Speaker 1: From the Skying Center. This is Paul Murray Live. How
Speaker 1: does my brace make it all the way from the
Speaker 1: man Cave? Anyway? We love sharing. Now, what are next
Speaker 1: few weeks we've got for you on this show? This
Speaker 1: show I love doing, but I love doing around big
Speaker 1: news and big events. This weekend we're going to be
Speaker 1: in Tasmania for our town. If you want to join
Speaker 1: us in long and send us an email at ourtown
Speaker 1: at scot News dot com dot au. Next week we're
Speaker 1: in Queensland doing a special pub test and of course
Speaker 1: the election. The week after that we're in Washington. We
Speaker 1: will be there for more than a week. I cannot
Speaker 1: wait and I cannot wait to tell you what is
Speaker 1: going on each and every day. So let's start in
Speaker 1: the beautiful state of Queensland. Just two weeks to go
Speaker 1: now until the good people are queens they get the
Speaker 1: chance to get rid of this bloody, awful government. Voting
Speaker 1: has already started. Early voting started on Monday. We're into
Speaker 1: day three of it well and truly more than two
Speaker 1: hundred thousand people have already voted. That is up on
Speaker 1: the same time four years ago. As people are ready
Speaker 1: to get rid of this government. Now, the Courier Mail
Speaker 1: did something very clever. They didn't just do a normal poll.
Speaker 1: They did a pole of the people who were voting early.
Speaker 1: They did this in about ten different seats and they
Speaker 1: asked about one thousand people. That's statistically quite relevant, and
Speaker 1: it was pretty much the same result on day one
Speaker 1: of early voting as it ended up being at the
Speaker 1: end of the election. So let's have a look at
Speaker 1: what they've been able to follow. Have a look here.
Speaker 1: The LNP is up according to this exit pole, voting
Speaker 1: up by twelve and a bit percent, Labor down nine
Speaker 1: and a bit percent, KAP is down a little, the
Speaker 1: others are down a little, The Greens are down a little.
Speaker 1: The only green otherwise you can see is for one
Speaker 1: nation that's going to matter in a couple of different seats,
Speaker 1: but obviously primary vote. This is a preferential election. If
Speaker 1: you've got a primary vote of let's say forty five
Speaker 1: and above, then most likely in a state that has
Speaker 1: places like the KAP and one Nation pulling some pretty
Speaker 1: big numbers in the areas that matter most. This is
Speaker 1: very good news for those of us that would like
Speaker 1: to see that change, but don't just assuming neighbors get
Speaker 1: to do it. You're the one that's going to have
Speaker 1: to do it. The exit pole on day two of
Speaker 1: early voting indicates that voters in three Townsville seats and Mackay,
Speaker 1: along with several Southeast queens and electorates, are about to
Speaker 1: remove the nine year Labor government from office. They will
Speaker 1: do so in just two weeks from now, on Saturday,
Speaker 1: October the twenty sixth. Crime, cost of living are the
Speaker 1: number one issues that are worrying for Labor as its
Speaker 1: predicted loss of at least three ministers could be on
Speaker 1: the cards, including with Megan Scanyon and Slick Mick Debrin Debrini. Now,
Speaker 1: let's have a look at seat by seat. Every one
Speaker 1: of these seats that you can see in your graphic
Speaker 1: is currently held by the Labor Party. Now cans you
Speaker 1: would say with thirty seven thirty six means that the
Speaker 1: preferences of One Nation and the Greens really matter there. Now,
Speaker 1: I've often talked about in federal elections that if you vote, say,
Speaker 1: in this case, one Nation one, but you put the
Speaker 1: LNP second last and Labor last, there's a very good
Speaker 1: chance that you're going to end up with a Labor seat. Now,
Speaker 1: obviously most one Nation's people will they'll put the Green's
Speaker 1: dead last. But my suggestion is if you want to
Speaker 1: get rid of the government, you vote one nation or
Speaker 1: cutter one and then obviously the LNP at number two.
Speaker 1: So cans line ball, but most likely it looks like
Speaker 1: it will end up falling based off those preferences. In Calundra,
Speaker 1: if you've got a fifty percent primary vote, well, obviously
Speaker 1: preferences will get you up and over the edge. They
Speaker 1: will win that seat. In the seat of Gavin, the
Speaker 1: same thing. If you've got it in the mid to
Speaker 1: high forties in your primary vote up thirteen compared to
Speaker 1: Labour down eleven, you're looking good. In Green Slopes and
Speaker 1: in Mackay, the primary vote, according to the exit pole
Speaker 1: after the first couple of days, would show a massive
Speaker 1: jump of either one in five or one in four
Speaker 1: voters getting behind the LNP compared to where they were
Speaker 1: four years ago. I repeat, one Nation. Preferences matter, Greens
Speaker 1: preferences matter, particularly in the seat of Cans. Let's keep
Speaker 1: looking seats of McConnell, Redlands, rock Hampton, Thuron Goer and
Speaker 1: in Springwood. You can see here too, a primary vote
Speaker 1: at forty six, fifty two, fifty six and fifty one.
Speaker 1: But in rock Hampton, the one nation preferences will decide
Speaker 1: who wins that seat. I repeat, if you want to
Speaker 1: vote one nation one, give them a chance to win
Speaker 1: the seat. Good luck to you. But number two is
Speaker 1: who you want to be the government. If you want
Speaker 1: it to be the Labor Party or you want it
Speaker 1: to be the LNP, that's who you pick as your
Speaker 1: number two. Again, the primary vote up fifteen thirteen, nine,
Speaker 1: twenty five percent in Thur and Goer. That is phenomenal. Again,
Speaker 1: the numbers that came in were pretty accurate four years ago.
Speaker 1: It doesn't mean they're automatically accurate this time. All signs
Speaker 1: pointing in the right direction. But please please remember where
Speaker 1: you put the major parties matter. You put them all last,
Speaker 1: you're going to get labor. You put the LNP way
Speaker 1: higher than Labor, you're more likely to get LNP And
Speaker 1: that obviously is what I believe Queensland does. Plenty of
Speaker 1: people voting early, they cannot wait to get rid of
Speaker 1: this government, will get more numbers by this time again tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Today in Brisbane there was a big event where the
Speaker 1: two major party leaders were meeting for one of another debate.
Speaker 1: The People's Forum will be in the final week of
Speaker 1: the campaign. That's when we will be in Queensland next week,
Speaker 1: so the pressure will be on for that. Cannot wait
Speaker 1: to see what one hundred undecided Queensland voters have to
Speaker 1: say to the leaders directly. But here's four things I
Speaker 1: want to bring out of this debate today. Miles is
Speaker 1: pushing a lie. It is a lie that abortion is
Speaker 1: going to be changed in Queensland. Yes, there are some
Speaker 1: conservative lnpmps who would like a vote on it, but
Speaker 1: it's not going to happen. And let's even imagine if
Speaker 1: there were some bizarre reason there was a conscience vote,
Speaker 1: all the Labor MPs, all the Greens MPs and the
Speaker 1: extreme majority of the LLNP would mean there will be
Speaker 1: no change. Doesn't mean Miles isn't trying to scare, particularly
Speaker 1: the women of Queensland.
Speaker 2: He can't give an honest answer what he believes when
Speaker 2: it comes to women's reproductive rights, despite being asked one
Speaker 2: hundred and thirty one times.
Speaker 1: Now it's just extraordinary, isn't it Okay they asked the
Speaker 1: question one hundred and thirty two times. He says the
Speaker 1: same thing one hundred and thirty two times. We're not changing.
Speaker 1: There's no different version of it. Yes, there are some
Speaker 1: people that will want to change, but there are some
Speaker 1: people inside the Labour Party who will want to change
Speaker 1: on the decriminalizing of drugs. The reality is is that
Speaker 1: David Chruso fully as the leader of the party. If
Speaker 1: they have a majority, we'll go nowhere near it. The
Speaker 1: only vote that may take place is if the caateg
Speaker 1: Australia Party ends up in a position where they are
Speaker 1: required to help form a majority government. Now, yes, this
Speaker 1: is all statistically possible, it is all very possible. However,
Speaker 1: if there was a vote in the Parliament, the extreme
Speaker 1: majority of people would make no change. So that's the
Speaker 1: lie that he's going to push. He's pushing it in
Speaker 1: his ads. It may well be effective, as inevitably polls
Speaker 1: do start to tighten, but I don't expect them to
Speaker 1: tighten anywhere that'll see miles even heading towards a minority government,
Speaker 1: let alone a majority government. For his part, David crucifully
Speaker 1: knows he hits a home goal a home run, rather
Speaker 1: or hits it for six every time youth crime or
Speaker 1: crime is brought up.
Speaker 3: What does it mean for Queensland to wake up on
Speaker 3: the twenty seventh of October to a fourth term and.
Speaker 4: Fourteen years of this government?
Speaker 3: What does it mean to Victor White who lost his
Speaker 3: wife allegedly at the hands of repeat young offenders and
Speaker 3: the other two hundred and eighty nine thousand, six hundred
Speaker 3: and fifty seven victims of the youth crime crisis? And
Speaker 3: what does it mean for the safety of your family
Speaker 3: in the next four years? Imagine waking up to four
Speaker 3: more years of that or a vote for change, a
Speaker 3: fresh start.
Speaker 1: Now. I like in these debates that they get an
Speaker 1: opportunity to ask each other questions. This was one about
Speaker 1: crime where Miles has gotten nowhere to.
Speaker 4: Run Premier Adult Crime.
Speaker 3: Adult Time is part of a plan to change youth's
Speaker 3: justice laws that your labor government weakened. Stephen, regardless of
Speaker 3: the election result next Saturday, will you today commit to
Speaker 3: making these laws by Christmas?
Speaker 2: Well, thanks for your question, David, And first of all,
Speaker 2: can I correct you that's not a plan. That is
Speaker 2: a slogan. It's a four word slogan that even your
Speaker 2: own team admits came out of a focus group.
Speaker 4: It's not thought through.
Speaker 2: You can't find a single expert to stand up with
Speaker 2: you and say it will make a difference. It's estimated
Speaker 2: to increase the detention population by fifty percent.
Speaker 4: You say that.
Speaker 2: Will happen by Christmas, but there is no detailed plan
Speaker 2: for how you will accommodate all of those additional detainees.
Speaker 4: I guess that's no.
Speaker 1: Now disgrace for a little bit of you know, jumping around.
Speaker 1: You saw there from Mars the new laws of adult
Speaker 1: crime at oult time will be introduced by Christmas. And
Speaker 1: then he turns around and tries to worry people that
Speaker 1: the prison population may increase by fifty percent. Good, it's
Speaker 1: what the people are coinslaying want. They want people who
Speaker 1: are committing violent crimes, regardless of whether they are teenagers,
Speaker 1: people in their twenties, or people who are much older
Speaker 1: and should know much better, to go to jail forever. No,
Speaker 1: it's not murder, but people need to go to jail.
Speaker 1: If that is going to increase the number of people
Speaker 1: in the jails, then guess what, build bigger jails. I
Speaker 1: don't think anyone in Queensland would have a problem with
Speaker 1: the proposition that's being placed, but nice try for Miles
Speaker 1: to try to pretend that all of this must happen
Speaker 1: before the end of the year, the laws before the
Speaker 1: end of the year, and then by his own estimates,
Speaker 1: a lot more people get locked up. Good crucifile. He
Speaker 1: needs to do better when he's answering questions about funding,
Speaker 1: particularly about tax.
Speaker 2: Thirty five times you or your shadow ministers have met
Speaker 2: with coal mining companies, executives.
Speaker 4: Or lobby groups.
Speaker 2: You gave a speech at a parliamentary function this week
Speaker 2: where you are sorry recently where you said they could
Speaker 2: take your commitments to the bank.
Speaker 1: What are those commitments that.
Speaker 4: When we said a tax scheme it should count for something.
Speaker 1: Now two weeks ago they're trying to save obviously the
Speaker 1: reality that half vote early, half vote on election day.
Speaker 1: They do need a little bit more meat on the bone.
Speaker 1: There no question whatsoever. But if anyone thinks that that
Speaker 1: is a reason why Queensand shouldn't change your government, you
Speaker 1: have not been paying attention to what's been happening in Queensland.
Speaker 1: But it from afar like me or those who live
Speaker 1: like oh so many, particularly watching us on Sky News Regional.
Speaker 1: You've got the chance to make it change less than
Speaker 1: two weeks from now and final question Anastasia Palichet. Well,
Speaker 1: despite the fact that, of course we know that if
Speaker 1: she was at this election, she'd be facing pretty much
Speaker 1: the same result, the same drubbing. She got out, so
Speaker 1: she doesn't have to live with that legacy. But she
Speaker 1: was our But Stephen Miles was asked whether he's become
Speaker 1: his own man after being her deputy every single day
Speaker 1: of the last term of parliament.
Speaker 5: You both believe that you've been able to step out
Speaker 5: of the shadow of your predecessors and former Premier Anastagia
Speaker 5: Paloche and Campbell Newman.
Speaker 6: Who wants to jump.
Speaker 4: In here, Well, I reckon I have.
Speaker 2: I'm pretty pretty proud of what we've been able to
Speaker 2: do over these last ten months.
Speaker 1: Please this bloke, all he has done in the past
Speaker 1: ten months is turn a budget surplus into a budget
Speaker 1: deficit with the promise of an even deeper one so
Speaker 1: he can stand in front of a slogan. As for
Speaker 1: the idea that the LNP premiere three elections, please please,
Speaker 1: they've played that scare every single election to full effect.
Speaker 1: It will not work this time. But Queensland, it's not
Speaker 1: up to the polls. It's not up to me, it's
Speaker 1: up to you flush them and flush them hard, including
Speaker 1: with your preferences. Three weeks to go tonight till we
Speaker 1: find out whether Donald Trump is going to be returned
Speaker 1: as the president of the United States or the vice
Speaker 1: president becomes the president of the United States for the
Speaker 1: next four years, both of them out and about on
Speaker 1: the trail Today. Donald Trump a couple of fainted at
Speaker 1: his event, so a little bit of dancing, bit of fun.
Speaker 1: And while the lefty media says, see this is an
Speaker 1: example his brain is columb collapsing before I very eyes.
Speaker 1: Does anyone look like they're not having a good time there?
Speaker 1: And as Andrew Bolt showed you a bit earlier tonight,
Speaker 1: people who were at the rally said, I love it.
Speaker 1: I could have gone for another couple of hours. Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris was on the radio late today where she was
Speaker 1: doing an interview, which is why there's no new pictures
Speaker 1: of her, and very strangely for a person who is
Speaker 1: this close potentially to the presidency, her first event wasn't
Speaker 1: until four o'clock this afternoon. Now, you would think with
Speaker 1: just a couple of weeks to go, you'd be getting
Speaker 1: up in one state, going to another state for lunch
Speaker 1: and going to bed in another state. How much does
Speaker 1: she want it? It can't all play it in the media.
Speaker 1: You've got to get out in front of people. Tomorrow
Speaker 1: her big day, and we'll be covering it here at
Speaker 1: Live on Sky News at ten o'clock Australia in eastern
Speaker 1: daylight time, which is Kamala Harris will be doing a
Speaker 1: thirty minute interview live to tape, no editing with Fox News.
Speaker 1: I'll be here with Laura Jays tomorrow morning to sell
Speaker 1: you what I think of what hopefully will be the
Speaker 1: begining car crash yet for Kamala Harris. But we'll all
Speaker 1: wait and see. As for the bookies, the bookies are
Speaker 1: getting even stronger behind the idea that three weeks from
Speaker 1: now Trump will win. Why because you can see Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: is now starting to get shaded red. According to the
Speaker 1: Lad's polls, Trump is winning in all bar one of
Speaker 1: the swing states. Now, as I've explained and shown you before,
Speaker 1: but I will show you again as we get a
Speaker 1: bit closer to the election. Four years ago, the polls
Speaker 1: were off. They undercounted him anywhere between two and four
Speaker 1: percent depending on the state. So if he's up by
Speaker 1: one or even half a percent, then you've got to
Speaker 1: expect the same mistake even if it was halved and
Speaker 1: was a two percent problem. Well, if he's in front,
Speaker 1: that would get him over the line. To give you
Speaker 1: an idea specifically about Pennsylvania, the state that will eventually
Speaker 1: crown the winner, these are the five most recent polls.
Speaker 1: They show Trump winning, Harris winning, Trump winning, Trump winning,
Speaker 1: Trump winning, which is why the bookies are flowing the
Speaker 1: way they are on the prediction models. Kamala Harris has
Speaker 1: gone from a strong chance of winning the presidency a
Speaker 1: week ago to now fifty point one percent chance. When
Speaker 1: my mate Lako tells you during a car race that
Speaker 1: the leader is here, but the person who's coming up
Speaker 1: is coming up very fast behind them, that's exactly what's
Speaker 1: happening here. Now I'm going to show you again why
Speaker 1: Trump's trajectory will overtake Harris, not by a huge amount.
Speaker 1: Have a look at this now. Biden dropped out July
Speaker 1: the twenty eighth. That is the far left of your
Speaker 1: screen with Trump way in front, Democrats way down. It
Speaker 1: then crossed over where the Democrats, or in this case,
Speaker 1: Harris started beating Trump after she picked her vice president.
Speaker 1: Then Kennedy started to Kennedy dropped out. That's when Trump
Speaker 1: started to pick up again. The Leader's debate happened. Trump
Speaker 1: started to fall. Then there was the vice presidential debate,
Speaker 1: when Harris peaked and started to fall again. Trump started
Speaker 1: to rise. Now, basically you can see in those numbers
Speaker 1: that it's about a two week gap between when there
Speaker 1: is a turnover one way that goes the other way.
Speaker 1: With just three weeks to go, presumably, unless there is
Speaker 1: some major issue in this, Trump keeps going up ever
Speaker 1: so slightly, takes the lead, and then we'll see where
Speaker 1: we are one week from today. But if you are
Speaker 1: backing Trump, all of it is starting to flow his way,
Speaker 1: which is why the media is setting its hair on fire.
Speaker 1: I'll show you that and get a comment from Megan
Speaker 1: Kelly before we get into our debate tonight. What about
Speaker 1: Albo's brand new coastal home, his mansion on a cliff top. Well,
Speaker 1: this bloke, of course, things so on. Nothing to see here.
Speaker 1: I'm just changing my life arrangements, blah blah blah. You know,
Speaker 1: he was selling a joint for one point nine, He's
Speaker 1: bought one now for four point three. He's planning to
Speaker 1: rent it out. He's not living in this thing, so
Speaker 1: this is just a pure rubbing people's faces in it
Speaker 1: that at a time of financial crisis, he's the one
Speaker 1: who's living it up large and no matter when he
Speaker 1: gets the backside as the Prime Minister, that'll be his
Speaker 1: view for the rest of his life and at least
Speaker 1: one of his houses. The guardians worked out that the
Speaker 1: joint that he's brought used to be rented out at
Speaker 1: nine hundred dollars a night as a five star AIRB
Speaker 1: and B, a lot better than most of the places
Speaker 1: that you and I live in let alone would have
Speaker 1: as a second place for later in life. How are
Speaker 1: the reviews going and the otherwise friendly press Sidney Morning
Speaker 1: Herald Labour MP's baffled by PM's four point three million
Speaker 1: dollar cliff Top perfection home. By at least four MPs
Speaker 1: who were asked not to be named so they could
Speaker 1: speak freely to the newspaper, have expressed frustration with the
Speaker 1: Prime Minister's decision. One of them says, I can't think
Speaker 1: of a greater act of self sabotage in my life.
Speaker 1: I'm gobsmacked. If you're a labor MP up against agreeing
Speaker 1: at the next election. Good luck. Another one. Some people
Speaker 1: within Labor were aware and tried to stop it. My
Speaker 1: instinct is that this is well as you can see.
Speaker 1: Certain word terrible. Another one. The idea that his missus
Speaker 1: is someone from the Central Coast and wants to live
Speaker 1: up there, but they grew up there is fair enough,
Speaker 1: but it's just not a good look. Two more said,
Speaker 1: at the very least he should have done it after
Speaker 1: the election, or maybe after the wedding. As for the Libs,
Speaker 1: they couldn't be enjoying a freeer kick.
Speaker 6: Is the Prime Minister out of touch?
Speaker 7: I've been saying he's out of touch for a long time.
Speaker 8: I just think that the timing and the tone of
Speaker 8: this one, it has been a little bit tone deaf.
Speaker 2: I think the timing of this is questionable by the
Speaker 2: Prime Minister.
Speaker 1: Not just the timing, it's the decision as well as
Speaker 1: for my colleague Harry marks In about an hour ago,
Speaker 1: she had a great little exclusive and jeez, wasn't this
Speaker 1: convenient when he bought the house. That happened happened to
Speaker 1: be advantaged by his own government's use of taxpayer money.
Speaker 9: Prime Minister Anthony Albinizi personally announced that his government would
Speaker 9: spending one hundred million dollars to upgrade the road that
Speaker 9: you guessed it leads right to his new four million
Speaker 9: dollar house. I can reveal that in June this year
Speaker 9: Albanezi personally spoke about a Voker Drive undergoing a major upgrade.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable. And we've all heard one thing too many times
Speaker 1: since this bloke was the Opposition leader and then became
Speaker 1: the Prime Minister.
Speaker 10: I grew up in a public housing where my mum
Speaker 10: lived in the same one house for all of her
Speaker 10: sixty five years. It's how I have got to a
Speaker 10: position of the son of a single mum who grew
Speaker 10: up in public housing, to be running for prime minister
Speaker 10: of this country. One of reason is why I'm standing
Speaker 10: here as Prime Minister of Australia is the fact that
Speaker 10: I had a secure roof over my head of public housing.
Speaker 1: Please please well even again, The Sidney Morning Herald part
Speaker 1: of the very friendly group of people who love to
Speaker 1: come to the Prime Minister's defense. They write an opinion
Speaker 1: piece today or they published one where somebody said, all
Speaker 1: right enough, no more of the council flat story. Well,
Speaker 1: I think of Australians were brought of it a lot
Speaker 1: more before today, but certainly his capacity to go back
Speaker 1: to it. And what about lovely lefties who no doubt
Speaker 1: would love to be going and doing a kitchen cabinet
Speaker 1: in the Prime Minister's new coastal retreat. Old made Annabelle
Speaker 1: crab the Prime Minister's news beach house has just made
Speaker 1: his job and his colleagues much harder. So even when
Speaker 1: normally the phone of friends all come in and back
Speaker 1: him in from labour MPs to the love he's over
Speaker 1: at Channel two. They know how bad this thing is
Speaker 1: for those who had to go on television to try
Speaker 1: to defend it today. Well, old clueless Clare O'Neil, who
Speaker 1: was there yesterday when all of this became po we're
Speaker 1: just doing such a great job. Well you're a great
Speaker 1: prime minister, thanks for demoting me. This was how she
Speaker 1: defended herself on Channel seven today Or is the Daily
Speaker 1: Mail correctly put it that the Housing Minister gave an
Speaker 1: eye watering answer for why the Prime Minister had decided
Speaker 1: to make the purchase at a time when there's not
Speaker 1: enough places for people to rent, let alone him to
Speaker 1: rent out another joint.
Speaker 7: The PM addressed this really extensively yesterday, Nat and I
Speaker 7: think we all understand and acknowledge that he's entitled to
Speaker 7: have a personal life and to purchase property as he
Speaker 7: needs to do. He's about to embark on a new
Speaker 7: life with his incredible fiance and I know we wish
Speaker 7: him all the best in that.
Speaker 1: Now, the reason this doesn't fly is he doesn't live
Speaker 1: in the family house from his former marriage. He leaves
Speaker 1: in one of two taxpayer funded mansions. His plan is
Speaker 1: to be the Prime Minister for as long as they
Speaker 1: print calendars and sell them an office works, so the
Speaker 1: need for him to buy the place for them to
Speaker 1: retire to is nothing urgent. It's just literally because he can.
Speaker 1: And yes, as a private citizen, does he have a
Speaker 1: right to do it. Sure, But does it get to
Speaker 1: go uncommented No, Welcome to the big boy world. The
Speaker 1: Prime Minister would be more than happy to leap into
Speaker 1: a liberal who did it, so he's got to be
Speaker 1: willing to copy it from those of us who say
Speaker 1: that he is out of touch. Good on Jane Hume
Speaker 1: for the way she pushed back on Rise this morning
Speaker 1: when that rubbish was being served up.
Speaker 8: I do have a problem with the timing and I
Speaker 8: do have a problem with the fact that this is
Speaker 8: very tone deaf during a housing crisis.
Speaker 6: It's unfortunate that Claire is the.
Speaker 8: Housing Minister, is the one that's being sent out to
Speaker 8: clean up this mess. She's right in saying that everybody
Speaker 8: has a right to a personal life, There's no doubt
Speaker 8: about that. And the Prime Minister has every right to
Speaker 8: make plans for his retirement. But I think that there's
Speaker 8: plenty of Australians and probably some of his colleagues now
Speaker 8: that would like to see that happen sooner rather than later.
Speaker 1: I can't wait. Prom and Bishop Stephen Conroyal, they would
Speaker 1: have made this in a whole lot more in a
Speaker 1: couple of moments time. And just on the rental market
Speaker 1: where we know that the cues they go around the block,
Speaker 1: where people who try to look for places that are
Speaker 1: available in places like Ipswich, literally one hundred people apply
Speaker 1: for just one spot. We learned today via mates at
Speaker 1: sky ONews dot com dot are you Great website? Make
Speaker 1: it your homepage? Merely one percent of rentals comfortably afford
Speaker 1: many essential workers anglicate with those numbers out today. I
Speaker 1: thing to see here, Prime Minister is there, there's always plenty,
Speaker 1: and we'll for show you. Also, I didn't fall for
Speaker 1: the lie last night from the Prime Minister. Now the
Speaker 1: rest of the media was more than happy to pretend
Speaker 1: that he was about to make a major decision that
Speaker 1: we have suggested, that I've suggested before on this program
Speaker 1: is exactly what should happen, which is we shouldn't be
Speaker 1: paying fees to access our own money.
Speaker 8: Irritating debit card surcharges could be a thing of the
Speaker 8: past within two years under a major federal government crackdown.
Speaker 11: The Alberanzi government says it's prepared to ban debit card
Speaker 11: surcharges if re elected next year.
Speaker 12: Sneaky surcharges on debit cards could be banned in a
Speaker 12: year or so.
Speaker 1: Now you notice a year or so if we're re elected,
Speaker 1: the parliament still has plenty of time before the next
Speaker 1: federal election. There will be many sitting days between now
Speaker 1: and the end of the year, and a few before
Speaker 1: we do go off to an election whenever that is
Speaker 1: next year. If it requires the parliament, I would imagine
Speaker 1: that the opposition would agree unanimously this stuff should go,
Speaker 1: and it should go now, because, as we know, after
Speaker 1: the pandemic. The extreme majority of Australians are tapping and going.
Speaker 1: Of those, a very significant number using debit cards. Now
Speaker 1: these debit cards means it's your money. There's nobody having
Speaker 1: to access credit credit card charges find they can still exist.
Speaker 1: But if places want us to be able to do
Speaker 1: tap and go, it shouldn't cost us or them to
Speaker 1: do so. The financial institutions who do this are underwritten
Speaker 1: by the federal government, meaning they shouldn't be passing on
Speaker 1: even sneaky versions of these fees. So don't tell me
Speaker 1: that anyone's going to be missing out. The banking sector
Speaker 1: is multiple billion dollars worth of profit. They can do
Speaker 1: without whatever hundreds of millions of dollars they make out
Speaker 1: of this. But how does the Prime Minister get credit
Speaker 1: for announcing a plan for a review for somebody else
Speaker 1: to make a decision that fingers cross maybe might result
Speaker 1: in the cards having the charges removed. The charges should
Speaker 1: go now, Peter Dutton, this s.
Speaker 13: Actually planned for a plan and this Prime Minister are
Speaker 13: always promises but never delivers. And we're very happy to
Speaker 13: look at anything the government's going to propose. But it's
Speaker 13: not an announcement, it's just that they're looking at it
Speaker 13: and it could come in in twenty twenty six. Australian
Speaker 13: families need help now from this government.
Speaker 1: All right, now, let's talk about the CFMAU because there's
Speaker 1: a few things worth mentioning that have gone a little
Speaker 1: bit quiet as we've been distracted by everything else happening
Speaker 1: in the world. Now. The CFMAU have been, in my view,
Speaker 1: the bad guys the construction industry for a very long time.
Speaker 1: There have been multiple governments that have introduced standing royal
Speaker 1: commissions because of their behavior. They are known to have
Speaker 1: broken the law multiple times on multiple fronts. Royal commissions
Speaker 1: have come again, and then of course the Building and
Speaker 1: Construction Commission came and went. We know that they don't
Speaker 1: mind a march in the street and the absurdity of
Speaker 1: their union power means that if you happen to be
Speaker 1: lucky enough to be working on a CFMEU site and
Speaker 1: you're holding up the stop go sign, you can get
Speaker 1: paid as much as two hundred thousand dollars of the
Speaker 1: walk off the job. It's not good enough, it's not acceptable.
Speaker 1: We certainly know of the past couple of months plenty
Speaker 1: of wrongdoing has been exposed. We know there have been
Speaker 1: attempts to distance and attempts to bring in an administrator,
Speaker 1: but there's something even more wrong with this organization, as
Speaker 1: we learned today via the reporting of David Crow and
Speaker 1: Olivia Island in the Channel on newspapers, the Fair Work
Speaker 1: Australia's got forty two different probes into the standout a
Speaker 1: tactics or coercion of the CFMEU and corruption that wasn't
Speaker 1: already exposed by among others, Nick mackenzie in the sixty
Speaker 1: Minutes program from a few months ago. But again there
Speaker 1: is a figure who would not normally get a shout
Speaker 1: out from me, but is somebody who is being directly
Speaker 1: victimized by those who do not like the pushing aside
Speaker 1: of the CFMMEU. And it's the boss of the ACTU,
Speaker 1: Sally McManus now Salie McManus and I would disagree on
Speaker 1: almost everything, but she's a person who apparently is starting
Speaker 1: to fear for her safety because of wishments that are
Speaker 1: slowly being handed out to the CFMEU. She gave an
Speaker 1: interview recently on the ABC where she talked about how
Speaker 1: she's had to change her movements to and from work
Speaker 1: because somebody is trying to threaten her.
Speaker 4: I don't go out much. I've had to change my routines.
Speaker 5: I live between different places. That's life unfortunately at the moment,
Speaker 5: because we're standing up to those people and that as
Speaker 5: a price to pay for that.
Speaker 1: Now, this is not acceptable. It is not acceptable. Salemia
Speaker 1: Manus can say whatever she wants during a job, but
Speaker 1: she should be absolutely safe on the way too and
Speaker 1: from it and when she is at home. This group
Speaker 1: is radioactive. This is a group who no political party,
Speaker 1: including the Greens, should be finding a way to sidle
Speaker 1: up to. The police should be doing their best to
Speaker 1: try to pull this group apart, and every state and
Speaker 1: federal government should be doing their best their best to
Speaker 1: rid this organization from the Australian workplace. That's just the reality.
Speaker 1: Why because you have a very powerful, strong and independent
Speaker 1: head of the ACTU saying this on radio publicly about
Speaker 1: clearly what she's been feeling privately for.
Speaker 5: Too long, thev helped understand the situation and the things
Speaker 5: that you've got to do as a result.
Speaker 12: Yeah.
Speaker 5: So, I mean, hopefully over time that'll get better, but
Speaker 5: you know, we're not walking away from what's got to
Speaker 5: happen now.
Speaker 1: While it is not ultraspecific to what's happening with Salem McManus,
Speaker 1: the general sensation of being stalked is something I want
Speaker 1: to talk about today. The Australian Bureau of Statistics gave us
Speaker 1: a shocking insight into a number of men and women
Speaker 1: who are being stalked at some point in their life
Speaker 1: after the age of fifteen. Now have a look at this.
Speaker 1: About two million women have been stalked at some point
Speaker 1: in their life, about six hundred and fifty three thousand
Speaker 1: men women one point nine million have been stalked by
Speaker 1: a man, three hundred and thirty three thousand have been
Speaker 1: stalked by a man, and more women are stalking men
Speaker 1: than men are stalking men here at three hundred and
Speaker 1: forty two thousand compared to two hundred and forty two
Speaker 1: thousand that have been stalking females. What does stalking mean? Well,
Speaker 1: thankfully they gave us a definition of those that have
Speaker 1: been stalked. The best part of what two point six
Speaker 1: million people in Australia. Seventy eight percent say that they
Speaker 1: have been stalked via the phone, the postal service, email,
Speaker 1: text messages or social media, they're loitering or hanging around
Speaker 1: a location that be it their work, their gym, or
Speaker 1: maybe their home, literally being followed or tracked. More than
Speaker 1: half of the two point six million victims that we
Speaker 1: know about of stalking, twenty six percent have seen inappropriate
Speaker 1: online posting or outright impersonation of them fake Twitter profiles
Speaker 1: and Instagram profiles. People are being interfered with or their
Speaker 1: property being damaged. Again, about a quarter sixteen percent have
Speaker 1: left objects where they would be found that were offensive
Speaker 1: or disturbing. Two point six million people. Now, if we've
Speaker 1: got the boss of the ACTU who is saying she's
Speaker 1: got to look over a shoulder and change your address,
Speaker 1: what about those who don't have the financial means to
Speaker 1: change their address. If there is a complaint made to police,
Speaker 1: it is very serious. It is borderline deadly serious. Men,
Speaker 1: women being stalked by men or women, All of it
Speaker 1: very serious. While I would hope that there is not
Speaker 1: a single person watching who has done this to somebody
Speaker 1: who they allegedly cared about at one point in your life,
Speaker 1: can I give you the tip, no matter how heartbroken
Speaker 1: you are being for whatever reason, stop stop right now.
Speaker 1: Stop with the texts. Stop with the emails, stop with
Speaker 1: the phone calls, with the letterbox drops, stop with the
Speaker 1: turning up, stop with the random phone calls to their parents.
Speaker 1: It's over, it's done. Life moves on. You have to,
Speaker 1: as I said, I'd return to what was happening in
Speaker 1: the United States just three weeks ago. Tonight, three weeks
Speaker 1: from tonight is when the results will be clear. We'll
Speaker 1: be on the rooftop in Washington, d C. After being
Speaker 1: part of an all day coverage, and of course many
Speaker 1: days between now and then. What an exciting time every
Speaker 1: night this week, Tazzy, next week, Queensland, the week after,
Speaker 1: into the United States. Always be here, set the DVR,
Speaker 1: get the podcast nine o'clock astraight in the eastern daylight time,
Speaker 1: each and every night here on Sky News. So, as
Speaker 1: I say, latest headlines, Donald Trump starting to get in
Speaker 1: front in all the key swing states. He's starting to
Speaker 1: look like he tonight, three weeks out, is winning this election.
Speaker 1: The media's response, they are turning it right up to Nuttsville.
Speaker 14: You know, you could say Trump was already a dangerous
Speaker 14: character before, but clearly losing the night the twenty twenty
Speaker 14: election has not improved his sense of fair play or
Speaker 14: thinking about the country over his own personal benefit. There
Speaker 14: were these moments where he would be honked about something
Speaker 14: and he would kind of ramble.
Speaker 6: I mean, this is kind of classic Donald Trump. For
Speaker 6: people who've covered him for a long time. We are
Speaker 6: used to seeing him have a discursive speaking style.
Speaker 11: But it has gotten more rambling, it has gotten more incoherent,
Speaker 11: and it's gotten longer.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they're trying to pretend that he is now Boden
Speaker 1: when Biden was Biden, and they all tell us that
Speaker 1: that was misinformation. They lied. Then they are lying now,
Speaker 1: all right, Like we'll dislike Donald Trump, pleas he ain't
Speaker 1: know Joe Biden when it comes to what's going on upstairs.
Speaker 1: As for Kamala Harris, it doesn't matter what fee she
Speaker 1: can stoke. She's trying to pretend that the bloke who's
Speaker 1: already been president and America survived will somehow bring the
Speaker 1: country to an end.
Speaker 15: Do you please respond to Trump's claim that he's going
Speaker 15: to use the Alien Enemies Act of seventeen ninety eight
Speaker 15: to round up immigrants if he wins the election. This
Speaker 15: law was last used to put Asian Americans in internment
Speaker 15: camps during World War Two, and I have a sneaking
Speaker 15: suspicion that if Trump wins, He's going to use this
Speaker 15: law to put anyone that doesn't look weight in camps.
Speaker 15: And I'm scared.
Speaker 12: Yeah, so you've hit on a really important point and
Speaker 12: expressed it. I think so well, which is he is
Speaker 12: achieving his intended effect.
Speaker 1: Atter rubbish didn't happen four years ago, it might be
Speaker 1: happening over the next four years. Feeding And then about
Speaker 1: twenty four hours ago, as she's trying to reach out
Speaker 1: to black male voters who are not voting in the
Speaker 1: same intensity that they did in previous elections for Democrats,
Speaker 1: because up to a quarter may well end up voting
Speaker 1: for Trump, she put out this tweet that was all
Speaker 1: aimed at ideas to win back male black voters. The
Speaker 1: first a million loans that are fully forgivable up to
Speaker 1: twenty thousand dollars. So that's not a line, that's a giveaway.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and she'll legalize marijuana, free lanes and pot.
Speaker 1: Meghan Kelly has something to say later in the show.
Speaker 6: The thing with the black voters is so disgusting.
Speaker 11: You tell me what they would say about a white candidate,
Speaker 11: say Trump, who decided to appeal to black voters by
Speaker 11: being like, I'll legalize weed. I know what you people want.
Speaker 1: It is literally racist. It is truly racist. But of course,
Speaker 1: because it's from the lefties, it's all just outreach Meghan
Speaker 1: Kelly in a moment or two time before then a
Speaker 1: ding dong battle. As always Bromba, Bishop Stephen Conry, you
Speaker 1: are in exactly the right place, not just tonight, but
Speaker 1: for at least the next month. Pull Murray Lave on
Speaker 1: Sky News two weeks to go to Queensland. We will
Speaker 1: be in Queensland next week. If you would like to
Speaker 1: join us for a special edition of the pub Test.
Speaker 1: Our special guest will be Peter Dutton taking questions from
Speaker 1: the audience. If you would like to join us this
Speaker 1: time next week next Wednesday, send me an email. Pub
Speaker 1: Test at skynews dot com dot A. You are you
Speaker 1: in Brisbane? Can you get to Brisbane for next Wednesday.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about the state election and we'll talk about
Speaker 1: things with the alternative Prime Minister next week here on
Speaker 1: Sky News. Let's fill the room tonight, Okay. Pub Test
Speaker 1: at skynews dot com dot AU. The carry out a
Speaker 1: champ on Wednesday night is none of them. Bromin Bishop
Speaker 1: the one who's just here to help and always somehow
Speaker 1: like Lucy in the football can't just kick that final goal,
Speaker 1: but he's all dressed up and he's here to help.
Speaker 1: With Stephen Conroy. So two weeks ago, when it comes
Speaker 1: to the Queensland election, Stephen, our first start with you.
Speaker 1: Are you hearing anything from Queensland that things are slightly
Speaker 1: closer than they see?
Speaker 16: Look, I think it's very hard when you're trying to
Speaker 16: seek a fourth term. You're going to struggle in modern politics,
Speaker 16: and so I think the result is going to be
Speaker 16: a tough night for Labor on all indications at the moment.
Speaker 16: I haven't heard anything from any of my good friends
Speaker 16: up there to suggest that there's a late swing back
Speaker 16: to us at this stage. So I think it's going
Speaker 16: to be a tough night. But it's three terms.
Speaker 1: But you know.
Speaker 16: The Premier is giving it a red hot go. But
Speaker 16: I think, yeah, the Olds just stacked against him just
Speaker 16: because twelve years very hard to ask for sixteen.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is what David Christofoli had to say in
Speaker 1: that Leader's debate today.
Speaker 4: They're not the numbers of drivers.
Speaker 3: They can't be when you think about what Queensland's going
Speaker 3: through at the moment. We've got an ambulance ramping at forty
Speaker 3: five percent.
Speaker 4: That drives me.
Speaker 1: He's referring, of course, to that exit poll which apparently
Speaker 1: was quite close to the final result last time. It
Speaker 1: shows labor with sorry that lives up in twenty five
Speaker 1: percent in some seats. What do you reckon?
Speaker 17: Well, I think they are going to win, But I
Speaker 17: think the most important thing about the selection news that
Speaker 17: the Greens go last.
Speaker 1: Bloody Earth.
Speaker 17: It's taken a long time to achieve, but that's a very,
Speaker 17: very important move. They are truly a vile party.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about Trump and Harris three weeks till this
Speaker 1: very night when we will find out what's going to
Speaker 1: happen Bromwin. Do you think like I do, that the
Speaker 1: numbers tonight are all leading in what we would believe
Speaker 1: is the right direction.
Speaker 17: Yes, I do, And I don't know whether they have
Speaker 17: adjusted their polling to factor in the reluctance of people
Speaker 17: to truly say how they're going to vote. But when
Speaker 17: Kamala first came in, I thought, oh, she'll get a
Speaker 17: sugar hit.
Speaker 1: And she did.
Speaker 17: But the more I watch it, it's vacuous, and I
Speaker 17: am filled with terror should she win, because America would
Speaker 17: be just so so weak. But I'm also very concerned.
Speaker 17: I think Obama's looking for a fourth term. He's been
Speaker 17: running Biden. He would really have preferred his own wife
Speaker 17: as the candidate, but that was a stretch too far
Speaker 17: for Biden, so he figures it can run Camilla anyway.
Speaker 1: Well, the good news is that Steven says going for
Speaker 1: a fourth term is difficult. May that be the case
Speaker 1: out against Stephen? Tell me where I'm wrong in some
Speaker 1: of the trajectories, right, I don't want anyone to think
Speaker 1: that I'm saying slam dunk Trump. That's it. He's won
Speaker 1: and we all look like the Hillary supporters from sixteen.
Speaker 1: But what do you think about what I presented as
Speaker 1: the bulk of where things are pointing?
Speaker 16: I think the poles have narrowed. I mean, as you've
Speaker 16: been focused on it's the seven key swing states, and
Speaker 16: you've been focused on, here's what the poles in these
Speaker 16: states have been pointing to. The only you know, the
Speaker 16: only thing about all of these poles over the last
Speaker 16: month or six weeks even is they're all within what
Speaker 16: you would call the margin of ras half a point
Speaker 16: or one point or you know, one and a half points,
Speaker 16: which are all within the margin of eraror now they
Speaker 16: could equally be all wrong in different directions, and there
Speaker 16: is I think you make the point, and Bromwin makes
Speaker 16: a point that there is the reluctance of Trump voters
Speaker 16: to identify. So it's really down to and I think
Speaker 16: you said, Paul, in sixteen and twenty the Poles under
Speaker 16: scored Trump, but in twenty two in the mid terms
Speaker 16: in the US, the Poles overstated the Republican vote. So
Speaker 16: there there are two things I'm trying to balance between.
Speaker 16: You know, what are these you know, within margin of
Speaker 16: errors made, but you'd have to say it's titans. And
Speaker 16: you know, the Trump camp are sounding confident and the
Speaker 16: word out of a Democrat camp is that they're starting
Speaker 16: to get nervous.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, look again, without boring everyone with the
Speaker 1: super detail on this, ideally you want to freak out
Speaker 1: two weeks out, not three weeks out, because theoretically you
Speaker 1: might be able to do something about the freak out.
Speaker 1: But can I just show you again Nate Silver, the
Speaker 1: bloke he used to run the Stats Guy at five
Speaker 1: point thirty eight again the race when it was Biden
Speaker 1: clear lead for Trump, then the switch back under the
Speaker 1: sugar hit. Then then of course the big swing back
Speaker 1: to Trump when she wasn't doing the wasn't answering anything.
Speaker 1: Then after that first debate where he obviously lost, and
Speaker 1: then he's been able to now start to pull things
Speaker 1: back in a trajectory that, as you say, you don't
Speaker 1: just sit. You see, there's a lot of crossover, and
Speaker 1: once it crosses over, it stays crossed over for a
Speaker 1: little while. Let's talk again about a little gift that
Speaker 1: is being given to Kamala Harris, particularly in the states
Speaker 1: with significant Arab American populations, is that Joe Biden has said,
Speaker 1: you've got thirty days to give more raid rather than
Speaker 1: bombs to the people of Gaza, or we're going to
Speaker 1: cut off the American bombs that help defend Israel Bromin. Obviously,
Speaker 1: it's very convenient to offer this up. Thirty days is
Speaker 1: longer than the election, meaning it can be dangled in
Speaker 1: front of these voters. The reality, I don't think they'll
Speaker 1: ever pull such a move. But what do you think, Well, I'm.
Speaker 17: Looking at Michigan with two hundred and forty two thousand Muslims,
Speaker 17: and I think that's domestic politics again, just as the
Speaker 17: same thing happens here, and I just think it pathetic.
Speaker 17: But it is very worrying to see on the international
Speaker 17: scene how weak the Democrats are in their commitment to democracy. Yes,
Speaker 17: they've given the additional defense mechanism to protect as well more,
Speaker 17: but I mean Israeli's circled.
Speaker 1: But also, Stephen, how does this not now? Again? I
Speaker 1: understand why the Biden administration is trying to send its
Speaker 1: smoke signal that way in a state that is won
Speaker 1: by a point here or a point there, But isn't
Speaker 1: it also a smoke signal to Iran that get ready
Speaker 1: in thirty days time, or even in the lead up
Speaker 1: to thirty days time, we might have you back.
Speaker 16: Well, look, firstly, I think you very correctly point out
Speaker 16: that it's after the election. What I think they're responding
Speaker 16: to is that there is Michigan has been a pretty
Speaker 16: good state for Camale she was installed, and Michigan is
Speaker 16: a worry that it's starting to slip and become possibly
Speaker 16: your Trump state off the back of clearly a drop
Speaker 16: off in support in that Muslim community. So I understand
Speaker 16: why they're playing that politics. But I agree entirely with you, Paul.
Speaker 16: It's very cynical. It's not till after the election, and
Speaker 16: it won't matter. It won't matter a zot after the election.
Speaker 1: Either at thirty seconds you can take the full or
Speaker 1: give Stephen fifteen albow and his new house Bromwin Well.
Speaker 17: Albo is now looking like the retired prime minister.
Speaker 1: He's checked out.
Speaker 17: He has a perfectly good house for her to live
Speaker 17: in in Marrickville, which is his place of residence. I
Speaker 17: just feel that the selfishness she is, selfishness of the
Speaker 17: man not to consider the plight of his own team,
Speaker 17: these marginal seat people who are tearing their hair at
Speaker 17: this stage. I would say, so everything he touches crashes.
Speaker 17: Whether it's the voice, whether it's the economy, it doesn't
Speaker 17: matter what it is. It just turns to absolute Well.
Speaker 17: I can't use that.
Speaker 1: Word Stephen literally one word answer helpful or two words unhelpful.
Speaker 16: I think it's been a tricky couple of days for him,
Speaker 16: with a focus completely away from the issues that they
Speaker 16: need to be focused on.
Speaker 1: All right, thank you, guys, do appreciate it. Again. Next
Speaker 1: week a couple of go to America. We'll be washing
Speaker 1: up or getting ready for Queens and next week as well.
Speaker 1: All right, quick break back with more. Meghan Kelly lots
Speaker 1: to say from the States, and she is more fired
Speaker 1: up than I've ever seen her before. Don't go anywhere
Speaker 1: than the late debate. About fourteen from now. Our favorite
Speaker 1: person to talk to in the entire world is Meghan
Speaker 1: Kelly from the United States. Just three weeks to go
Speaker 1: until the presidential election. We will know the results, hopefully
Speaker 1: this day. Three weeks from now. Meghan love you to
Speaker 1: see you.
Speaker 6: I mean three weeks.
Speaker 11: This is it and you can feel it in the
Speaker 11: messaging on her side. Trump is slow and steady, wins
Speaker 11: the race. He's not changed a thing. He's still putting
Speaker 11: himself out there. Just today he did a very contentious
Speaker 11: interview on economics, which was actually amazing. And you watch
Speaker 11: him sitting on stage for an hour and a half
Speaker 11: with this guy who clearly doesn't like him, and he
Speaker 11: took him on, he challenged him. Trump was actually pretty respectful.
Speaker 11: They sparred, but the point was, can you imagine Kamala
Speaker 11: Harris going an hour and a half with adversarial media.
Speaker 11: She has, however, changed her approach, and that includes putting
Speaker 11: herself out there at all. As you know, she was
Speaker 11: running like a basement campaign similar to President Biden when
Speaker 11: he ran in twenty twenty up until very recently, and
Speaker 11: obviously it wasn't working. There's zero chance they'd be taking
Speaker 11: the risks that they're taking now if they had good
Speaker 11: internal polling. You don't mess with the race if you
Speaker 11: have good internal polling. It's just more of the same,
Speaker 11: including going on Fox News on Wednesday night and weirdly
Speaker 11: putting out that she's in talks with Joe Rogan about
Speaker 11: possibly doing Rogan Show, which seems kind of hard to believe, like,
Speaker 11: apparently he's going to do Trump.
Speaker 6: Trump's going to do Rogan, which is good. Ah, is
Speaker 6: he really going to do Kamala?
Speaker 11: And by the way, even if he does, how on
Speaker 11: earth is she going to say yes to that? There
Speaker 11: is zero chance she can handle three hours live on
Speaker 11: Joe Rogan.
Speaker 1: Now, let's talk about Harris. You believe the data is
Speaker 1: she's starting to lose touch, but she's always a chance
Speaker 1: in a fifty to fifty race. She went on with
Speaker 1: the view she was asked questions like, so, what would
Speaker 1: you differently than Biden's done for the past four years.
Speaker 1: She couldn't answer the question. By this time tomorrow, she
Speaker 1: will have done an interview with Bret bear Over on
Speaker 1: Fox News. But he's going to hit her harder than
Speaker 1: anyone's hit her in the entire campaign. If she couldn't
Speaker 1: do the view, how's she going to be able to
Speaker 1: do Fox?
Speaker 11: The bar is low and the left will declare this
Speaker 11: victory if she doesn't walk away druling.
Speaker 6: You know, she went into the lions Den and she
Speaker 6: did fine.
Speaker 11: You know that's probably the going to be the takeaway
Speaker 11: without having seen it yet, but yeah, the stakes are
Speaker 11: high for Brett. I've known Brett for twenty years. I mean,
Speaker 11: I've anchored countless hours of television with Brett and seeing
Speaker 11: him do countless interviews.
Speaker 6: He's going to do fine. Brett's good.
Speaker 11: He's a mild mannered guy, but he can be aggressive
Speaker 11: in an interview in a totally appropriate way. He never
Speaker 11: emerges with somebody's jugular. But I predict he will follow
Speaker 11: up with the question was madam? The question was like,
Speaker 11: he's not going to let her just go on her
Speaker 11: little sojourns without reeling her back in come over here,
Speaker 11: I direct this interview, so I think we'll get that,
Speaker 11: which will be very satisfying. I definitely think he's going
Speaker 11: to ask her tough questions, you know, more pointed than
Speaker 11: we've heard in any other interview so far, and I think,
Speaker 11: thankfully a lot of them will come from a perspective
Speaker 11: of what conservatives want to see her asked. That's been
Speaker 11: one of our big frustrations, right. All of her questions,
Speaker 11: even the ones that are mildly challenging, are basically being
Speaker 11: asked by leftists who are trying to figure out the
Speaker 11: way we want questions asked and what might satisfy us.
Speaker 11: You know, like that guy in sixty minutes who was
Speaker 11: asking her about the border, why didn't you do it sooner?
Speaker 6: Why didn't you do it sooner?
Speaker 11: That's fine, but what really needed to be asked was
Speaker 11: why did you reverse all of Trump's executive orders tightening
Speaker 11: the border on day one of this administration. That's the
Speaker 11: real question is not why didn't you as a border
Speaker 11: bill earlier? It's like, why did you subvert the secure
Speaker 11: border from day one? I predict you will hear more
Speaker 11: pointed questions like that from Brett. The one frustration is
Speaker 11: we'll have two frustrations. Number One, Fox News is going
Speaker 11: to want ongoing access to her, both for the next
Speaker 11: three weeks and if this thing is like a sustained
Speaker 11: contest in the month or two thereafter, and if she's
Speaker 11: elected in the four to eight years thereafter. So they
Speaker 11: do have to be mindful of not blowing it up
Speaker 11: entirely in one interview. And I'm sure that they represented
Speaker 11: to her that it would be respectful and fair, which
Speaker 11: it will be.
Speaker 6: So that's one thing they need to worry about.
Speaker 11: And the other thing is they only have thirty minutes,
Speaker 11: and once she gets filibustering, it's hard, especially if you're
Speaker 11: a man, to keep interrupting her.
Speaker 6: You know how she is.
Speaker 11: I'm speaking, mister bear, I'm speaking, so to some extent,
Speaker 11: he's going to have to let her filibuster here and
Speaker 11: there and pick his moments of aggressively interrupting.
Speaker 1: Now, as we get closer three weeks Togo, nothing is
Speaker 1: subtle anymore. We know that she's got some problems with
Speaker 1: black men, a significant percentage he's going to vote for Trump.
Speaker 1: Majority will still vote for her. But what about her
Speaker 1: outreach program basically free lines, you don't have to pay
Speaker 1: back and.
Speaker 6: Marijuana because she stinks of desperation. That's why she's desperate.
Speaker 11: They must have seen some horrifying information on those internal polls.
Speaker 11: There is no other reason to be this obvious in
Speaker 11: your pandering. I mean, the thing with the men is
Speaker 11: just so amusing to watch from afar.
Speaker 6: Truly.
Speaker 11: You can just see them with looking at their horrid numbers,
Speaker 11: with men going, is there anyone here who's ever shot
Speaker 11: a bird or anything? Raise your hand if you've ever
Speaker 11: shot anything? Yeah, a pheasant, Yes, we'll take it. Okay,
Speaker 11: get out there. And then Tim Walls completely bumbles it.
Speaker 11: He can't even load his gun. All the real hunters
Speaker 11: are like, oh my god, that's horrifying. They can tell
Speaker 11: it's fake. They know this is a photo op. He,
Speaker 11: by the way, according to the reports.
Speaker 6: Didn't even fire his weapon forget get a bird. He
Speaker 6: didn't get a bird. He didn't even fire his weapon
Speaker 6: one time.
Speaker 11: And I think men who they're trying to appeal to,
Speaker 11: who are hunters, they're seeing right through it.
Speaker 6: The thing with the black voters is so disgusting.
Speaker 11: You tell me what they would say about a white candidate,
Speaker 11: say Trump, who decided to appeal to black voters. By
Speaker 11: being like, I'll legalize weed. I know what you people want.
Speaker 11: You want to be high all the time. I'll help
Speaker 11: you out. Oh and by the way, I'll help you
Speaker 11: out on bitcoin too, because what you like to do
Speaker 11: is get high and then make risky bitcoin bets in
Speaker 11: the market.
Speaker 6: That's what I think of you.
Speaker 11: What an insult right to the distinguished, well educated, non
Speaker 11: high drug population or black population out there that says,
Speaker 11: I don't do drugs, I don't know anything about bitcoin.
Speaker 11: I do know about your horrid economy, and i'd like
Speaker 11: you to speak to that right. Her whole proposal is
Speaker 11: assumes you have nothing and you need mother Mama law
Speaker 11: to come in there and save you. It's just absolutely
Speaker 11: insulting for me on the outside. It's fun to watch
Speaker 11: because she clearly doesn't know how to do it, and
Speaker 11: neither does her team. And that's nice for a change,
Speaker 11: because usually the Democrats are very good at the panda.
Speaker 6: It's just time is short.