WEBVTT - Slater + Gordon’s ‘fake email’ nightmare

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Claire Harvey.

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It's Wednesday, February twenty six. The Teal candidates are confident

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>they'll hold and maybe even grow their numbers at the

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>looming federal election, with polling commissioned by Climate two hundred,

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the organization that backs the Teals, showing it'll be hard

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Liberals to win back blue ribbon inner city

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>seats they lost in twenty twenty two. That's an exclusive

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 1>live now at the Australian dot com dot au. Please

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>vote for the major parties. That's the plea from one

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of the nation's major oil producers, Beach Energy Chief executive

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Brett Woods says, even if you hate Labor or the Coalition,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a minority government would be a disaster for the country.

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>It's the scandal that has ever every lawyer in Australia

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>talking an apparently fake email from a senior executive, smashing

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>up colleagues reputations and disclosing salary and performance details. Class

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>action law firms Slater and Gordon have called in the

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>police and are now trying to calm a furious workforce. Today.

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>How the so called ambulance chasers found themselves at the

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>bottom of a cliff. Where to from here? The world

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is cold and bleak. In law firms Slater in Gordon's

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>latest suite of ads, Unfortunately something's gone wrong institutions, businesses, hospitals,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the system let ordinary people down. A slip at the supermarket,

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a fall at work, a medical mistake.

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>The world can feel like a lonely place.

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Everything seems hopeless.

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Slater and Gordon can help you make a claim through

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>your super.

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And then the sun comes out along with the Slater

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and Gordon app and some uplifting music. Are you really

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>getting what's fair, not just what's off it? Talk to

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Slater and Gordon and we'll take it from here. In

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Slater and Gordon's own in house promo video, the firm

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>proudly sets out its history from representing railway union workers

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen thirties to revolutionizing the legal system in

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen nineties. More than just knowing the law, we've

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>helped change it, providing better outcomes for asbestos and deadly

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>silica dust workers and those employed in the growing gig economy.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen ninety four, when a young future Prime Minister

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Julia Gillard worked there, Slater and Gordon introduced a revolutionary concept,

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>no win, no fee. That's the idea behind those ads.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Before this concept, you could only sue for personal injury

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.399
<v Speaker 1>or workers compo if you had enough money to pay

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.399
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer. Slater and Gordon's idea was if they didn't win,

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't charge the client at all, and they raked

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in the cash because for many employers, whether they be

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>small businesses, giant corporations, or government, it's much cheaper to

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>settle a legal claim out of court rather than fight it,

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and the fees could be hefty, up to twenty five

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>percent of a client's payout. Slater and Gordon took it

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a step further with class actions, where they'd go looking

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for plaintiffs to take action against wealthy corporations. They took

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>on big tobacco companies, mining giants, federal and state governments,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>delivering life changing payouts for individuals like those who'd suffered

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>asbestos related diseases at the hands of manufacturer James Hardy.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Slater and Gordon have been referred to as ambulance chases,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>people who go after claims and chase those claims incredibly

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 2>hard for their client.

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Ellie Dudley is The Australian's Legal affairs correspondent.

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 2>But they would say that they're all about clients first, right,

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.839
<v Speaker 2>They're all about the little guy, those who have been

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>wronged by their employer or by a large corporation. And

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 2>they've had some huge wins when it comes to class

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 2>actions in Australia, things like Manus Island. They're the firm

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 2>that's going after Optus after their data breach, so they

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 2>have had some huge wins and they've got quite a

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 2>good reputation for chasing you know, big workplace or labor

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 2>or class action claims.

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.799
<v Speaker 1>And we're here to talk about the h R nightmare

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>engulfing Slater in Gordon.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 2>It is insanely GC.

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Last Friday morning, Slater and Gordon's staff. We're settling in

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>for another day of chasing down bad bosses and standing

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>up for the little guy, when an email popped into

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of inboxes.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 3>To be blunt, the situation at Slater and Gordon is

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 3>a text bookcase of dysfunction.

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>We've used a voice actor to read you the email.

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>The email purported to be from Slater and Gordon's Chief

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>people officer, that is the head of human Resources, Mari

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Ruiz mathieson handing over to the person who was taking

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>over her job, and it seemed to be referring to

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>chief executive Dina.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 3>To Tungi, Dina's primary focus is her own bottom line.

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 3>She's determined to maximize her bonus and is laser focused

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 3>on keeping salaries locked down. She openly admitted her grand

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 3>plan is to cash out and retire with millions in

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 3>a few years.

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The email accused the firm's owner's private equity fund allegro

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of ruining, its culture heads are rolling, and what remains

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is a skeletal crew barely keeping things together.

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 3>The endgame a polished up shell to be sold off

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.119
<v Speaker 3>at the right price. Grim but predictable.

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't just a Tungi who copped it pasting.

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Senior figures at the firm were described as.

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Ruthlessly ambitious, lazy and unm motivated, senile and needs to retire.

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Morale is abysmal, money is hemorrhaging. Best of luck, you'll

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 3>need it.

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 2>My jaw hit the ground. It was the most shocking

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>internal email I think I have ever read. And then,

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 2>on top of that, after all of these criticisms, she

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 2>then attaches or the author then attached a spreadsheet containing

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the salary, performance rating, and bonus information of nine hundred

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 2>and six Slater and Gordon employees. Now that email was

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 2>blind copied to a wide range of Slater and Gordon employees.

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 2>So can you just imagine sitting at your desk at work,

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and all of a sudden you get this email from

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 2>your colleague calling out every single person at the organization

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 2>divulging this incredibly private information. Plus you can not only

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 2>see your own salary in this spreadsheet, but the salary

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>of the people sitting either side of you. So it's

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 2>really really shaken this firm.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can imagine Maria action would be between complete

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>glee that something so excruciating was happening in public, and

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>then rage if my own salary was revealed and finding

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>out what, you know, my hopeless colleague.

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Totally I would be going and I'd been knocking on

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 2>my boss's door and saying, Hey, why is old mate

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 2>being paid X? And I'm being paid why? I think

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 2>it's time for a little bit of a pain negotiation,

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>which is just the world of pain that Slater and

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Gordon finds themselves in. Now.

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, probably the least likely person to have actually sent

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this email is Mari Ruiz Mathison, right, she's denying it totally.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 2>So this email hit inboxes on Friday morning. By Friday afternoon,

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Slater and Gordon had issued a statement saying that it

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 2>was a hoax and saying that somebody who was not

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Marie Ruiz Matheson had sent the email, and saying both

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the firm and miss Ruiz Matheson intended to report the

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 2>matter to police because a serious breach had been conducted.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 2>So since then, Marie Ruiz Matheson has also come out

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 2>with her own statement via her lawyers, strenuously denying that

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 2>she sent it, saying that her and her family are

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 2>deeply distressed, and saying that they're planning on taking legal

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 2>action at some point. We don't know what that legal

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 2>action looks like yet, but she is planning on taking

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 2>legal action, and she has lawyered up. So she has

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 2>said that it's absolutely not her. And that's what it

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>makes sense, right, because somebody that senior to blow themselves

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>up like that before leaving an organization, that's you done,

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 2>that's your reputation absolutely in tatters. But it does lead

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to an incredibly interesting discussion point, which is, well, if

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't her, then who did send it? The email

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 2>included incredibly high level information about all these different employees,

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 2>about Dina Tutungi, the chief executive, and with all of

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 2>this personal payroll information, so it must have been somebody

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 2>who had access to all that information. On top of that,

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 2>it included a lot of personal details about Mari Ruiz Matheson,

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 2>including you know, the names of her dogs. The email

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>was signed off, I'm going to spend time with my ups,

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Ruby and Pearl, things like that, which is incredibly sinister

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 2>when you think about it. So it's left a big

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>mystery over this entire saga, which you know, as you

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 2>can imagine, the rumor Millets later in Gordon is just

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 2>churning out all kinds of theories about who sent this email.

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 1>So the spreadsheet that was attached with performance ratings and

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>income level salary packages, do we know if that information

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>was accurate?

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Slater and Gordon have said that a lot of the

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>information included in this email was quite a work of fiction.

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 1>They would say that.

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 2>They would say that, and we know that the spreadsheet

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 2>included salary information for people who haven't worked at the

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>firm for a long time. So while Slater and Gordon

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 2>can say that that salary information is disputed and is

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 2>not accurate, it might just mean that it's outdated. But

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>they definitely say that it's not one hundred percent accurate.

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 2>But we know that Slater and Gordon employees have looked

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>at the information and have said, no, that's my salary,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 2>So it's got to be accurate to some extent.

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Coming up house later in Gordon is trying to pacify

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the troops. So for employees of Slater in Gordon, I'm

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>sure some of whom speak to you, what do they

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>do now?

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Gosh? I think it depends on who you talk to.

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Slater and Gordon is in absolute crisis mode at the moment.

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 2>They've set up an HR process specifically for pay negotiations.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>So anybody who feels like they're not earning enough because

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 2>they've seen what their colleagues are earning, there's a special

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 2>HR process that is coming shortly. They're holding emergency staff meetings.

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>As we know, Slater and Gordon is incredibly focused on

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 2>their reputation and so they've been very quick to say

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 2>that no client data has been breached as part of

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 2>this so look, it's just crisis mode at the moment,

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 2>and if you're an employee it's later in Gordon, you're

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 2>probably feeling incredibly distressed, incredibly angry, but also probably you know,

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of chatter going on and engaging in

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 2>that too.

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Ellie, Now famously journalists don't get paid very much,

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but what was your take on seeing those salary numbers?

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>What sort of money we're talking about?

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 2>So, Dina Tutungi, according to this disputed spreadsheet, is earning

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 2>six hundred and ninety thousand dollars, which is a lot

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 2>of money.

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 2>I can promise you I'm not earning anywhere near six

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 2>hundred and ninety thousand dollars. But when it comes to

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 2>the CEO of quite a large law firm, it's.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Probably not that much money.

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 2>But it ranged from that down to the lowest paid

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 2>was a legal assistant on twenty two thousand dollars. Now

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>that's surely hopefully somebody who's just you know, working one

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 2>day a week or something like that. But that was

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 2>broadly the range of salaries that was in there. The

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>rest of it sort of checked out, you know, lawyers

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 2>on one hundred and fifty thousand dollars that sort of stuff,

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 2>some ranging up to the four hundred thousand dollar mark.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, what's later in Gordon's reputation within the legal

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>sector as a place to work, so.

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Broadly, it's been known as a place that you want

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 2>to work if you want to work in the class

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 2>action sector. That being said, though, they have been embroiled

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 2>in a few scandals over the past year or so.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 2>At one point it hit the media that there was

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 2>a huge underpayment scandal that they were underpaying employees over

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 2>a period of twelve years. I think the money that

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 2>at totaled too was three hundred thousand dollars in underpayments.

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 2>As a result of that scandal, the former head of

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 2>HR has also sued the company in the federal court,

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 2>which is still an ongoing legal battle that's between Alicia

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Gleeson and Slater in Gordon. So they do appear to

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 2>be the seeds of scandal that are coming out of

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Slater in Gordon. And then all of a sudden, this

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 2>email leak comes through and now it's a firm in crisis.

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a nightmare for any boss to deal with.

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Dinner to Tonguey's probably processing the quite stark criticism of

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>her in this email from someone who we don't know.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>But some personal details about her were also revealed in

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the email.

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, that email included a link to her home,

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>this beautiful home that she owns with her husband and

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>lives in with her kids, about dinners that she hosted

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 2>out at home incredibly snarkily, you know, referred to them

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 2>as being quite boring. But yeah, this is a huge

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 2>crisis for dinners Tutungi, not just on a professional level

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>but a personal.

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Level as well.

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 2>It was heavily, heavily critical of her and you can't

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>even imagine what she's going through at the moment.

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Ellie Dudley is the Australians of the Legal Affairs correspondent.

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of legal affairs, the Antoinette Latoufe versus the ABC

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>case is back in the Federal Court on Thursday. You'll

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to follow it live by joining US subscribers

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Australian dot com dot au