WEBVTT - HECs - what just happened to your bill?

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>James Kirkby, editor at The Australian. Welcome aboard everybody. Lots

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>happening on the markets as we speak, because it is

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the morning after Donald Trump's resounding, resounding, clear victory, only

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the second time in a century that a US president

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>who lost an election came back to win again. And

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>what's really interesting from an investment point of view, and

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking much about this today. If you guys

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>want us to do something on this, we will go

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>deeper into it another day. But what's really interesting is

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that the US market went up three and a half

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>percent last night. And that's all fine and dandy, and

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>if you see a day where the US goes of

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>three and a half percent, then the ASEX as a

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>rule runs up behind it. But it didn't happen this morning.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>The market's only open an hour or so and it

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>is flat zero, nothing, no response. And I'll tell you why,

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>because there's a certain point which we can't keep going

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>up on the back of a market in the US

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>which is thriving on the basis that it's going to

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>be protectionist and it's going to turn in on itself,

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's particularly going to turn hard on China because

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>we're a China proxy on the AX and global markets.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>And that is what all the institutional disks around the

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>world would say this morning. Don't know about the ASEX anymore,

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>don't know about that Under a Trump regime, we will

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>be talking about that as we go. But actually, folks,

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I imagine I hope at least that most of you

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>have a more burning issue in mind, which is how

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.559
<v Speaker 1>much you have, how much you have in the bank,

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>how much you're going to make in your life, and

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>how you're going to achieve the elementary what do you

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>might on the elementary targets in wealth building, which might be,

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for instance, to own your own home, which might be

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to have some decent amount of super as a start,

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and then to do wider things that you might wish

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to do. And dragging I imagine on that is hex

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Your hex bill now, the average hex bill is twenty

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand dollars twenty six five hundred. Many people listening

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to this show, I know from the demographic, from the

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>demographics that we see, will have hex bills and they

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>will be twenty seven thousand dollars or thirty seven or

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.679
<v Speaker 1>forty seven or higher. And we had some really big

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>news this week, which I hope didn't get lost in

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>our distraction on the US, which is that the government

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>has announced quite remarkable I think the biggest thing that's

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>happened to Hex for many years. Number One, all HEX

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>bills are going to be cut by twenty percent. Number two,

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the way you pay Hex and how much you have

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.399
<v Speaker 1>to pay is going to be as simple as that,

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and a few other things as well. My guest today

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is a regular on the show, is also in the

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>top reaches of the top Advisor's list, and one of

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the youngest at the top of that list. I don't

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>know if he has a X bill. It's Hugh Robertson

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of Centaur. How are you, Hugh, have you got an

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>X bill?

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 2>I do not.

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 3>You paid it off?

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>You do not? You paid it off? And now you say,

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>why did I pay it off? I could have had

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a twenty percent discount exactly.

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 3>That.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I wonder what percentage of the population have paid

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>off their expill I wonder that's not a figure I'm

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>familiar with. Okay, when people come into you, I'm going

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you, both as an individual and as

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>an advisor. Let's first of all tell people, explain to

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>people what is due to happen. Now. This is important

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>because the mechanics of how you pay is going to change,

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and the twenty percent discount is due to kick in

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>on June one next year. The mechanics of how you

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>pay is going to change from July one next year.

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a typical complications and there each thing is

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>makes sense in and of itself, but the course as

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole it looks, as usual ridiculously complicated. In any event,

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the plan, but of course the government, that is

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the alp Albanesi government will have to win to implement this.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.799
<v Speaker 1>But Hugh, could you first of all, would you explain

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>if I came into your office and said, as part

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of my plans, I've got a hex bit of fifty

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>grand and there's some big changes. What should I do?

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>What would you say?

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>The first one is the twenty percent one off. Interestingly,

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't a recommendation of the University a chord panel,

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 2>so this is comeing independently of that, which probably is

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 2>curious as to the timing. So that's going to cost

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 2>about twelve thirteen billion, might even be as much as

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 2>sixteen billion when I was trying to look at the

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 2>numbers that they're going to give us the one off.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>So if you've got the average hextead of around twenty

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 2>seven and a half thousy twenty seven thousand, six hundred thereabouts,

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 2>that will reduce to twenty two thy eight hundred. So

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the idea of that is to help with to help

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>with debt and to help with cost of living pressures.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 2>So there might not be a direct correlation there, but

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the and that will be applied before the indexation as well,

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's probably interesting.

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a very important point. So listeners, I'm sure

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>they'd remember there was always this thing, you know, don't

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>worry about your hex bill. You don't have to pay interest,

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and that was all fine. That did not mean it

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't go up. People thought it did. There was no

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>inflation for so many years it didn't matter. Suddenly we've

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>had I think it was a seven percent followed by

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a four percent lift in hex and that the way

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going this year, I would think it's coming in

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>at about three and a half. That really kicks up

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>your bill. So when you mentioned the indexation. He's talking

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that the government have also promised that

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>this twenty percent cup will come before they kick in

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the indexation, and the indexation's on June every year, and

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that's why this part of the plant is due to

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>coming on June one next year. Okay, So that's the

0:05:57.560 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>big thing.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 2>So that that comes in the office is going to

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 2>be better by five and a half thousand dollars, which

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 2>is good. And then we've got the change in the

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 2>minimum incun levels, so this is really overdue, coming in

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 2>for a twenty five twenty six financial year, so that's

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 2>going to move up. Everyone's wages have moved up, so

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 2>that's going to go from fifty four, four hundred and

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 2>thirty five thousand up to sixty seven thousand. So if

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 2>you earn less than that sixty seven thousand, you don't

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:27.679
<v Speaker 2>have to make any repayments.

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>You yes, if you are in less than sixty seven

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand a year, you don't have to make any repair.

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean that's just kicking your bill down the road, right,

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>You make the repayments, but your bill is going to

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>keep going on.

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 2>So this is where the financial planning element comes in.

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 2>When you start being given these things. Even thinking about

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>this debt reduction that people have been given or not

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 2>needing to make more as much in repayments, people tend

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 2>to treat it as a bonus. And if they treat

0:06:57.920 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 2>it as a bonus and they spend it and they

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 2>blow it. I was looking at just from our hundred thousand,

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 2>So say you had an income of one hundred thousand

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 2>dollars that currently you'd be paying five thousand, five hundred,

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 2>and with the changes, it's going to be four nine

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty, so five hundred and fifty dollars more

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 2>in your pocket. So really, with then saying what would

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 2>they do with that with an extra ten dollars a week,

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 2>most people probably aren't going to look to do something

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 2>substantial with that. But you've got to really make sure

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 2>that you're not just leaving these debts debts outstanding.

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, And there's another thing which everyone should be aware of.

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I haven't done the maths on this, but hey, I've

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>got a think that's advisor on the show, and I'm

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>sure he's really numerous. That doesn't mean that's just straight away,

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but here's the thing. The other change is they're introducing

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a system called marginal repayment, which was recommended. And what

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it means is you in the up to now you

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>paid what was the interest on your bill, whatever that

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>bill might be. From July one next year, you pay

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the interest on your bill above the threshold. So if

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a seventy thousand, how does it can can

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you bring us through? It's whatever you're over sixty seven thousand?

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that how it will actually come to pass?

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 2>The rates are fifteen cents in the dollar up until

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it might have been one hundred and twenty

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars.

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 3>And then above that, well that no change from that perspective.

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, we still want to incentivize people to go

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 2>out there and work, but then in terms of years

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 2>to pay off with the new amounts because of the

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 2>reduction that they're giving. To say, this example of the

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven thousand dollars average, with the twenty percent discount,

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>it's now takes the debt to twenty two two and

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 2>eighty dollars. And on that person for one hundred thousand,

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 2>we know that they're going to be they're going to

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>be paying less because of the changes, but now they'll

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 2>get it paid off in four point four to six

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 2>years versus five point oh two years. So because of

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the twenty percent reduction, they're still going to be painted

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 2>off quicker, which I think is important.

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>So what do you say to people, have you got

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a defaud position on Hex?

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's we've always left let that run in the background,

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's usually a matter of paying off the majority

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 2>of people that are coming to see us, or also

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 2>with a debt with a mortgage, and usually we're just saying, look,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 2>pay that off more quickly if you have additional repayments,

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 2>pay that off at your principal place of residence. Because

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 2>that's not a tax deductible debt. And the interstright volatility's

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 2>been pretty extreme and it just gives you more capability

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 2>when you're paying down your debt. You can either use

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 2>that to reinvest, you can save up for your kids' education,

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 2>you can you know, use the money to.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Just pay down debt. In it in an absolute term.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And you're comparing it to to tax deductible debt, which

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is you're saying you had an investment property versus HEX

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>at least with the investment properties tax deductible. What about

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the home itself? What about if you have a mortgage.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Probably the interest rate differential the interstrate is higher on

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 2>your home loan than it is on the indexed amount

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 2>of the debt with HEX. I think that that important

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 2>point that you raised is that people really do need

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 2>to understand that the HEXT does go up and you're

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 2>forced to repay. So with those repayments years gone by,

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 2>you do you remember when they used to be there

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 2>was benefiting pain it off at a quicker rate, the

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 2>government incentivized it.

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, there was in this whole package that was announced.

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>There is no incentive whatsoever that I can detect to

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>pay it off earlier. And there used to be Was

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it a ten percent discount if you paid early? And

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they dropped that in two o nine and there's no incentive.

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Is there an incentive if I've missed it?

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think for the majority of people they're happy

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 2>just to take on the debt. There's talk about different

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 2>degrees having different costs associated with Obviously, a medical degree

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 2>is going to give you a very clear career pathway,

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 2>and there's conversation that they should pay more, and there's

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 2>people that maybe do an arts degree that probably pay less.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 2>It's difficult that the advice that you would give someone

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 2>who's going to university is just make sure the degree

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 2>is relevant and it's something that you're going to need.

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Don't take on a debt that you don't need. If

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 2>you're thinking about postgraduate studies and your mid career, make

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 2>sure it's really applicable to you, because it's going to

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 2>be with you a long time.

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 3>The debt.

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting though the academic see and the studies show

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>that essentially what OC code when the Coalition did something

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that had never been done before, which is they tried

0:11:53.520 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to price education in a fashion that tilted the market

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>towards maths and science. And the evidence so far is

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 1>that there is no evidence that people change their mind.

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>If I'm going to do medieval art history and someone says, hey,

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>accountancy is much better value, you should do that, I'm

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>not going to change my mind. And I think that's

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>one point I just want to make to listeners. The

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>other thing is which or if I was really interesting,

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>is someone was doing some modeling on this. This is

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the hex as it stands.

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 3>By the way.

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Alison Preston. I haven't talked to her.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>She's an economist University of Western Australia, and she says

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that in terms of paying off hets sorry, this is

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>post if the government's thing comes through. If the government's

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>plan comes through and the twenty percent comes through that men,

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting. Men on average will have their student

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>loans paid off at thirty six, I will have none

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>left and women will still be repaying theirs until the

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>age of fifty. And if you think about it, if

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, that's actually instantly explained from an

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>economic rational point of view, because A they earn less.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 2>B the.

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Higher earning some higher earning professions are more dominated by

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>men at this point. Still though it's bad. It's a

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>hell of a gap. So that's something too to think about.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 2>That's great research done and interesting. Really got a factor

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 2>in that family. Absolutely how you have some equality there?

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's certainly something that wasn't considered. Just one last thing.

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>If I said to you, is there any is there

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>anything better than X? Aunts to that, there probably isn't,

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is there? Since at the end of the day it's

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>interest free.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 2>We looked at obviously when I had it, I looked

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 2>at it a lot more detail, and there really isn't it.

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those necessary evils. I think in some

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>ways we're very fortunate the amount the inflation applied to

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 2>our debt has been more generous, and say over in

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the UK or New Zealand or other systems, when in

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>America there's very much.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 3>That family savings or people just borrow money. We're kind

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 3>of lucky.

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 2>You get an interest free loan from the government for

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 2>your education. We're still the lucky country in many ways,

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>and there's nothing that we can say about it.

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm happy with the income.

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Above the threshold that that was overdue, and that's something

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 2>that when you start your career and you're trying to

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 2>get your wealth creation engine going, that the more money

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>you've got, the better you're also combined to that now

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>with the cost of rent straight away, when I saw

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe an extra couple of bucks ten twenty dollars in

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 2>someone's pocket a week, that helps with the cost of

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 2>living and rent. The one thing that I did question

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>when we're allocating sixteen billion in a budget to an area,

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I probably think that we could have helped more people.

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 2>The numbers here is that you're going to help three

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 2>million people, which is great, but I reckon with sixteen

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 2>billion we could have helped more people.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And of course anyone who's paid off says, oh,

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would have liked that, and anyone who's

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>coming in the future obviously they just simply get the reset.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you just one thing, one last thing,

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>which is just looking at it more generally, Does it

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>change your view in any way about the speed at

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>which people should do it and should people not bother

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to pay a damn thing till this comes through?

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Why would you one hundred percent? I would hold off.

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 2>And I think if you're looking at debt, it it's

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 2>going to take you.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 3>You on the average when.

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 2>You look at the average tables, if you had the

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 2>average amount of debt you're looking at the and you

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 2>currently have that I should say six six four and

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 2>a half, six and a half years to pay it down.

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>There's no benefit in paying it off quicker than that.

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 2>You'd get a better benefit, better bang for buck paying

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 2>down your home loan or saving a deposit. And no

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 2>benefit for parents to offer to pay down their kids either.

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>No, because there's no incentive. As I said at the start,

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that's right now. Yeah, that's a really really glaring error.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I think in what they did Okay, we'll be back

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. Folks. Hello, welcome back to The Australian's

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Money Puzzle podcast. I'm talking to Hugh Robertson of The

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Center or ce NTAU or Group Financial Advisor regular on

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the show. Now, Hugh, before we got questions on Trump

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and the election, I did make the point at the

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>start that the US markets went out three and a

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>half percent and the Australian markets didn't follow that. They

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>didn't follow that because why would they. Because this particular

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>regime that has been elected is protectionist and is particularly

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>so in relation to China. We are seeing as a

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>China proxy on global markets. You can see that straight away.

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why the dollar is going the wrong way this morning.

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>But what do you say to clients who say, is

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>there any broad guidance you can give as to allocation

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for investors in the view of this new presidency?

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Great?

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the Dow going up three point five point seven

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 2>last night is definitely a pro US story. Are you

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 2>saying there is going to be greater protectionism? Trump's gonna

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 2>implement all the Republicans are going to tax cuts for

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 2>corporate There's going to be higher tariffs, tieder immigration, so

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 2>we're really Trump two point zero is that continuation of

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 2>the anti globalization perspective.

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 3>So from our perspective, it does.

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a worry for Australia from that perspective, so you

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 2>really need to take a global outlook when you invest.

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I think we've seen, and I think we've talked about

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 2>it previously, the rise and rise of index funds, not

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 2>giving financial advice, but now we're really looking to go

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 2>from those market cap weighted index funds that have really

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 2>high concentration risk into more of those equal weighted kind

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 2>of opportunities there because you look at America and the

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred, well we've talked spent a

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 2>year talking about just that magnificent seven. There's four hundred

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 2>and ninety three other companies and when you looked at it,

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I was really curious to see if the Dow beat

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>the NASDAK and it did, so I think from a clicktic.

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>That's and it doesn't very p So you're seeing you're

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing you like equal.

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Weighted US I do, and I think you etf to

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 3>strip out. The big take is that it.

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think from an Australian perspective, the majority

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 2>of clients we see are very overweighting Aussie and that's

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be a real challenge. I think Europe is

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 2>coming out of some pretty rough years, so there's opportunity there.

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 2>I think there's still continued opportunity in America outside of

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 2>that top seven. And from the client perspective, it's really

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 2>to sort of don't be scared of going global because

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 2>it might actually be safer than domestic because we are

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 2>a China proxy and the world we're what two or

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 2>three percent of the world market cap. So unless we've

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 2>got resources doing well or banks doing well, if we

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 2>think that the tail wins the technology through AI or

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 2>healthcare through the GLP ones and all those, then we're

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>not getting exposed to that in the Australian market.

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, very good, All right, very interesting. Now the first

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>question was actually from Peter said, is if Anthony Albanezi

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to cut student debt, it's the only point

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in paying off hex's debt early. I think we answered

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that piece. Certainly, isn't any point in rushington pay it

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>off early bit before we see whether this whether this

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:09.719
<v Speaker 1>gets through on June one next year, which would imply

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that the government must somehow be able to get that

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>legislation through, which would suggest that this government would have

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to be re elected or at least told power in

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>June one next year. Tim, is it normal that income

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>protection By that he means income protection insurance is going

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>up twenty percent year on year for the older contracts.

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And is any advisor advising to keep the old terms.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I bet they are, but you can tell.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Us you it is.

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the conversation's advisers are having every

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 2>single day with their clients. Tim might be referring to

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.479
<v Speaker 2>and actually an agreed value income protection policy. These are

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 2>ones that were already marked up a little bit more expensive,

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 2>but you agreed to the value of the on the

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 2>terms at the time when you took the insurance policy

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>out as oppos to an indemnity one, which is a

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 2>time of claim you prove what you weren't. But if

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 2>you have an income or a salary that's highly volatile,

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 2>then the agreed value is still important. What we are

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 2>seeing though, is people are really due to the income protection.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 2>People are really assessing their needs again. And maybe you

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 2>took out the income protection when you had a higher

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>level of dead or kids education expenses, so you can

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 2>ensure yourself for up to seventy five percent of what

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 2>you earn, but you don't have to. You can toggle

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 2>around with your waiting period, whether it be thirty days

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 2>and now you've got more money in your offset account

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 2>in your home, you might be able to go ninety days.

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 2>You might be able to go a couple of six

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 2>months a year without needing to claim on your income protection.

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 2>So you could use your home loan, or you can

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 2>offset account, or you can use sick leave at work.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 2>So you've got to be clever around building your plan

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 2>onto what your lever is how much financial risk are

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 2>you're going to transfer to you personally and be self

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 2>insured versus the insurance. So that's the things we've changed

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 2>a lot. We look at the waiting period, we look

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 2>at the benefit period. Most people don't need to get

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 2>paid till sixty five. It might only be a two

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 2>year benefit period, and the actual sum insurance you might

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 2>not need a full seventy five percent of what you own.

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>We're not seeing people cancel it, but we're definitely modifying

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 2>a lot. And the stuff that we're always cautious of

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 2>is don't just go to something that's cheap, because you know,

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 2>if you get a cheap policy, you might get a

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 2>cheap outcome. We just want to make sure you get

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 2>something that's appropriate to you. So definitely that's a sec

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 2>advice part.

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good answer. Okay, very interesting. Interesting, isn't

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it that crosses over in all insurances. I did something

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>on private insurance, private health insurance that is, and four

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand people in the last two years downgraded their

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>health insurance from gold to silver or whatever, silver to brands.

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Same thing. They say, Okay, I'm not going to drop it,

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>but you know, really look at it and say is

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it applicable to me? Just means that once a year,

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>having a damn hard look at it. Okay, Rob says,

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>would it make a big difference to government deficiency if

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>all public servants traveled economy always? Are they our servants

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>or are we the increasingly vexed public there? Yes, okay,

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this is that we're keeping away from politics.

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 3>Rob.

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. They all seem to They all

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like to treat themselves. It seems to me on all

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>sides of parliament. That's all I have to say.

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Did I say the Singapore Prime minister recently traveling in

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 2>a planing, he always flies economy.

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Did I say that.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>If economy isn't he great? Reminds me of the wonderful

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Feeney who was the Atlantic philanthropy's man, who was

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire, gave all his money to charity later on

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>huge benefacture of universities around the world, and he created

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>basically he didn't create Judy Free, but he was the

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>first billionaire and the free business in the US. Chuck Feeney,

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>who died recently, and he always traveled economy and when

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>he was asked why, he said, we all arrive at

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the same time. Okay, Now I've got some very good

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>questions coming up from doctor Joseph, from and from Augustin

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be back in a moment. Hello, Welcome back

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Australian's Money Puzzle. Hugh Robertson of the Centaur

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Financial Advice Group, speaking on the show today. First question

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is from doctor Joseph. I have exposure to the artificial

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:51.719
<v Speaker 1>intelligence AI opportunities by being invested in the US megacap

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>tech giants as well as Copper. You've thought it through,

0:24:55.480 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Joseph, would having exposure to international data centers overkill

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>or is this necessary to capture the full opportunity? Okay,

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 1>number one, we don't advise. Number two, We certainly don't

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>talk individual advice. It's as information only. But I will

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>say that I would include data centers certainly in the

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>AI opportunity for sure, and the big super fronts for

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>sure are including it. If you think of what they've

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>paid for air Trunk recently. You see this CDC auction

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 1>coming up now as well, and obviously the share price

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>hot share price of next DC and also Mcquarie that

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>is the Mcquarie Technology Group as opposed to Mcquarie Bank.

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 2>What do you think you the idea Yes, yes, says

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 2>over exposure, but yeah, you're investing in that thematic and

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 2>there is a diversification benefit there. I do like the

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 2>concept of when everyone's digging for gold, sell the shovels,

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and I think our data centers are that sor it's

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 2>a nice little infrastructure play. You're not going to get

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 2>the same returns that you're going to get in a

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 2>AI leading kind of invention like a chat GPT of

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the world. But it's appropriate whether you be in all

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 2>three of those. Again, if it's I do think that

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 2>AI is going to be that once in a generation

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 2>opportunity that we get from an investment perspective, and you

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 2>just don't know which area is going to hit. I

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 2>was just spent time at M I, T, and Harvard

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 2>a couple of months ago, and hearing them talk about

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 2>how they're what they're doing with AI just absolutely blew

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 2>my mind. And some people have spent over a billion

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 2>dollars and they've made never made a dollar of revenue.

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 2>So depends where you're at what you want from your

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 2>from your investment.

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Did did though, I'm sure it was all wonderful. Did

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you come away with any specific investment lessons?

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>No, there's out of AI. It's going to be there's

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 2>going to be a lot of failures. There's going to

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 2>be a lot that are commercializing. You're going to hear

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of really good star stories and good narratives

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 2>that just won't come through. So for me, it's still

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 2>allocate money to it, but know the risks that you're

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 2>taking in that area. I think a lot of the

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 2>really great ones are going to be via private equity.

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 2>They won't be public for some time, so I'd rather

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 2>take something that's a little bit more established, like the

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 2>data centers, for example. I think that's appropriate.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, it's interesting. I covered a corresponds upon a time,

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the dot com boom, and I was actually technology editor

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of a business of what was then Business Review weekly magazine,

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and I must have met, I don't know, fifty one

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com companies. They were just queuing off basically,

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and as you say, they are great stories, marvelous stories,

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>great ideas, and three three came through in the end.

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>There are only three that I know of that are

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>still there today. One completely went onto the radar and

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I missed it completely, and most people did, which was

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 1>car Sales, which is a leader to the readestate dot

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>com dot U Norea, part of NewsCorp, Disclosure and Seek.

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 1>The Bassett brothers, I can remember them coming in and

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>talking and they were just another They were just another

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of young guys jumping around the office, excited about

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>what they were planning. And I had seen so many,

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but they were one. But they were one for everyone

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that worked. There was thirty forty that that didn't work,

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>So keep that in mind.

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 2>But AI, this is how I always talk about Mark

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.959
<v Speaker 2>Zuckerberg and you think, okay, he made Facebook, but there

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 2>was a million people trying to do exactly what he did,

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 2>so you go. So it's not I want to be

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 2>the next Mark Zuckerberg. There was hundreds and thousands of

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>people trying to do that exact same thing. So there's

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 2>always the element of luck. And that's why you don't

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 2>go into just one. You diversify. And if you think, okay,

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 2>like that venture capital world, that AI world, that's really risky.

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 3>I think if you can just come back a few.

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Degrees of risk, you just need to let the risk

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 2>takers go for it.

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 3>But you can still pick it up.

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 2>And if even if you had a got sick ten

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 2>years ago, real estate dot com ten years ago, you're

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 2>going to be pretty happy with the return that you've got.

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, absolutely, yes, very true, very true. So you're

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>saying to me, let other people make the mistakes first,

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't you. Yeah, of course that's right. The innovators don't

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>always aren't always the ones that make all the money,

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>as we know. Okay, final question, Augustin, amazing podcast. I

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>never miss it. Thank you, Augustin. I read your article

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in The Australian about the This was actually an article

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I commissioned on four oh one K plans and whether

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the Angus Taylor, the opposition finance person, had floated in

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a single sentence to me I see in an address

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago the single the words US style

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>four oh one K plans, and he rattled a few

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>cages and some of the industry funds were instantly saying, no,

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we can't have four oh one ks. But Auguston asks

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>how do they work? And why are they being considered

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>for Australia's superannuation system. Now it's the extent that they're

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>being considered. All Anger Sailor said was that our superannuation

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>system should be more aligned to global systems such as

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>four oh one K. There's all sorts of aspects of

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>four oh one K, one of which is that it's

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>voluntary and that's very different than our system, which is mandatory. However,

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it does have some really interesting things, and one of

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>them is that you don't pay taxes. You accumulate, you

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>pay tax that you start to tap it. And I

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>like that because it gives everyone a fair chance. If

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I inherit a whole bag of money and I just

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>drop it into super every year, it just kind of stagnates.

0:30:56.200 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of wealth building and entrepreneurialism. But

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>if as I accumulate, if I in my working life,

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>if I am able to put more into SUPER, that's

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>when I want the tax bricks more. And I think

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>our system is tilted towards older Australians, and most older

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Australians if we put them in a room and interrogated

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>them hard with a big bright lamp over their head,

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>would probably eventually say, yeah, it's true. Have you ever

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>looked at for a one case do you what do

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you think of them?

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? The nuances there's different.

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Usually you've got employers match the contributions as well. So

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I like the idea if you're going to pay welfare

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 2>to someone at the end of the day because they

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 2>don't accumulate enough capital, then it's worth giving up the

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.239
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent tax on earnings now so they can have

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 2>that self determination.

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 3>So I feel we've always said.

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 2>That supers a concessionally tax vehicle versus starting to seed

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 2>as the wealth creation vehicle, and then you could tax

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 2>it at the end when there is a big bulk

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 2>of money. I think the four to one case probably

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 2>a bit better from the tax advantage there because if

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I have, if we've got clients that generate one hundred

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars er income out of their pension, would they

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 2>mind paying tax? Not really, they want they want Australia's

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 2>future better for their kids and grandkids, and they're happy

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 2>to pay the tax.

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I just listen to.

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Your point there around do we feel the systems more

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 2>built for those nearing retirement? That's one hundred percent sure,

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 2>and I think it would be great.

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Well in retirement. I think you in it. Yeah. The

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the issue that the amount you can put into super

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>now on a tax efficient basis is more or less

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>back only back to where it was about ten years ago,

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I certainly. I think that's that should be reviewed.

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope that was in some way useful to you, Augustin,

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and I hope it puts it into context as well.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that there could be a lot more review

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.239
<v Speaker 1>of how it all works, and there could be there

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>could be your review of our big super works as well.

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Because if the r b A and the and ASSIC

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and the IMF are all lining up with the things

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>they want to check and examine investigate, I think it's

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>time for a broader review of how big super works,

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the context of some big funds. Okay, terrific,

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much, Hugh. Great to have you on. I

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>knew it would be good, it always is.

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much.

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>He picked a good day to come on.

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, excited and you know we could have gone before

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.239
<v Speaker 2>the Melbourne Cups. We could have got some tips. You've

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of covered off on everything this week.

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's been a it's been a it's a

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>been a curious week. But thanks very much for coming

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on the show, and thank you everybody for listening. Let's

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>have some more emails the Money Puzzle at the Australian

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com dot au. Talk to you soon.