WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 3 June

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Lately.

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Late Debate.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us on the Late Debate.

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm James Macpherson with Caleb Bond and freyer Leitch coming

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 3>up tonight. Chess isn't generally regarded as a great spectator sport,

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 3>but you may rethink that when you see the world

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 3>number one lose.

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And his reaction will show you a little later.

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Plus, when we look at what's making news tomorrow, Tasmanian

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 3>politicians reject a massive pay right, that's right, you heard

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 3>me correctly, they rejected.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>A massive pay rise.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 3>And the Australian newspaper reveals the extraordinary amount the federal

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 3>government is spending on climate change every single year. I

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 3>promise you it's eye watering. We'll get to all of

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 3>that shortly, but first, is it okay for a man

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 3>to refuse to shake hands with a woman because well

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 3>she's a woman. Take a look at what happened Sunday

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 3>night after the Champions League game in Europe when CBS

0:00:56.160 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Sports welcomed UFC fighter Kabib Nugomv to their panel. Now,

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 3>he shakes hands with all the male panel members, but

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 3>when the only female broadcaster extends her hand, well, take

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:13.639
<v Speaker 3>a look.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 4>Wow, how are you agree?

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to the show, apologize, Thank you so much for

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>b in the UFC fights.

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It is a pleasure to have you.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 5>We didn't know you were.

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Here now could be visit about Muslim So refusing to

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 3>shake a woman's hand is part of his religion.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's the question. Was he rude or was he principled

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a man of faith standing for the tenets of his religion.

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 6>Caleb Well, I mean he is entitled to his religion,

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 6>as we are all entitled to whatever religion we may

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 6>or may not ascribe to. But when you're on Western soil,

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 6>I think you have to play by Western rules.

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I wouldn't go to a.

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 6>Majority Muslim country and begin to tell them how they

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 6>should behave, and I would adhere to whatever expectations they

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 6>had of me while I was there, because they would

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 6>probably expect that while I'm there, I would not shake

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 6>a woman's hand, And I'll say, that's fine, that's your culture.

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 6>I'm in your country, so I'm not going to do it.

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 6>I disagree with that, but I'm not going to do it.

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 6>And by the same token, if you come to our countries,

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 6>you should also have to adhere by our standards, and

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 6>our standards are that women are equal to men. The

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 6>idea that you cannot shake a woman's hand is rooted

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 6>in misogyny, and we in the West say that is

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 6>a bad thing.

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 2>So, yes, you're free to practice your religion.

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 6>But when it comes to fundamental standards and values that

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 6>we hold, Dear, everyone should be held to the same standard,

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 6>regardless of religion or creed or anything else.

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you reckon?

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I totally understand what you're saying, Caleb, and

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 7>there definitely are aspects of fundamentalist Islam that are discriminatory

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 7>towards women. Unequal access to divorce, unequal shares in inheritance,

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 7>a woman's testimony is worth less than a man's. There

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 7>are plenty of examples. But I do think in this instance,

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 7>one of the rules of Western soil is that we

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 7>are a pluralist civilization. You can practice your religion and

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 7>you should be free to practice that religion, and so

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 7>I think in this instance there are plenty of aspects

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 7>of fundamentalist Islam that are genuinely sexist. I don't know

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 7>if this necessarily was one, and I would also note

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 7>that Orthodox Jews also don't shake the hands women. I

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 7>don't think that's rooted in misogyny, so I would say

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 7>it was awkward. It's awkward that he then embraced the

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 7>other men. But like I mean, he should be free

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 7>to practice his religion rude. I don't think it was rude.

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I don't think he was trying to make

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 7>her feel uncomfortable. I think this is his religion. And

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 7>if you want to have a conversation around sexism in

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 7>fundamentalist Islam, that's a valid conversation to have. But in

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 7>this instance, he's just practicing his religion. We would ask

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 7>an orthodox doe to shake a woman's hand, so why

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 7>are we asking?

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't.

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I would.

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 6>I don't care what religion you're a part of. If

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 6>you're on Western soil, you obey by the rules that

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 6>we have, which is that we believe women are equal

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 6>to men.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 2>What's wrong with that? But what about what others?

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 5>That you should be able to practice your religion freely?

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 6>Okay, But at what point does practicing your religion freely

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 6>then impinge upon the majority's rights and freedoms?

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I have long held don't have a right to have

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>someone shake your hand.

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 2>That's okay, sure.

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 6>Sure, But if the reason that someone is saying they

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 6>don't want to shake your hand is because of their religion,

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 6>and their religion dictates that you can't shake a woman's hand,

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 6>you can't tell me that that's not sexist and in

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 6>some way rooted in misogyny. For what reason can you

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 6>not shake a woman's hand?

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 7>But plenty of people have sexist and misogynist views. They're

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 7>not outlawed, they're not banned. You might not like it,

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 7>but I still defend it right religion.

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 6>I never said that it should be in law, but

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 6>I'm saying we should call it out and say it's wrong.

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you can say something misogynistic or sexist on air,

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 6>and then I can say that's a lot of odswallop.

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 6>That's how this works. That's what we're doing with him there. Yes,

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 6>he's free to practice his religion. But if we say

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 6>that women are equal, then I would expect to see

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 6>people adhere to that. And if they don't want to

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 6>adhere to that, why are you in my country?

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.799
<v Speaker 3>Well, I agree that he's free to practice his religion.

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 3>That's a pluralistic society, as you pointed out, But I

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 3>don't think that allowing people to practice their religion, demands

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 3>that we approve of how they practice their religion, and

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I think he's been rightly condemned. My question is where

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 3>are the feminists calling this out? This is the bigotry

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 3>of low expectations. If the Catholics don't allow women to

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 3>be priests, then everyone is quick to slam Catholicism as

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 3>a misogynistic religion. But if a Muslim Man refuses to

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 3>take the hand of a woman who extends it in

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 3>friendship because I can't touch a woman, well that somehow

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 3>gets a free pass. It's a bigotry of low expectations,

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>where people expect and allow less from I think from

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 3>the religion of Islam than they do for other religions.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 7>Well yeah, I mean imagine if Popo Leo refused to

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 7>the hands of women, there would be global outrage, like

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 7>a complete convulsion and meltdown in the West. So yeah,

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 7>it is interesting to note the silence from some quarters.

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 6>I do wonder where our good mate Clementine Ford is.

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 6>Clementine Ford's Instagram and you can have an Instagram story

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 6>highlight like a collection of stories that she's actually.

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Got one dedicated to me.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 6>So I get a guernsey. But oh mate, kebeb doesn't

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 6>get one. I mean, come on, Clementine, surely it's a

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 6>fair go here, isn't it. Now.

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Of course, you may be aware.

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.559
<v Speaker 6>That it has been Reconciliation Week leading up to today. Today,

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 6>June the third is the last day of Reconciliation Week.

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 6>They don't adhere to general weeks on the calendar, it

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 6>would seem, but it runs from I think it's the

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 6>twenty sixth or the twenty seventh.

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Of May every year through to the third of June.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 6>But I think it's gone a little bit too far

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 6>in this case. And I have no problem in saying

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 6>that as a country, of course, we should all strive

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 6>towards reconciliation. And let's not forget the definition of the

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 6>word reconciliation assumes that you reckon style, which means you

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 6>come together and you settle your differences and you all

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 6>move forward as one.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that is a great thing.

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 6>That we should all be working towards. But that is

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 6>not what they mean when they talk about reconciliation. The activists,

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 6>of course mean that we should divide people, and that's

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 6>exactly what North Kottai has been doing. Down in Victoria

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 6>where they've taken it one step over the mark, I think,

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 6>and have put a sign out the front of the

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 6>school which you will be able to see on the

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 6>screen here, which says sorry, and of course Sorry day

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 6>marks the day that we apologized for the stolen generations,

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 6>or Kevin radd apologized for the stolen generations, and henceforth

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 6>we must always be sorry for everything that was done

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 6>in this country, apparently including settling it etc. We sent

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 6>our cameras down this afternoon to take a look at

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 6>this sign out the front, which, of course is it

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 6>right in front of the flag poles. So as the

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 6>kids arrive at school with the Australian flag there, they

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 6>are made to feel like they have to be sorry

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 6>for something. And once the camera's turned up, the sorry

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 6>sign was taken away. Now we don't know whether it

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 6>was taken away because our cameras turned up or because

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 6>today was the last day of Sorry Day.

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 2>That would seem convenient that it.

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 6>Was taken in at precisely the time our cameras arrived.

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 6>We did contact North kot High for comment and they

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 6>said no comment on the phone. But this idea, I mean,

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 6>you know you're a kid going to school. I mean,

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 6>the teenagers should admit. It's not like they're the little kids,

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 6>but this idea is being put into their heads that

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 6>they must feel guilty for things that other people may

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 6>or may not have done generations ago. I mean, I

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 6>wonder if you're saying, we obviously have a great Margrant story.

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 6>This is that's from last year. By the way, they've

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 6>done this multiple years in a row. Now that photo,

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 6>we have a great Margaret story in this country which

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 6>we celebrate even though they're living on stolen land.

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how you marry those two up.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 6>But if you're an Indian kid going to school at

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 6>North kot High now you know you weren't involved in

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 6>the first fleet in any way, and you have to

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 6>feel sorry for what someone else?

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you? I mean, for Heaven's sake.

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 6>Sure, reconciliation, but why do we keep telling people they

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 6>must feel guilty for what has been well?

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the sign begs a number of questions. Right, firstly,

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 3>sorry for what, Second, sorry on behalf of whom?

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>And third sorry to who exactly?

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 3>And this is counterproductive because you're teaching kids two things

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 3>that kids should not be taught. Number one, you're teaching

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 3>them collective guilt, and there's nothing worse than collective guilt

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 3>that you are guilty of the sins of your father

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 3>and his father and his father. Western civilization moved away

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 3>from that, and that's what helped Western civilization become great.

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 3>We rejected the idea of collective guilt. And the second

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 3>thing they're teaching kids through gestures like this is to

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 3>make empty, meaningless gestures, as if somehow they are accomplishing

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 3>something quite profound. Sticking a sorry sign on the grass

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 3>out the front in front of the flag pole and

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 3>then hurriedly removing it when cameras turn up does nothing

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 3>to change a single indigenous life. Somehow, kids are taught

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 3>that if you make these empty gestures, you're making a difference.

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's a dangerous thing to teach young people.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 3>That's not how you change the world. It's not how

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 3>you make a difference. And collective guilt, as I said,

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 3>is an evil that I thought we'd move beyond.

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, look, it's all performative activism. I see this among

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 7>my friends all well, most of them aren't really my friends,

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 7>but I see this among my age group quite a bit.

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 7>People will have their little bios on Instagram and instead

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 7>of saying they're from Sydney, they'll say Eora on stolen

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 7>Land or Gadigul or num And it's just like, what

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 7>are you actually accomplishing here?

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 5>It really doesn't make any sense.

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 7>And I also think just the bombarding young people with

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 7>guilt about something they can't control and they had.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 5>No part of. I mean, what is this doing?

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 7>How is this helping our nation move forward towards reconciliation?

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 7>As you say, Caleb, who will reconciling here? It doesn't

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 7>make any sense.

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 3>As part of their reconciliation plan at the school, they

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 3>had students watch an eight minute video of the former

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 3>police chief make a groveling apology for the stolen generations,

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 3>and so they had kids sit in class and watch

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 3>that eight minute video. I'm just not sure how that

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 3>brings people together when you're continually pushing one side of

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 3>the story, and that is the wrongs that were done

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 3>years ago that these young people have nothing to do with.

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 3>And as you said, many of these kids in a

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 3>city Melbourne probably weren't even born in this country as immigrants.

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 6>I think we've reached a point now where we need

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 6>to be honest about what this is really all about,

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 6>and it's not about reconciliation. Reconciliation is a misnomer.

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Continually.

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 6>What is pushed is an US and them idea that

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 6>you the white man, and then everyone else who's come

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 6>after the white man has committed terrible atrocity, atrocities and

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 6>you must home for them forever. I mean, there is

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 6>no end timeline, seemingly to the point at which we

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 6>reach reconciliation, because the activists don't really want to reach reconciliation.

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 6>They want an admission that the settlement of Australia was wrong.

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 6>And once you admit that the settlement of Australia was wrong,

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 6>you open yourself up to reparations and land back and

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 6>all these other things. That is the ultimate end goal.

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 6>It's not, as I said before, that the dictionary definition

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 6>of reconciliation to reconcile, to come together and settle your differences,

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 6>is not the end aim of this. And does anyone

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 6>talk about the fact that when the British came out here,

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 6>that the people who were sent out were charged to

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 6>treat Aboriginal people as British subjects. I mean, I have

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 6>at home and South Australia is a free setless state,

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 6>so it's slightly different to the convict states. But I

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 6>have the Proclamation of South Australia on my wall at home.

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 6>I look at it every morning when I have a

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 6>cup of coffee, and it says explicitly on there that

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 6>the people, the Aboriginal people who were found in South

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 6>Australia were to be treated as British subjects as though

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 6>they were any other person who was moving to settle

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 6>South Australia. So there was no intent for a genocide,

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 6>there was no intent to kill people. They were sent

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 6>out he to settle peacefully. Do you reckon the kids

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 6>are being told about that? No, of course not, because

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 6>it's not about reconciliation, it's about division.

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 2>They should call it division well.

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 7>And there's no doubt that there definitely was discrimination against

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 7>Indigenous people and that was absolutely terrible and the repercussions

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 7>are probably still being felt in communities today. But that

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 7>doesn't mean we continually have to live in this guilt

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 7>of things we can't change. Let's focus on practical ways

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 7>to move forward. At another kindergarten in Victoria, a local

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:52.359
<v Speaker 7>council has come under fire for a pamphlet promoting this kindergarten.

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 7>On the pamphlet, proudly on the front was displayed the

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 7>prime flag, the Indigenous flag, the Torres Strait Island flag,

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 7>but notably missing was the Australian flag. One ratepayer said,

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 7>now it appears the council's kindergarten acknowledges the gay, Aboriginal

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 7>and Torres Strait Islander communities, as evidenced by eliminating the

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 7>Australian flag, which represents all of us from the official paperwork.

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 7>Does that mean the rest of us are exempt from rates?

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think that's a pretty fair question. I

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 7>understand presenting other symbols under certain circumstances, but removing the

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 7>Australian flag seems like a deliberate political point to I

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 7>don't know, eraise our national identity.

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 3>It would seem fairly deliberate at the Council's job to

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 3>collect rubbish, not distribute it. The mayor, Anthony Marsh, he

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 3>said he was appalled by this brochure and he's investigating,

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 3>and maybe he is.

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll take him at his word.

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 3>However, he has previously made a big deal about the

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 3>fact that the council is flying the Pride flag out

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 3>front of the chambers for International Day against Homophobia and

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 3>every other sort of phobia. So he certainly committed to

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 3>pushing those sorts of agendas. Back in twenty twenty three,

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 3>there's an interesting incident at this very council where a

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 3>female council member objected to the fact that they were

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 3>flying a Pride flag and she was sent for personal

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 3>development and banned from speaking to other council staff until

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 3>she had finished that re education. So you know, the

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 3>mayor says, oh, that he's appalled and he's investigating. But

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 3>this is a council that has been pushing the LGBTQ agenda.

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to push the agenda, that's fine.

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 3>The issue is council members are paid by rate payers

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 3>to do the normal sorts of things that councils would do,

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 3>not to push different ideologies, and certainly not on three

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 3>and four year olds. I would say this, If Anthony

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Marsh the mayor, is appalled by this brochure that's gone

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 3>out on the council dime, and he's investigating to find

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 3>out how it happened, will we ever be made aware

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 3>of who did this and who was promoting this to kindikits.

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I should hope.

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 6>So. I do find it curious that you say councils

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 6>are meant to collect rubbish, not distributed. I would say

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 6>councils are probably some of the greatest distributors of rubbish

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 6>in this country and point and to be fair to

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 6>the council, and I mean the elected members of the council,

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 6>none of them would have had any idea that this

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 6>leaflet was being put together. It's been done by a

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 6>staff member who's obviously got some responsibility for the kindergarten.

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 6>And then when the elected members have been made aware

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 6>of it that the mayor has come out said he

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 6>will do something about it. So good on him, and

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 6>let's hope all of that is done. But I can't

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 6>get my head around why exactly those flags were there

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 6>in the first any of them, to be perfectly honest,

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, if you're selling a kindergarten or places in

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 6>the kindergarten, I mean I'm not looking at the front

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 6>of it, not that I have children in that position,

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 6>I wouldn't be looking at the front of the leaflet

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 6>for the kindergarten.

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Where's the flag?

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 6>I can only send my kid here if it's got

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 6>a flag on the front. I mean, I want to

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 6>open the thing up and find out that they're going

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 6>to do a good job.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 2>For my kid. I don't particularly give a toss about

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 2>any flags.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 6>So you then have to say, Okay, if you've made

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 6>a conscious decision to put some flags on the front,

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 6>you must have done it for a reason. You've not

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 6>put the Australian flag there, so you know, we'll read

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 6>into that whatever you want.

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 2>But you have deliberately put the Pride flag, the Aboriginal

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 2>flag in the Torres Straight Islander flag.

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 6>So is the suggestion that we are an inclusive place,

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 6>and we are inclusive of LGBTIQA plus and Aboriginal and

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 6>Torros Straight Island are people.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 2>They're three to five year olds.

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's not relevant. It's completely irrelevant. Certainly on

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 6>the point of the Pride flag. It's completely irrelevant because

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 6>they're three to five years old. Is it a message

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 6>that that's what we're going to teach them about?

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Perhaps it expands upon that. But if

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the purpose.

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 6>Of having the Aboriginal and the Torys Straight Islander flag

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 6>is to say that we are accepting, tolerant of indigenous people.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 6>Where's the Indian flag and the Pakistani flag and the

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 6>Schlangan flag and the Bangladeshi flag and the Argentinian flag?

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, is this to say that this kindergarten is

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 6>exclusive of Argentinian children, that it will discriminate against them

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 6>if their parents dare to enroll them there? What is

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 6>the point of the flags being there in the first place,

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 6>That's the bit I would like to understand, unless they're trying.

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 2>To make some weird political point. But again, what you

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 2>got to do with three to five.

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Year olds having listened to you speak there, Maybe we

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 3>should be thanking whoever designed this brochure for designing it

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 3>in the way they did, because it's an alert to

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 3>all parents. If you said you said you are Kady

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 3>in the Mornington Peninsula, this is the kind of stuff

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 3>they're going to think is appropriate for three to four

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 3>year olds.

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 3>After October seven, there was a lot of anti Israel

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 3>sentiment that went into anti semitism, just outright and ground

0:18:55.960 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 3>zero for that were universities, Sydney University not least among them.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 3>For two months there was a permanent pro Palestinian encampment

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 3>on the campus that meant Jewish students feared going to class.

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Many of them stayed home rather than going to lectures

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 3>because they felt unsafe. So the university has spent four

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred and forty one thousand dollars reviewing how they could

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 3>do things differently to combat anti Semitism. Gee, for half

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 3>a million dollars, you'd think, wow, what could we do?

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Maybe don't allow an encampment on the student grounds stopping

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 3>students from getting to class. Anyway, They've come up with

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 3>five revised policies, one of which is actually a pretty

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 3>good idea. They've decided to end what's commonly known as

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 3>lecture bashing.

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the practice, and I'll get Freyer.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 3>To explain it to us in a moment, because you're

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 3>more recently out of university than i am.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Freyer.

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 3>But this is the practice of before or after a lecture.

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 3>The lecture up gives an open forum to a student

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.959
<v Speaker 3>to then make a political speech on all manner of

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 3>things not necessarily related to the subjects. Students have paid

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 3>to sit in that lecture theater and learn. And many

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 3>of these student bashings or lecture bashings have been quite provocative.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, exactly, And that's kind of what happens these socialist activists.

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 7>It's always the same ten or fifteen socialists who come

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 7>into these lectures and basically yell at you about whatever

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 7>social justice cause is of the day. But obviously last

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 7>eighteen months it's all been about demonizing Israel, and they

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 7>will come into your lecture theater whether or not the

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 7>lecturer wants them to. In fact, check out this case

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 7>where the lecturer did not want these protests to come in,

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 7>yet they came in. Anyway, if you're opposed to the

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 7>genocide in Palestine, you know there's a ralliant Thursday one PIO.

0:20:52.800 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 6>You can come along to that one.

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 7>Instead of letting these absolute idiots yell at that class

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 7>about pro Palestinian rallies, the guy the lecturer just started

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 7>playing Beyond Sy to shut them up. I think that's

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:18.479
<v Speaker 7>an absolutely amazing response, really, But there is a deeper

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 7>problem here that I don't think banning lecture bashing is

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 7>really going to solve, and that is that our universities

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 7>have been captured by radical, radical activists. I went back

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 7>to my alma mater a couple of weeks ago for

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 7>an event where people got to put on VR headsets

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 7>that depict October seven, and as I was leaving the event,

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 7>this is the greeting I got from some very tolerant

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 7>left wing activists.

0:21:49.960 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 5>Shime on you, Oh it's you mine. Wow wow wow wow.

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 7>And then they proceeded to follow me and my dad.

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 5>It was just insane.

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 7>They were waiting out there for the full duration of

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 7>the event, like three hours. I mean, the first thing

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 7>we learn is none of these people have jobs or

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 7>really care about their studies, because they have all the

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 7>time in the world to harass people.

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.719
<v Speaker 5>But it is just crazy, and so I don't know

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 5>what it will take.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 7>For the university to truly root out all these anti

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 7>Semitic activists, but it seriously is ground zero for the

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 7>general collapse in social fabric that we're witnessing across the country.

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 6>I just find the whole concept rather bizarre. I mean,

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 6>putting aside the content of what they're saying. I mean,

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 6>they could be talking about the regulation of farm equipment

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 6>in US bigger Stan for all I care. Who gives

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 6>you the right to stand up in front of a

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 6>captured audience, I mean, talk about whatever your pet project is.

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 6>I mean they're there to learn, presumably that's what they

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 6>are paying fees for. That's what the taxpayer for many

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 6>of these cases is paying their fees upfront in terms

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 6>of hex and then they'll pay it back later. For

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 6>of course, the taxpayer also gives other significant funding to universities,

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 6>and we do that because we expect that students will

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 6>be churned out on the other side with skills that

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 6>will be helpful to this nation and instead they're going

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 6>off to UNI.

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 2>And the unie says, yeah, it's all.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 6>Right, you can have the soapbox, stand up and talk

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 6>about whatever the hell you want.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's not what it's for.

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.959
<v Speaker 6>I understand that unis of places should be places of

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 6>free speech and debate, and nothing should be off the table.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 6>It's all up for discussion, but not when the lecture

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 6>is going on.

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you want to stand on the front.

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 6>Lawn and bleed about whatever your issue is, that's fine.

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 6>That's what the town square is about. But the town

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 6>square doesn't extend into a captive audience. You have a

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 6>right to say what you want to say, but you

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 6>don't have a right to a captive audience that can't

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 6>just get up and walk out.

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 3>So Mark Scott, the Vice Chancell's made a good decision

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 3>on this bat and the practice. But of course the

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 3>student Representative Council they're up in arms saying it impinges

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 3>on the long history of political debate at Sydney University,

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 3>which is kind of ironic since it was only a

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 3>few weeks ago that the student union held a meeting

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 3>to debate the definition of anti Semitism, and when a

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Jew got up to speak about it, a huge number

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 3>of people in the room all turned their backs on

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 3>the speaker at the student Union or Representative Council, So

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure how their commitment to political debate is

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 3>reflected in that Caleb.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 6>It's all good when it goes your way, speaking of

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 6>political debate and matters of religion and free speech. A

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 6>shocking case out of the UK overnight, we're bloken by

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 6>the name of Hamid Koskin has been convicted found guilty

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 6>of a religiously aggravated public order offense. This is blasphemy

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 6>laws by any other name.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Now. His offense was to back.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 6>In February, he is from Turkey himself, to go out

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 6>the front of the Twokish embassy and burn a copy

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 6>of the Quran which he was waving around and saying

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 6>f Islam, Islam is a religion of terrorism, and Quran

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 6>is burning. He was protesting against President Erduan in Turkey,

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 6>who he says is running.

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 2>An Islamist regime.

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 6>He was attacked by another man in the process of

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 6>staging this protest, but he was then arrested, taken off,

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 6>gets his day in court, and he's told the offense

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 6>is not that he sets something on fire in a

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 6>public place, and I would understand that we don't want

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 6>people going around starting fires in public places, but it

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 6>was specifically aggravated motivated by religion. And the judge in

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 6>fact said in this case that one of the aggravating

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 6>circumstances was not just that he had a hatred of Islam,

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 6>but by extension, that means that he has a hatred

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 6>of Islamic people. And so the display that he put

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 6>on his peaceful protest, because of course he didn't hurt anyone,

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 6>was somehow discriminatory, and he has now been convicted essentially

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 6>of a form of blasphemy.

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is ridiculous.

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 6>Again, find him whatever for starting fires in public places,

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 6>But what does it matter what he set fire.

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 3>To that the irony is that he was attacked as

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 3>he burned the Qur'an, and he was attacked by a

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 3>guy with a knife who allegedly stabbed him and allegedly

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 3>kicked him when he was on the ground. The attacker,

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 3>do you think he's been to court yet?

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Not yet.

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 3>He's walking around free on bail. He's not due in

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 3>court for another two years.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So the guy who allegedly does a stabbing, he's walking around.

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 3>But the guy who burned the Qur'an, he's already been

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 3>tried and found guilty. Kirs Starmer went to the High

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Court as a lawyer defending a woman for the right

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.239
<v Speaker 3>to trample on a US flag, and he said at

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 3>the time even the most insulting acts are protected by

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 3>free speech. But of course now as the Prime Minister,

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 3>he's been absolutely silent on this issue. Even his own

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 3>party call for the desecration of religious texts to become

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 3>a crime. The leader of the Conservatives, Kemy Badenock, has

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 3>said de facto blasphemy laws will set this country on

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 3>a road to ruin this case should go to appeal.

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Freedom of belief and freedom not to believe are inalienable

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 3>rights in Britain. As I said in this interview. I'll

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 3>defend those rights to my dying days. He was originally

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 3>charged with harassing the religious institution of Islam. That's what

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 3>the prosecutors originally came up with, as if Islam is

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 3>somehow a person, it's an idea, the same as Christianity

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 3>is an.

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Idea, the same as communism, capitalism. They're all ideas.

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 3>And if we're not free to criticize, debate, if necessary,

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 3>mock and ridicule ideas, then we are not free in

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 3>any sense at all. This is a terrible judgment in

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 3>the UK. And if Keir Starmer doesn't do something to

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 3>overturn this and speak strongly against it, then the whole too.

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Tiakia applies doubly.

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 7>It's a very dark day for the West when you

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 7>can't criticize religion without being hauled before courts. It's like,

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 7>I'm sorry, are we in the twenty first century or

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 7>the sixteenth century?

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 5>Here? Seriously?

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 7>And there are other countries in Europe that have now

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 7>banned the burning of korans for fear of public disorder.

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Hmm, let's just think about that.

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:34.199
<v Speaker 7>They're scared of public disorder when you criticize is Lam.

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think any religion, any idea, any political

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 7>philosophy should be up for debate, and you should be

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 7>open to criticism. And the poor guy, the poor protester here,

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 7>he fled Turkey as an atheist because he was being persecuted.

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 7>He has first hand experience with the danger of fundamentalist Islam.

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 5>And also the harassment didn't stop. Apparently two people.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 7>Invaded his home, he received death threats, and he's now

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 7>being protected in a safe house. Seriously, Britain, not only

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 7>can they not guarantee the safety of people who criticize Islam,

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 7>they're also now prosecuting them. How have we gotten to

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 7>this point?

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 6>And we should point out as well that it's one

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 6>thing to be able to criticize ideas, but what this

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 6>does is put a certain set of ideas.

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 2>On a higher pedestal than all others.

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 6>Because if you burnt a copy of the Communist Manifesto,

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 6>for instance, in somewhere in London, I don't think they'd

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 6>be charging you with some sort of you know, otherwise

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 6>aggravated defense. It would be a public order offense that

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 6>you're setting things on fire in public places, But I

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 6>don't think they would say, ah, that was a politically

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 6>motivated defense and.

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Therefore it is different.

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 6>But you know, so often these things come up now

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 6>where you think back to an old movie.

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 2>You're an old TV show.

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 6>And you go, jeez, when they did that, that was satire,

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 6>like they were making fun of these things, as though

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 6>it could never happen again. It turns out most of

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 6>the time they were actually instruction manual. Sir, in this

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 6>case the life of Brian, you have.

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Been found guilty by the elders of the town of

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Uttering the name of our Lord, and so as.

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 5>A bless fever.

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 6>You are to be stoned to death. Look, I had

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 6>a lovely supper and all I said to my wife

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 6>was that piece of honey.

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But was good enough for Jehovah? He said it again.

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 6>Direct from the UK courts in twenty twenty five.

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 5>So funny.

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 7>And that's the thing, right, if you burnt a Bible

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 7>in front of Westminster Abbey, I highly doubt he would

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 7>be getting prosecuted. But do you guys remember the Olympics

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 7>in Main colleig.

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Trying to forget the Paris Way that was so bad?

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 5>True?

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 7>Another example, do you remember the drag show of Jesus

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 7>at the opening community that was never prosecuted. But imagine

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 7>if that was the prophet Muhammad. Different story. But anyway,

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 7>a Algerian boxer in Main Khalif caused quite the stir.

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 5>There was a lot of speculation.

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 7>Was she a male, a female, inter sex, transgender?

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 5>It was all very unclear.

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 7>The Olympic Committee said because her past sport identified her

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 7>as a female, she was able to compete in the

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 7>female category and won the gold medal, except leaked medical

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 7>records from the Boxing Federation shows she was actually excluded

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 7>from an international boxing competition back in twenty twenty three

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 7>because she showed some male chromozoone markers. And they've now

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 7>said she has to undergo or I guess he they

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 7>the boxer has to undergo further chromosome testing to prove

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 7>that they're actually a female, because these initial tests showed

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 7>they were in fact a male.

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 5>Now, the worst part of all this is that.

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 7>The Olympic Committee knew at the Paras Olympics that there

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 7>was doubt, serious doubt over the Algerian boxes gender and

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 7>that the boxing Federation had already excluded them from competition.

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 7>Yet they allowed them to compete beating females, rubbing females

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 7>of the chance to win the gold medal. And now JK. Rowling,

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 7>who has been a fierce defender of women's rights, has

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 7>spoken out against this, essentially calling for the medal to

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 7>be revoked. We call for medals to be a revoked

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 7>when cheating occurs. This is an unfair advantage. I don't

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 7>see why it's any different.

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course the medal should be revoked.

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 3>It's say boxer who has male chromosomes competing in a

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 3>women's event and winning. That's not fair, It's not right,

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 3>and the medal should be returned. Otherwise, you could choose

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 3>next time the Olympics roll around, to watch the Olympics

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 3>or watch your cartoon. What's the difference, watch World Federation wrestling.

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 3>The whole thing is just make believe that. The silly

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 3>thing about this is twofold one, the one who always

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 3>say follow the science, trust the science, and yet on

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 3>this one the Olympic committee said, we don't want to

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 3>know about the science. Forget a DNA test or a

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 3>chromosomal test. We're happy to take the athlete's word for it.

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 3>And so they simply allowed athletes to self identify according

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 3>to their own passport, which of course is based on

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 3>their own say so. The other thing I found strange

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 3>about this story is now that it's being reported Khalif

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 3>has male chromosomes. The New York Post, which reported it,

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 3>continually referred to Khalif as she and her. And this

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 3>is what a topsy turvy, mixed up world we're in now,

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 3>where even after it's discovered male chromosomes, the media are

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 3>still using female pronouns to refer to the person.

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 6>And you have to feel sorry for Khalif on some

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 6>level because it would seem that she. I mean, obviously

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 6>they choose to go by she, but probably lived most

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 6>of their life as a girl or believing that they

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 6>were a girl, but for whatever reason, a gender disorder

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 6>exists whereby they're not actually entirely a girl.

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Now that of course.

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 6>Gives you some level of advantage, and I can imagine

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 6>it would be really difficult.

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is not a case of.

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 3>Way, can I break in for a second. You can't

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 3>be half a boy and half a girl. There's not

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 3>this third dimension, well there is in it was delayed

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 3>sexual development. Whereupon I believe the story is that when

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Khalif was born, it was believed that Khaliff was female. Yes,

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 3>but later discovered Kalif is actually male.

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 6>Yes, so you can understand why that would be a

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 6>difficult situation. But there are two problems here right. One

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 6>is that Khalif continues to compete in the knowledge of

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 6>that which is unfair. And the second is that the

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 6>IOC did nothing about it.

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>They called it Russia propaganda.

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 6>They were aware, well aware of this testing and they

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:00.439
<v Speaker 6>chose to do absolutely nothing about it. The IOC needs

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 6>to be hauled over the coals for that. Of course,

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 6>as we said before, they said it was oh, you

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 6>just show your passport. I mean, for Heaven's sake, in

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 6>many states of Australia now you can have this stuff

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 6>changed in five minutes flat. So you can't trust what

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 6>is on the front of a passport. And for the

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 6>IOC to say that is an absolute joke. If they

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 6>don't fall on their swords for this thing, you know,

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 6>what's the point, It's all over for us.

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 3>So before we go to a break, I want to

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 3>get your thoughts on comments out of Beijing. After the

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Defense Symposium in Singapore, where the US Defense Secretary Pete

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 3>Hegseth encouraged Australia's Richard Miles to convince alban easy to

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 3>increase defense spending to three point five percent of GDP,

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 3>which makes sense. We live in a perilous world at

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 3>the moment. But a retired colonel from the People's Liberation

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Army in China has told journalists quote, is it necessary

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 3>for you, Australia to follow the US to challenge China?

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 3>If you do not go to China, There's no way

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 3>China would come to Australia to fight against you. This

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 3>is a moment for US Australia to do some soul searching.

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Why would China, Freyer be encouraging Australia not to spend

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 3>any more money on defense. You don't need to arm yourselves,

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 3>even as they embark on the greatest military upgrade since

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 3>World War Two?

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Would there be a slight agenda there? Do you think?

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 7>And not only that, he says there would be no

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 7>reason for China to come to you.

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 5>They're already here.

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:29.240
<v Speaker 7>Do you not remember the PLA naval flotilla that circum

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 7>and navigated Australia. Do you not remember the research vessel

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:38.359
<v Speaker 7>that tracked our undersea cable. I'm sorry, China is already here.

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Look, they just sending dictation to the handsome boy, aren't

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 6>they saying this is what you WoT to do?

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 2>And look, it is a.

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 6>Real testing moment for the Prime minister because if he

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 6>chooses to take the side of China, then we know

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 6>exactly where he stands. I think when they sent that

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 6>vessel down, the Twister, that Submarina vessel during the election campaign,

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 6>it was a test of the Prime Minister to see

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 6>in the middle of an election campaign who he would

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 6>side with, and in that case he sided with China.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 2>He did what they wanted him to do. So it

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 2>would be very interesting to see how this plays out.

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 3>And Alberinezi says, we have our own policy. We don't

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 3>just follow America. Fine, don't follow America in upgrading our

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 3>defense capabilities.

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Just do it because Australia should do it.

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty obvious, as you said Frey, You've got Chinese

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 3>warships live firing off the coast of Sydney. You've got

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 3>a massive armament build up happening in China.

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to follow the US.

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Just do it, because it's a blindingly obvious thing to

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 3>do when you're living in this part of the world

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:41.879
<v Speaker 3>and you've got China arming at such a rapid rate.

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:42.879
<v Speaker 1>We're going to go to a break.

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 3>When we come back, we'll look at what's making news tomorrow,

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 3>including a great story on the front page of The

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 3>Australian about just how much money the federal government is

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 3>spending tackling climate change.

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Promise you it'll make your eyes water. That's coming up

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>in a moment.

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to the program. Let's take a look at

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 3>what's making news tomorrow. And Caleb, I've got to admit

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 3>when I saw the front page of tomorrow's Hobart Mercury,

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 3>I thought that must be fake news.

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:16.319
<v Speaker 2>Are you talking about that sculpture looking thing?

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Sculpture?

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I'd agree with that. That does well. It ought to

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 2>be fake news, I think.

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.359
<v Speaker 6>But if you're referring to the story below it, which

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 6>says poly paycheck check. Premier Jeremy Rocliffe has rejected advice

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 6>from the Productivity Commission that Tasmanian politicians receive a twenty

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 6>two percent pay rise from July one, saying the recommended

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 6>increase is out of step with community expectations. That I

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 6>would say, yes, I can understand why you thought that

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 6>might be fake news. Apparently they haven't had a pay rise.

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 6>The pollys in Tazzi for seven years and so the

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 6>base salary for an MP would have gone from one

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 6>hundred and forty thousand to one hundred and seventy one

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 6>and a half thousand. But you know, Rockcliffe has quite

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 6>rightly pointed out that it's rather out of kildeer with

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 6>community expectations right now, so perhaps we should not take

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 6>our own interest first here, and good on him for

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 6>doing it. I do find it extraordinary that they haven't

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 6>had a pay rise for seven.

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Years, but you know, good on him for not having one.

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 3>We're just to point out the premier himself, his pay

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 3>rise would have been from three hundred and one thousand

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 3>to three hundred and sixty eight thousand, so he's taken

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 3>a big hit by showing leadership on this issue.

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's the problem.

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.839
<v Speaker 3>If you don't take pay rises when they're due, then

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:28.840
<v Speaker 3>seven years lady, you think, gee, we better get up

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 3>to where we should be. Everyone says, what a twenty

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:34.479
<v Speaker 3>two percent pay rise? We can't do that. Little mind

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 3>that they haven't had a pay rise since twenty eighteen.

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 7>And seriously, inflation now versus twenty eighteen, they've actually had

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 7>a real pay cut when you consider the amount of

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 7>inflation we've had in Australia. So I don't know, but

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 7>principal decision from Rockcliffe nonetheless, but also down in Tasmania,

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 7>he may not last long as premier because apparently he's

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 7>at mercy of house revolved. Tasmanian Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockcliffe

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 7>appears to have lost the confidence of the House of

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 7>Assembly and, barring any Cross bencher backflips, will have to

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 7>resign or call a snap election. With three Cross benches

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 7>late on Tuesday publicly supporting a foreshadowed Labor no confidence

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 7>motion in the beleagued Liberal leader, his premiership appears doomed.

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.760
<v Speaker 7>The final decision will now rest with the States Greens,

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 7>who will meet as a party, most likely early on Wednesday,

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:26.439
<v Speaker 7>to decide mister Rockcliffe's fate. I mean, this can't be

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 7>just over the twenty two percent pay rise.

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Surely, I was going to say that's probably only over

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 3>the teat.

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Didn't Tony Abbott.

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:37.879
<v Speaker 3>Do his He basically did his number when he made

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 3>changes or suggested changes to politicians' pensions. Didn't your superinnuation

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 3>or something in that was there.

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 6>There was also the small problem of giving Prince Philip

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 6>as well as well, though though I have to say

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 6>you can't call him the greatest prime minister we never had,

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:54.879
<v Speaker 6>because of course he was prime minister for a short time.

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 6>But I think he's the greatest prime minister we sort

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 6>of missed out on who was there for such a

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 6>short time and could have done great.

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 3>But the timing of this rejects a play rise form.

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it.

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Is rather interesting.

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 6>It is.

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:08.760
<v Speaker 5>It's very interesting.

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 6>They only had I mean the election, say election there

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 6>was fourteen months ago. It was March last year, and

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 6>already they are in trouble. And of course it took

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 6>a few days for them to sort of come out

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 6>of the wash in that election as to how things

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 6>are actually going to turn out. But you know, if

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 6>you can't last fourteen months after an election, you're in trouble.

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.240
<v Speaker 2>And even if you survive.

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 6>An incident like this, you really should be thinking about

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 6>your future anyway, because if they're talking about no confidence,

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 6>it'll come back again. If it doesn't happen.

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Now and later in the week, we could be talking

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 3>about Premier Eddie Erica.

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 7>Beet Yes, perhaps stay tuned. Also, in the Australian climate

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 7>change spend surges to nine billion a year, the federal

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 7>government spending on climate change and ntzera policies have reached

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 7>nine billion a year, up from six hundred million just

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 7>a decade earlier, and up more than four hundred percent

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 7>in the last term of parliament. New analysis shows despite concerns,

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 7>progress on emissions cuts is too slow and the costs

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:16.919
<v Speaker 7>of electricity keep on rising. I mean, this is the problem, right.

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 7>We've now got a government that is spending billions mitigating

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 7>climate change, trying to cut emissions to very limited success.

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 7>And as we say, Australia is less than two percent

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 7>of global emissions. So we're spending billions and billions of

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 7>dollars every year to achieve what.

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 6>Nothing I mean is nine billion now was one point

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 6>seven billion in March twenty twenty two. I mean, forget

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 6>about it was six hundred million a decade ago.

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:50.359
<v Speaker 2>We're talking three years ago.

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 6>We've gone from one point seven billion to nine billion.

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 6>And what has been delivered for that? Well, I was

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 6>going to say nothing, but that's not true. Everything's just

0:42:58.560 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 6>become more expensive.

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, we can't afford to properly defend ourselves. We know

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 3>where the money can we.

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 6>Can defend ourselves against carbon dioxide.

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 3>The greatest threat facing this country, no doubt, Caleb. Let's

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 3>go to the advertiser in South Australia. Six point eight

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 3>million dollars to stop jail balls up reads the headline.

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Tougher barriers to prevent people lobbing tennis balls filled with

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 3>drugs into the women's prison a part of a six

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 3>point eight million dollar corrections package in this week's state budget.

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 3>The Treasurer said the funding would include building new railings

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 3>on the jail's perimeter defense, where people recently had been

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:39.760
<v Speaker 3>caught hitting tennis balls filled with contraband into the prison yard.

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 3>They'll also pay for new high tech security scanners to

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 3>be installed. Weirdly enough, this is not unique to the

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 3>South Australian Women's prison. Some years ago there were guys

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 3>prosecuted in New South Wales for lobbing tennis balls filled

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:58.240
<v Speaker 3>with drugs into the prison yard, and I read stories

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 3>this afternoon about similar activities in UK prisons as well.

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 3>So apparently it's a very common way to try to

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 3>smuggle drugs into a prison just whack a tennis ball

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 3>over the fence.

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 6>It's a little more low tech than the video we

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 6>saw last week of a throne being used to drop

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 6>vapes and stuff into prison. But look, to be honest,

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:18.360
<v Speaker 6>I would have thought there's always been a ban on

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 6>balls in women's prisons. Let's go to the front of

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:24.399
<v Speaker 6>the Herald's Sun Tomorrow where it says exclusive by Rebecca Ball,

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 6>greenlight for Principles to suspend expel students who attack peers

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 6>or teachers away from school bullies Beware is the headline.

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 6>Victorian students bullying are attacking other children and teachers outside

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 6>of school house faces benion or expulsion under a crackdown

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:38.880
<v Speaker 6>on vicious behavior.

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:40.320
<v Speaker 2>The Herald Son can reveal.

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 6>The States Principles will soon have the authority to discipline

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 6>students whose actions, both in person and online outside school

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 6>grounds risk the welfare of their peers and educators. And

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:52.919
<v Speaker 6>I think it's a common sense move because, of course

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 6>we know once upon a time bullying occurred in the

0:44:56.000 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 6>school yard, but essentially the school yard bullying now just continue. Used,

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, ad for an item, because it goes straight

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 6>onto Facebook or or TikTok, whatever the hell the kids are.

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Using now and it doesn't stop.

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 6>And it is fundamentally a school issue because that's where it.

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 7>Emanates exactly and that is the dangerous part of social media.

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 7>The bullies follow them home literally in their pocket in

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 7>the courier mail. Thugs get a clear record. Kid creams

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 7>who invade Queensland homes armed and attack resonance with knives

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 7>in heinous acts should not have convictions recorded against them,

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 7>the state's highest court has ruled. In a decision handed

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 7>down yesterday, three Court of Appeal judges declared that the

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 7>two teens who stormed the home of Wallaby's rugby legend

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 7>two Tai Kefu should not have convictions on their record.

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 5>Is this fair, James?

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 3>If you break into a home, and if you break

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 3>into a home with a knife, and you break into

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 3>a home with a knife and threaten people, it doesn't

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 3>matter how old you are, that should stay on your records. Sorry,

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 3>but you just can't go soft on things like this.

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 3>You've got to stamp it out. And we've tried the

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 3>soft approach doesn't make a difference. Got to get tough

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 3>on it. We're going to go to a break when

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 3>we come back. Chess is not normally regarded as a

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 3>spectator sport, but maybe that's about to change. When you

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:15.439
<v Speaker 3>see the tantrum thrown by the world number one when

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 3>he lost.

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>That's coming up in a moment.

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Prior to the break, we were looking at tomorrow's newspapers,

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 3>which made me think, what sort of newspapers would you typically.

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Go to for news? Thought?

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:27.479
<v Speaker 3>Washington Post, Caleb. Would you go to the Washington Post

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 3>to get your news?

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 6>Oh? Most definitely you would, because it'll tell you things that.

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:33.440
<v Speaker 2>You wouldn't tear anywhere else.

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 6>Probably because no one else would dare to say them,

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:37.279
<v Speaker 6>because it'd bit silly.

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Particularly in this case.

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 6>The Washington Post had this great expose on fentanyl being

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 6>taken into the United States dropping by record numbers. I

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 6>mean they say in this article that there's a new

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 6>and puzzling reality confronting people working at the bottom. Why

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 6>could this be that fananel going into the US has

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:02.879
<v Speaker 6>suddenly dropped Habe. It's because Donald Trump is president, and

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:03.839
<v Speaker 6>of course he said he.

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Was going to crack down on this, and so they thought.

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, maybe we won't bother taking it over the border.

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:11.879
<v Speaker 6>It's gone from seventeen hundred pounds was averaged last year

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:13.799
<v Speaker 6>going over the border each month of being ceazed at

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 6>the border to seven hundred and forty six pounds, and

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 6>the Washington Post is ah, but this started before Trump

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:22.919
<v Speaker 6>became president, ignoring the fact that, of course, for two

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:25.959
<v Speaker 6>months between the election and him becoming president, they knew

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 6>he was coming anyway.

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 7>Come on, It's almost like if you police the border,

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 7>people stop smuggling legal things in. But look, finally someone

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 7>has made an honest Harvard ad.

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 5>It is a parody, but it's pretty funny. Check this out.

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:44.720
<v Speaker 8>Ever, wish your child was a full blown liberal idiot

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 8>desperate to turn them into a Jew hating extremist who'd

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:50.360
<v Speaker 8>rather burn a flag than think for themselves, Well, Harvard

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 8>University has the answer. For the low, low price of

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 8>half a million dollars will transform your kid into the

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 8>kind of zealot who sets bags about on fire in

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 8>the street, screaming about whatever CNN's whining about today. Our

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 8>elite program guarantees they'll swap reason for rage and facts

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:10.919
<v Speaker 8>for feelings faster than you can say protest permit. But wait,

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:14.839
<v Speaker 8>there's more. Our tuition doesn't cover the essentials. Blue hair dye,

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 8>nose piercings, and a weak, flaccid body are sold separately for.

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.839
<v Speaker 7>The small price of five hundred thousand USAU.

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 5>Sounds like a pretty good deal, James.

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:26.200
<v Speaker 3>The best humor always comes from telling the truth, and

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 3>that's the reason lefties hate humor. He chess isn't normally

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.840
<v Speaker 3>a spectator sports. Probably pretty boring to watch other people play.

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:36.400
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know, maybe I'll change my mind after

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 3>watching Magnus Carlson, he's the current world number one lose

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 3>a look at his reaction when he loses to a

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 3>nineteen year old kid. He's certainly not happy about it.

0:48:58.080 --> 0:49:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god, that's about as exciting as chess gets.

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:11.399
<v Speaker 1>But it reminds me of when I was a kid

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and you'd lose a game. In you it is still it.

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:17.240
<v Speaker 6>Is still one of the most polite responses to losing.

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:19.399
<v Speaker 6>I think you should see me when my horse gets

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 6>done on the line.

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot worse than that.

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That's all from us. Good night, stick around to bit

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:25.319
<v Speaker 1>a penalty up in just a moment.