Speaker 1: On scorns Australia.
Speaker 2: This is the winder Panety Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panehy Show. I'm
Speaker 3: Daniki di Giorgio coming up tonight. Shocking anti Israel protests
Speaker 3: erupt in Melbourne. Daniel Wilde would join us to discuss
Speaker 3: the crazy scenes.
Speaker 4: The WA Parliament has.
Speaker 3: Passed an urgency motion which will allow anyone, including children,
Speaker 3: to change their legal sex and allow men to access
Speaker 3: female only spaces. Stephanie Bastian joins us shortly. Will dive
Speaker 3: into all the best moments of the Trump Harris presidential
Speaker 3: debate with Army Horowitz, including this hilarious moment.
Speaker 5: Everything that she believed three years ago and four years
Speaker 5: ago is out the window. She's going to make philosophy now.
Speaker 5: In fact, I was going to send her a maga.
Speaker 3: Hat Uk labor sparks outrage over their controversial funding cuts
Speaker 3: that could lead the elderly without heating during winter grimes
Speaker 3: on that later in the hour and of course left
Speaker 3: he's a losing it, including more white dudes for Karmela.
Speaker 4: There lunacy nos no bounds.
Speaker 6: Look, I'm going to vote for Kamala Harris. She could
Speaker 6: run over a child live on TV. I'm going to
Speaker 6: vote for Kamala Harris. I'm never going to vote for Trump.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is Deputy executive director of the Institute
Speaker 3: of Public Affairs, Daniel Wilde. Daniel, thank you very much
Speaker 3: for joining us. Let's start with the out of control
Speaker 3: lunacy that unfolded on the streets of Melbourne today when
Speaker 3: anti war and anti Israel idiot activists clashed with police.
Speaker 3: Here's a look, Daniel, this is absolutely disgraceful. The protesters
Speaker 3: threw paint, they threw horsepoo at the cops, they threw
Speaker 3: a manure at the horses. They were totally out of control.
Speaker 3: What do they seriously think they are going to achieve here?
Speaker 1: Well, it's a good question, Denika. There's a couple of things.
Speaker 7: I mean, everybody has a right to protest, and everyone
Speaker 7: has the right to freedom of speech.
Speaker 1: That's fundamental to.
Speaker 7: Our way of life, whether you agree or disagree with
Speaker 7: the particulars of what these people are talking about. But
Speaker 7: at the same time, the community also has the right
Speaker 7: to attend events peacefully, and clearly that was not the
Speaker 7: intent of these protesters, many of whom were, as you've
Speaker 7: pointed out, engaging in violent acts and seeking to intimidate
Speaker 7: those who were attending this very important function held in Melbourne.
Speaker 7: The police in Victoria were given special powers with which
Speaker 7: to deal with these protesters, and it's important that those
Speaker 7: powers are used in a balanced way, not overdone. It
Speaker 7: looks like the police have done the right thing on
Speaker 7: this occasion. The other point that I'd make is I've
Speaker 7: seen some people criticizing the police for brutality, but where
Speaker 7: were these people during the COVID lockdowns, where police at
Speaker 7: the time I were dealing in a very brutal way
Speaker 7: with protesters who were saying who had a different opinion
Speaker 7: to what the government had at the time. So I
Speaker 7: think the point here is one to have equal policing
Speaker 7: and an equal set of rules applied to everybody. And
Speaker 7: I think on this occasion the police look to have
Speaker 7: got it right, at least based on what I've seen
Speaker 7: so far.
Speaker 3: Oh look, absolutely, I mean the scenes we saw today
Speaker 3: certainly warranted it, and I do agree with you. You know,
Speaker 3: you have a right to protest in this country, but
Speaker 3: it clearly was not peaceful today. There Now, youth crime
Speaker 3: is out of control across the country, but you figures
Speaker 3: released today by the Crime Statistics Agency reveal just how
Speaker 3: frightening the situation is. In Victoria, teen criminals are breaking
Speaker 3: into ten times more homes than when Labour came to power,
Speaker 3: and the number of residential aggravated burglaries a committed by
Speaker 3: offenders age ten to seventeen has almost surged one thousand
Speaker 3: percent in the last financial year. Daniel, it means that
Speaker 3: teens are now breaking into a home on average three
Speaker 3: times a day. That's shocking. How has it gotten this point, Well.
Speaker 7: It's gone to this point because of illediate justice system.
Speaker 7: When it comes to violent crime. You know, we know
Speaker 7: that those who commit violent crime need to be dealt
Speaker 7: with immediately.
Speaker 1: There needs to be immediate.
Speaker 7: Consequences for these actions. State governments haven't helped because in
Speaker 7: the main they have been advocating for raising the age
Speaker 7: of criminal responsibility and the effect of that is to
Speaker 7: encourage gain behavior where adults end up getting children to
Speaker 7: commit crimes starting that the children can get off scot free.
Speaker 1: So it's a very bad system.
Speaker 7: One of the issues with our criminal justice system more
Speaker 7: broadly is there's been too much of a focus on
Speaker 7: nonviolent criminals and not enough focus on violent criminals. Those
Speaker 7: who commit violent crimes and our threat to the community
Speaker 7: need to be dealt with in a swift fashion and
Speaker 7: that just hasn't been happening.
Speaker 3: No, and it hasn't been happening around the country. It's
Speaker 3: been absolutely shocking and no wonder a number of residents
Speaker 3: are terrified. Look, let's now talk about Big Australia. The
Speaker 3: Bureau of Statistics has confirmed that Australians are now getting
Speaker 3: poorer faster, due in large part to the record rate
Speaker 3: of migration we've seen, particularly since Labor came into power. Now, Daniel,
Speaker 3: the IPA has researched this extensively.
Speaker 1: What have you found, Well, thanks, Anika.
Speaker 7: What we've found is that we are experiencing the largest
Speaker 7: search to our population in our nation's history, and that
Speaker 7: it hasn't been planned for and as a result, Australians
Speaker 7: are getting poorer. As you rightly say, there's been six
Speaker 7: consecutive quarters of negative per capita economic growth, which is
Speaker 7: the longest declient to living standards on record, and those
Speaker 7: records go back to the early nineteen seventies. So this
Speaker 7: economy is worse than the economy that Whitlam presided over.
Speaker 1: For the living standards of mainstream Australians.
Speaker 7: And the reason this is happening is there's been no
Speaker 7: planning in place and we've got immense pressure on our
Speaker 7: social services, our schools, our roads, our hospitals and of
Speaker 7: course our housing. We know that there is an acute
Speaker 7: housing shortage and rental affordability has plummeted along with it.
Speaker 7: So look, as a nation, we want to be a
Speaker 7: welcoming nation. We want to be a tolerant nation, and
Speaker 7: who can blame migrants for wanting to come to our
Speaker 7: great country for a better future and a better way
Speaker 7: of life. But the current size of the program is
Speaker 7: simply too big for our nation to absorb. And that's
Speaker 7: why a large and growing majority of Australians are saying
Speaker 7: to the government this intake must be reduced, and it
Speaker 7: must be reduced fast.
Speaker 3: Look absolutely, because in the end, nobody ever voted for
Speaker 3: a big Australia, yet here we are, and it's putting
Speaker 3: a lot of pressure on those particularly wanting to get
Speaker 3: into the housing market or the rental crisis. So no
Speaker 3: really good observation there. Let's talk about this gold mine saga.
Speaker 3: It gets murkier and murkier For Tanya Plipisec of course,
Speaker 3: she blocked that gold mine in New South Wales for
Speaker 3: Aboriginal cultural heritage reasons.
Speaker 4: Yet I can't provide the evidence.
Speaker 3: To support the decision because of Aboriginal cultural heritage reasons.
Speaker 3: Now questions have been raised over a newspaper article from
Speaker 3: nineteen twelve which informed the establishment of an indigenous burial
Speaker 3: site within the area of that proposed gold mine. Now
Speaker 3: Daniel experts are warning not to take that newspaper article
Speaker 3: at face value. There is no evidence to support it,
Speaker 3: they say, So it just gets more and more embarrassing
Speaker 3: for the minister.
Speaker 7: Well it does, and ever since day one, Tanya Plibasek
Speaker 7: has not been upfront with the Australian people for her
Speaker 7: extraordinary decision to not allow this gold mine to go ahead.
Speaker 7: As the days go by, it's increasingly apparent that the
Speaker 7: can of bureaucracy is at war with Australia's resources sector.
Speaker 7: This gold mine is just the latest example. But any
Speaker 7: major project that's trying to get up these days is
Speaker 7: either going to be disrupted by partially government funded green
Speaker 7: activists like the Environmental Defender's Office, or they're going to
Speaker 7: experience tremendous delays in the approvals process. Which is designed
Speaker 7: to grind them to a halt because they know if
Speaker 7: they hold these projects up for long enough, the economy
Speaker 7: will turn against the business case and ultimately these projects
Speaker 7: won't go ahead. There's also a sovereign risk where if
Speaker 7: you're an investor, and you could be investing in a
Speaker 7: lot of countries around the world when it comes to
Speaker 7: resources sector projects, you look at these issues and you say, well,
Speaker 7: I might avoid Australia because there's this risk to which
Speaker 7: at a premium is attached on your investment. So you
Speaker 7: know there's very wide ranging economic and social implications of this.
Speaker 7: And as you say, the Environment Minister, she hasn't been
Speaker 7: transparent at all with the Australian people and there's been
Speaker 7: conflicting information.
Speaker 1: It's time for her to tell us the truth.
Speaker 3: Yeah, basically says to investors and business that we're closed.
Speaker 3: We're closed. We're not open. We absolutely closed your spot on. Now,
Speaker 3: a new report has found in order to meet its
Speaker 3: ambitious five year housing target, the New South Wales government
Speaker 3: needs to reprioritize and put major projects like the Metro,
Speaker 3: schools and hospitals on hold. Daniel. The housing crisis, of course,
Speaker 3: is not just conducive to New South Wales. It's everywhere,
Speaker 3: but this certainly is a very ominous warning.
Speaker 1: It is a concerning warning.
Speaker 7: We were just talking about migration and the pressure that
Speaker 7: that's placing on demand and this is one of the
Speaker 7: consequences that there's only so much money and ultimately governments
Speaker 7: have to choose what it is that they're going to finance.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 7: I know the Premiere Chris Minz has rejected this suggestion
Speaker 7: and said they're going to go ahead with all of
Speaker 7: the projects that's currently slated. But to take a broader
Speaker 7: view of this, we've got a dysfunctional federation because the
Speaker 7: federal government is in charge of the migration intake, which
Speaker 7: is increasing demand, but state governments are in charge of
Speaker 7: the supply site in terms of houses and schools and
Speaker 7: roads and other social services. I don't know what National
Speaker 7: Cabinet is doing if they're not talking about this. The
Speaker 7: left hand's not talking to the right hand, and Australias
Speaker 7: look at and they don't understand why we have this problem.
Speaker 7: If you're going to bring in x many migrants, then
Speaker 7: you're going to have to have x many houses.
Speaker 1: It's very simple.
Speaker 7: So there's clearly been a failure of foresight and coordination
Speaker 7: between labor governments. I mean it's not as if there's
Speaker 7: a political device. It's wall to all labor other than
Speaker 7: in the Northern Territory in Tasmania. So I think Australians
Speaker 7: look at this and they just can't understand why we
Speaker 7: have these infrastructure problems.
Speaker 3: No, it makes sense. Now look before we let you go,
Speaker 3: this is fun. A private crew has set out on
Speaker 3: an orbital expedition as they prepare for the first ever
Speaker 3: space walk by non professional astronauts. Daniel, this will be
Speaker 3: quite a feat. If successful, it'll be the first ever
Speaker 3: spacewalk by civilians.
Speaker 1: Well, it's very exciting.
Speaker 7: I think this shows the power of vision, and of
Speaker 7: entrepreneurship and of ambition. So I think this has the
Speaker 7: capacity to bring a lot of people together with excitement.
Speaker 1: We're pretty divided a lot of the time.
Speaker 7: So I hope this is a success and I'm very
Speaker 7: excited to see what might come of it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, me too, Fingers crossed, Daniel Wilde, thanks for joining us. Well,
Speaker 3: this is very concerning. WA Parliament has used its numbers
Speaker 3: to pass an urgency motion, effectively acting any scrutiny of
Speaker 3: its self id bill. What does that mean? Well, it
Speaker 3: means anyone will be able to change their legal sex,
Speaker 3: including children, and permit men to access female only spaces,
Speaker 3: sports and services. Joining me now is Stephanie Bastian from
Speaker 3: Women's Forum Australia. Stephanie, good to see you, Thanks for
Speaker 3: joining us. How dangerous is this?
Speaker 4: What sort of a precedent is it setting?
Speaker 8: Good evening, Danika. These laws are very concerning because, of
Speaker 8: course it makes it easier for men in particular to
Speaker 8: change their gender on their legal documents to access women
Speaker 8: sports spaces and services. It also allows children to do
Speaker 8: so as well. Now, obviously there are security issues, particularly
Speaker 8: in terms of women and the privacy in there in
Speaker 8: things like change rooms, domestic violence shelters and things like that.
Speaker 3: But of course there are other concerns.
Speaker 8: Such as the healthcare system which is a risk to
Speaker 8: persons who identifies transgender as well where they may be
Speaker 8: mis diagnosed or mistreated. So it's very concerning. The WA
Speaker 8: government has rammed this through without consultation. Last month they
Speaker 8: vetoed a parliamentary inquiry. It seems that they just don't
Speaker 8: want to have this bill scrutinized. And of course when
Speaker 8: these laws pass, it makes it a lot easier to
Speaker 8: undo the damage that's done by them. It also sets
Speaker 8: a legal precedent that we're seeing being weaponized around the
Speaker 8: country that is in particular being used against women.
Speaker 3: So there's a range of issues with this bill.
Speaker 8: It's scremely shameful and I just hope that should there
Speaker 8: be a change of government at the next election, the
Speaker 8: Liberals undo this.
Speaker 3: Look absolutely. And the other point to make is, Stephanie,
Speaker 3: what does this mean for parents? Because if your child
Speaker 3: says I'm going to change my gender, legally they're allowed to,
Speaker 3: right Is that the case here?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 8: Absolutely, So the law allows miners to change their identity
Speaker 8: on their legal documents, and the same issues applied, particularly
Speaker 8: in terms of health. The parents have no say, they
Speaker 8: can't get any support for their child if they are
Speaker 8: going through things.
Speaker 3: It's very concerning. Yeah, it is extremely concerning. Now I
Speaker 3: want to go to this case in the UK because
Speaker 3: a surrogate mother in London has one access to her
Speaker 3: biological son in what is been touted as a landmark
Speaker 3: case after her child's same sex parents claimed it was
Speaker 3: homophobic for her to be involved in their motherless family
Speaker 3: with quote no vacancy for a woman, Stephanie, she is
Speaker 3: the genetic mother. How is that homophobic? It's not.
Speaker 8: And one of the key point into this case is
Speaker 8: at no point was the best interests.
Speaker 3: Of the child prioritized.
Speaker 8: It was all about the feelings and desires of these
Speaker 8: two commissioning parents. At the end of the day, the
Speaker 8: biological mother is is not dispensable. Her role is important,
Speaker 8: and to remove that child from the mother creates a
Speaker 8: primal womb that has lifelong ramifications, including trust issues, anxiety, depression.
Speaker 8: There's a range of issues that are linked that are
Speaker 8: just not acknowledged when it comes to surrogacy. And the
Speaker 8: fact that they breached their agreement with her in order
Speaker 8: to try and shut her out of that child's life
Speaker 8: is just very concerning. But I'm so pleased that the
Speaker 8: law upheld her right to be involved in child's that
Speaker 8: child's life, and that the law saw fit to prioritize
Speaker 8: the interests of the child over the wishes of the parents.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Absolutely, a really really interesting case, but you are
Speaker 3: spot on. I mean, it is her right as the
Speaker 3: genetic mother. Now, look, we know that Victorian woman is
Speaker 3: facing legal action for calling trans breastfeeding experimental and a
Speaker 3: dangerous fetage fetish rather.
Speaker 4: But now to add to.
Speaker 3: This, the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne is including men
Speaker 3: in its breastfeeding program. Stephanie, this just seems like complete lunacy.
Speaker 3: What evidence is there to support that drug induced lactation
Speaker 3: is indeed safe for infants.
Speaker 8: There seems to be very little evidence, if any at all.
Speaker 8: And it's not just the drugs that are being used
Speaker 8: to induce the lactation, it's the plethora of hormones and
Speaker 8: drugs these men are taking to present as women. I mean,
Speaker 8: there's no safety data on this. Once again, the feelings
Speaker 8: of men are being prioritized at the expense of the
Speaker 8: safety and nutrition of the baby. It's wrong and it
Speaker 8: just shows the fact that the Royal Women's Hospital doing
Speaker 8: this just how far this gender ideology is entrenched in
Speaker 8: our healthcare system.
Speaker 3: It's an enormous breach of trust.
Speaker 8: And I know, as a mother and as a woman,
Speaker 8: I would be avoiding any health care system, any healthcare
Speaker 8: service like the Women's like the Royal Children's that are
Speaker 8: promoting these practices because there's no scientific basis. In fact,
Speaker 8: the science out there is to the contrary a mother's
Speaker 8: body is biological. The way that she produces milk is hormonal,
Speaker 8: and it is designed to feed the baby into meat
Speaker 8: its needs at the time a milk changes men.
Speaker 3: Biological men can't.
Speaker 8: Do that, and there's no evidence that even the liquid
Speaker 8: that they do supply is able is enough to sustain
Speaker 8: the infant in the first place. I think that this
Speaker 8: is just further proof that we need an investigation into
Speaker 8: all these practices and just how captured these healthcare systems are.
Speaker 3: I absolutely agree with you there needs to be an
Speaker 3: investigation because you know, it could potentially be very dang
Speaker 3: juris for an infant, and we need to get those
Speaker 3: facts pretty quickly. Stephanie Bastian, great to be with you,
Speaker 3: Thanks for joining us. Well still to come, Lefties Losing
Speaker 3: It plus Donald Trump and Kamala Harris go head to
Speaker 3: head during their presidential debate. Army Horowitz will join me
Speaker 3: next to one. Pack it all. Now it is time
Speaker 3: for Lefties Losing It. We will get to the presidential
Speaker 3: debate lunacy in just a second, but first let's start
Speaker 3: with the Swifties, or should I say the deranged and
Speaker 3: demented sect of the Taylor swift Brigade who are losing
Speaker 3: their minds over the singer being pictured with the wife
Speaker 3: of an NFL player, Brittany Mahomes. Why did she kill someone?
Speaker 3: Did she, I don't know, commit a crime? Did she
Speaker 3: hurt someone? Oh no, no, no, it's because she don
Speaker 3: you wait for it, liked then unliked an Instagram post
Speaker 3: by Donald Trump? But how could she possibly unconfirmed but
Speaker 3: maybe like Donald Trump? But maybe not? And how could
Speaker 3: Taylor like this girl? Well? C the full blown lefty
Speaker 3: meltdown of Trump derangement syndrome proportions.
Speaker 9: Taylor Swift is even worse because she surrounds herself with
Speaker 9: misogynistic Trump supporting people like she is supposed to be
Speaker 9: the raw raw advocate for feminism, to be this like
Speaker 9: icon in the pop space, when these are the people
Speaker 9: that she associates herself with. Birds of a feather flock together.
Speaker 3: Oh how dared Taylor Swift? She can't possibly be an
Speaker 3: ally then, of the LGBTQ community if she associated with
Speaker 3: someone who liked and unliked a Donald Trump Instagram post.
Speaker 10: I have always felt that you need to Calm Down
Speaker 10: is a performative LGBTQ song, And honestly, here is a
Speaker 10: proof because if she was an ally, you know, an ally,
Speaker 10: she would not be hanging around a Trump supporter.
Speaker 4: That's just the very.
Speaker 3: Plain and symbol.
Speaker 5: Anybody who is not a straight white Swifty is.
Speaker 3: Going to have some thoughts about this because Trump and
Speaker 3: everyone who supports the hym are literally coming for our next,
Speaker 3: particularly trans people and people of color, poor people like
Speaker 3: the list goes on. No, she's definitely not an ally.
Speaker 3: She must of course be a homophobe. Then can Taylor
Speaker 3: Swifty friends of Brittany Mahomes.
Speaker 9: Sure, but then we are going to have to speculate.
Speaker 11: Okay, who do you allow in your life?
Speaker 3: Are you going to allow homophobes?
Speaker 5: Like?
Speaker 3: And uh, we should speculate that you have no life.
Speaker 3: And let's not forget these are the lefties who pride
Speaker 3: themselves on so called tolerance and speaking of Trump derangement,
Speaker 3: it really affects the brain in certain ways for the
Speaker 3: white dudes of Kamala.
Speaker 6: Cru Look, I'm going to vote for Kamala Harris. She
Speaker 6: could run over a child live on TV. I'm going
Speaker 6: to vote for Kamala Harris. I'm never going to vote
Speaker 6: for Trump.
Speaker 3: Okay, then that is truly normal, very saying that very
Speaker 3: normal stuff, and in the same breath, that same lefty
Speaker 3: diverts and takes us on a different journey.
Speaker 6: But the fact is, even though I think she'll make
Speaker 6: a good president, she's not a good candidate. If you
Speaker 6: remember from when she ran before, she tends to get
Speaker 6: real irritated with stuff she doesn't like. She's not real
Speaker 6: fast on her feet. Maybe she's better now, but live
Speaker 6: events things like that. I don't know, man, I don't
Speaker 6: think she's going to do so well in the debate.
Speaker 3: I can't keep up. I guess just your average Karmala voter.
Speaker 3: I mean, this is what happens when Democrats, as we do,
Speaker 3: forget their auto Q.
Speaker 4: One minute, it's one thing.
Speaker 3: Next you don't know where that thought bubble will lead to.
Speaker 3: It's an illness. And Karmala certainly has a unique supporter base.
Speaker 12: Do you oh, how interesting?
Speaker 7: Come?
Speaker 12: Tell me right?
Speaker 5: So viz.
Speaker 2: Immediately I'm busy.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I wonder what will happen when she grows old
Speaker 3: with that one. And now to the Haitian migrant situation
Speaker 3: and claims of immigrants killing and eating pets and park
Speaker 3: animals in Ohio, and the Dems are in a meltdown
Speaker 3: over the pets for Trump explosion on social media AI
Speaker 3: images like this one protect our Ducks and Kittens in Ohio?
Speaker 3: And how about this one from Donald Trump Junior save
Speaker 3: our Pets? And I've got to say, the goods just
Speaker 3: keep on coming, aren't they just classic? Yet the poor
Speaker 3: old sad dems with no sense of humor who are
Speaker 3: devoid of joy, I'm not happy.
Speaker 12: What in the hell is this? The chairman tweets protect
Speaker 12: our ducks and kittens in a Ohio because he goes
Speaker 12: some down, goes down some crazy rabbit hole, completely debunked
Speaker 12: that aliens are eating pets. My god, are you okay,
Speaker 12: mister chairman? Because last year, for a very long time,
Speaker 12: you tweeted and promoted Kanye West as he was calling
Speaker 12: for genocide against the Jews, and you kept it up.
Speaker 12: And now when we have victims coming here, you're tweeting
Speaker 12: this nonsense. I don't know why you would do this.
Speaker 12: I hope you're okay.
Speaker 3: You gotta laugh. But all you can say is if
Speaker 3: you like your pets or your catsave it or your
Speaker 3: ducks like we've seen, particularly in the Ohio pond, well.
Speaker 4: There's only one choice come November.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is filmmaker and journalist Army Horowitz. Amy,
Speaker 3: thank you so much for joining us. Let's start with
Speaker 3: the highlights of the presidential debate, including Trump's claim that
Speaker 3: migrants are rating hats and dogs in Springfield.
Speaker 5: They're eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're
Speaker 5: eating the cats, they're eating they're eating the pets of
Speaker 5: the people that live there.
Speaker 3: And then he nailed Kamala Harris the borders are challenging
Speaker 3: her on Live to TV to go to the White House,
Speaker 3: wake Joe Biden up and sign a bill to close
Speaker 3: the border down.
Speaker 5: Now do you know that crime in Venezuela and crime
Speaker 5: in countries all over the world is way down. You
Speaker 5: know why because they've taken their criminals off the street
Speaker 5: and they've given them to her to put into our country.
Speaker 5: I'd like to see her go down to Washington, DC
Speaker 5: during this debate, because we're wasting a lot of time,
Speaker 5: sign a bill to close up the border, because they
Speaker 5: have the right to do it. The president of the
Speaker 5: United States. You'll get them out of bed. You'll wake
Speaker 5: them up at four o'clock in the afternoon. You'll say,
Speaker 5: come on, come on down to the office. Let's sign
Speaker 5: a bill.
Speaker 3: I mean, Kamala Harris has no legs to stand on
Speaker 3: when it comes to her border failures. Did Trump show
Speaker 3: her up today? What's your take?
Speaker 13: Yeah? I think that this.
Speaker 14: If I had a scorecard, I would say she had
Speaker 14: a slight edge overall on this, but it was pretty close.
Speaker 13: The problem is that she needed a knockout blow because
Speaker 13: we're trending.
Speaker 14: The polls are trending against her now that the sugar
Speaker 14: high of her replacing Biden is over and after the DNC,
Speaker 14: and she did not score that that knockout punch. Look,
Speaker 14: if you look at the New York Times poll that
Speaker 14: came out, this is very very bad news for her
Speaker 14: campaign and has her up one among lately voters, two
Speaker 14: among all voters. And as how we all know foles
Speaker 14: seem to under sample Trump voters. But if you look
Speaker 14: at the cross tabs, they're even worse for her.
Speaker 13: This is an election of change.
Speaker 14: People majority of people want change, and actually a clear
Speaker 14: majority view Trump as the agent of change more than
Speaker 14: Kamala Harris. And if they talked to the voters and said, hey,
Speaker 14: who do you think will do better on the particular
Speaker 14: issue that you care about the most about exemplifying or
Speaker 14: specifying particular issue. Again, Trump wins a clear majority over
Speaker 14: Kamala Harris, and he's up sixteen percent of her in
Speaker 14: the economy, which is the number one issue across voters.
Speaker 13: So she really needed a knockout blow. She didn't get it.
Speaker 14: Look, this is a typical Trump debate. He's the same
Speaker 14: tip debate he had before.
Speaker 13: It was kind of rambling.
Speaker 14: A little unfocused, but there's so much ammunition against Biden
Speaker 14: Harris that some of the stuff that he was shooting
Speaker 14: the gatling gun ended up hitting and sticking. The difference
Speaker 14: this time was that he didn't have an opponent who
Speaker 14: came on stage, poured gas lino over himself, let himself
Speaker 14: on fire.
Speaker 13: She didn't do that.
Speaker 14: In fact, he kind of put himself a little bit
Speaker 14: of a disadvantage by continuously talking about how dumb she is,
Speaker 14: how terrible she is, So people are expecting that. Usually
Speaker 14: you try to pump up the person you're about the debate.
Speaker 14: He didn't do that, did the opposite and did not
Speaker 14: serve him well. And in the first five minutes he
Speaker 14: had a chance for a real clean body blow. When
Speaker 14: she was asked, are you are are Americans better off now?
Speaker 14: They were four years ago. She did not answer the question,
Speaker 14: and when it came back to Trump, he should have
Speaker 14: pointed out she didn't answer the question because the answer
Speaker 14: is obviously no. He took a swing and a miss
Speaker 14: on that. I thought it was a huge opportunity missed.
Speaker 14: But again, he was also debating the moderators who who
Speaker 14: simply were clearly on her side. The biggest issue was
Speaker 14: they kept fact checking him in real time, but never
Speaker 14: fact check hers when she clearly exaggerated or out right
Speaker 14: live and I think that was a problem that all
Speaker 14: Republicans have when it comes to debates, and this particular
Speaker 14: one as well.
Speaker 3: Let's talk. I want to talk more about that, because
Speaker 3: it felt as though the moderators spent an enormous amount
Speaker 3: of time, as you said, fact checking Donald Trump, but
Speaker 3: not doing the same with Kamala Harris. Have a look
Speaker 3: at this.
Speaker 11: You bring up Springfield, Ohio, and ABCDS did reach out
Speaker 11: to the city manager there. He told us there had
Speaker 11: been no credible reports of President Trump. As you know,
Speaker 11: the FBI says overall violent crime is actually coming down
Speaker 11: in this country. But you have said quote you lost
Speaker 11: by a whisker that you quote didn't quite make it
Speaker 11: that you came up a little bit short. You did
Speaker 11: bring up something you said she went to negotiate with
Speaker 11: Vladimir Putin. Vice President Harris, have you ever met Vladimir Putin?
Speaker 3: How biased army was this debate by ABC News? In
Speaker 3: your view, it felt to me as though it was
Speaker 3: very much so three against one.
Speaker 13: Yeah, it was.
Speaker 12: It was not great.
Speaker 14: Look, it wasn't the most egregious of all of all
Speaker 14: the people I've seen moderate debates, But it wasn't good.
Speaker 14: And I think the single biggest issue in my view
Speaker 14: was the fact that they were fact checking him.
Speaker 13: And by the way, rightly.
Speaker 14: So I'm not saying that fact that the moderate should
Speaker 14: not fact check. I think they should. I think I
Speaker 14: don't like it when either side exaggerates or says lies.
Speaker 13: Both sides did it.
Speaker 14: There are a number of times are up screaming at
Speaker 14: the screen saying, guys, this is so obviously wrong. And
Speaker 14: by the way, one of the most one of the
Speaker 14: biggest ones the fact that she kept saying Trump abortion band,
Speaker 14: trump abortion ban. Wasn't he didn't, There's no Trump abortion
Speaker 14: band or the worst of all for me is Charleston.
Speaker 14: That's one of the biggest lies of all time that
Speaker 14: she continued this lie of he was referring to the
Speaker 14: neo Nazis as good people on both sides.
Speaker 13: I think go one and on and on, and I
Speaker 13: think that was the worst of it.
Speaker 3: But I'm going to say as well, ABC changed its
Speaker 3: tune midway through, allowing Kamla to also interrupt Trump, so
Speaker 3: it left him to roll out this comment.
Speaker 5: She was big on defund the police in Minnesota. She
Speaker 5: went out, I'm talking now, do you know mind?
Speaker 4: Please?
Speaker 5: Does that sound familiar?
Speaker 4: Now?
Speaker 3: Of course, that was a reference to when she debated
Speaker 3: Mike Pence in the VP debate and she said I
Speaker 3: am speaking when he interrupted her.
Speaker 15: Mister Vice President, I'm speaking. I'm speaking, Yes, a vice president,
Speaker 15: I'm speaking. I'm speaking. Okay, if you don't mind letting
Speaker 15: me finish, we can then have a conversation.
Speaker 3: Okay, please, okay.
Speaker 14: Yes, uh, Kamala Harris, I'm a victim here, I'm a woman.
Speaker 13: Hear me a roar. I'm a victim. Look. I didn't
Speaker 13: like it when she did it. It didn't. It didn't.
Speaker 14: It doesn't come across as good. And I think when
Speaker 14: Trump did it also doesn't come across as as as good.
Speaker 14: I don't think I think either one. She's kind of
Speaker 14: let it go. It was odd that her micro was on,
Speaker 14: but yeah, I don't think it helps anybody when they
Speaker 14: kind of play that role saying, oh, please let me speak,
Speaker 14: let me speak. I don't, I said, don't play well
Speaker 14: on TV.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it looked fair enough.
Speaker 3: And there was also a funny moment where Donald Trump
Speaker 3: said this because as we know, Kamala has been not
Speaker 3: copying some of his policies, the ways of doing things.
Speaker 5: Everything that she believed three years ago and four years
Speaker 5: years ago is out the window. She's going to my
Speaker 5: philosophy now. In fact, I was going to send her
Speaker 5: a Maga hat. She's gone to my philosophy. But if
Speaker 5: she ever got elected, she changed it and it will
Speaker 5: be the end of our country.
Speaker 3: I thought that was hilarious. I'd like to see Kamlay
Speaker 3: in a Maga hat. But we know that she's really
Speaker 3: struggled to articulate her own policies or lack thereof. Did
Speaker 3: she explain her policies at all better in this debate?
Speaker 14: No, no, not at all. I watched the debate twice.
Speaker 14: It's by the way, I recommend nobody do. And in
Speaker 14: the second time through for a time of life. Second time,
Speaker 14: I was going through it and I was looking for
Speaker 14: where the policies might be.
Speaker 13: Didn't see them.
Speaker 14: Look, I mean, she did actually populate her website with
Speaker 14: a few paragraphs of policy, but as we as was
Speaker 14: actually kind of proven, she just cut and literally cut
Speaker 14: and paste Biden's policies onto her policy page.
Speaker 13: So I guess we really want to her policies.
Speaker 14: You just have to look at the last four years
Speaker 14: of the Biden Harris presidency and I think you'll get
Speaker 14: a sense of what her policies are. But I think, look,
Speaker 14: the truth is, actually she will be more radical. One
Speaker 14: thing Trump said that was right was yes, she did
Speaker 14: change her tune on fracking, but she never said when she.
Speaker 13: Said I changed in twenty twenty, what.
Speaker 14: She was referring to is she was essentially vocalizing the
Speaker 14: policy of her boss, the eventual president, Joe Biden.
Speaker 13: She never said I believe this. She kept referring to.
Speaker 14: What Joe Biden wanted to do, and in fact he
Speaker 14: did do. And I think Trump was right when he said,
Speaker 14: if she becomes president in Pennsylvania this debate was happening,
Speaker 14: she will attempt to ban fracking day one.
Speaker 13: I don't have any question about it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, she was yo yoing on that one, and you're right,
Speaker 3: she likes to copy and paste things too.
Speaker 4: Now, Donald Trump asked.
Speaker 3: A key question that really has been on everyone's mind.
Speaker 3: Where on earth is the president?
Speaker 5: We're playing with World War three and we have a
Speaker 5: president that we don't even know if he's Where is
Speaker 5: our president? We don't even know if he's a president.
Speaker 5: And just a clarity, he threw him out of a
Speaker 5: campaign like a dog.
Speaker 13: We don't even know is he a president?
Speaker 3: I mean, there were reports this week that Joe Biden
Speaker 3: has been on holiday for forty percent of his presidency,
Speaker 3: and Trump really did ask a legitimate question there Where
Speaker 3: on earth is the president?
Speaker 13: I don't know.
Speaker 14: It depends where doctor Joe Biden is. Where doctor Joe
Speaker 14: Biden is, That's where the president is. Look, it's it's
Speaker 14: it's so interesting that they kept talking about how they
Speaker 14: had to replace him as president as the nominee because
Speaker 14: he clearly wasn't competent to be the nominee. The next
Speaker 14: question needs to be, well, was he competent to be president?
Speaker 13: Because if you.
Speaker 14: Can't run, I'm not sure you can actually it's actually
Speaker 14: more taxing and more difficult, and frankly more important to
Speaker 14: run the country than to run for the guy running
Speaker 14: the country. So I think that brings up more questions
Speaker 14: than an answer is when you replace him as the nominee.
Speaker 14: And I don't think he answers them when he's falling
Speaker 14: asleep on the beach in Delaware.
Speaker 3: No, clearly not. He is clocked off in Delaware and
Speaker 3: not running America. Look, let's move on, army, because I
Speaker 3: want to get your response to the CNN anchor Aaron
Speaker 3: Burnett appears to have marveled at some of the far
Speaker 3: left policy positions that Kamala Harris had when she was
Speaker 3: a presidential candidate back in twenty nineteen, including taxpayer funded
Speaker 3: gender transition surgeries for detained a legal migrants. Have a listen.
Speaker 2: Let's take immigration and look at what she said here.
Speaker 2: She said on immigration, she made this open ended pledge
Speaker 2: to end immigrant attention. She said she supported taxpayer funded
Speaker 2: gender transition surgeries for deteined migrants.
Speaker 7: She also said she.
Speaker 16: Taxpayer funded gender transition surgeries for detainment.
Speaker 3: He actually said she supported.
Speaker 2: She wrote, both wrote and answered in the affirmative when
Speaker 2: she was asked this, and she said she also supported
Speaker 2: it for federal prisoners. Now, she also pledged to slash
Speaker 2: immigration detention by fifty percent, close all family and private facilities,
Speaker 2: and decrease funding for ICE and then the end and
Speaker 2: ICE detainers with local law enforcement.
Speaker 16: I mean, these are these are things that you know,
Speaker 16: it would be hard to think that you would come
Speaker 16: up with taxpayer funding gender transitions for for detained migrants.
Speaker 16: And yet this, as you say, written and verbally.
Speaker 4: Army, it sounds like this CNN.
Speaker 3: Host is surprised by the evidence that's right in front
Speaker 3: of her.
Speaker 13: Oh that was so delicious to watch. I got.
Speaker 14: I gotta say, Look, Andrew Kazinski is actually, you know,
Speaker 14: a pretty good reporter, and I think he does hold
Speaker 14: people to account on both sides. So I'm glad they
Speaker 14: had him on to talk about this issue. I think
Speaker 14: it highlights a couple points. First of all, that their
Speaker 14: CNN and the mainstream he is so used to carrying
Speaker 14: the Democrats water that then where they're confronted with a
Speaker 14: data point from their own people, they are genuinely shocked.
Speaker 14: I think they really do believe their their their their bs.
Speaker 14: And I think what's what's interesting is. It does high
Speaker 14: and by the way, you know, later on on that
Speaker 14: in that interview they talked about they held her to
Speaker 14: account that she was that that Kamala Harris was taking
Speaker 14: a you know, photos and videos of her in front
Speaker 14: of the wall that Donald Trump built. I think that
Speaker 14: was interesting as well. That was a little bit shocking,
Speaker 14: but it highlights the point, which is that's look, outside
Speaker 14: of of the economy and inflation, immigration is their biggest vulnerability.
Speaker 14: And that's where we have to continue on hitting her. Now,
Speaker 14: Trump did that in this in this debate to to
Speaker 14: a large extent, but it does not serve him well.
Speaker 14: It does not serve the purpose of the Republicans being elected.
Speaker 14: But continue to talk about things like the clip you
Speaker 14: showed before about the Haitians eating pets.
Speaker 13: Right, it makes you look weird.
Speaker 14: It does make that does make you look weird, right,
Speaker 14: and it does make it It's an it's it has
Speaker 14: been look, whether it debunked or not, I'm not sure
Speaker 14: a number of people have debunked it, I don't know.
Speaker 14: But it doesn't serve you well for that to be
Speaker 14: your immigration talking point.
Speaker 13: It just doesn't There's.
Speaker 14: So many more clear, true direct ways to hit her
Speaker 14: on immigration.
Speaker 13: You don't have to use that.
Speaker 14: It doesn't serve you well, It doesn't make you look
Speaker 14: good among regular people don't know anything about this stuff.
Speaker 14: I think they need to focus on the same the
Speaker 14: issues that she is most vulnerable on.
Speaker 13: That clearly she is losing on an imigrasion.
Speaker 3: Yeah, absolutely, she certainly, she certainly is. Now. Look, Milania
Speaker 3: Trump has spoken publicly for the very first time about
Speaker 3: the assassination attempt on her husband, questioning officials accounts of
Speaker 3: the incident. This is the video she posted.
Speaker 17: The attempt to end my husband's life was a horrible,
Speaker 17: distressing experience. Now, the silence around it feels heavy. I
Speaker 17: can't help but wonder why didn't law enforcement officials rise
Speaker 17: the shooter before the speech? There is definitely more to
Speaker 17: this story, and we need to uncover the truth.
Speaker 4: I mean, what do you make of the statement she's
Speaker 4: made here?
Speaker 14: First of all, I think it's so interesting. I mean,
Speaker 14: one of the most monumental moments in election history was
Speaker 14: a candidate an assassination tend to begin a candidate live
Speaker 14: on television. Yet we've pretty much forgotten all about it.
Speaker 14: Like I remember, in the moment, it was like this
Speaker 14: is it Trump in that moment with his hand in
Speaker 14: the air. I know I will staying around saying, oh God,
Speaker 14: the election's wrapped up. But we've really, for the most part,
Speaker 14: it's not been an issue. Kind of forgot all about it,
Speaker 14: which I think is fascinating. Look, I think her pointed
Speaker 14: are interesting. I don't think it's any conspiracy around here.
Speaker 14: I don't like the idea of a conspiracy around it.
Speaker 13: And it's true.
Speaker 14: I think competency really was the major issue there. Do
Speaker 14: you remember when they were saying, well, why didn't they
Speaker 14: go on the roof and check out the roof? It
Speaker 14: was a slanted roof. It couldn't go on a roof
Speaker 14: because it was too dangerous because it was a slight,
Speaker 14: little slant to the roof. I think that the bigger
Speaker 14: focus is on a competence as opposed to some kind
Speaker 14: of conspiracy theory.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Look, that's certainly the way they're trying to paint it,
Speaker 3: for sure. Now, look, White Fragility author Robin DiAngelo has
Speaker 3: been tricked into paying reparations to a black producer in
Speaker 3: podcaster Matt Walsh's upcoming documentary Am I Racist? This is
Speaker 3: according to The New York Post, which says that an
Speaker 3: undercover man bun wearing Walsh go to DiAngelo into ponying
Speaker 3: up cash to his producer Ben to compensate for the
Speaker 3: sins of the past by first coughing up the money himself.
Speaker 4: I mean, what do you make of this?
Speaker 14: Okay, I love that kind of thing. That's part of
Speaker 14: what I do as well. So I think when they're
Speaker 14: able to embarrass a race huckster like like like her,
Speaker 14: Robert de Angelo, I'm all for it. Robert Deaneo has
Speaker 14: made millions of dollars race baiting and creating racial division
Speaker 14: or country. She gets significant speaking fees. She does them
Speaker 14: all the time, and and and by the way, yeah.
Speaker 13: She she also is.
Speaker 14: Look, she's one of the more negative forces in our country.
Speaker 14: And also you know during her PhD thesis she's actually, ironically,
Speaker 14: I've been accused of plagiarizing a minority scholar.
Speaker 13: So yeah, I find it all fascinating. Happy to see it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's very fascinating. Army Horror, it's great to be
Speaker 3: with you. Thank you very much for joining us on
Speaker 3: the show this evening. What's the pleasure We'll stay with
Speaker 3: us Coming up after the break, the UK labor government
Speaker 3: sparks outrage over there controversial funding cuts that could lead
Speaker 3: the elderly without hating during winter. Darren Brimes will join
Speaker 3: me next. Welcome back. Joining me now is gb News
Speaker 3: host Darren Grimes. Darren, thanks for joining us. Let's start
Speaker 3: with the British Prime Minister ki Istamo, who has warnty
Speaker 3: is prepared to make unpopular decisions on government spending after
Speaker 3: voting to cut payments which help millions of elderly pay
Speaker 3: for their heating bills. Now here is the Prime Minister
Speaker 3: getting slammed by a journalist for cutting the winter fuel.
Speaker 18: Allowance on that twenty two billion. I want everybody watching
Speaker 18: this to know and understand that nearly half of that
Speaker 18: twenty two billion, nine billion pounds comes from decisions that
Speaker 18: your government has made to give many public sector workers
Speaker 18: pay rises above inflation, including junior doctors getting twenty two
Speaker 18: percent of an increase over two years. So again, when
Speaker 18: it comes to winter fuel allowance, that was a choice.
Speaker 18: It was a political decision for reasons that you say
Speaker 18: you want to sort out the economy, But how can
Speaker 18: you justify it to viewers who feel like it is
Speaker 18: an attack on some people who've worked hard all their lives.
Speaker 18: They're not wealthy, they don't have money to spare and
Speaker 18: this year, if it's cold, they're going to be looking
Speaker 18: at the thermostat I'm wondering if they can pay their bills.
Speaker 3: Darren, what does the Prime Minister have against pensioners.
Speaker 19: Well, that's a very good question, actually, and I think
Speaker 19: there's a fair amount of evidence right now to suggest
Speaker 19: that he does have an issue. But look, the issue
Speaker 19: fundamentally is one of pure polity, which is that the
Speaker 19: elderly generations do not vote for the left wing Labor Party.
Speaker 19: It's a Labor party that thends twelve billion pounds in
Speaker 19: so called climate aid abroad over helping pensioners in an
Speaker 19: environment in which the Labor Party are actively making energy
Speaker 19: more expensive through its pursuit of the not zero policy,
Speaker 19: because they're actually seeking to put household bills up through
Speaker 19: expensive negotiations that they've just had hundreds of pounds on
Speaker 19: energy bills through renewable subsidies. So elderly people are going
Speaker 19: to really suffer this winter as a consequence of the
Speaker 19: pursuit of net zero and the fact that the Labor
Speaker 19: Party is ideologically wedded to combat and that it strikes
Speaker 19: me the so called good times pension has have had
Speaker 19: since twenty ten, even though we have some of the
Speaker 19: lowest pensions in the OECD. I just think fundamentally this
Speaker 19: is purely one of him looking to make some cuts
Speaker 19: and seeing that elderly people do not vote Labor and
Speaker 19: therefore they'll be the first ones to receive the acts.
Speaker 19: It's pure politics and it's really quite wrong actually, because
Speaker 19: I think thousands of elderly people are going to struggle
Speaker 19: this winter as energy bills go up by ten percent
Speaker 19: ten percent. We should be an energy independent country, but
Speaker 19: where instead a basket case in pursuit of greater politics.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you're not wrong, and it's a very concerning particularly
Speaker 3: for the vulnerable. As you mentioned now, Darren, more than
Speaker 3: seventeen hundred prisoners have been released early in England and
Speaker 3: Wales as part of a government scheme to ease over
Speaker 3: crowding in prisons. I've got to say, Darren, this seems
Speaker 3: like a worry to me.
Speaker 19: Yeah, well indeed it is. I mean, there are a
Speaker 19: lord of young men getting out of prison yesterday saying
Speaker 19: that they would vote for the Labor Party for the
Speaker 19: rest of their lives. They were so happy with that
Speaker 19: as they popped champagne courts and all the rest of it. Look,
Speaker 19: this is deeply troubling because the report suggests that actually
Speaker 19: there are a whole host of people in this country
Speaker 19: victims of crime who don't know that the perpetrator of
Speaker 19: said crime is now released and into the wild, so
Speaker 19: getting up to goodness only knows what. There is no
Speaker 19: safety anymore in this country. You know, knife crime goes
Speaker 19: off without hitch. Phone snatchings in London are more frequent
Speaker 19: than catching one of those red buses. It just it
Speaker 19: seems like this is a country where that is really
Speaker 19: really just thing to hell with law and order, and
Speaker 19: that has severe consequences for the population, but also even
Speaker 19: for tourism and things like that. People don't feel safe
Speaker 19: coming to a country that is operating in the way
Speaker 19: in which we are right now. So I'm afraid to
Speaker 19: say that until actually the law and law makers make
Speaker 19: sure that there are consequences for law breakers, then this
Speaker 19: kind of thing is just going to continue to spiral on.
Speaker 19: I don't know about you, but I would have done
Speaker 19: absolutely everything in my gift to make sure that prisoners
Speaker 19: would not be out early, to make sure they have
Speaker 19: actually suffered the consequences of their actions. But now we're
Speaker 19: talking a believer it or not. The Labor government are
Speaker 19: talking about putting them up in hotels in the interim
Speaker 19: because we don't have the prison population. Well, what's wrong
Speaker 19: with the Bibby Stockholm that we had are just off
Speaker 19: the coast of Britain where actually we were going to
Speaker 19: put the asylum so called asylum seekers that arrived here illegally. Well,
Speaker 19: that actually would have done for a few prison population places.
Speaker 19: But instead we're talking about putting them in hotels. I mean,
Speaker 19: what kind of a terran is that?
Speaker 4: Well, what kind of precedent is it setting?
Speaker 3: It's just like a he go, here's a free for all.
Speaker 3: You can get out of jail early. No worries on
Speaker 3: the labor government extraordinary. Now, look, the UK has joined
Speaker 3: the US, France and Germany in imposing fresh sanctions on
Speaker 3: Iran for supplying Russia with ballistic missiles for use in
Speaker 3: Ukraine Darren. The measures include a halting national carrier Iran's
Speaker 3: ability to fly to the UK.
Speaker 4: How big of an impact will this have do you think?
Speaker 19: Look, I think the impact will be negligible at best,
Speaker 19: because let's not forget that we are a country that
Speaker 19: just the other week suspended barred band certain arms sales
Speaker 19: to the State of Israel. Now, the State of Israel,
Speaker 19: in my opinion, is very much at the frontier of
Speaker 19: the battle against the tyrannical Iranian state and its proxies. Now,
Speaker 19: we can do this all we want and virtue signal
Speaker 19: about Iran air and all these other things, but actually
Speaker 19: we just said to Israel that we're going to unarm
Speaker 19: them in certain respects whilst they actually fight Iran. Now
Speaker 19: to me, that means that we're pandering to the allies
Speaker 19: of Iran here at home over actually standing by what
Speaker 19: is one of our most important, key strategic allies within
Speaker 19: the region. So I think this is just completely disjointed
Speaker 19: by the United Kingdom. Apparently our US allies are also
Speaker 19: angry with the decision that's a care starmer made to
Speaker 19: suspend the sale of those arms. So I'm afraid that
Speaker 19: I don't buy this whatsoever. I think there is far
Speaker 19: too much pandering to these nefarious Islamists who are in
Speaker 19: the State of Iran, but also their allies within the
Speaker 19: Western world too, And until we get serious on that,
Speaker 19: because around does have a significant hold within places like
Speaker 19: the United Kingdom, which is maddening to say, to be
Speaker 19: perfectly frank, but until we actually get serious on the
Speaker 19: threat at home as well. But it doesn't really matter
Speaker 19: about the threat through an airline carrier. I'm afraid no.
Speaker 3: I completely agree he look, I want pivot to the
Speaker 3: Royals because Megan and Harry showed their desperation for relevancy
Speaker 3: once again. Soon after Princess Kate released her heartfelt cancer update,
Speaker 3: the Non Royals then released a teaser for their latest
Speaker 3: Netflix program, Polo. I don't know about you.
Speaker 4: I find the timing very curious.
Speaker 3: They've always got a.
Speaker 4: One up the actual Royal family, it seems.
Speaker 19: Yeah, exactly, And it's disgusting timing, really, isn't it, given
Speaker 19: that that was a very emotional video in which the
Speaker 19: Princess of Wales, Kate was actually making clear that you know,
Speaker 19: she had gone through her chemotherapy journey, and it was
Speaker 19: a message of hope, of love, of optimism, really really lovely.
Speaker 19: And then you've got actually a little sop to a
Speaker 19: sport that precious little people play, apart from the extremely
Speaker 19: privileged in many cases and royal members of the Royal family.
Speaker 19: So I think the timing cannot be coincidental. As Jenny
Speaker 19: Bond was saying there, I think actually the fact of
Speaker 19: the matter is that they want to actually piggyback off
Speaker 19: of the fact that the case is in the press
Speaker 19: in such a serious way. Every single press outlet that
Speaker 19: I can think of, whether it be America, Australia, the
Speaker 19: United Kingdom, was carrying that video. So they want to
Speaker 19: actually ensure that their Netflix venture, which is going down
Speaker 19: the pan by the way, they want to make sure
Speaker 19: it has some semblance of success. This is desperation from
Speaker 19: this petulant pair.
Speaker 3: Absolutely as always, Darren Grimes, great to have you on.
Speaker 3: Thank you so much for joining us this evening.
Speaker 4: Well that's it for me. Up next is News Night.
Speaker 3: Good Night,