WEBVTT - The Salt Path author’s passionate defence

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>From the Australian. This is the weekend edition of The Front.

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm Claire Harvey. The Salt Path, a best selling memoir

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>by Rayna Winn, seems to be following what's becoming a

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>predictable trajectory. Faced with adversity, a protagonist embarks on an

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>epic quest, finding meaning on the way. The resulting memoir

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is inspiring and labeled unflinchingly honest. Copies fly off the shells.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>The manuscript is optioned and turned into a hit movie,

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>this one starring Gillian Anderson and Jason Isaacs. But similar

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to James Fray's A Million Little Pieces, a memoir about

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.599
<v Speaker 1>drug and alcohol addiction, which had to be reclassified as

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>semi fiction after various exaggerations and fabrications were uncovered, and

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Belle Gibson's The Whole Pantry, a cancer miracle cure cookbook

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>written by A Kancas who never had cancer. The Saltpath's

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>authenticity has now been called into question after an investigation

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>published this week by the Observer. The author, Rayna Winn

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is strongly denying The Observer's allegations, and you'll hear more

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>from her soon, joining me to unpack the saga is

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Tim Douglas, in house expert on all things cultural and

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>editor of review published in the weekend edition of The Australian.

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>The Salt Path starts with the author, Rayna Wynn and

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>her husband Moth losing it all after an investment with

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>their friend goes south, homeless and destitute. The hits keep

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>coming for this middle aged couple.

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 2>We also house, We lost our livelihood, and a few

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>days later my husband of thirty two years received a

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>terminal diagnosis an we gosto future.

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>The diagnosis is for cordico basal degeneration, a rare and

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>degenerative brain disease with similarities to Parkinson's. With nothing to lose,

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the couple embark on a thousand kilometer walk along the

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>southwest Coast path of Britain.

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>It became more than just a walk for us. It

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 2>became something that saved us.

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Only this week, a widow named Ross Hemmings has detailed

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in The Observer a very different sequence of events. Hemmings

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>alleges that Winn, whom she knew by her legal name

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Sally Walker, had embezzled money from her late husband Martin

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>while working as his bookkeeper. The initial sum was thought

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to be around nine thousand pounds. Winn pleaded for forgiveness,

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>according to Roz, and assured her employer the money would

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be repaid only soon after it was established the missing

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>sum was much higher, like close to sixty thousand pounds higher.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's what Roz Hemmings told the Observer newspaper in Britain.

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>She's made a lot of money out of ruining my

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>family's life. Allegedly, Winn was arrested in questioned, but flew

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the coup before further action could be taken. Then, a

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>distant relative of Wynn's husband, Tim also known as Morth,

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>bailed the couple out with a one hundred thousand pound

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>loan and in return, the Hemmings's agreed to drop the

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>matter and sign a non disclosure agreement. Then, reportedly the

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>loan was called in and that's how they lost the house.

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Hardly a business venture gone south. Here's part of a

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>statement raynal Wynn has released. She's denying any wrongdoing. We've

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>included in the show notes a link to her full statement,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're including some of it here too. But it's

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>fair to say she has a detailed response to what

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>The Observer has reported We've used an AI voice to

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>read the statement, and you'll hear more of Rain and

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Ween's responses throughout this episode.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 3>The Observer article is grotesquely unfair, highly misleading, and seeks

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>to systematically pick apart my life. But as our walk

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 3>along the Salt Path taught us, when life has ground

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 3>you into the dirt, you need to stand up, turn

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 3>your face to the wind, and continue unafraid. So that

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 3>is what I must do. I worked for Martin Hemmings

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 3>in the years before the economic crash of two thousand

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 3>and eight. For me, it was a pressured time. It

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 3>was also a time when mistakes were being made in

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 3>the business. Any mistakes I made during the years in

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 3>that office I deeply regret and I am truly sorry.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Mister Hemmings made an allegation against me to the police,

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 3>accusing me of taking money from the company. I was questioned.

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 3>I was not charged, nor did I face criminal sanctions.

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 3>I reached a settlement with Martin Hemmings because I did

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 3>not have the evidence required to support what happened.

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the decisions that have been made up

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>until this point. Penguin Random House would have given this

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>woman an advance to write this book, and how to

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>sign a contract in which presumably she would have given

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>an undertaking that it was true. This is not the

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>only literary scandal that's around at the moment, But but once

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a year we hear that a best selling book is

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>based on an untruth or that there might be some

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>doubt about its origins. Do you think it matters for

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the publishing house? They're now getting a huge amount of

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>publicity out of it.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Those books are sold, so it's already sold two million

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 4>books and counting. Whether this will harm that is another story.

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 4>So I think that it's an interesting question about whether

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 4>it matters. It's a really philosophical one. I mean, in

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 4>this country, of course, we've got Helen Dennadenko and Miles

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Franklin winning the handsign the paper, and we have the

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 4>normal curity scandal of course that broke. We've got Bell

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Gibson too, and there are shades of that with this

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 4>story also. So I think her subsequent books will be

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 4>harm She's got a book coming out in a month

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 4>or two, I believe.

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:02.799
<v Speaker 5>But I think the film side of it is really interesting.

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 4>It had kind of a muted release here, opened in May,

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 4>took four hundred thousand on the opening weekend. But in

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 4>the UK it's massive. It's the third biggest film of

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.239
<v Speaker 4>the year there already, it's taken almost eight million pounds

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 4>at the box office. It is yet to secure a

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 4>North American release, and I think it is an independent film,

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 4>so independent films have a slow burn. So this was

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 4>released last year at Toronto Film Festival in September, got

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot of recognition there, then had a release in

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 4>the UK and Australia simultaneously. But the producers bank on

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 4>word of mouth from a big kind of UK release

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 4>to secure those theaters in the US to really make

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 4>their money back. Now, if social media is any indication,

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 4>I think that looks increasingly unlikely that major cinemas would

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 4>take a gamble on that.

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 5>They also wait for the streaming.

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 4>Rights to roll out. Will anyone want to watch this

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.799
<v Speaker 4>on a streaming platform? If these allegations prove to be true,

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 4>It's an interesting question.

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is the responsibility of publishers and

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>film houses when they're buying a story like this. Obviously

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a commercial consideration, but is there also an ethical

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>question here, particularly when it relates to something medical?

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean there is.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think as journalists we find it difficult

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 4>to understand how a publishing house might not perform due

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 4>diligence and get across that story and say, Okay, this

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 4>isn't your real name. This didn't actually happen. I mean,

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 4>one would have thought that there are people employed to

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 4>perhaps you know, tract.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, when you're signing a legal contract with someone,

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.679
<v Speaker 1>surely you would be asking to see a driver's license

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>at least.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's right.

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Rain and Winn responded with this, let me explain my names.

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Win is my maiden name, and like most women who

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 3>have married, I've used both my maiden name Win and

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 3>married name Walker. In the early years after Math and

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 3>I met, I told him I disliked my name Sally Ann.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 3>It made me think of ringlets and Gingham dresses and

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 3>how I wished I'd been given the family name of Raynor.

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>From then on, he called me ray It is the

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 3>name many people who are close to me have known

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 3>me by, and the name I love and chose as

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 3>my pen name, Moth is just an abbreviation of his name, Timothy.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 4>I think the medical issue is a different concern, because,

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 4>of course it's patient doctor confidentiality. And there are from

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 4>one of the better term, miraculous things that happen in

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 4>terms of health, whether that is becoming a terminal, very rare,

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 4>serious neurological condition by going out for a stroll is.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 5>A Is that the issue?

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 3>Here's what Rhina Wein said about that among the Observer's

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>many accusations, the most heartbreaking is the suggestion that Moth

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 3>has made up his illness. This utterly vile, unfair, and

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 3>false suggestion has emotionally dev stated Moth, who has fought

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 3>so hard against the insidious condition of cortico basil syndrome.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 3>I have never sought to offer medical advice in my

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 3>books or suggests that walking might be some sort of

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 3>miracle cure for CBS. I am simply charting Moth's own

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 3>personal journey and battle with his illness and what has

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 3>helped him. We will always be grateful that Moth's version

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 3>of CBS is indolent. Its slow progression has allowed us

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 3>time to discover how walking helps him. Others aren't so lucky.

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Publishing has survived against all the odds. Probably twenty years

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>ago there were predictions that publishing would die, but it's

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>books like beasts that have kept publishing, isn't it. Memoir

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>has been a big part of along with romanticy, of

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>why people are still buying books in paper discussing them

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in book clubs. Do you think in the age of

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>social media, where publishing houses are very quick to leap

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>on something that's big on TikTok, that there's a diminution

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of the checks and balances that they once would have

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>gone through. They've lost a bit of their power.

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they may have done that.

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you're right, memoir is huge, and you know,

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm waiting for yours to come out, actually, because I

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 4>think people would be quite interested, to be honest, I

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 4>expect to people in publishing all the time and they're

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 4>always looking for.

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 5>That new story.

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 4>I feel like this one was apparently the author wrote

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 4>the book.

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 5>Just for a husband. I mean, what do we believe anymore?

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 4>But it didn't intend for really to become a published

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 4>book or let alone a publishing phenomenon. But yeah, I

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 4>think it's interesting in the world of social media and

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 4>selfie culture and generation me that those personal stories, embellished

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 4>as they may be, are so interesting to people.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about where the story goes after the loss

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of the house and the diagnosis. In the book, they

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>set out on one of these walks that middle aged

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>people seem to be doing a lot now and what

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>happens on the course of that walk in the book, Well.

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 5>I read the book. There was a lot of whining

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 5>that happened in it. I've found really hard going.

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I'm the only one, but basically they realized that

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 4>the pension they're going to get from the government isn't

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 4>enough to really keep them alive, so they beg borrow

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 4>and steal and steal in some cases from small business owners,

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 4>and you know, they meet other people along the path,

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 4>but invariably I found there's this really insufferable tone from

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 4>the author of the book about how they were doing

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 4>it the only righteous way, and that other people on

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 4>the path are always rude to them, and no one

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 4>could believe that they could possibly do this walk.

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 5>And it's a good walk. I mean six hundred and

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 5>thirty miles.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 4>I think it's onenty twelve kilometers from Somerset to Dorset,

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 4>so it's a big effort. But I found some of

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 4>the writing quite difficult.

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Going more of my chat with Tim Douglas after the

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>Break it's meant to be uplifting, obviously, and that's one

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons why this book went viral. It was

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a story of triumph over adversity. These people took their situation,

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>which was basically being homeless, and turned it into an adventure.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a new genre in publishing, isn't it. We used

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to have misery memoirs. Now we have middle aged people

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>where something bad happens and then they.

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 5>Go for more. Yeah, it's true.

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 4>My wife or her friend's fortieth just did the Santiago

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 4>to Compostella Walk because one hundred and sixty kilometer walk

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 4>as part of the Camino de Santiago Walk. A friend

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 4>of hers, at a dinner party maybe three or four

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 4>weeks ago, said, you have to read this book.

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 5>I hadn't seen the film.

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 4>I still haven't seen it, but he said, you have

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 4>to read this book because it's just so uplifting. It's amazing,

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 4>You've got to do this walk, and so, Yeah, people

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 4>in their forties and fifties are now, you know, really

0:12:57.840 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 4>embarking on these kind of journeys trying to stay far.

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 4>But you're right, it's a new genre, and look, it's

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 4>worked for Raynal Winns. She's had three subsequent book deals

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 4>out of it, all of which detail her husband Moths

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 4>overcoming this horrible disease with which he has lived for

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 4>eighteen years, apparently.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's the other part of the story with which

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the Observer has raised questions, isn't it because neurologists who

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>are specialists in this particular disease are saying nobody lives

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>for eighteen years, and certainly nobody lives in what appears

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to be quite good.

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Health exactly, and not just good health, but doing the

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 4>equivalent of as it says in the book for Summits

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 4>of Everest on this walk. I mean, these people are

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 4>in good nick.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>There was obviously something about this book that had your

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 1>spidy senses tingling when you were reading it. Do you

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>feel justified now in your hatred of it as a

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>piece of literature? And doesn't mean you don't have to

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>go on one of these epic walks?

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, okay, two things. It means I don't have to

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 4>watch the film, which I've managed to avoid doing.

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 5>I didn't hate it. I just found the Tony sufferable.

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 4>And you know this kind of inverse noobbery of being

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 4>out on the trail and all these people with their flashbackpacks.

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 5>We're doing it the right way.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 4>You know, no one believed we could do it, and

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 4>all these serendipitous coincidences that I just found a little

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 4>bit darling. As for the walk, my wife wants to

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 4>do the Camino Way from Santiago to Compostella. I'm one

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent in it's eight hundred ks. I just need

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 4>to convince the editor in chief to let me have

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 4>eight weeks off work fully paid.

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, you could be writing a book about it.

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure anyone would want to read that.

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Tim Douglas is the editor of Review. You can check

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it out by picking up a copy of the Weekend

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Australian or going to the Australian dot com dot auslash

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Review anytime. This episode of the Front was hosted by

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>met Claire Harvey and produced by Jasper Leek, who edited

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the episode and also wrote our theme. Thanks for joining

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>us on the Front this week. Our team also includes

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Christian amyot Leat, Sammaglu, Tiffany Dimac, Joshua Burton and Stephanie Coombs.