WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 28 May

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Lately.

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Late Debase.

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for joining us on the Late Debate.

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm James Macpherson with Caleb Bond and freyer Leitch coming

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 4>up tonight. Our dope of the day A bloke tries

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 4>to set fire to a restaurant in Melbourne and only

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 4>succeeds in setting fire to himself.

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Will show you that later.

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Plus, when we look at what's making news tomorrow, the

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 4>Coalition announce their shadow Cabinet and Victoria's machete Band results

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 4>in skyrotting, skyrocketing sales of machetes.

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Who would have thought we'll get to all of that shortly.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 4>But first, we live in a time where there are

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 4>wars and rumors of wars, and the latest rumor is

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 4>that Israel will soon attack Iran's nuclear facilities. The Israelis

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 4>believe that Iran, if they choose, could develop a nuclear

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 4>warhead within about a week. The Israelis also believe that

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 4>with Iran's air defense system currently in disrepair, there now

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 4>exists a window of opportunity to attack those nuclear facilities successfully.

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 4>But Donald Trump, who's involved in talks with Iran at

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 4>the moment, has asked the Israelis to.

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 3>If you will cool their jets.

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 4>In the Israel Times newspaper, it's said that officials report

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Trump's message to Benjamin Netan Yahoo is that he doesn't

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 4>want him to antagonize Iran at a time when Trump

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 4>himself is trying to solve problems, and while he's keeping

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 4>the other option, that is an attack open. Trump wants

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 4>to give a chance to diplomatic talks before Benjamin Netan

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 4>Yahoo embarks on a military campaign. So the question becomes

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 4>talks or bombs Caleb, which one.

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think talks in the first instance would be

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the right thing to do. And of course Trump was

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>talking about this in read a couple of weeks ago

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>that he feels that the interventionist policy of previous administrations

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 2>has not worked. And I don't think you can argue

0:01:57.800 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 2>with that. I mean, I would defy anyone to tell

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>a single instance of the US interfering in the Middle

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 2>East that has actually worked. We can go through Libya,

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 2>we can go through Iraq, we can go through Afghanistan,

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 2>on and on you can go. It has never ever worked.

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 2>So Trump said, look, on the basis of that, I'm

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 2>going to give something else to go. I want to

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 2>have talks with Iran to see if we can do anything.

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>This is him talking about exactly this just a couple

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 2>of weeks ago, and reate.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 3>I want to make a deal with Iran.

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 5>If they can make a deal with Iran, I'll be

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 5>very happy if we're going to make your region and

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 5>the world a safer place. But if Iran's leadership rejects

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 5>this alive branch and continues to attack their neighbors, then

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 5>we will have no choice but to inflect massive maximum

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 5>pressure drive Iranian oil exports to zero, like I did before.

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Now. Of course, the background to this is that there

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 2>was a nuclear deal done with Iran in twenty fifteen,

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 2>and Trump pulled out of that in twenty sixteen because

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>he thought it was a bad deal, that it gave

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 2>too much leeway to Iran. So he pulled out and

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 2>put sanctions on Iran, and those sanctions were quite successful.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 2>It has to be said. Then along comes Joe Biden.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 2>He basically undoes all of it, gives hundreds of billions

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 2>of dollars to Iran, which they then promptly go and

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:21.839
<v Speaker 2>give to their mates the hooties and etc. And we've

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>seen what the result was of that. So Trump has said, look,

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I will try and negotiate my own deal, and if

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 2>you don't come to the table, I'll go hell for

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 2>leather against you. He wrote to the Iatola in March

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 2>and said, you come and talk to me and we

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>strike a deal, or I'll get my military onto you.

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 2>So he's very clear about where he's going. He's not

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 2>ruling out military intervention. He's simply saying, let's try a

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 2>way of doing this first that doesn't involve guns and bombs.

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think he's right to do so.

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 6>It's a nice idea to assume that we can negotiate

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 6>with all countries and that we somehow share a set

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 6>of values and common interests that mean can strike a deal.

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 6>But I just don't think this is realistic at all.

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 6>As you mentioned, there have been previous attempts and in fact,

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 6>previous nuclear deals with Iran, and they have all failed

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 6>because they benefit Iran lifting sanctions and then guess what,

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 6>they just go ahead and keep enriching uranium.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 3>Anyway.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 6>They're now enriching uranium at a sixty percent purity, which

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 6>is almost weapons great, and there is genuine reason to

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 6>believe that that's a possibility, and that would present an

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 6>existential threat to Israel. And I think the other challenge

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 6>here for Trump is he came in on this peace

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 6>through strength doctrine, which is essentially deterrence, right, But deterrence

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 6>relies on the enemy knowing that at some point you

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 6>might actually take actions, military actions against them. Hence why

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 6>they want to avoid conflict. So I guess the question

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.119
<v Speaker 6>for Trump is if Iran rejects this nuclear deal, which

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 6>in all likelihood they will, what's he.

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Going to do?

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 6>What is he going to do to shut down their

0:04:59.240 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 6>nuclear weapons?

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 4>He's fuck concerned with Trump and talks because remember Trump

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 4>made a big deal of Hamas. When Trump comes in,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 4>the hostages will be released. Otherwise he'll unleash hell will

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 4>Hamas are still in control of the Gaza Strip. The

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 4>same accusation could be made of Trump's negotiations with Putin

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 4>that Putin just doesn't seem to believe that Trump will

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 4>wield the stick as he says he will. And when

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 4>you're dealing with Iran, you said, can you negotiate with

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 4>other nations? But of course Iran is a very different nation.

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 4>It's basically a terrorist organization that run Iran and their

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 4>commitment to destroying Israel is not an idle threat. It's

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 4>a religious ideology, it's a worldview, and they've been making

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 4>threats for a long time now. Nobody wants war. But

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 4>you can't blame the Israelis for saying, how long will

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 4>we sit here while the leaders of Iran talk about

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 4>destroying us as they develop nuclear weapons.

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 3>At some point, enough talk. You've got to defend yourself.

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but if you don't give Trump a chance to

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 2>at least try and achieve something. And Trump's ultimate goal

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 2>is to achieve some level of stability in the Middle East,

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 2>and you're not even giving it a go. He's made

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 2>it clear, he told the Ayatoller, if you don't meet

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>my demands, I will get involved militarily. So he's already

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 2>put that on the table.

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 6>He also told He also told her mass if all

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 6>the hostages weren't released by the inauguration or hell would

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 6>break loose, and it didn't, so at some point he

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 6>has to back up these threats.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 2>But you have to be somewhat reasonable in these things.

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you want full scale war in the

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Middle East and I don't, then you can go in

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and just start throwing bombs and stuff with it.

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>And everywhere right.

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Now agree with that characterization. It's not that you want

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 4>full scale war in the war.

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 3>In the Middle East.

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 4>It's you don't want a nuclear bomb going off in

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East, and that's why you would engage in

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 4>a military action now to prevent the worst military action

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 4>down the track.

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Of course, but that's also the point of achieving the deal,

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 2>is to prevent the nuclear bomb from being created. If

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 2>you are saying that there is no deal that can

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 2>be struck that will prevent a nuclear bomb from being created,

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 2>and that simply targeting their infrastructure at the moment will

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 2>prevent it, I mean that goes straight back to the

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 2>drawing board. They're not going to stop, so your only

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 2>other solution is to wipe you around off the face

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 2>of the planet. Do we want to do that?

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 3>That's what Irana threatening for Israel. So you can understand

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 3>why the Israelis but of course.

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I understand that. But then you go and do it,

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 2>and then you end up with full scale war in

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 2>the Middle East. This is the problem is that you

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 2>don't actually genuinely solve anyim They'll go on for time

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>immemorial until we actually wipe someone off the face of

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 2>the planet, and no one really wants to have that

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 2>discussion because of war.

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 4>Until IRA walk away from their ideological stamps, which they

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 4>never will. So at some point this blows up. Well

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 4>it is literally, and who chooses the timing of it?

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, literally, it blows up. Let's move to some lighter

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 2>international news. We'll get into the details of King Charles's

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>visit to Canada very shortly, but I could not get

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>over this. Justin Trudeau, of course, until five minutes ago,

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>was the Prime Minister of Canada, so you would think

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>he has some standards, he has some understanding that when

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>you're meeting foreign diplomats and dignitaries, I mean, the king

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 2>of your country, the head of state of your country,

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>for heaven's sake, that you would dress up for the occasion.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 2>But apparently not, because take a look at this. This

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 2>is what Justin Trudeau rocked up to Parliament wearing today.

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Look at his shoes. He's wearing sneakers, for goodness sake,

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:25.559
<v Speaker 2>green sneakers that I mean seriously, he's wearing a suit.

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>So he's got to all that effort. He's put on

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the shirt, he's put on the tie, he's put on

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the suit, he's brushed his hair, and then he gets

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 2>to the shoes and he's like, now, I'm just going

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 2>to put my sneakers on today because I want to

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 2>go for a run before I go and see the King.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, for goodness sake, there is no circumstance in

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 2>which you should wear sneakers or runners or whatever you

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 2>want to call them with a suit. If you're wearing

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 2>a suit, you should be wearing leather shoes or boots.

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just the rules. If you go to all that effort,

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 2>make the effort to actually look decent, and you certainly

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 2>don't do it when you're going to work or parliament, or,

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 2>for heaven's sake, to meet the king. Standards have slipped

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 2>so much.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 4>I disagree with you, Kelly. There is an you wear them, well,

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 4>I've got them on right now. But there is a

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 4>reason why you would wear sneakers at an event where

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 4>the king is speaking, and the reason is you want

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 4>everyone to look at you. How else to have the

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 4>attention on yourself when you've got the King of England there, Well,

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 4>you commit a.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 3>Fashion faux pass such as he has done.

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 4>And what are we talking about Before we even get

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 4>to talking about what the King said. We're talking about

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 4>justin Trudeau mission accomplished, frail.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 6>I don't even think the sneakers were the worst part

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 6>of this. I can tolerate sneakers. I'm a sneaker advocate.

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 6>But the main problem was the sneakers didn't even match

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 6>the suit.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 2>He could have.

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 6>Gone for a tasteful white and nice navy something to compliment.

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Hester and proved my point. They wanted to teach.

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 6>This is a clearly obvious move. He wanted to stand out,

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 6>he wanted to draw attention from the king, and he

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 6>didn't even Yeah, see that's look at that that green

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 6>in that blue they classed.

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 2>But it's the fact that this sneak is at all.

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 2>I don't care if the Navy or wife or whatever.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>This is a hill I'm willing to die on. We

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 2>have to maintain some level of standards in this world

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 2>or we will end up in a place where everyone

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 2>goes to work in their pajamas. Before COVID, I didn't

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 2>wear a tie to work. But then you know, obviously

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I was working from home for all that time, my

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 2>pajamas all bloody day, and I got sick of it,

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 2>so I started wearing a suit and tie to work

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 2>every day to create a contrast. And I think there

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 2>is something nice about that because it shows respect for

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 2>the people around something.

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Were you wearing a suitain tie when you're working from home?

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no no. When I went back to what you

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 2>were saying, you've got stuff at home, pajamas, the mood,

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, I can't do this anymore. So

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I wore a certain time of it. But it shows

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 2>respect to the people around you that I have put

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>in the effort to look good because I take my

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 2>job seriously and I take my workplace seriously, and I'm sorry,

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 2>going to work with your sneakers on makes it look

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 2>like you don't take the job seriously. If you walked

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 2>into an interview, I'm telling you, and you've got a

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 2>sneakers on, they will mark you down against the bloke

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 2>who has a suit and appear not.

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Walking into the studio tonight wearing a T shirt or hoodie.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Did you sort of give me the side of it.

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 2>You've been doing it for two and a half hears,

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 2>so I'm kind of used to it now. But yes,

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 2>I would never do.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 6>Fashion standards change over time. What people wear now, especially

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 6>post COVID. Most people don't even wear suits to work anymore.

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually with Caleb that it was highly inappropriate, but

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 4>I know why he did it.

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you think it was inappropriate or do you think

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 3>it was okay.

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 6>For this occasion. I think it's inappropriate, but I defend

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 6>sneakers in suits. But let's move on and listen to

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 6>what the King said in the Canadian Parliament. Obviously, in

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 6>the lead up to the Canadian election, there was a

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 6>lot of tension with Trump saying that he wanted Canada

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 6>to become the fifty first state, and in fact, the

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 6>Prime Minister Mark Conney essentially turned the tide of the

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 6>election based on these threats from Trump. And so this

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 6>whole visit from King Charles could kind of be seen

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 6>as a way to reinforce Canada's position, and this is

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:00.839
<v Speaker 6>what the had to say.

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 7>Canada Fairs is another critical moment. Democracy. Pluralism, the rule

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 7>of law, self determination, and freedom are values which Canadians

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 7>hold dear and ones which the government is determined to protect.

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 6>So kind of uneventful, kind of what you would expect

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:29.479
<v Speaker 6>from a tour of its designed to reinforce Canada against America.

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Kind of ridiculous though, don't you think.

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the whole thing about Trump making Canada fifty

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 4>first state of the United States was always a joke.

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 4>He was ribbing them about their need to pay their

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 4>fair share. I'm just surprised that Charles took that seriously

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 4>and gave it sort of that kind of gravitus when

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 4>most thinking people realized Trump was just being Trump.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, the thing is, King Charles didn't actually write this speech.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 6>He was given the speech by the Prime Minister, and

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 6>the prime minister's whole mandate for reelection was to be

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 6>the anti Trump, pro Canada candidate. So he's now got

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 6>to keep up this facade that Canada is under threat

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.719
<v Speaker 6>from the United States in order to maintain his political relevance.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 3>Really, it's the.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Same as when the Governor General opens parliament here.

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, but he still chooses to read it some respect.

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, it is convention that he reads.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 4>It's like an invention that you speak the truth, you

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 4>don't speak rubbish because you've been told to.

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 2>No, you're making it sound like he's just there to

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 2>be a part.

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Is essentially that like it is, it is.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Convention that the king or the head of stage or

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the Governor General in whatever circumstances, reads the opening of

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 2>the Parliament from the government. It's not the words of

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 2>the king. It's not the words of the governor.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Should have rolled his eyes as he read it.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Look, look, you just we've learned that you have no

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 2>regard for tradition. Tonight. You think it's okay to wear

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 2>sneakers with your your suit and men. You think it's

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 2>it's it's okay to throw away all this tradition about

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>how we open our parlor.

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 4>It gets even worse because have a look at this

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 4>clip from King Cha. I was reading somebody else's speech

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 4>the acknowledgment of the traditional owners have listened.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 7>I would like to acknowledge that we are gathered on

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 7>the unseeded territory of the Algonquin and the Shinabeg people.

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 7>It is my great hope that in each of your communities,

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 7>and collectively as a country, a path is found toward

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 7>truth and reconciliation in both word and deed.

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Hang on, sower.

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 4>The king just sat there and said, I'm the king

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 4>of unseeded territory. So is that a dig or is

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 4>it an admission that maybe he shouldn't be there?

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, what does that make him a conqueror? Like I'm

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 6>not actually sure and what legitimacy does he have now?

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 6>And the fact is Canada is even more clear than

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 6>Australia because they've had treaties with the indigenous people as

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 6>far back as the seventeen hundreds. It is well documented

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 6>they've had an extensive history of land sales and treaties.

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 6>So the whole thing honestly preposterous.

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean it was a humiliation ritual really that

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 2>they put the king through there, and the sad thing

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>is that he actually has to rock up and do it,

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Well literally just made by point hit.

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 2>But he's a figure hit. I mean, the monarch is

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 2>always a figurehead. We know that that's not you, James,

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 2>but it is. It's almost like, at the same time

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 2>as they're trying to use the King to send a

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 2>message to the United States, back off. You know, you're

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to be one of us, because we're

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 2>not going to be one of you because we're part

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 2>of the Commonwealth. While they're using the King to do that,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 2>they're at the same time humiliating him by making him

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 2>say that he's on unseated land. I mean, you know,

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 2>have some respect for the guy if you want him

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 2>to be useful for you when you want him to

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 2>be useful.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 4>So all of a sudden, justin Trudeau sneakers were not

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 4>the most disrespectful part of it.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 2>There were many disrespectful parts.

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 6>And honestly, it was so funny looking at all the

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 6>reactions to this on X because I've never seen so

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 6>many leftists supporting the monarchy as they are now. It's

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 6>crazy to see. But let's move on now to Victoria,

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 6>where the chief executive of Santos has compared Victoria to

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 6>North Korea. Take a listen to this.

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 8>But if I think about Queensland, Northern Territory, South Australia,

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 8>Western Australia, these are actually very supportive jurisdictions, They're.

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Very development friendly.

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 8>Victoria, Victoria, North Korea, They're in a different categories altogether.

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 6>I mean, is he wrong when you have blanket bans

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 6>on gas connections in new homes and businesses, it is

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 6>essentially uninvestible, extensive government control over almost every aspect of

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 6>the gas industry.

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 3>He might be right, No.

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 4>I think it's very unfair on North Korea to say that.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 4>He went on to say if he had a dollar

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 4>to invest in Australia or in Papua New Guinea in

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 4>the same circumstance, the same business, he wouldn't hesitate to

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 4>spend that in Parpa New Guinea because he was confident

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 4>that he could get the project approved and finished. He

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 4>had no such confidence regarding Victoria. I must say he

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 4>copped a lot of stick for that comment. Victoria's Energy

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 4>minister called him hysterical and said that the comment was unhinged,

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 4>and he later joked he said, maybe I shouldn't have

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 4>said that, Perhaps I need some more media training. But

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 4>I think he's handled that very well. He's got a

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 4>headline that's in all the major newspapers and made his

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 4>point it's very difficult to do business in Victoria and

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 4>increasingly companies such as his, which is one of the

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 4>largest energy companies in the country just choosing not to.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 2>And Gallagher is a straight shooter and a very good

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 2>operator and has been a very good boss at Santos,

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and you can hardly blame him. I mean, I think

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 2>we've all seen Gcinta Amen or should it be Jinto

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 2>jong Un recently. I think we've got a photograph of

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 2>her here there we go and it's not real. I

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 2>don't need to point that out, but that's sort of

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 2>where Victoria is going. And you can't forget the Andrews

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>government in twenty seventeen put a ban on gas exploration

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 2>in Victoria and that went through to twenty twenty one.

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 2>It's still banned. Fracking and Colson gas exploration is still

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>banned in Victoria. And so of course even people who

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 2>want to invest in Victoria are like, well, why would

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I bother? Because you know the government's already done at once,

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 2>so they could always do it again and say no,

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 2>gas exploration is off. And just from every perspective, it's

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 2>so difficult to invest in Victoria. We talked last night.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it was about the treasure of Jacqueline Sim's

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 2>asking a property council breakfast what their favorite tax was,

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 2>which was a great window into exactly how they are thinking.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 2>But you know, you want to talk about tax land

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 2>tax in Victoria. For instance, my accountant, good Evening, mister Morgan,

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 2>has a client who had a property in Melbourne, not

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 2>a principal place of residence, but an investment property on

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 2>a sizeable piece of land, and the land tax on

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 2>that property used to be five thousand dollars. Of course,

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Andrew's changed the rules around land tax and changed

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 2>it from the threshold was three hundred k down to

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 2>fifty k for a value of property, et cetera. The

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 2>land tex on that property is now forty two thousand dollars.

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 2>So a few years ago it's five thousand, now it's

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 2>forty two thousand. So why would you invest in property

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 2>in Victoria? Why would you invest in gas exploration when

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 2>until five minutes ago it was banned to do so

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like they don't want people to invest in Victoria,

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 2>which is so dumb, because it's the only way they'll

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 2>ever get themselves out of the great debtthole in which

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 2>they find themselves is to get real business and investment

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 2>generating in the state so they can make some genuine income.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 2>They just keep driving it away.

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 3>Melbourne will become known as a Phenong Peng of the South.

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 4>I want to talk about a story from the UK

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 4>that really got my attention today. Here's a question, how

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 4>old is too old to have a baby? And I

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 4>don't mean to naturally conceive a baby. I suppose biology

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>and nature determine the answer to that question.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 3>But have a look at this headline.

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 4>A couple in their seventies in the UK have won

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 4>the right to parent a surrogate baby. Now, this couple,

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 4>man and a woman of seventy two years of age.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 4>They used the man's sperm and a donut egg to

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 4>have a child, which was then impregnate or to conceive.

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 4>It was impregnated in a surrogate in the US who

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 4>gave birth to the baby, and now the couple have

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 4>been legally approved to parent this surrogate.

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 4>The reason they did this, they said, was because they

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 4>had a son who died in twenty twenty at the

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 4>age of twenty seven. He died of cancer, and they

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 4>said they've always missed him, and so as a way

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 4>of helping to deal with their own grief, they really

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 4>wanted another child, and so this is what they've done.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 4>Having a baby at age seventy two means this child

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 4>will start primary school when they are seventy six, high

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 4>school when they're eighty two. And this child on his

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 4>eighteenth birthday, Mom and dad will be eighty nine years

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 4>of age.

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 3>Freyer their healthy, they're wealthy. Anything wrong with this?

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I mean now we're at the point where with

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 6>commercial surrogacy, they're not only ripping this baby away from

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 6>the woman who gave birth to the child, which is

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 6>morally questionable in and of itself, they are also depriving

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.239
<v Speaker 6>the child of having proper parents because they're not the

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 6>age of parents, they're the age of grandparents or even

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 6>in some instance's great grandparents.

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 3>This child will be their care yes.

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 6>Correct, and I don't see how that is fair if

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 6>they are trying to deal with their own grief. That's

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 6>very sad that they lost their son. But here's an idea,

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 6>go to counseling, adopt or look after friend's children people

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 6>in the community. You don't need to bring a life

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 6>into this world that you are not ready or prepared

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 6>to care for. It's unfair to the child and this

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 6>is part of the problem with commercial surrogacy. There are

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 6>so few safeguards around it, and it's leading to a

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 6>range of issues from you know, who can qualify to

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 6>become parents, but also human trafficking and the exploitation of

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 6>women is also a massive issue with sarrogacy. So this

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 6>is a can of worms that only the twenty first

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 6>century Western world could open. But it's pretty scary.

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's supremely selfish of these two people to

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 2>decide that, at the age of seventy two they want

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 2>to have a child, And of course they can't have

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 2>a child by natural means, because of course, you know,

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 2>seventy two, you've well and truly been through a menopause, right,

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 2>And so it's not unusual to have older fathers. But

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 2>generally you have an older father with a younger mother

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 2>because she's still of an age where she can conced

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 2>So even if dad drops off the twig, mom is

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.239
<v Speaker 2>still around to look after them. Of course, there are

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 2>circumstances where, completely out of their control, young children lose

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 2>both parents, say they die in a car accident or whatever. Right,

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 2>so these situations do happen in other completely different ways.

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 2>I can't see how the court could get around giving

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 2>them the child, because because the child has already been born,

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 2>So what's the court going to say, Ah, yes, this

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>child was created with your sperm, and now it has

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 2>to disappear into the ether into someone else's arms. That

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>probably wouldn't have been right either, But what goes through

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 2>your head to think that, Yeah, at the age of

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 2>seventy two, both of us being seventy two, we're going

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 2>to pay someone on the other side of the world

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 2>to have a child for us, like go and get

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 2>a dog. I get that it's sad that you lost

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 2>your son, but you have to think about other people

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 2>in these circumstances. A commercial surrogacy is wrong. That's why

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 2>it's banned in Australia, and situations like this really shouldn't

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 2>exist in it.

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 4>So just point out one little hypocrisy, at least I

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 4>think it is. As I was reading comments on this

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 4>story today online, a lot of people really outraged about this,

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 4>and it's not fair on the child. You're bringing a

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 4>child into the world who's never going to have both

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 4>parents there. And yet many of those people in left

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 4>leaning journals and magazines would support same sex couples acquiring

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 4>a child in the same way, not unhappy at all

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 4>that the child won't have a mum or perhaps won't

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 4>have a dad, depending on the sex of the couple.

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 4>I just think that's a slight double standard in this argument.

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 2>It's a very fair point. Now, of course, last night

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 2>we talked about the fact that the proposal to sell

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>rose Hill Racecourse for five billion dollars to the state

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 2>government fell through because the members of the Australian Turf

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Club said they would prefer to keep it as a racecourse.

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Chris means, as you can imagine, the Premier of New

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 2>South Wales is none too pleased about this because he

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 2>was so looking forward to turning the racecourse into twenty

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 2>five thousand host Here he was responding this morning.

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>The truth of the matter is it feels like the

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>closeness of the result makes it more difficult to take,

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>not easier. And I think it's an opportunity that Sydney's

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>missed out on a few It was like a goal

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>and opportunity that slipped through our fingers. Very disappointed by that,

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but I accept the decision.

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 2>So with the proposition of trashing the great sport of

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 2>racing off the agenda, he says, well, I've got a

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 2>few other ideas.

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>We've got proposals that we're getting ready to roll out

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for more housing closer to Sydney CBD. They're not ready

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for me to announce today and not everyone will love them,

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>but they're absolutely necessary for Sydney now.

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 2>One of these ideas is to apparently develop the Glebe

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Island Port in Sydney, which is basically right next to

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 2>the city. It's in the Rosehill Balmain area right, So

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 2>it's the only working port left in Sydney, and much

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 2>like the rose Hill idea, he says, here's a bit

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 2>of useful operating infrastructure that we currently have that is

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 2>doing things and we should turn it into housing instead.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I've no issue with the idea that. I mean, obviously

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 2>we need more housing and we'll come to the regional

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 2>aspect of this in just a moment. But what is

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 2>with this tunnel vision idea that we must take things

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 2>that work and are operating and are delivering something for

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 2>a city and turn them into houses. It's shortsighted. A

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 2>city is more than just houses. If you want a

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 2>city that consists of just houses, I don't know, go

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 2>and live in North Korea where there's not much else

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 2>to do. But unfortunately we do have to do other

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 2>things in a city. And having a working port the

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 2>only working port left in Sydney like, nah, let's just

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 2>ribble all apart to the houses, there are other bits

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:31.439
<v Speaker 2>of land.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Seems like this is chris Min's only plan.

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.719
<v Speaker 4>First in one of the race course turned into housing

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 4>that didn't work. Now it's a port turning into housing.

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 4>If that doesn't work, he says he's got other ideas.

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 4>I just can't say them yet, but here on the

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 4>late debate we can let you know. His other ideas

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 4>are the botanic gardens.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 3>And if that doesn't work.

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 4>The Sydney Cricket Ground we have turned into housing, and

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 4>why not those after that?

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Why not knock over the art gallery?

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 6>I know right, No, he does seem to be a

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 6>little bit obsessed with this. But look, as someone who

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 6>very recently lived in Rosel, I can tell you that

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 6>that whole precinct you've also got the White Bay power

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.199
<v Speaker 6>station and a cruise terminal. It is rather ugly. It

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 6>is ripe for development, and there is going to be

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 6>a metro station being put in there. But I do

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 6>agree when you look at the sums around how much

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 6>it would cost to relocate the deep water port and

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 6>the extra costs associated with that, it doesn't really make

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 6>sense to develop that as housing. The real solution would

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 6>just be to release more land, ditch this socialist planning

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 6>system where you have everyone shoved into a small space

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:38.199
<v Speaker 6>surrounded by a ring of green that you can't touch,

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 6>and put everyone in crappy two bedroom apartments, like, why

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 6>don't we just release more land build family homes? And

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 6>by the way, family homes are the things people actually want.

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 6>My generation, we want to be able to have a

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 6>family in a free standing house with a backyard, but

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 6>we are not being allowed to do that, and instead

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 6>there's a subsession with building two bedroom skyscrape which doesn't

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 6>meet the needs of real people.

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you want your traditional Aussie home, the solution

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 4>is to get out of the capital cities and move

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 4>to a regional city, and increasingly Australians are doing that.

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Twenty five percent more people are moving from capital cities

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 4>to regional centers than the other way around. Geelong is

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 4>now the most popular regional center for people to move

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 4>to internal migration in Australia nine point three percent of

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 4>people moving within the country and moving to Geelong. Sunshine

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 4>Coast comes in second and Lake Macquarie is third. I

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 4>don't blame people at all. As someone who lived in

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Townsall for ten years and I got a bit when

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 4>I moved to Townsville. I thought I'm moving to the

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 4>ends of the earth. My life is over. But I'll

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.479
<v Speaker 4>tell you what I loved it. It was ten minutes

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 4>to anywhere. If you have to drive fifteen minutes, you're like, oh,

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 4>this is forever. These days, fifteen minutes gets you one kilometer.

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 4>In Sydney, you knew half the community, your kids felt

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 4>safe out on the streets. It was a wonderful life.

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 4>And increasingly people are finding if you want the sort

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 4>of Australia that we all knew, that you've got to

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 4>get out of these condensed cities and into regional centers.

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 3>And more and more people are saying that's the way to.

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Go, and it is the solution. And I don't know

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 2>why we don't talk about this more. What is with

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 2>this obsession with putting everyone in the capital cities. You

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 2>look at the United States, and I will preface this

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 2>by saying that the United States has some of the

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 2>most densely populated cities in the world. But you look

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 2>across the expanse of the United States and it is

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally a country of small towns. They have dotted all

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 2>over the country, Whereas here, you know, Sydney, you've got

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Woollongong and the Newcastle, Adelaide's got murray Bridge, Melbourne's got Geelong,

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 2>and Brisbane's got the Sunshine Coast and the Gold.

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Coast, and the Gold Coast is a rat race.

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, yeah, But largely we just stay in the cities.

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 2>We haven't created these small centers. That is the solution.

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 2>There's land, cheap land available. We keep all these margarets

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 2>coming in, and we shouldn't have coming in, by the way.

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 2>But just you can't go to the city, You've got

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 2>to go to a region. Bugger off.

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, part of the problem is that the government hasn't

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 6>been willing to build the infrastructure to connect the regions

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 6>to the cities, and that's what's really holding it back.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 6>Plus they are unwilling to release more land in a

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 6>lot of cases. But let's move on now to another

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 6>story taking place in Melbourne. Two transgender netball players have

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 6>been banned from a local netballing league after it was

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 6>determined that their biological maleness meant that their size and

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 6>stamina was a danger and an unfair advantage over other

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 6>female players. Now you might think, ah, maybe you're just exaggerating,

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 6>how bad can it really be? But check this out.

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Out.

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 6>As you can see there she is clearly a well

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 6>the biological or male player in the blue is clearly

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 6>significantly larger than the female opponents, literally knocking one player

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 6>onto the ground. Now, I must say it's refreshing to

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 6>see a sporting league actually come out and defend women's

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 6>rights to safety in sport. But meanwhile, while this competition

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 6>has banned transgender players, Netball Victoria is still conducting a

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 6>review into whether it is actually safe for transgender people

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 6>to play against women. I don't get what's so controversial

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 6>about this. All you have to do is watch that

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 6>video to go this is not.

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Fair that local league really had to ban that.

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 4>There's two transgender players who have now been banned for

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the year because other teams were threatened

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 4>to boycott. So it's going to destroy the competition. But

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 4>you're right, Victorian Netbull, who oversee the whole sport where

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 4>they're conducting an investigation which they say must be thorough

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 4>and considered.

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how thorough it needs to be.

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 4>We just saw video of the blatant obvious biological males

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 4>have an advantage.

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 3>They put out a.

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 4>Statement, Victorian Netball saying we continue to support our lgbtt

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 4>LGBTQ plus.

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Community forgive you that way.

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.239
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, and we're committed to providing a safe and

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 4>inclusive netball environment for all our participants. The thing I

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 4>can't understand is why their emphasis still even after video

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 4>footage like that. Their instinctive response is all but we're

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 4>very inclusive and we're very much concerned about the LGBTQ community.

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 3>What about the girls playing.

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 2>The sport fairness? I suppose it's just not a virtue

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 2>these days. I mean that chap is built like a brick,

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 2>you know what, house like. Do we really need to

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 2>investigate whether or not it is unsafe to put biological

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 2>males on the court with women? It just seems very strange.

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 2>And speaking of these matters, props to this young fella

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 2>in the United States, Liam Morrison. He's taken case all

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the way to the Supreme Court where it's being chucked out.

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 2>But he was fighting a free speech case on the

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 2>basis that he went to school wearing a shirt that

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 2>had a factual statement on it. And this is how

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 2>you come to this position where you have to investigate

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 2>whether or not it's too dangerous to have men on

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 2>the netball court. There's the shirt there, whether it's too

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 2>dangerous to have men on the netball court with women?

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Because we can't actually talk about facts anymore. Here he

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 2>is describing exactly what happened.

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 9>What did my shirts say? Fathooble words? There are only

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 9>two genders, nothing harmful, nothing threatening, just to steam, and

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 9>I believe to be a fact. I have been told

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 9>that my shirt was targeting a protected class? Who is

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 9>this protected class? Are their feelings more important than my rates?

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 2>The Supreme Court refused to hear the case. They upheld

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 2>the decision of the first Circuit court, which said the

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 2>school was right to tell him to take it off

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 2>because it could be harmful to others students. I mean,

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 2>you know we're in a position now. Were it harmful

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 2>to say the truth?

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Please? Yeah?

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's a biological fact, isn't it. It's not

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 4>a political statement. So next he'll be banned from wearing

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 4>a shirt that says the sky is blue because someone

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 4>takes exception to it. And the other question I've got is,

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 4>if you can't wear a T shirt saying there are

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 4>only two genders? Could you wear a T shirt saying

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 4>there are only three genders or only ten genders? Or

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 4>could you wear a T shirt saying there are infinite

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 4>an indefinite number of genders. There are at least at

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 4>least two genders. At what point are they going to

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 4>give permission? In this same school, of course, pushes the

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 4>whole pride concept. All the gay activists sort of days

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 4>are celebrated in this school. But when a kid turns

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 4>up with a biological fact on his T shirt, kids

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 4>get upset and so he's sent home.

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.479
<v Speaker 6>And it's interesting to see how in these cases, time

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 6>and time again, they only care about the concerns of

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 6>a select minority group. When they're running Pride day, I

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 6>doubt they're worrying about how offensive that might be for

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 6>Christian or Muslim students. But when someone rocks up with

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 6>a statement of fact on their T shirt, oh no,

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:13.439
<v Speaker 6>that's too far.

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of going too far in the consideration of other

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 4>people's feelings, just before we go to the break, a

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 4>professor from London University. He's an expert on food policy.

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 4>His name is Professor Tim Lang. He's been talking about

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 4>the need for countries to stockpile food in case of

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 4>the apocalypse or nuclear explosion or some sort of natural disaster.

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 4>And that makes sense, but because of you won't believe

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 4>what he said. He actually said that the UK need

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 4>to not just stock food, but particularly they need to

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 4>stop food to make sure that vegans and Muslims with

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 4>their halal food are taken care of.

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Because he said, if you go through.

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 4>A psychological shock like an earthquake or a nuclear war,

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 4>and then you've gone through all of that and then

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 4>the food that the government gives you is well not

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.959
<v Speaker 4>vegan friendly or not hallal compliant, I mean that would

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 4>just add shocked to shock and you would not cope.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Is this the most.

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 4>Fragile or slash entitled generation in history? Imagine getting it

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 4>to the apocalypse. You survive, but you're pissed off because

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 4>they haven't got your favorite food.

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I just imagine all the GFD if people feel

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 2>really left out too, because you know, their problems are

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 2>just as legitimate as the others are they seriously, you

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 2>just be glad to get anything exactly.

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 3>We're to go to a break.

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 4>When we come back, we look at what's making news tomorrow,

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 4>including victorious Maschetti band results in greater sales of machetes.

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 3>That's at a moment.

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to the program. Let's take a look at

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 4>what's making news tomorrow. Will start with the Daily Telegraph,

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 4>here in New South Wales, and I got to say

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm not that excited about reading this headline. I'll try

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 4>to read it with enthusiasm, but as a former Queenslander.

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 3>It's not easy.

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 4>Just good to Oh is Brian to Oh, the New

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.879
<v Speaker 4>South Wales player who scored an important try in tonight's game,

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 4>which of course was won by New South Wales eighteen

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 4>to six. Blues draw first blood in sun Corp epic.

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 4>So there you go, three game series. New South Wales

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 4>lead one nil. Haven't seen the Career Males front page

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 4>for tomorrow, but I suspect it won't be quite as

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 4>triumphant as that of the Daily Telegram.

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 2>Well they could just do a quite similar headline, just

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 2>go to oh, you know, that's how you'd be feeling

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 2>if you were in Quex right now, wouldn't you. Let's

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 2>go to the front of the OS tomorrow where it

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 2>says Lee's target not a lot of net zero. Susan

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Lee has declared she will not pursue a net zero

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 2>missions target at any cost as she faces a backbench

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 2>push to go to the next election with about a

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 2>pull out of the Paris Climate Agreement. The new opposition

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.720
<v Speaker 2>leader on Tuesday unveiled a shadow cabinet that promoted factional

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:57.240
<v Speaker 2>supporters and dumped prominent women who opposed to leadership, hours

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 2>after signing a new coalition agreement with the National that

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 2>ended almost a week of internal warfare. Can I just

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 2>say something, Well, no, no, you you're going to shut up.

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Go on.

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 4>She will not pursue that zero. She won't pursue NET

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 4>zero at any cost. Or she won't pursue zero at

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 4>any cost. It's a little bit confused.

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, she's what she's saying.

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 3>First I got excited when I.

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, no, no, Well, what she was saying today essentially

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 2>was that she agrees with the idea that we need

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 2>to combat climate change, et cetera, but we can't do

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 2>it at any cost, right, we do actually need to

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 2>take account of what it means to the people. So

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 2>she is kind of opening the doors potentially getting rid

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 2>of NED zero. But that's a decision that the party

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 2>room will have to make, and obviously they will do

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 2>in conjunction. We've got Nationals. But the shadow cabinet and

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:49.399
<v Speaker 2>shadow ministry that she unveiled today few curious decisions in there.

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, people like Claire Chandler good operators

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 2>who were dumped.

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Hum.

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, you can kind of understand why Jane Hume got

0:38:57.600 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 2>the punt after she came up with the working from

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 2>home policy that was so distractive during the campaign.

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Or was it the backflip that was destructive?

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, I mean they backflipped on the basis of

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 2>the polling, and the polling I don't think was wrong,

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 2>but it made them look either they went went out

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 2>and they went out with a piece of policyat that

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 2>wasn't popular, and then they looked even weaker by walking back.

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 6>Jamimes is also one of their best media performers. So

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:23.919
<v Speaker 6>that's the other challenge that I think they're going to face.

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 6>They've lost some good media performance, Jane's Hume, just enter

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 6>Price as well.

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.879
<v Speaker 4>And there's less women in their shadow cabin now than

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 4>there were. So all this talk about we're going to

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:35.839
<v Speaker 4>connect with women, what happened to that? And she's got

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 4>rid of as you said, just in the NAPA. Gymber

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Prices is out well, Gizelle, but she's not in the

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:44.840
<v Speaker 4>shadow ministry.

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 6>I mean, Gizelle Captarian hasn't even won the seat of

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 6>Bradfield yet and she's in the outer shadow ministry. So

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 6>it is interesting. I mean, this is definitely a shadow

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 6>ministry about rewarding one's friends and dampening one's foes. So

0:39:58.719 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 6>it'll be interesting to.

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 2>See how there were a few decent apployments. So I

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 2>think I think Tim Wilson to small business makes sense.

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:06.760
<v Speaker 2>I think Dan Teene will do well.

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:08.879
<v Speaker 3>In Andrew Hasty is out of defense.

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 2>But he's into home affairs though, and that is a

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 2>serious portfolio.

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I know Aison he was great in that portfolio.

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but he'll do great. I mean, look, they're all

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 2>good operators and they will all do great things. But

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, Barnaby Joyce not being part of it, you know,

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and Barnaby Joyce is a good effective well Canavan wouldn't

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 2>want it, I don't think. But Barnaby Joyce I think

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 2>is better inside the tent than out of it. Another

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 2>story on the front. While we're talking about defense of

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 2>the old Tomorrow, Labour's defense disconnect leaves nation guarded by

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 2>a paper ADF is Aspy's warning. Labour's focus on future

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 2>military capabilities and it's business as usual defense budget will

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 2>leave Australia with a paper ADF that is ill prepared

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 2>for near term conflict and new report warns The Australian

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 2>Strategic Policy Institute says the pre are prioritization sorry of

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 2>long term defense programs such as ORCUS has come at

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 2>the expense of present day readiness, leaving a hollow out

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 2>force with limited munition stockpiles and a shortage of critical

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 2>capabilities including missile defense systems and long range weapons. And

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 2>you know it is marked as an exclusive story on

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the front of the Odds tomorrow, and it's a good

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 2>report by Asby. But you've got to say, we already

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 2>knew this, didn't we.

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 4>There's one line in this article that I really like.

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 4>He says, when the Labor Party talked about excuse me,

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 4>talk about making a you're gonna have to take I've

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 4>just lost my voice.

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 6>You go, well, I think this is definitely something we've

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 6>all known, and under the last government there have been

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 6>I think it was over forty billion dollars of cuts

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 6>and reprioritization of capabilities in the Defense Force to try

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 6>and pay for ORCUS. But this is the problem. You

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 6>can't bring on a massive new project like ORCUS without

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 6>increasing your overall spend because what that means is you're

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 6>just going to have to suck money out of other things.

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 6>So our defense spending of two percent is woefully low.

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 6>And this report just confirms.

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 3>That I got my voice back. I've got to tell

0:41:58.160 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 3>you this line. He said.

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 4>When you see the Labor Party talking about how they're

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:04.879
<v Speaker 4>making a generational investment, what they mean is the next

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:07.439
<v Speaker 4>generation will have to do it because we're not doing

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 4>it right now.

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:10.240
<v Speaker 2>And it has been thus for quite some time. Another

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:12.280
<v Speaker 2>story on the front of the oars miners and critical

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 2>minerals producers will be hit by Labour's unrealized capital gains

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.880
<v Speaker 2>tax as self managed super funds will pull millions of

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars out of high risk businesses such as exploration companies,

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 2>warm the chief executives of resources companies and their investors,

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and again I get it's a cash grab, but I

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 2>just don't see how it's going to work. I was

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 2>talking to a mate of mind tonight who will be

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:38.479
<v Speaker 2>hit by all of this, and he's saying, look, I'm

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 2>just going to have to start ripping stuff out of

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 2>my super fund and I'll put it elsewhere. You know,

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:43.959
<v Speaker 2>he's got a business in his super fund, so I'll

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 2>just pull that out and it'll just exist under my

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 2>name and instead of paying thirty percent or pay the

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty five percent corporate.

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, another area where this is super confusing is startups.

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 6>If you're super annuation company invests in a startup that

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 6>suddenly goes up massively in value, you're all going to

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 6>be landed with a huge tax bill and then what

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:02.919
<v Speaker 6>if the next year it goes bust, then you don't

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 6>get that money back. So it's pretty nuts. But let's

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:09.839
<v Speaker 6>move on now to the Herald Sun, where the headline

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 6>is blunt force. Brazen retailers are flouting the Allen government's

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 6>machete sale ban as the Premier faces mounting pressure over

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 6>her decision this week to not fast track making it

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 6>illegal to possess the deadly weapon. Despite the retail ban

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 6>coming into effect at noon on Wednesday, the Herald Sun

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:32.799
<v Speaker 6>was able to buy long bladed items across Melbourne for

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 6>as little as four dollars. Seven stores from Richmond to

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 6>spring Vale still have the lethal items on offer, with

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 6>one selling three long blades for just seventeen dollars and

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 6>seventy cents. I mean, we kind of knew this was coming.

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 6>How do you enforce a ban? That's the whole problem,

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:55.839
<v Speaker 6>and won't all these kids just rushed to buy machetes.

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 3>And winja center.

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Ellen was asked on Monday, why wouldn't you apply the

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 4>ban immediately other than wait until noon on Wednesday. She

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.919
<v Speaker 4>said we wanted to give retailers time. She didn't say

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 4>the next part to discount their blades so they could

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:10.479
<v Speaker 4>get rid of them. And so if you're a gang

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 4>member in Melbourne, happy days, four bucks for a blade.

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 3>It's really good going. So there you go.

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 2>What did they think would happen? Really? Oh? Oh god?

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:24.319
<v Speaker 4>So it's a story Victorian labor party though unintended consequences

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 4>in pretty much every area.

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Now, now you know what else you can't sell in

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Victoria illegal cigarettes, and yet you can buy them in

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 2>every convenience store in the state.

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Let's go to Tasmani. The front page of the Hobart

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:41.919
<v Speaker 4>Mercury headline reads troubled waters fairies face more delays.

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe this story.

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 4>Tasmania's replacement bas straight fairies will remain on the other

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 4>side of the world for an indefinite period while repairs

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:53.479
<v Speaker 4>are made to fixate problem uncovered during sea trials. Now,

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 4>these fairies were supposed to be completed in twenty twenty one,

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 4>where now what twenty twenty five, and they're hoping to

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:06.760
<v Speaker 4>have them now by well, we don't know when we'll

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 4>get them. The problem originally was that the port in

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 4>Tasmania was not sufficient to take these new fairies. The

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 4>port was meant to be ninety million dollars to renovate.

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:20.479
<v Speaker 4>It's now blown out to four hundred and ninety three

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 4>million dollars. Won't be ready until October twenty twenty six.

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:28.399
<v Speaker 4>So take all of that and Tasmanians are paying five

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 4>hundred million dollars a year to have these fairies sit

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 4>ones in Scotland. I think the other ones in Ireland

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 4>or wherever it is idle waiting for the port to

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:37.880
<v Speaker 4>be built.

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 2>And I think the Irish wanted to float it and

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 2>turn it into a refugee camp today while they waited.

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:44.800
<v Speaker 2>You send it the Anians.

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 4>We're going to lease it out as a refugee camp

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 4>and then finally get it.

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 6>Back to probably the infrastructure.

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, we're going to go to a break. When

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:53.840
<v Speaker 3>we come back, we're going to show you dope of

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 3>the day.

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 4>You won't believe what this Melbourne criminal did to himself

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 4>that's coming up in a moment. We don't talk about

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 4>Russian TV too often, but Fray, they've got a new

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:10.320
<v Speaker 4>cartoon that is of interest in the.

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Country of Russia. They do well.

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 6>I think everyone's concerned about how we instill patriotism into

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 6>our children. The Russians have really taken this on and

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:21.640
<v Speaker 6>one of their most infamous propagandists have produced a new

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 6>cartoon for children to teach them about geopolitics and the world.

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:30.280
<v Speaker 6>Some of the characters featured include Donald Trump, Elon Musk,

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:31.399
<v Speaker 6>and Kim Jong Un.

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Check it out.

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Must the Muscape bullets.

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 6>So those are all the world leaders in a like

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 6>a babyface filter meeting on a zoom call to discuss geopolitics,

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:56.879
<v Speaker 6>which is pretty hilarious. But as I was watching that,

0:46:57.120 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 6>I got a bit upset and I thought, well, where

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 6>were Albanese's invite if he World leader propaganda Zoom summit.

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 6>And so you know, we did a bit of mocking

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 6>up on Ai behind the scenes, and this is what

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 6>we reckon. He would look like he'd probably get on

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 6>there and lecture them on how they could also instill

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 6>Marxist identity politics into their constitutions as well.

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 2>The poor bag has already gone gray as a baby,

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:27.320
<v Speaker 2>and he does versifully have a little more here than you, James,

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 2>though I think actually that is giving him a bit

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 2>of a free ride because he's here, isn't all that

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:34.359
<v Speaker 2>much different to yours, James, if you look at him from.

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Behind, just get on with the show.

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's just an occupational hazard. You've got to

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 2>deal with it, James. HR will deal with me later.

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 2>No they won't. I have a perfect record of course.

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 2>Actually actually become a big thing as well. Now people

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:48.880
<v Speaker 2>are doing this with like other clips, they get AI

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 2>to generate baby versions. I've seen it of like Clarkson's

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 2>farm and top gear and stuff. It's quite amusing really.

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of amusing, we're going to bring you a new

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 2>segment that we call Dope of the Day Dog and

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 2>there will be plenty of entries I'm sure over the

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 2>coming months and days. But the one I have for

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:14.799
<v Speaker 2>you today is a particular fellow down in Melbourne. Now

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 2>he carried out this attack last year in May that

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the coppers are still looking for him. So he rocks

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 2>up to a restaurant in Campbellfilld the Almjean Restaurant, which,

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 2>for some reason or another. He decided it would be

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 2>a good idea to set on fire. So he breaks

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 2>through the front door and palls around the petrol or

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 2>whatever xellerant he has and gets out the match and

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 2>lights it up and boom goes the restaurant and he decides,

0:48:38.080 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 2>oh god, I've got to get myself out of this

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 2>position now. So he walks out of the restaurant on

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 2>fire and he's trying to get in the car and

0:48:44.760 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 2>you can see he's on fire trying to get in

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the car. The head he goes, no, I got to

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 2>get down and do the stop, drop and roll. And

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not the first time we've seen an example of this.

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 2>We showed one ages ago again in Melbourne, I think

0:48:56.880 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 2>where they'd gone after a tobacconist and you can see

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the blow. I mean, look at him there, pouring it

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:04.160
<v Speaker 2>all over himself as he's trying to get away, sits

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:07.880
<v Speaker 2>himself on fire. They don't send their brightest minds in

0:49:08.040 --> 0:49:08.799
<v Speaker 2>to do these jobs.

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's called karma. I think.

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he would have filled any karma after

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 2>he left the restaurant.

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Put it that way, Well, that's all we've got time for.

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 3>But stick around Coming up is the readA Pennety Show,

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 3>good Night