WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 24 March

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.479
<v Speaker 1>On Scoring Lives Austrodia.

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 2>This is the winder Panety Show. Good evening and welcome

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 2>to the Reader Panney Show.

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Coming up tonight, Australia headed for years of deficits as

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to hand down a big spending budget.

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Adam Criton will be here to discuss the day's top headlines,

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 3>including Menique Bryant's husband caught tearing down a sign for

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the Liberal candidate in q Yok. Professor eam Plymer will

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 3>fact check labor claims that energy bills plummeted in twenty

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty four.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>The Great Josh Hammer will have the latest from the US,

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:40.319
<v Speaker 2>and later in the.

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Hour, Kinseysko film will have the figures for what looks

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 3>like being one of Disney's most disastrous films ever. And

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Left Is Losing It features this UK delicate for the

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 3>United Nations Commission on the Status of Women.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually going to be talking to you about my.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Nipples, Okay, but first, the latest news poll is in

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 3>and women, young women in particular, are ditching Labor and

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 3>the Coalition for the Greens. Labour's female support base has

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 3>dipped to twenty nine percent for the first time, with

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 3>the Greens now the beneficiaries of fifteen percent of the

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 3>female vote, but the two party per therred vote remains

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 3>at fifty one to forty nine in favor of the Coalition,

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 3>thanks mainly to growing anti labor sentiment in Victoria and

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 3>a surgeon support for the Coalition in Queensland. Pitter Dutton

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 3>does appear to have a problem with young women. His

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 3>approval rating is just twenty one percent among that corehort,

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 3>with a disapproval rating of sixty four percent.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Compare that to the Prime Minister's.

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Approval rating of forty percent for that demographic. But the

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 3>issue appears to be with young women only. If you

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>add women of all ages into the mix, the two

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 3>party per free third metric favors the Coalition fifty one

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 3>to forty nine percent. Joining me now for more on this,

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 3>a senior fellow and chief economis at the Institute of

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Public Affairs.

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Adam Crichton.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Adam, young women are increasingly leaning left.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 2>We can see that from the data.

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 3>We can see that anecdotally fifteen percent of them. You

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 3>could argue you are leaning radical left.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 5>Yes, Look, this is a phenomenon that's actually happening all

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 5>around the world, and it's hard to explain. The only

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 5>theory that I can come up with is it's the

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 5>education system, which is increasingly far left and increasingly feral,

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 5>if you like, and it tells young women that young

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 5>men and many in general are the enemy and art

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 5>to be trusted, et cetera, et cetera.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's what's polarizing it.

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:43.839
<v Speaker 5>And of course we also saw on that data I think,

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 5>or at least maybe not that data, but we certainly

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 5>see it around the world.

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 6>Is that young men are.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 5>Actually becoming more conservative. Yes, so that's happening at the

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 5>same time. And actually just this week in the New

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 5>York Times there was an editorial saying that actually, young

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 5>people as a whole now have actually become a lot

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 5>more conservative, which is quite interesting. And I actually put

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 5>that down to COVID, to their experience with COVID, to

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 5>their experience with big government, having their lives destroyed. I

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 5>think has actually made some of them wake up to

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 5>the pernicious nature of government.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 2>Yes, particularly the young men.

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's also a rebellion because if you

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 3>look at all the institutions, whether you're talking about education,

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 3>whether you're talking about the corporate world, Hollywood, sporting organizations

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 3>that have all become so left leaning, so woke.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 2>So you actually want to be a rebel, you'd be

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 2>a conservative. You don't want to be a part of

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 2>that group think.

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 3>And you mentioned what we're seeing in this newspot mirroring

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 3>what's happened elsewhere, and certainly the trend in the US.

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 3>It's all with Donald Trump's election in twenty twenty four.

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 3>He won married men, he won unmarried men, He won

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 3>married women, but lost and lost badly amongst unmarried women.

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>You look at the data, there's sixty eight percent.

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 3>To thirty one when he came to unmarried women, but

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 3>every other category he was winning. So that does seem

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 3>to be this very particular demographic that is leaning increasingly left.

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 3>And because the margin is so dramatic and it's a

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 3>growing group, it will have an impact on elections.

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, look, that's that's probably true, and it does. Although

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 5>I think I'd rather be I'd rather be in the

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 5>position of Donald Trump in the USA because, as you say,

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 5>he's actually won more of these subcategories, if you like.

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 5>It's just the white women who are educated in particular,

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 5>for some reason, lean left increasingly and The reason I

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 5>think is the media I think encourages it, and also

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 5>the education system.

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I think universities of a lot to answer for.

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 3>And if you faced just well over a decade of doctrination, it's.

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Going to have an impact.

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Now to this astonishing footage of Monique Ryan's husband Peter Jordan,

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 3>who was called removing a sign backing the liberal candidate

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 3>for Q Young Amelia out Hamer.

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Watch this footage. I'm going to play you the whole thing.

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 3>He refuses repeatedly to identify himself and seems very proud

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 3>of what he's done.

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 6>So hang on, mate, what are you doing?

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:15.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking the sign?

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, beg you pardon?

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 7>I'm taking the sign out?

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 6>What are you doing that for? It's on public land.

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 7>I'm I'm not saying who I am?

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 8>Who are you?

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 6>Or you wearing a teal T shirt. I'll start to

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 6>film you now, are you Monic Ryan?

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 3>Supporter of ripping down people's people's signs are so?

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 7>What are you doing?

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 6>It belongs to me. Hey, you can take it off

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 6>the property, but it belongs to me. If it goes

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 6>back up, it'll be taken down again. There you go,

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 6>Monique Ryan, There you go.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Community values, but he has since changed his tune, is

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>now saying I unreservedly apologize for removing the side. It

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 3>was a mistake. I believe the sign was illegally placed,

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 3>but I should have reported my concerns to counsel and Monique.

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Ryan too has also apologize, saying it should not have happened. Adam,

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 3>I do wonder whether there'd be any apologies without that

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 3>footage being taken and becoming public.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 6>Not certainly not.

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 5>Look, I mean, I'm not sure it actually hurts her though,

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 5>to be honest, I mean, it's kind of sweet that

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 5>her husband's out there helping her, you know, even if

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 5>it's not you know, it's romance.

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 2>It's dead.

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it goes on a lot, and look, there are

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 5>rules about where things can and can't be put. But yeah, look,

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean it's it's kind of embarrassing, and clearly she

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 5>was embarrassed by it. She's apologized, he's apologized. We'll probably

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 5>see more of this through the election campaign.

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 3>I would say, yeah, but you would hope not to

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 3>see it from the husband of the local MP. You

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 3>would think they would have more sense. The just have

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 3>brazen and entitled. You'd have to be do.

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 2>You wonder whether she hate like that.

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 5>Do you wonder whether she knew in advance, whether he

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 5>told her?

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 9>Who knows?

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 4>We'll never find that out.

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 3>No, no, we can't blame the sins of the husband

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 3>or not on Monique. Now let's go to tomorrow night's budget.

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 3>We're going to see labor doing what labor does best,

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 3>handing out bundles of tax payer funds and plunging the

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 3>country to further economic strive. Treasury give Chalmers has considered

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 3>that Australia is headed for years of deficits, saying that

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 3>it remains to be seen when the budget will return

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 3>to a surplus. With billions of dollars in extra spending

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 3>set to be announced just weeks before the federal poll,

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the timing couldn't be better for looking.

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 5>So it's all pretty depressing, to be honest, to talk

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 5>about the budget we've just had. You're living through the

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 5>biggest increase in federal spending since GoF Whitland fifty years ago,

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 5>and this is all being paid for through the proceeds

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 5>of a fading mining boom. So that's all going to

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 5>run out. The tide's going to go out. If you

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 5>like the revenue tide's going to go out and it's

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 5>going to expose all of these spending problems, spending programs

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 5>that we just can't afford. So I'm hoping that in

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 5>the budget we see some signs of fiscal rectitude, but

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 5>I am far from confident.

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting.

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Do you think there's going to be a price to

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 3>pay for labor for really failing to deliver on their

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 3>election promises. We were promised our electricity bills were going

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 3>to go down, we were promised all sorts of cost

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 3>of living relief, and if anything, things have gone backwards.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 3>People's living standards have fallen sharply in some cases. Is

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 3>there going to be a reckoning or our Australian's going

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>to be forgiving given this is a first term labor government.

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, I mean I certainly hope so that there's

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 5>a reckoning and that labour suffers at the polls.

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 2>But it's too early to say yes.

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 5>But I certainly do think people are waking up to

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 5>the cost of net zero. I mean, it was promised

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 5>that power prices would fall I think by two hundred

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 5>and seventy five dollars somewhat Fastically, yes, and I think

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 5>we've read just in recent days that the power bills

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 5>will be going up by nine percent. So clearly something

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 5>is not working out there. Someone's lying and I think

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 5>it's the it's the renewable energy exhialos who have been lying,

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 5>and I think more and more people are waking up

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 5>to this. So I think the fact that Labour's had

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 5>to announce another one hundred and fifty dollars, I think

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 5>another two billion dollars, I think that's very embarrassing for them.

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 3>It is and taking our money, wasting some of it

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 3>in the bureaucracy and then handing back the rest.

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 2>That is not really a way to drive down energy prices.

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to.

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Canada now, and the newly appointed Prime Minister Mark Carney

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 3>has decided to capitalize on the Donald Trump trade war

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 3>with a nation and call a snap election for April

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight, well ahead of the original date of October

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty with support for the Liberal Party in Canada growing

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 3>amid the tariff war with Donald Trump and course for

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Canada to become.

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>The fifty first date. Not a smart move here.

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Of course, you're going to capitalize if you and you've

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 3>got Canadians finally being proud of Canada being patriotic.

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Who could have imagined this? Donald Trump can work miracles.

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 5>Now, Look, it's been an absolute godsense for Mark Carney, the

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 5>whole tariff and Donald Trump's comments about Canada.

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 2>So I mean it's very unfortunate for the.

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 5>Poor opposition leader who was basically coasting to victory.

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 3>I think Olivier is a very capable candidate, but Donald

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Trump doesn't like him and he's not doing him any favors.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 5>The great irony here is that the globalist Mark Krney

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 5>is going to cruise to victory on a wave of patriotism,

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 5>which is basically.

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 2>What's going to happen.

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 5>I think if you look at the polls, I mean

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 5>their election, I think is it's for late April, right,

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 5>so there's still a few weeks, but it's not looking

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 5>good for Pierre. Well.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this Carney character has got all sorts of red

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 3>flags with him. So we'll be remains to be seen

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 3>where the Conservatives can capitalize on that. Now, the reimagined

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Australian five dollar bill will sport a new indigenous theme

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 3>and replace the long standing portrait of the British monarch.

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 3>This is country, is the land of water and sky.

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>The RBA has said in a statement, and key to

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the theme is the recognition of First Nations communities contribution

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 3>to the restoration and conservation of our environment Adam. They say,

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 3>this is an important context.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 2>For this connection.

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 3>What do you think I mean as the country crying

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 3>out for a new five dollar bill?

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 5>No, And look, I think if you are going to

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 5>have a constitutional monarchy, which is what we have, you

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 5>should have the monarch's face on something. And I think

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 5>it's always been on the five dollar not or at

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 5>least for a very long time it has. And so

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 5>my personal view is that Charles should be drawn on

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 5>that note. I think this is republicanism by stealth.

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't have strong views either way with monarchy or not,

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 5>but if you are going to have one, you know,

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 5>I think as a sign of respect you should have

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 5>the head of state's face on something.

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 3>You should And let's got two sides. Why can't you

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 3>have on one side and change the other side? Now,

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 3>before you go, you've been the US correspondent for the

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Australian newspaper for several years. You were there for much

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 3>of the COVID madness, and you would be very familiar

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 3>with his next character the file left activist teaches union

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 3>boss Randy Windagan and who's been attempting to reride history,

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 3>claiming that she was always for pushes to reopen schools.

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 2>This is what she's claiming.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 3>She wanted schools to be reopened as early as April

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty.

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 2>But the receipts say otherwise. Let's have a look.

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 11>Just because Donald Trump wants to take a risk with

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 11>people who go to bars or beaches, those of us

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 11>who have spent our life teaching kids are not going

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 11>to take a risk with kids or with our members' lives.

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 12>Remote and hybrid are really the only two ways you

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 12>can reopen schools safely.

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 11>We got at the Lady School opening because if you

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 11>don't have the mask, how are you going to.

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Be able to do this.

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 11>There's a huge difference between working in Walmart and working

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 11>at a school.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 12>You know, even in a situation like Florida where it was

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 12>pretty that schools should not reopen and where Miami schools

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 12>did not reopen because you had people who were courageous

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 12>and who were willing to divide. De Santosis denials.

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 2>This is like thirty seconds.

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 3>There's about ten minutes of her just railing throughout the

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 3>entire COVID era against any school reopening. We had the

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 3>same experience here, absolutely, but these people have found themselves, Adam,

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 3>on the wrong side of history.

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Well certainly.

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 5>One thing that I did learn in the US is

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 5>that the teachers unions over there are so extreme and

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 5>far left and powerful. That really shocked me. And they were,

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, they did a terrible job during COVID and

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 5>so many young American kids have suffered just you know,

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 5>just as they have here, and we really do need

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 5>a raw commission into you know, who said what went.

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 3>At least in America you did have states like Florida

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 3>and Texas that reopened schools, whilst here the experience was

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 3>very different, particularly in the state of Victoria where we're in.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Adam Christian, thank you so much for your time, Thanks

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 2>for joining me.

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Now is esteem geologist and author Professor I Primber In

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Labor's extending its energy rebates. It's going to be providing

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 3>another one hundred and fifty dollars in energy bill relief,

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 3>and the Albaneezy government has used the so called savings

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 3>provided by this existing rebate to claim that they've reduced

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 3>any energy bills by twenty five percent.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 2>But Ian, I'd love a fact check from you.

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Is taking money from the taxpayer and giving some of

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 3>it back to them in the form of a rebate.

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Is that really something that you could call a drop

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 3>in energy prices?

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 2>And certainly nothing to be proud of.

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 3>And I would say by any objective measure, energy prices

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 3>are going up, not down, as the treasurer claims.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 13>Well, the average elector is not going to be conned

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 13>by this. This is a simple job where we're still

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 13>waiting for our two hundred and seventy five dollars.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 7>After that we might get one hundred and fifty, but

0:14:58.920 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 7>we're paying for it.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 6>And when that money shifts from one hand to the other,

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 6>the ticket gets clipped and there's a bit.

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 7>Of money taken out. Now, what the government should be

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 7>addressing is the root cause of their extraordinary high cost

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 7>of electricity. Remember it was once cheap and reliable. Now

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 7>because of renewables, it's very expensive. So they should be

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 7>addressing the question, should we have so much renewable in

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 7>the grid, Should we not resurrect our coal fired power stations?

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 7>Should we not change the regimes such that we can

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 7>get gas producers getting their gas into the market very quickly.

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 6>This is a band aid solution.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 7>It's not treating the problem at its source, and it's

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 7>treating the electric with the absolute disdain. So they're taking

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 7>a huge amount of money with one hand and giving

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 7>us back peanuts.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 6>I don't fall for it. That no one else does.

0:15:55.520 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 3>And there's growing resistance against renewable energy infrastructure in the

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 3>regions Australia's energy infrastructures are Tony. Maha said the rollout

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 3>of the nation's renewable and transmission projects face significant.

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Hurdles to win over rural communities, with.

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 3>The latest example in South Australia's Brossa Valley.

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 2>We've got the locals.

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 3>They're protesting against a major wind projects later for the area.

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 3>They say the idea is absolute idiocy, and I've got

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 3>to agree in we're talking about a beautiful area being

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 3>scarred by these monstrosities.

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 7>Well, we have foreign solar and wind companies who are

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 7>building their facilities using Chinese parts and Chinese machines to

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 7>generate electricity. We once had cheap, reliable electricity. We're now

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 7>putting these monstrosities across beautiful areas. Areas which are farming areas,

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 7>and areas which are areas where people actually live and

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 7>make money and keep themselves alive from farming.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 6>Now, the Barossa is a beautiful area, but it's one.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 7>Of the many areas that's being attacked by these wind turbines.

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 7>For example, the potato farmers just north of Ballarat are

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 7>suffering the same problem. And this is in the seat

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 7>of Catherine King. She is the infrastructure Minister. She should

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 7>be concerned about infrastructure and how that infrastructure is going

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 7>to stop potato farmers using heavy equipment underneath the wires

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 7>that are going across their land. This is politically a

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 7>disaster in marginal seats such as Ballarat. It's a political

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 7>disaster for those in rural Australia.

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 6>And we are.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely dismissive of the farmer's concerns. They're treated with disdain

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 7>and it's divisive in the farming community. Is creating mistrust

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 7>of governments and bureaucrats and it's a really poisonous.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 6>Policy that's been put into practice now.

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 7>Armors count when we want to eat, but they don't

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 7>count when we want to destroy their land.

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 6>And this is what's happening.

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>In Shadow treasurer Angus Taylor has refused to say whether

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 3>the coalition would increase defense spending, repeal price caps on

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 3>coal and gas, or by how much it would reduce

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 3>net overseas migration, which is going to be a big

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 3>issue in the upcoming election. And Opposition finance spokeswoman Jane

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 3>Hume has refused to commit to delivering income tax cuts

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 3>for workers, despite vowing lower and simpler and fairer taxes

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 3>under a coalition government. What exactly is the coalition plan here?

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 3>It seems to have left itself with scan policy detail,

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 3>really not articulating a position that's dramatically different to labor.

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 3>What are they taking to the federal election.

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 7>I think they're making themselves a small target. They are

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 7>not having twenty seven different policies on the table.

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 6>The major policy is the cost of living. Part of

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 6>that is related to.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 7>The cost of energy, part of it is related to

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 7>government inefficiency, and so they're actually trying to reduce the

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 7>areas where the opposition can be attacked by the government. Now,

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 7>the principal area that the opposition should be looking at

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 7>is cost of living, but they also should be looking

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 7>at how businesses operate when businesses are in trouble. They

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 7>cut their costs. Governments are not doing that, and they

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 7>should be pushing very very hard what they want to

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 7>do with just enterprise and cutting the cost of government

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.719
<v Speaker 7>and the cost of creating services to people. This is

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 7>above and beyond the necessary costs that you should have.

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 7>And they're trying to make a small target of themselves

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 7>and not trying to have a situation where they can

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 7>be attacked on every quarter and such that they'll lose.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 6>A few votes. You lose a few votes there.

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 7>So I think it's a deliberate campaign by the opposition

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 7>to reduce the amount of a text that they get

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 7>from the government.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but I don't think that's the way to get elected,

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 3>essentially running on the platform that we're not the Anthony

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Albanese government.

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 2>The Victorian Lives have tried.

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 3>That at state level and it does not work. You

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 3>need to actually stand for something and give people a choice.

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 2>Professor Ian Plymer, thank you so much for your time tonight.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for your time, and still to come. Lefty

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 2>is losing it.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Plus the latest from the US, including Bill Maher's plans

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 3>to visit Donald Trump.

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Josh Hammer is up next.

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 3>You're watching the Reader Panney Show, and it's time for

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 3>lefties losing. It's start left is with the tragic fall

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 3>of Bill Burr, a comedian who was once hilarious, unashamedly

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 3>politically incorrect and not scared to take on the left

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 3>group thing, but sadly a lefty wife and a.

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Severe case of TDS.

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's reduced Bill Burr to a sad joke, a

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 3>very unfunny sad joke.

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Watch him here out on the View, yes the View here.

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 2>He had a golden.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 3>Opportunity to folk fun of these crazy hysterical women, but

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 3>instead he's joined their ranks and is railing against Elon Musk, these.

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 14>Tech nerds that want to build robots because they do

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 14>know how to talk to hot women.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna take.

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 6>All in a word, they're going to take off.

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 14>They are literally going to replace us. They were like

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 14>Beta right now and they come out with like the BC.

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 14>And I think Elon has got the rockets going because

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 14>they realize there's other earths out there and they're going

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 14>to they're going to trash this one and because they

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 14>don't have any concern for it, and they're going to

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 14>move on to the next earth.

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 3>Not sure that a billionaire with at least seven baby

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 3>mamas that we know of has any issues talking to

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 3>hot women. You should probably be talking to less. But

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 3>great call there, Bill Burr. Remember when you were funny?

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I do got to mention.

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 15>It's a male subsidized league. We gave you a league.

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 15>None of you showed up.

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 8>Where are all the feminists?

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 16>You failed them, not me, not men. Women failed the WNBA, ladies, Ladies,

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 16>name your top five all time WNBA players of all time.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 16>Coont's name five WNBA team named the WNBBA team in

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 16>your city.

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 2>You can't do it, yep.

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 3>The WNBA and body positivity were favorite topics, and it

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 3>was always funny.

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Ladies.

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 16>If you could just support the WNB the way you

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 16>support a fact ship that's prout.

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 7>Of your body, it is no longer a threat to you.

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 16>You know that lead would be doing bettercompos in the NBA.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 16>Oh my god, that's one of the saddest things I've

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 16>ever seen.

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, you've a got it. You're gorgeous.

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 8>You look great at bikini.

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I would kill myself if I look like that.

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 16>You saw an alcoholic, we'd be like, oh my god,

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 16>look at you your face down, passed up, your kids

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:28.719
<v Speaker 16>are crying.

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 15>You're a hero, You're a god.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 8>Keep doing what you're doing.

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 3>But now Bill Burt is just another lefty losing it,

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 3>cheering on a murderer and railing against capitalism.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 14>Some corporate had to give himself bonus check at the

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 14>end of the year. What if we made it worse

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 14>but made it look the same, then could our pools

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 14>be bigger?

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 17>Free?

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 10>Luigi?

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Where did the laughs go?

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 9>Bill?

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Where did they go?

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 3>But I'm gonna say Bill Burs still has some ways

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 3>to go to rival Rosio O'Donnell in the loopy stakes.

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Fresh from fleeing the US for Ireland, Rosie is now

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 3>engaging in dangerous democracy denial and trying to start a

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 3>conspiracy theory about the swing states and Elon Musk's influence.

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 10>I question why the first time in American history, a

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 10>president has won every swing state and is also best

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 10>friends and his largest donor was a man who owns

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 10>and runs the Internet. So I would hope that that

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 10>would be investigated and that we would see whether or

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 10>not it was an anomaly or something else that happened

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 10>on election night in America when Kamala Harris was filling

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 10>up stadiums with people who supported her, and Donald Trump

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 10>was not able to do that. So it's curious to me,

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 10>and as an American and a believer in democracy, I

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 10>would hope that we would be able to look at

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 10>all of the reasons why this happened.

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 3>I must have missed when Elon Muska owned and run

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 3>around the internet.

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 2>What is she on about? And you won't be shocked

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 2>to learn.

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 3>That her circle is very small and very insula.

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 5>How do you think America has changed in the months

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 5>since he's been elected?

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 10>Well, if you talk to any Americans, they're all in shock,

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 10>or at least the ones that I know, I will

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 10>have to say, I don't really have many people in

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 10>my life that support him. I don't really understand how

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 10>people could support a convicted Felon.

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's go from Ireland to Britain now and hear from

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 3>the UK delegate for the United Nations Commission on the

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 3>Status of Women.

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually going to be talking to you about my nipples.

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 4>As an oles and proud trans woman, I can tell

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 4>you my nipples have been on quite the journey. Soon

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 4>after starting HT, my nipples became quite scumbalous.

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Now talking about Lefty is losing it. Remember this chat

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 3>before the election featuring teds Judio, actor Robert de Niro,

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 3>and TV host Bill Maher.

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 9>If he is he wins the election, you won't be

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 9>on the show anymore. He'll come looking for me, will

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 9>be There'll be things that happened that none of us

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 9>can imagine. That's what happens in that kind of a dictatorship,

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 9>which is what he says. Let's believe him. Take him

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 9>at his word.

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I did from the beginning. Yeah, I mean, I said

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>from the very beginning, this guy is never going to concede.

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Power a dictatorship.

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, no one has come for Robert de Niro and

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Bill Maher is still on TV, and now he will

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 3>be meeting President Donald Trump at the White House. This

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 3>has been set up by one of Mar's recent guests

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 3>and one of Trump's friends, rockstar Kid rock Let's bring

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 3>in Newsweek's senior editor at Large and article three projects

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 3>Senior Council Josh Hammat. Josh, what do you think about this?

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 3>I've got to say I am not a fan of

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 3>this plan.

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 6>Rita.

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 15>I don't trust Bill Maher.

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 8>I to put the mildly, I mean the same way

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 8>that I don't trust Mark Zuckerberg and a lot of

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 8>these California liberals who are increasingly in Donald Trump's good graces.

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 8>Having said that, even though I don't trust him, I'm

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 8>not sure that it's a politically bad move for Donald Trump.

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 8>It's very little in the way of downside here. Frankly,

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 8>there's only potential upside. I mean, Rita. Before the election,

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 8>you and I discussed how the twenty twenty four election

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 8>America really did not come down necessarily to an ideological

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 8>right versus an ideological left divide. Rather, you have the

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 8>MAGA America First Coalition, which is basically a non partisan

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 8>coalition of the common sense. That's how you had so

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 8>many prominent ex Democrats, people like RFK Junior, Tulsi Gabber there.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 8>And then on the other hand, you had the sibilsational

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 8>arsonist that woke crazy. He's there now again. Bill Maher

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 8>is a liberal. I disagree with him on more issues

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 8>than I agree with him on there, but he is

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 8>very anti woke. There are some things that he's potentially

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 8>amenable to the Trump administration's message on. And more importantly,

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 8>he's got a massive audience and he has an absolutely

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 8>massive audience. His show is when god knows how many

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 8>Emmy awards here in the United States. There he has

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 8>genuine reach there, just kind of colloquially speaking here in

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 8>my circles there people watch his show. I mean, I mean,

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 8>here's message gets out there. So if Donald Trump can

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:28.959
<v Speaker 8>kind of bring him in, and if Bill Mark can

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 8>at least becomes slightly less hysterically trumped arrangement syndrome induced.

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 8>I'm not getting my hopes of for that, by the way,

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 8>but if there's any possibility that happening, there seems like

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 8>it's worth it to me. Again, I don't trust the

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 8>guy there, but I see very little in the way

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 8>of downside for this play.

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I think he gets a golden run. Josh.

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Not only is ma a tedious sufferer, I think he

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 3>benefits from the bigotry of low expectations conservatives have these

0:28:56.520 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 3>days for the left because occasionally, yes, he'll say something

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 3>thing that's anti woke. He'll point out some sensible point

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 3>of view, something the writer has been saying for years,

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 3>and we all stand around and clap like he's said

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 3>something profound, even though it's really just repeating what has

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 3>been said by the other side of politics for for

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 3>a long time. But as making Kelly exposed in her

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 3>chat with MA, this dude is in a bubble, profoundly

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 3>ignorant of stuff that he pretends to be passionate about,

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 3>like election denial.

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 15>Hillary Clinton, of course, is the original election denier. I'm

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 15>sure you voted for her in sixteen.

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, she's not an election denier.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 15>She absolutely was the og election denier.

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>First of all, she came out before the sun had

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>risen to concede the election to Trump, and.

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 15>Then spent the next four years seeing he was illegitimate.

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 15>He was an illegitimate president.

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>She okay, well, first of all saying she didn't say

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>he was an ill Well she did, You tell me

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly what she said?

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 15>She said those exact words repeatedly. I believe he knows

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 15>he's an illegitimate president.

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what do you say to that?

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Because, yes, amongst other left wing commentators and TV hosts,

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 3>he's far more sensible, far more balance.

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 2>But the end of the day, he has.

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Bought all these propaganda about Trump and hasn't bothered to

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 3>check some of the information, including things like things that

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:36.479
<v Speaker 3>have been debunked for years that the left still are

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>pushing these to this day.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 8>Look, I am not a Bill Moher apologize. I'll be

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 8>very keen with you. I don't even watch the show actually,

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 8>But having said that, I've had a number of friends

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 8>here who have been on his show there, and I

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 8>can tell you that that based on I've heard from

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 8>those who have been there on the show with him,

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 8>some of them have actually tried to talk in private

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 8>off camera. I won't need names, I won't kind of

0:30:57.840 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 8>get into that, but some of them have actually tried

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 8>to talk about Trump with him off camera there, and

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.479
<v Speaker 8>they hear it there and everywhere hit a block because

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 8>he seems to just genuinely have a mental block when

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 8>it comes to Donald Trump there. He has a very

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 8>hard time getting over with go over that, even if

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 8>he is sympathetic to a lot of his policies there,

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 8>He's definitely sympathetic to a lot of what Trump says.

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 8>When it comes to the dangers of radical Islam, he's

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 8>very pro Israel. I mean, like a free speech I mean,

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 8>there's some stuff that he genuinely seems to disagree with

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 8>the modern left on, but he has a massive hold

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 8>up when it comes to Donald Trump. That's probably what

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 8>Donald Trump is thinking and taking this meeting. Actually, he's like, Okay,

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 8>this guy's a massive critic of mine. He's got a

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 8>gargantuan platform. Maybe I can bring him in and like,

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, let's get it. Let's get a MacDonald's happy

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 8>meal or something, and I'll show the like I'm not

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 8>that I'm not a fascist, that I'm not straight out

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 8>of Munich in nineteen thirty three or something.

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 11>There.

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 8>Again, maybe not the greatest odds in the world of

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 8>succeeding there, but I'm just not necessarily seeing the downside here.

0:31:56.200 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh look, I think as the potential to backfire, because yes,

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 3>he does wail against the modern left occasionally, but that's

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 3>because he realizes that it's stopping them from being elected.

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 2>He wants the Democrats in power.

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 3>He's a fan of Gavin News and wants him to

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 3>be president. So you look at what he's done to California.

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>That's I've got my doubts about this.

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 3>We're going to keep a close eye, but I've got

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 3>a feeling this is going to backfire. Now, let's talk

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 3>about failed VP candidate Tim Walls. He's been forced to apologize,

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 3>well sort of, for this idiotic out first.

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 18>They've got that little stock app. I added Tesla tude

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 18>to give me a little boost during the day.

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Two twenty five and dropping now here.

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Tim Walls sort of apologizes, but then he mocks the

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 3>right for being and I quote but hurt.

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 2>This clown is all over the place.

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 18>This gay bugs me in a way that is probably unhealthy.

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:08.239
<v Speaker 18>And but but I have to be careful about being

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 18>a smart ass. I was making a joke. These people

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 18>have no sense of humor. They are the most literal people,

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 18>most literal people. But but my point was they're all

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 18>mad and I, you know, said something I didn't you know,

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 18>probably shouldn't have about a company.

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 15>He is agree, agreed.

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 18>They're all but hurt about the Tesla thing.

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Josh, does he even realize that the falling Tesla prices

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 3>hurts the people in his state, not to mention the

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 3>tens of thousands of Americans that Tesla employs.

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 8>He probably does not actually realize that because he's not

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 8>operating at a particularly a particularly high intelligence level. If

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 8>I'm just calling it like I see it here, you know,

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 8>there actually are some moderate ish Democrats who are not

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 8>going like full complete utter discuss jerk when it comes

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 8>to the issue of Tesla. So, for instance, Rocanna, who

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 8>comes from Silicon Valley, he plays foot seat with a

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 8>lot of the big tech big wigs.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 11>You know.

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.479
<v Speaker 8>He had an interview this past week Rita where he said,

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 8>I'm not rooting against Tesla, Tesla employees twenty thousand people

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 8>in my district. Okay, thank you for speaking some common

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 8>sense there, But Tim Walls doesn't really know common sense.

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 8>From the other side of his foot there, I means

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.760
<v Speaker 8>this man speaks drivell and when he's not speaking drivell,

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 8>he's speaking far left ideological pamblem there. Thank god this

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 8>man is not the Vice president of the United States.

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 8>Right there, I mean, frankly, rooting for an iconic American

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 8>company to fail in this manner, to root for people

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 8>who are living off of their investment income, living off

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 8>their capital gains, people who are in their sixty seventies,

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 8>who are retired, who are just living off of their dividends.

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 8>Whatever they're rooting for them to fail is nothing short

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 8>of disgusting. It's not about Elon Musk. That actually is

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 8>virtually nothing to do with Elon Musk. This company has

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 8>a ton of employees, workers who work at the manufacturing mills,

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 8>and you have investors there really about them. By the way,

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 8>I have to say, it was not that long ago.

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 8>I feel like it was basically yesterday that Tesla was

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 8>actually culturally here in America was largely a left wing

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 8>company that was as recently as probably three, four or

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 8>five years ago before Elon Musk started making his turn

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 8>towards the rights, and it was considered to be a

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 8>culturally left wing company for a very obvious reason is

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 8>that it's an electric vehicle. It was going to be

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 8>considered to be the clean energy equivalents of the gas

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 8>guzzling pickup trucks from Ford and Chevy.

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 11>There.

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.800
<v Speaker 8>Heck, I read I remember in some of my conservative circles,

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 8>like like during COVID four or five years ago, we

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 8>were making fun of lip bulls for driving Teslas. So

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 8>I mean, how quickly things change there. I don't personally

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 8>drive a Tesla. I happen to think that it's wonderful technology.

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 8>Not really my cup of tea, to be honest with you.

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 8>But the point is, this is an American company that

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 8>has American employees and employees a lot of Americans, including

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 8>right there in Tim Walls's state of Minnesota. And you

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 8>have a lot of people that are dependent upon Tesla's

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 8>stock going up and up and up. As the underlying

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 8>guy of the company should didentate that it will do

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 8>to actually live out the rest of their lives. So

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 8>shame on you, Tim Walls, and thank god, thank god, sir,

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 8>that you are not vice president of this great country.

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 3>I think he's the worst vice vice presidential candidate we

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 3>have seen. I struggle to think of anybody who has

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 3>been more disastrous, just more bizarre or.

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Out of touch.

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 3>And he's the governor of Minnesota. Minnesota state employees have

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Tesla shares in their pension funds, so if he's cheering

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:33.479
<v Speaker 3>on the falling share prices, he knows it's hurting them,

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 3>or he at least should know. Now talking about Elon Mask,

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 3>he has had enough. Hear has said that he's suing

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 3>CNN after a panelist Jamal Bowman called him a thief

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 3>and a Nazi.

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:53.240
<v Speaker 14>He's incompetent, he's a thief, he's a Nazi, and people

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 14>don't trust him.

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a lawyer. You are a lawyer, But.

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 3>That looks like a slam dunk defamation case if ay

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Long follows through.

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 8>So the guy he's talking to there, Joe BURRELLI is

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 8>a personal friend. Joe Burrelly is from stan Island. He's

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 8>a no nonsense New Yorker. And I wish we saw

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 8>the rest of that clip, reader, because I know that

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 8>Joe Brelly probably socked Jamal Bowman proverbally speaking, right across

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 8>the face. But Jamal Bowman lost his primary in New

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 8>York City for being a one a genuine moron. Two

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 8>for just being as idiologically left him as they come.

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.720
<v Speaker 8>Someone who was basically openly cheering on October seventh Amas.

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I'm barely exaggerating there. Someone who has taken

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:38.359
<v Speaker 8>every radical defund the police, open borders, defund ice, every

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 8>left wing lunatic stance imaginable that guy has taken.

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 14>There.

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 8>Now, when you're calling someone a Nazi, here look the

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 8>technical legal standard. And by the way, this is made up.

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 8>The Supreme Court made this up. This is not what

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 8>the First Amendment actually says. But in a nineteen sixties

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 8>case called New York Times versus Sullivan, the Supreme Court

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 8>basically said that when you have a defamation suit involving

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 8>a public figure, which Elon Musk clearly is, then the

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 8>burn of proof would be on the public figure and

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 8>here that's Elon Musk, to show that the person saying it,

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 8>that's Jamal Bowman, acted with actual malice. That's the legal standard,

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 8>actual malice.

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 15>So look, you.

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 8>Definitely it's possible, It's absolutely possible. In this particular case there,

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 8>you would definitely need some evidence and get to a jury.

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 8>It would be a whole process there. If you're Elon

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 8>Musk and you're the wealthiest guy in the world, what

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 8>do you have to lose by bringing this lawsuit there,

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:29.879
<v Speaker 8>you're not worried about attorney fees or anything like that. There,

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 8>go ahead and do it. Send a message to these

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 8>thugs riad a Jamal Bowman's a thug. These people are bullies,

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 8>the people that are coming across the Elon Musk. The

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 8>only way to deal with a bully, whether it's on

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.959
<v Speaker 8>a playground in a kindergarten, whether it's i'm a CNN set,

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 8>the way you deal with a bully is that you

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 8>can't just cower in the corner and just let the

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 8>bully punch you. You have to stand up for yourself

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 8>and start throwing some punches back there. So I mean,

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 8>if that means Elon musk file on defamation suit. I

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 8>say godspeed and go for it.

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 3>And Donald Trump got a huge reception over the weekend

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 3>when he attended the packed Wells Fargo Center Arena for

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 3>the NCAA Wrestling Championships.

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I had no idea this was such a big deal.

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:14.760
<v Speaker 3>The crowd there was huge, and he got a salute

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 3>from White Hendrickson, who won the national championship.

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Chaft America did America brun I can't believe it. My

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 6>job's on the floor.

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 3>He did it, and he got a hug there from

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the champion as well.

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 2>And we don't see that at sporting events. We've certainly

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 2>seen it in the UFC, we've seen it.

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 3>At the football Trump as much as he is hated

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 3>by the media and they tell us the polls are

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:55.399
<v Speaker 3>against him, when he goes to these sporting events, you're

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 3>hearing cheers and that is not normal.

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Normally the ends up booing politicians.

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and he's done this many times now, right. So

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 8>he actually went to the first NASCAR race of season,

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:09.840
<v Speaker 8>the Daytona five hundred, which is called the Great American

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 8>Race period. He got a massive round of applause there

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 8>at the Daytona five hundred. He went to the Alabama

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 8>Georgia football game this past year, the Army Navy football games.

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 8>Everywhere he goes to these big sporting games, he gets

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 8>a massive round of applause. He's become the modern day

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 8>Barack Obama in so far as he is the new

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 8>cultural totem, he's the new cultural icon. Back in two

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 8>thousand and eight, all the cultural amendment in this country

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 8>was with hope and change in Barack Obama. The cultural

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 8>momentum right now is with MAGA, is with MAGA and

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 8>America First. It's an absolutely incredible sea change. The Democratic

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 8>Party frankly, only has themselves to blame for it, as

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 8>their approval ratings crater into the twenties. The most recent

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 8>polling has their net approval rating hovering around twenty seven

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 8>to twenty nine percent or so, So they only have

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 8>themselves to blame for it. There, all Donald Trump basically

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.720
<v Speaker 8>has to do is get up there and sound normal

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 8>and talk about normal issues and talk about tru and

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.439
<v Speaker 8>to solve normal people's problems in a normal way.

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:03.760
<v Speaker 7>There.

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 8>You know, maybe insert a funny joke you are there.

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 8>He's very good at that. He's a very funny guy

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:09.320
<v Speaker 8>and then you have a recipe for being a smashing

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 8>success in today's dnage in America. And that's what he's done.

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's what we are seeing. The media is still

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 3>having its meltdown. The American public seem to be pretty

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 3>comfortable with what's happening at Josh hammert Thank you so

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 3>much for your time tonight, Thank you reader.

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:29.959
<v Speaker 2>And still to come the reaction to what.

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Looks to be one of Disney's most disastrous films.

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 2>Kinsey Schofield has the latest welcome back.

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now is celebrity and royal commentator Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey,

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 3>The reviews are in, and Disney's woke reimagining of Snow

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 3>White has been widely panned as one of the worst

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 3>movies ever. Even the most so called progressive publications hates

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 3>this film.

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's just have a look. It's just a few of.

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 3>The summer is here. Lazy, visually repellent, said The Independent.

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Exhaustingly awful, said The Guardian.

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I like that one.

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 3>A strange hot mess came from the Huffington Post.

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Good enough for TV.

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 3>It's about the nicest review we've seen. That's was from

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Vanity Fair and the BBC came up with the film

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 3>has a major identity crisis. Again BBC being polite there,

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 3>And I've got to say, the extraordinarily bad film isn't

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 3>helped by the fact that its biggest star is deeply

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 3>Unpopulousno white actress Rachel Zegler is an unlikable lefty activist,

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:57.879
<v Speaker 3>infamous for all sorts of outbursts, including this one after

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump won the twenty twenty five for election, posting

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 3>made Trump supporters and Trump voters and Trump himself never

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 3>know peace, goodness may How badly is this going for

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Disney Kinsey?

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 17>That's right, I mean exactly, You're a poet. The New

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 17>York Times reported that Disney Bosses exploded in August twenty

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 17>twenty four after she shared a trailer for the movie

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 17>on Twitter and captured it and captured it and always

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 17>remember Free Palestine. It forced the snow white producer to

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 17>go have a meeting with her, flying from LA to

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 17>New York, and they had these crisis talks where he

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 17>stressed her, You've got to watch what you say online

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 17>because you could alienate half of your audience. And he

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 17>went home feeling pretty confident in it. And then she

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:49.399
<v Speaker 17>pulled this Donald Trump's done, and people were so outraged

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 17>by the Donald Trump post that she actually had to

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 17>come out and apologize. I don't think she's learned any

0:43:55.400 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 17>lessons from this. She just seems to be relentless in

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 17>her being outspoken and politically politically salacious in some ways.

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 17>And I think that it hasn't done Disney has learned

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 17>their lesson. I think at the end of the day,

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:15.879
<v Speaker 17>that's the most important thing.

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is the true Disney have been burnt before

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 3>by this sort of activism, and yet they just seem

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:28.840
<v Speaker 3>to be on a crusade to destroy much loved films.

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:30.840
<v Speaker 2>And if you want to make.

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 3>A film where the heroine isn't about finding her prince

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 3>and true love, it's all about her being empowered and

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:44.280
<v Speaker 3>this feminist message, write a new script, write a new story.

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Don't take something that's a much loved classic and completely

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 3>mess it up and turn it into this hot mess

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 3>of lefty activism. Now let's talk about Harry Potter author JK.

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Rowling. She's using a new TV series.

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 3>Is based on her books to get a little bit

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 3>of revenge on the ungrateful triover actors that she made

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:11.399
<v Speaker 3>into huge stars. Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Green

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 3>too all turn their backs on Rally because she's taken

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:17.240
<v Speaker 3>a stand for women's rights.

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Tell me about this project.

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 17>Well, it's going to be on HBO and auditions are

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 17>going to begin next month for the children ages nine

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 17>to eleven. They're looking again for Harry Ron and Hermimi

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:34.359
<v Speaker 17>and this show's casting team are working through thirty two

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 17>thousand audition tapes to give you an idea of what

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 17>a track this is going to be. And it's going

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:45.439
<v Speaker 17>to go through the entire book series, and she's going

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 17>to executive produce as well. JK and HBO is saying

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 17>she's very, very involved in this project and she is

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:55.760
<v Speaker 17>there to ensure that it is faithful to her books. Now,

0:45:55.800 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 17>she has said that she the original cast could apologize,

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 17>she doesn't think she has it in her to forgive

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 17>them because they've just been so vile and the words

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 17>used when it comes to this new project is totally

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 17>eradicate and expunge these actors from the origin of this

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 17>of its success. And she says, you know, I blame

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 17>them for e wroting women's hard one rates. You know

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:23.359
<v Speaker 17>they're to blame for this.

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Good on her, Good on her for taking a stand.

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, Royal author Tom Quinn has told us in his

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 3>new book Yes Man, The Secret Life of Royal Servants that,

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 3>according to Camilla's royal aids, she in fact hated the

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 3>idea of being queen and would regularly say to Charles,

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 3>can't we get away from all this protocol?

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 2>It's all bollocks.

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 3>That sounds like something she would say, But Charles, who

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 3>hates swearing, would reply, you're going to do it.

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Become queen for me, Darling Kinsey.

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Do we believe these conversations took place? I do enjoy

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 3>these direct quotes that are big dished up in this book.

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, Tom Quinn, aka writer for the Crown, You know,

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 17>I wonder if Camilla was afraid that it was history

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 17>repeating itself. Alice Keppel was Queen Camilla's great great grandmother

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 17>and the mistress of King Edward the seventh, King Charles

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 17>the Third's great great grandfather. So perhaps she thought she

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 17>would never be the wife, always the mistress. Perhaps she

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:32.240
<v Speaker 17>had just grown to accept that. But her great grandmother

0:47:32.440 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 17>was her husband's great great grandfather's mistress in the eighteen

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:39.879
<v Speaker 17>nineties Wow and was so well loved by the man

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 17>that she was there with him at his deathbed. So

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:45.479
<v Speaker 17>you know, maybe Camilla just thought, I know my role.

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 17>But I think she's done a really great job of

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 17>being the queen so far in supporting King Charles.

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:55.320
<v Speaker 3>I think she has as well, and I think she's

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 3>much loved these days because she was probably the most

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 3>hated woman Britain during Diana's time after that interview, and

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 3>she's really shown that she's a servant for the people.

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 3>She's doing a role she possibly doesn't want to do

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 3>to support Prince Charles or King Charles. I should say,

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:19.840
<v Speaker 3>before you go, tell me about this gift that Kay

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Trump has received from the president. This is I think

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 3>President Trump is telling us who his favorite grandchild is.

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:30.760
<v Speaker 3>What's Kay driving these days?

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:34.720
<v Speaker 17>So this is a gift from I imagine it's Trump

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 17>and Elin and Trump. But the way that she presents

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 17>it is that this was a special gift from Elon

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 17>and it's some souped up cyber truck and she is

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 17>so proud of how fast she can go on this car.

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I cringe.

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:49.280
<v Speaker 10>I'm so scared.

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 17>I'm like, put your seapole on. But yeah, I think

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 17>that there's definitely some favoritism there. And hey, this blows

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 17>all those reports that Trump and Elon have any issues

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 17>out of the water. Elon is not gifting Trump's granddaughter

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:04.360
<v Speaker 17>a car if these two have any behind the scenes beef.

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Yep. It's been a couple of big weeks for Kate Trump.

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Her mom has just come out and confirmed she is

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 3>dating Tiger Woods. I'm sure we'll talk about that later

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 3>in the week. Kinsey, thanks for joining me tonight, and

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:19.799
<v Speaker 3>that's it from me. Tomorrow night is Budget Night, so

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:23.399
<v Speaker 3>we'll be coming to you from our digital platforms. Check

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 3>out us out on the app, on YouTube, don't go

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:27.399
<v Speaker 3>anywhere though.

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Newsnight is up next