WEBVTT - Penrith Can Rewrite History | Storm Can't Win Without Hughes | Raiders lack Depth for GF | CODE NRL

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Competentis win the comp.

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 2>They've got to get through the next three weeks, merge unscar,

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 2>stay in the top four.

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Any team can do it from outside? You know they can.

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that they can. His true suggests they can't.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 3>History suggests we've never seen a team like that.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Direct.

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 5>I think the side in the top four that have

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 5>another gear and.

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 6>And they are in this position where they can still

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 6>make the eight. They have a roster that is absolutely

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 6>capable of winning a camp.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 7>Bailey Simonson omitted again from the Eels line up to

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 7>play the rabbit Os on the weekend.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>What's Doing.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 7>Welcome to the Code n r L Show Adam Mobbs

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 7>here with Michael Carrionis, David Riki and Brent Reid Hot

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 7>takes this week.

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Competis win the comp? Yes, yeah they can?

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 2>For sure of just one word. Yeah, I think they can.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 2>But but I think Melbourne are clearly still the favorites

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>for me. But I think depending on how things play out,

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 2>they've got to stay in the top four. I think

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>you can't win it from outside the top four. For me,

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>they've got to stay in the top four. They've got

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 2>a tough run the next three weeks. I think they've

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 2>got to get through the next three weeks. Merge On

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 2>scares stay in the top four, and then I'll be

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll be worried about him. You're not worried about him

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 2>now from the top four.

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 4>I'd be worried about him regardless if I'm.

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 2>That's on the top four.

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, okay, Yeah, if any team can do it from outside,

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 6>you know they can.

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that they can. I think they'll finish

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 2>in the top History suggests they can't.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't think we've said history suggests we've never

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 3>seen a team like that?

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Correct we have in the sixties.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 6>Okay, yeah, we've said a better team, but only you

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 6>were alive then.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 2>It was close.

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 8>What about the lack of injuries, I mean, I know

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 8>is A is out for that. Yeah, but that's it's

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 8>what happens every year. Their injury run is always time

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 8>to perfect, isn't it. Every year they have a big injury.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 8>This year, he'll be playing it the business.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 3>End were playing next week.

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 4>That's what happens with Penrith. For whatever reason, their injuries.

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 5>I know they've carried Nathan and Jerome over the last

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 5>couple of years, but it works out for him.

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 6>The big thing is the defense is back in order

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 6>and that's that was the I regon that was the

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 6>biggest concern when we started to think about writing them

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 6>off and actually write them off.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>From earlier this year. When we started to.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 6>Their defense was it was like something we haven't seen

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 6>before from Penmouth side in so many years. And I

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 6>think I think now that's back in order. I think

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 6>they're conceding on.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Average twelve points. That's just crazy.

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 6>That's that's back to championship stuff. So yeah, absolutely they can.

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 6>We're going to get a great look at them over

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 6>the next three weeks though.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the barometer for them.

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 4>I think they beat Melbourne.

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps, no Jerome Hughes, they get their chance.

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 5>That's the big one for Melbourne is if they get

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 5>perhaps we'll be back obviously, but Jerome Hughes, if he's

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 5>not back, I'd have Penwrith as premiership favorites.

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Can Melbourne win it without Jerome Hughes, No, No, I

0:02:58.480 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think so.

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I reckon they can.

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 4>I just don't think the other players.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the current is very wide open this year, hugely.

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I think even Melbourne have been a bit inconsistent. They

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 2>haven't been something.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>They haven't been coned right.

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 2>I don't know whether they're waiting for the finals, but

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 2>there's been moments where they have played so well, they've

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>blown teams away for twenty thirty minute periods and then

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>they've just shut up shop and stopped playing.

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 2>No, one's been informous. Yeah, so I don't look, I

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 2>think Melbourne can win it without run. I think it

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>becomes infinitely more difficult for them. But I think they

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 2>can win it without him.

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if they can without No, I don't think.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, sorry, sorry.

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 4>It's crazy.

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 5>We've said for ages now they haven't been great, but

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 5>they're coming second.

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 2>But there's another way.

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 5>But yes, I think the only side in the top

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 5>four that have another gear and Melbourne Penrith.

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 4>I think Cambury has been exceptional this year.

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Obviously you'll start baking cabod No. I think that gets you, buddy.

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 4>But I think they played their best footage, right. I

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 4>think Canbury have probably played their best.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Foot an element of waiting for the finals.

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.839
<v Speaker 6>For the Raiders point of view, I regon they flat

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 6>lined a little bit on the on the basis of waiting.

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 3>A lot of young blokes that haven't been in this.

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Situations around them right where Melbourne and Penereth are known

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 5>quantities in the business end of the season.

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 2>See people keep saying this about Canberra, but they've got

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of finals experience, a lot of finals experience.

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Do We have this argument with Jimmy Graham the other week,

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 2>but Jimmy said, they've got they've got heaps of finals.

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Not in the spine premiership, in the sport. They've got

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 4>a lot of premiership experience.

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 2>You mean winning comps. No, they don't know that they've

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 2>got they've got experience in big games in finals. What

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 2>about the grind?

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 7>What about getting in the grind, because you know Melbourne

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 7>can do it, you know Penrith can do it. You've

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 7>seen Canterbury at the season grinding out wins. Canberra have

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 7>relied on their attack to get him out of trouble

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 7>at times and then you know they finally had that

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 7>that that.

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Defeat that rocked them a little bit.

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 7>And even against Manly, I thought mainly held their gloves

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 7>up pretty well in the middle a little bit and

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 7>then they got the win again.

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 5>So they will get punished for those lapses in the

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 5>finals if they if they don't eradicate them.

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 4>That's the concern for camera. How many finals they played

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 4>or something.

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 3>Look, the big factor is is what the Raiders is.

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be playing these semi finals at home.

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 6>Yes, that's the fact that you just can't run away

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 6>from that. As soon as you say that advantage Raiders.

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 3>They could play Penrith week one of the finals down

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 3>in Canberra.

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Who would you be tipping?

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Well, I bet you well, okay, just hold that thought.

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I'd take camera anyway, but hold that thought.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 3>But you would have a vastly different view if that.

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Game was at Penroth. It's not a discussion, you know

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>what I mean.

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 6>So it shifts your view of how that result goes

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 6>based on the fact that they've put themselves in this

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 6>position to be planning to get into a grand final

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 6>at home.

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>It's huge.

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I think got three survivors.

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 5>That's not a lot, but a lot of finals experience

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 5>since not in their spine Cads and young Josh.

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah minutes.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Look it up, half played finals footy. Since a lot

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 2>of guys that played Jamal Foggery, A lot of guys

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 2>playing the finals they haven't how many of the want

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 2>of them played Origin, how many of they want of

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 2>them played test footing?

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 4>How many finals of they one don't know their finals.

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 2>You have to give me more notice of You would

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 2>like to saying they don't have a big match experience.

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 2>They do.

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 5>They they haven't had finals, correct, winning finals experience, winning, losing.

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 2>It's still finals experience, not sorry, if you lose, does

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 2>it not?

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm comparing it to Cannon to Melbourne and Penrith doesn't

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 5>even come close.

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Who's going to get close to them? You put it

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:52.679
<v Speaker 2>on through team.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 5>There's obviously question So obviously because you're comparing it tod,

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 5>I said, listen, no one, listen because youre annoying me.

0:06:59.600 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 5>I said there's question marks over their big game experience

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 5>and you're saying there's not because they've had no success

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 5>in big game of spruits. So it's sweet and so

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 5>they had no success. You said that the finals and

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 5>finals they've had no success.

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 2>But they played big matches other than finals.

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 4>We're talking finals football reasons.

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 2>No, you said big match.

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking if we went back.

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 5>I said, finally, does origin and origin and test? Because

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 5>I said finals origin. I said that Melbourne and Penrith

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 5>have a distinct advantage. They've got an avenger over everyone exactly,

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 5>so put them on through every other team in the top.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, there you go. Done mix says pen Melbourne.

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>No one else cooking it.

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 5>Done and ready says camera con Because three blokes played

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 5>a ground final five years.

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 2>And all the blokes who played tests foot in the

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>stud of Origin footy as well.

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 7>I want to ask you, Dave about the Sydney Roosters,

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 7>your thoughts on how they're going where they should be

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 7>sitting at the moment, because the last couple of weeks

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 7>they've you know, they've the season has been on the

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 7>line and losses would have pretty much ruled them out

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 7>and they kept themselves in the running. Should they are

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 7>they where they should be? I think they should be

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 7>a bit higher.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 6>So last September I wrote a column about how the

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 6>vacuum of leadership and experience is going to hurt the

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 6>Roosters this season and how I had them struggling to

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 6>make the eighth after watching the rise of Mark Nawanakatawezi,

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 6>Robert Toyer, Hugo Savala and a couple of Blake Steve's

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 6>the younger forwards coming through. I've shifted my I've shifted

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 6>my mind on where this team sits, probably around May

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 6>June this year, and then watching unfold the Dally m

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 6>favorite his form of the form of James de Desco

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 6>has shifted my mind and what this team is capable of.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 6>When you then throw in the class and caliber of

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 6>all the representative players Angus Crichton, Connor Watson, who else,

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 6>who else too, like Lindsay Collins, Spencer Lanu, Victor Radley.

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 6>They have been with Sam Walker for okay, So then

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 6>you come back to the fact that Samsmoon missing yet

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 6>here they are okay, granted, but they still had Sam

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 6>and Smith.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>They could have.

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 6>They bought Chad Townsend for a reason. I'm not saying

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 6>it worked or it didn't. A deal didn't work, but

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 6>they did buy him. So they had ample experience and

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 6>depth in the halves. They unearthed Hugo.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And they are in this position where they can still

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>make the.

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 6>Eight and once they get there, they are they have

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 6>a roster that should be and is absolutely capable of

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 6>winning a camp and getting to at least getting to

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 6>the Grand.

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Final this year. Yes, this year.

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 3>If they get to the eighth, that's rules, that's a team.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 4>Your turn.

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>How well that that team right.

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 2>On, the class of Melbourne cameras.

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's play more finals.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 6>So they've got the Dallian favorite, Jimmy the Dallim it's

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 6>a good player.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 3>They've got five Origin players.

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, I.

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Throw a start.

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>You can't.

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, I just had him coming into this year missing

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 5>the eight. I don't think I had just missing the ape.

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 6>So there's some dem you must see some damn good

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 6>teams above the roosters.

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>As far as rosters are concerned, well.

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 5>I just thought with all the amount of players that

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 5>left the side last year, right, there was a lot

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 5>of a lot of high quality, a lot of experience

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 5>out the door.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Taking his stack of footy.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 5>Take it into the account that Sam Walker we didn't

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 5>know exactly when and he was going to be back

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 5>this year. So I thought they'd have a slight dip

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 5>this year, not a catastrophic dip, a slight dip this year,

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 5>but obviously signing Ree robson for next year, and then

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 5>with those players that have had more exposure like the

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 5>far who White, all those sort of guys that have

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 5>played a lot more first grade this year, and I

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 5>just wasn't sure with that experience, was not a player.

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 6>In the roof, just back line that wouldn't walk into

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 6>the majority of the teams.

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 4>I get your point. I do get your point.

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 5>I just basing it on what my expectation was on

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 5>him headed into this year, and I didn't have him

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 5>in my eight.

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So which teams did you have started beating him in

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the eight? Did you have the Dolphins, the Warriors, the Raiders.

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Definitely not, You're going great.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>These are all teams above them.

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 7>So you had the Storm, Bulldogs, Panthers, Broncos.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>You would have happen manly how you can even.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 6>You considered the Manly Liner to have been comparable to

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 6>what the Roosters have at their disposal off one mind blowing.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 4>But do you have them start again?

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Because I'm hearing what you said the vacuum of experience,

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I went no.

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:53.719
<v Speaker 1>But halfway through this year, so you didn't know the eight? No,

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>probably not, but I'm not even willing to seen that.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 5>I understand what your hundred percent, one hundred percent, I

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 5>understand what you're saying. And then if you look at

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 5>it now, I think they'll make the eight right because

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 5>of the injuries that have got to teams in and

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 5>around and mainly have fallen off a cliff, right, the

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 5>Dolphins have all these injuries. I think Brisbane will make

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 5>the AID as well, despite the three injuries that they've got.

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 4>But I think the Roosters will finish.

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 6>What I'm saying is so Tedesco is having a dallim season.

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 6>I don't think they can win the comp mark.

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>No one could toys. He is the Daly m Rookie

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Year.

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 6>You can NRL can can stamp the papers, but he

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 6>is right, he's the best.

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Young player in the game.

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Really.

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 6>Then Robert Toyer comes out and plays three games in

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 6>a State of Origin series and wins it with Queensland.

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 6>These are the things that you didn't know would happen

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 6>when you were doing your top eight exactly.

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, right, That's why I had my doubts, right yeah.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 6>But so now they emerge with this capability and they

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 6>are where are they tenth at the moment?

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Tenth?

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Not they are underachieving, nah, because I think you're I

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 5>understand your point, Dave, but you can't, like just because

0:12:58.120 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 5>we get to the halfway point and we'll reassess, right,

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 5>you can't discard how hard it was for him at

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 5>the start of the year without Sam Walker without the

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.719
<v Speaker 5>all those guys that were playing longer minutes for the

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 5>first time and stuff.

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 4>You just can't discount that, I can. I say.

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's talking about how the rooster turned the corner, right am?

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 4>I right?

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>They won the one Tour a right now because they

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>win two weeks so I can't remember. Yeah, I think

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 2>that was two games before that. That's actually been flying.

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 2>They haven't been that good this year.

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>No, that's why I think they're underachieving.

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 2>But but but you are also sudden they could win.

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>The comp Well, why did those do they win the comp?

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 7>What?

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Based on the roster?

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Well they can make they can't make the why those boys?

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 6>Why did those boys get picked for the New South

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 6>Wales't because why Robbie Toy got picked?

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Because we ran our troops basically again, so ordinary Spencer

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 2>and some of the other boys got shown loyalty. Spencer,

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 2>Connor Watson angers got shown loyalty.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So they still got there. Right.

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 3>But if they're going on my bustards, there's enough back

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 3>rails around and over the top.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Surely over the course of this seed season you can

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 2>see that they've been too inconsistent, and.

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 3>They have been inconsistent they're underachieved and.

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Considered too many points to go anywhere close to winning this.

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Corp, and they're to improve.

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>No doubt, they're underachieving.

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 5>Dave's not basing it on the way they played. Dave's

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 5>based on the way they should be playing. But you

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 5>can't put I don't agree with it.

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't agree based on the way they're playing.

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Notice to say they are achieving.

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 6>What if I'm talking about ten and he's planning at

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 6>a six, he's underachieving even what.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, you're saying they can make the Greend Final.

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Give the shape if they can't, If they can't base

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 3>all those boys.

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 2>If you're basically how they're playing, they can't.

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, if they play to their ability, they can.

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, maybe this is their ability. Maybe we've overrated.

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a different topic.

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think they make the finals for the season.

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>That's a different I thought their ability was they've exceeded

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>their ability to get to where they are.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, they've got some issues with their roster.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Then going aback the camera quickly, do you think the

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 2>rooster should clim They made a prelim in twenty twenty

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 2>and they made the file second with the finals in

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two Melbourne, Melbourne. That's big game experience.

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 6>Do you think do you think do you think the

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 6>Rusters should clean out their roster? Well you should. You

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 6>think they should because they're not playing for their ability.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 6>I think they've reached their I think.

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>This year if the Rusters was always going to be

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 2>a transition year and they're going to be better next year.

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 6>But you just said those players are playing to their

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 6>ability and potential. Well some of them are, so they're

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 6>on long economy.

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Nick mentioned Angus Anger has been a bit down this year.

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Tour are going to get better. Mark the Winged is

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 2>going to get.

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 5>Better, right, Lafio wait'sn't gone, Ye was going to get better.

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 6>You throw robson, so who is playing to the who

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 6>has He's gonna win.

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 2>The rob To pro rob to? Probably have you got standing?

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Sammy Walker has been great?

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Since said maybe they've reached their potential.

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 5>It's probably there. It's it's probably the higher earners haven't

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 5>been great. That's obviously they miss Sam Walker for a

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 5>long time. Teddy's been great, but Lindsay Corns, I don't

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 5>think was great, has been great this year. I think

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 5>Angus has been great this year. Bradley hasn't been great

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 5>this year. So I think that's where their issues are

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 5>at the moment, the roosters, not not the emerging players,

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 5>which is why I think they'll be really good next year.

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 5>They could win the COP next year, you know. But

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 5>I just think that if.

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 3>They missed the it's it's it's an underachieving season.

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Win too.

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 7>They've got two big games, don't they storm Ye Bulldogs,

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 7>and so they've got to win the other two, which

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 7>are Paramatta and then South. You reckon two people from

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 7>there gets him in the eighth.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 6>No certain, I'll tell you what That form and against

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 6>helped them against the Dolphins.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>To beat the Dogs. Yeah, I could see that happening and.

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 4>Then they can get up for it.

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 7>Rumor Mill obviously breaking news on the Thursday morning Sean

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 7>Lane officially announcing his retirement. You guys had it at

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 7>Sport Confidential six weeks ago, so if you want to

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 7>hear the latest, always go there first. So the other

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 7>one is Bailey Simonson omitted again from the Eels line

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 7>up to play the rabbit Os on the weekend.

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>What's doing this.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 6>Seems like another situation of Jason Ryles taking a stand

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 6>or a position on a player that he knows is

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 6>not part of the club's future and has decided to

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 6>not pick Bailey. There's been opportunities to pick him through injury.

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Sean Russell's a good example. He's been out.

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Brown ahead of him.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's right, and clearly that's a case of Rosey

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 6>putting the foot down again and say hey, if you

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 6>can get another club, do your best. The problem is

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 6>for this right is Bailey needs to be careful about

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 6>asking for a release because when you ask for a release,

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 6>it's that's you, that's your terms, that's what you want.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not necessarily the club.

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 6>The club can go, well, we don't want to release you,

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 6>and then therefore it becomes part of the financial package

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 6>of the departure. So Para going to say no, we

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 6>don't want to release and we're not chipping in. He's

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 6>on around four hundred, four hundred and fifty zero. It's

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 6>a good salary for his capabilities and he's if he's

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 6>not careful and just wants to walk and throw the

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 6>toys out of the cot, Para aren't going to chip

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 6>into his next contract.

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 4>Yea.

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 3>So it's interesting.

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 5>About decent money too, Like he's not like you know,

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 5>so it is an interesting to him because he's underpaid, no,

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 5>because he was resigned recently. It's like some of the

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 5>other guys that Roles a let go had.

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 4>He inherited a lot of them. Yeah, so it's probably

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 4>the first one of.

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 3>The projecting with a few clubs on their injured.

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 6>There's certainly some I mean club's ears prick up when

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 6>they hear about because they know he's got ability his

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 6>former club. The raid is they're not interested in a

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 6>return for Bailey. He will get a club, but he

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 6>just needs to be careful on the whole release and

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 6>who's paying what so he can still maximize his four hundred.

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 7>It is a little strange that Roles has brought Dylan

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 7>Brown back in and playing him in the centers. I

0:18:58.080 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 7>know he's played a little bit there before, but that

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 7>to me, I found that that's the thing that sticks

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 7>out as a little weird.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, I suppose you could take that view, couldn't you?

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 6>Given how much Roles he's going down the future first path.

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 6>Have you not got a young gun center that you

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 6>could blood and look at.

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 7>I would have thought, and I'm told that they don't

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 7>want to rush him in, but this time of year,

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 7>you've got nothing else to play for Richard, it might

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 7>be someone that you put through you know, you blood

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 7>him into first grade, you give him some reasons.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 5>It's also a bit of a reward for Dylan Brown

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 5>to apparently he's been outstanding the training.

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, has you dropped his bottom lip?

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Why do you feel they need to do? And I

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 2>love what Jason Rowls is doing. I want to stress

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 2>that why do you feel they need to reward someone

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 2>who's leaving the club, Because when when I finish, when

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 2>you can record reward guys who' be doing the job

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 2>for the new south Well's Cup, or reward guys younger

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 2>guys who have been head down training hard part of

0:19:55.760 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the club's future. Why would you again, I stress, I'm

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 2>on a huge sport of roles. I think he's doing

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 2>an amazing job. The world your rewarded guys leaving the.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 5>Joy because it's not punished, and Dylan hasn't been He

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 5>shouldn't be punished.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 2>That's not because reward.

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 3>Simply because it's to win football games, and it's not

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 3>just that.

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 5>It's because his attitude has been amazing and the players

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 5>wanting to play because he's been.

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure the players wanted to play previous weeks. He

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 2>hasn't picked it.

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but there comes there comes a point where like,

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 5>you can't just that this guy has been outstanding around

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 5>the group. Right, It's not like he's dropped his bottom

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 5>lip or anything like that, So you know, if you've

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 5>got a vacancy there, you don't need to keep kicking him.

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 2>So what about the other kids who've been around the group, But.

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 4>Maybe they're not ready. Maybe there's players are there that

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 4>aren't ready.

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Just a question.

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 6>I think coach has still come back to the fact

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 6>that this blood gives me a better chance of winning

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 6>the game.

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you go to a point and right, but

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I think he's.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Show it's not necessarily about winning Dave. Otherwise Dylan would

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 2>have been the team to start with, Like, why would

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 2>you drop Dylan? Dylan gives you a better chance of winning?

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, he's a.

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Better he's a better football and Dean Hawk Yeah yeah, No,

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 2>I understand that.

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 6>I understand that, but I still think you do get

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 6>to a point where you're not throwing games for throwing games, save.

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Suggesting throwing games.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 5>But I obviously doesn't feel like there's anyone that's ready

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 5>or up to play a NROL yet.

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And look young penas coming back.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 4>I could understand what Bailey thinks slapped in the face.

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 5>Not so much a young kid, you know, like in

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 5>Dylan being picked over a rookie, but I can understand

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 5>what Bailey's frustrated by.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 7>It, no doubt, And he has shown role with that.

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 7>He's not afraid to throw young guys into the mix.

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 7>You know, you've seen with Josh papal Or can only

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 7>Katonga and guys who haven't had a had an opportunity

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 7>at first grade to other clubs have come in and

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.199
<v Speaker 7>he believes that they've earned it, so they go in.

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 7>And I know Richard penasen he's come back from that

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 7>a c L and they wanted him a full season

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 7>in Cup to bring him through.

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 2>But has he been going to good? Yeah, he's been

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 2>going right.

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 7>I don't think we're too far away from seeing the

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 7>brothers in first go together at some point.

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Next reason