1 00:00:05,320 --> 00:00:08,200 Speaker 1: From the Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Claire Harvey. 2 00:00:08,280 --> 00:00:15,440 Speaker 1: It's Tuesday, February three, twenty twenty six. Federal parliaments back 3 00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:19,040 Speaker 1: today and everything's all shook up, with the crumpled coalition 4 00:00:19,200 --> 00:00:23,440 Speaker 1: scrambling to reorganize their seating arrangements and Susan Lee bracing 5 00:00:23,520 --> 00:00:24,440 Speaker 1: for a looming. 6 00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:25,520 Speaker 2: Assault on her leadership. 7 00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:29,360 Speaker 1: We'll be following every development live at the Australian dot 8 00:00:29,400 --> 00:00:36,239 Speaker 1: com dot au. The Reserve Bank meets today and is 9 00:00:36,400 --> 00:00:39,480 Speaker 1: likely to push up the cash rate. That's because inflation, 10 00:00:39,800 --> 00:00:42,760 Speaker 1: fueled by government spending, is on the way back up. 11 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:46,400 Speaker 1: Through the past year, Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Bank Governor 12 00:00:46,440 --> 00:00:50,599 Speaker 1: Michelle Bullock were optimistic that the economy was improving. So 13 00:00:50,920 --> 00:00:53,240 Speaker 1: how did they get it wrong? And who's to blame 14 00:00:53,360 --> 00:00:56,880 Speaker 1: for the rise that will cost average mortgage holders thousands 15 00:00:56,960 --> 00:01:12,960 Speaker 1: of dollars? That's today's story. Treasurer Jim Chalmers says it 16 00:01:13,080 --> 00:01:16,280 Speaker 1: all the time. The independent Reserve Bank. 17 00:01:16,440 --> 00:01:20,440 Speaker 3: The Reserve Bank has taken its decisions independently. Cut rates 18 00:01:20,440 --> 00:01:23,640 Speaker 3: are ready. I don't second guess decisions taken independently by 19 00:01:23,680 --> 00:01:26,399 Speaker 3: the Bank or it's board. I don't know that they've made. 20 00:01:26,440 --> 00:01:29,320 Speaker 3: I cherished the independence of the Reserve Bank and tain 21 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:33,200 Speaker 3: the report are about bolstering the independence of the Reserve Bank, 22 00:01:33,360 --> 00:01:35,560 Speaker 3: not undermining that independence. 23 00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:40,160 Speaker 1: But is the central bank responsible for setting the cash 24 00:01:40,240 --> 00:01:43,040 Speaker 1: rate that determines how much it costs banks to obtain 25 00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:46,039 Speaker 1: money and therefore how much they charge us all in 26 00:01:46,040 --> 00:01:48,000 Speaker 1: interest rates? Really independent? 27 00:01:48,640 --> 00:01:52,240 Speaker 3: Jim Charmers says higher interest rates are smashing the economy. 28 00:01:52,600 --> 00:01:56,120 Speaker 3: Global economic uncertainty and higher interest rates are smashing household 29 00:01:56,160 --> 00:01:57,680 Speaker 3: budgets and slowing our economy. 30 00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 2: Dr Chalmers is blaming the economic outlook on the RBA's 31 00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:02,440 Speaker 2: rate hikes. 32 00:02:04,400 --> 00:02:07,040 Speaker 1: When Jim Chalmers became Treasurer with the election of the 33 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:10,280 Speaker 1: Albanzi government in May twenty twenty two, the cash rate 34 00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:13,520 Speaker 1: was zero point three five percent and the standard variable 35 00:02:13,600 --> 00:02:16,320 Speaker 1: rate for home loans was four point seven seven percent. 36 00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:20,880 Speaker 1: Then it went up and up twelve consecutive rises until 37 00:02:20,919 --> 00:02:24,440 Speaker 1: February twenty twenty five, then three cuts and a whole 38 00:02:24,480 --> 00:02:28,240 Speaker 1: lot of holding steady through the past year. Chalmers has 39 00:02:28,280 --> 00:02:31,040 Speaker 1: been quick to bask in the glory when the bank 40 00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:31,920 Speaker 1: cuts rates. 41 00:02:32,240 --> 00:02:34,280 Speaker 2: Thanks for your time, Gi, you must have been happy 42 00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:35,240 Speaker 2: when you got that news. 43 00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:39,000 Speaker 3: I was a pretty welcome decision by the Reserve Bank 44 00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:41,800 Speaker 3: because it means more money in the pockets of millions 45 00:02:41,800 --> 00:02:44,959 Speaker 3: of Australians who are still under pressure. It also means. 46 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:47,640 Speaker 1: Even when the bank has held rates steady, like in 47 00:02:47,720 --> 00:02:50,960 Speaker 1: July twenty twenty five, the Treasurer has talked about it 48 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:53,280 Speaker 1: as part of an overall downward trend. 49 00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:58,240 Speaker 3: But it is clear now the direction of travel on 50 00:02:58,360 --> 00:03:01,680 Speaker 3: inflation and on interest rates has been established. 51 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:06,200 Speaker 1: And now he's insistent that b learning inflation isn't the 52 00:03:06,240 --> 00:03:10,240 Speaker 1: government's fault, that is ultra higher public spending isn't what's 53 00:03:10,320 --> 00:03:13,959 Speaker 1: causing the independent Reserve Bank to keep rates high or 54 00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:14,680 Speaker 1: push them up. 55 00:03:14,960 --> 00:03:17,079 Speaker 3: The Reserve Bank Governor has said on a number of 56 00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:20,360 Speaker 3: occasions now our budget is better than a lot of 57 00:03:20,400 --> 00:03:25,440 Speaker 3: other countries, and that a change in fiscal policy wouldn't 58 00:03:25,480 --> 00:03:28,800 Speaker 3: necessarily warrant a change in their approach to monetary policy. 59 00:03:28,800 --> 00:03:30,280 Speaker 3: And so I know that there'll be a lot of 60 00:03:30,360 --> 00:03:34,119 Speaker 3: political commentary about last week. 61 00:03:34,200 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 1: Inflation numbers came in higher than the government wanted, up 62 00:03:38,320 --> 00:03:41,160 Speaker 1: point four of a percentage point to three point eight percent, 63 00:03:41,520 --> 00:03:46,040 Speaker 1: and well above the Reserve Bank's target range. Matthew Cranston 64 00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:49,720 Speaker 1: is the Australian's Economics editor Matt The Reserve Bank is 65 00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:53,480 Speaker 1: widely tipped to put rates up when it meets on Tuesday. 66 00:03:53,920 --> 00:03:55,440 Speaker 1: If it does, who can we. 67 00:03:55,400 --> 00:03:59,560 Speaker 2: Blame, Claire? I think you can blame both the RBA 68 00:04:00,240 --> 00:04:03,720 Speaker 2: and governments and why because governments have been spending an 69 00:04:03,840 --> 00:04:08,080 Speaker 2: enormous amount and that has been driving up inflation. But 70 00:04:08,200 --> 00:04:11,040 Speaker 2: also you've got to blame the RBA too, because the 71 00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:14,440 Speaker 2: RBA has missed on a lot of its forecasts, whether 72 00:04:14,520 --> 00:04:17,360 Speaker 2: it's where it thinks GDP is going to go, or 73 00:04:17,360 --> 00:04:20,320 Speaker 2: where it thinks inflation's going to go, or unemployment for 74 00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:25,559 Speaker 2: that matter. So I think both have responsibility in where 75 00:04:25,600 --> 00:04:28,960 Speaker 2: inflation's gone because that's what's causing interstrates to go back up. 76 00:04:29,480 --> 00:04:32,480 Speaker 2: Who's to blame for inflation is the question, really, Claire, 77 00:04:32,800 --> 00:04:36,800 Speaker 2: And both the government and the RBA are responsible in 78 00:04:36,839 --> 00:04:40,160 Speaker 2: some ways for that. The RBA delivered three interstraight cuts 79 00:04:40,200 --> 00:04:44,240 Speaker 2: last year, which is very stimulatory to an economy, and 80 00:04:44,480 --> 00:04:47,159 Speaker 2: the government has been spending, at least the federal government 81 00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:49,840 Speaker 2: as well has been spending at a record amount, and 82 00:04:49,920 --> 00:04:52,280 Speaker 2: states governments as well have been spending in a lot 83 00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:55,279 Speaker 2: and that just drives inflation, and that's probably why we're 84 00:04:55,279 --> 00:04:57,400 Speaker 2: going to see a rate hike on Tuesday. 85 00:04:57,600 --> 00:05:01,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, there's two kinds of public spending. Government outlays on 86 00:05:01,320 --> 00:05:05,520 Speaker 1: pensions and welfare and public sector wages, and then there's 87 00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:09,000 Speaker 1: what they call public investment, which is spending on infrastructure projects, 88 00:05:09,040 --> 00:05:12,400 Speaker 1: big roads, big rail projects. Both of those are at 89 00:05:12,400 --> 00:05:14,800 Speaker 1: record highs at the moment. But the government has an 90 00:05:14,880 --> 00:05:18,160 Speaker 1: argument to defend both of those things, that it's not 91 00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:21,360 Speaker 1: got welfare out of control, and that those infrastructure projects 92 00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:23,560 Speaker 1: are part of the great growth in productivity that we're 93 00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:25,800 Speaker 1: all going to have. What's your take on both of 94 00:05:25,800 --> 00:05:26,360 Speaker 1: those things. 95 00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:30,240 Speaker 2: Well, the Treasurer keeps saying that government spending is not 96 00:05:30,279 --> 00:05:35,400 Speaker 2: contributing to the overall increase in GDP growth. That's not right. 97 00:05:36,279 --> 00:05:37,840 Speaker 2: You can just go on to the ABS and look 98 00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:40,560 Speaker 2: at the September quarter and you can see that public 99 00:05:40,640 --> 00:05:45,279 Speaker 2: demand did contribute, and it contributed both in expenditure. So 100 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:48,200 Speaker 2: that's the things like you mentioned before, where you're just 101 00:05:48,600 --> 00:05:52,360 Speaker 2: spending to keep people employed or you're spending to buy materials, 102 00:05:53,200 --> 00:05:56,320 Speaker 2: and the other side, which is this investment. So it 103 00:05:56,400 --> 00:05:59,200 Speaker 2: keeps on pumping out money as well, especially in these 104 00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:03,520 Speaker 2: things called off balance sheet items. So for example, last 105 00:06:03,600 --> 00:06:06,600 Speaker 2: year they went and put money into all sorts of investments. 106 00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:11,240 Speaker 2: That's doing two things, as you say, the capital investment 107 00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 2: and the spending, and that is contributing overall. And what 108 00:06:15,320 --> 00:06:17,400 Speaker 2: else does that do. It has the potential to do 109 00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:20,080 Speaker 2: what it's called crowding out and that means that the 110 00:06:20,120 --> 00:06:23,000 Speaker 2: private sector goes, oh, well, the government's beating us on 111 00:06:23,520 --> 00:06:26,640 Speaker 2: this contract or in terms of buying the things that 112 00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:30,520 Speaker 2: are needed for it, competing with resources and labor and materials, 113 00:06:31,160 --> 00:06:33,200 Speaker 2: and then the private sector doesn't grow as much as 114 00:06:33,240 --> 00:06:35,800 Speaker 2: it could. So private sector is still growing, but it's 115 00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:38,520 Speaker 2: not growing as much as it could. And it also 116 00:06:38,640 --> 00:06:41,919 Speaker 2: means that there's capacity constraints in the economy too. So 117 00:06:42,720 --> 00:06:46,440 Speaker 2: that's the answer is that, well people say it's not, 118 00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:49,359 Speaker 2: it is and you can see that just with the 119 00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:51,080 Speaker 2: last September quarter of data. 120 00:06:52,279 --> 00:06:55,680 Speaker 1: Jim Chalmers would say that on those big spending priorities, 121 00:06:55,720 --> 00:06:57,720 Speaker 1: you know, let's say the NDI is that the government 122 00:06:57,760 --> 00:07:00,320 Speaker 1: is trying to get spending under control, and that for 123 00:07:00,360 --> 00:07:03,960 Speaker 1: other priorities, let's say the Orcus nuclear submarine project, that 124 00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:07,240 Speaker 1: that's something that Australia just has to do. Where are 125 00:07:07,279 --> 00:07:10,400 Speaker 1: the most obvious areas that public spending is out of 126 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:12,800 Speaker 1: control or is too high, or they haven't shown the 127 00:07:12,840 --> 00:07:13,920 Speaker 1: restraint that they've needed. 128 00:07:14,400 --> 00:07:18,080 Speaker 2: Well and diis they said only in the media budget 129 00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:21,160 Speaker 2: update in December was growing at ten percent and their 130 00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:24,320 Speaker 2: target was more like six percent. So Indy Ice is 131 00:07:24,440 --> 00:07:26,760 Speaker 2: one area that I think you wouldn't have too much 132 00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:30,960 Speaker 2: trouble trying to find some excessive spending on trying to 133 00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:34,320 Speaker 2: get what you need out of that service. Public sector 134 00:07:34,360 --> 00:07:37,760 Speaker 2: wages are pretty big. They fall through public sector wages. 135 00:07:37,800 --> 00:07:40,160 Speaker 2: That's an area where I think the bill has now 136 00:07:40,200 --> 00:07:43,800 Speaker 2: reached a record for public servants, the wage increases they get. 137 00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:48,040 Speaker 2: I think overall, though, there's this idea that the spending 138 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:52,080 Speaker 2: doesn't contribute to inflation because it might not be as 139 00:07:52,160 --> 00:07:54,880 Speaker 2: big as it has been in the past, and that's 140 00:07:54,920 --> 00:07:57,400 Speaker 2: sort of true. The rate of growth in government spending 141 00:07:57,480 --> 00:08:01,640 Speaker 2: is sort of coming back down again. But I actually 142 00:08:01,720 --> 00:08:05,000 Speaker 2: just don't believe that they are going to show as 143 00:08:05,080 --> 00:08:09,080 Speaker 2: much fiscal restraint as they say they have. I think 144 00:08:09,120 --> 00:08:12,680 Speaker 2: a huge amount of the spending is actually discretionary. When 145 00:08:12,960 --> 00:08:17,160 Speaker 2: the Treasurer says that this spending is in what he said, 146 00:08:17,360 --> 00:08:21,280 Speaker 2: any reasonable person would call this necessary or essential spending. 147 00:08:23,160 --> 00:08:25,360 Speaker 2: And I think this is a really important point, Claire, 148 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:28,880 Speaker 2: because it shows if you read the retoric of the 149 00:08:29,320 --> 00:08:32,800 Speaker 2: Treasurer on this point, it shows you that if they 150 00:08:32,880 --> 00:08:37,000 Speaker 2: think this is essential spending, then they're going to continue 151 00:08:37,200 --> 00:08:41,520 Speaker 2: that spending. And I think they actually believe that all 152 00:08:41,559 --> 00:08:42,880 Speaker 2: this spending is warranted. 153 00:08:45,800 --> 00:08:48,360 Speaker 1: For Jim Chalmers and Anthony Albanezi, I think the greatest 154 00:08:48,400 --> 00:08:53,640 Speaker 1: fear is spiraling unemployment. Michelle Bullok has had a similar 155 00:08:53,679 --> 00:08:56,240 Speaker 1: tune the governor of the Reserve Bank. She said that 156 00:08:56,400 --> 00:08:58,959 Speaker 1: her goal has been to avoid high unemployment. 157 00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:03,200 Speaker 4: The board strategy, as you know, has been to bring 158 00:09:03,240 --> 00:09:07,520 Speaker 4: inflation down while avoiding a sharp rise in unemployment. Because 159 00:09:07,520 --> 00:09:09,960 Speaker 4: we didn't take rates as high as some other countries, 160 00:09:10,040 --> 00:09:12,480 Speaker 4: it may be that we don't need to reduce rates 161 00:09:12,520 --> 00:09:13,280 Speaker 4: as much either. 162 00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:17,319 Speaker 1: Has she not been quick enough to push rates up? 163 00:09:17,800 --> 00:09:20,520 Speaker 1: And some of her critics would say that if that's 164 00:09:20,520 --> 00:09:23,800 Speaker 1: the case, that she is under political pressure from the 165 00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:25,600 Speaker 1: government or she's buckling to that pressure. 166 00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:28,480 Speaker 2: What do you think? Okay, So just there's two parts 167 00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:32,120 Speaker 2: that question. The first is around the employment. Really interesting 168 00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:34,720 Speaker 2: to know that a lot of the new employment and 169 00:09:34,760 --> 00:09:37,160 Speaker 2: what's got us down to this really low employment rate. 170 00:09:37,640 --> 00:09:41,319 Speaker 2: A lot of it has been public sector jobs. So 171 00:09:41,320 --> 00:09:43,880 Speaker 2: how do you get the public sector jobs through spending? 172 00:09:44,360 --> 00:09:47,320 Speaker 2: How do you do the spending through borrowing? And what 173 00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:50,720 Speaker 2: happens when global cost of debt goes up That means 174 00:09:51,559 --> 00:09:55,160 Speaker 2: younger people have to flip the interest bill in decades 175 00:09:55,200 --> 00:09:59,319 Speaker 2: to come. There's that first part of the question. Second is, yeah, well, look, 176 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:01,560 Speaker 2: I've been in the US for four years and I 177 00:10:01,640 --> 00:10:06,160 Speaker 2: came back a year ago listening to the change in 178 00:10:06,200 --> 00:10:11,000 Speaker 2: the retric from the RBA governor and the relationship between 179 00:10:11,320 --> 00:10:15,000 Speaker 2: the treasure Jim Charmers, and I measured that against when 180 00:10:15,040 --> 00:10:17,320 Speaker 2: I was away. There was quite a lot of tension 181 00:10:17,640 --> 00:10:22,480 Speaker 2: around what Michelle Bullock was saying needed to happen, and 182 00:10:22,880 --> 00:10:25,000 Speaker 2: there was a little bit of rgie bargie, to say 183 00:10:25,040 --> 00:10:29,320 Speaker 2: the least, between Charmers and Bullock, and I think that 184 00:10:29,600 --> 00:10:33,760 Speaker 2: set a tone. And I interviewed Michelle Bullock in December 185 00:10:34,520 --> 00:10:37,520 Speaker 2: and I said to her, are you actually saying what 186 00:10:37,559 --> 00:10:41,440 Speaker 2: you need to say to inform the public about how 187 00:10:41,520 --> 00:10:45,079 Speaker 2: important the fiscal impulse is, the government spending is when 188 00:10:45,120 --> 00:10:48,000 Speaker 2: it comes to making your decision about where interest rates 189 00:10:48,040 --> 00:10:50,880 Speaker 2: should go. And she said, we had to do better. 190 00:10:51,480 --> 00:10:53,920 Speaker 2: So she's saying that the RBA has to do better 191 00:10:54,360 --> 00:10:58,040 Speaker 2: in explaining to the public the importance of government spending 192 00:10:58,080 --> 00:11:01,719 Speaker 2: and so forth. So I think maybe she's gone through 193 00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:04,760 Speaker 2: a lull of pushing back on charmers and you know 194 00:11:04,840 --> 00:11:08,440 Speaker 2: where rates should be and so forth, because obviously Chalmers 195 00:11:08,480 --> 00:11:11,040 Speaker 2: would love to see further interest rate cuts to keep 196 00:11:11,040 --> 00:11:14,640 Speaker 2: on fueling the economy, but she's now having to go, well, 197 00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:17,800 Speaker 2: we have to lift to make sure that inflation doesn't 198 00:11:17,800 --> 00:11:21,320 Speaker 2: get away from us. And I think maybe that easing 199 00:11:21,360 --> 00:11:24,040 Speaker 2: in the language is starting to just ever so slightly 200 00:11:24,080 --> 00:11:30,080 Speaker 2: maybe come back. And even though government spending growth is 201 00:11:30,400 --> 00:11:33,400 Speaker 2: slightly less than the growth it was before, and it's 202 00:11:33,400 --> 00:11:35,120 Speaker 2: sort of coming to a point where she might be 203 00:11:35,120 --> 00:11:37,959 Speaker 2: a little bit more comfortable, I still think she's going 204 00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:41,440 Speaker 2: to give some slight nudges about all governments, not just 205 00:11:41,480 --> 00:11:44,160 Speaker 2: the FEDS, but the states as well, in making sure 206 00:11:44,559 --> 00:11:47,880 Speaker 2: that the government spending is in control and doesn't contribute 207 00:11:47,920 --> 00:11:51,160 Speaker 2: to inflation which would force them to make even more 208 00:11:51,200 --> 00:11:57,560 Speaker 2: than one or two interestrate hikes. 209 00:11:58,040 --> 00:12:01,880 Speaker 1: Coming up. Housing is a big part of huge daily expenses, 210 00:12:02,360 --> 00:12:06,400 Speaker 1: so how we'll pushing up mortgages make anything better? That's 211 00:12:06,520 --> 00:12:25,000 Speaker 1: after the break. Finally, Matt, let's just talk about housing. 212 00:12:25,160 --> 00:12:29,280 Speaker 1: One of the mind bending parts of this inflation jigsaw 213 00:12:29,320 --> 00:12:31,880 Speaker 1: puzzle is that one of the big contributors to inflation 214 00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:34,960 Speaker 1: in January was housing. The cost of housing, and everyone 215 00:12:34,960 --> 00:12:37,320 Speaker 1: who's got a mortgage or is paying rent knows that 216 00:12:37,400 --> 00:12:41,160 Speaker 1: it is cripplingly high. A rise in the cash rate 217 00:12:41,280 --> 00:12:44,560 Speaker 1: will mean mortgage rates go up and housing becomes even 218 00:12:44,600 --> 00:12:47,520 Speaker 1: more expensive. So how do we get out of this spiral? 219 00:12:48,760 --> 00:12:52,120 Speaker 2: I know it sounds silly, but it's a very simple answer. 220 00:12:52,280 --> 00:12:56,080 Speaker 2: But it's just politically not workable, and that is you 221 00:12:56,200 --> 00:13:01,439 Speaker 2: have to boost supply side. Politicians fall in love with 222 00:13:01,559 --> 00:13:04,760 Speaker 2: demand side because it always looks as though they're giving 223 00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:08,760 Speaker 2: money to people and they're helping people, whereas supply side, 224 00:13:08,760 --> 00:13:11,720 Speaker 2: what you're doing is you're helping produce, and there are 225 00:13:11,800 --> 00:13:15,600 Speaker 2: fewer producers than there are consumers. Right, so you might 226 00:13:15,640 --> 00:13:19,760 Speaker 2: just have one property developer who sells to one hundred consumers. Right, 227 00:13:20,240 --> 00:13:24,640 Speaker 2: So it doesn't have the same political power as helping 228 00:13:24,679 --> 00:13:28,600 Speaker 2: the demand side. But the solution is the supply side 229 00:13:28,840 --> 00:13:32,480 Speaker 2: got to release more land, got to cut the regulations. 230 00:13:32,800 --> 00:13:34,880 Speaker 2: It's all the stuff that isn't that sexy and that 231 00:13:34,960 --> 00:13:38,120 Speaker 2: doesn't get big headlines and so forth, but it's the 232 00:13:38,160 --> 00:13:42,480 Speaker 2: stuff that actually helps increase supply so that you're not 233 00:13:42,559 --> 00:13:47,600 Speaker 2: really damaging house prices because we all want our homes 234 00:13:48,080 --> 00:13:51,280 Speaker 2: to be worth more and to not affect our wealth, 235 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:55,240 Speaker 2: but also we want more homes so that people can 236 00:13:55,280 --> 00:13:58,880 Speaker 2: actually get started and move in. I mean, there really 237 00:13:58,960 --> 00:14:02,240 Speaker 2: is no other response way because everything else is demand, 238 00:14:02,720 --> 00:14:06,760 Speaker 2: and you're just throwing more money, which allows more people 239 00:14:06,800 --> 00:14:09,040 Speaker 2: to compete and bid each other up, and it makes 240 00:14:09,040 --> 00:14:12,439 Speaker 2: it harder to get in it's supply side, and until 241 00:14:12,480 --> 00:14:16,040 Speaker 2: the politicians brave enough to go down that avenue. I mean, 242 00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:19,360 Speaker 2: there are some things. Peter Chulick, the former RBA economists 243 00:14:19,400 --> 00:14:22,600 Speaker 2: now working at the Center for Independent Studies, He was 244 00:14:22,640 --> 00:14:24,600 Speaker 2: saying that what you should do is sort of ramp 245 00:14:24,680 --> 00:14:29,320 Speaker 2: up reward payments to the states who can make sure 246 00:14:29,440 --> 00:14:32,960 Speaker 2: that they are boosting supply side through measures such as 247 00:14:33,480 --> 00:14:37,720 Speaker 2: expediating approvals and so forth. So that's sort of interesting. 248 00:14:38,360 --> 00:14:41,160 Speaker 2: The government does have a mechanism to do that, where 249 00:14:41,200 --> 00:14:44,640 Speaker 2: they give more money to the states who meet their 250 00:14:44,680 --> 00:14:46,640 Speaker 2: goals in delivering housing supply. 251 00:14:52,040 --> 00:14:53,680 Speaker 1: Matthew Cranston, thank you very much. 252 00:14:54,520 --> 00:14:59,200 Speaker 2: Thanks Claire, you can read. 253 00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:02,560 Speaker 1: Maths journalism and follow our live reporting and analysis of 254 00:15:02,600 --> 00:15:05,880 Speaker 1: the Reserve Bank decision and all the fallout live at 255 00:15:05,960 --> 00:15:08,080 Speaker 1: the Australian dot com dot au