Speaker 1: This is outside.
Speaker 2: Good morning, and welcome to Outsiders, the show that is
Speaker 2: to combating woke identity politics and lefty lunacy on steroids
Speaker 2: wherever we find it.
Speaker 1: What a stroll across.
Speaker 2: The White House lawn is to an excitable four year
Speaker 2: old boy?
Speaker 3: Yes, this is the clip that stole the hearts of
Speaker 3: the Internet yesterday as Elon Mask's little boy X got
Speaker 3: to hang out with the.
Speaker 4: Forty seventh president. And doesn't he just look delighted?
Speaker 5: And indeed, guys, who can blame him for not waiting
Speaker 5: around for his dad when hey look at that he's
Speaker 5: got a real great, big helicopter to ride on.
Speaker 1: Just imagine in an alternative universe that could have been Joe.
Speaker 2: Biden staggering across the White House lawn sniffing his granddaughter's hair.
Speaker 2: And while you ponder that frightening thoughts, let's grab the
Speaker 2: latest outside his news. Well, Rita and James, Australian businesses
Speaker 2: have suffered the sharpest annual fall engross operating margins in
Speaker 2: a quarter of a century. Great work, Charmers, great work, Albaniasi,
Speaker 2: great work Bowen. You guys are a complete and absolute failure.
Speaker 2: Fifty one percent spike in gas prices. Seriously, Rita, the
Speaker 2: disasters just mount up from this bunch of clowns.
Speaker 3: Well, this is talking about the fact that we've had
Speaker 3: a per capita recession for consecutive quarters, and nobody seems
Speaker 3: to be too concerned about that. We are in a
Speaker 3: recession in the way that it matters most. Yes, you
Speaker 3: can bring in hundreds of thousands of people here every
Speaker 3: year and pop up the GDP figures and make it
Speaker 3: look like we've got all this economic activity and we've
Speaker 3: got growth, But what matters is how it's impacting people's lives,
Speaker 3: and those per capita figures revealed that we've had a
Speaker 3: sharp fall in our living standards. And it's not just households,
Speaker 3: as these figures show, Australian businesses have suffered the sharpest
Speaker 3: fall in gross operating margins in twenty five years.
Speaker 4: And you mentioned gas prices. That's got a lot to
Speaker 4: do with it.
Speaker 3: We are sitting on abundant gas reserves Victorian particular. I
Speaker 3: wrote about this during the week, potentially sitting on hundreds
Speaker 3: of years of gas reserves. But the Victorian constitution has
Speaker 3: been changed thanks to the feckless lips down there who
Speaker 3: joined with Labor to do.
Speaker 4: That a few years back.
Speaker 3: So fracking is banned and no future state gouvern it's
Speaker 3: going to be able to reverse that crazy policy without
Speaker 3: change of the constitution, which will be almost impossible to
Speaker 3: do because Labor is never going to vote with the
Speaker 3: limbs to do that.
Speaker 4: And so this is all self inflicted.
Speaker 3: This isn't due to COVID, it's not due to international issues.
Speaker 3: This is policies that have been made in this country
Speaker 3: that have disadvantage.
Speaker 2: Each It all comes back to net zero. It all
Speaker 2: comes back to read to mention the constitution. They're in
Speaker 2: Victoria changing but the constitution in Germany under the new
Speaker 2: conservative government they didn't get the AfD. They've got this
Speaker 2: conservative woke mob who have changed the German constitution to
Speaker 2: put in net zero and climate change and all that.
Speaker 2: And will be speaking to Ralph Sholhammer later in the
Speaker 2: show about that.
Speaker 1: You don't want to miss that. But James, let's go
Speaker 1: back going on in Australia.
Speaker 6: There's a bigger problem though.
Speaker 5: I mean, yes, you know you mentioned the living stamps
Speaker 5: have gone back by almost ten percent since the Abany
Speaker 5: government took power. We know that our economy has got
Speaker 5: all sorts of problems, even though the numbers are kind
Speaker 5: of spun by the government say.
Speaker 6: Hey, we're doing really, really well.
Speaker 5: But you know you mentioned Rita a moment ago, the
Speaker 5: feckless Libs in Victoria. Well, I'm starting to get a
Speaker 5: little concerned here about the Libs federally as we head
Speaker 5: into an election campaign which I presume is going to
Speaker 5: be called next weekend, after the budget or the follow weekend.
Speaker 5: But what I am concerned about here is that in
Speaker 5: the absence of economic policies from the coalition to ease
Speaker 5: the cost of living, and every single polster I speak
Speaker 5: to they all say the same thing. Cost of living
Speaker 5: and things related to cost of living and energy are
Speaker 5: all the top one two, three plus plus plus issues
Speaker 5: for voters. The Liberals aren't answering that. Sure they've got nuclear,
Speaker 5: but that hasn't.
Speaker 6: Come online for ten or twenty years.
Speaker 5: They don't have anything about net zero, getting energy out
Speaker 5: of the ground, any of the sort of things that
Speaker 5: will bring costs down in the here and now.
Speaker 2: Look what they're concentrating on. So Peter Dutton is called
Speaker 2: for Chris Bowen to be sacked. Well, you know, okay,
Speaker 2: and Chriss He's always been the secret. I remember keep
Speaker 2: Pitt on this show years ago saying no.
Speaker 1: No, keep Bowen in place, and there is the best
Speaker 1: thing go.
Speaker 2: But have listened to Peter Dutton calling for Bowen to
Speaker 2: be sacked, and then will also play you Bowen's genius.
Speaker 7: Response shows the need to keep on going more than
Speaker 7: ever before, with the plan to introduce more of the cheapest,
Speaker 7: most reliable form of energy for Australians, and that of
Speaker 7: course is renewable energy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so we'll show you Peter Dutton in the second.
Speaker 2: But basically there's Bowen still flogging this horse going on on.
Speaker 2: The horse is dead, Chris, it's not moving. Your renewables
Speaker 2: ain't working. It's driving the cost of energy up. You're
Speaker 2: never going to drive it down. And there they're saying,
Speaker 2: oh no, if you had call, it's going to be Marksman.
Speaker 2: That's a nonsense. How can anybody read to believe a
Speaker 2: word that this mob say?
Speaker 3: Well, sadly many still do, because so much of our
Speaker 3: media just regurgitates this absolute nonsense uncritically and just defies reality.
Speaker 3: The fact that we are all living this experience. We
Speaker 3: have seen it happen overseas. Now we're seeing it happen
Speaker 3: here where you invest in enormously in renewables, the new
Speaker 3: infrastructure prices skyrocket, reliability goes down, and you make it
Speaker 3: so much harder for anybody who's in fossil fuels to
Speaker 3: actually and then you complain about cold stations having it. Well,
Speaker 3: what idiot would invest in that when the state and
Speaker 3: federal governments are just pumping up taxes saying this is
Speaker 3: an obsolete industry, And then they complain about oh, well.
Speaker 5: You know, beyond that, beyond that, you know, like and
Speaker 5: don't know, we're talking about tariffs the lead of the show,
Speaker 5: but the thing is too you know, we're talking about
Speaker 5: this sort of thing where we're going to go and
Speaker 5: you know, do a deal with the Americans over critical
Speaker 5: minerals and all the things we can get out of
Speaker 5: the ground that the Americans want, except though the federal
Speaker 5: and state governments make it so hard to get anything
Speaker 5: out of the ground. So if you want to do
Speaker 5: any of the sort of the mining or extraction that
Speaker 5: you know they say is so critical that we can
Speaker 5: use to leverage in a trade deal, a new trade
Speaker 5: agreement with the United States, well, you know, tell you what, that's.
Speaker 6: Not going to happen anytime soon.
Speaker 5: But to come back to the big issue here, but
Speaker 5: our economy the other issue. And we've got a budget
Speaker 5: coming up in a little over a week here, and
Speaker 5: we are going to see in that budget a whole
Speaker 5: new swag of handouts by the government. So what this
Speaker 5: government is doing, let's be really clear about this. They
Speaker 5: have policies that make your life more expensive, and then
Speaker 5: they have high taxes to take some of that money
Speaker 5: and give that back to you so that everybody feels like, oh,
Speaker 5: thank you, we've gotten some relief. Now the opportunity here
Speaker 5: for the Liberals to say, no, we're going to let
Speaker 5: you keep more of your money, We're going to cut
Speaker 5: your taxes, we're going to cut your regulatory burden, and
Speaker 5: we are going to stop this renewable nonsense. Because if
Speaker 5: you think about the idea of spending hundreds of billions
Speaker 5: of dollars for a transmission rid for twenty seven million people, well,
Speaker 5: my god, our parent prais is going to go up
Speaker 5: until we are all bankrupt if we keep doing that.
Speaker 5: The opportunity here for the Coalition to really return to
Speaker 5: that free market, tax cutting, pro growth, grow our way
Speaker 5: out of the debt dough text our way out of
Speaker 5: the debt ideology, I think is huge for them. And
Speaker 5: I'm really looking forward to Peter Dunn's budget reply speech
Speaker 5: because that is going to be his opportunity and if
Speaker 5: he misses that it's going.
Speaker 1: To be they will miss it. They will miss it.
Speaker 2: James, I wish I could share your faith that they won't.
Speaker 2: But you're in this opportunity for the simple reason. The
Speaker 2: single biggest, dopiest thing that the Liberals have done is
Speaker 2: to commit to staying in the Paris Agreement and committing
Speaker 2: to net zero.
Speaker 1: Because James is.
Speaker 2: One hundred percent right read there is one hundred percent correct.
Speaker 2: That is the thing that is destroying our economy. Being
Speaker 2: in net zero. Being in Paris about tariffs.
Speaker 6: Every single aspect.
Speaker 2: Of your life, of your business life, everything your family does,
Speaker 2: every holiday, every car you every time you get in
Speaker 2: the car, every time you go to the shops.
Speaker 1: You are being hit with a net zero tariff.
Speaker 2: It's a massive tariff on every single aspect of our lives.
Speaker 1: Subsidies are just tariffs.
Speaker 2: So the so don't faff around about worrying about a
Speaker 2: couple of steel and aluminium tarfs. We have self imposed
Speaker 2: on our own economy, massive net zero tariffs, which are
Speaker 2: driving our economy into the ground. Unless the Liberals come
Speaker 2: out and say we are pulling out of Paris, we're
Speaker 2: following Donald Trump's example. We're going to do what the
Speaker 2: entire industrialized world is doing. We're moving away from net
Speaker 2: zero and we're concentrating on cheap energy.
Speaker 1: That is the only way forward.
Speaker 3: Reta yes, and Peter Data needs to be bolder. He
Speaker 3: needs to stop being meek. He needs to find that
Speaker 3: voice mod show that he had where he was strong,
Speaker 3: where he was articulating the Yet okay, but he's not
Speaker 3: going to win an election on that. And the latest
Speaker 3: News poll shows that the gap between him and Anthony
Speaker 3: Albanesi has widened in Anthony Albanese's favor and I think
Speaker 3: that is a reflection of the fact that people still
Speaker 3: don't know precisely what his plan for this country is.
Speaker 3: And you mentioned Netzira. I think one of the reasons
Speaker 3: they are reluctant to pull out of Paris and say
Speaker 3: we're abandoning this destructive policy is because he is frightened
Speaker 3: of these Donald Trump comparisons. Instead of actually dismissing the
Speaker 3: media dismissing the activist class and treating them with a
Speaker 3: disdain they deserve. Like Donald Trump did and won in
Speaker 3: a landslide. The liberals in this country, at state and
Speaker 3: federal level are spooked by any sort of media backlash,
Speaker 3: by any sort of activist backlash, and that's why they
Speaker 3: will not come out. That's why they will match labor.
Speaker 3: And I think that's what we're going to see.
Speaker 1: Labor.
Speaker 3: We're going to go on a spending spree on this
Speaker 3: budget to try their buy their way back into power
Speaker 3: and to stay in power. And I think the Libs
Speaker 3: are going to match it because we're too frightened not to.
Speaker 4: And that is not the handso for a country.
Speaker 2: If that's the deeper James I wrote to my Spectator
Speaker 2: Australia editorial this week that Dutton must embrace Trump. Stop
Speaker 2: running away from Trump, stop being scared of Trump, Stop
Speaker 2: saying things like all you we're going to keep Kevin
Speaker 2: right in there. Embrace the Trump philosophy. Why can't the
Speaker 2: Libs understand that the blueprint is there for success all
Speaker 2: they have to do. Why isn't Why isn't Peter Dutton
Speaker 2: on a plane to Washington, sitting there in the Oval
Speaker 2: office with Donald Trump saying right, we're going to form
Speaker 2: a government that you're going to want to do business with.
Speaker 1: Why has Dutton not done that?
Speaker 5: James, Well, yeah, I mean there's so many things that
Speaker 5: he could be doing.
Speaker 6: And you're absolute right.
Speaker 5: The Kevin Rudd thing, by the way, I think we
Speaker 5: need to talk a bit more about that, because you know,
Speaker 5: having Kevin Rudd in that position. We said on this program,
Speaker 5: we have all been saying it for months and months
Speaker 5: and months since long before the election, that if Trump won,
Speaker 5: you know, keeping Kevin Rudd there would be untenable and
Speaker 5: that you know, there was no way that Rudd was
Speaker 5: going to be able to get along with with with
Speaker 5: with Donald Trump in the way.
Speaker 6: With anybody.
Speaker 5: I mean, yeah, I mean, you know, yeah exactly, you know,
Speaker 5: uh and so so you know, that would have been
Speaker 5: such an uneasy win right there for the Albanesi government
Speaker 5: too to do so, but they were too you know again,
Speaker 5: they too were too terrified to do anything that that
Speaker 5: would look like they were sort of you know, trying.
Speaker 6: To do business here.
Speaker 5: So I think also Albanese has been really very opportunistic
Speaker 5: on this whole issue of tariffs. I think we need
Speaker 5: to talk about that too, because you know, I think
Speaker 5: the way that he has played up the division over
Speaker 5: steel and alobinium tariffs here to create this sort of wedge,
Speaker 5: opportunistic wedge between Australia and the United States to try
Speaker 5: and make kid look like a tough leader for once,
Speaker 5: for once, you know, nearly three years of his government here.
Speaker 5: You know, I think that also needs to be called
Speaker 5: out for the nonsense, savage and it is.
Speaker 3: And you know what, these labor and green types should
Speaker 3: be absolutely thrilled.
Speaker 4: There's a tariff.
Speaker 3: This is a carbon tax of types. This is exactly
Speaker 3: what they want. This is a suddenly their fossil fuel
Speaker 3: enthusiasts and they want us to be reducing I mean,
Speaker 3: give us a break. I mean talk about mixed messaging here,
Speaker 3: and to pick a fire, to use this for some
Speaker 3: cheap politics domestically to appeal to the rusted on base
Speaker 3: who you know, this is his returning to his student
Speaker 3: politics days, Anthony alb and easy.
Speaker 4: I think this is actually weird.
Speaker 3: Is happiest fighting Tories, fighting Trump get stuffed.
Speaker 4: This isn't good for the country. At the end of
Speaker 4: the day.
Speaker 3: As Prime Minister, his number one priority is doing what's
Speaker 3: best for Australian and Australians, and that means you have
Speaker 3: to have a good relationship with America and have a
Speaker 3: appreciation of the reality of where we are in that relationship.
Speaker 3: The fact that Donald Trump won't even pick up the
Speaker 3: phone jath Andy Albernezer right now, let alone have a
Speaker 3: meeting speaks volumes this relationship.
Speaker 2: I say again, why this is Peter Dutton not on
Speaker 2: the phone to Donald Trump. There's plenty of opportunities that
Speaker 2: Peter Dutton could be speaking to Trump.
Speaker 1: They're forming that relationship.
Speaker 2: Why we had Susan Lay on the show before us
Speaker 2: say not refusing to commit. What what the Libs should
Speaker 2: be doing is saying we guarantee, we guarantee we will
Speaker 2: get rid of these tariffs on the strength I can't
Speaker 2: guarante they of course they can.
Speaker 1: Of course they can.
Speaker 2: If they were any good, they would make more engage
Speaker 2: it also because they would be on the phone, they
Speaker 2: would be there, they would be sorting it up.
Speaker 6: Well, it should be.
Speaker 2: The tariffs are irrelevant to to those you know Australia,
Speaker 2: it's what three percent of their aluminium, It's irrelevant.
Speaker 5: Well, the thing is too, is that what Peter Dutt
Speaker 5: should be doing and I would hope and I just
Speaker 5: say that I hope. I don't know whether they're doing
Speaker 5: it or not, but you would hope that the people
Speaker 5: in the dut In Tea are making and using connections
Speaker 5: between Australia and the Trump administration to start forging those
Speaker 5: relationships right now and to be sending those messages up
Speaker 5: the line.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, let's have a let's let's also talk about So
Speaker 2: here's a classic example. So Kirs Starmer, you know, the
Speaker 2: hard left British Prime minister has actually adopted Donald.
Speaker 1: Trump type policies.
Speaker 2: So they've scrapped the NHS England that's called it's called
Speaker 2: Project Chainsaw as the joking name they've given it. Starmer
Speaker 2: came away so impressed from meeting Donald Trump that he
Speaker 2: went back to his cabinet in Britain and said, hey,
Speaker 2: let's let's let's actually get rid of some of the
Speaker 2: bu roaucrats. Let's get little of the red tape that's
Speaker 2: strangling Britain. Can you believe it reads a hard left
Speaker 2: like Kirs Starmer copying Donald Trump. And here in Australia,
Speaker 2: apparently the Libs are terrified to say yes, we want
Speaker 2: to do what Trump's doing, That's what we want to do.
Speaker 3: I think I think that's a reflection of the almost
Speaker 3: uniformly awful US coverage we have in this country, where
Speaker 3: to this day, the Donald Trump coverage is so unhinged,
Speaker 3: so divorced from reality, ninety five percent of it, you know,
Speaker 3: other than you know, possibly this program James and I.
Speaker 3: It is just uniformly awful, ill informed, hyperbolic, just wrong
Speaker 3: on so many levels. And I think they look at
Speaker 3: that and say, you know that the public doesn't like
Speaker 3: Donald Trump. It would be a disaster for Dutton and
Speaker 3: Trump to be compared.
Speaker 4: That's not going to work for him.
Speaker 3: Instead of actually getting on the front foot and making
Speaker 3: the arguments, that's what you've.
Speaker 4: Got to do.
Speaker 3: You've got to you can't expect the media to do
Speaker 3: that for you if you're a conservative. As for Kirstar Mar,
Speaker 3: I've got a sa roh and he may be, you know,
Speaker 3: denouncing these sort of projects. I've got zero faith that
Speaker 3: UK Labor is going to actually cut the bureaucracy, cut costs,
Speaker 3: even if they have those intentions, because they make our
Speaker 3: lot look like they're you know.
Speaker 2: But my point is that even a hard lefty like
Speaker 2: kill Starmer is not afraid to say, actually, what Trump
Speaker 2: is doing in terms of reducing the cost of government
Speaker 2: and the red tape and the green tape is necessary
Speaker 2: to advance.
Speaker 5: There is the most calculating political animal. You simply we know.
Speaker 5: This is just like when you know he said, oh, well,
Speaker 5: we're going to make moves to cut migration, because of course,
Speaker 5: you know, his approval ratings were absolutely in the toilet,
Speaker 5: and he knows that he's got to at least see
Speaker 5: these things of what's stay in power. He will say
Speaker 5: anything and do anything to stay in power. He didn't
Speaker 5: leave any of this.
Speaker 1: Well you say that, but they have cut they have
Speaker 1: made moves against.
Speaker 4: Alf on the ground.
Speaker 3: It was only like what a week two weeks ago
Speaker 3: when he was pledging boots on the ground in Ukraine.
Speaker 4: And then literally in the.
Speaker 3: Next sentence he said, with us support she knew would
Speaker 3: never ever ever come under a Trumpet administration. But he
Speaker 3: got to say that line and get all the praise
Speaker 3: of the world's media as this great statesman, completely vacuous,
Speaker 3: completely intellectually bad.
Speaker 2: That's fine, But I want to hear Peter Dutton getting
Speaker 2: up there and embracing the Trump Revolution.
Speaker 1: Not running scared from it. That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 4: Guys, just don't run scared, full stop.
Speaker 3: This seems to be a feature of conservatives in this country,
Speaker 3: politicians who are from the center right. Where is the backbone,
Speaker 3: Where is the courage, Where is the conviction? We saw
Speaker 3: it during the Voice and they prevailed despite all the odds,
Speaker 3: despite the fact that the yescamp had all the institutional support,
Speaker 3: had all the money, had every celebrity sporting club, every bank,
Speaker 3: every bloody mining company.
Speaker 4: Except for Hancock Prospecting and a couple of others.
Speaker 3: Despite all that, they still lost. And yet here we
Speaker 3: are where they've running scared again. They've forgotten what just happened.
Speaker 6: Part of the problem.
Speaker 5: Part of the problem courses, you know, in you know,
Speaker 5: the parliamentary part, the party rooms in both the state
Speaker 5: and federal level. You know, you've got these massive factions
Speaker 5: of wet set of moderates too, that drag the policy
Speaker 5: of the liberals to the left. So you know, the
Speaker 5: base doesn't get a look in so often. You know,
Speaker 5: we see this in New South Wales, and leadership comes
Speaker 5: from the top.
Speaker 2: If the leader of the Liberality was there embracing Trump
Speaker 2: firmly rather than kind of seeing a bit gun shy
Speaker 2: on the topic. That would make a huge difference. But
Speaker 2: let's talk also, James, you've written about you know this,
Speaker 2: the native title thing that suddenly exploded. Where is Dutton
Speaker 2: on this? Dutton was so good on the voice, your
Speaker 2: senses so great, Senators, you sent an amagimate price. We
Speaker 2: now find out that compensation has been given pretty much
Speaker 2: according to this new court ruling to basically anybody who
Speaker 2: did anything at any point in a colonial history can
Speaker 2: can grab some compose.
Speaker 6: A couple of caveats on it.
Speaker 5: It applies at this point only to the Northern Territory
Speaker 5: and ACTI Commonwealth territories. But the precedent that this case
Speaker 5: here says, this is the unipingu case, and it has
Speaker 5: potentially huge financial implications because it means that now native
Speaker 5: title is a monetizable thing that you can get compensation for.
Speaker 6: So if you have a native.
Speaker 5: Title claim, then suddenly the government or whoever had it
Speaker 5: before can be on the hook for the.
Speaker 6: Value of that.
Speaker 5: We could be talking about billions and billions of dollars here.
Speaker 5: It's a very dangerous piece of judicial activism here, and
Speaker 5: I don't think it's gone anywhere near enough attention in
Speaker 5: the media because the implications this has for our extractive
Speaker 5: industries and so many others, and for the government bottom
Speaker 5: line overall, if these courts start to rule in this
Speaker 5: direction could be devastating.
Speaker 2: Well, also, it's something that's been brought up I think
Speaker 2: one nation and tried to bring it up in the.
Speaker 1: Past, which is put a cap on native title.
Speaker 2: Let's it just say right, that's it done, dusted, next
Speaker 2: June or whatever it is, that's it no more. It's
Speaker 2: all over and done with by then. And the Liberal Party,
Speaker 2: the Coalition should be coming forward. Yes, they've been pantat.
Speaker 2: They would great on the voys, they've been fantastic saying
Speaker 2: we only want one flag, we don't want the other
Speaker 2: aboriginal flags at every single meeting, et cetera. Allth of
Speaker 2: that's great, and just sent a nampajimper price looking into
Speaker 2: dose like the excessive spending across governments, with particular reference
Speaker 2: to the extraordinary spending we'd put into indigenous affairs without
Speaker 2: any tangible results. But let's have the coalition come out
Speaker 2: much stronger on something like this and say we're going
Speaker 2: to put a cap on native title. That's it no
Speaker 2: more because it is getting out of control.
Speaker 1: We've also deportation is another thing where the Coalition could
Speaker 1: be standing up.
Speaker 2: Peter Dutton has kind of said, oh yeah, we might
Speaker 2: have a referendum on deeportation of anti Semitic group, which
Speaker 2: is great, but go further, go further, do what Trump
Speaker 2: is doing in America where he's saying this.
Speaker 1: Muhammad Mahmoud Khalil Khay he's out.
Speaker 2: He was pushing anti Semitic protests and that at Columbia
Speaker 2: University he's out.
Speaker 6: Goodbye.
Speaker 4: I just think that this is the.
Speaker 5: Thing you can just you can just do things. You
Speaker 5: don't need to say, oh we're going to have referendum,
Speaker 5: you can just do me.
Speaker 3: An utterly mad possibly the craziest thing I've heard all month,
Speaker 3: and it's been a big month already. To have a
Speaker 3: referendum on that, really, I think even just the notion
Speaker 3: of a referendum will appall the overwhelming majority of Australians
Speaker 3: who have just gone through the divisive voice referendum that
Speaker 3: they never asked for. There was Alban easy forced upon them.
Speaker 3: And then to have a referendum on this, I think
Speaker 3: it is an utterly mad idea. And whoever told Peter
Speaker 3: Dutch to run with this should be sacked immediately.
Speaker 2: Probably the same probably the same person he said during
Speaker 2: the voice. Oh, if you know, we'll have referendums every state.
Speaker 2: Can we remember that nose?
Speaker 1: Can we remember just.
Speaker 4: Before that came to a position.
Speaker 5: Let's just just that everybody who might not be across
Speaker 5: what this Mohammad Khalil situation is. Muhammad Khalil was a
Speaker 5: spokesman and a big organizer of the anti Semitic protests
Speaker 5: at Columbia University Oliver Palestine. Now, these protests were not
Speaker 5: just about oh, free Palestine, oh civilian casiaries. These protests
Speaker 5: that went on in Columbia, they involved huge amounts of
Speaker 5: property damage. They involved occupation of the campus Jewish students.
Speaker 5: Jewish students had to barricade themselves in libraries and in
Speaker 5: classrooms to prevent themselves from getting attacked by these mobs.
Speaker 5: These these protests called for bringing the INTI fought a
Speaker 5: Home i e. Violent terrorism to the United States. Khalil
Speaker 5: was on a green card. He has been arrested and
Speaker 5: he is booted from the country. Good, There's been many more.
Speaker 5: And you know John Howard here in this country. He
Speaker 5: set the formula for Austrae and migration. And when you
Speaker 5: are coming into this country, we decide who comes here.
Speaker 5: And you know what, if you are somebody who's going
Speaker 5: to come here and you are going to you know,
Speaker 5: free speech is one thing, but this was well beyond
Speaker 5: free speech, well beyond free speech. And if you're going
Speaker 5: to come here and you're going to act like this,
Speaker 5: then you know what, you are not good for the country,
Speaker 5: you're not good for the community, and you are quite
Speaker 5: welcome to get back on a plane. And if you
Speaker 5: don't want to get on a plane, we will take
Speaker 5: you and put you on that plane. It's a very
Speaker 5: simple thing. And I don't know why there isn't just
Speaker 5: total moral clarity on this issue.
Speaker 1: Absolutely issue that's got nothing to do with that, but it.
Speaker 5: Is because we have these same protesters here who are
Speaker 5: we do at our universities who occupied campuses, who are
Speaker 5: from other countries and booted out.
Speaker 4: Were not citizens.
Speaker 3: And you don't need to have a referendum on this
Speaker 3: issue that is existing at provisions.
Speaker 6: Thank you, That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: And it's incredible with the case you just describe that
Speaker 3: the Democrats who have just become trying to make themselves
Speaker 3: even more unelectable. They are absolutely standing with this Islamist
Speaker 3: in saying you shouldn't be deported. This is an act
Speaker 3: of fascism. And some of the language coming from some
Speaker 3: Democrats is absolutely astonishing and they're doubling down in that
Speaker 3: support and it is just hugely unpopular. But yeah, that's
Speaker 3: the Democrats for you, and for the Coalition to be
Speaker 3: flirting with another referendum.
Speaker 4: I don't care how righteous the idea is.
Speaker 2: So the message there is Coalition viewers, coalition watchers, coalition
Speaker 2: advisors are out there. Please you've got an election coming up.
Speaker 2: Can we please have some voice, like strong policies from
Speaker 2: your leader Peter Dutton going into this election. That's what
Speaker 2: the voters of Australia want. And you can win in
Speaker 2: a landslide if you do. After the break Reader's Reality Innity, you're.
Speaker 3: Watching Outsiders with your host Rowan rambunctious stem names prodigal
Speaker 3: Son Morrow and I'm Rita Panaghy and soon we'll be
Speaker 3: looking into us some of the modern lefts collectively losing
Speaker 3: their tenuous grip on reality. But first this week you
Speaker 3: would have seen headlines and extensive coverage on a silly
Speaker 3: American girl who became among the most hated people in
Speaker 3: Australia after posting this footage of herself man handling a
Speaker 3: baby wombat.
Speaker 6: Look at the mother. It's like, oh, cha'ts it after?
Speaker 4: Okay, mama's right there and she's pissed.
Speaker 3: Let's let them go, all right, social media influencer Sam
Speaker 3: Jones their Joey in front of the cameras. I've got
Speaker 3: to say watching that, as an animal lover, I was
Speaker 3: absolutely disgusted. You can see the animal's distressed mother following her,
Speaker 3: and no wonder Australians were furious and demanding this girl
Speaker 3: be deported, and as I wrote in their Old Son,
Speaker 3: those calls for deportation were numerous.
Speaker 4: And entirely valid. Begone woman, and she is.
Speaker 3: But the only thing that could be said in her
Speaker 3: favor is that there was no malice in her actions.
Speaker 4: She's stupid, not cruel.
Speaker 3: She wasn't some sociopath getting a thrill from terrifying a
Speaker 3: helpless animal, and the Joey and its mother were soon
Speaker 3: reunited unharmed. It was a very different story a few
Speaker 3: years ago, when footage of a South Australian police officer
Speaker 3: whyalon John Cowx doning a terrified one back to death
Speaker 3: by hurling large rocks at it went viral. That seconing
Speaker 3: footage was enough to have the officer come under police attention.
Speaker 4: You think it'd be sacked and I.
Speaker 3: Don't know, charged in prison for such splatant animal cruelty.
Speaker 3: But no, that's not what happened, and I'll explain why
Speaker 3: shortly now. The video of that killing is too distressing
Speaker 3: naturally to show you here. But in the footage, the
Speaker 3: off duty police officer throws rock after rock, hitting the
Speaker 3: helpless animal and causing it to topple over. He then
Speaker 3: raises his arms in triumph and smiles at the camera
Speaker 3: as the animal struggles on the ground. It really was,
Speaker 3: in my mind, unspeakably cruel. But despite the entire incident
Speaker 3: being on camera, the footage going viral, and authority is
Speaker 3: assuring us there that they would act, well, nothing happened
Speaker 3: to the officer because it emerged that he is indigenous
Speaker 3: and his behavior is protected.
Speaker 4: Yes, he escaped any sort.
Speaker 3: Of punishment because the heinous behavior I just described is
Speaker 3: protected under the Native Title Act. You see, under this act,
Speaker 3: indigenous Australians are permitted to hunt species that are otherwise protected,
Speaker 3: and that includes using methods that can be disturbingly cruel.
Speaker 3: That is what allowed the wombat killer to dodge charges.
Speaker 3: The South Australian Police Commissioner Grant Stevens released a statement
Speaker 3: at the time explaining why officer John Cock wouldn't be
Speaker 3: charged or face disciplinary action beyond being counseled over his use.
Speaker 4: Of social media.
Speaker 3: Seriously, the Commissioner Grant said, as a traditional Aboriginal man,
Speaker 3: the senior Community Constable has an appropriate permit to hunt
Speaker 3: wombats for food, even if you believe the wombat was
Speaker 3: killed to be eaten. It's shameful that we have a
Speaker 3: legal system with two sets of rules depending on one's
Speaker 3: skin color or ethnicity. Wombats are not the only protected
Speaker 3: species that are killed in this The unchecked, unmonitored cruelty
Speaker 3: of traditional hunting results in protected jw goongs and even
Speaker 3: endangered endangered sea turtles being routinely slaughtered on Australian shores.
Speaker 3: It's wrong, it's a national disgrace and it has to stop.
Speaker 3: Peter Dutton should tackle this issue head on. If we've
Speaker 3: learnt anything this week is that Australians feel very strongly
Speaker 3: about animal cruelty.
Speaker 4: It is an.
Speaker 3: Issue that crosses political lines and it's time our laws
Speaker 3: were consistent. The Native Title Act must be changed to
Speaker 3: reflect modern Australian values.
Speaker 1: Great stuff, Thanks Riza well joining us.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 2: Can you believe it's five years since the whole COVID
Speaker 2: nightmare began? This coming Tuesday, March eighteenth, that's when they're
Speaker 2: all all the nightmare began. Tony Nikolich was one of
Speaker 2: the great fighters against the insanity of COVID. Throughout those
Speaker 2: horrible years. He was often here on Outsiders. I'm proud
Speaker 2: to say where we supported him and he supported so
Speaker 2: many people out there who were struggling to get some
Speaker 2: kind of justice during the insane COVID nonsense.
Speaker 1: Well, this week the Human Rights.
Speaker 2: Commission, who were completely absent, totally silent, and he may
Speaker 2: as well have not existed during the entire COVID period.
Speaker 2: Now five years later, have gone, oh, oh, hang on, oh,
Speaker 2: we've released a report. Oh we've found that Australians from
Speaker 2: all walks of life were adversely affected. You don't say so,
Speaker 2: Human Rights Commission, well spotted, great job.
Speaker 1: I don't know you get an F plus for effort.
Speaker 1: I guess Tony Nicholae.
Speaker 2: Great to see you again. As always, you did such
Speaker 2: an amazing job. So many people owe you so much
Speaker 2: for how you stood up fought throughout the law, the
Speaker 2: legal system to help people who'd been lost there jobs
Speaker 2: and COVID mandate's vaccine.
Speaker 1: Man, that's all of that hell is stuff. What do
Speaker 1: you make of the.
Speaker 2: Australian Human Rights Commission five years? I go, oh, maybe
Speaker 2: maybe some human rights were trampled on during this period.
Speaker 8: Well, so thanks.
Speaker 9: For having me on and it's a lovely day today.
Speaker 10: But the way I see it is you're absolutely correct.
Speaker 10: It's very little too late. Unfortunately, it's a case of
Speaker 10: fixing your bayonets charging out of the trench when the
Speaker 10: guns on the West and Front have already fallen silent.
Speaker 1: I love it.
Speaker 10: And in that sense, I think you're absolutely right. We
Speaker 10: have been fighting this from the start. Give you an
Speaker 10: indication it's still going on. Okay, these legal challenges. I'm
Speaker 10: still in court for employment relations. You know, we have
Speaker 10: police officers who were subjected to know Section one D
Speaker 10: notices that are really reserved for police officers engaging in
Speaker 10: serious misconduct and corruption. We have Airlines staff who have
Speaker 10: been terminated. It's a tragedy to think that, you know,
Speaker 10: five years on and we were as you know, we're
Speaker 10: on your show how many times and in the media.
Speaker 10: I've done many submissions. You can go to my website
Speaker 10: and you'll see further submissions both in many inquiries. The
Speaker 10: way I see it is truth is knowledge held backed
Speaker 10: by power, and we're starting to see this salami slicing
Speaker 10: of truth. But that was brought forward in cases as
Speaker 10: evidence as scientific knowledge.
Speaker 9: Follow the science. Well we followed the science. They didn't
Speaker 9: follow the science.
Speaker 3: And yet we've still got a majority of Australians backing
Speaker 3: some of these policies.
Speaker 4: This was disturbing.
Speaker 3: It wasn't just authorities letting us down, but our fellow
Speaker 3: citizens being such mindless sheep.
Speaker 4: And there was a poll out just this week.
Speaker 3: Fifty seven percent i think was the figure of Australians
Speaker 3: still back COVID vaccine mandates.
Speaker 4: That that was the headline. How this this.
Speaker 3: Is going to impact a generation two of Australians and
Speaker 3: how we see ourselves, how the rest of the world
Speaker 3: sees us too well.
Speaker 9: Absolutely correct.
Speaker 10: If you look at the fifty seven percent Let's put
Speaker 10: that into one slight little context here, and that is
Speaker 10: this is some of the largest criticisms we've faced over
Speaker 10: the last five years has been censorship, and not just doctors, lawyers,
Speaker 10: but many journalists and I know journalists who have been
Speaker 10: calling my phones over the last five years, sant TONI.
Speaker 10: We desperately want to get this out, but our network
Speaker 10: editors aren't letting us do it. So and that was
Speaker 10: something where we've even seen a forensic pathology report of
Speaker 10: a fifty two year old chap that said they died
Speaker 10: of COVID as a cause of sorry, a cause of
Speaker 10: the fires, a vaccine that was suppressed, and the ABC
Speaker 10: came out and actually gas lip the family who had
Speaker 10: been fully vaccinated and their young sixteen year old son
Speaker 10: was doing CPR and his father on the kitchen flool.
Speaker 10: So what we're saying is the censorship. So that's that
Speaker 10: fifty seven percent rat that you're talking about was the
Speaker 10: result of a fully censored society where posts were being
Speaker 10: pulled down.
Speaker 9: Take that away, and that fifty.
Speaker 10: Seven percent, dear, I say, could come down to about
Speaker 10: seven percent because if people.
Speaker 1: Really I think that's a great point. I think that's
Speaker 1: a great point, James.
Speaker 6: Well, I don't know.
Speaker 5: I mean, I wonder about that, because people embraced the
Speaker 5: fear message very quickly before we even you know, knew
Speaker 5: what we were grappling with. There was a great deal
Speaker 5: of enthusiasm for social distant restriction, wanting to be seen
Speaker 5: to do the right thing, and there was a huge
Speaker 5: sort of effort around that. But so much of that too,
Speaker 5: we also now know was driven from overseas, and we
Speaker 5: know it was driven by the Biden White House and
Speaker 5: by you know, various organizations in the United States which
Speaker 5: outwardly censored Twitter, all of these you know, social media
Speaker 5: platforms and said things. It's like, you know, you can't
Speaker 5: talk about where the virus came from. Are you concerned
Speaker 5: about that official censorship of the question of where it
Speaker 5: came from? And how that completely changed the nature of
Speaker 5: our response?
Speaker 10: Oh, absolutely, the nature of its origins. So we had
Speaker 10: the Proximal Origins paper and that had a number of authors.
Speaker 10: Fauci even had University of Sydney professors who.
Speaker 9: Are on that.
Speaker 10: I've done a number of foiis of which they're declining,
Speaker 10: but I believe Shari Marksan's all over that one now,
Speaker 10: which is a really good thing.
Speaker 9: But what we were really quick to lock down.
Speaker 10: We were really quick to mandate people based on that
Speaker 10: international knowledge.
Speaker 9: But when it came.
Speaker 10: To that knowledge being forced through what was happening here
Speaker 10: with respect to cases and subpoenas well, we knew it
Speaker 10: didn't stop transmission, We knew it didn't confer immunity, it
Speaker 10: didn't stop the hospitalizations, and it certainly didn't stop the deaths.
Speaker 11: So what was all this about?
Speaker 10: So the proximal origins, we had these lockdowns stating the economy.
Speaker 10: Look at Victoria, it is absolutely devastated. Businesses have been closed, Sydney,
Speaker 10: businesses closed all around the country. We had people being
Speaker 10: denied access to their loved ones. But now the Human
Speaker 10: Rights Commission wants to come out, so we'll hang on
Speaker 10: a second.
Speaker 9: There was something wrong? Well yeah, hello, absolutely.
Speaker 2: And Tony, Tony, I want to focus in on that
Speaker 2: point because the Human Rights Commission have come up and
Speaker 2: said with this report, I suppose it's better than no report,
Speaker 2: but anyway, have come out and said, oh, you know,
Speaker 2: we've got to do better next time. We've got to
Speaker 2: have better plans in place. But the reality is, Tony,
Speaker 2: and you're fully aware of this. We had perfect plans
Speaker 2: in place, Tony Abbott's plans. They were discarded in this
Speaker 2: crazy panic. No one's ever got to the bottom of it.
Speaker 2: I've been calling for, and I know you have too,
Speaker 2: a Royal commission into the abuse of power during COVID
Speaker 2: because so many individuals at so many levels, in my
Speaker 2: opinion of government, of the bureaucracies, health, buaucrasies and that
Speaker 2: have so much to ask for the pain and the
Speaker 2: suffering they put through every day, put every day Australian
Speaker 2: through Tony, tell us what you know, what can we
Speaker 2: do to ensure this never happens again? And also, Tony,
Speaker 2: how are the people still suffering that you're still supporting?
Speaker 1: Tell us about a couple of those all right.
Speaker 10: Well, firstly, with respect the latter point, we have many, many,
Speaker 10: many injured people and some deceased reports. So we have
Speaker 10: deceased people within twenty four hours of receiving the vaccine,
Speaker 10: previously healthy firefighter for instance, okay, a rural firefighter. We
Speaker 10: have a fifty two year old gentleman seven days after
Speaker 10: the deceased. Forensic pathology report was then denied by administrative
Speaker 10: officers in the TGA as the cause I would have
Speaker 10: thought a coroner had a little bit more sway than
Speaker 10: an administrative person. In the TGA, we have people with
Speaker 10: debilitate and I mean they can't walk. This is I
Speaker 10: cannot see how this level of compassion that we used
Speaker 10: to have as a country has gone. We have people
Speaker 10: who are literally bedridden their body shape, they're in wheelchairs.
Speaker 10: Where has our compassion gone? Irrespective of whether someone took
Speaker 10: a vaccine or no vaccine, we have descended into this
Speaker 10: mindless biss of It is absolutely morally ethically and legally bankrupt,
Speaker 10: almost in the sense that we've left these people languishing
Speaker 10: and we're saying, well, it's got nothing to do.
Speaker 9: Well, yes it does. It absolutely does.
Speaker 10: If you recall, all we had to do was get
Speaker 10: a PCR test and you are confirmed diagnosed. But here
Speaker 10: are people coming up with tests and they're almost putting
Speaker 10: a criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt to prove they've
Speaker 10: been injured. This is not rule of law, this is
Speaker 10: not justice, not procedural fairness, and it's definitely not.
Speaker 9: A compassionate society.
Speaker 10: We have absolutely deviated from that, and to that end,
Speaker 10: I think that we really need to bring it back.
Speaker 9: Yes, we do need an inquiry. And I will tell
Speaker 9: you one thing.
Speaker 10: We're finding that there are people who sitting on government
Speaker 10: agencies over here who were also sitting on large let's
Speaker 10: call them advisory firms who also do business with government
Speaker 10: to understand what's happening in the COVID sphere.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think frightening absolutely those links just very quickly.
Speaker 1: Jans.
Speaker 5: I was just going to say, tell you, you know, one
Speaker 5: of the things that always struck me during the pandemic
Speaker 5: in those first months was we saw how bankrupt the
Speaker 5: whole thing was, the.
Speaker 6: Whole region was.
Speaker 5: When you know, we were told we couldn't go and
Speaker 5: visit each other at home, but then they allowed a
Speaker 5: BLM protest on the streets of Sydney. I mean, we
Speaker 5: knew that this was a political thing so early on,
Speaker 5: and that you know, it wasn't really about distancing, it
Speaker 5: was about control. Oh.
Speaker 10: Absolutely, iran an urgent injunction early on. It was dismissed,
Speaker 10: but the injunction was to allow the Jewish community to
Speaker 10: come out and blow you know, the shahafa during Russia Shana,
Speaker 10: and there was also Christians and Jewish coming up because
Speaker 10: what we found in some of the information that we
Speaker 10: were getting back from the Beverergiclian government was that you
Speaker 10: could go to Bunnings, you could go to an alcohol shop,
Speaker 10: and you could go to a brothel, but you couldn't
Speaker 10: go to church.
Speaker 1: You couldn't even send.
Speaker 10: A car and hear your sermon over a radio with
Speaker 10: a car park distance between you. This is where I
Speaker 10: was saying, our society really needs to have a really good,
Speaker 10: hard look at itself. And I really think the Christian
Speaker 10: and Jewish community for standing up because a week or
Speaker 10: two later Gladys purergically and had so much pressure on
Speaker 10: her hands that she had to open up. But I
Speaker 10: will say one thing if I can, on the only
Speaker 10: issue of Tony Habit. Yes, he's been quite outspoken, and
Speaker 10: good on him. He's come out, he's having a go.
Speaker 10: He's telling us the way we should be looking at
Speaker 10: this in the future.
Speaker 9: There is a lot of work to be done.
Speaker 10: We do need an unbiased and unfettered inquiry. And what
Speaker 10: you want, you don't want, you know, all these other
Speaker 10: people that were there cheerleading with their pomp poms, you know,
Speaker 10: saying go you go you. We want people who are
Speaker 10: really going to critically analyze this and who have been
Speaker 10: on the ground from day one.
Speaker 1: Well turn the nick. You've been an absolute legend.
Speaker 6: I know.
Speaker 2: I hear from so many people how hard you have
Speaker 2: worked on their behalf and so on behalf of all
Speaker 2: of those people. Thank you for your sterling efforts, Tony,
Speaker 2: and keep up the great work because it's not over yet.
Speaker 2: And thanks for coming on Outsiders, and we'll speak to
Speaker 2: again to you soon.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much, Tony. Coming up after the break your
Speaker 1: favorite net Zany.
Speaker 2: Left you learn to see wacademia so much more Outsiders. Yes,
Speaker 2: you're watching Outsiders, and thank you so much for watching
Speaker 2: us every Sunday morning.
Speaker 1: We certainly do appreciate your company. Well, net Zany. The
Speaker 1: insane world of.
Speaker 2: Net zero policies which just gets madder and crazier and stupider.
Speaker 2: And the hypocrisy, the hypocrisy is off the charts when
Speaker 2: it comes to anything to do with net zero. Rita
Speaker 2: tell us about Mike canon Brooks.
Speaker 3: This is possibly the best story you'll hear all week,
Speaker 3: all year, the decade. It is you talk about hypocrisy.
Speaker 3: This is weapon grade hypocrisy. This is incredible, This climate
Speaker 3: change fanatic buying a private jet because obviously you know,
Speaker 3: flying first class is.
Speaker 4: Not what I love most.
Speaker 3: Is he talks about this deep internal conflict he had
Speaker 3: before he made the decision.
Speaker 4: But really this is a selfless decision.
Speaker 3: We should be praising Mike cannon Brooks because let me
Speaker 3: read you the rationalization, and this is this is beautiful stuff,
Speaker 3: because really he's brought himself a private jet to save
Speaker 3: the environment. Of course, we all have je environment, he says,
Speaker 3: It probably comes as no surprise. I have an extremely
Speaker 3: rigorous carbon regime for all my flying, including using direct
Speaker 3: air capture and sustainable fuels for the carbon and contrass
Speaker 3: to far exceed my flight footprint. These options aren't practical
Speaker 3: for commercial flights, but they're viable privately. This means my
Speaker 3: flights actually have a net negative.
Speaker 6: I think climate hero.
Speaker 1: Give the man a metal. He's saving that planet. Two
Speaker 1: man saving private jet at the time.
Speaker 2: If we all had a private jet, we'd all be
Speaker 2: able to save the planet.
Speaker 1: And ritatically, I want.
Speaker 2: A private jets Sky Sky can someone at Sky by
Speaker 2: the three of us private jets and will help save
Speaker 2: the planet with our carbon capture.
Speaker 1: And it gets better because, of course.
Speaker 2: Mike cannon Brooks can now fly down to the Formula One.
Speaker 1: In his private jets to that. I don't know.
Speaker 4: Williams team, is it?
Speaker 1: James?
Speaker 5: James tell us about it like wow, I said, this
Speaker 5: is this is this is amazing to be here. So
Speaker 5: of course this weekend we've got the marvelous F one
Speaker 5: down in Melbourne, a wonderful event. But yes, he's sponsoring
Speaker 5: a team of this motorsport. Now are these Rita? You
Speaker 5: know we've both been to the F one? Are they
Speaker 5: when when you see the cars go around, they're kind
Speaker 5: of making a noise that sounds like it's a petrol
Speaker 5: legend And then you know that's before we get to
Speaker 5: the supercars and the porches and everything else that run
Speaker 5: around all the day. But yeah, he's got an F
Speaker 5: one team here. So let me get this straight.
Speaker 6: readA.
Speaker 5: You've got Mike cannon Brooks here, the technology billionaire who
Speaker 5: goes on about the climate. He's sponsoring. He's our own
Speaker 5: Gretath Thundberg. He's got very similar hair to Gretath Thundberg,
Speaker 5: and he's got and he's going down to Melbourne for
Speaker 5: the F one, which is a motorsport. He's going on
Speaker 5: a private jet to save the planet. Of course, because
Speaker 5: you get And it is also important to note, though
Speaker 5: it is in absolute fairness to make canned Brooks, it
Speaker 5: is very hard to find any commercial air service between
Speaker 5: busy air corridors in the world. And of course there's
Speaker 5: also by canded Brooks whose actual physical land footprint of
Speaker 5: his holdings and so on are absolutely.
Speaker 4: Having point Piper, Now, well, I think you actually.
Speaker 5: Brought two and knock them together memory service save the planet,
Speaker 5: because then it reduces your footprint because you've just got
Speaker 5: one property spread over to things.
Speaker 1: So you see, I think he's doing it all to
Speaker 1: save the planet.
Speaker 5: I feel like the temperature are you guys feeling the
Speaker 5: temperature drop already?
Speaker 2: The thing is when he's not there, and when he's
Speaker 2: not busy saving the planet with his private jet, he's
Speaker 2: he has these wonderful plans to cover vast acreage miles
Speaker 2: of the Northern Territory with solar panels, and.
Speaker 5: Ye can read before we get to the great hydrogen
Speaker 5: you know, I always found this project that he had
Speaker 5: to put all these solar panels in the Northern Territory
Speaker 5: and then run a great, big extension court the longest
Speaker 5: successive corner you've ever founded. Buddings All the way to Singapore.
Speaker 5: And of course you know, well this is the idea. Now,
Speaker 5: So here's the crazy idea about this here if you
Speaker 5: think about the way the earth turns right, So just
Speaker 5: as all the Singaporeans are getting home from work and
Speaker 5: turning on their lives and want to run their air
Speaker 5: conditioners because you need your air conditioner in Singapore, it's
Speaker 5: getting dark in the northern territory. So this is I mean,
Speaker 5: this wouldn't be a year six science project.
Speaker 4: Look that this man is a billionaire, and.
Speaker 3: I think if we must bow out to hillionaire if
Speaker 3: we've learned anything, kids, if you're listening, anyone could be
Speaker 3: a billionaire, don't that. You know what, if you're getting
Speaker 3: marks that really aren't what your parents want, if you're
Speaker 3: sort of you know, not coming up with the ideas,
Speaker 3: you've got an ambish you can still make it because
Speaker 3: if you've got someone with this sort of rationalization, with
Speaker 3: these sort of ideas, brilliant and it has got more
Speaker 3: money than anyone could ever need. So maybe this just
Speaker 3: shows what a greatest country Australia is.
Speaker 1: This is the opportunity.
Speaker 2: Well, also, the only way that he can save the
Speaker 2: planet is by flying that jet because it's no good.
Speaker 1: The carbon capture doesn't work if it's sitting on the runway.
Speaker 6: No no, no, no, no, no, no.
Speaker 5: You've got you've got to fly, fly somewhere.
Speaker 6: I recommend it.
Speaker 1: Something I was thinking.
Speaker 4: An empty around the world.
Speaker 2: Might just no, no, no, I think Mike hop on
Speaker 2: a plane to Los Angeles. Well, because the billionaires there
Speaker 2: have discovered that the volatile organic compounds released into the
Speaker 2: air while cooking food contributes to potentially.
Speaker 1: Harmful O zone poll pollution.
Speaker 2: This is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration research to
Speaker 2: stop this is.
Speaker 1: Cooking is frying the planet.
Speaker 2: So it's not global boiling, like Anthony Gueterra says, it's
Speaker 2: global cooking.
Speaker 1: Of global cooking has no.
Speaker 6: Rowing row ro rod. This is this is beyond that.
Speaker 5: This is so so basically all of your cooking smells
Speaker 5: in your kitchen. You know, first they were coming for
Speaker 5: the gas stove. They were saying, oh, the gas stove,
Speaker 5: it's you know, the emissions of that. That's you've got
Speaker 5: to use this electric you know, induction thing which you
Speaker 5: can't steak on because they're terrible. You know, you're we're
Speaker 5: gonna make you do that because you can't have gas.
Speaker 5: Oh no, no, the Stak spells too good already. So
Speaker 5: that's actually what's killing the planet. So it's not Antonio
Speaker 5: good Terrace here, it is Klaus. But he is saying,
Speaker 5: is you've been eat the buns?
Speaker 6: Would you've been?
Speaker 5: Eat them rare buns?
Speaker 6: I've got a plan. I'm going to plan.
Speaker 2: What Mike cannon Brooks could do is do the cooking
Speaker 2: on his plane, on his private jets the gallery around
Speaker 2: the well, doing all the cooking on his private jets,
Speaker 2: land down, feed all the billionaires who can't cook in
Speaker 2: Aldus committee. There you get here, Mike canon Brooks, you're
Speaker 2: under all winner, their mate.
Speaker 1: Go for it, saving the planet.
Speaker 2: We can all breathe easily thanks to Mike canon Brooks.
Speaker 1: We're gonna take a short break.
Speaker 2: But when we come back, but just before we do,
Speaker 2: have a quick look at this. Sorry, just guys, just
Speaker 2: have a quick look at this little grad I wanted
Speaker 2: of the pandemic. This is I wanted to play this
Speaker 2: during Tony Nikolic. This is just to remind us how
Speaker 2: the during the pandemic, all the mask wearing.
Speaker 1: Was such a bit of theater. Have a look at it.
Speaker 12: Have a look.
Speaker 2: Hello, You're watching Outsiders with Rita Persian Princess Panahee, James
Speaker 2: Manhattan born and bred Morrow, and myself Rowan, Ossie, Larak
Speaker 2: and Dean.
Speaker 1: One of the great boasts of Australia is.
Speaker 2: That we are the world's most successful multi cultural melting pot,
Speaker 2: attracting ethnicities and cultures from all across the world to
Speaker 2: live together in peace and harmony under our beautiful Southern skies.
Speaker 2: Yet yesterday our Labor Prime Minister Anthony in Albanize, he
Speaker 2: felt compelled to release this letter to the Australian people,
Speaker 2: headlined International Day to Combat Islamophobia, in which he commits
Speaker 2: Australians to standing firm against any expression or act of
Speaker 2: hatred or hostility towards the Muslim community, which is presumably
Speaker 2: the current definition of Islamophobia. Mister Albanesi then feels compelled
Speaker 2: to reference the horrible New Zealand Mosque shootings of several
Speaker 2: years ago, in which fifty one people were horrifically killed,
Speaker 2: before going on to praise the Muslim community in Australia
Speaker 2: for their contribution to our country, and finally he urges
Speaker 2: all Australians to celebrate our diversity and our inclusive spirit, which,
Speaker 2: let's be honest, is all a little bit vague. Christ
Speaker 2: Church shootings were horrific and yes, committed by a lunatic Aussie,
Speaker 2: but it was in New Zealand and was quite a
Speaker 2: while ago, not Australia.
Speaker 1: But the letter does kind of lead one wondering what.
Speaker 2: Is it precisely that mister Albanizi wants every day Australians
Speaker 2: to combat, Or to put it more literally, what does
Speaker 2: combating Islamophobia actually entail? Where do every day Australians draw
Speaker 2: the magical line between legitimate criticism and aspects of political Islam,
Speaker 2: for example, criticizing Katari money being used within Western universities
Speaker 2: to fund pro Palestinian protests, or legitimate criticism of aspects
Speaker 2: of cultural Islam for example, he ant racism culture that
Speaker 2: fueled the covering up of the horrific rep gangs of Rotherham,
Speaker 2: or the ongoing debate in the UK about marrying cousins,
Speaker 2: or even dare one say it, legitimate criticisms of aspects
Speaker 2: of the religion of Islam thank God. For example, the
Speaker 2: late great cartoonist Bill Leak woke up to find a
Speaker 2: fat wire on his head for a cartoon he'd done
Speaker 2: depicting the prophet Muhammad. Seeing as this combating Islamophobia letter
Speaker 2: was put out by the Prime Minister, let's simply focus
Speaker 2: on the political aspects of Islam and leave aside the
Speaker 2: cultural and religious, although of course they do all overlap.
Speaker 2: What criticism of political Islam should we avoid for fear
Speaker 2: of being labeled islamophobic? Is it legitimate and important political
Speaker 2: free speech to point out, for instance, as this person
Speaker 2: did on x that the head of the UK Justice System,
Speaker 2: the newly appointed head of the UK Office for Standards
Speaker 2: in Education, and the Mayors of London and the Mayor
Speaker 2: of Brighton are all avowed and practicing Muslims. Or is
Speaker 2: pointing this fact out an example of Islamophobia? Perhaps the
Speaker 2: Prime Minister could enlighten us. In the case of Hamid Patel,
Speaker 2: the new chairman of OFFSTED, that's the standards of education
Speaker 2: in England. There were many astonished tweets when that was
Speaker 2: announced this week, one of the politer ones of which stated,
Speaker 2: everything that British children learn in schools from now on will.
Speaker 1: Go through this man. Just wow? Is that islamophobic?
Speaker 2: Or is it islamophobic to show this clip of British
Speaker 2: protests against high levels of mainly Muslim immigration a legitimate
Speaker 2: political story, or is showing a clip like that islamophobic?
Speaker 1: Again?
Speaker 2: Perhaps the Prime Minister could enlighten us. Here's a clip
Speaker 2: posted on next showing a long queue of young Muslim
Speaker 2: men in Dublin heading into an Islamic education center. It's
Speaker 2: had over a million views. Why you decide now?
Speaker 13: Is Bill.
Speaker 2: Bill So is showing a clip like that islamophobic or
Speaker 2: of legitimate political or even cultural interest?
Speaker 1: Again, perhaps the Prime Minister could enlighten us?
Speaker 2: Or is it islamophobic to show clips like this of
Speaker 2: churches across Europe converted to mosques? Should Christians or other
Speaker 2: religions be concerned at the march of Islam across many
Speaker 2: nations speaking over Hallowed ground? Is of islamophobic to show
Speaker 2: this clip of Ramadan being celebrated out of all places,
Speaker 2: Lord's cricket ground? Or how about this story from America
Speaker 2: this week from Patterson in New Jersey.
Speaker 11: But I'm all local.
Speaker 9: Ramada Momora.
Speaker 14: Patterson is proud to have the largest Muslim population in
Speaker 14: the state of New Jersey, and we are a better
Speaker 14: city because Muslim's. Paul Patterson, Paul and as you can
Speaker 14: see here in South Patterson on Palestine Way, we are
Speaker 14: proud to light the Hellal something that has inspired other cities.
Speaker 2: That's in the US, of course, the other great melting
Speaker 2: pot nation. But is that a positive example of say assimilation?
Speaker 2: Is that what we should be looking forward to in
Speaker 2: Australia mayors, councils and even towns potentially becoming predominantly Muslim.
Speaker 11: I'm not the one who said it, but I've heard
Speaker 11: people say that Patterson.
Speaker 14: Is probably the fourth most halal, the holiest city in.
Speaker 11: The world.
Speaker 14: Jerusalem, Mecca, Medina and Patterson, New Jersey.
Speaker 6: Hello Hell.
Speaker 2: Sounds a bit like colonialism to me, But is its
Speaker 2: Islama fed to say? Here's Douglas Murray speaking last year
Speaker 2: about the pro Palestinian demonstrations occurring every weekend and disrupting
Speaker 2: normal London life.
Speaker 15: I don't know why we have given in to Islamists
Speaker 15: and terrorists. I don't know why we've done it. Why
Speaker 15: is it that Saturday after Saturday people parade through the
Speaker 15: streets of London calling for jihad, praising Hamaz, praising terrorists,
Speaker 15: and clambering over and defiling our.
Speaker 1: Sacred war monuments. Why do they get to do that
Speaker 1: every Saturday. Good question, Douglas.
Speaker 2: Or is it islamophobic Prime Minister to even ask such questions?
Speaker 1: I think Anthony Albanezi should enlighten us.
Speaker 2: Well, how about when the Italian Prime Minister Georgie Maloney
Speaker 2: said this.
Speaker 4: You're benso problematic compatibilita lamiga.
Speaker 2: Lamigashiw so saying if your Italian is not quite up
Speaker 2: to scratch. She was basically saying that Islam is not
Speaker 2: compatible with Italian culture, of Western culture and so on.
Speaker 2: Is that is islamophobic to say that, perhaps, mister Albaneze,
Speaker 2: you might care to enlighten us on that issue or
Speaker 2: indeed call out his Italian counterpart.
Speaker 1: For Islamophobia if that's what he believes.
Speaker 2: Or is this slightly blunt acclaim made earlier this month
Speaker 2: by a religious.
Speaker 1: Figure, Bishop Athanasius Schneider. Is this legitimate political discourse?
Speaker 16: This is very serious, no way of witnessing and invasion.
Speaker 16: They are not refugees. No, this is invasion of mass,
Speaker 16: Islamisition of Europe, which already event on for at manymum
Speaker 16: fifty sixty years islamisition in Europe. But no, it is
Speaker 16: in Mass, which is very evident and so this is
Speaker 16: a global political agenda by the powerful of the world
Speaker 16: to destroy Europe.
Speaker 2: Is he correct or are those comments by the bishop
Speaker 2: deemed to be Islamophobia? Please enlighten us Prime Minister, because
Speaker 2: as sure as night follows day, the current vast influx
Speaker 2: of Muslim migrants into this country will most likely have
Speaker 2: the same consequences as have been seen throughout Europe, Britain
Speaker 2: and the United States. And that, as the Prime Minister
Speaker 2: of Italy and the leaders of other European nations have
Speaker 2: pointed out, is the compatibility problem we have already seen
Speaker 2: here in Australia, under the guise of protesting in favor
Speaker 2: of Palestinian rites, the disgusting genie of anti Semitism let
Speaker 2: out of the bottle in this country, frequently fuel that
Speaker 2: would appear by Muslims or Muslim sympathizers disgracefully. In my opinion,
Speaker 2: the Albanezi government is bringing in three thousand Garzans, many
Speaker 2: if not most, of whom, will, on the available evidence,
Speaker 2: harbor to whatever degree a level of antipathy towards Jews,
Speaker 2: including Australian Jews. We are bringing twenty six thousand Afghans
Speaker 2: are Australian Jews not allowed to express alarm at these
Speaker 2: developments or is that islamophobia?
Speaker 1: Prime Minister?
Speaker 2: It is clear from Europe and the United Kingdom that
Speaker 2: large influxes are predominantly Muslim migrants can put strains on
Speaker 2: social cohesion. And how do Labor and other left disc
Speaker 2: governments cope with this breakdown in social cohesion?
Speaker 1: Do they slow down the rate of immigration? Perhaps?
Speaker 2: Do they put in stricter assimilation programs to ensure integration?
Speaker 17: Nope, We've seen a devastating rise in Islamophobia, leaving people
Speaker 17: feeling fearful and unsafe in their own country. As leader
Speaker 17: of the Labor Party, I am indebted to the contributions
Speaker 17: of Muslim members, activists and politicians who make our party
Speaker 17: what it is today. I'd like to thank Muslim organizations
Speaker 17: and Mosques who work tirelessly to raise awareness and shine
Speaker 17: a light on the scale of Islamophobia.
Speaker 1: Islamophobia.
Speaker 2: Last week I played in the footage of the first
Speaker 2: ever Islamic prayers inside Windsor Castle and.
Speaker 1: For many years Prince now King Charles.
Speaker 2: Has been lauded within the Muslim community worldwide as the
Speaker 2: most pro Islam monarch in British history. He is for example,
Speaker 2: a patron of the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies. In
Speaker 2: his youth, Charles apparently studied Arabic in order to better
Speaker 2: understand the Qoran, and there were rumors several years ago
Speaker 2: made by a Turkish Muslim dismissed I might stress by
Speaker 2: the Palace as nonsense that Charles had converted to Islam
Speaker 2: during a visit to Turkey.
Speaker 1: As I said, Palace said, it's nonsense.
Speaker 2: Regardless, Charles made great play of ditching his ancient title
Speaker 2: of defender of the Faith meaning Christianity, to defender of
Speaker 2: faith's plural, which of course includes Islam, no matter the
Speaker 2: theological contortions or contradictions that that may entail. He was
Speaker 2: ultimately crowned under the original title, whilst also committing to
Speaker 2: allow all faiths to live freely under his reign.
Speaker 18: Not my.
Speaker 2: Way yet Interestingly, opposition to Charles has been growing, and
Speaker 2: certainly recent events surrounding Ramadam have seen those crowds demonstrating
Speaker 2: not my king, not my king, against King Charles, but
Speaker 2: our silly memes online mocking Charles as being a secret
Speaker 2: Muslim Islamophobia do tell us play minister, which brings us
Speaker 2: back to Australia. At every single opportunity these last eighteen months,
Speaker 2: members of the Labor Government have sought to always find
Speaker 2: the moral equivalence between anti Semitism.
Speaker 1: And Islamophobia.
Speaker 13: I find offensive, I find it had its origins in
Speaker 13: anti Semitism, and I condemn it unequivocally, just as I
Speaker 13: condemn forms of that.
Speaker 1: I have seen.
Speaker 13: Islamophobic comments and behaviour as well.
Speaker 2: We have seen Australian anti Semitism in spades, synagogues and
Speaker 2: childcare centers, torched cars and homes, graffited, huge marches on
Speaker 2: the steps of the opera house, with people.
Speaker 1: Screaming wears or gas or air or whatever.
Speaker 2: The Jews, even kids being taught to chance anti Semitic slogans.
Speaker 2: We know what anti semitism looks like. It has been
Speaker 2: defined by the actions.
Speaker 1: Of due haters across the nation.
Speaker 2: But Islamophobia, which by the way, semantically simply means fear
Speaker 2: of Islam, much like arachnophobia means fear of spiders or
Speaker 2: claustrophobia means fear of enclosed spaces. Is it wrong to
Speaker 2: fear the political or cultural extremes of Islam? Is it
Speaker 2: wrong to fear the lack of compatibility between certain communities
Speaker 2: and the breakdown in social cohesion that may follow large
Speaker 2: scale Muslim immigration, decried by some political and religious leaders overseas.
Speaker 1: Perhaps mister Albanezi might take the.
Speaker 2: Time to more clearly define what it is he means
Speaker 2: by Islamophobia.
Speaker 1: Well, lot's happening in Syria.
Speaker 2: Former British Commander Richard Kemp joins us now from Tel Aviv, Israel. Richard,
Speaker 2: it's always very kind of you to stay up so late,
Speaker 2: because it's some ungodly.
Speaker 1: Hour there in the morning, in two or three in
Speaker 1: the morning in Tel Aviv.
Speaker 2: But you're always great to come on outside as we
Speaker 2: certainly do appreciate it. More importantly, our viewers appreciate your insights.
Speaker 1: What is going on in Syria? How bad is it?
Speaker 2: Is there a genocide of Christians and Allowhites taking place
Speaker 2: that we keep hearing about.
Speaker 1: What's what's happening on the ground there, Colonel Well, it's.
Speaker 8: Always a pleasure to join your rowin no matter what ungodly.
Speaker 14: I think.
Speaker 19: The situation in Syria is extremely serious, yet it is extreme,
Speaker 19: It was extremely predictable. While have now a new leadership
Speaker 19: in Syria so cool, which is led by a chap
Speaker 19: called Jilani who was and maybe still is a senior
Speaker 19: al Qaeda leader. He wears a suit and tie, and
Speaker 19: it's been lord of by many European and probably for
Speaker 19: all I know, Australian leaders as.
Speaker 8: Well, for being you know, the new light in Syria.
Speaker 19: I think, you know, as you could predict, he has
Speaker 19: of course turned on those people, turned against rather those
Speaker 19: people that he sees as a threat to his regime,
Speaker 19: and those predominantly are the alle Whites and the Christians
Speaker 19: and also the Kurds.
Speaker 8: And we've seen very large numbers of.
Speaker 19: All members of those communities massacred in recent days and
Speaker 19: indeed the last week in some cases subject to before
Speaker 19: they were killed, subject to humiliation like making them crawl
Speaker 19: along the ground, etc. And I've no doubt, I don't
Speaker 19: have any proof of this, but no doubt alongside that
Speaker 19: most of the people have been killed in men and
Speaker 19: I've no doubt it's been accompanied by mats rates as well.
Speaker 19: That would be the standard procedure for the people that
Speaker 19: are carrying out these attacks. So I think we're, you know,
Speaker 19: we're far from seeing you know, the new Syria adhering
Speaker 19: to Western values or anything approaching non violent values I
Speaker 19: think was always a dream and I'm very pleased to
Speaker 19: say that as soon as the Assad regime fell, Prime
Speaker 19: Minister Netnahu in Israel here ordered the destruction of the
Speaker 19: largest large parts of the Syrian armed forces hardware, so
Speaker 19: at least they don't have that to not only oppress
Speaker 19: their own people, but to attack others.
Speaker 3: Well, as you said, this is entirely predictable. We've seen
Speaker 3: it elsewhere with this sort of regime change, and the
Speaker 3: naive types in the West who celebrated this really and
Speaker 3: that shocking footage, we have seen the slaughter, the torture
Speaker 3: of innocent Syrian people. Where is the UN in all
Speaker 3: these rich I mean, are they supposed to be there
Speaker 3: to protect the innocent and precisely these sort of situations.
Speaker 19: Well, the UN of course is silent on this and
Speaker 19: is not really interested, which is the opposite perspective to
Speaker 19: the one they took on what's going on and what's
Speaker 19: been going on in Gaza and eleven And of course
Speaker 19: they were the first because people were being killed, mainly
Speaker 19: Hamas terrorists, but also unfortunately some guards and civilians were
Speaker 19: being killed inadvertently by the IDFY. The United nations turned
Speaker 19: on them. They've they've had numerous resolutions against them. And indeed,
Speaker 19: the very man who issued or who who asked for
Speaker 19: a restaurant to be issued against the Prime Minister of
Speaker 19: Israel and the former Defense of Israel, the chief prosecutor
Speaker 19: of the ICC, Kareem Khan. He was pictured very soon
Speaker 19: after Julani got to power in Syria shaking hands with
Speaker 19: the man.
Speaker 5: So I think, basic, James, I want to ask you
Speaker 5: maybe a don't barreled question if I make colonel first
Speaker 5: of all, is there now finally after you know, the
Speaker 5: last twenty twenty five years of Western foreign policy seems
Speaker 5: to have been a record through the Arab Spring and
Speaker 5: so much other, so many other instances of saying, hey,
Speaker 5: we've replaced somebody bad and winding up with somebody worse.
Speaker 5: Are we going to start to have some sort of
Speaker 5: more realistic look at the way we look at totalitarian
Speaker 5: regimes at this part of the world. And how does
Speaker 5: Donald Trump's actions with the Hooties relate to all of this.
Speaker 5: I think it's a very good move that he's done this,
Speaker 5: But in a sense I almost wonder what took him
Speaker 5: so long?
Speaker 19: Yeah, I agree with you, I think he's actually had
Speaker 19: quite a lot on his fate s various others. But nevertheless,
Speaker 19: it's long overdue. The attacks that we saw tonight or
Speaker 19: whatever time it is in Australia, but tonight in Middle
Speaker 19: East time attacks quite severe attacks by US air strikes
Speaker 19: including drones, I believe against the Houthis, and my understanding
Speaker 19: is that their target was against the Hoothy leadership.
Speaker 8: They were trying to.
Speaker 19: Take out as many of the leads as they could
Speaker 19: in this particular strike, which I believe is going to
Speaker 19: keep going on.
Speaker 8: But it's long overdue.
Speaker 19: It's not only overdue in the Trump administration, but it's
Speaker 19: been overdue ever since October twenty twenty three, when this
Speaker 19: campaign by the Houthis began against shipping in the Red Sea,
Speaker 19: and of course Biden, as he was in the United States,
Speaker 19: basically went was soft on it because he was trying
Speaker 19: to appease their masters, the Houthis masters in terran trying
Speaker 19: to appease them, and so there's been this very weak
Speaker 19: approach to Totalityranism, particularly including as it affects the West.
Speaker 19: Of course, the Hoothy's attacks on shipping effect the West,
Speaker 19: and equally the Iranian regimes. A nation to develop a
Speaker 19: nuclear weapons capability is also going to affect the West,
Speaker 19: yet the Biden administration has been soft pedaling on that
Speaker 19: as well. I'm pleased to say that President Trump has
Speaker 19: taken a different approach. He's returned to his maximum pressure
Speaker 19: campaign of sanctions against Iran and has also threatened if
Speaker 19: Iran doesn't agree to dismantle its own nuclear arsenal or
Speaker 19: it's development of nuclear weapons. If it doesn't agree to
Speaker 19: do that, then he will unleash Israel onto Iran and
Speaker 19: give Israel all the support it needs to carry out
Speaker 19: military operations against the Iranian nuclear program, which I think
Speaker 19: is something that should happen, and it should happen.
Speaker 8: Sooner rather than later.
Speaker 19: The time is ripe now for that, and that will
Speaker 19: be a demonstration, I think too, not only to the
Speaker 19: Iranian terrorist regime, but also to dictate as elsewhere in
Speaker 19: the Middle East as to what they can expect if
Speaker 19: they continue to threaten not only Israel.
Speaker 2: But the West and Richard is Finally on Gaza, Donald
Speaker 2: Trump has threatened several times to release hell, rain down
Speaker 2: Hell on Gaza unless all the hostages are finally out.
Speaker 2: We've also had the Gaza Trump Towers Gold Coast Resort plan,
Speaker 2: which is maybe you put your name down for a
Speaker 2: flat share up there on one of the Trump Towers
Speaker 2: overlooking the Mediterranean.
Speaker 1: But where are we with Hamas And at what point
Speaker 1: will you know? Will the threat of unleashing hell take place?
Speaker 2: Will we see the Israelis move in, will we see
Speaker 2: the Americans giving them the green lights move in?
Speaker 8: Well with the massive fee I received for appearing on outside.
Speaker 2: Of course your top top ten towers, Gars are towers,
Speaker 2: that's the kemps very much.
Speaker 8: Yeah, But to be serious, I think the the.
Speaker 19: We're receiving mixed messages now about the continuation of the
Speaker 19: sea fire which has been going on for several weeks,
Speaker 19: and that the aim of the ceasefire was not to
Speaker 19: preserve the mass life, of course, because that's something that
Speaker 19: needs to be annihilated, but was to to pause operations
Speaker 19: in order to get back as many hostages as possible.
Speaker 19: And it looks like her mass are quite concerned about
Speaker 19: the threats from Trump to enable Israel and to give
Speaker 19: the green light to Israel, because there now they've now
Speaker 19: said at least that they're going to release some more
Speaker 19: hostages and that shows to my mind, that shows fear
Speaker 19: in their in their heads. But however this works out.
Speaker 8: However, this latest sort of series of negotiats to workout.
Speaker 19: I think, come the time that the Israeli government decides
Speaker 19: they have secured the release of as many hostages as possible,
Speaker 19: and of course there are still some alive and some
Speaker 19: dead in garths until once that time arrives, I believe
Speaker 19: that the Israelis will then resume operations in guards, they
Speaker 19: go back to the fight and finish Mass, which has
Speaker 19: got to happen. And I believe if that does happen,
Speaker 19: then the new US administration will be fully supportive of them,
Speaker 19: as the previous one wasn't. The previous Biden administration tried
Speaker 19: to restrain Israel. I think the Trump administration, once the
Speaker 19: decision has taken to return to the fight, will encourage
Speaker 19: Israel to fight on to the end, because of course,
Speaker 19: there can be no resolution to this situation before really two.
Speaker 8: Main things happen.
Speaker 19: First of all, her mass is destroyed in Gaza, and
Speaker 19: contrary to what people say about you can't destroy in ideology,
Speaker 19: ha mass can be destroyed in Gaza and should be.
Speaker 19: And secondly that the head of the octopus, which includes
Speaker 19: all of the numerous proxies around the region, is chopped off.
Speaker 19: In other words, the regime in Tehran.
Speaker 1: Richard Kim, Colonel Richard came. Always great to chat you.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much.
Speaker 2: We'll let you go to sleep now and we'll speak
Speaker 2: to you again here on Outsiders. Thanks so much, Richard
Speaker 2: camp Kelonel Richie Kent there in Israel coming up after
Speaker 2: the break, lots more to talk about.
Speaker 1: James's Donkey Bote in it.
Speaker 5: Hello, you're watching Outsiders with your hosts and my friends
Speaker 5: Rowan Deane, Rita Panahee, and of course I'm James Morrow.
Speaker 5: And if you don't feel like you've gotten your fill
Speaker 5: of me talking American politics in this segment, well make
Speaker 5: sure to tune in at six pm on this very station,
Speaker 5: where I'll be talking to about the Australian election campaign
Speaker 5: on my new show Campaign Confidential tonight at six. Anyway,
Speaker 5: it seems like I can't leave the desk for a
Speaker 5: couple of weeks without everything going crazy, particularly those folk
Speaker 5: who are suffering from not Trump derangement syndrome, but Musk
Speaker 5: derangement syndrome. People who are angry about Elon Musk and
Speaker 5: his Department of Government deficiency. People who, let us be
Speaker 5: very clear here, are so utterly confused about things, politics,
Speaker 5: life that they live in an upside down world where
Speaker 5: an effort to cut government that is again an effort
Speaker 5: to reduce the size and scope of the state, is
Speaker 5: considered fascism. Now, of course, this can lead to some
Speaker 5: very funny, oh I mean a totally tragic events, like
Speaker 5: this guy who managed to set himself on fire while
Speaker 5: trying to throw petrol bombs at Tesla chargers.
Speaker 6: Well, well we're all.
Speaker 5: Involved there, but for sheer idiocy, it is hard to
Speaker 5: go past this guy. In hypertolerant New York, where you
Speaker 5: know it's all about live and let live, baby, anti
Speaker 5: must protesters have not only been occupying Tesla dealerships but
Speaker 5: setting them on fire with such regularity that even the
Speaker 5: cops have told them to knock it off. And then
Speaker 5: there is just ridiculous such as these very posh women
Speaker 5: in the Georgetown neighborhood of Washington, DC who are doing
Speaker 5: a big old dance against Elon Musk.
Speaker 6: Yeah, that'll show them anyway.
Speaker 5: Meanwhile, lefties all over the place are training in their
Speaker 5: tesla's and being very self righteous about it.
Speaker 6: Here's Democrat Congressman Mark Kelly.
Speaker 20: Every time I get in this car in the last
Speaker 20: sixty days or so, it reminds me of just how
Speaker 20: much damage Elon Musk and Donald Trump is doing to
Speaker 20: our country, talking about slashing Social Security, cutting healthcare benefits
Speaker 20: for poor people, for seniors. It's one bad thing after
Speaker 20: the next. He's firing veterans. I'm a veteran, so have
Speaker 20: a really hard time driving around in this thing. Is
Speaker 20: what matters is is you know, doing the right thing.
Speaker 1: I think it's time to get rid of it.
Speaker 20: You know, Elon Musk kind of turned out to be
Speaker 20: an asshole, and I don't want to be driving the
Speaker 20: car built and designed by an asshole.
Speaker 5: Well, I can't say further that. Kelly's outburst, though, is
Speaker 5: funny for two reasons, not the least of which is
Speaker 5: that once upon a time, cutting government waste was Yes,
Speaker 5: you're not going to believe this a Democrat priority. Here's
Speaker 5: Barack Obama back in twenty eleven announcing his own doge
Speaker 5: like effort ed. Boy, you are not going to believe
Speaker 5: who played the role of Elon Musk in this little caper.
Speaker 21: That's why, starting today, I've asked the Vice President to
Speaker 21: lead a renewed effort to hunt down misspent tax dollars
Speaker 21: in every agency and department of this government. We're calling
Speaker 21: it the Campaign to Cut Waste. And I knowed Joe's
Speaker 21: the right man to lead it because nobody messages we Joe.
Speaker 22: There's a new standard by which the government is going
Speaker 22: to function. This point on, the American people are entitled
Speaker 22: to transparency. Look, a lot of this depends on new
Speaker 22: sophisticated methods been it also, and also we know depends
Speaker 22: on relentless focus on making this a priority focus that
Speaker 22: can't be delegated.
Speaker 6: That's right. Nobody messes with Joe.
Speaker 5: And by the way, is it just me you're watching
Speaker 5: that and with all those jump cuts and everything, do
Speaker 5: you think that may have already started to have been
Speaker 5: some slippage.
Speaker 6: Up there with mister Biden.
Speaker 5: But anyway, what's even funnier than that is that Mike Kelly,
Speaker 5: who we just saw and who presumably bought his Tesla
Speaker 5: in the first place to save the planet, traded it
Speaker 5: in apparently for this. Yes, according to Capitol Hill reporters,
Speaker 5: Kelly's new whip is a fossil fuel powered.
Speaker 6: Chevy Tahoe suv so again.
Speaker 5: Great work, Congressman Kelly, and great proof that it's never
Speaker 5: really about saving the planet.
Speaker 6: It's about telling you what you can and can't do.
Speaker 5: In other words, totalitarian control over what is and what
Speaker 5: is not acceptable in terms of your behavior and beliefs
Speaker 5: coming from the left funny, I don't know, sounds a
Speaker 5: little bit late fascism.
Speaker 6: Nah, the left fascist.
Speaker 1: Couldn't be fantastic.
Speaker 2: Joining us now is our great friend on the show,
Speaker 2: Ralph Schlhemmer from Europe. Ralph, extraordinary tweet you put out
Speaker 2: on the weekend. We had to get you on to
Speaker 2: tell us all about it. It appears that Germany has
Speaker 2: just put climate neutrality by twenty forty five I met
Speaker 2: zero nonsense into its constitution. Is this and this is
Speaker 2: a so called conservative government, Ralph?
Speaker 1: True?
Speaker 6: Well, it is true.
Speaker 23: And I remember we talked on your show about the
Speaker 23: German elections, and I remember quite distinctly that the argument
Speaker 23: was that the conservatives in Germany are not real conservatives.
Speaker 23: And this is precisely what's happening now. Mister Meats made
Speaker 23: two promises, no new debt and the end of green
Speaker 23: madness will be kind of the signif the signature features
Speaker 23: of its new administration. The election was barely a week
Speaker 23: over and he back pedaled on both of those. It's
Speaker 23: very frustrating, but to be quite honest, everybody who had
Speaker 23: two cents two census in their head now that this
Speaker 23: was going to happen.
Speaker 3: Well, you've got the Germans overwhelmingly voting for center right parties.
Speaker 3: This supposed conservative party got the most votes. Uh, the
Speaker 3: a f D were second few percentage points below them,
Speaker 3: and yet they did not form a coalition with the
Speaker 3: a f D. They formed a coalition with with other
Speaker 3: smaller parties. Explain how that processes were worked and what
Speaker 3: a betrayal this is of what the German population actually
Speaker 3: voted for.
Speaker 23: Well, it was not that overwhelming, right, the Conservatives got
Speaker 23: twenty eight percent of the vote, and that was the
Speaker 23: worst result in history. They only had one result that
Speaker 23: was even worse that It was our.
Speaker 11: Four years before that and the AfD.
Speaker 23: It is true they doubled from ten to twenty percent,
Speaker 23: but twenty percent and twenty eight percent is forty eight percent.
Speaker 23: So even if they would have entered into a coalition,
Speaker 23: they would have had a majority in parliament, but it
Speaker 23: would have been a stretch to say that the overwhelming
Speaker 23: majority of the German people supported the center right government.
Speaker 23: They supported slightly more than the alternatives. But the problem
Speaker 23: is the Germans, for historical reasons, they are still shying
Speaker 23: away after when it comes to voting for right wing parties.
Speaker 23: And now they're paying a price because if you don't
Speaker 23: allow the rights to come to power, the left will
Speaker 23: stay in power. So now the Greens or the Social Democrats,
Speaker 23: I mean the Social Democrats will be part of the
Speaker 23: next government. The Greens will not be, but all their
Speaker 23: policy preferences have now entered the coalition negotiations and.
Speaker 11: They will be executed.
Speaker 23: So sure that no longer is all about topic the
Speaker 23: disastrous Green Minister of the Economy, but many of his
Speaker 23: policies will continue with the future government.
Speaker 5: And Ralph, you know I've heard that now under this
Speaker 5: government is supposedly said to right government, the biggest issue migration.
Speaker 5: Well they've swept that under the carpet. Apparently Afghan migrants
Speaker 5: are being brought back in again to Germany.
Speaker 6: And more broadly, what.
Speaker 5: Is the future for democracy in Europe when the will
Speaker 5: of the people when it comes to voting for parties
Speaker 5: like AfD or candidates like the one who was barred
Speaker 5: for money in Romania are simply shut out by the establishment,
Speaker 5: officially or unofficially because well, the people just have got
Speaker 5: it wrong and they're only going to be allowed to
Speaker 5: vote when they get it right.
Speaker 23: Well, the main reason is, and please forgive them my
Speaker 23: franchis that most European conservatives parties idiots, because what they're
Speaker 23: doing is they say we will never anti coalition with
Speaker 23: the quote unquote far right, meaning they enter into negotiations
Speaker 23: with center left parties and saying we have no alternative
Speaker 23: to you. So Friedrich Metz says, I'm not going to
Speaker 23: do something with the AfD. So then of course the
Speaker 23: Social Democrats say, well, if we are here on the option,
Speaker 23: we're going to dictate to you what we want.
Speaker 11: And this is exactly what they're doing.
Speaker 23: You see the same thing happening in the Netherlands right
Speaker 23: where they refuse to make head Will as the prime minister.
Speaker 23: You saw the same thing happening in Austria where the
Speaker 23: right wing party became the strongest party after the elections,
Speaker 23: and now you have three smaller parties forming a government.
Speaker 23: And what happened in Romania, I have to admit is
Speaker 23: the most shocking of all the developments. I means you
Speaker 23: have a candidate, when's the first round of the presidential elections,
Speaker 23: the elections get annulled. Now in the polls, he's riding
Speaker 23: high with forty four percent, so he's leading the polls.
Speaker 23: Now he's spanned from running. And the interesting party is
Speaker 23: they come up now with all these reasons and are
Speaker 23: he's a fascists and so on and on, and let's
Speaker 23: sciprolate that all of that is true. Well, then that
Speaker 23: was known in December when the first round of the
Speaker 23: elections took place. So why was it not a problem
Speaker 23: in December, and why is it a problem now? And
Speaker 23: it reminds one after saying by Stalin's head of the
Speaker 23: secret police, who wants it to Stalin? Show me the man,
Speaker 23: I show you the crime. And this is what's happening
Speaker 23: in Romania. And this seems to be a little bit
Speaker 23: of a dry run. If you can't beat them at
Speaker 23: the elections, you drag them into court and you ban
Speaker 23: them from running for office. A very very borious on development.
Speaker 3: Now we've seen the Trump administration cajole the Europeans into
Speaker 3: spending more for their own defense.
Speaker 4: How is that project progressing.
Speaker 3: We've seen them say yes, we're going to form a
Speaker 3: coalition and we're going to step in and help Ukraine.
Speaker 3: Even though Ukraine's now agreed to this piece. Still, what's
Speaker 3: the mood like in Europe with the US really pivoting
Speaker 3: away from what has traditionally been their role.
Speaker 23: Well, in general, I think what the United States are
Speaker 23: doing to Europe is not a bad thing. The idea
Speaker 23: that Europeans have to stand on their own feet is
Speaker 23: something that's good for Europe.
Speaker 11: And that on the long run it's also good for
Speaker 11: the US.
Speaker 23: However the issue is and then we can connect the
Speaker 23: dots from the new realmaments program and green policies. If
Speaker 23: you hollow out to industrial base, all the money in
Speaker 23: the world is not going to afford you any weapons,
Speaker 23: because it's not about coins and bills and euros. It's
Speaker 23: about turning these coins and bills and euros into guns, tanks,
Speaker 23: and cannons.
Speaker 11: But if you no longer have the industry, if you don't.
Speaker 23: Have access to the resources, there's not much you can do.
Speaker 23: So in the worst case, this is turning into inflation
Speaker 23: because now armaments companies have to compete with the private sector,
Speaker 23: or the civilian sector for resources, or that money is
Speaker 23: going to the United States because they have the military
Speaker 23: industrial complex, or as it happened right after the Russian
Speaker 23: invasion of Ukraine.
Speaker 11: All of this is just talking. Nothing is going to happen.
Speaker 23: So those are the options about the administration and sympathetic
Speaker 23: to Donald Trump. If you say, guys, you have to
Speaker 23: do more, very good, I think the way in which
Speaker 23: he's saying it. And then I'm actually more thinking about
Speaker 23: the Canadians than the Europeans. I think they could be
Speaker 23: improved because there is a tendency now in Europe less so,
Speaker 23: but particularly in Canada that in a kind of knee
Speaker 23: jerk reaction, people now start to vote for left wing
Speaker 23: parties because they feel that their domestic right wing party
Speaker 23: likes Trump, and if Trump speaks better about their country,
Speaker 23: they kind of automatically then.
Speaker 11: Swivel to the left wing party. This is what you
Speaker 11: see in Canada.
Speaker 23: I mean the Liberal Party of Justin Toudou is doing way, way,
Speaker 23: way too good, only because of the things that Trump
Speaker 23: has been saying about Canada.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, Ralph Chouldan always great to CHATCHI head of the
Speaker 2: Center of History there in Europe, and you can follow
Speaker 2: Ralph on Twitter is fantastic. Thanks so much, Ralph always
Speaker 2: great to Chatchy, thanks for staying up again to chatters
Speaker 2: here on Outsiders after the Break, Canber Clown Show, lots
Speaker 2: more here on is in a tick.
Speaker 1: Roll up, roll up, step right this way.
Speaker 6: It's the wackiest show on earth.
Speaker 2: It's the Canberra Clown Show where Burko the Clown has
Speaker 2: been hogging the spotlight and there's no excuse for that.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 15: How tries you South Wales Premier Chris means you can
Speaker 15: see you also, I'm.
Speaker 11: Sorry I've said, I've just said last question.
Speaker 9: I'll go back and do this because otherwise you're.
Speaker 1: Going to do the vision running after me if I
Speaker 1: do have other movies.
Speaker 2: Ah, yes, it seems Burko the Clown is not only
Speaker 2: a master showman, he's a film director as well. So talented,
Speaker 2: but not nearly as talented as that wily old clown
Speaker 2: from the foreshores of Sydney Harbor. Mister Trumbull, who chose
Speaker 2: this pivotal week in world affairs, when the threat of
Speaker 2: tariff's hangs in the air, When the Ukraine Russia War
Speaker 2: is on a knife edge, when Syria is undergoing a
Speaker 2: genocide against Christians. What better time for mister Trumbull to
Speaker 2: try and grab a little of the limelight for his.
Speaker 1: Favorite person himself.
Speaker 2: Yes, mister Trumbull, who regular viewers may remember was a
Speaker 2: favorite on this show for many years, chose to pop
Speaker 2: up like an old discarded jack in the box this
Speaker 2: week with an appearance on Bloomberg where he tried to
Speaker 2: land throw a pie in the face of US President
Speaker 2: Donald J.
Speaker 1: Trump.
Speaker 9: So this is a very different United States.
Speaker 24: Trump does not subscribe to the same values that we
Speaker 24: have in the past shared with America. Look, he doesn't
Speaker 24: have a commitment to the international rule of law, that's obvious.
Speaker 24: Doesn't care about treaties or alliances.
Speaker 2: Oh really, treaties an alliance, as mister Trumbull, you mean
Speaker 2: like the Paris Agreement on climate change.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's a good one.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump ran on the promise of withdrawing America from
Speaker 2: the Paris Agreement and did so as one of his
Speaker 2: first actions, having one a resounding mandate at the election.
Speaker 1: Contrast that to the legacy.
Speaker 2: Of mister Trumbull, who, along with Tony Abbot's treacherous deputy
Speaker 2: Julie Bishop, simply ratified the Paris Agreement with no electoral
Speaker 2: mandate whatsoever, which of course made a mockery of mister
Speaker 2: Trumbull's so called definition of democracy.
Speaker 24: You see, the key to democracy, liberal democracy is that
Speaker 24: it empowers the majority, but it also, through the rule
Speaker 24: of law, constrains the majority. And if you get to
Speaker 24: the point where anybody who can muster a majority, and
Speaker 24: I don't think Trump can do that, by the way,
Speaker 24: but anyone who can muster a majority is given absolute
Speaker 24: power and then can do whatever they like to the minority.
Speaker 1: That's not a democracy.
Speaker 6: That is a tyranny.
Speaker 9: Tyranny.
Speaker 2: I wonder how mister Trumbull would describe someone who constantly
Speaker 2: undermined his own party leader, Tony Abbot, the man who
Speaker 2: had one in a landslide and then at the first opportunity,
Speaker 2: stabbed him in the back. In a world exclusive, here
Speaker 2: is the never before seen secret footage of a Liberal
Speaker 2: Party breakfast meeting in which Malcolm and Julie were overheard
Speaker 2: working out whether to get rid of Tony before or
Speaker 2: after the twenty thirty election.
Speaker 11: So we allowed the election to run its course and
Speaker 11: he won't be pooked.
Speaker 4: What other courses there? It's in the hands of God's in.
Speaker 1: The hands of the College of Cardinal's mother. Not quite
Speaker 1: the same thing.
Speaker 6: Oop.
Speaker 1: Sorry, my mistake.
Speaker 2: That was Chesaree and the notche Borgia, not Malcolm and Julie.
Speaker 1: Easy mistake to make, I suppose.
Speaker 2: But back to mister Trumbull, riveting American viewers with his
Speaker 2: astonishing insights.
Speaker 24: Yes, he is the President of the United States, but
Speaker 24: that is really the only thing he's got in common
Speaker 24: with his predecessors.
Speaker 6: Hmmm and argument.
Speaker 2: Arguably, the only thing mister Trumbull had in with any
Speaker 2: of his Liberal Party predecessors was that he had won
Speaker 2: his job in a landslide election.
Speaker 1: Oh hang on, turns out he hadn't.
Speaker 25: I was at the Wentworth Sheridan hotel that night where
Speaker 25: the Liberal Party was. They were all waiting for Turnbull
Speaker 25: to appear. Turnbull is at home and he's waiting. He's
Speaker 25: waiting to get the results.
Speaker 10: It was enough to hold power, but with a wafer
Speaker 10: thin majority, just one seat.
Speaker 25: So by this stage it's about midnight and eventually he
Speaker 25: has to go to the hotel. He arrives too late,
Speaker 25: too unhappy. One of the paradoxes is he's won the election,
Speaker 25: but he acts as though he's lost the election, but
Speaker 25: the shock of the very very narrow nature of that
Speaker 25: win left him very very distraught, very upset, and looking
Speaker 25: to blame other people.
Speaker 24: The Labor Party ran some of the most systematic, well
Speaker 24: funded lies ever peddled in Australia.
Speaker 2: By Ah Yes, what a magnificent winner, mister Trumbull. Following
Speaker 2: Malcolm's outburst on Bloomberg, Donald Trump put out a succinct
Speaker 2: and fairly accurate rapusts describing Malcolm Turnbull as a weak
Speaker 2: and ineffective leader who led Australia from behind the President
Speaker 2: also described Australia as that wonderful country. Yet here's mister
Speaker 2: Trumbull on the ABC last year.
Speaker 24: Trump is a bully. He encourages people to suck up
Speaker 24: to him. You know, notoriously.
Speaker 8: I didn't do that.
Speaker 24: I mean, that was partly my personality and partly circumstance.
Speaker 1: But I think it was a good thing.
Speaker 2: Hang On, hang on, mister Trumbull didn't suck up to
Speaker 2: President Trump.
Speaker 1: That's not what the picture record shows.
Speaker 2: How to look at Malcolm and my wife Lucy grinning
Speaker 2: like two cheshire cats.
Speaker 1: That have swallowed the cream to be sitting.
Speaker 2: There in the Oval Office, while by the looks on
Speaker 2: their faces, it's clear Donald and Milania Trump are wondering
Speaker 2: what on earth the cat dragged in? Oh, and then
Speaker 2: mister Trumbull decided to channel Mark Latham's conger lion gag.
Speaker 24: Are we just going to become, you know, just a
Speaker 24: conger line of sycophants creeping through the White House?
Speaker 2: And finally, even when even the ABC questioned the rather
Speaker 2: inappropriate timing of mister Trumbull's intervention, now I've come struck
Speaker 2: out at then.
Speaker 24: I mean, really, Sally, is this where we've got that
Speaker 24: we've become? You know, is the ABC becomes so pusillanimous
Speaker 24: that you're seriously suggesting that we shouldn't be free to
Speaker 24: speak to the truth in Australia for fear of Donald Trump?
Speaker 21: Is that?
Speaker 24: Is that the depths you've sunk to.
Speaker 5: Well, it's interesting providing commentary about the ABC, but this
Speaker 5: interview you you are from.
Speaker 24: That I got the same line from Sarah ferguson last night.
Speaker 24: I think it really troubled me. I believe in the ABC,
Speaker 24: I believe in freedom of speech, I believe in Australia,
Speaker 24: and I believe in standing up for Australia, and I
Speaker 24: think I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Apparently you don't, Oh dear Didons.
Speaker 2: For old Malcolm, I was reminded of the time my
Speaker 2: former boss Andrew Neil on the BBC triggered Malcolm Turnbill
Speaker 2: by reminding him how his own party had discarded him,
Speaker 2: using the very phrase that Malcolm had used against Kevin Rudd.
Speaker 2: Discarded like another course on a lazy Susan.
Speaker 23: And yet you were still the fourth Australian Prime minister
Speaker 23: in eight years to be discarded, well.
Speaker 24: Discarded like another course on a lazy Susan in the
Speaker 24: Vietnamese restaurant.
Speaker 6: The cruelty of it.
Speaker 24: Well, yeah, I was certainly voted out by my party room,
Speaker 24: fairly narrowly.
Speaker 1: And then Malcolm came out with this classic.
Speaker 24: Basically, you could argue that their concern was not that
Speaker 24: I would lose the election, but rather that I would
Speaker 24: win it.
Speaker 6: You're telling me your own party didn't want you to win.
Speaker 26: The next Well, I'm just saying, if you analyze credit
Speaker 26: we ah no, Andrew, that certainly was not credible.
Speaker 2: And indeed that pretty much sums up mister Trumbull, the
Speaker 2: clown and his harbourside ringside circus act not credible. And finally,
Speaker 2: while we're reminiscing about the good old days, this week
Speaker 2: or last week, the women of the Labor Party celebrated
Speaker 2: International Women's Day by releasing this excruciating video of them
Speaker 2: performing Julia Gillard's vile and disgusting misogyny speech, certainly one
Speaker 2: of the most disgraceful spectacles of any clown that ever
Speaker 2: performed under the Burly Griffin big top.
Speaker 27: I will not be lectured about sexism and misogyny by
Speaker 27: this man. I will not and not be lectured anounce
Speaker 27: and misogyny by this man, not now, not ever.
Speaker 4: The Leader of the Opposition says that people.
Speaker 27: Who hold sex's news and who are melogynousts are not.
Speaker 28: Appropriate for high office. Well, I hope the Leader of
Speaker 28: the Opposition is gone a seacial paper and he is
Speaker 28: writing out his resignation because he wants to know what
Speaker 28: misogyny looks like in him Australia, and he doesn't need
Speaker 28: emotion in the house represented his heeding.
Speaker 2: Hyperable extreme exaggeration as pronounced by Julia Gillard. Hyperbolelet's hear
Speaker 2: it from Bob Geldoff, remember him who yes the boomtown here,
Speaker 2: he's the guy who is behind all of that band
Speaker 2: aid and don't they saving African kids? And gat the
Speaker 2: great eighties hero reader have listened to what he had
Speaker 2: to say on the project.
Speaker 18: This week, the most powerful man on the planet, the
Speaker 18: richest man in the world, have decided to take away
Speaker 18: any of the life support systems of the most fun
Speaker 18: of the poorest children on the planet, quite literally, take
Speaker 18: the last food from their mouth, quite literally, take the
Speaker 18: bandages of the gang raped woman.
Speaker 6: Quite literally.
Speaker 4: Do you think this great song.
Speaker 23: Is songwriting.
Speaker 1: Like Mondays? Yeah?
Speaker 3: So pulling funding for things like studying transgender mice. That's
Speaker 3: literally taking food out of the mass of starving children.
Speaker 3: What an absolutely ridiculous, ridiculous man old enough to know
Speaker 3: better about that age. If you're still that stupid at
Speaker 3: that age, then I can't help.
Speaker 1: You, Jay.
Speaker 25: Yeah.
Speaker 5: No, I mean look, I don't think there's really anything
Speaker 5: to add except that is the worst type of ball
Speaker 5: we've had here for a while. I mean, did you say,
Speaker 5: like the ridiculous lists of all of the different stupid things.
Speaker 5: But also the other sinister thing that Dosees found also,
Speaker 5: and this cannot be stressed enough, is the way that
Speaker 5: the government, the federal government in the US States has
Speaker 5: been undermining allied governments around the world by funding our
Speaker 5: position papers and things like that, and pushing you know,
Speaker 5: anti church, anti family agendas in traditional countries and causing
Speaker 5: caos where it's a damn good thing doges here, and.
Speaker 3: Funding NGOs to do things that they can't legally do,
Speaker 3: but essentially they're funding It's.
Speaker 5: Like an angio non organization sort of paradox. You're either
Speaker 5: governmental or not.
Speaker 1: End it.
Speaker 11: Just quickly read it.
Speaker 1: Dun Smurray how to win against the Guardian.
Speaker 3: An enormous victory that had to issue a humiliating apology
Speaker 3: and a big fact check from what I'm told. So
Speaker 3: this is after they accused Douglas Murray of supporting violent
Speaker 3: racist attacks when there were anti immigration rallies in the UK,
Speaker 3: and thank thank god he took them on because you
Speaker 3: know what, it's very difficult to launch a defamation case.
Speaker 3: It can be very costly, but this was just so
Speaker 3: egregious that he took it on and film.
Speaker 2: Great blow Douglas Murray. And that's it fro Outsiders this week.
Speaker 2: We'll see you next Sunday morning, but so much during
Speaker 2: the week tonight. Starting tonight, you've got James's Campaign Confidential,
Speaker 2: all about the Australian election which is about to be called.
Speaker 1: Of course, don't miss that tonight. You've also got during
Speaker 1: the week the RITA panel he shot at eleven o'clock every.
Speaker 2: Night, and then, can you believe it, Friday nights. Thank
Speaker 2: god it's Friday. You've got the World according to Rwandine
Speaker 2: at seven pm on Friday. Then you've got James Morrow's
Speaker 2: US Report at eight and then Rita.
Speaker 1: Panny's Left is losing little. We'll see you next Sunday
Speaker 1: at nine am.