WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 16 September

0:00:02.660 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Paul Murray Live. Thank you, Shari. Congratulations on

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the early success of Bondi Terror. What a spectacular book.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:13.430
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you get a couple of copies. It's one

0:00:13.450 --> 0:00:15.060
<v Speaker 1>of those ones you're going to want to share around.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.050
<v Speaker 1>Tonight on the program, we've got an awful lot to

0:00:17.070 --> 0:00:18.650
<v Speaker 1>get to. I'm going to need a lot more than

0:00:18.670 --> 0:00:22.050
<v Speaker 1>the 60 minutes we've got, so let's not waste a second.

0:00:22.910 --> 0:00:26.750
<v Speaker 1>Trust in the Prime Minister is falling because, unsurprisingly, Australians

0:00:26.790 --> 0:00:29.410
<v Speaker 1>don't like being lied to. even by a bloke that

0:00:29.430 --> 0:00:32.770
<v Speaker 1>they rehired by quite a margin at the election last time.

0:00:33.229 --> 0:00:39.260
<v Speaker 1>And why? Because he tells lies, even telling a lie

0:00:39.340 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>about telling the truth. My word is my bond. And

0:00:46.620 --> 0:00:51.050
<v Speaker 1>the central lie under which the entire Albanese government is

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.390
<v Speaker 1>built was the original promise that cost of living would

0:00:55.430 --> 0:01:00.510
<v Speaker 1>be lower under a Labor government. Now, this is just

0:01:00.570 --> 0:01:05.369
<v Speaker 1>not true. And I must say that as relentless as

0:01:05.430 --> 0:01:07.950
<v Speaker 1>we are on the subject, because it is the number

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:13.090
<v Speaker 1>one concern of people right around the country, the Rest

0:01:13.130 --> 0:01:14.730
<v Speaker 1>of the media sometimes can be a little bit slow

0:01:14.750 --> 0:01:16.789
<v Speaker 1>to catch up. They'll sort of discuss the issue, then

0:01:16.830 --> 0:01:19.250
<v Speaker 1>they'll sort of scurry away. It's not as important to

0:01:19.290 --> 0:01:22.380
<v Speaker 1>discuss each and every day. So it was with a

0:01:22.740 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>little smirk on my face that I started to notice

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that an organisation that has just as much access to

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the daily news cycle as we do seemingly has discovered

0:01:33.050 --> 0:01:38.770
<v Speaker 1>the issue of cost of living. That, yes, of recent times, Maccas, MacBooks,

0:01:39.690 --> 0:01:44.030
<v Speaker 1>And virtually everything else gone up by inflation. Well, well done, Scoop. Exclusive.

0:01:44.330 --> 0:01:48.070
<v Speaker 1>Walkley on its way. Another example, of course, of something

0:01:48.110 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that is costing more is petrol. Now, the latest numbers

0:01:53.420 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>show us this is the change from June to today.

0:01:58.980 --> 0:02:03.820
<v Speaker 1>And you can see up in Sydney, up in Melbourne,

0:02:04.420 --> 0:02:09.340
<v Speaker 1>up in Brisbane, But is there any chance that there

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.419
<v Speaker 1>is about to be a cut in the 52 cents

0:02:12.540 --> 0:02:16.709
<v Speaker 1>per litre tax that the federal government adds to every

0:02:16.870 --> 0:02:20.210
<v Speaker 1>litre of fuel? Not to mention, of course, the 10%

0:02:20.210 --> 0:02:24.530
<v Speaker 1>tax that is the GST. Well, some people have been asking,

0:02:24.990 --> 0:02:28.230
<v Speaker 1>and the response from Labor MPs is, well, it doesn't

0:02:28.250 --> 0:02:31.090
<v Speaker 1>really affect me. I've got a fuel card, so do

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:32.500
<v Speaker 1>people pay for petrol?

0:02:35.910 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Look, we said the excise cut was temporary. We were

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 2>very clear on that right from the beginning.

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.980
<v Speaker 3>We did extend it a bit to have it gradually

0:02:44.020 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 3>return to more normal levels.

0:02:45.210 --> 0:02:46.130
<v Speaker 1>That has played out.

0:02:46.810 --> 0:02:50.210
<v Speaker 3>We're not going to respond to every daily movement on

0:02:50.230 --> 0:02:51.070
<v Speaker 3>the world oil price.

0:02:51.850 --> 0:02:54.270
<v Speaker 1>Excellent. So the government that says it's all about doing

0:02:54.290 --> 0:02:57.010
<v Speaker 1>something about the cost of living is now pig-headedly ignoring

0:02:57.060 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest areas of increase of cost of living,

0:02:59.780 --> 0:03:02.820
<v Speaker 1>and that is petrol. Literally, I'm being asked by people,

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.310
<v Speaker 1>when will the price come down? Obviously, I don't know.

0:03:05.990 --> 0:03:10.500
<v Speaker 1>But it is that top of mind. that people are

0:03:10.620 --> 0:03:13.940
<v Speaker 1>randomly asking about when the petrol price is going to

0:03:13.980 --> 0:03:17.180
<v Speaker 1>come down. The government could drop it by, effectively, 52

0:03:17.180 --> 0:03:19.660
<v Speaker 1>cents per litre, every litre. But no, no, they've got

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.910
<v Speaker 1>to get their little cut, right? They've got to clip

0:03:21.930 --> 0:03:25.490
<v Speaker 1>the ticket on the way through. And then the media

0:03:25.530 --> 0:03:28.370
<v Speaker 1>that have largely sort of come and gone from the

0:03:28.450 --> 0:03:31.490
<v Speaker 1>issue randomly discover that cost of living exists. Well, hang on,

0:03:31.510 --> 0:03:33.549
<v Speaker 1>what about the original promise that if you elected a

0:03:33.590 --> 0:03:38.310
<v Speaker 1>Labor government, things would be lower? Nothing is lower. even

0:03:38.410 --> 0:03:41.740
<v Speaker 1>after some of the subsidies here, there and everywhere. And

0:03:41.780 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>then there is, of course, the great python of interest

0:03:45.500 --> 0:03:49.090
<v Speaker 1>rates that has made paying off the single biggest risk

0:03:49.150 --> 0:03:54.910
<v Speaker 1>you will ever financially take harder. The reality is that

0:03:54.930 --> 0:03:58.750
<v Speaker 1>for people my age in Generation X, we are never

0:03:58.770 --> 0:04:01.270
<v Speaker 1>going to pay off our houses. for a whole bunch

0:04:01.310 --> 0:04:04.110
<v Speaker 1>of reasons, but unlike our parents, that's not going to happen.

0:04:04.850 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>So how exactly a generation of people are going to

0:04:06.940 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>pay for their aged care? Whatever, who cares? Look over there.

0:04:09.460 --> 0:04:15.060
<v Speaker 1>Pauline Henson said something on a podcast. Well, 15 times

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>interest rates have gone up under this mob. 15! And

0:04:19.100 --> 0:04:22.630
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are higher than comparable countries because, of course,

0:04:22.990 --> 0:04:24.969
<v Speaker 1>before the war even started, our interest rates were too

0:04:25.010 --> 0:04:29.070
<v Speaker 1>high because our inflation is too high, because the government...

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>has not been able to live within its means. Well,

0:04:32.900 --> 0:04:36.580
<v Speaker 1>the expectation is that when they meet, they will increase

0:04:36.620 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. But how's this? Three more times. The markets

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>are starting to talk about a 16th, a 17th and

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>an 18th interest rate rise under this mob. Now, yes,

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that has automatic political consequences because as the rates go up,

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.370
<v Speaker 1>their poll numbers go down. But remember... Every time that

0:05:00.390 --> 0:05:04.090
<v Speaker 1>it's just been held at 15 interest rate rises, the

0:05:04.270 --> 0:05:06.770
<v Speaker 1>media have turned around and said, relief phone buyers today

0:05:06.830 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>because it didn't go up. There's no relief. The python

0:05:10.060 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of interest rates is squeezing every possible cent out of

0:05:15.060 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the family budget, tens of thousands of dollars that you

0:05:18.339 --> 0:05:21.620
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to pay on your home loan since this

0:05:21.690 --> 0:05:23.969
<v Speaker 1>government was elected, you now have to pay because this

0:05:24.029 --> 0:05:27.450
<v Speaker 1>government was elected. And they want to pretend nothing to

0:05:27.510 --> 0:05:30.339
<v Speaker 1>see here. Everything's fine. Any problems about the economy is

0:05:30.420 --> 0:05:35.380
<v Speaker 1>talking Australia down. No, you guys have driven Australia down.

0:05:36.140 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>And it is amazing every now and then when the

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:43.559
<v Speaker 1>media does notice what you're living each and every day,

0:05:43.779 --> 0:05:45.860
<v Speaker 1>which is why we talk about it almost each and

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:51.229
<v Speaker 1>every night. Aged care. It is, again, one of the

0:05:51.290 --> 0:05:54.550
<v Speaker 1>great concerns that we either have for ourselves because it

0:05:54.630 --> 0:05:58.190
<v Speaker 1>is heading our way or certainly for parents. But the

0:05:58.230 --> 0:06:00.010
<v Speaker 1>system as we currently have it in Australia, it is

0:06:00.060 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>not acceptable. Put simply, the way that aged care works

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in Australia right now is that you put all your

0:06:07.500 --> 0:06:09.700
<v Speaker 1>money into your house, your house value goes up, you

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>pay financial kaplunk. And you'll be able to pay for

0:06:12.620 --> 0:06:14.930
<v Speaker 1>some form of aged care. Hopefully, you'll be able to

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:19.190
<v Speaker 1>get home care before that. But that all depends on

0:06:19.230 --> 0:06:24.409
<v Speaker 1>whether an algorithm decides that you qualify for the right

0:06:24.470 --> 0:06:28.190
<v Speaker 1>amount of care. And this is an algorithm that human

0:06:28.250 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>beings are very reluctant or at times unable to overrule. Now,

0:06:37.020 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>for many people watching, you are in this fight right now.

0:06:40.020 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>It's about you. It's about your parents. Again, which is

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.330
<v Speaker 1>why I lead the program with it tonight. And remember,

0:06:46.370 --> 0:06:49.590
<v Speaker 1>this algorithm comes from the very same people, being the

0:06:49.670 --> 0:06:52.190
<v Speaker 1>current Labor Party, the current government, who made such a

0:06:52.210 --> 0:06:55.990
<v Speaker 1>song and dance about the robo-debt situation. But they themselves introduced,

0:06:56.250 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>not inherited, introduced a system where computer says no is

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.460
<v Speaker 1>now part of your aged care.

0:07:06.310 --> 0:07:08.469
<v Speaker 4>Some of the new policies and processes that have been

0:07:08.510 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 4>implemented by the providers has and will cause more pain

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 4>for a lot of the older people and their families.

0:07:16.900 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 4>By self-managing, we thought we'd be able to achieve more.

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>It is an active choice of government to have set

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.710
<v Speaker 1>up a scheme that is the one that's playing out

0:07:28.750 --> 0:07:34.110
<v Speaker 1>right now. And amazingly, some Freedom of Information documents have

0:07:34.150 --> 0:07:38.250
<v Speaker 1>given us an insight into just how screwed up the

0:07:38.290 --> 0:07:42.190
<v Speaker 1>system was. This system invented by the government that they

0:07:42.250 --> 0:07:44.710
<v Speaker 1>assumed the algorithm would do a certain amount of work

0:07:44.790 --> 0:07:46.930
<v Speaker 1>and then the human would be able to double-check it

0:07:47.210 --> 0:07:50.150
<v Speaker 1>rather than the human would have to find a way

0:07:50.190 --> 0:07:55.630
<v Speaker 1>to overrule the algorithm. This was released today in the

0:07:55.690 --> 0:07:59.490
<v Speaker 1>Daily Telegraph, the Herald Sun, Courier Mail, Adelaide Advertiser and,

0:07:59.510 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, the Mercury in Tasmania. The minister was blindsided.

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they didn't work out they had a problem

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.500
<v Speaker 1>here until a couple of days before it all was

0:08:12.540 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>made public. The Department of Health, Disability and Age briefing

0:08:16.740 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>released under Freedom of Information laws, remember the ones this

0:08:19.420 --> 0:08:21.790
<v Speaker 1>government tried to make harder for you to be able

0:08:21.810 --> 0:08:25.910
<v Speaker 1>to see what's happening on the inside because the House

0:08:25.950 --> 0:08:29.110
<v Speaker 1>of Transparency isn't quite as transparent as they promised it

0:08:29.170 --> 0:08:32.150
<v Speaker 1>to be, exposes the last minute panic when Minister Wray

0:08:32.740 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>learnt that humans would be legally unable to change decisions

0:08:37.780 --> 0:08:42.699
<v Speaker 1>where they didn't agree with the algorithm on October 29,

0:08:42.700 --> 0:08:46.020
<v Speaker 1>three days before the whole thing was launched on November

0:08:46.179 --> 0:08:50.860
<v Speaker 1>the 1st. So they designed a system that they couldn't overrule.

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>The briefing marked urgent, stated that this was contrary to

0:08:54.740 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>statements that had been made in the media in the

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>lead up to the change. Jeez, what a surprise. They'll

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.610
<v Speaker 1>tell you one thing publicly, they'll do another thing to

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:06.550
<v Speaker 1>you privately. although it is not believed that this was

0:09:07.210 --> 0:09:10.850
<v Speaker 1>referred to comments made by the minister. You know, monumental

0:09:10.870 --> 0:09:12.650
<v Speaker 1>stuff up in the run-up to the changes last year,

0:09:12.670 --> 0:09:15.150
<v Speaker 1>the department had been telling assessors they would be able

0:09:15.170 --> 0:09:18.050
<v Speaker 1>to override the system prior to realising that was not

0:09:18.090 --> 0:09:23.969
<v Speaker 1>the case. They designed a system that is intentionally screwing

0:09:24.030 --> 0:09:28.270
<v Speaker 1>people over. People who may have paid taxes their whole life,

0:09:28.429 --> 0:09:31.570
<v Speaker 1>may have voted for Labor all their life, but they

0:09:31.610 --> 0:09:32.030
<v Speaker 1>don't care.

0:09:32.090 --> 0:09:32.270
<v Speaker 5>Why?

0:09:32.330 --> 0:09:34.870
<v Speaker 1>Because, you know, it's all about under-50s, right? You know,

0:09:34.970 --> 0:09:36.990
<v Speaker 1>over 50s, One Nation, Libs, they can have them because

0:09:37.010 --> 0:09:39.469
<v Speaker 1>there's more under 50s and that's where we're going to

0:09:39.490 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>win elections. But just like their attitude towards veterans, their

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>attitudes towards older people tells us everything, everything about the

0:09:48.380 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>decency and the lack of priorities inside the government itself.

0:09:53.260 --> 0:09:56.730
<v Speaker 1>There is a Senate inquiry right now into all of this.

0:09:58.429 --> 0:10:02.219
<v Speaker 1>Professor Cathy Everett, Egger, who is from the University of

0:10:02.260 --> 0:10:04.100
<v Speaker 1>New South Wales, an expert in all of this, she

0:10:04.140 --> 0:10:07.610
<v Speaker 1>referred to the algorithm as, quote, fatally flawed, really bad

0:10:07.750 --> 0:10:12.569
<v Speaker 1>and indefensible. And that's, of course, the algorithm that in

0:10:12.630 --> 0:10:14.869
<v Speaker 1>part can decide how much support you may need to

0:10:14.890 --> 0:10:17.370
<v Speaker 1>be able to stay in your house. If you end

0:10:17.450 --> 0:10:20.380
<v Speaker 1>up in a facility, and yes, while the vast majority

0:10:20.390 --> 0:10:22.460
<v Speaker 1>of people in it are doing decent things, there are

0:10:22.500 --> 0:10:26.220
<v Speaker 1>plenty of examples of the system not covering the Australians

0:10:26.420 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>who had to sell their house and take every cent

0:10:28.820 --> 0:10:32.620
<v Speaker 1>they could to pay for their care in an aged

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:38.300
<v Speaker 1>care facility. Aged Care Watch is run by the unions,

0:10:39.690 --> 0:10:44.990
<v Speaker 1>and the unions themselves take reports about everything From the

0:10:45.090 --> 0:10:47.310
<v Speaker 1>cleanliness of a joint all the way through to missing

0:10:47.370 --> 0:10:49.470
<v Speaker 1>meals and the rest of it. As you can see,

0:10:49.690 --> 0:10:54.980
<v Speaker 1>there is not a part of populated Australia, significantly populated Australia,

0:10:55.000 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that is not covered by complaints. Whistleblowers have revealed shocking

0:11:01.580 --> 0:11:05.340
<v Speaker 1>neglect inside the aged care homes. Any urgency here? No.

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Because they're old people and they don't seem to matter

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.990
<v Speaker 1>either in the media or the political environment. Well, bugger that.

0:11:12.590 --> 0:11:16.490
<v Speaker 1>If you're watching, you do. And then there was another

0:11:16.530 --> 0:11:19.329
<v Speaker 1>story over the past couple of days where some of

0:11:19.390 --> 0:11:24.390
<v Speaker 1>the providers have been, to use an impolite term, taking

0:11:24.410 --> 0:11:27.830
<v Speaker 1>the piss. And by that I mean taking money. Have

0:11:27.850 --> 0:11:29.309
<v Speaker 1>a listen to an example that popped up in the

0:11:29.330 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>past couple of days on Channel 9.

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.740
<v Speaker 6>Last November, the Albanese government changed how Australians in aged

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:39.859
<v Speaker 6>care were charged for so-called lifestyle options. It allowed some

0:11:39.900 --> 0:11:43.580
<v Speaker 6>providers to get greedy. $ 5 per day for residents to

0:11:43.620 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 6>watch their own TV in their room. Fitness classes, extra.

0:11:47.940 --> 0:11:52.260
<v Speaker 6>The opportunity to choose between two meals, extra. A daily

0:11:52.260 --> 0:11:56.630
<v Speaker 6>$ 2. 50 charge, adding up to a whopping $ 900 a year

0:11:57.070 --> 0:11:59.250
<v Speaker 6>for one night out at a restaurant.

0:12:00.550 --> 0:12:03.270
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, this is the system they changed, as well as

0:12:03.290 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm that they changed, as well as the cost

0:12:05.540 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of living that goes through the roof that they promised

0:12:08.260 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to do something about. Jeez, what a surprise. People don't

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.829
<v Speaker 1>trust the Prime Minister anymore. As for the Victorian Premier,

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:19.190
<v Speaker 1>Ben Carroll, latest opinion polling there from Emma Kosmaris at

0:12:19.270 --> 0:12:24.579
<v Speaker 1>the Redbridge Accent Organisation is worth a read here because nothing.

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.460
<v Speaker 1>has changed when it comes to the future of the

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party and time is running out. Yes, they have

0:12:31.510 --> 0:12:35.929
<v Speaker 1>quarterised in terms of the preferred premier situation in that

0:12:35.950 --> 0:12:38.090
<v Speaker 1>it is not as bad as it may have previously

0:12:38.130 --> 0:12:39.869
<v Speaker 1>been and One Nation does take an awful lot of

0:12:39.890 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>numbers away. But have a look here. The primary vote

0:12:44.179 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>between One Nation and the Liberal Party and National Party

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:52.300
<v Speaker 1>that theoretically The voters, forget what the organisations do, the

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.220
<v Speaker 1>voters would be preferencing amongst the two parties that most

0:12:55.400 --> 0:13:01.850
<v Speaker 1>represent changing the government is now 54%. But fascinating to

0:13:01.890 --> 0:13:04.550
<v Speaker 1>watch in all of this is firstly how high that

0:13:04.650 --> 0:13:09.510
<v Speaker 1>Greens number is. The Independent and other is not as

0:13:09.580 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>much of a play in Victoria due to a whole

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>bunch of spending reasons. But I want to show you

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.940
<v Speaker 1>why preferences matter. It is a point that I have

0:13:17.980 --> 0:13:20.260
<v Speaker 1>made many times before, but I have to show you

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.540
<v Speaker 1>the receipts that back the opinion up. There is a

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>significant number of people who vote Liberal who will not

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>preference One Nation, who ironically, despite being as furious as

0:13:32.970 --> 0:13:36.270
<v Speaker 1>they are with the government in Victoria, would return the

0:13:36.309 --> 0:13:39.309
<v Speaker 1>government in Victoria if One Nation ended up as a

0:13:39.350 --> 0:13:43.030
<v Speaker 1>more popular option in some seats. If the battle comes

0:13:43.070 --> 0:13:46.030
<v Speaker 1>down to a battle between the Coalition Party with the

0:13:46.100 --> 0:13:49.260
<v Speaker 1>largest number of seats, versus Labor, with the second biggest

0:13:49.300 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>number of seats. The Liberal Party, with the Coalition and

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:57.820
<v Speaker 1>the National Party, preferences from One Nation gets them to 56%.

0:13:58.140 --> 0:14:02.350
<v Speaker 1>It flips to 53% Labor. Labor's numbers go up by

0:14:02.570 --> 0:14:06.690
<v Speaker 1>nine points, depending on the success of One Nation finishing

0:14:06.850 --> 0:14:11.850
<v Speaker 1>in front of the Liberals. Hence why. The argument that

0:14:11.870 --> 0:14:14.230
<v Speaker 1>will be run by Ben Carroll and the Labor Party

0:14:14.309 --> 0:14:18.610
<v Speaker 1>will exclusively be about One Nation, trying to pretend that

0:14:18.630 --> 0:14:21.890
<v Speaker 1>they are not fighting the Liberals who have a higher

0:14:21.930 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>primary vote, a higher number when it comes to preferred premier. Instead,

0:14:26.180 --> 0:14:28.420
<v Speaker 1>they will be trying to pretend that One Nation is

0:14:28.460 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the boogeyman, the boogeyman in each and every seat, because

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.470
<v Speaker 1>that's their best chance to hold onto power, power they

0:14:35.570 --> 0:14:39.220
<v Speaker 1>no longer deserve to hold. But I've had that view for, well,

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.740
<v Speaker 1>almost as long as they have been in power. The

0:14:42.820 --> 0:14:48.770
<v Speaker 1>potholes issue, again, perfect example of how the Premier somehow thinks, oh,

0:14:48.810 --> 0:14:51.370
<v Speaker 1>I've got the great answer to get through the 6pm news,

0:14:51.410 --> 0:14:54.310
<v Speaker 1>but makes the whole world harder for himself. Remember a

0:14:54.330 --> 0:14:57.250
<v Speaker 1>couple of days ago, this turned deadly.

0:15:00.370 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 3>A 71-year-old motorcyclist died when he hit a pothole on

0:15:03.900 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 3>the Western Highway.

0:15:05.100 --> 0:15:08.100
<v Speaker 2>Peter Mason was riding along the Western Highway near.

0:15:07.940 --> 0:15:12.460
<v Speaker 3>Ballarat when tragedy struck and the pothole still hasn't been repaired.

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.359
<v Speaker 1>And despite the fact that the Premier said, well, it's

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.370
<v Speaker 1>a top priority and send everyone out and we're even

0:15:18.390 --> 0:15:22.470
<v Speaker 1>thinking about taking prisoners out of the jails to fix

0:15:22.510 --> 0:15:24.610
<v Speaker 1>the potholes, when he's confronted about, OK, so how many

0:15:24.630 --> 0:15:27.580
<v Speaker 1>have you done? This happened....

0:15:30.790 --> 0:15:32.890
<v Speaker 3>I'd have to give you the exact details, Paul, but

0:15:32.930 --> 0:15:35.140
<v Speaker 3>we've committed to remove half a million.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 5>You can't tell me how many have been done so far?

0:15:37.780 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>We've got to give you those details because I know

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the crews are out right now. You see, again, rather

0:15:44.820 --> 0:15:47.479
<v Speaker 1>than coming up with a fair dinkum fix that you

0:15:47.500 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>would use all of your power to be able to

0:15:49.740 --> 0:15:51.739
<v Speaker 1>be on top of. Now, again, the idea of how

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.470
<v Speaker 1>many exactly, you can give a small break to any

0:15:55.540 --> 0:15:58.570
<v Speaker 1>leader to be able to be not aware of that. However,

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:01.900
<v Speaker 1>you would imagine that you'd be able to roughly guess

0:16:02.500 --> 0:16:05.230
<v Speaker 1>because the person who does have a little more responsibility

0:16:05.290 --> 0:16:09.810
<v Speaker 1>further down the chain, you'd be calling every day that

0:16:09.830 --> 0:16:13.290
<v Speaker 1>there would be a demand that an A4 piece of

0:16:13.330 --> 0:16:16.970
<v Speaker 1>paper is produced and on your desk each and every

0:16:17.010 --> 0:16:19.740
<v Speaker 1>day that provides a number. And then again, if you

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.380
<v Speaker 1>can't remember exactly, you can vaguely say, oh, 2,000 yesterdays.

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, remember, of course, we were able to get

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a daily update about the number of people who were

0:16:27.710 --> 0:16:30.770
<v Speaker 1>coughing in Victoria at any one time. When the swizzle

0:16:30.790 --> 0:16:36.290
<v Speaker 1>sticks were going positive, oh, instant information, daily press conference.

0:16:37.070 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>No such information about fixing holes that are killing people.

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>It's up to you, Victoria. You get a chance to

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>flush them. Now, of course, it is a couple of

0:16:49.540 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>years on from when Donald Trump was almost assassinated. Do

0:16:53.540 --> 0:16:56.180
<v Speaker 1>you remember this? It was the middle of July in

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.260
<v Speaker 1>the election year. Many argue this was the moment where

0:17:00.300 --> 0:17:03.950
<v Speaker 1>whatever doubt was there disappeared. And he, of course, took

0:17:04.070 --> 0:17:07.010
<v Speaker 1>the run towards the presidency. I love in that moment

0:17:07.050 --> 0:17:10.450
<v Speaker 1>the fight, fight, fight image. But there is something very

0:17:10.530 --> 0:17:14.330
<v Speaker 1>strange about something that was as significant as that, that

0:17:14.410 --> 0:17:17.350
<v Speaker 1>did injure Donald Trump, but obviously, potentially, you know, a

0:17:17.430 --> 0:17:20.889
<v Speaker 1>millimetre here, a millimetre there, could have killed one of

0:17:20.930 --> 0:17:22.710
<v Speaker 1>the two people who was running for president and a

0:17:22.810 --> 0:17:26.770
<v Speaker 1>former president. The stake's obviously high, hence why global news

0:17:26.810 --> 0:17:28.550
<v Speaker 1>and all the discussion that was in and around it.

0:17:29.070 --> 0:17:33.670
<v Speaker 1>But why is there such little follow-up here? Now, the

0:17:34.410 --> 0:17:37.670
<v Speaker 1>alleged shooter, and you have to say alleged shooter here because,

0:17:37.690 --> 0:17:42.500
<v Speaker 1>of course, there wasn't a court process because... confronted and killed.

0:17:43.100 --> 0:17:47.100
<v Speaker 1>But what do we know about this person? Well, apparently

0:17:47.140 --> 0:17:52.700
<v Speaker 1>some documents have been slowly but surely released, not fully redacted,

0:17:52.740 --> 0:17:55.980
<v Speaker 1>but at least released to people that are trying to

0:17:56.030 --> 0:17:58.590
<v Speaker 1>get to know some of the behind the scenes here.

0:17:59.050 --> 0:18:02.230
<v Speaker 1>And it gives us a little more picture about the shooter. Now,

0:18:02.270 --> 0:18:04.109
<v Speaker 1>as you know, on this program, I'll show you a

0:18:04.130 --> 0:18:10.140
<v Speaker 1>graphic of what their name is, but I'm A large

0:18:10.180 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the documents has to do with the evidence

0:18:12.340 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that his father had given to the FBI as part

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.790
<v Speaker 1>of the investigation. Now, it will not surprise you about

0:18:20.850 --> 0:18:26.109
<v Speaker 1>how out of his mind the alleged shooter was. And

0:18:26.150 --> 0:18:29.270
<v Speaker 1>apparently that problem had gone all the way from birth.

0:18:30.130 --> 0:18:32.629
<v Speaker 1>But interestingly, we get a little more of a picture.

0:18:32.690 --> 0:18:36.970
<v Speaker 1>Who was this person? At one point, they wanted to

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:42.580
<v Speaker 1>join the military... to work in nuclear submarines, but this

0:18:42.630 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>was more just an idea that he thought it would

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be cool, according to the FBI, from an interview with

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the gunman's father. The person then, in terms of when

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they started playing with guns, started going to the gun

0:18:57.660 --> 0:19:01.740
<v Speaker 1>club around the time of the pandemic and apparently he

0:19:01.780 --> 0:19:04.620
<v Speaker 1>was a terrible shot. He couldn't hit the paper target.

0:19:07.369 --> 0:19:09.369
<v Speaker 1>It took four to five years of practice before he

0:19:09.390 --> 0:19:13.109
<v Speaker 1>could even do that. This is where it starts to

0:19:13.130 --> 0:19:17.310
<v Speaker 1>get scary. Eventually, with practice, Thomas became a better marksman.

0:19:17.330 --> 0:19:21.570
<v Speaker 1>My apologies for using his name. Coming home with range targets,

0:19:21.730 --> 0:19:23.510
<v Speaker 1>showing off to his dad how well he did with

0:19:23.570 --> 0:19:26.850
<v Speaker 1>a target placed at over 100 yards away. He found

0:19:26.890 --> 0:19:29.990
<v Speaker 1>that he was able to shoot even further distances after

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>he bought a particular sight and eventually became very knowledgeable

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.060
<v Speaker 1>in how to measure and zero in on a target.

0:19:37.910 --> 0:19:40.470
<v Speaker 1>and knew exactly how many clicks that it would take

0:19:41.390 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>for the specific angle on the site. In terms of

0:19:45.460 --> 0:19:49.310
<v Speaker 1>his politics, he apparently called himself a Republican. He didn't

0:19:49.350 --> 0:19:53.300
<v Speaker 1>like the welfare state and was against woke ideology, but

0:19:53.460 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 1>never really espoused the Republican ideology. That says, the father

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>of the son, who instead preferred debating government policies in

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:09.090
<v Speaker 1>a general sense. His son expressed shock at the Capitol

0:20:09.270 --> 0:20:12.850
<v Speaker 1>riot in 2001, in line with the shock that almost

0:20:12.910 --> 0:20:16.850
<v Speaker 1>everyone experienced that day. His father said that his son

0:20:17.010 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>did not believe the 2020 presidential election was rigged. So again,

0:20:23.380 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>no great insight here into what you would imagine there

0:20:27.619 --> 0:20:30.540
<v Speaker 1>would be as full a picture as possible. Now, obviously,

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.550
<v Speaker 1>with the subject not here, but still a series of

0:20:33.590 --> 0:20:36.489
<v Speaker 1>people around. But isn't it always amazing that these incredibly

0:20:36.730 --> 0:20:42.350
<v Speaker 1>massive stories get very little follow-up? Now, yes, we are

0:20:42.430 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>all grateful that this did not become a presidential assassination,

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's as close as any of us have seen,

0:20:50.420 --> 0:20:53.260
<v Speaker 1>and certainly anyone has seen, because all of it was

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>happening in real time, live on camera. Just a little update,

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:00.899
<v Speaker 1>because occasionally the news should do that, shouldn't it? They

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>should turn around and update a story. Hey, remember that

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.060
<v Speaker 1>really massive thing that happened? Well, we've learnt a little

0:21:06.100 --> 0:21:11.270
<v Speaker 1>bit more. Let's check in. Now, as for the American

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:17.130
<v Speaker 1>political scheme, system, I should say, in November, of course,

0:21:17.150 --> 0:21:19.510
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be the midterms, and then two years away,

0:21:19.550 --> 0:21:21.770
<v Speaker 1>there will be the vote to replace Donald Trump as

0:21:21.790 --> 0:21:23.290
<v Speaker 1>the President of the United States.

0:21:23.750 --> 0:21:23.950
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:21:24.410 --> 0:21:26.590
<v Speaker 1>Trump will not be like any president. I don't imagine

0:21:26.609 --> 0:21:29.010
<v Speaker 1>the term lame duck is truly going to apply until,

0:21:29.210 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, 1159 on January 20, 2029, the minute before

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.210
<v Speaker 1>he hands over to the next president. Who that will

0:21:37.260 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 1>be is fascinating. Now, J.D. Vance is the current vice president,

0:21:40.980 --> 0:21:45.380
<v Speaker 1>is assumed to be the Republican candidate in a couple

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of years' time. In fact, the latest opinion polls show

0:21:48.140 --> 0:21:51.460
<v Speaker 1>you here that the number one choice, J.D. Vance, number

0:21:51.500 --> 0:21:55.030
<v Speaker 1>two choice, Marco Rubio, number three choice... Donald Trump Jr.

0:21:56.930 --> 0:21:59.790
<v Speaker 1>But the assumption is because generally, let's be honest, every

0:21:59.869 --> 0:22:02.379
<v Speaker 1>president is a reaction to the previous president, hence why

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>it goes red, blue, red, blue, red, blue, blue, red, blue, right? There's,

0:22:06.060 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, George H.W.

0:22:08.780 --> 0:22:10.220
<v Speaker 5>Bush. W.

0:22:10.220 --> 0:22:14.470
<v Speaker 1>Bush's father would be the latest example of... a two-term

0:22:14.510 --> 0:22:16.850
<v Speaker 1>president being able to be replaced by his vice president

0:22:16.869 --> 0:22:19.609
<v Speaker 1>pushing through to a third term. So the assumption is

0:22:20.090 --> 0:22:21.300
<v Speaker 1>that it is a race that is up for the

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>taking when it comes to the Democrats. Again, let's have

0:22:23.780 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a look at the polls there. Kamala Harris currently at

0:22:26.540 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the top with about a quarter of the vote, believe

0:22:29.020 --> 0:22:32.459
<v Speaker 1>it or not. Followed by Gavin Newsom, who is the

0:22:32.540 --> 0:22:38.540
<v Speaker 1>governor of California. Buttigieg, who was the former transport secretary. AOC,

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.570
<v Speaker 1>the super hardcore lefty. And then we're off down into

0:22:41.609 --> 0:22:44.190
<v Speaker 1>the single figures. Why am I talking about all of

0:22:44.230 --> 0:22:47.090
<v Speaker 1>this two and a bit years out? Because Gavin Newsom

0:22:47.230 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is playing a little bit of 4D chess here, seeing

0:22:50.260 --> 0:22:52.379
<v Speaker 1>that he's got a good number, but it's not a

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>good enough number, and he knows that Kamala will either

0:22:56.220 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>beat him, based off these opinion polls, or he has

0:22:59.580 --> 0:23:01.300
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to push her out of the race.

0:23:02.300 --> 0:23:05.980
<v Speaker 1>So amazingly, he did an interview with CNN where the

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.899
<v Speaker 1>man who's obviously running for president, desperately wants to be president,

0:23:08.940 --> 0:23:12.250
<v Speaker 1>has the presidential hair, is pretending he'd get out of

0:23:12.290 --> 0:23:16.570
<v Speaker 1>the way If Kamala decides to run, this, in my view,

0:23:16.630 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>is a way of trying to smoke out Kamala for

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.620
<v Speaker 1>her to confirm she's not going to run. But this

0:23:22.660 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>interview happened in the middle of a fishing expedition because

0:23:25.300 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what blokes do.

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 6>You're not even the only Californian.

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:33.429
<v Speaker 1>No, right. You've got Ro Khanna, Kamala. Yeah, I don't

0:23:33.450 --> 0:23:35.350
<v Speaker 1>know if she runs, but we'll see. I know she's

0:23:35.369 --> 0:23:38.570
<v Speaker 1>called around. Yeah, but I wouldn't run if she ran.

0:23:39.730 --> 0:23:44.300
<v Speaker 1>If she runs, you will not? Of course not. So

0:23:44.340 --> 0:23:46.940
<v Speaker 1>I get very clever. Megan Kelly picks up on this.

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:48.370
<v Speaker 1>We'll have a chat with her a little bit later

0:23:48.380 --> 0:23:49.389
<v Speaker 1>in the show, but I've got to give you a

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:49.910
<v Speaker 1>sneak peek.

0:23:51.190 --> 0:23:53.050
<v Speaker 2>I wish I could like ask them, what bait are

0:23:53.070 --> 0:23:56.050
<v Speaker 2>you using? What flies are those? What are you fishing for?

0:23:56.270 --> 0:23:58.910
<v Speaker 2>I guarantee you neither one can answer either question. Not

0:23:58.950 --> 0:23:59.330
<v Speaker 2>a chance.

0:24:00.380 --> 0:24:03.229
<v Speaker 1>I reckon one of them will say, boots, and they're fabulous.

0:24:03.770 --> 0:24:06.169
<v Speaker 1>All right, now, looking forward to our town in Bathurst

0:24:06.210 --> 0:24:08.590
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks before the great race. We have

0:24:08.650 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the great appearance. That is the Paul Murray Live Our Town.

0:24:12.340 --> 0:24:14.139
<v Speaker 1>I would love you to be there. The reason we

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>are mentioning this so hard is because it is going

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.470
<v Speaker 1>to be at the National Motor Museum, and I know

0:24:20.609 --> 0:24:22.950
<v Speaker 1>that there's plenty of locals. who would love the chance

0:24:22.990 --> 0:24:24.250
<v Speaker 1>to be able to see the show. So if you're

0:24:24.270 --> 0:24:28.890
<v Speaker 1>watching us live, be it on free-to-air, Foxtel, or through

0:24:28.910 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the Sky News app, please, this is your moment, okay?

0:24:31.740 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>OurTown at News24. com. au. OurTown at News24. com. au. Sorry, Macbeth, Macbeth, Macbeth,

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.570
<v Speaker 1>the News24 app. All right, send an email, get some tickets,

0:24:42.690 --> 0:24:44.149
<v Speaker 1>bring along a couple of mates. And again, if you

0:24:44.190 --> 0:24:45.869
<v Speaker 1>can make it from Oberon, if you can make it

0:24:45.910 --> 0:24:48.250
<v Speaker 1>from Orange, if you can make it across from Lithgow,

0:24:48.530 --> 0:24:51.930
<v Speaker 1>we'd love to see you, okay? A couple of Sundays away,

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>really looking forward to it. Let us get into tonight's

0:24:55.140 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>show by a discussion about immigration. Tomorrow, the government's going

0:24:58.700 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>to put its number on the table. We know what

0:25:00.500 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>One Nation's number is on the table. So, as Goldilocks

0:25:03.900 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>once asked, what's the right number?

0:25:06.790 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Next.

0:25:12.250 --> 0:25:13.810
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for watching wherever you happen to be.

0:25:13.830 --> 0:25:15.869
<v Speaker 1>Darren Bunnett, my brother from another mother, is here in

0:25:15.890 --> 0:25:18.950
<v Speaker 1>the man cave. The difference is the glasses. Lovely to

0:25:18.970 --> 0:25:22.620
<v Speaker 1>see you. I can take them off. Don't it'll confuse everyone.

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.100
<v Speaker 1>Sean Bill, of course, One Nation Senator from New South Wales.

0:25:25.140 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>He joins us now in Canberra. So, as always, One

0:25:28.700 --> 0:25:32.340
<v Speaker 1>Nation puts a number down. It's the one that clearly

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:34.540
<v Speaker 1>is doing pretty well in the polls. We'll find out

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow what the Labor Party number is and then eventually

0:25:37.980 --> 0:25:41.780
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal Party will turn up and put its number down. Sean,

0:25:41.820 --> 0:25:44.820
<v Speaker 1>what's your expectation out of tomorrow? Apparently the big change

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.790
<v Speaker 1>is going to be about international students being able to

0:25:47.869 --> 0:25:51.189
<v Speaker 1>invite their family members out. But the PM apparently put

0:25:51.210 --> 0:25:52.429
<v Speaker 1>his foot down and said, no, no, no, we've got

0:25:52.450 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep the refugee number as high as it currently is. Paul,

0:25:57.900 --> 0:25:58.379
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you this.

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 7>Whatever the government claims, you can believe it's going to

0:26:01.420 --> 0:26:03.850
<v Speaker 7>be untrue. I mean, how many times did they say

0:26:03.890 --> 0:26:06.379
<v Speaker 7>they were going to cut energy prices by $ 275 for

0:26:06.619 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 7>your bills?

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Never eventuated.

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.139
<v Speaker 7>The government is going to be big on announcements and

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 7>I think very light on delivery. And I'll tell you

0:26:14.700 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 7>something incredible that occurred today. Senator Hanson put up a

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:22.230
<v Speaker 7>motion calling for the government to take a step back,

0:26:22.330 --> 0:26:25.669
<v Speaker 7>move away, and agree that they will not bring in

0:26:25.790 --> 0:26:28.669
<v Speaker 7>another million people over the next four years like they've promised.

0:26:28.850 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 7>We said, acknowledge that's wrong. and they voted against it.

0:26:32.619 --> 0:26:36.609
<v Speaker 7>They have committed to their current policy. They voted that

0:26:36.619 --> 0:26:38.810
<v Speaker 7>they would not stop bringing in a million people. So

0:26:38.910 --> 0:26:41.350
<v Speaker 7>I actually don't think whatever the government says, we are

0:26:41.390 --> 0:26:43.810
<v Speaker 7>going to see any real change. I think at the

0:26:43.890 --> 0:26:45.870
<v Speaker 7>very best, they might try to move some numbers around

0:26:46.050 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 7>on the books to hide the true scale of the

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 7>migration plan they continue to run to prop up the economy,

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:53.740
<v Speaker 7>which is suffering at the hands of their incompetence.

0:26:54.100 --> 0:26:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, Darren, again, you know, the idea that

0:26:56.740 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a Goldilocks number here, right, is that the higher education...

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>A lobby, of course, sets its hair on fire if

0:27:03.020 --> 0:27:06.220
<v Speaker 1>they're denied the chance to be able to sell degrees

0:27:06.740 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>to overseas students. People will say, well, because it's a

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.300
<v Speaker 1>giant export industry, there's all of the economic activity that comes.

0:27:13.340 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 7>Which it is.

0:27:14.180 --> 0:27:17.300
<v Speaker 1>Correct. However, the frustration is that if you go to

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>an emergency department, the sheer amount of people that are

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.260
<v Speaker 1>there becomes a problem. Every queue in the country gets

0:27:24.340 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>longer if more people join it.

0:27:26.990 --> 0:27:29.470
<v Speaker 5>True, but it's also the case that there are jobs

0:27:29.750 --> 0:27:33.570
<v Speaker 5>that migrants will fill. I actually went to a speech

0:27:33.609 --> 0:27:37.649
<v Speaker 5>last week from Peter Malinowskis who impresses me in general.

0:27:37.710 --> 0:27:38.150
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, great.

0:27:38.369 --> 0:27:41.389
<v Speaker 5>And his point was that people who are... You know,

0:27:41.410 --> 0:27:44.060
<v Speaker 5>it takes millions of dollars to train up Australians in

0:27:44.100 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 5>the sense of you're born, you go to school, you

0:27:48.180 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 5>get educated, you do whatever. If you can get skilled

0:27:50.820 --> 0:27:54.850
<v Speaker 5>migrants to come in, they're ready-made, they become taxpayers... So

0:27:54.869 --> 0:27:57.270
<v Speaker 5>there's arguments and then there's counter-arguments.

0:27:58.130 --> 0:28:01.630
<v Speaker 1>I get that argument and it's in advocacy of what

0:28:01.670 --> 0:28:04.030
<v Speaker 1>he believes it makes sense but it really annoys me

0:28:04.109 --> 0:28:08.110
<v Speaker 1>because it's an acknowledgement that we have dropped the ball

0:28:08.310 --> 0:28:11.380
<v Speaker 1>for 30 years, that we have said to every young

0:28:11.450 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>person here, rather than becoming a tradie, rather than becoming

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>a skilled worker, you've got to go to uni, you've

0:28:16.340 --> 0:28:17.459
<v Speaker 1>got to go to uni, you've got to learn your

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>film studies, and this has been a policy failure. You've

0:28:21.820 --> 0:28:22.660
<v Speaker 1>been reading my CV again.

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 5>That's fine.

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Sean, I don't know if you've got sort of some,

0:28:27.020 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, deep knowledge of sort of Italian film or

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:33.530
<v Speaker 1>something back there in a BA, but, again, this is

0:28:33.590 --> 0:28:35.770
<v Speaker 1>part of the problem, right? So the government will turn

0:28:35.810 --> 0:28:37.110
<v Speaker 1>around and say, well, we've got to keep a number

0:28:37.130 --> 0:28:39.750
<v Speaker 1>at a certain level because we need people who will

0:28:40.010 --> 0:28:44.130
<v Speaker 1>insert job, insert job, insert job, without admitting that they themselves,

0:28:44.170 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>from sort of Kim Beazley onwards, have championed this idea

0:28:47.300 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that there's only one option for kids and that's to

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.460
<v Speaker 1>go to uni and only losers pick up a hammer. Well,

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:53.740
<v Speaker 1>guess who's making the cash?

0:28:56.030 --> 0:28:58.450
<v Speaker 7>Paul, my entire life I've been told that Australia is

0:28:58.530 --> 0:29:02.270
<v Speaker 7>suffering a skills shortage and migration can fix it. Well,

0:29:02.290 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 7>if migration could fix the skills shortage, we wouldn't have

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:09.060
<v Speaker 7>a skills shortage. The real driver, one of the huge

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 7>drivers of this huge explosion in net overseas migration is

0:29:12.820 --> 0:29:16.570
<v Speaker 7>being the additional $ 1 million temporary visa holders that have

0:29:16.650 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 7>piled up under this Labor government. And those are not

0:29:20.220 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 7>necessarily skilled workers. Huge numbers of those are people on

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 7>study visas and graduate visas who are visa hopping. These

0:29:26.980 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 7>are not construction workers. You know, these are not nurses.

0:29:30.180 --> 0:29:32.980
<v Speaker 7>And even the government acknowledges this, which is why I'm

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.690
<v Speaker 7>pretty sure that, you know, tomorrow or by the end

0:29:35.710 --> 0:29:37.890
<v Speaker 7>of the week, we will see the government announce that

0:29:37.910 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 7>they'll be claiming to crack down on this. But there

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:42.660
<v Speaker 7>is only one party that you can trust to actually

0:29:42.740 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 7>crack down on this issue, and that party is One Nation.

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>What, if anything, is the political danger here, Darren, in

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.260
<v Speaker 1>Labor going too far in the direction of where One

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:56.060
<v Speaker 1>Nation has planted the flag? Is there a constituency that

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.690
<v Speaker 1>somehow gets annoyed that there's not more, apart from, yes,

0:29:59.750 --> 0:30:01.810
<v Speaker 1>the people that have physically filled out a piece of paper.

0:30:01.910 --> 0:30:04.370
<v Speaker 5>I think it's big business to an extent. I'm not

0:30:04.430 --> 0:30:05.750
<v Speaker 5>saying these are groups that.

0:30:05.630 --> 0:30:07.430
<v Speaker 1>Mean you win elections. No, you're not speaking in advocacy

0:30:07.470 --> 0:30:07.650
<v Speaker 1>of them.

0:30:07.670 --> 0:30:11.390
<v Speaker 5>But big business will say that you need more migration

0:30:11.430 --> 0:30:14.430
<v Speaker 5>to fuel economic growth. And I accept what you say

0:30:14.450 --> 0:30:16.230
<v Speaker 5>about queues getting longer. I'm just trying to put that

0:30:16.270 --> 0:30:20.900
<v Speaker 5>counter-argument that there are some industries, I've had a little

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.750
<v Speaker 5>bit to do in recent times with automobiles, shops, you know,

0:30:24.770 --> 0:30:26.710
<v Speaker 5>people running sort of auto work.

0:30:26.930 --> 0:30:27.070
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:30:27.390 --> 0:30:30.910
<v Speaker 5>They're short of workers, their workforce is ageing, their kids

0:30:30.970 --> 0:30:33.190
<v Speaker 5>don't want to do it, so you've got a bunch

0:30:33.230 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 5>of people who are going to retire in the next

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 5>five to ten years, and they think it's more likely

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.500
<v Speaker 5>that skilled migration can fix that gap in addition to

0:30:42.100 --> 0:30:44.940
<v Speaker 5>more apprentices. Now, you've got to get that balance right.

0:30:45.860 --> 0:30:48.820
<v Speaker 5>I don't think the government... Look, I don't think the

0:30:48.860 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 5>government's going to go, obviously, to where One Nation is, but...

0:30:53.350 --> 0:30:57.810
<v Speaker 5>The next election will be about migration. Just absolutely. And

0:30:57.870 --> 0:31:00.810
<v Speaker 5>housing is part of that. And housing shortage and whether

0:31:00.850 --> 0:31:04.410
<v Speaker 5>that's a function of having more people coming in than

0:31:04.650 --> 0:31:07.910
<v Speaker 5>going out. Therefore, we have shortages. So all of the

0:31:07.990 --> 0:31:12.660
<v Speaker 5>flow-on effects, emergency departments, schools, roads, it's going to be

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.479
<v Speaker 5>a migration election. tomorrow is a really important day for

0:31:16.500 --> 0:31:20.090
<v Speaker 5>the government because if they change their position again after this,

0:31:20.510 --> 0:31:23.370
<v Speaker 5>it will be a back down or, you know, they've

0:31:23.430 --> 0:31:25.950
<v Speaker 5>moved sideways, crab walk, whatever the case may be. So

0:31:26.290 --> 0:31:29.250
<v Speaker 5>tomorrow is actually a really important day for the rest

0:31:29.330 --> 0:31:30.490
<v Speaker 5>of the parliamentary term.

0:31:30.690 --> 0:31:33.230
<v Speaker 1>Well, correct. But also, as Sean was saying, that right

0:31:33.250 --> 0:31:36.570
<v Speaker 1>when it was Clueless Clare O'Neill who was there telling

0:31:36.630 --> 0:31:38.230
<v Speaker 1>us that, oh, you know, we're going to do something

0:31:38.270 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>about this... They've had a couple of cracks at this.

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>We're doing something about number. And yes, the number is

0:31:43.900 --> 0:31:46.540
<v Speaker 1>down from where it was. a couple of years ago,

0:31:46.620 --> 0:31:49.660
<v Speaker 1>but as Sean says, had an opportunity to declare, hey,

0:31:49.740 --> 0:31:51.940
<v Speaker 1>are you going to deliver what you've delivered in the past?

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.460
<v Speaker 1>They voted the way that they did. So we've all

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>heard about data centres. What about this one that is

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:03.500
<v Speaker 1>on its way to Queensland? This is giant, OK? $ 32b4

0:32:03.620 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>billion is how much is going to be spent as, essentially,

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.850
<v Speaker 1>part of the Western Downs is going to go Well,

0:32:12.900 --> 0:32:15.850
<v Speaker 1>from what it currently is to the full data centre, right?

0:32:16.350 --> 0:32:21.250
<v Speaker 1>About 250km northwest of Brisbane, $ 32 billion.

0:32:21.430 --> 0:32:25.470
<v Speaker 5>It's the same amount of power that powers 1.5 million homes.

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Correct.

0:32:26.100 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 5>It's crazy. It's an unimaginable amount.

0:32:28.340 --> 0:32:31.510
<v Speaker 1>So, again... I'm on a journey with everyone to try

0:32:31.530 --> 0:32:35.170
<v Speaker 1>to work out whether there is money in them hills

0:32:35.570 --> 0:32:38.190
<v Speaker 1>or whether this is a little bit of a con where, oh,

0:32:38.230 --> 0:32:41.090
<v Speaker 1>there's 500 jobs for building it and then there's one

0:32:41.130 --> 0:32:43.670
<v Speaker 1>bloke who just walks around for the next 20 years

0:32:44.050 --> 0:32:45.250
<v Speaker 1>checking whether it's still on.

0:32:45.870 --> 0:32:48.470
<v Speaker 5>Well, we have to hope that what's being promised is true,

0:32:48.510 --> 0:32:50.730
<v Speaker 5>but they're also saying it's going to have the same

0:32:51.190 --> 0:32:55.100
<v Speaker 5>water usage as your average commercial building. I find that

0:32:56.060 --> 0:33:00.510
<v Speaker 5>A questionable plan. $ 32 billion to build. Look, I think

0:33:00.550 --> 0:33:03.350
<v Speaker 5>we're going to see an attitude to data centres here

0:33:03.390 --> 0:33:06.570
<v Speaker 5>similar to what we've seen in the US, and really

0:33:06.590 --> 0:33:09.430
<v Speaker 5>the rubber hasn't hit the road yet and we don't

0:33:09.530 --> 0:33:12.340
<v Speaker 5>know what the future looks like. Everyone wants the benefits

0:33:12.380 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 5>of AI. They don't necessarily want a data centre in

0:33:16.020 --> 0:33:20.340
<v Speaker 5>their backyard for a bunch of reasons. We're going to see...

0:33:20.340 --> 0:33:24.890
<v Speaker 5>It's going to be a problematic transition, to say the least.

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:29.300
<v Speaker 1>Well, Queensland Government apparently welcoming it in through the door there,

0:33:29.300 --> 0:33:31.730
<v Speaker 1>$ 32 billion. Sean, your thoughts?

0:33:33.450 --> 0:33:36.450
<v Speaker 7>Look, I don't think people quite understand the sheer scale

0:33:36.470 --> 0:33:40.170
<v Speaker 7>of these data centres and the infrastructure that they're suggesting

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.660
<v Speaker 7>will be needed to provide the energy. And then we

0:33:42.700 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 7>talk about the energy. Chris Bowen said the National Press

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 7>Club the other day that he wants data centres to

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.260
<v Speaker 7>be 100% renewable powered. Now, I know that the Queensland

0:33:52.300 --> 0:33:54.570
<v Speaker 7>state government has pushed back on that, but I looked

0:33:54.590 --> 0:33:56.730
<v Speaker 7>at that proposal for this new data centre, and even

0:33:56.790 --> 0:33:59.410
<v Speaker 7>they're claiming that they're going to enter a purchasing agreement

0:33:59.690 --> 0:34:04.050
<v Speaker 7>and they're going to be using green intermittent swindle factories.

0:34:05.070 --> 0:34:06.050
<v Speaker 7>And I can tell you, so you look at a

0:34:06.150 --> 0:34:10.529
<v Speaker 7>one gigawatt hyperscale data centre and and they say that

0:34:10.550 --> 0:34:14.469
<v Speaker 7>they will need about 7,000 hectares of solar panels plus

0:34:14.510 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 7>a battery, and that is with additional gas for firming.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 7>7,000 hectares minimum of solar panel for one gigawatt data centre.

0:34:24.860 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 7>And you're looking at four gigalitres of groundwater a year.

0:34:28.650 --> 0:34:31.710
<v Speaker 7>So when they start saying that these are huge issues

0:34:31.810 --> 0:34:33.469
<v Speaker 7>and you know the people who are going to bear

0:34:33.489 --> 0:34:36.700
<v Speaker 7>the brunt of it, it's those solar farms, those swindle

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:40.060
<v Speaker 7>factories are not going into the city. It's rural and

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 7>regional areas. And then you can see that Labor government

0:34:44.020 --> 0:34:46.729
<v Speaker 7>clearly is looking for any excuse to continue to push

0:34:46.770 --> 0:34:49.549
<v Speaker 7>the net zero agenda to help hit those targets they set.

0:34:49.940 --> 0:34:52.219
<v Speaker 7>So I think the government's more concerned about net zero

0:34:52.260 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 7>and how this can benefit that than they are about

0:34:53.900 --> 0:34:56.989
<v Speaker 7>the actual data centres themselves. I think there's huge problems,

0:34:57.050 --> 0:34:58.550
<v Speaker 7>especially when you look at the energy factor.

0:34:58.750 --> 0:34:59.070
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:34:59.710 --> 0:35:02.750
<v Speaker 1>Again, Darren, I mean, we all certainly know the NIMBY

0:35:02.770 --> 0:35:04.710
<v Speaker 1>version of things, which is, hang on, didn't look like

0:35:04.730 --> 0:35:07.100
<v Speaker 1>that before. It looks like that now. And obviously something

0:35:07.140 --> 0:35:10.419
<v Speaker 1>that is the cost of Frankly, I think they're pretty

0:35:10.460 --> 0:35:12.439
<v Speaker 1>close to a little more than is to be spent

0:35:12.500 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>on the 2032 Olympics.

0:35:13.980 --> 0:35:16.850
<v Speaker 5>That's right, the infrastructure spend. Look, I say the same

0:35:16.870 --> 0:35:18.430
<v Speaker 5>thing that I've said for a while, and it's not,

0:35:18.489 --> 0:35:21.609
<v Speaker 5>you know, Labor policy. Unless you give cheap or free

0:35:21.670 --> 0:35:26.890
<v Speaker 5>power to people who are near this energy infrastructure, whatever

0:35:26.930 --> 0:35:29.890
<v Speaker 5>that may look like, or a data centre, they're going

0:35:29.910 --> 0:35:31.900
<v Speaker 5>to complain. They're not going to be happy about it.

0:35:32.270 --> 0:35:35.070
<v Speaker 5>And that needs to be the starting point is... giving

0:35:35.110 --> 0:35:37.950
<v Speaker 5>a better deal to those who are near that infrastructure.

0:35:38.340 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 5>If you do that, then you can bargain. But if

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.739
<v Speaker 5>they don't do that, you're going to see widespread kind

0:35:43.780 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 5>of protests and lack of support.

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.339
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but also, I mean, remember, you know, if they're

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 1>going to build a shopping centre, right, with what used

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.500
<v Speaker 1>to be not a shopping centre, well, that's because it's

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>going to produce this many jobs, right? That's always generally

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:02.230
<v Speaker 1>the trade-off, right? The disruption results in what is the benefit, right? Again...

0:36:02.770 --> 0:36:04.930
<v Speaker 1>It'll be fascinating to see how that conversation plays out

0:36:04.969 --> 0:36:06.450
<v Speaker 1>with a project as big as this. But I was

0:36:06.489 --> 0:36:09.210
<v Speaker 1>watching the Queensland Premier today and, again, this is one

0:36:09.230 --> 0:36:11.870
<v Speaker 1>of those things, right, where what's difficult, I think, for

0:36:11.890 --> 0:36:13.260
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people to get their head around, right,

0:36:13.300 --> 0:36:15.299
<v Speaker 1>which is that you'll hear people screaming, it's bad, it's bad,

0:36:15.340 --> 0:36:18.980
<v Speaker 1>it's bad. Okay, why? It's good, it's good, it's good. Okay, why?

0:36:19.660 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Is helpful.

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.529
<v Speaker 5>I'm still ambivalent, but I think it's, as Sean very

0:36:24.610 --> 0:36:28.450
<v Speaker 5>rightly pointed out, the scale of this is enormous and

0:36:28.830 --> 0:36:31.250
<v Speaker 5>getting that right is going to be a tricky exercise.

0:36:31.310 --> 0:36:33.489
<v Speaker 1>Sean, part of the job, of course, is that you

0:36:33.510 --> 0:36:36.430
<v Speaker 1>get plenty of constituents who either bar you up in

0:36:36.450 --> 0:36:38.770
<v Speaker 1>the street, send you a message, letter, all the rest

0:36:38.790 --> 0:36:40.690
<v Speaker 1>of it, right? How many do you get about the

0:36:40.770 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>aged care algorithm? Is it something that people feel powerless

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:47.900
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, that they feel that aged care is

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:51.060
<v Speaker 1>being rearranged around them, or is it a media thing?

0:36:51.460 --> 0:36:54.170
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing it's not a media thing, but what do

0:36:54.230 --> 0:36:57.150
<v Speaker 1>you get as a person who they would go to, frankly,

0:36:57.210 --> 0:37:02.180
<v Speaker 1>as a last resort because the system is so difficult?

0:37:03.900 --> 0:37:05.779
<v Speaker 7>It is a big issue. We get people reaching out

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.100
<v Speaker 7>to my office all the time. And when it becomes

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.669
<v Speaker 7>a media issue, then it also then escalates the number

0:37:10.710 --> 0:37:13.750
<v Speaker 7>of people who contact the office. And I think people

0:37:13.790 --> 0:37:16.650
<v Speaker 7>are rightfully concerned because when you read reports that the

0:37:16.710 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 7>minister has been completely blindsided by his department and he

0:37:20.900 --> 0:37:23.819
<v Speaker 7>finds out that he's going to be suddenly responsible for

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.260
<v Speaker 7>the fact that humans can't override decisions made by AI.

0:37:28.330 --> 0:37:30.589
<v Speaker 7>And I think people should be rightfully concerned about that.

0:37:30.610 --> 0:37:33.270
<v Speaker 7>And I know that the Senate, we've worked to take

0:37:33.350 --> 0:37:37.490
<v Speaker 7>steps to actually fix this. We've amended legislation that's before

0:37:37.530 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 7>the Prime Minister right now to help deal with this because,

0:37:41.340 --> 0:37:43.460
<v Speaker 7>you know, these are our most vulnerable people. And I

0:37:43.500 --> 0:37:46.540
<v Speaker 7>know that people say this is robo-debt 2.0. But if

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 7>they get this wrong, you're going to wind up with robo-death.

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 7>You know, this is the pain and stress and suffering

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 7>you're putting on elderly Australians as they're attempting to deal

0:37:54.540 --> 0:37:54.819
<v Speaker 7>with this.

0:37:55.340 --> 0:37:58.540
<v Speaker 1>It could be fatal. Yeah, I agree completely. Literally, we

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.020
<v Speaker 1>know that people have died waiting through this system. The

0:38:01.060 --> 0:38:04.780
<v Speaker 1>Four Corners report showed us that a couple of weeks ago. Darren, again,

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we certainly know that, you know, the blob goes off

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:11.339
<v Speaker 1>and makes its own decisions, but this one absolutely blindsided

0:38:11.380 --> 0:38:13.739
<v Speaker 1>the Minister that, oh, yeah, you can override it.

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:17.060
<v Speaker 5>Three days before the scheme went live, it doesn't work

0:38:17.340 --> 0:38:20.390
<v Speaker 5>in the way that we thought it might. Logically, you'd

0:38:20.450 --> 0:38:23.270
<v Speaker 5>have to think there should be some type of manual

0:38:23.469 --> 0:38:29.299
<v Speaker 5>override from human assessors, and the parliament will nut that out.

0:38:29.780 --> 0:38:33.300
<v Speaker 5>But you'd be a foolish government to not take this seriously.

0:38:33.660 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 5>If people do die as a result of your algorithm,

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 5>then it does become robo-debt.

0:38:38.820 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>There is a lawsuit which is going to play out

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>in Queensland in the next little while. Apparently, it is

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:47.430
<v Speaker 1>going to involve many people. Of the 3,000 Queensland police

0:38:47.469 --> 0:38:50.810
<v Speaker 1>officers who lost their job because they did not become

0:38:50.870 --> 0:38:57.919
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated for COVID-19, this is ludicrous, Sean, that this has

0:38:58.020 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>kept going, right? Now, at the time, it seemed very obvious,

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:08.110
<v Speaker 1>very obvious that... There didn't need to be this mandate.

0:39:08.190 --> 0:39:12.839
<v Speaker 1>And even after everyone was returned to normal, they were

0:39:12.940 --> 0:39:15.760
<v Speaker 1>still kept on the sidelines because the then Palaszczuk government

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>was particularly pig-headed about this. This is one of those

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:24.629
<v Speaker 1>hangovers from that particularly difficult time, which means these people

0:39:24.650 --> 0:39:27.390
<v Speaker 1>haven't been working since then, hence the lawsuit.

0:39:29.590 --> 0:39:29.770
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:39:30.100 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 7>You quite often hear the Labor government talk about, you know,

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 7>people wanting to cut frontline services. Well, what greater cut

0:39:35.980 --> 0:39:39.020
<v Speaker 7>to frontline services have we seen than that during COVID,

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:41.790
<v Speaker 7>where people were forced out of their job because they

0:39:41.830 --> 0:39:45.469
<v Speaker 7>refused to get an injection that I think has since

0:39:45.570 --> 0:39:48.310
<v Speaker 7>proven to be something that people shouldn't have been getting?

0:39:48.900 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 7>I mean, and look, good on Clive Palmer for going

0:39:51.260 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 7>forward with this, to helping people push forward with this,

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.339
<v Speaker 7>because how quickly we have seemed to move on, how

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.459
<v Speaker 7>quickly the government has acted like this should go away.

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we do still need a serious investigation into

0:40:03.580 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 7>what happened in COVID. I think we do need a

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:07.819
<v Speaker 7>Royal Commission. One Nation is still committed to a Royal Commission,

0:40:08.550 --> 0:40:10.710
<v Speaker 7>because unless we get to the bottom of it, you know,

0:40:10.790 --> 0:40:13.350
<v Speaker 7>things like this, how is it still dragging on? I mean,

0:40:13.390 --> 0:40:17.450
<v Speaker 7>these police officers, they need to be compensated or give

0:40:17.469 --> 0:40:18.129
<v Speaker 7>them back their jobs.

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, look, you know, at risk of the

0:40:20.780 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 1>inevitable thousands of emails I'm about to get, right? I

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:25.890
<v Speaker 1>disagree with you about something that wasn't needed to be taken.

0:40:25.950 --> 0:40:29.930
<v Speaker 1>But the idea that once that moment had passed, once

0:40:29.969 --> 0:40:33.300
<v Speaker 1>we got to 96% of people who were taking it,

0:40:33.330 --> 0:40:36.049
<v Speaker 1>if you remain somebody who wanted to object to it, well,

0:40:36.110 --> 0:40:37.730
<v Speaker 1>there was a system where, oh, you've got to wait

0:40:37.750 --> 0:40:40.260
<v Speaker 1>a little while, then everyone gets to play back together.

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>When everyone got back to play back together, and again,

0:40:42.540 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I know the timelines are so damn important here, that's

0:40:44.940 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>when those officers should have been back. Straight away, at

0:40:47.140 --> 0:40:48.420
<v Speaker 1>that moment, they should have been back.

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:54.259
<v Speaker 5>Studied cinema studies, Paul. Thankfully not the law degree. But look,

0:40:54.700 --> 0:40:56.890
<v Speaker 5>it's a serious issue. It's very serious for the people

0:40:56.910 --> 0:40:58.650
<v Speaker 5>who have not been able to get work ever since.

0:40:59.410 --> 0:41:01.190
<v Speaker 5>As you rightly point out, it was trying to get

0:41:01.230 --> 0:41:04.589
<v Speaker 5>that sort of immunise the herd to 90% and then

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.410
<v Speaker 5>the rest can kind of take care of itself. Lawyers

0:41:07.430 --> 0:41:09.299
<v Speaker 5>will sort this out, but it does seem like they've

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 5>been hard done by.

0:41:10.140 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Appreciate it, lads. Senator, future senator, former senator,

0:41:13.540 --> 0:41:16.460
<v Speaker 1>current senator, I do appreciate everyone here. All right, just

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:17.820
<v Speaker 1>give me everyone the job and then I took it

0:41:17.860 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>away from you, Darren. Quick break. Back with more Megyn

0:41:20.140 --> 0:41:22.299
<v Speaker 1>Kelly in a moment or two's time because guess what?

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Harry and Megyn have pulled the kids out of school

0:41:25.260 --> 0:41:28.700
<v Speaker 1>after just two days back in the UK. Come on.

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 1>It's our favourite time of the week to talk to

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:36.219
<v Speaker 1>our favourite person in the world, the one, the only,

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:38.180
<v Speaker 1>the wonderful Megan Kelly. Megan, lovely to see you.

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:39.980
<v Speaker 2>It's so good to be with you.

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:43.180
<v Speaker 1>So what a surprise that Harry and Megan, as soon

0:41:43.219 --> 0:41:46.460
<v Speaker 1>as they're back in the UK, the drama begins. They

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>pulled their kids out of school after just two days.

0:41:51.380 --> 0:41:55.830
<v Speaker 2>OMG. Who doesn't research what kind of a commute will

0:41:55.870 --> 0:41:58.270
<v Speaker 2>we have? Does that work for our family? Does the

0:41:58.310 --> 0:42:00.450
<v Speaker 2>timing work? Does the route work? And if you're a

0:42:00.469 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 2>public person, is it safe and everything's kosher with the kids?

0:42:05.020 --> 0:42:08.379
<v Speaker 2>Not these two. No, apparently not. Unless this is all

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 2>some big lie and what happened was the first two

0:42:11.219 --> 0:42:13.489
<v Speaker 2>days they didn't get enough attention and they find another

0:42:13.510 --> 0:42:15.870
<v Speaker 2>school where they're going to feel like bigger fish in

0:42:15.890 --> 0:42:18.609
<v Speaker 2>a smaller pond. That could also be possible with these

0:42:18.630 --> 0:42:21.969
<v Speaker 2>two losers. So they, first of all, they've been there

0:42:22.010 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 2>for about two minutes and all they've done is cause drama.

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, the king wrote that letter saying to everybody

0:42:28.219 --> 0:42:31.339
<v Speaker 2>in England, they're just private citizens now and you should

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:33.850
<v Speaker 2>treat them like private citizens. They're, you know, they are

0:42:33.890 --> 0:42:36.910
<v Speaker 2>technically royals, but they're not working royals. So in response

0:42:36.950 --> 0:42:39.109
<v Speaker 2>to all of the incoming requests we've had about like,

0:42:39.370 --> 0:42:41.210
<v Speaker 2>how do we treat them? Or is this like another,

0:42:41.450 --> 0:42:43.910
<v Speaker 2>are they on par with Wills and Kate? No, the

0:42:43.950 --> 0:42:46.299
<v Speaker 2>answer is no. Nothing's changed from their status six years

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:49.899
<v Speaker 2>ago when they Meg-cited. It's private citizens who just happen

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:53.500
<v Speaker 2>to have some royal titles, but that's it. And those

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 2>two had to throw a fit. God forbid they just

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:59.500
<v Speaker 2>let the king's, you know, edict stand. He's the king,

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:02.310
<v Speaker 2>after all. They've got to make sure they, through their

0:43:02.350 --> 0:43:06.130
<v Speaker 2>press people, release to everybody, we don't like the term

0:43:06.350 --> 0:43:09.590
<v Speaker 2>public citizens or private citizens. We want to be called

0:43:09.910 --> 0:43:13.370
<v Speaker 2>public figures. That's how we should be thought of and

0:43:13.450 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 2>referred to. This is unbelievable that they thought that was

0:43:16.700 --> 0:43:21.020
<v Speaker 2>a nit worth raising as an objection. For the past

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 2>six years, they've been trying to tell us all they

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:26.430
<v Speaker 2>want is privacy. We want privacy. You know, the South

0:43:26.450 --> 0:43:28.650
<v Speaker 2>Park thing. It's a lie. We all knew it was

0:43:28.690 --> 0:43:30.589
<v Speaker 2>a lie, but even now they are saying it was

0:43:30.630 --> 0:43:33.350
<v Speaker 2>a lie. They don't want to be private citizens, and

0:43:33.390 --> 0:43:36.469
<v Speaker 2>in fact, they find the term offensive. So we have

0:43:36.510 --> 0:43:41.750
<v Speaker 2>to make sure we refer to them as public figures, a.k.a. celebrities.

0:43:41.790 --> 0:43:43.969
<v Speaker 2>That's really what they're trying to say. Okay, so the

0:43:44.469 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 2>king gets his hand slapped. in trying to say what's

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be what for the royal family. Then they're like,

0:43:51.540 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 2>he didn't run the letter by us. That's because he's

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 2>the king and you are a loser from deal or

0:43:57.180 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 2>no deal. You are never going to get the memo

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 2>run by you.

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:05.690
<v Speaker 1>Now, from one glamour couple to another, let's talk about

0:44:05.770 --> 0:44:09.590
<v Speaker 1>in California, Kamala Harris, the former senator, former vice president,

0:44:09.630 --> 0:44:13.469
<v Speaker 1>former loser to Donald Trump, and Gavin Newsom, the current

0:44:13.610 --> 0:44:17.299
<v Speaker 1>governor and potential presidential candidate who thinks that he can

0:44:17.340 --> 0:44:22.500
<v Speaker 1>beat J.D. Vance. But he's decided to say no. I'm

0:44:22.540 --> 0:44:25.420
<v Speaker 1>not going to run if Kamala runs because, of course,

0:44:26.100 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>after you, darling. I think this is a bit of

0:44:28.660 --> 0:44:31.259
<v Speaker 1>4D chess and the fact that it happened while he

0:44:31.300 --> 0:44:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was talking to a CNN reporter while fishing.

0:44:33.780 --> 0:44:37.870
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my God. The Democrats are still trying to act

0:44:37.890 --> 0:44:41.549
<v Speaker 2>like men. They have to study it and then act it.

0:44:42.130 --> 0:44:46.210
<v Speaker 2>You know, like most real men wake up. just being

0:44:46.290 --> 0:44:50.490
<v Speaker 2>men and then live their days as men full of testosterone,

0:44:50.870 --> 0:44:55.859
<v Speaker 2>sometimes aggressive, sometimes angry, sometimes sweet, but like, they don't

0:44:55.920 --> 0:45:00.380
<v Speaker 2>have to think about like, how do I project manly today?

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:07.990
<v Speaker 2>It just happens. Only these two, like honestly, Gavin Newsom,

0:45:08.610 --> 0:45:11.469
<v Speaker 2>like he might be more woman than I am with

0:45:11.489 --> 0:45:15.350
<v Speaker 2>the perfect hair and the chiseled jaw and his perfect

0:45:15.390 --> 0:45:20.020
<v Speaker 2>little outfits and you know, his little magazine spreads, like

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 2>truly magazine spreads like this and children of the rich,

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:27.380
<v Speaker 2>you know, his little image is so curated. He's definitely

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 2>way more vain than your average woman. And so because

0:45:31.219 --> 0:45:33.500
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats don't understand how to be a man, he

0:45:33.540 --> 0:45:37.410
<v Speaker 2>decides to go out fly fishing. And Jake Tapper decides

0:45:37.450 --> 0:45:40.150
<v Speaker 2>to go on this adventure with him, suffering from some

0:45:40.170 --> 0:45:43.629
<v Speaker 2>of the same problems. And they have their little fake

0:45:43.670 --> 0:45:47.400
<v Speaker 2>conversation in the river as they cast for their fly fish.

0:45:47.940 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 2>And I'd love, I wish I could like ask them,

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:52.739
<v Speaker 2>what bait are you using? What flies are those? What

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:55.060
<v Speaker 2>are you fishing for? I guarantee you neither one can

0:45:55.100 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 2>answer either question, not a chance. And probably right off

0:45:59.590 --> 0:46:05.790
<v Speaker 2>screen is the guide with the net who baits it up, right?

0:46:06.469 --> 0:46:10.110
<v Speaker 2>I've been there, but I don't pretend to be a fisherman. Anyway,

0:46:10.130 --> 0:46:12.870
<v Speaker 2>I guarantee if you zoomed out, that's what you'd see.

0:46:12.890 --> 0:46:17.020
<v Speaker 2>That's a very funny image. Anywho, So he gets out,

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:19.260
<v Speaker 2>he does make some news, which was of course planned.

0:46:19.900 --> 0:46:21.620
<v Speaker 2>And Gavin Newsom says, I'm not going to run if

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris runs. Of course, it'd be a nightmare. What

0:46:23.660 --> 0:46:25.180
<v Speaker 2>am I going to do? Like, I'm not going to

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:27.529
<v Speaker 2>do that to you, Jake Tapper, which was kind of

0:46:27.570 --> 0:46:29.989
<v Speaker 2>a funny slip. Jake's like, I don't care what you do.

0:46:30.010 --> 0:46:32.270
<v Speaker 2>You know, sure, sure. He means you're a fellow Democrat. Like,

0:46:32.310 --> 0:46:34.270
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to do that to you. And he's

0:46:34.330 --> 0:46:36.390
<v Speaker 2>clearly trying to clear the field. He's basically trying to

0:46:36.410 --> 0:46:39.170
<v Speaker 2>get his rich donors to go to Kamala. It's either

0:46:39.230 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 2>you or Gavin. Democrats are twice bitten four times shy,

0:46:43.340 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 2>I guess, because they tried Hillary. They tried Kamala. Both

0:46:47.460 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 2>ended in a disaster. Both were against Trump. Both thought

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:54.899
<v Speaker 2>that they could beat, you know, that he was so

0:46:54.980 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 2>abhorrent and terrible that they could beat Trump. And both

0:46:57.640 --> 0:47:00.940
<v Speaker 2>got totally walloped by him. So they don't want to

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:02.660
<v Speaker 2>do this again, right? This is not going to be

0:47:02.700 --> 0:47:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Trump this time, but it's going to be a Trump disciple,

0:47:04.410 --> 0:47:07.690
<v Speaker 2>probably J.D. And they I don't think the Democrats are

0:47:07.830 --> 0:47:09.930
<v Speaker 2>of the mind at all to run a woman again.

0:47:11.190 --> 0:47:13.790
<v Speaker 2>What they're saying is they'd rather have a white guy.

0:47:14.230 --> 0:47:17.670
<v Speaker 2>And if you could be a Christian, so much the better. Like,

0:47:18.250 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 2>they just want to win. They are so sad about

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:24.339
<v Speaker 2>being out of power and letting Trumpism take over.

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:24.820
<v Speaker 1>MAGA.

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:27.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think they'd much rather go with Gavin Newsom.

0:47:28.380 --> 0:47:31.660
<v Speaker 2>He's new blood. He looks the part. They haven't tried

0:47:31.700 --> 0:47:34.609
<v Speaker 2>with him twice and lost, as Jake Tapper points out

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:37.089
<v Speaker 2>to Gavin. And no sooner does Gavin say, oh, I'm

0:47:37.110 --> 0:47:37.569
<v Speaker 2>not going to do that.

0:47:37.590 --> 0:47:37.930
<v Speaker 7>I'm not going to.

0:47:37.930 --> 0:47:39.870
<v Speaker 2>And Jake says, well, she ran twice and lost and

0:47:39.890 --> 0:47:41.570
<v Speaker 2>you haven't tried. He's like, oh, that's a good point.

0:47:42.010 --> 0:47:46.109
<v Speaker 2>You got a point there. Oh, did anyone else hear

0:47:46.150 --> 0:47:49.810
<v Speaker 2>Jake Tapper's point? Clearly he wants to run. And I

0:47:49.850 --> 0:47:51.350
<v Speaker 2>think this is a good way of getting the word

0:47:51.390 --> 0:47:53.879
<v Speaker 2>out to all the rich donors that Get rid of her.

0:47:54.260 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Make it clear for me so that all the black

0:47:56.540 --> 0:47:59.950
<v Speaker 2>female voters in this party don't hate my guts. I

0:47:59.989 --> 0:48:04.790
<v Speaker 2>have to telegraph that I'm being reluctantly drafted because, but

0:48:04.810 --> 0:48:08.170
<v Speaker 2>I was totally ready to cede to the queen, Kamala.

0:48:09.570 --> 0:48:12.010
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Megan. We'll see you again next week. Before

0:48:12.070 --> 0:48:14.250
<v Speaker 1>we are done and the late debate is just seconds away,

0:48:14.489 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>while you were working. Just enough time to show you

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the stupid social media videos made by the

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:27.100
<v Speaker 1>people who make up our federal parliament. This one is

0:48:27.160 --> 0:48:29.610
<v Speaker 1>a Labor senator. She's so clever.

0:48:31.110 --> 0:48:33.570
<v Speaker 3>Thought I'd give kicking a can down the road a

0:48:33.610 --> 0:48:37.129
<v Speaker 3>try since One Nation make it look so easy. They

0:48:37.170 --> 0:48:39.410
<v Speaker 3>think it's okay to take money out of your super

0:48:39.450 --> 0:48:42.220
<v Speaker 3>now even though it'll make you poorer in retirement.

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.399
<v Speaker 1>They aren't taking money out of your super. The idea

0:48:46.420 --> 0:48:48.170
<v Speaker 1>is that you would be able to get access to

0:48:48.430 --> 0:48:50.570
<v Speaker 1>your money, Senator. See you tomorrow.