WEBVTT - The students behind the historic ICJ climate ruling

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So my name is Cynthia who Nuhi. I am from

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Solomon Islands. I think I was around eight to ten

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>when I could see the world more clearly and I

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>started noticing sea level rise.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Cynthia Hanuhi knew about the climate crisis before she had

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 2>a word for it. As a kid, she would travel

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 2>with her dad to the outlining Fanalay Island to visit

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 2>her family. There she saw empty, stilled houses sitting above

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the water.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I liked asking questions and my dad was a very

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>patient man, and he told me about how the people

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>have had to move inland because the sea level was

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>coming in. And the more I asked, the more I

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted to find out. And the more I found out

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>this changes are happening not because something that the people's

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in the islands that are way far from the outside world,

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so remote. It's not because of their owndoing. They contribute

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>almost nothing to this. But they are the ones that

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:01.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, get.

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 2>To loose their homes these days. Finally is quiet. Around

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent of houses are abandoned, freshwater wells have been

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 2>inundated with salt water, and vegetables no longer grow in

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 2>the soil. Watching the slow destruction of her family's ancestral

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 2>home by man made climate change, Cynthia was motivated to act.

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Cynthia's six year fight took her all the way to

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>the Hague and the International Court of Justice, where a

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>landmark for ruling was handed down last week. Hi, I'm

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Daniel James and you're listening to seven AM today reporter

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Shane Anderson on the Pacific Island students behind the historic

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 2>icj ruley and the implications for major polluters, including Australia.

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>It's Monday, July twenty eighth. Shane. You've been speaking to

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Cynthia about her journey from the Pacific to the International

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Court of Justice. Can you tell me about it?

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, Cynthia, from those early experiences of seeing her relatives'

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 3>houses literally falling into the sea, she described it as

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 3>something that really motivated her to do something that could

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 3>help her people in a practical way, and that led

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 3>her to enroll in a law degree at the University

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 3>of the South Pacific. So she ended up moving from

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 3>the Solomon Islands to Port Vila, the capital of Vanawatu,

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 3>where the campus was. From there she ended up in

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 3>a course on environmental law.

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>We went in bright eyed, you know, ready to be inspired.

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>But the more we learn, the more frustrating it became

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that the mechanism the climate change regime that's in place

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is not reflective of the urgency of the matter for

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>our people, especially all of us came from online communities,

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and so you have difference from Tonga, Fiji, some more Kiribas,

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>all the others coming together to walk together towards a solution.

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 3>So what was really concerning to them was they were

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 3>seeing firsthand how the law was failing to recognize climate

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 3>harms that are having impacts on smaller nations who have

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 3>very little political power on the world stage to do

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 3>anything about it. It's in the context of this that

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 3>they started to learn about this thing called an advisory opinion.

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Can you explain what an advisory opinion is?

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So, an advisory opinion is delivered by the International

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Court of Justice in the Hague, which is connected to

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 3>the UN, and one of its functions is dispensing these

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>advisory opinions that aim to clarify some of the most

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 3>complicated and controversial legal questions regarding international law. And the

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 3>findings are non binding, which means they're not changing laws

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 3>on their own, but these opinions carry a lot of

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 3>legal weight, and it's for this reason that the ICJ

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 3>doesn't just give opinions on anything, and they usually tend

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 3>to deal with things like border disputes. So, for example,

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 3>there's an opinion being deliberated on at the moment around

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 3>the occupied Palestinian territories. But you know, when Cynthia and

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 3>her classmates were learning about the ICJ and the advisory opinion,

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 3>she told me that one of the reasons why it

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.799
<v Speaker 3>was so appealing to her was because it sounded so familiar.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>In the Pacific, we've always had this worldview where when

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>there's uncertainty in terms of customs or culture, we go

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to our chiefs and what they say in clarity how

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>many to our people. That's the same worldview we'd like

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to present here in terms of the icc because we're

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>missing that secret authority that can clarify and set the basis.

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:55.239
<v Speaker 3>Now, the ICJ is actually never given an advisory opinion

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 3>on climate change before, but in twenty twelve, the you know,

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 3>tiny Pacific nation of Palout initially had this idea of

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 3>going to the ICJ to seek an advisory opinion about

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>what the responsibilities are from the biggest polluters towards the

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 3>least polluters. That campaign failed, but the students thought, you know,

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 3>in the time that had passed since his campaign had failed,

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 3>the global awareness of climate change and the damage being

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 3>brought on the Pacific has grown so much that maybe

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 3>it was the right time for a renewed push with

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 3>slightly tweaked wording. And their next question was, well, this

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 3>is a good idea. How do we actually get this

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 3>before the UN General Assembly?

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so tell me about it. How did they go

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>about that?

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 3>So, to start with, they formed an advocacy group called

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 3>the Pacific Island Students Fighting Climate Change, of which Cynthia

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 3>became the president, and they began this massive letter writing campaign.

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 3>They wrote to the heads of state of a bunch

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 3>of different countries. They even sent a letter to former

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 3>Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison and probably not a surprise

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 3>to know they didn't get the response that they wanted.

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:09.799
<v Speaker 4>Initially, we waited and we waited and waited and waited

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 4>and waited, and to a point where we thought, okay,

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 4>let us must have just gone to the out box.

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Those were really hard days because there was a lot

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:24.119
<v Speaker 1>of criticism and you know, people telling us off that

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>this is impossible, it's not going to go. But then

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 1>one country came back with very compelling positive response, and

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that is the Republic of Vanuatu.

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 3>So the first person to take their initiative seriously was

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 3>the then Foreign Minister of Vaniwatu, Ralph Frankenfarnu. He was

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 3>a former law student from that campus himself, and he

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 3>recalled being really impressed by their initiative. And from there

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 3>the idea was taken on by the Republic of Vaniwatu's government.

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, so they've got the support of one country, but

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 2>you need more than that to get an issue in

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>front of the General Assembly.

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Right yes, So in order to get something referred to

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 3>the International Court of Justice, you need a majority vote,

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 3>So you need ninety three countries minimum to support a

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 3>question to be referred to the ICJ. So the first

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 3>step of the Vadawatu government was to take it to

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 3>the Pacific Islands Forum. This happens every year. Australia and

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand are part of the negotiations there. Even that

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 3>alone took nearly three or four years to be fully

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 3>endorsed by the Pacific Islands Forum and then from there

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 3>the momentum built globally. So the Pacific Island Students, including Cynthia,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 3>they engaged something like fifteen hundred different advocacy groups across

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and thirty countries. So this is a group

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 3>of volunteer law students who then went on and spent

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 3>all years traveling around the world trying to drum up

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 3>support for the initiative in front of the UN and

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 3>it absolutely worked. They got the vote they needed at

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 3>the General Assembly and then it went before the ICJ.

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Once it was there, a record number of countries lined

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 2>up to have their say. After the break, the judges

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 2>make their ruling about what we owe our smaller neighbors

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 2>feeling the impact of climate change. Okay, so what did

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 2>the International Court of Justice find and what did they rule?

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 3>So the question put to the ICJ was, you know,

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 3>asking them to clarify what are the obligations between bigger

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 3>polluting states towards smaller states in regards to protecting them

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 3>from climate change.

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Climate change pauses are quintessentially universal risk to austics.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 3>And the Interctual Court of Justice spelled out for the

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 3>first time that the failure of larger polluting states to

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>protect smaller states from climate harms could be backed up

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 3>by legal consequences.

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 2>The Court found that countries fail to take measures to

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 2>prevent climate change, they could be in violation of international

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 2>law and the countries.

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 3>It goes on to explain that failures could be including

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 3>things such as still producing fossil fuels, still consuming fossil fuels,

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 3>still granting exploration licenses, or offering subsidies for the fossil

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 3>fuel industry.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 2>One of the things this does is clear the way

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 2>for countries to actually sue each other over their emissions

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>and contributions to climate change, even for historic emissions.

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 3>What this does is it gives these smaller nations power

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 3>that they didn't have before. It gives them leverage in negotiations,

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 3>and it forces bigger nations to come to the table

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 3>and agree to more ambitious climate policy because now there's

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 3>the threat of consequences if they fail to do so.

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 2>And given all that, how could this impact Australia.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 3>It could have massive impacts on Australia in a number

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 3>of different ways.

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Definitely. One of the options is litigation against Australia. Possibly

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 2>according to what Ralph.

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 3>Frank Andvarannu, who's now the Minister for Climate Change Adaptation

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 3>in the Republic of Anawatu. He actually went on the

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 3>ABC the morning the ruling was delivered and spelled out

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 3>really plainly that future litigation against Australia is now one

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 3>of the options on the table.

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 4>To the Advisory pin and handed out today.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Australia is committing internationally wrong for acts because it is sponsoring,

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 2>it is subsidizing fossil fuel production and excessive emissions.

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean Australia is one of these.

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 3>So not only does that leave Australia open to future litigation,

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 3>but it could influence cases that are already happening here

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 3>at the moment too.

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 2>So tell me a little bit more about that. Because

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>this decision comes just after another high profile climate decision

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 2>where traditional owners from the Torres Strait went to the

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Federal Court of Australia and argued that the government had

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>a duty of care to protect their homelands from climate change.

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 2>The judge found the government didn't have an obligation, but

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 2>acknowledged the impact of climate change. So what impact could

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 2>this ruling have on that case and others like it?

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if we look back on that case, the

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 3>judge found that the government didn't have an obligation, not

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 3>because there wasn't a moral reason to protect the Torres

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Strait Islanders, but because the current legal framework didn't allow

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 3>for it, and that's changed now. That's what doctor Wesley

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Morgan told me this week. He's a research associate at

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 3>the Institute for Climate Risk and Response at UNSW Doctor

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Morgan believes that this advisory opinion could change the outcome

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 3>of that case if there were to be an appeal.

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 2>So, Shane, this is a huge victory for the group

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 2>of law students who first came up with this idea

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 2>way back in twenty nineteen. How do they feel about

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the outcome.

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 3>I speak to Cynthia just after the advisory opinion was delivered,

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 3>and she told me she was happily exhausted.

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be emotional, I think emotional fust because

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it's been six long years.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 3>So even though this is a massive victory, I mean,

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 3>they've been doing this in a volunteer capacity now for

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 3>six years, and as excited as they are, I think

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 3>they're also really looking forward to having some rest.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's cost us our youth. We've seen things

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.599
<v Speaker 1>the young people in our shoes, but not normally do.

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>So we've grown with this campaign and so be emotional

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>all that reason.

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 3>One of the things Cynthia really stressed to me when

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 3>I was speaking to her is that this advisory opinion,

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't solve the climate crisis, obviously, but their best

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 3>hope was that it would give the next batch of campaigners,

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, a blueprint for going forward, and that's exactly

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 3>what they've done.

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I think my motivision has always been my islands, my people.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I love my people in my islands. I don't think

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been born as Solomon Islander for a mistake. I

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>was to be a Solomon Island because those are the

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>people that really really need our help.

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Shane, thank you so much for your time.

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Thanks.

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Daniel, A spokesperson for Australia's Minister for Climate Change and Energy,

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 2>said the government is carefully considering the court's options. Also

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 2>in the news, more than one hundred international aid organizations

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 2>and human rights groups have warned of mass starvation in

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the Gaza Strip as the Israeli militaries is it's starting

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 2>to air drop aid there. The move by the IDEA

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 2>follows international condemnation by EID experts saying air dropping food

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.599
<v Speaker 2>is inefficient, a distraction, and could even kill starving civilians

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 2>if they go awry. The United Nations has warned that

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 2>one in three gardens are going days without food. At

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 2>least eighty five children have died from starvation so far.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Allding to Gaza's health ministry and Australia will not recognize

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 2>a Palestinian state at this point, according to Prime Minister

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albanesi. Last week, French President Emmanuel Macron announced he

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 2>will recognize a Palestinian state at the UN in September,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 2>but Anthony Alberesi said he was only open to doing

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 2>so once there were appropriate guarantees about the viability of

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 2>the state, pointing to a need to exclude Hamas and

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 2>ensure a Palestinian state does not threaten the existence of Israel.

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:38.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm Daniel James. This is seven am. Thanks for listening.