WEBVTT - Special edition: Listener questions answered

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby, the editor at The Australian, and welcome aboard everybody. Well,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I've had by public demand, you might say, we've had

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>lots of questions, and I know they've been banking up

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and I know a lot of you have had questions

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in the tank if you like for some time today,

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do a special on readers questions and

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll find it very interesting. We will go

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>off in all sorts of directions, so you won't have

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>a common theme if you like. There won't be much

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in the way of structure or order that we normally have,

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>but we will actually bounce off a lot of really

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting subjects. There are all questions from listeners, all types,

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>all real and genuine. I'd like to add, and who

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>will help me with these questions? Well, I mentioned to

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.319
<v Speaker 1>you that I'm away for a week, so the next

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>two shows will be hosted by James Girard and he

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is here to help me today. How are you, James Gerard?

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing well. Good to be back again. Thanks James,

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 2>You're welcome.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>James Gerard, a financial advisor dot com dot au here

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>with me. So on the other thing I'm going to do, James,

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>is as you know, i'm trained as an editor, I'm

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit I'm a bit severe on the editing, as

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you would probably know as a contributor to the paper.

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>But more than that, with the with the correspondence we

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>get and I do want to take the opportunity to

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>say thank you to everyone who writes in and if

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you ever feel the urge to write a review on

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>your podcast app, I would really like that too. But

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>in editing, I keep the questions I demand if you

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>like that, questions are short, and people have got very

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>good at that. That's just in the interest of fairness

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>really that we can get more done. But also, James,

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>as an editor, I snip off endearments or things like

0:01:58.000 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I love the show or whatever, but I

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>think today we leave them in just to give people

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.279
<v Speaker 1>a flavor here and there of some of the stuff

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that people are saying. All right, so my first question,

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>and we'll read them alternately, James, and we'll take our

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>usual segments, but we'll try and do maybe three or

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>four in each segment. So the first question straight off, first,

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Cab off the rank, folks is Yolanda Hiolanda. She says,

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned a Super black spot, a zone where you

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have too much or too little in Super. Are you

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>able to describe this in more detail and give a range?

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Surely a very common range would be six six seven

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to one point five million? What is the amount most

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>people with a full working life which SUPER will have

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 1>in superun retirement without making extra extra contributions. And if

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't answer it, she says, can you point me

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to someone who can hold on? Yolanda, we will make

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a damn good job of answering this. I hope James

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>calls this is really funny. James as an advisor and

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>an optimist, cause it the sweet spot. He talks about

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>sweet spot and Super where you should be. I talk

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>about the black spot and Super where you shouldn't be.

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>That might tell you something about our distinct personalities. But anyway,

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth, here's the thing. And always remember,

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, before we say any answer here, it's probably

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>better to have your own money. Of course, it is okay.

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>You're going to be more independent if you've got a

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>million in Super and someone says I don't have a

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>million in super, but guess what I might as well

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>have for the amount I'm getting in various ways through

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>government payments, and technically that can actually be argued in

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>some cases it's not the same. However, for all the

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>effort we make for all the savings, you do wonder

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes is there a zone in super where when it's

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>arguable on a year to year income basis okay, and

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm including everything you can get from the government done

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Central Link and coming with seniors health cards and everything else,

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and there is a zone where it's arguable whether it's

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>worth the effort. I think James, it's somewhere in the

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>order of four hundred thousand to six hundred thousand. What

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>do you work on?

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's about right. It depends on the person, if

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 2>they're single, if they're a couple, if they own a house,

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 2>or if they don't own a house. Because what I call,

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 2>as you've mentioned, the sweet spot. So the ideal situation

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 2>is where you can pick up the age pension from

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 2>the government in retirement, which is available from age sixty

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 2>seven onwards but subject to an assets and income test.

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 2>But you're also what we call a self funded retiree

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>or have hundreds of thousands of dollars in super as well.

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 2>So the way that you sort of hit that sweet

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 2>spot to get the full age pension from the government,

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 2>which for a single person is almost thirty thousand dollars

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>a year. So it's not pocket money here.

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Well that's what happened when I was saying about a

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. I mean, if you're very conservative estimate if

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you had it in a poorly paying cash account, a

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, what the thirty thousand a year might be

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>there thereabouts what you're going to get, right, So.

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. So yeah, you caush your mind back

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years ago when the cash rates and

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 2>will turn to positve rates, we're giving you half a percent,

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>one percent, you're getting peanuts and even on a million dollars.

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 2>So getting this guaranteed payment of thirty thousand if you're

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 2>a single, forty five thousand if you're a couple from

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the government is great. But of course, with the cash

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 2>rate going up, the return out of super being better.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.679
<v Speaker 2>But still the principles are the same around this sweet spot.

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 2>So the place that your lander should have a look

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 2>at is it's called a guide to Australian Government payments

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>and it's on the services website and you go there,

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 2>you have a look in the back around the assets

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 2>test section and then you just identify which one you

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 2>are and again are you single, you're a couple, Do

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 2>you own a house? Do you not own a house?

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 2>And it will show you how much assets, so how

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 2>much super value of your bank account, car contents, how

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 2>much you can have in assets to receive the full

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>age pension. And then if you exceed the threshold for

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 2>an age and full age pension, you're going to the

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 2>part pension range. And then if you exceed that up

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>a threshold, you get zip.

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 1>So it's called it, and they taper it, don't they.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's like for every dollar over x, it takes

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty cents off your pension. And so keep that in mind.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a long term thing. But it's I mean, it's

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just a huge issue. And by the way, folks,

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>all these retirement calculators, you know, be very careful, be

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.559
<v Speaker 1>damn skeptical about these people saying you need a million

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>and super you need one point six million, a million,

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you need? Well, you know there's a government

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>pension for first of all, and some people will live

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>on that. Part two, there are a lot of other

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>issue items that you can pick up as an older

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>person if you don't have SUPER. But the megapoint I'd

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:12.559
<v Speaker 1>like to make to everyone, James is if you don't

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>own your own home, you will pay highly in this

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>system because it's entirely biased towards the homeowner because the

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>home value is basically not counted, but all SUPER is.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So if there's two people, one has a five million

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>dollar house and tiny bit of SUPER and the other

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>person has a million dollars and SUPER but no home,

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>then that person with just lots of SUPER and no house,

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do worse than the system, aren't they.

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>They are.

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good point. The net assets of the

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>person with the house is much higher, but they get

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the pension, where it's someone with a lower net asset,

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 2>but just because their money is in SUPER, they don't

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>get the pensions. So that's a very good thing. That

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the good point to note that the family house is

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 2>not included in the assets test.

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So keep that in mind, you lander, and all the

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.679
<v Speaker 1>your lander's out there. No advice here, of course, information only,

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And also folks, That is why if you were listening

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to the most recent show, it's why I've come around

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to saying you, yes, you can use your super to

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>buy a family home. Not because it's a great idea,

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>not because it's in principle I think it's terrific, but

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>because the tax system is so loaded against you if

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a home that you are better off

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>with one before you start forever, not just in midlife,

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>young life, but even more so when you're retired. Okay,

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a question from Luke. Do you want to read that one, James?

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I will. When in a DP acronym for dividend reinvestment

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.599
<v Speaker 2>plan for an ETF acronym for exchange traded fund, is

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 2>a dividend reinvestment made at the price post or pre

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 2>distribution post.

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, oh please? Do you're the financial advisor? Yes?

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I wasn't sure. If I asked you a bit,

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll ask.

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>If they're hard. If they're hard, you answer, it's really

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's basically the routine.

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, got it? Sorry, I'll get with the program. Okay.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 2>So the answer is that the dividend is paid and

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 2>then it gets reinvested. So the dividend reinvestment is made

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 2>based on the share price after the end.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>They so so they figure out what the dividend is.

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>The dividend is the dollar per share, and then once

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>they know that, I presume after thirty within the period

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of something, they reinvest that dollar for you in the

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>shares that you have in there in the in the

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>ETF just like a share, just like an ordinary share.

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>They do it the same way. I don't believe there's

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>any difference at all, And I know people are always

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>asking that. Okay, Pavel p A v. E. L Hi

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>as a regular listener to the podcast, and it informative

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and enjoyable, and especially given the quality of the guests

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that you have honored their experience and willingness to share

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>good insights. That's you, James Gerard. I think it would

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>be great if, not if in the not too distant future,

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you could have a financial advisor to summarize what the

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>recontribution strategy is. Oh, okay, our completely upside down, totally

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>twisted supersystem has a thing which allows you to take

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>money out and put it back in and reduce your

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>tax ability of your ultimate inheritance you might pass on

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>through your super That's it conceptually. Would you explain what

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a recontribution strategy is, James, how it might work.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 2>Yep. So we have this hangover from supernuation years of

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the past, with components of supernuation. There's a taxable component,

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a tax free component. There's even a less common

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.839
<v Speaker 2>untaxed component as well. And this was back when I

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 2>first started my career twenty years ago, where we had

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 2>things like reasonable benefits limits and we had to do

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>these complex calculations to work out how much people could

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 2>get out of super in retirement tax free. But going

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 2>back on maybe fifteen years ago now they sort of

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 2>simplified the system and got rid of all these complex

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 2>calculations and basically said that people over the age of

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 2>sixty who are retired will have everything tax free and

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 2>if they're in the pension phase. But the last the

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 2>past few years they've changed the rules a bit and

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 2>they've brought in these one point nine million dollar caps,

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>and it's going to be a three million dollar cap

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 2>at thirty percent. But that aside, for most people who

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 2>are retired in drawing a pension money out of it's

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 2>tax free. So the strategy here around the recontribution is

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>that it didn't really really mean anything to you while

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 2>you're retired drawing your pension because it's tax free. It's

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 2>more for your non dependence. So typically adult children who

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 2>inherit your super money after you pass away dependent so

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 2>spouses they receive the money tax free from your super

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 2>if you pass away, but non dependence. So for kids

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 2>who are grown up, who have their own spouses and

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 2>families and who are not reliant on you, they have

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 2>to pay seventeen percent tax only on the taxable component

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 2>of your super account. So a lot of people don't

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 2>actually know what their components of their SUPO is, So

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 2>you probably need to look at a statement or bring

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 2>up the super fund and you might be surprised because

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 2>there might be a high taxable component, which again you

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be worried about because it doesn't mean anything for

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 2>you in retirement. But there's a planning opportunity depending on

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 2>your age, because you can do this recontribution strategy where

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 2>you take money out of super and then you put

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 2>it back in again, and doing that, you're taking money out,

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 2>and when you take money out, your withdrawal is proportionately

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 2>split between the taxable and tax free component. So in

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>simple terms, if you had one hundred thousand dollars in

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 2>your super account and it was fifty percent taxable fifty

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 2>percent tax free, and if you took ten thousand dollars

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 2>out as a lumps on withdrawal, that one thousand dollars

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 2>withdraw payment would be a mix of fifty percent taxable

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent tax free. And so you've got this ten

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars in your bank account. Now you can put

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 2>it back as what we call a non concessional contribution.

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 2>There's no tax payable when that goes back in, and

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 2>that payment adds to the tax free component of your

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 2>super account.

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a long, elaborate, my mildly absurd way of legitimize,

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>legitimately minimizing the tax of your beneficiaries in the long

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>period of time. And most people by the time they

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>get inheritance now are adults anyway, aren't they. But the

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>other thing is to say, for as, if you've never

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>met any voluntary contributions ever, would you're would it be

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent taxable? Then that's right, yeah, which would

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of people. And increasingly and increasingly people

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>know that the SGC so high that I imagine that

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>group is getting bigger and bigger. Okay, I imagine that

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>all makes perfect sense to you also far these are

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>questions that I've basically distilled some of the more common

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>questions that we get, and we will, as I say,

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>be bouncing around. That was very quickly there. That was

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>two on super and one on dividend reinvestment plans, which,

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of course I'm sure you know what they are. Once

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>upon a time all shares used to have them. Now

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of entirely they're so sort of ruthless in

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>their ways corporate, so they turned them all and off

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>as it suits them. But it's a good discipline if

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you have shares to just sign up for a d

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>or P unless you're very efficient and you know exactly

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>what you're going to do with your cash every time.

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And the other theory academically is like if you think

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a company is good enough, like if you think Commonwealth

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is good enough, common Well Bank's good enough, then it's

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>probably good enough to reinvest in. That is an interesting

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of test if you ever want to sign up

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>for a dividend reinvestment plan for either an ETF or

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a share. Okay, we'll take a short break and we'll

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>be back in a moment. Hello, Welcome back to the

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Australian's Money Puzzle podcast James Kirby with James Girard, and

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a reader's Questions special show for you today.

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Nothing but readers questions, all sorts, shapes and sizes, and

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting one from Scott. I've got to read this.

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a great question. What is the endgame of

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>someone who invests in shares outside of Super for the

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>long term? What's their desired end state? If you're investing

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in shares for the long term, you'd surely do it

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in Super if you're worried about quick access or liquidity.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what an emergency fund is for. I'm forty and

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I've spent the last fifteen years investing in the share

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>market for the long term outside Super through index based ETPs.

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>It suddenly dawned on me that I would likely to

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>crystallize these investments before retirement. I would have invested through Super. Whoops,

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, okay, Scott and all the Scott's out there.

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Interesting point. I originally, when I saw this question, I

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>thought it was what's the end game of investing? There

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>was the old joke in the in the in the

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Danny DeVito movie about with the two they're fighting over,

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it's all about It's about money this movie. It will

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>come to me in a second. Well, it's cold, and

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>he explains to someone else on Wall Street. The guy says,

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>what what's it all about? Why are we doing this anyway?

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And Danny DeVito says, the guy who dies with the

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>most wins, which which is what people will say sometimes

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to me on issues about Super. But I say to them, yes, yes,

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>well settle down there. We all need money in this world,

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and we need to be able to defend ourselves in

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>times of difficulty. That's the first thing not to mention

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>when we get when we are not able to make

0:16:52.320 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the Sundari we make in our prime. Now, Scott, the

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>only thing I would say to you in retrospect because

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it's too late, right, I imagine, so you could switch

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>this stuff into super in specie transfer, but it's too

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 1>late in many ways. You can have. How much can

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you have outside of super tax free in income anyway? James,

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>any single person, anyone in the country can have a

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>certain amount.

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can. It depends a little bit if you're

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 2>a capitable single But let's say start to day ten thousand,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 2>but it can be around twenty five thousand in circumstances.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so whoever you are, even a rock bottom minimum,

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you can make an income of eighteen thousand perannum and

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it's tax free. It doesn't matter whether that money's in

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 1>super or not. So perhaps someone like Scott could could

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>hold it right there and have a look and say, well,

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>how much am I making? What would be the income

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>out of this? And you mightn't have to transfer it

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>if he wanted to transfer it into super, if that

0:17:53.880 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>was his, if that seemed better. How can you do there?

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Can you say this? And I've got did he give

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a number one? How much is there?

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>But let's say let's say he has twenty five brand

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in investments their ETFs and he says, God, I should

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>have put that in my super fund ten years ago,

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>but he's still got ten years to go or twenty

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Can he switch that stuff into his super

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and what would be the upside or downside of that move?

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he can definitely do that. The upshot is that

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>it reduces tax downstream when he's retired, as zero percent

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 2>tax on the capital gains. If he eventually sells it

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 2>and super funds. A lot of them will do what's

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 2>called in specie transfer, so Scott won't have to sell

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 2>the share and then repurchase it through his super fun

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 2>He can just like pick it up and then transfer

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 2>it and drop it into his superfund, which is good.

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 2>There will be capital gains tax implications though, because he's

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 2>crystallizing again whether he does the in specie transfer or

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 2>sells it and moves it to the super fund, so

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 2>that needs to be considered. One thing which I speak

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 2>to clients about is deferring or minimize in capital gains tax.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 2>We're accumulating assets. We're acumulating shares and properties throughout our

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 2>working lives, partly in super, partly personally. So the stuff

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 2>that we hold outside of souper, the best time to

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 2>transfer it into super is generally just stuff you stop working,

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.959
<v Speaker 2>and the reason is that you don't have your employment income,

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>which means that you're not being pulled into the higher

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 2>tax brackets. So as soon as you go into the

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 2>lower tax bracket when you're retired, assuming that you're still

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>under the seventy five years of age for the contribution caps,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 2>that's when we start to crystalize.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So good. This is exactly where our advice comes into play.

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>This is where you know, I would say, folks, this

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is where using advice really pays off. That's such an

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting way of using and optimizing how the system works,

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>and people wouldn't necessarily guess that. Yeah, okay, so just

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so just ron that scenario. If you were gems about

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the person who had the ETFs and let's say they

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>had the twenty grand in ETF and 's they're ten

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>years to go to retirement, what would a person what's

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what is in your view and an optimum uh a

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>pathway there?

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, if they've held that ETF for a

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 2>while and there's a large capital gains tax bill, we

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 2>would just leave it and say, okay, let's just let

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 2>it ride, assuming that we like that et F, and

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 2>then when you retire, the year after you retire, we'll

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 2>sell it at lower tax rates and then transfer that

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 2>money into souper. If there's not that much in the

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 2>way of capital gains tax ten years from retirement, we

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 2>might do it earlier. So it just depends on how

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 2>much tax we're going to get.

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>The little tax treads and ew because of their age.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Correct yeah, that's kind of the key there, I see.

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Very very interesting. Okay, okay, very good. All right, you

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>want to read the question from mac Daddy, which I

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>presume is not a real name. M A C D

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>A D d y macdaddy.

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not an Irish name, is it, James. You haven't

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 2>come across it.

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Now unless it's a very very obscure Scottish name. And

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it is that Danny DeVito movie. I

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 1>think it was Other People's Money, the one you're here

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>are the people's money. Thank you. It's good to Yes,

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we should do a session sometime on financial business and

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>investment movies. That's one of the that is one of

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the really good ones, Steady de Vito, Other People's Money year. Okay, Macdaddy, Right,

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>what's the question?

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for the insightful and entertaining commentary you provide each

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 2>week on Everything finance. How does the stock split affect

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 2>the charts and graphs of the company's share price? For example,

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 2>if a company does a one to four split with

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the share price suddenly dropped by seventy five percent, I

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 2>am guessing not so. How are the share price and

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 2>charts of a single price adjusted for a stock split.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Great question, Macdaddy. Oh gosh, every financial journalist nightmare the

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>time you do the story about the plunge and the

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>share price and you get a call the next day

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>saying you didn't know that there was a stock split,

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>did you? Oh god, it did happen to me once.

0:21:57.600 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a dot com. It was in the middle

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of all the crazy, crazy craziness of dark com. But

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it did happen, and I was super alert to them

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>ever since. So stock split, First of all, actually there's

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>one going on. Is it in Vidia going to do one?

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've followed, But would make sense given how much

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 2>the share price? I don't think so.

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I think so so companies do it when often when

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they when the share price just goes bananas and it's

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just so so high that they that they are of

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the opinion that retail investors don't don't want to buy

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>shocks stocks that cost ten thousand each or whatever, so

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they split them at ten and for every stock you have,

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>suddenly you have ten worth a thousand rather than rather

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>than one worth ten thousand. But it doesn't affect anything, really,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>does it, James. It's just a technicality on the charts.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I supposed it'd be some sort of an inflection point

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>or something which would suggest what happened.

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I've seen this over the years, and what

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 2>happens is that the charts, the historical charts, and the volumes,

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 2>the share volumes are adjusted to ensure continuity, so that

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 2>you're looking at it based on the current after split

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 2>share price. And how it works is, let's just say

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 2>that you have one hundred shares at one hundred dollars each.

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 2>After the split, you'd have you'd have shared at twenty

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 2>five dollars. You'd have more shares, you'd have four hundred shares,

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 2>but you still own the same amount, and the stock

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 2>chart just adjust to show that the new share price

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 2>at twenty five dollars in the proportioned that the previous

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>price history, so it all looks nice and clean.

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So it was one for four split. As mcdeddie asks,

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>then would the share price drop by seventy five drop?

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it does show a drop of that seventy five

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.239
<v Speaker 2>percent straight away, but what I've seen is that they

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 2>sort of smooth it out, so they sort of like

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 2>apply the split, if that makes sense, going backwards, so

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.160
<v Speaker 2>that you don't see that big drop if you I'm

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 2>back six months later. It just looked like everything had

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 2>always been.

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the charts, and it doesn't matter. Well apart from

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you have four shares for everyone you had,

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>mac Daddy, the value of the shares you have have

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in no way change whatsoever. All things been equal, I

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>mean on the day that it happened. But interesting, and

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. We haven't had a question on stock splits before.

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>They're not as common as they used to be, but

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>every now and again they happen in companies. I think

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think CESL might have had one along the way,

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and in video I think I've read that they might

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>be doing one.

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Two.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, right, that was mac daddy. Brad. Thank you for

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>your excellent and concise financial, property and market commentary. I

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>won't bore you with this stuff anymore, folks. I just

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>thought today and it being a reader's question show, we

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>would actually read out what they say. We normally ate

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it all stuff out. I plan to hold some equities

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that is, by the way, they're called shares shares, and

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>sell after the end of June in order to raise

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>realize capital gains at a lower tax rate. Because the

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Stage three tax cuts are coming through. Do you believe

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>others will do the same and will there be any

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>impact on financial and property markets in the next financial

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>year as a result of Stage three tax cuts? I

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>love your question, Brad. Here's the thing. I'll do a

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>quick thing about property and James might pick up on

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the financial side. Do you know that following Stage three

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts which kick in on July one. I don't

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>have the tables in front of me, but if you

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 1>were on one hundred thousand a year when your tax

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>cut comes in, your borrowing capacity will go up by

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty five thousand dollars straight away on July one. If

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you're on one hundred and fifty thousand, your borrowing capacity

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>that is the amount extra you can bid on a

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>house for, will will increase by thirty seven thousand automatically

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>on July one. These are figures from Morga's Choice, which

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I just got yesterday. So there's a property market impact

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>instantly that people will be able to borrow and bid more.

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's take it or anyway you like, But that

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>is not going to put prices down. Let's put it

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 1>that way. It has the potential to put them up.

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>What about more generally James the s there's all sorts

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of angers on this one is for an advisor.

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So firstly, with the planning, with the tax changes

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 2>from one July, some clients are trying to bring forward

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 2>productions into this financial year to claim a higher tax

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 2>deduction because there's higher tax bands compared to next financial year.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 2>But really that's only for people who earn less than

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and ninety thousand dollars per year, because if

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 2>you were in one hundred and ninety thousand dollars a

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 2>year next financial year, you're still going to be taxed

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 2>at a marginal rate of forty seven percent. So people

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 2>below one hundred and ninety then there can be a

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 2>bit of a benefit by trying to prepay interest and

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 2>do other things like that this financial year. With regards

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 2>to broader impacts on financial markets, I don't think it's

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be that much. Cuts will happen, people will

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 2>be happy. But you know, if I ask you, can

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.239
<v Speaker 2>you remember the tax cuts that occurred years ago, ten

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 2>years ago, how do you feel about that? Does that

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 2>still influence your financial decisions? And it is no for everybody,

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 2>So it'll just flow through. People be a little bit

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>richer with more money in their pockets, and then everyone

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 2>will get on with life.

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>They might spend more, though, which could push up inflation. Yeah,

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't say that. I'm looking forward. I was looking

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>forward to interest rates coming down.

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 2>Later this year. Yeah, it looks like next year. Now

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 2>is the later?

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, now they're saying December twenty twenty five. This

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is the money markets. Oh yeah, why don't you say

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six file you're at it? Oh lord, yes,

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll be waiting. We did say, we did say a

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>lot time and go on this show. Don't be waiting

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for their interest rate cuts, my friends. There is no

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>sign of them at all. But thank you for the question. Bad,

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>very very interesting. So tax cuts, yes, some obvious things

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>is that people will have more to spend. Two surveys,

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>NAB and Westpact, both done in the last month, both

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>said the same thing, that the majority of people intend

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to save their tax cuts. And the only thing I

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have to say about those surveys is what people say

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>on surveys and what they do can be very very different.

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>As you know from election polls. Pre election, people will

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>always say what you what they think they should say.

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I say the chances that the people will save eighty

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>percent of their tax cuts are zilch. That's my that's

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>my personal view. What do you think?

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I agree? I agree, it's been tough time.

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Say that anyway, won't you? Yeah? Did the extend they

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>even notice them?

0:28:58.880 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 2>You know what?

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I I don't mean to be facetious there, but how

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>many people are so numerous and financially obsessive that they

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>will note the change per per in their in their pay?

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Not everybody, I have to say, and I'm not just

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>guessing about that. In those same surveys, twenty percent of

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>people didn't know anything about the text cuts. They didn't

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>know they were coming because they haven't been listening to

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasts or reading newspapers. All right, we will take a break.

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm back with some very good questions from John and

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Dan and Rick. Hello. Welcome back to The Australian's Money

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Puzzle podcast. It's a reader's and listeners listeners questions special

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>they have been building up. I thought you might enjoy

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>hearing the questions that are coming in from all sorts

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of angles. Sometimes we in the show, we we do

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>them at the end. Perhaps we do do them too quickly,

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>And I thought this was an opportunity expandid opportunity to

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>catch up to speed on them and actually just zone

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in on them as well. Okay, question from John Great podcast.

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>We have three children age between twelve and eighteen. I

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>would like them to be involved in the families financial decisions.

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this would help them in the future. At

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>what age would you recommend involving them in financial decisions,

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>what chairs to buy, what property to invest in, how

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to manager family trust? Should they be so lucky as

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>having one? He didn't say that that was me at

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the end, James Strars, we both have this situation. My guys.

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to say. They used to say that they

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>understood everything anyway, and then I would challenge them. I say,

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you know about Super?

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I know all about that it was, and then I'd

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>ask them one or two questions, precise questions. They would

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>know the answers. So I have found that their interest

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is building rapidly and it's almost entirely linked with not

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>with Super. They're aware of Super, but it's almost entirely

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>linked with the property prices and how they will fare

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and how they will ever get into the metropolitan markets

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of Australia. Which is probably where they're going to live,

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>considering the sort of jobs that they are probably going

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to get. But so I tried with my guys when

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>they were but I think there were sixteen seventeen eighty

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>when I even tried in any serious way to sit

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>them down a bit. What do you think and what

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>do you think and what do you actually do?

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>B Okay, all right? So similar to John, I've got

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 2>three kids, three girls, so Vivian's five, Viva seven, and

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Chloe's fourteen, so I can speak up to fourteen years

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 2>of age with experience. And I also I insist that

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 2>they listened to the podcast around the dinner table. So hello, girls,

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I love you, hope you're listening to this. And what

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 2>we do is, of course, you want them to understand

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 2>finance at a young age, but I find that children

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 2>just aren't interested and you shouldn't force it on them.

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I found that with Chloe, my elders starting to introduce

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 2>her to debit cards, and I think the good age

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 2>is anywhere from twelve to maybe up to fifteen years

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 2>of age, so they start to understand the basics of

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 2>spending money and earning money through pocket money and doing

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 2>jobs from fifteen onwards, and then starting to introduce them

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 2>to investments, maybe from sixteen through to twenty as they

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 2>show interest in that, and then introducing them to more

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>advanced things such as if you have a family trust,

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 2>how that works, what that means for them in the future,

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the property market, superannuation, saving for the future. I think

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 2>all that foundational stuff. Anyway, from twenty to twenty five.

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of sounds a bit late, but really it's

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 2>difficult to sit an eighteen year old down and get

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 2>them to think about supernuation and salary sacrificing in the

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 2>benefits they'll get at age sixty when they're thinking about

0:32:58.760 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 2>going to the next tailor swift.

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Well that was I suppose you can kick

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it around forever. But that was the brilliance, in some

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>ways of the Paul Kating move of the SGC. I mean,

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>here we are saying, you know, you can actually tap

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it for your super on the same show. But there's

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>no two ways about it. I mean, it's in your

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>twenties that you really really got to get started to

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>get the compounding, and it's in your twenties that you

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>really really really don't care two jots for super because

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you think you're going to live forever, et cetera. So

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>one other thing I thought I just thought I might

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>mention to John is that in my dealings with very

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>very wealthy families, and we've had advisers on the show,

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know who don't say this on the show, but

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they won't deal with people that have you know, they

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>they have to deal with people with ten million. I've had.

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>There's one advisory, there's two advisors on the show that

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>basically that's their range. They just have a small squad

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of clients and these people are very very wealthy. That's

0:33:59.000 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>all they do.

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Uh. And and.

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>What they tell me is how these matriarchs and patriarchs

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>at seriously wealthy families, how they get their kids. More

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>difficult in sub cases for them because you can't really

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>convince the kids that they're going to ever need money,

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to have to pay the mortgage and

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah, because they know they're not going to

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>because they know there's just so much there. And so

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the issue becomes imperative. Uh And what and their way

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>in is philanthropy. So they say, well, you know, you

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to achieve something in climate, climate change, or

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you want to make a difference in some way, get

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 1>involved in the Family Investment Committee and have your place

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>at the table, and then we'll see if we can

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>do what you wanted to do. That's actually a way

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in as I imagine that, imagine that it works for

0:34:57.560 --> 0:34:59.720
<v Speaker 1>all families, at all ages and all types of families.

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>It's that the figures are smaller. Perhaps all right, maybe

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 1>believe it at that terrific great great answers and and

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>and really good on all those issues. And thank you

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody for listening to the show. Okay emails the money

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Puzzle at the Australian dot com dot a U Okay,

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 1>talk to you soon.