WEBVTT - ORIGIN FALLOUT! Dean & Alex clash over Daley's Blues selections. "He'll get respect with a series win!"

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Well hello and welcome to the Code NRL Monday Show.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by Fatima Cadou and of course Alex from

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>NRL Soapbox. Welcome troops, thank you. What do we make

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of yesterday? What an amazing performance up there by the

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Eastern George ill at Warret Dragons toppling Brisbane after two

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five days for goodness, say, can you

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>believe that? An amazing victory? Fatima?

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 2>What did you make of it? No one gave him

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>a chance. In fact, I think everyone.

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Thought that they would get beaten by forty or fifty

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and Dean Young's Red VEV come out and shocked Ruglar league.

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 3>They have. I think they completely ambushed the Broncos. Oh,

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't a good performance by the Broncos at all.

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, headlines this morning that it was rock bottom

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>for them. Maybe this is the loss that they need

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>to have. But yeah, the Broncos I think showed very

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 3>little respect to the Dragons in a way, just out enthused,

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, zero respect for the ball, especially in that

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 3>first half, and the Dragons made them pay. I think

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 3>what fifteen straight losses, eleven straight losses this year? If

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 3>you look at their draw, you think, when is their

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 3>next win coming? But Dean Young pulled it off and

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>against the reigning premieres Alex.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think most that watched yesterday thought the Broncos looked

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>old and slow.

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not particularly in that order either.

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah yeah, and like it was more like they decided,

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 4>finally we're going to try and scoring points, like when

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.199
<v Speaker 4>we get down into the twenty, because they were alway

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 4>getting down. They were always getting field position, but they

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 4>weren't creating opportunities. They threw in so many offloads it

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 4>looked actually exciting halves are running around.

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know when that happened, Sophie, which is to

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 3>me a worrying sign is when Madge went from the

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 3>coach's boss down to the sideline. Yeah, that's when all

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden things clicked, all of a sudden. Rees

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Walsh was invested involved. Like you said, they were, you know,

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 3>looked like the Broncos of old. But if I'm Madge,

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking, well, what did the players think? Did they

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 3>not know I was there for the first sixty minutes

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 3>or whatever it is? You know that they needed to

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 3>see the coach on the sideline before he was able

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 3>to elicit a response from them against the team coming last.

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, they did finish fast, but yeah, I think

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 3>that's because they looked to the sideline and there was

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Madge sort of stalking the sideline.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Well that's the.

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 4>Thing, right, it didn't look like a Michael maguire coach

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 4>team for most of that game. I think Madge did

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 4>Madge even come out and say we didn't respect the

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 4>opposition and they paid the price for that, like they

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 4>should have respected the Dragons because the Dragons came to play.

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a level of complacency there, There's no

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>doubt about that, the way they came out and by

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the time they pulled their fingers out it was far

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>too late, which was a diabolical loss for the Broncos.

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you, though, alex Reyese Walsh, his

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>performance gain yesterday was average at best.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Where's he at?

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>He certainly hasn't attained the levels he got to last

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>year when he virtually drove Brisbane single handley through those

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>finals and to the premiership.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he did run, he did time, He's run late

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 4>last year. My suspicion this is uninformed though, but my

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 4>suspicion is that he's still carrying a little bit of

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 4>that injury or that tentatives from what's happened. Takes him

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 4>a while to find his flow, and he does work

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 4>better when his teammates are running straight, they're getting meters,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 4>and it just hasn't been working for them. I reckon,

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 4>he'll turn it up. That's Reese Walsch. She's a superstar,

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 4>but he's looking pretty poor right now.

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Fatima, the Broncos, they're on the same spot now as

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they were last year. We know what happened last year.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>We saw it unfold before her very eyes. I just

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>can't see it happening again. Every season is different.

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Just because it.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Happened last year, I think it would be wrong to

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>fall into that lalla of thinking it can happen again.

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gone.

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, I think they were guilty of being complacent

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 3>last year, even before they went on their run, and

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 3>they're guilty of it again, probably thinking in the back

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 3>of their minds, Okay, we were in the same spot

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 3>last year, but look at us. We went on to

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 3>become premier. So that's another thing that Michael maguire has

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 3>to address. But you know, I still think they absolutely

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>have the star power to do it. You know, pain

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Haas is bad, you know people. He looked sometimes a

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 3>little bit tentative, but still managed to knock out two

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 3>hundred plus meters Reese Walsh. I agree Sopie will get

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>to his best as the season goes on. They still

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 3>have a couple of guys injured, like Dean Maroner Jordan

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Ricky I think is now out with an extended period

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 3>with a full injury. But I still think they have

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 3>enough star power to if they scrape through, especially the

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 3>top four, that they're going to be their late September.

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 4>They've got to reach top four though, so if they

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 4>want to defend their premiership, it's not scraping into finals.

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 4>They've got to find form quick because they've got to

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 4>make top four to really make a title defense.

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Let's flip onto a positive. The Dragons we touched on

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the show. An extraordinary win. I

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>can't remember the last five ten years that we've seen

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it upset quite like that. What did you make of it?

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>How do they win?

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Good on them? Well, it was fantastic.

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's great for the game, and the Dragons actually

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 4>always put themselves in positions in games two score tries

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 4>and then did nothing with the ball in that final twenty.

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 2>But you just watched that game.

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 4>I think there was at one point they had more

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 4>than double even triple the offloads of the Broncos. So

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 4>they were starting to play a bit more chaotic and

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 4>manic footy. And in this era of the rules that

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 4>we have, that's what's kind of working.

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 2>You do.

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 4>You need structure, you need strategy, but you also just

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 4>need to do some chaotic stuff and they did that

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 4>very well, Like even just Cayle Flanagan, Like there's one

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 4>play where he's running left, there's nothing there and he's

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 4>running back over.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 2>He's not done that this season.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 4>So that kind of style of it's more this chaotic,

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 4>spontaneous footy, that's what worked for the Dragons. That's been

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 4>the missing ingredient for them. So they could actually get

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 4>a few more wins if they adopt that playing style again.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was interesting in watching Dean Young in

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the coaching box.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't excited.

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Sure inside he was incredibly relief, but there was no

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>banging on the glass, there was no hugging. It was

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>just very controlled, very measured. For Black that just bowled

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>over Brisbane.

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that sometimes a bit of self respect

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 4>of like, well we should win games rather than like

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 4>celebrating like you've won a Grand Final. Well it's been

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 4>one win this I reckon he's setting a new standard

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 4>of like, no, this is the standard we want to play.

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 3>He did celebrate like they had won a finals. The players,

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:09.559
<v Speaker 3>you know, especially the young players. There was this shot

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 3>of one of the Couchmen brothers, I don't know which

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 3>one and like a Pacificatongua and I think Kamie Stewart

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 3>and they're just embracing and the smile on their faces.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 3>I felt so happy for them because, especially because their

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 3>forward pack in that first half in particular, did lay

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 3>that platform for them to be able to attack the

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 3>way they did. So, Yeah, Den Young kept it cool

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and probably because he knows what's coming in the next

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks for them. It's not an easy month.

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 3>But the players definitely the monkey was off the back

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 3>and you can definitely see it.

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>They've got Cornella away this week, putting you on the spot.

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>How many more wins do you think that can get

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this year? I mean, it was a wonderful performance. Take

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but if they only finished the season with one or

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>two wins or three, it's still an abomination of a year.

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And the second part of the question is was it

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>enough yesterday for the Draggings to say, right, Dean Young

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is our man on.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 3>How many more games they're going to win? Just looking

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 3>at the next month, it's Karanulla Knights, Raiders Tigers. None

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 3>of those games going to be easy. The Raiders have

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 3>been up and down Tigers as well, quite plucky teams.

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 3>So you know then they have the buye after that,

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 3>So I don't I can't. Yeah, I don't want to

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 3>say they're not going to win another game because who knows,

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 3>they might ambush another team and then the lead up

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 3>to that Broncos win. They were pretty good against Kenrith

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 3>and they were pretty good against the Warriors before they

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 3>finally knocked over Brisbane, so there might be another sneaky

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 3>winning there.

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Dean Young, we're thinking he's the man.

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 4>I think it's really hard. He would have to get

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 4>more wins For me. I feel like he's this is

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 4>my kind of thing at the moment. I think it's

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 4>a poison chalice that Dragons Gig is an interim coach

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 4>because his body of work that he'll be presenting to

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 4>the board to be hired might only be one win,

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 4>and that's really hard to make a decision if you're

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 4>looking at statistics and how the team's performed. He would

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 4>have to get some more wins to feel like that

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 4>he secured that job.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I feel a bit sorry for Din. He's such a

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 2>great Dragons person. His father was a great Dragons person.

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>He's come in when the club desperately needed him, and

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>he's done the right thing, and it could end up

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>resulting in him missing out on the top job. So

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel a bit sorry for him. Do you think

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>he's the man to take them forward?

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm with Sophie. I'd probably like to see a few

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 3>more wins. Having said that, I love the way every

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 3>time he's been in front of the media, how he

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 3>speaks about the job he's got to do, how much

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 3>he cares about the club. Before the Broncos game, he said,

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 3>we lost the physical battle against the Warriors, and our

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 3>focus this week has been to win the physical battle.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 3>And his young forward pack responded to that so clearly.

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, and even guys that haven't been playing well

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 3>like vour Homes, you know, finally, delivered. So he might

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 3>not have the wins on the resume, but if he's

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 3>got the backing of the players, then you know, maybe

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 3>he is the right guy to take them forward.

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 4>It's also not going to get harder, Like next year

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 4>is coming in with a great spine. They've got some

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 4>great recruits coming in. This is the hardest it's going

0:08:58.400 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 4>to be for him for the next eighteen months if

0:08:59.920 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 4>he to get the gig. Like, it is really tough

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, it seems like every week we get stuck

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>into the same topic. Winch comes out of Bellmore, another loss,

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a very cranky Cameron Serrelo at full time over a

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of on field rulings.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 2>Alex, what did you make of.

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>The two decisions that Sorello was cranky about the no

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>try to Stephen Crydon and of course the big one

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>was the charge down by Josh Curran.

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so it's unfortunate, but that is the rule that

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 4>the player charging down can't hit a player's leg, and

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 4>there's been If you want to win about that one,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 4>then there's about twenty teams that get to wings as

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 4>well where there's been nominal contact. Making the argument that

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 4>will Jerome just turned around and run, So it wasn't

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 4>that big a deal that shouldn't come into play.

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 2>The will is the rule.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't matter a player gets a head knock and

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 4>they get up and keep running, They've still had a

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 4>head knock. So the a lot of argument that Surroundo

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 4>was using there doesn't work. It's the rule. You might

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 4>want to change the rule, but that's the rule. The

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 4>other one is the collision with Kiraz and.

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Was it Truba. Yeah, yeah, I don't.

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.599
<v Speaker 4>Understand what the big why everyone's so upset. It just

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 4>seemed like a genuine contest and you can't stop momentum

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 4>physics is going to happen.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 2>It didn't look like an illegal play. I look, corraz

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 2>actually was the instagrator. He ran into Taruva another way around. Yeah,

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>and like him.

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 4>Some Bulldogs fans are saying, oh, he was offside, it

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 4>should never have happened, but they review that, and again,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 4>offsides are very difficult to review. So there wasn't like

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 4>special significant mistreatment of the Bulldogs. You could argue they

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 4>were unlucky, but it wasn't undeserved.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I think so Alos just I think he's frustrated the

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>year that he wanted to have is just not happening.

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Another one we talked about was the Crichton no try

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>he grounded the ball on someone's leg. I think it

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>was you could see straight away that he was anxious

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>because he tried to roll over very quickly to get

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it down, which indicated that he knew straight away that

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a try. So I think as much as

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I irritated the dogs, I think both those decisions were

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>right now for Timmy, you wrote about this this morning,

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the Stephen Crichton decision not to challenge a fumble from

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>Lachland Gown and when Galvin did say, please challenge it,

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>what did.

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 2>You make of it?

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 3>It was definitely an interesting and in the commentary it

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 3>was just described as a bit of a flashpoint. I

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 3>don't think in the grand scheme of things, it's probably

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a storm in a teacup. But when

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 3>you think about the fact that Galvin is the number

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 3>seven and the general you know when he might not

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 3>be the captain, but when your number seven is saying

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 3>to the captain, oh, you know, look, I'm pretty sure

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 3>this wasn't a fumble, And if you look at the replay,

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't a fumble, Kaypeerspoort does make a raking motion

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 3>at the ball. You know, it makes you think, okay,

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 3>is there there's Critter, the captain not fully trust his

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 3>number seven, and again is that problematic? In real time?

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 3>To Crutter's defense and the ref's defense, it did look

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 3>like it was a knock on. It wasn't until it

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 3>was slowed down. Eventually Critter said, okay, let's challenge it.

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 3>By that point it was too late. So yeah, look,

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 3>it was something that Canonbury fans I got copped a

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 3>bit of heat on social media about bringing that up,

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 3>sort of like stirring the pot. But Cannaber fans did

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 3>notice it as well, and pretty instantly. Bulldogs insiders have

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 3>almost immediately knocked back the suggestion that there's some sort

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 3>of you know, distrust or issue between Galvin and Crichton

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 3>crighton to me and in a lead up to last

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 3>his final series like launched an impassioned defense of Galvin.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 3>So I don't think there's any kind of personal issues

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 3>between them, but you know, on the surface, it did

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 3>seem like that the captain doesn't trust his number seven,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 3>which you know could be problematic.

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>What did you make with a body language Alex with

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Crochton and Galvin, did you see anything in there? Without

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>being body language experts, clearly yeah, did you see something

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there that you thought or something's.

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Just not quite right here?

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 4>No, I honestly, like I'm not a body language expert,

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 4>so it just looked like he was like distrusting. It

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 4>looked like a strip, and then it didn't look like

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 4>a strip for Crichton, and then he's made the decision

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 4>as challes but it's too little, too late. But for me,

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 4>I think and maybe Bulldogs fans can speak into this,

0:12:57.640 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 4>but gascutters come out and said that we're taking responsible,

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 4>we're taking this on the chin. This is all good,

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 4>but I keep seeing a lack of responsibility and ownership

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 4>from the Bulldog's leadership, particularly Surrealdough, like he's blaming that,

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 4>he's blaming that they didn't get the call on the rake. Well,

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 4>they should take responsibility on what we're talking about and

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 4>use the captain's challenge. And this is not the first

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 4>time there's been discussion about referees. There's been other times

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 4>where it's like hints, it wasn't so volatile and passionate,

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 4>but he's very very regularly throughout the season.

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Put some blame on the refs.

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the six agains two were seven nil to

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the bull Yeah, so they got the rubber of the grain.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but there was also you know, Sitily Chupreneur was

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 3>lucky that he didn't get SimBin for that shot shoulder

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 3>touch charge on m I C. Macasini. There was I

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 3>think the was it the Galvan try as well, where

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 3>when that was slowed down it looks like the river

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 3>got his hand in between the ball. Looked like a

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 3>bit of separation. So yeah, it's you know, we're not

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 3>used to seeing coaches who lose say they didn't get

0:13:58.200 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 3>the rubb of the green, but there was just as

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 3>many that could have gone the Tiger's way they didn't.

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask you a question, put you on the spot, Alex.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Do the Bulldogs play finals football this year?

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 4>I generally thought whoever won this game, whoever lost this

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 4>game is kind of said goodbye to finals. I think

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 4>there's still space for that. They could do it, but

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 4>that's the kind of game they need to win. And

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 4>I've been piling on the Bulldogs here, but I actually

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 4>thought they played well. I thought they were aggressive, Setilli

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 4>was like insane. He looked illlegal to run that hard

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 4>and fast, so they had.

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 2>They have the hunger.

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 4>They've just got a similar problem to the Dragons where

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 4>they can't convert their opportunities into points. So because of that,

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 4>because they just can't, it's just clunky. They almost never

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 4>go left. I don't see them making finals.

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we saw one of, if not the games

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of the year out there at Combak Stadium on Sunday night,

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers against the Warriors, even with five State of

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Origin players rested. It was a classic game, high quality

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>elite footy. Alex, what did you make of it? It was unbelievable.

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 4>If I was like, hey, we want an advertisement for

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 4>the game, and I wanted to bring someone new to

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 4>get into footy, that's the I take them to. The

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 4>discipline from both teams was amazing. The collision was so good.

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 4>There was argie bargie, there was getting in people's faces.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 4>It was tight down to the last minute. You didn't

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 4>know what the result would be. And the atmosphere I

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 4>was there at the stadium, the atmosphere was insane. The

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 4>Warriors fans turned out and sometimes it felt like we

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 4>were at a Warrior's home game. It was electric energy,

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 4>players played phenomenally. The refereeing was very decent, like you

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 4>couldn't really criticize the refee.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Just an unbelievable spectacle determined.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we saw the Grand Final in late

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>May or should I say the Grand final teams.

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 2>May? Yes?

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 3>I think so far we're almost at the halfway point

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 3>of this season. There's no doubt that Penrith and the

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Warriors have been the two best teams and most consistent

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 3>teams all year. Can you imagine a Panthers Warriors Grand Final,

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just the Warriors against anybody in a Grand Final,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 3>considering this surge of support that they have in the

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 3>last couple of years. It'd be amazing, talk about, you know,

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 3>a spectacle the game, It'd be absolutely amazing. But yeah,

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I still think, I mean, there is definitely now at

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 3>a point in the season where we can see there

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 3>is a gap between Penrith and the Warriors and everyone else.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I wrote Bulldogs bite today on Lourie Daily, and

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>how I think that the state of New South Wales

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>or many people aren't showing him the full respect. New

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>South Wales into Queensland on Queensland. They won in the

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>final minute. Yes, Carlin Ponger was sent off. I understand

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that thoroughly, but we had six debutantes and I think

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>ultimately Lourie isn't getting the respect that he deserves. We

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>won as in New South Wales, yet the way he's

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>been chastised it's like we got beaten. So I just

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think Lurie deserves a bit more credit for what he did.

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's a lot of people out there that

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>will disagree, Alex.

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 2>What did you make it look? Yeah?

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 4>I disagree and I love Laurie. Think he's a respectable,

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 4>likable guy. But you'll get respect when you get a

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 4>series win, and that's what it's going to come down to. Yes,

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 4>they've won, and there were some parts of his decision

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 4>made that we're very astute, Like the Bradley one, We're

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 4>all like, what's going on?

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 2>That was great, But the pack that he.

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Chose, not starting with Murray, how the team actually played,

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 4>they couldn't get it to the edges. There's a lot

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 4>going on there that I think is questionable and we

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 4>must remember, yes we won, to be proud of the win,

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 4>but if Queenslanders were claiming that if they played like

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 4>we played and were claiming a win, I'd be calling

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 4>them diluted like we were insipid for the first sixty minutes.

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 4>It took a major game breaking moment for us to

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 4>click into gear. And yes we clicked into gear, we

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 4>stayed present. We won, but there's still so we will

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 4>get smoked if we played like game one and Queensland

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 4>have thirteen players for Game two.

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 2>What did you make of it? Tim? Do you think

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 2>we're not giving the Blues enough credit for the victory? Yes?

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>As I said before, it was extenuating circumstances that New

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>South Wales won and we literally run inside the final minute.

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 2>But a win's a win. Yeah. Origin comes down to.

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Big moments and we own the big moments.

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Yep, Am I being unfair toward Cooinsland?

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Umm? Look, I agree, a win's a win. In a

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 3>three game series, a win is a win, so you

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 3>take it. But there's no doubt because we got that

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 3>win against twelve men that it is slightly tainted. And

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 3>like Soapie said, we weren't great like especially in that

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 3>first half. And my fear is that if we start

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 3>patting ourselves on the back, then all of a sudden,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's this we're convincing ourselves that we don't

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 3>need to make any changes when.

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 2>Clearly we do.

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Like there was a lot of criticism about Lurie's forward pack.

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was interesting that some of the first

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 3>changes he made midway through the first half. I thought, oh,

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 3>you know, Adam f Noah Blake and Mitch Barnett were

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 3>clearly gassed. You're going to go to sidh Feedi for

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 3>another big man, especially because we weren't getting that go forward.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 3>But he went with the two small men in Cam

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 3>Murray and Victor Radley, and to be honest, that was

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 3>a pretty good move because all of a sudden they

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 3>sort of changed the energy of the game for the Blues.

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I think Laurie was brave to pick players like Ethan Strange,

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 3>to pick players like Casey McLean. I'm a Ratus fan

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 3>and even I thought, oh, like, this is he's not

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 3>picking that Ethan Strange of last year where the Raiders

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 3>were the minor premiers. The Raiders have been struggling and

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 3>he hasn't been at his best, but he goes out

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 3>there and plays like his yeah, being playing origin his

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 3>whole life and then he backs it up on the

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 3>weekend with an incredible performance against the Cowboys. Same thing

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 3>with Casey McLean. So in terms of that, I think

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Laurie deserves his Jews because he has added some fresh

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 3>blood and I think we reap the rewards of that,

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 3>but I still think some changes need to be made.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those changes.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Alex Well, it's always nuanced, right, So he's clearly Laurie's

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 4>done phenomenally with younger talent. The younger talent's really overperformed.

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 4>What are those changes? Well, if paynhas is fitting ready,

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 4>he's coming back in, that's got to be number one

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 4>that we put back in. Outside of that, I think

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 4>my opinion is that you've got to start Cameron Murray

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 4>at lock and you move Yo into the front row

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 4>and just get a bit more agility and mobility in

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 4>that pack. They were gassed, the players that he chose

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 4>were gased and we were losing that line speed within

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 4>the first twenty minutes. I definitely thought the person would

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 4>get gas first was flag and he outlasted the new

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 4>South Wales Park. So he's got to make some changes

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 4>there where they can get some more longevity minutes and

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 4>energy from the middles.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Mitchell Moses, Liam Martin Boughts.

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Liam Martin had a pretty quiet return

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 3>from injury, so I don't know where he factors. That's

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 3>crazy sort of saying that because you talk about players

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 3>made for Origin and Liam Mardin is that guy. But

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe there's a spot from on the bench

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 3>because I think Hutson Young did well. Ola Kawatu. You

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 3>know you're probably not dropping those guys just yet, either

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 3>of them. Sorry, he was the other one, Mitch Moses.

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think it all depends on how bad

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 3>his hamstring injury is. The ils a hopeful he could

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>probably play in that King's Birthday game of Monday against

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 3>the Bulldogs, but today they have day off Paramatta, so

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 3>they're waiting for him to come back on the Tuesday

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 3>to sort of assess where he is. But you know,

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Ethan Strangers got to be in that team somewhere, And.

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Just finally on the Blues, Alex, I'll ask you the

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Cleary narrative. He was quiet, There's no doubting that

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>for the first sixty old minutes. But when the crunch

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>moments came forty twenty try and people have probably acknowledged

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the bomb. Yeah, I know it's only a bomb, but

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>he landed pinpoint. Yeah, it's another meter short. Teddy doesn't

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>fall over the line, So he owned the big moments.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 2>Nathan. Does the narrative change or does he have to

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 2>win the series for it to Joe?

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm gonna speak to any Queenslanders or doubters. If

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 4>the New South Wales win this series, the debate over

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 4>Cleary is over. He played phenomenally. It doesn't matter if

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 4>they were down a man. He's the one that led

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 4>them and carried the team there. When you say when

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 4>we say he was quiet, of course he was quiet

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 4>because his team sucked. What can I have to do

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 4>if his teammates are dropping the ball all the time

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 4>in their own half, you can't do anything. So what matters, though,

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 4>is that when the win was on the line, he

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 4>led the team to victory. And he also when we

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 4>got down into Queens's territory in.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 2>The first half.

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 4>We're not really talking about how believable his grubble was

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 4>to set up that try. So the debate will be over.

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 4>If they get the series, it's over. He led New

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 4>South Wales to that victory. Doesn't matter if they were

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 4>a man down. It matters if you win. And when

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 4>we call that bomb a hit and hope, it totally

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 4>disrespects the talent, skill composure to land that on a

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 4>dime for your start full back to catch it.

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And just lastly, Teddy's decision, sorry Laurie's decision to pick Tedesco.

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Did that try justify the selection?

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it did.

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 4>I think if he butchers the other try and that

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 4>that's the end of the story, it's going to be

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 4>a more question more controversial decision. But what did James

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Sidesco do wrong? In the backfield? He was catching every ball,

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 4>He was safe as houses. It was a difficult game. Again,

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 4>his teammates were not playing well. I think Teddy's done enough.

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 4>I actually generally think Teddy established himself as an origin

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 4>legend in that moment, considering from what he's overcome.

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 2>He was dropped.

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 4>He also botched a try, but champions step up and

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 4>he called it Cleary, Hey kick it, I'm going to.

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Go for it. That's a champion to me.