Speaker 1: On scos Ostudio.
Speaker 2: This is the Wider Panalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Reader Panety Show. We
Speaker 3: have a big program for you tonight. I'll be joined
Speaker 3: by James Moron Kosher Gator to discuss the latest local
Speaker 3: international news, and a woman's rights campaigner will be here
Speaker 3: with a message for Olympic organizers and of course lefties
Speaker 3: losing it.
Speaker 4: We have an extended.
Speaker 3: Version for you tonight, including this rainbow lanyard wearing useful
Speaker 3: idiot who feels it's her right to refuse service to
Speaker 3: a Jewish man wanting to laminate a pro Israel article
Speaker 3: at office works.
Speaker 4: I'm pro Palestine.
Speaker 5: That's okay, here to do a job of laminade.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: We have the.
Speaker 6: Right to deny jobs.
Speaker 5: Is that an office works position or your personal position?
Speaker 4: It is an officer.
Speaker 6: We have the right to deny jobs.
Speaker 5: So office works position is that you're pro palestign and
Speaker 5: you won't take a lumina.
Speaker 4: Why that's my position, But.
Speaker 6: We have the right to deny jobs.
Speaker 3: Joining men as Mensi's Research Center Senior Fellow and Danube
Speaker 3: Institute visiting fellow Nick Cata, we will get to that
Speaker 3: shameful incident from Melbourne shortly. But let's start with a
Speaker 3: new immigration minister, Tony Burke, facing his first major challenge,
Speaker 3: with convicted foreign criminals still receiving sanctuary in Australia. The
Speaker 3: Australian Newspaper reports a convicted child sex offender from the
Speaker 3: Philippines and a Lebanese man who was part of a
Speaker 3: large scale drug operation have been spared deportation under the
Speaker 3: reworked visa cancelation instruction from Direction one oh one, Nick.
Speaker 7: They call it the Visa cancelation instruction. I think it's
Speaker 7: the Visa non constant Cancelation instruction actually Rita. But this
Speaker 7: is Tony Burke's chance to show that he really is
Speaker 7: a tough man, right Like he likes to present himself
Speaker 7: as a big tough guy in Parliament, you know, beating
Speaker 7: up on the opposition. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, there go
Speaker 7: Tony Burke. Let's see how tough he is. Because this
Speaker 7: is tough, this portfolio. And you have to be because
Speaker 7: you have to recognize that what rights Australia has towards
Speaker 7: non citizens And the answer is zero, that's right. I mean,
Speaker 7: the responsibility is towards citizens. And I don't know whether
Speaker 7: these characters had a chance to become citizens, but if
Speaker 7: they did, they would have had to swear an oath
Speaker 7: which said they're going to obey the law, which plenty
Speaker 7: they haven't in the most heedious way in both cases.
Speaker 7: So I just think that that labor is just completely
Speaker 7: lost it on this. They've joined this sort of international
Speaker 7: world without borders, anybody can come sort of philosophy, which
Speaker 7: doesn't happen here in Hungary, by the way. But you know,
Speaker 7: and I think they've just got to they've just got
Speaker 7: to recognize that Australians feel a great responsibility to those
Speaker 7: who are connected to the community in that they have
Speaker 7: gone to the trouble of taking out citizenship or they
Speaker 7: were born here. But everybody else no, particularly if they're criminals,
Speaker 7: we have no responsibility for them, and they should be
Speaker 7: at scent packing.
Speaker 3: We have to speak about Hungary when you're back. It's
Speaker 3: a fascinating country and they've got policies there that are
Speaker 3: really quite radical in some ways in the modern age,
Speaker 3: where they are promoting population growth but domestically not through immigration.
Speaker 3: And they've got some fascinating tax incentives. If you're a
Speaker 3: woman and you have a child, you get a twenty
Speaker 3: five percent discount on your income tax for life. If
Speaker 3: you have four children, you don't pay income tax at all.
Speaker 3: So the incentives are there and they are working. But
Speaker 3: we'll talk about that another day. Let's talk about the
Speaker 3: NT government. They've accepted seven hundred and thirty eight million
Speaker 3: in extra federal funding. There's under a promise to improve
Speaker 3: nap land results, lift attendance rates, increase number of year
Speaker 3: twelve graduates, particularly among Indigenous children. Because you look at
Speaker 3: the results they get right now under the Labor government,
Speaker 3: and it is absolutely appalling.
Speaker 4: The standards are declining.
Speaker 3: Among some of the most dire results in twenty twenty
Speaker 3: two to twenty three were twenty eight percent of Aboriginal
Speaker 3: students in year seven failing to meet minimum numerous they standards,
Speaker 3: Aboriginal attendance rates of fifty seven percent, and only thirty
Speaker 3: two percent of year twelve students Aboriginal year twelve students
Speaker 3: completing their high school certificate. There has to be a
Speaker 3: dramatic improvement in these results, Nick, if we've got any
Speaker 3: hope of closing the.
Speaker 7: Gap those who are actually worse than they look meat
Speaker 7: Because if you fifty no, you say, I mean up
Speaker 7: to fifty percent of Aboriginal kids, particularly in remote regional
Speaker 7: areas where the percentage is even higher by the way,
Speaker 7: don't go to school at all, so they didn't turn
Speaker 7: up to do the nap plant test, so they've not
Speaker 7: been tested. So I think this is absolutely dire result.
Speaker 7: It's quite frankly, it's a shame on the Northern Territory government.
Speaker 7: It's a shame on Australia really that we haven't been
Speaker 7: able to crack this issue of giving Indigenous kids exactly
Speaker 7: the same educational opportunities as non Indigenous kids. But it
Speaker 7: also shows reader that this is not about money, right.
Speaker 7: You remember that when the government, the last of the
Speaker 7: Gillard government, introduced to the new Gonsky Scheme, which was
Speaker 7: about sending more money out of the door. That has
Speaker 7: done nothing to improve education anywhere in Australia the best
Speaker 7: I can see. In fact, standards in most areas have
Speaker 7: gone down, and particularly with Indigenous kids. So you know,
Speaker 7: we've really got to look for a proper approach to
Speaker 7: this and obviously that the Anti government is not capable
Speaker 7: of delivering it.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 3: An office works employee in the suburb of Elston Week
Speaker 3: in Melbourne, a suburb that's got a significant Jewish population,
Speaker 3: has refused to serve a man because she says she's
Speaker 3: pro Palestinian and he was seeking to laminate an article
Speaker 3: from the Australian Jewish News.
Speaker 5: What's the reason of the name of I'm not comfortable
Speaker 5: proceeding with that party. You not the entire thing, the art.
Speaker 4: Comfortable, Nikka, this is just astonishing.
Speaker 3: I'll be playing the full clip later in left is
Speaker 3: losing it. But the article in question that seems to
Speaker 3: have triggered this young lady is written by a local rabbi.
Speaker 4: A man I know, a lovely man.
Speaker 3: Who's The headline there, as you saw, would have was
Speaker 3: about the spirit of the Jewish people. The image was
Speaker 3: of delegates holding an Australian an Israeli flag. What exactly
Speaker 3: was so triggering that that young woman refused service to
Speaker 3: that man refused to laminate that article.
Speaker 7: This is disgraceful, Reta, it really is that it had
Speaker 7: come to this in Australia. I wouldn't have believed it
Speaker 7: even a year ago, that you wish people are being reserved.
Speaker 7: Assume this guy was Jewish. I don't know. I mean,
Speaker 7: maybe you just like the article, but Jewish people being
Speaker 7: refused service in a shop like office works. Come off it.
Speaker 7: I think you know that this woman should be sacked
Speaker 7: office works, should you know, produce a really thorough reply
Speaker 7: and an apology to this gentleman and the entire Jewish
Speaker 7: community and the rest of the incident who are offended
Speaker 7: by this. And if they don't, well, I won't be
Speaker 7: going to office works. I mean, I'm afraid I was
Speaker 7: an office works addict ause most of us are on
Speaker 7: nipping in every other day for a pen or battery
Speaker 7: or something. Well, I'll tell you what, I've had three
Speaker 7: months in Europe weaning myself off office works and I'm
Speaker 7: not going back until we get an apology out of
Speaker 7: these people.
Speaker 3: And on a comical side notes, if you watch the
Speaker 3: full video, you see the young woman has got a
Speaker 3: rainbow LGBT type lanyard that she's wearing, and yet she's
Speaker 3: so vehemently pro Palestinian that she can't laminate a article
Speaker 3: about but from Australian Jewish News. Does you have any
Speaker 3: idea of how the LGBT community is treated.
Speaker 4: In and places like Gaza?
Speaker 3: I mean, is that even a consideration or the I mean,
Speaker 3: it's it is so frustrating the level of stupidity among
Speaker 3: some folks in our own community. Before you go, I
Speaker 3: want to ask you something about what's happening in Melbourne
Speaker 3: and our CBDs. It remains a depressing place and part
Speaker 3: of the reason is that offers vacancy rates other highest
Speaker 3: in the nation. The numbers of empty desks in Melbourne
Speaker 3: CBD is growing and the vacancy rate increased eighteen percent
Speaker 3: over the six months to July, from sixteen point six
Speaker 3: percent in January and fourteen point nine percent last July.
Speaker 3: City Traders Nick are pushing for the state government to
Speaker 3: take more action and ensure at least that public servants
Speaker 3: sharp to the offer. We've still got so many who
Speaker 3: are working from home or spending part of the week
Speaker 3: working from home.
Speaker 7: Look, reader, as I said a couple of weeks ago
Speaker 7: on this show, I'm on dodgy ground here right. I'm
Speaker 7: working from Hungary right now, so it's very difficult for
Speaker 7: me to people who've got to go back in the office.
Speaker 7: But I tell you what, public servants, definitely this is ridiculous.
Speaker 7: I mean, we all know that the productivity goes way
Speaker 7: down when people are working at home. You know they've
Speaker 7: got the captor shampoo. They've got this and that got
Speaker 7: to make another smoothie or some lonny thing. So look,
Speaker 7: I no, I think definitely, definitely that we want to
Speaker 7: see the government, the Victorian government, as if it would
Speaker 7: the Victorian government get its public servants servants back into
Speaker 7: the office, not three days a week, by the way, Rita,
Speaker 7: but five, five days a week because we know what happens.
Speaker 7: They all come in from Tuesday to Wednesday, take a
Speaker 7: four day weekend and those poor people that are trying
Speaker 7: to run sandwich stands in the middle of Melbourne go broke.
Speaker 7: So now let's get the CBD back up and running
Speaker 7: in Melbourne properly by having people working there.
Speaker 3: Yes, let's make Melbourne great again. Nikita, thank you so
Speaker 3: much for your time this evening.
Speaker 4: Thanks joining me now is Guy News.
Speaker 3: Contributor Kosher Gator. Let's start with the Olympics. Australia's female
Speaker 3: boxing captain, Caitlin Parker has hit out at the Olympics
Speaker 3: approval of two boxes who failed gender eligibility tests, calling
Speaker 3: the decision incredibly dangerous. Two boxes in the female category
Speaker 3: previously failed gender tests set by the International Boxing Association,
Speaker 3: who claimed the boxers chromosome tests came back as x
Speaker 3: Y instead of xx. You know that's female.
Speaker 4: XX.
Speaker 3: Parker joins the growing chorus of female boxes slamming the
Speaker 3: Olympics decision to allow these two boxes to compete. Gold
Speaker 3: medallist American boxer Calarissa Shields tweeted, so they got men
Speaker 3: fighting against women in the pics. I wouldn't have stood
Speaker 3: for no stuff like that. That is so heartbreaking to
Speaker 3: the women who have to have their dreams ruined by
Speaker 3: a man.
Speaker 4: Sad, and you can figure out the rest there. It
Speaker 4: certainly is sad. It's outrageous.
Speaker 3: I'm going to be talking about this later with a
Speaker 3: woman's rights campaign who's got some strong thoughts. But just
Speaker 3: the optics of having a man beating up a woman
Speaker 3: in a boxing competition and possibly being awarded with a
Speaker 3: medal for.
Speaker 6: It, it's absurd on every level of the optics the reality.
Speaker 6: We've had some cases. There was a volleyball player in
Speaker 6: a high school in the US who got seriously injured
Speaker 6: because a biological male was on the other side spiking
Speaker 6: the ball. Multiply that by one hundred, and that's what
Speaker 6: can happen with boxing. It's really important to demystify the
Speaker 6: language as you did there too, because they try to
Speaker 6: say that you know, they fail the gender eligibility to
Speaker 6: us know, if they have an XX versus an x
Speaker 6: Y chromosome, that's what this is about. That's very clarifying
Speaker 6: and sadly, I think the only thing it's going to
Speaker 6: take reader for this to change is something really drastic,
Speaker 6: because drastic times called for drastic measures. Either somebody's going
Speaker 6: to get really injured, which I hate to say, or
Speaker 6: it has to be really high profile, high visible protests
Speaker 6: beyond the tweets and the statements, which are very good
Speaker 6: for them Poker and then the American but they imagine
Speaker 6: if all the boxers or all the female athletes just
Speaker 6: completely boycotted the Olympics because of us, that would get
Speaker 6: the words.
Speaker 3: You know what, at the end of the day, I
Speaker 3: think that is going to be the only way it stops.
Speaker 3: If the women say in unison, not just one or
Speaker 3: two of them taking one for the team, in unison.
Speaker 4: Say no, we're not doing this. We're not getting in
Speaker 4: a ring with a bloke. That's not fair.
Speaker 3: That's why we've got men in female categories for a reason.
Speaker 4: Now, let's talk about the US election.
Speaker 3: Trump supporters have released another parody advert for the Kamala
Speaker 3: Harris campaign.
Speaker 4: Have a look.
Speaker 8: Look I get it.
Speaker 9: I'm unlikable, I'm an authentic I said crazy. It is
Speaker 9: time for us to do what we have been doing
Speaker 9: in that time is every day. Can we talk about
Speaker 9: the children of the community. They are a children of
Speaker 9: the community. You need to get to go and need
Speaker 9: to be able to get where you need to go
Speaker 9: to do.
Speaker 4: The work and get home.
Speaker 9: And yes, okay, I was the borders are and so
Speaker 9: even though I might have been a bad vice president,
Speaker 9: what I do have is ambition.
Speaker 4: You would not believe what I would do for this country.
Speaker 3: Mixture of AI comedy and most of the clips that
Speaker 3: are actually real, that's really Kamala saying some of those
Speaker 3: ridiculous things in her speeches, but humor memes videos like that.
Speaker 3: They're a big feature of this election campaign, and they
Speaker 3: really seem to speak to people who don't consume media
Speaker 3: as were used to. They're getting their media from new outlets,
Speaker 3: from social media, from podcasts, from all sorts of places.
Speaker 6: If a picture is worth a thousand words, I think
Speaker 6: these videos and parody videos are worth a million. They're
Speaker 6: sick people remember them having interleasing new Who's with Quanmedy
Speaker 6: isn't new like John Stewart and that genre used to
Speaker 6: do that. This just does it better, faster in real time.
Speaker 6: On a serious note, you know, as video editing technology
Speaker 6: and AI continues to grow, there might be some legislative
Speaker 6: issues that come in. I know Governor Gavin Newsom is
Speaker 6: challenging the ideas.
Speaker 3: Well, these are just ones fans, these unofficial campaign in ads.
Speaker 4: So these are just people on and as long as.
Speaker 6: It's disclaimed, which it is at the end, it's fine.
Speaker 6: It's not like you're misleading the person and you know
Speaker 6: they're memorable. And as you said in her case, I
Speaker 6: would say eighty percent of his real and twenty percent
Speaker 6: of it has added well.
Speaker 3: Talking about new ways of consuming news, podcast John Joe
Speaker 3: Rogan the most listened to.
Speaker 4: Podcast in the world.
Speaker 3: He's asking some serious questions about how Kamala Harris went
Speaker 3: from being the most unpopular vice president in history to
Speaker 3: now being some sort of a American hero.
Speaker 1: So everybody forever was like, Kamala Harris is the worst
Speaker 1: vice president. She's the least popular vice president of all time,
Speaker 1: and then in a moment, a moment in time, all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, she's our solution, she's our hero. Everybody's
Speaker 1: with her, all these social media posts about her. Try
Speaker 1: googling a negative story on her, you won't find one.
Speaker 4: Now, that is a key point.
Speaker 3: They're Google and Meta, that's Facebook, Instagram are certainly going
Speaker 3: out of their way to fortify another election. It's something
Speaker 3: that has been noticed by more and more Americans, including
Speaker 3: people big wigs in Silicon Valley like Elon Musk. That
Speaker 3: is a concern because Google's power in particular is enormous.
Speaker 3: They've got a virtual monopoly. That's how we find information.
Speaker 3: And there are so many examples of what people doing
Speaker 3: at Google. Search in Kate, for example, Donald Trump rally
Speaker 3: and all the top results are about Kamala Harris and trying.
Speaker 4: To get negative stories.
Speaker 3: Trying to find old stories on Kamala is becoming increasingly
Speaker 3: difficult because the first page is just populated by what
Speaker 3: looks like propaganda pieces very true.
Speaker 6: You know, we were talking just a moment ago about
Speaker 6: AI and all of that out piecing legislative frameworks. The
Speaker 6: biggest example of that is Google, most powerful company ever
Speaker 6: created in human history in terms of its market cap
Speaker 6: and the product they sells information flow, so it's extra
Speaker 6: doubly important. I think Trump's assassination attempt that was big
Speaker 6: news last week is not hard to find or searching
Speaker 6: for his rallies and hers come up.
Speaker 3: It's a big Facebook meta marked that iconic image of
Speaker 3: him putting his fist up on that fight motion with
Speaker 3: the American flag above his head. They said that was fake,
Speaker 3: and then they came out and apologized. But I think
Speaker 3: they that to apologize was they got caught.
Speaker 6: Right and there was a backlage, and they do it
Speaker 6: seven days later. So the damage in those seven days
Speaker 6: is irreversible to an extent. Because a lot of people
Speaker 6: are influenced by this, it's a huge issue. I think
Speaker 6: there's a Joe Rogan sized hall in the facade. There's
Speaker 6: an X and Newline Musk sized hole in the facade,
Speaker 6: So those few things are kind of poking at it, thankfully,
Speaker 6: otherwise you can only imagine without those platforms how powerful
Speaker 6: it would be. But yeah, it's a big problem. And
Speaker 6: I think Kamla is a case in point of somebody
Speaker 6: who was on record, very very unpopular, as evidenced by
Speaker 6: her poll results in the primaries. In real an election
Speaker 6: in San Francisco as the DA versus how She is
Speaker 6: now the palling which is tightening, says it all.
Speaker 3: Well, I'm not surprised it's tightening because we still have
Speaker 3: a large portion of the population and who do consume
Speaker 3: media through to those traditional methods, and it's just been
Speaker 3: a kamala honeymoonlike anything we've seen. It's been incredible to
Speaker 3: witness just Oh, they're not.
Speaker 4: Even subtle about it. I thought they'd be a bit
Speaker 4: more subtlety, but that.
Speaker 3: With that motorcycle manufacturer Harley Davidson, the iconic brand, they've
Speaker 3: angered many of their loyal base by going woke. Journalist
Speaker 3: Robbie Starbuck has exposed the company's leftist activism, and there's
Speaker 3: been a backlash from the company's mainly conservative customer base,
Speaker 3: including UFC start short Strickland.
Speaker 4: I've lined Harley's.
Speaker 3: Most my life, but I will never own a Harley again.
Speaker 4: If you love America, you will own a Harley.
Speaker 10: And let me explain to you guys, why I'm so
Speaker 10: upset and why you should be upset. The CEO Harley
Speaker 10: is a woke zond This man wrote the book on
Speaker 10: bocusm He wants a fundamental change who you are, how
Speaker 10: you live, and how you think, and how you raise.
Speaker 3: Your DAMI same some corporates still haven't learned from bud
Speaker 3: Light's self inflicted damage.
Speaker 6: Like bud Light, Harley Davidson, a great econic, one hundred
Speaker 6: and twenty year old American brand. There's so much imagery
Speaker 6: on it if you look back, you know, during World
Speaker 6: War Two and icons like Bridget Bordeaux on and all
Speaker 6: this stuff, and then now you see how far it's
Speaker 6: come away from the consumers that made it what it is.
Speaker 6: I think there's one of two explanations. Either they haven't learned,
Speaker 6: or if you want to be more sinister, they're doing
Speaker 6: exactly what the intent is, which is institutional capture. Taking
Speaker 6: over some of these iconic brands that are loved, truly
Speaker 6: loved by a certain side, one side of the political aisle,
Speaker 6: and you know, trying to throw a big monkey runge
Speaker 6: in them will.
Speaker 3: Be interesting to see because unlike bud Light a motorcycle,
Speaker 3: it's a lifestyle. It's a big investment. It's harder to
Speaker 3: walk away from. There's a five hundred beer brands you
Speaker 3: could pick from. There's not too many Harley Davidson's that
Speaker 3: you can replace if you love that lifestyle and love
Speaker 3: those bikes. But the backlash is certainly there. Whether it
Speaker 3: translates into lost sales, We'll keep an eye on Koshagata.
Speaker 3: Thank you so much for your time. This evening still
Speaker 3: to come, an extended version of left is losing it
Speaker 3: and Trump's spars with furious journalists. Next with James Morrow.
Speaker 4: Welcome back.
Speaker 3: Now it's time for lefties a losing it. You know,
Speaker 3: it's been a rough week for former Pink Floyd Dude
Speaker 3: Roger Waters. Not only has Israel taken out members of
Speaker 3: the Harmas and Hezbolla leadership, but his dictator mate down
Speaker 3: in Venezuela is facing mass protests after rigging an election
Speaker 3: that has prompted Waters to release this rant in defense
Speaker 3: of dictator Nicholas Maduro. And it's Elon Musk who he
Speaker 3: blames for the uprising in the South American country.
Speaker 11: Elon Musk Mask, he's posting anti Maduro tweets about Venezuela
Speaker 11: and the election that Nichola Maduro just won there. This
Speaker 11: is the Elon Musk who sat in front row seats
Speaker 11: probably given to him by his.
Speaker 12: Friend net Yahoo. The mass murderer. It's call the more
Speaker 12: crassie elon Moron.
Speaker 3: Look, I'm just happy Roger stopped talking to his imaginary mate,
Speaker 3: who is also called Roger.
Speaker 13: That's just weird. Calm down, Roger, calm down. Don't sink
Speaker 13: to this level. All right, I won't level, but stop shouting.
Speaker 8: Stop shouting back.
Speaker 13: Sorry.
Speaker 3: Now to the Melbourne suburb of elston Wick, which has
Speaker 3: a large Jewish population. And look how this office works
Speaker 3: employee treats a member of the community who wants to
Speaker 3: have an article from the Australian Jewish News laminated. This
Speaker 3: is hard to believe, but here it all is on tape.
Speaker 3: This is what leftist lunacy gets you.
Speaker 4: A young woman.
Speaker 3: Wearing a rainbow lanyard refusing service to a Jewish man
Speaker 3: because she's anti Israel and triggered by a news article.
Speaker 5: What's that I'm pro Palestine. That's okay, here to do
Speaker 5: a job of laminade.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we have the right to deny jobs.
Speaker 5: Is that an office works position or your personal position?
Speaker 4: It is an officer.
Speaker 6: We have the right to deny jobs.
Speaker 5: So office works position is that you're pro Palestine and
Speaker 5: you won't take a.
Speaker 4: Why that's my position. But we have the right to
Speaker 4: deny jobs.
Speaker 5: What's the reason of denying.
Speaker 4: I'm not comfortable proceeding with it.
Speaker 8: Which part are you?
Speaker 14: Not? The entire thing?
Speaker 3: The article, as you can say, the article has a
Speaker 3: headline about the spirit of the Jewish people and the
Speaker 3: image features delegates holding in Israeli and an Australian flag.
Speaker 3: It's written by a local rabbi. He is a wonderful man.
Speaker 3: What exactly is so awful about any of that? No
Speaker 3: matter how much you identify as pro Palestinian, Let's see
Speaker 3: what happens next.
Speaker 8: No, I've looked at the phone the headline.
Speaker 5: What's that You're in a Jewish community and we Israel.
Speaker 3: Judaism can be completely separate from what from religion?
Speaker 8: And what do you what are you separating the culture
Speaker 8: and the religion?
Speaker 5: Okay, so what's.
Speaker 8: Wrong with this? I'm just not comfortable with doing that.
Speaker 5: Okay, Well, maybe I can speak to your manager or another.
Speaker 5: So you're the manager of this whole store.
Speaker 4: She's the manager and she's not comfortable.
Speaker 3: If you thought that was bad, just wait because the
Speaker 3: video ends with her threatening to call the Corps. I
Speaker 3: am pro pala sign and that means reasons I'm not comfortable.
Speaker 5: Is politics played within office Works? Is that a personal
Speaker 5: staff members discretion to make decisions?
Speaker 8: We can, we have the right to do, and what
Speaker 8: are those reasons?
Speaker 4: Websites right?
Speaker 5: So what what what policy am I breaching by getting
Speaker 5: an article about?
Speaker 8: Are you reporting me?
Speaker 4: Can you not report to ask you to leave?
Speaker 5: No, that's okay, you can call it.
Speaker 8: You can call the police, the police.
Speaker 4: We won't be continuedsaction.
Speaker 3: Office Works is a multi billion dollar company owned by
Speaker 3: West Farmers, which we know like to get political. They
Speaker 3: pushed money into the failed race based referendum. But even
Speaker 3: they must be absolutely aghast at what had happened has
Speaker 3: happened in one of their stores.
Speaker 4: Absolutely shameful.
Speaker 3: Now to a woman who fought her heart out to
Speaker 3: keep schools closed as long as possible throughout COVID, who
Speaker 3: backs all the file left lunacy you see in so
Speaker 3: many American schools, and who is a walking, talking advertisement
Speaker 3: for homeschooling. This is Randy wind Garden, president of the
Speaker 3: American Federation of Teachers, a radical activist, And of course
Speaker 3: I left you losing it.
Speaker 15: But it is seldom a dramatic event or attack that
Speaker 15: lifts fascism in the door. The violence comes later after
Speaker 15: they are voted in. When the history books are written
Speaker 15: about this moment, let them record.
Speaker 16: That we the people united, mobilized and voted down this
Speaker 16: existential threat to democracy and freedom, that we continue the
Speaker 16: march for progress, that we lay the foundation for a
Speaker 16: better future, and that we sought to create a more
Speaker 16: perfect union. Progress is possible.
Speaker 2: Kike marching Ooh.
Speaker 3: I don't know about you, but that performance reminded me
Speaker 3: of anomagrites Vega.
Speaker 4: Take it away, Dwight.
Speaker 10: I say to you, and you will understand that it
Speaker 10: airs a privileged to fight.
Speaker 2: Blood alone moves the wheels of history.
Speaker 3: Now over and eight, Donald Trump sat down with a
Speaker 3: panel of cycled journalists at a conference for black journalists,
Speaker 3: and it didn't take long for the liftist activists on
Speaker 3: the panel to start losing it. Here is the abac's
Speaker 3: Rachel Scott.
Speaker 4: This is how she started.
Speaker 14: I want to start by addressing the elephant in the room, sir.
Speaker 14: A lot of people did not think it was appropriate
Speaker 14: for you to be here today.
Speaker 4: Yes, she started badly and it only got worse.
Speaker 3: This is unbelievable and just white fort Trump's response.
Speaker 14: You have told four congressmen women of color who were
Speaker 14: American citizens to go back to where they came from.
Speaker 14: You have used words like animal and rabbit to describe
Speaker 14: black district attorneys. You've attacked black journalists, calling them a loser,
Speaker 14: saying the questions that they ask are quote stupid and racist.
Speaker 14: You've had dinner with a white supremacist at your maraologue resort.
Speaker 14: So my question, sir, now that you are asking black supporters.
Speaker 4: To vote for you, why should.
Speaker 14: Black voters trust you after you have used language like that.
Speaker 10: Well, first of all, I don't think I've ever been
Speaker 10: asked a question so in such a horrible manner. A
Speaker 10: first question, you don't even say, hello, how are you?
Speaker 4: Are you with ABC?
Speaker 10: Because I think they're a fake news.
Speaker 15: Network, a terrible net work.
Speaker 10: And I think it's disgraceful that I came here in
Speaker 10: good spirit. I think it's a very rude introduction. I
Speaker 10: don't know exactly why you would do.
Speaker 16: Something like that.
Speaker 10: And let me go a step further. I was invited here,
Speaker 10: and I was told my opponent, whether it was Biden
Speaker 10: or Kamala, I was told my opponent was going to
Speaker 10: be here. It turned out my opponent isn't here. You
Speaker 10: invited me under false pretense, and then you said you
Speaker 10: can't do it with zoom. Well you know where's zoom.
Speaker 10: She's going to do it with zoom and she's not coming.
Speaker 10: And then you were half an hour l a just
Speaker 10: so we understand, I have too much respect for you
Speaker 10: to be late. They couldn't get their equipment working, and.
Speaker 3: Of course the race obsession was never far away. It's
Speaker 3: weird that the left loves DII policies, diversity equity inclusion.
Speaker 3: They think it's great and necessary, but when you point
Speaker 3: out someone is a DEI.
Speaker 4: Higher, they get all offended. Again.
Speaker 3: Trump's answer here had the lefties losing it.
Speaker 10: Define the define it from.
Speaker 14: Me if I just defined it, sir, Do you believe
Speaker 14: that Vice President Kamala Harris is only on the ticket
Speaker 14: because she is a black woman.
Speaker 4: Well, I can say no.
Speaker 10: I think it's maybe a little bit different. So she
Speaker 10: was always of Indian heritage and she was only promoting
Speaker 10: Indian heritage. I didn't know she was black until a
Speaker 10: number of years ago when she happened to turn black,
Speaker 10: and now she wants to be known as black. So
Speaker 10: I don't know is she Indian or is she black?
Speaker 14: She is always.
Speaker 13: Black.
Speaker 10: College I respect either one, but she obviously doesn't because
Speaker 10: she was Indian all the way. And then all of
Speaker 10: a sudden made a turn and she went she became
Speaker 10: a black.
Speaker 3: Pros And that answer had the media outrage. Had Dad
Speaker 3: he say she identified as Indian and not black. But
Speaker 3: here is AP News's headline, They said, Harris calls Trump's
Speaker 3: false claims about race the same old show. But wasn't
Speaker 3: it AP News who ran with his headline it I said,
Speaker 3: California's Kamala Harris becomes first Indian American US senator.
Speaker 4: That was back in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 3: And here is Kamala herself saying, fash in recent.
Speaker 2: Years, certainly you could become the first Indian senator in
Speaker 2: US history, which would be quite accomplishment.
Speaker 17: Not good because you are idiot, Yes, okay, And I
Speaker 17: don't know that everybody knows that, But I find that
Speaker 17: wherever I go and I see Indian people at the
Speaker 17: supermarket on the street, everyone's like, you know, Kamala Hara's
Speaker 17: is Indian, right, It's like our thing. We're so excited
Speaker 17: about to have you running for president, so we're both Indian.
Speaker 3: Look how I said is you can be Indian, you
Speaker 3: can be black. It can be Indian and Black, Indian
Speaker 3: and Jamaican. This obsession with race and basing your vote
Speaker 3: on the race or ethnicity of a.
Speaker 4: Candidate is just backward. That's stupid.
Speaker 3: Joining me now, Sky News, host of The US Report
Speaker 3: and co host of Outsiders, James Morrow Nylon Musk has
Speaker 3: been outspoken in recent days about what is happening in
Speaker 3: Venezuela after the sham elections in the South American country.
Speaker 3: He called President Nicholas Maduro a dictator. A. Maduro has
Speaker 3: called Mask the arch enemy of Venezuela's peace and accused
Speaker 3: him of promoting the fascist ideology of the extreme right.
Speaker 3: There is a mass uprising happening there right now. James,
Speaker 3: will we finally see the fall of this socialist dictator?
Speaker 2: Well, we can only hope, sir Rita. It's great to
Speaker 2: be with you this evening. You know, Nicholas Maduro is
Speaker 2: part of this whole Chevez Chavez style government there, which
Speaker 2: is you know, socialist or communists, basically incredibly brutal, incredibly repressive.
Speaker 2: They've taken one of the richest countries in the world
Speaker 2: and run it absolutely into the ground. And now they
Speaker 2: held this sham election, and hey, guess what is finally
Speaker 2: okay to question election results again? They've held this sham election.
Speaker 2: Even the New York Conset of was a sham that
Speaker 2: said and said, oh no, no, Berduro got all these
Speaker 2: late votes, and he's fine and he's in. But you know,
Speaker 2: we've seen incredible scenes of some police taking off the
Speaker 2: uniforms because they didn't want to fire on their own people.
Speaker 2: We've seen others of real terrible repression. You know, Maduro
Speaker 2: has to go. The question is how much pressure is
Speaker 2: the United States going to exert on this, because right
Speaker 2: now Biden has been relying on Venezuela for cheap oil
Speaker 2: to keep prices down at the pump of an election
Speaker 2: coming up.
Speaker 4: Good point, good point.
Speaker 3: Any you might be interested to know that according to
Speaker 3: the New York Times, when is Viola's are being destroyed
Speaker 3: not by socialism but what they call brutal capitalism. So
Speaker 3: this is some of the reporting we are seeing in
Speaker 3: the US. Now, let's talk about of the state of Massachusetts.
Speaker 3: The Senate of that state has passed a bill raising
Speaker 3: the concept of mothers and fathers from birth certificates, replacing
Speaker 3: them instead with person who gave birth and other parent.
Speaker 4: That's nice.
Speaker 3: The advocates for this plan argue this promotes legal parentage equality,
Speaker 3: and the bill will soon be finalized and sent to
Speaker 3: the governor for approval.
Speaker 2: James, Well, Rita, you know, I really can't believe how
Speaker 2: old rate and fascist this Massachusetts bill is, because you know,
Speaker 2: they are totally erasing every parent who identifies as a
Speaker 2: cat or an arter or an octopus by saying the
Speaker 2: person who gave birth is what is happening here in
Speaker 2: the once woke state of Massachusetts. Seriously, really, this is
Speaker 2: this is one of these things that is designed. I
Speaker 2: think it is an absolute attack on the family. It's
Speaker 2: an attack on the concepts of motherhood and fatherhood, which
Speaker 2: are both crucial to parenting and to children. And it's like,
Speaker 2: you know, we're trying to shrink the number of things
Speaker 2: we were allowed to say. It's something straight out of
Speaker 2: George Orwell. This is exactly what the news speak was
Speaker 2: in nineteen eighty four that he warned against. But of
Speaker 2: course these people think nineteen eighty four was an instruction manual.
Speaker 4: The following it very closely. Indeed, you're so right about that.
Speaker 3: Let's talk about Kamala because this is also Orwellian. We're
Speaker 3: being told she's this great, moderate, safe pair of hands, popular,
Speaker 3: visionary leader. But here she is in twenty nineteen, not
Speaker 3: that long ago, talking about wanting illegal immigrants to be
Speaker 3: put on the path to citizenship. It seems like she
Speaker 3: thinks that's the solution to the illegal immigration crisis.
Speaker 9: The idea that we would have a president of the
Speaker 9: United States that vilifies immigrants, that wants to build what
Speaker 9: I call his vanity project, a multi billion dollar wall,
Speaker 9: which by the way, will never get built, is un
Speaker 9: American deal with the problem. We have eleven million people
Speaker 9: here who need a pathway to citizenship. Be a leader
Speaker 9: on that, but we're not going to get that out
Speaker 9: of this present.
Speaker 4: Will this come back to haunt her?
Speaker 3: Because it's all well and good for these videos to
Speaker 3: be unearthed, some of them even more recent, some of
Speaker 3: them from six months ago, But if the media isn't
Speaker 3: going to highlight it, if they're going to run these
Speaker 3: bogus fact checks saying no, this isn't her position. She's
Speaker 3: now pro fracking, she's pro safe borders, she's pro economic prosperity.
Speaker 3: How are the American people are going to make a
Speaker 3: decision that's based on facts.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I mean, you know, we know that Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris has a long record of hard left progressive ideology.
Speaker 2: We also know that frankly, she's not all that bright,
Speaker 2: so we'd actually know how much he actually thought through this,
Speaker 2: whether it's just she was sort of the vibe of
Speaker 2: the time and what the Democrats were saying either way
Speaker 2: at the moment, though, as long as the media isn't
Speaker 2: giving her the scrutiny for this and so many other things,
Speaker 2: you know, including they should give illegal immigrants health care.
Speaker 2: She was attorney general in California when they decided to
Speaker 2: give illegal immigrants driver's licenses, which is absolutely insane to me.
Speaker 2: I don't know how that works. You know, until there's
Speaker 2: a media scrutiny, no one's going to know. She's going
Speaker 2: to be this blank slate that everybody can project their
Speaker 2: own sort of idea. Well, you know, this is what
Speaker 2: I think progress would look like, and they throw it
Speaker 2: on her. But it's also up to Donald Trump, I think,
Speaker 2: to really start to refocus his attacks, because he had
Speaker 2: all of the attacks on Joe Biden's Sleepy Joe. All
Speaker 2: that's out of the window. He's gone, and now he's
Speaker 2: got to start really focusing hard on Kamala Harris, border,
Speaker 2: the economy, crime, these things, because right now, you know,
Speaker 2: at the moment, the left is kind of getting to
Speaker 2: define the terms of what people are talking about. That's
Speaker 2: dangerous for it.
Speaker 3: I think they've got to get away with the get
Speaker 3: away from focusing so much on whether she's Indian, whether
Speaker 3: she's black, all those sorts of games, and actually get
Speaker 3: to the issues of substance and what matters is her
Speaker 3: track record.
Speaker 4: And it's shocking that.
Speaker 3: There's so much material for them to work with that
Speaker 3: they don't have to really try very hard to show
Speaker 3: the American people just how radically left she is. And
Speaker 3: I don't know, they seem to be preoccupied by a
Speaker 3: few trivial things at the moment.
Speaker 4: Now this isn't trivial.
Speaker 3: Fox News has obtained more footage from the Trumpet near
Speaker 3: assassination from one of the supporters there who was shot.
Speaker 3: It clearly shows the shooter moving about on the roof
Speaker 3: minutes before he opened fire. James, we know the director
Speaker 3: of the Secret Service, Kim Cheatle, has a stepped down
Speaker 3: in disgrace, but.
Speaker 4: That's not enough that can't be the end of this matter.
Speaker 3: The media and the Democrats want to memory hold this
Speaker 3: attempted assassination, but there needs to be some accountability for.
Speaker 4: The failures on that day.
Speaker 3: I mean, when you look at that footage, it is
Speaker 3: beyond belief that well he was allowed to take those
Speaker 3: shots and kill a man and also almost kill President Trump.
Speaker 2: It's you know, and it's just amazing how you think
Speaker 2: that we were maybe a half an inch away from
Speaker 2: American history being a very different thing right now, in
Speaker 2: America being a very different place right now, because you know,
Speaker 2: we watched it Rita, We saw it happen that morning,
Speaker 2: that Sunday morning here in Australia. You know, it's just shocking.
Speaker 2: And I also don't think that just mere resignations are
Speaker 2: enough here because there needs to be a really full
Speaker 2: deep in. That vision is just unreal. You know, how
Speaker 2: is it that the Secret Service let the president, the
Speaker 2: former president, the possible future president up on that stage
Speaker 2: when they knew that there was somebody running around with
Speaker 2: a rangefinder possibly a gun, and they let him out
Speaker 2: on that stage. How is that even possible? And then
Speaker 2: to see that vision where you know, we know from
Speaker 2: other shots that there were snipers on the roof behind Trump.
Speaker 2: They didn't see this figure running around on the roof
Speaker 2: across the way. I mean, it's not just about getting
Speaker 2: Kim Cheneld to resign. It's not just about myorcis even
Speaker 2: resigning or anything like that. This is about finding out
Speaker 2: the real dereliction of duty that happened here and why.
Speaker 3: And we know that Trump campaign wanted extra resources they
Speaker 3: were denied that. Since the attempted assassination, the Secret Service
Speaker 3: has advised the Trump campaign not to hold these outdoor rallies.
Speaker 3: To me, that's borderline election interference. That's how Trump campaigns.
Speaker 3: How can you ask Keim to change how he campaigns because.
Speaker 4: You're not competent enough to protect him?
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, I mean exactly right. I mean that really
Speaker 2: does feel like they're putting the thumbs on the scale
Speaker 2: and saying, you know, your big asset is your ability
Speaker 2: to speak to huge arenas, huge crowds, and we don't
Speaker 2: want you to do that anymore. Well, I'm sorry, he's
Speaker 2: the can that you figure out how to protect him.
Speaker 2: I mean, this is like saying, oh, you know, she
Speaker 2: was wearing a short skirt. She deserved it. This is
Speaker 2: you know, really just a real dereliction of their duties
Speaker 2: to protect everybody. And one of the interesting thing is is, too,
Speaker 2: is I think we're going to see bipartisan consensus on
Speaker 2: this too, because we saw during those hearings with Kimberly Cheedle,
Speaker 2: who's now resigned headed a secret service, how the Democrat,
Speaker 2: how many Democrat lawmakers were also furious because they all know,
Speaker 2: they all know that everybody's in jeopardy. It's not just
Speaker 2: Trump from some mad person out there for whatever reason.
Speaker 2: And they rely on this agency being as absolutely world
Speaker 2: class competent as it can be. They're not getting it,
Speaker 2: and democracy in America depends on it.
Speaker 4: Absolutely.
Speaker 3: Now, Donald Trump has appeared at a panel event held
Speaker 3: by the National Association of Black Journalists where it.
Speaker 4: Was quizzed on all sorts of issues.
Speaker 3: In a very hostile manner, I might add, And one
Speaker 3: of the discussion points, naturally was January.
Speaker 14: Sixth, were the people who assaulted those one hundred and
Speaker 14: forty officers, including those I just mentioned, patriots who deserve pardons?
Speaker 10: Well, let me bring it back to modern day, Like
Speaker 10: about five days ago, we had an attack on the capitol,
Speaker 10: horrible attack on the Capitol.
Speaker 4: You saw the people that were.
Speaker 10: Protesting and sprang these incredible monument's bells, lions, all these
Speaker 10: magnificent limestone and granite with red paint. They viciously attacked
Speaker 10: our government.
Speaker 6: What with police they fought?
Speaker 10: Were them much more openly than I saw on January sixth?
Speaker 4: What's going to happen to those people?
Speaker 10: What's going to happen to the people in Portland that destroyed?
Speaker 4: My question is on that, what's going to happen.
Speaker 14: Assaulted officers?
Speaker 6: You party?
Speaker 4: What going to happen? Absolutely?
Speaker 10: I would you would if they're innocent, I would pardon.
Speaker 4: Them, James.
Speaker 3: That answer is going to outrage the Trump haters, but
Speaker 3: it's precisely what Republicans want to hear. Are you surprised
Speaker 3: that he showed up to this event in Chicago?
Speaker 4: He would have known he wasn't going to get an
Speaker 4: easy go there.
Speaker 2: Yeah. But you know what's really interesting is you know
Speaker 2: who didn't show up there, reader, and that was Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: You know, Kamala Harris has been an absolute witness protection
Speaker 2: or I should say with list protection really given who
Speaker 2: we're talking about here, you know, and I think that
Speaker 2: good on Donald Trump. Whatever you think of his answers
Speaker 2: to that he said some fairly contentious things. I think
Speaker 2: he said some deliberately provocative things which are going to
Speaker 2: play out in some interesting ways over the next few
Speaker 2: days and weeks. But you know, he has never shied
Speaker 2: away from sitting down with hostile journal's hostile press, Kamala Harris,
Speaker 2: though the press go, it's gonna have a lot of
Speaker 2: questions to ask, or they should otherwise we're going to
Speaker 2: see another situation like where it was with Joe Biden
Speaker 2: for the first years of his administration, when basically, you know,
Speaker 2: the press gave him cover. They were treated like garbage
Speaker 2: by the Biden White House, you know, fed absolute you know,
Speaker 2: scraps and so on, and and told to you know,
Speaker 2: go write that essentially, but don't you know, ask anything
Speaker 2: with scrutiny, because again it's like this thing, well, well,
Speaker 2: we don't want to, you know, help Donald Trump out,
Speaker 2: so we're going to be really easy on the Democrat.
Speaker 2: I fear that's a pattern that we're falling into again.
Speaker 3: Rita, that's right, And Kamala is going to make an appearance,
Speaker 3: but it'll be via zoom, which Trump wasn't allowed to do.
Speaker 3: So he was upset about that as well. James Morrow,
Speaker 3: thank you for your time this evening. I'll see you
Speaker 3: Sunday morning.
Speaker 2: For outsiders, see you Sunday. Rita.
Speaker 3: Still to come is the Australian Nursing and mid Wiffery
Speaker 3: Federation being captured by trans Ideology. Rachel One joins me next,
Speaker 3: welcome back, joining me now as the CEO of Women's
Speaker 3: Forum Australia, Rachel Wong Rachel. Male violence against women is
Speaker 3: now an Olympic sport, apparently after the Olympics Committee approved
Speaker 3: two boxes who previously tested positive for male chromosomes, meaning
Speaker 3: you know they're men, they're allowed to compete.
Speaker 4: Against the women.
Speaker 3: How is this allowed to happen, particularly in a sport
Speaker 3: like boxing.
Speaker 4: Gosh, reader, it's just insane.
Speaker 18: It used to be the case that if you were
Speaker 18: a man beating up a woman, you'd go to prison,
Speaker 18: but now you get to be celebrated as an elite
Speaker 18: Olympic athlete. In terms of how it was allowed to happen, well,
Speaker 18: I mean, the reason we even have single six sport
Speaker 18: in the first place is reserved fans and safety for
Speaker 18: female athletes, particularly in contact sports like boxing. But we're
Speaker 18: in a situation now where gender ideology has captured sport entirely,
Speaker 18: and other institutions, some sports internationally are actually pushing back.
Speaker 18: But while sports like World Rugby and others were actually
Speaker 18: making things better for women and girls and restoring things
Speaker 18: to the way they should be and ensuring that biological
Speaker 18: males were not playing in the competitions, the International Olympics
Speaker 18: Committee actually a few years ago made their rules even
Speaker 18: more relaxed, which basically means that now they've left things
Speaker 18: up to the international federations to basically decide who they
Speaker 18: want to include. And as we heard the International Olympics
Speaker 18: Committee sports person say the other day, all you need
Speaker 18: now is a passport that says you're a woman, And
Speaker 18: if you're coming from a country that has these relaxed
Speaker 18: sex self id laws, then that doesn't really require much
Speaker 18: at all. And so it's incredibly problematic, and I'm not
Speaker 18: sure what it's going to take for these rules to change,
Speaker 18: because we've already seen were being injured in sports like
Speaker 18: boxing and other sports as.
Speaker 4: Well by biological males who are competing.
Speaker 18: So I don't know, are we going to have to
Speaker 18: see a woman die before the rules are changed. I
Speaker 18: think we're maybe in a place now where women just
Speaker 18: have to start boycotting these sports. But it really shouldn't
Speaker 18: be up to them, because why should they have to
Speaker 18: sacrifice all the hard work they put in. It should
Speaker 18: be the Olympic Committee and other sports that allow males
Speaker 18: to com eat and female competitions to actually tighten the
Speaker 18: rules and bring back fairness and safety foremen and girls.
Speaker 3: It is unfair for the women have to take action
Speaker 3: and miss out on events to try to have some
Speaker 3: sort of meaningful change and to have some sort of
Speaker 3: security that this isn't going to happen again and again,
Speaker 3: because you don't just go to the Olympics. You start
Speaker 3: training as a child. In many instances, it's years of
Speaker 3: grind and sacrifice, and then to have your place taken
Speaker 3: by a man, or to have to boycott an event
Speaker 3: because man is competing, it's not very fair on the women.
Speaker 3: But Rachel, I wonder whether that's what it's going to take,
Speaker 3: where the women in unison say we are not going
Speaker 3: to compete, and then they don't have an event, and
Speaker 3: perhaps then sanity will prevail.
Speaker 18: Yeah. I think sadly we may be at that point
Speaker 18: because like I said before, women have been injured.
Speaker 17: There have been.
Speaker 18: Situations in sport where it's clearly been unfair. I mean,
Speaker 18: we know that males have physical advantages over women in
Speaker 18: just about every sport where physical prowess is relevant, and
Speaker 18: yet there are still sporting bodies like the INTERNATIONALLYMPS Committee
Speaker 18: who are ignoring the evidence. And quite frankly, we don't
Speaker 18: even need evidence in research. It's very very obvious that
Speaker 18: males are stronger, faster and so on in relation to females.
Speaker 18: That's again why we have single sex sport in the
Speaker 18: first place. So unfortunately we may be at a stage
Speaker 18: where the women need to start boycotting. But as I said,
Speaker 18: it really should have to come to that, and it's
Speaker 18: not fair on the female athletes, but this entire situation
Speaker 18: isn't fair, and so if that's the only way to
Speaker 18: get it done, then that may be what has to
Speaker 18: happen now.
Speaker 3: An executive council member of the Australian Nursing and Midwiffery
Speaker 3: Federation here in Victoria, has written in the nation's trade
Speaker 3: magazine in the Union's trade magazine that the CAST review
Speaker 3: into gender firming care is bogus.
Speaker 4: She claims it's not an example.
Speaker 3: Of robust or ethical research, and it didn't have sound practices.
Speaker 3: It only included studies that were based on randomized control trials.
Speaker 4: What's your response to that.
Speaker 3: Rachel, Because again Australia seems to be somewhat of an
Speaker 3: outlier here. We've had a dramatic change in policy in
Speaker 3: the UK, many parts of Europe, throughout Scandinavia, many parts
Speaker 3: of the US. But in Australia we've ignored all that
Speaker 3: and we are going down this gender firming care method
Speaker 3: without really much criticism or inquiry.
Speaker 18: That's right, I mean reading that article, it's just more
Speaker 18: activist talking points. We saw when the Cash reviews first
Speaker 18: released that the activist lobby groups, the MPs who were
Speaker 18: on board, were scrambling to basically say that the review
Speaker 18: wasn't relevant, it wasn't done rigorously enough. Meanwhile, in the UK,
Speaker 18: after this four years isematic review by a highly esteemed pediatrician,
Speaker 18: they have now banned puberty blockers except in the cases
Speaker 18: of clinical trials. That has also actually carried on over
Speaker 18: into the new Labor government, which was actually quite surprising
Speaker 18: because weren't sure if label were going to be on
Speaker 18: board with this. But because they study the review was
Speaker 18: so well done they've actually said, well, no, we're going
Speaker 18: to continue while the Tories were doing, and we're going
Speaker 18: to actually put a permanent ban on puberty blockers. So
Speaker 18: all this is happening in the UK, things like that
Speaker 18: are happening in other jurisdictions as well. Meanwhile, Australians still
Speaker 18: have their in the sands and you've got again these
Speaker 18: activist talking points being spouted out, in this case by
Speaker 18: a union which is meant to be representing work because
Speaker 18: I'm not quite sure why they felt the need to
Speaker 18: weigh in on this, but we're seeing it again and
Speaker 18: again and again, and until the MPs and and the
Speaker 18: health practitioners start to listen to people other than the transactivists,
Speaker 18: we're going to continue going on down this road which
Speaker 18: is incredibly harmful, especially for children young people.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, and I know you've been calling for an inquiry
Speaker 3: locally so we can know precisely what's happening and what
Speaker 3: the outcomes have been here in Australia. Rachael Wong, thank
Speaker 3: you so much for your time this evening, and that's
Speaker 3: it from May.
Speaker 4: I'll see you tomorrow night.
Speaker 3: For Lefties losing it at nine point thirty Now it's Newsnight,
Speaker 3: good Night,