WEBVTT - Sharri | 1 August

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Bit Sharry Good Evening Tonight an exclusive interview with the

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Jewish customer who is refused service by a pro Palestinian

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>staff member at Officeworks. What'sir, I'm pro Palestine.

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 2>That's okay.

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 3>You're here to do a job of luminade.

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we have the right to deny jobs.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Utterly outrageous and here will be joining the show live.

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll also bring you Officework's unacceptable response to this saga.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Also tonight, concern the nation's housing crisis will worsen under

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Clara O'Neil, and China blames Australian beef for the positive

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>drug test of two of its Olympic swimmers. Basil Zemplers

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Canavan will join me to discuss. This comes

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>as the world is still processing a Chinese swimmer's jaw

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>dropping world record and one hundred meter free, with one

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Aussie coach saying it's just not humanly possible that story

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>coming up. So at first, we've entered an absurd new

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>era where terrorism is, if not condoned, then accepted and

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>even understood by Western political leaders and authorities. Terrorists who

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>have killed thousands of innocent people are being offered plea

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>deals and if they're killed, the left is worried about what.

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 4>It will mean for stability.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>One of the master minds of the September eleventh terror attacks,

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Kaylid Sheik Muhammad, has been spared the death penalty and

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>instead given a plea deal by American prosecutors. Two other

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Al Qaeda terrorists involved in the attack have also been

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>given plea deals. Now, these are the last people who

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>should ever be given deals for their role in the

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>murder of two thousand, nine hundred and seventy six people

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Twin Towers, because what they did is unforgivable.

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>The families of those who died are reportedly devastated. They've

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for twenty four years to see justice. The

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>New York Post calls it an atrocity of justice. When

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Hamas chief Ismayo Honeyere was assassinated, you've probably heard concern

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>in the media about the escalation in violence, rather than

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>an acknowledgment or any praise for eliminating a bloodthirsty terrorist. Well,

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>recall when President Barack Obama made this famous announcement in

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>two thy and eleven.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 5>Tonight, I can report to the American people and to

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 5>the world that the United States has conducted an operation

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 5>that killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 5>and a terrorist who's responsible for the murder of thousands

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 5>of innocent men, women, and children.

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Osama Bin Laden was killed when elite US soldiers attracked

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>him down in a Pakistani compound in a high risk,

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>top secret operation. The news was welcomed, movies were made.

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>The courage and stealth of the brave squad was rightly praised.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>It was a great political achievement for Obama as well.

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>No one criticized the assassination out of concern or fear

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that al Qaida would retaliate.

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Of course not.

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>We weren't so weak in those days, and terrorists weren't

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>so emboldened. So what's happened to the world in the

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>past thirteen years. The operation to assassinate Honeyea was brazen,

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>presumably drawing on high level intelligence.

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Operatives tracked him down.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And killed him in his own home in Tehran in

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>an early morning strike. We presume it was Mossad, although

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Israel hasn't confirmed it. It was without question an impressive hit.

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>He thought he was protect it safe from the violence

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of Gaza in the powerful city of Tehran. The lesson,

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, is that there's no place where these terrorists

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>can hide. But it's bizarre that the reaction to the

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>very welcome news that Honeye was killed has been muted,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:24.239
<v Speaker 1>to say the least, both by authorities and the media. Instead,

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>there are concerns for what it will mean for stability

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in the region and what will happen to the prospects

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of a ceasefire.

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 6>The message to the other negotiators is we were on

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 6>the brink of a ceasefire, and they were very close.

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 6>The Americans thought they were within days. You someone has

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 6>now shot dead our key negotiator, and they will assume.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 6>They will say it's the Israelis. We cannot now make

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 6>a peace deal with you.

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And this could definitely have a negative effect on those

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>ongoing negotiations.

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Certainly does maybe even irreparable damage to the ceasefire talks,

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 2>since Hania was essentially the chief Palestinian negotiator.

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>A ceasefire, by the way, that can't happen anyway until

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the hostages are returned and Hermas has surrendered or has

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>been destroyed and is no.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Longer in power.

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was a similar sentiment from the United Nations

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>after the Security Council held emergency talks following the deaths

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Hamas and Hesbella leaders. The YUN concerned the

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>air strikes have made matters worse.

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 7>Dangerous escalation at a moment in which all efforts should

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 7>instead be leading to a ceasefire in Gaza.

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Honey Yeh didn't remotely care about Palestinians. He was

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>living in obscene wealth while causing misery.

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 4>For his own people.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Not only did he order barberic massacres against Israelis, but

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>he was responsible for the military strategy where her Musk

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>fighters operate from densely populated civilian areas, despite knowing this

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>will cause innocent Palestinians to die. All the while, Honey

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Air was safely asconced in Qatar, living a comfortable life,

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of food, and worth a call four billion dollars.

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>The phrase that Benjamin NETTNYA, who uttered early on the

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>need for moral clarity, encapsulates what we're seeing here. There's

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>a bizarre confusion about what's right and wrong. Some on

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>the left seem to think terrorism might be justified. The

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>concern over the death of a terror chief is bizarre.

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>You've heard the argument that the mission to destroy Hermas

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>is pointless because an ideology can't be defeat it. Now,

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>if you don't realize how warped this is, perhaps because

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you're so conditioned to hearing it from authority figures. Well,

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine if that was applied during World War II. I

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>don't kill Hitler and the Nazis because you can never

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>kill off the ideology of fascism.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 4>It's truly absurd.

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there's risk of escalation and retaliation, but of course

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean you allow terrorism to foster. That doesn't

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>mean you pack up and go home and allow terrorists

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to repeat atrocities over and over again without consequence. That

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean your own citizens should have to accept living

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in a state of fear and violence. And it's actually

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>weakness in our global political leadership that has sent the

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>message to the Ayatolas of Iran that they can get

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>away with brazen strikes. They doubt America's global commitment to Israel.

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>They doubt it's global leadership. The realization needs to sink

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in that yes, these terrorists are anti Semitic, but it's

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>actually anti Americanism that's driving them. They see Israel as

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>an arm of America because Israel is a democracy amid

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>dictators Iran, Hamas and Hezbealah can't comprehend that there are

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Western values, inclusivity for all religions, ethnicities, sexualities, and genders

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in a country in the very heart of the Middle East.

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It's everything that Islamic extremism despises about the West in essence,

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Jews in the Middle East representing democratic values, and Iran

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and their proxies like Hamas can't compute that they've lived

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>on the land of Israel for more than three thousand years.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, a lot to come on the show tonight,

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>As I said, the exclusive interview with the Jewish customer

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>denied service at office works.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 4>That's coming up.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>But first now, let's bring in tonight's panel, Perth Mayre

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Basil Zemplus and National Senator Matt Canavan.

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Welcome to you both. Great to see you again.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Look, let's start with this scandal where China is blaming

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Australian beef for two of its swimmers testing positive to

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a steroid two years ago. Chinese authorities say that they

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>suspect the swimmers eight hamburgers, contaminated with an anabolic steroid.

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Despite Australian farmers and authorities confirming that the substance hasn't

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>been used in any of Australia's beef production or medicine basil.

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 4>This seems as absurd as when the.

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese authorities tried to say that COVID nineteen came through

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in imported frozen meat.

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 7>Absurd and absolutely outrageous, And the question obviously has to

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 7>be asked in response, is it possible that no Australian

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 7>athletes have eaten in any similar sorts of products during

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 7>that same period, yet mysteriously have not tested positive. We

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 7>know that it is highly unlikely to be true. In fact,

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 7>we know it's not true. It's a ridiculous claim. And

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 7>why would those two test positive but no one else

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 7>who's eating Australian beef. Think of all the athletes in

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 7>all of the sports competing all around the world at

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 7>the same time with a similar diet who haven't tested positive.

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 7>It is ridiculous, ridiculous.

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt, there seems to be an issue here, China once

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>again not taking responsibility and trying to blame Australia. I

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>thought the relationship was meant to be back on track

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>under Albin.

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:45.359
<v Speaker 8>Ezi well, like Basil has said, this is absurdly ridiculous,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 8>and I think everybody right in the.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 2>World will see it as such.

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 8>But there's a bigger concern here that you've hinted at,

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 8>that China seems to be able to influence and gag

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 8>international bodies of quite importance. We saw that during COVID nineteen,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 8>where where it was able to almost co opt the

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 8>World Health Organization into it's hiding care, it's hiding the

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 8>evidence campaign to throw people off the scent of the

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 8>Wuhan lab as being now the prime suspect of the

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 8>origins of coronavirus. And likewise, here the Chinese authorities have

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 8>somehow being able to convince international sporting bodies to keep

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 8>these doping breaches under wraps for a couple of years,

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 8>and now they go off with these absurd excuses trying

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 8>to distract from that. So I think the bigger issue

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 8>is not this ridiculous claim that it's austrained beef. It's

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 8>that why has the Worldwide Sporting Body not being transparent

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 8>with these complaints or these breaches that involve Chinese athletes.

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, it's a really big issue.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And look, this comes as the world is still processing

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Chinese swimmer Pan Zanli's jaw dropping world record in one

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred meter freestyle over ninety one goal. He was up

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>against Kyle Charmers, who did an amazing swim but came

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>second got silver. Now Pan did that swim in forty

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>six point four oh seconds. I'm no swimming expert, but

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I read the comments that Australian swim coach Brett Hawk

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>made on the Nightly this evening.

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 4>This is a big story on the Nightly and he

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 4>says that that time is not humanly possible.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Basil, what do you think I mean, You've got a

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>top Australian coach questioning this. There's no suggestion that swimmer

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>has any history of drugs, but there is a cloud

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>under the Chinese swim team.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, we know past form obviously, so we can certainly

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 7>point to that. We can point to that with some confidence.

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 7>There have been breaches in the past, they have been

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 7>found guilty, they have been suspended. That time was a

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 7>ridiculously fast time, and to beat Kyle Charmers by over

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 7>a second was either a phenomenal performance or a superhuman performance.

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 7>Without wishing to find anybody guilty of anything before the

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 7>proper process has run. Let me say this, I'm really

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 7>pleased that Kyle Chalmers swum from eighth on the turn

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 7>to be second on the line, because if anything is awry,

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 7>if anything is found to be out of place with

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 7>subsequent testing that happens post race, Kyle Chalmers is in

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 7>an excellent position to potentially be elevated from that silver medal.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 7>Not pointing the finger of blame at anyone, but at

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 7>least Kyle's in second and can bump up. But it

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 7>was a ridiculous time, incredibly fast. He's either the absolute

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 7>greatest we've ever seen or there's something else at play.

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Indeed, I echo all of your sentiments about we're not

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>saying there's anything wrong here, but if it does turn

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>out that situation that you just explained, Basil, I mean,

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Chalmers would never get that moment back of standing

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>on the podium winning gold, having the Australian Anth and

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 1>played and Matt. I don't know about you, but we

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>were all hanging in there for Chalmers. He wanted this

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>so badly. It was the third Olympics where he had Swami,

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>he'd overcome a lot of challenges and he was just

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>he really wanted it.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 4>He was determined.

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, he really felt for him. I watched it live

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 8>and it wasn't remarkable second fifty meters from the Chinese swimmer.

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 8>I hadn't seen, ever, seen a one hundred meter race

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 8>in an Olympics final be decided by such a margin.

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 8>But look there's Basil said. We don't know, we don't

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 8>know anything, and I don't think it helps throwing around accusations.

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 8>Kyle did an amazing swim himself, and good onying. Congratulations.

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 8>Silver medal is a fantastic achievement, so I'll leave it

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 8>at that.

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>No, absolutely, it is second best in the entire world.

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>It's incredible. Australian politicians are reportedly being threatened more than

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>ever before. The AFP says that there've been more than

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>one thousand complaints of harassment, nuisance, offensive and threatening communications

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>against MPs over the past next year. Bazzil, you're a

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>politician yourself. I don't know if you've experienced anything like this,

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but it is troubling and we have seen a lot

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of aggression and violence outside the offices of some labor

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>politicians as well.

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it never had anything physically confronting. I've had the

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 7>odd protester at council House. You'd expect that for any

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 7>Lord mayor in any jurisdiction. But I must say online

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 7>it does come thick and fast. I've potentially got a

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 7>thicker skin than most I've had thirty years in the media.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 7>It's a very good preparation for what you might get

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 7>in the political world. And I do feel well adjusted,

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 7>so I sort of see it through a bit of

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 7>a different lens. But I must admit if I was

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 7>a first time er, if I'd had no experience or

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 7>exposure to it and was reading some of the things

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 7>that can get sent my way in other politicians way,

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 7>it can be very confronting. And that online world, that dark,

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 7>anonymous world, that wed world where no one is really

0:15:54.320 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 7>held accountable, that's where this danger and evil festers until

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 7>such time as we're able to eradicate the anonymity aspect,

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 7>that part of it. I think it will continue to exist.

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 7>When people have to own up and own their own actions,

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 7>they often act very differently.

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's right.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>People feel free to say the most violent and vile

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>things on social media. Matt Canavan, what about you? Have

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you had ever had issues with this? I presume you

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>would have.

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Well of Basil's right.

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 8>What Basil said is right. I mean physically, in my face,

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 8>I've never had anything, never had any issues. But yes,

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 8>that separation that exists online allows people to put their

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 8>manners in the drawers or some people, it's only a

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 8>minority of people. Look, I would not support imposing some

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 8>kind of removal of anonymity online. I think sometimes it's

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 8>important to get that feedback online too, and people are

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 8>less likely to give honest feedback either if they're not anonymous.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 8>We've also seen situations where people have lost jobs and

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 8>been persecure for just political statements they've made online. So

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 8>I think if we were to remove a nonanimity across

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 8>the board, that would lead to perverse outcomes. But look, look,

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 8>we're very lucky in this country. We haven't had a

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 8>history of political violence along that stay that way, So

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 8>I don't want to jump in shadows here. We do

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 8>have a very good security system in place. We have

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 8>a good culture in this country, notwithstanding some people going

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 8>too far online with their comments. So I, like Basil,

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 8>I'm very worried about how it would discourage people getting

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 8>into politics. But you do develop a thick skin very

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 8>quickly and ultimately eurialize very fast. It's really only your

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 8>family and friends that what they think about you that matters.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Everybody else doesn't matter at all, exactly.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with that sentiment, Matt Canavan. Now The

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Australian's reporting that a new survey has found that nearly

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of Australian companies say they have no intention

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of meeting net zero emissions targets by twenty fifty. Another

0:17:54.880 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>forty two percent say they haven't even begun decarbonizing their operations. Basil, Well,

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>has this been a bit of an unrealistic target given

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we've just seen and New Zealand come out this week

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and say they're not going to meet their twenty thirty targets,

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps it's the start of other companies admitting the same.

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 7>Well, perhaps the targets weren't unrealistic, but the ability to

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 7>actually achieve those targets, I think we're seeing more and

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 7>more is increasingly unrealistic. The ambition has outweighed the practicality

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 7>and obviously the expense of being able to get there,

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 7>and ultimately, when there's a cost of living crisis on

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 7>in Australia and in many parts of the world. We

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 7>know what is most important to families is being able

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 7>to get through this crisis, to pay the bills, to

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 7>get the kids to school, to look after the mortgage

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 7>that has to and logically becomes priority one. And so

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 7>it's no surprise to me that some of these ambitious

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 7>targets are now a distant second, not only in family life,

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 7>but in corporate life also. We all want want what's

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 7>best for our environment, but we want to get there sensibly,

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 7>not unrealistically.

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 4>Matt Canavan final word, Well.

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 8>Look, you say that earlier that thirty percent of Austraian

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 8>businesses so they can't meet the net zero targets by

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 8>twenty fifty. I think that indicates that the other seventy

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 8>percent of the strain businesses are telling polkies they're.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Not going to be met.

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 8>These targets are not going to be met. They're totally

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 8>fantastical and the more we pursue them, the high costs

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 8>of the higher cost of living goes for you.

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt Canavan, Basil Zemplars, great to see you again.

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Now after the break, our exclusive interview will be live

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>with the Melbourne Jewish Man who was refused service at

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>an office works because the staff member was pro Palestinian

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're outrageous response. That story coming up right after

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the break Welcome Back. A Jewish customer was refused service

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>at officeworks because the manager was pro Palestinian. He wanted

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>to laminate an article from the Australianish News, and the

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>manager at the Elstonwick Melbourne store refused. Have a look,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>what's that I'm pro Palestine.

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 3>That's okay here to do a job of laminade.

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we need to have the.

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Right to deny jobs.

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Is that an office works position or your personal position?

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 4>It is an officer, so we have the right to

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 4>deny jobs.

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 3>So office works position is that you're pro Palestine and

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 3>you want to.

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Take a why that's my position?

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 4>But we have the right to deny jobs.

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 3>What's the reason of denying.

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm not comfortably proceeding with it.

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 9>Which part are you? Not?

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 3>The entire thing?

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 2>The article?

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>It's anti Semitism, no question to refuse service to a

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Jewish person wanting to photocopy an article from the Jewish

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>local paper. But what's most upsetting about this incident is

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>not even the response from the ignorant and racist manager.

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Clearly she's been captured by the Prohamus movement. What's most

0:20:55.480 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>upsetting is office works response. The woman is still employed there,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the man was only offered one hundred dollar gift voucher,

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>hardly adequate for such an extreme example of racism, and

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the woman hasn't offered an apology, despite inaccurate claims by Officeworks.

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Earlier today, in a.

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Statement to Sky News, office Works Managing director Sarah Hunter

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 1>said they were deeply disappointed that the incident occurred and

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>confirmed that the customer's job should have been performed by

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the team member and that office Works does not discriminate

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>against our customers on the basis of political views, religious beliefs, gender,

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>sexuality or race. Office Works said that the team member

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>had undergone education and training and had visited the Holocaust Museum. Well,

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>this is utterly unacceptable and until Officeworks takes this seriously

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and addresses it properly, that no one should shop there.

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not the only complaint about anti semitism by the way,

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>at office Works either, and I'll bring you another one

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. If Officeworks isn't going to take responsibility here,

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>then we need to see some leadership from West Farmers

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's one of Australia's largest listed companies and it also

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>owns Kmart, Target, Bunnings, Price Line, Soul Patterns and Chemist,

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Catch dot Com, Dot a You, Beaumont Tiles and many more.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>The Office Works Managing director Sarah Hunter ironically told The

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Nightly just in May that hiring someone for their values

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>was more important than their skill set. She said this,

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and I quote it is so important to ensure that

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you are working with someone who is a cultural and

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>values fit.

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 4>With your organization. She said.

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>If that means taking extra time in the recruitment process

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to find the recruit who aligns with the values of

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>your business, it will pay off in the long run

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>once you have found that the skills can be taught later.

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>That was Sarah Hunter in May saying that the values

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of an employee were more important than the skill set

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that was in May. Office Works had been either ignoring

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>or not adequately dealing with the complaint of anti semitism

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>since March when the incident happened. Well, let's bring it

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>now for an exclusive interview. The Jewish customer. Welcome to

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the program. Now, I want to say you want to

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>keep your identity private for understandable security concerns, but thank

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining me tonight, Hi sharing. So

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>tell us how did this all unfold?

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 3>So I went to office works to get a page

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 3>laminated from the Australian Jewish News and I had given

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 3>the office works employee of the article and she went

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 3>away to do the job. About twenty seconds later she

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 3>returned and she said she can't do it as she's

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 3>pro Palestine. I had my phone in my hand and

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 3>started recording and asked to repeat what she just said

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 3>and why she wouldn't laminate the newspaper. And the rest

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 3>is just what you would have seen on the video

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 3>and very.

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Quick thinking to film it.

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>What was your reaction when the manager first started to

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>refuse you service.

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 3>I was very shocked, like very very very shocked. I

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 3>couldn't believe what was happening. In the moment. I felt vilified, discriminated,

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 3>and I also just felt embarrassed in front of others,

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 3>the other staff members and the customers behind me.

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, understandably.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So now this happened in March over four months ago,

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>so for four months you've kept quiet about this, trying

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to get a proper response from office Works and also

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>their owners West Farmers.

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Can you tell us what's happened?

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, as far as I understand, there's the process

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 3>to follow. My legal team, Alex s. Flilmberg and Justin

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Azzarti and doctor Emon Kelly were writing to Office Works

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 3>and there were some back and forth, but they were

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 3>not properly engaging.

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 4>It's unbelievable.

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So you're now taking legal action. They weren't properly engaging.

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>You're now taking legal action by lodging a complaint with

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the Victorian Civil and Administration's Tribunal.

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 10>Is that right?

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's correct. So even though they said they're taking

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 3>this issue seriously, it's clear that they haven't. The anti

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 3>semitic employee is still currently employed, which would make it

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 3>seem that Office Works condone to behavior. It seems as

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 3>though you know, you can be blatantly anti Semitic and

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 3>still keep your job. I haven't got the whole claim

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 3>in front of me, but we are swing it under

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 3>the Equal Opportunities Act.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Suing under the Equal Opportunities Act.

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's appropriate that the woman who refused

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>your service is still working for Office Works?

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely?

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 3>Like I mentioned, I cannot understand how that would not

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 3>meet the criteria for a for an immediate dismissal from

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 3>her role. I even wonder if she's still acting as

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 3>a department manager.

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And how has this affected you personally, you know, and

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>has it shaken your faith in Australia as a safe

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>place to live for Jews.

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Look, I'm extremely shaken. Even though it's been several months,

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 3>I still vilified a target for anti Semitism, and it's

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 3>it's just become a table conversation where you know of

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 3>whether it's safe for Jews to just go about their

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 3>normal lives doing normal things, even something as simple as

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, getting the newspaper laminated. And more so, especially

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 3>since October seven, I think Jews have increasingly felt unsafe

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 3>in the diaspora. And now I find and myself asking

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 3>my family is it a matter of when we are

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 3>moving to Israel? But not if? And this really really

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 3>saddens me, as this is not the beautiful Australia I

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 3>grew up and that we all love.

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely well, thank you so much for your time for

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>speaking up here on this program. It's unacceptable what happened

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>and for a managing director who speaks about values to

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's okay to have a racist employee.

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 4>It's just not good enough. So thank you very much

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 4>for your time.

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much.

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 12>Lie.

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we'll keep following up and covering that story

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 1>next week. Now let's have a look now at Australia's

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>housing crisis. It does continue to be a problem for

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>so many families across the country, new dwelling approvals falling

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to their lowest level in twelve years.

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 4>For the year to.

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>June, there were only one hundred and sixty two thousand

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>houses and apartments that were given the green light. This

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is a drop of eight and a half percent. It's

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>just not enough to keep people off the street. Thousands

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of Australians are sleeping rough every night because of the

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.239
<v Speaker 1>demand in housing and services. Well, let's bring in now

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 1>a shadow Minister for Housing, Michael Sucker.

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much for your time. Michael.

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Look, before we get into housing, I just wonder if

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you want to comment on that interview that we just

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:25.479
<v Speaker 1>heard from that Jewish customer who was refused service at

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>an office works in Melbourne, and their response that they

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's okay to keep that person employed.

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 12>Well, Sherry, thank you for giving that customer a voice.

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 12>I think this is a shocking example of the sort

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 12>of twisted logic and twisted thinking that has consumed so much,

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 12>particularly of the left in this country, that someone couldn't

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 12>see in that case, that worker at Office Works couldn't

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 12>see how blatantly bigoted she was being. That that wasn't

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 12>something that was obvious to her. She clearly couldn't expel

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 12>playing why she was unwilling to do the laminating of

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 12>that particular paper, but it was just clearly a hatred

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 12>of Israel and potentially of the Jewish people. I think

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 12>it is depressing, though that swift action from Office Works

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 12>isn't forthcoming. I mean, it's a clear cut case here.

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 12>I'm not someone who rejoices in seeing people lose their

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 12>jobs or rejoice in people being canceled, but you're as

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 12>a business putting people on the front line to deal

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 12>with customers in a respectful way, and it's the most

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 12>blatant and worse form of anti Semitism. I think that

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 12>you could imagine in that sort of instance, and the

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 12>fact that the company couldn't see that that would be

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 12>an obvious situation where that person was ill suited to

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 12>dealing with the public and ill suited to dealing with

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 12>quite frankly, any customer that walks through that door and

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 12>asks for a lawful service, which is clearly what the

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 12>customer you just spoke to did. So the truth is here,

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 12>and you know, you don't want to draw too many

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 12>long bows. But we have not seen any leadership from

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 12>the Prime minister down on this issue since October seven.

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 12>It's bizarre to me that we have a situation in

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 12>this country. We're large groups of people think it's entirely

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 12>acceptable to show their anti Semitism towards Israel, the country

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 12>who was attacked in the most brutal way by Hamas,

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 12>And I would say part of that permission structure that

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 12>I think has crept into our society, I think has

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 12>partly come from the fact that there's so many mixed

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 12>messages from the Prime Minister in his government. No leadership

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 12>on this. You could imagine a prime minister like John Howard,

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 12>Robert Menzie's Bob Hawk. You could imagine that they would

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 12>rise to the occasion. Here we've seen a prime minister

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 12>that's not willing to offer that leadership. Instead, we said

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 12>that leadership being offered by people like Peter Dutton, who

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 12>you know has has obviously taken a very important trip

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 12>to Israel. So I think it's shocking that this thing

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 12>hasn't been dealt with until it hits the headlines, and

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 12>even then it hasn't been dealt.

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>With exactly exactly very well, said Michael, Completely agree with you.

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's return to the housing issue now that you've come

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on here to speak about Labour has committed to the

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>target of building one point two million homes over five years.

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this is going to be yet another

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>broken promise?

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 12>Well, I can't meet the target, Sharry. I mean it's

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 12>clear this year alone there'll be about seventy five thousand

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 12>homes short in one year. Most reputable commentators are saying

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 12>they might be lucky to get to eight hundred and

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 12>eight hundred and fifty thousand, which would be the smallest

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 12>number of homes over a five year period that we've

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 12>seen for twenty five years. We saw approvals yesterday down again,

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 12>and for your viewers, Shari, the problem with approvals being

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.040
<v Speaker 12>even further down is that if we're saying we're not

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 12>building enough homes now and there are less homes being

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 12>built under Labor now than we're under the former coalition, government.

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 12>The lack of approvals we're seeing now is going to

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 12>flow through the pipeline of housing over the next eighteen

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 12>months to two years, which means even fewer homes will

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 12>be built over that period. And the great irony of

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 12>this situation now is we've got the failed former minister

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 12>Claire O'Neill, who was dumped from the Home Affairs portfolio

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 12>into this portfolio, now facing up to so much of

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 12>the mess that she created in her failed job as

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 12>Home Affairs Minister. Because in two short years of this government,

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 12>we've had more than a million migrants come to this country,

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 12>so we're running a world record gold medal level of

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 12>migration in this country, yet we're building fewer homes and

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 12>as I outlined a few weeks ago, it means we

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 12>need to build a new home every two point four

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 12>minutes just to house and accommodate the new migrants that

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 12>labour's bringing into this country. So sadly we now see

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 12>a failed former minister being put into housing and quite frankly,

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 12>I believe housing is one of, if not the most

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 12>important portfolio in any government and it shouldn't be treated

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 12>as a dumping ground for a failed minister. Who's really

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 12>ordered with being demoted.

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's an interesting point that you make that

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>she was immigrated, well, she was Home Affairs Minister, so

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>she was in charge of bringing in the higher levels

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of immigration that is now adding to the problem she's

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have to solve in her new role as

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Housing Minister. And we've also seen the reporting from Simon

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Benson in The Australian that the Albanezi government under their

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollar housing fund has paid out thirty million

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars in executive salaries and bonuses, but as of June

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>hadn't built it one completed house. So this is definitely

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be a problematic area and it's a crisis

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>for families. Michael Suka really appreciate your time, Thank you

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>very much. Now still to come, Tony Burke left to

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>clean up more of the mess by his predecessor Andrew Giles.

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Plus the photo that has broken the internet. Ask my

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>panel what they think of Macron's cozy kiss with the

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:10.720
<v Speaker 1>French sports minister.

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 4>Stay tuned.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, lots more to get through tonight, so let's bring

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.919
<v Speaker 1>in our political panel, The Australian's National Affairs editor Joe

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and commentator Jason Morrison.

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 4>Great to see you both.

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Now, the new Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has been

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>left to clean up the debacle left by his predecessor

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Giles, with the news that two more foreign criminals

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>have been allowed to stay in Australia. A convicted child

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>sex offender and a man who was involved in a

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:46.399
<v Speaker 1>drug operation both escaped deportation under Direction one hundred and ten.

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 4>This was the ministerial.

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Order which replaced the failed Direction ninety nine. Joe is

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Burke now under pressure to once again have a look

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>at these directions and why they're not working to protect

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the community safety.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 10>Sharry. He's under immediate pressure. Tony Burke's challenge upon taking

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 10>this portfolio as to be a Minister of action and

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 10>a man of solutions. It's very important that he assert

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 10>his authority to do that after ten months of mismanagement

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 10>under Andrew Giles. So I think he should move very quickly.

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 10>I think that the first thing he should do is

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 10>override this decision from the AAT in relation to these

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 10>two individuals. As the minister, he does have the power

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 10>to do that. He should recancel the visas and then

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 10>very swiftly I think he should overturn Direction one hundred

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 10>and ten and replace it with a much stronger direction.

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 10>If you look at Direction ninety nine and Direction one

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:49.800
<v Speaker 10>hundred and ten, there aren't major differences. Direction one hundred

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 10>and ten still requires decision makers to have to take

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 10>into account the connection between an individual and Australia. So

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 10>that's Tony Burke's problem and I think he should fix it,

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 10>should fix it fast.

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, Jason this is an issue that the

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Albanezi government is still putting, As Joja said, an individual's

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>connection with Australia, not their citizenship, their connection above the

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>safety of Australians.

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 13>Connection of the individual above protection of the masses.

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 9>All right, what are we up to one hundred and eleven?

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 13>Direction one hundred and eleven look after the Australian people first.

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.280
<v Speaker 9>That is the number one role of anyone in government.

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 13>And they will see and be able to talk themselves

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 13>in their crowded rooms of advisors that they have these

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 13>obligations to all these treaties and things like that. Their

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 13>obligation is the people who put them there and pay

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 13>for them and vote them in.

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 9>And I think that is forgotten.

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 13>And I read that article in the Australian and no

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 13>criticism of the newspaper here, but every paragraph is full

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 13>of gobblygook from the bureaucracy that essentially goes through and

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 13>rationalizes that this is how they think of things in Canberra.

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 13>Well outside of Canberra, in real Australia, people expect their

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 13>governments to stand up for some protect citizens and that

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 13>is simply not going on here.

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.240
<v Speaker 9>So, mister Burke, you know one hundred and eleven.

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 13>Direction look after the Aussies first mate, simple as that.

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's go now to Peter Dutton's comments about the ABC.

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>He made them here on the program last night. He's

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a reminder of what he said.

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 11>I think the ABC needs to have a recheck. I

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 11>think Kim Williams really needs to show some backbone and

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:25.919
<v Speaker 11>stand up to people like Laura Tingle and others who

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 11>have hijacked the ABC. I mean, I think there's people

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:31.800
<v Speaker 11>who really have been quite amazed by some of the reporting,

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 11>particularly the ABC, and that's been expressed to us by

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:36.800
<v Speaker 11>different people on this visit.

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe, do you think this is a surprise move from Dutton?

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You know he's picking a fight, he says the new

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.760
<v Speaker 1>check Kim Williams needs to show some backbone. He's accused

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Laura Tingle of hijacking the ABC. Very strong comments from

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the opposition leader when you know he's going to need

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.240
<v Speaker 1>positive media coverage to get elected next.

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 10>Year doesn't surprise me at all, Sherry. Peter Dutton has shown,

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 10>I think, a willingness to weigh into media debates, to

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 10>single out members of the media for criticism when he

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 10>thinks they deserve it. Not just Laura Tingle, He's identified

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 10>other members of the press gallery as well. I think

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:24.320
<v Speaker 10>that is a bit of a departure from standard practice

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:28.919
<v Speaker 10>from the political class. But Peter Dutton's got a point

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 10>to make here about the ABC. The ABC has a

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:38.280
<v Speaker 10>responsibility to uphold its charter to provide balanced coverage and frankly,

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 10>I think there have been a number of examples where

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 10>the ABC is falling short, and I think it is

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 10>critical to hold the public broadcaster, which takes in such

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 10>a lot of taxpayers money, to account. So it doesn't

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 10>surprise me. It doesn't surprise me in the least in

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 10>that regard.

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 4>What do you think do you think this.

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Is going to end up being a bit of a

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>war between Dunton and or do you think more people

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>should speak out about irresponsible journalism.

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 13>We see that yes, because the public's already voting where

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 13>they're remote. In ABC News viewership has never been lower.

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 13>ABC primetime viewership has never been lower. ABC radio ratings

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 13>are tanking.

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 9>There's a problem. There's a message out there, Kim Williams,

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 9>listen to it. Read what the public are saying.

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 13>Peter Dunton, Yeah, you know, he's understandably frustrated with the

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 13>ABC's You'll never win.

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 9>You can give all the money in the world, they'll

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 9>never be your friend.

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 13>It's just sort of the sick thing that people in

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 13>liberal party think if you look after your enemies, they'll

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 13>be your friends.

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:35.720
<v Speaker 9>No, no, no, you're just emboldening your enemy.

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 13>And that is the best way to treat. Treat them

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 13>with contempt while they treat you with contempt. It's the

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 13>only way to deal with them. I don't know why

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:45.280
<v Speaker 13>this is a hard lesson to learn. I just struggled

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 13>to learn it, and Kim Williams is going to struggle

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 13>to learn it.

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the chairs I only ever criticize the

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>ABC before and after the job, and they take no action.

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 4>When they're actually there.

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 9>Frustrating them.

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's finish on the photo that's breaken the internet.

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>At least in France Ssident Emmanuel mccrun's intimate moment with

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>his spots minister.

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 4>It's caused quite the stir.

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>With people noting just how close the French spots minister

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>gets to his neck.

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Joe, what's his explanation here?

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 10>Well, well, Sherry, sometimes photos very difficult to explain. But

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 10>I think this goes to the power of an image

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 10>in telling a story. And you know basically better than

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 10>anyone how important an image can be sometimes when you

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 10>are telling a story. Am I particularly bothered by this image?

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 10>Not really, I mean I find it a little bit refreshing.

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 10>I don't think he can draw any sort of wider

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 10>conclusions about what's going on. I mean, both politicians have

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 10>been married for nearly twenty years to their respective partners.

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 10>Could I imagine a similar thing happening between Anthony Albanezi

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 10>and Anika Wells, Of course not. I don't think that

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 10>would happen in Australia. But I think the real story

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 10>is whether the Olympic Games and the French hosting of

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 10>them are going according to plan. Given all the numerous

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 10>criticisms that are made about the Olympic village and so on.

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and we have been covering those stories as well.

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 4>They just missed.

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 9>I just think they just missed.

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 4>Coming out. But it is quite in a brace.

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>She's holding his neck and holding his neck on the

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:22.240
<v Speaker 1>one side and then kissing him. I mean, the French

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are touchy feely, but that does seem a bit close.

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 13>I think I think it was an accident, and I

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 13>think it's the perfect case of two people who lined

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 13>up for an embrace that was meant to be a

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 13>peck and they missed.

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:36.839
<v Speaker 9>I just I don't know.

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 13>I kind of want to give them both the benefit

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 13>of the doubt, because it's not sort of the place

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 13>you show the world the little secret that no one's

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 13>meant to be knowing.

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 9>Unless we're all missing the secret here.

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 4>Who knows.

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:48.799
<v Speaker 1>We'll learn one day, right, Joe Kelly, Jason Morrison, thank

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you both very much. Now still to come, we'll hear

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.919
<v Speaker 1>from the US as Trump tries to defend himself from

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 1>yet another pie line. But perhaps this time he made

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the wrong remark statuned.

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back.

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's go over to the US now, where the

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>former president Donald Trump was asked in front of a

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>national Association of Black journalists whether.

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Kamala Harris was a diversity higher. Here's what he said.

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 11>She was always of Indian heritage, and she was only

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 11>promoting Indian heritage.

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know she was black.

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 13>Until a number of years ago when she happened to

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 13>turn black, and now she wants to be known as black.

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:31.800
<v Speaker 9>So I don't know is she Indian or is she black?

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's bring you now the elections correspondent at the Federalist,

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Brianna Lyman. Thank you very much for your time.

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:43.240
<v Speaker 4>He's technically wrong. There isn't he, Donald Trump.

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, Kamala Harris is half Indian, half Jamaican. That being said,

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 14>I think what Donald Trump was trying to allude to

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 14>is the fact that Kamala Harris is trying to play

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 14>up half of her heritage while ignoring the other half

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 14>to appeal to obviously black voters, because that is a

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 14>voting block that Joe Biden was actually losing. You saw

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 14>a lot of black voters who had really low enthusiasm

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 14>rates with Joe Biden, and Biden and the Democrats were

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:11.720
<v Speaker 14>headed for a twenty sixteen repeat in which black voters

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 14>in particular, were so disillusioned with Hillary Clinton that they

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 14>chose the couch as a third option. Right, it wasn't

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 14>Hillary Trump, it was the couch and Democrats risk that,

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 14>so now they have to try to win back those voters.

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 14>And I think that might have been what Donald Trump

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 14>was trying to convey. Whether or not he did that

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 14>the best way, that's up for you know, everybody's own interpretation.

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Look, it's been said that Kamala Harris brings out the

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 1>worst in Donald Trump's instincts, that he often makes sexist

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:42.439
<v Speaker 1>comments about her, and I guess we're starting to see

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>or not necessarily sexist, but inappropriate comments about her, and

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see that. Do you think that proposition

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 1>is right that the way he's responding to her isn't

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>presenting him in the best lot.

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 14>Well, I would disagree a little bit. I would say

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 14>that I have not heard Donald Trump say anything that

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 14>was you know, sexist misogynists. Problem is is that in America,

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 14>you know, there's not a ton of conservative outlets both

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 14>on media, both on TV, in print, and so they're

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 14>kind of crafting the narrative. They have been known to lie.

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 14>They're still lying or lying. Actually, as we speak right now,

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 14>I've read a dozen articles in the past twenty four

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 14>hours that really distorts what actually happened yesterday at the conference.

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 14>When it comes to Kamala Harris, though, I think she

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 14>does one thing. She agitates Donald Trump, and not for

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 14>him to say anything that's sexist, misogynist, racist, but she

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:28.320
<v Speaker 14>gets him to speak. And if you notice a difference

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 14>between the debate back in June to when Joe Biden

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 14>dropped out, Donald Trump was quiet. This is a man

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 14>who was tempered, and we know Donald Trump, He's never

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 14>this way, and it was working for him. People were

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:40.399
<v Speaker 14>actually saying, where's Donald Trump? Like, why is he giving

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:42.320
<v Speaker 14>us news to focus on? We have to actually focus

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 14>on the Democrats. Kamala is different. Donald Trump is now

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 14>kind of forced to go out on the defense because

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 14>Kamala is more active on the campaign trail. Kamala is

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 14>taking hits at Donald Trump that Biden wasn't literally able

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 14>to do because he was cognitively impaired.

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And let's have a look at one of those hits.

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Here was Kamala Harris responding to what Trump had to say,

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was the.

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Same old show.

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 11>The divisiveness and the disrespect, and let me just say,

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 11>the American people deserve better.

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 6>The American people deserve better.

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>So, uh, Brianna, it's a different candidate, but the campaign

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>strategy is the same, which is focus on Donald Trump

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the man, focus on his divisive character, focus on the chaos.

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And this is probably what we're going to see more

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of over the next few months from the Democrats.

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, and again, I think it's important that when we

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 14>frame this, you know, Donald Trump is actually not a

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 14>divisive figure. If you ask the American mainstream media, he's divisive.

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 14>But if you talk to the average American. I mean,

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 14>I have Democrat friends fortunately sometimes who will literally say yeah, like, actually,

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 14>the economy was better under Donald Trump. Hey, things were

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:57.879
<v Speaker 14>safe for under Donald Trump. I have friends who voted

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 14>for Biden in twenty twenty that have changed the regis.

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 14>So Donald Trump isn't actually the divisive monster that Democrats

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 14>and the media have portrayed him as. But that is

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 14>their playbook. And the problem with that playbook is Joe

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 14>Biden won in twenty twenty because his message was I'm

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 14>not Donald Trump, vote for me, and that worked because

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 14>people were you know, they were consuming mainstream media every

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 14>day they felt like there was some really big problem.

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 14>But when you have four years of a Trump record

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 14>versus four years of a Biden Harris record, and she

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:26.280
<v Speaker 14>owns every bit of that record just as much as Biden,

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 14>people start to think, well, what made my pockets feel better?

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 14>Who allowed me to put more food on the table,

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:33.919
<v Speaker 14>Who allowed me to pay my bills with ease? And

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 14>that's the problem that Kamala Harris will have to overcome

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 14>with independent voters.

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and inflation and cost of living of course, just

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a big issue in the US like it is for

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>us here in Australia. Kamala is being criticized though for

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:50.320
<v Speaker 1>refusing to do any interviews with journalists. In the past,

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that journalists are able to easily pick.

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Her answers apart.

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:59.399
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't go well in those circumstances, but she can't

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:00.799
<v Speaker 1>avoid them forever, can she.

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 13>No.

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 14>But Kamala Harris has this really luxury or benefit right now,

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 14>is that most candidates would have had months in the

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 14>public eye before the election, right Joe Biden was technically

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 14>chosen as the presumptive nominee back in what February. I

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 14>think our primaries ended maybe March it was clear that

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 14>he was going to be the nominee. Kamala Harris has

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 14>what ninety seven days left compared to most candidates who have,

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 14>you know, six to seven months, who have that intense scrutiny.

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 14>So she's going to skate by, you know, four months

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 14>of solid interviews, of solid scrutiny of questions, and that's

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 14>what she's going to use to her advantage. She has

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:37.840
<v Speaker 14>yet to sit down for a live, sit down interview.

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:39.960
<v Speaker 14>I'm curious as to when that will happen, and I

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 14>think the fear from her handlers is that she has

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 14>the same problem Biden does. She can read off a

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 14>teleprompter just fine. She can you know, chat with people

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 14>for a minute or two here and there on the streets,

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 14>but when it comes to answering questions, especially about her record,

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 14>they don't really have a lot of answers to explain

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 14>why things have gone so poorly.

0:47:56.719 --> 0:48:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting Donald Trump does expose himself to hostile interviews.

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that time and time again. The Black Association

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was one such hostile place. But Kamala will probably try

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to only do media interviews with friendly stations. That's what

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I think is most likely going to happen over the

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:17.879
<v Speaker 1>next few months to reduce the risk. Brianna Lyman, thank

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you very much for your time and thanks everyone at

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>home for your company this week. I'll see you Monday

0:48:23.160 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>at eight and up now, Paul Murray