Speaker 1: Late Wait.
Speaker 2: Welc the Late job Bait.
Speaker 3: Hello and welcome to the Late Debate. I'm Gabriella Power.
Speaker 3: Thank you for your company joining us this evening. We
Speaker 3: have Kel Richards, Hello and Frail. Lovely to see you
Speaker 3: coming up on the show. Lefties are having a meltdown
Speaker 3: about how to handle political conversations at Christmas, especially after
Speaker 3: Donald Trump's decisive victory, and we might just have the
Speaker 3: solution for them. Also, who doesn't love gingerbread men. Well,
Speaker 3: some woke lunatics have decided to use these Christmas cookies
Speaker 3: to make a statement about gender. Yes, you can now
Speaker 3: buy non binary gingerbread people.
Speaker 4: Unbelievable.
Speaker 3: But first let's take a look at Labour's spending because
Speaker 3: the International Monetary Fund is warning the Albanezy government to
Speaker 3: curb spending overconcerns.
Speaker 5: About inflation and interest rates.
Speaker 3: The IMF has thrown its support behind the Reserve banks
Speaker 3: restrictiveary stance, labeling it appropriate, and is calling for support
Speaker 3: with fiscal policy that avoids an expansionary stance. Now, the
Speaker 3: Central Bank kept rates steady at a thirteen year high
Speaker 3: of four point three five percent at its December meeting,
Speaker 3: and the warning from the IMF comes after a midyear
Speaker 3: budget update from Treasurer Jim Chalmers that revealed a projected
Speaker 3: twenty seven billion dollar deficit.
Speaker 4: Kel is labor listening.
Speaker 3: They can't really seem to get their spending under control.
Speaker 6: If the International Monetary Fund needs to say it, when
Speaker 6: they've been hearing it from every economist and the RBA
Speaker 6: for the last two and a half years, three years,
Speaker 6: I give up there. Okay, so we need what we
Speaker 6: need to do. It's Christmas time. Is thinked the Three
Speaker 6: Wise Men of Christmas, Chris Bowen, Tony Burke, and Jim Chalmers.
Speaker 6: Chris Bowen because he was going to reduce your power
Speaker 6: will by two hundred and seventy.
Speaker 2: Four hours and instead it went up by one thousand dollars.
Speaker 6: Tony Burke when he was in industrial relations, make sure
Speaker 6: the unions had more power, making life more figul and
Speaker 6: everything more expensive for small and middle spis. Business is
Speaker 6: just harder for everyone. Have they passed the cost on
Speaker 6: to you? And then we had Jim Chalmers, whose approach
Speaker 6: to everything is the one that troubles the eyem If
Speaker 6: you just throw money at everything. What we're experiencing now
Speaker 6: and what you experience when you try to buy stuff
Speaker 6: for Christmas. It's the hard landing we weren't supposed to have.
Speaker 6: This is the hard landing that we were promised and
Speaker 6: it's happening now, which is why you're having half a
Speaker 6: ham in sort of a full leg.
Speaker 4: Well, that's what's happening.
Speaker 3: Australians are certainly feeling the pinch this Christmas, and many
Speaker 3: are said to be cutting back on buying large legs
Speaker 3: of ham for Christmas and are instead opting for half
Speaker 3: a leg instead, as they do what they can in
Speaker 3: this cost of living crisis. Food company Primo Food says
Speaker 3: that consumers have been searching for value in the lead
Speaker 3: up to Christmas. Audi has been performing really well and
Speaker 3: consumers are spending less time dining out and more time
Speaker 3: gathering at home.
Speaker 4: Does this surprise you, Frail, not really, as Kel said,
Speaker 4: I think households really are doing it. Tough. Food has
Speaker 4: gone up by ten percent since the last election, and
Speaker 4: it is an absolute train wreck for labor. And you
Speaker 4: notice they have repeatedly tried to blame inflation on Donald Trump,
Speaker 4: on Ukraine, on Netanyahu, on anyone but themselves, and most recently,
Speaker 4: their new escapegoat has been the RBA. Oh, it's all
Speaker 4: the RBA's fold. They're the ones messing around with monetary
Speaker 4: policy and causing this all to go awry. But that
Speaker 4: is factually untrue. They have added three hundred and forty
Speaker 4: seven billion dollars in extra spending since the election. That
Speaker 4: equates to thirty three thousand dollars per household. Do you
Speaker 4: feel like you're getting an extra thirty three thousand dollars
Speaker 4: in value from the government, I certainly do not. All
Speaker 4: that money is doing is fueling inflation, and the inflation
Speaker 4: we're seeing now. You've also got to remember there's a
Speaker 4: lag between when the government spends money and when we
Speaker 4: actually see that it resulting in inflation. They have now
Speaker 4: been in for two and a half years. That is
Speaker 4: about the perfect amount of time to actually see the
Speaker 4: true impact of government spending flow through the economy and
Speaker 4: result in inflation. And what are we seeing inflation is
Speaker 4: remaining too high core inflation, the RBA's preferred measure, much
Speaker 4: too high out of the two to three percent band.
Speaker 4: And we know this is an Australian problem because it
Speaker 4: is a home grown inflation problem. Inflation on products produced
Speaker 4: and consumed here is higher than inflation on products we're
Speaker 4: importing from overseas. So we know this is an Australian problem.
Speaker 4: We know that this is the result of government spending
Speaker 4: and unfortunately we know this government will look for anyone
Speaker 4: to blame but themselves.
Speaker 3: And it's sad cal isn't it almost really seeing this
Speaker 3: play outo at Christmas time and people have to cut back.
Speaker 2: Well, they're maxing their credit cards.
Speaker 6: What people know is if we're going to have Christmas
Speaker 6: this year come January, we will set in February because
Speaker 6: we'll still be suffering the Then max the credit cards
Speaker 6: is what people do because you've got to give the
Speaker 6: family Christmas and you've got to give the little kids Christmas,
Speaker 6: and so people do that, don't you reckon Gabriel. Come
Speaker 6: the next election, all Peter Dutton has to stand up
Speaker 6: and say is do you feel better off now than
Speaker 6: three years ago?
Speaker 1: And he's got one.
Speaker 3: Well, absolutely, that's what Trump said and that certainly helped
Speaker 3: him get elected.
Speaker 4: But he makes a point.
Speaker 3: It's felt right here in Australia and I think everyone
Speaker 3: can relate to that. I don't know how many people
Speaker 3: are better off right now than they were four years ago.
Speaker 2: Please let me know we're going to have a show off.
Speaker 4: Has It's sad, isn't it?
Speaker 3: Look Tomorrow many families will be getting together celebrating Christmas,
Speaker 3: and following at the US election result, we heard from
Speaker 3: some on the leftist campaigning for people to boycott Thanksgiving,
Speaker 3: essentially turning off communication entirely with any family member or
Speaker 3: friend who dared to vote for Donald Trump. And now
Speaker 3: with Christmas approaching, some on the left are still kicking
Speaker 3: screaming about this and are refusing to turn up to
Speaker 3: their families gatherings just in protest, and others are nervously
Speaker 3: trying to work out how on earth to have conversations
Speaker 3: about politics with relatives who might have a different point
Speaker 3: of view. Now some are suggesting that the topics of
Speaker 3: politics and religion just be banned all together at the
Speaker 3: dining table. It's just working out how to speak to
Speaker 3: someone who might have a different point of view, may
Speaker 3: have some valuable insight to offer. Its all too hard,
Speaker 3: isn't it. I have a solution. If you find yourself
Speaker 3: at the dinner table with someone who's still moaning that
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris lost the election to Donald Trump, you could
Speaker 3: give them this ornament as a reminder of those states
Speaker 3: that stayed blue and every swing state that turned read
Speaker 3: look at that. Look cal what do you make of this?
Speaker 3: So are you switching off politics at Christmas?
Speaker 1: We're not here.
Speaker 6: I don't think it's as bad here as it is there. Yeah,
Speaker 6: I mean families have arguments about politics. But I think
Speaker 6: we're pretty good In Australia let's saying, oh, yeah, you're
Speaker 6: an idiot, but will have a beer. I think we're
Speaker 6: reasonably good at that. What's happened in America more than here? Actually,
Speaker 6: the Big American dictionary, the Merrian Webster, chose as their
Speaker 6: word of the year polarization. What polarization means is you've
Speaker 6: got lots of people at one end of the spectrum
Speaker 6: and lots of the other, and very few in the middle.
Speaker 1: It used not to be spread like that.
Speaker 6: And what's made it really bad is the way the
Speaker 6: left think about the rest, because right wing think is
Speaker 6: right wing voters tend to think left wing voters are wrong,
Speaker 6: but the left wing thing the right evil. We are wicked,
Speaker 6: we are morally inferior. So how can you have dinner
Speaker 6: with someone who voted for Trump? Therefore they're morally are grown? Yeah?
Speaker 3: And I wonder why they think they're evil when you've
Speaker 3: just heard from the mainstream media that he's essentially the
Speaker 3: next thing since Hitler, when you've constantly been hearing this
Speaker 3: message from the left wing media.
Speaker 4: But you know, what do you.
Speaker 3: Make of this prayer? Do we turn off politics at
Speaker 3: Christmas time?
Speaker 4: Well, anyone who knows anything about me or my Faumid
Speaker 4: knows we are definitely not turning off politics or religion.
Speaker 4: We love talking about that stuff at the family dinner table.
Speaker 4: Come around any night of the week and you will
Speaker 4: hear some fiery discussions. And I think that's healthy. I
Speaker 4: think that's how it should be. We should be a
Speaker 4: society that can have open and robust conversations. And I
Speaker 4: think actually this tells us the fact that people are
Speaker 4: turning off from politics and explicitly saying this won't be discussed.
Speaker 4: That indicates that we have lost as Kel says, that
Speaker 4: mutual respect, the ability to disagree but still see each
Speaker 4: other as a decent human being. And I think we
Speaker 4: see that reflected through all levels of our political discourse.
Speaker 4: And I think, to be honest, the mainstream media has
Speaker 4: been one of the worst perpetrators of this culture. By
Speaker 4: framing anybody that disagrees with them as evil, and we
Speaker 4: have seen people trying to import that kind of retoric
Speaker 4: into Australia and I think that's very dangerous. We saw
Speaker 4: during the Voice anyone who campaigned for Noah was voting
Speaker 4: no was now somehow racist or stupid, and that is
Speaker 4: that same culture that leads to polarization, and that is
Speaker 4: the culture we have to fight against. So if anyone
Speaker 4: is trying to tell you not to talk about politics
Speaker 4: at Christmas, I know, talk about it because when we
Speaker 4: stop talking about it and we do become divided, we
Speaker 4: do become animized, polarization will take root and we cannot
Speaker 4: have that here in Australia.
Speaker 6: Believe, even in America, where they are not so about
Speaker 6: this and it's caused by woke, work means morally superior.
Speaker 6: So anyone who's woke means I'm a wake up I
Speaker 6: can see what's going on. You can't, so I'm morally
Speaker 6: superior to That's where it all follows out of. But
Speaker 6: even in America, wouldn't you think if you're inviting the
Speaker 6: family for Christmas and you wanted it to be okay
Speaker 6: because you knew George hated Frank, and Frank hated George.
Speaker 6: Did you just say my table, my rules, no politics.
Speaker 6: People would go along with that.
Speaker 3: That's how families re have to boycott Christmas, boycott Thanksgiving.
Speaker 3: It defeats the point. Anyway, One day we'll learn to
Speaker 3: all get along. But back staying in the US, I
Speaker 3: should say, President Biden has announced that he would commute
Speaker 3: the sentence of nearly all the inmates on death Row.
Speaker 3: Of the forty inmates, Joe Biden is commuting thirty seven
Speaker 3: individual sentence to death and is reclassifying their sentences to
Speaker 3: life without the possibility of parole.
Speaker 5: But Joe Biden is.
Speaker 3: Now facing serious questions as to why he commuted the
Speaker 3: sentences of murderers and rapists.
Speaker 5: One of those that he commuted.
Speaker 3: Is George Terrez, who was a serial killer and a
Speaker 3: kidnapper who sexually assaulted and killed two girls and a
Speaker 3: United States Navy sailor.
Speaker 5: But let's look at Joe Biden. Here he is in
Speaker 5: the nineteen nineties.
Speaker 7: Biden Crime Bill is before US calls for the death
Speaker 7: penalty for forty fifty one offenses. A wag in the
Speaker 7: newspaper recently wrote that something to the effect that Biden
Speaker 7: has made it a death penalty offense for everything with
Speaker 7: jaywalk I am a supporter of the death penalty.
Speaker 3: Well, he's certainly changed his tune, there, hasn't he. It's
Speaker 3: certainly a Christmas wish for some of the country's worst criminals.
Speaker 4: It is truly bizarre, and I think this is what
Speaker 4: we've seen from Biden. Nothing about his administration makes sense,
Speaker 4: probably because he's not actually leading his administration. Other people are.
Speaker 4: And it is The complete backflip on the death penalty
Speaker 4: is very strange, and I think it's also just concerning
Speaker 4: because it overturns and it undermines the principle of the
Speaker 4: rule of law. If you are opposed to the death penalty,
Speaker 4: that is fine, and I think there are some very
Speaker 4: strong arguments for and against the death penalty. That's fine,
Speaker 4: but go about it the right way. Change the law.
Speaker 4: The role of the courts is to interpret the law.
Speaker 4: That's what they've done when they've applied the death penalty.
Speaker 4: For Joe Biden to now come over top and say
Speaker 4: to the worst child rapists, killers, the worst people in
Speaker 4: society are that now they won't have to get the
Speaker 4: death sentence. That is it's absurd.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it just makes me wonder who's really and Joe
Speaker 3: Biden's ear.
Speaker 4: What do you think?
Speaker 6: How well, clearly there is an agenda to try to
Speaker 6: stop Trump, because in the end, I don't think this
Speaker 6: is actually about the death penalty or these people on
Speaker 6: death row. They've been sitting there for years and they're
Speaker 6: going to stay in prison forever. And Obama, Biden and
Speaker 6: Obama before him just suspended their death sentences, didn't take
Speaker 6: them away permanently, didn't commute them, just suspended them so
Speaker 6: they weren't executed. Now, when Trump came in his first term,
Speaker 6: he said, the death pedaly is the law, Okay, go
Speaker 6: ahead with it. And twenty one people were executed under
Speaker 6: federal charges. So that Biden thinks, Okay, Trump likes to
Speaker 6: do that, I'm going to stop him.
Speaker 2: It is just an anti Trump agenda.
Speaker 6: It's this weird personal Can we stop Trump doing what
Speaker 6: he's doing? Can we possibly spend more federal money now
Speaker 6: so there's less money for Trump to spend. Can we
Speaker 6: appoint more judges now so there are fewer benches that
Speaker 6: need to be filled by Trump? It is a weird
Speaker 6: anti Trump thing of.
Speaker 1: Actually, when you think about it. It's anti democratic of
Speaker 1: co very.
Speaker 6: It was a landslide win by Trump and the Democrats
Speaker 6: and Joe Biden. Well, Joe Biden to the extent that
Speaker 6: he knows what day it is, sitting there saying, Okay,
Speaker 6: he won the election. We are rejecting the will of
Speaker 6: the American people. We're going to try to stop him
Speaker 6: doing what he was elected to do.
Speaker 2: It's just absurd.
Speaker 4: And I think as well, it's interesting to look at
Speaker 4: who he has actually commuted the sentences for. So it's
Speaker 4: thirty seven out of the forty people on death row. Now,
Speaker 4: the three he has excluded are the most politically red hot.
Speaker 4: It's one guy who's shut up a sin, it's another
Speaker 4: one who's a white supremacist who shut up a church,
Speaker 4: and it was another guy who orchestrated the Boston marathon bombing.
Speaker 4: So clearly Joe Biden wants the benefits of commuting these
Speaker 4: sentences without having to commute the sentences for anyone who
Speaker 4: could cause a political headache, because it's fine, you know
Speaker 4: the victims of that murder or that child rapist, whatever,
Speaker 4: it's storm in a teacup, But you know these other
Speaker 4: guys over here who've actually who've you know, have committed
Speaker 4: politically motivated terror. That's in the too hard basket. So
Speaker 4: I think it just shows how weak he is. It
Speaker 4: is exactly as cal said, it's all about political points scoring.
Speaker 4: It's all about stopping Trump from actually implementing his agenda
Speaker 4: that he was elected to carry out. And I think
Speaker 4: it just shows how weak and vapid his whole presidency
Speaker 4: has been, right to the very end.
Speaker 5: His whole campaign was anti Trump.
Speaker 6: All of that, and the Democrats don't have the courage
Speaker 6: to actually make it an issue and try to change
Speaker 6: the death penalty. Obamashah, he was against it, but wouldn't
Speaker 6: try to persuade the American people to drop the death penalty.
Speaker 6: Neither would Biden, so they just do this instead.
Speaker 3: Anyway, Moving on to the case that has captured at
Speaker 3: the attention of the world, suspected healthcare CEO killer Luigi
Speaker 3: Mangioni has pleaded not guilty to murder and terrorism charges.
Speaker 3: Luigi Mangioni appeared in court to answer eleven at federal charges,
Speaker 3: and dozens of protesters appeared outside of court, weirdly showing
Speaker 3: their support for Mangioni. But questions are being raised about
Speaker 3: the spectacle surrounding him, and new pictures of him smiling
Speaker 3: for the cameras have appeared, and interestingly, Luigi Mangioni's lawyer
Speaker 3: has slammed New York City officials for what she referred
Speaker 3: to as a staged walk for her client. She said
Speaker 3: it looked which I have to say, did look like
Speaker 3: a scene from a movie, but she claims that officers
Speaker 3: have been treating him differently. She says he was on
Speaker 3: display for everyone to see in the biggest stage perp
Speaker 3: walk I've ever seen in my career, and it was
Speaker 3: absolutely un necessary. But the twenty six year old, well,
Speaker 3: he could face the death penalty if he is found guilty.
Speaker 3: And it appears that some media outlets are also getting
Speaker 3: caught up in this sick hype around Mangioni.
Speaker 4: In his appearance, Luigi Mangione drop yeah, yeah, definitely woo.
Speaker 1: You're ruin for justice, right.
Speaker 5: Luigi Mangioni dropped his extradition fight and was flown from
Speaker 5: Pennsylvania to New York to face multiple charges. In related news, Bumble.
Speaker 3: Exploded, Yeah, Frey, what do you make of what went
Speaker 3: to air on SNL? You know, the cheering, the kind
Speaker 3: of smirk that it's making it okay to celebrate someone
Speaker 3: that's been accused of murder.
Speaker 4: It is absolutely shocking and it just shows you the
Speaker 4: lows the left has stoops to. They're now cheering for
Speaker 4: somebody who executed in an act of political terror, a
Speaker 4: father of two, a hard work as someone just doing
Speaker 4: his job as the CEO of an insurance company. It
Speaker 4: is honestly absurd, and I think the whole case, I mean,
Speaker 4: this is part of the problem. Right. The reason Luigi
Speaker 4: Mangioni was smiling in court, I personally think is because
Speaker 4: this is what he wanted all along. He shows the
Speaker 4: classic symptoms of someone with a narcissistic personality. The idea
Speaker 4: that he felt so morally self righteous that he could
Speaker 4: come up with this manifesto about the insurance sector, about
Speaker 4: US medical system, and that he could then pick somebody
Speaker 4: to personally execute in order to carry out his grand
Speaker 4: political vision for the United States is genuinely horrendous. And
Speaker 4: that is the sign of somebody who is completely self absorbed.
Speaker 4: He's obviously he's got this sort of fantasy image of
Speaker 4: himself as this kind of hero who's crusading for justice
Speaker 4: in America, and the left and these depraved idiots, when
Speaker 4: they cheer for him, when they make like, you know,
Speaker 4: fun edit of him on the internet, when they send
Speaker 4: him love letters in prison, when they protest from outside
Speaker 4: the court, they are playing into that. So I think
Speaker 4: he's smiling because, in some sick and twisted way, he
Speaker 4: has actually won the fight he set out to wage,
Speaker 4: which is to become this kind of figure of left
Speaker 4: wing fight back in the most horrendous way. But if
Speaker 4: he wanted to do that, take the legal means executing
Speaker 4: someone in the street because of your political differences. That's
Speaker 4: what they do in dictatorships. We have the ballot box
Speaker 4: so we can express our views without violence, and this
Speaker 4: undermines all of that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and of course they're just allegations. He's still pleaded, yes, guilty,
Speaker 3: and he suspect.
Speaker 4: Can you believe what is playing out?
Speaker 6: That's very strange. I'm not sure that he is a
Speaker 6: left wing warrior. I think he's just a bad boy.
Speaker 6: I just think he's an ordinary, run of the mill,
Speaker 6: common or garden psychopath. And for some reason, some people,
Speaker 6: some young women find psychopaths and bad boys attractive. The
Speaker 6: judge Janine Piro, who's on Fox News, tells a really
Speaker 6: interesting story. When she was a judge on the bench,
Speaker 6: she'd convict someone. She said, this happened more than once.
Speaker 6: She would convict someone of first degree murder and pronounce
Speaker 6: the death sentence, and then as the court was about
Speaker 6: to be dismissed, the girlfriend would turn up and say, quick, judge, quick,
Speaker 6: marry us now in the court room before he goes
Speaker 6: to prison. And she did it a couple of times.
Speaker 6: She said, it happened.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: I mean, you're intelligent.
Speaker 6: Why do these women find the bad boys attractive? I
Speaker 6: don't understand.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't know if people have just been seriously manipulated.
Speaker 4: It's scary stuff.
Speaker 3: But it's so low to see that kind of play
Speaker 3: out now on Saturday Night Live, that he's seeing the
Speaker 3: weird stuff online, the weird protesters. But then when it's
Speaker 3: now getting into the media and people are somehow normalizing.
Speaker 5: This alleged crazy behavior.
Speaker 3: Anyway, look to another issue, keeping women safe in sport.
Speaker 5: We can keep trying.
Speaker 3: Texas Attorney General at Ken Paxton has sued the National
Speaker 3: Collegiate Athletics Association to try and block the participation of
Speaker 3: transgender athletes in women's sports, claiming that it tricks and
Speaker 3: misleads fans. He argues that the association violates the Texas
Speaker 3: the Texas Rather Deceptive Trade Practices Act by promoting women's
Speaker 3: sport that may include a transgender athlete. Now, the lawsuit
Speaker 3: seeks an injunction to stop the association from allowing transgender
Speaker 3: athletes to compete in women's sport in Texas or in
Speaker 3: sports that involve Texas programs, or to at least stop
Speaker 3: marketing events as women's sports if transgender athletes are allowed
Speaker 3: to compete. And here is Democratic Senator Dick Deurbin trying
Speaker 3: to down play the issue.
Speaker 8: How many athletes are there in the United States and
Speaker 8: the NCAA schools.
Speaker 4: Five hundred and ten thousand?
Speaker 8: How many transgender athletes are you aware of? Less than ten?
Speaker 8: Less than ten? You got a five hundred and ten thousand, yep.
Speaker 4: Prayer.
Speaker 3: The issue here, why do biological men have the right
Speaker 3: to compete in women's sports, use their locker rooms, their bathrooms,
Speaker 3: change rooms, and.
Speaker 4: Why do women have to put up.
Speaker 3: With this risk to their safety? It is to accommodate
Speaker 3: it such a handful of people.
Speaker 4: My blood is literally boiling right now listening to this guy.
Speaker 4: What if I told you there are five hundred thousand
Speaker 4: athletes in our NCUBA competition. Yeah, ten of them are
Speaker 4: using performance enhancing drugs. But that's fine. It's just ten
Speaker 4: out of five hundred thousand, So it doesn't really matter. No,
Speaker 4: it's it's a prizzle principle. The heart of sport is
Speaker 4: that we all play by the same rules fairness. That
Speaker 4: is the essence of sportsmanship. And when some people, no
Speaker 4: matter if it's ten or a thousand, or however many,
Speaker 4: when anyone is able to play by a different set
Speaker 4: of rules, then that is fundamentally unfair, and it undermines
Speaker 4: sport itself, and it is unfair to women most importantly.
Speaker 4: I think the other thing this does is sure, in
Speaker 4: the NC Double A there might only be ten transgender athletes,
Speaker 4: but the NC Double A is like the most elite
Speaker 4: level of competition in the United States. What about at
Speaker 4: the junior clubs? What about for the kids at the
Speaker 4: grassroots levels? And I think that's where we're actually seeing
Speaker 4: that even more concerning results of this policy play out,
Speaker 4: Because there is a big difference between a ten year
Speaker 4: old girl and a ten year old boy. They should
Speaker 4: not be competing in the same field and it starts
Speaker 4: at the top, but it trickles down to all levels
Speaker 4: of women's sport. So they need to show some courage.
Speaker 4: They need to man up, to show some leadership and
Speaker 4: actually say, hang on a second, we are going to
Speaker 4: abide by reality and say that men and women should
Speaker 4: compete in their own categories. Maybe we need some sort
Speaker 4: of third category for transgender people. I don't know that
Speaker 4: that could be a conversation down the line, but seriously,
Speaker 4: your sex at birth, that's the category you should be
Speaker 4: competing in. Anything other than that, and it's grossly unfair.
Speaker 3: And why do you think about a third category? Kel,
Speaker 3: Do you think we need to do that? Or well,
Speaker 3: stick to this issue first.
Speaker 2: We've got to get rid of it here.
Speaker 6: I don't know that it's a big enough field to
Speaker 6: be able to put teams and competitors.
Speaker 1: On the field. It have been very tiny, wouldn't it.
Speaker 6: Let me say the unsayable trans athletes are cheats.
Speaker 1: They are cheating. It's as simple as that.
Speaker 6: Everyone has forty six chromosomes, twenty three pairs. The twenty
Speaker 6: third pairs called the gender determining chromosomes. They're either xx
Speaker 6: or x y xx of women x y men anyone
Speaker 6: with a Y chromosome will on average, be bigger, faster,
Speaker 6: and stronger than someone who doesn't have a Y chromosome.
Speaker 6: A Y chromosome is being a cheat. If you just
Speaker 6: had a few transathletes like that, bigger, faster, stronger, in
Speaker 6: the women's rugby league, they would trample everyone else, and
Speaker 6: every other team that didn't have a trans member in
Speaker 6: their team they'd be put at a disadvantage. So suddenly
Speaker 6: the women's rugby league would have to start recruiting transathletes
Speaker 6: for their team in order they could have another six
Speaker 6: foot six inch broad shouldered bloke to knock over the
Speaker 6: women under the pretense that he's a woman too. So
Speaker 6: it's just cheating. It's just cheating. It destroys the whole
Speaker 6: point and concept of sport. There was a fairly famous
Speaker 6: case some years ago in American intercollegiate swimming.
Speaker 1: Where there was a young man.
Speaker 6: Who decided he identified as a woman, competed in the
Speaker 6: women's events, and all of these very good female swimmers
Speaker 6: lost races they should have won because he just kept
Speaker 6: winning race after race. That if you kape's times to
Speaker 6: men's times, he wouldn't have got a place cheating. He
Speaker 6: was going out of the men's competition because they all
Speaker 6: beat him women's competition.
Speaker 4: It's cheating, that's the thing. This was the Leah Thomas
Speaker 4: and Riley Gains case. Leah Thomas, who is the person
Speaker 4: who decided to identify as a woman. He was ranked
Speaker 4: like three hundred and something in the male swimming category,
Speaker 4: transitioned to a woman, same biology save six foot something, tall, high, everything,
Speaker 4: and then all of a sudden came first in the
Speaker 4: national championships. If you think that's fair, then you need
Speaker 4: a reality check. And this is the irony of the
Speaker 4: wave of feminism we're in now. They claim to be
Speaker 4: about protecting women, but the only people that this is
Speaker 4: hurting a woman.
Speaker 3: And I think this argument in Texas is actually interesting
Speaker 3: as well, the fact that they're seeing on the basis
Speaker 3: that they're tricking people. If you're advertising that you're watching
Speaker 3: women's sports and you're not actually also watching biological men play,
Speaker 3: is that fair exactly anyway?
Speaker 5: And more left winger lunacy.
Speaker 3: There's now a move right here in New South Wales
Speaker 3: to address toilet anxiety.
Speaker 4: Guess trans advocates, i should.
Speaker 3: Say, are now pushing for male and female bathrooms to
Speaker 3: be replaced with gender neutral cubicles. I was in New
Speaker 3: York City recently, nearly every art gallery or shopping center
Speaker 3: I went to just filled with gender neutral toilets. Now
Speaker 3: a new South Wales parliamentary inquiry investigated the design and
Speaker 3: inclusivity of public toilets, and it's heard that these so
Speaker 3: called harmful gender labels, well they should be removed. The
Speaker 3: University of Sydney is, of course, among those pushing for
Speaker 3: the overhaul. Researchers are claiming that gender diverse people can
Speaker 3: often feel forced to use a toilet that is not
Speaker 3: aligned with their gender identity. Some MPs are voicing concerns
Speaker 3: and common sense that families might be frightened away from
Speaker 3: the beach showers and changing rooms all of a sudden altered,
Speaker 3: and that male and female facilities are all of a
Speaker 3: sudden replaced with unique sex toilets. The inquiry has also
Speaker 3: heard for gender neutral toilets in public schools, prayer that's
Speaker 3: too far in primary schools, public schools, what.
Speaker 4: Are they doing? It is actually unbelievable and if they
Speaker 4: think this is helping anyone, they are seriously wrong. I
Speaker 4: came across a study that was done in the UK
Speaker 4: and in the years twenty seventeen to twenty eighteen, ninety
Speaker 4: percent of all sexual assault cases that happened in change
Speaker 4: rooms and bathrooms happened in unisex change rooms and bathrooms.
Speaker 4: That is all this policy does. It gives predators greater
Speaker 4: access to their victims in areas that are discreet, like
Speaker 4: there are no security cameras in change rooms and bathrooms obviously,
Speaker 4: so you are more vulnerable. Crime does happen. And putting
Speaker 4: this in schools I think is the most gross negligence
Speaker 4: you could imagine for any educator to seriously or politician
Speaker 4: to seriously consider, because that is when girls are super vulnerable. Boys'
Speaker 4: brains haven't developed. You want to minimize risk at all times.
Speaker 4: And let me tell you, putting boys in the same
Speaker 4: bathrooms and change rooms as young girls is going to
Speaker 4: lead to disastrous results. And I fear that the statistics
Speaker 4: in the UK around sexual assault in unisex and spaces
Speaker 4: will be replicated here. And if we change all if
Speaker 4: we spend millions of dollars changing all of these facilities
Speaker 4: to unisex facilities, basically all we will accomplish is just
Speaker 4: making women more vulnerable. Absolutely. Cal employer agree.
Speaker 1: With that, oh absolutely.
Speaker 6: And we already have the toilets for people who are
Speaker 6: confused about who they are. They're called disabled. You know,
Speaker 6: there's the men's, there's the women's, the disabled, the disabled
Speaker 6: is for you go there. I haven't conducted a survey,
Speaker 6: but I would guess in a city of the size
Speaker 6: of Sydney or Melbourne, there would be tens of thousands,
Speaker 6: maybe hundreds of thousands of public toilets. You can't just
Speaker 6: change the name on the door, the label on the
Speaker 6: door from a stick figure of a man the stick
Speaker 6: figure women to a question mark and say whatever.
Speaker 2: You can't.
Speaker 6: You've got to rebuild them completely. The urinals have to go.
Speaker 6: You can't have blokes standing up there exposing themselves.
Speaker 1: To urinate when they are a women.
Speaker 6: That you can't do it, So they have to go,
Speaker 6: and the cubicles have to be built up to the
Speaker 6: roof so that there's no way for some pervy bloke.
Speaker 1: To peer over the top.
Speaker 6: The whole all of them, tens of thousands of them,
Speaker 6: would have to be totally rebuilt. It's just a completely impractical, nonsensical,
Speaker 6: nonnecessary idea.
Speaker 4: And not to mention the fact the guy's toilets are
Speaker 4: much more disgusting than women's toilets, and frankly, I don't
Speaker 4: want that into the lovely women's spaces that we enjoy from.
Speaker 2: Our point of view.
Speaker 6: You know what happens at women's toilets queues, We are
Speaker 6: not queuing.
Speaker 5: That's true, women's bathrooms.
Speaker 3: They are a same space for women to go if
Speaker 3: they want to touch up their makeup.
Speaker 4: And I must say I have in the past been
Speaker 4: tempted to just sneak into the male toilet to avoid
Speaker 4: the line in the female toils, and I think that's
Speaker 4: that could.
Speaker 5: Be you could get away with another way to get.
Speaker 2: Away because the queue was too long.
Speaker 4: Yes, exactly to.
Speaker 5: The we're moving on.
Speaker 3: I thought we were going to a different story, but
Speaker 3: here we go. Last week we brought you a report
Speaker 3: that confirmed essentially.
Speaker 4: What we already knew.
Speaker 3: The White House aids covered up Joe Biden's apparent mental
Speaker 3: decline from day one of his presidency, shielding him from
Speaker 3: the public and even rearranging his schedule just to get
Speaker 3: him to bed earlier and accommodate for his good days
Speaker 3: and bad days.
Speaker 5: We were lied to repeatedly.
Speaker 3: Now an interview with retired Army General Mark Miley on
Speaker 3: sixty Minutes has resurfaced from last year, and just listen
Speaker 3: to what he had to say about the commander in chief.
Speaker 9: I would just tell you that I meet frequently with
Speaker 9: the President, and every single time i'm you with them,
Speaker 9: he is just fine. If the American people are worried
Speaker 9: about an individual who is you know, someone who's making
Speaker 9: decisions of war and peace and has access to you know,
Speaker 9: makes the decision of nuclear weapons of that sort of thing,
Speaker 9: I think.
Speaker 5: They can rest easy, sleep easy.
Speaker 3: The man with cognitive decline who's running the country and
Speaker 3: he's making decisions when it comes to nuclear weapons.
Speaker 5: I tell you who is sleeping easy. Take a look a.
Speaker 7: Meal in Peace approject with national priorities and other electoral
Speaker 7: and regional engineers.
Speaker 3: Closing Hello, there is Joe Biden and earlier this month
Speaker 3: in Africa, sound asleep, not a care in the world
Speaker 3: during his meeting, but cal This response from Mark Miley
Speaker 3: is pretty wild because he's not just dancing around the question.
Speaker 3: He's relatably lying, saying that he's having conversations with Joe
Speaker 3: Biden and there's nothing to see here.
Speaker 6: Yes, so all of that was fantasy. All of that
Speaker 6: was fiction. He was just making it up, but they
Speaker 6: all were not, just from day one of his presidency
Speaker 6: right through the campaign, well before he ran, because he
Speaker 6: ran from the basement the Delaware on the basis that
Speaker 6: you know there's COVID still run, so we can't.
Speaker 1: Let the old man out of the basement.
Speaker 6: And he didn't do the press conferences, he didn't face questions,
Speaker 6: he didn't do the big rallies, he didn't do the things.
Speaker 6: He was not cognitively and he wasn't cognitively capable. Then,
Speaker 6: I mean, the Democrats have been lying to us from
Speaker 6: the beginning. All they wanted to do was to get
Speaker 6: rid of Trump in twenty twenty. And they decided that
Speaker 6: there had been so much turmoil which was generated in
Speaker 6: the Democratic media around Tump, the one thing they could
Speaker 6: offer the public was a nice old man, a nice grandfather,
Speaker 6: the old man, safe pair of fans.
Speaker 1: You know him.
Speaker 6: He was Obama's vice president. He's a nice man, you
Speaker 6: like him. He'll be okay, he won't do anything dramatic.
Speaker 6: So they lied from the beginning. They set him up
Speaker 6: what he should have been allowed to retire comfortably, instead
Speaker 6: of which they committed elder abuse, which is the only
Speaker 6: weak to describe what they did to Joe Biden. And
Speaker 6: the decisions that are supposedly being made by Biden now
Speaker 6: are clearly not being made by Biden at all. We've
Speaker 6: never known who's actually running the White House, presumably his staff,
Speaker 6: possibly the Obama's from somewhere behind, is the puppet masters.
Speaker 1: We just don't know who's been running America now, I know.
Speaker 5: And it's quite scary, isn't it.
Speaker 3: We know, as you say, it's elder abuse seats. We
Speaker 3: can laugh at it, but it's so worrying to see
Speaker 3: someone who's meant to be leading America, leading the world,
Speaker 3: and he's just to sleep in meetings. He's not there,
Speaker 3: you know. But he didn't want to give up power.
Speaker 3: J'll Biden clearly didn't want him to give it up either.
Speaker 4: What frustrates me about this is that the legacy media
Speaker 4: always complains that there's a lack of public trust. No
Speaker 4: one trusts the media anymore, no one trusts politicians anymore.
Speaker 4: We're in this trust crisis. It's like, yeah, well, why
Speaker 4: do you think that is? Because the leader of the
Speaker 4: free world is basically I mean, he's too fragile and
Speaker 4: senile to face court. And now we have evidence of
Speaker 4: a full scale cover up involving hundreds, if not thousands
Speaker 4: of people, aids in the White House, the media, everyone
Speaker 4: in the Democrat political establishment, and they wonder why no
Speaker 4: one trusts the media anymore. It's like, come on, have
Speaker 4: some common sense. Maybe you're part of the problem by
Speaker 4: covering this up. And I think the second really concerning
Speaker 4: aspect of this story is that of course our enemies
Speaker 4: would know this too. We cannot underestimate how intelligent Russia, China, Iran, ah.
Speaker 4: And it is absolutely no coincidence that under a Biden
Speaker 4: presidency we have seen the most disastrous deterioration in global stability,
Speaker 4: I think in probably two decades. Putin knows exactly what's
Speaker 4: going on in the White House. The Ayatolas know what
Speaker 4: is going on in the White House. We should not
Speaker 4: expect any less of right and we shouldn't assume that
Speaker 4: they're stupid. They can see they.
Speaker 3: Acted as a result, and cal I think that's an
Speaker 3: interesting point as well. It's probably one of the reasons
Speaker 3: why Donald Trump was elected. People were saying, look under Trump,
Speaker 3: no wars. Under Biden, Look, look what's what's happening.
Speaker 2: And the person they offered is that as the next
Speaker 2: president was Carmel, who was part of the plot.
Speaker 6: She was there saying, oh, yes, he's very bright, he's
Speaker 6: on top of it all. I've been there in the
Speaker 6: situation room and Joe's been calling the shots. So she
Speaker 6: was part of the lie when she was telling those lies.
Speaker 6: Everyone had seen the first debate and everyone had seen
Speaker 6: Joe doing that their famous slake shawed, glassy.
Speaker 2: Eyed look of his.
Speaker 6: You know he was that dear roll bloke who really
Speaker 6: needed to be led by the hand.
Speaker 2: Were sure that everyone saw it. Everyone knew.
Speaker 6: So when she came up with her lines in the
Speaker 6: election campaign, everyone said, you're a lying to us. Why
Speaker 6: should I trust you a man anything? So Carmela was
Speaker 6: part of the guilty.
Speaker 4: She was she was part of this cover up.
Speaker 3: We have to go to a break coming up, but
Speaker 3: we'll take a look inside at London's biggest Christmas market
Speaker 3: and what storeholders have been trained to say. Welcome back
Speaker 3: to the late debate. Well it's not just woke Victorian
Speaker 3: councils that refuse to acknowledge Christmas. London's biggest Christmas market
Speaker 3: is banned from saying Merry Christmas. They're essentially rebranding the
Speaker 3: winter market to be called winter market because Christmas is
Speaker 3: somehow offensive and the winter market is more inclusive.
Speaker 5: Just take a look.
Speaker 2: Is this a Christmas market market a winter market?
Speaker 1: What's the difference? Sorry to do with religion. They can't
Speaker 1: say Christmas, but.
Speaker 4: Happy Christmas or happy holidays.
Speaker 2: Both?
Speaker 1: Why both?
Speaker 4: Well, Christmas, isn't it?
Speaker 2: It's Christmas?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 5: Why would you say happy holidays?
Speaker 6: Which scenario because not everybody celebrates Christmas?
Speaker 4: Freya?
Speaker 3: Why does this happen right around the world? Melbourne, London,
Speaker 3: no mention of Christmas being a religious holiday.
Speaker 4: It's like we can't live in denial. The reason we're
Speaker 4: all on holidays is because it's Christmas. Let's just acknowledge
Speaker 4: that fact. And Christmas is such an amazing tradition, It's
Speaker 4: part of our Christian fabric, is Western civilization. But what
Speaker 4: really frustrates me about this is you can say happy
Speaker 4: other holidays, happy honekh haneker coincides with Christmas this year.
Speaker 4: That's awesome. If there were Hanekah markets, that would be fantastic.
Speaker 4: Happy Honekh, but also happy Christmas. The problem is there's
Speaker 4: a double standard. We are allowed to acknowledge other religious
Speaker 4: holidays except when they're Christian, and that is the offensive
Speaker 4: part of this. Why can we not celebrate Christian holidays
Speaker 4: as much as we can celebrate every other holiday given
Speaker 4: we are, in fact a majority Christian nation with a
Speaker 4: very strong Christian heritage and the essence of our society,
Speaker 4: our Judeo Christian values come from the Bible. And so
Speaker 4: I just think it's really frustrating and insulting.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think it's really sad seeing those tips that
Speaker 3: people have actually been trained trained not to say the
Speaker 3: word Christmas.
Speaker 4: It's now winter market.
Speaker 1: So sly.
Speaker 6: I mean, if it had originally been to pick up
Speaker 6: on Friar's point, Ramadan Market, would it have been changed.
Speaker 6: If it was Dowali Market, would it have been changed. So,
Speaker 6: for some reason, Christianity is being targeted, and I am
Speaker 6: baffled to understand who wants to target it. Even Richard Dawkins,
Speaker 6: the old New Atheists, very aggresis both now it doesn't
Speaker 6: believe anything but calls themselves a cultural Christian on the
Speaker 6: basis that Christianity has contributed so much to our culture. Now,
Speaker 6: if Dawkins this fairly hysterical atheist can get to that point.
Speaker 6: Everyone must recognize that I've got no idea who they
Speaker 6: think that who they think they're defending, Well, why they
Speaker 6: think it's necessary to do this. But you've got to
Speaker 6: deny reality, You've got to deny history in order to
Speaker 6: say And the other thing they have to do is
Speaker 6: they have to undermine multiculturalism. And these are people, these
Speaker 6: lefties who love multiculturalism because in multiculturalism, every part of
Speaker 6: the culture contributes something. And Christians we contribute to Christmas. Right,
Speaker 6: It's one of the things we've given you.
Speaker 2: It's great.
Speaker 1: So if you're a.
Speaker 6: Multiculturalist, you've got to accept the fact that this is
Speaker 6: our gift to you. So I just I can't This
Speaker 6: happens every year, as you say, and I can't keep
Speaker 6: my head around who is getting upset? They celebrate Christmas
Speaker 6: in Japan. You know, it's never been a Christian country.
Speaker 6: The Christian population of Japan's very I know friends who
Speaker 6: are missionaries in Japan and it's a real battle to
Speaker 6: get a hearing for Christianity in Japan. But they love Christmas.
Speaker 6: And they said, I write Christmas and they call it Christmas.
Speaker 6: So I just I don't understand the opposition.
Speaker 3: We will be celebrating Christmas here, but it makes me
Speaker 3: sad for also the younger generation, for the kids. It's
Speaker 3: such an exciting time of year and to go and
Speaker 3: see Santa, for all the traditions that come with it.
Speaker 3: To take that away, to take Christmas away, replace it
Speaker 3: with winter and sometimes somehow helping them.
Speaker 4: Take You can tear down all these traditions, these institutions,
Speaker 4: but what are you replacing them with? Nothing? So what
Speaker 4: does that lead to? A flattened, hollowed out human experience.
Speaker 4: You're just removing a whole element of joy in life
Speaker 4: and fun and getting together as a family, and you're
Speaker 4: replacing it with nothing. So I think it's really sad.
Speaker 4: And my other theory around why people are so allergic
Speaker 4: to the term Christmas is because it has the name
Speaker 4: Christ in it, and it's in turnalized anti Semitism because
Speaker 4: Christ is one of the most successful and famous Jews
Speaker 4: of all time. So maybe it's also deep internalized anti
Speaker 4: Semitism around the Western world that makes them so allergic
Speaker 4: to Christmas.
Speaker 6: Which it's also a hatred of Western civilization. Our civilization
Speaker 6: for a thousand years has been built on Christian values,
Speaker 6: and even people who are really aggressive atheists or real
Speaker 6: secularist or whatever, they don't realize the value for the individual,
Speaker 6: the kind of legal system we have, the concept of democracy.
Speaker 6: All the ideas which have made us who we are
Speaker 6: come from.
Speaker 2: That Christian tradition and that Christian worldview, absolutely.
Speaker 4: And we have to celebrate it.
Speaker 5: We have to keep fighting for it.
Speaker 3: Shouldn't be having to fight for it, should not be
Speaker 3: being taken away from us but staying. In the UK,
Speaker 3: the UK government has released a video showcasing their digital
Speaker 3: ID system that's set to be rolled out next year,
Speaker 3: and in this video they attempt to paint anyone who
Speaker 3: uses a physical idea as someone who's just clumsy and outdated.
Speaker 2: Can I get a pint of log of leasts? Yeah,
Speaker 2: of course it's got someone here.
Speaker 10: Okay, hid have a pint of Christmas cracker please. So
Speaker 10: we're changing the law so that next Christmas young people
Speaker 10: will have their ID on their phone, so they won't
Speaker 10: have all of the hassle of needing to get ID
Speaker 10: or leaving their idea at home or their paper ID
Speaker 10: getting lost or damaged. So it means that giving an
Speaker 10: ID is safer than it's ever.
Speaker 3: Been before, safer than it's ever been before.
Speaker 4: I'm not too sure about that.
Speaker 3: There are still concerns around digital IDs and the security
Speaker 3: around them.
Speaker 4: So what do you think of that ad? Well, the
Speaker 4: ad left a very sour taste in my mouth. I
Speaker 4: must say. Depicting anyone that prefers the old school ID
Speaker 4: is somehow stupid or bumbling is just insulted. But I mean,
Speaker 4: I must admit on this one, I might be a
Speaker 4: little contrarian on sky. Here in New South Wales. We
Speaker 4: do have our driver's license on our Service New South
Speaker 4: Wales apps, and I must say I don't even carry
Speaker 4: a wallet around anymore. I've got my debit card on there,
Speaker 4: my license everything.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 4: I can see Kel looking a bit concerned over there,
Speaker 4: but I you know, as a gender native, it's just
Speaker 4: I can't get around the old school paper stuff. I'm sorry.
Speaker 4: So I am a fan of what we have here
Speaker 4: in New South Wales, but I do not think it
Speaker 4: should be mandated. And I think claiming that anyone who
Speaker 4: prefers the old school system is somehow stupid, I think
Speaker 4: that's really wrong.
Speaker 3: I think there are still concerns that no one should
Speaker 3: really be forced into getting this digital idea.
Speaker 6: And also concerns about what it's really all about. I mean,
Speaker 6: the impression that I get from that commercial is they're
Speaker 6: lying to you. They're telling you you need this on
Speaker 6: your phone so that you can buy a bier. Well,
Speaker 6: only if you're lead young or look young. That's not
Speaker 6: what it's all about. This is an app which on
Speaker 6: your phone I take it can track wherever you are
Speaker 6: and track every movement. You will live in a surveillance
Speaker 6: society where if the government wants to, it can know
Speaker 6: where you are at any minute, any time of the day,
Speaker 6: any day of the week, and it's all there, and
Speaker 6: I can check where you were at eleven o'clock last
Speaker 6: Thursday morning. I just think it's very close to big
Speaker 6: Brother is watching you. Yeah, and that worries me.
Speaker 4: I think so too.
Speaker 3: I think there are concerns when everyone is forced to
Speaker 3: sign up to this. If you want to and it's
Speaker 3: easier and you want to go out to the pub
Speaker 3: and buy whatever you want and not be clumsy, Sure,
Speaker 3: but I agree with you, Cal's not offs.
Speaker 6: There's something going on. There's another agenda. Remember they brought
Speaker 6: out this health thing where you can have this my
Speaker 6: health and everything your doctor tells you ends up being
Speaker 6: loaded there, and they keep reassuring you, no, no, it's
Speaker 6: going to be perfectly right. Only authorized individuals will be
Speaker 6: able to get into it, including the sales staff at
Speaker 6: the local chemist. But you know, just author right, But
Speaker 6: you could opt So I opted out and I'm not
Speaker 6: in it.
Speaker 2: I'm not part of it.
Speaker 6: When they bring in a digital idea and they say
Speaker 6: you can't opt out, You're getting this whether you want
Speaker 6: it or not. They've got another agenda.
Speaker 5: I think, so absolutely right.
Speaker 3: Well you have to go to a break stay with
Speaker 3: us though, the woke take on gingerbread people.
Speaker 4: Yes, that's right.
Speaker 3: You can now buy non binary gingerbread. That's next, welcome
Speaker 3: back to the late debate. Well, who loves gingerbread, especially
Speaker 3: at this time of the year, and who wants to
Speaker 3: make gingerbread about gender? Well, if you happen to be
Speaker 3: interested in that work rubbish, you can now buy non
Speaker 3: binary gingerbread people. That is right, non binary gingerbread people.
Speaker 5: There, it is right there, Freyer.
Speaker 4: What are they doing.
Speaker 3: They're trying to take away Christmas from us?
Speaker 4: And now this nothing is safe. Nothing is safe anymore,
Speaker 4: not even our gingerbread men are safe from being rebranded
Speaker 4: and co opted by the left to be some sort
Speaker 4: of grand political statement and virtue signaling attempt. It's so sad.
Speaker 4: Just leave the gingerbread men alone. It's clearly a man.
Speaker 4: But actually, I mean, like it's just stupid, Like nothing
Speaker 4: is safe anymore. What does it even achieve?
Speaker 2: Caw nothing?
Speaker 1: You look at the picture?
Speaker 6: Can we have that image back on the screen because
Speaker 6: the little thing they have labeled a gingerbread people looks
Speaker 6: exactly like a regular gingerbread man. It's no different, right,
Speaker 6: they haven't changed anything. There aren't little bits in gingerbread man,
Speaker 6: so it doesn't mean we should.
Speaker 5: Call them out.
Speaker 3: We could get a gingerbread man and then this gingerbread
Speaker 3: people put them up on the screen on top of.
Speaker 6: That comes from the nursery rhyme, And in the nursery rhyme,
Speaker 6: man is the rhyme word run Run as fast as
Speaker 6: you can. You can't catch me. I'm the gingerbread man.
Speaker 6: You can't have gingerbread you know I'm expensive, I'm not cheap,
Speaker 6: and you can't buy me. I'm the gingerbread people. It
Speaker 6: doesn't work as a nursery.
Speaker 1: Rhyme, does it? So I'm sorry, it's just nuts. Do
Speaker 1: loney things like this.
Speaker 3: I have no one is buying gingerbread people. We cannot
Speaker 3: support that.
Speaker 5: Bears.
Speaker 3: Disney appears to be finally backing out of culture Wars
Speaker 3: after years of backlash, and the company has recently been
Speaker 3: taking an active role in moving away from political issues.
Speaker 3: The company confirmed to Fox News Digital that it would
Speaker 3: be removing a transgender storyline from the upcoming animated Pixar
Speaker 3: series Win or Lose as process, and said that when
Speaker 3: it comes to animated content for a younger audience, we
Speaker 3: recognize that many parents would prefer to discuss certain subjects
Speaker 3: with their children on their own terms and their own timeline.
Speaker 3: Frey are finally some common sense from Disney, finally.
Speaker 4: But the thing that has brought about this common sense
Speaker 4: is that they've realized people do not want to go
Speaker 4: to the movies and have political agendas shoved down their throat.
Speaker 4: It's like there's no such thing as entertainment anymore in Hollywood.
Speaker 4: Everything has to be some sort of message about whatever
Speaker 4: cultural war issue they're crusading about that day, and people
Speaker 4: don't want that. You just sometimes you want to switch off.
Speaker 4: You want to go to the movies. You want to
Speaker 4: not be scared about what your children are going to
Speaker 4: be watching, and you just want some entertainment. So Disney
Speaker 4: has finally realized that ordinary people do not want ideologies
Speaker 4: shove down their throat every time they turn on the TV.
Speaker 4: Cal do you agree?
Speaker 6: Oh, look what we need to say, and you want
Speaker 6: good news for Christmas?
Speaker 2: Wok is over. Wok is dead.
Speaker 6: The vast majority of the population have decided they're fed
Speaker 6: up to the back teeth with being having this dreadful
Speaker 6: work stuff. And so that's what the that's what the
Speaker 6: Trump election in America means. Work is over, work has gone.
Speaker 6: That's what our voice vote here forty six was telling us.
Speaker 6: Worker is over, Wokers dead, so the work can go on.
Speaker 6: Being a ten percent little minority in the population won't
Speaker 6: affect us.
Speaker 3: And on that note of work being over, this ought
Speaker 3: to get some shoppers in the right mood. And automated
Speaker 3: window display in New York City. It's an Arizita store.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure if I'm pronouncing that correctly. Appears to
Speaker 3: be doing the Trump dance.
Speaker 4: Take a look at this, but.
Speaker 3: To see it going viral everywhere, and that is all
Speaker 3: we have time for on at the late debate.
Speaker 5: Thank you so much for joining us.
Speaker 3: Wishing you a very merry Christmas. Coming up next to
Speaker 3: the liberals in power too.