Speaker 1: Late Welcome the Late Bay.
Speaker 2: Well, thanks for joining us.
Speaker 3: I'm James Macpherson with Liz Storra and Caleb Bond coming up.
Speaker 2: A pro Palestinian activist tears down.
Speaker 3: Greek flags because she didn't know what the Israeli flag
Speaker 3: looked like. We'll show you that fiasco a little later. Plus,
Speaker 3: when we look at what's making news tomorrow, GWS footballers
Speaker 3: facing bans over their end of season antics, and while
Speaker 3: Australian politicians demonies Cole, global demand hits an all time high.
Speaker 2: We'll get to all of that.
Speaker 3: Soon, but first, most Australians would be completely oblivious to
Speaker 3: the fact there will be an election in Canberra this Saturday.
Speaker 3: Even fewer Australians Liz would know the name of the ACT.
Speaker 2: Liberal leader starts.
Speaker 3: All of that changed this afternoon. The ACT Liberal leader
Speaker 3: Elizabeth Lee, made national headlines, not for any policies, but
Speaker 3: for giving the middle finger to a Canbrick journalist. Elizabeth
Speaker 3: Lee got into a heated argument with one of those
Speaker 3: pesky journalists who demanded to know why, three days out
Speaker 3: from an election, the Liberals haven't yet costed their policies,
Speaker 3: and then as she walked away from the interaction, she
Speaker 3: forgot she was the liberal leader and momentarily found herself back.
Speaker 3: I don't know in year nine at a public school.
Speaker 3: Have a look at what happened.
Speaker 4: Late in the day for Andrew Bart You still have
Speaker 4: not submitted costings for his policies. No, you can't throw
Speaker 4: things at the opposition and expect to have no comeback
Speaker 4: when the fact is that this is a treasurer who's
Speaker 4: been in charge of the ACT Treasury who I'm saying.
Speaker 1: You finished. I just want you to answer are you finished?
Speaker 2: I answered the question, are you.
Speaker 1: Finished or not?
Speaker 4: I will answer the question in my own way, and
Speaker 4: you don't get to dictate how I answer the question.
Speaker 5: Thanks thought, Oh my god.
Speaker 3: Now, later on, Elizabeth Lee, the ACT Conservative leader, issued
Speaker 3: this apology. She said, earlier, I engaged in poor behavior
Speaker 3: that was unprofessional, and I apologize. I respect the work
Speaker 3: that journalists do, including asking the tough questions, and I
Speaker 3: think I've demonstrated during this term that I'm willing to
Speaker 3: step up and answer tough questions. Well, yeah, she answered
Speaker 3: the questions, but you're probably not meant to flick journalists
Speaker 3: the bird, Caleb. I'm wondering, you know, Mark Latham is
Speaker 3: famous for losing that election because of the handshake. Will
Speaker 3: Elizabeth Lee go down as losing the election because of
Speaker 3: the rude finger?
Speaker 6: No, I think she'll go down as losing the election
Speaker 6: because she's the liberal leader in the act. You know,
Speaker 6: she doesn't stand a snowballs chance in hell of ever
Speaker 6: winning that one. Let's be perfectly on, it's been twenty
Speaker 6: three years, exactly exactly. But I mean, you know, I
Speaker 6: don't think her name is Elizabeth Lee. I think of
Speaker 6: this as it was Elizabeth leave your brain at the door, Like, seriously,
Speaker 6: how could you not know?
Speaker 1: You are there talking.
Speaker 6: To a group of journalists televised event. You're being filmed
Speaker 6: for the six pm seven pm.
Speaker 1: News that night. You know there are cameras.
Speaker 6: There, and you can't walk out of the room without
Speaker 6: turning around and giving the bloke the bird on the
Speaker 6: way out. And it looked like in that footage the
Speaker 6: journalist she was giving the finger to.
Speaker 1: She was doing it to his back. She's looking at
Speaker 1: his back as she does it. She could not help herself.
Speaker 6: I mean, these are the people who want to run
Speaker 6: this country, or at least parts of them.
Speaker 1: In the act.
Speaker 6: You know, it's a pretty small part of the country.
Speaker 6: I'd say inconsequential, but it's not, because, of course it's
Speaker 6: full of all the public servants that do actually run
Speaker 6: the country. But this is a woman who saying, let
Speaker 6: me run the territory. And she can't even get through
Speaker 6: a press conference without giving a journalist the bird. If
Speaker 6: you can't control your emotions to some degree.
Speaker 1: Perhaps you're in the wrong job.
Speaker 7: For heaven, such a disgusting display. Is it any wonder
Speaker 7: the Libs haven't held power in the Act since two
Speaker 7: thousand and one. If this is the quality of their leadership, lady.
Speaker 8: If that's how you perform under.
Speaker 7: Pressure, you are in no way, shape or form a leader,
Speaker 7: much less cut out for any role in politics. And
Speaker 7: I have to correct you, Mac, because you called her
Speaker 7: the conservative leader she's supposed to. I know plenty of
Speaker 7: people in the Canberra Liberals. I lived there for two
Speaker 7: years working for Senators ed Socelgia a long time ago now,
Speaker 7: and these guys bear their teeth when they see an
Speaker 7: actual conservative coming. And since Elizabeth Lee became the leader
Speaker 7: of the opposition, she has turfed more Liberals, sorry.
Speaker 8: Conservatives, out of the liberal parties.
Speaker 7: I've lost count most recently last month, Elizabeth Kicktt, a
Speaker 7: senior eight year Liberal in the Act Liberal Party member
Speaker 7: for Jarrett Ginnendera, suffered an absolute stitch up because it
Speaker 7: was very clear the powers that be wanted to get
Speaker 7: rid of her, and they use this dodgy CCTV footage
Speaker 7: a still frame from it which appears to show Elizabeth
Speaker 7: Kickittt shoving her phone in one of the staff member's
Speaker 7: face at Liberal HQ. Now, Kickett said, this footage has
Speaker 7: been edited. I was on the phone, I was taking
Speaker 7: a call and I was putting it to this guy's
Speaker 7: ear and he jerked back because he was like, I
Speaker 7: don't want to talk to them.
Speaker 8: So that was the context.
Speaker 7: Of it, and the Act Liberal Party turfed her over that.
Speaker 7: They put out a statement saying that Kickett had allegedly
Speaker 7: quote exposed the party to potential workplace claims end quote.
Speaker 8: If you've seen the tiny.
Speaker 7: Seconds of footage that I'm talking about, it's like two
Speaker 7: seconds long, you'll be able to recognize it. Doesn't take
Speaker 7: an ag expert to notice this is an absolute stitch up and.
Speaker 8: To speak to that.
Speaker 7: The ACT Liberals won't release the rest of the footage. Okay,
Speaker 7: so absolute stitch up? Why did she do this, Well,
Speaker 7: you can draw your own conclusions, but kick it was
Speaker 7: a real conservative. She was a strong conservative and trusts
Speaker 7: me having worked for senators ed.
Speaker 8: Soceelgia that party does not like conservatives.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 3: The irony about the behavior of Elizabeth Lee in flicking
Speaker 3: the bird to a journalist that she says she's had
Speaker 3: history with is that just two days ago she was
Speaker 3: quoted in The Guardian accusing the Labor Party of playing
Speaker 3: student politics. Well, it doesn't get much for playground and
Speaker 3: giving the bird to people behind their back.
Speaker 6: I know, I've got to put you up on something
Speaker 6: as well. You said that's the sort of thing that
Speaker 6: would go on into public school. I mean, why only
Speaker 6: public school. I'm pretty sure that goes on in private school.
Speaker 2: Caleb, And there was a lot more in the public schools.
Speaker 6: Well, I've only been to a public school, so I
Speaker 6: can't speak for I didn't have all those advantages. I'm sorry, James,
Speaker 6: I can't speak for what goes on in the private schools.
Speaker 6: But I mean, for heaven's sake, these are the people
Speaker 6: supposedly charged with running the show. No wonder the joints
Speaker 6: going down the toilet. Speaking of a leader who doesn't
Speaker 6: deserve to be.
Speaker 1: Anywhere near power. Kamala Harris.
Speaker 6: Now, Donald Trump held a town hall in Pennsylvania yesterday where,
Speaker 6: of course, you know, people get to come along and
Speaker 6: ask questions of the would be president, former president Donald Trump,
Speaker 6: and he gets to answer them. Now, at some point
Speaker 6: during this town hall, they started playing some music. I'll
Speaker 6: tell you why in a minute, but here's a little
Speaker 6: bit of the musical interlude that they enjoyed.
Speaker 1: Time to say goodbye.
Speaker 6: Presumably he means that for Harris, not for himself in
Speaker 6: that particular clip, but the Harris campaign got hold.
Speaker 1: Of it and said, look at this. It clearly means
Speaker 1: the bloke has lost the plot.
Speaker 6: Her campaign, which on Twitter is called Kamala HQ, tweeted
Speaker 6: Trump appears lost, confused, and frozen on stage as multiple
Speaker 6: songs play for thirty plus minutes and the crowd paws
Speaker 6: out of.
Speaker 1: The venue early.
Speaker 6: And then Caamala retweeted that and said, hope he's okay,
Speaker 6: clearly implying that there is something wrong with his mental faculties.
Speaker 1: Well, here's what actually happened.
Speaker 9: But then thirty minutes in, two attendees suffered medical emergencies.
Speaker 1: A doctor plus doctor.
Speaker 2: The incidents shifted the mood, prompting Trump.
Speaker 9: To cut the question short and instead play some of
Speaker 9: his favorite music.
Speaker 3: How about this, We'll play YMCA go on.
Speaker 9: Trump kept DJing, and most of his supporters stayed for
Speaker 9: another thirty minutes of his pleasures. Well, in certain quarters
Speaker 9: of social media, people had a field day with that,
Speaker 9: and I guess on the screens it might have looked
Speaker 9: quite strange inside that hall. However, people were having a
Speaker 9: good time.
Speaker 6: I mean, for Heaven's sake, How pathetic is that Harris
Speaker 6: and her campaign took advantage of two people having medical
Speaker 6: episodes in the crowd and Trump trying to keep the
Speaker 6: crowd happy in the midst of that, to suggest that
Speaker 6: he had something wrong with his mental faculties.
Speaker 1: Try better next time.
Speaker 6: But of course Trump hit back in the way that
Speaker 6: only Trump can twice see hit back. Actually, he posted
Speaker 6: on his platform truth social as to her her being Harris,
Speaker 6: her completely desperate request for my medical statements. She is
Speaker 6: dying to see my cholesterol which is one hundred and eighty.
Speaker 6: I have already provided the many times, including quite recent,
Speaker 6: and they were flawless.
Speaker 1: Of course they were flawless.
Speaker 6: However, I have just seen Kamala's report, and it is
Speaker 6: not good. According to her doctor's report, she suffers from.
Speaker 1: Yuri how do you call it?
Speaker 6: Uri? Ticaria and defined as a rash of round, red
Speaker 6: welts on the skin that itch intensely, sometimes with dangerous swelling.
Speaker 6: She also has allergic rhinitis and allergic conjunctive itis, a
Speaker 6: very messy and dangerous situation. These are deeply serious conditions
Speaker 6: that clearly impact her functioning. Maybe that is why she
Speaker 6: can't answer even the simplest of questions asked by sixty
Speaker 6: Minutes and others. What is all this about? I don't
Speaker 6: have these problems. I'm not surprised she has conjunctive artists.
Speaker 6: She'd be rubbing her eyes from all the crying she's
Speaker 6: doing every time she.
Speaker 1: Can't answer a question.
Speaker 6: Or perhaps she's been looking at the polling in the
Speaker 6: Swing States. He then had another go on X where
Speaker 6: he said, I believe it is very important that Kamala
Speaker 6: Harris passed test on cognitive stamina and agility. Her actions
Speaker 6: have led me.
Speaker 1: To believe that there could be something very.
Speaker 6: Wrong with her. Even sixty Minutes and CBS in order
Speaker 6: to protect Lion Carmala illegally and unscrupulously replaced an answer
Speaker 6: she'd given, which was totally bonkers, with another answer that
Speaker 6: had nothing to do with the question asked. Also, she
Speaker 6: is slow and lethargic in answering even the easiest of questions.
Speaker 6: We just went through almost four years of that. We
Speaker 6: shouldn't have to do it again. I mean, the heaven's sake,
Speaker 6: they took what was a serious thing, people having medical
Speaker 6: episodes in the crowd, and Trump's gone well out of respect,
Speaker 6: I probably shouldn't carry on with the event as I
Speaker 6: was going to in the meantime, Why don't we have
Speaker 6: a bit of fun while the medics attend to them?
Speaker 1: And then they've tried.
Speaker 6: To use that to say, oh, look there's something wrong
Speaker 6: with Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Does it get any more pathetic?
Speaker 3: And isn't it interesting that the Harris side of politics
Speaker 3: are the ones that keep going on about misinformation and
Speaker 3: here they are peddling misinformation. But the other instructive thing
Speaker 3: while we're talking about misinformation is the way that it
Speaker 3: was cleared up without government help. The truth got out
Speaker 3: there credit to the ABC. In the United States, we
Speaker 3: don't often do that, but they managed to clear the
Speaker 3: episode up without.
Speaker 2: Laws to censor people.
Speaker 3: The other thing about this is that now that it's
Speaker 3: being cleared up and everybody knows that it was an
Speaker 3: absolute hatchet job, you would think, if they had any decency,
Speaker 3: the Harris campaign and Kamala Harris herself would remove that
Speaker 3: tweet from their feed. But I checked just before we
Speaker 3: came up on air it's still there. So they just
Speaker 3: don't care. And as you just said, absolutely shameless.
Speaker 7: This is just par for the course with this campaign.
Speaker 7: All they do is lie. All they do is one eighties.
Speaker 7: They're copying Trump's policies.
Speaker 10: They have nothing new except to lie and sheet.
Speaker 7: And that is what they're running with because they know
Speaker 7: there's no other way to win for them. I could
Speaker 7: argue that's what they did in twenty twenty, but I
Speaker 7: don't want to get into trouble. Harris is well on
Speaker 7: track to bring in the lowest share of black votes
Speaker 7: since JFK faced off against Nixon in nineteen sixty. This
Speaker 7: is very alarming for the Dems because normally black voters
Speaker 7: are one of their strongholds when it comes to voting proportions. Normally,
Speaker 7: the black community votes Democrat. Don't ask me why this
Speaker 7: is the party of the KKK, But they've managed to
Speaker 7: convince people that that wasn't even them. Most people on
Speaker 7: the streets of America. I've watched many vox pops who
Speaker 7: are asked, which do you think was the party of
Speaker 7: the KKK? They all say Republican. They really need a
Speaker 7: lot more education in that country. But what has she
Speaker 7: done three seconds to midnight the election, breathing down her
Speaker 7: neck to get back, specifically the black men vote of America.
Speaker 8: She's promised that she's going to make steps.
Speaker 7: Toward legalizing marijuana.
Speaker 8: This, of course, is.
Speaker 7: Absolutely hilarious because during her time as Attorney General in California,
Speaker 7: she locked up over nineteen hundred people for marijuana offenses.
Speaker 7: According to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, eighteen
Speaker 7: one hundred and eighty three people.
Speaker 8: Were admitted to state prison on her watch.
Speaker 7: So this is fact, ladies and gentlemen, This is cold,
Speaker 7: hard fact. And here she is desperate for the black
Speaker 7: vote now promising I'm going to legalize it. Her campaign
Speaker 7: has come out and said Kamala Harris will legalize recreational marijuana,
Speaker 7: breaking down unjust barriers that hold black men and other
Speaker 7: Americans back and making sure black Americans have opportunities to
Speaker 7: succeed as the marketplace takes shape. You may remember that
Speaker 7: this was brought up way back in twenty twenty, a
Speaker 7: whole four years ago at the Democratic debate, when Tulsi
Speaker 7: Govered went after her on this very issue.
Speaker 8: She put over fifteen hundred people in jail for marijuana
Speaker 8: violations and then laughed about it when she was asked
Speaker 8: if she ever smoked marijuana, you owe them an apology.
Speaker 7: And now she's tweeting, oh, no, one should go to
Speaker 7: jail for smoking weed.
Speaker 8: Well, well, well, how times have changed. Kamala Harris.
Speaker 7: Here she is on a breakfast show trying to debunk
Speaker 7: these claims, saying, no, wait a minute. I was one
Speaker 7: of the most progressive das when it came to marijuana
Speaker 7: during my time in the hot seat.
Speaker 2: One of the biggest allegations against you is that you
Speaker 2: targeted and locked up thousands of black men in San
Speaker 2: Francisco for weed.
Speaker 11: It's just simply not true. And what public defenders who
Speaker 11: are around those days will tell you, I was the most
Speaker 11: progressive prosecutor in California on marijuana cases and would not
Speaker 11: send people to jail for simple possession of weed, and
Speaker 11: as Vice president have been a champion for bringing marijuana
Speaker 11: down on the schedule, so instead of it being ranked
Speaker 11: up there with heroin, we bring it down. And my
Speaker 11: pledge is as president, I will work on decriminalizing it
Speaker 11: because I know exactly how those laws have been used
Speaker 11: to disproportionately impact certain populations and specifically black men.
Speaker 7: California's own Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
Speaker 8: Like I say, their own data shows.
Speaker 7: She did indeed lock up eighteen hundred and eighty three
Speaker 7: individuals for marijuana related offenses.
Speaker 8: So here she is.
Speaker 7: We've just spoken about the last lie. Oh Trump looks
Speaker 7: like he's dazed and confused on stage during some weird
Speaker 7: musical fest.
Speaker 8: At a rally. He must be suffering. He's not doing okay.
Speaker 7: He or she is once again bald faced, lying saying no,
Speaker 7: that didn't happen.
Speaker 8: I was really progressive when it came to weed.
Speaker 6: There'll be a lot more people dazed and confused in
Speaker 6: the United States if she manages to have and lied
Speaker 6: to criminalization.
Speaker 2: Maybe that's the key to understanding her. When she speaks.
Speaker 6: Precisely for me, you know, imagine thinking, oh god, I've
Speaker 6: got a real problem. With the black voter, though, what
Speaker 6: could I possibly do to bring it back to me?
Speaker 1: I know? Will legalize illicit drugs?
Speaker 6: Like? Is that the best she can possibly do to
Speaker 6: go from having locked up, as you say, nearly two
Speaker 6: thousand people for marijuana offenses, now trying to rewrite the
Speaker 6: history and they.
Speaker 1: Say no, no, I would never have possibly.
Speaker 6: Done anything like that, and going completely full circle and saying, oh, well,
Speaker 6: now I'm going to legalize the stuff. Please, If that's
Speaker 6: the best she has got to attract black votes is
Speaker 6: to say we must legalize illicit drugs and then we're
Speaker 6: going to try and create jobs for you in the
Speaker 6: illicit drug now legal drug market.
Speaker 1: I mean that is.
Speaker 6: Absolutely pathetic, like everything she has let go of, everything
Speaker 6: she has ever believed in this run for president.
Speaker 1: Fracking.
Speaker 6: Once upon a time she wanted it banned. Oh no,
Speaker 6: I don't believe in that anymore. Once upon a time
Speaker 6: she said that building the wall was Unamerican. Now I'm
Speaker 6: going to bring back to Bordeville so we can continue
Speaker 6: building the wall. On and on it goes. I locked
Speaker 6: up people who had marijuana on them. No, no, now
Speaker 6: we're going to legalize it. She has wrote everything out
Speaker 6: the window in this campaign. You're not voting for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 6: You voted for whoever got into her EA five minutes ago.
Speaker 3: Like you said, it's just so incredibly insulting to black
Speaker 3: men that she thinks if she legalizes the whacky tobacci,
Speaker 3: they're suddenly going to vote for her.
Speaker 2: But I love how she says, you know, the.
Speaker 3: Fact that marijuana is illegal, it's an unjust barrier holding
Speaker 3: black men back. So the thing holding Black African men
Speaker 3: back is the fact that they can't smoke marijuana. But
Speaker 3: I got to admire her for being willing to put
Speaker 3: the pot back into potus.
Speaker 2: So well done to her for that.
Speaker 3: Now, while she's struggling to attract the vote of black men,
Speaker 3: she's completely lost the vote of border patrol agents. They're
Speaker 3: threatening to quit en Mass if Harris is reelected.
Speaker 2: Have listened to Paul Perez.
Speaker 3: He's the leader of the National Border Patrol Council, saying
Speaker 3: if Harris wins the presidency, not only are we all
Speaker 3: walking off the job, but the whole country is going
Speaker 3: to go to hell.
Speaker 1: If we allow borders.
Speaker 2: Are Harris.
Speaker 1: To win this.
Speaker 9: Election, every city, every community in this great country is
Speaker 9: going to go to hell.
Speaker 10: Now.
Speaker 3: According to federal data quoted in the New York Post,
Speaker 3: since the Biden Harris administration has been in power, border
Speaker 3: patrol agents have had about ten million interactions with illegals
Speaker 3: on the southern border. Seventeen percent of border patrol agents
Speaker 3: have quit the job in the last three and a
Speaker 3: half years, and the reason is pretty obvious. One of
Speaker 3: the border patrol agents quoted in the New York Post
Speaker 3: said that the Harris administration obviously couldn't outwardly say don't
Speaker 3: enforce the border restrictions, but they've done everything to make
Speaker 3: our job as inefficient as possible, and so they're being
Speaker 3: hamstrung in doing their job. They're incredibly frustrated, so frustrated
Speaker 3: that for the first time in history, the agency actually
Speaker 3: hired a suicideologist because in twenty twenty two, fifteen border
Speaker 3: patrol agents took their own lives, presumably because of such
Speaker 3: low morale. They say that she's acting like she really
Speaker 3: cares about border security, which just rubs salt into the
Speaker 3: wound because they know that's not happening. So they're threatening
Speaker 3: to quit on mass But Donald Trump, he's promising to
Speaker 3: employ thousands more border patrol agents give them a ten
Speaker 3: percent pay rise and a ten thousand dollars signing on bonuses.
Speaker 9: Donald Trump, but after I went, I will be asking
Speaker 9: Congress immediately to approve a ten percent rais haven't had
Speaker 9: won in a.
Speaker 1: Long time for all agents, and a ten thousand dollars
Speaker 1: each retention and signing voters.
Speaker 3: Is this, to me is Trump's winning policy because it's
Speaker 3: undeniable what's happening. And the more the border patrol agents
Speaker 3: speak out to testify to what's happening, to the fact
Speaker 3: that when Biden and Harris visited they quickly cleaned up things,
Speaker 3: only to return it to its normal chaos after they left.
Speaker 3: The more they speak, the more Americans realize what's happening.
Speaker 3: And Trump should just hammer that issue home over the
Speaker 3: next couple of weeks.
Speaker 8: Oh this was said at the very beginning of the campaign.
Speaker 7: If all he does is talk about illegal immigration for
Speaker 7: the next few months, right up until polling day, he
Speaker 7: has got this in the bag. And that has proved
Speaker 7: true throughout the campaign.
Speaker 10: And nobody is more aware of the.
Speaker 7: Dire situation than those who have been on the border
Speaker 7: who were technical charged with not letting illegals through, and
Speaker 7: yet on this very show, we have shown footage of
Speaker 7: them being instructed to cut the wire to let illegals
Speaker 7: into the country. So these guys are completely demoralized. They've
Speaker 7: had four thousand people leave since the Biden administration started,
Speaker 7: as more and more of them recognize this job's a joke.
Speaker 7: Now we're literally just facilitating people coming in instead of
Speaker 7: keeping people out. And no doubt they're well aware of
Speaker 7: as all Americans are who have seen their cities overrun,
Speaker 7: their taxpayer dollars squandered on people who don't even belong
Speaker 7: in their country. They're well aware of the fact that
Speaker 7: Americans do look at them and blame them. How could
Speaker 7: you not? What are you flogs doing on the border
Speaker 7: if you're not stopping such a mass exodus into our
Speaker 7: country from over the Mexican border, So can you blame them?
Speaker 7: And no wonder they're saying that, each of them. In
Speaker 7: this article, so many individual agents are sharing their own
Speaker 7: stories and saying, this is why we're just waiting to
Speaker 7: see what happens this.
Speaker 10: Election, and if she gets back in, we are out.
Speaker 8: This is our hope.
Speaker 7: If Trump gets back in, will stay And you can
Speaker 7: only imagine what detrimental effect that will have even more
Speaker 7: on the border. They've only got nineteen thousand left as
Speaker 7: it is in the border patrol.
Speaker 10: How many more thousands will leave?
Speaker 7: And Kamala, they obviously don't believe her promises that she
Speaker 7: is going to change and she is going to be
Speaker 7: strong on boarders if she wins the presidency. Otherwise they'd
Speaker 7: hang around and find out. But nope, they say election
Speaker 7: day where out if she gets the.
Speaker 6: Gone why would you believe she hasn't stood by any
Speaker 6: other convictions.
Speaker 1: She's shit ahead.
Speaker 6: I mean one of the border agents who was quoted
Speaker 6: in the New York Post saying, you know, Kamala was
Speaker 6: elected again.
Speaker 1: He said, I'm not doing this shit again. And you
Speaker 1: don't blame him for that.
Speaker 6: Why would you hang around for another four years of
Speaker 6: twiddling your thumbs and sitting on your hands. You've been
Speaker 6: charged with doing a job, and presumably you believe in
Speaker 6: that job. You go and do something like that, much
Speaker 6: like being a copper, because you want to protect your
Speaker 6: country and the people of your country and you're being told, hey,
Speaker 6: you can't do your job.
Speaker 1: Is let them all in?
Speaker 6: I mean, it's the same as wondering why people don't
Speaker 6: want to be coppers down in Victoria, and nothing to
Speaker 6: do with Daniel Andrews using them like his Gestapo during
Speaker 6: COVID and making them go out and fire rubber bullets
Speaker 6: at people who are protesting against the government. Of course,
Speaker 6: you don't want to be part of that. That's not
Speaker 6: what you signed up to do. There is no reason
Speaker 6: that they would believe that she would do anything about it.
Speaker 6: But of course, like we've talked about many times before,
Speaker 6: this has all been by design. The point is to
Speaker 6: let all of these people in then give them a
Speaker 6: pathway to citizenship so that they can eventually go off
Speaker 6: and vote. And who are they going to vote for.
Speaker 6: They'll vote for the party that allowed them to come
Speaker 6: into the country, or they just get on the voter
Speaker 6: role now and then the DOJ band states and taking
Speaker 6: them off the voter role and they can go and
Speaker 6: vote anyway. And all the polling shows that behind the economy,
Speaker 6: the number one issue people are worried about in the
Speaker 6: US is illegal immigration. Right Democrat voters, which is clearly
Speaker 6: why Kamala is now talking about it.
Speaker 1: I'll bring back the border bill. I've got to do
Speaker 1: something about it.
Speaker 6: But it is one of the most serious issues in
Speaker 6: the United States. Trump needs to keep driving at home.
Speaker 6: On the way home to November the fifth, let's come
Speaker 6: back home now. An interesting story out of Sydney at
Speaker 6: Avalon Beach, where there is a local shopping center that
Speaker 6: is looking to be redeveloped. The owners have put in
Speaker 6: an application to the local council, the Northern Beaches Council
Speaker 6: say we want to not be joined over, put up
Speaker 6: a new shopping center and down the bottom would be
Speaker 6: a Dan Murphy's and on the top would be a
Speaker 6: childcare center. It all sounds pretty straightforward. Who cares, it's
Speaker 6: just a local shopping center, except that the health.
Speaker 1: Narc say no, there is no way you could possibly.
Speaker 6: Have a childcare center on top of the saying shopping
Speaker 6: center that has a Dan.
Speaker 1: Murphy's in it, give me a brak.
Speaker 6: This is the new South Wales Health's department on the
Speaker 6: Northern Beaches, the Northern Sydney Local Health District. They put
Speaker 6: a submission into the Northern Beaches Council. Their director of
Speaker 6: Population and Planetary Health, Paul clarina Are He says the
Speaker 6: proposed DA would increase young children's exposure to alcohol and
Speaker 6: alcohol marketing on a regular basis.
Speaker 1: Won't somebody think of the children.
Speaker 6: He also points out in this submission that there is
Speaker 6: evidence showing the relationship between exposure to alcohol marketing and
Speaker 6: increased youth drinking. Now we're talking about a childcare center here, right,
Speaker 6: So the kids who are going along to childcare, like
Speaker 6: pre school age, you know, two.
Speaker 1: Three, four years old?
Speaker 6: Do you really think they're going to go to childcare
Speaker 6: and go mummy, daddy, it's Dan Murphy's down skins.
Speaker 1: Can we go and get a beer?
Speaker 7: Please?
Speaker 1: No, They've got no idea what Dan Murphy's is.
Speaker 6: I cannot believe these health wowsers even think this is
Speaker 6: an issue. What do they think the kids are going
Speaker 6: to start wandering out of childcare in the middle of
Speaker 6: the day, go down to Dan Murphy's with a fake
Speaker 6: beard on, and you know, three of them stacked up
Speaker 6: in a trench coat.
Speaker 1: Excuse me, mister, if and I buy a bottle of
Speaker 1: wine please, But it's not going to happen.
Speaker 6: It's not a real issue. And this is public money
Speaker 6: because this is the government's health department. Public money is
Speaker 6: being spent stopping a shopping center from being redeveloped because
Speaker 6: four year olds are apparently going to take up the groth.
Speaker 3: Come on, all right, I'm going to take the opposite
Speaker 3: view here, and I think your characterization is very funny.
Speaker 2: However, that's not what he's saying.
Speaker 3: He's clearly not thinking a four year old is going
Speaker 3: to get on the gross.
Speaker 7: Exactly what it would increase young children's exposure to alcohol
Speaker 7: and alcohol marketing.
Speaker 3: Okay, So what he's saying is that if you've got
Speaker 3: a kid who goes to daycare five days a week
Speaker 3: for four years, they're seeing alcohol constantly, and there's a
Speaker 3: correlation between to alcohol advertising and youth drinking. He's not
Speaker 3: saying they're going to be four years old and on
Speaker 3: a you know, on the grog.
Speaker 7: He says, these pictures, which to a child just look
Speaker 7: like a picture of a beverage. There's a can, there's
Speaker 7: a bottle, there's some bubbles in a nice glass.
Speaker 8: They're going to know that that.
Speaker 1: No, you're saying, look at evil Dan Murphy's side.
Speaker 3: Also, you're saying that you're normalizing it right from their
Speaker 3: first formative years, and there will be consequences down the train.
Speaker 2: Can disagree with it from forty pocket.
Speaker 8: I'm sorry, who even has memories.
Speaker 2: That's the point it's aminal. So there's another thing.
Speaker 3: There's another thing you're forgetting to mention here, and that
Speaker 3: is on the Northern Shore, the rate of hospitalization for
Speaker 3: alcohol related incidents is sixty five percent higher than the
Speaker 3: state average.
Speaker 2: So clearly, and they're all.
Speaker 3: Four years old, no what to do can finish the point.
Speaker 3: Clearly this is a hot but an issue for the
Speaker 3: health services in that area. And so they're simply saying,
Speaker 3: you know what, we don't have to expose kids to this,
Speaker 3: So why should we. I think it's nice to someone
Speaker 3: baby is taking the innocence of kids seriously, innocence.
Speaker 7: Can we just acknowledge though that Dan Murphy's. Everyone's familiar
Speaker 7: with the Dan Murphy's right. You drive past it, you
Speaker 7: walk past it. They don't have advertising outside their stores.
Speaker 7: Everyone knows what that man's face means. Everyone knows what
Speaker 7: the name Dan Murphy's mean. You know, it's a liquor stare.
Speaker 7: But it doesn't say bottle O or come inside for grog,
Speaker 7: or have massive posters of various alcoholic drinks.
Speaker 8: No, it is nothing. It is a giant green shop.
Speaker 7: So this idea that oh, these infants are going to
Speaker 7: see all this alcohol marketing, it's going to subliminally affect
Speaker 7: their choices.
Speaker 3: Well, I don't think there's any question that advertising affects
Speaker 3: your thinking and that over time. About saying this, kids
Speaker 3: are going to go out and start game exactly, what
Speaker 3: is no He's saying that there are certain things we
Speaker 3: should shield children from for as long as possible. I'll
Speaker 3: give you an example right in Victoria. Different issue, but
Speaker 3: it goes to the theme they put a drug injecting
Speaker 3: room right next to a primary school and didn't think
Speaker 3: twice about it. It goes to this point that a
Speaker 3: generation ago we would have said there's no way a
Speaker 3: bottle shop should be near a childcare center. A generation
Speaker 3: ago that would have been a given.
Speaker 6: If nonsensical exposure to a Dan Murphy sign is then
Speaker 6: there full link.
Speaker 1: When you're three four years old exposed to Dan Murphy,
Speaker 1: it's not just a son.
Speaker 6: It's more likely to make you later in your youth
Speaker 6: take up drinking all the Dan Murphy stores because the
Speaker 6: kids are in the car with them. They go to
Speaker 6: the shops with their people to see the liquor land
Speaker 6: side and the damn.
Speaker 3: Move totally misrepresenting What is his argument?
Speaker 6: Is there is able in showing your relationship correlates alcohol
Speaker 6: marketing an increased you drink. So the resistence of a
Speaker 6: Claire Murphy, he's going to cause these people to be
Speaker 6: drink because when they're older.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he's saying, there's a correlation between exposure and later behave.
Speaker 3: You're going to take your kid every single day for
Speaker 3: four years to a premises where the first thing they
Speaker 3: see is a bottle shop.
Speaker 8: Maybe it's such a good Oh, it's a bottle shop.
Speaker 8: Is a green store, that says.
Speaker 3: Dan Murphy, and they don't have any outside adnoising there's
Speaker 3: nothing in the windows.
Speaker 8: Have you not been to a Dan Murphy's I'm a.
Speaker 2: Tea total lie?
Speaker 1: Don't lie. You do partake in the you.
Speaker 3: Got me onto it that you will forever be consented.
Speaker 1: Incorrectly, they're going to bear my face soon because they're
Speaker 1: going to say it encourages that gives a.
Speaker 7: Drunk go to a agreed to disagree.
Speaker 1: Like they're putting a knock shot down.
Speaker 2: Did you just say that your face drives people to drink?
Speaker 6: No? No, no, I'm saying, you know, people associate my
Speaker 6: good looking face with the red wine drinkers or something.
Speaker 1: And then they're going to ban it.
Speaker 7: Oh my goodness, speaking of a pile of nonsense.
Speaker 8: Michelle Roland, Communications Minister.
Speaker 7: Is very worried about a lot of people taking her
Speaker 7: Combating Misinformation Disinformation.
Speaker 8: Bill the wrong way.
Speaker 7: It's just about keeping Australian safe, as you know.
Speaker 8: So she's taken.
Speaker 7: Upon herself to write an article it's not a very
Speaker 7: good one to reassure the Australian people that no, no,
Speaker 7: this is just about keeping you safe, which is a
Speaker 7: great line which every dictator and tyrant has used throughout
Speaker 7: history in order to exercise their tyranny over the people.
Speaker 7: This irony seems to be completely lost on Michelle Roland.
Speaker 8: Part of her article reads.
Speaker 7: In the digital world, misinformation and disinformation can threaten people's health,
Speaker 7: safety and well being. It can undermine our social cohesion,
Speaker 7: economy and democracy. For a minute there, I thought she
Speaker 7: was describing government.
Speaker 8: I really did.
Speaker 7: This cracks me up no end reading the entire article.
Speaker 7: You've got to read it because it reads like an
Speaker 7: absolute joke. She is trying to sell the biggest furfee
Speaker 7: to the Australian people. Goes to show what they think
Speaker 7: of our collective IQ. Clearly these people do not understand
Speaker 7: we don't trust you. We don't trust you with our health,
Speaker 7: We don't trust you with our education. You fail us
Speaker 7: on infrastructure half of your policies, if not more, our
Speaker 7: entire crap.
Speaker 8: Heck, if it weren't.
Speaker 7: For government being so bad at their jobs, we in
Speaker 7: the media wouldn't have a job because what would we
Speaker 7: talk about, Oh, great news, great news, Oh this.
Speaker 8: Is going so well. There's no one to hold account.
Speaker 8: Everything's just going hunky dory.
Speaker 10: No. Instead, we're here every single night.
Speaker 7: Exposing their corruption, bad ideas. Mir the deals for mates
Speaker 7: four point three million dollar ocean front properties by a
Speaker 7: PM so concerned about climate change that you and I
Speaker 7: have to.
Speaker 8: Fit the bill every rich way. It goes on and
Speaker 8: on and on. So here's the communications.
Speaker 7: Minister Noves did interest whatsoever there trying to convince us
Speaker 7: in her own words, that this is a good idea,
Speaker 7: that we should be censored and she and her posse
Speaker 7: should be the arbiters of truth.
Speaker 6: I think the Daily Telegraph knew exactly what they were
Speaker 6: doing when they covered fheries, right, They knew what a
Speaker 6: joke it was. Because I'll point out two things. The
Speaker 6: opening sentence of this article is this week there has
Speaker 6: been a lot of wild claims about how misinformation bill
Speaker 6: that is grammatically incorrect should be This week, there have
Speaker 6: been has is singular, have is plural.
Speaker 1: She's talking about a lot of wild claims.
Speaker 6: I mean, for Eaven's sake, if you can't even get
Speaker 6: that basic stuff right at the beginning of the article,
Speaker 6: why would.
Speaker 2: The bill itself? Is wild enough?
Speaker 6: Goes onto site two examples of misinformation. There are reasons
Speaker 6: we need this bill, and they are people during the
Speaker 6: pandemic saying that drinking bleach would cure COVID and that
Speaker 6: five G phone towers caused COVID. If no tin foil,
Speaker 6: hat is that firmly attached to your head that you
Speaker 6: think drinking bleach is going to stop the COVID or
Speaker 6: that five G towers caused the COVID? I'm sorry, no
Speaker 6: misinformation bill anywhere in the world is ever going to
Speaker 6: save you. That it's the worst she can possibly come
Speaker 6: up here.
Speaker 7: If you genuinely believe that, act on that advice and
Speaker 7: remove yourself from the gene call.
Speaker 3: She said that that conspiracy theory went mainstream.
Speaker 2: That was her example.
Speaker 3: Well, that's an example of misinformation because drinking bleach never
Speaker 3: went mainstream. I reckon your conspiracy theory is absolutely true
Speaker 3: that the Daily Telegraph published this.
Speaker 8: That's not a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 2: It read like a school all the flat.
Speaker 8: Earth is sitting at home going. That's not a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 8: It's not even a theory.
Speaker 3: My favorite part about this article warning about misinformation is
Speaker 3: she said that misinformation should be a concern to any
Speaker 3: right thinking Australian. When you're trying to convince us that
Speaker 3: you're not introducing a dystopian bill to censor and to
Speaker 3: you know, shape our thinking, don't talk about right thinking
Speaker 3: people at the beginning of your article.
Speaker 2: It kind of gives the game away.
Speaker 7: Bwades that jolly pole where eighty Australians are very concerned
Speaker 7: about this and this is why we've taken upon ourselves
Speaker 7: to curb everybody's speech.
Speaker 8: Nobody believes that, Pole lady.
Speaker 7: Nobody believes that eighty percent of that's a million of us.
Speaker 7: I'm like, oh, yes, absolutely, please censor us.
Speaker 3: Even if it is eighty percent of people are concerned
Speaker 3: about misinformation. That's very different to eighty percent of people
Speaker 3: believe the government should censor our opinions.
Speaker 2: Totally different thing.
Speaker 3: Before we go Quantus have come under fire for their
Speaker 3: carbon credits scheme, being accused of misleading customers about their
Speaker 3: carbon neutral flights and misinformation having people start to think
Speaker 3: that somehow if you pay I think if you fly
Speaker 3: from Sydney to Melbourne return and you pay five dollars
Speaker 3: and sixty cents on top of your flight, somehow that
Speaker 3: makes the aviation industry sustainable. That money goes towards things
Speaker 3: like bush fire protection, rainforest conservation, which are all good things,
Speaker 3: but as the Climate Integrity Group points out, none of
Speaker 3: those things change the fact that Quantus contributes four percent
Speaker 3: of Australia's.
Speaker 2: Emissions every year.
Speaker 3: There was a Dutch court ruling in March that took
Speaker 3: task to twenty airlines, saying they had to change their
Speaker 3: advertising and stop trying to convince customers that if they
Speaker 3: paid the carbon credit fee that somehow they were offsetting
Speaker 3: emissions and it was all neutral.
Speaker 2: It's just not true.
Speaker 3: Bad news for Quantus, but I think most people know this,
Speaker 3: which is why we don't bother to pay it, because
Speaker 3: we know it's a ferthy.
Speaker 6: I mean, if you're paying it, I think you deserve
Speaker 6: to be a fleet of.
Speaker 1: Your five dollars.
Speaker 6: I do hope Quantus gets rinsed for this though, and
Speaker 6: this is the Environmental Defender's Office has now gone off
Speaker 6: to the A Triple C to say something should be
Speaker 6: done about it. I do hope they get rinsed for it,
Speaker 6: because they're trying to in one breath and say, oh,
Speaker 6: look at us, we're so virtuous, we're doing great things
Speaker 6: for the planet when need spewing emissions out right, they
Speaker 6: know exactly what they're doing.
Speaker 1: Don't pretend you've been good for the planet.
Speaker 6: Just say yes, we burn lots of fuel so people
Speaker 6: can fly around the world.
Speaker 1: That's what we signed up for.
Speaker 8: I do love it when corporates do this though.
Speaker 7: It's like, help us, sponsor us to stop the destruction
Speaker 7: that we're doing to the planet.
Speaker 8: Chase my money.
Speaker 2: We're going to go to a break.
Speaker 3: But when we come back, well, look at what's making
Speaker 3: news tomorrow, including the fact global demand for coal is
Speaker 3: at an all time high. Matt Kean will not be
Speaker 3: happy about that. Welcome back, Let's look at tomorrow papers. Caleb,
Speaker 3: you've got the herald son a big AFL story.
Speaker 6: Brewing indeed exclusive from Robbo Mark Robinson. He says, GWS,
Speaker 6: that's great, Western Sydney players face bands over disgusting Wacky
Speaker 6: Wednesday party antics Giant sex doll blow up is the headline,
Speaker 6: and what a headline.
Speaker 8: It is.
Speaker 6: A skit involving a player addressed as rugby league star
Speaker 6: Jared Hayne and a blow up sex doll is among
Speaker 6: several offensive displays at gws giants Wacky Wednesday Party being
Speaker 6: probed by the AFL. Some players are facing twenty thousand
Speaker 6: dollars fines for this, others are facing suspension. This was
Speaker 6: a private event where this happened, but a complaint was
Speaker 6: made post the event. It's believed it might have come
Speaker 6: from someone who was working at the venue where it
Speaker 6: was held, that then made its way through to the
Speaker 6: club and then made its way through to the AFL.
Speaker 6: The club supposedly was not going to hand down any
Speaker 6: heavy sanctions, but the AFL has intervened and they are
Speaker 6: the ones that now want to impose fans in twenty
Speaker 6: thousand dollar fines. I suppose the question is what should
Speaker 6: you be able to get away within a private setting
Speaker 6: as opposed to a public setting, Because.
Speaker 1: If you just wandered into the pub on.
Speaker 6: Any old Wednesday, and I don't know down the local
Speaker 6: and started doing some weird Jared Haynes sex thing with
Speaker 6: a doll. I mean you'd say, yes, you deserve to
Speaker 6: be suspended because you're bringing the club into disrepute. But
Speaker 6: we only know about this because the AFL has decided
Speaker 6: it will take action, So you can't necessarily argue that
Speaker 6: the club had yet been brought into disrepute because it
Speaker 6: hadn't been made a public matter. I mean, yes, it
Speaker 6: was stupid and ill advised, but is it worthy of
Speaker 6: a twenty thousand dollar fine?
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're absolutely right.
Speaker 3: None of us would have heard about this had the
Speaker 3: AFL not made such a big deal about it. So
Speaker 3: if the AFL are worried about their reputation, were they
Speaker 3: able to look at themselves. You've got forty four blokes
Speaker 3: aged what eighteen to thirty who book a private room
Speaker 3: for a private function. Nothing illegal happened. Was it distasteful?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 3: The theme of the party was troubled couples, so you
Speaker 3: are for it as a trouble. But no one died,
Speaker 3: no one was did anything illegal. But someone working there
Speaker 3: got upset and made an anonymous complaint. And now some
Speaker 3: of these guys will miss the start of next season
Speaker 3: because the AFL Integrity Unit. If you want to talk
Speaker 3: about the AFL integrity Unit, I mean they can't even
Speaker 3: make an Integrius fixture. Every team doesn't play every other
Speaker 3: team once. Some teams have advantaged. So the AFL should
Speaker 3: sort their own house out before they go after a
Speaker 3: bunch of young guys having a private function.
Speaker 7: This is just because gws are awesome.
Speaker 8: We're the best team.
Speaker 10: In the league and they hate us for it.
Speaker 8: They hate us for it.
Speaker 7: Okay, if you're going to be the best, you're gonna
Speaker 7: face persecution.
Speaker 8: To the front page of the Mercury Now.
Speaker 7: Exclusive world first Thilo.
Speaker 10: Scene genome breakthrough.
Speaker 7: This is going to change the state of the nation,
Speaker 7: Ladies and gentlemen, ninety nine point nine percent of the puzzle.
Speaker 8: They have it. They're on the brink.
Speaker 7: A US bioscience company that is racing to bring the
Speaker 7: thylacene back from extinction has announced a suite of key
Speaker 7: milestones and the controversial project, including producing the most complete
Speaker 7: genome of any ancient species to date. They have also
Speaker 7: identified the fat tail Dunnart that's that little marsupial guy
Speaker 7: in the circle that you can see there on the
Speaker 7: front page. To eventually carry the world's first Thylocene embryo.
Speaker 7: Can I just say that I find these things such
Speaker 7: a waste of.
Speaker 10: Millions of dollars.
Speaker 7: It is eye watering to me. Who cares whether it
Speaker 7: comes back or not? Like genuinely, who is sitting at
Speaker 7: home rubbing their hands together, giggling to themselves, being like,
Speaker 7: I have missed the Thylocene and this is going to
Speaker 7: make the quality of my life shoots through the roof.
Speaker 7: But some scientists are squandering millions of dollars on this
Speaker 7: project because they watched Jurassic Park and got inspired.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean it's amazing technology, right If they can
Speaker 3: one hundred years after an animal went extinct de extinct,
Speaker 3: it so great technology.
Speaker 2: But it raises the question just.
Speaker 7: Because for something for the better man of humanity, not
Speaker 7: for bringing back some cat looking dog.
Speaker 3: The more interesting question to me is just because you
Speaker 3: can do something, And this is a question science hasn't answered,
Speaker 3: should you? And you know, if they managed to achieve this,
Speaker 3: what's next to wille mammoth, the Tyrannosaurus wreck.
Speaker 1: That's what I want sylosaurs.
Speaker 6: Please, But I mean, you ask some people, they'll tell
Speaker 6: you that the Thylo scene still actually exists, that there
Speaker 6: are some of them running around down in Tazzy. You know,
Speaker 6: there's these spottings, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 1: I mean, really, what are we going to do? Oh great,
Speaker 1: we've got the Tazzy tiger back. Next two cares.
Speaker 2: Be good for tourism.
Speaker 3: Let's go to the front page of the Daily Telegraph
Speaker 3: metro boom key to solving housing crisis, where way off
Speaker 3: track reads the headline Sydney is going to need to
Speaker 3: build hundreds more metro train and light rail stations if
Speaker 3: the new South Wales government has any hope of tackling
Speaker 3: the housing crisis, or report has found, with housing advocates
Speaker 3: warning the state cannot afford to stop investing in new
Speaker 3: metro lines. The article goes on to say that Sydney
Speaker 3: is trailing behind cities like New York, Paris and London
Speaker 3: in both the number of stations and the amount of
Speaker 3: density around them.
Speaker 2: You know, it's really funny.
Speaker 3: I wouldn't have thought more metro stations with high density
Speaker 3: housing was the key to solving the housing crisis. Maybe
Speaker 3: just stop immigration for a while until the housing can
Speaker 3: catch up.
Speaker 2: That might do it.
Speaker 3: But instead the recommendation is to put us all in
Speaker 3: Soviet style high rises because we don't want a backyard.
Speaker 3: We don't want space to kick the footy with the kids.
Speaker 3: We want to all be in shoe boxes close to
Speaker 3: a metro. That's what we really want. It'll make the
Speaker 3: country wonderful.
Speaker 8: I can't wait.
Speaker 6: I mean it does raise a fair point, though, which is,
Speaker 6: if you're going to have all this housing, you've got
Speaker 6: to move around the people who live in the housing somehow.
Speaker 6: Like we've only talked about one piece of the equation.
Speaker 6: You can't just talk about one piece. You've got to
Speaker 6: talk about the whole lot. And that's you know, we
Speaker 6: can't even build the houses at the rate that we
Speaker 6: need to build them.
Speaker 1: As if we're gonna be able to build the bloody.
Speaker 3: Stain immigration housing crist are solved within a couple of years.
Speaker 6: Well, that's right, because the fertility rates through the floor,
Speaker 6: So now one's having kids anyway exactly. Let's go to
Speaker 6: the front of the Ouster Borrow, where it says coal
Speaker 6: demand to hit global high despite moral hazards.
Speaker 1: What a surprise.
Speaker 6: Global coal demand is forecast to hit a new high
Speaker 6: in twenty twenty four, driven by strong growth from.
Speaker 1: China and India. What is surprise as climate changes.
Speaker 6: Matt Keane warned that handouts to prolong coal stations in
Speaker 6: Australia risk creating a moral hazard, and in saying that,
Speaker 6: he is totally correct, because if you stop giving handouts
Speaker 6: to keep coal being mined in this country, there is
Speaker 6: a great moral hazard, and that is that you will
Speaker 6: consign billions and millions, if not billions, of people in
Speaker 6: India and China to lives of abject poverty because you
Speaker 6: don't give them the opportunity to build industry that pulls
Speaker 6: them out of that poverty. Unknowingly, he's actually hit the nail.
Speaker 2: On the head. Well, here's another moral hazard.
Speaker 3: We are impoverishing a free, democratic nation while enriching a
Speaker 3: communist nation that has us in their sights just to
Speaker 3: our north. I would have thought that is a moral
Speaker 3: hazard that maybe our politicians might think about.
Speaker 6: No, why would they think about that? Imagine having cheap power. God,
Speaker 6: we couldn't possibly have that in a first world nation,
Speaker 6: could we? James in front of the odds tomorrow Very quickly,
Speaker 6: pms by takes a negative turn. Labor MPs are pushing
Speaker 6: for negative gearing changes to be put on the table
Speaker 6: in the wake of revelations Anthony Alberizi purchased a four
Speaker 6: point three million dollar beach side home, threatening a pre
Speaker 6: election schism between Prime Minister and Jim Charmers over housing
Speaker 6: tax policies. Oh mate, I bet he didn't think that
Speaker 6: was going to happen when.
Speaker 1: He paid for that house, did he. Well, good job.
Speaker 2: We're going to go to a break. But stick around.
Speaker 3: We've got to show you vision in a moment of
Speaker 3: a pro Palestinian activist too tore down the great Flag.
Speaker 3: It's coming up in a moment. Okay, welcome back now.
Speaker 3: Liz Storer believes she may have found twenty twenty four's
Speaker 3: most stupid protester.
Speaker 2: Liz, take it away.
Speaker 7: So we've all had good fun making fun of pro
Speaker 7: Palestinian protesters who clearly have absolutely no idea exactly what
Speaker 7: they're protesting for.
Speaker 10: They just know they're angry, but nobody to date.
Speaker 7: In my humble opinion, that beats this low IQ activist who,
Speaker 7: when seeing what she believed to be the Israeli flag
Speaker 7: flying outside of a kebab store, decided to unleash her
Speaker 7: wrath upon them.
Speaker 8: I don't stand for this.
Speaker 12: There's genocide, and I don't stand for Zionism. I'm mon clear,
Speaker 12: I don't support it. There's a genocide, you know that, right,
Speaker 12: They're killing children.
Speaker 1: It's a purpose.
Speaker 12: You proud of your heritage, You're understanding of the genocide. Right,
Speaker 12: there's nothing against people who are Jewish. But this is
Speaker 12: this is not okay, this is ricky. Who's this?
Speaker 1: This is grecky?
Speaker 2: What very ricky?
Speaker 11: Yeah?
Speaker 12: Oh that its Israel?
Speaker 1: My bad.
Speaker 8: Right, color scheme, wrong flag.
Speaker 7: Someone better warn the Argentinian any Argentinian restaurants in the
Speaker 7: vicinity as well.
Speaker 3: The stupidest part about that is do you know who
Speaker 3: posted the video?
Speaker 2: She posted it?
Speaker 1: Look at what an idiot I am.
Speaker 2: I want the whole world to know. I am the
Speaker 2: stupidest person in the world.
Speaker 1: My bad.
Speaker 7: Don't be a virtue signal, like, look, I am campaigning genocide.
Speaker 8: Look I got it.
Speaker 7: But essentially the basis of my argument was correct.
Speaker 6: But I just love the look on the face of
Speaker 6: that She just hell, are you doing in the front
Speaker 6: of my wrist and she's like, are you proud of
Speaker 6: your heritage?
Speaker 1: And he's standing there.
Speaker 6: Like, I mean, yeah, apart from the fact that my
Speaker 6: country goes broke every five minutes.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm pretty proud of my You had no idea
Speaker 1: what was so good?
Speaker 6: But it once again proves how stupid these people are.
Speaker 6: Do not take them seriously for one minute. At least
Speaker 6: they can give us a laugh.
Speaker 3: Well, on that note, it's a good night from us,
Speaker 3: but stick around.
Speaker 2: Coming up is readA Pennehy