Speaker 1: From the Skying Center. This is Paul Murray Live.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Jerry, Welcome to the man Cave. On a
Speaker 2: night where it's no silks, no left He's the carry out.
Speaker 2: A cham Bromwin Bishop is here Kristin Abram from Melbourne
Speaker 2: as well, with a libertarian perspective. But we know how
Speaker 2: much you love the former Speaker of the House. The
Speaker 2: worst poll yet of twenty twenty five for Anthony Arbernezi.
Speaker 2: And it doesn't matter how much money or how many
Speaker 2: self is.
Speaker 1: He's in the world of trouble.
Speaker 2: Peter Dutton way up as preferred Prime Minister in that
Speaker 2: one and the video that is sending the Internet a blaze.
Speaker 1: The whole thing no clips, no edits full celebration.
Speaker 2: And speaking of the final things to say about an
Speaker 2: incredible past couple of days in the United States is
Speaker 2: you may all have noticed quite a few people in
Speaker 2: the flatter about the Amazon boss, his fiance, Jeff Bezos's fiance,
Speaker 2: and what she decided to wear to the inauguration. Some
Speaker 2: say incredibly modern, some say a little too low cut.
Speaker 1: What does Meghan Kelly say?
Speaker 3: This is not my first time saying she dresses like
Speaker 3: a hooker, because she does have some dignity and some
Speaker 3: respect for your setting. In your circumstances, no one should
Speaker 3: be talking about your tits.
Speaker 1: I love that lady.
Speaker 2: As for Mark Zuckerberg, his opinion currently under review.
Speaker 1: Meghan's on the show tomorrow night. I can't wait to
Speaker 1: have her. That's why we love her, love her very much.
Speaker 2: Now still in Washington before we move back to Australia.
Speaker 2: And believe me, this poll in and around Elbow, it's
Speaker 2: not one that he's going to be excited about, nor
Speaker 2: many of his supporters. Those of us who want to
Speaker 2: see the back of him, You'll be happy in a
Speaker 2: couple of seconds time. The Foreign Minister, Penny Wong was
Speaker 2: the representative of Australia along with Karen, the current ambassador,
Speaker 2: but the focus wasn't on him. Instead it was on
Speaker 2: her and some of the people that have gone a
Speaker 2: little bit overboard that any critic of the way that
Speaker 2: the government that has previously bagged him personally is now
Speaker 2: right back in the front seat. Have a look at
Speaker 2: this for some sickening stuff. Sydney Morning Herald Pennywong's golden
Speaker 2: ticket will he wonke style? She's got a golden tier kit.
Speaker 2: She's got a golden tierket.
Speaker 4: Wow.
Speaker 2: Now, of course they even had the photo showing that
Speaker 2: there she was a couple of rows from the Frondais
Speaker 2: circle that even sec there's nothing wrong, and no one's
Speaker 2: ever said that there was going to be something massively wrong.
Speaker 2: It just was pretty obviously the team that has said
Speaker 2: bad things about him publicly is not going to be
Speaker 2: as tight as the people who've said nice things about
Speaker 2: him publicly.
Speaker 1: But have a listen to how they spin the ball.
Speaker 2: Pennywong and Donald Trump, the cerebral, cautious champion of labors
Speaker 2: left and the brash real estate tycoon turned Republican hero
Speaker 2: otherwise known as President. But anyway, at Hardley it hardly
Speaker 2: sounds like a match made in political heaven. Yet there
Speaker 2: was Australian's foreign minister in prime position at Trump's inauguration
Speaker 2: in the Capitol rotunda, seated next to his elder sister.
Speaker 2: It goes on Wong was one of only a handful
Speaker 2: of foreign dignitaries in the actual room, receiving the volunteer
Speaker 2: cat to the event. Despite the crowd size being dramatically
Speaker 2: cut back when the inauguration was moved indoors because of
Speaker 2: the freezing temperatures. Countries with far bigger populations and economies.
Speaker 1: Like Australia, such as.
Speaker 2: France or Germany, they didn't make the cut. The vast
Speaker 2: majority of countries would have been desperate to trade places
Speaker 2: with Australia as they navigate the choppy waters caused by
Speaker 2: Trump's remarkable return to the pinnacle of global politics. Okay,
Speaker 2: and at all Penny Wong, she was able to work
Speaker 2: out exactly where to sit and all the rest of it.
Speaker 2: And then there was a meeting today between the brand
Speaker 2: new Secretary of State and Australia's Foreign minister, and the
Speaker 2: media again saw this as an absolute q and a
Speaker 2: coup of the kind they.
Speaker 1: Like as well.
Speaker 2: Penny Wong one of the first foreign ministers to meet
Speaker 2: new Secretary of State Marco Rubio, not.
Speaker 3: Even twenty four hours into the new presidency, and the
Speaker 3: White House had an Australian guest Foreign Minister.
Speaker 5: Penny Wong US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is side
Speaker 5: by side with Australia's Foreign minister.
Speaker 1: Okay, great, but calmed down.
Speaker 2: The reason Australia had the prominent position, and it was Australia,
Speaker 2: not the person who was sitting in the seat on
Speaker 2: the behalf of Australia was all to do of course,
Speaker 2: with the COAD. This is the relationship between Australia and India, Japan,
Speaker 2: South Korea to have an understanding and to be able
Speaker 2: to share intel and information, principally about pushing back on China. Now,
Speaker 2: the reason that whoever was representing the Quad got the
Speaker 2: great seats on the behalf of the Quad.
Speaker 1: Well, it has to do with.
Speaker 2: This that we are part of that relationship again with
Speaker 2: those other countries.
Speaker 1: And all of.
Speaker 2: Those ministers met today with Marco Rubio, India, Japan, Australia,
Speaker 2: the United States. I apologize, South Korea not part of it.
Speaker 2: Those are the four countries. They all met with the
Speaker 2: brand new Secretary of State. And I'll tell you the
Speaker 2: reason why the Quad gets the billing that it does
Speaker 2: in terms of foreign policy and Donald Trump specifically, and
Speaker 2: I'm sorry I issue a trigger warning you are about
Speaker 2: to see a ghost, a ghost of Prime Minister's past,
Speaker 2: because you see, the Quad was revived by Donald Trump
Speaker 2: in twenty seventeen and in the same way as you've
Speaker 2: used the Abraham Accords as the key to Middle East peace,
Speaker 2: ones he put in place. He views the quad and Australia, Japan,
Speaker 2: the United States and India working together in that quad.
Speaker 2: He sees that as the way of trying to battle China.
Speaker 1: So yeah, okay, great, here's the deal.
Speaker 2: No one thinks that Australia was going to get such
Speaker 2: a cold shoulder that he just would withdraw the troops
Speaker 2: from Darwin, get rid of the submarines from Perth and
Speaker 2: Pine Gap. Well, that could be turned into some sort
Speaker 2: of glamping establishment. The point was, and the point that
Speaker 2: anyone who has been critical of the things that have
Speaker 2: been said in the past, is that the people have
Speaker 2: had to do a pretty obvious about turn. But each way,
Speaker 2: Albo is the way that, of course our Prime minister
Speaker 2: chooses to be no doubt. Eventually, once ambassadors talk to ambassadors,
Speaker 2: and ministers talk to ministers, eventually leaders talk to leaders.
Speaker 2: At some point there will be some sort of a
Speaker 2: warmer embrace. And whether that's under Anthony Arbernezi, Peter Dutton
Speaker 2: or whenever and whoever is the Prime minister when in
Speaker 2: the next four years there is an opportunity to meet. Now,
Speaker 2: first it'll be face to face in all those group
Speaker 2: meetings like the g seven, or the G twenty, or
Speaker 2: the Quad meetings, or the asiat and meetings, or all
Speaker 2: the other reasons why Airbus Albo has to leave the
Speaker 2: country every five minutes. Australia will be warmly welcomed. But
Speaker 2: the point is that if they didn't say the things
Speaker 2: they had said in the past, then there would be
Speaker 2: no water that needed to go under the bridge for
Speaker 2: a better relationship, a real and enthusiastic relationship.
Speaker 1: Let me compare the.
Speaker 2: Pair, as those Union superads like to say, former Prime
Speaker 2: Minister Scott Morrison was with Donald Trump, in fact invited
Speaker 2: to his house on New Year's Eve. He does not
Speaker 2: have an official position anywhere representing Australia anymore, but of
Speaker 2: course he was one of only very small bunch of
Speaker 2: countries who were recognized with the State Dinner. Le Australia
Speaker 2: gets this honor again in the next four years. But
Speaker 2: you see, when you're invited over to somebody's house, it's
Speaker 2: a little bit different than when.
Speaker 1: You are.
Speaker 2: Chasing them around a golf course and yelling at their
Speaker 2: golf cart and.
Speaker 1: Not riding with them.
Speaker 2: You see, Kevin Rudd has been desperate to say that
Speaker 2: despite the fact that the former Prime Minister is invited
Speaker 2: over for New Year's Eve. He's the one who's got
Speaker 2: all the connections in the world, and even the ABC
Speaker 2: writing the most sympathetic version couldn't really cover up for
Speaker 2: the difference between the two former Prime ministers. The ABC
Speaker 2: has learned that mister Rudd briefly met with Trump at
Speaker 2: the Trump International Golf Course in West Palm Beach, Florida,
Speaker 2: near his house in Mary Lago. You mean the one
Speaker 2: that Scomo was invited over to on Year's Eve. Rudd
Speaker 2: reportedly conveyed the good wishes of the Prime Minister and
Speaker 2: told Trump and the Foreign Minister.
Speaker 1: That he we're looking forward to the inauguration. In fact,
Speaker 1: I think we have a video of just how long
Speaker 1: that meeting took place. I planned to go to law school.
Speaker 6: After I graduated, but it looks like my folks won't
Speaker 6: have enough money.
Speaker 7: It's put me through college.
Speaker 1: Well, the world is Stitchtiggers too.
Speaker 2: Nice, Tray, you have no idea how excited I am
Speaker 2: after just pointing that out about Kevin Rudd. I was
Speaker 2: able to play perhaps my top three favorite films of
Speaker 2: all time. We found a way to get it in there.
Speaker 2: But anyone who knows the film. You get the point.
Speaker 2: One is invited over for New Year's Eve, the other
Speaker 2: is trying to pretend, oh, it's closer than ever, despite
Speaker 2: the fact that he's again running after him in the
Speaker 2: car park. So let's get too A poll has just dropped.
Speaker 2: It is just dropped via the nine network on television
Speaker 2: and its assets in the newspapers, and it is the
Speaker 2: worst start to the election year than Anthony Alberize could
Speaker 2: possibly have. Because let's have a look at some of
Speaker 2: these numbers here. If we can bring him up on
Speaker 2: the screen, where the preferred Prime Minister, which was dead
Speaker 2: level at thirty five, is now thirty nine, thirty four,
Speaker 2: Albow goes backwards, Dutton surges forward, and once you start
Speaker 2: to cut this up state by state, it gets really
Speaker 2: bad for the prime minister. The most number of people
Speaker 2: in the country, well they live in of course New
Speaker 2: South Wales and Victoria. But what is the findings here, Well,
Speaker 2: again as the preferred prime minister, the numbers here in
Speaker 2: New South Wales pretty significant. Now, that was the Freshwater
Speaker 2: pole from a couple of days ago. If we can
Speaker 2: focus in on the pole that is there today, you'll
Speaker 2: see that in New South Wales in particular, there is
Speaker 2: a huge leap forward for Peter Dutton. The same in Victoria,
Speaker 2: where things are ever so slightly better for the there
Speaker 2: we go for the prime minister. But still Dutton is
Speaker 2: the preferred prime minister in New South Wales, in Victoria,
Speaker 2: in Queensland, if we can there we go. Have a
Speaker 2: look at that ten point lead. The East Coast preferred
Speaker 2: prime minister where the majority of the population is, the
Speaker 2: majority of the seats are, that is no longer the
Speaker 2: current prime minister for the rest of the country, So
Speaker 2: say South Australia, Tasmania, Northern Territory, Western Australia. Yes, Anthony
Speaker 2: Umbernezi doing better. But the way these poles work is
Speaker 2: that they would ask fewer people from Tasmania or West
Speaker 2: Australia or South Australia because of the populations compared to
Speaker 2: the populations of Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland. So
Speaker 2: the prime minister level pegging at the end of last
Speaker 2: year thought that was as bad as was going to get.
Speaker 2: He has now lost his position as preferred prime minister
Speaker 2: in a poll which was released in newspapers that at
Speaker 2: the start of his prime ministership were already talking about
Speaker 2: a second term based off his polling. Let's have a
Speaker 2: look at the primary vote. This was the election result
Speaker 2: in twenty and twenty two, where as you can see,
Speaker 2: the government was at thirty three percent, the LYMPT thirty six, Greens,
Speaker 2: twelve and five apiece for the Independence and one nation.
Speaker 2: Three years on, have a look at this, the Labour
Speaker 2: Party's lost five points. Where have they gone. They've gone
Speaker 2: to the Coalition, They've gone ever so slightly to the Greens,
Speaker 2: they have absolutely gone to the Independence. A trend that
Speaker 2: we have shown you over and over again, and remember
Speaker 2: Sunday Nights is when we get right into the reeds,
Speaker 2: when we get right into the detail in and around
Speaker 2: election data with state of the race. That's when we
Speaker 2: get some polling people with all of their insight and
Speaker 2: data and information, and the great Michael Kroger to talk
Speaker 2: about his perspectives and tactics. What do they think of this?
Speaker 2: A five point drop? A five point drop. As for
Speaker 2: the Prime minister's personal performance, fifty five percent of the
Speaker 2: country say the Prime Minister is performing poorly or very poorly. Repeat,
Speaker 2: fifty five percent of the country thinks the bloke is
Speaker 2: in the wrong place. He's now losing it nationally as
Speaker 2: preferred prime minister. He's losing it in New South Wales,
Speaker 2: in Victoria and in Queensland. He's going to hope that
Speaker 2: Western Australia were holding up, and that of course will
Speaker 2: mean a very long election night whenever it happens to be.
Speaker 2: And whether that is the difference between minority or majority,
Speaker 2: or who forms minority, it means strap in Western Australia
Speaker 2: you're going to matter more than ever before at a
Speaker 2: federal election. We'll be doing plenty about this between now
Speaker 2: and then. So the Prime Minister is in a world
Speaker 2: of pain. But then you have a look at the
Speaker 2: comments that some people have been making in this pole
Speaker 2: and they're going to be bone chilling too. These are
Speaker 2: the people who told the polster why they were going
Speaker 2: to vote the way that they did, or why they
Speaker 2: had the view that they did. Labor is going down
Speaker 2: a path I disagree with Abbou is showing few leadership qualities.
Speaker 2: The PMS given six hundred million dollars to a footy
Speaker 2: team in Papua New Guinea.
Speaker 1: We could to build homes with that.
Speaker 2: Cost of living has been so destructive for a lot
Speaker 2: of people and the government are doing nothing. Crime rates
Speaker 2: are horrendous, the justice system is in crisis.
Speaker 1: And on and on and on it goes.
Speaker 2: Now, as I've got into great detail with you, one
Speaker 2: of the things that is being laid out in the
Speaker 2: early days of twenty and I get it anyone with
Speaker 2: school kids, they're still on holidays. They'll be up the coast,
Speaker 2: down the coast, wherever it happens to be. And yes,
Speaker 2: the majority of Australia will start to reconnect with the
Speaker 2: real world over the next couple of weeks. But what
Speaker 2: we have seen since we've been back on the air,
Speaker 2: but obviously since the start of the year, is that
Speaker 2: there have been two ways of performing. One has been
Speaker 2: Peter Dutton going around the country giving a series of
Speaker 2: speeches about his values and the Prime Minister going well
Speaker 2: door to door trying to frankly offer money for people
Speaker 2: to even think about voting for his government. And we've
Speaker 2: also seen a great difference between the two when it
Speaker 2: comes to leadership. Leadership around an issue that is increasingly
Speaker 2: important to Australians and that is the safety on their
Speaker 2: streets because of conflicts on the other side of the world.
Speaker 2: People feeling empowered because the hate preacher seems to have
Speaker 2: more power than federal government ministers, who should have never
Speaker 2: given those people a visa, let alone wait a week
Speaker 2: or so before booting them out. We know what's been
Speaker 2: going on in our country and we know that it
Speaker 2: was twenty twenty three when Peter Dutton said it was
Speaker 2: time for a national Cabinet meeting about what was playing
Speaker 2: out across the country, about the obvious antisemitism and the
Speaker 2: obvious threat that was existing to not just that population,
Speaker 2: but the people who may well live next door to
Speaker 2: the house, or next door to the childcare center, or
Speaker 2: next to order the synagogue, take you pick, that have
Speaker 2: all of course been targeted. So National Cabinet it meets.
Speaker 2: Last night we had the breaking Yews and what the
Speaker 2: result of it was, which was nothing nothing in fact,
Speaker 2: just two lights of the entire thing referenced anything that
Speaker 2: was new, and what was new it was to establish
Speaker 2: a database to track anti Semitic crime. This was a
Speaker 2: meeting that went for hours. Appropriately Peter Dutton has given
Speaker 2: it to him right between the eyes, because a meeting
Speaker 2: of those people after that long, with all that power,
Speaker 2: and they came.
Speaker 1: Up with a scoreboard.
Speaker 7: Ministers had fifteen months really to try and address this issue.
Speaker 7: The trouble is he's been walking both sides of the street.
Speaker 7: The Prime Minister had an opportunity to call a National
Speaker 7: cabinet very early on, he chose not to do that.
Speaker 7: Yesterday he convenes a National Cabinet meeting after saying that
Speaker 7: one wasn't necessary just twenty four hours before that, and
Speaker 7: there was nothing substantive that was delivered out of that
Speaker 7: National Cabinet meeting.
Speaker 2: Now, just to prove how their little this announcement was.
Speaker 2: The Prime Minister popping up again today didn't talk about
Speaker 2: the single thing, the single thing that was new, and
Speaker 2: that was that national database. Instead, this was the question
Speaker 2: that he was getting from reporters.
Speaker 6: Well, do a lot of criticism that you've been slow
Speaker 6: to act on these anti Semitic attacks. It is coming
Speaker 6: mostly from the opposition. Were you wrong to be so
Speaker 6: reluctant to hold the National Cabinet pet it up and
Speaker 6: said you should have seen that these attacks that have
Speaker 6: been ramping up this way would happen.
Speaker 7: Have you been that's on us?
Speaker 1: Now?
Speaker 2: Remember first call twenty twenty three, he does it at
Speaker 2: the start of twenty twenty five and all that comes
Speaker 2: out of it is two lines, two lines and a
Speaker 2: scoreboard for a national database, so we can keep an
Speaker 2: eye and we know exactly how many things are taking place, when,
Speaker 2: of course you can see it with your own eyes
Speaker 2: each and every day, you can read it in the news.
Speaker 2: You could get out a pen and paper if you
Speaker 2: wanted to, and you could write them all down and
Speaker 2: then you would have as much information as National Cabinet
Speaker 2: promised yesterday when it comes to action. So did the
Speaker 2: Prime Minister speak about the importance of the announcement yesterday
Speaker 2: of keeping.
Speaker 1: Score Well, of course not. It's just a way to pretend.
Speaker 1: Peter Dutton's the problem, not at all. We're back to
Speaker 1: it from day one. And I'll tell you.
Speaker 4: What is of some concern is people who seek political
Speaker 4: advantage from what is a traumatic circumstance. And I've worked
Speaker 4: with all of the communities. Peter Dutton, for someone who
Speaker 4: is responsible for some national security issues as Minister for
Speaker 4: Home Affairs, should know better.
Speaker 2: In twenty twenty three, that being, Peter Dutton says, I've
Speaker 2: got a solution here, not to stop the whole thing,
Speaker 2: but to make sure that everyone around the country, all
Speaker 2: the premiers, all the Chief Ministers and the Prime Minister
Speaker 2: can all be in the same spot and then they.
Speaker 1: Can meet again, and they can meet again.
Speaker 2: And we all know that when it was the wurflu,
Speaker 2: they're meeting every five minutes. Of course, the Labour people
Speaker 2: wouldn't go on and do what was agreed in those
Speaker 2: because there was a federal election to be one, and
Speaker 2: we know that there's also a federal election to be one.
Speaker 2: But when the numbers are the way they are, particularly
Speaker 2: in New South Wales, the Prime Minister's attempts to have
Speaker 2: it each way like he always does are failing. He
Speaker 2: is not going to be able to put it back
Speaker 2: in the horse or the genie back in the bottle,
Speaker 2: if you prefer to be more polite, and he is
Speaker 2: being outshone by plenty of other people in the Labor Party,
Speaker 2: including of course the News Sobail's premier. As I commented yesterday,
Speaker 2: the Prime Minister of Australia was reduced to looking like
Speaker 2: a nodding backbencher trying to hold in a yawn. There
Speaker 2: by the way, but that's what he was reduced to,
Speaker 2: not the bloke who was in charge, but the bloke
Speaker 2: who was standing behind the guy who was in charge.
Speaker 8: We will leave no stone unturned in combating rampant antisemitism
Speaker 8: and violence in our community.
Speaker 1: It will never be tolerated.
Speaker 7: If you are responsible for these criminal activities, you can
Speaker 7: expect police to.
Speaker 1: Be visiting you soon.
Speaker 7: This is not the end of these arrests.
Speaker 1: Operation Pearl is just getting started.
Speaker 2: All I was going to say was that he built
Speaker 2: upon that today and that's what you just saw. There
Speaker 2: is also something that I want to deal with here,
Speaker 2: and it is something that Chris Means is openly talking
Speaker 2: about as one of the bricks that he wants to
Speaker 2: put in the wall to deal with this problem. And
Speaker 2: it would require news of OL's Parliament to meet and
Speaker 2: pass a new law past laws trying to specifically go
Speaker 2: after what would be defined and as hate speech. Now,
Speaker 2: pretty obviously we know that the graffiti that says if
Speaker 2: the is pretty obviously hateful as it would be if
Speaker 2: it was about gay people, people of any race or religion,
Speaker 2: disabled people. We get what that is about. But the
Speaker 2: hard thing about these laws is that how you put
Speaker 2: them together can always have unintended consequences.
Speaker 1: Now, that's why the.
Speaker 2: Laws were debated but were pulled back on ultimately last year,
Speaker 2: as the Premier told Charry last night that he will
Speaker 2: push on and he in fact had a regret that
Speaker 2: he didn't put the laws into place last year. He
Speaker 2: believes that the hateful language it leads to the hateful events,
Speaker 2: and that's why he needs to introduce the laws. But
Speaker 2: the same people who had some objections to the laws,
Speaker 2: who are not, by the way, trying to find permission
Speaker 2: for people to spray if the on walls, they're just
Speaker 2: talking about those unintended consequences where they're starting to have
Speaker 2: opinions around all of this, including some concerns that the
Speaker 2: Premiere may be moving in a direction that is contrary
Speaker 2: to the advice that he is receiving, the advice that
Speaker 2: he is receiving, not just internally or politically, not just
Speaker 2: from free speech advocates, but of course in and around
Speaker 2: legal advice as well. Now the issue here about hate laws,
Speaker 2: I've got to be very careful here because it could
Speaker 2: be very easily misinterpreted about what I'm going to say.
Speaker 2: But of course the laws will not just be for
Speaker 2: one group. Put in simple terms, they're not going to
Speaker 2: be for the group that you specifically want the most
Speaker 2: amount of protection for. The inevitability will be that it
Speaker 2: will be all forms of religion, all forms of gender,
Speaker 2: all forms of sexuality, forms of ability or disability. And
Speaker 2: the concern that I have about these laws, as well
Speaker 2: intended as they are, and we have to watch the
Speaker 2: process be put together and then look at the actual language,
Speaker 2: is that I don't want to have a scenario where
Speaker 2: the courts will be in a position to be able
Speaker 2: to declare that you have committed a hate crime because
Speaker 2: you are critical of the actions of a person who
Speaker 2: is a certain race, has a sexuality, a certain sexuality,
Speaker 2: is able bodied or disabled. You see, we've seen with
Speaker 2: say human rights legislation, that there are plenty of people
Speaker 2: who want to go off and want to in the
Speaker 2: hope of trying to stamp out racism or discrimination. They
Speaker 2: end up setting a very very low bar for what
Speaker 2: is able to be claimed, and then a very very
Speaker 2: very high threshold for the potential penalties under these things.
Speaker 2: And also, forgive me if I don't have incredible faith
Speaker 2: in the courts to be able to exercise a level
Speaker 2: of common sense here, because for obvious reasons, to make
Speaker 2: sure that the person who writes f the Jews on
Speaker 2: a car on a wall that that person goes to
Speaker 2: JAR for a significant period of time, they'll be pretty high.
Speaker 2: Maximum penalties there, of course won't be mandatory minimums, and
Speaker 2: that's a good thing because you don't want somebody who
Speaker 2: is on this level of offending to end up in
Speaker 2: JARL for as long as the person who's on this
Speaker 2: level of offending. I might be making my point as
Speaker 2: clearly as I want to hear, but I want to
Speaker 2: make it crystal clear that we all want people to
Speaker 2: live in a safe and harmonious society.
Speaker 1: We want every lever government.
Speaker 2: Has to keep us safe. But we also don't want
Speaker 2: a handbreak on free speech. And I am not talking
Speaker 2: about the freedom to discriminate, the freedom to be hateful,
Speaker 2: but someone being able to use what is intended for
Speaker 2: this purpose to be weaponized to be used for this purpose.
Speaker 2: That's the issue that must be discussed. Again, I hope
Speaker 2: you understand the full breadth of what I am trying
Speaker 2: to say here. But again, remember we have a court
Speaker 2: system which has multiple times looked the other way on
Speaker 2: things where governments and you would imagine the public want
Speaker 2: people to be actually held account like people who have
Speaker 2: closed the Sydney Harbor Bridge they did so, but because
Speaker 2: it was in the name of climate change and the
Speaker 2: trauma that they had in around the floods and fires. Well,
Speaker 2: of course out of jail. The same with Queensland and
Speaker 2: their scenario when it came to protest laws. This happens
Speaker 2: over and over and over again. So I am all
Speaker 2: up for the greatest protections possible to keep people safe.
Speaker 2: I do not want a system that is so broad
Speaker 2: that it can be weaponized by someone else. And then
Speaker 2: the final point on all of this, which is perhaps
Speaker 2: the most dangerous thing I could possibly say right now
Speaker 2: around all of this. It is already illegal to assault someone,
Speaker 2: yet people do it. It is already illegal to destroy property,
Speaker 2: but people do it. All the laws in the world,
Speaker 2: if well balanced, give us the best possible protection of
Speaker 2: holding someone accountable for their actions and hopefully a.
Speaker 1: Deterrent from doing those things.
Speaker 2: But any politician anywhere who is going to promise that
Speaker 2: they are going to guarantee a crime free result because
Speaker 2: they've introduced a new law is not telling you the truth. Thankfully,
Speaker 2: Chris Bans is acknowledging that there will always be people
Speaker 2: who break the law, and sadly that will be the
Speaker 2: case when it comes to this stuff, as it is
Speaker 2: with everything else. But watch this space. We can all
Speaker 2: have good intentions, we can all want to take care
Speaker 2: of each other, but how we do it is going
Speaker 2: to matter. I hope you understand. I look forward to
Speaker 2: your view on this and many other things. Email Pauliczguyews
Speaker 2: dot com dot au. Now, of course, in the real world,
Speaker 2: that being the one that you and I live in,
Speaker 2: we are trying to buy things, and we're able to
Speaker 2: buy things because we have a job to do those things,
Speaker 2: and we do our best to help out small business.
Speaker 2: We are not relied upon the government to be able
Speaker 2: to give us the capacity to buy the things that
Speaker 2: we want and take care of the businesses that are around. However,
Speaker 2: the government and the government sector that taxpayer, is now
Speaker 2: hiring more people than ever before. And yes, these are
Speaker 2: real jobs, particularly when it comes to nurses and police,
Speaker 2: but it's not all real jobs when it comes to
Speaker 2: the overarching wide view of government when it comes to
Speaker 2: things like the public service. In fact, more than four
Speaker 2: out of five jobs in the past two years have
Speaker 2: been filled in the public service, so more people are
Speaker 2: being hired into the public service than working in the
Speaker 2: private sector.
Speaker 1: At the moment.
Speaker 2: Now, yes, it is state based as well about health
Speaker 2: and education, and economists are saying that in the same way,
Speaker 2: they have to pull in their spending in lots of
Speaker 2: other areas, adding more people for permanent wages that adds
Speaker 2: to spending. In fact, Shane Oliver from the AMP he
Speaker 2: talks about the effect that this may have on, say
Speaker 2: the Reserve Bank, its decisions around interest rates, meaning how
Speaker 2: much it costs for us to pay.
Speaker 1: Off our houses.
Speaker 2: He says that sectors such as healthcare are important, but
Speaker 2: had probably focused too much on boosting employment over dampening inflation.
Speaker 2: The government helped to avoid a recession, but it arguably
Speaker 2: made inflation worse. It'll be challenging in an election year,
Speaker 2: but the government probably needs to cut spending in some
Speaker 2: areas to make up for the spending that they have
Speaker 2: in others. One more time to the United States. Because
Speaker 2: of all of the different videos and all of the
Speaker 2: things that we had to have a look at, there's
Speaker 2: plenty that I need to quickly tick off before we
Speaker 2: move on to no sook snow lefties. Now you know
Speaker 2: about how many illegal immigrants have made their way across
Speaker 2: the southern border under the former regime of Joe Biden
Speaker 2: and Kamala Harris. I say regime because I want to
Speaker 2: piss a few people off on the internet. But yes,
Speaker 2: of course, the legitimate and legal presidency of Joe Biden
Speaker 2: and his vice president Mala Harris. Now these people were
Speaker 2: just in southern states. Instead, governors and places like Florida
Speaker 2: and Texas decided to say, bugger this, We're going to
Speaker 2: send some of you people to blue cities, which are
Speaker 2: sanctuary cities that are fined to be sanctuary cities because
Speaker 2: they actually don't have to deal with it like New York,
Speaker 2: and you can see the overflow. And the New York
Speaker 2: Mayor Eric Adams had to deal with this problem, and
Speaker 2: when it became New York's problem, it was one he
Speaker 2: was willing to bring up with the president.
Speaker 9: The President came here to New York City, the governor
Speaker 9: and I sat down went with the President and I said,
Speaker 9: mister President, I'm not sure what they're telling you about
Speaker 9: this problem, but this is a terrible problem that's planned
Speaker 9: out on the ground that we need to fix our
Speaker 9: border and we need to just stop allowing people to
Speaker 9: come into the country with no destinied.
Speaker 2: The response of the President and the people who worked
Speaker 2: for the president, the people who thought the lefty Jedi
Speaker 2: mind trick, it's not.
Speaker 1: Really a problem.
Speaker 2: Well, somehow this would apply when you are talking to
Speaker 2: the mayor of one of the bluest cities in the
Speaker 2: country that is telling you fix the border.
Speaker 1: Basically, a good democrat, Eric, be a good Democrat. That
Speaker 1: was the basic overall theme. You know.
Speaker 9: One of his a's told me that listen, this is
Speaker 9: like a goldstrong it a.
Speaker 2: Pass unbelievable, truly unbelievable.
Speaker 1: I can't believe that of all of.
Speaker 2: The things that we looked at and talked about about
Speaker 2: the Trump inauguration that I didn't like devote the entire
Speaker 2: hour of last night's program to one thing that happened
Speaker 2: at one of the inaugural balls.
Speaker 1: This could be.
Speaker 2: The most amazing and awesome thing I've seen all year.
Speaker 10: Enjoy with the sword left his hands.
Speaker 2: And yes, that was a new air Force, one that
Speaker 2: was in fact ordered and designed by Trump. Biden never
Speaker 2: got the flowing at Trump will. Trump gave a massive
Speaker 2: press conference today where the media started to find their
Speaker 2: way to have a crack. He decided to say buggarov
Speaker 2: and push them back. There's been understandable controversy in around
Speaker 2: the January sixth pardons, particularly the people who had committed violence,
Speaker 2: Like any wonder of a common sense view on that,
Speaker 2: which is, people who committed that violent should have stayed
Speaker 2: in jail. Other people, well, that's a decision that's been made.
Speaker 1: By the president.
Speaker 2: But in the same way I admired Donald Trump for
Speaker 2: having the balls the stones to speak truth to power
Speaker 2: in front of Biden and his failures yesterday, I've got
Speaker 2: to say I admire the same about a pastor who
Speaker 2: decided to deliver a very negative message directly to Donald
Speaker 2: Trump today at a church service. Now you may disagree
Speaker 2: with this, but in a country that truly believes in
Speaker 2: free speech, you can say this to a president and
Speaker 2: nothing happens.
Speaker 11: There are gay, lesbian, and transgender children in democratic, Republican
Speaker 11: and independent families. And the people, the people who pick
Speaker 11: our crops and clean our office buildings, who labor in
Speaker 11: poultry farms and meatpacking plants, who wash the dishes after
Speaker 11: we eat in restaurants, and work the night shifts in hospitals.
Speaker 11: They may not be citizens or have the proper documentation,
Speaker 11: but the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals.
Speaker 2: Trump understandably didn't like it, but he also didn't take
Speaker 2: the bait and start some fight with a person in
Speaker 2: the clergy and said he thought that they could have
Speaker 2: done better with their choice. But a clearly better choice
Speaker 2: for Donald Trump and certainly for ater timement value was
Speaker 2: the pasta from Detroit.
Speaker 1: Who was there when he was being sworn in. This
Speaker 1: bloke is a star.
Speaker 5: So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops up New Hampshire.
Speaker 5: Let freedom ring, or from the mighty mountains of New York.
Speaker 5: Let freedom ring from the heightening aleghaties of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: That freedom ring from.
Speaker 5: Every state, every city, every village, and every hamlets.
Speaker 2: In fact, Trump actually said you're a star while hugging
Speaker 2: him after it. All right, no sooks, no lefties, Let's
Speaker 2: get into it, Bromin, Bishop, straight after the break, send
Speaker 2: me em my, Paulskynews dot com dot AU, big discussion,
Speaker 2: big debate, big night ahead. I'm glad you, no sooks,
Speaker 2: no lefties, tonight, joining me as always in the man cave,
Speaker 2: the carryover champ. How do your favorite none of them,
Speaker 2: the wonderful Bromwin Bishop, how are your rockstar terrific?
Speaker 1: Thank you?
Speaker 2: Very much, Love you to see you. A rock star
Speaker 2: in the making, and equally one of our favorites, none
Speaker 2: other than the wonderful Christenaden, of course, say passionate libertarian
Speaker 2: joining us for the first time this year.
Speaker 1: Love you to see you mate.
Speaker 2: Hopefully you've had a good summer as well, and I'm
Speaker 2: sure the three of us could have a very good,
Speaker 2: long philosophical discussion about hate laws and the over extension
Speaker 2: of these things and the infringements of around free speech.
Speaker 2: I will save that for when they start to become
Speaker 2: a potential reality in New South Wales. But let's start
Speaker 2: on where I mentioned the worst poll that Albo could
Speaker 2: have going into an election year. Where As we said,
Speaker 2: fifty five percent of people say that he's doing a
Speaker 2: poor or a very poor job. The preferred prime minister
Speaker 2: number is now thirty nine to thirty four Nationally. It's
Speaker 2: forty two thirty three in favor of Peter Dutton in
Speaker 2: New South Wales, thirty eight thirty four in favor of
Speaker 2: Peter Dutton in Victoria, forty two thirty two in favor
Speaker 2: of Peter Dutton in Queensland. Bromwin polls aren't elections poles
Speaker 2: up the beginning of trends, Darta da da da da
Speaker 2: book bookies, all the rest of it, But your sense
Speaker 2: about the start of this year when the numbers are
Speaker 2: coming in as clear.
Speaker 8: As that I told you before. They were ready to
Speaker 8: go on the seventh of December, and they will be
Speaker 8: beating themselves up that they lost their nerve and didn't
Speaker 8: go because it's not going to get any better. I mean,
Speaker 8: the Prime minister performance today was pathetic. I mean truly
Speaker 8: it was cringe worthy when you start hear him try
Speaker 8: and push away the responsibility for what is happening in
Speaker 8: this country because of his poor leadership on the antisemitism
Speaker 8: and trying to say it's foreign actors when the one
Speaker 8: word that the Commissioner used was could, yeah, good point,
Speaker 8: not make could, and he turns it into a full
Speaker 8: blown thing. It's not my fault, it's all them overseas.
Speaker 1: Yes, it's the crypto people. Absolutely.
Speaker 8: It's just unbelievable that the man who got to be
Speaker 8: Prime minister can be that pathetic. You know, I heard
Speaker 8: somebody say today anyone who gets to be leader, well,
Speaker 8: they have to have something gave for them, not this land.
Speaker 1: You don't see it now.
Speaker 8: He never did, and it's just so apparent. Somebody pointed
Speaker 8: out today that the best week he had in the
Speaker 8: lead up to the last election was the week he
Speaker 8: had offered covid.
Speaker 2: Well Kristen again in favor of Dunton forty two thirty
Speaker 2: two in Queensland, thirty eight thirty four in Victoria, forty
Speaker 2: two thirty three in New South Wales.
Speaker 1: You said, whils Victoria, Queensland.
Speaker 2: That's the seats now, Are there enough to fully pull
Speaker 2: it all together? Yes, but it all depends on the
Speaker 2: performance in and around the teals. But let's talk about
Speaker 2: you know, Woktopia that is Victoria. Well, it's back on
Speaker 2: the trend and they don't want this block, No.
Speaker 12: They don't. We're sick of the cream of the crop
Speaker 12: of labor being Anthony Albaneasy. We are sick of everything
Speaker 12: that labor has done to Victoria and disseminated it. And
Speaker 12: I personally think that we're going to see something like
Speaker 12: America did, because you can already see Dutton doing better
Speaker 12: in the polls. The only risk that I find in
Speaker 12: this is that there's a bunch of minor parties left,
Speaker 12: minor parties that will prop up labor. Yes, and that
Speaker 12: is the risk in the election, whereas the Libs don't
Speaker 12: really have that and they might not be able to
Speaker 12: get over the line in enough seats to form a
Speaker 12: majority government.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I mean, let's talk about that right now again Sunday
Speaker 2: night with the full deep dive on this. But we
Speaker 2: know that in a system that relies upon preferences, if
Speaker 2: you are a Team Blue candidate or a Team Green
Speaker 2: in the Green and Yellow in the regions for the
Speaker 2: National Party, I am recognizing the differences here, but you
Speaker 2: know the point if you're a Team Blue candidate that
Speaker 2: if it's you versus forty eight people on the ballot,
Speaker 2: well forty seven of them are all going to get
Speaker 2: together and the non u vote ends up if it's
Speaker 2: under fifty being able to over fifty being able to
Speaker 2: get you the preference discipline on the right that was
Speaker 2: shown in twenty nineteen from UAP voters and from One
Speaker 2: Nation voters, we're essentially two out of three of them
Speaker 2: backed in the coalition, meant Morrison one in twenty nineteen
Speaker 2: when that wasn't the case. That was kind of the
Speaker 2: other way around. Bugger them all, Bugger the system and
Speaker 2: all the reasons why people did what they did. Well,
Speaker 2: we got the government that we did. What's your sense
Speaker 2: about the people who are in a very significant group
Speaker 2: of people, up to seventeen percent of people who aren't
Speaker 2: buying into Team Red, Team Blue. They're saying independent another
Speaker 2: one nation. What's your sense about what they're going to
Speaker 2: do with number two?
Speaker 8: I think people getting to the stage where independent is
Speaker 8: a luxury good that they don't want a situation where
Speaker 8: nothing can be done about that cost of living problems,
Speaker 8: about their mortgage problems. I mean, the country is in
Speaker 8: the wrong direction when you've got the snake charmer out
Speaker 8: there saying all these jobs is created, eighty two percent
Speaker 8: of them are in the public or public dependent sector. Correct,
Speaker 8: the private sector has been squeezed out. Now, all those
Speaker 8: people who risk their houses to have their own businesses,
Speaker 8: all those people who are struggling to pay themselves a
Speaker 8: wage to employ other people with a disastrous industrial relations
Speaker 8: laws which are starting to be felt, and they'll get
Speaker 8: to be felt more. I think they're going to think,
Speaker 8: maybe independence is a luxury we can't afford this time.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well look again in the Senate the pictures there.
Speaker 2: Sorry, Kristin, there are plenty of other pictures and certainly,
Speaker 2: and I'm not going to pretend that Kristin doesn't of
Speaker 2: course represent that the libertarian perspective. And again, whether they're
Speaker 2: fight is in and around the Senate will all wait
Speaker 2: and see. But again, sorry I interrupted you, Kristin.
Speaker 11: No.
Speaker 12: I was going to say, well, Labor, the federal labor
Speaker 12: government is taking a play out of the Victorian Labour's
Speaker 12: book in terms of stacking the deck. The more people
Speaker 12: that they put in the public sector, the more people
Speaker 12: that are going to guarantee them votes. And it's amazing
Speaker 12: that people don't see that that's what they're doing.
Speaker 2: All right, let's talk about Trump, but more importantly the
Speaker 2: umbrella of which he has now created for Peter Dutton
Speaker 2: potentially to be able to either pull Australia out of
Speaker 2: the Paris Accord or to be able to not play
Speaker 2: the game that the left wants when it comes to
Speaker 2: twenty thirty five targets. We know that there is a
Speaker 2: twenty thirty five target that's going to be coming, but
Speaker 2: Anthony Ambanez says, I possibly couldn't possibly tell you that
Speaker 2: before the election because we all know that it would
Speaker 2: be negotiated as one of the things to potentially keep
Speaker 2: himself in offers. This is a massive issue for Australia
Speaker 2: because now that essentially China doesn't really have to apply
Speaker 2: till twenty thirty, India the same, the developing world the same,
Speaker 2: and now America. It's the best part of sixty plus
Speaker 2: percent of the world's emissions.
Speaker 8: Look, what Trump has demonstrated is he said this is
Speaker 8: going to be a golden age. And you can't have
Speaker 8: a golden age with rigid policies, green policies, you just can't.
Speaker 8: They're sclerosis. They're unable to adapt to new things. Look
Speaker 8: we got from Germany three things, world War one, world
Speaker 8: War II, and the Greens Party and the Greens Party
Speaker 8: came out of the anti nuclear party, and there's bands
Speaker 8: still trotting it out today. But in Europe they're starting
Speaker 8: to push them away. It's been a part of which
Speaker 8: has got no ability to adapt to one of the
Speaker 8: new circumstances. Now, what Trumps said is that the future
Speaker 8: of prosperity is energy electricity, that without that you cannot
Speaker 8: have a prosperostination. And he's right. We are punishing ourselves.
Speaker 8: We have the cost of the supermarket checkout, we have
Speaker 8: the cost of the electricity bill when it comes in,
Speaker 8: we have the cost of the mortgage every month, and
Speaker 8: then on top of that we get the insurance bill now,
Speaker 8: which hits you really hard because it gets bigger and
Speaker 8: bigger each time. So unless we go back to having
Speaker 8: cheap energy and cheap fuel, then we can never get
Speaker 8: a prosperous nation again. And this government is rigid. It
Speaker 8: is unable to adapt. If it's getting warmer, adapt to
Speaker 8: it new policies. But just don't say we've got to
Speaker 8: put our head in the sand and say, oh, the
Speaker 8: wolves all coming to an end because because because because
Speaker 8: climate change has become the world's biggest excuse to do nothing.
Speaker 2: Great, Kenn, I know what you think about that. I'm
Speaker 2: pretty sure I know what many of you will.
Speaker 1: Paul. It's GODEWS dot com dot Are you quick break
Speaker 1: back with more Chris than I promise.
Speaker 2: Your first cab off the brank, a first cap off
Speaker 2: the rank after the break.
Speaker 1: Plenty more to talk about here on Paul Murray Live.
Speaker 1: Thanks for watching. About fifteen minutes still Lactiday, a.
Speaker 2: Few days away from Australia Day, and thankfully we are
Speaker 2: not having the Invasion Day debate over and over and
Speaker 2: over again. Instead, what we are starting to see is
Speaker 2: actually the majority of councils and the majority of people
Speaker 2: representing people in those councils wanting to embrace Australia Day. Yes,
Speaker 2: there are a significant number who do not, but particularly
Speaker 2: in areas that represent people who may have come to
Speaker 2: the country in this generation or the one before. Now,
Speaker 2: Chris and Abram is here along with the wonderful Bromwin
Speaker 2: Bishop Kristen.
Speaker 1: What is it that is so obviously.
Speaker 2: On show in newer communities that their public embrace of
Speaker 2: a national day is louder than the people who have
Speaker 2: had the privilege of being born here and growing up
Speaker 2: here over many generations longer.
Speaker 12: I'm a first generation Australian myself, Paul, and I'm grateful
Speaker 12: that my parents migrated to Australia. And these people that
Speaker 12: are getting their citizenship certificate on Australia Day, they've chosen
Speaker 12: this country. They've said, no, I'm going to leave my
Speaker 12: home country behind and make this my home and call
Speaker 12: Australia home. So it is quite a beautiful embrace, and
Speaker 12: we should be proud of the nation that we live in.
Speaker 12: We should be proud of whether that's the people that
Speaker 12: have chosen to become Australian, the people that were born
Speaker 12: here first generation, or the people that have been here
Speaker 12: for forty thousand years. We should all be proud to
Speaker 12: be Australians. And I'll say something very controversial about Australia
Speaker 12: Day though, Paul, and that is I do think that
Speaker 12: we should change the date of Australia Day on the
Speaker 12: condition that we celebrate it louder, prouder, bigger and better
Speaker 12: than we have in the previous years, because I'm sick
Speaker 12: of this cloud hanging over Australia Day. I am proud
Speaker 12: to be in Australian and I want the rest of
Speaker 12: the country to be proud with me. And if that
Speaker 12: means changing it to today, the thirtieth of January, or
Speaker 12: whatever the day it may be, that is okay. As
Speaker 12: long as we celebrate it, breat it loud and proud,
Speaker 12: well say, I will be celebrating it in Talkie Beach
Speaker 12: with a Libertarian counselor with a public barbecue so anyone
Speaker 12: can come down and get amongst it.
Speaker 2: Good stuff, all right, We'll enjoy the BBQ at Torqui
Speaker 2: beautiful place of course. At the start of the grade
Speaker 2: Ocean road. That said, of course, I think the issue,
Speaker 2: as always bromwinize, is that April the twenty third or
Speaker 2: September six. The whole point is there's a certain group
Speaker 2: of people who do not want that recognition around modern Australia.
Speaker 2: But again to this point where people from places in
Speaker 2: New South Wales like a Bankstown or a Liverpool that
Speaker 2: their mayors are saying, look, I'll do any interview you
Speaker 2: want about how great Australiaday is, but try and find
Speaker 2: the one on the northern beaches of Sydney to have
Speaker 2: the same view.
Speaker 8: Well, I'll give you two good reasons why Australia Day
Speaker 8: is so important for people taking citizenship, as we just heard,
Speaker 8: and that is that as a local member, I went
Speaker 8: to all citizenship ceremonies. If I missed one, I'd be amazed.
Speaker 8: And I did it because I think it was so
Speaker 8: important that someone was taking the decision to give their
Speaker 8: all to this country and to sign up to this country,
Speaker 8: and that is a fantastic and big decision to make,
Speaker 8: and so I thought it was incumbent on me to
Speaker 8: be there to talk to them, to discuss with them,
Speaker 8: to meet them and to know what their hopes and
Speaker 8: aspirations were. But in answer to the problem about why
Speaker 8: the twenty sixth of January is such an important date,
Speaker 8: it's not only important because that's the day that Governor
Speaker 8: Philip arrived with the first fleet. It's also the day
Speaker 8: in nineteen forty nine when Australians went from being British
Speaker 8: subjects to becoming Australian citizens. And that was a very
Speaker 8: important change, and that included Aboriginal people. So there are
Speaker 8: two good reasons. The sheer guts of the people who
Speaker 8: traveled over those seas and then had to try and
Speaker 8: make a living out of the land and stay alive
Speaker 8: with food and invented things like the stump plow and
Speaker 8: all that they could do it. That's a good reason.
Speaker 8: But so is becoming an Australian citizen as distinct from
Speaker 8: a British subjects.
Speaker 1: Yeah, very good point.
Speaker 2: I should mention Northern Beach is counciled before they send
Speaker 2: a complaint to me. They are having a breakfast on
Speaker 2: the twenty sixth at Newport Beach indeed, and they will
Speaker 2: be there.
Speaker 8: So we used to make we used to have a
Speaker 8: big ceremony where we made people's citizens on the Beach. Yeah,
Speaker 8: they don't do that anymore.
Speaker 1: Think that's the way, that's the way to do it.
Speaker 12: But what's the alternative If if we're not, if we're
Speaker 12: not having people that are choosing to be Australian citizens
Speaker 12: be proud on Australia Day, then why are they becoming
Speaker 12: Australian citizens in the first place? What is the alternative?
Speaker 12: And everyone else should feel that pride as well.
Speaker 2: Great point, excellent point is this is the thing that
Speaker 2: people who have not had to go through that process,
Speaker 2: and those rituals seem to be the ones that are
Speaker 2: most loud and loud and out there.
Speaker 1: Again, we're all across the past, we're all we're all aware.
Speaker 2: But are anyone who thinks that, you know, Australian Days
Speaker 2: sort of you know, victory day or rub it in
Speaker 2: people's face? Of course not right, of course, not the
Speaker 2: case anyway. We see it as the day when so
Speaker 2: many people do renew themselves to the country. I was
Speaker 2: going to talk about dogs in cafes, but I'll save
Speaker 2: that for tomorrow night. Thank you so much to you,
Speaker 2: bron with Bishop will see you again next week and
Speaker 2: christin Abrams again.
Speaker 1: Talkie talkie, beach or the mainStreet. Where are you going
Speaker 1: to be?
Speaker 12: Yes, Talkie Rich twelve pm public barbecue. Everyone's welcome. I
Speaker 12: will be having Australia Day tattoos for you.
Speaker 2: How ironically libertarian that you're going to buy it for
Speaker 2: everyone else, But I get the point.
Speaker 8: And happy a strategy to you too. I hope it's
Speaker 8: great for you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, very much, Thank you guys. All right, that's our
Speaker 2: shaving a thank you very much for watching. Brighton and
Speaker 2: Bishop will be back next week in the morning. Meghan Kereley,
Speaker 2: I promise she will be on the show tomorrow and
Speaker 2: she's no doubt going to make just as many global
Speaker 2: headlines as she did today. What a great rip in
Speaker 2: that was. If you want to watch her show, you
Speaker 2: can find it on YouTube. If you want to find
Speaker 2: the videos, details or anything else about ours, you go
Speaker 2: to the page that.
Speaker 1: Should be your homepage.
Speaker 2: People still do that' sky news dot com do A
Speaker 2: youa