WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 4 May

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>From the Skying Center. This is Paul Murray Live Today,

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Good evening. Haggod, was that West Tiger's win? How many

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>did that Saturday? Right? Haggard? Was that Tiger's win? Okay?

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Obviously millions of people are not feeling great today, rough

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>night last night and trying to process exactly what went wrong,

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>what the future may or may not look like. Can

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I just say at the start of this show, at

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the start of this next phase of the journey that

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the country goes on, and the journey that we've been

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>on now for more than fifteen years, this next phase

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>is not in any way about going to be criticizing

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>what we believe. Okay, Will the Greens drop a want

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>for free dental because Adam Bant may or may not

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>lose his seat? Of course not. There are fundamental things

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that we believe in. There's a fundament into worldview that

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we have and it's one that you have every right

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to hold. The conversation that clearly has to happen. Will

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>happen is to talk about the vessel with which millions

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>of people trusted with their vote yesterday and its capacity

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to be able to harness that support and grow it

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>into areas that clearly it has lost over a long

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>period of time. Like all good friends, you have to

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>tell the truth, and sometimes those truths are going to

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>be uncomfortable. But I'm going to make this promise right now,

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this program, this station will continue to do what every

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>media organization in the country should have as its central

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>purpose each every day, which is to hold powerful people

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to account. Because a government wins a majority of one

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>seats or one hundred seats does not mean you're never

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>allowed to criticize them. It doesn't mean that you give

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>them a free parts on every piece of legislation that

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they introduce, and that you won't focus on the people

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>who are inevitably left behind when a line is drawn

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this way or that way when it comes to policy. Now,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>something that I have focused our show on over the

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.399
<v Speaker 1>past few years is to always give you as much

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>data as possible. So if we've been following these weekly conversations,

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:30.119
<v Speaker 1>there is no surprise about the result. There is a surprise,

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, about the magnitudes, and that's demographics and a

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of stuff that I'll bore you with later.

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>But front and center, this show, this program, this station

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>will do what it has always done and on this

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>program and me as a host, I will show you

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the data from the Bureau of Statistics that tells us

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>how many people are working multiple jobs. I'll show you

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the data from the Bureau of Statistics when the inflation

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.839
<v Speaker 1>numbers come out that while the headline's going to be good,

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money that you're having to pay over

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>insurance has gone through the roof. When there's a report

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that tells us from the OECD about how our classrooms

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>are some of the most disruptive in the developed world,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about it. When the napland results

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>tell us that a third a third of Australian kids

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not hitting the marks of basic literacy and numeracy.

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about it now. Will we of

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>course find funny clips of people we disagree with saying

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and doing stupid things, you bet you, But also we're

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have the conversation that we have had on

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this program for fifteen years. And I always talk about

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>how I try to in putting the show together and

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in sitting in front of the microphone each and every night,

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is to try to be the most honest show on

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>television and by that I mean, when I'm pissed off,

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you'll see it. When I'm happy, you'll see it. When

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>there's good news to tell you, I'll tell you it.

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And when there are tough truths to discuss, we will

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>do it. I am certainly and absolutely have never been

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>arrogant enough to believe that mine is the only voice

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and therefore I'm right about everything. Like

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>any diet, you need lots of ingredients, perhaps for me

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>a few less nuggets, but you get my point. So

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Millions of people are really upset today.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But the joy of our democracy is regardless of whether

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you are a person who got the result that they

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted or the one that didn't. We all love this joint.

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>We all want it to be better, and that's why

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we get annoyed when we see the signs that it

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is not. I have gone on and on and on

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and on and on and on and on during the

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>cost of living stuff about three million people being this

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>close to homelessness. That's the point that is just as

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>valid the day before the election as it is the

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:18.239
<v Speaker 1>day after the election. So let's go on the journey

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>for the next little while of trying to work out

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>what's next. Let us not delude ourselves, and if everyone's

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.799
<v Speaker 1>just a bit more like us, then everything will be awesome.

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's be serious about how our country has changed. And

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that again I've shown you is

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>about the demographics, about the difference about under fifty over

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty male and female, and tonight in the state of

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the race. We will get into all of that in

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a moment or two's time. We'll also have a chat

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to Tom Connell about the latest results which are showing

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>some pretty tight races in some of the seats that

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>people had claimed last night. Is a privilege to talk

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to you every day, one I will never take for granted,

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and one that I hope to repay with honesty, enthusiasm,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.799
<v Speaker 1>and at times a little bit of entertainment. So let's

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>get to the five things not about this election, about data.

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>But let's get too so what's next. We all know

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what happened last night. I will save you playing five

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred times over speeches you've already heard that have already

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>no doubt probably made you feel a little weird, but

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>still Prime Minister takes his victory lap today. While I

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 1>was in the room last night in Brisbane one of

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the most lovely moments. And remember when Kim Beasley lost

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and one, there was a lot of

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>people in his concession speech you said, oh, if that

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>guy had turned up, that'd be the guy who'd win

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>an election. That's not the point I'm going to make here,

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>but I loved that there was a really human dad

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>moment where the kids turned to him and he turns

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to the kids. Not for the politics of it all,

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>but for people who knew that their dad may have

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>woken up yesterday with the hope of being the Prime Minister,

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but ended last night as a person who is now

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>out of Australian politics. To Peter Dutton, to his wife

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Kiri Lee, and to those beautiful children they have had

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to share their father with the entire country for a

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>long time, in fact, for most of their lives. They

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>now have dad back, and I look forward to continuing

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a friendship with a man who I well and truly

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>do admire. In terms of the gravity and size of things. Again,

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I could sit here and show you this chart and

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that chart, but you know all of that. You've seen

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>all of that. If you're watching now, you were watching

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>every minute of the coverage last night, and I loved

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>our panel and I loved their insights. But I've got

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to say probably the person who, with good humor and

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>his traditional smile, an old school labor man, Joel Fitzgibbon.

0:07:56.160 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>He made a point about where things are stark, a

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit frightening, but it's also true.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 2>What do all these people have in common other than

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they led the Liberal Party at some

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 2>point Menzies, Holt, Gordon, McMahons, Nevin p Cock, Howard, Yusen, Downer, Nelson, Turnbull,

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Abbott and Dunton. They all represented seats the Liberal Party

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 2>no longer represents. Thank god, they've hung on to one.

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And Cook that's pretty wild. That's pretty wild, and he's

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>not rubbing sold into the wounds. Is diagnosing the obvious again.

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Tom Connell, who was the first call at the best

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>call it the man who is top of his game,

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>top of his game, knows it inside, knows it outside,

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and will always take a random phone call from me,

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>what about this? What about that? Have you thought about this?

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>What's going on there? Tom Connell is an absolute star,

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>absolute star, and he's going to move his screen a

0:08:58.120 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>little closer to the man Cave'll talk to him in

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a moment. Who's time? State of the race? The last

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:03.719
<v Speaker 1>one for these Sunday nights that have gone all the

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>way through. But obviously Cos Samarus from Redbridge and Michael

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Kroger are part of the PM Live family and we

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>will have a chat in such a fashion in a

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of moments time. So what's next now? Again, I

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>could go through five different things about what happened here

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in demographic and I'll get to all of that. But

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got to look forward, and you've got to be positive,

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to be pragmatic, and you've got to

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>be realistic. So I'm going to ask some questions that

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe I don't have the answer to the day after,

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think is the beginning of the conversation that

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>needs to be had about the political vessel under which

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>millions of people voted for yesterday. Number One, I want

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal Party to take time to be honest about

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what happened. I don't want a quick review in and

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>out couple of weeks one press conference. I don't want

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the people at the front of the movement to think

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that label will eventually drop the ball. And the last

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>person standing will one day become the prime minister. No,

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to require a lot more work than that.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see the Liberal Party have the honesty

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and openness to not just have one review, but what

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>about multiple reviews, not just chapters inside the reviews. What

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>about about one done by a person under fifty about

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 1>the issue of under fifty? What about suburban inner suburban

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>ideas out of suburban ideas as well? I should say

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>there should be multiple people of those different flocks who

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>tell us their views of things. Why not invite the

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>living former prime ministers not to make a submission, but

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to make it public about what they think the future

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of the movement is. There's no point or purpose in

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>constantly talking about the numbers that came in on Saturday,

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>but they are the reality and the political reality that

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>we will be living with for the next three years.

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I also think that the organization should look to some

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>elements of the corporate sector here, and you're going to

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe think, oh, a little bit lefty here, Paul, No, no, no,

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>there are people who work for massive corporations in this

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 1>country who are experts in change, and that isn't about diversity, quota,

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>special mentions of this and everyone humming at the sun

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>at midday. These are about people. These are people, I

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>should say, who have incredible insights not just into human

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>behavior but organizational behavior. And yes they are not of

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the political flock, but I think there's an opportunity because

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>at an organizational level, and again I bare you by

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>going through it, but think about it. In New South

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Wales they couldn't fill out a form to get the

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>councilors nominated. In Victoria they couldn't fill out a form

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to argue the redistributions. There's how many in Western Australia.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Queensland's going well at the state level, but clearly at

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the federal level we saw what happened. There were seats

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of Labor Party wouldn't have even privately thought were possible

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that ended up changing. So there's lots of different areas

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of expertise and there are lots of people, and there's

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>millions of people who they are able to reach out to,

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>not just a conversation inside quick tick and flic go

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>go on the attack from day one and will eventually

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>tear him down. That's not going to work. Bill Shorten, Yes,

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>unsuccessful labor leader, he talked about how you did you

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>fix your party, work on the policy, then turn your

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>attention to an election. That's the sort of stuff that

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this organization needs to deal with. Number two

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 1>in the five things that I think are the insights

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>into the future, don't just learn a lesson, but be

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>seen to learn a lesson. Now, Australian politics is basically

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>one third Labor, one third Liberal, and one third who

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>are voting for something else, the majority of which are

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>preferencing the Labor Party. Whoever the leader or leadership team is.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope that in the first months after this election

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that they go and hold public town halls in every

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>single seat that they lost, not so people can yell,

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>not so we could gnash our teeth and get the

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>win about, but to hear people. Hear people who were

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>disappointed and went off to the right, disappointed and went

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>off to the left. And no, you don't turn around

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, you know, Jenny and Bendigo had this

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>one incredible idea, let's change everything. So Jenny from it's

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>not about that. But slowly but surely, once you have

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a meeting here, and a meeting there, and a meeting

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>over there, and one back there, and one over there

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and one off to the side, and yes, the press

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>will be there. You'll be able to slowly but surely

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>see there two, four, six, eight ten ideas. And then

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you put that into the process of an organization that's

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>serious about change, that's talking to people about change. And

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's how you can modernize. I think

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that's how you reflect the changes in our country. The

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>third one worth talking about it you've got to meet

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the people where they are.

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>People who think the politics about an arm wrestle and

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it's only two sides and that's it. Well, we're not

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>in a cocin Pepsi world anymore. We're not in a

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Fosters or VB world. Where in a world when have

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you ever been to a bottle shop. There's a lot

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of choices out there, and yes, there are two primary

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>ones when it comes to the choice of government right now,

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>but you can't always assume that that's going to be

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the case. In a place like the UK, the Reform

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Party at the council elections and the system's different. It's

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>voluntary voting and it's first past the post, but they

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>got more people elected to more councils across the entire

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>UK than any other party that was running, and they

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>only had just to bear few members of parliament in

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Parliament. Nija Faraj is still part of the

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Polmurray Life family and he'll be back with us sooner

0:15:58.200 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>rather than later. But he was focused for the past

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>few weeks on a campaign and on a campaign about

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>being a happy warrior. So again, it's about the people

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you talk to too. Now you're going to see a

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of inevitable analysis from people who are commercial or

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>ideological rivals, who say, oh, you don't talk to this person,

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you should only talk to this people. And there's not

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a strategy of winning that you know. If you do

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a weekly appearance on radio national, everything will be okay. No,

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you go everywhere, you go everywhere. Whoever the next leader is,

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>they should be on those breakfast TV shows every single week.

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Whoever the leader is should be offering opinion columns regularly

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in multiple media outlets, of which seventeen people who work

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for those media outlets could turn around and write the response.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>But you're still out there. You're still out there talking

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to maybe even a room where ninety percent of people

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>may disagree with you. There's also the worlds of social media,

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>non traditional media, sports, media, entertainment, meet there's lots of

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>different places to go, FM, breakfast radio. And I know

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not breaking news that you need to do

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>these things, but you don't need to do these things

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>three weeks before an election. You need to do them

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>for the full three years to be part of that conversation,

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>no matter how far away you are from power. And also,

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that this idea about meeting people where there are,

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is probably as sharp as I'm going to

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>get tonight, which is it's not about putting voters through

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>purity tests or the people that you talk to through

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>purity tests, and unless you fully pass, you know you

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>must be this blue tobaccos. Well, the real is a

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty is red, to thirty is blue, and a thirty's

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>question mark at the moment. The other thing too, about

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>meeting people where they are is the people generally speaking,

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they wake up every single day with a smile on

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>their face. The sun comes up, and how good is

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it be a happy warrior. Perfect example of that is

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the great Nigel Farage, who is going to be on

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the show on Tuesday Night, Number four empower the next generation.

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>This does not mean that the Liberal Party has to

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>automatically go, oh, if we run lots of people looking

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>like gen Z, then gin Z will vote for us.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>All the millennials will vote for us.

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>One of the coolest things that happened last night was

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>as I was about to leave the room, it took

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>me about an hour to leave the room because I

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>had these great conversations with young party volunteers. Half a

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>dozen here, half a dozen there, half a dozen next

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to where we were broadcasting. And I hope that those

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>voices are not just the soldiers who go and do

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.719
<v Speaker 1>what head office says. I hope that those people feel

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>like they are part of a process where you're able

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, my friends say this, and my friends

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>say that again, not so you just flip and flip

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and flip, but so you've got real insight. I'd like

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to see a greater prominence in the policy conversation about

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the next generation of voices, which does not mean that

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the current generation or older generations are irrelevant in the conversation. No, no, no.

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>The coalition of getting yourself to half of the country

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is that there's lots of different networks that make that up,

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and one should not have more value than the other.

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>My view is in this process, if done right, you

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>have an ability to have insight into each of those networks,

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>respecting the people who have won and done before taking

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>some risk with the people who think that there might

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>be a different way of doing something. Every now and then,

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and finally, most obviously for the Liberal Party, everything is

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>on the table. Everything is on the table. Whoever the

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>next leader is, I think they should basically stand up

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>as soon as next week and say, okay, reset button.

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Every policy we took. The election gone will decide whether

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>we do or don't recommit to those things. And that's

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>not a conversation about values. That's conversation about policy. You've

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>got three years to have that conversation. Obviously, with people

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 1>voting early, you have to have the big ideas out early.

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But everything's on the table about how to get more

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>people to run and the things that you talk about,

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the branding, the logo, all of it. Everything should be

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>on the table. So again I say, as one of

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the millions of people who are disappointed by the result,

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we continue because when we give up is when they

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>truly win. All right, let's get to Tom Connell, the

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>man who, as I say, I cannot blow enough smoke

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and I cannot pump those tires up hard enough. In fact,

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I think his tires should be so big that they

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>could go onto one of those mining trucks that we

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>saw in Cowgoli last week. Tom Connell, he's a mate,

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>he's a colleague, and he has been kicking as this election. Mate.

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I know you don't love the public the public praise,

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>but congratulations on the night made.

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 3>Very generous.

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 5>I mean I bumped into a couple of people at

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 5>the hotel and they said, oh are you Thomas said yeah.

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 5>They said, do you know Paul Murray? So you know

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 5>we all know really where the Sky newsans sit out there.

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>It's all the family. We love you, we love you. Okay,

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 1>let's get through some stuff. Latest count now, obviously labor,

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>you know there's still plenty on the table for them

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>to push a little bit higher. What did say one

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>day do because we've got to give credit to the

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Electric Commission. They actually did have a look into some

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>postal voting today and that's tightened a couple of races.

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it has.

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Let's go through the tally first of all, and where

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.479
<v Speaker 5>we're at. So this is pre election Labour seventy eight.

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 5>I want to draw some attention to here Green's four independent,

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 5>four climates two hundred and six. So when we go

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 5>right now to the current count Labor eighty seven, pet Trees,

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 5>the other one that's fallen today with some certainty Coalition

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 5>thirty eight.

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think they're going.

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 5>To win probably three or four more, depending on how

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 5>things go. Look over here at the moment, the Green's

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 5>still on zero confirmed.

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 3>I think they will.

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 5>Win two at least at this stage, but nothing is

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 5>actually confirmed. The other independent there it Tally Andrew g

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 5>is set to win Claire. We're just seeing who might

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.719
<v Speaker 5>finish second or third. And that's the other interesting story

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 5>I think about this, how many contests are turning into

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 5>tight ones where we might see an independent of some

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 5>flavor finishing top two. So Goldstein right now, and I'll

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 5>go to that in a moment. You can see climates

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 5>two hundred ahead in that Monash could be an independent

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 5>and second Bean is an independent and second Bean in Canberra, Paul.

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 3>That's the margin that Camber that Labour has.

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 5>There we go to the next page, the next to

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 5>a Liberal Labor contest, but Bradfield is obviously a Climate

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 5>two hundred contest. Flinders could end up being Climate two

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 5>hundred and second. Menzies is a mess and could have

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 5>an Independent and Fremantle cap Hewlett running very close there

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 5>as well. The next page I mentioned as well Andrew

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Clare and Independent. So this could be the other part

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 5>of the story. The next election, when we get that pendulum,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 5>there's going to be a whole chunk.

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 3>We'll see how big the cross Bench is.

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 5>I think it will be a similar size, maybe even

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 5>a little bit bigger or a similar size to that sixteen,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 5>but there'll be another whole number of seats where they'll

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 5>be in the two candidate preferred if they run again

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 5>next time around. So I think that's something really worth

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 5>thinking about as we think about how much our sort

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 5>of electoral system and someone has been upended. I wanted

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 5>to go here, well here i Ama and Marie at Goldstein.

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 5>I wanted to tell you why Goldstein has changed today. Essentially,

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.959
<v Speaker 5>Zoe Daniel thought she'd won last night. This is the

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 5>margin right now at this stage we don't worry abot

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 5>that match swing, and so on we go, who's leading,

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 5>how many votes Zoe Daniel is at the moment about ninety.

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Votes ahead of Tim Wilson.

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 5>The problem for her is the postal votes that are

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 5>coming in right now. So here are the postal votes.

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 5>This is what's come in so far. About ten thousand

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 5>have come in two party preferred.

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Again, don't worry about the swing.

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 5>There's a three thousand vote difference to Tim Wilson's advantage.

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 5>On the postals, there will be about twenty thousand postal votes.

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 5>Twenty seven thousand applications were issued. You know, we apply

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 5>a rough for melody rate, not to boy your viewers,

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 5>but there'll be about another ten thousand, so basically he'll

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 5>go three thousand ahead last time around Zoe Daniel on

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the vote to come that's absent declaration.

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 5>Pre Pole and Provisional only won by about six hundred.

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 5>So I'm just going to look at one more booth

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 5>to make sure it's still flowing that way. But I

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 5>don't see a way back right now actually for Zoe Daniel,

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 5>so just a little bit hesitant because of the way

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 5>pre Pole and postals gone in this election, and they

0:24:58.119 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 5>can be a bit acceptive early.

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 3>But it looks like he'll clearly.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 5>Get in front and Zoe Dane you won't be able

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 5>to make it back. So we're just pause and be

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 5>a little bit wary because it's not going to change

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 5>election right now, but it looks like that will be

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 5>the one climate two hundred seat that will actually fall.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 5>The other really interesting one is the seat of Melbourne.

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 5>So this has been a tricky one because the call

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 5>by the AEC they have to pick before there's a

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 5>single vote who will be the candidates, and they didn't

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 5>actually initially pick Labor. Well it is Labor. Now look

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 5>at this margin right now. Don't get carried away by

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 5>this margin. It's very early on in this count in

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 5>terms of the match two pp right now it's going

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 5>to be a match, a much closer contest.

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 3>So right now our system is thinking the projected tally.

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 5>These are just raw numbers coming in, so it's a

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 5>bit seat of the pants. The projected tally will have

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 5>Adam ban On about fifty point five percent.

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 3>In other words, it's far too early.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 5>So this is very early on the two party preferred

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.679
<v Speaker 5>and we just need more votes to come in have

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 5>any sort of an idea where that contest has gone.

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 5>So they're redoing account.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Basically, can I just quickly ask about the pace of

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>count in Melbourne, where again lots of places and lots

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of type places. Is it a slightly slower pace that's

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>coming out of that city And is that because there's

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 1>this particularly large number of people who might have been

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in Brisbane for magic round.

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, when you're somewhere else, you have an absent vote,

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 5>so that shouldn't affect it.

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you go off and you cast an absent.

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Vote, that just means the absent bucket is bigger. I

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 5>have noticed today and I know some of these prepole

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 5>booths are getting really big in Melbourne fifteen thousand and

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 5>so on. So the issue is the bigger the booth

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 5>along it is the count. We were waiting for one today.

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 5>In fact, in mensies today, Paul and I thought that

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 5>there was a possibility that might just get a little

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 5>bit closer, and it has become today. This was four

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 5>percent and five percent last night. It's come into one

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 5>point eight percent. But on the current numbers, the postal

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 5>catch up, you can see the gap between the two

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 5>is a little bit less than three thousand, and that's

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 5>going to be the problem for Keith Wallerhan, I just

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 5>want to see one more batch of because my understanding

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 5>is he ran a postal a direct mail campaign this

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.239
<v Speaker 5>time he didn't last time. Sometimes late that means they

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 5>can break really well. I don't expect they will. I

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 5>don't think he'll win that. And the problem at the

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 5>moment is the way those postals are flowing. So think

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 5>about that gap. Three thousand or so was the gap.

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 5>You've got ten thousand postals in so far he has

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 5>made up what thirteen hundred votes, So if there's there

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 5>is eight thousand votes, thirteen hundred votes he's gaining. Actually

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 5>that's quite interesting, So that's a better postal. There's actually

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 5>more votes here. Then when I start the ball, so

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 5>start bigger catch up. So I'll go and crange some

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 5>more numbers. That's a bigger catch up than he was

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 5>getting because the first four thousand he caught up about

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 5>three hundred, So the next what four thousand, he's caught

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 5>up more like a thousand.

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 3>That could get him closer.

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 5>Look, that won't breage the gap on those current numbers

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 5>because it's not there's not a heap of postal in

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 5>there that will get quite tight. So that will end

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 5>up being the total two party preferred on this seat

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 5>will end up being sat more like fifty point five

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 5>at this rate, and he needs another sort of increase

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 5>in post will be a competitive but I'll tell you what,

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to keep a eye on that one.

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Can I also ask I've always wanted to do this.

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask to have a look at the seat

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of Bradfield, because again, you know that there's all sort

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>of all the news websites, and then there's the data

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>that you're getting the AAC. Your computer is going to

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>be more powerful than my laptop. Right Apparently that's now

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 1>under one thousand votes right now, it's assumed that that

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:34.479
<v Speaker 1>is running the Teel way. But again the Prepole and

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Postal conversation, if that's at around one thousand, that's interesting.

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is. Let's have a look.

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 5>That's well, that's about eighteen hundred at the moment right now,

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 5>eighty percent countered. This is always going to be just

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 5>a case of what vote is to go. I don't

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 5>think there'll be Prepole left let's double check. No, that's

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 5>an EAV that's hearing assisted, so they tend to be

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, fifty votes. Postal is the main one left

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 5>and absent. Absent can actually trend back towards climate two hundred.

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 5>So you want a lead of five hundred if you're liberal. Okay,

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 5>so seven thousand in trending pretty well. Fourteen hundred she's

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 5>made up so far.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 3>I think that is going to be quite tight.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 5>So I'll go and see exactly how many postals from

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 5>memory in Bradfield there would be enough to get Giselle

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 5>Capterian back into the lead.

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Just then she needs the hope.

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 5>To hang on when the absent come in, and I'll

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 5>start to come in tomorrow and Tuesday. There's also funny

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 5>votes called declaration pre pole that's when you vote early,

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 5>not in your electorate, and provisional when you've got to

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 5>prove who you are.

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 3>So this is what these things can get down to

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 3>later on.

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 5>Provisional is very small, but absent can be a decent

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 5>amount of votes fifteen hundred two thousand or so, so

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 5>you can get a decent lead if they sort of

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 5>break one way on them.

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>This is amazing. It's like human human Google, human check GPT,

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>where I can just ask Tom and Tom will do

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the work for us. I love it. I love it

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's because you've had a long time, so

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to hold you for too much longer. But

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>can you give us the quick sweep when it comes

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to the Senate because the question there is obviously labor

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to end up getting Like in Queensland it

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>was they got remember one at one election, that'll end

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>up clearly getting two Victoria. They could end up, you know,

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he be a little bit higher. Give us an idea

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>about because basically the last spot, so we're looking here

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at your one nations or your family firsts or your trumpets.

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think the two.

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 5>Most relevant things obviously who the makeup is, who goes

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 5>out one nation will be interesting watch. But Labor effectively

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 5>have twenty five to start with out of the ones

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 5>we know they'll get here if they can make up three,

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 5>they get to twenty eight and the Greens will get eleven.

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 5>That would mean Labor and the Greens pass legislation by

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 5>not talking to anyone else. I think that's probably the

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 5>most relevant status. Like, so can labor make up three?

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 5>So Queensland, top line here is how many were up.

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 5>Bottom line is the quota, So you can already see

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 5>labor makes up one there, that's simple two to the

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 5>LNP one of the Greens. One nation's in a pretty

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 5>good position to get that position and win it back.

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Courtesy of Malcolm Roberts.

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 5>New South Wales is interesting now so far on these numbers,

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 5>if they held, you'd say label will make up another

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 5>one two point six to two quotas Liberal Nationals two

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.479
<v Speaker 5>Greens won, but Labor well ahead of one nation. But

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 5>so far this amount thirty seven point five percent. That's

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 5>well above what they're getting at a state house level,

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 5>and the amount of voting here at the Senate is

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 5>about thirty percent. In other words, the vote could actually

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 5>drop off for Labor and we're we're not going to say, oh,

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, this is locked in.

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 3>If these numbers end up like this, Labor would win one.

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 5>But if it comes down then they get into a

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 5>battle with one nation would be their problem. Liberal Nationals

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 5>as well, they're not going to get above two. Obviously

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 5>Perin Davy was third on the ticket, so the Deputy Nationals.

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Leader will lose her seat as well.

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 5>South Australia and Malanowski's power perhaps is powering Labor here.

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 3>So two are up two point six to two.

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 5>They're a pretty good chance of keeping that because I

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 5>think this is more representative of the sort of.

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Vote they're going to end up with in South Australia.

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 3>So two will end up Liberal, one Green, two Labor.

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 5>I think Labor would get the third at this stage

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 5>over one nation.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Again, wait to see though.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 5>Because if that gets a bit closer, if it's point

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 5>four to five versus point five to five, you do

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 5>often get minor parties preferencing and helping out.

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 3>So Labor's in a decent position.

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 5>Now we'll see where the vote goes Tasmania to finish

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:20.719
<v Speaker 5>with as well, Paul. So we're going to see two Labor,

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 5>at least one Liberal, at least one Green, two more

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 5>up for grabs.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Where do they go.

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 5>Labor could get one, Liberal could get one, Greens could

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 5>get one or Jackie Lamby.

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 3>But in other words, she's not assured right now.

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 5>Of returning waiting for more vote, not calling this right now,

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 5>but she'd be very vulnerable right there trying to win

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 5>off point four to six given that relatively even spread elsewhere.

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 3>So that will be a watch.

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 5>I still think, you know, depending on how things go.

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 5>She's been a pretty strong force in Tasmanian politics, so

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 5>she's got that recognition when you get to that preference element,

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 5>but not a strong position to be in right now,

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 5>so we'll have to wait. They press a magic in

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 5>the Senate in a few weeks when we find out everything.

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 3>But we will get closer to knowing as we get

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 3>more count in the next few days.

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Tom, that could be the favorite fifteen minutes I've done

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen years. I love that. I love the chat,

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I really do. Thank you, mate, Congrats again. I will

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>see you all the day and we'll chat again later

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>in the week. Thank you, Tom Connall. How good is he?

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>How good is it? I'm telling you the ability to

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>get all that picture and you're still seeing on the

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night, what's sort of being counter or maybe back

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe this way? I love it. I love it. We

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>love the numbers of an election, regardless of which way

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>they go. All right, quick break back with more. Let's

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>get back into the final of the state of the race,

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>because we know the race is over. What are the insights,

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>what are the positive conversations, and let's talk about some

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>polling mistakes, including what was being whispered into the liberal

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>parties here. Want to see good? How Good's nerding out

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>with your numbers out. That's what we should have called

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that segment. God love Tom Connall. All right, let's get

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>into it right now, fellow number nerds. None of them

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>cost Samaras, who congratulations to his organization, Red Bridge absolutely

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>nailed the changes, the Democrat all of it right. That's

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a really hard thing to do. Congratulations to you and

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues. The wonderful Michael Kroger again, one of the

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>millions that are disappointed with what's happened here. And we'll

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>get into the future and all the rest of it here.

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>But how are you the day after mate?

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, we've been here before, Paul is the answer to that.

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 7>So incredibly disappointed, disappointed for some really good candidates and

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 7>MPs who have lost, and very disappointed for Peter Dutton.

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 7>But you saw the best of Peter Dutton a bit late,

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 7>a bit late. His concession speak last night was what

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 7>it doesn't it? I mean, I don't know, dun't all

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 7>that well, to be honest, but what a class act

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 7>he is. That was That was a that was a

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 7>class performance by Peter Dutton. For goodness sake. You know

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 7>the guy, the guy's an absolutely quality human being and

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 7>you know regrettably we won't see him as prime minister,

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 7>but he joins a long pantheon of people. It would

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 7>have been great prime minister of this country.

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 6>But that's the way they rule. It will turns mate.

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get into again keeping a nerd out

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>on some of the numbers here, because it was fairly

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>obvious about whether the result was going to be the

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>conversation of minority majority was the outside expectations then once

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it becomes clear majority and obviously there's a way past that. Now,

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>was there a particular result or a seat that as

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>an old school party guy and now the sort of

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>external data guy where he went, wow, that's pretty big.

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Mine would be the labor result in Queensland.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's right correct. I mean our Casey's track was

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 4>tracking those seats so like long moon forward, and it

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.959
<v Speaker 4>was showing pretty good numbers for Labor and I thought, look,

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 4>it might be a data operation. But we thought no, no,

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 4>there are our numbers. We're going to publish them. And

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 4>when they foul, I thought, well, okay, geez, something's going

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 4>on here.

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty big.

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 4>And it's as Queensland seats that took me by surprise.

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 4>Everything else was as I expected, you know, means's was

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 4>going to because it was going to play out like

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 4>I did in Melbourne and Deacon and Goldstink could go

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:20.320
<v Speaker 4>back to Tim Wilson and I think it will.

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 4>And Labor was going to be okay in seats in Melbourne,

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 4>which you know the College were hoping to get because

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:34.240
<v Speaker 4>we saw a very significant swing to labor in that stay.

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 4>But it was Queensland that took me by surprise in

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:37.439
<v Speaker 4>a very big way.

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean certainly. Again, you know, we know that

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 1>when an independent gets re elected, get ready that they

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>have had their feet in wet cement. They are there,

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>all right. We saw with Wilkie in Tasmania, Sharky in

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>South Australia, Catta in Queensland, and that is now the

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>case when it comes to the reelection of the world

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 1>all bar one of the teams. That Bradfield number is

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. Obviously. You know, if they get there, well

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that's on the way towards what people predicted. If they don't,

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we know that that's their second and massive crack at it.

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And their expectation was to grow the footprint. And if

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the footprint does retract either with Goldstein or the failure

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 1>in Bradfield. It'll be really fascinating here. But I want

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>to ask again the question of your cause, which is

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we know that generally speaking, fifty two forty eight, fifty

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>three forty seven reality fifty five forty five. Is that

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>a miss or that's the margin of error conversation.

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we're projecting in So's pole Bludger projecting that

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 4>it will land on about fifty four.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So basically yeah.

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, And so, I mean we had it at

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 4>fifty three. It's about one point one percent out, and

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 4>I think a couple of other pulses as well were

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:57.359
<v Speaker 4>within that space as well.

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good, that's what you want. Yeah, well, well

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say, I was just going

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, is that But also, Michael, the type of

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 1>polling that I personally think is going to be more

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>instructive for the next three years and probably for the

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>future of the industry. Thank goodness for the national poll,

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>but I don't care. I want to see a pole

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of twenty seats, the ones that swing and the back

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and forth. Because Okay, as we were talking about before

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the election, Michael was a just hardcore labor vote that

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>was going up in hardcore labor seats. All right, But

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>if you can see in the things that swing what's happening,

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 1>as well as marry that in with the electoral role,

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get pretty damn close, don't you think, Michael,

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 1>that that has to be the future of insight into

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the electric.

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 6>Although it depends on how big the pole is.

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you see these rubbish poles occasionally where I

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 7>mean Chris Bowen, there were some polls showing that he

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:52.760
<v Speaker 7>was on nineteen percent and his challenger was on forty percent.

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 7>You see this push polls, these fake poles which are

0:38:56.920 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 7>on small numbers by non credible sources. Take the view

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.840
<v Speaker 7>that in a federal seat, in the actual seat, I

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:05.720
<v Speaker 7>don't want to see a pole less than a thousand

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.839
<v Speaker 7>voters in a federal seat because that's one percent. It's

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 7>not a huge number and it can change. But I

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 7>prefer to see the bigger the poll, the better. If

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 7>you're seeing a seat where the pole is one hundred

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:21.839
<v Speaker 7>or one hundred and fifty, just put it in the bin, mate,

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 7>just take my notus.

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 6>But it is very hard.

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 7>It's very hard to poll individual seats, very hard.

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's also a couple of companies I could name,

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and because we'll probably be happy if I did. But

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 1>if you know, you know, well you just go okay, radio,

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 1>goodbye into the not even for the narrative conversation. I'm

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>not going near any of that stuff, all right, So

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>let's talk here as well, in and around polling fresh Water. Okay. Now,

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>they were the most generous to the coalition, they published

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Financial Review, but they were providing the private

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>insights to the Liberal Party. James Campbell's got a story

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 1>this afternoon that some of the seat polling and the

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 1>seat insight into Dixon was allegedly being held back from

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Peter Dunton. If that's the case, well again, political malpractice

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>from the people who should always tell you what's going on.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to be flying blind. You'll hit you'll

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>hit the cliff. But they came out and have basically

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>as a reputational exercise, defended themselves via the Financial Review tonight.

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 1>In amongst other things, they congratulate Cosin Redbridge for getting

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it bang on the money, which I thought is a

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.240
<v Speaker 1>good thing to do. But this is what they say

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>about the three things and the three reasons that they

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>miss Labour's landslide. I'm going to read all three of

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>them to you from the people behind the Freshwater Organization.

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I can get those up, guys. The first quote, first,

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>polling appears to have overestimated labor defectors to the coalition,

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>particularly those who voted no the voice referendum. Okay, just

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 1>on this one point, Bob Hawk was simultaneously re elected

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>multiple times while losing multiple referendums. The idea that the

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 1>referendum equals the result in an election, there's no overlap.

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But as you can see there number two on what

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>they had to say here. Second, for all the noise

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>about preference flows being different in a way that was

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>substantially benefit the coalition performance, that outcome simply did not materialize. Now,

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the one nation vote we're going to talk about this

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 1>at some points was up around seven, eight, nine, even ten.

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Looks like at this stage we're sitting at about six

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and a bit. There was a little bit of junk

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>news that was around because somebody quickly touched a couple

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of things that you know, the preference flows were running

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>at ninety percent, and therefore if they're up, then the

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.879
<v Speaker 1>preference flows go well, that wasn't true. Third thing here,

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>The third was the late swing. Given that all the

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 1>polsters seem to have underestimated the swing to labor, and

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone's field work would have been over the days in

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that week, it strongly suggests dot dot that there was

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a late swing among soft voters. Well, surprise, surprise. I

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>think many last minute undersided voters just go who do

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they think is going to win? But that's part of

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:01.919
<v Speaker 1>my theory. Michael can't help to talk about the data

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that's inside the room, the data that was being fed

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>into the machine. Publicly, we saw that it was the

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>most positive of the polling, but it also seems that

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the spin they were giving to the media, and I

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>think in potentially the candidate was oh, mate, in fifteen seats,

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we're fifty to fifty. Where fifty to fifty Where the

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>reality was it was fifty two forty eight, And they'd

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>hoped the fifty two forty eight was their way, but it.

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:29.240
<v Speaker 6>Was so mate. Long experience tells me never to listen.

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 7>To private polling, private party polling. A senior coalition person

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 7>said to me during the election, the private polling is very,

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 7>very good. I said, don't take any natives of it.

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 7>I know, No, it's very we're very confident in this

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:46.720
<v Speaker 7>that and the other seat. And I said, I've actually

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 7>seen the polling in writing. No any documents or any spreadsheets,

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 7>anything on zoom or anything. No, I said, so some

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 7>polsters just said it's very good and you've sallowed that

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 7>and gone away. Yes, or so I said, because a

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 7>lot of if you if you say a lot of

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:09.319
<v Speaker 7>a lot of reasons. But one of the reasons is

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 7>that that out of high level meetings things need to

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 7>leak out, and then they might leak to people like

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 7>pests like James Campbell. He keeps writing this stuff with

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 7>very good, very good columnists. By the way, well he's

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 7>a brilliant writer, Campbell.

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 6>But you know, so you.

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 7>Always keep the the the confidence up of everyone. Now,

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.799
<v Speaker 7>what James has written tonight is is devastating.

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 6>If they if they have kept.

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 7>From Peter Dutton certain polling in his own seat and

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 7>in Brisbane. And if that's that's true, that's Dunton would

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.360
<v Speaker 7>have every reason to be profoundly disappointed with that. But no,

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:46.760
<v Speaker 7>I'd never take any notice of private polly and don'ts

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 7>and people that ring me and say what I think

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 7>the private polling is saying I said I always say,

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 7>don't take any notice of it.

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 6>Just read cos or news poll or get it.

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 7>Get a sense of consensus for these polls, and you

0:43:56.640 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 7>know where the thing's going. Otherwise, what you're saying is

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 7>that the private polling's right and every other pole is wrong.

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:04.360
<v Speaker 6>Well that's just nonsense.

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 7>So the private polling isn't isn't terribly relevant, I don't

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 7>think correct.

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm going to pull in Eddie maguire here causes

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 1>response after the break, Stay wild, baby, stay wild, stay

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 1>with us. But plenty more to talk about, including that

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>organizational stuff that I said at the start of the show,

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and again, part of what we're going to do over

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the next few weeks, the next few months, and logically

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>over the next three years is got a whole bunch

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of people on who will offer an answer to some

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>questions that maybe we don't have the answer to. Doesn't

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 1>mean they're all going to be right or all going

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to be wrong, but that's the point, not just to

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 1>learn a lesson, but to be seen to be learning

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a lesson as well. Hot to see, all right, we're

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>all in it. Thank you, appreciate that we're here. Of course,

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 1>don't forget Meg and Kelly Wednesday night Nige or for

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Urs Tuesday night. And you know, I'm going to be

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>sad face here, not the TikTok sad face that some

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>people try to put on me. It's not real. By

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, is this state of the race. I've enjoyed

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>these conversations and I look forward to versions of them

0:44:57.600 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 1>in the next little while. I really do appreciate, brother

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:01.439
<v Speaker 1>of you, and it's lots of stuff and other things

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to do, but I appreciate cos Sam Marris and Michael

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Kroger you having these conversations. Because all right, enough of

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the hold over the Liberal Party private polling and why

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you think it was so wrong?

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So it's all about how you use the data

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 4>and interpret the data. So I think, look, their polling

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 4>would have been fine, but it's when you get served

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 4>the numbers you've got to actually say to yourself, Okay,

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 4>what's set in my piling. So if I'm polling one

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:31.919
<v Speaker 4>and I'm using a CADDY, which is what the two

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 4>majors use, it's a process called the computer aided telephone interview,

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 4>and that is a call center, a live call center

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 4>rings into the electric Now, why, I know that trying

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 4>to ring young people and get them to answer their

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 4>phone on the maibile is very difficult, right, And so

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 4>what it does is that under reports the vote of

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 4>young people, and the types of young people that answer

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 4>the phone are sometimes not reflective of that population.

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 8>So you grab those numbers, you're going to upweight their

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 8>short fall and you can content to make the whole sample.

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 8>This happens right across the board. Both mayors do this

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 8>now in one and that's going to be pretty accurate.

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 8>Why Well, because it's an older electorate.

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Therefore the liberal polling approach would be quite sound. But

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 4>you roll it out into a federalcy like Hawk in Melbourne'

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 4>out of western suburbs where it's very young, you're going

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 4>to underreport the labor vote because there are more labor

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 4>young voters there than their own liberal and so as

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:37.799
<v Speaker 4>a strategist you've got to go, Okay, these numbers are

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 4>telling me, you know we're fifty two. I'm going to

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:44.400
<v Speaker 4>take three or four percent of that because I know

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 4>in my bones that's actually under reporting it. So your

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 4>advice to the boss being done and would be a boss,

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 4>this is what they're telling us but a caveat X.

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, and a perfect example, as you say about those

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>demographic things, is that again at the electoral role, we

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 1>showed this it was nine thousand more people under fifty

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 1>than over fifty, So a perfect example in that seat

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 1>where there is such a stark difference that, Yeah, the

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>methodology falls apart, all right, Michael. I know the answer

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>takes three years and probably much longer to actually answer.

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But what are the types of questions that you think

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the Libs need to ask themselves?

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 7>So Mata I said you on Thursday night, there's one

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 7>thing for certain out of this.

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 6>Election, which is it will be we will be shocked

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 6>at the result.

0:47:31.680 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 7>And that's exactly what happened, although I wasn't able to

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:39.280
<v Speaker 7>tell you which way we'd be shocked, but there it is. Well,

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 7>look I distill it down this way. This is simplistic,

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 7>but it's largely right. You fight elections on your brand equity.

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 7>You look at the sixteen election and the twenty five

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 7>election very similar. Yeah, fought basically on one dominant theme,

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 7>lots of sub themes. Trump and the nuclear one dominant

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:02.959
<v Speaker 7>theme in sixteen and twelve. How did labor go one

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 7>dominant theme in the nineteen election. How did the Liberal

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 7>Party go twenty two is different because the government have

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 7>expired expired, right, it's been there nine years three Prime

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 7>Minister's fourth term agenda that wasn't one.

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:14.400
<v Speaker 6>Et cetera.

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:17.240
<v Speaker 7>But three of the last four elections have been short

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:21.360
<v Speaker 7>on been fought on the party's major brand equities. Labour

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:24.440
<v Speaker 7>did tremendously well have it won ninety seats in thirteen.

0:48:24.480 --> 0:48:28.320
<v Speaker 7>We almost lost in sixteen message there are elbow. Labour

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 7>fought that on their number one brand equity. They revived

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 7>that this time with a shocking smear campaign of lives

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 7>and disinformation, but they got away with it.

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Correct.

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 6>We fought the nineteen election on tax So what.

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Have you got to do.

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 7>You've got to wrestle the debate and you've got to

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 7>be good enough to wrestle the debate on your brand equity.

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:49.320
<v Speaker 7>If the elections have fought on the economy, debt, deficit,

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:52.800
<v Speaker 7>et cetera, on the fact that in the year's a

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:54.759
<v Speaker 7>head mate, the federal government are going to have to

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 7>make massive cuts everywhere.

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's us all labor.

0:48:57.480 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 7>If Labour keeps spending at this at this level, right,

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:03.399
<v Speaker 7>Debt's going from your debt's gone up, the gross death's

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:05.759
<v Speaker 7>gone up three hundred billion dollars from nine hundred to

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 7>one point two trillion in the seven year period from

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.840
<v Speaker 7>twenty one to twenty two to twenty nine. Right, this

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 7>bloke charmers is very reckless.

0:49:12.680 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 6>So what's the message.

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:15.879
<v Speaker 7>The message is get back on to the reason people

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 7>vote for the Little Party, which is your core brand equity,

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 7>and not policies which are a bit unrelated to your

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 7>core brand equity, because when you do that, you don't win.

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Because I know you've got an appearance with Peter Creedlin

0:49:28.360 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and plots, have plenty of other commitments. But can I

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 1>get you back for the best part of a full

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 1>hour in maybe the next couple of days because the

0:49:34.600 --> 0:49:38.840
<v Speaker 1>answer is long and complicated to the very same question. Again,

0:49:39.000 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you boys, I really do appreciate it. Thank you

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>for talking you through the election. I look forward to

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 1>again plenty more chats in the thanks very near future.

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>That's our chef for tonight. We'll see you again tomorrow night.

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>The Raw Reports Next