Speaker 1: This is the US Report with jenmes Moros.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the program. Coming up tonight,
Speaker 2: Sanctuary City, is birthright citizenship? Doze all the action from
Speaker 2: the last week of jumb two point zero plus. Donald
Speaker 2: Trump welcomes young female athletes to the White House and
Speaker 2: doesn't sniff anyone's hair. And why are these protectors against
Speaker 2: deportations waving Mexican flags when they want to stay in America.
Speaker 2: We'll find out, but first I tell you what. It
Speaker 2: just does not stop with this guy. Deportations, trade wars,
Speaker 2: doze women's sports the Middle East. The velocity of the
Speaker 2: return to Donald Trump presidency is something to behold. It's
Speaker 2: like he's managed to turn a diet of big Max
Speaker 2: in three hours sleep into a juggernaut of change for
Speaker 2: the United States and a world that badly, frankly needs it. Now,
Speaker 2: let's take a look at what's been going on for
Speaker 2: the past few days, shall we. Right now, the world
Speaker 2: is obsessing over Donald Trump's mooted and now slightly walked
Speaker 2: back takeover of the Gaza Strip. Hey, by the way,
Speaker 2: if he pulls that off, what should we call it? Magaza?
Speaker 2: Maybe Gaza Lago? The possibilities are endless. But hey, seriously,
Speaker 2: while that takes center stage, there's something else, And frankly,
Speaker 2: I think something much bigger going on, namely a shutdown
Speaker 2: of and a deep dive into the activities of a
Speaker 2: little multi billion dollar operation known as the US Agency
Speaker 2: for International Development or USAID. Now, in the past week,
Speaker 2: Elon Muskin, perhaps the most dynamic team of liberty loving
Speaker 2: unelected young men since the founding fathers, have been charging
Speaker 2: through the government's databases on this following through, and I'm
Speaker 2: going to explain at a moment why this is so important.
Speaker 2: Following through on a promise Donald Trump made during the
Speaker 2: campaign fourth.
Speaker 3: At the suggestion of Elon Musk, who has given me
Speaker 3: his complete and total endorsement.
Speaker 4: That's nice, smart guy. He knows what he's doing.
Speaker 3: He knows what he's doing, very much appreciated. I will
Speaker 3: create a Government Efficiency Commission, task with conducting a complete
Speaker 3: financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and
Speaker 3: making recommendations for drastic reforms.
Speaker 5: Need to do.
Speaker 3: It can't go on the way we are now.
Speaker 2: I can't continue on the way they're doing it. He
Speaker 2: was right then, and perhaps he did not know at
Speaker 2: the time quite how right. He would turn out to
Speaker 2: be because since the Musk team, the Doze team for
Speaker 2: Department of Government Efficiency started going through the books, well
Speaker 2: you would not believe the ways that US taxpayer money
Speaker 2: is being torched. First though, listen to this worker at
Speaker 2: USAID offices describe what happened when Doje came in.
Speaker 4: Dog was in the building.
Speaker 6: We started. We took down our pride flags.
Speaker 7: We took down I took out any books I thought
Speaker 7: would be incriminating.
Speaker 2: Oh no, they took down their pride flags. This is
Speaker 2: this woman for real? And what books was she hiding?
Speaker 2: The Communist manifesto? Anyway, here's a tiny example, but it
Speaker 2: gives you a flavor of the sort of quote unquote
Speaker 2: AID that has gone through the offices of USAID and
Speaker 2: many other departments. The US State Department via USA decided
Speaker 2: that a great use of taxpayer funds would be get
Speaker 2: this a drag workshop in Ecuador.
Speaker 8: And Manisina.
Speaker 2: Yes, oh yeah, work it somehow though. That costs twenty
Speaker 2: five thousand US dollars in a country where the average
Speaker 2: income is a little over thirteen hundred dollars a month.
Speaker 2: That's a lot of grift. Oh sorry, I mean glitter.
Speaker 2: Now charities and churches were big recipients too, which may
Speaker 2: explain why there are so many left wing lectures coming
Speaker 2: out of the pulpit these days. Remember that episcopal bishopess
Speaker 2: who lectured the president after the inauguration about migrants. Turns
Speaker 2: out her church has a quote unquote charity arm that
Speaker 2: is devoted to bringing in migrants, and they've trousered fifty
Speaker 2: three million dollars from the government. And it turns out,
Speaker 2: in fact that the US government has been paying a
Speaker 2: whole network of church run NGOs to bring in to
Speaker 2: help bring in the millions of migrants that flooded across
Speaker 2: the border under Joe Biden. And it is hard to
Speaker 2: find a left wing effort of the past four years
Speaker 2: in fact, that hasn't been astroturfed with usaid or rather
Speaker 2: taxpayer money, like, for example, the US government, through Anthony Fauci,
Speaker 2: of course, funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Speaker 2: This was even before the Biden administration, and that is
Speaker 2: now thought to be the source of the COVID pandemic.
Speaker 2: I guess now it makes sense why the government was
Speaker 2: so keen to label Lablik's misinformation Vigilant citizen researchers, meanwhile,
Speaker 2: have been pouring through open databases and finding that news
Speaker 2: outlets like Politico, the Associated Press, Reuters, and The New
Speaker 2: York Times have all been in on the grift in
Speaker 2: one way or another. USA money has been discovered going
Speaker 2: to left wing opposition groups in countries like Hungary and
Speaker 2: supporting various efforts to quote unquote strengthen democracy, which we
Speaker 2: all know is code for dumping money into countries to
Speaker 2: make sure populists who run against globalist, open borders type
Speaker 2: governments don't win. Investigative journalist Mike Schellenberger broke down just
Speaker 2: how sinister this is a couple of nights ago on Fox.
Speaker 9: Nonetheless, this memo that he wrote relied heavily on a
Speaker 9: report done by an organization funded by USAID. In fact,
Speaker 9: it's initial founding funding. I mean now it's tens of
Speaker 9: millions of dollars had gone into this group called the
Speaker 9: Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, a name that's not
Speaker 9: very memorable OCCRP, but it was basically created as an
Speaker 9: extension of the State Department and then of USAID. And
Speaker 9: as you know, Jessin, this is very serious to be
Speaker 9: involved in an effort to do regime change at home.
Speaker 9: As we've been discovering, as the files have come out
Speaker 9: with the what Elon Musk has been doing, we know
Speaker 9: that USAID was really about regime change abroad. It was
Speaker 9: a kind of public facing part, you know, regime change
Speaker 9: operation like CIA, but not covert or overt. Well, now
Speaker 9: you see a similar blowback. Just like they did censorship
Speaker 9: abroad and brought sensorship tools back home. They were doing
Speaker 9: this sort of thing abroad, creating a predicate essentially for
Speaker 9: Trump's impeachment.
Speaker 2: And while there was it has to be said, plenty
Speaker 2: of stuff in the USA budget that would look like
Speaker 2: real charity work, you know, digging wells, handing out mosquito,
Speaker 2: and that's that sort of thing. What has been discovered
Speaker 2: is incredibly damning. Billions tens of billions of dollars in
Speaker 2: taxpayers money have been scooped off into a huge slush
Speaker 2: fund designed to pour money into the pockets of left
Speaker 2: wing causes, undermine the will of the people at home
Speaker 2: and abroad, create the appearance of false consensus for progressive politics,
Speaker 2: and even in some cases has been used to attempt
Speaker 2: to change governments even in the United States, Now, of
Speaker 2: course the left has lost their mind about this. They're
Speaker 2: organizing protests saying Doge is undemocratic and not what the
Speaker 2: people voted for. Well, I'm sorry, guys, but cutting unelected
Speaker 2: bureaucrats wasting money is not, as you would say, fascism.
Speaker 2: It is just the opposite. And more to the point,
Speaker 2: as I said at the top of this piece, it
Speaker 2: is exactly what the American people voted for.
Speaker 8: Well.
Speaker 2: Joining me now as he does each week from Washington,
Speaker 2: d C is former White House Chief of Staff and
Speaker 2: senior advisor at Bondai Partners by good friend Mick mulvaney. Mick,
Speaker 2: thanks for coming on the US Report this week. Now,
Speaker 2: before we get into the other top news of the story,
Speaker 2: some breaking news in the last few hours that the
Speaker 2: confirmation vote on cashent Hell has been delayed by a week.
Speaker 2: What's going on? Is this procedural? Is this part of
Speaker 2: a bigger Democrat pushback at the Trump efforts? Break it
Speaker 2: down for US Bick.
Speaker 10: Yeah, it looks like it is procedural. It looks like
Speaker 10: it is just part of the larger Democrat effort to delay.
Speaker 10: The Democrats are really upset about Elon Musk and Doje Actually,
Speaker 10: I'm not sure how upset they really are. They have
Speaker 10: really good polling that says Elon Musk is unpopular, so
Speaker 10: they're trying to draw as much attention to him as
Speaker 10: they possibly can. As I sit here and talk to
Speaker 10: you right now, we're going through the final votes on
Speaker 10: RUSS vote for the O and B director. We expect
Speaker 10: him to be confirmed by tomorrow, but you can expect
Speaker 10: this delay now for just about everybody going forward. Importantly, James,
Speaker 10: the Democrats cannot stop any of the negotiations. They can
Speaker 10: just stretch them out to where you can only do
Speaker 10: one every thirty hours.
Speaker 2: Right, Okay, And so with Cash Ptel, what's your call,
Speaker 2: is he still going to get over the line once
Speaker 2: that vote finally comes to the floor.
Speaker 4: I think he did.
Speaker 10: Cash had a really really good series of hearings, comported
Speaker 10: himself very very well, was very sharp on the topics,
Speaker 10: and I think made a lot of converts.
Speaker 4: Look, I don't know Cash that well.
Speaker 10: I was a little bit of a critic when him
Speaker 10: go with him going into it because of some of
Speaker 10: the conspiracy theories, but the guy put on just a
Speaker 10: tremendous show. James, during the confirmation hearings, he's clearly sharp,
Speaker 10: clearly has his head around the issues here, and he'll
Speaker 10: make a really good FBI director.
Speaker 4: I think so. I think a lot of Republicans see
Speaker 4: it that way.
Speaker 10: He should sail that then gets us downe to Toolsy
Speaker 10: Gabbert at RFK, which are a little bit more up
Speaker 10: in the air.
Speaker 2: I'm agree those two are dicey mccash, butttel really impressed now.
Speaker 2: I gotta say though, with this dose stuff, I have
Speaker 2: been absolutely amazed by the breakneck velocity with which Elon
Speaker 2: Musk and his team of programmers and experts have been
Speaker 2: getting into the system. And as I discussed at the
Speaker 2: top of the show, the amount of graft and waste
Speaker 2: and bizarre things that money is going to, Well, it's
Speaker 2: been amazing to see them tear it all up. And
Speaker 2: it's always been amazing to see where American tax pair
Speaker 2: dollars have been going. What do you make of it?
Speaker 4: It's just an onslaught James.
Speaker 10: It's everything that Republicans have feared for generations, that we
Speaker 10: were using taxpayer money to sort of push the progressive
Speaker 10: liberal agenda everywhere overseas domestically. You know, there's money coming
Speaker 10: out now that they are news coming out now. They
Speaker 10: were funneling money to newspapers and magazines in this country
Speaker 10: to keep them afloat. It's really really bad stuff, and
Speaker 10: it's coming at a breakneck speed. These are things that
Speaker 10: we tried to get at russ Vote, and I tried
Speaker 10: to get at this one. We're at the OMB, and
Speaker 10: the career staff always told us, Oh, you can't get
Speaker 10: that information. You can't get that information. Give Elon Musk credit.
Speaker 10: He went around that, he cut through all of that
Speaker 10: pushback and now is finding the receipts. I expect this, James,
Speaker 10: to go on for a long time. If you think
Speaker 10: your mind has been blown so far, buckle up because
Speaker 10: you're going to see a lot more of this in
Speaker 10: the weeks to come.
Speaker 2: Well. And I think Nick Hughes made this gestion in
Speaker 2: the Hill that the reaction of the left to this
Speaker 2: exposure of all of the secrets here really proves that
Speaker 2: they're on to something.
Speaker 10: Yeah, they really don't like the fact that the curtain
Speaker 10: is being pulled back right now. They thought they had
Speaker 10: They thought these things were secret. They thought they would
Speaker 10: go on forever. I mean, James were hearing about, you know,
Speaker 10: payments to individuals payments to campaigns for Democrats. Add to
Speaker 10: that the stuff that's happening overseas where they where we're
Speaker 10: tying State Department money or excuse me, foreign aid to
Speaker 10: making countries change their laws on gay marriage and abortion.
Speaker 10: It's almost colonial in nature, it's so elitist in nature.
Speaker 10: It's really horrible stuff. But again, many Republicans thought that
Speaker 10: it was there. Now they're finally finding that it actually
Speaker 10: is the case. You're looking at the beginning of a wholesale,
Speaker 10: a wholesale sort of restructuring of what the federal government's like,
Speaker 10: in large parts because of what DOGE has been able
Speaker 10: to do since they've been here in the Trump administration.
Speaker 2: Now you mentioned what's going on overseas. Of course, the
Speaker 2: other big story this week is the big proposal around
Speaker 2: the Gaza Strip and suggestions the US might take over
Speaker 2: or own Gaza or do something with Gaza. Now, there's
Speaker 2: been an awful lot of controversy around this, but Mick,
Speaker 2: you know, nothing that we've done for decades about Gaza
Speaker 2: and this conflict has worked. I kind of feel like
Speaker 2: Trump deserves some credit for thinking outside of the square
Speaker 2: on this.
Speaker 10: Yeah, James, I got asked, you know, was this a
Speaker 10: negotiating tool or was it a way to sort of
Speaker 10: throw out a new idea And it's sort of all
Speaker 10: of the above. Look, the place has been a difficult
Speaker 10: place for a long long time, and it's just going
Speaker 10: to be more difficult going forward.
Speaker 4: I had dinner last.
Speaker 10: Night with some folks from the US military here, and
Speaker 10: they expect that it could take between five and ten
Speaker 10: years just to clear the area of the unexploded ordnance.
Speaker 10: Think about that for a si before you could even
Speaker 10: begin to think about rebuilding in a safe fashion. Five
Speaker 10: to ten years of removing all the bombs and explosive
Speaker 10: that are still lying on the ground in Gaza.
Speaker 4: This is a monstrous undertaking that we're looking at.
Speaker 10: So, look, did Donald Trump probably get ahead of the
Speaker 10: get ahead of himself a little bit.
Speaker 4: Yeah, he spoke to the Senate here yesterday.
Speaker 10: I think the Senate sort of reeled him back in
Speaker 10: a little bit, making it very clear that there was
Speaker 10: no support here at our government for any dollars going
Speaker 10: to Gaza or any soldiers going to Gaza. So we're
Speaker 10: going to continue to look at the options. Give Donald
Speaker 10: Trump credit for at least throwing one out there, But
Speaker 10: I don't think anybody knows what Gaza looks like for
Speaker 10: the next decades to come.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, I mean this is something that I want
Speaker 2: to ask you about too, because an awful lot of
Speaker 2: MAGA supporters of Trump, you know, they said, no more
Speaker 2: stupid wars, that's what we're getting out of here. And
Speaker 2: the potential here for this sort of well, call it
Speaker 2: what you want. Some people will say imperialism. That has
Speaker 2: a lot of dirty connotations these days. But you know,
Speaker 2: that sort of boots on the ground thing. We saw
Speaker 2: how that worked Iraq. I just feel like there are
Speaker 2: there's a lot of risk here.
Speaker 4: Mick, there is. Listen.
Speaker 10: The one thing you know, I thought a lot of
Speaker 10: what Republicans agreed on was that we don't do nation
Speaker 10: building very well, and that's sort of what Trump rolled out.
Speaker 10: So yeah, look, there's a lot of Republicans. I was
Speaker 10: one of them sort of reel back and said, I'm sorry,
Speaker 10: did he just say we're going into Gaza for the
Speaker 10: next fifteen or twenty years? Again, I don't think there's
Speaker 10: going to be a lot of support for that. I
Speaker 10: think he recognizes that. Look, Donald Trump sometimes freethinks, and
Speaker 10: he'll float trial balloons and I think that's probably what
Speaker 10: this was. Honestly, I think it was anybody. It was
Speaker 10: probably Jared Kushner's ideas behind the scenes that you saw
Speaker 10: sort of filtering up to the surface. He did had
Speaker 10: tremendous success when it came to the Abraham Accords. I'm
Speaker 10: not sure the same approach sort of looks and works
Speaker 10: in Gaza, given the extent of the devastation there. But
Speaker 10: at the end of the day, James, look, nobody's got
Speaker 10: a silver bullet or what to do about Gaza. If
Speaker 10: we did, we would have shot that bullet a long
Speaker 10: time ago.
Speaker 2: Absolutely right, Nick, thank you so much for your time.
Speaker 2: As always, Now let's bring in the Federalist Selection correspondent,
Speaker 2: Brianna Live and Brianna, thanks for coming on the US
Speaker 2: Report this evening. Now, the Democrats may have lost the
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four election, but it seems like their losses
Speaker 2: keep on coming. And it has been revealed now the
Speaker 2: damning losses that CBS, the news network in the United States,
Speaker 2: went to when dealing with Kamala Harris. And have a
Speaker 2: look at this here there's been new footage that has
Speaker 2: emerged from that interview when Kamala Harris is asked about
Speaker 2: the Middle East. First, we're going to see what she said,
Speaker 2: and then we're going to see what CBS put to air.
Speaker 4: It seems that Prime Minister Netanyah who is not listening.
Speaker 5: Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted
Speaker 5: in a number of movements in that region by Israel
Speaker 5: that were very much prompted by or a result of
Speaker 5: many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen
Speaker 5: in the region.
Speaker 4: But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyah who is not listening.
Speaker 5: We're not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for
Speaker 5: the United States to be clear about where we stand
Speaker 5: on the need for this war to end.
Speaker 2: Brianna, they really took a word salad and turned it
Speaker 2: into a finally cooked steak.
Speaker 11: There.
Speaker 2: How dishonest is CBS being about all of this?
Speaker 7: Well, they fought tooth and nail to not release this transcript.
Speaker 7: They had the opportunity a few months ago when this
Speaker 7: came out for the first time to be transparent, to
Speaker 7: put out the transcript that was unedited, to release the
Speaker 7: unedited video. And the only reason they're doing it now
Speaker 7: is because they were sued and the FCC got involved,
Speaker 7: and I think what this confirms. Most Americans understood that
Speaker 7: what we saw a few months ago was true and
Speaker 7: that they did deceptively edit it. What we confirm now
Speaker 7: is that the mainstream media, which should be rightly called
Speaker 7: the propaganda press in America, decided to run a siop
Speaker 7: for Kamala Harris. They tried to convince voters that she
Speaker 7: was something that she was not ie competent, and they
Speaker 7: deserve a lot of the blame for a lot of
Speaker 7: the division in this country because they lied to her
Speaker 7: supporters and they denigrated Donald Trump supporters.
Speaker 2: Indeed, nahy I, why do we want to the other
Speaker 2: some one of the big news from this week and Brianna,
Speaker 2: the Trump administration, just the hits keep coming every single day.
Speaker 2: But a key election promise for Trump was to sort
Speaker 2: out the transgender issues and women in sports. This week,
Speaker 2: President Trump signed the No Men in Women's Sports Executive Order,
Speaker 2: aiming to keep biological men out of girls at women's sports.
Speaker 2: Let's have a little look here at this moment from
Speaker 2: the ceremony. What's what I do?
Speaker 4: And then I'm going to give you something talk out?
Speaker 3: You ready?
Speaker 4: What a nice picture of this is?
Speaker 11: Uh?
Speaker 3: Governor?
Speaker 4: You're ready? We'll do a good job. Why let me
Speaker 4: press that.
Speaker 3: I want to make this a really good signature, Brianna.
Speaker 2: Two things struck me about that. Number one, he was
Speaker 2: surrounded by young women, and unlike his predecessor Joe Biden,
Speaker 2: he didn't sniff a single girl's hair. But also, more seriously,
Speaker 2: Poles showed that this is an eighty twenty issue. Four
Speaker 2: out of five Americans back the president on this. How
Speaker 2: dumb were the Democrats to let themselves get hijacked by
Speaker 2: the radicals here?
Speaker 7: Yeah, this is like two sides of a point.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 7: On the one hand, it's great that Donald Trump has
Speaker 7: been dedicated and committed to ensuring fairness in women's sports,
Speaker 7: which means keeping men out of women's sports, and he
Speaker 7: has gotten this done the first few weeks of as presidency,
Speaker 7: so codos to him. But like you said, it is
Speaker 7: a sad day here in America that we even got
Speaker 7: to the point where a president had to confirm that
Speaker 7: men are not women and therefore should not compete on
Speaker 7: a women's sports team. And it is exceptionally popular to
Speaker 7: not allow men to take advantage of women by joining
Speaker 7: the sports team. People understand that there is a biological
Speaker 7: and physiological advantage that men have against women. Unfortunately, a
Speaker 7: small percentage of the population who was mentally ill. You
Speaker 7: are mentally ill if you believe you are a man
Speaker 7: who can become a woman. They co opted the Democratic Party.
Speaker 7: They weaponized this issue to call the rest of the
Speaker 7: country transphobic and all these other horrible labels. And the
Speaker 7: Democratic Party encouraged this type of behavior. They ignored women.
Speaker 7: The party that has told us that they are the
Speaker 7: party of women turned a blind eye with women's that
Speaker 7: help us. Men are cause playing as women and telling
Speaker 7: us how we should think and act. And Donald Trump
Speaker 7: has now done a one't eighty from the previous administration.
Speaker 2: Indeed, absolutely right. Hey, while we're on the subject too,
Speaker 2: other big news here that the Trump administration is pushing
Speaker 2: forward now with plans to eliminate the Federal Department of Education,
Speaker 2: which I believe was a creature of that very successful
Speaker 2: Jimmy Carter administration. Well, if you look at the screen here,
Speaker 2: you'll see a graph that shows that while spending per
Speaker 2: student has doubled since that department came in results of flatline,
Speaker 2: they've gone backwards. Brianna, will parents in America go along
Speaker 2: with this idea of getting rid of this federal bureaucracy
Speaker 2: getting involved with everybody's education hopefully.
Speaker 7: You know, I think people don't understand that the Department
Speaker 7: of Education is best described as a giant welfare program.
Speaker 11: Right.
Speaker 7: They funnel money to states and encourage them to use
Speaker 7: things like common Core curriculum, which for some of your viewers,
Speaker 7: if you don't know, it is the most ludicrous thing
Speaker 7: I've ever seen, and it takes regular addition and makes
Speaker 7: it ten times harder. They use it to push left
Speaker 7: wing agenda. So if we can diminish or dismantle the
Speaker 7: Department of Education because it is a giant welfare system,
Speaker 7: that would be great. Otherwise, though public schooling, it does
Speaker 7: come down to state and local levels and a lot
Speaker 7: of instances. So Donald Trump should use this as an
Speaker 7: opportunity to one dismantle the Department of Education to promote
Speaker 7: his policy of school choice in school vouchers, which is
Speaker 7: exceptionally popular, especially for minority students who have a better
Speaker 7: opportunity with school vectors. And third, encourage parents to take
Speaker 7: seriously their local elections for school board meetings because a
Speaker 7: lot of things that happen in schools happens at the.
Speaker 2: Local level, absolutely right, and I wish we had that
Speaker 2: level of local control over schools in Australia. But finally,
Speaker 2: I just want to talk about one last thing here.
Speaker 2: You know, we've been speaking the whole program about the
Speaker 2: work of DOGE and the different things that they have
Speaker 2: found the government has been spending money on and by
Speaker 2: the government, I mean taxpayers. Tell us about how it
Speaker 2: turns out that the government has been quietly giving backhanders
Speaker 2: to all sorts of media websites, left wing outlets, and
Speaker 2: creating a false consensus around left wing positions in the media.
Speaker 12: So upon coming out here to the briefing room, I
Speaker 12: was made aware of the funding from USAID to media outlets,
Speaker 12: including Politico, who I know has a seat in this room.
Speaker 12: And I can confirm that the more than eight million
Speaker 12: taxpayer dollars that have gone to essentially subsidizing subscriptions to Politico,
Speaker 12: the American taxpayer's dying will no longer be happening. The
Speaker 12: DOGE team is working on canceling those payments.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 12: Again, this is a whole of government effort to ensure
Speaker 12: that we are going line by line when it comes
Speaker 12: to the federal of government's books.
Speaker 7: Yeah, this should be This is probably the second biggest
Speaker 7: scandal of the century, behind the fact that we had
Speaker 7: a dead man walking essentially running the White House for
Speaker 7: four years. And what the Biden Harris administration did is
Speaker 7: they use taxpayer dollars to fund the propaganda wing of
Speaker 7: the Democratic Party. They Politico along with other outlets. They
Speaker 7: were running pieces, for instance, and in karts Answership they
Speaker 7: ran a piece political Rand, a piece on why WhatsApp
Speaker 7: is not censoring election related speech because they.
Speaker 11: Didn't like that.
Speaker 7: They ran a sigh out that Kamala Harris had a
Speaker 7: dream economy and it's like, actually, it was a nightmare economy.
Speaker 7: They told us that Donald Trump was increasing his violent
Speaker 7: rhetoric over the Liz Cheney comment that they purposely distorted
Speaker 7: and manipulated. All of this was just propaganda. And Americans
Speaker 7: see this new evidence from DOJE that has been released
Speaker 7: as further proof why they should not trust the mainstream
Speaker 7: corporate press.
Speaker 2: Brianda, thank you so much, love your analysis as always,
Speaker 2: love your insights. You can reader on the Federalist. Now
Speaker 2: don't go anywhere because you're watching the US Report. And
Speaker 2: in a moment I'm going to be joined by editor
Speaker 2: at Lodge the Wall Street Journal Jared Baker. But first, Hollywood, Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's right, Hollywood is steaming mad at Donald Trump. They're furious,
Speaker 2: they're besides themselves. Why here's comedian Rob Schneider.
Speaker 8: Elon Musk.
Speaker 10: I have this to say to you on behalf of
Speaker 10: the American people.
Speaker 8: Thank you, thank you so much. It's been incredible.
Speaker 1: We really appreciate it.
Speaker 4: Keep going, you can do it.
Speaker 2: Hey turns out not everyone's bad at Trump and Elon
Speaker 2: Musk after all, good on your Rob. Come and join
Speaker 2: us on the show sometime and you keep watching the show.
Speaker 2: Baker is next, Welcome back to the program. I'm James Morrow,
Speaker 2: and you are watching the US Report. Well. The new
Speaker 2: Trump administration's efforts to secure the borders and make sure
Speaker 2: the only people living in America are supposed to be
Speaker 2: there has gained a lot of fans, but also some enemies,
Speaker 2: people like Squad member ilhan Omar, also known as the
Speaker 2: Commerce woman from Mogadishu, seen here giving advice to her
Speaker 2: Somali constituents on what to say if immigration officers questioned them.
Speaker 13: Hanel and and had a halak, I is a and
Speaker 13: who has been did in whet it and lawyer and
Speaker 13: advice Green and eo and in Kala mark borrough and
Speaker 13: and sumadiari and in art halak adam do Kenniti and
Speaker 13: information either read.
Speaker 2: There are some titles there, but you get the idea.
Speaker 2: It's the old mafia wise guy's code. Give them nothing
Speaker 2: and they got nothing. But pretty strange if you asked
Speaker 2: me to see a congress woman telling people how to
Speaker 2: essentially evade the law me. And while in places like
Speaker 2: Los Angeles protesters carrying Mexican flags have blocked traffic protesting
Speaker 2: Trump's plans to deport them, have a look at this
Speaker 2: scene from the other day. Now, I keep seeing this
Speaker 2: sort of thing, anti deportation protesters waving Mexican flags or
Speaker 2: flags of wherever else they came from. And I'll tell
Speaker 2: you what, this makes no sense to me because if
Speaker 2: you came to the US illegally but you wanted to
Speaker 2: say stay, well, surely the message you would want to
Speaker 2: send is, hey, look, we're peaceful, we want to contribute,
Speaker 2: we want to join the American family, even if we
Speaker 2: came in through the back door. I'd say that migrants
Speaker 2: and their supporters would do well to take a page
Speaker 2: out of the nineteen sixties civil rights movement. Here you
Speaker 2: see marchers in nineteen sixty five and Selma, Alabama proudly
Speaker 2: carrying the red, white, and blue, And this is one
Speaker 2: of my favorite photos of all time, showing young black
Speaker 2: marchers in Montgomery holding yes American flags, challenging America to
Speaker 2: live up to its promise. Now, would be migrants illegal
Speaker 2: or not, I think would do really well to send
Speaker 2: a similar message. We want to stay in America, but
Speaker 2: we want to be part of America too. But instead,
Speaker 2: what we're seeing from them is an advertisement for immigration,
Speaker 2: as ethnic separatism, even invasion, to which I and pretty
Speaker 2: much every other fair minded person is going to say
Speaker 2: no thanks. But there is a good side to all
Speaker 2: of this, because hey, by carrying the flags with their homelands,
Speaker 2: they're just making it easier for authorities to know where
Speaker 2: to send them to. Well, let's bring in a great
Speaker 2: friend of this program, editor at large at The Wall
Speaker 2: Street Girl, Gerard Baker. Girard, thank you so much for
Speaker 2: coming out of the US sport tonight. I want to
Speaker 2: talk to you about a piece you wrote a couple
Speaker 2: of weeks ago actually, first of all, and it was
Speaker 2: about the changing of the guard in the United States.
Speaker 2: How you had an old oligarchy that wasn't really working
Speaker 2: and we see a new oligarchy on the stage at
Speaker 2: the inauguration and on all the events two weeks in.
Speaker 2: How do you think this new regime is going well?
Speaker 1: Thanks James, Thanks for mentioning the column two. Look, I
Speaker 1: was having a little bit of fun with the idea
Speaker 1: that the United States is now being run by an oligarchy.
Speaker 1: There was a lot of beating and complaining from the
Speaker 1: usual suspects in the media when we saw Trump's Trump's
Speaker 1: inauguration a couple of weeks ago, all those tech bros
Speaker 1: up there on the stage with him, the Mark Zuckerberg's
Speaker 1: and the Elon Musks, of course most obviously, but others too,
Speaker 1: and this alarm supposedly going up that, oh, my goodness,
Speaker 1: we have these incredibly powerful business leaders who control these
Speaker 1: trillion dollar companies who are handing glove now with Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: What a terrible and unprecedented state of effect.
Speaker 4: That is.
Speaker 1: Well, those same people, in many cases, and certainly those companies,
Speaker 1: have been handing glove with Democrats for much longer than
Speaker 1: they have been with Donald Trump. They've been, as you
Speaker 1: well know, running interference for Democrats for years, blocking material
Speaker 1: that they think is unhelpful to Joe Biden, doing Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's bidding. They tend to be staffed by people who
Speaker 1: worked in democratic administration. So if I think, as we
Speaker 1: have seen, these oligarchs have now kind of done a
Speaker 1: one to eighty degrees and have now decided that actually
Speaker 1: all the things that Donald Trump stands for, which is
Speaker 1: ending diversity, in equity and inclusion madness, ending so much
Speaker 1: of this radical left wing stuff that these companies have
Speaker 1: themselves been promoting for so long, then bring it on.
Speaker 1: You know, let's have an oligarchy that actually works in
Speaker 1: the interests of the American people and not against them.
Speaker 2: Well, and it occurs to me, jar that one of
Speaker 2: the things we also talked about a lot during the
Speaker 2: Biden administration was how back in those days it seemed
Speaker 2: like this kind of Brezhnavira Soviet Union gerontocracy that was
Speaker 2: running the place. And now we see a much sort
Speaker 2: of more young and dynamic cabinet coming in. You know,
Speaker 2: many of these people in their forties, fifties, young people
Speaker 2: like jd Vance, relatively younger people like jd Vance, you know,
Speaker 2: with their young families. Is there just a broader sense
Speaker 2: of youthfulness about this administration even if Donald Trump himself
Speaker 2: is pushing eighty.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's ironic, isn't it. Donald Trump actually was the
Speaker 1: oldest president in November, the oldest man ever to be
Speaker 1: elected president of the United States, because he was actually
Speaker 1: older than Joe Biden was in twenty twenty. So he is,
Speaker 1: you know, he's not quite there yet at Joe Biden's age,
Speaker 1: but he will be if you get presuming he gets
Speaker 1: through this term. And yet, as you say, there's a
Speaker 1: there's more important. There's an energy and the dynamism of
Speaker 1: about the siministrator. You don't have to like all of it.
Speaker 1: And I, you know, I write independently. I don't praise
Speaker 1: everything they do. I don't like some of the things
Speaker 1: they do. I didn't, for example, like Donald Trump's use
Speaker 1: of attempted to attempt to use tariffs this week to
Speaker 1: get Mexico and Canada apparently to do absolutely nothing. So
Speaker 1: I'm not not always a fan of what Donald Trump does,
Speaker 1: but there's absolutely no denying the first two and a
Speaker 1: half weeks have been the most astonishing, you know, blizzard
Speaker 1: of activity, much of it much of it desirable. You've
Speaker 1: talked about immigration there in your in your remarks just
Speaker 1: a minute ago, and finally moving to remove some of
Speaker 1: the many, many illegal immigrants in this country again abolishing
Speaker 1: DEI diversity equally inclusion programs in throughout the federal government.
Speaker 1: Getting Elon Musk to do is extraordinary doge exercise and
Speaker 1: exposing all kinds of frankly dubious and abusive spending practices
Speaker 1: in the federal government. He's really you know, he's moving.
Speaker 1: I mean he's and again you know, some of it again,
Speaker 1: some of it. Maybe he moves a bit too fast,
Speaker 1: like promise to take over for the United States, going
Speaker 1: to take over Gaza. But there is a there's an
Speaker 1: energy and a dynamism, particularly in rolling back this. This
Speaker 1: is the key, James, and you've talked a lot about
Speaker 1: this on your show over the years, rolling back this
Speaker 1: takeover of the institutions of this country. And I'm sorry
Speaker 1: to say it's the same in Australia and England where
Speaker 1: I come from. By this progressive left elite that have
Speaker 1: people that have that have injected their ideological viewpoint into it,
Speaker 1: have turned these institutions frankly into sort of cultural cultural
Speaker 1: bastions in which they can promote these ideas that are
Speaker 1: fundamentally inimical to free speech and inimical to the values
Speaker 1: on which this country was built. And I think, you know,
Speaker 1: whatever else I may think about what Donald Trump's doing,
Speaker 1: I think that program, that effort, that energy that he's
Speaker 1: bringing to roll that back is very welcome.
Speaker 2: And you know, I spent an awful lot of time
Speaker 2: in the US last year and after that election, I
Speaker 2: just felt like there was that energy in the air.
Speaker 2: But so many of the things they do this just
Speaker 2: seems like, you know, I mean, Carmon SeNSS no reuse
Speaker 2: for But for example, Pam Bondy, who's the new Attorney General,
Speaker 2: just confirmed well one of the first things that she's
Speaker 2: announced is that they're going to do cut federal funding
Speaker 2: to sanctuary cities that refuse to deal with federal immigration authorities.
Speaker 2: I mean, this seems like such basic stuff that we
Speaker 2: weren't able to do four years in the United States.
Speaker 11: What do you make of that?
Speaker 1: Absolutely, you know, the sanctuary city thing situation that we've
Speaker 1: had where shows your viewers know, you know, these cities
Speaker 1: actually essentially refused to cooperate with the federal government in
Speaker 1: identifying and dealing with the massive numbers of illegal limorates.
Speaker 1: I live in New York City. It's supposedly a sanctuary city.
Speaker 1: You know, especially in the last four years, we've had
Speaker 1: a huge influx of illegal migrants into the city, and
Speaker 1: we've had increases in crime, and we've had them, you know,
Speaker 1: very very hard, a lot of pressure on housing here
Speaker 1: and on health services and all these other things. And
Speaker 1: yet as a sanctuary city, New York refuses to do
Speaker 1: anything about it. Well, you know, incomes Pam BONDI then
Speaker 1: you were the new Attorney General and says, sorry, we're
Speaker 1: not going to let you do that anymore. So there
Speaker 1: will be, as you say, common sense, there will be. Look,
Speaker 1: the number of illegal migrants in this country is completely
Speaker 1: out of control. We've probably had ten million in the
Speaker 1: last four years, maybe more, on top of millions who
Speaker 1: existed were here before that. Look, many of them, and
Speaker 1: I think these will be you know, I think we
Speaker 1: need to be a little careful about sort of branding
Speaker 1: them all. There are a lot of people here who've
Speaker 1: lived here for a very long time, children were born here,
Speaker 1: and who are contributing to the US. And maybe a
Speaker 1: way can be found to keep those there. But there
Speaker 1: are large numbers of criminals, James, There's large numbers of yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, violent criminals. There's large numbers of people who
Speaker 1: are scoff laws. There's large numbers of people's people who
Speaker 1: frankly are living off the state and living off for
Speaker 1: the various benefits that they get in some of these cities.
Speaker 1: It's only right in the interests of American voters and
Speaker 1: taxpayers that those people should be dealt with.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And finally, just sticking on Pam Bardy, another thing
Speaker 2: that she's announced is this Weaponization Working Group to look
Speaker 2: into ways in which government was weaponized and politicized during
Speaker 2: the Biden administration. I'd love to getting your take on this.
Speaker 2: Does this seem like a good idea to you? Or
Speaker 2: are you concerned at all that this bat's a bit
Speaker 2: of a witch hunt.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's a risk there. Look, weaponization of government is
Speaker 1: something that's been steadily going on over a long time
Speaker 1: and has stead of been getting worse. I don't think
Speaker 1: it's any question that it did get notoriously dramatically worse
Speaker 1: under Joe Biden. And what we're talking about here is
Speaker 1: not just the attempts to prosecute the prosecutions of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: And you can, you can like or not like those.
Speaker 1: I think there's a mixed bag. But there's no question
Speaker 1: that the Justice Department was by spending a lot of
Speaker 1: time trying to get Donald Trump essentially prosecuted, convicted, and
Speaker 1: locked up. We're not just talking about those cases. We're
Speaker 1: talking about the cases where the Justice Department, the FBI,
Speaker 1: which of course is part of the Justice Department, was
Speaker 1: being used to go after, ess actually people who had,
Speaker 1: you know, kind of political views, views that were at
Speaker 1: odds with the kind of you know, with the prevailing
Speaker 1: orthodoxy as defined and as mandated by the Biden administration,
Speaker 1: and we're going after them and sort of looking at
Speaker 1: to you know, supposedly criminal activity. A good example, James,
Speaker 1: as you know about this are Catholic organizations, organizations that
Speaker 1: are you know, that are pro life, that are anti abortion,
Speaker 1: don't break the law. These individuals don't break the law.
Speaker 1: They protest against abortion. They work hard to get abortion
Speaker 1: laws overturned. You can like that or dislike it, whatever
Speaker 1: you think about it. They're not not criminals. But the
Speaker 1: FBI and the Justice Department spend a lot of time
Speaker 1: in the last four years investigating these organizations and it
Speaker 1: going to you know, going along to you know, to
Speaker 1: masses and things like that undercover to try and catch
Speaker 1: Catholics who were saying things that were considered unacceptable. That
Speaker 1: really is a kind of weaponization of justice that we
Speaker 1: should be very disturbed about. And if if Pam bond
Speaker 1: in I think she will, if she's going to do that,
Speaker 1: and if she's going to avoid perhaps the temptation that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump will have to pursue his own vendettas against
Speaker 1: those who pursued him, then more power to.
Speaker 2: Her, absolutely right. Couldn't agree more. I think that even
Speaker 2: said that going to Latin mass was a sign of radicalation,
Speaker 2: which was pretty nuts. Gerard Baker, thank you so much
Speaker 2: for joining me. As always, we'll see you again soon
Speaker 2: on the US Report. Now don't go anywhere, because in
Speaker 2: a moment we're gonna have John Fund here to talk
Speaker 2: more about the outrage over Donald Trump tipping out that great,
Speaker 2: big slush fund of lefty money in USAID. But before that,
Speaker 2: we've heard a lot about all the crazy things us
Speaker 2: AID was spending money on, including apparently twenty million dollars
Speaker 2: for an Iraqi version of the kids show Sesame Street. Well,
Speaker 2: guess what I think we found a clip of an
Speaker 2: episode have a look worth every penny as far as
Speaker 2: I'm concerned. And actually that turns out to have been
Speaker 2: a clip from comedian Jimmy Kimmel's program back in two thousand,
Speaker 2: back when he used to be funny. What happened to
Speaker 2: that guy who knows? Anyway, don't go anywhere because John
Speaker 2: Fun is coming up after the break. Welcome back to
Speaker 2: the program.
Speaker 11: Man.
Speaker 2: I'm thrilled to be joined now by another great friend
Speaker 2: of the program, political journalist John Fun. Thank you so
Speaker 2: much for coming on the program. And I want to
Speaker 2: start off here and get your thoughts on Senator Mitch McConnell,
Speaker 2: who has suffered a bit of an incitant, a bit
Speaker 2: of a fall.
Speaker 11: Have a look.
Speaker 2: Now, anybody can have an accident, they may can have
Speaker 2: a trip, things like that. But this comes after he
Speaker 2: also had that bizarre moment where he froze up on
Speaker 2: camera last year. John, you've written about this before. Here.
Speaker 2: Is this a case for the need for the US
Speaker 2: to have term limits on senators to avoid well exactly
Speaker 2: this sort of thing.
Speaker 8: Well, I think it's necessary because if we don't have
Speaker 8: term limits. I'll tell you what the American people are
Speaker 8: going to do. They're going to put an age limit
Speaker 8: on congress people. North Dakota has already voted one, you
Speaker 8: can't serve after the age of eighty from that state. Look,
Speaker 8: the average age of the United States Senate is now
Speaker 8: over sixty five, and that means there are a lot
Speaker 8: of people who are past their prime. And one of
Speaker 8: the reasons why Joe Biden was able to hide in
Speaker 8: plain sight his frailty is there were a lot of
Speaker 8: senators who didn't want to make that an issue, otherwise
Speaker 8: the spotlight would have turned on them.
Speaker 4: See a farm.
Speaker 2: Look, I agree completely. And you know, we spoke earlier
Speaker 2: in the show about the gerontocracy that we had in
Speaker 2: the United States under the Biden administration. Hopefully that's starting
Speaker 2: to come to an end now. But one of the
Speaker 2: other things is coming to an end, John, is this
Speaker 2: huge slush fund of stuff that was being paid for
Speaker 2: by dough by the USAID that is now being taken
Speaker 2: over by Dose, which is going through and finding amazing
Speaker 2: things here. Republican Senator Joni Erst this week went through
Speaker 2: and found tons of examples of wilful sabotage that USAID
Speaker 2: engaged in in their time, which even included millions of
Speaker 2: dollars to fund research in that Wuhan coronavirus lab. How
Speaker 2: is it John that Democrats are still able to defend
Speaker 2: this institution from Elon Musk in which seems like a
Speaker 2: very necessary truth telling exercise.
Speaker 8: Well, the smarter ones like Ram Emmanuel or Obama strategist
Speaker 8: David axelrodters saying let's not defend them too much because
Speaker 8: there are other things we have to defend. The real
Speaker 8: scandal is not twenty one million dollars for Sesame Street
Speaker 8: in Iraq. The real scandal is what Musk has already
Speaker 8: founded the Treasury Department. The Treasury payment officers were told
Speaker 8: you will approve every payment no matter who it is, too,
Speaker 8: so fraudulent groups, terrorist groups are receiving money literally. Musk
Speaker 8: has interviewed people in the Treasury who say I never
Speaker 8: rejected a payment in my entire career. That, if you
Speaker 8: take it across government departments in general, adds up to
Speaker 8: a shadow government of completely illegitimate payments, never authorized by Congress,
Speaker 8: never contemplated by Congress. The Pentagon, which is something that
Speaker 8: conservatives support, but frankly should question when they have found
Speaker 8: it failed its last seven audits. The Pentagon can't account
Speaker 8: for its own money. The government is running two separate tracks.
Speaker 8: A track where it sends out checks to people Social Security,
Speaker 8: Medicare people like that track, and then there's a lot
Speaker 8: of these other programs that are an automatic pilot and
Speaker 8: nobody knows what they're doing and or how they're spending it.
Speaker 2: It's just unbelievable, but also unbelievable. Has been some of
Speaker 2: the reaction to all of this, and I want it,
Speaker 2: particularly coming from the left. I want to get your
Speaker 2: reaction here to what Congresswoman le Monica McIver had to
Speaker 2: say earlier this week. Have a look at this.
Speaker 11: We will not take this.
Speaker 14: We will fight back. And as I close out, because
Speaker 14: I've never been out here for a long time, hey,
Speaker 14: goddamn it, shut down the city. We I am warm anytime,
Speaker 14: anytime a person can pay two hundred and fifty million
Speaker 14: dollars into a campaign and they've be given access for
Speaker 14: access to the Department of Treasury of the United States
Speaker 14: of America, we are at war.
Speaker 2: They're at war. They're gonna fight, They're gonna shut down
Speaker 2: the city.
Speaker 11: John I don't know.
Speaker 2: There's a word here I'm thinking of and it begins
Speaker 2: with I can he helped me out? It feels like
Speaker 2: it's something like insurrection that she's calling for.
Speaker 8: Well, Donald Trump has successfully done something no one thought possible.
Speaker 8: Do he realize that once he'd won the popular vote
Speaker 8: and had legitimacy, that a lot of people on the
Speaker 8: left would be deflated. They wouldn't be as angry, they
Speaker 8: wouldn't be as deranged. So what has he done to
Speaker 8: create a new source of distraction, a new shiny object
Speaker 8: for them to focus on and be deranged about. He's
Speaker 8: created Musk derangement syndrome. Musk over what Donald Trump has
Speaker 8: left behind. And it is hilarious to watch. I mean,
Speaker 8: we had one. Elon Omar said this is how dictatorship
Speaker 8: begins in the countryes Chuire magazine has said the solution
Speaker 8: to Elon Musk is deport him, arrest him, or at
Speaker 8: least tax him until his eyeballs bleed. I mean, this
Speaker 8: is crazier than even Trump derangement syndrome.
Speaker 2: John Fund, I think we finally found an immigrant left
Speaker 2: doesn't like. Thank you so much for joining me on
Speaker 2: the US Report. See you next. Time now coming up
Speaker 2: Only in America. But before that, I have to show
Speaker 2: you this because it is just so plain embarrassing. Here
Speaker 2: is Chuck Schumer, you know him well, trying to start
Speaker 2: a chant at a protest against Trump and Elon Musk,
Speaker 2: and there moves to God forbid stop hundreds of billions
Speaker 2: of dollars going out the door to phony maloney, transgender
Speaker 2: dance troops in Somali or whatever that money is being
Speaker 2: spent on. But here's the thing. His chant didn't go
Speaker 2: as planned.
Speaker 3: We are gonna fight this fight.
Speaker 5: I am gonna stand with you in this fight.
Speaker 2: And we will win.
Speaker 11: We will win. We will win. We will win.
Speaker 4: We will win.
Speaker 10: We w we won't rest, we won't rest.
Speaker 2: I think he was the only one chanting there by
Speaker 2: the end. I haven't seen Chuck Schumer fail that badly
Speaker 2: since he tried to stage a Father's Day cookout last
Speaker 2: year and put cheese on entirely uncooked burger patties. Yum. Yeah, sure, Senator,
Speaker 2: you're a master of the tongs. Only in America is next,
Speaker 2: And now it's time for a little segment we like
Speaker 2: to call Only America. So tonight on Only in America,
Speaker 2: let's do a little thought experiment. Who is smarter Elon
Speaker 2: Musk or Alexandria Okazia Cortes. Well, Elon Musk can catch
Speaker 2: a giant rocket booster with chopsticks, But AOC she's not impressed.
Speaker 2: This dude is probably.
Speaker 6: One of the most unintelligent billionaires I have ever met
Speaker 6: or seen are witnessed, which you know, you can.
Speaker 11: Probably even glean that from watching.
Speaker 6: These people on TV.
Speaker 2: Gosh, she's got a bit of a Kamala laugh there going.
Speaker 2: But anyway, it turns out that AOC herself turns out
Speaker 2: not to be that bright herself. Well, here she is
Speaker 2: grappling with technology.
Speaker 6: I am told this is a garbage disposal. I've never
Speaker 6: seen a garbage disposal. I never had one in any
Speaker 6: place I've ever lived. It is terrifying. I don't know
Speaker 6: what to use it for or what its purpose is.
Speaker 2: You don't know what it for, AOC. It's a garbage disposal.
Speaker 2: The hint is in the name. Just please, whatever you do,
Speaker 2: don't stick your hand down there. Not even Elon could
Speaker 2: fix that. Anyway. That's all the time we have this week.
Speaker 2: See you next time on the US Report. Bye bye,
Speaker 2: mm hmm.