WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 22 September

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:07.850
<v Speaker 1>This is Paul Murray Live. Thank you, Shari. Welcome to

0:00:07.870 --> 0:00:09.430
<v Speaker 1>the show. You know I'm standing up, which means I've

0:00:09.450 --> 0:00:10.770
<v Speaker 1>got an opinion poll to give you in a moment

0:00:10.789 --> 0:00:14.630
<v Speaker 1>or two's time. But tonight on the program, Chris Bowen

0:00:14.850 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and electric vehicles. There was an extraordinary report on the

0:00:18.550 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>ABC last night. You were watching us, so you missed it.

0:00:21.300 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Wait till I show you how wrong this bloke is

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>about the car he drives. More in a moment. The

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.620
<v Speaker 1>great Nigel Farage will be here. We will, of course,

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.090
<v Speaker 1>join us live from London, the only place you can

0:00:33.110 --> 0:00:35.650
<v Speaker 1>ever see him. on Aussie TV is here on Paul

0:00:35.670 --> 0:00:37.989
<v Speaker 1>Murray Live. And as always, we end the show with

0:00:38.030 --> 0:00:41.650
<v Speaker 1>a look at the social media videos the politicians waste

0:00:41.670 --> 0:00:44.449
<v Speaker 1>their time making, but sadly we all have to pay for.

0:00:44.550 --> 0:00:46.470
<v Speaker 1>As I say, I'm standing up because we have the

0:00:46.490 --> 0:00:49.570
<v Speaker 1>very latest edition of the News 24 Pulse. This is

0:00:49.630 --> 0:00:51.670
<v Speaker 1>our opinion poll, which is done in conjunction with the

0:00:51.690 --> 0:01:00.930
<v Speaker 1>good people of YouGov. Now, before I get to the

0:01:01.090 --> 0:01:03.650
<v Speaker 1>overall picture when it comes to the parties, I think

0:01:03.670 --> 0:01:07.429
<v Speaker 1>the headline out of tonight's poll is just how unpopular

0:01:07.610 --> 0:01:11.369
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister is. Now, we have been measuring all

0:01:11.430 --> 0:01:15.550
<v Speaker 1>year the satisfaction or dissatisfaction rating of the Prime Minister. Tonight,

0:01:15.790 --> 0:01:19.250
<v Speaker 1>we are at the equal low of the Prime Minister's

0:01:19.890 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 1>time in our poll. In fact... 62% of Australians are

0:01:24.819 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>dissatisfied with the Prime Minister's performance. That is up three

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:33.140
<v Speaker 1>points in just two weeks. As you can see, the

0:01:33.180 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>satisfied number is very close to the Labor primary and

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>is only about a third of the electorate. Now, this

0:01:40.020 --> 0:01:43.649
<v Speaker 1>is worth breaking down because the perceptions of the Prime

0:01:43.670 --> 0:01:47.130
<v Speaker 1>Minister are negative for both men and women. but blokes

0:01:47.170 --> 0:01:49.050
<v Speaker 1>seem to have more of a problem with the Prime

0:01:49.070 --> 0:01:52.230
<v Speaker 1>Minister than female voters, but both have a negative view.

0:01:52.650 --> 0:01:55.620
<v Speaker 1>As you can see, female voters, six out of ten

0:01:56.080 --> 0:02:01.180
<v Speaker 1>dissatisfied with the Prime Minister, the number higher at 64%. Now,

0:02:01.300 --> 0:02:03.270
<v Speaker 1>amazing in that change, by the way, when it came

0:02:03.370 --> 0:02:06.130
<v Speaker 1>to the female vote, this is the past two weeks.

0:02:06.550 --> 0:02:10.049
<v Speaker 1>The past two weeks has seen... Four points when it

0:02:10.090 --> 0:02:12.430
<v Speaker 1>came to female voters, two points when it came to men.

0:02:12.710 --> 0:02:15.239
<v Speaker 1>He was already in negative territory, but at six out

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of ten he is in a world of trouble. Other

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>demographic breakdowns to have a look at all of this here,

0:02:21.380 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>which are by generation. Now as you can see, even

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.410
<v Speaker 1>Gen Z, supposedly the young voters that are up with

0:02:27.490 --> 0:02:31.510
<v Speaker 1>all of the agenda, from the housing taxes to climate change, well,

0:02:32.010 --> 0:02:34.950
<v Speaker 1>the majority of them, barely, but the majority of them

0:02:35.090 --> 0:02:38.260
<v Speaker 1>are dissatisfied with the Prime Minister's approval. The older it gets,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the worse it gets for the Prime Minister. But as

0:02:40.620 --> 0:02:43.540
<v Speaker 1>you can see, for millennials... Now, supposedly, again, this is

0:02:43.580 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a group of voters that are under 50. The entire

0:02:46.860 --> 0:02:50.500
<v Speaker 1>calculation of the Prime Minister and the Labor Party is

0:02:50.540 --> 0:02:53.350
<v Speaker 1>that older voters, they can do without them because everyone

0:02:53.389 --> 0:02:55.430
<v Speaker 1>under 50 will vote for them. Well, if you've got

0:02:55.610 --> 0:02:59.030
<v Speaker 1>six out of 10 of millennial voters, as well as

0:02:59.090 --> 0:03:02.590
<v Speaker 1>the section of Gen X that's under 50 at 64%,

0:03:02.590 --> 0:03:07.810
<v Speaker 1>being basically where boomers are at 65% disapproval, let alone

0:03:08.330 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>three quarters. of people that are in the greatest generation,

0:03:12.380 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the parents of the boomers. That is an extraordinary indictment

0:03:16.820 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>on the Prime Minister. And what about the class divides

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:25.380
<v Speaker 1>in Australia? Now, again, these are all self-defined, but working-class voters,

0:03:25.590 --> 0:03:31.150
<v Speaker 1>just 31% satisfied with the Prime Minister. 65% of people

0:03:31.169 --> 0:03:36.620
<v Speaker 1>who are self-identified as being the backstory of the Prime Minister... Well,

0:03:36.660 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>their view is that they are dissatisfied with the Prime Minister.

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>For the vast bulk of the country, otherwise known as

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the middle class, the picture is not particularly good either. Basically,

0:03:46.300 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>six out of ten, up five points in two weeks.

0:03:50.300 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>The Prime Minister has had a shocking fortnight. That is

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.590
<v Speaker 1>the reality here in his personal numbers. And we were

0:03:57.610 --> 0:03:59.670
<v Speaker 1>told that the past two weeks was all a shocker

0:03:59.690 --> 0:04:02.950
<v Speaker 1>for Pauline Hanson. No, there's a problem for the Prime Minister.

0:04:03.570 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the upper class or will to do, however, again,

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this is all self-identified via people doing the survey with YouGov.

0:04:12.300 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And remember, the YouGov numbers were bang on in the

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>2025 election. So don't let anyone tell you that this

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.170
<v Speaker 1>stuff is outlier. This is basically... the true picture of

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.510
<v Speaker 1>Australia right now and its problems with the Prime Minister. Unsurprisingly,

0:04:24.850 --> 0:04:29.190
<v Speaker 1>those that are well off, less than 50% dissatisfied. Conversely,

0:04:29.230 --> 0:04:35.010
<v Speaker 1>less than 50% satisfied, but his best numbers are with people, frankly,

0:04:35.070 --> 0:04:38.820
<v Speaker 1>like himself. who obviously don't have to worry about their

0:04:38.860 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>current life, let alone the cost of living, let alone

0:04:41.300 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>their future life, let alone, of course, retirement. It is

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.460
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary set of numbers and none of them good

0:04:47.500 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Prime Minister on a personal level tonight. But,

0:04:50.540 --> 0:04:53.660
<v Speaker 1>of course, what's he doing to try to turn things

0:04:53.700 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>around here? Well, nothing, because he's in New York and,

0:04:55.900 --> 0:04:57.890
<v Speaker 1>of course, he's going to change the world via the

0:04:58.310 --> 0:05:01.010
<v Speaker 1>United Nations. Alright, let's have a look now at the

0:05:01.170 --> 0:05:05.170
<v Speaker 1>overall party figures. The... One Nation Party remains the most

0:05:05.210 --> 0:05:07.669
<v Speaker 1>popular party in the country right now. This is the

0:05:07.690 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>very latest opinion poll. Again, we do this every two weeks.

0:05:11.450 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>The primary vote for One Nation might be down, but

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>it's still in front of Labor. 27-26. Now, as I've

0:05:17.740 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>told you before, when it comes to interpreting these polls,

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.490
<v Speaker 1>a point here, a point there is essentially a tie.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.150
<v Speaker 1>This is essentially a tie. There has been a little

0:05:27.190 --> 0:05:30.890
<v Speaker 1>bit of movement from One Nation straight back to the Coalition.

0:05:31.810 --> 0:05:35.630
<v Speaker 1>While the Coalition is still well and truly running third, right,

0:05:35.790 --> 0:05:38.050
<v Speaker 1>probably fourth if you want to count daylight right now,

0:05:38.330 --> 0:05:40.690
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of things inside the poll that

0:05:40.790 --> 0:05:43.589
<v Speaker 1>are to me quite interesting for part of the potential

0:05:43.650 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Coalition rebuild. But again, the vote not coming off Labor. Equally,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.340
<v Speaker 1>the vote to the Greens is only coming off the

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.230
<v Speaker 1>minor party vote. That Mana Party vote is also worth

0:05:54.270 --> 0:05:57.740
<v Speaker 1>talking about because, of course, there are plenty of independents,

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:02.660
<v Speaker 1>plenty of Greens... And plenty of teals. So, I thought

0:06:02.700 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I should actually show you the breakdown here of the

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>other number. Because, remember, the fundamental theory of the Prime

0:06:08.820 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Minister and the Labor Party is that all of this

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.460
<v Speaker 1>ends up as preferences back eventually to the Labor Party,

0:06:14.750 --> 0:06:17.710
<v Speaker 1>which is why they may hold on to government, perhaps

0:06:17.810 --> 0:06:20.570
<v Speaker 1>in minority, but they certainly are nowhere near the thumping

0:06:20.589 --> 0:06:23.310
<v Speaker 1>majority that they got not that long ago. These are

0:06:23.330 --> 0:06:26.810
<v Speaker 1>all single digits, but still worth noticing that more than 10%

0:06:26.810 --> 0:06:31.770
<v Speaker 1>sits out there, and that's why the preference game is particularly... important. Now, again,

0:06:31.790 --> 0:06:34.660
<v Speaker 1>I want to go by gender here and again, the

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.779
<v Speaker 1>primary vote and which particular party was getting the backing there. Okay,

0:06:38.860 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you can see here when it comes to men, One Nation,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.940
<v Speaker 1>number one, Labor, number two, but surprisingly, a little bit

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of movement toward the Greens and a little bit of

0:06:48.190 --> 0:06:51.409
<v Speaker 1>movement towards Other and the Coalition. But again, six points

0:06:51.470 --> 0:06:54.630
<v Speaker 1>went travelling. Again, if these numbers aren't exact in terms

0:06:54.670 --> 0:06:58.570
<v Speaker 1>of this numbering up here, it's because round up, round down,

0:06:58.589 --> 0:07:01.250
<v Speaker 1>of course, with 0.5 being the threshold to go up,

0:07:01.310 --> 0:07:05.020
<v Speaker 1>and 0.4 being what goes down. Female voters, again, let's

0:07:05.050 --> 0:07:07.170
<v Speaker 1>have a look at where they are. The number one

0:07:07.190 --> 0:07:09.390
<v Speaker 1>party for them is the Labor Party. Number one party

0:07:09.410 --> 0:07:12.170
<v Speaker 1>for them is the Labor Party at 28%, so it

0:07:12.290 --> 0:07:14.970
<v Speaker 1>is in front and clear enough to say that it

0:07:15.070 --> 0:07:18.030
<v Speaker 1>is the number one choice of female voters. But remember

0:07:18.070 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>what their position is when it comes to the Prime Minister.

0:07:20.900 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Still six out of ten having a problem right there. Now,

0:07:24.460 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I also wanted to show you, again, when it came

0:07:26.580 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to the generations, but do it slightly differently here because, again,

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.100
<v Speaker 1>some of this data can become a little bit eye-glazing,

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:33.950
<v Speaker 1>but I want you to see what is the number

0:07:34.010 --> 0:07:36.420
<v Speaker 1>one choice of each of the generations. For Gen Z...

0:07:37.570 --> 0:07:40.730
<v Speaker 1>It's the Greens, and by a mile. For millennials, the

0:07:40.790 --> 0:07:45.180
<v Speaker 1>number one political party in this poll, and I think

0:07:45.190 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it's for the first time outright, is One Nation at 28%.

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Gen X, One Nation at 34%. For boomers, it is

0:07:55.620 --> 0:08:00.690
<v Speaker 1>equal between the Coalition and Labor at 31%. And for

0:08:00.750 --> 0:08:02.770
<v Speaker 1>the greatest generation, then again, it is.

0:08:02.770 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 2>48%.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:09.610
<v Speaker 1>So interesting to view there. Again, self-identified by class. This

0:08:09.670 --> 0:08:13.570
<v Speaker 1>is how people describe themselves, as working class. Majority there,

0:08:13.590 --> 0:08:17.790
<v Speaker 1>or the biggest single party there, One Nation, 33%. Middle class,

0:08:18.170 --> 0:08:21.570
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party and the Coalition, they split the vote at 26%.

0:08:21.570 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Well off is the Coalition at 32%. There's an awful

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.610
<v Speaker 1>lot inside all of this, right? Now, also, we asked

0:08:29.700 --> 0:08:33.150
<v Speaker 1>inside the News 24 Pulse about how people feel about

0:08:33.170 --> 0:08:37.390
<v Speaker 1>their financial circumstances at the moment and, unsurprisingly... It is

0:08:37.470 --> 0:08:39.870
<v Speaker 1>essentially a three-way split in the country about how you

0:08:39.890 --> 0:08:43.929
<v Speaker 1>feel about your financial circumstances right now. 39% of people

0:08:43.970 --> 0:08:46.890
<v Speaker 1>say comfortable. I'm a little surprised by that number, but still,

0:08:47.050 --> 0:08:50.709
<v Speaker 1>I'm presenting it to you as the findings of the poll. 32,

0:08:50.710 --> 0:08:53.730
<v Speaker 1>or a third of the country, says struggling. Now, neither's

0:08:53.750 --> 0:08:57.069
<v Speaker 1>interesting because, of course, it literally is the in the middle, right? Now,

0:08:57.190 --> 0:08:59.410
<v Speaker 1>in the middle could be just a pressure that has

0:08:59.450 --> 0:09:02.470
<v Speaker 1>been there for years, and that obviously takes us to

0:09:02.490 --> 0:09:05.210
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the country being in an unpleasant place, or,

0:09:05.570 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>despite the pressure... things are OK, which puts the majority

0:09:08.900 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of people in the comfortable category. I would think it

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:15.090
<v Speaker 1>is most likely to be the former rather than the latter.

0:09:15.550 --> 0:09:17.949
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the social media laws, which are currently

0:09:17.970 --> 0:09:21.290
<v Speaker 1>before Parliament, we're the first organisation to actually start polling

0:09:21.510 --> 0:09:25.170
<v Speaker 1>on this, and I'm pleased to read the reaction to

0:09:25.230 --> 0:09:27.730
<v Speaker 1>it here, because, of course, it's not just about the

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.820
<v Speaker 1>overall digital duty of care, but, of course, it is

0:09:30.860 --> 0:09:33.980
<v Speaker 1>a discussion about how much power the individual has minister,

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.540
<v Speaker 1>Annika Wells, should have in all of this. So, let

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>me break it down for you. 42% of people, they're

0:09:39.059 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>completely fine with everything as is, right? The law goes

0:09:41.940 --> 0:09:46.300
<v Speaker 1>through with the minister being able to decide individually what

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:51.390
<v Speaker 1>is harmful, okay? Now, 28% say they agree with the law,

0:09:52.210 --> 0:09:55.190
<v Speaker 1>but they think the minister's right to have personal power

0:09:55.429 --> 0:09:59.350
<v Speaker 1>to define what is harmful on social media or the internet,

0:09:59.390 --> 0:10:03.630
<v Speaker 1>that is the British too far. 20% hardcore no, and

0:10:03.670 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>those that are still trying to work it out, and

0:10:05.140 --> 0:10:08.460
<v Speaker 1>understandably so, about 10%. All of that is right now

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.660
<v Speaker 1>on news24. com. au. We call it the News 24 Pulse. We

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>do it every two weeks here on Paul Murray Live. Now,

0:10:22.220 --> 0:10:24.179
<v Speaker 1>the sun is just rising in the United States where

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.660
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister is getting ready for his big global

0:10:26.700 --> 0:10:29.570
<v Speaker 1>award for, you know, being everything is awesome. But there

0:10:29.590 --> 0:10:31.470
<v Speaker 1>have been plenty of people trying to hold the fort

0:10:31.510 --> 0:10:35.550
<v Speaker 1>here for Labor as firstly NewsPoll. Now, us have findings

0:10:35.590 --> 0:10:38.309
<v Speaker 1>that the Australian people are not happy, Jan.

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:44.820
<v Speaker 3>Polls are obviously not great, but we are not focused

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.020
<v Speaker 3>on the polling, what we're focused on. is making a

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 3>real difference in people's lives. And we know that they're

0:10:52.059 --> 0:10:54.460
<v Speaker 3>doing it tough. We hear that. I'm out all the

0:10:54.500 --> 0:10:57.579
<v Speaker 3>time in my electorate. People will tell you that they're

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:58.420
<v Speaker 3>feeling pressure.

0:10:59.020 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, polling is incredibly important, but we are still focused

0:11:03.780 --> 0:11:05.620
<v Speaker 4>on how we can help people with the cost of living.

0:11:05.660 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 4>We know people are doing it really tough out there,

0:11:08.140 --> 0:11:10.099
<v Speaker 4>which is why we're focused on the things that make

0:11:10.140 --> 0:11:10.580
<v Speaker 4>a difference.

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.100
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think what this type of poll shows

0:11:13.140 --> 0:11:14.860
<v Speaker 5>is that Australians are doing it tough.

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, this has been a really difficult.

0:11:17.100 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 6>time for many Australians.

0:11:19.900 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>We feel your pain. We understand your pain. Are you

0:11:21.660 --> 0:11:22.990
<v Speaker 1>going to do anything about it when it comes to

0:11:23.030 --> 0:11:28.030
<v Speaker 1>fuel taxes? Of course not. No interest whatsoever. Now, again,

0:11:28.190 --> 0:11:30.390
<v Speaker 1>a little more data from the news poll that we

0:11:30.410 --> 0:11:32.710
<v Speaker 1>told you about first on Sunday and were able to

0:11:32.730 --> 0:11:36.230
<v Speaker 1>dig into over the past couple of days. And it is,

0:11:36.250 --> 0:11:40.090
<v Speaker 1>of course, to do with migration. Now, the extreme majority

0:11:40.110 --> 0:11:43.460
<v Speaker 1>of Australians in multiple polls from multiple media organisations have

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.530
<v Speaker 1>told you the same thing over and over again. Stop

0:11:47.250 --> 0:11:50.570
<v Speaker 1>just too many people. Why? Because as we've gone from

0:11:50.570 --> 0:11:53.910
<v Speaker 1>18 million to 28 million, look at the roads in Victoria,

0:11:53.929 --> 0:11:57.750
<v Speaker 1>look at the hospitals everywhere. We haven't matched the infrastructure.

0:11:58.070 --> 0:12:02.190
<v Speaker 1>As we move towards 30 and 40 million, come on. 64%

0:12:02.190 --> 0:12:05.569
<v Speaker 1>of people told the news poll via The Australian that

0:12:05.630 --> 0:12:10.130
<v Speaker 1>they want fewer. people coming to the country via migration. 26%

0:12:10.130 --> 0:12:12.650
<v Speaker 1>say keep it the way it is. 10%. Who are

0:12:12.670 --> 0:12:16.250
<v Speaker 1>the 10% apart from Treasury officials who say that we

0:12:16.270 --> 0:12:18.270
<v Speaker 1>should be having more? Let's break it down in a

0:12:18.270 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>little more detail. 39% say a lot fewer than currently. 26%

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:24.740
<v Speaker 1>say keep it as is. Fewer than now, 25%. So, again,

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you put 25 and 39 together, you get to your 64.

0:12:26.860 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>More than now, seven. A lot more, three. Well, regardless

0:12:37.010 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of how the polls feel about it, we know where

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.820
<v Speaker 1>the country is going, and that is to have more people,

0:12:41.900 --> 0:12:45.660
<v Speaker 1>more people every single year. No promise, no plan for

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.380
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure, but of course you need the taxpayers, right? Well,

0:12:49.420 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>as I showed you last night in the Intergenerational Report,

0:12:51.940 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we're on our way towards close to 40 million, or

0:12:55.300 --> 0:12:58.790
<v Speaker 1>in fact past 40 million by the 2060s. The green

0:12:58.870 --> 0:13:02.250
<v Speaker 1>you can see here is the migration part of population growth.

0:13:02.630 --> 0:13:04.450
<v Speaker 1>The blue you can see at the bottom is the

0:13:04.490 --> 0:13:11.530
<v Speaker 1>birth rate, which basically disappears, meaning despite the plan for

0:13:11.610 --> 0:13:14.309
<v Speaker 1>even more people to be coming to the country via migration,

0:13:14.809 --> 0:13:16.670
<v Speaker 1>we're still going to be in a scenario where for

0:13:16.700 --> 0:13:19.420
<v Speaker 1>the next 40 years the budget will be running in

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.819
<v Speaker 1>a deficit. I'm going to show you these graphics a

0:13:22.179 --> 0:13:26.900
<v Speaker 1>lot because I want them to be tattooed on your

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.060
<v Speaker 1>eyes about decades the state of the problem right now.

0:13:30.900 --> 0:13:33.939
<v Speaker 1>And also that if that graph was going to suddenly

0:13:33.980 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>turn towards surpluses, well, the free advice is out there.

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's not because people are going to start small

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.980
<v Speaker 1>businesses and those small businesses are going to be successful. No,

0:13:45.380 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the suggestion is let's add even more people than the

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands that are coming each and every year,

0:13:52.140 --> 0:13:53.860
<v Speaker 1>let alone the more than a million that have been

0:13:53.900 --> 0:13:56.500
<v Speaker 1>here since the Prime Minister came to power and the

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:01.420
<v Speaker 1>close to two that will be here sooner rather than later.

0:14:03.340 --> 0:14:08.500
<v Speaker 1>That's the reality. What do they want? They want more migration. Why?

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.949
<v Speaker 1>Because it is an instant taxpayer as opposed to a

0:14:10.990 --> 0:14:12.989
<v Speaker 1>baby that's born here who ends up using up the

0:14:13.030 --> 0:14:17.250
<v Speaker 1>money from government when it comes to early childhood, primary school,

0:14:17.290 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>all the rest of it. So the plan, yeah, let's

0:14:19.620 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>just keep doing more of that. In fact, more of

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.310
<v Speaker 1>the more, please. As always, this is a show where

0:14:25.350 --> 0:14:26.750
<v Speaker 1>you turn up to try to find just a little

0:14:26.770 --> 0:14:28.990
<v Speaker 1>bit of detail. That's something you didn't see everywhere else,

0:14:29.010 --> 0:14:31.990
<v Speaker 1>and I very much appreciate that. Morning, noon or night, rain,

0:14:32.010 --> 0:14:35.450
<v Speaker 1>hail or shine, summer, winter, spring or autumn. We don't

0:14:35.470 --> 0:14:37.890
<v Speaker 1>do fall on this program. I love America, but we

0:14:37.930 --> 0:14:41.410
<v Speaker 1>ain't yanks. It's autumn here. And there was a little

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>detail today that, again, is one of the bricks that

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:46.180
<v Speaker 1>you can put in the wall of the argument you

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>will inevitably have with family who just says, well, you're

0:14:48.100 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>being racist when you're talking about the realities of migration, right?

0:14:53.530 --> 0:14:55.630
<v Speaker 1>that the reason it is turning up at the rate

0:14:55.650 --> 0:14:58.350
<v Speaker 1>that it is is because of the ready-made taxpayer and

0:14:58.390 --> 0:15:01.030
<v Speaker 1>the only way to guarantee that the future taxpayers can

0:15:01.070 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>pay for the former taxpayers is just to add more

0:15:03.290 --> 0:15:07.620
<v Speaker 1>and more and more. It's a Ponzi scheme, right? Now,

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.940
<v Speaker 1>we are constantly lectured to that any conversation at all

0:15:10.980 --> 0:15:15.660
<v Speaker 1>about migration is racist because migration is focused on one

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:17.500
<v Speaker 1>thing and one thing only, and that is making sure

0:15:17.540 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that we have the people who can do the jobs

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that Australia desperately needs.

0:15:23.180 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, we have a simple reality that if you're

0:15:26.180 --> 0:15:29.740
<v Speaker 5>talking about building houses, 28% of people in building and

0:15:29.780 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 5>plumbing work are born overseas. In the economy, one of

0:15:34.020 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 5>the ways that we're dealing with that is in skilled migration.

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:42.100
<v Speaker 3>Construction apprentices, and there is a responsible role for skilled

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:43.380
<v Speaker 3>migration in that as well.

0:15:44.180 --> 0:15:46.110
<v Speaker 1>Well, every now and then there's a little bit of

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.590
<v Speaker 1>information that falls out of the far right-wing think tank

0:15:48.630 --> 0:15:52.580
<v Speaker 1>known as the Australian Bureau of Statistics. where one of

0:15:52.620 --> 0:15:58.390
<v Speaker 1>the key statistics in the migrant settlement outcomes was, quote, 71%

0:15:58.390 --> 0:16:03.330
<v Speaker 1>of permanent migrants aged 15 to 64 held a non-school

0:16:03.930 --> 0:16:09.810
<v Speaker 1>qualification in 2021. So, again, we're being told that, yes,

0:16:09.850 --> 0:16:12.850
<v Speaker 1>that means somebody's got a TAFE degree, somebody's got a

0:16:12.930 --> 0:16:15.950
<v Speaker 1>uni degree. But what about the other 30%? And why

0:16:16.350 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>are the numbers so old here, where we're looking back

0:16:19.900 --> 0:16:23.740
<v Speaker 1>at 2021 as opposed to the most recent numbers? Again,

0:16:24.020 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just worth noticing, because you learn something each and every day,

0:16:27.060 --> 0:16:32.380
<v Speaker 1>and you certainly hopefully learn it here each and every night. Now, again, oh,

0:16:32.500 --> 0:16:34.420
<v Speaker 1>this government, we're doing everything we can when it comes

0:16:34.500 --> 0:16:37.290
<v Speaker 1>to the cost of living. But what about petrol? Yeah,

0:16:37.350 --> 0:16:40.430
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to keep talking about it because it's It's

0:16:40.450 --> 0:16:43.850
<v Speaker 1>outrageous right now. I almost dropped a real bomb. It's

0:16:43.910 --> 0:16:48.290
<v Speaker 1>outrageous right now. Now, the problems in the Middle East,

0:16:48.350 --> 0:16:49.970
<v Speaker 1>and that is, yes, what has been driving all of this,

0:16:49.990 --> 0:16:51.450
<v Speaker 1>but the problems in the Middle East mean it's going

0:16:51.470 --> 0:16:54.450
<v Speaker 1>to get even more expensive. I show you this every night,

0:16:54.470 --> 0:16:57.030
<v Speaker 1>but again, this is a little snapshot of what's happening

0:16:57.070 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in Sydney, what's happening in Melbourne, what's been happening in Brisbane.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It's all the same. Uppity-up-up-up is where we go here.

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Yet still... Australians are being charged 52 cents per litre

0:17:10.340 --> 0:17:12.619
<v Speaker 1>by the government. The government is trying to put off

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.780
<v Speaker 1>any help when it comes to petrol. Now, remember, any

0:17:16.820 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>help with petrol doesn't just help people that get in

0:17:20.140 --> 0:17:21.949
<v Speaker 1>the car to take the kids here and there or

0:17:21.970 --> 0:17:24.730
<v Speaker 1>to take themselves here and there. It helps every small

0:17:24.770 --> 0:17:28.649
<v Speaker 1>business that uses a vehicle powered by petrol to be

0:17:28.710 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>able to do their work. It also... brings down the

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.909
<v Speaker 1>cost of transporting the things that are grown on a

0:17:34.940 --> 0:17:39.010
<v Speaker 1>farm or need to be taken from dock to shop

0:17:39.550 --> 0:17:42.550
<v Speaker 1>or from dock to post office and post office to

0:17:42.590 --> 0:17:46.570
<v Speaker 1>your house. Fuel is in everything. And while they may

0:17:46.609 --> 0:17:48.830
<v Speaker 1>well have this grand dream of one day everyone going

0:17:48.890 --> 0:17:52.550
<v Speaker 1>electric and therefore petrol price completely not mattering, the reality

0:17:52.590 --> 0:17:56.370
<v Speaker 1>is who knows what the EV after-sales market is like,

0:17:56.730 --> 0:17:58.970
<v Speaker 1>which means most likely there'll be another generation of people

0:17:58.990 --> 0:18:01.210
<v Speaker 1>who can't afford a brand new car, so they buy

0:18:01.250 --> 0:18:03.310
<v Speaker 1>a used car. That used car most likely to be petrol.

0:18:03.510 --> 0:18:04.969
<v Speaker 1>So petrol's going to be part of the problem for

0:18:05.010 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a while. So the government has to cut the tax.

0:18:08.130 --> 0:18:08.380
<v Speaker 5>Why?

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:14.530
<v Speaker 1>Because they did it recently. In fact, I double-checked this today. Now, remember,

0:18:14.670 --> 0:18:16.860
<v Speaker 1>it took about a month before the government did this.

0:18:16.890 --> 0:18:19.780
<v Speaker 1>They were dragged, kicking and screaming. They did it when

0:18:20.260 --> 0:18:24.939
<v Speaker 1>the price was $ 2. 52. Currently, we're at $ 2. 41, which is

0:18:25.060 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>already higher than the number when the calls first started

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.670
<v Speaker 1>before the inevitable happened. Now, remember, of course, they took

0:18:33.730 --> 0:18:36.870
<v Speaker 1>away the concession. They put back the tax. They did

0:18:36.910 --> 0:18:38.790
<v Speaker 1>that when petrol was $ 1.

0:18:38.690 --> 0:18:38.750
<v Speaker 5>65.

0:18:38.730 --> 0:18:46.330
<v Speaker 1>We are now. It's somewhere between 230 to 40. And

0:18:46.350 --> 0:18:49.869
<v Speaker 1>if you're in diesel land, just either side of three

0:18:49.990 --> 0:18:54.710
<v Speaker 1>bucks right now. And unsurprisingly, six out of 10 people

0:18:54.830 --> 0:18:57.830
<v Speaker 1>disapprove of the Prime Minister. Perhaps it's because they remember

0:18:57.910 --> 0:19:00.629
<v Speaker 1>what he was like as the opposition leader when he

0:19:00.690 --> 0:19:02.730
<v Speaker 1>was a far more popular figure from being able to

0:19:02.790 --> 0:19:05.330
<v Speaker 1>point and blame the then government for every problem, including.

0:19:06.650 --> 0:19:09.149
<v Speaker 1>Do you reckon Scott Morrison has been to a petrol

0:19:09.190 --> 0:19:13.540
<v Speaker 1>station lately? Petrol prices are surging on his watch. The

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:19.930
<v Speaker 1>price then, as you just saw on your screen, $ 1. 79.

0:19:18.090 --> 0:19:22.450
<v Speaker 1>Right now, anywhere between $ 2. 30 and $ 3, depending on what

0:19:22.510 --> 0:19:27.350
<v Speaker 1>you use. This needs to change. It needed to change yesterday.

0:19:27.410 --> 0:19:29.550
<v Speaker 1>Under the coalition, they put a system in place that

0:19:29.570 --> 0:19:31.909
<v Speaker 1>if global oil prices hit the level they are at

0:19:31.970 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, guess what automatically falls? The fuel tax. It's

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.899
<v Speaker 1>exactly what the government should be doing. But also speaking

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:46.770
<v Speaker 1>about fuel, when Russia attacked Ukraine years ago, one of

0:19:46.990 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the responses that the world had was to find a

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.660
<v Speaker 1>way to punish Russia because it was so clear about

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:54.340
<v Speaker 1>right and wrong.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 7>We again say to President Putin, stop this war now.

0:20:03.700 --> 0:20:09.170
<v Speaker 7>Withdraw your forces now. This is an unprovoked attack No

0:20:09.260 --> 0:20:12.740
<v Speaker 7>one is threatening Russia. No one is threatening Russia's sovereignty.

0:20:13.300 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 7>President Putin can stop this and he can stop this

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.620
<v Speaker 7>today and he should stop this today.

0:20:21.140 --> 0:20:23.260
<v Speaker 1>It was right then and it is still right today.

0:20:23.780 --> 0:20:26.379
<v Speaker 1>So the federal government, along with previous ones, which have

0:20:26.420 --> 0:20:28.790
<v Speaker 1>always had some sort of a sanction against Russia, they

0:20:28.890 --> 0:20:31.889
<v Speaker 1>really ramped it up and rightly so. You can go

0:20:31.950 --> 0:20:34.050
<v Speaker 1>right now to the Department of Foreign Affairs and you

0:20:34.090 --> 0:20:36.540
<v Speaker 1>can read it all. Let me Pay attention to the

0:20:36.580 --> 0:20:40.300
<v Speaker 1>bottom bit there, where there's restrictions on the export or

0:20:40.340 --> 0:20:43.570
<v Speaker 1>supply of certain goods or the import or purchase or

0:20:43.660 --> 0:20:48.830
<v Speaker 1>transport of certain goods. One of those examples is apparently

0:20:48.910 --> 0:20:54.629
<v Speaker 1>a ban that Australia has on Russian oil that becomes petrol. Why?

0:20:54.690 --> 0:20:58.969
<v Speaker 1>Because that petrol, that oil, is helped to fund the

0:20:58.990 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>war effort. In fact, there's other advisories about that from

0:21:02.020 --> 0:21:06.940
<v Speaker 1>the Foreign Affairs Department. Now, I have spoken about this before,

0:21:07.700 --> 0:21:11.500
<v Speaker 1>but I'm pleased to say that my discussions previously are

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.489
<v Speaker 1>still true now, which is Australia is actually finding a

0:21:15.550 --> 0:21:21.389
<v Speaker 1>backdoor way of using Russian oil. What happens is that

0:21:21.410 --> 0:21:24.669
<v Speaker 1>the Russian oil makes its way towards refineries in the

0:21:24.710 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Middle East or in Asia, and then we buy it

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>from those refineries. So I didn't steal the TV. I

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.109
<v Speaker 1>just bought the TV from the guy who stole it.

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:39.939
<v Speaker 1>This from Matthew Knott today in the Nine Papers. He's

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>sitting down. The vast majority of fuel arriving in Australia

0:21:43.580 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>from a key Asian refinery has come from Russia, the

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>analysis has found, sparking warnings that motorists and businesses are

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>inadvertently funding Vladimir Putin's war on Ukraine. A new report

0:21:54.619 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>from the Centre for Research and Energy in Clean Air

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:03.350
<v Speaker 1>estimates that 68% of oil exported to Australia... from a

0:22:03.410 --> 0:22:07.189
<v Speaker 1>refinery in Brunei in the first seven months of the

0:22:07.250 --> 0:22:12.909
<v Speaker 1>year was Russian. That's up from 24% from two years ago, 24%

0:22:12.910 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to 68%. Now, am I blaming the government for this? No.

0:22:19.180 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>But if the government has a hard line on Russia,

0:22:21.780 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>then our fuel supply becomes part of that hard line.

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:30.030
<v Speaker 1>Just because the Russian tanker made it somewhere else, filled

0:22:30.109 --> 0:22:34.470
<v Speaker 1>a tank, and then we... bought from the person who

0:22:34.650 --> 0:22:38.750
<v Speaker 1>empties that tank but transports it, it's still hot property.

0:22:39.730 --> 0:22:44.470
<v Speaker 1>That's the reality here. Oh, and by the way, also

0:22:44.490 --> 0:22:47.990
<v Speaker 1>worth noting here that Australia is in a position to

0:22:48.030 --> 0:22:50.630
<v Speaker 1>take a stand on these sorts of issues. But do

0:22:50.730 --> 0:22:54.310
<v Speaker 1>I expect this government to do it as they should? No,

0:22:54.390 --> 0:22:56.770
<v Speaker 1>because old mate Chris Bowen there, of course, the Climate

0:22:56.790 --> 0:23:00.790
<v Speaker 1>Change and Energy Minister, he has not... He did the

0:23:00.830 --> 0:23:05.169
<v Speaker 1>calls for Australia to ban slave labour being used in

0:23:05.230 --> 0:23:08.370
<v Speaker 1>China to make solar panels. That's, of course, the claim

0:23:08.390 --> 0:23:11.830
<v Speaker 1>being made by the enslaved Uyghur people in China, something that,

0:23:11.869 --> 0:23:15.190
<v Speaker 1>by the way, and if you go, well, that's from 2021,

0:23:15.170 --> 0:23:17.350
<v Speaker 1>what about from last year? The people who don't have

0:23:17.369 --> 0:23:22.010
<v Speaker 1>the freedom to leave, the human cost of Australia's solar boom. Now,

0:23:22.130 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>even Joe Biden... in between falling up the stairs and

0:23:26.619 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the dodderiness and all the rest of it. Even old

0:23:29.140 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden saw this and banned it in the United States,

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.139
<v Speaker 1>that in the United States you cannot have solar panels

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>or the ingredients of them that have any connection to

0:23:39.250 --> 0:23:42.770
<v Speaker 1>slave labour in China. Will Australia do the same? Will

0:23:42.830 --> 0:23:45.169
<v Speaker 1>Australia do the same when it comes to Russian oil?

0:23:45.990 --> 0:23:49.270
<v Speaker 1>Who knows? We'll all find out together. But I think

0:23:49.310 --> 0:23:50.770
<v Speaker 1>we all know one of the ways you get a

0:23:50.810 --> 0:23:55.430
<v Speaker 1>Global Citizen Award is to not upset anyone. some of

0:23:55.450 --> 0:24:01.660
<v Speaker 1>the bad actors of the world. Now, speaking of Chris Bowen,

0:24:01.700 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>last one I want to show you before we get

0:24:03.340 --> 0:24:07.699
<v Speaker 1>into the discussion tonight. Four Corners, last night on the ABC. Now,

0:24:07.740 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>like a broken clock, you know, the ABC can be

0:24:09.740 --> 0:24:12.140
<v Speaker 1>right a couple of times a day, right? And they

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:16.390
<v Speaker 1>were talking to Chris Bowen because Chris Bowen is, of course,

0:24:16.450 --> 0:24:19.190
<v Speaker 1>a massive advocate of electric vehicles. Now, I don't care

0:24:19.210 --> 0:24:20.869
<v Speaker 1>about electric vehicles. Yes, I'm a petrolhead, but if you

0:24:20.890 --> 0:24:22.429
<v Speaker 1>want to buy one, good luck to you, right? But

0:24:22.550 --> 0:24:22.710
<v Speaker 1>I have.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>One of those people who's deeply suspicious of the technology

0:24:27.010 --> 0:24:30.550
<v Speaker 1>that exists in the Chinese cars. Because remember, China is

0:24:30.590 --> 0:24:35.030
<v Speaker 1>not a normal country. And any of the surveillance stuff,

0:24:35.310 --> 0:24:37.429
<v Speaker 1>any of the cameras, any of the microphones, any of

0:24:37.470 --> 0:24:42.900
<v Speaker 1>the data, well, ultimately, like with TikTok, the Chinese have

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:44.780
<v Speaker 1>to hand it over at a point in time when

0:24:44.820 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the government at any one time would demand it to be.

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.180
<v Speaker 1>This was the entire point of the story. And to

0:24:51.220 --> 0:24:53.780
<v Speaker 1>give you an idea of what they were able to

0:24:53.940 --> 0:24:57.869
<v Speaker 1>do to Chinese vehicles, and we're talking about the biggest

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:02.950
<v Speaker 1>seller in BYD and the brand that the climate change

0:25:02.990 --> 0:25:05.670
<v Speaker 1>minister drives, this is what they presented on the ABC

0:25:05.710 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>last night. The car is not being hacked.

0:25:10.930 --> 0:25:14.580
<v Speaker 6>All we're doing is showing what data the manufacturer can

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.540
<v Speaker 6>access in real time.

0:25:18.500 --> 0:25:19.660
<v Speaker 1>OK, what can you see?

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:24.290
<v Speaker 8>I can see every single system within that vehicle, everything

0:25:24.530 --> 0:25:28.290
<v Speaker 8>from your driving state to the position of your seat.

0:25:28.869 --> 0:25:30.770
<v Speaker 8>I can see that you don't have a passenger sitting

0:25:30.810 --> 0:25:34.010
<v Speaker 8>next to you. Anything that's involved in the vehicle systems,

0:25:34.350 --> 0:25:35.830
<v Speaker 8>I have real-time visibility of.

0:25:36.330 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>So can you see where I am?

0:25:38.380 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 3>I can.

0:25:39.060 --> 0:25:43.260
<v Speaker 8>You're next to the Soccer Academy at Centennial Park in Sydney.

0:25:43.540 --> 0:25:47.780
<v Speaker 1>Wow, OK, that's a little creepy. And if that didn't

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>freak you out enough, what can be done remotely to

0:25:51.940 --> 0:25:56.420
<v Speaker 1>the car? Again, a hacker working out of the ACT

0:25:56.810 --> 0:26:02.470
<v Speaker 1>worked with the ABC to illustrate that that little microphone

0:26:02.510 --> 0:26:04.910
<v Speaker 1>which picks up when you want to change the song

0:26:05.330 --> 0:26:10.750
<v Speaker 1>or maybe call for roadside assistance, guess what? They can

0:26:10.810 --> 0:26:14.550
<v Speaker 1>turn it on. I know where you're going.

0:26:16.020 --> 0:26:20.140
<v Speaker 6>While he's hacked the car, all he's doing is replicating

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 6>what could be controlled from China.

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:27.540
<v Speaker 1>He's going around the roundabout. I guess he missed his turn,

0:26:27.660 --> 0:26:29.020
<v Speaker 1>so he's going to go back down. It looks like

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:34.620
<v Speaker 1>Anzac Parade. How about we turn on the microphone?

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.980
<v Speaker 6>What you're about to see is a scenario we devised

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.300
<v Speaker 6>to illustrate just what can be done with this kind

0:26:41.340 --> 0:26:45.460
<v Speaker 6>of remote access. And don't worry, I did warn my mum.

0:26:46.470 --> 0:26:46.970
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Siri.

0:26:47.030 --> 0:26:48.050
<v Speaker 9>Uh-uh.

0:26:48.609 --> 0:26:54.460
<v Speaker 1>Call Mum Mobile. Calling Mum Mobile Mobile.

0:26:55.940 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Mum, Angus here.

0:26:57.500 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Angus, how are you? Yeah, good, thanks.

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:00.580
<v Speaker 6>Did you get out for coffee this morning?

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I certainly did.

0:27:02.300 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 7>I had a lovely morning in the sun discussing books.

0:27:05.020 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>With a friend. Wow. And then because the phone call

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.090
<v Speaker 1>was being taped on that program, they were able to

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.149
<v Speaker 1>turn around and take the driver's voice saying, Hey, Siri.

0:27:17.540 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to activate the phone, to be able

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.100
<v Speaker 1>to then ask a whole bunch of questions that helped

0:27:23.300 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>unlock the fictitious bank account that apparently he was setting

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>up for his mum. Frightening, right? Oh, but hang on,

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>all the smart cars do this. Well, of course. This

0:27:32.940 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is part of the privacy conversation that was the wider

0:27:35.300 --> 0:27:37.379
<v Speaker 1>point of the story and a wider conversation that we

0:27:37.420 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 1>have to have about all this smart technology that's listening

0:27:39.900 --> 0:27:41.990
<v Speaker 1>to us all the time. Where's the data kept? Who,

0:27:42.109 --> 0:27:44.889
<v Speaker 1>in worst-case scenario, is able to get access to it?

0:27:46.050 --> 0:27:47.990
<v Speaker 1>But the reason, of course, that I am slightly suspicious

0:27:48.109 --> 0:27:51.590
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese vehicles and how successful they are at

0:27:51.710 --> 0:27:54.470
<v Speaker 1>not just being able to be driven all over the country,

0:27:54.530 --> 0:27:56.570
<v Speaker 1>but being placed all over the country and the remote

0:27:56.609 --> 0:27:59.070
<v Speaker 1>access to the cameras and the sensors, being able to

0:27:59.109 --> 0:28:02.810
<v Speaker 1>turn them into sort of little mobile surveillance units, that was, again,

0:28:02.910 --> 0:28:05.850
<v Speaker 1>the point of the story, denied, of course, by the

0:28:05.970 --> 0:28:10.670
<v Speaker 1>two manufacturers that were the focus here. Chris Bowen, of course,

0:28:10.710 --> 0:28:12.830
<v Speaker 1>drives one of these cars. And Chris Bowen isn't just

0:28:12.850 --> 0:28:16.650
<v Speaker 1>the climate change minister. He's on the National Security Committee

0:28:17.060 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of Cabinet. So imagine what he might be talking about

0:28:20.500 --> 0:28:23.540
<v Speaker 1>in his car at any one time. Well done to

0:28:23.580 --> 0:28:26.300
<v Speaker 1>the ABC for hitting right between the eyes.

0:28:27.780 --> 0:28:30.780
<v Speaker 6>One person who might be concerned about this is the

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 6>Minister for Climate Change and Energy, Chris Bowen. He drives

0:28:35.500 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 6>an Xpeng G6. You drive a Chinese EV. How do

0:28:40.020 --> 0:28:40.420
<v Speaker 6>you find it?

0:28:40.420 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>It's great.

0:28:41.500 --> 0:28:46.110
<v Speaker 6>Are you comfortable then that the manufacturer, Xpeng, knows, for example,

0:28:46.450 --> 0:28:51.770
<v Speaker 6>your home address, your real-time location, the charge on your battery,

0:28:52.090 --> 0:28:55.070
<v Speaker 6>whether your alarm is off or on, whether the doors

0:28:55.130 --> 0:28:56.930
<v Speaker 6>are unlocked, the position of your seat?

0:28:56.950 --> 0:29:00.459
<v Speaker 10>The point I'd make, Angus, is whether a car is

0:29:00.500 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 10>electric or not, it doesn't matter what the motor is, right?

0:29:05.620 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 10>Car manufacturers do have access to those sorts of information

0:29:08.300 --> 0:29:11.180
<v Speaker 10>increasingly because every car now is basically connected, every new car.

0:29:11.660 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 10>Whether it's an electric car, whether it's made in China, Korea,

0:29:14.140 --> 0:29:16.220
<v Speaker 10>in the United States, they're connected to the grid.

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:20.070
<v Speaker 6>So you're telling me you are not concerned that a

0:29:20.210 --> 0:29:24.190
<v Speaker 6>Chinese manufacturer knows very intimate patterns.

0:29:23.830 --> 0:29:24.470
<v Speaker 1>Of your life?

0:29:25.070 --> 0:29:26.910
<v Speaker 10>I mean, most constituents of mine know where I am

0:29:26.970 --> 0:29:27.590
<v Speaker 10>on most days.

0:29:27.750 --> 0:29:29.510
<v Speaker 6>I think you're being a bit dismissive of that, though.

0:29:29.530 --> 0:29:30.030
<v Speaker 1>Well, you could say that.

0:29:30.050 --> 0:29:32.790
<v Speaker 6>Like, this is granular detail about your life.

0:29:32.910 --> 0:29:34.470
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm comfortable.

0:29:35.390 --> 0:29:36.390
<v Speaker 10>with the arrangements.

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:39.910
<v Speaker 1>Well of course the local constituents don't have the ability

0:29:39.930 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to listen to the freaking microphone in your car. Again,

0:29:44.900 --> 0:29:48.180
<v Speaker 1>this story's really interesting. I've given you the short version

0:29:48.220 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of it, but the challenge to government... is to be

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.220
<v Speaker 1>able to work out that, yes, someone makes it. Yes,

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.130
<v Speaker 1>someone wants to buy it. But should somebody know up

0:29:57.350 --> 0:30:00.530
<v Speaker 1>front what they are buying? Should you know in big,

0:30:00.830 --> 0:30:06.330
<v Speaker 1>bold letters what you are buying? Not the 535th page

0:30:06.350 --> 0:30:09.670
<v Speaker 1>of Terms and Conditions that no one reads. Because I

0:30:09.710 --> 0:30:12.690
<v Speaker 1>reckon it would be a different conversation before you've made

0:30:12.710 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the choice or not to purchase the product. For me,

0:30:17.420 --> 0:30:21.950
<v Speaker 1>I'll be buying a 1983 Commodore ASAP. More in a

0:30:21.970 --> 0:30:24.500
<v Speaker 1>moment here on Paul Murray Live. Lots to discuss, lots

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, including, yeah, the Channel 9 KKK thing.

0:30:27.740 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>How stupid was this? So ridiculous. But, you know, what

0:30:31.380 --> 0:30:33.860
<v Speaker 1>a surprise. They thought in the past two weeks if

0:30:33.900 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>they whack her and whack her as hard as they can,

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>guess what will happen to the polls? Well, guess what

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.590
<v Speaker 1>did happen in the polls? The exact opposite. More in

0:30:40.610 --> 0:30:46.710
<v Speaker 1>a second. Thank you very much for watching. Joining me

0:30:46.730 --> 0:30:48.670
<v Speaker 1>in the man cave right now from the PR Council.

0:30:48.710 --> 0:30:50.550
<v Speaker 1>She's also doing some good work with Redbridge. She's known

0:30:50.590 --> 0:30:52.690
<v Speaker 1>as the wonderful Christy McSweeney. Lovely to see you, my friend.

0:30:52.710 --> 0:30:53.790
<v Speaker 4>So great to be here.

0:30:54.030 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of here to help is none other than our

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.300
<v Speaker 1>old mate Steve Conroy. Of course, official board member, and

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.860
<v Speaker 1>I should say, you know, Mr. Board Member, we appreciate it.

0:31:01.900 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, of course. And he's always here to help.

0:31:03.820 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So I know everyone's heard about it a little bit

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>throughout the night, but I've got to throw in my

0:31:08.620 --> 0:31:12.050
<v Speaker 1>two cents here, right? which was Channel 9 going to

0:31:12.110 --> 0:31:16.190
<v Speaker 1>find the KKK to see what they think about Pauline Hanson. Now,

0:31:16.470 --> 0:31:18.770
<v Speaker 1>this was part of a wider program that was about

0:31:18.830 --> 0:31:22.030
<v Speaker 1>Trump's America. I'm familiar with how to put such programs together,

0:31:22.250 --> 0:31:24.330
<v Speaker 1>but I'm also familiar that when we were putting our

0:31:24.410 --> 0:31:27.370
<v Speaker 1>one together, that we tried to avoid the cliches, right,

0:31:27.610 --> 0:31:29.410
<v Speaker 1>of let's go and find the weirdest and the wildest.

0:31:29.430 --> 0:31:33.090
<v Speaker 1>We tried to find it normal, right? And, again, that

0:31:33.130 --> 0:31:36.090
<v Speaker 1>was our whole theory. But it's sort of pretty low-hanging

0:31:36.130 --> 0:31:38.270
<v Speaker 1>fruit to go, let's go to the KKK and... had

0:31:38.290 --> 0:31:41.950
<v Speaker 1>them say crazy racist stuff about Trump. And then because, obviously,

0:31:41.990 --> 0:31:44.690
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, somebody was trying to... I don't know,

0:31:44.730 --> 0:31:48.060
<v Speaker 1>somehow Pauline Hanson comes up, apparently from the KKK, person

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>suggesting it, because I'm presuming the four-second Google that happened beforehand. But, look,

0:31:53.260 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you've seen it all night, but if you haven't, this

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:57.660
<v Speaker 1>was the moment that went to air.

0:31:59.010 --> 0:32:03.530
<v Speaker 6>The Ku Klux Klan director brought Hansen up, unprompted, as

0:32:03.590 --> 0:32:05.410
<v Speaker 6>we were preparing for our interview.

0:32:05.770 --> 0:32:08.310
<v Speaker 11>She is demonized by the same element of people that

0:32:08.350 --> 0:32:11.110
<v Speaker 11>wants to demonize us. What I understand of her is

0:32:11.150 --> 0:32:15.270
<v Speaker 11>she's concerned about the immigrants, especially from Asia, China and

0:32:15.310 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 11>so on, coming into Australia and changing the racial complex

0:32:19.410 --> 0:32:22.510
<v Speaker 11>of Australia. changing the culture, changing all the things that

0:32:22.550 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 11>the people love and hold dear and change into something different.

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And she wants to restrict that.

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.940
<v Speaker 3>Is it heartening for you to see someone like anti-immigration

0:32:30.980 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Pauline Hanson doing well in Australia?

0:32:32.660 --> 0:32:37.380
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's encouraging. Absolutely. Now, let's say the view

0:32:37.460 --> 0:32:40.350
<v Speaker 1>is the obvious here, right, which is I don't think

0:32:40.390 --> 0:32:42.890
<v Speaker 1>that should have happened, right? Obviously, it was an attempt

0:32:42.910 --> 0:32:45.330
<v Speaker 1>to try to create a moment and then they'll be

0:32:45.350 --> 0:32:48.490
<v Speaker 1>high-fiving because they've created a moment. Pauline Hanson didn't take

0:32:48.530 --> 0:32:51.050
<v Speaker 1>it lying down. She shoved it back pretty hard, particularly

0:32:51.070 --> 0:32:54.870
<v Speaker 1>when it came to socials here. So Stephen Conroy is

0:32:54.910 --> 0:32:56.970
<v Speaker 1>a person who has no plans of voting or supporting

0:32:57.050 --> 0:33:00.660
<v Speaker 1>One Nation any time soon. Help or hurt this sort

0:33:00.700 --> 0:33:01.300
<v Speaker 1>of nonsense?

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.500
<v Speaker 12>Well, look, Pauline Hanson's made a career of playing the victim.

0:33:07.100 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 12>So this is playing into her hands again. I mean,

0:33:11.060 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 12>this is a bloke I think I saw on Andrew

0:33:12.860 --> 0:33:17.140
<v Speaker 12>Bolt's show earlier. that has actually talked about Pauline Hanson

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:22.550
<v Speaker 12>in a 2017 interview done by Channel 9. So this

0:33:22.610 --> 0:33:27.709
<v Speaker 12>is a bloke that obviously knows of Hanson. But for

0:33:27.750 --> 0:33:29.810
<v Speaker 12>people to then try and say that she has Ku

0:33:29.830 --> 0:33:32.650
<v Speaker 12>Klux Klan policies or values.

0:33:32.990 --> 0:33:34.790
<v Speaker 1>It's just a waste.

0:33:34.530 --> 0:33:38.630
<v Speaker 12>Of time and space. Ask her about her policies. Ask

0:33:38.670 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 12>her to explain how a policy is going to work.

0:33:40.380 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 12>I mean, you saw the shambles for a couple of

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 12>weeks where they couldn't even define what their policy was.

0:33:45.620 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 12>And they had three or four different policies. I mean

0:33:47.500 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 12>they've settled now on a position. But just ask her

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.570
<v Speaker 12>questions about her policies. Don't let her play the victim.

0:33:53.650 --> 0:33:57.130
<v Speaker 12>Don't let her pretend you're suddenly attacking me because I'm

0:33:57.170 --> 0:33:58.010
<v Speaker 12>Pauline Hanson.

0:33:58.050 --> 0:33:58.290
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:33:58.850 --> 0:34:01.940
<v Speaker 12>You're advocating to be Prime Minister of Australia. We're entitled

0:34:01.980 --> 0:34:04.900
<v Speaker 12>to ask you those questions. Don't give her the victim

0:34:05.620 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 12>status that she seeks to put on herself at all times.

0:34:09.060 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're going to talk about GetUp because whether they

0:34:11.219 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to play right into this or not, we'll

0:34:13.420 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>get into in a second. Christy, again, I thought it

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>was very clever for her to respond as aggressively as

0:34:18.820 --> 0:34:22.390
<v Speaker 1>she did about all of this. Again, you know, they

0:34:22.410 --> 0:34:24.450
<v Speaker 1>didn't send a dude from Australia there. It was a

0:34:24.489 --> 0:34:26.230
<v Speaker 1>guy who already works there, but they were going for

0:34:26.250 --> 0:34:28.910
<v Speaker 1>the low-hanging fruit. How does this hurt her?

0:34:29.850 --> 0:34:30.820
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it does hurt her.

0:34:31.270 --> 0:34:31.730
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't.

0:34:32.010 --> 0:34:35.069
<v Speaker 4>I completely agree with Stephen. This gives her an opportunity

0:34:35.130 --> 0:34:36.750
<v Speaker 4>to do a number of things. The first thing is

0:34:36.790 --> 0:34:40.270
<v Speaker 4>to say, look at that mainstream press. Don't listen to

0:34:40.310 --> 0:34:43.550
<v Speaker 4>the traditional media. They just want to spread hate about

0:34:43.700 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 4>me and everybody who supports me. The second thing is,

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 4>at Redbridge, when we have looked into the, you know,

0:34:52.380 --> 0:34:56.060
<v Speaker 4>the tribe of One Nation and what people particularly think

0:34:56.100 --> 0:35:00.259
<v Speaker 4>about Pauline, My colleague, Alex Fine, did some incredible work

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 4>around how people bond to Pauline Hanson. Unlike other politicians

0:35:04.739 --> 0:35:08.469
<v Speaker 4>in Australia, they view her as she's a personal friend.

0:35:08.810 --> 0:35:10.109
<v Speaker 1>She's one of us.

0:35:10.510 --> 0:35:13.350
<v Speaker 4>And, you know, Gina Reinhart giving her a plane or

0:35:13.390 --> 0:35:17.980
<v Speaker 4>the media attacking her, they just think... Well, they would

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.739
<v Speaker 4>do that because she's one of us, she's a normal person.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.260
<v Speaker 4>No wonder one of us who become successful gets attacked

0:35:24.340 --> 0:35:28.060
<v Speaker 4>in this way. They almost have this parasocial relationship with her.

0:35:28.110 --> 0:35:30.230
<v Speaker 1>And, again, I've talked about it here, about when the

0:35:30.390 --> 0:35:33.430
<v Speaker 1>union movement was lining up and going after industrial relations,

0:35:33.570 --> 0:35:36.049
<v Speaker 1>yet there's clearly a little bit of movement there from

0:35:36.090 --> 0:35:39.129
<v Speaker 1>those Labor One Mission curious people, right? But this sort

0:35:39.170 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of personal gear, which is all sort of fun, lights

0:35:41.580 --> 0:35:46.630
<v Speaker 1>up blue sky... No, thank you... uh, Michelle Bullock, yet again,

0:35:46.690 --> 0:35:48.629
<v Speaker 1>kind of giving us the idea of a couple more

0:35:48.690 --> 0:35:51.310
<v Speaker 1>rate rises. Now, politically, that's going to be massive problems

0:35:51.330 --> 0:35:53.860
<v Speaker 1>for the government, but more importantly, for the third of

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the country that's trying to pay off a house. Like,

0:35:56.020 --> 0:35:59.020
<v Speaker 1>can you... A more frustrating message at all that we

0:35:59.060 --> 0:36:01.779
<v Speaker 1>got from the Reserve Bank Governor today. Roll the tape.

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 9>I'm not signalling anything. I'm only one person on the board,

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 9>so I can't tell you what the board will want

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:11.770
<v Speaker 9>to do. The only thing we've been doing in the

0:36:11.810 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 9>past few weeks is we highlighted after our most recent

0:36:17.180 --> 0:36:20.460
<v Speaker 9>meeting that we felt that the inflation risks were skewed

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:21.219
<v Speaker 9>to the upside.

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>But she also built the cap, which was prices will

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.020
<v Speaker 1>never go down. It is all now just a conversation

0:36:27.060 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 1>about by the margin by which they continue to go up.

0:36:30.340 --> 0:36:32.100
<v Speaker 1>Yet the only button they have is the one that

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.660
<v Speaker 1>they look like they're going to push another couple of times,

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:38.069
<v Speaker 1>which Christy, I don't quite understand because, again, the people

0:36:38.090 --> 0:36:40.810
<v Speaker 1>that it punishes are the people who theoretically have already

0:36:40.890 --> 0:36:44.569
<v Speaker 1>received 15 increases in the interest rates and who are

0:36:44.790 --> 0:36:45.469
<v Speaker 1>right on the limit.

0:36:46.210 --> 0:36:47.379
<v Speaker 4>And people are feeling it, Paul.

0:36:47.550 --> 0:36:48.299
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, bloody oath.

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 4>You know, people who are traditional sort of working class,

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 4>for want of a better word, because I don't believe

0:36:54.100 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 4>in that term, right, have been feeling it for quite

0:36:57.219 --> 0:37:01.089
<v Speaker 4>some time. People who have an average mortgage in Sydney

0:37:01.150 --> 0:37:04.390
<v Speaker 4>and Melbourne now You know, Sydney's 1.6, Melbourne I think

0:37:04.450 --> 0:37:08.310
<v Speaker 4>is 1.2, might be falling a little bit. They're stretched

0:37:08.330 --> 0:37:11.009
<v Speaker 4>to the limit if you've got kids. And making a

0:37:11.130 --> 0:37:15.510
<v Speaker 4>pretty good income in this country, you are still feeling

0:37:15.550 --> 0:37:20.049
<v Speaker 4>incredibly poor. Productivity is very low. Inflation still tries to

0:37:20.070 --> 0:37:22.509
<v Speaker 4>track high. And that's why you've got One Nation out

0:37:22.530 --> 0:37:24.830
<v Speaker 4>there saying, hey, you can dip into your super, right?

0:37:24.870 --> 0:37:25.130
<v Speaker 1>Correct.

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 4>And you've got the coalition, although they haven't said it

0:37:27.500 --> 0:37:29.990
<v Speaker 4>for a while, and I don't know why not, have

0:37:30.010 --> 0:37:34.070
<v Speaker 4>been saying, hey, we think, you know, young first homebuyers

0:37:34.090 --> 0:37:36.730
<v Speaker 4>can dip into this. But, oh, hey, what about bracket creep?

0:37:37.230 --> 0:37:38.710
<v Speaker 1>It'd be nice if they mentioned the bracket creep, the

0:37:39.030 --> 0:37:42.010
<v Speaker 1>single most popular thing that came out of the damn budget. But, yeah,

0:37:42.090 --> 0:37:44.330
<v Speaker 1>let's not get started on their message game.

0:37:44.350 --> 0:37:46.950
<v Speaker 4>That's an offset to Labor not managing inflation. You can

0:37:47.010 --> 0:37:50.250
<v Speaker 4>talk about the inflation with the bracket creep, but they

0:37:50.310 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 4>don't do it.

0:37:51.310 --> 0:37:52.529
<v Speaker 1>But people are.

0:37:53.630 --> 0:37:56.670
<v Speaker 4>and it is coming for Labor out there in the community.

0:37:57.190 --> 0:38:00.489
<v Speaker 4>It may not be baseball bat yet, but I can

0:38:00.530 --> 0:38:04.650
<v Speaker 4>tell you this, the cost of living and the disgruntlement

0:38:04.790 --> 0:38:09.860
<v Speaker 4>towards the Albanese government is feeding into our polling in Victoria.

0:38:10.510 --> 0:38:14.180
<v Speaker 4>It is making a dent in the Labor brand. Now,

0:38:14.219 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 4>the Victorian Labor Party have done enough work on themselves

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:19.620
<v Speaker 4>for that brand to be toast, right?

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:21.500
<v Speaker 1>There's more pothole than road for them at the moment.

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:38:21.700 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not.

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:23.690
<v Speaker 4>You know, they've done enough of.

0:38:23.739 --> 0:38:25.510
<v Speaker 1>They've lifted the heavy load there.

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:29.950
<v Speaker 4>But the federal upset, the cost of living and the

0:38:30.010 --> 0:38:33.250
<v Speaker 4>changes to the CGT and the negative gearing, that is

0:38:33.270 --> 0:38:36.070
<v Speaker 4>eating the Labor brand as well. There is a sentiment

0:38:36.150 --> 0:38:38.070
<v Speaker 4>out there... It might be a little bit on the

0:38:38.110 --> 0:38:39.570
<v Speaker 4>back burner, but it's coming.

0:38:39.910 --> 0:38:41.390
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating to see. I do want to get to smart

0:38:41.410 --> 0:38:43.250
<v Speaker 1>cars in a second here. So, Stephen, can you save

0:38:43.270 --> 0:38:46.250
<v Speaker 1>it to the usual five-minute rant about the Reserve Bank?

0:38:46.270 --> 0:38:47.670
<v Speaker 1>Just give me the bumper sticker version.

0:38:48.469 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 12>So, look, I agree with most of what Christy just

0:38:51.300 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 12>said there.

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they're very, very valid points.

0:38:55.060 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 12>The Reserve Bank, Michelle Bullock's actually said it, but I

0:38:57.940 --> 0:39:02.509
<v Speaker 12>think unemployment's got to hit close to 5%. Now, That's

0:39:02.530 --> 0:39:04.820
<v Speaker 12>just not an acceptable statement from a Reserve Bank governor.

0:39:04.860 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 12>I mean, these are people's lives she's playing with. These

0:39:07.620 --> 0:39:09.620
<v Speaker 12>are people's lives. She's going to be putting people on

0:39:09.660 --> 0:39:13.980
<v Speaker 12>the unemployment list. They're going to lose their house. And

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 12>they've done nothing wrong. There is no wage explosion. It's

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.950
<v Speaker 12>like the Loch Ness Monster, the Reserve Bank looking for

0:39:20.989 --> 0:39:23.770
<v Speaker 12>a wage explosion. They were at it again the last

0:39:24.070 --> 0:39:26.460
<v Speaker 12>week or two. You know, she keeps talking about it.

0:39:26.570 --> 0:39:30.720
<v Speaker 12>It's never happened. It's never arrived. And it's not going

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:36.380
<v Speaker 12>to arrive. So stop blaming the people at the bottom

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.340
<v Speaker 12>half of the economy. This is driven by profits of companies.

0:39:39.420 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 12>It's driven by, unfortunately, Donald Trump's failed execution of of

0:39:44.700 --> 0:39:47.380
<v Speaker 12>his war in the Middle East. It's driven by the

0:39:47.660 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 12>Houthis cutting off the Saudis oil, it's driven by the

0:39:50.340 --> 0:39:54.410
<v Speaker 12>Russians and the Ukrainians, and it's not driven by workers

0:39:54.610 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 12>in this country. Stop pretending there's some wage explosion as

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 12>an excuse for what you're about to do to these people.

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.299
<v Speaker 1>Now, gang, I've got Nigel Farage standing by, but I

0:40:04.340 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 1>do just want to get, again, just a little taster

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.430
<v Speaker 1>from both of you about this smart car stuff. Again,

0:40:09.469 --> 0:40:11.850
<v Speaker 1>Four Corners last night, the story was phenomenal. I showed

0:40:11.890 --> 0:40:14.589
<v Speaker 1>the shorter version here. The idea that Chris Bowen, oh, well,

0:40:14.610 --> 0:40:16.790
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows where I am. Mate, no one can, they

0:40:16.830 --> 0:40:21.340
<v Speaker 1>can't hack into the microphone in your car. The overall

0:40:21.380 --> 0:40:24.509
<v Speaker 1>point being, right, to me the overall point being, Stephen,

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.390
<v Speaker 1>that we have to keep right up with the standards

0:40:27.690 --> 0:40:29.430
<v Speaker 1>to go, okay, if you're going to buy this stuff,

0:40:29.630 --> 0:40:31.370
<v Speaker 1>you need to know all of this is what comes

0:40:31.430 --> 0:40:33.109
<v Speaker 1>with when you buy it. Well, nine out of ten

0:40:33.130 --> 0:40:34.629
<v Speaker 1>people say, I don't care, I've got nothing to hide.

0:40:34.730 --> 0:40:34.969
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

0:40:35.250 --> 0:40:38.009
<v Speaker 1>But people need to know that these possibilities exist and

0:40:38.050 --> 0:40:41.390
<v Speaker 1>that there's a difference between a Chinese-homed product and an

0:40:41.430 --> 0:40:42.410
<v Speaker 1>American-homed product.

0:40:44.410 --> 0:40:46.740
<v Speaker 12>I wouldn't buy a Chinese car if you paid me, Paul.

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 12>That's probably the simplest answer to say. I wouldn't trust them.

0:40:50.700 --> 0:40:53.850
<v Speaker 12>I don't want them going through my life. I mean, yes,

0:40:53.950 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 12>the American companies aren't much better but they're just doing

0:40:56.580 --> 0:40:59.290
<v Speaker 12>it for profit. The Chinese want to surveil you.

0:40:59.590 --> 0:41:01.069
<v Speaker 1>And use it against you.

0:41:01.890 --> 0:41:04.650
<v Speaker 12>Not a great distinction, but I'll stick with our system

0:41:04.670 --> 0:41:05.350
<v Speaker 12>rather than theirs.

0:41:05.410 --> 0:41:07.149
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it is these fine splitting of hairs of which

0:41:07.210 --> 0:41:09.170
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with the splitting when it comes to

0:41:09.190 --> 0:41:09.770
<v Speaker 1>this in our own secret.

0:41:09.790 --> 0:41:11.750
<v Speaker 4>The lesser of the two evils, Stephen.

0:41:11.770 --> 0:41:14.230
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, correct. They're both fine, but which one? I appreciate it.

0:41:14.250 --> 0:41:16.469
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, guys. Nigel Farage, he joins us next. So

0:41:16.510 --> 0:41:19.270
<v Speaker 1>much to discuss with him about broken Britain, about how

0:41:19.290 --> 0:41:21.370
<v Speaker 1>to fix it and about how to call out the

0:41:21.430 --> 0:41:24.009
<v Speaker 1>BS that is growing there by the day. The Great

0:41:24.030 --> 0:41:30.420
<v Speaker 1>Man next on Paul Murray Live. It's time for the

0:41:30.460 --> 0:41:35.569
<v Speaker 1>man who's never boring. Great Nigel Farage joins us now

0:41:35.610 --> 0:41:38.770
<v Speaker 1>from London, the Reform Party leader, future Prime Minister, we hope, certainly.

0:41:38.810 --> 0:41:42.589
<v Speaker 1>Lovely to see you, mate. I cannot believe how dumb

0:41:42.610 --> 0:41:44.910
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Party could be, right, when supposedly they've just

0:41:44.950 --> 0:41:46.890
<v Speaker 1>had a big reset and they're ready and it's about

0:41:46.930 --> 0:41:48.570
<v Speaker 1>the man from the north and number 10 north and

0:41:48.590 --> 0:41:49.950
<v Speaker 1>all the rest of it, right, and I'm different and

0:41:50.210 --> 0:41:52.130
<v Speaker 1>I don't do press conferences out the front of number 10,

0:41:52.130 --> 0:41:54.270
<v Speaker 1>I do them in the backyard of number 10. Okay,

0:41:54.310 --> 0:41:56.850
<v Speaker 1>that'll change the world. He gets asked a question about

0:41:56.870 --> 0:41:59.830
<v Speaker 1>the EU and rather than saying, no, go away, no way,

0:41:59.890 --> 0:42:02.650
<v Speaker 1>that's dealt with, see you later, he leaves the damn

0:42:02.730 --> 0:42:03.489
<v Speaker 1>door open.

0:42:07.290 --> 0:42:10.890
<v Speaker 2>Yep, he certainly does, just as, you know, Keir Starmer

0:42:10.910 --> 0:42:14.870
<v Speaker 2>was talking about resets and closer alignment, and Burnham's gone

0:42:14.890 --> 0:42:17.450
<v Speaker 2>a whole step further. And it just goes to show,

0:42:17.810 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 2>with that, with him bringing the ridiculous giveaway of the

0:42:21.890 --> 0:42:27.460
<v Speaker 2>Chagos Islands to Mauritius, or China, really, that actually this

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister, who was going to be the most revolutionary

0:42:29.700 --> 0:42:33.260
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister in 40 years, fundamentally going to change everything,

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:38.930
<v Speaker 2>actually is now a continuity... Labour Prime Minister, going back

0:42:38.989 --> 0:42:43.489
<v Speaker 2>to all the old ideas that failed totally and miserably.

0:42:43.820 --> 0:42:46.660
<v Speaker 2>And here he is this week at the United Nations

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:50.740
<v Speaker 2>with his fellow globalists and no doubt in his element.

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:53.980
<v Speaker 2>We are going to see no change from this man

0:42:54.020 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 2>at all. We have deteriorating public finances. Nothing's getting better.

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 2>And he might smile a lot. He might have better

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:04.450
<v Speaker 2>PR than Keir Starmer. But frankly, it's more of the same.

0:43:04.450 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>100%. I've got to ask you, again, sort of one

0:43:07.140 --> 0:43:08.760
<v Speaker 1>off the top of the head here about the EU,

0:43:09.100 --> 0:43:12.260
<v Speaker 1>which was, you said a couple of weeks ago, Canada

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:16.430
<v Speaker 1>with associate membership, right? hopefully, that doesn't mean that any

0:43:16.450 --> 0:43:19.410
<v Speaker 1>of the stupid decisions of the EU binds Canada, but

0:43:19.450 --> 0:43:24.050
<v Speaker 1>the idea of trying to form a closer relationship with

0:43:24.550 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>such a massive trading partner for the United States. I

0:43:27.980 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 1>was not frightened, but I just was utterly surprised that

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a country whose political leadership has got such advantage out

0:43:36.820 --> 0:43:39.950
<v Speaker 1>of Trump's comments about the 51st state and turning them in,

0:43:39.950 --> 0:43:42.410
<v Speaker 1>you know, not a prime minister, a governor, would do

0:43:42.650 --> 0:43:45.750
<v Speaker 1>anything to seem like it was anything other than a

0:43:45.770 --> 0:43:48.669
<v Speaker 1>country on its own two feet. Instead, normal people don't

0:43:48.710 --> 0:43:52.190
<v Speaker 1>know the distinction between full membership and associate membership of

0:43:52.450 --> 0:43:53.469
<v Speaker 1>Canada and the EU.

0:43:53.730 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 2>What do you think of that? Well, it's almost like

0:43:58.219 --> 0:44:01.410
<v Speaker 2>a surrender, isn't it? Oh, dear, America's threatened us, so

0:44:01.430 --> 0:44:03.950
<v Speaker 2>let's go and join another club. Rather than we're Canada,

0:44:04.210 --> 0:44:07.190
<v Speaker 2>we'll make our own way. It's the basic sovereignty point.

0:44:07.650 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 2>No association with the European Union does not involve a

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 2>loss of sovereignty in some way, whether it's standardising rules, laws,

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 2>whatever it may be. But that's Mark Carney all over.

0:44:19.340 --> 0:44:21.180
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he was governor of the Bank of England

0:44:21.219 --> 0:44:25.049
<v Speaker 2>during the Brexit campaign, urging us to stay in. All

0:44:25.090 --> 0:44:29.790
<v Speaker 2>his instincts are globalist. All his instincts are fundamentally against

0:44:29.830 --> 0:44:36.430
<v Speaker 2>the nation state, really counting and really meaning very much. So, yeah,

0:44:36.550 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a very, very bad error. And frankly,

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:43.380
<v Speaker 2>all it does... is to further antagonise an American president

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:46.500
<v Speaker 2>who does whatever you think of his decisions, but he

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:49.460
<v Speaker 2>does believe in the nation state very, very strongly, and

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:51.839
<v Speaker 2>he hates the whole concept of European Union.

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:54.459
<v Speaker 1>Now, I mean, so much is always made about how

0:44:54.500 --> 0:44:56.859
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom would get along

0:44:56.880 --> 0:45:00.180
<v Speaker 1>with the US President, the special relationship, obviously the X

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 1>factors of whether it's a Trump or a Biden, whether

0:45:02.500 --> 0:45:05.669
<v Speaker 1>it's a Burnham or a Farage, right? But You must

0:45:05.750 --> 0:45:09.029
<v Speaker 1>see things like the UN General Assembly or an EU

0:45:09.070 --> 0:45:11.259
<v Speaker 1>gathering or a G8 or a G20, and you see

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:14.739
<v Speaker 1>the way they all interact with each other, right? And obviously,

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:18.880
<v Speaker 1>there's that interpersonal kindness, which you obviously would extend to everyone.

0:45:18.900 --> 0:45:21.689
<v Speaker 1>You're a very charming chap. But give us a little

0:45:21.750 --> 0:45:26.410
<v Speaker 1>insight into... Would you bring swagger to the world stage

0:45:26.450 --> 0:45:30.009
<v Speaker 1>on the behalf of the UK, a scepticism, a want

0:45:30.090 --> 0:45:33.230
<v Speaker 1>to go one-on-one rather than sort of the group photos?

0:45:33.270 --> 0:45:37.750
<v Speaker 1>When you think about Prime Minister Farage potentially, what's he

0:45:37.810 --> 0:45:41.069
<v Speaker 1>like on things like the United Nations stage?

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:47.060
<v Speaker 2>Well, swagger's a mistake. I mean, swagger is not what

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:51.950
<v Speaker 2>the Brits do. But self-confidence... That's what we want to see.

0:45:52.110 --> 0:45:56.370
<v Speaker 2>We want to see a prime minister who exhibits self-confidence,

0:45:56.790 --> 0:46:00.170
<v Speaker 2>who shows that he or she are not out of

0:46:00.250 --> 0:46:04.940
<v Speaker 2>their depth, prepared to play the game with the family

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:08.339
<v Speaker 2>photographs or whatever it may be, but actually wanting pretty

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:13.350
<v Speaker 2>intense one-on-one negotiations. And This meeting that will take place

0:46:13.390 --> 0:46:17.070
<v Speaker 2>later today between Burnham and Trump couldn't come at a

0:46:17.190 --> 0:46:20.730
<v Speaker 2>more important time. You know, the world is in a very,

0:46:21.210 --> 0:46:25.390
<v Speaker 2>very dangerous place. We've got an American president saying things

0:46:25.450 --> 0:46:28.650
<v Speaker 2>about Ireland, saying things about the Falkland Islands that are

0:46:29.150 --> 0:46:31.950
<v Speaker 2>really problematic. And I'm going to say to you, you know,

0:46:31.969 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned this last week. If Burnham sits there and

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:39.420
<v Speaker 2>says we're going to pay to give the Chagos Islands

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 2>to Mauritius... And given that Mauritius is absolutely being controlled

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:49.460
<v Speaker 2>by China, I think Trump will erupt. He'll erupt because

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Diego Garcia is strategically the most important military base America

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.259
<v Speaker 2>has in the world. And my advice to the Prime

0:46:57.280 --> 0:47:01.340
<v Speaker 2>Minister would be, drop the Chagos deal, give Trump something

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:04.839
<v Speaker 2>at the start of the negotiation, and then he'll start

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:07.980
<v Speaker 2>to give back. That's how business people work. You give

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:10.580
<v Speaker 2>me something, I'll give you something. But here's the problem.

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Virtually no one these days who goes to represent our

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:17.800
<v Speaker 2>country has ever been in business, has ever been part

0:47:18.380 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 2>of negotiations and understands human psychology. You're dealing with an

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:26.479
<v Speaker 2>American president, but you're dealing with a dealmaker, and that's

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:26.879
<v Speaker 2>the point.

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:29.500
<v Speaker 1>Oh, get him in there. Get him in there now,

0:47:29.540 --> 0:47:31.100
<v Speaker 1>all right? But we'll wait and see whether it's an

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 1>early election or one in a couple of years' time.

0:47:33.140 --> 0:47:34.950
<v Speaker 1>But certainly, I love that. It's a wonderful thing. Swagger's

0:47:34.989 --> 0:47:37.029
<v Speaker 1>the wrong approach. It's beautifully said. That's not what the

0:47:37.050 --> 0:47:39.230
<v Speaker 1>Brits do. Class is what they do, and you are

0:47:39.290 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 1>all class, sir. Appreciate it. Thank you, Nigel. He's a

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:45.770
<v Speaker 1>good man. Nigel Farage, you can see him on GB News,

0:47:45.810 --> 0:47:47.830
<v Speaker 1>of course, or, of course, every now and then you

0:47:47.850 --> 0:47:48.930
<v Speaker 1>get to see him pop up and ask a question

0:47:48.969 --> 0:47:51.549
<v Speaker 1>in Prime Minister's Questions, getting a bit of line and

0:47:51.570 --> 0:47:53.529
<v Speaker 1>length thing before it'd be him, the one answering them

0:47:53.770 --> 0:47:55.660
<v Speaker 1>after the next election. That's what the polls tell us.

0:47:56.020 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Quick break. Back with more. Before we're done, late debate

0:47:58.020 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in a few minutes' time. What have they done on

0:48:00.060 --> 0:48:03.660
<v Speaker 1>social media today? The politicians, showbiz for ugly people, you

0:48:03.700 --> 0:48:06.390
<v Speaker 1>pay for it, and I show it because I try

0:48:06.410 --> 0:48:14.739
<v Speaker 1>to have a laugh at them. Before we go, what

0:48:14.780 --> 0:48:16.779
<v Speaker 1>did they do while you were working? Well, of course,

0:48:16.900 --> 0:48:20.380
<v Speaker 1>nothing apart from dumb social media videos like this. The

0:48:20.420 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 1>member for Bennelong.

0:48:22.620 --> 0:48:24.300
<v Speaker 8>Why don't scientists trust atoms?

0:48:24.700 --> 0:48:24.939
<v Speaker 3>Why?

0:48:25.020 --> 0:48:26.280
<v Speaker 8>Because they make up everything.

0:48:26.300 --> 0:48:29.259
<v Speaker 3>Is that all right? What do you call a fake noodle? What?

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:34.060
<v Speaker 1>An impasta. Excellent. A little bit funny. A little bit funny.

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 1>A little bit funny. Corinne Monholland is a Labor senator,

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:39.490
<v Speaker 1>and what did she do while you were working today?

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:40.980
<v Speaker 1>It's R U OK?

0:48:41.060 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 4>Day and I thought I would check in on some

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:46.489
<v Speaker 4>of the people in my Facebook comments. Sonny says, you've

0:48:46.530 --> 0:48:49.550
<v Speaker 4>got more roles than a Michelin man, you fat mole.

0:48:51.350 --> 0:48:56.169
<v Speaker 1>Far out. I mean, could have been answering letters from

0:48:56.630 --> 0:48:59.170
<v Speaker 1>constituents or dare I say meeting them? No, no, I've

0:48:59.190 --> 0:49:02.629
<v Speaker 1>got a video to mark. The reading bad tweets thing

0:49:02.730 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>was a boring thing 10 years ago when Jimmy Kimmel

0:49:06.500 --> 0:49:09.310
<v Speaker 1>was doing it. 2026 is boring now. See you again

0:49:09.330 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow where our special guest is Megan Kelly.