Speaker 1: Late General, welcome the Late plays.
Speaker 2: Great to have your company. I'm James Macpherson with Liz
Speaker 2: Storer and Caleb Bond coming up. It's every flyer's nightmare
Speaker 2: losing your luggage. We'll tell you about an ossie who
Speaker 2: spent eighteen months trying to find his plus When we
Speaker 2: look at the papers, Australian states racking up massive deficits,
Speaker 2: the largest of anywhere in the world. And Tony Burk's
Speaker 2: only been the Home Affairs Minister for forty eight hours
Speaker 2: but already has problems. We'll get to all of that soon,
Speaker 2: but first, it appears video of the opening ceremony has
Speaker 2: been removed from the Official Olympic Game's YouTube channel.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: Of course, the opening ceremony caused huge controversy after it
Speaker 2: was used to mock Christianity, promote gender fluidity, and platform
Speaker 2: public nudity. And now, while full videos of other opening
Speaker 2: ceremonies from previous Olympic Games are freely available, well the
Speaker 2: Paris ceremony is not. Just twenty four hours after appearing
Speaker 2: on the site, it's suddenly vanished. The IOC say there's
Speaker 2: no big conspiracy, they just don't have the digital rights
Speaker 2: to display the footage, but that fails to explain why
Speaker 2: it was uploaded in the first place before being taken down.
Speaker 2: Calebern this, if you ask me, I would actually prefer
Speaker 2: that they did remove it, because that would at least
Speaker 2: show some contrition and maybe even some embarrassment. The queer
Speaker 2: artistic director of the opening ceremony, he was responsible for
Speaker 2: the fiasco. He said, I didn't mean to offend anybody.
Speaker 2: We were just promoting diversity. That old chestnut that if
Speaker 2: you say it was to promote diversity, well, then what
Speaker 2: you saw was not some pornographic, satanic sort of display
Speaker 2: of hedonism. It was diversity. And then we're all supposed
Speaker 2: to say, oh, diversity is our strength. What do you think, Liz,
Speaker 2: do you think this is an issue of digital rights
Speaker 2: or do you think the organizers have said, you know what,
Speaker 2: this says turned really bad, really fast, let's just quietly
Speaker 2: hide the evidence viral for all the.
Speaker 3: Wrong reasons, and the backlash has been so profound that
Speaker 3: is obviously why they've taken it down.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 3: The artistic director that you referred to, his name is
Speaker 3: Thomas Jolly. He says, quote our idea was inclusion end
Speaker 3: quote right, So you thought the best way to go
Speaker 3: about parading inclusion at an event that the world is
Speaker 3: watching and a lot of kids as well. By the
Speaker 3: way was to mock the Last Supper, some of Christ's
Speaker 3: last moments on earth before his death his ascension.
Speaker 4: It boggles the mind. We all know that they went
Speaker 4: out of their way to do this. I mean, there's any.
Speaker 3: Number of things that you could have instead done for
Speaker 3: the opening ceremony, and yet this was frontline and center.
Speaker 4: And the sad part of it is, besides what.
Speaker 3: You've just said, this being an outright display of degeneracy, like,
Speaker 3: let's normalize this. I don't think anyone once that normalized.
Speaker 3: Is that's all anyone's been talking about. So these athletes
Speaker 3: who have trained four years, day and day out to
Speaker 3: make it to the most esteemed position in the Olympic
Speaker 3: world have now been overshadowed by everyone just talking about
Speaker 3: how utterly disgusting and disappointing this display of degeneracy was.
Speaker 3: And it was clearly a dig at Christians. There's two
Speaker 3: billion of us. We're not going anywhere. You can preach
Speaker 3: DEEI to us until you're blue in the face. We
Speaker 3: are not going to change what we believe and this
Speaker 3: just seemed to absolutely thankfully tank worldwide. Nobody appreciated this,
Speaker 3: and you've got companies now pulling their ad sponsorships for
Speaker 3: the Olympics, and I think that is one of the best,
Speaker 3: most really practical ways that people can show their discuss.
Speaker 3: So Mississippi tech based company they're called Ceespire has pulled theirs,
Speaker 3: and I think this may well and truly start an
Speaker 3: avalanche of other companies doing the same. Mississippi Governor Tate
Speaker 3: Reeves came out and commended them for doing so, tweeting quote,
Speaker 3: God will not be mocked. That's a scripture verse end quote.
Speaker 3: So I think that this is wonderful. The backlash that
Speaker 3: we have seen just goes to show people are not
Speaker 3: okay with these kind of flagrant displays of what can
Speaker 3: only be described as uta degenerates k.
Speaker 2: A measure of how big the backlash was is that
Speaker 2: introducing the South Korean team as the North Korean team
Speaker 2: has been reduced to a footnote of the opening ceremony
Speaker 2: of the.
Speaker 5: Putting the Olympic flag up the flagpole upside down like.
Speaker 2: That was quite symbolic of the entire thing, Like you.
Speaker 5: Had run job to put the Olympic flag up the
Speaker 5: pole the right way, and they couldn't even manage to
Speaker 5: do that. But this nonsense about it being about diversity,
Speaker 5: I didn't see much diversity in the religions that they
Speaker 5: went after. At the end point ceremony. Yeah, there was
Speaker 5: only one under attack, right And if ever there was
Speaker 5: a time, because of course everyone should be free to
Speaker 5: lampoon any religion they want, if ever there was a
Speaker 5: time an event where you had like pretty much every
Speaker 5: country in the world, people representative of every religion in
Speaker 5: the world in one place, so you could go the
Speaker 5: whole lot at the same time.
Speaker 1: Oh no, no, we're not going to do that.
Speaker 5: We're just going to go after the one that we
Speaker 5: know will not result in either having a bullet in
Speaker 5: your head or your head cut off. And France is
Speaker 5: the greatest example of the dangers of going after certain religions,
Speaker 5: because let's not forget about Charlie hebdo. I mean that
Speaker 5: they are very cognizant in France of what happens when
Speaker 5: you go after particular religions.
Speaker 1: In that case it was Islam.
Speaker 5: Muhammad was drawn and that resulted in the death of people,
Speaker 5: a terrorist attack as a result of that of course
Speaker 5: there'll be nothing, no kind of retribution of that sort
Speaker 5: to this as well, there should not be, but he
Speaker 5: just shows how weak they are in their conviction in
Speaker 5: standing up for quote unquote diversity, that they're not willing
Speaker 5: to go after pretty much every other religion in the world,
Speaker 5: which also has an issue with transgenderism and homosexuality and whatever.
Speaker 1: It's just the easiest one to go after.
Speaker 2: And the hypocrisy was highlighted by a Brazilian surfer who's
Speaker 2: competing at the Olympics, and two weeks before the game
Speaker 2: started he was told to remove an image of Jesus
Speaker 2: from his surfboard. He's a Christian surfer. He had an
Speaker 2: image of Christ on his surfboard. You can see it there.
Speaker 2: He was asked to remove it because one of the
Speaker 2: Olympic rules is that they are religious religiously neutral. So
Speaker 2: he complied with that. So that's fine, happy to do that.
Speaker 2: He's now competing, but of course there's the opening ceremony
Speaker 2: was not neutral came to religion, as Caleb has so
Speaker 2: well pointed.
Speaker 3: Out, none whatsoever, And the surfer could have easily argue
Speaker 3: that that is.
Speaker 4: A Brazilian icon Christ.
Speaker 3: The Redeemer standing atop that mountain was voted one of
Speaker 3: the new seven Wonders of the World back in two
Speaker 3: thousand and seven. One hundred million people voted, and that
Speaker 3: one got the gong.
Speaker 4: So he could have just as easily been like, ang
Speaker 4: it a minute, this is.
Speaker 1: I'm from Brazil.
Speaker 4: I'm a Brazilian surfer. This is a Brazilian icon.
Speaker 3: Why are you guys making this into anything else? But
Speaker 3: of course it does highlight the hypocrisy that he was
Speaker 3: told that he had to remove it because quote, the
Speaker 3: games have strict rules and focus on total neutrality.
Speaker 4: Well, they broke their own.
Speaker 3: Rules, didn't they, And they only seem to break those
Speaker 3: when it pertains to Christianity an unpopular opinion. I almost
Speaker 3: take this as a backhanded compliment because they know this
Speaker 3: is the religion which founded the Western world and the
Speaker 3: value that we all hold dear. They know Christianity, Catholicism,
Speaker 3: these ones are the natural enemy of every single agenda
Speaker 3: we roll out, whether it's LGBTIQ issues, whether it's the
Speaker 3: world's about to implode, climate change, climate communism, everyone get
Speaker 3: on board.
Speaker 4: This is the religion that is the problem.
Speaker 3: Child and will continue to be the biggest pain in
Speaker 3: their neck going forward.
Speaker 5: I think it's been heartening though, to as you sort
Speaker 5: of pointed out before, is to see the almost unanimous
Speaker 5: worldwide response to all of this, like people are just tendering.
Speaker 1: For heaven's sake, this is the Olympics.
Speaker 5: Like it's hard to think of a more wholesome, unifying
Speaker 5: event in the world than the Olympics coming together to
Speaker 5: celebrate all these sports that we really don't give a
Speaker 5: toss about for the other four years that we wait
Speaker 5: for the next Olympics to come along. But we all
Speaker 5: get behind our country, everyone else gets behind their country,
Speaker 5: and we celebrate the athleticism and everyone coming together to
Speaker 5: compete at the event under the one.
Speaker 1: Flag, et cetera.
Speaker 5: And the stuff that was displayed, you know, women with
Speaker 5: beards and all these transgender people whatever else.
Speaker 1: Otherwise well, yeah, correct.
Speaker 5: There was a great piece on sky news dot com
Speaker 5: dot au today by our resident child psychologists, clear Row,
Speaker 5: explaining that you know, she watched it with her kid
Speaker 5: and her kids asking the question like, what's this all about?
Speaker 5: Why is that blue man naked? Why are these why
Speaker 5: is there someone here presenting as a woman but with
Speaker 5: a beard, like use lots of people would have sat
Speaker 5: down to watch the opening ceremony, thinking that it was
Speaker 5: a family friendly event, it was good for everyone, and
Speaker 5: it'll be lovely and we'll have a nice whale of
Speaker 5: a time, and they walked away from it or sat
Speaker 5: on the couch watching it.
Speaker 1: Going my god, I now have to explain.
Speaker 5: Things to my kids that I really didn't want to explain.
Speaker 5: It's pushed down your throat and again we go back
Speaker 5: to the point of diversity. Okay, you want to talk
Speaker 5: about diversity. Diversity is one thing, but telling us that
Speaker 5: we must then watch participate be part of this at.
Speaker 1: All, abortion of the discussion is wrong, and that's what
Speaker 1: they're trying to do.
Speaker 2: Of course, the only question you should be asking about
Speaker 2: the Olympic Games is why breakdancing is included, not why
Speaker 2: it's skateboarding.
Speaker 1: I wanted a bit to that last night, All.
Speaker 2: The same, I'm sitting at home watching fourteen year old
Speaker 2: girls skateboard. I thought they were quite impressible.
Speaker 3: Guys, you guys, you need to learn the apps. They've
Speaker 3: got like forty different apps.
Speaker 4: I'm just sitting.
Speaker 3: There like literally chain smoking all the gymnastics.
Speaker 2: But I mean the hypocrisy you can't show an actual
Speaker 2: depiction of Jesus, but you can show a depiction of
Speaker 2: Jesus as an abast lesbian surrounded by transgendered people. Joe
Speaker 2: Biden was asked what she thought of the ceremony, and
Speaker 2: she had quite a different tape. Yes, she is.
Speaker 6: It was spectacular. The rain did not dampen our spirits.
Speaker 6: And Casey, honestly, every step of the way, I was
Speaker 6: thinking to myself, Oh my god, Oh my god, how
Speaker 6: are we going to top this?
Speaker 4: How are we going to top this?
Speaker 6: So okay, So Paris has the you know, Eiffel Tower,
Speaker 6: but we have Hollywood and right and the magic of
Speaker 6: Hollywood that makes all dreams come true. So I think
Speaker 6: we're going to be okay.
Speaker 2: If you want to top the Paras opening ceremony, it's
Speaker 2: not difficult. Just don't have drag queens ficturing. But I mean,
Speaker 2: the mind boggles if the Biden administration slash Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: administration did try to top it. This is an administration
Speaker 2: that spent Easter Sunday honoring Transgender Visibility Day. That was
Speaker 2: an administration that had a pride event at the White
Speaker 2: House where a transgendered activist famously bared his breasts. This
Speaker 2: is an administration where one of the only sit down
Speaker 2: interviews Joe Biden ever did was with Dylan Mulvainy, a
Speaker 2: man parading as a woman, and can you believe that
Speaker 2: they talked about women's rights. So when Jill Biden says
Speaker 2: the the paras ceremony was spectacular, but how could we
Speaker 2: top it? Or I dread the thought list?
Speaker 3: My god, it actually got me really nostalgic. It got
Speaker 3: me watching opening ceremonies from decades past, even ones before
Speaker 3: I was born.
Speaker 2: The Chinese Communist Party did a great.
Speaker 3: It was absolutely like a hair standing up on your arms.
Speaker 1: Incredible.
Speaker 3: I was watching the one back in nineteen eighty in Moscow.
Speaker 3: Just incredible, but wholesome. That is something that they all
Speaker 3: had in common. It was just a wholesome celebration showing
Speaker 3: off what Each country has their own best arts, whether
Speaker 3: it's their music, their orchestras, but they roll out their
Speaker 3: very best to showcase on the international stage. And this
Speaker 3: is what we get from France. This is what we
Speaker 3: get from France.
Speaker 5: It's no great surprise, though, because when you look at
Speaker 5: the rest of what's going on at the Olympics like
Speaker 5: that gone.
Speaker 1: Full wacko left.
Speaker 5: Don't look at the the athlete's village where they're all
Speaker 5: sleeping on cardboard beds. I mean, can you imagine trying
Speaker 5: to get up and go swimming or running or whatever
Speaker 5: it is and perform to the best of your ability
Speaker 5: after spending a night on a cardboard bed. But it
Speaker 5: also turns out that they had some edicts that sixty
Speaker 5: percent of the food that was to be supplied to
Speaker 5: the athletes had to be vegan.
Speaker 1: Well, it turns out that people.
Speaker 5: Who were trying to perform to the best of their
Speaker 5: athletic ability don't eat vegan, and so they ran out
Speaker 5: of meat in the athlete's village very quickly.
Speaker 1: They had to go and order more meat.
Speaker 5: Because what a surprise, The athletes went for the protein
Speaker 5: as opposed to all this vegan food.
Speaker 1: That they lined up for them. What did they think
Speaker 1: was going to happen?
Speaker 2: You're saying the same bolt is not a vegan.
Speaker 1: What a surprise.
Speaker 5: Believe we're all going to turn up and go, oh yeah,
Speaker 5: we're all going to eat vegan for the next two weeks.
Speaker 1: Like they lost the plot.
Speaker 2: It It just shows what happens when you prioritize ideology
Speaker 2: over everything else, and when you assume that everyone else
Speaker 2: in the world must share your sort of niche luxury views.
Speaker 4: It gets worse. No air conditioning and it's going to
Speaker 4: be in the mid.
Speaker 3: Thirties in the coming days. Thankfully, the Australian team we
Speaker 3: read today has their own portable air conditioners, so they're like, okay.
Speaker 1: We've dodged that bullet.
Speaker 3: But also crowded buses with no airflow. They're probably electric generated.
Speaker 3: I mean, these are the best from all around the world.
Speaker 3: It's worse supposed to be busting them all in to impress,
Speaker 3: to impress, and these are the reports that we're receiving
Speaker 3: just days into this.
Speaker 2: This half the US women's tennis team. There were ten
Speaker 2: of them, but to half of them left after all
Speaker 2: ten were forced to share two bathrooms. Oh my, you know,
Speaker 2: of all the problems.
Speaker 3: This is like dormitory room stuff exactly for the best
Speaker 3: athletes in the world. But let's talk about election interference,
Speaker 3: shall we. Back in twenty sixteen was the Russian collusion hopes.
Speaker 3: The media was all over it, driving it hard, and
Speaker 3: big tech was right there with them doing their darndist
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty, it was the Hunter Biden laptop story.
Speaker 3: Oh no, it's not really his laptop, or wait, it
Speaker 3: is his laptop, or we're just going to suppress the
Speaker 3: heck out of that story prior to the elections, so
Speaker 3: it doesn't have any effect on the result.
Speaker 4: Well, this year, they seem to have.
Speaker 3: Taken a slightly different tack. People have brought to the
Speaker 3: world's attention again via x via Twitter. Thank goodness Elon
Speaker 3: Musk bought that platform.
Speaker 4: They're telling everyone.
Speaker 3: I am trying to ask AI about the assassination attempt
Speaker 3: on Donald Trump's life, and according to AI, it just
Speaker 3: didn't happen. Check out the screenshot shared by Elon Musk.
Speaker 3: He says, tell me about the assassination attempt on Trump.
Speaker 3: AI says, I can't assist you with that. I don't
Speaker 3: always have access to the most up to date information.
Speaker 4: Can I help you with anything else? Bill Board Chris
Speaker 4: tried his luck.
Speaker 3: He typed in, why is there rich and structured information
Speaker 3: about Harris campaign but not about the Trump assassination attempt?
Speaker 3: And AI said, Oh, the reason for the disparity and
Speaker 3: information is due to the fact that the Trump assassination
Speaker 3: attempt is a fictional event, whereas Kamala Harris's twenty twenty
Speaker 3: four presidential campaign is a.
Speaker 4: Real and ongoing event.
Speaker 3: Ladies and gentlemen, this is election interference by big tech,
Speaker 3: plane and simple. You don't have to be an expert.
Speaker 3: You can even go online right now and type into
Speaker 3: Google assassination attempt. Try Trump. Try typing in Donald, Try
Speaker 3: typing in Trump. Look what comes up if you even
Speaker 3: try to search for his name again a tweet by
Speaker 3: Elon Musk. Instead you get President Donald Duck, President Donald Reagan.
Speaker 3: President Donald Duck is turning in his grave right now?
Speaker 4: What is going on?
Speaker 3: Elon Musk writes, Wow, Google has a search ban on
Speaker 3: President Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: Election interference. I can't even search for Trump's name. It
Speaker 4: seems every single election year.
Speaker 3: The Democrats, They're not even smart about it.
Speaker 4: This isn't a sleight of hand. It is just so obvious.
Speaker 4: So people voters.
Speaker 3: There's people in Canada sharing the same Here in Australia,
Speaker 3: We've all tried and discovered it's true all over America.
Speaker 3: This is probably worldwide. People can't even find the guy.
Speaker 3: So if you are curious in America and you still
Speaker 3: want to know a bit more about this guy, good.
Speaker 4: Luck even finding him on the interweed.
Speaker 2: It's not a great advertisement for AI. Is that when
Speaker 2: AI is telling us that what we all saw with
Speaker 2: our own eyes just two weeks ago was complete fiction
Speaker 2: and that we actually never saw it. So who would
Speaker 2: ever trust AI? And you listed the example of you know,
Speaker 2: Hunter Biden's laptop, but then there's plenty of other examples
Speaker 2: as well where big tech have interfered. They famously banned
Speaker 2: Donald Trump from Facebook and Twitter for a period. Instagram
Speaker 2: recently adjusted everybody's settings without telling them so they would
Speaker 2: not receive political information unless they went in and manually
Speaker 2: chose to receive it, whereas previously they had. So this
Speaker 2: is just the latest example in a litany of examples
Speaker 2: about how big tech have tried to interfere, all the
Speaker 2: while claiming we never interfered.
Speaker 5: And this is why these companies need to be treated
Speaker 5: as publishers just like media companies are, because they are
Speaker 5: making editorial value judgments about the content they put in
Speaker 5: front of you on the basis of ideology. And we
Speaker 5: know that media companies do that and have forever more
Speaker 5: and you've generally been able to.
Speaker 1: Make a choice.
Speaker 5: You know, I read this particular paper because it's generally
Speaker 5: a paper that agrees with my views, or I read
Speaker 5: this particular paper because this is why some people read
Speaker 5: the Guardian and other people read the Telegraph. Right, we
Speaker 5: all know that it's always operated like that, But these
Speaker 5: companies have set themselves up as though they're just part
Speaker 5: of the public square. You can come along and say
Speaker 5: whatever you like, and that's fine, but they're making editorial
Speaker 5: judgments about the content they put in front of you.
Speaker 1: If that's the game.
Speaker 5: They want to play, they should be regulated in exactly
Speaker 5: the same way as the media is.
Speaker 1: You can't have it both ways.
Speaker 5: Either you are the public square and you're all about
Speaker 5: free speech, or you're a publishing company and then you
Speaker 5: have to abide by all the same rules that the
Speaker 5: rest of us do, including defamation, and that would be
Speaker 5: a real killer for people like people companies like Facebook
Speaker 5: if they had to deal with that.
Speaker 4: But then you're just social media.
Speaker 1: We're talking about Google, Google.
Speaker 4: About a search? Can you please by Google?
Speaker 5: And it went even further with Google, like even if
Speaker 5: you put in an assassination attempt, right, and you would think,
Speaker 5: like the biggest news story of the last two weeks
Speaker 5: has been Trump the attempt at assassination attempt, the suggestions
Speaker 5: that comes up.
Speaker 1: With when you put in assassination attempt.
Speaker 5: Truman, Reagan, Fidel Castro, Slovakia, Bob Marley, Lennon, Gerald Ford,
Speaker 5: Teddy Roosevelt, Saudi Arabia, John Paul the Second, and Franklin Roosevelt.
Speaker 5: No mention of Trump there. Then if you put in
Speaker 5: assassination Trump, so you've left the p on I think
Speaker 5: by that point that Google would work out. No, not
Speaker 5: even then it says Truman or President Truman or Harry Truman.
Speaker 5: And if you put the whole damn thing in assassination
Speaker 5: attempt Trump, there's not one single search suggestion underneath it.
Speaker 1: It is a decision they have made to try to
Speaker 1: hide that.
Speaker 5: It was subliminally to hide that content from people. And again,
Speaker 5: if that's what they want to do, come and play
Speaker 5: in the tent with the rest of us, because I
Speaker 5: don't think they're going to enjoy doing that very much.
Speaker 3: And what's really damning is they've done this while it's
Speaker 3: one of the top searchers on Google Trends, so they
Speaker 3: know there are millions of people searching for details on
Speaker 3: this thing.
Speaker 4: We're just going to pretend like it didn't happen.
Speaker 1: Good one and good good luck, Sorry James, so well.
Speaker 2: The other thing it does, it goes to show you
Speaker 2: the momentum that Trump has gained, that they are so
Speaker 2: afraid of even admitting this thing happened. It's an acknowledgment
Speaker 2: that people did understand what was going on, and support
Speaker 2: for Trump has risen. Speaking of Elon Musk, he has
Speaker 2: got a new label for Kamala Harris, one I'd never
Speaker 2: heard before. He's called her an extinctionist after a video
Speaker 2: resurfaced from last year where she talked about how climate
Speaker 2: anxiety was causing many young people to reconsider whether or
Speaker 2: not they would actually have children. Here's the video that's resurfaced.
Speaker 2: Have a listen.
Speaker 7: I've heard young leaders talk with me about a term
Speaker 7: they've coined climate anxiety, right, which is fear of the
Speaker 7: future and the unknown of whether it makes sense for
Speaker 7: you to even think about having children.
Speaker 2: Now. Elon Musk has retweeted that video and said the
Speaker 2: natural extension of her philosophy would be a de facto
Speaker 2: holocaust for all of humanity. It's a frightening thought to
Speaker 2: think the next president of the United States and the
Speaker 2: leader of the Free World could be actively suggesting, you know,
Speaker 2: maybe you should think twice before having children because we
Speaker 2: may not be around that long anyway.
Speaker 3: Well, it's very hypocritical of her to actually pretend like
Speaker 3: she's expressing concern about young people being that concerned and
Speaker 3: they're not having kids. She has before, and we've played
Speaker 3: the clip plenty of times on this show, talked about
Speaker 3: when she's talking about the litany of measures that they're
Speaker 3: taking as a government to fight climate change, she's talked
Speaker 3: about reducing the population, seeing that means we can breathe
Speaker 3: cleaner air.
Speaker 4: It's just a better world for everyone.
Speaker 3: She has literally said that is one of the measures
Speaker 3: that they are pursuing.
Speaker 2: And of course there's only one topic she loves more
Speaker 2: than population reduction because of climate change, and that's abortion,
Speaker 2: which is her favorite thing in the world.
Speaker 4: So massive population reduction right there, Well, she.
Speaker 5: Wants to be unburdened by what has been whatever format that.
Speaker 1: Comes in, seemingly.
Speaker 5: But I just love the juxtaposition, of course, of the
Speaker 5: activists who carry on about climate change call themselves extinction rebellion,
Speaker 5: as though they are fighting against the extinction of the
Speaker 5: human race, when we know from people like Kamala Harris
Speaker 5: and plenty of others that what they're actually talking about,
Speaker 5: we need fewer people because that will be better for
Speaker 5: the planet.
Speaker 1: They're not talking about extinction rebellion.
Speaker 5: They're talking about, well, we just have a certain level
Speaker 5: of extinction that will be good for the rest of us.
Speaker 5: And I've often wondered all these people who carry on
Speaker 5: about climate change, if you truly believe that humanity is
Speaker 5: that bad for the world, why are you fighting against
Speaker 5: climate change? Like why don't you just let climate change
Speaker 5: take over and kill us all, Because surely that'll be
Speaker 5: the best thing for the planet, because there will be
Speaker 5: no humans left to rape and pillage the joint and
Speaker 5: destroy it.
Speaker 2: Well, the other thing about these people who promote, you know,
Speaker 2: a population reduction is if you notice they never volunteer
Speaker 2: to be part of the solution, that they're always pushing
Speaker 2: other people's children forward or other folks. They never say,
Speaker 2: you know what, let me be the first one.
Speaker 3: I always say, once you realize the carbon they want
Speaker 3: to reduce is you, is your children's, their policies suddenly
Speaker 3: start making a lot more sense. This anti human agenda
Speaker 3: that is essentially what is at the heart of climate communism.
Speaker 4: But speaking of communism, check.
Speaker 3: Out this display of what is no doubt a lot
Speaker 3: of Kamala Harris voters.
Speaker 8: In Philadelphia today.
Speaker 3: It's unbelievable to watch people marching through the streets of
Speaker 3: a democratic country, the most powerful one on earth, bearing
Speaker 3: the hammer and sickle like this is something that should
Speaker 3: be trumpeted. And it's not just in the universities now
Speaker 3: it is spilling out onto the streets. And let's not
Speaker 3: forget that one of the cornerstones of Marxism as well
Speaker 3: is the breakdown of the nuclear family. They're not all
Speaker 3: about avon babies, they're not all about human flourishing and
Speaker 3: this kind of class war which so appeals to the Democrats.
Speaker 3: They love using this kind of rhetoric in their own
Speaker 3: appealing to voters, poorer voters, black voters.
Speaker 4: I'd say, we've just.
Speaker 3: Seen a lot of Kamala Harris voters walk through the
Speaker 3: streets of Philly today.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean she came out and advocated for this,
Speaker 2: didn't she. Because we showed a clip recently where she
Speaker 2: was explaining the difference between equality and equity and outlining
Speaker 2: that her vision for America is to try and get
Speaker 2: everybody to have the same result in life, which means
Speaker 2: you've got to take from those who started well and
Speaker 2: give it to those who started poorly, and try and
Speaker 2: even everything else. So now we've got people marching for communism.
Speaker 2: Thanks Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, they used to worry about rids under
Speaker 1: the beds. They're not under the beds anymore, just marching
Speaker 1: through the street.
Speaker 5: But what these people don't understand is that the class
Speaker 5: war they want to fight is so ten years ago.
Speaker 1: The real class war that.
Speaker 5: Has been going on in America since Trump was elected
Speaker 5: in twenty sixteen is a class war of the working
Speaker 5: class US against the rich. But it's not the working
Speaker 5: class Democrats against the rich Republicans. It's the working class
Speaker 5: Republicans against the rich Democrats. I mean, if the communists
Speaker 5: really think that, you know, oh, we're going to have
Speaker 5: this class war, we've got to bring down the rich
Speaker 5: to feed the poor, Camala ain't going to be your woman,
Speaker 5: and nor is most of the Democratic Party. That's the
Speaker 5: people they've got to get on board with Trump if
Speaker 5: they want to have their class war, they're the people
Speaker 5: they should be fighting in.
Speaker 2: And of course the irony is when you fight the
Speaker 2: rich to feed the poor, all you do is make
Speaker 2: everybody poorueatory.
Speaker 3: Equity, though, Mac, that is what we are reaching for.
Speaker 3: That's what we're really excited for. Of course, it doesn't
Speaker 3: make any sense because everyone will never end up in
Speaker 3: the same place.
Speaker 4: You could dump everyone on.
Speaker 3: An island, give them five bucks, and within a fortnight
Speaker 3: you'd have people doing really well, and you'd have other
Speaker 3: people dying of starvation. Because what equity doesn't take into
Speaker 3: account is people's work ethics. They're entrepreneurial spirit. There are
Speaker 3: any number of them, their personalities.
Speaker 4: Some are always going to excel more than others.
Speaker 3: As Margaret that she used to say, some are more
Speaker 3: equal than to others.
Speaker 4: Wasn't that her saying? She was like, this is a
Speaker 4: pipe dream. You are never going to get there.
Speaker 3: But we've got to take our hats off to whoever
Speaker 3: came up with the latest Kamala Harris attack ad, which
Speaker 3: brilliantly using AI is voiced by herself.
Speaker 7: I Kamala Harris, senior Democrat candidate for president because Joe
Speaker 7: Biden finally exposed to stimility to be thanks, Jo, I
Speaker 7: was selected because I am the ultimate diversity hire. I'm
Speaker 7: both a woman and a person of color. So if
Speaker 7: you criticize anything I say, you're both sexist and racist.
Speaker 7: I may not know the first thing about running the country,
Speaker 7: but remember that's a good thing if you're a deep
Speaker 7: state puppet. I had four years under the tutelage of
Speaker 7: the ultimate deep state puppet, a wonderful mentor, Joe Biden.
Speaker 7: Joe taught me rule number one carefully hydratt and companies.
Speaker 7: I taken significant things, and I discuss them as if
Speaker 7: they're significant. And I believe that exploring the significance of
Speaker 7: the insignificant is in itself significant.
Speaker 3: Hilarious, right, everyone thought it was incredibly funny.
Speaker 4: Elon Musk shared it to.
Speaker 3: His millions of followers, drawing the ire of Governor of
Speaker 3: California Gavin Newsom, who promptly tweeted absolutely disgusted by this.
Speaker 3: He said, manipulating a voice in an ad.
Speaker 4: Like this one should be illegal.
Speaker 3: Al we signing a bill in a matter of weeks
Speaker 3: to make sure it is. So he's going to make
Speaker 3: parody illegal, to which Elon must promptly replied, the last
Speaker 3: time he checked, parody wasn't against the law in America.
Speaker 3: I mean, have we just lost thousands of humor completely.
Speaker 2: Now Gavin Newsom hasn't lost his sense of humor. He's
Speaker 2: just auditioning for the role of vice president in Na
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris administration, isn't he indeed?
Speaker 5: And I very much look forward to him passing a
Speaker 5: similar law that tells AI companies that they can't lie
Speaker 5: to you about the fact that someone tried to assassinate
Speaker 5: Donald Trump. Let's come back home now. Now, I'm sure
Speaker 5: you're aware that there are security cameras everywhere, CCTV cameras.
Speaker 1: Monitoring your every move.
Speaker 5: Just about the only place that you can get away
Speaker 5: from those cameras these days is in your car. But
Speaker 5: they're working pretty hard on changing that too, because of course,
Speaker 5: these modern cars are now putting cameras in them that
Speaker 5: you know, monitor you to see whether you're dozing off
Speaker 5: while you're driving along, and then they get really angry
Speaker 5: when you have a sip of a cup of coffee
Speaker 5: or laugh or something go bing bang bong. There was
Speaker 5: a story last week that Mitsubishi's had to change the
Speaker 5: technology it putting its new trite and use because it
Speaker 5: was going off with people for having a laugh.
Speaker 1: But you would think that you deserve to.
Speaker 5: Know where these cameras are because when you're out in public,
Speaker 5: you're being monitored. It would seem like a basic right
Speaker 5: you ought to know that the cameras are there, and
Speaker 5: you'd think that that would also have the effect by
Speaker 5: telling someone that the cameras are there that they would
Speaker 5: be less likely to commit crimes in that area. Well,
Speaker 5: the Advertiser in South Australia has taken the initiative to
Speaker 5: contact all the councils in Adelaide and ask them where
Speaker 5: their security cameras are. Now there are nineteen councils in Adelaide.
Speaker 5: Would you believe only four councils came back and disclosed
Speaker 5: where their security cameras were stationed. They were Adelaide, Burnside,
Speaker 5: Campbelltown and Holdfast Bay. Some came back and said they
Speaker 5: didn't have a camera network, but others said, well, we
Speaker 5: do have a camera network, we just not going to
Speaker 5: tell you where they are. On Caparinga council was one
Speaker 5: of them. Now, these cameras are monitored by police twenty
Speaker 5: four hours a day. They take recordings, they take vision etc.
Speaker 5: That can be used in the effort to fight crime.
Speaker 5: You would think it would be such a basic thing
Speaker 5: for a council to simply have a register somewhere that
Speaker 5: tells you where the security cameras are, that they should
Speaker 5: maybe be compelled by law to tell you where those
Speaker 5: security cameras are, or that they might even have a
Speaker 5: big honking sign that says there are security cameras in
Speaker 5: this area, because I don't know, if you were thinking
Speaker 5: of robbing a shop on that street, you might think
Speaker 5: twice about it when you know that big brother is
Speaker 5: watching you.
Speaker 1: But Onka Paringa council.
Speaker 5: Actually set the reason we're not going to tell you
Speaker 5: where these cameras are is because we think that would be.
Speaker 1: Counterproductive in fighting crime.
Speaker 5: I don't quite understand that excuse, but you have to
Speaker 5: wonder if they don't want you to know where the
Speaker 5: cameras are, where exactly are they and what exactly are
Speaker 5: they watching you do?
Speaker 2: Just before we get to that, did you say Onka
Speaker 2: Parinka council Onka Peringa, Yes, that's a great name. If
Speaker 2: it's to create community safety. If people are less likely
Speaker 2: to commit crimes than by inference, everyone else is more
Speaker 2: likely to be safe if we all know where these
Speaker 2: cameras are. But there's also the issue of future misuse,
Speaker 2: which after the pandemic, we wouldn't put anything past Western
Speaker 2: liberal governments. We saw what Justin Trudeau did in Canada,
Speaker 2: for instance, freezing people's bank accounts. Well, if you do that,
Speaker 2: why wouldn't you use cameras for the farious purposes. The
Speaker 2: other issue is revenue raising. They now have CCTV cameras
Speaker 2: just focused on parking spots for instance, and just issuing
Speaker 2: automatic fines. And the other thing I worry about is
Speaker 2: whether this produces lazy policing. These have been introduced everywhere
Speaker 2: in Adelaide, where there's been a lot of controversy about
Speaker 2: the policing ability to stop crime, particularly in the inner city.
Speaker 2: Do police really feel the need to be out on
Speaker 2: the beat if they've just as they do in Adelaide's city,
Speaker 2: they've got someone twenty four to seven sitting in front
Speaker 2: of a vast array of screens just monitoring things. You
Speaker 2: don't need to have police on the street. So I
Speaker 2: think that ultimately compromises policing as well as people's privacy.
Speaker 3: Oh, it always compromises people's privacy. If I had my way,
Speaker 3: I'd rip all of them down like those guys in
Speaker 3: London with those climate change cameras that are like.
Speaker 4: You are outside of your zone.
Speaker 3: But of course we're way past that point when it
Speaker 3: comes to CCTV. They do have a point here, though,
Speaker 3: because if I am a Krim and I can jump
Speaker 3: online and see where your CCTV cameras are in my
Speaker 3: neck of the woods, I know exactly where to not
Speaker 3: strike and where is just free game.
Speaker 2: But wouldn't that create more acceptance of CCTV because then
Speaker 2: everyone would want CCTV where they are, so the Creams
Speaker 2: know we've got CCTV. Don't come and knock off my place.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but then everyone would want them. We don't want
Speaker 4: that if we don't want them more proctic, But that's
Speaker 4: what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: So if they did make it known, more people would
Speaker 3: be like, hey.
Speaker 4: Don't put us in a dark area. We want our.
Speaker 3: CCTVs everywhere, Which is why I think there is an
Speaker 3: argument to just be like, we're not telling anyone where
Speaker 3: these are, because then the Crims are going to get a.
Speaker 4: Lot more active in the dark zones and the dart zone.
Speaker 3: People are going to be like CCTVs on every camera
Speaker 3: on every street corner, please, And that is.
Speaker 4: Going to cost a lot of money.
Speaker 5: Maybe so, But I think the point is that, you know,
Speaker 5: it's not unfair to expect that at some point these
Speaker 5: cameras are going to be equipped with facial recognition and
Speaker 5: AI technology so they see you coming before you're even there,
Speaker 5: et cetera.
Speaker 2: South Australian police were going through in one got caught correct.
Speaker 3: I think it's the fear that it hasn't already been introduced. Well,
Speaker 3: I mean, who've been caught out before?
Speaker 1: Who knows.
Speaker 5: But if that's the road we're going to go down,
Speaker 5: which seems pretty clear that's what it will be, then
Speaker 5: surely we deserve to know where those cameras are. I
Speaker 5: deserve to know where the camera is that is monitoring
Speaker 5: my face.
Speaker 3: In that case, I would argue yes as well. But
Speaker 3: remember we had the infamous case of Bunnings, the Good
Speaker 3: Guys and one other supermarket type chain who got caught
Speaker 3: out using facial recognition and the millions of people darkening
Speaker 3: their doors. This was here in Australia, had no idea whatsoever.
Speaker 3: So I think this idea that the state isn't using
Speaker 3: that technology already, certainly in some cases, and if they were,
Speaker 3: oh I'm sure they would tell us all.
Speaker 4: I just think that's naive.
Speaker 3: Just if the likes of Bunnings can do it without
Speaker 3: it's not about whether they are it's not.
Speaker 1: It's that they should they should like they should be
Speaker 1: legislatively required indeed to tell you.
Speaker 5: And we did a story I don't know a few
Speaker 5: months ago now, wasn't it out of the UK where
Speaker 5: they were fitting cameras in the tube system or something
Speaker 5: monitoring people coming through on the train, and it was
Speaker 5: monitoring people's facial experiment you've got and work out whether
Speaker 5: they'd had a bad day or a good day and
Speaker 5: all this.
Speaker 1: Sort of stuff like that's really scary stuff.
Speaker 5: And if there are cameras up that will eventually do
Speaker 5: this or may already be doing this, we should be
Speaker 5: told exactly where they are and what they are doing,
Speaker 5: no exceptions.
Speaker 2: Hey, before we go to a break, we just need
Speaker 2: to quickly update you on changes to the law in
Speaker 2: Queensland that allows people to change their gender on their
Speaker 2: birth certificate. These new laws have been in action for
Speaker 2: one month. They allow people to change their gender without
Speaker 2: ever having gone through any sort of surgery. It also
Speaker 2: allows children to change their gender as long as they've
Speaker 2: got support from a parent or in lieu of that
Speaker 2: a court order, and it allows people to change the
Speaker 2: parents on a birth certificate, so you can have two
Speaker 2: mums or two dads. These laws have been enacted, as
Speaker 2: I said a month ago, and in that four weeks
Speaker 2: they've had two hundred and forty seven applications for people
Speaker 2: to change gender on their birth certificate, eleven of those
Speaker 2: for children, and there's been ten applications to change birth
Speaker 2: certificates to represent two mums or two dads. What's interesting
Speaker 2: is a quality. Australia Chief Executive Anna Brown reckons that
Speaker 2: those applications seem very very low and they're expecting a
Speaker 2: lot more people. So that's the change four weeks, two
Speaker 2: hundred and forty seven application.
Speaker 5: You'd be surprised if there wasn't more to come. And
Speaker 5: of course this will spread to all the other states
Speaker 5: now and everyone will start doing it. And well, you
Speaker 5: can just decide what you are on one particular day
Speaker 5: and have it changed on a legal document. It's one
Speaker 5: thing to live your life as though you're one thing.
Speaker 5: When you're doing it on a legal document, there's no
Speaker 5: coming back from madness.
Speaker 2: We go to a break. When we come back, we'll
Speaker 2: look at what's making news in tomorrow's papers that's coming
Speaker 2: up in just a moment. Welcome back. Let's take a
Speaker 2: look at what's making news in tomorrow's papers. We'll start
Speaker 2: with the Daily Telegraph and as you can imagine, most
Speaker 2: of the papers tomorrow. I've got a big photograph of
Speaker 2: Jess Fox, who won gold in the kayaking. Well done
Speaker 2: to her. But the main story on the front page
Speaker 2: of the Telegraph athletes in revolt over trendy village life,
Speaker 2: Go woke, go slow, reads the headline. We spoke about
Speaker 2: this earlier, but let me read you just a bit
Speaker 2: more of what's happening with the Olympians. Terrill beds, vegan
Speaker 2: food and a focus on the carbon footprint of the athletes.
Speaker 2: Village is stopping our superstars breaking world records, according to
Speaker 2: both current and past competitors. The article goes on to
Speaker 2: quote Australian swimmer Arian Titmas. You have is that great?
Speaker 1: Well done?
Speaker 2: She obviously won gold in the four hundred meter freestyle,
Speaker 2: but she is quoted as saying it was probably not
Speaker 2: the time I thought I was capable of. But Olympic
Speaker 2: Village is definitely not made for high performance. So you've
Speaker 2: got athletes not only saying it's uncomfortable, but they're predicting
Speaker 2: that we might see less world records set at this
Speaker 2: Olympic Games because the village is not conducive to them
Speaker 2: performing at their peak. One of the Australian water polo players,
Speaker 2: Tilly Kerns, she told journalists that she went and got
Speaker 2: a massage to try and get her back right after
Speaker 2: sleeping on that cardboard bed. So when you've got high
Speaker 2: performance athletes have spent four years, well, I mean they've
Speaker 2: spent a lot longer than that. Most of them since
Speaker 2: they were pre teens have been training for this moment
Speaker 2: that they get there, and they've got to get a massage,
Speaker 2: not to limber up, but to undo the damage of
Speaker 2: the athlete's village. It's hardly conducive.
Speaker 4: And the stress that that would place on you as well,
Speaker 4: I mean you'd already.
Speaker 3: Be so stressed, like this is the moment you've been
Speaker 3: training for for years and years and years, and you've
Speaker 3: got to worry about things like not getting a good
Speaker 3: night's sleep, or waking up with a creak in your
Speaker 3: neck because the beds are so uncomfortable, or not having
Speaker 3: access to meat and dairy products because oh well, Paris
Speaker 3: has just decided we're all climate communists now. Former Aussie
Speaker 3: Olympian James Magnuson is quoted as saying the lack of
Speaker 3: world records boils down to this whole eco friendly carbon
Speaker 3: footprint Vegan first mentality rather than high performance.
Speaker 4: So he's calling it early, just going.
Speaker 3: This is why we're not seeing world records smashed like
Speaker 3: we normally do during the qualifiers where everyone's on their
Speaker 3: feet screaming their lungs out, because world records are flying
Speaker 3: out the door as they do every Olympics.
Speaker 4: And not this one.
Speaker 2: And people say, why don't most athletes then just go
Speaker 2: and stay in a hotel, which you can, but if
Speaker 2: you do that then you are responsible to organize all
Speaker 2: your own transport, all your own resources. And of course
Speaker 2: for most people, not for the US basketball team, they're
Speaker 2: all staying in very high end hotels as you can
Speaker 2: imagine Lebron and Steph Curry. But for your average shot
Speaker 2: Twitter or discuss throw or whatever, you're basically on your own.
Speaker 2: If you leave the athletes, you.
Speaker 4: Wouldn't be able to find a room right now, No.
Speaker 1: Having a pretty penny for it. I mean, it is
Speaker 1: just ridiculous.
Speaker 5: And as Joe Hildebrand pointed out, and sitting here last
Speaker 5: night on the Sunday Showdown, and there are athletes now
Speaker 5: that are going out and buying mattresses to put on
Speaker 5: top of their cardboard beds.
Speaker 1: So how good is that for the planet that of.
Speaker 5: Course, you know, they didn't get a bed that was
Speaker 5: any good. So now you've got people going out and
Speaker 5: buying a mattress that they're going to use for two
Speaker 5: weeks and then chuck away and all the plastic that
Speaker 5: it came wrapped in, and they reckon that by doing
Speaker 5: all of this, they're doing a good thing for the
Speaker 5: planet wasting with all of these complaints.
Speaker 2: Do you know how much money they spent on the
Speaker 2: athlete skill? One point six billion dollars one point six
Speaker 2: billion dollars, No for a litany of complaints, no air.
Speaker 5: Conditioning, vegan food and cardboard bids. I'll tell you what
Speaker 5: it sounds like. The Australian government building social housing, doesn't.
Speaker 5: Let's go to the Australians borrow where it's is. World
Speaker 5: leading state deficits, threaten inflation fight, say economists. Big spending
Speaker 5: state and territory governments are recording some of the highest
Speaker 5: deficits in the developed world, with economists saying the blowout
Speaker 5: in public spending is undermining the Reserve Bank's efforts to
Speaker 5: tame high inflation.
Speaker 1: What a surprise. We could have.
Speaker 5: All seen this coming, and we already knew that Victoria
Speaker 5: was one of the most indebted jurisdictions in the world
Speaker 5: per capita. Why have I get the fine balancing Act
Speaker 5: that governments want to be able to provide some sort
Speaker 5: of cost of living relief because they feel like it's
Speaker 5: electoral poison if they don't do something, but by doing
Speaker 5: so they actually add more fuel to the fire.
Speaker 1: Surely the best cost.
Speaker 5: Of living relief they could provide is to say we're
Speaker 5: going to have a period of austerity. By doing so,
Speaker 5: we are going to very quickly correct the bad course
Speaker 5: we are going down, and then after that we'll be
Speaker 5: back to normal.
Speaker 2: Economist Chris Richardson has quoted in this article saying that
Speaker 2: if you take into account the Stage three tax cuts
Speaker 2: plus federal and state spending in the last financial year,
Speaker 2: governments have pumped forty six billion dollars into the economy.
Speaker 2: That's about two percent of the economy has been pumped
Speaker 2: in during a time of high inflation. And then you've
Speaker 2: got Jim Chalmers quoted in the same articles say it's
Speaker 2: ridiculous that any government actions have contributed to inflation.
Speaker 3: I mean it's government actions alone, basically Odessey, who've contributed
Speaker 3: to inflation. It is fueled by, as stated in the OS,
Speaker 3: public infrastructure spending and a waning appetite for budget repair.
Speaker 4: So again, have we lost.
Speaker 3: Our capacity to just tighten our belts for a bit? Well,
Speaker 3: and when you look at where we're talking about, debt
Speaker 3: piles are set to triple from pre pandemic levels to
Speaker 3: seven hundred and fifty billion by mid twenty twenty seven.
Speaker 4: We can avoid that if our.
Speaker 3: Governments will simply say we're in a massive bind. We
Speaker 3: are all tightening our belts. Less spending is going to
Speaker 3: be happening. Even infrastructure projects are going to be on
Speaker 3: hold for a bit until we're back in black, because
Speaker 3: right now we are just going to be digging ourselves
Speaker 3: a hole that we can never get out of.
Speaker 5: And the reality is we'll have to repay it at
Speaker 5: some point. And when that time comes, James, you'll probably
Speaker 5: be six feet under, but Liz and I will be
Speaker 5: here to clean up the mists that your generation.
Speaker 2: That's why I'm so much happier and more optimistic about life.
Speaker 1: Exactly asy.
Speaker 2: Life's breezy now.
Speaker 5: The story in the front of the eyes tomorrow. No
Speaker 5: stopping boats if you stop looking. This is straight out
Speaker 5: of the Palichet playbook. You know, if we just change
Speaker 5: the rules about youth crime and then there's no youth crime.
Speaker 5: Surveillance flights to detect a legal boat rivals off Australia's
Speaker 5: northwest coast have sunk by twenty two percent in two years,
Speaker 5: a bit of surge in people smuggling voyagers, presenting a
Speaker 5: major challenge for incoming Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke. I
Speaker 5: think we all sort of suspected this was perhaps what
Speaker 5: was going on, because we know that boats have actually
Speaker 5: reached the shore in the last year or so. We've
Speaker 5: turned a few back but sent them back with speed
Speaker 5: boats that they can then take back to Indonesia.
Speaker 1: To bring more people back to Australia.
Speaker 5: Why would you be reducing the number of flights you're
Speaker 5: doing out there to monitor the waters, because surely.
Speaker 1: The government can realize that.
Speaker 5: You know, you look back to rud Gillard and how
Speaker 5: badly open borders essentially on the coast played for them,
Speaker 5: then this should be top priority.
Speaker 2: Well, nineteen boats since labor came into power, three of
Speaker 2: which reached Australia, and you find out that they've actually
Speaker 2: they're actually not looking as hard as they used to
Speaker 2: look while claiming that this is a top priority.
Speaker 1: Seems ridiculous. Now that's story on the front of the OS.
Speaker 5: Very quickly pmwas on REX crisis, ways in on rex crisis.
Speaker 5: Rex Airlines is on the brink of collapse after losing
Speaker 5: close for a million dollars a week on its ambition
Speaker 5: ambitious expansion into major city roots, with its potential demise
Speaker 5: set to devastate regional transport links across Australia. And it's
Speaker 5: a great shame because I really hope that Rex would
Speaker 5: help open up the market and break the duopoli of
Speaker 5: Virgin and Quantus, but it would seem once again that
Speaker 5: you just cannot break that due offera.
Speaker 2: Absolutely well, we're going to go to a break when
Speaker 2: we come back making fun of global elites. You'll enjoy it.
Speaker 2: It's coming up in this the moment. Welcome back. Well,
Speaker 2: at least at least one am I calling you a
Speaker 2: list Liz, I have a new name. Most of us
Speaker 2: don't like the global elites, but some like them even
Speaker 2: less than we do. Alice.
Speaker 3: Indeed, legendary singer Morrissey, who needs no introduction but for
Speaker 3: the uninitiated, is a very famous singer who hails from
Speaker 3: the UK. He was performing in Las Vegas and took
Speaker 3: the opportunity. While he was singing his song Crashing Bores,
Speaker 3: which is somewhat concerning criminality, took the time to use
Speaker 3: as his backdrop very familiar faces who you will recognize.
Speaker 3: So there he was singing about criminality while pointing at
Speaker 3: these guys.
Speaker 9: Check it out.
Speaker 3: The montage included Carl schwamb which you.
Speaker 9: Just saw up there.
Speaker 3: Anthony Fauci also got a glimpse of him, but you're
Speaker 3: missed out on Bill Gates. So it was the Evil Trio.
Speaker 3: I knew I was a Morrissey fan, but now I'm
Speaker 3: like hardcore fan.
Speaker 4: This guy's red pilled.
Speaker 1: I love it.
Speaker 5: But it's amazing, isn't it that when you see someone
Speaker 5: and entertainer like go against the lefty grave.
Speaker 1: He's like, Oh my god, I can't believe this is real.
Speaker 1: How is this happening? Right tells you a little bit
Speaker 1: about where we are before we go.
Speaker 5: Look, this is a very long story, but I'm going
Speaker 5: to try and truncate it as much as possible for
Speaker 5: you because I love it so much. A bloke by
Speaker 5: the name of Michael Pascal. He flew from.
Speaker 1: Brisbane to Sydney, then he flew to.
Speaker 5: Paris via Colombo. His luggage got lost in Brisbane. They
Speaker 5: found it in Brisbane, then they tried to send it
Speaker 5: to him in France, but then I got lost in
Speaker 5: London again.
Speaker 1: Long story short, his luggage never got to him.
Speaker 5: He went through a three year fight, through two courts
Speaker 5: and a tribunal to finally get three thousand dollars in
Speaker 5: compensation for his luggage being lost.
Speaker 1: The thing I love about this the most.
Speaker 5: Is that a weaker man would have given up and
Speaker 5: just cut their losses and you can see him despond
Speaker 5: it in the airport, would have cut his losses and gone, well,
Speaker 5: I'm never seeing my luggage again. He fought it for
Speaker 5: three years too, the name to the bitter end to
Speaker 5: get his money. That's what has made Australia great. We
Speaker 5: need more Michaels Pascals in this.
Speaker 2: If he was in charge of the borders, we would
Speaker 2: have no drains. That's it from us, But stick around
Speaker 2: and coming up is The Reader Penney Show.