WEBVTT - Property investors brace for new super tax squeeze 

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. Now, after more than a year of intense debate,

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the big changes to super tax appear now to finally

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have been settled, and you've probably heard the Treasure has

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>put forward a pretty shrewd, politically shrewd solution to the

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, whereby the very rich in our country, those

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>at more than ten million in super will play a

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>prohibitive rate of tax and there will be some offset.

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.319
<v Speaker 1>It's part of this package for low income miners, which

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>should probably ensure it goes through Arliament. Right now, most

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>listeners to the show will not be in either category.

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I expect you're not a low incommner and I expect

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't have more than ten million in super. Maybe

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong, but I reckon ninety percent of listeners are

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in the category where quite simply, the news is that's

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>super tax rates are going to double above three million dollars. Okay,

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>so there's no tax up to two it's fifteen percent

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>on earnings over two million, and from July one next

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>year it's thirty percent on earnings in super over three million.

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that this will more than anything else hit

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>property investors. And my guest today is ideal for this.

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>It's Stuart Williams, property and finance expert. How are you, Stewart.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm really well, James, and welcome back from you all leave.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 2>It's lovely that the Treasurer waited until you were back

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>to make that announcement.

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Very thoughtful lot, I thought too. So yes, that's right.

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>He more. I said he was going to redesign us

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a month ago, and folks, I have been. I have

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>been away for a month. We had some pre records

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there and I had some great shows thanks to Julia

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Spragg who stood in for a number of shows which

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>she recorded on the weeks. So we're back in the

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>saddle tod. They try very hard to catch up with everything.

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Glad to have Stuart with me. So Stuart, could you

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>spell out from July one next year what are the

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>rates of tax on super And also I was crucially

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>spell out that the whole thing about on Relo's games

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>is got.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and that's a really important point. And I think James,

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 2>before we talk about it, my observation would be the

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 2>consultation process has worked like okay, yes, maybe politicians come

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 2>up with silly ideas to begin with, but the whole

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 2>process should be, well, we go out to constituents, the industry,

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 2>we get feedback, and we reflect that feedback in policy.

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 2>So I know that there's a few articles sort of criticizing,

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 2>calling a backflip, all these sorts of things. Of course,

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 2>you know that's true in some sense, but in a way,

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 2>well unto the treasure of fullystening to the feedback and

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 2>coming up with something a little bit more sensible. Because

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 2>SUPER was designed to fund retirement, not to be a

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 2>tax savior. And you know, I think anyone that has

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>more than ten million dollars in SUPER, it's no longer

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 2>about retirement, it's about tax saving and a tax haven.

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 2>So I totally support the revised policy. So essentially an accumulation.

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 2>So as we're working, you're right, up to three million dollars,

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 2>we're paying fifteen percent. Between three and ten million were

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 2>paying thirty percent, and then over ten million we're paying

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 2>forty percent. And that's just on realize capital gains and

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 2>any investment income. So there's no tax on unrealized gains.

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's particularly important for property investors because a lot

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of people that have used their SUPER to invest in property.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Are only really thinking about, well, one day I will

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 2>sell this in retirement, and then that's when I crystallize

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>the capital gain. So at least we've removed the unrealized

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>gains tax. Now, of course, once we enter into retirement,

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the only change there is the first two million dollars

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 2>is now tax free. And so as I said, you know,

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I think, well, SUPER is there to fun retirement, and

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 2>the progressive tax rates I think make a lot of sense.

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 2>And even if you look at say a balance of

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>five million dollars in retirement, the average tax rates about

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent, So it's still not bad. It's not like

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 2>we're punishing those people with a lot of money inside SUPER.

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 2>And I would argue, anyone five million SUPER, can I

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 2>afford to pay fifteen percent and make a contribution towards

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of tax revenue. I think they could have done

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot more on the incentives for lower income earners,

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 2>because it's a bit unfair that if you've got someone

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 2>on a very low income with a very low SUPER

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 2>balance and they do want to save for retirement. Sure,

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 2>now about the first five and a half thousand dollars

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 2>in contributions is tax free because of the offset. But

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I would argue that if you're in a low income

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 2>and you have a low SUPER balance, that you shouldn't

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 2>pay any tax to put money into Super because it's

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 2>in the government's best interest because it produces a burden

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 2>on the welfare systems.

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>No, you know, you've actually pay fifteen percent as it

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>calls in, and it's like, ah, gosh, you know I

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>was being encouraged. Okay, now, But for property investors, here's

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing. What happens next. So we all know now

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in the property market that there's a new tax rate

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>coming in, and we all know that anyone who has

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>accumulated property assets in Super the tax rate, assuming they're

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>total super assets, and no doubt their total superassets would

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>be heavily chunkily if you like, composed of property assets.

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>The tax rate's going to double on earnings over from

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the tax lace basically between three and ten is going

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to double. Isn't it used to be fifteen percent and

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>now it's going to be thirty percent on the earnings

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>on assets above those above the actually shold and that

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>would apply to property earnings. What does it mean for

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the property marked.

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, they're being a bit silent on how these util

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 2>tax rates will apply to capital gains, because at the moment,

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 2>super funds get a third reduction in capital gains tax rates.

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 2>So income is taxed at fifteen percent, you know, between

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.679
<v Speaker 2>zero and three million dollars in accumulation, whereas capital gains

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:17.799
<v Speaker 2>are taxed at ten percent, so you get a third

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 2>reduction on the tax rate. I would imagine they're going

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 2>to apply the same principle to the new tax rates.

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 2>So if you're paying, if you've got more than ten

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 2>million dollars and you're paying forty percent, well you'll pay.

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, you'll probably get a third discount on that.

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 2>And remember it's marginal as well. So even if you

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 2>look at the average tax rate on say twenty million dollars,

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 2>it's about thirty one percent on income, so it might

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 2>be about twenty percent or so on capital gains. Well

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 2>that's still probably the same more slightly less than what

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>you'd pay if the if you crystallize that capital gain

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>in your personal name, I'm not sure. I mean for

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>someone that crystallizes a huge, huge capital gain, you might say, well,

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 2>it's not worth it being side super and you should

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 2>pull it out before you sell it or now. But

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I think for most people and most people listening to this,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it changes very much. I still think

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the tax benefits aren't as great as they used to be,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 2>but they're still their relative to say, holding it in

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 2>a family trust, to hold me in individual names or

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 2>even in a company name.

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So you're saying, all right, So the point your

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>first point is that in relative terms, compared to outside super,

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>though it's not as good as it used to be,

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it remains better than many options outside super. Okay. And

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>also then property income does property income coming in? So

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>someone has saved has and their key acid in their

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>super is let's say a small apartment and that small

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>apartment block pays income each year, and the apartment block

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>is worth more than three then their tax is going

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to double. Is that right? Yeah?

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>It will. But if there's a balance is five million dollars,

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 2>they're paying an average rate of fifteen percent. Well, you're

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 2>probably going to pay more than that if the asset

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 2>was held personally. If it was in a company, you're

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 2>going to pay thirty percent. If it's in a family trust, again,

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 2>it will end up in an individual name, so you're

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 2>going to pay more than fifteen percent. So yes, there's

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 2>a tax hike, but still Super remains attractive. And James,

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 2>this is something that I talk to clients about a

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 2>lot because a lot of people go, well, I don't

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 2>want to concentrate on Super. They're always moving the rules,

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 2>right they are. They will they will always change the

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Super rules. It's been like that since the early nineties

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>when Super began, and it's going to be like that

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 2>for the next twenty or thirty years. But it will

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 2>always be concessionally taxed right at the end of the day,

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 2>So it's always going to be an attractive proposition. Now

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>that's not to say you put all your money into it,

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 2>because someone with ten million dollars might start thinking about,

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, diversifying on your ship structures. But I think

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 2>for most people listening to this podcast, it doesn't change.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't really change the outcome. Super is still an

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 2>attractive environment as well.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Now, what about the impact at the upper end of

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the market. So there is a report already that perhaps

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously the family home remains free of allttax

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of games exemption, so you would think the top

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>end of the market even be juicier basically will even

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>be more attractive than it used to be. So we

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>may find even more heat coming into the housing market,

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly at your brand. What do you think of that

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Hereio it look?

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 2>I think so at ten million dollars, the average traits

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty three percent, So if you have more than ten

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 2>million dollars, you start to think about maybe pulling some

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 2>of that money out. It's a little bit of a

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>cautionarytail for most people. For some people as well, because

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I've spoken our advice to this day to our clients

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 2>is don't do anything until it's law. We're not going

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 2>to do anything now. I know there's been a lot

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 2>of stories about people pulling money out of Super, giving

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 2>early inheritance, upgrading the family home, all those sorts of things.

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's the thing we can learn from this exercise.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Don't jump at shadows, don't make changes until something is law.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 2>But I think you're right, James. I think if for

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 2>those people that have super high balances inside Super excuse

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the pun, I think that there's an incentive there to

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 2>start pulling out and maybe the early inheritance, maybe upgrading

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 2>the family home, taking those opportunities to try and avoid

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 2>that tax. But it's only going to impact a small

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 2>proportion of the community, of course. And I don't think anyone,

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anyone ever criticized right from the beginning

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 2>that you know, someone with a one hundred million inside

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 2>super can afford to pay more tax and it's not great.

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I got the yeah, and I think that was broadly

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>accepted across all investment markets. That's fair enough. Nobody was

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Marchmont Streets or indeed to bort of having people having

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:48.119
<v Speaker 1>enormous amounts and Super tendillion is an enormous amount. Very interesting,

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>great to get you on this morning. We take a

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>break and we're going to come back with one of

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>our favorite topics with the new anger that you may

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>not have considered before, which is where they're the big

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in basement of the national property market is turning or

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>not Talk to you in a moment. Hello, Welcome back

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Australians Money Puzzle podcast. James Kirby here with

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Stuart Weens. Okay, so now we've got you up to date,

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I hope with the new super tax. Folks, if you

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>want to know more, send in some questions the Money

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Puzzle at the Australian dot Com Dot I know people

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>had any many questions about this during its sort of gestation,

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 1>it's trouble gestation, and they probably have even more questions

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>now because it's clear to us because we're watching it

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>every day, but it may not be clear to you.

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>So send let us know what you need to know

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and we will answer that promptly. Okay. Now, the theme,

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of course that I'm mentioning is Melbourne the bargain basement

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>were told of the national property market, and boy, it's

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly cheap compared to the other cities, and some historically

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>are likely anomalous situations where for instance, it's cheaper than Adelaiding,

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 1>you don't mind, it's cheapid than Brismond, it's cheaper than Perth.

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>How can that be? So there are many interstated bests

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>who believe that's going to be a bargain and they've

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>come into the Melbourne market. Stuart Wins and his circle

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>would have been involved in this. Stuart, I've put it

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to you recently. I've looked at the numbers of the

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>September quarter. The Melbourne things are still helpless.

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 2>They are, but if you look at the fundamentals, they're

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 2>pretty strong. James, you've got Melbourne, Victoria has the second

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 2>highest population growth in percent each terms, but in absolute

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 2>terms one hundred and twenty five thousand people. That population

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 2>increased one hundred and twenty five thousand people over the

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 2>last twelve months. That's more than double Perth and New

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 2>South Wales is about one hundred thousand. So in absolute terms,

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 2>strongest population growth. Unemployment, I mean, because everyone sort of

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 2>criticizes the economy. Unemployment is four point four percent nationally

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 2>or at four point two percent. There's not a big

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 2>difference there. Vacancy rates over the last twelve months have

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 2>reduced from about one point eight percent to about one

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 2>point three percent. Having said that, those other markets you

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 2>just mentioned in are below one percent now, so the

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>fundamentals are very strong. What we're seeing on the ground

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 2>from feedback from buyers agents, the results are patching. So

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 2>if a couple of sales on the weekend, one exceeded

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 2>expectations by about three hundred thousands so sold for one

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 2>to five, they were creating one two. Another property that

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 2>was considered superior failed to sold for one point four

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 2>to five, so failed to even get to one five.

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>And even though it was probably worth more.

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Seeing a grounds for just yit so just to put

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the numbers in, like, there is some growth in the

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne market, but considering it is anomalous in its in

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>its law price against all other cities, and considering everyone

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>knows this. Now Sydney grew faster than the September quarter

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the national average group if I've got it right, it's

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>coming up on six percent of Milduran was over three.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that I know? There was just the biggest Which

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>ones do you use?

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I use karality because they are sort of comparing apples

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 2>with apples, So it looks at the attributes of property

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 2>and compares like for like if you like, so five

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>capital city aggregates about four point six percent over the

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 2>last year. Melbourne's two point two is half the growth

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 2>you know in yashin the national pace.

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the thing is okay, so you've taken heart

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>with some macro facts and so some wider investments specialists

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and experts, and the number you really hang on to

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>there was the fact that the population, the net migration,

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the population is growing, which is all very fine. And

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>there's two things I think that I the concerns on

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the other side, One is hasn't Melbourne got the best

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>supply for us two of all the states, and the

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>second is that the net migration figure if we really

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>burrow into it. Is it true that the explanation is

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Melbournians aren't leaving anymore because they can't afford

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to go the Queen's lab Yeah, possibly, James, although could

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>could it be an interpretation of the figures?

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, like you and I've spoken about, there's other reasons

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 2>while we stay in Victoria other than you know, our

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 2>ability to move into state, things like family, business, jobs,

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 2>these sorts of things that kind of keep us here.

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess given the whole negative sentiment, anyone that doesn't

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 2>have those ties has moved, and you know, there's the

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 2>rest of us are trapped here if you like, because

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 2>of either jobs or family. But it's true, it's really

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 2>the decline in departures rather than and there's been actually

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 2>a small decline in arrivals, but departures are declined by more.

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 2>That's turned the interstate migration positive. So that's kind of

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 2>naturally you should expect that. And the data is very

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 2>noisy over the last five years because of COVID, so

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 2>it's really difficult to draw trends necessary trends that are

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 2>going to repeat themselves. But the other thing, James, you know,

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about the data, the thing we've got

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 2>to be conscious of is this first home guarantee it

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and its impact on the data because the price caps

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 2>for this guarantee are around about the median value. So therefore,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 2>if we increase the transactions that are below the median value,

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 2>it's actually going to pull the medium value down because

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at the midpoint of all that data.

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're saying, absolutely, anagress. It's unlimited, right universal,

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So anyone bunder Frostco Is entitled to this skin.

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm told an agent was talking to a mortgage

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>broker that was based in sin Killary and Melbourne and

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 2>he was saying that there's fifteen he's got fifteen clients

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 2>have been approved to go and buy property that if

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't for that guarantee, they wouldn't be there. And

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 2>when other buyers agents saying definitely there's first time buyers

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 2>more active out there in terms of bidding and so forth.

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's going to be an increasing transactions

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 2>that are sort of sub that million dollar mark, and

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 2>that's actually going to pull welling medium values down. And

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 2>that's why I think that coality data is important because

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 2>we need to look at data for houses and apartments separately,

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and we try need to try and marry up some

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 2>sort of comparison, so we're comparing like with like.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's a very interesting point, Stuart. So at one thing,

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it will pull the media down everywhere. Right, So now

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>yes say it's a right, yeah, very interesting. I don't

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>thought about that. Okay, keep an eye on that, folks.

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll take a short break out some great questions I

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>have been collecting. I want to catch up on them.

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>We haven't had some questions for a while, so back

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in a moment, Hello, Welcome back to the Australians Money

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Puzzle podcast. James Kirby here with Sturet Wims of pro

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:46.479
<v Speaker 1>Solution on a milestone week when the new super tax,

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>which has been a major distraction in the market for

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a long time, seems to have been sorted politically. And

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to say that there was absolutely white

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it Google or the decision from the treasure to chuck

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>away a notion of on realized gains and just to

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>have a straight tax on actual earnings and he's basically

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>what he's done is he doubled the amount of tax

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you pay in super on earnings between three million and

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>ten million. And that's the big news basically, which will

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>hit most people. It's got a bit also, it's got lost,

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>but it's probably a little bit sort of buried in

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the wider noise around it because he introduced another new

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>tax in super. Yes, sir, for the very wealthy group

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>who have more than ten million assets and super and

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they will pay in effect of forty percent tax on super.

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the news news as it hits listeners. I expect

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this that simple piece of information that on earning is

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 1>about three million, the super tax you pay will move

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to thirty percent. But as Stewart said, see is in

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>context still lower than just about anything else out there. Okay,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>some really good questions. Let's have the first one from

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Helena if you want to read that once?

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.479
<v Speaker 2>Sure, yeah, absolutely so. Helena writes, I hope you're having

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 2>a lovely day. You recently hosted James O'Reilly on The

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Money Puzzle, who spoke about buying property through a self

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 2>marrige superfund and that it could leave you a million

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars worse off. The problem isn't that the self married

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Superfund underperformed. It's that the calculations when comparing four hundred

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 2>thousand fully invested into shares to only one hundred and

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 2>sixty thousand deployed into property, when you actually modeled out

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 2>both sides correctly, the so called million dollar loss disappears.

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, thank you, Helena. I mean there's one key point

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that that that that MOSCIP agree with, which

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>is having properly an SMSs, having a property asset in

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>an SMSSI, which many people will now be pondering, especially

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>if they already have one, because the tax has changed

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>on it. The issue is that you pay higher rates

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>than other people. And also the negative gearing isn't as

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>good right because because it's insight So they're the crucial points.

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Of course, people can make succests out of property in

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.479
<v Speaker 1>an s MESSIVE. But I think James had some very

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>valid point about the fundamental sort of hurdles that aren't

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>very clear sometimes and certainly it wouldn't be made clear

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to you by someone who was trying to sell you

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the of putting property into your an SMSSI that's why

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we have this show.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.959
<v Speaker 2>I just add to that. Sorry, if James you know

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 2>that there's I think I have two comments. Firstly, we

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 2>can model comparisons, and it's correct that you should. You know,

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 2>if you if you're modeling sort of two different strategies,

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 2>you should assume the same return on both asset classes,

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>because it's about a strategy comparison rather than asset class comparison.

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 2>But also the flip side is that you should strategy,

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 2>you should model your own scenarios. So in James's scenario,

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 2>it was like leave all the super or take some

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 2>put it in as a deposit, and then leave some

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 2>cash left over to investors a bit of a buffer.

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 2>And so what he was modeling is what he would

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 2>actually do, and so I think that's what we need

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 2>to be careful and not saw a drawing conclusions on

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 2>modeling outcomes unless they really apply to our own situation.

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think the general theme of what James was saying,

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 2>which I totally agree with, was that not any property

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 2>will work inside Super. If you're going to invest in

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 2>property inside Super, absolutely make sure it's a great property.

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 2>And I totally support that. If you're just going to

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 2>go out and buy any property or be sold any

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 2>property that it's not going to work.

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to work because it has to be

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>very good because it has particular hurdles. As he is

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>being at the bomb with the girl. All right, one

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>final question which is from Josh, do you know why

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the government brought forward the starting dead for the first

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>home buyers five percent? Positive skin and do you really

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>need only five percent to buy a home now? Josh, careful.

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>This has happened a couple of times, and I've noticed

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>on the show people the folks that scheme universal scheme

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>getting so much attention, which is changing the numbers, as

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Stewart explained, and it will bring down the medium price,

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>believe it or off, because everybody has to buy under

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the cap. If you like, that is allowed rule the scheme,

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the cap on the house price you're allowed by You aren't.

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>You'll just have five percent. You it's not just five percent.

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>This is how it works. You put down you only

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>need a deposit of five percent, but the other ninety

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>five percent is paid by your loan, your mortgage. Okay,

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the government is only covering the potential insurance obligation on

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>that amount, which you would have had to pay if

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>they didn't do this scheme, So keep that in mind.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't have an eighty percent mortgage, but you have

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a ninety five percent mortgage. If you join the first

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>home buyer deposit scheme at five percent, it's fine. I

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>suppose baricycles for some people, but all those people Stewart

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>will be on ninety five percent mortgages. So as a

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>whole new class, isn't there a homeowner in Australia being

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>encouraged by the government who would sit there on ninety

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>five percent mortgages? Probably for the average you know who

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>knows they have one hundred persent mortgages and that's going

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to take a long time to pay down.

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 2>Yep, that's right. It's not a solution to housing affordability.

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 2>It's a solution to borrowing capacity. Yeah, that's all it is.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 2>And but we you know, like anything, borrowing is a

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 2>fantastic servant, but a terrible master. So you must make

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 2>sure that what you're borrowing is affordable and you can

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 2>repay it and all those sorts of things. Having said

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 2>all that, you know, if I had my time again,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 2>and I was in my twenties buying my first property,

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I would certainly swing for the fences. I think if

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 2>I look back over the last twenty or thirty years

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 2>as a property or an investor, I've probably been two

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 2>conservative times with my decision making. And you know, when

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 2>you ever have a look back, if you're old like

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 2>James and I, you can look back and think about

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 2>property you own twenty or thirty years ago, you go wow,

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 2>you're not sure.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, And so what you're saying is, yep, you're

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>offering me nineteen five percent mortgage. I take it, yeah,

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>by five percent deposit on the assumption that you know

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing, and you'll know what you're doing if

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you keep listening to us. All right, folks, That was

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Stuart Williams of pros Solutions. Thanks Stuart, Thank you James.

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Always great to have you back on the show. Great

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to be back on the show, folks. As I say,

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I am wide open to questions on anything you like

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the money Puzzle at the Australian dot com dot au.

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Talk to you soon.