WEBVTT - The AFP's failure to investigate itself

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Ruby Jones and you're listening to seven AM.

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.239
<v Speaker 1>The AFP is in charge of investigating the country's most

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>serious crimes, terrorism, corruption, drugs and human trafficking. But a

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 1>new report from the Commonwealth Ombardsman has suggested that the

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>thing it's not good at is investigating itself. It's found

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that the agency is dismissing complaints that should be investigated,

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>including allegations of corruption and assault. Today journalist Karen Middleton

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on allegations inside the AFP and what they tell us

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>about the culture of the agency. It's Wednesday, July twenty three.

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>So Karen, you've been looking into the report just released

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>into internal complaints at the AFP. Tell me what you've uncovered.

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Commonwealth Ombardsman is responsible for overseeing the operations

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 2>of the AFP and the Ombardsman files a series of

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 2>reports every year on aspects of those operations. One of

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 2>those is about its handling of complaints against its own

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 2>offices and staff. And we've just seen a report tabled

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 2>by the Obodsman in the last week or so looking

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>at that. Now, there's a bit of a lag in

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 2>these reports. They aren't published for a year or so

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 2>beyond the period that they look at, so this report

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 2>is really from twenty twenty three to twenty four, and

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 2>there was a change to the way the AFP managed

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 2>its complaints in the middle of twenty twenty three. It

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>went from using regionally based bodies right around the country

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 2>to one centralized body. But what this report suggests is

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>there's a pretty chronic overuse of the power of discretion

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>that is given under law to the Commissioner of the

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 2>AFP to you dismiss complaints without any further action or investigation.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Now that power is a delegated power. He doesn't exercise

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 2>it personally directly himself. It is exercised by that complaint's body.

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>But the list of complaints that are being dismissed has

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 2>gone up pretty dramatically. If we look at the figures

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>in that report, they show that in the year before

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 2>that centralization occurred, just thirty two percent of complaints were

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 2>being dismissed under this discretionary power. In the year after

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>it began, the rate was eighty five percent. And the

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Ombudsman is very concerned about that. The Ombudsman's report says

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 2>they found that in nine of the eleven instances they

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 2>reviewed the use of the discretionary power was unreasonable, unfair

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 2>and failed to meet the requirements of the legislation.

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, can you tell me what kind of complaints we're

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about, what sort of alleged conduct.

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the most prominent of the examples it

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 2>gives is allegations of the personal misuse of police vehicles.

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 2>So there's not a lot of detail about exactly what happened,

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>whether these were marked or unmarked police cars, but the

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 2>suggestion was that they had been used inappropriately. The obitsmen

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 2>found that when the police were asked to explain this,

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 2>its response was that even though the guidelines for using

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>police vehicles were clear, it had discovered that officers didn't

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>understand them and that the practice of using police vehicles

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 2>personally was widespread, so they took no further action. The

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Commonwealth Combitsmen's taken a very dim view of that and

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 2>says that it needs to be referred to the National

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Anti Corruption Commission for examination as potential serious systemic corruption.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 2>The example of the police vehicles dated back to before

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the switchover in the complaints handling, and also before the

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Anti Corruption Commission, which we call the NAC had been created.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Prior to that, there was another body that was responsible

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 2>for investigating police corruption allegation see Australian Commission for Law

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Enforcement Integrity. But in this case it was found that

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 2>it was referred to them. Initially they sent it back

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 2>to the police and said, look, you look into this,

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>let us know if you find any evidence of wrongdoing.

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 2>The police did uncover what the Ombardsman says could have

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 2>actually been admissions and a number of other pieces of

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 2>information that were potentially useful, but it was never referred

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>formally and that really was why the Ombodsman has decided

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 2>that it needs proper investigation and the police have agreed

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 2>to do that, and they've also agreed to set up

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 2>their own separate external inquiry into the whole complaints handling system.

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 2>They've appointed a law firm to run that. They consulted

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 2>the Obardsmen in the course of setting that up and

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 2>that should start by the end of the month.

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So that particular case is going to the knack now

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Onwardsman has I suppose pointed it out in

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>their report, But tell me more about other cases that

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they identified where the AFP hadn't fully pursued an investigation

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>where perhaps the Onwardsmen thinks that they should.

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Have found well. The Obousman found one allegation of sexual

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 2>misconduct against AFP personnel who had been dealing with a

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 2>person in custody. Now that was also dismissed without further investigation,

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 2>on the basis that the body cam vision that the

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 2>police were wearing didn't substantiate the allegation. But when the

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Obodsman's office reviewed the footage, they found but nineteen minutes

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 2>of it was missing, and no record that either the

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 2>people who were accused or the specific complainant had been

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:43.119
<v Speaker 2>contacted for their version. And there was another complaint about

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 2>an officer inappropriately using a firearm in the workplace. Now

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 2>that was dismissed on the basis that the person had

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 2>already been counseled. But the Onbardsman has found that this

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 2>didn't reflect the seriousness of the allegations. It didn't properly

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>consider comments that were contained in the complaint that other

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 2>personnel felt unsafe when this had happened, and there seemed

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 2>to be no if it made to establish whether this

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 2>was a service weapon, a real weapon, or a training

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.679
<v Speaker 2>weapon a replica. So there were a range of concerns

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the onbitsmen had and said that needed further examination.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>After the break. Why the AFP is allowed to decide

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>not to investigate itself, Karen. Central to all of this

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>is the idea that serious allegations of misconduct, at times

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>or at least in one case, potentially reaching the level

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>of corruption, have been identified but then dismissed or not

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>investigated further within the AFP. So can you tell me

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>a bit about how that decision is made.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So, this legislation that governs the AFP's operations, it's

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the Australian Federal Police Act, and there's one section in

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 2>that section forty TF that gives the Commissioner the discretion

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 2>to take no further action on a complaint. Even though

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>that is a power that is ultimately the commissioners, it's

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>a delegated power. So it's the complaints handling body that

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 2>really exercises that discretion and makes the decision on whether

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>or not things should be further investigated. So that seems

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 2>to be where these problems are centered. The almostmen found

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>that these sort of first pass assessments that the body

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 2>was doing didn't always consider a whole lot of other

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 2>available evidence, you know, other verifying information, what other sources

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 2>there might be that they could pursue, witnesses or other records.

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Didn't always consider that any available evidence might be highly

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>credible even though it was limited. Didn't look at whether

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 2>more investigation could be required to establish the basic facts

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>before making a ruling, or whether the seriousness of the

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 2>allegations just naturally necessitated taking more steps to inquire about

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>them before making a determination.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so is the ombudsman critical then of either the

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Central Complaints Body or the leadership of the AFP.

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, Interestingly, he notes that there has been an old

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 2>quote a particularly high repeat of issues over the last

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 2>six years, and that is actually the time that the

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 2>AFP Commissioner Rees Kershaw has been in his job. He

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 2>started there in twenty nineteen. Now, as I say, it's

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 2>a delegated power, so it's not a power that he

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 2>personally has exercised. But the Home Affairs Minister, when I

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.719
<v Speaker 2>asked his office about that timeline, has backed in the

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 2>commissioner and says Commissioner Kershaw is an impressive leader and

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 2>enjoys my confidence. So he's certainly not raising any concerns

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 2>about the Commissioner.

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Personally okay, But all of this, what does it tell

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you about the culture within the AFP at the moment.

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the concern it raises is the risk

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 2>that there's a perception of impunity among the police about

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 2>complaints against themselves. And of course the police is a

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>very important institution, but they depend very heavily on public trust,

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 2>and the ombudsman is saying that this is now looking

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 2>like a pattern of failing to completely investigate or even

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 2>do an initial examination of too many allegations. When I

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 2>ask the AFP for specific responses to what the ombardsmen found,

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 2>it points to the fact that it's setting up this

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 2>independent review and it says that this is to ensure

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 2>the police force quote maintains a mature and defensible complaint

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 2>management system unquote, and it also insists that the internal

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 2>mandatory reporting regimes that it has on professional standards, which

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 2>include allegations of sexual abuse and misconduct, are robust.

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So do you get the sense then that what the

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>omwardsman has found is being taken seriously by the AFP.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they've accepted the majority of the recommendations the obodsmen made,

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 2>but there are a handful that they've only partially agreed to.

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And what isn't clear from the report is which bits

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 2>of those they've agreed to and which they haven't. So

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 2>there are some caveats on what they're doing. But they have,

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 2>as I say, said, they will send that allegation about

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 2>police car' misuse to the Anti Corruption Commission, and they've

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 2>undertaken to re examine some of the issues that the

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Ombudsman recommends looking at. What they haven't fully committed to

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 2>is re examining some of the cases where the Ombudsman

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 2>says that things were classified too low in terms of

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the level of the complaint. Some of those the Obodsmen

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 2>thinks should have been upper category, which would have warranted

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 2>a different kind of investigation and would have had potentially

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 2>more serious consequences, and the Ombodsman Ian Anderson was concerned

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 2>that things were being kind of downgraded to dismiss them

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 2>more readily. Now the police have said they'll re examine

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 2>their way they categorize these complaints, but they haven't yet

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 2>committed to re examining and reinvestigating if necessary, some of

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 2>those key complaints that the Obotsman.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Raised, And so Karen, it seems like the AFP is

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>tasked with the job of investigating itself in a lot

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of these instances. So do you think that there is

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a question there about whether or not that is appropriate.

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Ombudsman hasn't specifically suggested that somebody else should

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 2>be doing the job, but I think the implication in

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 2>the level of criticism in this report is that the

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 2>AFP should certainly be doing the job better.

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, Karen, thank you so much for your time today.

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Ruby.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Also in the news today, Pauline Hanson has nominated Independent

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Senator David Pocock for the role of Senate President. Pocock

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>declined the nomine nation, saying he was flattered and surprised,

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>but focused on his role representing the ACT. Labour's Sue

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Lines was returned to the role after beating the Greens

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Penny Almond Pain fifty five twelve and new figures show

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>an alarming increase in the number of women and girls

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>seeking homelessness support. Homelessness Australia research shows there's been an

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>increase from twenty four thousand, five hundred and seventeen women

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and girls seeking help in May twenty twenty two up

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to almost thirty thousand in March of this year. The

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>figures also show an increase in the number of females

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>at risk of homelessness. Almost half of women and girls

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for support had experienced domestic and family violence. I'm

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Ruby Jones. This is seven am. Thanks for listening.