WEBVTT - Credlin | 8 July

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Peter Kredlin live on Sky News Australia.

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the show. I'm Jamie Rogers

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 2>filling in for Peter Kredlin. Here's what's coming up tonight.

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Australians hit by a network blackout that left Telstra uses

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 2>stranded and the government in damage control. The Industry Watchdog

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 2>is set to investigate. But what insurances do we have

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 2>that it won't happen again? The global artificial intelligence giant

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>eyeing off more space in Australian data centers, but warnings

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>tonight from the RBA that it could come at a

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 2>cost to Ossie livelihoods. Plus, we'll head live to London

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 2>with Nigel Farage setting up a people versus the Establishment

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>by election. So could this chess move boost his popularity

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 2>or destroy it? We'll find out more. And the Middle

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 2>East is under fresh pressure tonight after the US launched

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>strikes against Iran. What does this mean for peace negotiations?

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 2>But first, when your phone says SOS, Thousands of Australians

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 2>woke up to those three letters, unable to access mobile

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 2>data and in some cases unable to contact emergency services

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 2>for hours. Australia's largest telecommunication network stopped working. One Nation's

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Barnaby Joyce has called for a full investigation.

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Don't want to be paranoid or conspiracy theorist, but we

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 3>know there is the capacity for people.

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 4>To affect, for Chiya to effect.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 3>That sort of software and that sort of network, and

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 3>I hope that that's investigated.

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 2>And Communications Minister Anika Wells, who returned from leave, slammed

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Barnaby's comments.

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 5>As a general principle, I think when it comes to

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 5>matters of national security, you shouldn't make stuff up. You've

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 5>heard from in Telstra acting CEO that there is currently

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 5>no evidence to suggest that those things are the case,

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 5>so I think it's irresponsible.

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, within the last half an hour, Telstra provided another update.

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Thankfully all remaining services are back online, but questions still remain.

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Still conducting our investigation into the root cause, but we

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 3>are confident we have identified a software defect. We've been

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 3>able to isolate it. We'll provide further technical details of

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 3>this once that once we complete the investigation. I want

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 3>to be clear this was not the result of a

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 3>cyber incident.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 2>Now, at a press conference earlier today, mister Acklan went

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 2>to say they must maintain trust in the provider.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I believe Australia can absolutely have faith in its biggest

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 3>in its biggest health go and that is Celsterro. We

0:02:56.440 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 3>take these outages very very seriously. Our investment in resilience

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 3>and cybersecurity and redundancy in our network is significant. But

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 3>it is a big and complex network and from time

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 3>to time issues do occur.

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>But here's the bigger question today expose just how dependent

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 2>Australia is on a handful of critical systems without enough

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 2>backup when they fail. Our phones, payment services for business,

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 2>emergency services, transport networks, frontline workers, all of them rely

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>on communications that work and when they don't, questions are immediate.

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 6>Warrants the government fronting up and getting clear to Australians

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 6>about what's going on here. And you know, there's many

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 6>questions Australians that are asking. We saw a provocative, an

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 6>unwelcome missile launch from the PLA yesterday and I can

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 6>understand why Australians are drawing that connection.

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 6>I don't know whether there's any connection or lot. I

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 6>have an idea, but it's no wonder Australians are starting

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 6>to questions like Daddy.

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Shadow Communications Minister Sarah Henderson says the outedge shows just

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>how far reaching a failure like this can be.

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 7>We've even had reports of people being trapped in trains

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 7>on the network in Victoria. Of course, when our communications fail,

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 7>the whole economy crashes.

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 2>And she's right, communications are critical infrastructure. So why aren't

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>we treating him that way? Where are the independent backup systems?

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Today's outage shouldn't just be another headline, it should be

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 2>a warning because if one technical fault can bring parts

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 2>of Australia to a standstill, imagine what a deliberate attack

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 2>could do. The Opposition leader raised that today this.

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 6>Is how you defend the nation. Now, it's true. The

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.039
<v Speaker 6>one part of defending the nation is making sure we

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 6>have the drones and the missile capability and the defense

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 6>force we need. But in a modern era, cyber attack

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 6>is real, whatever source might it might come from. So

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 6>we need to know the answers to these questions and

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:17.799
<v Speaker 6>we need them, we need them fast, and that's the point.

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Defending Australia is not just artillery. It's about making sure

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the systems we rely on every hour of every day

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 2>can resist a hit. Because in the modern world, a

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 2>nation that cannot communicate, cannot defend itself feeling poorer, that's

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 2>because you are. Australians are working harder, paying more tax

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>and according to the OECD, we have suffered one of

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the biggest falls in living standards anywhere in the developed

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>world since the pandemic. Real wages have fallen by more

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 2>than five percent since twenty twenty one, and the warns

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>they're expected to fall again this year. Deputy Liberal Leader

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Jane Hume said labor is to blame.

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.559
<v Speaker 8>People are getting poorer under a labor government. It actually

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 8>said that our real wages have gone backwards by five

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 8>point one percent since Labor came to office, But the

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 8>average OEEDC nation have seen their wages go up by

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 8>five percent, so that's more than a ten point difference.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 8>No wonder Australians are feeling the pinch. This cannot be

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 8>blamed on anybody else, and yet that seems to be

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 8>what labor is best at doings.

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Australia is one of the wealthiest countries on Earth, yet

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Australians are becoming poorer in real terms. So how did

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 2>we get here? Part of the answer is inflation. Australia

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 2>now has the second highest across all advanced economies independent

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>economists Judith Sloan, So the government needs to rain in

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:58.799
<v Speaker 2>spending to bring inflation down.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 9>That they really need to do is try and get

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 9>on top of spending. You know, they're just spending like

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 9>drunken salesce, which is probably an insult the drunken salesce

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 9>because of course drunk and saless spend their own money.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 7>They spend it however they like good on you.

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 9>Go, yes, But because that is adding to the inflationary pressures.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean, basically, I don't think you have to have

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 9>done economics to understand this. If you're allowed to demand

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 9>to grow faster than supply, prices will rise. And a

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 9>lot of that is to do with excessive government spending.

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 2>But high inflation is only part of the story. The

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 2>other part is tax. Australians pay some of the highest

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 2>taxes in the developed world. Our top income tax rates

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 2>sits at forty seven percent, including the Medicare levy, higher

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>than countries like the United States, the UK and France,

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 2>and after Labour's recent changes to capital gains tax, Australia

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 2>now have one of the highest CGT rates in the world.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>According to the Australian Shareholders Association. The changes will make

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 2>it harder for young people to build wealth through shares

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>and ETFs compared to countries like Singapore, New Zealand and

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the US. So think about the message that this sends.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>We're taxing the very behavior we should be encouraging, and

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 2>it's happening at a time when living standards are falling.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Then there's productivity. For years, we've relied on population growth

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 2>to make the economy look bigger, but a bigger economy

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean Australians are better off. In fact, Deloitte says

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Australia is now facing its longest stretch of weak economic

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 2>growth since the recession of the early nineteen nineties. Treasurer

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Jim Chalmers said the Deloitte report was a reminder of

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the lingering costs of the Iran War. He further said

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 2>under Labor Australia has the lowest average unemployment of any

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 2>government in half a century, smaller deficits and less debt

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 2>than what the Coalition left us, booming business investment with

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 2>tax cuts and higher wages that the right wing parties oppose.

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 2>But Chalma's talking point has a problem that so called

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 2>investment boom is heavily concentrated in data centers, and much

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 2>of that equipment is imported. So in other words, it

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 2>looks better in the press release than it actually feels

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 2>in the economy.

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 9>But then if you go and sort of dig down

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 9>and have a look under the bonnet, you'll find that

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 9>it's pretty much all this investment in data centers. Now

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 9>they're controversial, right, So they're controversial for a number of reasons.

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 9>All the comparatory is imported, right Okay, So okay, the

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 9>workers might be local, but everything else is imported. But secondly,

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 9>they're really really big users of energy, water, and they

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 9>make a lot of noise. We want business in men

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 9>in a whole lot of sect it's not just in

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 9>data centers, and that is a concern at the moment.

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>And that's why tonight's OECD report matters. It confirms what

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>millions of Australians have been feeling for years. They're falling

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 2>behind and no government should ever be comfortable with that. Well,

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 2>that's said to canber Now for tonight's Political Headlines with

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Sky News political reporter Reuben Spargo.

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 10>The Prime Minister is bringing his specific counterparts together in

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 10>Brisbane to strengthen regional security. The leaders of Papa, New Guinea,

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 10>Samoa and Tonga a meeting after Australia signed a landmark

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 10>security pact with FIGI.

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 11>What we want to do with Samoa and Tonga.

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 12>Lets continue to have engagement about how we can improve

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 12>the relations.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 10>The government is also turning to sport diplomacy. A quarter

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 10>of a billion dollars will fund a new primary and

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 10>high school rugby competitions across the Pacific.

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 12>Will just empower parents, it will empower leaders of communities.

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 10>The leaders will cup off the day at tonight's State

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 10>of Origin Decider.

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, plenty of news to get through today, so

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 2>let's make a start with our Wednesday panel. Senior fellow

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 2>at the Menzies Research Institute, Nick Cata, an adolescent psychologist

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 2>and Sky News contributor Clairo, Welcome to you both. Let's

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 2>start with this Telstra outage this morning. Not many parts

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 2>of Australia were left unaffected, and it's moments like this

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 2>that really exposes our vulnerability and our dependency on telco's Nick,

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 2>we saw the damage that was done when the Optus

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 2>network went down. Lives were lost. What does the government

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 2>need to do to ensure that it can stay ahead

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 2>of outages like this.

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 12>Well, first the government needs to ensure there's lots of

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 12>competition in the mind because that is actually the best

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 12>thing we have at the moment, thanks really going back

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 12>to the Howard governments telco reforms. We have three independent networks,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 12>so that gives us a really strong resilient system with

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 12>plenty of redundancy. Where the government needs to step in

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 12>is in emergencies like this, when one network goes down

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 12>for reasons which are far too complicated for me to understand.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 12>But at that point of course we do face problems,

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 12>particularly with emergency calls, also with businesses. At that point

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 12>of course, the government should really step in and make

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 12>the companies enforce a roaming agreement so that Telstra's calls

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 12>can be rooted through Vodaphone or optov OPTAs. That's very technically,

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 12>it's very easy to do. But because companies don't like

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 12>covering covering taking other phone companies' business if they can

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 12>help it, but in an emergency situation, of course it's

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 12>vital that they do. And that I understand is happened

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 12>in Canada, it's happening in other parts of the world.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 12>I think the removes oft to do it here, but

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 12>they clearly need to move on that bit very very

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 12>quickly and make sure that that happens without any delay,

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 12>because I really can't see any reason why that shouldn't

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 12>be happening already.

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 2>No, I completely agree, Claire. I want to take a

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 2>look now at this report that I was just talking

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 2>about in my editorial revealing that Australia has experienced one

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 2>of the sharpest declines in living standards in the developed world,

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>and this is since the pandemic. So this was from

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the OECD, and they have warned that real wages are

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 2>set to fall even further this year and that's DUDO

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 2>inflation eroding workers' incomes. But how can any hard working

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Australia see this and just think who can we look

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 2>to for some help here? Because labor they seem to

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 2>disblame everybody other than themselves.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, and I expect that they will try and do that.

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 13>Some of these pressures have been global inflation effect almost

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 13>every developed country after COVID. But this report, I think

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 13>quantify hasn't tells us that Australia has performed particularly poorly

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 13>compared to our peers and Australians don't need a report

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 13>to tell them how they've been feeling. I think it

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 13>really comes down to that promise of the Australian dream,

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 13>that social contract that we've had, which is that you

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 13>work hard, you save up, you buy a home, and

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 13>you hope will know that your children are going to

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 13>have a better laugh than you are. That's what's being

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.479
<v Speaker 13>eroded away. And with that, you know, optimism and hope.

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 13>I don't think they've all necessarily become unhappy because they've

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 13>got less money in the moment. They've become disillusioned when

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 13>their effort is no longer seems connected to a reward,

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 13>and of course that's been compounded recently after this budget,

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 13>and that's of course when voters will take risks on

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 13>political outsiders when they feel that the traditional system is

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 13>not delivering anymore. One thing that we've said Australia has

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 13>been missing now for a very long time and it

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 13>looks like it's nowhere near on the horizon is a

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 13>talk about in a conversation about aspiration.

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 14>I think all this can put up for tough.

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 13>Economic periods if they think that things are going to

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 13>get better. But I think Australians at the moment. What

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 13>they're fearful of is that this is the new normal

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 13>and potentially getting worse.

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Nick, I'm interested in your response to this report that

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Labor has amended its draft national platform to commit Anthony

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Albernezi to developing an anti racism strategy, but the party

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 2>is also going to use its fiftieth national Conference to

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>formalize their support for welcome to Country ceremonies and backing

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 2>in the principles of the ULARU statement from the heart.

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 2>What are your thoughts about that, because for me, it

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 2>seems like the country doesn't want this sort of stuff,

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 2>but Labor just continues pushing it, hoping that which our minds.

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, a pretty interesting piece of product differentiation I think

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 12>they're going in for, which I think is what they're doing.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 12>They're saying, because we've got two parties on the center right,

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 12>they'll take the left ground and they'll take it even

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 12>more solidly, so push out further the left. Interesting policy

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 12>on this particular question of welcome to country. You don't

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 12>really need to do an opinion poll on this because

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 12>we had a very good referendum just a couple of

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 12>years ago, as you remember, a result sixty forty and

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 12>I think that would pretty much be the result, if

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 12>not more, on this welcome to country question. So Labour

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 12>seems to me rather arrogantly, I think banking on the

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 12>fact that forty percent of the vote is going to

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 12>be enough for them or less than that, on the

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 12>basis that the center right won't be able to get

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 12>its act together this side of the next election. They

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 12>may be right on that, but it's a pretty cynical

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 12>ploy because we know where most of the country are

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 12>on this. There's no argument about.

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 2>That and Claire loved get your thoughts on this. So,

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 2>despite denying its plans for a name change, the James

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Cook University's governing council has backed advice on how it

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 2>should rebrannd. Now this is going to cost twelve million

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 2>dollars to do this. Why a university is so intent

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 2>on a raising Australia's history.

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 13>Oh, look, I don't know. Maybe it's a growing belief

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 13>that the way to deal with parts of history that

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 13>one doesn't like is to remove it or at least

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 13>edit it. Perhaps psychologically that's you know, appealing. You feel

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 13>like maybe you've got an illusion that you've solved part

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 13>of the problem. But that is a very frightening of course,

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 13>or Welliam overtone to it. And the irony is that

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 13>university is supposed to be places where complexity is explored,

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 13>you know, not removed. I think it's utterly maddening and sad.

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 13>I mean, James Cooke didn't established the colony of New

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 13>South Wales. He was a brilliant explorer navigator. When I

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 13>went to school, he was certainly revered and celebrated. And

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 13>to your point, I mean, twelve million dollar if you

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 13>really want to change some lives and have some social cohesion,

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 13>I mean, imagine what that could fund rather than changing

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 13>the name on the front gate, you know, scholarships and

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 13>indigenous education programs and regional outreach. So you know, when

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 13>we start looking at renaming the past instead of educating

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 13>students for the future, I think we've really lost our

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 13>way on what universities are actually meant to be.

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Nick, what do you make of the name change

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 2>or the proposed name change and going down this path

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 2>of spending excessive amounts of money to do that.

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 12>I think they're crazy. James Cook University's got the best

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 12>brand and one of the best brands in the country.

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 12>James Cook was a man of the enlightenment. He was

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 12>a first and foremost a scientist, an innovative navigator. You know,

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 12>he achieved so much in that field. And you know,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 12>it's just the sort of person you'd want to name

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 12>your university after, Isn't it why they get rid of it.

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 12>I think they're getting rid of it because they've got

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 12>some miss misshape and idea about his role in history,

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 12>you know. And he was not the colonizer, by the way,

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 12>as they like to call him. The colony happened some

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 12>time afterwards. But yeah, I mean, he's a great man.

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 12>He needs to be celebrated, not derided.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 2>And I really.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 12>Think that this is just shows how small minded and

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 12>of low intelligence universities have become that they don't even

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 12>recognize the great name that they have that their university

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 12>is named afterwards after.

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I do want to have a look now at in

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.959
<v Speaker 2>battled Victorian MP more redeeming. She has come out on

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.959
<v Speaker 2>social media and apologized for this later scandal that has

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 2>engulfed the liberals. Let's take a listen.

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 15>I think it's time that I addressed the fact that

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 15>there have been so many distractions, so many huge distractions

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 15>that have taken away from the work that you, as

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 15>my constituents and Victorians, really needed to be done. And

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 15>I am genuinely, so so sorry that all of these

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 15>things over the past three and a half years have happened.

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 2>So Claire. She has apologized to her constituents, yet to

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 2>apologize to Matthew Guy. But Moira wants four members of

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 2>the party state executive ban from any discussions over her

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 2>political future. What do you think is the best outcome here?

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 9>Oh?

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 13>Look, I don't think there's any other outcome other than

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 13>Maura's got to go. But Maura's got to go quickly

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 13>and quietly, and that doesn't seem to be happening with

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 13>the court case that she's now launched against the Liberal Party,

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 13>and the Liberal Party can't actually disendorse her. They've said

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 13>that they'll wait pending that court case, but that never,

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 13>you know, is a quick process, and with the election

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.239
<v Speaker 13>looming in November, I mean, I just see this. What

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 13>is remarkable about this saga? I mean more a Deeming

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 13>had already won she had one years ago after that

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 13>defamation case, and many people, including people who didn't necessarily

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 13>agree with all of her views, said that she had

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 13>been treated unfairly. You know, she had sympathy I think

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 13>from a lot of people. She had momentum, she had

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 13>the opportunity, I think, to be a very significant voice

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 13>within the Victorian Liberal Party. But somewhere along that line,

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 13>that way will very quickly recently that that political capital

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 13>has absolutely been squandered away now and I think that, Look,

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 13>politicians make mistakes, and I think that the public can

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 13>forgive mistakes, but the first step to that admitting you

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 13>made a mistake. And she's doubled out and refusing to

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 13>do that. So you know, I think when they struggle

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 13>to do that, that's going to be a very hard

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 13>path to come back from and very messy. Now that

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 13>where it's all pending a court's decision.

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, Nick and Claire, I will leave it there. After

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 2>the break, the already strained DRAN ceasefire could be officially

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 2>over with fresh strikes. So could we see the straight

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 2>completely shut down yet again? Welcome back. It is great

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 2>to have your company coming up. Warnings from the RBA

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 2>that AI data center investment could undermine Australian businesses and

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 2>its workforce. But now the fragile ceasefire in the middle

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.479
<v Speaker 2>East is under fresh pressure tonight. The United States has

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 2>launched fresh strikes against a run following attacks on ships

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 2>in a straight of hom Moves, raising fears the conflict

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 2>could once again escalate. And just moments ago, Donald Trump

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>told reporters that he thinks the ceasefire is over and quote,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't like them and they're evil people. Joining me

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 2>now is Sky News defense analyst Peter Jennings. Peter, it's

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 2>great to see you start now with the Middle East

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and off the back of the US launching strikes against Iran.

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 2>And that does follow the attack on ships in the

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Straight of Horn Moves, and then Donald Trump now making

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 2>the comment that looks like the ceasefire. P still everything's

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 2>off the table. How significant is this escalation?

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 14>Well, the escalation was significant. The Americans hit somewhere between

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 14>eighty and ninety targets. That's a far bigger military operation

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 14>than we've seen for quite a few months now. And

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 14>all of those targets were in and around the northern

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 14>end of the Strait of Hall Moves, after the Iranians

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 14>had attacked three commercial ships. And I'm struggling to sort

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 14>of interpret Trump's comments as to whether or not he

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 14>now intends to go back to a much broader war.

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 14>I think what's more likely, Jamie, is that the Americans

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 14>are going to assert that the Iranians will not be

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 14>allowed to run a protection racket, effectively charging shipping companies

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 14>to let their vessels go through unmolested. And if that's

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 14>the American intent, I think we probably will see more

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 14>operations of the type that have happened over the last

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 14>twenty four hours, and they'll be doing things like hitting

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 14>the fast patrol boats which the Iranians use to go

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 14>out and hit the ships with limpid mines. They'll be

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 14>attacking Revolutionary Guard maritime capability at the north end of

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 14>the Strait, and you know, expect more of that. I

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 14>think that's what we'll probably have for the next week

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 14>or so, until if and until the Iranians then decide

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 14>that they're going to stop attempting to enforce a protection

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 14>racket which is putting money into the hands of the

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 14>Revolutionary Guards.

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 2>And Peter, we do have that grab now where Donald

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Trump was speaking just moments ago in and kra let's

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 2>take a listen to me.

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 16>I think it's over. I don't want to deal with

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 16>them in with this scum. You know, it's there's gum,

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 16>there's sick people. They're led by sick people, and they're vicious,

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 16>violent people, and if they had a nuclear weapon, they'd

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 16>use it.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 2>As far as I'm concerned, it's over Gpeter. Those are

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 2>some strong words, scum, sick people, and violent. Surely Iran's

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 2>not going to be copying this and they'll be retaliating.

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 2>But I would imagine they're quite Their arsenal is significantly depleted, but.

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 14>They're reconstituting it very fast. Jamie. I've now seen reports

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 14>which say that in fact, they've got about fifty percent

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 14>of the missile capability they have before the start of

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 14>the war in February. So they're rebuilding fast because that's

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.959
<v Speaker 14>their priority. That's what they're putting money into. They're being

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 14>assisted by the Chinese in that development as well. I mean,

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 14>I think Trump's judgment is right, but the problem he's

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 14>got is that he can try and negotiate a piece

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 14>or he's back into military conflict, and we know he

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 14>doesn't want to do that. So what does he end

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 14>up doing Right now? The signals are it's going to

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 14>be a more limited military operation around the passage of

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 14>those ships through the Strait of Worms. I don't think

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 14>the President is going to want to go back into

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 14>fuller scale military operations, but it's kind of in the

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 14>hands of the Revolutionary Guard, and what they're showing is

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 14>a high level of defiance. They're trying to make the

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 14>case that they're stronger now than they were back in February.

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 14>That's not necessarily so, but they're rebuilding fast and so

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 14>the prospect for more conflicts is definitely there. And one

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 14>can sense the frustration on Donald Trump's part. He's not

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 14>been able to negotiate the outcome he wants, and so

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 14>that pushes him back into the direction of more military force.

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 2>And definitely something that I don't think he'll be wanting

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 2>to do in the lead up to the midterm elections.

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 2>But Peter, I saw some comments made today that I

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:53.479
<v Speaker 2>wanted to get your thoughts on, and this was the

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 2>finish president. He said Ukraine has won the war against Russia,

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 2>but he said it around more so they preserve their

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 2>independence and sovereignty for more than four years. What do

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 2>you make of those comments?

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 14>Strictly speaking, I think we're still in a stalemate, but

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 14>I guess a Russian the absence of a Russian victory

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 14>is a kind of Ukrainian success. Certainly, so far this year,

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:26.239
<v Speaker 14>the Ukrainians have been beating the Russians comprehensively. They've been

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 14>killing large numbers of Russians on the battlefield, about thirty

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 14>five thousand a month, which is sort of First World

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 14>War levels of military fatalities. And they've been pursuing an

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 14>extended campaign of military strikes inside Russia, sometimes quite deep

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:46.719
<v Speaker 14>inside Russia, to attack their oil and energy infrastructure. And

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 14>I think the issue is how long can the Russians

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 14>actually go on doing this. On the other hand, Russia

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 14>still occupies somewhere between twenty twenty five percent of Ukraine territory.

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 14>That's where we are, Jomie. It's a hard fort stylemate

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 14>where the Ukrainians I think starting to have the upper hand.

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 14>But the war is far from over. And really the

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 14>key factor here is apparently the determination on the part

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 14>of Vladimir Putin to keep fighting, even though this is

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 14>doing immense damage to the Russian economy and killing Russians

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 14>on an industrial scale, which must be beginning to have

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.719
<v Speaker 14>some sort of domestic impact on Putin standing inside his

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 14>own country.

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 2>And there's an incredible vision where you see eighteen hour

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 2>queues of cars trying to get petrol. Now, the Finish

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 2>President made those comments as NATO allies were all meeting

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 2>in Turkey, and it was just interesting because they're meeting

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>to look at Ukraine's future, but also how they can

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 2>reduce their reliance on the US. How can you see

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 2>that happening, especially when you look at how much money

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 2>the US contributes. They're the largest funder in the defense

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 2>budget of NATO, yes.

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 14>By a long way. And you know, fundamentally, the answer

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 14>is the European countries cannot reduce that dependence on the

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 14>United States, even with a difficult president. The United States

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 14>is the essential strategic stabilizing factor in all parts of

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 14>the world, certainly in Europe. And unless NATO countries want to,

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 14>you know, double and even more than that increase their

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 14>defense spending, which they don't, that relationship with the United

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 14>States remains absolutely crucial. We are now starting to see

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 14>some European countries spend more, invest more and rebuilding defense infrastructure,

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 14>but they've got a long way to go. And really

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 14>America is still i think the critical factor in European security,

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 14>just as it is in Asia specific security in our

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 14>part of the world.

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 2>And just quickly off the back of that before I

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 2>let you go, do you think because of how significant

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the US is to NATO's defense and security, they should

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 2>have played a bigger role in supporting the US when

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 2>it came to the conflict in Iran.

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 14>It's an interesting question. America could have done a better

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 14>job of bringing key NATO partners in from the start,

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 14>which would have involved a bit of discussion about war

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 14>aims that didn't happen. But fundamentally, it is in Europe's

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 14>interests to see the straightup Wolmers open because they're the

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 14>customers for a lot of the oil, and it's also

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 14>in their interests that Irun doesn't acquire a nuclear weapons.

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 14>So yes, they should have done a better job. But equally,

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 14>the Americans should have done a better job negotiating with

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 14>the Europeans before the war actually started.

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Peter, I always appreciate your insights. Thanks for your time tonight.

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Now to the push by a tech giant, Anthropic, which

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 2>is making moves to buy up more of Australia's data

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 2>center capacity against the backdrop of concerns today from the

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 2>RBA that data center investment could undermine Australian businesses and

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 2>its workforce. Here to discuss it further is chief scientists

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 2>at the University of New South Wales' AI Institute, Professor

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Toby Walsh, Professor Welcome Andthropic is the AI company that's

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 2>behind Claude and so for any of us that don't

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 2>know who what that is, it's an AI platform that's

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of similar to chat GPT, which has exploded in popularity.

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Now it stands ready to swoop on any available data

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 2>center space in Australia that it can pretty much get

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 2>because they believe that we're a good fit for its

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 2>expanding business model. But there appear to be two issues

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 2>here the investment push into the Australian market, but then

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 2>also ongoing concerns about unregulated harms. What are your big

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 2>issues around what Anthropic are trying to do?

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 17>We write there's a significant opportunity for Australia here. There's

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 17>an insatiable appetite for compute. Anthropic have signed a deal

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 17>to spend a billion dollars a month on the data

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 17>center in the US, so they're looking elsewhere and Australia

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 17>is a fantastic place to build building data centers. We've

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 17>got the second biggest pipeline, and we've got plentiful renewables

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 17>to run those data centers. We've got plentiful land, and

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 17>we're a very stable economy, so there's a lot of

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 17>attractions to build them there.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 4>But we and it's it's helping to keep our economy going.

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 17>The last rb A ABS figures showed our quarterly GDP

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 17>was being kept afloat by the spend on building data centers.

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 17>In fact, we would have be gone into recession if

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.479
<v Speaker 17>they hadn't been spending so much building new data centers.

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 17>So there's a great opportunity for us there. But equally,

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 17>as the RBA is warning, we need to be concerned.

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 17>But you know, maybe it's going to be driving inflation.

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 17>All those people being employed to build those data centers.

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 17>Maybe they're not building houses. We need to build lots

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 17>more houses, and maybe there aren't enough trades to go around,

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 17>and that's pushing up wages of traders and that's going

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 17>to cause inflation and cause us to have to put

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 17>inflation interest rates up again. So we need to walk

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 17>a very narrow line here to make sure that we

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 17>get the benefit without some of the some of the risks.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 2>One thing that I thought was interesting is Labor have

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 2>dumped its AI advisory panel, which you were a part of.

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we're at risk now of repeating the

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 2>mistakes of social media where we start to see young

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 2>people having AI companions and AI therapists.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 17>Yes, sadly, I think that's something that we should be regulating.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 17>We decided after the event that young people should be

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 17>kept off social media there was rather harmful. Well, we

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 17>got to do the same there with artificial intelligence that

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 17>a large number of teens are using AI companions and

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 17>AI therapists and speaking to these chatbots like Claude, the

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 17>Anthropic Make and probably I think we should probably decide

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 17>they should be an age limit for these tools, just

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 17>like the riginal social media.

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 2>And you've seen some wild things overseas where people marry

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 2>their chatbot and become very close friends with it. So

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 2>there's that out of it as well. But in terms

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 2>of our our VA's concerns when it comes to jobs,

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 2>do you think we should be in a position where

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 2>we reframe it and retrain and reskill our workforce in

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 2>an AI environment instead of trying to push back and

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 2>stop it coming into our officers.

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 4>Well, AI is coming. I think that's very, very true.

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 17>We can't put our heads in the sand and expect

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 17>AI not to be transforming our workforce, but so we

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 17>will be looking to reskill and retrain people. We need

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 17>to support people through that. Good news and governance figures

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 17>out this morning show that the impact of archip intelligence

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 17>has been rather than modest so far, but there are

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 17>growing signs. There are sides in those numbers that AI

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 17>is starting to have some impact on the most exposed jobs.

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 17>So we are going to have to deal with that,

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 17>and it takes time for people to reskill. Young people

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 17>today choosing careers, we need to help them make good choices.

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Think about what are the jobs of the future.

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, exactly on that point, looking at the job of

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the future, what are you saying to kids now at

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 2>university who are studying degrees that are potentially going to

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 2>be worthless in four or five years, how do we

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 2>counter that?

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 17>Well, I hope none of the degrees are going to

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 17>be completely worth us. I hope there are many things

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 17>you pick up on a degree that beyond just the

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 17>subject of the degree itself. The communication skills, the critical

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 17>thinking skills, those human facing skills.

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:25.919
<v Speaker 4>Emotional intelligent, social intelligence, grit.

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 17>All of those things I think are going to be

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 17>ever more important in an AI enabled world. Those are

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 17>the things that are going to distinguish humans from the machines.

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 17>Those are the things I think the employers are going

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 17>to be looking for. Those are the things that will

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 17>be valuable and get you a job in the future.

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, professor, it's a very interesting world that we're all

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 2>going to have to get used to navigate, because it's

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 2>certainly not going anywhere. Thank you for your time. After

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 2>the break, we crossed to London for the latest on

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.399
<v Speaker 2>the dramatic decision by Reform leader Nigel Farage to quit

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.360
<v Speaker 2>his seat for a by election. Could this be the

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 2>chess move that could set him up as the next

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 2>British leader. Welcome back coming out Words of the Week

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 2>with kel Richards. But now to that traumatic announcement overnight

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 2>from Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, who resigned as a

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 2>member of Parliament calling a by election amid concerns about

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 2>party funding and his associations with a convicted criminal.

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Now I've decided that the people of Clapton should be

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the judges of my actions. This will be a people

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>versus the establishment by election. It's a chance to stick

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>two fingers up to the entire establishment, to frankly tell

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.760
<v Speaker 1>them where to go. And that is why I will

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>be putting my name forward to stand in this by election.

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I will fight to win. I will fight to continue

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the political revolution that Reform has started.

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 2>We're here to discuss this further. The editor of Spiked Online,

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Tom Slater, Tom, welcome well. Labor and the Tories have

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 2>said they're not going to be standing in this by election,

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 2>which is pretty much going to leave the Reform leader

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 2>alone on a ballot against just some novelty candidates. What

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 2>do you make about this? It seems like a little

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 2>bit of a face or is this a stroke of brilliance?

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 18>Well, I think the refusal of the other parties to

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 18>stand just shows that deep down and they would have

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 18>a cat telling chance of winning. I mean, Nigel Farage

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 18>won in that seat in Clacton in Essex with a

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 18>higher margin than any of his other Reform colleagues at

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 18>the last election. And I think what they're responding to

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 18>is the fact that this is a pretty risky but

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 18>pretty audation's political gambit, and it's something which has allowed

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 18>Nigel Farage to retake the initiative to fight a by

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 18>election on his terms rather than have one voised upon

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 18>him after this very kind of got up standards process

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 18>which has been sparked into him and donations that were

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:00.839
<v Speaker 18>made to him before he was elected. And I think

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 18>it's very effectively in that address that you've already shown

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.800
<v Speaker 18>a clip from from Reform HQ frame this as putting

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 18>it back to the voters, saying that it doesn't fall

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 18>to a scandal mongering media or to ethics committees or

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 18>filled with opposition MPs to decide who represents voters. And

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 18>I think that message is certainly going to resonate in Clacton,

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 18>and I dare say amongst other sections of the country

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 18>as well, who are as furious with the establishment as

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 18>Nigel Parrock's clearly yes.

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 2>And this is what's going to be interesting, isn't it, Tom,

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Because critics have been coming for Nigel for a long time.

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 2>But are we looking at a tactical maneuver or it

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 2>just continues to frame his fight as you just mentioned

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 2>about the establishment, where it's the people versus the establishment,

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 2>and this is going to be what potentially makes his

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 2>rise grow even more as people move away from the

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 2>bigger parties.

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 18>I mean, time will tell, but I think with that

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 18>very strong address that he gave yesterday, he reminded the

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 18>establishment and the public of two things, one of which

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 18>is that he is the key anti establishment candidate in

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 18>this country. That he is someone who's been in politics

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 18>for a very long time, very consistent, and there's a

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 18>reason that so many people in the media and within

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.439
<v Speaker 18>the kind of establishment political circles are gunning for him.

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 18>And the other thing that he reminded everyone of is

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 18>that ultimately it comes down to the voses to decide.

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 18>That's almost a kind of quaint notion for some people

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 18>in politics these days. That really is the people who

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 18>get to decide who represent them. But he's put that

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 18>firmly back on the table. So who knows if this

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 18>will this will actually pan out, whether or not the

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 18>refusal of other parties sam will blunt the impact of

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 18>this particular by election, But I think he's put down

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 18>a marker with this and reminded people that he is

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 18>the figure sets the political weather in this country. Everyone

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 18>is sort of responding to what himself and the reform

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 18>are doing, and that's certainly been the case of of course,

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 18>of the past twelve.

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Hours or so.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Before I move on to the other big story that

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 2>happened overnight, I do just want to get your thoughts

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 2>on Andy Burnham. You did just have a slight chuckle about,

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, when people actually vote someone in. And Andy

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Burnham is potentially going to be the next Prime minister

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 2>not having been voted in. What are your thoughts on

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 2>his potential leadership and whether or not he's going to

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:14.280
<v Speaker 2>move the UK further to the left and the response

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 2>on the ground of what people think of him.

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 18>I think there's sort of two plausible cases with Andy

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 18>burn and one of which is that he turns out

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.760
<v Speaker 18>to be essentially just Keir Starmer and a pair of genes.

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.320
<v Speaker 18>This is someone who has committed himself to the twenty

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 18>twenty four Manifesto, who signed himself up to the fiscal

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 18>rules that were set by Keir Starmer's government, that is

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 18>going to be quite terrified of kind of spooking the

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 18>horses in the direction, or he reverts back to his

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 18>kind of happy place, which is a more soft left

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 18>dish kind of perspective, which, frankly, given all of that

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.919
<v Speaker 18>would mean for the economy, socially, immigration or whatever would

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.360
<v Speaker 18>prove to be even more disastrous than Kirstarmer. So the

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 18>best case scenario is that it's more of the same.

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 18>And given how terrible more of the same looks at

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 18>the moment, I dare say that whatever glow there is

0:40:58.760 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 18>around him at the moment will.

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Come very quickly.

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 9>All right.

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I do want to turn our attention now to that

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 2>story around the Duke of Sussex, Prince Harry. He has

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 2>lost his long running sixty five million dollar privacy invasion

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 2>case against the London tabloids, the Daily Mail and The

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Mail on Sunday. Just talk us through this here, Tom,

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 2>But also what is there any sort of for that?

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you think here? For Harry?

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 18>Oh, this is a total humiliation for him. In a

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 18>very good day for the freedom of the press. This

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 18>case that was brought like just by Prince Harry, but

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 18>by kind of coterie of other celebrities and members of

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 18>the great and good was totally thrown out. The judgement

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 18>clear that in relation to the stories that you were

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 18>taking issue with, it was entirely plausible that they'd been

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 18>produced by legitimate sources. And I think it's reminded everyone

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 18>what we knew already, which is that when it comes

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 18>to Prince Harry and Megan Markll, they don't care about privacy.

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 18>Their own privacy is they did, they wouldn't braide themselves

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 18>in front of the Netflix cameras if they did. Prince

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 18>Harry wouldn't have written such excruciating, stomach turning detail about

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 18>his own genitals his autobiography. This is about controlling the press.

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 18>This is about Prince Hary doing what many of us

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 18>thought there is in the Royal Family seek to do

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.479
<v Speaker 18>over centuries, which is to tame the media for having

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 18>the temerity to report on what they get up to,

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 18>and to mock them, as has happened many times with

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 18>Prince Harry. So I think this is this is a

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 18>real blow to what has basically been a crusade against

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 18>the free press by Prince Harry, and we can only

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 18>hope that this draws are close to it.

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 2>And before I let you go, what can you tell

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 2>us about some reports that Meghan Mikkel has now vowed

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 2>to never see the Royal family again.

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 18>Well, I dare say that might be quite welcome news

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:37.720
<v Speaker 18>from much of the Royal family, who was still really

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:42.320
<v Speaker 18>from being accused of racism left right center by Meghan Markel.

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 18>I mean, of course, there was a very sad family

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:46.400
<v Speaker 18>human story in the midst of all of this. I

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 18>believe Prince Harry and Megan Mark's children haven't seen their

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 18>grandfather since twenty twenty two. That is something that's always

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 18>worth bearing your mind. But once again, you know, despite

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 18>all of the media hype, despite the way in which

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 18>has been interrupted in some courts, certainly in America, this

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 18>is a mess, very much of the Sussex is making.

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:03.239
<v Speaker 4>Whatever else you.

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 14>Might conclude about it.

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, Tom Slater, great to see you, Thanks for coming on.

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Well after the break, plenty of words to get through

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 2>with Kel Richards. That's next, welcome back. Well let's get

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 2>straight into it with wordsmith and broadcaster Kel Richards. Kel welcome.

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what. You've got some really interesting words

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 2>on this list tonight, and I saw a lot of them, thought, oh,

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:34.720
<v Speaker 2>what really good ideas to talk about now. The first

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 2>one spitting chips, which I think all of us have

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 2>used at some point, and you actually threw it out

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 2>to Credline viewers for help with this one to say, okay,

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 2>we all hear it, we all know what it means.

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 2>But where does it come from?

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 11>Yep, and it's an Australian coinage was coined here in

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 11>Perth eighteen ninety nine and first first have been the

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 11>person newspaper called the Sunday Times. But nobody knows what

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 11>sort of chips will be spat out. And I actually

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 11>call some of the einguish s I know, some of

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 11>the clever people who work on dictionaries. They didn't know

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 11>the answer. So I asked the viewers and I got

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 11>more than two hundred emails. All One bloke at a

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 11>very creative idea. He said, it's from the footy. When

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 11>you're at the footy and you're eating chips and the

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 11>ref makes a stupid decision and you yell at at him.

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 11>You're spedding chips. Now, that's a lovely idea. It doesn't

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 11>have a lot of credence, but it's a nice idea.

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 2>I like that one.

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 11>Nearly everyone said has to do with wood. If you're

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 11>cutting wood with a good sharps or what it spits

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 11>out is fine sawdust. But if it's a bit blunt

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 11>or some of the some of the teeth are a

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 11>bit crooked, it rips into the wood and spits out chips,

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 11>and the idea is that's probably the image behind someone

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:47.719
<v Speaker 11>spitting out angry words. Spitting out angry words is a

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:49.799
<v Speaker 11>bit like what the sword does when it hacks into

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 11>a So viewers are the team of us collectively. I

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 11>think have solved this one. Well done.

0:44:57.480 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Oh I like it now. This is another one. I

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:03.320
<v Speaker 2>think that we all often use quite a lot. Blood

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 2>is thicker than water. But Don wrote in to say

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:09.240
<v Speaker 2>that blood is thicker than water does not mean family

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 2>bonds at the closest bonds, as we always assume. So

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 2>can you please set the record straight?

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 11>Yes, non, you're wrong. It's very old. It goes back

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 11>to the twelfth century. Was originally in German. It was

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 11>in German for a long time before it was in

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 11>English in the eleven hundreds, and then it turned up

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 11>in English in fourteen twelve, somewhere like that and the tomb.

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 11>There are two myths, not one myth, but two myths.

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 11>One myth says blood is stronger than water, actually is

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 11>referring to soldiers in battle. Nothing bonds brothers in battle

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:41.320
<v Speaker 11>together than like bathing in the blood of the enemy,

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 11>which may well be true, but it's not what it's about.

0:45:44.640 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 11>It's not what it ever said. It's the proverb never

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 11>meant that, not in the original German, not in English.

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 11>The other one is that this is a shortened version

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 11>of a longer proverb that says the blood of the

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 11>covenant is stronger than the water of the womb, which

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 11>means though people who trust in the blood of Jesus

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 11>are bonded closer than family members, which may be the case,

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:08.799
<v Speaker 11>but that's not what it said. If that were true,

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 11>there would be written evidence for that. It's not, in fact,

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 11>what all the myths are untrue. They're all urban myths.

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 11>So non. Sorry, it was a clever idea, but you're

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 11>on the wrong track. It really means what we thought.

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:24.959
<v Speaker 11>It means family bonds are the strongest bonds.

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Dog's Breakfast Karl wants to know the meaning and origin

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:32.760
<v Speaker 2>of a dog's breakfast, first.

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 11>Record of the late eighteen hundreds, and it just comes

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 11>from the idea of being missing and in fact it's

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 11>another insult to our canine friends. It's pretending they're messing eaters,

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 11>and so it's fairly straight in that sense. It's straightforward.

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 11>What is interesting about it from a linguistic point of

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:49.320
<v Speaker 11>view is we like dogs. We all like dogs. Dogs

0:46:49.320 --> 0:46:52.720
<v Speaker 11>are our best friends. But nearly every expression in English

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 11>about dogs is negative. Dogs breakfast dog with its til

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 11>between its legs, can't teach an old dog new tricks.

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 11>Down with dogs, get up with fleas.

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 14>Everything we say.

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 11>We love dogs, but everything we say about dogs in

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 11>English is negative. And when I discovered that that pattern,

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 11>I thought, that's really interesting, that's worth drawing attention to.

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 2>And then immigrant versus migrant, what's the difference between the two.

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 11>Yes, Now, the bloke who asked me about this said

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 11>he's been puzzled for you is very intelligent, very well

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 11>informed man, but he just said, it's really puzzling. Why

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 11>do we say immigrant migrant? The answer is they are

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 11>exact synonyms. They mean the same thing. Both come from Latin.

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 11>Migrant comes from an old Latin word meaning you've shifted

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 11>your residence, so it means exactly what we think it means.

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 11>And then sometime later the Latin prefix m was added.

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 11>All that means is action has been taken. So although

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 11>they look like their different words, they are identical words

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 11>with exactly the same meaning. And the person who asked me,

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:54.959
<v Speaker 11>don't be bothered. About the muse either.

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, Cal we've got twenty seconds for you to explain

0:47:57.960 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 2>the word nilist.

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 11>Yes, this is a Credlin view of very clever Credlin

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:05.400
<v Speaker 11>viewers who said in the World Cup there should be

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:08.400
<v Speaker 11>an award for the nillist team, because we all know

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 11>soccer is a low scoring game. There are a lot

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 11>of nils scores, and some teams must score a lot

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 11>of nils and they should get a special award as

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 11>the nilis team. Nillis once was a word in Old English.

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 11>It was the opposite of will if you will do

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 11>something or your nilist do something, and it survives in

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 11>the willy nilly expression will be nilli.

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Love it kel and thank you Robert. We'll all have

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 2>to start using that. It is now time for the

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Bolt Report.