia, Sydney and Melbourne dominate all of the
Speaker 4: you know, the federalismith such that you know, it's very
Speaker 4: hard to govern via that thing. So you have to
Speaker 4: come back again around to that John Howard big tent
Speaker 4: philosophy too to a certain degree, I no, I disagree.
Speaker 1: Sorry, Carolina, I have to take issue without I think
Speaker 1: the big church whatever it is, nonsense. You win elections,
Speaker 1: as Donald Trump has shown. Yes, I know, and that
Speaker 1: was in a very very differ from the era that's
Speaker 1: when the Liberals were built. Yes, they were a broad
Speaker 1: church to an extent that there were a couple of Bedweathers,
Speaker 1: but basically it was a conservative party. Now we've got
Speaker 1: this idea that you can have a kind of mixture
Speaker 1: of Bedweathers and Conservatives.
Speaker 2: It doesn't work.
Speaker 1: Conservatism is the creed that the Liberal Party should be following,
Speaker 1: not pandering to Teals and the likes of it. But
Speaker 1: let's move on and talk a little bit about Well
Speaker 1: we mentioned were on Mundane and the no vote at
Speaker 1: the Voice referendum. Now we have this character at the
Speaker 1: ABC James wandering around calling for reparations and for Australians
Speaker 1: to pay reparations to Indigenous strands because of all the
Speaker 1: harm that colonialism has done to our indigenous brethren.
Speaker 2: James, what do you make of it? Well, I think
Speaker 2: it's hilarious.
Speaker 4: I think it's a great comedy here for a Sunday
Speaker 4: morning here. I love this idea that Australia is such
Speaker 4: a racist and discriminatory country towards its First Nations people.
Speaker 4: If we could use that to borrow from Canada or
Speaker 4: reported from Canada, that a guy who's on six figures
Speaker 4: with the ABC, paid with the Australian taxpayers' money can
Speaker 4: then go and talk about, you know, all of the
Speaker 4: ways in which his people are oppressed. Well, clearly, you know.
Speaker 4: I'm not sure. I think this is a fantastic campaign
Speaker 4: he's doing. It's called I think hashtag wealth back or
Speaker 4: something which is talking about recond return and repair. And
Speaker 4: I think it would be wonderful if all these lovey
Speaker 4: sort of people that you see with their friends of
Speaker 4: the ABC bumper stickers on their clapped out old subru
Speaker 4: stage wagons, on the Harris Farms car parks and things
Speaker 4: like that all start you know, shoveling their money towards
Speaker 4: this thing.
Speaker 2: And I challenge them. I challenge all of the.
Speaker 4: Good lefty greeny people who believe in this, who believe
Speaker 4: in voting yes and all of this. I say, go out,
Speaker 4: please give your money to this campaign.
Speaker 2: You know it's voluntary.
Speaker 4: Do it. Also, give a spare bedroom or two to refugees,
Speaker 4: do all of these sort of things. Give your land
Speaker 4: back and your will do it. You know what they
Speaker 4: want because this is all a great, big virtue signal.
Speaker 4: So of course she's gonna love it. People get exercise
Speaker 4: to it. I think it's hilarious and the most hilarious
Speaker 4: thing is that no one's going to want to participate it.
Speaker 1: Well, what I'd like to see, Caroline, is I think
Speaker 1: this is a good idea. Mister Tony Armstrong the ABC.
Speaker 1: What I think we should do is make all money
Speaker 1: going to Indigenous Australians voluntary on your wealth back program.
Speaker 1: Let's put you in charge of that, and let's cancel
Speaker 1: the thirty four billion dollars a year that we Australians
Speaker 1: give out of the generosity of our spirits and our
Speaker 1: good will and our love for our indigenous breath and
Speaker 1: we'll keep that. Thanks, We'll keep the thirty four billion
Speaker 1: and let you and your virtue signaling wealth backed clowns.
Speaker 1: Let's see if you can do as well as the
Speaker 1: Australian people have already done year in year.
Speaker 5: Well, that thirty four billion isn't exactly done out of love.
Speaker 6: I mean that is mandatory.
Speaker 5: We have to pay our taxes that goes to it,
Speaker 5: without any much choice.
Speaker 6: At least this is a voluntary scheme.
Speaker 5: So I'm with you, Rowan, But the problem is that
Speaker 5: once you start a voluntary scheme, it slowly slips down
Speaker 5: the slope.
Speaker 6: Into being a mandatory one as well.
Speaker 5: So the rest of us will be asked to pay
Speaker 5: five dollars one hundred dollars, that's how much they're asking for,
Speaker 5: up to one hundred dollars a week or a month
Speaker 5: in reparation.
Speaker 2: How much should we pay Carolina already so much?
Speaker 5: Exactly can they close the gap? We still hear about
Speaker 5: it constantly, We still hear about changing the date. It
Speaker 5: hasn't made a real difference. There's still on acceptable levels
Speaker 5: of abuse within Indigenous communities, domestic violence, child sexual abuse.
Speaker 5: So if that can't how is one hundred five dollars
Speaker 5: a week going to make a difference to that it's
Speaker 5: thirty four Can I.
Speaker 2: Answer something here?
Speaker 4: You know Rowan said we should make that thirty four
Speaker 4: billion dollars voluntary. You know that's given you told the
Speaker 4: various digitus communities. I think you know what they're doing.
Speaker 2: It tough. Let's keep that in the budget.
Speaker 4: But what I do want to see is the billion
Speaker 4: point three dollars what were three billion dollars that we give.
Speaker 2: To the ABC. Make that completely voluntary.
Speaker 4: If you want pay for the ABC, if you want
Speaker 4: to pay for Tony Armstrong virtue signing, Yeah, go for
Speaker 4: your life.
Speaker 2: That's you me. I want a part of it.
Speaker 1: Well, it's Australia Day coming out next week. It'll be
Speaker 1: outside of It'll be please yeah, exactly. Well one indigenous, Well,
Speaker 1: there are many Indigenous Australians. This is the great myth,
Speaker 1: the great lie. Of course, it's peddled many, many Indigenous Australians.
Speaker 2: I would who knows, possibly most who knows.
Speaker 1: But actually like Australia Day where it is, and I'm
Speaker 1: quite happy with the way things are. Could be a minority,
Speaker 1: could be a majority, I don't know. But let's listen
Speaker 1: to one Indigenous woman with her candid take on the
Speaker 1: date of Australia Day.
Speaker 8: It's a date and it wouldn't matter if you change
Speaker 8: it to the sixth of December.
Speaker 1: For the eleventh of July, for the twenty ninth of February.
Speaker 2: You still find something quingja.
Speaker 1: Bear so colorful language there. But I think the point
Speaker 1: was Australia Day is a great day and we should
Speaker 1: be celebrating it. I was here we go again, the
Speaker 1: Australian Open. Always good for a bit of a laugh.
Speaker 2: James or Caroline.
Speaker 1: There's one of the spectators at the Australian Open felt
Speaker 1: that there weren't enough people of color in the crowd.
Speaker 1: This is Iron Bloom Broomfield, who went to the Australian
Speaker 1: Open and was very unhappy with the lack of people
Speaker 1: of color in the crowd.
Speaker 5: Your thoughts, Caroline, Well, she's not just a spectator, she's
Speaker 5: a wag.
Speaker 6: To correct you, I mean she's a tennis player. She
Speaker 6: a girlfriend. I don't know if that Tomas now considered.
Speaker 2: Ways got a sense of humor.
Speaker 5: No, No, well, perhaps I think both apply in this case.
Speaker 6: No, her name's Ian Broomfield.
Speaker 5: She's a girlfriend of Francis Tierfo, he's a US player,
Speaker 5: and she made this observation and she just got flooded
Speaker 5: with comments from people saying, well, maybe that's the case.
Speaker 5: I mean, obviously the makeup of our country is a
Speaker 5: little bit different to where she comes from.
Speaker 6: But they're saying, we can't afford.
Speaker 5: To go to the US Open ticket the Australian Open,
Speaker 5: it's so expensive. And she said, well, DM me send
Speaker 5: me a message directly, I'll pay for your ticket. So
Speaker 5: she may get quite a few people trying to get
Speaker 5: tickets to her.
Speaker 4: Is she going to wind up buying Tony Armstrong a
Speaker 4: ticket to the Australia?
Speaker 1: That's why I want to see a blue Now let's
Speaker 1: go with lots more to talk about.
Speaker 2: Let's go to London.
Speaker 1: Mayron Natsentral Nathan regular here on Outsiders, Myron, great to.
Speaker 2: See you for the new year.
Speaker 1: I hope you had a good, freezing cold Christmas over
Speaker 1: there in Blighty. This is a story that I just
Speaker 1: just I cannot believe it.
Speaker 2: Peers, our beloved Keir Starmer wants.
Speaker 1: To put in place a bill that stops people talking
Speaker 1: in pubs because they might say something offensive.
Speaker 2: I remember my.
Speaker 1: Days in British pubs, and we certainly said all sorts
Speaker 1: of things. I'd be straight in the twinkler or whatever
Speaker 1: it's called if this bill came in, tell us about it, Myron.
Speaker 9: Well, apparently, this is the employment rights bill that's looking
Speaker 9: to be introduced. Hasn't been introduced yet, but it's designed
Speaker 9: to give employees workers more rights in the workplace and
Speaker 9: to protect them from intimidation, from humiliation, from offense, which
Speaker 9: are entirely subjective terms which are incredibly difficult to legislate against.
Speaker 9: I mean, we're in a country here where people get
Speaker 9: locked up for Facebook posts. We already have laws in
Speaker 9: place to protect protected characteristics. We even have something called
Speaker 9: non crime hate incidences. Make that make sense, non crime
Speaker 9: hate incidences, which if somebody is offended by something you say,
Speaker 9: the police can come to your door and give you
Speaker 9: a caution and discuss it with you. It will go
Speaker 9: on your record, but not as a crime. So this
Speaker 9: is the hyper politically correct society that we already live in.
Speaker 9: And on top of that, we have another bout of
Speaker 9: legislation that's about to come through to protect workers. Now,
Speaker 9: if you're a pub owner or a restaurant owner, you're
Speaker 9: going to be living in a little bit of fear,
Speaker 9: probably policing the conversations with your customers just in case
Speaker 9: the upsets someone on your workers, which could make you liable.
Speaker 9: But my personal opinion is my gut feeling is the
Speaker 9: little common sense that's still remaining in our country will prevail,
Speaker 9: and I doubt this will actually get through.
Speaker 1: Well, let's hope so, Mayra, and let's just have a
Speaker 1: quick listen to Nigel Farag's thoughts. He knows plenty about pubs,
Speaker 1: as I can attest to.
Speaker 10: Let's have listens to Nigel's thoughts.
Speaker 7: Frankly, if we can't go to the pub for a
Speaker 7: pint and talk nonsense, there's almost no point in going.
Speaker 2: You might as well close them all down.
Speaker 1: There you go, Mayra, Nowlison, we also wanted to ask
Speaker 1: you about this voter ID bill that kis. This is
Speaker 1: really disturbing stuff. So they're going to abolish we're trying
Speaker 1: to get voter ID in this country. But where the
Speaker 1: kids times talking about abolishing voter ID?
Speaker 2: What's this? Man? Myron Well?
Speaker 9: I think it's an act of desperation by the Labor Party.
Speaker 9: I mean they have severed their votes with the elderly
Speaker 9: by cutting the winter fuel allowance. They severed their votes
Speaker 9: with the farmers by the inheritance tax, they severed their
Speaker 9: vote with the small businesses with their high taxation and
Speaker 9: national insurance rises. And they've cast all essentially white working
Speaker 9: class people with some kind of far right movement.
Speaker 2: So they are in.
Speaker 9: Desperation looking for more votes, looking for a whole new
Speaker 9: vote bank, and they've managed to try and work that
Speaker 9: down to young teenagers, a sort of gen Z generation
Speaker 9: sixteen years perhaps and a bit older they're trying to
Speaker 9: get to, but more importantly to foreign nationals, which are
Speaker 9: around five million now. The problem with this is it
Speaker 9: completely devalues the privilege of actually casting your vote. I mean,
Speaker 9: to be a British citizen and to dictate the democratic
Speaker 9: pathway that your country is about to embark on is
Speaker 9: a huge privilege and it shouldn't just be given just
Speaker 9: to anybody, and it's it's it's now making the UK
Speaker 9: turn into some kind of banana republic. I would also
Speaker 9: add to that they have canceled the county council elections
Speaker 9: and a number of areas in May. These these it's
Speaker 9: very rare to cancel elections that's a very severe thing
Speaker 9: to do. But the reason why they say they're doing
Speaker 9: it is to reorganize local areas, to unify them. But
Speaker 9: the real reason is Nigel Farrach, Nigel Farage. The Reform
Speaker 9: Party is soaring in the polls and these county council
Speaker 9: elections in May are likely to really embarrass the Labor
Speaker 9: Party and really highlight just how far they have fallen
Speaker 9: since their loveless landslide in the general elections. So, as
Speaker 9: I said, I've said to you this, said this to
Speaker 9: you before we are exiting the First World and entering
Speaker 9: some kind of banana republic states under this government.
Speaker 4: But Maron tell me then, you know, Nigel Ferance, we're
Speaker 4: talking about Nigel Nigel Nigel or throughout this discuss we
Speaker 4: haven't mentioned the Tories at all. So the question here is,
Speaker 4: you know, for me, I look at the last ten
Speaker 4: years of British history. I see that the Tories had
Speaker 4: the mandate of breaks. If they failed with that, they
Speaker 4: filed with their mandate around migration. Have the Tories now
Speaker 4: become the third Banana and now it's really a Labor
Speaker 4: versus Reformed contest in the UK?
Speaker 9: I would say at the moment you've hit the nail
Speaker 9: on the head. The Conservative Party are licking their wounds.
Speaker 9: They have been in power for fourteen years and the
Speaker 9: problem with the Conservative brand is this, every time they
Speaker 9: try and raise an opinion against Keir Starmer about immigration,
Speaker 9: about net zero or whatever it is, every time they
Speaker 9: raise their head above the power pit, they get knocked
Speaker 9: down by the argument of you were in power for
Speaker 9: fourteen years, you started this mess. And so they have
Speaker 9: no credibility to talk and protest and be a credible
Speaker 9: opposition against the Labor Party, and so they're having to
Speaker 9: almost go into their bunker and go into hiding. And
Speaker 9: as a result of that that the space is wide
Speaker 9: open for a new fresh party. Niger ferrags Reform UK
Speaker 9: to soar ahead in the polls, and that's exactly what's happening.
Speaker 9: Labor are going down, the Conservatives are going down, and
Speaker 9: Reform is soaring.
Speaker 5: Caroline Mayron, I wanted to ask you about Elon Musk's
Speaker 5: intervention into British politics. We saw him recently come out
Speaker 5: and have a crack at Nigel Farage and say that
Speaker 5: he doesn't think that Ferras should be leading Reform. Obviously,
Speaker 5: this had a lot to do with the Grooming Gangs
Speaker 5: and Tommy Robinson in particular. A little bit of difference
Speaker 5: of opinion there. What did you make of Elon's intervention
Speaker 5: and do you think that's going to have an impact.
Speaker 9: I have huge respect for Elon. He's a hero in
Speaker 9: many many ways. But with respect I'd probably say he
Speaker 9: doesn't fully appreciate the intricacies and the subtleties of British politics.
Speaker 9: This is not a presidential system, which is not Nigel
Speaker 9: Farage versus Starmer in state. In all the states of
Speaker 9: the UK, we work in a first past to post system.
Speaker 9: Nigel Farage has to take the whole the whole population
Speaker 9: with him in some respect, he has to be he
Speaker 9: has to choose his strategy pretty carefully and as a
Speaker 9: result of that, I think Elon wants Nigel to be
Speaker 9: very very tough and very very strong on these things.
Speaker 9: But first of all, I think Nigel is ideologically not
Speaker 9: aligned with Elon on some of these issues, especially when
Speaker 9: it comes to Tommy Robinson. But I think Nigel appreciates
Speaker 9: that we have to have an understanding of the different
Speaker 9: opinions in the country and we have to work with
Speaker 9: the first past, the post system, and therefore he cannot
Speaker 9: move the Overton window as fast and as severely as
Speaker 9: some people would like if it were say, in the
Speaker 9: presidential system. And I think it's that that I don't
Speaker 9: think Elon fully appreciates. But I think as time goes
Speaker 9: on and he sees reform ascending in the polls, I
Speaker 9: think he will realize that there is only one solution
Speaker 9: to save the decline of the UK of Britain, and
Speaker 9: and that is the reform partied and Nigea Faraj.
Speaker 2: Beautifully put there. Myron.
Speaker 1: Always great to chat to you and we'll speak against soon.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much for coming on Outsiders, and as I said,
Speaker 1: happy year, great start of the year after the break,
Speaker 1: James's Donkey vote, plus how to celebrate Australia Day Here
Speaker 1: on outside skin It Tick.
Speaker 2: Hello, you're watching Outsiders.
Speaker 4: I'm James Morrow here with the fully ratified Rowan Dean
Speaker 4: and the constitutionally correct Caroline Marcus. And in less than
Speaker 4: forty eight hours we will finally be saying Cyonara to
Speaker 4: the Biden administration, a presidency that managed to combine all
Speaker 4: the sleeves of the Clintons with the weaknesses of Jimmy
Speaker 4: Carter and the totalitarian terror, to say nothing of mental
Speaker 4: incapacity of Woodrow Wilson. Now to say that the Bidens
Speaker 4: and their cronies will not be missed, is I have
Speaker 4: to say, an understatement. Indeed, fully sixty one percent of
Speaker 4: the American people think that his presidency was a failure,
Speaker 4: according to a new poll.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's even worse than the Voice.
Speaker 4: And the incoming Trump administration is going to have its
Speaker 4: work cut out for it in the coming weeks, dealing
Speaker 4: with the carnage of the past four years, and one
Speaker 4: of the first orders of business well booting out the
Speaker 4: millions of illegal immigrants who were allowed into the country
Speaker 4: under Joe Biden's disastrous open border policies. Now, over the
Speaker 4: past few days, we've started to hear details what is
Speaker 4: being called a big you know what operation likely to
Speaker 4: start on day one of Trump's presidency, led by none
Speaker 4: other the new borders are Tom Homan, who knows it
Speaker 4: might even start during the inauguration, kind of like the
Speaker 4: Michael Corleone settling all the family business scene in The
Speaker 4: Godfather Baptism. Remember that one but one thing is clear.
Speaker 4: These new people in the Trump administration, well they are
Speaker 4: damn serious about what they're going to do here? Have
Speaker 4: them listened to new Department of Homeland Security nominee Christy
Speaker 4: Nome explain this a bit more.
Speaker 11: My goal and my mission is to build trusts. We
Speaker 11: will undertake a large job and a large duty that
Speaker 11: we have to fulfill that the American people expect us
Speaker 11: to do by securing our border to make sure that
Speaker 11: our nation is a nation with borders or we're no
Speaker 11: nation at all.
Speaker 2: A nation of borders, or we're no nation at all.
Speaker 4: Hallelujah. Put that up in lights, because that, friends, explains
Speaker 4: it all why the entire radical left has their program
Speaker 4: to undermine America, and as well nations like Australia and
Speaker 4: Britain and Germany and France and so on have discovered.
Speaker 4: And this of course has so much of the mainstream
Speaker 4: media in an absolute lather because well, their sympathies are,
Speaker 4: particularly when it comes to the border with the radical left.
Speaker 4: Here's Secreative State Designate Marco Rubio absolutely schooling meet the
Speaker 4: Press's Kristen Walker.
Speaker 12: Donald Trump has said he's willing to build migrant detention
Speaker 12: camps and deploy the US military to deport the more
Speaker 12: than eleven million undocumented immigrants in this country. It would
Speaker 12: be the largest deportation operation in American history.
Speaker 6: Do you support that plan?
Speaker 8: Eleven million, that's an outdate. That was the number ten
Speaker 8: years ago. We're talking upwards a twenty twenty five, maybe
Speaker 8: thirty million. There's been almost ten million people in a
Speaker 8: entered this country in the lawry in the last three years. Question,
Speaker 8: would you say the number varies big time? I mean
Speaker 8: it's another nine to ten million people just in the
Speaker 8: last three years. The answer to your question is yes.
Speaker 8: Back in twenty thirteen, when I was involved in immigration reform,
Speaker 8: we had eleven twelve million people that have been here
Speaker 8: for longer than a decade. Now we've had almost that
Speaker 8: number in the last three years alone from all over
Speaker 8: the world. Believe, people that I believe are terrorists, people
Speaker 8: that I believe are going to conduct terrorist attacks in
Speaker 8: this country have given the opportunity, certainly people that were
Speaker 8: criminals in their home country. This is a completely difference.
Speaker 8: This is not immigration. You asked me about immigration. This
Speaker 8: is mass migration. Mass migration. This is an invasion of
Speaker 8: the country and it needs to be dealt with dramatically.
Speaker 4: And that, my friends, is how it's done. Do not
Speaker 4: shy away from words like deportation and invasion. Lay it
Speaker 4: out there and the people will be with you. But
Speaker 4: let's be clear, Joe Biden, though he is still for
Speaker 4: a few more hours, the president and he and his
Speaker 4: team are clearly determined to inflict as much damage as
Speaker 4: they can before they leave town. I mean, you're not
Speaker 4: gonna believe this one. On Friday, the administration unilaterally declared
Speaker 4: that something called the Equal Rights Amendment, a feminist cause
Speaker 4: for one hundred years that was most recently resurrected in
Speaker 4: the nineteen seventies, was now law today.
Speaker 13: I affirm the Ecal Rights Amendment to have cleared all
Speaker 13: the necessary hurdles.
Speaker 2: To be added to the US Constitution.
Speaker 13: Now, the Ecal Rights Amendment is the law of the
Speaker 13: land now. It's the twenty eighth Amendments of the Constitution.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 4: Yeah, he just apparently declared it law of the land
Speaker 4: now and said it was part of the constitution because
Speaker 4: apparently that's how things.
Speaker 2: Work in our democracy.
Speaker 4: And gosh, what a president he's setting for Donald Trump here.
Speaker 4: But anyway, Joe Biden's reasoning around the egal Rights Amendment
Speaker 4: is that enough states had ratified it once upon a
Speaker 4: time and despite this ratification not happening well within the
Speaker 4: necessary time limits. Well, he's the president, and it'll dare
Speaker 4: well tweet out and say whatever the ally wants. This
Speaker 4: is of course total bananay public alice in Wonderland stuff,
Speaker 4: where the Constitution says whatever the President says. It says
Speaker 4: nothing more, nothing less, And in a way it's also
Speaker 4: kind of hilarious. I mean, everyone knows Joe Biden has
Speaker 4: completely lost it. Even the New York Times, which enthusiastically
Speaker 4: participated in the gas lighting of the world over Joe
Speaker 4: Biden's medal condition, is now admitting it and writing about
Speaker 4: it and reporting on it, and so everyone's pretty much
Speaker 4: decided to ignore it now. Kamala Harris tried to back
Speaker 4: Biden up with his Equal Rights Amendment declaration on x
Speaker 4: but was quickly community noted to oblivion, with users pointing
Speaker 4: out that no, the president cannot just declare the Constitution
Speaker 4: amended and nothing that the National noting that the National Archivist,
Speaker 4: who is in charge of what is officially in and
Speaker 4: not in the Constitution, has confirmed that the Equal Rights
Speaker 4: Amendment was not ratified and that thus, sorry, there is
Speaker 4: no so called twenty eighth Amendment. I wonder if these
Speaker 4: community notes, by the way, are the reasons why they
Speaker 4: left absolutely hates X and Elon Musk so much because
Speaker 4: they can't control the narrative well anyway, speaking of Kamala Harris,
Speaker 4: let's finally check in on the biggest bullet dodge this
Speaker 4: side of Butler, Pennsylvania, seeing here addressing her staff in
Speaker 4: a farewell address with her husband slappy dog Ebhoff and
Speaker 4: mangling Dylan Thomas's famous poem, do not go gentle into
Speaker 4: that good night.
Speaker 14: And our work is not done. And as you all
Speaker 14: know me, because we have spent long hours, long days,
Speaker 14: and months and years together, it is not my nature
Speaker 14: to go quietly into the night.
Speaker 6: So don't worry about that.
Speaker 2: Oh dear.
Speaker 4: And she also of course thanked her t while ultimately
Speaker 4: really making it all about her.
Speaker 14: I am fully aware that I am the public face
Speaker 14: of a lot of our work, and so I have
Speaker 14: the benefit of running into people all over our country.
Speaker 6: Who thank me.
Speaker 14: And I will tell you I am fully aware that
Speaker 14: when they are thanking me, they are thanking our team
Speaker 14: for the extraordinary commitment that you each have and as
Speaker 14: a team.
Speaker 4: Have thanks for nothing. Good Bye, bla, goodbye Joe.
Speaker 1: Good riddance, fantastic stuff, James, we will miss it here
Speaker 1: on Outsiders.
Speaker 2: I got to admit there's a kind of thing.
Speaker 4: That says every week, what are we going to do
Speaker 4: without the word salads?
Speaker 2: You know the word salads. Here we go, there we go.
Speaker 1: Australia Day next week, next Sunday, Outsiders will be here
Speaker 1: Big Outsiders on Australia Day, So make sure you're watching
Speaker 1: us next week. But there are other things you can
Speaker 1: do to celebrate Australia Day, even if the miserable work
Speaker 1: crowd don't want you.
Speaker 2: To join us.
Speaker 1: Now is Daniella heather Rich, the convener of Celebrate Australia. Danielle,
Speaker 1: great to see you, Thanks for coming on Outsiders. Next Sunday,
Speaker 1: you're going to be holding a rally in Melbourne. Tell
Speaker 1: us why in particular, tell us what happened last year
Speaker 1: with your son and his mates when they wandered into
Speaker 1: town with an Aussie flag.
Speaker 2: Tell us about Daniella.
Speaker 10: Hi Rowan.
Speaker 15: Thank you for having me. Last year, my son and
Speaker 15: his friends went into the city to celebrate Australia Day
Speaker 15: and they were threatened with violence if they did not
Speaker 15: put their flags away and leave. As you can imagine
Speaker 15: as a mother, this has left me feeling incredibly disturbed
Speaker 15: that it's no longer safe to celebrate our national day and.
Speaker 2: So what are you doing about it?
Speaker 15: You've got plans, we have and you know as well
Speaker 15: that the Victorian Labor government has canceled our Australia Day
Speaker 15: parade indefinitely. This has left many of us feeling very
Speaker 15: sad and frustrated as it reflects to greater shift against
Speaker 15: national pride and patriotism. So a group of volunteers called
Speaker 15: Celebrate Australia have gathered together and we are holding a
Speaker 15: rally on Australia Day.
Speaker 5: Danielle I wanted to ask, are you expecting counter protesters
Speaker 5: at this rally given your son's experience when he tried
Speaker 5: to just bring in a flag to the middle of town.
Speaker 15: Look, I understand that there are groups in the city.
Speaker 15: We're meeting in Port Melbourne at one pm and we'll
Speaker 15: be walking to Katani Gardens in sin Kilda where we'll
Speaker 15: be holding our rally at about two thirty. We've spoken
Speaker 15: to the police will be facilitating the days. That will
Speaker 15: be a fun, family friendly day for everybody.
Speaker 4: James so tell us more though, who exactly threatened your son?
Speaker 4: I'm so just you know, was the police with protesters?
Speaker 4: Was it ordinary civilians? And do you think though that
Speaker 4: you know, despite this, given the way we've seen so
Speaker 4: many corporations retreat from their anti Australia Day stances, that
Speaker 4: maybe finally things are trying to turn the other way.
Speaker 15: I definitely think there's a shift. We can see that
Speaker 15: with the pubs having canceled Australia Day celebrations and the
Speaker 15: turnaround within twenty four hours because there was such a
Speaker 15: big public backlash, and of course the IPA results came
Speaker 15: out that sixty nine percent of Australians want to celebrate
Speaker 15: Australia Day on January the twenty sixth. This is an
Speaker 15: overwhelming majority. Only fourteen percent of people said they didn't
Speaker 15: want to celebrate Australia Day. So I think the Victorian
Speaker 15: government is not representing the majority of Victorians, and we
Speaker 15: want to give them the opportunity to publicly come together
Speaker 15: to unite. No matter what your background, no matter no
Speaker 15: matter what your religion, you know what, we love this
Speaker 15: country and we want to celebrate inunity together because we
Speaker 15: have won the lottery, we live in the greatest country
Speaker 15: on Earth.
Speaker 1: Well, Danielle, here's someone who agrees with you. The leader
Speaker 1: of the Opposition, Peter Dutton, have a listened to what's
Speaker 1: he had to say.
Speaker 16: I don't want to be told by works CEOs and
Speaker 16: a week Prime Minister that I can't celebrate Australia. I
Speaker 16: want to celebrate Australia and I want to stand there
Speaker 16: with those new citizens who have come from a country
Speaker 16: and they want the future for themselves, for their children,
Speaker 16: their grandchildren. That's the great Australian migrant story. Why would
Speaker 16: we be ashamed of.
Speaker 1: That, well said Peter Dutton, and that's why he deserves
Speaker 1: to be the next minister, because we need that sort
Speaker 1: of leadership. Daniella, So Melbourne have canceled their official Australia
Speaker 1: Day celebrations, So yours is the alternative.
Speaker 2: Correct, You're where.
Speaker 1: People should be going victorially who want to go, get
Speaker 1: ready now start preparing.
Speaker 2: So we want a huge crowd there.
Speaker 1: We want to show Daniella is right and that Australians
Speaker 1: want to be there and celebrate January twenty six as
Speaker 1: Australia Day. So again I'll repeat Danieller, it's one pm
Speaker 1: assembling at Port Melbourne at the band Rotunda.
Speaker 2: Correct and then parading on from there Currakilda. Excellent.
Speaker 1: Well listen, Danieller, you have a good tiny gardens fantastic.
Speaker 1: You have a great day and we'll be here on
Speaker 1: Outsiders as well, and we urge as many people to
Speaker 1: go along and support your wonderful effort there. Thanks Daniella,
Speaker 1: thanks so much, and have a great Australia Day next week.
Speaker 2: Coming up lots more after the break.
Speaker 1: We've got Netzaney, we've got lefty lunacy, we got whakademia.
Speaker 2: It's outside's of course in a tick.
Speaker 1: Welcome back to Outsiders with Caroline Marcus filling in for
Speaker 1: Rita and James Morrow filling in for James Morrow, and
Speaker 1: myself Rowan Bean. Great to be back with you. Net Zany.
Speaker 1: The insane and increasingly insane world of.
Speaker 2: Net zero policies.
Speaker 1: We had all the Californian wildfires, bushfires and the poor
Speaker 1: people of California after having gone through all of that,
Speaker 1: and I'll be talking about that later on in the show.
Speaker 2: But they've now got a lithium fire. That would be James.
Speaker 1: I believe batteries put the side to save the planets
Speaker 1: are now releasing all sorts of toxic garbage and creating
Speaker 1: mayhem in California.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, look, we know that lithium batteries do
Speaker 4: have this propensity to suddenly decide to catch fire and ignite.
Speaker 4: The sort of funny thing or not funny thing about
Speaker 4: the lithium batteries versus sea take of petrol or something
Speaker 4: like that. It's pretty easy to put out a gasoline
Speaker 4: fire relatively speaking. I mean, that's what you know, our
Speaker 4: professional firefighters are for. But professional firefighters have a huge
Speaker 4: amount of difficulty with these lithium batteries when they decide
Speaker 4: to short circuit and go. We have seen, by the
Speaker 4: way here in Australia and Sydney large numbers of apartment
Speaker 4: fires from people with e scooters and things like that
Speaker 4: that they bring in their dodgy. They're from China and
Speaker 4: they're not very well made, and the batteries decide to
Speaker 4: catch fire and they're very very hard to put out
Speaker 4: these fires. I'm terrified of what happens if what happens
Speaker 4: one of these cars with their batteries goes off, goes
Speaker 4: up in a shopping center car park, in a car
Speaker 4: park underneath an apartment building. This lithium stuff, we don't
Speaker 4: have any handle on it. We've decided that this is
Speaker 4: a better way to power things.
Speaker 2: It's not. And also they're heavier.
Speaker 4: There's so many other reasons why this is actually just
Speaker 4: shifting the environmental costs from one place to the other. Well,
Speaker 4: by the way, also, guess who makes all the batteries China?
Speaker 4: So you know, why do you think the Chinese love
Speaker 4: all of our net zero stuff because it just means
Speaker 4: more money for them. Remember, all of this stuff is
Speaker 4: set up to shift our manifacturing wealth from Australia, from
Speaker 4: the United States, from the West to China.
Speaker 2: That's what's all about. And Carolina money. For some reason
Speaker 2: or other, when I saw this story about.
Speaker 1: Massive lithium fire there in America, in California, Chris Bowen
Speaker 1: popped into my head. I mean, they say living rent.
Speaker 2: Free there, but you can get help for this right
Speaker 2: and help for it.
Speaker 1: But why would that be Carolin? Why would I suddenly
Speaker 1: have an image of Chris Bowen?
Speaker 6: I don't know.
Speaker 5: Maybe it's because we have the same net zero delusions
Speaker 5: here and complete climate change zaniness in Australia. I mean,
Speaker 5: look what happens if a Lithian battery and one of
Speaker 5: these e scooters explodes near the bush in Australia, what
Speaker 5: happens then? I mean, James's right, this is happening far
Speaker 5: too frequently. It's happening when people try and charge these
Speaker 5: batteries like it's not that the nassalily even being.
Speaker 6: A response with them. That is just craziness.
Speaker 5: And at the end of the day, China is benefiting
Speaker 5: as you point out, and they don't have to cut
Speaker 5: their own emissions, so the we're the ones that are
Speaker 5: ultimately suffering.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. And on the topic of Chris Bow and there
Speaker 2: I'm mentioning him again.
Speaker 1: Please I need that helpen pills.
Speaker 2: You can even out of your mind. Donald Scotch.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has tweeted that windmills should be torn down.
Speaker 2: Here's a tweet from Donald Trump the other day.
Speaker 1: Windmills are an economic and environmental disaster. I don't want
Speaker 1: even one built during my administration. The thousands of dead
Speaker 1: and broken ones should be ripped down. Asp most expensive
Speaker 1: energy only work with massive government subsidies which we will
Speaker 1: no longer pay.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: You can't get any clearer than all of those windmills
Speaker 1: and out off the beautiful, pristine Australian coastlines, places like
Speaker 1: Port Stevens elsewhere. Donald Trump would be having those things
Speaker 1: not happening in the first place, or tearing them down
Speaker 1: if they were already there. That's the sort of leadership
Speaker 1: we need here. Net zero is a con James.
Speaker 4: Well, yeah, you know, and these windmills. I just looked
Speaker 4: at the national energy market just now. Right now, wind
Speaker 4: is providing a total of fourteen percent of the national
Speaker 4: energy markets. Electricity coal is still providing around sixty especially
Speaker 4: when you add in the gas to that as well.
Speaker 4: So good old fossil fuels are getting it done. Keeping
Speaker 4: your TV on this morning here, watching this here, while
Speaker 4: these windmills, you know, the only reason that they survive,
Speaker 4: or that they can be built at all, is because
Speaker 4: number one, massive subsidies. And it's not just substuce, but
Speaker 4: the market is rigged so that people who operate these
Speaker 4: wind farms can never lose money. Also beyond that, you know,
Speaker 4: their environmental disasters. We've seen the environmental impact statements for
Speaker 4: the wind frogs in places like Queensland. Tear down the rainforest,
Speaker 4: kill the claws with hammers. Actually that's what they say.
Speaker 4: So that we can get our clean energy. Each one
Speaker 4: of these things takes up a huge amount of concrete
Speaker 4: and everything else. You see these abomin nations everywhere you
Speaker 4: drive in Australia.
Speaker 2: You see that when you drive down.
Speaker 4: Towards Camebra, these huge disgusting wind turbines.
Speaker 2: They just spoil the views.
Speaker 4: They're horrendous around Lake George, up towards crook Well, everywhere
Speaker 4: across this country and they're just entire fad and their
Speaker 4: visual pollution. They don't actually do anything to save the environment.
Speaker 4: In many cases, they hurt the environment.
Speaker 1: Camperlin, I want to move on from that to another point,
Speaker 1: which is that Donald Trump is now in the.
Speaker 2: White House, the leader of the free world.
Speaker 1: He's going against net zero, He's going pull out of Paris.
Speaker 1: The whole agenda is going to change the American economy,
Speaker 1: the most powerful economy in the world.
Speaker 2: This time round, Trump aint messing around.
Speaker 1: He's going to put an end to the climate hysteria
Speaker 1: and the climate con So Mike questions you, Caroline, is
Speaker 1: what should the coalition be doing, or what should the
Speaker 1: Australian government be doing. Should we be following America or
Speaker 1: should we be going in the opposite wity.
Speaker 6: I think, you know how I'm going to answer that question.
Speaker 5: Of course we have to, because if Drum pulls out
Speaker 5: of the Paris Agreement, if we get he abandons all
Speaker 5: this crazy climate change promises, we're going to be left
Speaker 5: virtually on our own, with a bunch of others in
Speaker 5: this country subsidizing it, spending billions of dollars on this craziness.
Speaker 6: That isn't going to.
Speaker 5: Give Australians reliable energy, that isn't going to make use
Speaker 5: of the abundant resources that we have in our country,
Speaker 5: and for.
Speaker 2: What beyond that?
Speaker 4: Beyond that, you know, this is the thing I think
Speaker 4: that everybody needs to be rational about here. You know,
Speaker 4: everybody on the left claims to own science, and they say, oh,
Speaker 4: we own science and all this and we need to
Speaker 4: take this action there is legally this is a magical
Speaker 4: thinking delusion that anything Australia does in terms of hell
Speaker 4: Austraias sources its energy will do anything to change the temperature,
Speaker 4: reduce the risk of bush fires, reduce the risk of flooding,
Speaker 4: reduce anything. If you believe in the climate narrative, all
Speaker 4: of your opprobrium should be directed at one place, Beijing,
Speaker 4: because Chinese Communist Party regime had admitted in the past
Speaker 4: few decades more carbon than the entire Industrial Revolution. So
Speaker 4: if you've got a beef, it's with them. We in Australia,
Speaker 4: we would like our living standards, thank you very much.
Speaker 1: I've got a graph who put up for you In
Speaker 1: a second, it's said China call hits record high. So
Speaker 1: there you go, love is China is going all gang
Speaker 1: By take.
Speaker 2: One more point.
Speaker 4: Yes, I'm sorry on this because this is the thing.
Speaker 4: The twenty first century is going to be the energy economy. Right,
Speaker 4: every massive improvement in human life, quality of living, lifespan,
Speaker 4: everything else, technology development that has all been developed by
Speaker 4: energy and having loads of abundant energy is how you
Speaker 4: get that. This is going to be the century of
Speaker 4: data centers, of high tech, all of this, all this
Speaker 4: goes a huge amount of energy. We need more energy
Speaker 4: from every source. And for this idea that we just
Speaker 4: simply have to get rid of the coal and the
Speaker 4: gas and can't have nuclear like everybody else seems to want.
Speaker 4: You know, it's insane and we will be a poorer country.
Speaker 4: I'm really big on this.
Speaker 1: The everybody graph there, you can, folks look at that
Speaker 1: that's China's coal production going through the roof and James
Speaker 1: one hundred percent. Right, let's get on with nuclear and
Speaker 1: let's get Australia.
Speaker 4: Let's get on, get on with emissions.
Speaker 6: Low.
Speaker 1: Let's that's something funny now, James, Uh, Caroline Amazon electric trucks.
Speaker 2: Well, they turn out to be. These are evs. If
Speaker 2: you look closely at the footage, have a look, if
Speaker 2: we go.
Speaker 17: I understand green energy, you know, electric vehicles, amazons doing
Speaker 17: their part, you know, stay green. But what doesn't it
Speaker 17: defeat the purpose when you literally have a diesel powered
Speaker 17: generator electrifying all of the electric vehicles. It makes no sense.
Speaker 1: Can you get over the craziness? And it's of course
Speaker 1: it's freezing cold and snowy. I mean it's a joke.
Speaker 4: No, They're just they're just diesel trucks with an extra
Speaker 4: step introduced, the.
Speaker 6: Same as the wind turbines.
Speaker 5: So the amount of carbon emissions you need to put
Speaker 5: out in order to make one of those things, and
Speaker 5: that that's something that the greenies never mentioned either.
Speaker 1: Anyway, if that was funny, we've got one. We'll go
Speaker 1: you even one better. James has discovered that wooly mammoth meatballs. Apparently,
Speaker 1: why would tell us talk about this line.
Speaker 4: Well, it's not just because Wooly Bamas don't exist Anymore's meatballs.
Speaker 4: There's a company that was going to try and get
Speaker 4: it on the whole sort of fake meat craze because
Speaker 4: we all wanted to eat you know, vegan balls or
Speaker 4: whatever it is that they call them. Anyway, this company
Speaker 4: called Wooly Mammith's meat Balls.
Speaker 2: There.
Speaker 4: They're actually thirty percent of their workforce because apparently, gosh,
Speaker 4: who knew the demand for this stuff wasn't all that high?
Speaker 2: And it kind of takes me back.
Speaker 4: I don't know if you guys remember during you know,
Speaker 4: COVID and all of that, when you'd see all the
Speaker 4: meat would be off the shelves, you know, at the supermarket,
Speaker 4: but there'd still be.
Speaker 2: That little second effect. Nobody wanted it.
Speaker 18: You know.
Speaker 5: Yeah, they're clearly going the way of the wooly mammoth.
Speaker 2: They the top product, let's be clear.
Speaker 1: So these are one of these products that's a genetically
Speaker 1: engineered meat or some horror that immediately you gag. It's freak,
Speaker 1: you're gagging the moment you hear about this stuff.
Speaker 6: These you thing cells from samples that are thousands of
Speaker 6: years old.
Speaker 5: I mean, what would that do anyway?
Speaker 1: All this climate craziness, it's just completely out of control.
Speaker 2: What do you do? It's it is just sheerlina sye.
Speaker 4: But here's the thing you're going to see. You're gonna see,
Speaker 4: You're gonna see more pressure this year. There's a big
Speaker 4: twenty twenty five prediction. There's going to be a bigger
Speaker 4: push against meat from a tax and compulsion point of view.
Speaker 4: And you're going to see a lot of articles seated
Speaker 4: in the media. See, we all need to stop eating
Speaker 4: meat to save the climate. This is really going to
Speaker 4: rev up in twenty twenty five because the market hates
Speaker 4: this stuff, so the bureaucrats are going to force it
Speaker 4: on us.
Speaker 2: Watch. Yeah, there you go.
Speaker 1: And speaking of climate change, just very quickly, I wanted
Speaker 1: to show you what Greta Thunberg is up to these days.
Speaker 1: All your people, all your kids out there who worship
Speaker 1: this crackpot. We sit here on this out our outsiders
Speaker 1: from day one that she was a fraud. Well look
Speaker 1: where our climate change queen has ended up.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 10: Hope she's happy with herself.
Speaker 2: There you go.
Speaker 1: Great, Well, after the break lots more coming up. We'll
Speaker 1: be talking to John Heindereiker of what's sappening with Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and lots more in a tick here on Outsiders
Speaker 1: Don't Go Away.
Speaker 2: Hello, you're watching Outsiders with James in touch with his feelings.
Speaker 1: Borrow, Caroline, diversity is my strength, Marcus and myself Rowan.
Speaker 2: I must combat my unconscious bias Dean.
Speaker 1: All attributes, of course, are being woke wokeness.
Speaker 2: I guess that's the noun or wokism. That's probably more appropriate.
Speaker 1: Let's stick with wokism for the time being. Here is
Speaker 1: some heartbreaking before and after footage of the lush Los
Speaker 1: Angeles suburb of Pacific Palisades, but it serves as the
Speaker 1: perfect metaphor for the most destructive force unleashed by the
Speaker 1: West since the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, and
Speaker 1: that destructive.
Speaker 10: Force is, of course, wokism.
Speaker 1: It is wokism that reduced these magnificent buildings to embers.
Speaker 1: It is wokism that torched those businesses and homes.
Speaker 2: It is wokism that.
Speaker 1: Snuffed out people's jobs, their finances, their properties, their hopes
Speaker 1: and their dreams, and even some of their lives. It
Speaker 1: is Wokism that has left a smoldering heap of what
Speaker 1: was once the most magical industry on earth, home to
Speaker 1: many of the greatest artistic achievements of the last century,
Speaker 1: much of it gone, all of it reduced to cinders,
Speaker 1: thanks to Wokism and the woke. What an apt metaphor
Speaker 1: for what wokism has done to our culture and our politics.
Speaker 1: Wok destroys art by replacing traditional emotive artistic merit with
Speaker 1: politically correct subject matter and virtue signaling. Wok destroys beauty,
Speaker 1: Work destroys history, work destroys humanity. Woke destroys national pride.
Speaker 1: There's the statue of Queen Victoria vandalized the other day
Speaker 1: in the run up to Australia Day. Woke destroys childhood innocence.
Speaker 1: Woke destroys merit and the quest for excellence. Woke destroys learning,
Speaker 1: Woke destroys wisdom, Work destroys humor, talent, and individual creativity.
Speaker 1: Woke spitefully denigrated one of our greatest comic talents, Barry Humphries.
Speaker 1: Work destroys everything good and funny and irreverent and reduces
Speaker 1: it to gray, cold ashes. Woke is hateful, Woke is violent.
Speaker 1: Woke is cruel and callous. Woke is totalitarian, the nature
Speaker 1: primitive and outlook and sinister in intent. Wok embraces conformity, mediocrity,
Speaker 1: and the drab grayness of the grasping collective.
Speaker 2: Woke is a fraud.
Speaker 1: Woke don's the garments of diversity and inclusion, then embraces
Speaker 1: rabid anti semitism, white self loathing, and socialist nuns hihilism.
Speaker 1: Woke despises the inherent richness, complexity, and goodness of Western
Speaker 1: civilization and its Judaeo Christian foundations and replaces them with
Speaker 1: the banality, the evil banality of empty progressiveness. Work is
Speaker 1: the censorious hand monitoring appropriate behavior and opinions online whilst
Speaker 1: relentlessly turning a blind eye to genuine rape, torture and murder.
Speaker 2: Don't believe me.
Speaker 1: The UK is currently being torn apart by the reigniting
Speaker 1: of the Pakistani grooming gang scandal. We spoke about it
Speaker 1: many times here on the show, and the Labor Party's
Speaker 1: failure to order a full and comprehensive inquiry in what
Speaker 1: could be one of the UK's greatest scandals. Muslim grooming
Speaker 1: gangs described here a few years ago in the UK Parliament.
Speaker 19: Accept that if we extrapolate nationally the JA report on
Speaker 19: Rotherham and other reports on Telford Brot and Oxford Le
Speaker 19: Pierre to have been upwards of two hundred and fifty
Speaker 19: thousand young white girls raped in this century, very largely
Speaker 19: by Muslim men.
Speaker 2: And given these girls are usually.
Speaker 20: Raped several times a day for years, Sir my was
Speaker 20: what is the government's answer to the Chief Constable of Northumberland,
Speaker 20: of Northumbria who has just said that there is every
Speaker 20: likelihood that these grooming gangs are operating in every one
Speaker 20: of our major cities.
Speaker 1: The current scandal is at the woke Labor Party of
Speaker 1: Kirstarmer refuses to hold a full and comprehensive official inquiry
Speaker 1: until all the alleged claims about the prevalence of and
Speaker 1: protection of these gangs.
Speaker 2: Where were the authorities who should have been protecting the girls?
Speaker 2: Where was the media? Where were the police? Where were
Speaker 2: the social workers?
Speaker 1: According to the UK Telegraph, the atrocities were covered up
Speaker 1: to protect Britain's image as a successful multicultural society.
Speaker 2: Wokism at work.
Speaker 1: The authorities were cowering in a sinister swamp of woke
Speaker 1: political correctness for fear of being labeled racist. Here is
Speaker 1: ex police officer Dion Miller all the way back in
Speaker 1: twenty eighteen, ironically, at the very height of the ultra
Speaker 1: woke Me Too movement.
Speaker 2: She was ignored, but have a listener.
Speaker 21: Former Chief Crown Prosecutor Miss Dandasa was stated in an
Speaker 21: interview to.
Speaker 1: The BBC Radio four.
Speaker 21: That's in two thousand and eight, the Labor government, under
Speaker 21: Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Home Secretary Jackie Smith sent
Speaker 21: a circular to all police forces in this country saying.
Speaker 18: That as far as these young girls who are being
Speaker 18: exploited in towns and cities, we believe that they have
Speaker 18: made an informed choice about their sexual behavior.
Speaker 1: Here is a girl all the way back in twenty
Speaker 1: fourteen being mocked and sneered at in a TV program
Speaker 1: for pointing the finger of blame. It Asian in Britain
Speaker 1: that means Pakistani or mainly Muslim men.
Speaker 22: I know it's probably an unpopular view, but I completely
Speaker 22: agreed that it is in some areas largely rapid committed
Speaker 22: by Muslims, because I know I grew up in Bradford
Speaker 22: all right, and in that kind of environment it is
Speaker 22: mainly Asian men, not because it's something about their culture,
Speaker 22: but because they're not getting caught. Like I've had friends
Speaker 22: who've been rapped and the police have told them not
Speaker 22: because it's an Asan man that've done it, probably not
Speaker 22: going to catch them.
Speaker 2: Well, it happens all the time.
Speaker 1: There were those, of course, like my friend James Dell
Speaker 1: and Pole who sounded the alarm but were shouted down.
Speaker 23: We've got these organized gangs, mostly of Muslim origin.
Speaker 6: Finish you very.
Speaker 2: Much spreading.
Speaker 1: Shouted down and silenced, I might add by a politically
Speaker 1: correct woman, by wokeism. Worse, the accusation is that the
Speaker 1: alleged crimes have not been properly investigated by the UK
Speaker 1: Labor Party because they were desperate not to offend their
Speaker 1: Muslim electorates. Unbelievably, the current British Prime Minister Kirs Starmer,
Speaker 1: who was the Chief prosecutor at the time of the
Speaker 1: Gordon Brown government, who allegedly did so little about those
Speaker 1: gangs at the time, and who has refused an inquiry,
Speaker 1: a full inquiry into the gangs, well he's introducing wait
Speaker 1: for it, woke islamaphobia and hate speech laws instead, whereby
Speaker 1: the police can rade people's homes and arrest them for
Speaker 1: making social media comments deemed racist or hateful on topics
Speaker 1: such as presumably allegations against Muslim rate gangs. Who knows
Speaker 1: workism is of course the guiding principle of the Australian
Speaker 1: Labor Party too, and we see here in Australia on
Speaker 1: a very very different issue.
Speaker 2: I stress the reluctance of the Australian.
Speaker 1: Labor government to also not offend their Muslim electorates, in
Speaker 1: this case, on allegations of anti Semitism.
Speaker 2: Indeed, since the atrocity is of October.
Speaker 1: Seven, fifteen months ago, Labor, Australian labor has hidden behind
Speaker 1: the pernicious lies.
Speaker 10: Of quote protecting the fabric of multiculturalism.
Speaker 2: Of workism.
Speaker 1: Here's New South Wales Premier Chris Men's doing just that
Speaker 1: this very weekend.
Speaker 24: It's one of the reasons why we have far stricter
Speaker 24: and far tougher hate speech laws in Australia than they
Speaker 24: do in the United States. And I don't make any
Speaker 24: apollogies for that. The reason we do is because we
Speaker 24: want to protect what can be a very fragile community
Speaker 24: that we've built in Australia. The multicultural community of twenty
Speaker 24: twenty five, and that's not up for it's not up
Speaker 24: for debate, and it's not up for a change.
Speaker 1: Sorry mate, but everything is up for debate and should
Speaker 1: be up for debate. Hate speech laws are not the answer.
Speaker 1: They are designed to do one thing, but like everything woke,
Speaker 1: they achieved the complete opposite. If our multicultural society is
Speaker 1: so fragile, mister Men's all of a sudden, then it's
Speaker 1: because it has failed. It's certainly used to be very robust.
Speaker 1: We never needed hate speech laws in the past when
Speaker 1: we had sensible immigration policies linked to assimilation and integration priorities.
Speaker 1: Now the police admit they are intimidated by large crowds
Speaker 1: from certain ethnic minorities. Hate speech laws will only entrench
Speaker 1: that division. Hate speech laws did nothing to protect those
Speaker 1: tens of thousands of girls estimated to have been the
Speaker 1: victims of those so called grooming gangs in the UK.
Speaker 2: Where are the arrests for.
Speaker 1: The actually anti Semitic violence we have seen here in
Speaker 1: Australia with synagogues torched, homes and cars burned or vandalized,
Speaker 1: or for the incitement to violence at the disgusting Sydney
Speaker 1: Opera house rally, Mister Mins. Woke preaches tolerance, but in reality,
Speaker 1: woke is a pernicious and dangerous tool of censorship, division
Speaker 1: and intolerance. But back to the Californian bushfires, they are
Speaker 1: the irrefutable result of woke politics and woke culture.
Speaker 2: Decades of woke.
Speaker 1: Environmental policies saw the wilderness Californian wilderness left unmanaged, saw
Speaker 1: valuable water resources siphoned off to save some fish or other,
Speaker 1: and then saw woke politicians slashing firefighting budgets and directing
Speaker 1: the money to woke causes and replacing seasoned firefighters with
Speaker 1: woke diversity hires and woke programs built around woke nonsense
Speaker 1: such as this.
Speaker 25: We are hosting our new employee orientation and our focus
Speaker 25: is to teach our new employees for them to understand
Speaker 25: cultural competency, identify implicit and unconscious bias, and be aware
Speaker 25: of the importance of us having a diverse and inclusive workforce.
Speaker 2: And how did that work out.
Speaker 1: Here's one such woke firefighter explaining how she manages to
Speaker 1: do her job.
Speaker 26: You want to see somebody that responds to your house,
Speaker 26: your emergency, whether it's a medical call, or a fire
Speaker 26: call that looks like you. It gives that person a
Speaker 26: little bit more ease knowing that somebody might understand their
Speaker 26: situation better.
Speaker 2: Is she strong enough to do this?
Speaker 26: Or you couldn't carry my husband out of a fire,
Speaker 26: which he got himself from the wrong place.
Speaker 2: If I have to carry himut of a fire.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has been warning for years these policies, these
Speaker 1: worke policies and practices would end as.
Speaker 2: They have done in disaster.
Speaker 27: So I think California ore to get their act together
Speaker 27: and clean up their forests and manage their forest because
Speaker 27: it's disgraceful.
Speaker 17: What's happening should never happen.
Speaker 2: I go all over the country and I meet with governors.
Speaker 2: The first thing they says, there's no reason.
Speaker 17: For for as far as like that in California.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was right back then in his first administration,
Speaker 1: and Donald Trump is right now.
Speaker 13: Woke has to stop because along with everything else, it's
Speaker 13: destroying our country.
Speaker 4: We're going to stop woke.
Speaker 2: Woke is Bulley.
Speaker 1: Couldn't have put it better myself. So in Australia, we
Speaker 1: must abandon workism. And the only way to do that
Speaker 1: is at the next election. By voting out Labor, the Greens,
Speaker 1: and the Teals. Above all, there is simply too much
Speaker 1: at stake. Joining us now as our mate, John Heindereika
Speaker 1: from the Center of the American Experiment and of course
Speaker 1: editor of the power Line blog or contributor thereof John.
Speaker 2: Great to see you.
Speaker 1: Happy new year, mate, And tomorrow is the inauguration.
Speaker 2: Of Donald Trump.
Speaker 28: Tell us about it, Rowan, It can't come too soon.
Speaker 28: We are finally set the end of the disastrous four
Speaker 28: year Biden administration, and Joe Biden has managed to kind
Speaker 28: of loop to the finish line his last week at
Speaker 28: office maybe one of the most bizarre of his entire
Speaker 28: four year term. But yes, indeed, on Monday, Donald Trump
Speaker 28: will be taking the reins, Caroline, John.
Speaker 6: Great to see you.
Speaker 5: We've already heard a lot of talk about deportations happening.
Speaker 5: How soon is that going to take place?
Speaker 6: And what's been the response over there from the voters.
Speaker 28: Well, the voters voted for it, you know. Donald Trump
Speaker 28: has never made a secret of his position on illegal immigration.
Speaker 28: He wants to end illegal immigration. He wants the people
Speaker 28: who have come here illegally to go back where they
Speaker 28: came from. To the greatest extent possible. That is a
Speaker 28: popular position. You know, the Democrats act like it's anathema.
Speaker 28: It's terrible. No, this is what the American people have
Speaker 28: voted for. And I think we're going to see steps
Speaker 28: taken toward these deportations as soon as Donald Trump is
Speaker 28: sworn in.
Speaker 4: Jane John, I'm concerned about what happens on not day one,
Speaker 4: when these mass deportations are scheduled to start happening.
Speaker 2: When on day two, day three, day four.
Speaker 4: How is the swamp which absolutely hates Donald Trump, hates
Speaker 4: the idea that he is returning. Responding to Trump's inauguration
Speaker 4: because I have seen people like Janet Yellen saying that
Speaker 4: the country is hitting the debt limit as of Tuesday,
Speaker 4: that there are people in the bondom market who are
Speaker 4: going to try and pull a Liz Trust on him
Speaker 4: and make it impossible for him to govern without massive
Speaker 4: chaos in the financial markets. What's the fight back and
Speaker 4: what's the plan for the fight back?
Speaker 28: James, The biggest problem that any Republican president has is
Speaker 28: that he doesn't really control the executive branch of the
Speaker 28: federal government. The employees of the executive branch in Washington,
Speaker 28: DC are probably ninety to ninety five percent Democrats and liberals,
Speaker 28: and there are many Now, there are some, you know,
Speaker 28: good employees there who will do what their bosses tell
Speaker 28: them to do, like they're supposed to. The President sets
Speaker 28: policy for the executive branch, but there are many who
Speaker 28: will try to obstruct Trump. And I think he learned
Speaker 28: this in his first term, and I hope that coming
Speaker 28: into office this time around better equipped with a player
Speaker 28: and to whip these people into shape and actually get
Speaker 28: his policies implemented.
Speaker 1: Now, John, when we spoke last year, one of the
Speaker 1: things I said frequently was that not only were you
Speaker 1: getting Donald Trump, you would be getting one of the
Speaker 1: I think one of the most impressive and astonishing administrations
Speaker 1: with the most incredible characters. I mean, we've talked about
Speaker 1: Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswami and JD. Vance and so on,
Speaker 1: and Telsea Gabbart if they're RFKJ if he's confirmed. But
Speaker 1: I was very impressed by these confirmation hearings that we
Speaker 1: had during the week. I just want to play you
Speaker 1: a grab of Pete Hegseeth, who is the We'll just
Speaker 1: have a listen first to what he has to say.
Speaker 2: Everybody in this room knows.
Speaker 6: If you're a rifleman and you lose your.
Speaker 2: Rifle, they're throwing the book at you.
Speaker 23: But if you're a general who loses a war, you
Speaker 23: get a promotion.
Speaker 1: He's the new Secretary of Defense, John, How is that
Speaker 1: of contrast to the previous Secretary of Defense?
Speaker 28: Well, I think this is just great rowand full disclosure.
Speaker 28: Pete is a friend of mine, Okay, I think the
Speaker 28: world of him. But what Donald Trump is saying here
Speaker 28: is I want a soldier in the Pentagon. I want
Speaker 28: a soldier with two bronze stars, a legitimate war hero
Speaker 28: running the Defense Department. That is not what we've had
Speaker 28: in the past. We've had either bureaucrats or generals with
Speaker 28: a bunch of ribbons who have never actually been shot at.
Speaker 28: And I think the large majority of the American people
Speaker 28: think it's a great idea to put a soldier in
Speaker 28: charge of the Defense Department.
Speaker 5: Caroline oh Well, I loved one of Pete's comments during
Speaker 5: his confirmation hearing John where he actually clapped back at
Speaker 5: Elizabeth Warren and really exposed these democrats here. Let's have
Speaker 5: a look at that quickly.
Speaker 29: In other words, you're quite sure that every general who
Speaker 29: serves should not go directly into the defense industry for
Speaker 29: ten years. You're not willing to make that same pledge.
Speaker 13: I'm not a general senator, You'll be the one.
Speaker 6: It's too good.
Speaker 5: I mean, there was a lot of speculation this confirmation
Speaker 5: wouldn't happen with Pete, haigsays, but he's performed very well.
Speaker 28: He's performed well. There are fifty three Republican senators. There
Speaker 28: were one or two who had expressed some misgivings above
Speaker 28: Pete because he wasn't the veteran bureaucrat right. But they
Speaker 28: have come around. Jony Ernst of Iowa in particular, has
Speaker 28: come around, has now endorsed him, and I don't have
Speaker 28: any doubt that Pete is going to be confirmed. And
Speaker 28: I think that all of Trump's nominees are going to
Speaker 28: be confirmed. In twenty twenty one, when Joe Biden came
Speaker 28: into office and he had all of his nominees, not
Speaker 28: a single Demo Democratic senator voted against a single Biden
Speaker 28: nominee in twenty twenty one. The Republicans are behind this
Speaker 28: administration and they're not going to be voting with the
Speaker 28: Democrats to block these nominees James.
Speaker 4: Finally, John, you know, being a lawyer, I wanted to
Speaker 4: get your legal opinion.
Speaker 2: Honestly, I just spoke about a moment ago.
Speaker 4: Which is Joe Biden's unilateral declaration that the twenty eighth
Speaker 4: Amendment of the Constitution now exists. Apparently there's an equal
Speaker 4: rights Amendment. Have we just gotten to the point now
Speaker 4: where nobody cares?
Speaker 2: James, this is so bizarre.
Speaker 28: You cannot make this stuff up. Yesterday last night, Joe
Speaker 28: Biden purported to amend the Constitution of the United States
Speaker 28: via Twitter. He issued a tweet saying falsely that the
Speaker 28: Equal Rights Amendment, which died by its own terms in
Speaker 28: two thousand and eight, has now suddenly come into being
Speaker 28: and as part of the Constitution. This is completely insane.
Speaker 28: I doubt that Joe Biden even knows that he did that.
Speaker 6: We don't know who in the.
Speaker 28: White House put that tweet out and put Joe Biden's
Speaker 28: name on it. But it's an indication of how far
Speaker 28: gone this administration is. It is an absolute clown show.
Speaker 1: And John just briefly the inauguration tomorrow, are their fears
Speaker 1: around it?
Speaker 2: He's moved it indoors?
Speaker 1: Was that a weather thing or a security thing or
Speaker 1: a bit of both. What dangers look around the inauguration any.
Speaker 2: Well, I hope not Rowan.
Speaker 28: I mean they say it was whether it's supposed to
Speaker 28: be ten degrees in Washington on Monday. Now where I live,
Speaker 28: that wouldn't be considered cold.
Speaker 2: Why in DC.
Speaker 28: That's called So there's only going to be two thousand
Speaker 28: people in the Capitol or a tunda for the actual inauguration.
Speaker 28: There'll be another event at the Capital Arena, which holds
Speaker 28: twenty thousand. Obviously security is going to be very very tight.
Speaker 28: But after the two assassination attempts on Trump, obviously it's
Speaker 28: something that we all are concerned about.
Speaker 1: John, heindrare get great to chat to and we'll chat
Speaker 1: again soon.
Speaker 2: Thanks so much. And as we go, John, I'm.
Speaker 1: Just going to play a quick a clip of Donald
Speaker 1: Trump there with Justin Trudeau as Justin was resigning.
Speaker 2: This is AI, obviously, but it's pretty funny.
Speaker 30: Last night over dinner, I told my kids about the
Speaker 30: decision that I'm sharing.
Speaker 2: With you today.
Speaker 30: I intend to resign as party leader as Prime minister
Speaker 30: after the party selects its next leader, who would robust
Speaker 30: nationwide competitive process.
Speaker 2: Fantastic.
Speaker 1: After the break, Caroline Marcus got lots to talk to
Speaker 1: us about here on Outsiders Don't Go Away Back in a.
Speaker 6: Sick welcome back to Outsiders.
Speaker 5: I'm Caroline Marcus here today with gentile James Morrow and
Speaker 5: Rabbi Rowan Deed.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 5: I don't know about you, but I don't recognize this
Speaker 5: country anymore. This isn't the Australia we know and love.
Speaker 5: So what does it remind you of? Nineteen thirties Germany?
Speaker 5: Maybe the terror enclave that is Gaza Yep getting warmer,
Speaker 5: but not a supposedly freedom loving, democratic Western nation. If
Speaker 5: this past week has been proof of anything, it is
Speaker 5: that the extremism and hatred that's been tolerated on our
Speaker 5: streets week after week, it has nothing to do with
Speaker 5: legitimate protest about a conflict more than twelve thousand kilometers away.
Speaker 5: This is what that hatred has culminated in an attack
Speaker 5: that has all the hallmarks of a targeted fire bombing
Speaker 5: at the former home of a Jewish leader. Again, something
Speaker 5: that belongs not in Australia in twenty twenty five, but
Speaker 5: Nazi Germany, our very own Crystal Nacht, the Night of
Speaker 5: the Broken Glass where Jewish homes, businesses and synagogues were
Speaker 5: vandalized and destroyed the year before World War II erupted.
Speaker 5: Alex Ripchen is the co CEO of Australia's Peak Jewish
Speaker 5: body and a tireless advocate for the community and the
Speaker 5: values all Australians should hold.
Speaker 6: Dear his family had moved out of the house.
Speaker 5: In fact, it doesn't even belong to Jews now. But
Speaker 5: intelligence has never been a strong point for these thugs.
Speaker 5: Brain dead and dangerous. It's a chilling combination. Not that
Speaker 5: their threats will work.
Speaker 23: And I can tell you that no fire, no vandalism,
Speaker 23: no paint, no threats, no intimidation will stop me. I
Speaker 23: will continue to fulfill my duty to my country, my
Speaker 23: community and my people.
Speaker 5: And the thing is this wasn't even the first attack
Speaker 5: on a Jewish leader to make headlines this week. A
Speaker 5: forty four year old man from Western Sydney was the
Speaker 5: day before arrested and charged by the new Federal Police
Speaker 5: Anti Semitism task Force, accused of making alleged death threats
Speaker 5: to another Jewish organization, the Australian Jewish Association, headed by
Speaker 5: doctor David Adler. Now we don't know yet the exact
Speaker 5: threat allegedly made, but the group has received several in
Speaker 5: the past fifteen months, like this image of a hangman's
Speaker 5: noose accompanied by the warning if the group dares show
Speaker 5: up at the Senate Inquiry to deal with anti Semitism,
Speaker 5: they will all delta, indye, echo die. Our expectations have
Speaker 5: become so low after more than a year of virtual
Speaker 5: inaction by authorities that this one arrest surprised everyone.
Speaker 6: So now we're seeing.
Speaker 31: It's refreshing because one of the concerns in the Jewish
Speaker 31: community since the Sea October twenty twenty three is that
Speaker 31: our law enforcement has not been focused and has not
Speaker 31: been taking action against the numerous anti Semitic incidents and
Speaker 31: threats that have occurred across Australia.
Speaker 5: So now we're seeing people being targeted leaders in the
Speaker 5: Jewish community. And these attacks follow what we've seen in
Speaker 5: recent days on a Sydney synagogue a second synagogue, the
Speaker 5: thugs tried to fire bomb and graffiti calling to gas
Speaker 5: the Jews. I guess until police analysts try to convince us,
Speaker 5: what the vandals really meant to say was where's the Jews?
Speaker 5: And of course there was a firebombing of a Melbourne
Speaker 5: synagogue early last month, over which there are yet to
Speaker 5: be any arrests. What mustn't be glossed over is that
Speaker 5: this latest incident in dober Heights, a heavily Jewish suburb
Speaker 5: in eastern Sydney, came after the ceasefire deal had been
Speaker 5: read between Israel and Hamas, a deal that's set to
Speaker 5: come into effect later today, a deal anyone who genuinely
Speaker 5: cares about Palestinian lives and an end to the conflict
Speaker 5: should be celebrating, given how disproportionately it rewards their side.
Speaker 5: Har Mask not only gets an end to the war
Speaker 5: it started, they get more than twenty two Palestinian prisoners
Speaker 5: per innocent Israeli hostage. That's seven hundred and thirty five
Speaker 5: violent prisoners, many of them murderous terrorists, in exchange for
Speaker 5: thirty three innocent children, women and elderly. Likely there's another
Speaker 5: ya Ya Sinoa among that group already plotting the next
Speaker 5: October seven, and the continuing violence here should convince anyone
Speaker 5: still in doubt that these protests were never about peace.
Speaker 5: These people don't care about Palestinian lives.
Speaker 6: They don't hate war.
Speaker 5: They just hate Jews, and by extension, they hate Australia.
Speaker 5: Never forget, these protests started before Israel even retaliated against
Speaker 5: October seven. Of course, the more sophisticated activists will try
Speaker 5: to conceal this truth. Instead, they'll gas light and use
Speaker 5: every trick in the book to turn themselves into the victims.
Speaker 5: Like Nasa Mashni, head of the Australian Palestinian Palestine Advocacy Network.
Speaker 11: Do you think there will be less anti Semitic incidents
Speaker 11: from here on in?
Speaker 31: It's an absurd question. It's an absurd question asked me
Speaker 31: when we've got tens of thousands of Palestinians that are dead.
Speaker 31: The challenge we have in Australia is not just.
Speaker 28: About anti Semitism, it's about anti Palestinian racism.
Speaker 6: But the jiggers up.
Speaker 5: It was up when we saw Palestinians celebrate the news
Speaker 5: of the ceasefire deal by taking to the street is
Speaker 5: to pledge their allegiance to one of the Hamas masterminds
Speaker 5: of October seven.
Speaker 6: And the jig was certainly up.
Speaker 5: When we saw her mask leader Khalil al Haya praise
Speaker 5: October seven and bow that the resistance will continue after
Speaker 5: the ceasefire.
Speaker 2: I mean, oktober, I'm jerzy in Jersey, asked well in
Speaker 2: jazz in and me amah and I'm I'm parible.
Speaker 5: In fact, there's already been a stabbing attack in Tel
Speaker 5: Aviv that's left an Israeli man seriously injured. We already
Speaker 5: you know, a good number of the hostages to be
Speaker 5: released aren't alive. They'll be coming back as corpses. A
Speaker 5: high level idf reservers who cannot be identified, told me
Speaker 5: our soldiers will remain sitting ducks there for about forty
Speaker 5: two days. The families don't know if they get a
Speaker 5: body bag or a live family member back. And there's
Speaker 5: an expectation female hostages would have been raped given testimony
Speaker 5: from already returned hostages. Even the UN, the UN for
Speaker 5: Heaven's Sake, was forced to admit it had found clear
Speaker 5: and convincing information hostages had been raped, and those hostages,
Speaker 5: even if alive, will come back as shells of the
Speaker 5: person they once were.
Speaker 6: Now there's nothing you wouldn't do if your loved one
Speaker 6: was a hostage.
Speaker 5: Nothing, but that is an incredibly high price for Israel
Speaker 5: to pay. I deally hope that there's deal leads to
Speaker 5: all hostages coming back and lasting peace in Israel and Gaza.
Speaker 5: But I don't hold my breath already deal is in
Speaker 5: jeopardy after Israel accused himas of missing the deadline to
Speaker 5: name the first three hostages to be released. PM Benjamin Nattanna,
Speaker 5: who said we will not move forward with the outline
Speaker 5: until we receive a list of the hostages to be freed.
Speaker 5: As agreed, Israel will not tolerate violations of the agreement.
Speaker 5: The sole responsibility lies with Heimas. But I do believe
Speaker 5: Donald Trump's presidency has signaled a new era, a new
Speaker 5: strength and moral clarity on Israel that our leaders finally
Speaker 5: fear and respect. Tragically, with our pathetically limp leadership back home,
Speaker 5: it's clear the violence on our own shores is only
Speaker 5: really just beginning.
Speaker 1: Well, Caroline, that was superb and I sincerely hope you
Speaker 1: are wrong about that last point. I do hope the
Speaker 1: violence is brought to heal in this country, and that
Speaker 1: will only come with a change of leadership as soon
Speaker 1: as possible.
Speaker 2: At a federal level.
Speaker 1: Peter Jennings joins us now from the Strategic Analysis Australia. Peter,
Speaker 1: thanks for coming on on a Sunday morning, do appreciate it? Now,
Speaker 1: there's two aspects. Do we want to talk about the
Speaker 1: hostages deal? I mean, on the one hand, I was
Speaker 1: kind of horrified at the thought that so many Palestinian
Speaker 1: criminals would be released from Israeli jails when we know
Speaker 1: that that's one of one such release last time round,
Speaker 1: that it was the mastermind of the October seventh attack.
Speaker 1: So Israel is releasing into the Middle East some very
Speaker 1: very dangerous people. But on the other hand, you do
Speaker 1: have to sympathize, as Caroline said, with the plight of
Speaker 1: the families of the hostages.
Speaker 2: Tell us your thoughts is this a good deal, a
Speaker 2: bad deal, or a bit of both.
Speaker 27: So it's been impossible really to reconcile these two compete objectives.
Speaker 27: For Israel won the rescue of the hostages, and from
Speaker 27: a human perspective, one can only be happy that potentially
Speaker 27: some are going to be released. But then the second
Speaker 27: was Nettaya, who's war aim to defeat Hamas to make
Speaker 27: sure that it could no longer be the political boss
Speaker 27: of Gaza. And it seems to me that in negotiating
Speaker 27: the cease fight, that's what has been lost. Some hostages
Speaker 27: may be returned at the price of Hamas staying in power,
Speaker 27: and I think what we're going to see over the
Speaker 27: next six weeks or so is going to be a
Speaker 27: pretty ugly cracked down inside Gaza itself where Hamas will
Speaker 27: reassert control. And as Caroline said in her ditorial just
Speaker 27: a minute ago, we've got a thousand or so a
Speaker 27: Hamas supporters coming out of Israeli jails. Israeli jails are
Speaker 27: the postgrad finishing school for the Hamas political leadership. That's
Speaker 27: where Sinoa came from, the man that actually masterminded the
Speaker 27: October seven attack. So from a strategic perspective, the war continues,
Speaker 27: and I'm delighted to see some hostages potentially coming back,
Speaker 27: but it's coming at an enormously high price for Israel
Speaker 27: to pay, which is that there is no political solution
Speaker 27: to Gaza. Hamas stays in power, the threat remains. That's
Speaker 27: a really bad outcome long term, it seems to me.
Speaker 2: James and Peter.
Speaker 4: One of the people who took an awful lot of
Speaker 4: credit for this deal when it was first announced was
Speaker 4: Donald Trump, the incoming president, and there was a lot
Speaker 4: of saying, oh, well, this is you know, an early
Speaker 4: win for his foreign policy before he's even taken office.
Speaker 4: But if as you say, and if it is as
Speaker 4: it looks like, this means that this all continues, There'll
Speaker 4: be another attempt at an October seventh down the road.
Speaker 4: Is there some other circuit breaker that maybe we're not
Speaker 4: seeing as part of this, some future idea of what
Speaker 4: happens to Gaza a multinational force?
Speaker 2: Where does this go?
Speaker 4: Or are we just stuck back where we started with
Speaker 4: and Hamas says, hey, we may have lost tens of
Speaker 4: thousands of people here, but we're still considering this strategically
Speaker 4: a whim.
Speaker 27: So the circuit breaker that we mightn't have seen, James,
Speaker 27: is what did Trump agree to to get Nettanahu over
Speaker 27: the line?
Speaker 2: Excepting the cease fire?
Speaker 27: Did he agree, for example, to support Israel striking Iran
Speaker 27: destroying their nuclear facilities so that Iran doesn't get a
Speaker 27: nuclear weapon sometime in twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: If that's the.
Speaker 27: Deal, I can see why Nettaya who would have signed
Speaker 27: up to it. There is a risk for Trump here,
Speaker 27: which is to say, before in his even his inauguration,
Speaker 27: he's made a tactical mistake. He wanted to deliver what
Speaker 27: he said he was going to deliver during the presidential campaign,
Speaker 27: which was that hostages would be released. But I don't
Speaker 27: think any part of that calculation from Trump was to
Speaker 27: leave har Mass in power. So you know, there's a
Speaker 27: lot that remains to be worked out here, James. I
Speaker 27: think potentially Trump will be disappointed to find that Hamas
Speaker 27: is not a reliable negotiating partner and that they're going
Speaker 27: to reneg on the deal, that they're going to continue
Speaker 27: to be a threat, and what looks like a victory
Speaker 27: for Trump today is going to look like a defeat
Speaker 27: for Trump in six weeks time when Hamas continues to
Speaker 27: be a problem, and then we may see the all
Speaker 27: hell break loose, which was the other half of Trump's
Speaker 27: promise for the Middle East. So there's a lot that
Speaker 27: I don't know, but I do think that Trump tried
Speaker 27: to get a domestic political gain. He's got that kind
Speaker 27: of at a high price, and now we have to
Speaker 27: see what American policy in the Middle East looks like
Speaker 27: going forward.
Speaker 1: But Peter, on that point, various I know they haven't
Speaker 1: been confirmed yet, but various of his top nominees is
Speaker 1: administration have all come out and several of them had
Speaker 1: said Hamas will never be allowed to run the Gaza strip,
Speaker 1: Hamas will never be allowed to stay in power. So
Speaker 1: I don't know if this is the second arm of
Speaker 1: Trump's deal that we've got this six week period till
Speaker 1: the so called phase two.
Speaker 2: But Trump's administration are.
Speaker 1: Saying very very clearly Hamas will not be allowed to
Speaker 1: remain in power and will be annihilated if necessary. And
Speaker 1: we've even had Netanyahu coming out today saying that I'll
Speaker 1: go back in and fight with American approval.
Speaker 2: So what do you make of all that? So Jones?
Speaker 27: So these there are two things here which cannot be reconciled.
Speaker 27: What one is negotiating with Hamas over the release of
Speaker 27: the hostages, which is what Trump's policy forced Netanyahu to do.
Speaker 27: The other is that Hamas can no longer lead Gaza.
Speaker 27: I can't see how these two things square. Hamas has not,
Speaker 27: for its own account, engaged in a negotiation knowing that
Speaker 27: it's going to be the end of them politically. So
Speaker 27: I guess my conclusion from that is that it's just
Speaker 27: a cease fire. It's not a permanent peace deal. It
Speaker 27: can't be a permanent peace deal. The war continues. I
Speaker 27: wrote in The Australian a few days ago that in
Speaker 27: the Middle East, ceasefires are made to be broken, and
Speaker 27: I expect that's what's going to happen, because ultimately Israel
Speaker 27: will continue to keep fighting for its own survival. And
Speaker 27: so we come back to James's question was what was
Speaker 27: the deal? I think the deal must have been around
Speaker 27: America giving cover to Israel to prosecute its war against Iran.
Speaker 27: I think that's what we'll see in future.
Speaker 2: Well, with you one hundred percent, Peter, it.
Speaker 5: Looks Peter like I said that the deal might already
Speaker 5: be in jeopardy with Israel accusing Hamas of not even
Speaker 5: releasing the names, which was part of the agreement, apparently
Speaker 5: that they had to release the lambs of the first
Speaker 5: hostages that are going to be released by Hamas, and
Speaker 5: they haven't.
Speaker 6: So we'll see what happens there. But what's your response.
Speaker 5: We've seen people cheering on the streets in Gaza, We've
Speaker 5: seen promises to continue the resistance.
Speaker 6: Let's show people at.
Speaker 5: Home a little bit of the reaction to this ceasefire deal.
Speaker 5: From your perspective, Peter, this seems to be being celebrated
Speaker 5: as a victory on the Hamas side.
Speaker 6: On the Palestinian side, yes.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 27: And so we come down to the reality that Hamasa's
Speaker 27: plan was always to accept military defeat in order to
Speaker 27: gain a political victory. And what Israel has done is
Speaker 27: that it's gained a military victory, but it's suffered a
Speaker 27: significant political defeat.
Speaker 2: That's the appalling.
Speaker 27: Nature of where we're at now. The truth is that
Speaker 27: there are majority support for Hamas still amongst Palestinians in Gaza.
Speaker 27: Hamas is going to treat this as a tremendous victory.
Speaker 27: This is going to cement what might have been its
Speaker 27: faltering political control over Gaza, and it's going to go
Speaker 27: down and Hammas propaganda as a tremendous achievement. Hamas is
Speaker 27: also a bad faith negotiator. I don't think we can
Speaker 27: be confident that the ceasefire is going to last six days,
Speaker 27: let alone six weeks, But the release of those hostages
Speaker 27: is going to traumatize Israel every day that a person
Speaker 27: is released, and I think that's all so part of
Speaker 27: Hermas's subjective. So I just come down to the tragedy
Speaker 27: that there is no lasting solution here, and I hope
Speaker 27: that Australia and other countries don't now read this as
Speaker 27: a signal to push money into Gaza, because all that means,
Speaker 27: under the guise of reconstruction is that we're going to
Speaker 27: end up lining the pockets of Hamas leaders in cutter
Speaker 27: and re arming Hamas. And so the fight continues.
Speaker 1: Peter Jennings, brilliant insights there, and you're absolutely right. The
Speaker 1: money Australia is poured into the Palestinian side is reprehensible.
Speaker 1: Peter Jennings, great to chat to you as always, Thanks
Speaker 1: so much for coming on Outsiders, and we'll speak again
Speaker 1: soon after the break. Canbra clown show in a tech
Speaker 1: roll up, roll up, step right this way. It's the
Speaker 1: wackiest show in town. It's the Canra clown Show. Hey
Speaker 1: remember this blast from the past, the great COVID clown himself.
Speaker 32: Hello, I'm still here.
Speaker 2: Yes, sadly it is true.
Speaker 1: Brett Sutton Dan Andrews, Chief COVID Health Bureaucraft, also known
Speaker 1: as Sluggate Sutton in honor of the disgusting affair that
Speaker 1: saw an independent, non unionized food catering business disgracefully shut
Speaker 1: down on spurious health grounds. But more importantly, Brett Sutton
Speaker 1: will forever be remembered as the man who was responsible
Speaker 1: for two years of Victorian COVID misery, lockdowns, social distancing
Speaker 1: in parks, mask mandates, five mile radiuses, vaccine mandates, QR codes,
Speaker 1: outrageous police brutality, protest marches being pepper sprayed, and Victoria
Speaker 1: being made the laughing stock of the world. Biometric Brett
Speaker 1: was even touted as Australia's sexiest health bureaucrat at one
Speaker 1: stage of the madness. Indeed, every other day this clown
Speaker 1: would front up to the to deliver his media circus act,
Speaker 1: spouting endless fearmongering gobblebeegook.
Speaker 2: I might start with an apology.
Speaker 32: I know that members of the Afghan community might have
Speaker 32: felt singled out by statements I made recently. That was
Speaker 32: absolutely not my intention. If we haven't known the clusters
Speaker 32: that have occurring, that have been occurring right through the
Speaker 32: really significant time through this second wave, the absence of
Speaker 32: new cases in Casey in the last couple of days
Speaker 32: is an indication that those pillars of public health response
Speaker 32: isolation of cases, quarantine of close contacts, testing broadly absolutely
Speaker 32: the keys to stopping them. So if people feel that
Speaker 32: it's a threat, they get anxious, or they feel like
Speaker 32: it's a really significant backward step. I would say we
Speaker 32: should expect them. They will occur, but we know exactly
Speaker 32: how to respond to them. There's no question that getting
Speaker 32: vaccinated and being two weeks after your first vaccine gives
Speaker 32: you a level of protection.
Speaker 2: One vaccine is not enough.
Speaker 32: I also think it's problematic when you see people who
Speaker 32: appear to be breaking the rules, as it were, until
Speaker 32: you can show that you've got evidence of vaccination and
Speaker 32: that it's an entitlement that applies across the board.
Speaker 1: Heaven help us now throughout COVID, I on this show
Speaker 1: is extremely skeptical about every aspect of the draconian mandates,
Speaker 1: and I even suggested we explore alternatives such as iver mecton.
Speaker 2: So I guess Bret Sutton.
Speaker 1: Had people like me in mind when he made this
Speaker 1: pronouncement from on High.
Speaker 2: They are anti everything.
Speaker 32: They are anti lockdown, they are anti they shutdown on
Speaker 32: international travel. They're anti mass they are anti social distancing.
Speaker 32: They think that everything will be solved by taking a
Speaker 32: horse de worming tablet either mectin if they've taken mandated
Speaker 32: vaccination as a hook.
Speaker 2: So be it.
Speaker 32: But let's not pretend that these are otherwise rational individuals.
Speaker 32: They are absolutely wacky.
Speaker 1: Absolutely wacky a brats, except, of course we were not.
Speaker 1: We were right to varying degrees on virtually every single issue.
Speaker 1: Even Iver Mechtan is now out of the sinbin well.
Speaker 1: Following COVID, they shipped biometric Bret off to a cushy
Speaker 1: job in Canberra. But it seems you can't keep a
Speaker 1: good globalist down these days.
Speaker 2: And now the bloke.
Speaker 1: Who inflicted the world's most draconian and onerous COVID restrictions
Speaker 1: onto Victorians has decided to team up with renowned World
Speaker 1: Economic Forum COVID and climate cultists and globalist billionaire Bill
Speaker 1: Gates to inflict even more nightmares upon innocent ozzies. This time,
Speaker 1: I call it the Mozzi Mandates. Yes, Brett Sutton, Bill
Speaker 1: Gates and the boffins at the CSIRO have decided what
Speaker 1: the good folk of far North Queensland really need right
Speaker 1: now is a swarm of genetically engineered red glowing masque.
Speaker 2: This is being done with.
Speaker 1: The blessings of Albozo in order to help Bill Gates
Speaker 1: on his passionate mission to eradicate dengy fever worldwide, even
Speaker 1: though there virtually isn't anydngy fever anywhere in Far North
Speaker 1: Queensland or anywhere else in Australia for that matter.
Speaker 2: Cane toads, do I hear you say?
Speaker 1: Still welcome to the wacky world of Sluggate Sutton's Mozzi
Speaker 1: mandates they.
Speaker 2: Are indeed toying the dark red.
Speaker 32: They've got a protein that's encoded for I think it's
Speaker 32: a coral protein that fluoresca's red, and that means they
Speaker 32: can be identified in the world when they're introduced, but
Speaker 32: also when you stop. When you stop introducing them, the
Speaker 32: numbers will fall away again and you can see that
Speaker 32: washing out in the population with that fluorescent gene.
Speaker 1: The King of Covid billionaire Bill and Glow in the
Speaker 1: Dark massies what could possibly go wrong? No memlest to
Speaker 1: Mosquito Morrison and the doors would say, no.
Speaker 14: Mea ls demski dom no mea orlis demoski dom no
Speaker 14: mea ortis demski do? Why I don't you go.
Speaker 1: Hyperbole extreme exaggeration as pronounced by Julia Gillard hyperbole. Well,
Speaker 1: we've got some great ones here. I mentioned before Guy Piers,
Speaker 1: the actor I mean, seriously, this is shameful stuff what
Speaker 1: he said about October sixth. But you can't stop a lovey.
Speaker 1: They wade into everything. Have a listened to this nonsense?
Speaker 7: Think about people who are less privileged, whether they are
Speaker 7: people with disabilities, whether they are people under occupation, whether
Speaker 7: they are people who who are struggling with climate change. So,
Speaker 7: you know, I think it's important too in this situation.
Speaker 7: It's great to promote our movie, no question, but I
Speaker 7: think it's also good to recognize everybody in the world.
Speaker 33: World.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I recognize everybody in the world climate change out
Speaker 1: and I will not go and see that movie, whatever
Speaker 1: it is, and I don't want anyone else to see
Speaker 1: it as well.
Speaker 2: That guy is a clown, an absolute clown.
Speaker 1: Jans sickening how these privileged types.
Speaker 2: Like, what's the profession? He's an actor? What's he doing?
Speaker 2: He's saying the lions, so you know, he knows.
Speaker 1: He's writing his own lines, but he probably but.
Speaker 4: He is saying the lines so because he knows that.
Speaker 4: You know, in the Hollywood woke left media sphere, what
Speaker 4: you do, Like, did you watch his eyes there during that?
Speaker 4: He's like, uh, oh, climate change. People that are patient
Speaker 4: raises us to things like that. You know, like you
Speaker 4: can't take these people seriously. Anybody who takes an actor
Speaker 4: seriously on politics is an idiot.
Speaker 2: Caroline.
Speaker 5: He's just ticked every left virtue signal and cause off.
Speaker 6: During that dar tribe. And I mean, I just remind
Speaker 6: Guy Pears.
Speaker 5: What happened between October six and October eight.
Speaker 6: That was a that was a her master the.
Speaker 5: Insensitivity around I mean, that's why there's a war.
Speaker 1: Well, this is this is why witness drives me completely insane.
Speaker 1: You can stand there and pretend to be compassionate about
Speaker 1: climate change and the underprivileged around the world, and you
Speaker 1: basically sneer at the rape, the butchery, the vile defiling
Speaker 1: of so many wonderful men, women and women and children
Speaker 1: and men. Another lovey here we got the You know,
Speaker 1: Hollywood is great for Hyperbowl because they all come out
Speaker 1: with it. Have a listen, Carol Caine, remember her, she's
Speaker 1: found out what caused the Californian fires.
Speaker 2: Oh what do you think it might be? Mmmm?
Speaker 13: That's just true.
Speaker 33: So many people that we know are losing their homes
Speaker 33: completely and police not their animals or their lives. Alo
Speaker 33: Ol Good said it was going to happen, and he was, oh, yeah.
Speaker 2: I haven't heard for a long time.
Speaker 4: Hour No, I mean, but again, this is the thing,
Speaker 4: like like what do these people do? And the thing
Speaker 4: has been climate change particularly, it's like a religious for
Speaker 4: these people. You know, it's climate change that went and
Speaker 4: emptied the hydrants in Los Angeles. It's climate change that
Speaker 4: made that reservoir have no water because it was under
Speaker 4: maintenance for like eight years or whatever it was. You know,
Speaker 4: it's climate change that made the fire department full of
Speaker 4: woke incompetence who won't go and rescue you.
Speaker 2: Apparently, according to that one lady, don't look like Carolin.
Speaker 1: I tell you what really amused me is she said
Speaker 1: al Gore was right. Remember Malibu, which all burnt down,
Speaker 1: is right on the beach there. So if al Gore
Speaker 1: had been right, the oceans would have risen by now
Speaker 1: and you wouldn't have had any bushfires there.
Speaker 5: Are supposed to have a north Pole that's completely ice
Speaker 5: free by this point. In fact, it was supposed to
Speaker 5: happen by twenty sixteen according to al Gore.
Speaker 6: So I think he's been wrong about plenty of things.
Speaker 2: Carol Kane, al Gore was right al Gore.
Speaker 1: Climate change is always to climb chins the ultimate excuse
Speaker 1: James and Caroline for anything. Caroline, thanks for being on
Speaker 1: Outsiders today.
Speaker 2: Thanks for having fantastic great work.
Speaker 1: And in a very exciting announcement, I have some news
Speaker 1: about a new show of mine for twenty twenty five.
Speaker 1: The World according to Rowan Dean will be on weekly
Speaker 1: this year on Fridays, available to stream for our Sky
Speaker 1: News online subscribers, and then here on your TVs at
Speaker 1: seven pm every Friday evening. The World according to Rowan Deane,
Speaker 1: followed of course by James Morrow and then read japany
Speaker 1: Friday evenings.
Speaker 2: See you next Sunday morning and on Friday evening.
Speaker 1: Bye