WEBVTT - Credlin | 27 October

0:00:08.260 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Good evening. Welcome to the show. Caught out misleading the

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.010
<v Speaker 1>Parliament today. The Prime Minister did his best to spin

0:00:14.050 --> 0:00:17.180
<v Speaker 1>it all away, but he couldn't. I'll get you across

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.790
<v Speaker 1>what's been a bad day for Labor in Canberra and more.

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.610
<v Speaker 1>Here's what's coming up tonight on the show. More angry

0:00:22.790 --> 0:00:27.290
<v Speaker 1>regional communities. Yet another massive renewables project is approved, this

0:00:27.450 --> 0:00:32.390
<v Speaker 1>one in Victoria, just before Labor's likely election loss in

0:00:32.409 --> 0:00:35.410
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks' time. Worse still, locals were not

0:00:35.470 --> 0:00:38.370
<v Speaker 1>even consulted. We'll check in with the people of Warwick,

0:00:38.430 --> 0:00:43.900
<v Speaker 1>Nabil tonight. Wind turbines on the way. More alarming vision, too,

0:00:43.979 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 1>out of Australian childcare centres. So why does the Prime

0:00:46.500 --> 0:00:50.260
<v Speaker 1>Minister still force parents to use what he tells them

0:00:50.340 --> 0:00:53.780
<v Speaker 1>to rather than give them choice in order to keep

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.300
<v Speaker 1>their children safe? The plan to strip the words war

0:00:57.330 --> 0:01:01.130
<v Speaker 1>memorial from the name of an historic Sydney pool. Well,

0:01:01.170 --> 0:01:03.730
<v Speaker 1>it's fired up the RSL president there and the premier,

0:01:03.790 --> 0:01:07.930
<v Speaker 1>Chris Minns, and yet another sign of official disrespect for

0:01:08.030 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>our veterans. Plus, as I say, the jigs up of

0:01:11.140 --> 0:01:15.259
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister. But despite the weight of evidence exposing

0:01:15.420 --> 0:01:20.300
<v Speaker 1>him and his Marrickville golf club lies, they can't tell

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the truth today. Just more spin.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.180
<v Speaker 2>I have said that was not correct.

0:01:26.980 --> 0:01:27.819
<v Speaker 3>It was not correct.

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.030
<v Speaker 2>The state government have moved in and are funding the project.

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.180
<v Speaker 1>We will stay with this problem because it's a problem

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not going away, despite how much the Prime Minister

0:01:39.180 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>might wish it would. The $ 6 million of your money

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.870
<v Speaker 1>that he's handed out to his mates at the Marrickville

0:01:45.950 --> 0:01:49.570
<v Speaker 1>Golf Club. Because this is an issue that's long moved

0:01:49.630 --> 0:01:52.490
<v Speaker 1>away from being a case of a simple pork barrel

0:01:52.930 --> 0:01:56.610
<v Speaker 1>from one Labor mate to another, and it's now elevated

0:01:56.690 --> 0:02:00.060
<v Speaker 1>to the charge of a Prime Minister misleading Parliament not once,

0:02:00.540 --> 0:02:05.540
<v Speaker 1>but twice. Even in this warped world where politicians don't

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.610
<v Speaker 1>like to take responsibility anymore, misleading the Parliament still has

0:02:09.770 --> 0:02:15.870
<v Speaker 1>serious consequences. Today, just after prayers, the opposition frontbencher Dan

0:02:15.930 --> 0:02:19.310
<v Speaker 1>Tehan kicked off the morning with this, a motion for

0:02:19.330 --> 0:02:21.470
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister to come clean on what he told

0:02:21.510 --> 0:02:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the House about the Marrickville Golf Club, which, as I've

0:02:25.620 --> 0:02:30.420
<v Speaker 1>proven here again and again, is at odds with the facts.

0:02:31.930 --> 0:02:36.050
<v Speaker 4>I move that so much of the standing and sessional

0:02:36.150 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 4>orders be suspended as would prevent the following occurring immediately.

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 4>The Prime Minister immediately attending the Chamber to make a

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.419
<v Speaker 4>statement of not more than 10 minutes to correct the

0:02:49.500 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 4>record as to the purpose of the 6.05 million grant

0:02:55.340 --> 0:03:00.169
<v Speaker 4>concerning the Marrickville Golf Club precinct. To act in good

0:03:00.270 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 4>faith We are seeking the Prime Minister attend the Chamber

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.820
<v Speaker 4>and provide a statement of explanation on the matter.

0:03:10.060 --> 0:03:13.300
<v Speaker 1>Now, remember, it was only last month when pushed about

0:03:13.380 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>why he gave his golf club mates $ 6 million for

0:03:16.540 --> 0:03:20.180
<v Speaker 1>a new clubhouse. A desperate Albanese tried to take the

0:03:20.260 --> 0:03:24.580
<v Speaker 1>higher moral ground and make it all about environmental protections

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:25.540
<v Speaker 1>and sewerage.

0:03:26.419 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 2>It's existed for a long period of time, almost 100 years,

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.370
<v Speaker 2>and they have a septic tank which, because when it

0:03:34.470 --> 0:03:38.610
<v Speaker 2>is on the floodplain, when it floods in Marrickville, raw

0:03:38.670 --> 0:03:43.570
<v Speaker 2>sewerage flows into the Cooks River. That is what the

0:03:43.650 --> 0:03:44.430
<v Speaker 2>funding is for.

0:03:44.450 --> 0:03:49.630
<v Speaker 1>Well, there he was, and again the following day.

0:03:50.860 --> 0:03:54.470
<v Speaker 2>And one for the upgrade of the Inner West Council-owned

0:03:54.620 --> 0:03:58.870
<v Speaker 2>Marrickville Golf Club. Included in that was funding to fix

0:03:58.950 --> 0:04:04.050
<v Speaker 2>the sewerage because it goes into the river and causes

0:04:04.110 --> 0:04:06.150
<v Speaker 2>a problem when it floods.

0:04:08.450 --> 0:04:12.970
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's September this year. The problem is, though, exactly

0:04:12.970 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>12 months earlier, the New South Wales State Government announced

0:04:17.420 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>announced $ 270, 000 to do the sewerage works itself. But there's

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>more here. If we go back to Albanese's media release

0:04:26.779 --> 0:04:30.450
<v Speaker 1>in last year's election campaign where he first promised the

0:04:30.550 --> 0:04:33.850
<v Speaker 1>money to the Marrickville Golf Club, there was no mention

0:04:34.170 --> 0:04:39.529
<v Speaker 1>anywhere about sewerage works in the announcement. Not one word.

0:04:39.970 --> 0:04:45.460
<v Speaker 1>No mention whatsoever of sewerage, septic tanks or sewerage repairs.

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:50.469
<v Speaker 1>Nor did the follow-up media updates from the council, headed

0:04:50.570 --> 0:04:53.750
<v Speaker 1>up by the PM's mate, the Mayor Darcy Byrne, mention

0:04:53.990 --> 0:04:58.299
<v Speaker 1>any sewage works either. Here's their media release from July

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:02.300
<v Speaker 1>last year. So that's two months before anyone knew that

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.970
<v Speaker 1>New South Wales was going to fix the sewage problems.

0:05:06.660 --> 0:05:11.299
<v Speaker 1>And yet it's not mentioned here either. Again, not a word. Instead,

0:05:11.380 --> 0:05:14.060
<v Speaker 1>says the Mayor Darcy Byrne, it's all about a $ 6

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:18.290
<v Speaker 1>million upgrade of clubhouse facilities so it can hold more functions,

0:05:18.710 --> 0:05:22.250
<v Speaker 1>just like Labor Party events, which it's done in the past.

0:05:22.790 --> 0:05:25.589
<v Speaker 1>And wait for it. It also includes the building of

0:05:25.630 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a new dog walking station. Well, there you go, Toto.

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Taxpayers are looking out for you as well as your boss. Again,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.900
<v Speaker 1>in Senate estimates, it was left to the public servants

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>under questioning to tell us the truth.

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:44.260
<v Speaker 5>Has the department provided any briefings or advice to Minister

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 5>King on what the grant is funding.

0:05:47.339 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>And more importantly in this case, what it's not funding?

0:05:52.060 --> 0:05:54.170
<v Speaker 6>So as part of the approval brief that was provided

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.670
<v Speaker 6>to Minister King, we outlined the scope of the project.

0:05:58.490 --> 0:06:02.849
<v Speaker 5>And the scope of the project... Did it include sewerage

0:06:02.930 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 5>works or not sewerage works, which is why I wanted

0:06:06.650 --> 0:06:09.300
<v Speaker 5>to confirm your evidence from last week?

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>It does not include sewerage works.

0:06:11.779 --> 0:06:12.299
<v Speaker 7>Righto.

0:06:14.100 --> 0:06:17.799
<v Speaker 1>OK, you heard that. No sewerage again, says a senior

0:06:17.820 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>public servant from the Department of Infrastructure. The same as

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.550
<v Speaker 1>we were told last Thursday during the special inquiry by

0:06:25.589 --> 0:06:28.089
<v Speaker 1>the Senate into the Marrickville millions.

0:06:29.110 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 6>The grantee must deliver the design and upgrade of the

0:06:32.070 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 6>Marrickville Golf Club, including the following deliverables. The club precinct refurbishment,

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:44.380
<v Speaker 6>which includes a range of elements. Installation of a stormwater

0:06:44.420 --> 0:06:48.870
<v Speaker 6>harvesting system, including storage tanks and pump. Creation of a

0:06:48.900 --> 0:06:53.310
<v Speaker 6>botanical garden and biodiversity area. And an upgrade of the

0:06:53.370 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 6>existing electrical capacity to 250.

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:57.310
<v Speaker 8>Amps.

0:06:57.730 --> 0:07:00.910
<v Speaker 6>The sewerage works are not in the scope of this grant.

0:07:00.950 --> 0:07:02.510
<v Speaker 3>This grant focuses on the stormwater.

0:07:04.490 --> 0:07:08.270
<v Speaker 1>So that's two statements from an official that are consistent

0:07:08.650 --> 0:07:12.890
<v Speaker 1>last week and yesterday. So explain to me then why

0:07:13.090 --> 0:07:17.450
<v Speaker 1>the Minister of that same department, Catherine King, told my

0:07:17.530 --> 0:07:20.890
<v Speaker 1>colleague Andrew Clennell this on Sunday.

0:07:21.860 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 9>Did the money end up going to sewerage works, as

0:07:24.380 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 9>the PM has said in the Parliament?

0:07:26.310 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 10>Yes, that is the works. There's two levels of work.

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 10>So both of it is to look at the water

0:07:32.420 --> 0:07:36.220
<v Speaker 10>outflow from the golf club itself and to deal with

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.740
<v Speaker 10>the sewerage issue. And there's also some facilities.

0:07:40.700 --> 0:07:44.230
<v Speaker 1>Well, hang on. No, says her department on Thursday. No,

0:07:45.190 --> 0:07:51.090
<v Speaker 1>says her department yesterday. But yes, she says on Sunday. Now,

0:07:51.130 --> 0:07:54.980
<v Speaker 1>that's the minister responsible for spending half a billion dollars

0:07:55.650 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on an invite-only grants scheme contradicting evidence from public servants

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.420
<v Speaker 1>about what the money will be spent on, despite this

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:09.380
<v Speaker 1>revelation today that public servants made it public Thursday, public today,

0:08:09.540 --> 0:08:13.950
<v Speaker 1>public yesterday, that Sewerage Works had nothing to do with

0:08:13.990 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this federal grant. And not just in the hearings. Under questioning,

0:08:19.820 --> 0:08:24.820
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure official told the Senate that her Minister Catherine King,

0:08:25.140 --> 0:08:28.780
<v Speaker 1>she knew this herself because the fact that it was

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>no sewerage was included in briefs to her office, which

0:08:33.780 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>she has signed.

0:08:35.660 --> 0:08:39.950
<v Speaker 5>Has Minister King's office ever requested advice from the department

0:08:40.010 --> 0:08:42.670
<v Speaker 5>as to whether the $ 6 million grant is or is

0:08:42.770 --> 0:08:44.630
<v Speaker 5>not funding the sewerage problem?

0:08:46.690 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 6>So the Department provided the Minister with the approval brief

0:08:49.130 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 6>for the project, which outlined the scope.

0:08:51.740 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 5>And the scope that the Department sees is being funded

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 5>doesn't include sewerage work.

0:08:59.080 --> 0:08:59.820
<v Speaker 7>Does or it doesn't?

0:09:01.100 --> 0:09:05.710
<v Speaker 1>It does not include sewerage work. Doesn't she read what

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.949
<v Speaker 1>she signs? I mean, it hardly fills you with any confidence,

0:09:08.990 --> 0:09:12.429
<v Speaker 1>does it? A Minister spending hundreds of millions of dollars

0:09:12.450 --> 0:09:17.310
<v Speaker 1>who's not across her brief. A department official admitting yesterday,

0:09:17.390 --> 0:09:20.290
<v Speaker 1>in fact, that it was Labor's head office that called

0:09:20.309 --> 0:09:23.270
<v Speaker 1>the shots on these grants, at least who was going

0:09:23.470 --> 0:09:27.380
<v Speaker 1>to get the money, rather than a properly run arms-length

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.179
<v Speaker 1>process led by the department. And then we've got a

0:09:31.220 --> 0:09:34.020
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister who hands out $ 6 million to his mates

0:09:34.059 --> 0:09:37.660
<v Speaker 1>across the back fence from his Marrickville home to tart

0:09:37.770 --> 0:09:42.810
<v Speaker 1>up the golf house, the clubhouse, where Labor routinely holds functions.

0:09:43.270 --> 0:09:46.469
<v Speaker 1>Throw in that dog walking station two for Toto. And

0:09:47.190 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>then we start asking questions here on this program, as

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>I did weeks ago. He then misleads the parliament, trying

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.209
<v Speaker 1>to pretend that none of this is about anything other

0:09:57.670 --> 0:09:59.870
<v Speaker 1>than essential sewerage works.

0:10:00.910 --> 0:10:04.370
<v Speaker 2>It's existed for a long period of time, almost 100 years.

0:10:05.070 --> 0:10:08.850
<v Speaker 2>And they have a septic tank, which because when it

0:10:08.950 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 2>is on the floodplain, when it floods in Marrickville, raw

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.220
<v Speaker 2>sewerage flows into the Cooks River.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.220
<v Speaker 3>That is what the funding is for.

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 2>And one for the upgrade of the Inner West Council-owned

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.420
<v Speaker 2>Marrickville Golf Club. Included in that was funding to fix

0:10:27.500 --> 0:10:32.610
<v Speaker 2>the sewerage because it goes into the river and causes

0:10:32.670 --> 0:10:34.689
<v Speaker 2>a problem when it floods.

0:10:36.910 --> 0:10:40.650
<v Speaker 1>It was never about sewerage works. Never even mentioned, not

0:10:40.990 --> 0:10:44.650
<v Speaker 1>one word in his press release last April, not one

0:10:44.830 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>word by the council in his documents in July. And

0:10:49.620 --> 0:10:52.339
<v Speaker 1>now public officials are on the record as saying the

0:10:52.380 --> 0:10:55.349
<v Speaker 1>sewage works have never been a part of any plans

0:10:55.809 --> 0:10:58.150
<v Speaker 1>for the Marrickville Golf Club. So let's be clear here.

0:10:58.870 --> 0:11:02.330
<v Speaker 1>This isn't a random project. This is the sixth grant

0:11:02.850 --> 0:11:06.050
<v Speaker 1>that Labor's made to the Marrickville Golf Club. It's in

0:11:06.130 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Albanese's own electorate. It's 200 metres from the back fence

0:11:11.220 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of his $ 3 million home. Let's cut the crap, pardon

0:11:15.140 --> 0:11:18.500
<v Speaker 1>the pun, but this is not an honest mistake. Anthony

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Albanese has misled the Parliament. And this today is about

0:11:22.220 --> 0:11:24.750
<v Speaker 1>as good as you'll get from a bloke who pathologically

0:11:24.809 --> 0:11:29.330
<v Speaker 1>lies and hates to ever admit when he's been caught out.

0:11:30.110 --> 0:11:34.580
<v Speaker 4>Will the Prime Minister just stop the spin and admit

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 4>he was wrong?

0:11:36.140 --> 0:11:40.050
<v Speaker 11>It's not correct to say. that the federal grant would

0:11:40.130 --> 0:11:47.050
<v Speaker 11>deal with the Sewer Row... Well, to quote the state

0:11:47.090 --> 0:11:50.850
<v Speaker 11>government media release of 17 September 2025, I assume it's

0:11:50.870 --> 0:11:54.610
<v Speaker 11>from the state government, putting an end to Sewer Row's

0:11:54.670 --> 0:11:57.790
<v Speaker 11>Maryford golf course to get a whole lot better. After

0:11:57.830 --> 0:12:00.980
<v Speaker 11>we made the commitment to the club, which included fixing

0:12:01.030 --> 0:12:04.930
<v Speaker 11>this issue, which has been an issue since 1947, the

0:12:04.980 --> 0:12:08.099
<v Speaker 11>state government have stepped in. That is a good thing.

0:12:08.500 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 11>I was not aware of the state government grant. Why

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:13.460
<v Speaker 11>would I be?

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Now, I'll say this. If we had not dug into

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.940
<v Speaker 1>the detail here and put this man under some pressure,

0:12:21.580 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't have had the Senate inquiry and this would

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>not have been pursued in the parliament as it has.

0:12:27.500 --> 0:12:32.690
<v Speaker 1>And if there's millions in dodgy grants in this program, well...

0:12:33.330 --> 0:12:35.830
<v Speaker 1>What the PM says doesn't stack up with the facts.

0:12:35.890 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Believe me, if there's millions here, there's millions, billions more elsewhere. Now,

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>all of this should be referred to the National Anti-Corruption Commission.

0:12:45.260 --> 0:12:48.940
<v Speaker 1>That's what it's there for. Law Professor Antumi has already

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:53.290
<v Speaker 1>labelled this as grey corruption, and it is. But more

0:12:53.350 --> 0:12:56.510
<v Speaker 1>than that, it's a pattern of behaviour from a man

0:12:56.530 --> 0:12:58.670
<v Speaker 1>who thinks he's above it all. Now that he's in

0:12:58.710 --> 0:13:02.530
<v Speaker 1>the Lodge, he doesn't have to tell the truth, admit mistakes,

0:13:03.130 --> 0:13:07.650
<v Speaker 1>or even apologise. And this is precisely why voters are

0:13:07.770 --> 0:13:12.890
<v Speaker 1>walking away from Labor, because it's Albanese that's tanking the

0:13:12.929 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>party's vote. Never forget that Labor won last year's federal

0:13:16.660 --> 0:13:20.660
<v Speaker 1>election with its lowest primary vote ever since the Second

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 1>World War, with seven out of every ten Australian voters

0:13:26.220 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>preferring someone else. Fire the liar, indeed. Right, let's get

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.339
<v Speaker 1>into the headlines now with Ruben Spargo. Good evening.

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:44.020
<v Speaker 12>Senator Fatima Payman is accusing the Prime Minister of waiting

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.059
<v Speaker 12>for an attack like the one on Helen Haynes before

0:13:47.179 --> 0:13:51.380
<v Speaker 12>finally granting her additional staff. The former Labor senator has

0:13:51.420 --> 0:13:56.219
<v Speaker 12>spent nearly two years seeking two additional advisor-level staffers from

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 12>Anthony Albanese.

0:13:57.660 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 13>Is the Prime Minister waiting for something like what happened

0:14:00.460 --> 0:14:04.130
<v Speaker 13>to Dr Helen Haynes to occur to my office, to me,

0:14:04.570 --> 0:14:06.809
<v Speaker 13>for him to take our request seriously?

0:14:06.910 --> 0:14:09.990
<v Speaker 1>That's an outrageous suggestion, Senator Payman.

0:14:10.429 --> 0:14:13.150
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I can't believe that I'm saying that or making

0:14:13.190 --> 0:14:15.130
<v Speaker 13>that suggestion because it's been two years.

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.140
<v Speaker 10>Maybe Senator Payman should just.

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 12>Fatima Payman has faced repeated abuse and threats. The remarks

0:14:21.900 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 12>were made on the same day MPs gathered to pay

0:14:24.870 --> 0:14:28.950
<v Speaker 12>tribute to Helen Haynes. Australia's cyber spy agency is warning

0:14:29.010 --> 0:14:33.730
<v Speaker 12>Australians to expect more significant service disruptions and network outages.

0:14:34.090 --> 0:14:38.370
<v Speaker 12>The Australian Signals Directorate says Frontier AI is enabling malicious

0:14:38.530 --> 0:14:41.230
<v Speaker 12>actors to strike faster and at greater scale.

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.850
<v Speaker 4>Australia must accelerate the modernisation of its technology and cyber

0:14:45.870 --> 0:14:48.930
<v Speaker 4>security foundations to protect the systems.

0:14:48.530 --> 0:14:49.180
<v Speaker 3>We rely on.

0:14:49.490 --> 0:14:52.830
<v Speaker 12>The Australian Cyber Security Centre responded to more than 1,500

0:14:52.830 --> 0:14:57.250
<v Speaker 12>cyber security incidents during the 2025 financial year. That number

0:14:57.390 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 12>is rising by more than 20% year on year and

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 12>more than 36% in the last five years.

0:15:03.500 --> 0:15:07.420
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get into a busy city week with

0:15:07.500 --> 0:15:11.860
<v Speaker 1>our News 24 Chief Political Editor, Andrew Clennell. I'll get

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>into this misleading the Parliament in a moment, Andrew, but

0:15:14.700 --> 0:15:21.830
<v Speaker 1>just on Fatima Payman, traditionally crossbench staff have been handed

0:15:21.970 --> 0:15:25.770
<v Speaker 1>out in an equitable way. This Prime Minister's made a

0:15:25.790 --> 0:15:29.530
<v Speaker 1>real art form of giving someone five, some four, some three,

0:15:29.910 --> 0:15:33.330
<v Speaker 1>depending on how they vote with Labor over their time

0:15:33.750 --> 0:15:37.030
<v Speaker 1>in the Parliament. Do you think, and our language might

0:15:37.050 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>have been a bit off, but do you think Fatima

0:15:39.340 --> 0:15:40.980
<v Speaker 1>Payman here has a fair point?

0:15:42.270 --> 0:15:44.070
<v Speaker 9>The language was off, she has a fair point, but

0:15:44.150 --> 0:15:47.090
<v Speaker 9>I need to discuss this James Ashby thing with you, Peter. Now,

0:15:47.130 --> 0:15:50.489
<v Speaker 9>this bloke Ashby came on your show last night and

0:15:50.510 --> 0:15:52.990
<v Speaker 9>he defamed me and multiple people have asked why he

0:15:53.010 --> 0:15:55.710
<v Speaker 9>didn't back me up. Now, I appreciate your apology last

0:15:55.770 --> 0:15:58.350
<v Speaker 9>night after the show. Things happen quick on live TV.

0:15:59.990 --> 0:16:02.270
<v Speaker 9>I think it's important to know that 20 years ago,

0:16:03.230 --> 0:16:06.190
<v Speaker 9>James Ashby was convicted and fined for making threatening and

0:16:06.230 --> 0:16:09.530
<v Speaker 9>abusing phone calls. He is in charge of this party

0:16:09.610 --> 0:16:12.930
<v Speaker 9>and his actions deserve scrutiny. I'd like to thank the

0:16:12.990 --> 0:16:15.010
<v Speaker 9>many viewers who have reached out to me in the

0:16:15.050 --> 0:16:18.970
<v Speaker 9>last 26 hours offering support for my journalism. And I'll

0:16:18.990 --> 0:16:22.070
<v Speaker 9>repeat again that Pauline Hanson is welcome on my show

0:16:22.090 --> 0:16:25.750
<v Speaker 9>any time. And I believe sometime in the future she

0:16:25.770 --> 0:16:28.670
<v Speaker 9>will come on my show. I've stood up to Prime

0:16:28.690 --> 0:16:31.690
<v Speaker 9>Ministers in this place and there's no way I'm being

0:16:31.750 --> 0:16:34.130
<v Speaker 9>stood over by James Ashby. That's all I wanted to say.

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 9>And I've been coming on the show nine years. It's

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.100
<v Speaker 9>a great thing that we do here, Peter. So, you know,

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:43.850
<v Speaker 9>it's just one of those things. The guy calls me

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.190
<v Speaker 9>a dickhead on air. Let's move on. But, you know,

0:16:47.390 --> 0:16:50.670
<v Speaker 9>I need to comment. If I come on and don't

0:16:50.730 --> 0:16:52.470
<v Speaker 9>talk about this, people are going to go, why isn't

0:16:52.490 --> 0:16:53.470
<v Speaker 9>he talking about this, you know?

0:16:54.650 --> 0:16:57.500
<v Speaker 1>Well, first of all, Andrew, one, have a look down there.

0:16:58.150 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>The show's called Credlin, right? I will decide what we

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>discuss on the show and the order in which we

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>discuss it. I said to you last night and I

0:17:06.100 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>said to you today we would put it in the rundown.

0:17:08.420 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>We've got a whole lot of issues that I want

0:17:10.460 --> 0:17:13.649
<v Speaker 1>to talk to first about what's impacting real people in

0:17:13.690 --> 0:17:17.910
<v Speaker 1>the Parliament today. I know you're upset. Everyone gets upset

0:17:17.930 --> 0:17:19.950
<v Speaker 1>from time to time in this game and you're right

0:17:20.090 --> 0:17:23.070
<v Speaker 1>to be upset, but we'll discuss it in an orderly way. Now,

0:17:23.130 --> 0:17:25.330
<v Speaker 1>now you have brought it up. As I said to

0:17:25.369 --> 0:17:27.230
<v Speaker 1>you last night, it was at the back end of

0:17:27.290 --> 0:17:29.590
<v Speaker 1>the show that If I didn't like you, if I

0:17:29.590 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't respect you, mate, you wouldn't be on this show

0:17:31.700 --> 0:17:35.290
<v Speaker 1>for nine years, and I do respect you. I've got

0:17:35.369 --> 0:17:37.770
<v Speaker 1>people in my ear, as you know, in this game,

0:17:38.090 --> 0:17:43.590
<v Speaker 1>absolutely constantly. I heard the discussion about him telling you

0:17:43.609 --> 0:17:47.470
<v Speaker 1>that Pauline Hanson thought you were a dick. I didn't

0:17:47.530 --> 0:17:49.550
<v Speaker 1>hear him say that, Andrew, and if I did, I

0:17:50.050 --> 0:17:52.810
<v Speaker 1>would have jumped in, right? I call a spade a spade.

0:17:52.830 --> 0:17:53.250
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, fine.

0:17:53.590 --> 0:17:56.100
<v Speaker 1>I'm straight up and down, but you're not going to

0:17:56.150 --> 0:17:58.820
<v Speaker 1>hijack my show because at the top when I said

0:17:58.859 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I would get to this. So let's get to some

0:18:00.859 --> 0:18:04.459
<v Speaker 1>of the issues that I know ordinary Australians want us

0:18:04.500 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to focus on, like the liar in the Lodge. I

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.510
<v Speaker 1>want your take on what happened today in the Chamber

0:18:11.550 --> 0:18:15.390
<v Speaker 1>that's about as strong as an admission you will get

0:18:15.450 --> 0:18:19.130
<v Speaker 1>from Anthony Albanese, where he has misled the House, there's

0:18:19.190 --> 0:18:22.820
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about that. He said last month, last September,

0:18:23.220 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that this was all about Sewerage Works, when 12 months ago,

0:18:27.850 --> 0:18:30.649
<v Speaker 1>We know that the state government had funded those works

0:18:31.050 --> 0:18:34.730
<v Speaker 1>and nowhere in his press release last April or any

0:18:34.750 --> 0:18:38.390
<v Speaker 1>of the council documentation does it mention sewerage. In none

0:18:38.410 --> 0:18:41.870
<v Speaker 1>of the reports before the government, before the minister, does

0:18:41.910 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it mention sewerage. And good on you for putting King

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>under some pressure on Sunday because on Sunday I think

0:18:47.740 --> 0:18:50.060
<v Speaker 1>she's caught between a rock and a hard place. She

0:18:50.100 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>has a brief in her office to say it's nothing

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.179
<v Speaker 1>to do with sewerage, but she backs the Prime Minister

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.970
<v Speaker 1>in with you on Sunday saying Because if she didn't,

0:18:59.630 --> 0:19:03.260
<v Speaker 1>she would be admitting that he had misled the House.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So where does this go from here?

0:19:07.820 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, I just couldn't believe that that occurred Sunday and

0:19:11.220 --> 0:19:15.180
<v Speaker 9>the officials the next day said, we've provided a brief

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.580
<v Speaker 9>to the Minister's office saying it wasn't Sirich, like a

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.139
<v Speaker 9>day later. And Bridget McKenzie, of all people, being the

0:19:21.180 --> 0:19:24.050
<v Speaker 9>prosecutor on that one, having gone down over sports rorts herself,

0:19:24.350 --> 0:19:25.470
<v Speaker 9>who would be better qualified?

0:19:25.510 --> 0:19:25.970
<v Speaker 3>But I think.

0:19:27.090 --> 0:19:30.290
<v Speaker 9>Ultimately for the PM, he's got an issue with admitting

0:19:30.390 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 9>wrong and apologising. And we've seen it multiple times. And

0:19:37.340 --> 0:19:43.139
<v Speaker 9>I think, again today, I called it a Fonz-type concession.

0:19:43.869 --> 0:19:45.390
<v Speaker 9>I was wrong, you know.

0:19:47.530 --> 0:19:49.330
<v Speaker 3>People look... So what does he do, mate?

0:19:49.369 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Because you were... know.

0:19:50.220 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 3>At leadership, we apologise with strength.

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I know from state polling... Sorry, we're not talking over

0:19:57.340 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>each other, viewers. We've got a time delay coming out

0:19:59.540 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of Canberra all the time into Melbourne. I know from

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.629
<v Speaker 1>state polling in Victoria that Anthony Albanese is coming up

0:20:05.690 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in focus groups about the Labor brand... And the one,

0:20:09.660 --> 0:20:12.220
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yes, there's cost of living, but the one

0:20:12.340 --> 0:20:15.060
<v Speaker 1>other big issue they're raising is that he's a liar,

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.540
<v Speaker 1>that they can't trust him, that he won't ever say

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>sorry when he gets it wrong. Now, this is brand

0:20:20.220 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>damage that once it cements itself in the electorate, a

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.010
<v Speaker 1>bit like Scott Morrison, it's really hard to come back from.

0:20:29.150 --> 0:20:30.370
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it is.

0:20:31.350 --> 0:20:34.010
<v Speaker 9>His one advantage is that conservative votes split.

0:20:34.690 --> 0:20:35.290
<v Speaker 1>So....

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.270
<v Speaker 9>Otherwise, you know, with that primary vote, if it was

0:20:38.310 --> 0:20:39.830
<v Speaker 9>just the Libs and Nats, he'd been a fair bit

0:20:39.869 --> 0:20:42.710
<v Speaker 9>of strife. I've said this to you a few times

0:20:42.770 --> 0:20:44.859
<v Speaker 9>and the talk down here, I still don't discount that

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:45.730
<v Speaker 9>he goes next year.

0:20:46.619 --> 0:20:47.470
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think it's 50-50.

0:20:47.500 --> 0:20:49.620
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you.

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 9>And all the talk down here because of the numbers

0:20:52.740 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 9>is Mark Butler. Now, I don't know how much of an...

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.180
<v Speaker 9>Mark Butler's competent enough, but, you know, is he really

0:20:58.220 --> 0:21:00.750
<v Speaker 9>going to be the big answer for Labor if they

0:21:00.790 --> 0:21:03.150
<v Speaker 9>do go down that path? And then they talk about

0:21:03.210 --> 0:21:06.449
<v Speaker 9>Charlton Treasury, you see. So a whole sort of rebrand.

0:21:07.660 --> 0:21:11.930
<v Speaker 9>But I just think, you know, they spend some time

0:21:11.970 --> 0:21:15.790
<v Speaker 9>in this job, they get barnacles and he's got a

0:21:15.810 --> 0:21:17.370
<v Speaker 9>fair few and Jim's got heaps now.

0:21:18.109 --> 0:21:20.869
<v Speaker 3>And I think, you know, there's an argument for it.

0:21:21.140 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 9>I've seen many times you get an extra term because

0:21:23.340 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 9>you change horse and some of the voters go, well,

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.260
<v Speaker 9>let's give them one more chance. But in this high

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:33.050
<v Speaker 9>inflation environment with no seeming answers to it, They're in

0:21:33.109 --> 0:21:33.649
<v Speaker 9>all sorts.

0:21:34.290 --> 0:21:35.810
<v Speaker 3>They are in absolute all sorts.

0:21:37.830 --> 0:21:40.389
<v Speaker 9>But I think, you know, I cannot believe that he

0:21:40.430 --> 0:21:42.430
<v Speaker 9>doesn't just wear a bit more of it. I mean,

0:21:42.470 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 9>that's just got to be pride and stubbornness, right? Like,

0:21:45.619 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 9>if he was running again and he wanted to win,

0:21:47.619 --> 0:21:48.260
<v Speaker 9>surely he would.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.820
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the lack of humility, I think, is something that

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>should come with a leader. When you get to the

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.990
<v Speaker 1>top job, you've climbed the mountain, particularly if you've got

0:21:59.010 --> 0:22:01.929
<v Speaker 1>a working class route like he says he does. And

0:22:02.170 --> 0:22:05.180
<v Speaker 1>that's where he's lost people, that lack of authenticity. I mean,

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.590
<v Speaker 1>Repicoli is saying that in his seat of Hunter. One

0:22:08.630 --> 0:22:12.590
<v Speaker 1>Nation's ahead there on 33 primary. It's hurting them across

0:22:12.630 --> 0:22:15.580
<v Speaker 1>the board, as we know, in Western New South Wales,

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously in Queensland. In Victoria, they're on the nose for

0:22:19.060 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of other reasons. I mean, this is

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:23.740
<v Speaker 1>going to be the challenge. And you're right to point

0:22:23.790 --> 0:22:26.750
<v Speaker 1>out Jim Chalmers. I think he's damaged goods. If we

0:22:26.790 --> 0:22:29.609
<v Speaker 1>get this rate rise out of the inflation data that

0:22:29.650 --> 0:22:33.210
<v Speaker 1>we expect will be pretty horrific tomorrow, well, again, you know,

0:22:33.609 --> 0:22:35.860
<v Speaker 1>what is it that Labor has done to make your

0:22:35.890 --> 0:22:38.300
<v Speaker 1>life easier? You'd ask yourself that as a voter.

0:22:39.859 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and, you know, they can go with tax cuts

0:22:42.260 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 9>to the next election, which is their plan, but they're

0:22:44.540 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 9>so expensive, as you know.

0:22:46.340 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 3>What can you really offer?

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:48.950
<v Speaker 9>I mean, last time it was just a cup of coffee,

0:22:48.970 --> 0:22:52.139
<v Speaker 9>and that's well and truly been swallowed up. So and

0:22:52.180 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 9>they've just introduced new taxes. So I just I mean,

0:22:58.150 --> 0:23:01.230
<v Speaker 9>Albanese goes on all these trips, overseas trips at the

0:23:01.250 --> 0:23:01.889
<v Speaker 9>end of this year.

0:23:02.010 --> 0:23:02.750
<v Speaker 3>Rates go up.

0:23:04.210 --> 0:23:07.230
<v Speaker 9>You can't see things getting better. The question really is

0:23:07.290 --> 0:23:10.380
<v Speaker 9>whether the Liberal Party improves its stocks. Now, I had

0:23:10.420 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 9>Hastie on today. He said there's no there's definitely no

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 9>challenge the last sitting week.

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:14.220
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.300
<v Speaker 9>And I expect the Victorian Liberals to win. So that

0:23:18.340 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 9>gives a bit of a boost to the Liberal brand.

0:23:20.100 --> 0:23:23.900
<v Speaker 9>And I mean winning their own right, incidentally. But then

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.869
<v Speaker 9>New South Wales happens in March and then you've got

0:23:26.900 --> 0:23:29.790
<v Speaker 9>a situation One Nation could become the official opposition or

0:23:29.830 --> 0:23:31.590
<v Speaker 9>near enough and the Libs can get wiped out.

0:23:31.830 --> 0:23:33.609
<v Speaker 3>Could well.

0:23:34.190 --> 0:23:36.790
<v Speaker 9>Is that kind of result the impetus or the pressure

0:23:36.830 --> 0:23:40.230
<v Speaker 9>for a Liberal leadership change? And there is risk associated

0:23:40.260 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 9>with that change as well. And then you've got the

0:23:43.619 --> 0:23:47.060
<v Speaker 9>added dimension that if Mike Newman gets there in official

0:23:47.100 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 9>opposition and, you know, some of their candidates are a

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:54.430
<v Speaker 9>bit dodgy and there's There's a few issues around how

0:23:54.450 --> 0:23:59.470
<v Speaker 9>they progress as an opposition. Does that deflate potentially the

0:23:59.570 --> 0:24:01.700
<v Speaker 9>federal vote? Because what's going to happen now.

0:24:01.730 --> 0:24:02.350
<v Speaker 1>Hang on, hang on.

0:24:02.570 --> 0:24:03.650
<v Speaker 3>is you're going to see... Yes.

0:24:05.190 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I just want to... Your rationale with New South Wales,

0:24:08.260 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand how a conservative in Angus Taylor would

0:24:11.820 --> 0:24:16.670
<v Speaker 1>lose the leadership If a moderate in Kelly Sloan goes

0:24:16.790 --> 0:24:19.379
<v Speaker 1>backwards in New South Wales, I know the Nats are

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.100
<v Speaker 1>under pressure from One Nation in New South Wales, but

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.140
<v Speaker 1>the conservative Liberals are in a better position. If Kelly Sloan,

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.820
<v Speaker 1>the moderate, takes them backwards, isn't that just underscoring the

0:24:28.900 --> 0:24:31.460
<v Speaker 1>point that if you put a moderate in the top

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.169
<v Speaker 1>job running the Liberal Party, well, you're in trouble?

0:24:36.420 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 9>Oh, it wouldn't be Wilson, it'd be Hastie. So then

0:24:39.220 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 9>you'd have a conservative replacing a conservative.

0:24:42.500 --> 0:24:43.380
<v Speaker 15>Well, I'm not so sure.

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:47.100
<v Speaker 1>Conservatives would regard Hastie as one of their own anymore. Yeah,

0:24:47.340 --> 0:24:50.430
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not so sure the conservatives would regard Hastie

0:24:50.470 --> 0:24:53.450
<v Speaker 1>as one of their own anymore. But we'll see. We'll see.

0:24:53.890 --> 0:24:58.149
<v Speaker 1>Worth thinking about. Now, can we leave shaking hands across

0:24:58.190 --> 0:25:00.190
<v Speaker 1>the screen? Rest assured, I have your back. You better

0:25:00.210 --> 0:25:03.290
<v Speaker 1>have mine though, mate. Someone calls me a well, I

0:25:03.310 --> 0:25:05.750
<v Speaker 1>won't say it on air, something worse than that, you'll

0:25:05.770 --> 0:25:08.620
<v Speaker 1>have my back and I'll have yours again. Thanks, Andrew.

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:09.620
<v Speaker 3>I'll always have your back, Peter.

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:12.820
<v Speaker 1>I meant what I said. I wouldn't have Andrew on

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.340
<v Speaker 1>the show. You know my viewers. I'd offend him when

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you email him thinking he's a bit fired up or

0:25:17.300 --> 0:25:19.620
<v Speaker 1>he's got the wrong end of the stick. I wouldn't

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:21.070
<v Speaker 1>have him on the show if I didn't like a

0:25:21.090 --> 0:25:23.410
<v Speaker 1>bit of hurly-burly. So there we go. Let's get into

0:25:23.450 --> 0:25:27.770
<v Speaker 1>some other issues. Victoria Barracks. Now, listen to this one.

0:25:28.810 --> 0:25:32.230
<v Speaker 1>We know that the Albanese government wants to sell it. Well,

0:25:32.250 --> 0:25:34.970
<v Speaker 1>they're moving out the brass from the building, the defence personnel,

0:25:35.450 --> 0:25:38.910
<v Speaker 1>and they're putting them in a CBD high-rise that's owned

0:25:38.950 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>by Singaporean interests and mortgaged to a Chinese bank. All

0:25:43.980 --> 0:25:47.140
<v Speaker 1>of this was exposed through Senate estimates this week. Here

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.780
<v Speaker 1>to discuss this and more, Shadow Minister for Defence Personnel,

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Phil Thompson. Well, Phil, Jess Collins makes the point. They've

0:25:54.270 --> 0:25:58.950
<v Speaker 1>got five floors in this CBD tower owned by the Singaporeans,

0:25:59.430 --> 0:26:03.730
<v Speaker 1>leased out to a Chinese bank. Now, the cost is staggering.

0:26:04.230 --> 0:26:11.429
<v Speaker 1>Australian taxpayers will spend $ 231 million on this lease. But wait,

0:26:11.820 --> 0:26:15.180
<v Speaker 1>another $ 83 million will be spent to make it secure

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>enough for Defence to use it. Now, down the road,

0:26:18.900 --> 0:26:21.580
<v Speaker 1>you've got a barracks that we own, no lease needed,

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and no $ 80 million either to make it secure. At

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the same time, we're cutting all of our support, left,

0:26:29.619 --> 0:26:32.390
<v Speaker 1>right and centre, to veterans. to pay for this sort

0:26:32.430 --> 0:26:32.949
<v Speaker 1>of waste?

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 7>Yep.

0:26:35.660 --> 0:26:37.700
<v Speaker 3>It is disgraceful and it shouldn't be happening.

0:26:37.700 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 16>1841 is when Victoria Barracks became home to the Australian Army.

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.090
<v Speaker 16>It has treated World War One soldiers. It has been

0:26:47.109 --> 0:26:49.930
<v Speaker 16>the place that has been the home for the Australian Army.

0:26:50.300 --> 0:26:53.350
<v Speaker 16>And now under a fire sale, because Richard Miles wants

0:26:53.380 --> 0:26:56.609
<v Speaker 16>to get rid of it, he's decided to, instead of owning,

0:26:56.950 --> 0:26:59.370
<v Speaker 16>which we already have, we own it. And he puts

0:26:59.450 --> 0:27:02.790
<v Speaker 16>a price of about $ 200 million over about 10 or

0:27:02.990 --> 0:27:07.060
<v Speaker 16>so years. He wants to lease a place that is

0:27:07.420 --> 0:27:10.020
<v Speaker 16>mortgaged through the Chinese bank.

0:27:10.670 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 3>And he wants to shove people. You don't own a lease.

0:27:12.980 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 16>And when the lease runs out, you spend all this money,

0:27:14.940 --> 0:27:16.859
<v Speaker 16>you spend all these upgrades, and then we're all out,

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 16>you know, looking for another home.

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:19.900
<v Speaker 3>I think it's disgraceful.

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 16>But one important point that I wanted to raise, and

0:27:23.260 --> 0:27:25.260
<v Speaker 16>I've asked Richard a couple of times and he skirts

0:27:25.340 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 16>around it, what was the Chief of Army's recommendation?

0:27:30.140 --> 0:27:32.260
<v Speaker 3>Because I have it on good authority.

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 16>The Chief of Army even stated that she would move

0:27:35.900 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 16>the head of the headquarters of the Australian Army two

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 16>Victoria barracks to save it. So why won't this Labor

0:27:43.180 --> 0:27:45.940
<v Speaker 16>Defence Minister listen to the Chief of Army?

0:27:48.060 --> 0:27:51.689
<v Speaker 1>This is a friendless proposal, as you know. You've got

0:27:51.730 --> 0:27:56.070
<v Speaker 1>almost every side of politics, including state Labor, against it.

0:27:56.750 --> 0:27:59.730
<v Speaker 1>I know the Premier's talking about a heritage order. I mean,

0:27:59.869 --> 0:28:02.389
<v Speaker 1>what can be done, Phil? What can you do in

0:28:02.470 --> 0:28:04.980
<v Speaker 1>Canberra to stop this travesty?

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 3>Well, we'll be in the fight. And that's what we

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:08.570
<v Speaker 3>will be in.

0:28:08.740 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 16>Because we've got a government who is hell-bent on selling assets.

0:28:13.090 --> 0:28:16.150
<v Speaker 16>And you can't sell off your history. And that's what

0:28:16.730 --> 0:28:20.450
<v Speaker 16>they're doing. We've been able to have good wins from opposition.

0:28:20.830 --> 0:28:23.990
<v Speaker 16>We've been able to be in the fight. We've reversed

0:28:23.990 --> 0:28:26.660
<v Speaker 16>$ 5, 000 caps. We got funding back to the Baird family

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 16>with your help and Tony Abbott's help.

0:28:28.820 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 3>And we can be in the fight here too. But

0:28:31.060 --> 0:28:31.500
<v Speaker 3>what I'm.

0:28:31.420 --> 0:28:34.619
<v Speaker 16>Terrified of is the lack of care from the Minister

0:28:34.660 --> 0:28:35.340
<v Speaker 16>and the Prime Minister.

0:28:36.950 --> 0:28:40.190
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're not wrong. It comes, you know, one after

0:28:40.230 --> 0:28:41.910
<v Speaker 1>another with this sort of stuff. You've got the story

0:28:41.970 --> 0:28:45.709
<v Speaker 1>too about Coggera, the council there wanting to drop the

0:28:45.790 --> 0:28:49.950
<v Speaker 1>phrase war memorial from the name of the Coggera swimming pool.

0:28:50.460 --> 0:28:53.020
<v Speaker 1>He's the president of the RSL in New South Wales.

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Appalling.

0:28:55.480 --> 0:29:02.380
<v Speaker 14>It's a war memorial. Coggera War Memorial Swimming Pool is

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.730
<v Speaker 14>a name that goes back 60 years. It's a name

0:29:04.750 --> 0:29:10.910
<v Speaker 14>that people identify... to have it associated with some Olympian's

0:29:10.970 --> 0:29:14.180
<v Speaker 14>name or the like. I just don't understand why you

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 14>would want to change it from a name like Coggera.

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And here's the Premier this morning on radio.

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.220
<v Speaker 7>They've said that the War Memorial must remain in the title.

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:27.940
<v Speaker 7>So I hope that they're not planning on having some

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.430
<v Speaker 7>double-barrelled name where they Make it a cultural name and

0:29:31.450 --> 0:29:33.830
<v Speaker 7>then an Olympic swimmer's name and then War Memorial at

0:29:33.870 --> 0:29:36.770
<v Speaker 7>the end. Removing the name or even jamming another one

0:29:36.830 --> 0:29:38.990
<v Speaker 7>next to it is not in the interest of our

0:29:39.050 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 7>duty to remember. people that came back from that terrible

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.290
<v Speaker 7>conflict and defended Australia and kept it free.

0:29:46.970 --> 0:29:49.730
<v Speaker 1>Now, it looks like this afternoon they're backtracking a bit,

0:29:49.850 --> 0:29:53.970
<v Speaker 1>but they're putting it out for community consultation. I think

0:29:54.020 --> 0:29:56.780
<v Speaker 1>the Premier's come back this afternoon and said, don't waste

0:29:56.820 --> 0:30:00.140
<v Speaker 1>the money, just make the decision, stick with the title

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.580
<v Speaker 1>that it is now. But this is the stuff that

0:30:02.620 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>really angers people, Phil.

0:30:05.090 --> 0:30:05.590
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it does.

0:30:05.660 --> 0:30:09.250
<v Speaker 16>And it really kind of ticks me off that every

0:30:09.310 --> 0:30:12.990
<v Speaker 16>other day we're turning on the TV or we're reading

0:30:13.050 --> 0:30:16.780
<v Speaker 16>a paper and there's another attack on our history and

0:30:17.180 --> 0:30:21.820
<v Speaker 16>our defence history. It's really, it's winding a bit thin

0:30:21.860 --> 0:30:26.380
<v Speaker 16>here because those that have paid the ultimate sacrifice, your families, veterans,

0:30:26.700 --> 0:30:29.890
<v Speaker 16>you know, they've done so much in support of this nation,

0:30:29.930 --> 0:30:32.370
<v Speaker 16>including those that have laid their lives down, to have

0:30:32.430 --> 0:30:37.190
<v Speaker 16>some council somewhere or some protesters here go, oh, we don't.

0:30:37.070 --> 0:30:39.450
<v Speaker 3>Care about the traditions anymore. We don't really.

0:30:39.950 --> 0:30:41.470
<v Speaker 16>We don't know about this, so we're just going to

0:30:41.490 --> 0:30:42.780
<v Speaker 16>gloss over it and make some change.

0:30:42.820 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 3>It's not good enough.

0:30:43.940 --> 0:30:45.900
<v Speaker 16>And if that was in Townsville, there would be riots

0:30:45.940 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 16>in the street because we support our veterans, we support

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 16>our Defence Force men and women.

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:54.290
<v Speaker 3>We should not be changing names of our memorial pools.

0:30:56.050 --> 0:31:00.570
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't reckon on Remembrance Day in Townsville... the

0:31:00.630 --> 0:31:03.740
<v Speaker 1>students that would have much luck doing some sort of

0:31:03.820 --> 0:31:06.070
<v Speaker 1>protest at the memorial, would they?

0:31:07.250 --> 0:31:08.150
<v Speaker 3>Oh, absolutely not.

0:31:08.310 --> 0:31:08.650
<v Speaker 14>No way.

0:31:08.670 --> 0:31:10.330
<v Speaker 16>And if, you know what, if you want to protest,

0:31:11.370 --> 0:31:14.870
<v Speaker 16>I'm all for, you know, the, your freedom of protesting

0:31:14.890 --> 0:31:16.950
<v Speaker 16>and you can go walk the shit, do it on Saturday,

0:31:17.250 --> 0:31:19.590
<v Speaker 16>do it on Sunday, do it on a day that

0:31:20.070 --> 0:31:22.150
<v Speaker 16>isn't one of our most sacred, but also don't do

0:31:22.170 --> 0:31:22.750
<v Speaker 16>it on a school day.

0:31:23.670 --> 0:31:26.130
<v Speaker 3>And then we'll see where, where the people really lie.

0:31:26.490 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 16>But I just can't believe that there's going to be

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.700
<v Speaker 16>protests in capital cities on Remembrance Day. I've never felt

0:31:33.030 --> 0:31:35.390
<v Speaker 16>you know, so ashamed of a government that hasn't stood

0:31:35.430 --> 0:31:37.860
<v Speaker 16>up and said, if you do that, the teachers that

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 16>are organised, you know, they'll be disciplined or moved on.

0:31:40.700 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 16>And no, we will not be supporting your absentee through

0:31:44.260 --> 0:31:45.110
<v Speaker 16>that process.

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:46.250
<v Speaker 3>It just was not good enough.

0:31:47.530 --> 0:31:48.830
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not good enough at all. And of course,

0:31:48.870 --> 0:31:51.670
<v Speaker 1>all these kids have got parents. They should know what

0:31:51.690 --> 0:31:53.190
<v Speaker 1>their kids are up to as well. Thank you, Phil.

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.010
<v Speaker 1>After the break, more disturbing footage has emerged regarding the

0:31:57.070 --> 0:32:00.630
<v Speaker 1>safety of children in our childcare centres. The government, though,

0:32:00.970 --> 0:32:04.030
<v Speaker 1>determined to plough on with a model that strips choice

0:32:04.330 --> 0:32:08.650
<v Speaker 1>away from parents. One size fits all after the break.

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.620
<v Speaker 1>Just before we get on to some other issues, Victorian

0:32:15.700 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Labor ramming through a whole lot of stuff before they

0:32:18.540 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>hit the caretaker issue. conventions on the weekend and a

0:32:22.460 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of it impacts regional communities. A lot of it's

0:32:25.180 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>got to do with planning for big renewable projects. I'll

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>get to that in a moment. But now to that

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:36.660
<v Speaker 1>alarming story overnight on the ABC, Four Corners, documenting, exposing

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:41.660
<v Speaker 1>abuse occurring in Australian childcare centres. A warning, some viewers

0:32:41.700 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>may find this unsettling.

0:32:43.180 --> 0:32:46.790
<v Speaker 8>You just can't imagine how someone can be so cruel

0:32:46.810 --> 0:32:47.220
<v Speaker 8>to babies.

0:32:50.350 --> 0:32:53.390
<v Speaker 1>It's beyond a red flag. It's in the middle of

0:32:53.570 --> 0:32:58.540
<v Speaker 1>a psychological storm characterised by cruelty and sadism.

0:32:59.100 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 10>How on earth could anyone do that to someone else's child?

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 11>We have to work, so he needs to go to

0:33:08.300 --> 0:33:10.340
<v Speaker 11>a childcare, so it's almost like we need to put

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 11>him in harm's way so we can survive.

0:33:13.420 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Tough to watch, isn't it? Joining me now, someone who's

0:33:15.020 --> 0:33:18.860
<v Speaker 1>been fighting for choice for parents, the founder of Childcare Choice,

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Jen Fleming. Jen, Shocking footage. Yeah, it's awful.

0:33:26.380 --> 0:33:28.670
<v Speaker 8>And I think every Australian who watched that last night

0:33:28.710 --> 0:33:31.510
<v Speaker 8>felt sick to their stomach to understand what was going

0:33:31.570 --> 0:33:34.330
<v Speaker 8>on in our childcare centres. And today parents have woken up,

0:33:34.430 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 8>like that parent in that footage, saying we have to

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.479
<v Speaker 8>go to work and we have no other option but

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 8>to continue using these services that are failing our children

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:42.140
<v Speaker 8>and our families.

0:33:43.900 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>And, of course, the money. We spend $ 16 billion a

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>year on childcare as taxpayers. It follows unionised childcare. Parents

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.660
<v Speaker 1>don't have a choice. If they're working and they need

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>their children looked after, they don't have anyone else to

0:33:55.940 --> 0:33:59.850
<v Speaker 1>help around, you know, grandparents or family, they have to

0:33:59.980 --> 0:34:04.010
<v Speaker 1>use these centres. And we know of people jailed for

0:34:04.050 --> 0:34:07.610
<v Speaker 1>abusing children. We know of 120 childcare centres jailed put

0:34:07.670 --> 0:34:11.649
<v Speaker 1>on notice. There's just case after case. Some are being

0:34:11.710 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>shut down. Concerns about not enough appropriate checks for workers

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>in these centres. And more and more, Jen, they're targeting

0:34:22.580 --> 0:34:26.259
<v Speaker 1>the really young infants because they're less likely to be

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>able to tell their parents what's going on. Yeah, it's disgusting.

0:34:31.980 --> 0:34:34.510
<v Speaker 8>I think it's really distressing to think about what's going on.

0:34:34.610 --> 0:34:37.490
<v Speaker 8>But you're right, there are stories every week and parents

0:34:37.530 --> 0:34:39.830
<v Speaker 8>are sick of it. The heartbreaking headlines have to stop.

0:34:39.930 --> 0:34:42.950
<v Speaker 8>These are not just numbers, they are people's babies. They

0:34:42.969 --> 0:34:45.500
<v Speaker 8>are the most precious people in our lives and right

0:34:45.540 --> 0:34:48.740
<v Speaker 8>now the system that the Albanese government is forcing families

0:34:48.820 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 8>into is... is failing miserably. But the government's solution is

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.170
<v Speaker 8>more money, more of your taxpayer money going into this

0:34:56.230 --> 0:34:58.590
<v Speaker 8>system that can't guarantee the safety of children.

0:34:58.630 --> 0:35:00.950
<v Speaker 1>And parents are sick of it. Parents want action.

0:35:01.270 --> 0:35:03.330
<v Speaker 8>They want to be heard and they want the government

0:35:03.370 --> 0:35:04.950
<v Speaker 8>to act and they need to do it today.

0:35:06.770 --> 0:35:10.709
<v Speaker 1>As we know, privatised union membership or union membership, sorry,

0:35:10.770 --> 0:35:14.450
<v Speaker 1>in private businesses is steadily in decline. Less than 9%

0:35:14.450 --> 0:35:17.980
<v Speaker 1>of the population belong to a union and outside places

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>like childcare where it's part of the rules. If you

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 1>want the funding, you've got to be unionised. So it's

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a growth area. You can see that's why the government,

0:35:26.540 --> 0:35:29.779
<v Speaker 1>you know, has got such an eye to use taxpayer

0:35:29.820 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 1>money to basically buy themselves a membership force and votes.

0:35:35.620 --> 0:35:38.540
<v Speaker 1>If you were redesigning this system, there's no reason why

0:35:38.580 --> 0:35:42.350
<v Speaker 1>you can't, the money should follow the parent and give

0:35:42.410 --> 0:35:42.890
<v Speaker 1>them choice.

0:35:42.910 --> 0:35:43.730
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:35:45.270 --> 0:35:45.870
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely.

0:35:45.910 --> 0:35:49.350
<v Speaker 8>So you're totally right, Peter. This is an attempt at unionisation.

0:35:49.390 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 8>It is a typical play from the Labor Playbook 101.

0:35:52.510 --> 0:35:55.150
<v Speaker 8>What they do is they unionise workforces to try and

0:35:55.210 --> 0:35:58.270
<v Speaker 8>get votes, and that's fine. They can unionise those workforces,

0:35:58.310 --> 0:36:00.049
<v Speaker 8>but don't force parents to use them.

0:36:00.350 --> 0:36:01.630
<v Speaker 1>We need to have more options.

0:36:01.790 --> 0:36:04.490
<v Speaker 8>Right now the funding should go directly to the parents

0:36:04.550 --> 0:36:07.049
<v Speaker 8>to be able to choose the care that best supports them.

0:36:07.450 --> 0:36:09.969
<v Speaker 8>We're eligible for this funding but we aren't eligible for

0:36:09.989 --> 0:36:12.339
<v Speaker 8>it unless we use what Labor want us to use. Well,

0:36:12.610 --> 0:36:14.739
<v Speaker 8>that's wrong. That's a backwards system and we can see

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:18.259
<v Speaker 8>that it's failing. We need to direct that funding to

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 8>families to be able to use alternative forms of care

0:36:21.500 --> 0:36:24.180
<v Speaker 8>that best suit us. Childcare didn't work for my family.

0:36:24.260 --> 0:36:26.700
<v Speaker 8>I tried as hard as I could and it didn't

0:36:26.739 --> 0:36:28.820
<v Speaker 8>work and I'm not alone in that. There are so

0:36:28.890 --> 0:36:31.509
<v Speaker 8>many families across this country who are being let down

0:36:31.550 --> 0:36:34.430
<v Speaker 8>by this system and the government is forcing us into

0:36:34.469 --> 0:36:35.550
<v Speaker 8>it and that needs to change.

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I saw a paper come out from the Liberal Party

0:36:39.340 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>think tank, the Menzies Research Centre. It had a whole

0:36:41.540 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of options, very flexible care. I don't agree with

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:46.660
<v Speaker 1>every one of them, but it's a debate we've got

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.290
<v Speaker 1>to have. I feel like, Jen, we're starting to get

0:36:49.350 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 1>some momentum here. Yeah, we are.

0:36:53.380 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 8>And parents have been asking for this for so long.

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.540
<v Speaker 8>We know that 78% of women across this country with

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 8>children under the age of six want a more flexible

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 8>childcare system. I can't remember a poll that has that

0:37:04.580 --> 0:37:08.100
<v Speaker 8>huge support across all voting preferences because this is something

0:37:08.140 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 8>that families are living every day. So it was really

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.930
<v Speaker 8>reassuring to see the Menzies Research Centre put that in

0:37:13.950 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 8>black and white, that parents need choice.

0:37:16.090 --> 0:37:17.870
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. There are a lot of options

0:37:17.950 --> 0:37:18.250
<v Speaker 1>in there.

0:37:18.370 --> 0:37:22.270
<v Speaker 8>It's probably potentially overcomplicating something that just should be very simple,

0:37:22.310 --> 0:37:24.469
<v Speaker 8>and that is funding parents, not providers.

0:37:24.489 --> 0:37:27.450
<v Speaker 1>Right, we'll leave it there, Jen. Keep up the fight.

0:37:28.030 --> 0:37:30.370
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the break. After the break, 100 projects

0:37:30.430 --> 0:37:34.150
<v Speaker 1>since July 1 rammed through by Labor as they head

0:37:34.170 --> 0:37:36.610
<v Speaker 1>to a state election that they're not expected to win,

0:37:37.110 --> 0:37:42.370
<v Speaker 1>including a horrific proposal for farmers out near Victoria's Warwick Nabil.

0:37:42.650 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll speak to them in a moment. Coming up, John

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:54.220
<v Speaker 1>Howard weighs in pretty hard about Labor's spending Significant comments

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.220
<v Speaker 1>from him. Of course, the inflation numbers out tomorrow, Tuesday

0:37:57.260 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 1>panel coming up. But now to the jaw-dropping push from

0:37:59.900 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Victorian Labor this week. Front page of the Weekly Times

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.910
<v Speaker 1>rushing to approve planning amendments, more than 100 of them

0:38:06.950 --> 0:38:11.150
<v Speaker 1>since July, before they switch into caretaker mode ahead of

0:38:11.170 --> 0:38:15.090
<v Speaker 1>the November election. Now, one of these projects is huge,

0:38:15.090 --> 0:38:20.430
<v Speaker 1>26,000 hectares of renewable energy near Warwick Nabil, two large

0:38:20.510 --> 0:38:24.169
<v Speaker 1>battery systems. This is a fire-prone area, I'll remind you.

0:38:24.590 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Transmission lines and 219 massive turbines, all signed up by

0:38:30.260 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the Minister, Sonia Kilkenny. Of course, she's got that large

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.370
<v Speaker 1>Islamic centre on her books as well. Here to discuss

0:38:37.410 --> 0:38:41.610
<v Speaker 1>it now, Wimmera Mallee Environmental and Agricultural Protection Association boss,

0:38:41.910 --> 0:38:47.489
<v Speaker 1>Ross Johns. Well, Ross, you've been blindsided here. People have

0:38:47.510 --> 0:38:51.320
<v Speaker 1>spoken up your way, so there's been no consultation. This

0:38:51.340 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>has just literally landed on you, and you've got an

0:38:54.300 --> 0:38:55.780
<v Speaker 1>election within weeks.

0:38:57.140 --> 0:38:59.299
<v Speaker 15>Well, it's always been a poor process, but what it's

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:03.670
<v Speaker 15>become is a very, very poor process, and unfortunately, And

0:39:03.710 --> 0:39:06.069
<v Speaker 15>taking away the rights of the local council through the

0:39:06.140 --> 0:39:09.899
<v Speaker 15>amendment to the planning scheme was absolutely outrageous and should

0:39:09.940 --> 0:39:13.260
<v Speaker 15>never happen. But that's not the only poor planning process

0:39:13.300 --> 0:39:17.219
<v Speaker 15>that Sonia Kilkenny has done. She approved some batteries in

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:22.020
<v Speaker 15>Gippsland that are awarded to a company in voluntary administration.

0:39:22.060 --> 0:39:26.320
<v Speaker 15>This is just terrible governance from government. And Sonia Kilkenny

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:28.580
<v Speaker 15>needs to answer why she's done it. And the new

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:29.580
<v Speaker 15>government should review it.

0:39:31.420 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, when I spoke to Jess Wilson, she said in

0:39:33.380 --> 0:39:36.940
<v Speaker 1>relation to another decision pending with the Minister that if

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.300
<v Speaker 1>they were to rush it through prior to the election,

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:41.990
<v Speaker 1>she would tear it up the other side. I think

0:39:42.070 --> 0:39:43.870
<v Speaker 1>this is part of your push. You've got to push

0:39:43.910 --> 0:39:46.850
<v Speaker 1>that all of them get reviewed. But just on the

0:39:46.870 --> 0:39:49.410
<v Speaker 1>point I made about the battery, I mean, you are

0:39:49.450 --> 0:39:53.709
<v Speaker 1>a fire-prone area. I've spoken to the CFA before about

0:39:53.969 --> 0:39:58.210
<v Speaker 1>aerial fire fighting when there are big transmission lines, let

0:39:58.250 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>alone these turbines. We saw that case down near Geelong

0:40:01.620 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>where a turbine head caught fire. This is a huge risk.

0:40:06.260 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 15>Oh, no, absolutely. There was a turbine fire at Bolgana,

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.750
<v Speaker 15>which is... to the east of Stawell, and it's inevitable

0:40:12.790 --> 0:40:16.549
<v Speaker 15>there'll be turbine fires in this project as well. One

0:40:16.630 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 15>in 1,700 turbines burn every year, and these turbines are

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.859
<v Speaker 15>placed west of Warratnabil, and the prevailing wind comes from

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:27.660
<v Speaker 15>the northwest, and I think it puts Warratnabil, and particularly

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 15>Brim as well, a small community to the north of Warratnabil,

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:34.140
<v Speaker 15>in high peril, and those issues have not been properly considered.

0:40:34.580 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 15>The area is normally.

0:40:38.140 --> 0:40:42.839
<v Speaker 15>Surveyed by firefighting capacity from the air, and that will

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 15>not be possible. You will not be able to fight

0:40:45.140 --> 0:40:49.500
<v Speaker 15>fires accurately from the air. It puts the whole community

0:40:49.580 --> 0:40:50.240
<v Speaker 15>in real peril.

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:55.030
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these organisations that are funding these projects

0:40:55.110 --> 0:40:58.569
<v Speaker 1>are foreign-owned. I spoke to someone out near Rapunyip. about

0:40:58.590 --> 0:41:01.650
<v Speaker 1>a wind turbine project near her. It's had three owners

0:41:01.690 --> 0:41:05.340
<v Speaker 1>in about four years, all foreign owned. People sign contracts

0:41:05.380 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>with one mob, they're gone the next day and on

0:41:07.980 --> 0:41:11.299
<v Speaker 1>it goes. What do we know about this body and

0:41:11.340 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 1>what's the feeling of locals up at Warwick?

0:41:14.540 --> 0:41:17.969
<v Speaker 15>Well, there's an air of concern and particularly now that

0:41:18.010 --> 0:41:22.930
<v Speaker 15>council's been taken out of a role of oversight completely,

0:41:23.010 --> 0:41:26.469
<v Speaker 15>I think there's a real air of concern. The problem

0:41:26.510 --> 0:41:30.259
<v Speaker 15>with neighbours and the community in general, they haven't been

0:41:30.300 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 15>properly consulted. There's been no community consultation and transparency. We

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 15>absolutely have been crying out for a proper process right

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:41.219
<v Speaker 15>from the start. And we've got anything but a proper process.

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 15>And now we've got large, potentially large batteries and turbines

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.530
<v Speaker 15>in a very high fire risk area for these communities.

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:53.450
<v Speaker 15>And it's just completely unacceptable. Australia is a very fire

0:41:53.550 --> 0:41:58.010
<v Speaker 15>prone place. Droughts and flooding rains. then the whole place burns.

0:41:59.090 --> 0:42:01.649
<v Speaker 15>I think we must do better. We can do better.

0:42:02.750 --> 0:42:06.150
<v Speaker 15>There's also some other considerations which I think are pretty big,

0:42:06.590 --> 0:42:08.710
<v Speaker 15>is what's the cost to the community? What's the cost

0:42:08.730 --> 0:42:13.070
<v Speaker 15>to government? The capacity investment scheme hasn't been fully explained.

0:42:14.770 --> 0:42:16.910
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back to this one. We'll stay right across it.

0:42:16.950 --> 0:42:20.739
<v Speaker 1>It'll be a feature in the election campaign. I'll get

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>off the show on the way home tonight. I'll make

0:42:22.180 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a few phone calls and... see how much we can

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 1>ramp it up because I know that this is not

0:42:26.420 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>something that's supported by so many other Victorians. It's not

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>just people up your way. Thanks, Ross. Thanks for your time.

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:35.780
<v Speaker 1>Ross John's there. That's in Warwick, Nabil, out near the Wimra.

0:42:36.140 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a break. After the break, my fabulous panel,

0:42:38.540 --> 0:42:41.419
<v Speaker 1>Lucy Zellick, you love her, and the Daily Telly's Chief

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:48.989
<v Speaker 1>of Staff, Jason Morrison, as well. I was just reading

0:42:49.010 --> 0:42:52.370
<v Speaker 1>my social media in the break and Meghan Markle's confirmed

0:42:52.469 --> 0:42:57.210
<v Speaker 1>as a co-host. of MasterChef that will be filmed in Victoria,

0:42:57.290 --> 0:42:59.879
<v Speaker 1>in Melbourne. I tell you what, Victorian taxpayers, they won't

0:42:59.910 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>be contributing to her security at all. Let's bring in

0:43:03.980 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>my panel broadcaster, News24 contributor Lucy Zellick and the Daily

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:11.339
<v Speaker 1>Telly's Chief of Staff, Jason Morrison. Well, John Howard, geez,

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>he's had a whack. He's gone to town on government spending.

0:43:15.610 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>pointing out that public servants are enjoying a river of gold,

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:22.339
<v Speaker 1>more pay than ever before, more super, as some have

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>got 25%, 35% pay rises, well and above anything out

0:43:27.340 --> 0:43:31.810
<v Speaker 1>there in the real world. Well, Lucy, he's not wrong. No,

0:43:31.830 --> 0:43:34.310
<v Speaker 1>he's absolutely not wrong, Peter. Great to be with you.

0:43:34.489 --> 0:43:38.390
<v Speaker 17>And if you are one of the businesses which contribute

0:43:38.550 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 17>to one third of our nation's GDP, you would be

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.710
<v Speaker 17>sitting back and thinking, Hang on a minute. Where's our break? But,

0:43:45.070 --> 0:43:46.890
<v Speaker 17>you know, to you and I and to many of

0:43:46.989 --> 0:43:49.950
<v Speaker 17>our viewers, of course, cuts to the public service make sense.

0:43:49.989 --> 0:43:52.069
<v Speaker 17>But to the broader public, if you cast your mind

0:43:52.110 --> 0:43:55.529
<v Speaker 17>back to the federal election campaign under then opposition leader

0:43:55.570 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 17>Peter Dutton, when he announced that he wanted to.

0:43:57.680 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Cut up to 41,000 APS jobs.

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.569
<v Speaker 17>Over five years and it would have saved the taxpayer

0:44:03.670 --> 0:44:07.109
<v Speaker 17>seven billion dollars he was pilloried for it and absolutely

0:44:07.190 --> 0:44:10.609
<v Speaker 17>smashed by the labor government well cast your mind back

0:44:10.650 --> 0:44:12.830
<v Speaker 17>to may this year where a report by the australian

0:44:12.890 --> 0:44:16.860
<v Speaker 17>financial review showed that under this albanese government the cost

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:21.660
<v Speaker 17>blowouts of running this aps under his government are now

0:44:21.739 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 17>exceeding over.

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:22.980
<v Speaker 14>19.6 billion.

0:44:25.060 --> 0:44:26.180
<v Speaker 3>Over four years.

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:30.210
<v Speaker 17>And not only that, they then started instructing government departments

0:44:30.250 --> 0:44:31.830
<v Speaker 17>to start scratching around.

0:44:31.590 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>To look for savings. I mean, it's remarkable, isn't it?

0:44:35.030 --> 0:44:37.290
<v Speaker 17>When you think about this, one had the courage to

0:44:37.330 --> 0:44:41.290
<v Speaker 17>take the policy to an election, the other over-promised and under-delivered.

0:44:41.370 --> 0:44:44.290
<v Speaker 17>And that's why our economy is tanking under this government.

0:44:45.870 --> 0:44:50.210
<v Speaker 1>You've got the secretaries of department, Jason, on close to

0:44:50.230 --> 0:44:53.029
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars, some a bit more than that. You've

0:44:53.050 --> 0:44:55.450
<v Speaker 1>got the Prime Minister now with more staff than any

0:44:55.489 --> 0:44:58.580
<v Speaker 1>other PM in history. Clearly they're not helping him. He's

0:44:58.620 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 1>making mistake and lie after lie on a regular basis.

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:04.460
<v Speaker 1>I had a look at what his chief of staff

0:45:04.580 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>earns or senior staff in his office. Most of them

0:45:07.660 --> 0:45:09.859
<v Speaker 1>are on the top staff, at least $ 140, 000 more, more

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:15.779
<v Speaker 1>than what I earned in the same job what, not

0:45:15.820 --> 0:45:19.500
<v Speaker 1>even a decade ago, this is where Australians are right

0:45:19.540 --> 0:45:20.180
<v Speaker 1>to be angry.

0:45:20.860 --> 0:45:21.319
<v Speaker 3>They are.

0:45:21.620 --> 0:45:23.970
<v Speaker 18>And this is the thing that's sort of gone missing

0:45:24.010 --> 0:45:25.650
<v Speaker 18>in all of this. It used to be, and I

0:45:25.930 --> 0:45:28.070
<v Speaker 18>come from a family of people who've worked in the

0:45:28.130 --> 0:45:30.930
<v Speaker 18>public service for most of my childhood, mother and father.

0:45:31.370 --> 0:45:34.270
<v Speaker 18>And the reason people worked in the public service on

0:45:34.310 --> 0:45:35.950
<v Speaker 18>a number of fronts was, well, it was one of

0:45:35.989 --> 0:45:39.050
<v Speaker 18>those jobs that you didn't lose easily. And in tough times,

0:45:39.230 --> 0:45:41.690
<v Speaker 18>the pressure wasn't quite on you like it was. So

0:45:41.750 --> 0:45:44.870
<v Speaker 18>you copped the lesser salary because that was the trade-off.

0:45:45.219 --> 0:45:48.359
<v Speaker 18>the safety of holding your position. These days, I mean,

0:45:48.390 --> 0:45:52.810
<v Speaker 18>the public sector is under, is assaulting the private sector

0:45:52.830 --> 0:45:56.830
<v Speaker 18>for staff. And some of the so-called brightest minds that

0:45:56.969 --> 0:46:00.430
<v Speaker 18>should be working in private enterprise are being drawn into

0:46:00.790 --> 0:46:04.410
<v Speaker 18>the relaxed and comfortable lifestyle of the public service. And

0:46:04.450 --> 0:46:06.950
<v Speaker 18>where are the ramifications for them not delivering on what

0:46:06.989 --> 0:46:09.800
<v Speaker 18>they're meant to be doing? Where's the ramifications for blowing

0:46:09.860 --> 0:46:10.460
<v Speaker 18>out the budget?

0:46:10.820 --> 0:46:12.700
<v Speaker 4>Nil, none. They roll on.

0:46:12.710 --> 0:46:15.450
<v Speaker 1>There are no consequences. They sit at home. They can

0:46:15.530 --> 0:46:17.890
<v Speaker 1>all work from home. They can work actually from anywhere

0:46:17.910 --> 0:46:19.430
<v Speaker 1>they like in the country. They don't have to be

0:46:19.469 --> 0:46:23.839
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near Canberra. Let's go to the AFP Commissioner. She

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:27.259
<v Speaker 1>can't front the Bondo Royal Commission, but she can have

0:46:27.300 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this to say.

0:46:29.020 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 9>Things like a cartoon that suggests someone should be hit

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.140
<v Speaker 9>by a car or something like that, does that have

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:35.700
<v Speaker 9>a direct link?

0:46:35.739 --> 0:46:36.500
<v Speaker 3>Is that what you're talking about?

0:46:36.739 --> 0:46:40.700
<v Speaker 5>We do see examples where there are particular announcements or,

0:46:40.900 --> 0:46:44.320
<v Speaker 5>you know... things like you've just described, there is a

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:46.089
<v Speaker 5>reaction amongst the community.

0:46:47.820 --> 0:46:50.790
<v Speaker 1>OK, so ever since that terrible incident with Helen Haynes

0:46:50.830 --> 0:46:53.910
<v Speaker 1>last Monday, we've had all this talk, you know, it's

0:46:53.930 --> 0:46:58.230
<v Speaker 1>the fault of social media, it's the fault of Hanson's cartoons.

0:46:58.870 --> 0:47:03.350
<v Speaker 1>Hardly anyone, Lucy, has gone after the man himself who's

0:47:03.390 --> 0:47:07.130
<v Speaker 1>been accused of this crime. We're not focused on him.

0:47:07.550 --> 0:47:10.830
<v Speaker 1>It's the fault of everything else. And I find that extraordinary.

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:14.790
<v Speaker 17>I find it extraordinary like you, Peter, but also very

0:47:14.850 --> 0:47:18.189
<v Speaker 17>egregious because it takes away the responsibility that this man

0:47:18.230 --> 0:47:21.089
<v Speaker 17>should face for these alleged attacks. And by the way,

0:47:21.250 --> 0:47:25.130
<v Speaker 17>to the points there that the AFP Commissioner Chrissie Barrett made,

0:47:25.870 --> 0:47:29.850
<v Speaker 17>saying and suggesting somehow that the reactions were, I quote, immediate,

0:47:30.310 --> 0:47:32.549
<v Speaker 17>these cartoons that they've been digging up over the last

0:47:32.650 --> 0:47:35.550
<v Speaker 17>few days that One Nation have produced, those were produced

0:47:35.690 --> 0:47:38.130
<v Speaker 17>in 2022 and 2023.

0:47:38.570 --> 0:47:40.210
<v Speaker 1>Did we see any attacks like the.

0:47:40.150 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 17>Horrific one that we saw on Dr Helen Haynes in

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 17>those periods in time? No, Dr Helen Haynes was attacked

0:47:47.100 --> 0:47:51.180
<v Speaker 17>eight days ago, not in 2022 and 2023. So the

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:55.049
<v Speaker 17>cause and link effect there are very, very misleading and

0:47:55.190 --> 0:47:57.549
<v Speaker 17>also takes away, as I said, the blame that this

0:47:57.670 --> 0:47:58.470
<v Speaker 17>man should face.

0:48:00.210 --> 0:48:03.250
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly, Jason, Hanson says if elected, she wants to

0:48:03.310 --> 0:48:08.310
<v Speaker 1>remove that retrospective law under which Ben Robert Smith has

0:48:08.390 --> 0:48:09.290
<v Speaker 1>been charged.

0:48:09.730 --> 0:48:12.529
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, well, I hope she gets there in that front

0:48:12.610 --> 0:48:15.970
<v Speaker 18>because that is an appalling thing that's happened. The fairness

0:48:16.030 --> 0:48:19.030
<v Speaker 18>in all of this, almost from the start, has worked

0:48:19.070 --> 0:48:21.910
<v Speaker 18>backwards on him. They changed the law to make it

0:48:21.989 --> 0:48:25.410
<v Speaker 18>less fair. They arrested him in a manner that made

0:48:25.450 --> 0:48:27.540
<v Speaker 18>it very, very hard for him to have a fair

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:31.410
<v Speaker 18>shot at looking like an innocent man being accused. They

0:48:31.450 --> 0:48:35.219
<v Speaker 18>have never treated this man with fairness and we need

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 18>the Parliament to recognise that. And if that fails, you've

0:48:37.620 --> 0:48:39.060
<v Speaker 18>got to hope the justice system does.

0:48:40.620 --> 0:48:42.460
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you on that. I'll leave it there. Thank

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:44.730
<v Speaker 1>you to you both. Lucy Jason, see you next week.

0:48:45.150 --> 0:48:48.170
<v Speaker 1>That's it for me. See you tomorrow night. He's Andrew Bolt.