WEBVTT - Credlin | 12 August

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Peto Quedlin live from New twenty four.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 2>What do you expect of the Prime Minister? Maxige Goose

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>himself on social media? Good evening, Welcome to the program.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Here's what's coming up tonight on Credline, the housing debate

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 2>hots up. The Coalition finally today putting some sort of

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 2>number on net migration, but is it official policy? Up

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 2>with that to the Opposition leader Angus Taylor, who joins

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>me live a little later, plus still with the coalition.

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 2>News twenty four Pulse poll has the opposition primary vote

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 2>closing in now on both One Nation and the government,

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 2>as Angus Taylor starts the climb back from the catastrophic

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 2>wreckage of Susan Lee's time as leader.

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 3>More on that with Tom Connell.

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Pluster reports tonight Asio will get secret powers to investigate

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>university research ties with hostile nations and we'll look at

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>more fuel or over Australia's de radicalization programs. And Angus

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Taylor today going hard on the Prime Minister over his

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 2>crude treatment at the Japanese PM as Albin Ezi digs

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 2>in and refuses to apologize.

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 4>Why won't the Prime Minister stop treating us like fools?

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Manner and say sorry to the Prime Minister of Japan.

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 2>We will stay with that issue because is it any

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 2>wonder that people have lost faith in politicians when our

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister is a purveyor of smart and repeatedly appears

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 2>to have what can only be described as a pathological

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 2>aversion to the truth. It's one thing to make a mistake,

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>quite another to refuse to admit it and character eroding,

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>to double down and then insist you did nothing wrong.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 2>But that's the mo the modus of runde of Anthony Albanezi,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and he is shameless, whether it's falling off a stage

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>and then denying what was clearly caught on camera.

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 5>Stepped off the stage.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 6>I didn't fall over on my backside.

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 5>I stumbled, That's what happened.

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Or a negging on election commitments to cut household power.

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 6>Bills reducing power prices by two hundred and seventy five

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 6>dollars two hundred and seventy five.

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.119
<v Speaker 4>Dollars two hundred and seventy five.

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Dollars a year, or that promise made some fifty times

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>plus by his own reckoning not to touch taxes on investments.

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 7>Can you rule out any changes to negative gearing and

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 7>capital gains taxes.

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 5>How hard is it for the fiftieth time.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>The Prime minister's pattern of deceit, well, it now defines

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 2>him and that's deadly, particularly when facing off against the

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 2>likes of Pauline Hanson, who is nothing but a straight shooter,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 2>even where her candor costs her votes.

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 8>I think disgusting that the Prime Minister can't even admit

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 8>whether he got two melons, and this is the way

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 8>he goes about this on air. I think it's disgusting.

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 8>We know what the hell he was talking about.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 2>I was in the House of Representatives that day when

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Julia Gillard came in like a galleon with sales full

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and cannons ready, as Tony Abbott stood at the dispatch

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>box and demanded that she sacked Peter Slipper, her turncoat speaker,

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 2>for highly derogatory comments that Slipper had made about female

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 2>genitalia published in the media that morning. But because the

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 2>removal of Slipper could have sent her hung Parliament to

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the polls, Gillard defended the indefensible deploying that now infamous

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>misogyny speech to save her own political skin at the

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 2>expense of.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Women and girls.

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, can you imagine the outrage if Abbott had made

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 2>hand gestures about Melon's and a female politician, rather than

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 2>merely as he did look at his watch, or Scott

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Morrison or Peter Dutton. Not only was Albanese's mocking of

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>a generous ceremonial gift from his Japanese counterpart ill judged

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>given the concern that Tokyo already has about his closest

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 2>to Beijing, but to use clearly sexual innuenda innuendo to

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Garners social media likes at the expense of our allies

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 2>first ever female leader was crass beyond belief. When was

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the last time that the member for grain Love stood

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 2>on the stage to give a sober economic speech as

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 2>opposed according influences with vacuous questions to even more vacuous

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 2>vacuous answers to even more vacuous questions.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 5>Budget late next week, listen up, very surreal.

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 6>Jeers by Abes and welcome to Happy Hour with Lucy

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 6>Nikki and the Prime Minister.

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, who's running the media strategy in his office

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 2>or any of these labor offices anyway? So enamored are

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 2>they all with TikTok sound bites and trending reels.

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 5>Mister Christmas to speak.

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 2>That labors Delulu if they think drivel like this goes

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 2>down well with everyday Australians at a time where their

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 2>house values are tanking, crimes spiking, and people are worried

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 2>about whether they can cover their power bills. It's indulgent.

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 2>It cheapens the high office that he occupies. He doesn't

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>own it, It just occupies it. Not that Alvin Easy

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 2>or his team appreciate that subtle but critical difference. What

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>stays me is the gas lighting. He insults our intelligence,

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 2>pretending that in a discussion about melons and Pamela Anderson

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 2>whilst juggling his chairs, hands in front of his chest,

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 2>as if it's anything other than what.

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 3>We know it was. The Japanese Prime Minister brought a melon?

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Did she smuggle it?

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 6>Got a couple of melons she brought too, She brought too,

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 6>as you.

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Do, Pamela Anderson melons. I mean, this is straight out

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>of the Daniel Andrews playbook.

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Try and tell people that what they saw they saw

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 2>it as black nut.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 3>It's white that what.

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 2>He did he didn't do, or what he said he

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't say. I mean, give me a contrite, Peter Beatty

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 2>any time. Give me any politician ready to say sorry

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 2>when they make a mistake, rather than one like this

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 2>that treats us with such contempt. And speaking of contempt,

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know who deserves the opprobrium more mister Albert

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Sleezy or his handbag hit squad of mean girls as

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.679
<v Speaker 2>they raced out to defend what, if said by anyone else,

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 2>would have been worse than a war crime. Just like

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 2>none of them seem to have watched the degrading so

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>called skit involving the mining billionaire Gina Reinheart, saying that

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 2>it was a matter for the ABC that they could

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 2>not comment on the content. What was it about the

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>conservative politics of Sano Takahatchi that meant she was denied

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 2>that a ritual defense so readily granted to women on

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the left. How galling must be for these labor women.

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're used as sheerler shields for alban easy,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>but how weak of them to go along with it.

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 2>In my day, women politicians told to get out there

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and defend the indefensible would have told the person at

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>the end of the phone it gets staffed, but not

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 2>these women of modern labor, quick to lecture all of

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 2>us about a kind of gentler parliament, quick to lecture

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 2>about the need for quotas to give women a fair go,

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 2>and yet so quick to produce themselves to be little

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>more than Patsy's for a craftsman who's diminishing faster than

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>even his critics would believe. The Prime Minister has been

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 2>very clear that the type of inference that you're applying

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 2>there is not what he was.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 9>What we have heard from the Japanese side of this

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 9>is there has been a sensationalized reporting of something that,

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 9>as the Prime Minister has been very clear about, has

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:35.599
<v Speaker 9>been mischaracterized.

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 10>The comments and the remarks from the Prime Minister have

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 10>been misinterpreted. The Prime Minister is very clear that he

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 10>did not mean for those comments to be interpreting the

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 10>way they have by some media outlets and by our

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 10>political opponents.

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Come on, girls, we will see you. But no one

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 2>should be surprised by that. Look at the track record

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 2>of these women and their treatment of liberals like Linda

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Reynolds and Fiona Brown, both now exonerated over allegations they

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 2>acted to damage Britney Higgins, and yet still no apology

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 2>for either woman. Spare thought too for their own colleague

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>who had the courage to call them Mount Kimberly Kitchen,

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 2>the late ALP senator ostracized by her own side for

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 2>daring to warn Reynolds of the coming storm, or fellow

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 2>labor victorian the late Jane Garrett, who showed incredible bravery

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>holding fast to ministerial standards that were then being debased

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 2>by Daniel Andrews, as laid out in last week's long

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 2>awaited Iback report. When it comes to integrity the left

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 2>of frauds, I couldn't imagine Peter Malinowskis or Chris Min's

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 2>behaving as the Prime Minister did in that low rent podcast.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't imagine Kim Beasley entertaining a question about shagging

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Kylie Mino. I just can't every guests he gets asked

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 2>these shag Mary date Kylie Minogue, Nicole Kidman or Ronda Birchmore.

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 3>I've just got married, I'm only six months in. Well,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>if it goes tits up, let's just pretend.

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 2>Oh Kylie, clearly he married Kylie and Shagger and data.

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 4>All of the above.

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how unedifying is that None of that now

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 2>notorious podcast was broadcast live, none of it.

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 3>It was all pre recorded there that's the sitting room.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 2>At the lodge, So how did it even make its

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 2>way to air? There's something off, creepy off about Albertez's

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 2>desperation to be faded by twenty somethings. Maybe it's because,

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 2>having once had his face on a can of beer,

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 2>it's all gone to his head now. I don't know

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 2>about this DJ Albow, but that's not who I want

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>to see on the international stage representing my country. I mean,

0:10:58.280 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 2>are we really going back to the days of beating

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Hill with this bloke? Give me a daggy John Howard

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 2>in a tract suit any day. Humility will now be

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 2>the biggest test for the Prime minister. Will he have

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the intestinal fortitude to personally apologize to the Japanese Prime

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Minister and to the Australian public who know exactly what

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 2>they saw on that podcast.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Well we will see. But today, whether it's a.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Travel roads of his MPs or his own budget lies.

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Almines has got a glass jaw, and that means he

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 2>rarely admits to being wrong, even when he is, and

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 2>to all those labor women who are out on camera

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 2>this week defending him, that footage is there.

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 3>We'll keep it so that the next.

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Time you get on your high horse when someone offends

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 2>your gender sensibilities or we will use it when you

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 2>go out there and you defend the indefensible, like you

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 2>are now rendering your right to criticize others, because yet again,

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the standard you are walking past as labor women is

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the standard you accept now. Honestly, ladies, how low will

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 2>you go? Let's get the headlines out of Canberra. Political

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>reporter Ruven Spargo.

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 11>Good evening the Prime Minister is refusing to apologize to

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 11>his Japanese counterpart over the melon controversy. Pauline Hanson is

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 11>taking Anthony Albenezi to task over his podcast appearance.

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 8>The way he goes about this on a I think

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 8>it's disgusting. We know what the hell he was talking about.

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 11>The Coalition has asked the Federal Police to investigate who

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 11>leaked diplomatic correspondents from Japan over the incident.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Why won't the Prime Minister stop treating us like fools?

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Man up and say sorry to the Prime Minister of Japan.

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 12>My office and my team have spent four years carefully

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 12>rebuilding our relationships.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 11>Labour insists the podcast appearance has not damaged to Australia's

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 11>relationship with Japan. The Coalition is vowing to slash a

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 11>long list of construction standards in a bid to lower

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 11>the cost of building homes and tackle Australia's housing shortfall.

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 11>It wants to cut more than two thousand pages of

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 11>building rules down to just eighty Everything beyond basic safety

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 11>standards would become an optional extra, including accessibility and energy

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 11>efficiency requirements.

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 13>It is illegal to build a cheap house in Australia,

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 13>which is outrageous. The house won't be gold plated, but

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 13>it won't fall down.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 11>The Coalition has confirmed it wants to cut net overseas

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 11>migration to fewer than one hundred and eighty thousand people

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 11>a year to ease pressure on housing demand.

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 2>There are good signs here of improvement for the Coalition

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 2>if you have a look at the trend under Angus

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Taylor's leadership. The Coalition is starting to close the gap

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 2>on both One Nation and the Government, and there's a

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 2>boost in personal support too for the opposition leader. News

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty four Chief Election analyst Tom Connell has more.

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 14>Peter, the gap between the Coalition and One Nation is

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 14>something we've been monitoring. It has closed again. The latest

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 14>news twenty four Pulse. Not a lot of movement in

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 14>this primary vote, but one nation down. The one percentage

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 14>point in the gap is now at two percent.

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 15>So why this focus.

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's track this.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 14>Over time and look at the primary vote of what

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 14>i'll call the Big three, going back to November last year.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 14>Labor then was still clearly in front of thirty two percent.

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 14>One Nation had begun to surge, remember six percent of

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 14>the election, so it's up to eighteen here the coalition

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 14>on twenty five, a summer dominated by the Bondai terror attack.

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 14>We had one nation edging ahead by January, but not

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 14>a big margin, twenty three to nineteen. In February Susan

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 14>Lee was replaced by March. The Coalition gap and One

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 14>Nation gap is growing. It's nine percentage point and then

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 14>the peak coming at the end of June thirteen percentage points.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 14>That's massive, but it has closed up pretty quickly. In

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 14>July it was down to six percentage points. Then you

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 14>get to now August, it's only two percent. The open

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 14>question we don't know the answer. Has one nation peaked

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 14>after perhaps what we'd call a post Bondi surge the

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 14>Prime minister's personal numbers. Meanwhile, they have dipped again. Satisfied

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 14>is down and dissatisfied up, so down three percent overall

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 14>the minus twenty one percent net satisfaction That is about

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 14>where Peter Dutton was before the last election, but it's

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.239
<v Speaker 14>still well ahead of where Susan.

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Lee got to.

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 15>Let's look at the opposition leaders net satisfaction over time

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 15>as well. Beginning in February.

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 14>This was when Susan Lee had her last result minus

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 14>forty percent net satisfaction, so comparing those unhappy with her

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 14>compared to happy, that is about as bad as it gets.

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 14>There was an instant bump for Angus Taylor back up

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 14>to minus eight percent, and then maybe it's a honeymoon period.

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 15>He got to almost neutral at minus.

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 14>One a pretty sustained slide after then May jun in

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 14>July down to minus sixteen percent, but in our latest

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 14>poll he's received a much needed boost, up five percentage.

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 15>Points in one poll at minus eleven.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 14>Now, any leader would rather be in positive territory, but

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 14>in opposition your job is to criticize, particularly early.

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 15>On in a term when you're not fleshing out your

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 15>own plan.

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 14>So if you look at these numbers minus eleven overall

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 14>and at the moment heading in the right direction he

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 14>needs to get his primary vote up, these numbers themselves,

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 14>they won't be.

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 15>A major concern for Angus Taylor, all right.

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 2>One political observation I bake there on that movement. As

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Tom said, there was a bit of a boost for

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Angus Taylor's personal ratings and there was a bit of

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>a slide and then there's been a boost back again.

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 2>A lot of that, in my view, has to do

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 2>with when Parliament is on and in that hiatus when

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 2>it fell away. The high point was obviously around the

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Budget reply speech he gave in Budget week. When it

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 2>falls away, it's when the opposition's not in a around Parliament,

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 2>they're not in the mix at night in the media

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 2>and they're not pumping out the content as they normally do.

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 2>So this will be something that the opposition will have

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 2>to watch closely.

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's get into the other issues.

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 2>I've got a Padel now joining me and News threenty

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 2>four contributor Cali cats and Barness and Deputy and director

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 2>at the Institute of Public Affairs, Dan Wild. Welcome to

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 2>you both, Carolee. I want to start with Question Time today.

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 2>They pushed really hard on the Prime Minister, who is

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 2>still refusing to apologize for the crude and sexist gestures

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 2>about the Japanese Prime Minister.

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Have a listen.

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Why won't the Prime Minister stop treating us like fools?

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 4>Man up and say sorry to the Prime Minister of Japan.

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 6>Can the Prime Minister assure the House that neither his

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 6>office nor his department leaked official and private correspondence from

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 6>the government of Japan. The Prime Minister has now been

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 6>asked three times why he will not apologize to the

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 6>Prime Minister of Japan for his appalling behavior on the

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 6>Bush Deep podcast.

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, we all know what we saw.

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I think out there in the real world people know

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 2>exactly what they saw. And this defense by the Prime Minister,

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 2>digging in the defense by all these women in this

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 2>front bench saying it's all been misinterpreted. I don't think

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 2>this is going to help him at all. This is

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 2>not when Rudd went to the Scores nightclub, the strip

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>club in New York. This is coming after a female

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 2>counterpart world leader.

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 3>It's a very very different thing, Kroly.

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 16>It shows a lack of respect to the Japanese Prime Minister,

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 16>and it also shows a lot of arrogance and Hubrit's

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 16>midway through the second term. The thing is you can't

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 16>change what you don't acknowledge. And the bottom line is

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 16>if Anthony Albanezi doesn't think that what he said and

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 16>did is offensive, doesn't matter how many times people try

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:58.959
<v Speaker 16>and point that out. He won't accept it because there

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 16>is no class to the man and he is not

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 16>a leader. The interesting thing to me is Tanya Plibersic,

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 16>as we know, seen as a long term rival from

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.959
<v Speaker 16>the same left faction as him. She was left on

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 16>you know, morning television having to defend him, and we

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 16>know that that's a poison chalice, isn't it. Because he

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 16>dumped her originally from education, put her an environment, then

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 16>dumped her from that, put her to water, put her

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 16>to social services.

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 3>So he's got a.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 16>Right where he wants her. You've then got Katie Gallagher,

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 16>the finance who came out as well, well you know

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 16>the alleged allegations before as being.

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 3>One of the mean girls.

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 16>He's got these women trying to defend him, who in

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 16>their own right have their own issues in the public

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 16>eye as well. And I just think it is incredibly

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 16>rude because as we know with the Prime MINISTERY has

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 16>a history of this, you know that Tetchie press conference

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 16>where he's at all for the fiftieth time, we're not

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 16>going to change, you know, to capital gains tax or

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 16>negative gearing, and he did. We've had the two hundred

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 16>and seventy five dollars energy bill credit that didn't come out.

0:19:59.240 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 3>We've had the.

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 16>Fall off the stage. I stepped off the stage. We've

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 16>had the promise of him going to the Northern Territory

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 16>to the Gama Festival, he hasn't done that. And then

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 16>poor Diddams he hasn't had a day off in a year,

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 16>so he went to take leave. I just think the

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 16>fact that he's not acknowledging this shows that he has

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 16>something to hide. And regardless of what he says, he

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 16>seems to dine out on, the eyes of.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 3>The world are on Australia.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 16>Well, he needs to wake up and realize that our

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 16>standing in the world, this is headlining around the world

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 16>still and the fact that he's refusing to apologize is

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.239
<v Speaker 16>just disgraceful because he did say it, he did do it.

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 16>The vision is there, and what can you say? He's

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 16>an embarrassment to Australia.

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm calling him Melvo sleazy Dan. I think that's

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 2>one part of the problem. The other is this ridiculous

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 2>defense by these women. I mean, I would not get

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 2>out there and defend the indefensible. Would no matter what

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>a Prime Minister's office woulded have threatened me with.

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 3>I just wouldn't have that against my name. So you

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 3>know them and they are weak to do that.

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 2>But I guess my biggest issue really with the whole

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 2>thing is it's the trust deficit. You know, this bloke

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 2>is a pathological liar. It's now part of the narrative

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Dan about him. And this I think is really rich

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 2>territory for the opposition heading into an election because if

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 2>you can't trust anything this bloke says, how on earth

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 2>can he be re elected?

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 15>Well, that's right.

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 7>And I think also the point that you've made tonight

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 7>and the other night was the hypocrisy of this all.

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 7>I mean, just imagine if the shoe was on the

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 7>other foot. Imagine if this was a center right political leader.

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 7>Imagine this was Angus Taylor or Matt Canavan who made

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 7>comments like this, you can imagine the reaction would be

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 7>apocalyptic from the media and from labor and from the

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 7>Green So the hypocrisy is something that frustrates me and

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 7>frustrates many Australians in addition to the obvious gas lighting.

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 15>I mean, this is what's so annoying.

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 7>We are constantly told by a political leader is don't

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 7>believe your own eyes. Whether it's to do with immigration,

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 7>don't believe your own eyes, whether it's to do with

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 7>living standards going backwards, don't believe your own eyes, or

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:10.719
<v Speaker 7>whether it's to do with the actual words and the

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 7>actions that the Prime Minister said and the Prime Minister performed.

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 7>Everybody knows what he was gesturing. Everybody know what he meant.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 7>Just fess up and apologize and move on. And the

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 7>fact that he won't do that for me is the

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 7>most frustrating and demeaning part of this whole episode.

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I know you've watched Dan very closely, all the numbers

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 2>coming in from the ABS about migration. We've got a

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 2>whole set of targets out there today. We got one

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 2>in part from the Coalition, from the Housing shadow Andrew

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 2>Bragg announcing net migration targets of around one hundred and

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 2>eighty thousand people per year on average.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 13>Have a listen, the shortfall between number of houses built

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 13>and the number of people coming in is three fifty

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 13>to four hundred thousand. That and so you need to

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 13>have a non summary around one hundred and eighty thousand

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 13>to bridge that gap over the fort estimates period.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Like that's just the range.

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so the non slides did it? That number?

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 2>It's forty five thousand less than labor in the short

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 2>term forecast. And let's not forget they've never met any

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 2>of their forecasts. And it's one hundred and twenty thousand

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 2>below what we saw in the actuals last year, Dan

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 2>bitter meat on the bone bones here finally from the coalition,

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 2>what do you make of it?

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, that number is way too high. One hundred and

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 7>eighty thousand is way too high. We've had one point

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 7>five million over the last few years.

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>This is not good.

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 7>And I don't know why Andrew Bragg is announcing policy

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 7>that doesn't have approval. I mean I interpreted this as

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 7>a direct threat, a direct challenge to Angus Taylor's leadership.

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Authority.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 7>Really, I think this is the first salvo in the

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 7>next leadership spill against Angus Taylor. Why hasn't Angus Taylor

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 7>clarified this, Why hasn't he slapped this down? Why hasn't

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 7>Andrew Bragg being sent to the back bench for this?

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean this is insane. Who's running the party? Is

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 7>Angus Taylor in charge or Andrew Bragg? I mean Andrew

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 7>Brake himself said that this is not party policy and

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 7>that no one else supports the number, So why is

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 7>he putting a number out now? I get that he's

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:25.360
<v Speaker 7>housing shadow, and yes there's a nexus between housing and migration,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 7>and what Andrew Bragg said about housing was spot on,

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 7>about cutting the red tape, about making sure we don't

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 7>gold plate and so forth. But I don't understand why

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 7>these numbers are being put out there if they're not

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 7>official government, not official Liberal Party policy. It seems bizarre

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 7>to me. So really, I think that Angus Taylor needs

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 7>to get in control of this because if they're going

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 7>to the next election with one hundred and eighty thousand

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 7>and with a policy of multiculturalism, I can tell you

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 7>what people are going to be taking off their blue

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 7>shirts and been putting orange shirts on pretty soon because

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 7>those numbers aren't going to cut it. We're not in

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 7>the nineteen nineties anymore. We're not living in the Howard era.

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 7>We need a dramatic, urgent, corrective action. Immigration is a

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 7>national emergency. It's not just another policy. So I just

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 7>think the Liberal Party needs to get in front of this,

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 7>otherwise it's going to get away from them.

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've got Angus Taylor coming up. I'll ask him

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 2>pretty much all of those questions you've just put out there.

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Right now, let's go to other issues. Work from home,

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 2>of course, it's big everywhere. It's hitting housing, of housing, office, accommodation, caralee.

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 2>Of course, in Melbourne we're told the equivalent of five

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 2>mcgs will be left empty by public servants. In Victoria

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 2>money paid for them though the rents paid on these buildings,

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 2>and we are talking about one hundreds of millions of

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 2>dollars wasted on empty public service offices and desks when

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 2>people aren't even there. But it's pretty bad federally too.

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 2>The Department of Home Affairs some thirty six percent of

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 2>them work from home, and in the Health Department sixty

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 2>one percent of that workforce work two or three, three

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 2>or more days a week. It is from home currily

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 2>any wonder the taxpayers are cranky.

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 16>Well, and so they should be, I mean work flexibility,

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 16>regardless of what your view may be on it.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 3>The fact that taxpayers are.

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 16>Forking out for the Department of Home Affairs thirty six percent,

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 16>as you said, are working from home.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 3>That's about three days a week.

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 16>The taxpayer is forking out one hundred and fifteen million

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 16>dollars in the last financial year. And at the Department

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 16>of Home Affairs, sorry, Home Affairs is thirty six percent

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 16>I'm sorry of working from home. That's a one hundred

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 16>and fifteen million.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 15>But also at.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 16>Department of Health it's sixty one percent working from home.

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 3>And that's fifty four million dollars a year.

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 16>Regardless of whether it's ten extra dollars or one hundred,

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 16>that is an enormous amount of money that taxpayers are

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 16>just shelling out for these empty offices. And the money

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 16>could be better spent in other areas as well.

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 3>And it's not good. As I said, we've got in Victoria.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:00.439
<v Speaker 2>Are you here?

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 16>The Premier Ben Carroll, he has got a lot of arrogance,

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 16>saying he's going to pause his work from home legislation

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 16>until July next year. Is not on track to win

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 16>this state election in November, but all it's working from home.

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 3>You can't have both.

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 16>You can't have the taxpayers shelling out for these empty

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 16>offices when people want the work flexibility because every taxpayer

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 16>dollars spent has to be accounted for responsibly, and it's

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 16>not been.

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Dan just quickly.

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 2>The reform to the Upper House voting ticket in Victoria.

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 2>It's been a long time coming. This is a really

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 2>good thing.

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look, it could be.

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 7>It depends on how it plays out. I mean, I'm

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 7>always a bit concerned about something that could potentially limit

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 7>the ability of other parties to get into the system.

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 7>We know there's a lot of frustration with the two

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 7>major parties as it is, So you know, something that

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 7>can limit the ability of third parties or independence to

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 7>get in I think should be treated pretty Some of these.

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Have got they've got Sorry, we've got a bit of

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 2>a delay. It's hard to just jump in on that point.

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:09.959
<v Speaker 2>But we're talking about some really micro parties with you know,

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 2>one or two hundred, one hundred votes.

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that is that is true, And you know there

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 7>is an issue with the never ending ballot and how

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 7>many people are on it, But I'd hate to think.

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we've got some good people in there, like

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 7>David Lindbrick. I'd hate to think that someone like him

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 7>might get rubbed out or not get reelected because of this.

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know.

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 7>I'm a little bit skeptical of when the major parties

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 7>support changes of this nature.

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I like it.

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I like to see some of the rap bags to Coventry,

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 2>but we'll agree to disagree on that one.

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you to you both.

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>All.

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, after the break, we'll get more.

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 2>On the opposition's plan on high migration and those comments

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 2>from Anthony Elbow sleazy not going away. We'll get to

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 2>those as well. Angus Taylor coming up, welcome back, coming up.

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>You won't believe how much you're set to foot out

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 2>as a bailout for the Tommigo smelter. Upwards of one

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars to be announced by the Prime Minister and

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Chris Mint tomorrow. But now to the issue that won't

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 2>go away for the Prime Minister. There's calls mount for

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 2>him to make a formal and personal apology to the

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Japanese Prime Minister following that tasteless melon's jibe here to discuss.

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 3>This and more.

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into migration of course too. Opposition Leader Angus

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Taylor and Gus welcome to the program. I think Greg

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Sheridan summed it up best in his piece in The

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Australian Today.

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 3>He said it it takes.

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>A special kind of high class, refined stupidity not available

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 2>to normal people for an Australian Prime Minister to choose

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to make crude jokes about a female Japanese prime minister. Okay,

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 2>everyone makes mistakes. Why doesn't this bloke, our Prime minister,

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 2>ever own up to a mistake and apologize when it

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 2>gets something wrong.

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 4>You're absolutely right, Peter. This was completely tasteless. It was

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 4>beneath the office of Prime Minister to make these comments. Well,

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 4>you're right, people make mistakes. But four times in question

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 4>time in the last two days we've offered him the

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 4>opportunity to apologize to the Japanese Prime minister. Four times

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 4>he's chosen not to. Now, Peter, this was the Prime

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 4>minister who said, before becoming Prime minister, when he made

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 4>a mistake he would fess up. He said that straight.

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 4>He's never done it. I've never heard him do it, Peter.

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 4>He certainly hasn't done it in this instance. And this

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 4>is a serious situation because our relationship with Japan, of course,

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 4>is incredibly important at a time, a more dangerous time

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 4>in the Asia Pacific than any time since the Second

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 4>World War. And yet he's putting that relationship at risk

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 4>and behaving this way. This is a guy who can't

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 4>lie straight in bed at night and can't be honest

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 4>with the Australian people. But he also can't apologize when

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 4>he makes a clear error.

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 2>We had some serious questions a little while ago about

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the Isis brides and about the Islamic state men, the

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Australian men. There's thirteen of them in the prison in Iraq.

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 2>The Prime Minister went to ground. I can't remember the

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 2>last time he gave a serious economic speech, but he

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 2>can find time for these podcasters that wasn't even live.

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he could have declined to answer those questions

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 2>about Kylie Minogue. He could have sat on his hands

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 2>and you know, not done the melon thing whatever. But

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 2>even if it had been put in the can, he

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 2>could have not let it run like he chose to

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 2>put himself on these platforms.

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Why can't we get a.

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Serious prime minister in these really serious times?

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.239
<v Speaker 4>Well, you're right, I mean Australians are hurting. You hear

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 4>it all the time. I hear it all the time.

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 4>I've been out over the last five weeks or so

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 4>what's called the window recess. I've spoken to around twelve

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 4>hundred businesses. I've taken spoken of thousands of Australians. And

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 4>I see anger, I see grief, I see frustration. I

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 4>see businesses failing at thirty a day, family businesses, small

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 4>businesses where the hopes are going up in smoke. Families

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 4>who can't make ends meet, they can't pay their power bills,

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 4>they can't pay the mortgage. And yet this Prime Minister

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 4>is carrying on in the way he does. He can't

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 4>be straight to the Australian people. He lied fifty times

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 4>in his own words about negative gearing and capital gains tax,

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 4>and now he can't fess up when he's made a

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 4>very clear error. And just listening to him in question time,

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's a hard place to be sitting in

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 4>the opposition having to listen to this stuff. But the

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 4>complete unwillingness time and time and time again to do

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 4>what is very obviously he just has to say sorry.

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 4>He just has to say sorry.

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 3>I'll come to my in a moment.

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 2>But I listened to Question Time today and you've really

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 2>got on the attack about the government's decision to cut

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 2>support for people over the age of sixty five to

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 2>hang on to their private health insurance. It's been repeatedly

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>raised with me on the program. I have raised it here.

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 2>I've got a huge response from viewers. People say to me,

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I am down to two meals a day, I am

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 2>cutting back on everything I can. The last thing I

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 2>want to give up and I'm on a modest income.

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 2>They say, the last thing I want to give up

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 2>is my private health insurance.

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 3>It won't hurt the rich angers.

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 2>This is going to hurt people, labor, people on modest incomes.

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Why is the government going after seniors like this?

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, because when labor runs out of money, they come

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 4>after yours. This is a government that is prepared to

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 4>give welfare and home deposit support for non citizens and

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 4>yet it's slashing support for private health insurance for Australians

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 4>over the age of sixty five. And the facts are

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 4>important here, Peter. This will be a sixteen hundred dollars

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 4>hit to a typical older Australian over the age of

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 4>sixty five. The ones will copy the most those over

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 4>the age of seventy. And this is at a time

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 4>of course in your life when you really rely on

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 4>good health insurance and good health services. What we will see,

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 4>and we expect we've seen modeling to say that forty

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 4>percent of people will drop their coverage and that means

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 4>they will go into queues and weight lists in the

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:41.280
<v Speaker 4>public system and put more pressure on that public system.

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Increase the weight lists, increase ambulance ramping, put more pressure

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 4>on the public system, which ultimately will have to be

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 4>paid for by US as state tax players. So, frankly,

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 4>this is bad policy, It's bad for older Australians and

0:34:56.200 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 4>it is made necessary because labor can't control bending.

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to housing. We know a big part of

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 2>that obviously is migration. Your housing spokesman Andrew Bragg was

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 2>out there today outlining a range for a migration target.

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:15.760
<v Speaker 2>He said around the range of one hundred and eighty

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 2>thousand a year. He did say it wasn't finalized policy.

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 2>He did say some don't agree with it. You're the

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 2>boss what's the official answer from the coalition.

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, the official answer is we've got housing in freefall

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 4>in this country right now. We've seen a collapse in

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 4>the housing marketing confidence because of Labour's toxic taxes they've

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 4>introduced in the budget, and we will cap migration based

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:49.359
<v Speaker 4>on housing supply. Now, I am deeply fearful that we're

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 4>going to see a freefall in the number of houses

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 4>being built in this country, a collapse in the number

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 4>of houses built in this country. It's already low. It's

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 4>down at around one hundred and seventy thousand a year,

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 4>well below where it was when we were in government, Peter,

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.359
<v Speaker 4>but I think there's a real prospect that it's going

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 4>to go far lower than that. Migration must be capped

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 4>based on the number of houses we've got in this country.

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 4>That's the mistake, I guess.

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 3>But you've got to have a number.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Far more people in well, and the number on the

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 4>number of houses we get built. We know that, and

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 4>I can tell you this, Peter, and I've said this

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 4>to you before. It will be well below one hundred

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 4>and eighty thousand. It will be a number that will

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 4>be real. I'll tell you Labour's targets. They've never met them.

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 4>They've always come over. No I know that or other

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 4>adversary one nation. They don't know the difference between tatl

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 4>migration and permanent migration, so no one knows what their

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 4>number is. The number will be right, will be capped

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 4>based on the number of houses available. It will be

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 4>well below two hundred thousand. I fear it will. We

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 4>have to be substantially below that because of the collapse

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing in housing supply and housing construction in this

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 4>country right now.

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, at the top of the show, I showed how

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the trend has been improving for for you ever since

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 2>the move away from Susan Lee. And I have said

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 2>here repeatedly Angus, that you are mopping up a mess

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 2>that began under Angus Taylor a decade ago. Right, so

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 2>you've made some inroads. But one of the things that

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 2>killed Susan Lee, Peter Dunton, to be fair Scott Morrison

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 2>as well was policy inertia. We need to have more

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 2>detail out there to debate and to work through so

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 2>we can see the color of your money. In Australians

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 2>know with confidence that if they vote for you, they

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 2>are going to get change. When is it going to happen?

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 4>Well, Peter, you can all read our plan, which has

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 4>still got more to do, but it's already out there.

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:45.439
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot in this that IH laid out through

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 4>the course of the budget and reply and then we

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 4>published this just about four weeks ago. And our plan

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 4>is to ax Labour's toxic taxes and to bring down

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 4>income taxes, to get rid of the red tape that's

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 4>making it too hard to build houses, to run businesses

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 4>in this country, grap net zero, and make sure we

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 4>use our natural resources in this country. To get energy

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 4>costs down, get rid of those energy taxes that have

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 4>been built into the economy everywhere you go in vehicles,

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 4>in industry and the electricity grid. Cap migration based on

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 4>our housing supply, but get our housing supply up, and

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 4>we've laid our policies here to do that. Putting Australians first,

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 4>to Peter, and that means that welfare program seventeen different

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 4>welfare programs should be restricted to Australian citizens. The NDIS

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 4>should be restricted to Australian citizens. And we have to

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 4>make sure that our warfighters, our defense force is properly

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 4>funded in this country. Now that and many other policies

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 4>are already laid out. We know there's more to do

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 4>as well, Peter, but that is, as you know, at

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 4>this stage of the election cycle, a serious plan with

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:54.320
<v Speaker 4>a serious team to deliver that plan. And I encourage

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 4>your viewers to have a root of this plan. You

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 4>can find it online.

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:01.879
<v Speaker 2>I guess, I promise you they are all over it.

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 2>You are a good man, but I think a few

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:06.399
<v Speaker 2>of his shadows to toe up the backside to get

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 2>them moving. I'll leave it there, thank you. All right, Well,

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 2>I have a look at the de radicalization programs. They

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 2>were raised in the Royal Commission. A lot of people

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 2>concerned that there are no audits going on.

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 3>You don't know much.

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 2>About the efficacy of these programs. The panel up next,

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 2>welcome back more flags tomorrow night. I hope you notice

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.879
<v Speaker 2>there behind Angus Taylor there were two flags, but two

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Australian national flags, I might add, I said two. The

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 2>problems go back ten years beyond actually back to the

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 2>time of Malcolm Turnbull. I think I might have seen

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Augus Taylor. I meant Malcolm Turnbull. That's where the rot

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 2>started for the coalition. Now to other issues, though the

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:55.720
<v Speaker 2>increasing concerns being aired in the Royal Commission into Anti

0:39:55.760 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Semitism and the massacre at Bondai regarding Australian d radialization programs,

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 2>claims that the schemes are flawed and have created a

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 2>false sense of security. I've been saying that for a

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 2>long time. Finally now that's in evidence at the Royal Commission.

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Joined me now my panel.

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Senior fellow at the Mensis Research Center, Nikator, and Liberal

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 2>MP the Barnstorming Phil Thompson. Well reports out of the

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 2>Royal Commission, as I say, reports that one of the

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 2>programs in particular discussed in evidence has not even been

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 2>reviewed in six years now, Nick, we are spending some

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:36.839
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and forty billion dollars on these programs. We've

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:41.439
<v Speaker 2>got some three hundred would be terrorists in them. How

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 2>on earth are we not auditing them?

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 12>Well, unfortunately, Peter. I think the history of terrorism is

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 12>that measures to combat terrorism are often reactive. You know

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:53.760
<v Speaker 12>the measures that we brought in after nine to eleven,

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 12>even before that, after the Locker a disaster which highlighted

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 12>those problems with aircraft security, and we've done it again, right,

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:04.840
<v Speaker 12>But I think this BONDI experience and what's being exposed

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 12>at the Royal Commission being exposed elsewhere show. So we've

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:11.240
<v Speaker 12>got to wake up very very quickly to this problem

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 12>of radicalization.

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:13.839
<v Speaker 1>We're not dealing with it.

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 12>We've become complacent, and yet the threat grows day by

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 12>day as the number of people on that radical list grows.

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got to wake up to it.

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 12>I just hope that this government can rise above it's

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 12>a performance elsewhere, let's say, and actually get serious about this,

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 12>because there's no more important duty of an in government

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 12>than to protect its people.

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting, Phil, you know a CEO has been handed

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 2>special power, secret powers to investigate universities who have research

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 2>ties with hostile nations. Now, i'd want to hope they're

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:50.720
<v Speaker 2>getting resources as.

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Well as just laws.

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 2>And I also want to see, as I just discussed,

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>there some audits of these drad programs. I am not

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:01.799
<v Speaker 2>convinced they will keep us safe.

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 17>Well, even with the deradicalization programs, we know that not

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 17>all of them are mandatory, which I think can be

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 17>a massive is a massive problem. I want to know

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 17>exactly how many people have gone through and what's actually

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 17>happened where these people are located, these deradicalization training or

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 17>what they go through. Do they work, We're not looking

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 17>at it. Six years is far too long. On the

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 17>university side, we've got in what world does a university

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 17>think it's appropriate to do business or operate with foreign

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 17>agencies or foreign governments and do research or have drone

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 17>kind of researchers doing stuff for foreign governments or to

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 17>foreign bodies.

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 4>Like that's crazy, Like I can't.

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 17>Believe that was even occurring, let alone the need for

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 17>ASIO to be able to make sure not just have

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 17>the powers to monitor or look at, but actually stop.

0:42:59.840 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 17>I also want to make sure that what AZIO is doing,

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 17>they have to come back and report to say the

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 17>Intelligence Committee on exactly what's going on the day for

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:13.879
<v Speaker 17>no more scrutinies over We need to be making sure

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:15.800
<v Speaker 17>that there is oversight for everyone.

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to the Tommago announcement due tomorrow, the PEAM

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and the New South Wales Premier. We'll spend one billion

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:26.879
<v Speaker 2>dollars of taxpayer money. They'll hand it across to Rio

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Tinto to keep the smelter operating. Now, the only reason

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Nick they're doing this is because we've gone down the

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:37.399
<v Speaker 2>path of renewable so hard and so fast that we're

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:42.399
<v Speaker 2>sending industry in this country up against the wall often overseas.

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 2>We can't afford to lose this smelter. They can't make

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 2>ends meet because of the cost of our energy now,

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:49.319
<v Speaker 2>so we're bailing them out.

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 12>This is carbon tax by stealth, isn't it, Peter. This

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 12>is a cost of billion dollars reportedly that every taxpayer

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.320
<v Speaker 12>in this country is going to have to contribute towards,

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 12>or it goes on the debt for future tax payers

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:08.760
<v Speaker 12>to share the burden just because of this crazy, nonsensical, ludicrous,

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 12>engineeringly ignorant energy plan that this government has introduced.

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>We're all paying the cost for that.

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 12>And no doubt there'll be some triumphant press conference tomorrow,

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 12>how wonderful they've done to bail out tom Ago. You

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 12>shouldn't have to bail out Tomogo if the fundamentals are right.

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's go back to those reports. I spoke about them

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:33.480
<v Speaker 2>on Monday and Tuesday. They're in the Australian. If I

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 2>can feel reference that half a million dollars spent on

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 2>three primarily three Muslim related entities, media entities paid for,

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 2>as I say, by Canberra, and these outlets have been

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 2>accused of promoting extremist voices, anti Semitic, conspiracy theories, pro

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 2>terrorist content. Some of them have luded Hesbala killers and

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 2>other things. Now, now, why on earth is this happening.

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 17>It should happening the govern The government has failed. There

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:05.919
<v Speaker 17>should be no money going to any group, especially media

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 17>outlets that promote terrorist activity. They should be stripped of funding,

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 17>stripped of the ability to even operate within Australia. But

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 17>this is a classic labor government. What they do. They

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 17>take their eye off the ball. It's really shameful that

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 17>this is occurring in our nation. And these groups should

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:24.280
<v Speaker 17>be fined, not given money.

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 2>And we're cutting the supports for pensioners to keep there

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 2>or not just pensioners, anyone out the age of sixty five,

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 2>to keep the private health insurance if you can believe it.

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 2>Nikata phel Thompson, thank you to you both. All right,

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 2>quick break after the break the wonderful Kel. He's wonderful

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:47.799
<v Speaker 2>as any and he joins me. On Wednesday, we're Smith

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 2>and broadcast Kel Richards question without notice on this one.

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Before we get into some of the words from viewers,

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 2>Kel Census we've had a census this week. Is the

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 2>plural censuses? Since I I'm intrigued.

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 18>Okay, No, we pluralize it the way we normally pluralize

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 18>English words. It's censuses. I know that's awkward because it's

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 18>all those sibil and sounds together, but Latin plurals are

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 18>wrong in English. Don't use Latin plurals in English. We're

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:20.320
<v Speaker 18>speaking English. And even if it's a bit awkward, it's censuses.

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Censuses. There we go up. Learn something.

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Brendan wants to know the origins for the phrase

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 2>skid row.

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 18>Well, this is interesting. Brendan suggests it might be connected

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:36.720
<v Speaker 18>with skid road road, which happened in timber growing areas,

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:39.480
<v Speaker 18>and it did. Every timber growing area had a skid road,

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:42.239
<v Speaker 18>a mud road that logs that have been filled were

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 18>dragged down, and often the poor workers lived in huts

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 18>beside the skid road, and that may have played a

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:50.240
<v Speaker 18>part in it. But the linguists tell me the most

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 18>likely source of this is that people who lived on

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 18>skid row, the poorest part of any town, they were

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 18>on the skids, that is, their life was going down,

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 18>It was not on the up. A that's probably the

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 18>main source of the expression.

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, I do like this next one coming up. Warren,

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:14.760
<v Speaker 2>like Petticrelyn, wants to understand where we got higgeley pickley from.

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:17.439
<v Speaker 18>Actually a long time ago, it's about five hundred years old.

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:21.399
<v Speaker 18>And the Oxford says, it's what's called a rhyming reduplication.

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:24.800
<v Speaker 18>We've got lots of these sort of rhyming re duplications,

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 18>hanky panky, and lots and lots of them, and the

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 18>English language likes them. And then the Oxford says, of

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 18>obscure origin. But they make the suggestion that it might

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 18>have been what they call a vocal gesture, and by

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:39.960
<v Speaker 18>that they mean a word in which the sounds are

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:43.439
<v Speaker 18>trying to suggest what they're naming. And Higgeldy pickoldy gets

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 18>fairly good at doing that, doesn't it?

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 3>It does?

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 2>What about beyond the pale? Blinda says, where's that one

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 2>come from?

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 18>Originally the word pale met a wooden steak driven in

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:56.880
<v Speaker 18>the ground, and a row of those wooden steaks in

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:59.400
<v Speaker 18>the ground made a wooden fence. We get our word

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 18>pole from the same source, the same ancient Latin word,

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 18>so pale poll that sort of thing and the idea

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 18>of that sort of wooden fences. Will we get our

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 18>paling fences from now? In the medieval era, around the

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 18>medieval towns, there was a demarcation which was called the pale,

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 18>beyond which the law of the town did not run.

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 18>So it was the limits of civilization. So if you

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 18>are beyond the pale, if your behavior is unacceptable, you

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 18>have passed the limits of civilization.

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the Prime Minister might have got their

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 2>closer on his melon stuff appropriate on.

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>The other side.

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 18>He's on the other side.

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 3>We'll be talking about that next week. We'll come back

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 3>to that.

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I've want sexism and misogyny, what's the difference.

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:45.640
<v Speaker 3>We'll do that next week. I'll leave it there, Thank you, kel.

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 3>That's it for me. See you tomorrow night. He's Andrew