1
00:00:03,600 --> 00:00:06,720
Speaker 1: From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Kristinamiot.

2
00:00:06,920 --> 00:00:13,640
Speaker 1: It's Tuesday, June tenth, twenty twenty five. Newly minted Opposition

3
00:00:13,760 --> 00:00:17,400
Speaker 1: Energy and Admissions Production spokesman Dantien says he'll take his

4
00:00:17,520 --> 00:00:21,280
Speaker 1: time on the fate of the coalition's contentious net zero target.

5
00:00:21,880 --> 00:00:23,880
Speaker 2: He says there'll be a conversation.

6
00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:27,240
Speaker 1: About nuclear two, but any future models won't replicate the

7
00:00:27,280 --> 00:00:34,800
Speaker 1: one proposed by Ouster Liberal leader Peter Dutton. Criminal cases

8
00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:38,559
Speaker 1: involving Aboriginal people could be heard in closed court or

9
00:00:38,640 --> 00:00:42,480
Speaker 1: by female judicial officers. Those are the new guidelines given

10
00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:45,520
Speaker 1: to judges in a revised New South Wales bench book.

11
00:00:46,280 --> 00:00:48,919
Speaker 1: That exclusive story is live right now at the Australian

12
00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:55,280
Speaker 1: dot com dot au. Chris Dawson has launched a last

13
00:00:55,400 --> 00:00:57,920
Speaker 1: ditch bid to have his conviction for the nineteen eighty

14
00:00:57,960 --> 00:01:01,160
Speaker 1: two murder of his wife quashed. The High Court of

15
00:01:01,200 --> 00:01:04,440
Speaker 1: Australia will this week consider an application made by the

16
00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:07,520
Speaker 1: former rugby league star for special leave to appeal of

17
00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:09,520
Speaker 1: finding that upheld the conviction.

18
00:01:10,040 --> 00:01:21,920
Speaker 3: That's today's episode, Christopher Michael Dawson on the charge that

19
00:01:22,040 --> 00:01:25,280
Speaker 3: don are about eight January nineteen eighty two, at Dayview

20
00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:28,200
Speaker 3: or elsewhere in the state of New South Wales.

21
00:01:28,920 --> 00:01:32,520
Speaker 4: You did murder Lynette Dawson. I find you guilty. All

22
00:01:32,560 --> 00:01:33,280
Speaker 4: the message down.

23
00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:37,400
Speaker 1: This was a moment more than forty years in the making.

24
00:01:39,240 --> 00:01:42,000
Speaker 1: On a bright winter's day in twenty twenty two, New

25
00:01:42,040 --> 00:01:45,920
Speaker 1: South Wales Supreme Court Justice Ian Harrison found Chris Dawson

26
00:01:46,040 --> 00:01:49,200
Speaker 1: guilty of the murder of his first wife, Lynette Simms,

27
00:01:49,680 --> 00:01:52,160
Speaker 1: who vanished from their home at Bayview in the early

28
00:01:52,320 --> 00:01:56,760
Speaker 1: nineteen eighties. She was thirty three years old, a doting

29
00:01:56,840 --> 00:02:00,160
Speaker 1: mum to two little girls, and a dedicated employee at

30
00:02:00,160 --> 00:02:04,600
Speaker 1: a childcare center on Sydney's Northern Beaches. Her fate was

31
00:02:04,680 --> 00:02:08,600
Speaker 1: unknown for decades until the Australians podcast The Teacher's Pet,

32
00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:13,680
Speaker 1: created by National Chief correspondent Hedley Thomas, exposed Lynnette's husband,

33
00:02:13,880 --> 00:02:18,880
Speaker 1: Chris Dawson, as a murderer. He's always maintained he played

34
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:22,800
Speaker 1: no role in Lynette's disappearance, and claims she left the family,

35
00:02:23,080 --> 00:02:26,320
Speaker 1: her daughters, her husband and the home she loved of

36
00:02:26,400 --> 00:02:31,800
Speaker 1: her own accord. The story captured national and international attention,

37
00:02:32,400 --> 00:02:36,640
Speaker 1: and in late twenty eighteen, within months of the podcast release,

38
00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:40,680
Speaker 1: police arrested and charged Chris Dawson with Lynette's murder.

39
00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:43,480
Speaker 5: The key thing to come out of this divena is

40
00:02:43,520 --> 00:02:48,400
Speaker 5: that the police are now confident of a prosecution. Remember,

41
00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:52,480
Speaker 5: a coroner twice has recommended charges in this case and

42
00:02:52,560 --> 00:02:55,919
Speaker 5: the DPP in the eighties said no. But now they

43
00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:57,639
Speaker 5: believe they have enough evidence.

44
00:03:00,720 --> 00:03:04,040
Speaker 1: More than three years after his arrest, Justice Ian Harrison

45
00:03:04,080 --> 00:03:07,520
Speaker 1: would find Chris Dawson murdered Lynette to replace her with

46
00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:12,880
Speaker 1: a teenage babysitter who'd become his second wife. Dawson was

47
00:03:12,919 --> 00:03:16,160
Speaker 1: sentenced by Justice Harrison to twenty four years in prison

48
00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:18,840
Speaker 1: with a non parole period of eighteen years.

49
00:03:19,919 --> 00:03:23,760
Speaker 6: I recognize that the unavoidable prospect is that mister Dawson

50
00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:25,240
Speaker 6: will probably die in jail.

51
00:03:26,240 --> 00:03:27,960
Speaker 4: Mister Dawson, would you please stand.

52
00:03:29,360 --> 00:03:33,240
Speaker 1: The new South Wales government introduced nobody no parole legislation

53
00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:37,520
Speaker 1: known as Lynn's Law in the months following Chris Dawson's conviction,

54
00:03:38,440 --> 00:03:41,040
Speaker 1: that means he won't be eligible for parole unless he

55
00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:45,720
Speaker 1: reveals the location of Lynette's remains to the authorities. In

56
00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:48,680
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, Chris Dawson launched a bid to quash

57
00:03:48,680 --> 00:03:51,000
Speaker 1: his murder conviction in the New South Wales Court of

58
00:03:51,040 --> 00:03:55,280
Speaker 1: Criminal Appeals, arguing he suffered a forensic disadvantage in improving

59
00:03:55,360 --> 00:03:58,120
Speaker 1: his innocence due to the long delay in bringing the

60
00:03:58,160 --> 00:04:02,680
Speaker 1: case to trial. He also argued there'd been a miscarriage

61
00:04:02,680 --> 00:04:06,440
Speaker 1: of justice due to Justice Harrison's reliance upon lies allegedly

62
00:04:06,480 --> 00:04:09,880
Speaker 1: told by Chris Dawson following Lynd's murder as evidence of

63
00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:13,720
Speaker 1: a consciousness of guilt, and that the verdict was unreasonable

64
00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:18,080
Speaker 1: because the Crown's case was wholly circumstantial and a hypothesis

65
00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:23,599
Speaker 1: consistent with Dawson's innocence wasn't excluded beyond a reasonable doubt.

66
00:04:23,960 --> 00:04:28,039
Speaker 1: Chris Dawson's barrister in the appeal, Belinda Rigg SC, told

67
00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:30,960
Speaker 1: the court transactions were made on Lynette's bank card in

68
00:04:31,040 --> 00:04:34,360
Speaker 1: the weeks following her disappearance, and that she'd called the

69
00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:37,720
Speaker 1: kiosk at the Northbridge Baths, where he worked part time

70
00:04:37,760 --> 00:04:40,720
Speaker 1: as a lifeguard, to let him know she needed some

71
00:04:40,760 --> 00:04:44,520
Speaker 1: time to herself, but the proof had been lost to time.

72
00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:49,839
Speaker 1: The three judge panel of Justices Julie Ward, Christine Adamson

73
00:04:49,920 --> 00:04:54,719
Speaker 1: and Anthony Payne unanimously dismissed the appeal, writing that Justice

74
00:04:54,760 --> 00:04:59,520
Speaker 1: Harrison's reasoning was sound, that the Crown's circumstantial case was compelling,

75
00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:03,240
Speaker 1: and that Chris Dawson failed to establish that the forty

76
00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:07,520
Speaker 1: year delay in bringing charges had caused him a forensic disadvantage.

77
00:05:08,760 --> 00:05:11,840
Speaker 1: A voice actor is reading part of the Justice's reasons.

78
00:05:13,040 --> 00:05:17,159
Speaker 7: First, given the applicants different versions of events, it was

79
00:05:17,240 --> 00:05:21,279
Speaker 7: unclear whether the unavailability of certain bank card statements was relevant,

80
00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:24,960
Speaker 7: and in any case, it was his own failure to

81
00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:28,520
Speaker 7: retain those statements, not any delay that caused them to

82
00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:33,800
Speaker 7: be unavailable. Secondly, the lack of records showing the applicant

83
00:05:33,880 --> 00:05:36,960
Speaker 7: was working at the north Bridge Barths on nine January

84
00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:41,560
Speaker 7: nineteen eighty two caused no disadvantage, since the Crown conceded

85
00:05:41,560 --> 00:05:45,920
Speaker 7: the applicant was working there on that day. Thirdly, records

86
00:05:45,920 --> 00:05:48,400
Speaker 7: of phone calls made to the north Bridge Baths on

87
00:05:48,520 --> 00:05:52,679
Speaker 7: nine February nineteen eighty two were unavailable because of limited

88
00:05:52,720 --> 00:05:56,560
Speaker 7: technology at the time, not because of delay, and records

89
00:05:56,600 --> 00:05:59,120
Speaker 7: of phone calls to the applicants house would not have

90
00:05:59,160 --> 00:06:00,000
Speaker 7: assisted the applace.

91
00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:03,920
Speaker 1: Now, Chris Dawson is taking the fight to the nation's

92
00:06:04,000 --> 00:06:06,560
Speaker 1: highest court in a last ditch effort. To have his

93
00:06:06,680 --> 00:06:13,040
Speaker 1: murder conviction quashed. For two weeks every month, the High

94
00:06:13,040 --> 00:06:15,960
Speaker 1: Court of Australia sits in Canberra to consider a whole

95
00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:20,640
Speaker 1: range of civil and criminal matters. Chris Dawson has applied

96
00:06:20,720 --> 00:06:24,239
Speaker 1: for special leave to appeal his murder conviction. That means

97
00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:27,160
Speaker 1: he's asking the High Court to grant him an appeal hearing.

98
00:06:27,920 --> 00:06:31,159
Speaker 1: If that application is granted on Thursday, he'll ask the

99
00:06:31,200 --> 00:06:33,960
Speaker 1: court to quash the twenty twenty two murder conviction made

100
00:06:33,960 --> 00:06:37,200
Speaker 1: by Justice Harrison and grant him a new trial.

101
00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:41,960
Speaker 6: Well, I think this is Chris Dawson's final role of

102
00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:45,520
Speaker 6: the dice in so far as his attempt to beat

103
00:06:45,720 --> 00:06:49,159
Speaker 6: the murder conviction of twenty twenty two Guys.

104
00:06:49,839 --> 00:06:53,039
Speaker 1: Headley Thomas is the Australian's National Chief correspondent and the

105
00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:55,200
Speaker 1: creator of the Teacher's Pet podcast.

106
00:06:56,120 --> 00:07:00,280
Speaker 6: Now he's seeking leave from the High Court to run

107
00:07:00,360 --> 00:07:05,200
Speaker 6: similar arguments that his conviction should be quashed, and much

108
00:07:05,279 --> 00:07:08,680
Speaker 6: of his argument turns on his claim that he had

109
00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:13,400
Speaker 6: a significant forensic disadvantage because of the age of the

110
00:07:13,400 --> 00:07:19,000
Speaker 6: case and the failure in his view of the police

111
00:07:19,240 --> 00:07:20,280
Speaker 6: at certain stages.

112
00:07:21,720 --> 00:07:24,080
Speaker 1: A voice actor is reading part of the grounds of

113
00:07:24,080 --> 00:07:26,560
Speaker 1: the former school teacher's High Court application.

114
00:07:27,880 --> 00:07:31,000
Speaker 8: The Court of Criminal Appeal irred by failing to find

115
00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:34,720
Speaker 8: that the applicants trial miscarried because the trial judge failed

116
00:07:34,760 --> 00:07:39,240
Speaker 8: to find that the applicants suffered a significant forensic disadvantage.

117
00:07:40,120 --> 00:07:41,760
Speaker 4: The Court of Criminal Appeal.

118
00:07:41,520 --> 00:07:45,720
Speaker 8: Irred by failing to take the applicants significant forensic disadvantage

119
00:07:45,760 --> 00:07:49,520
Speaker 8: into account when considering whether the verdict was unreasonable and

120
00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:51,840
Speaker 8: unable to be supported by the evidence.

121
00:07:53,400 --> 00:07:58,040
Speaker 2: Chris Dawson says significant witnesses, namely Sue Butlin, who purportedly

122
00:07:58,080 --> 00:08:00,320
Speaker 2: saw Lyn Dawson getting into a car at a fruit

123
00:08:00,320 --> 00:08:03,360
Speaker 2: shop on the New South Wales Central Coast, had died

124
00:08:03,480 --> 00:08:06,160
Speaker 2: by the time the case was tried by Justice Harrison

125
00:08:06,200 --> 00:08:10,280
Speaker 2: alone in twenty twenty two, and that important documents from

126
00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:14,040
Speaker 2: the abandoned initial homicide investigation had been lost.

127
00:08:14,880 --> 00:08:15,680
Speaker 4: We have in.

128
00:08:15,760 --> 00:08:19,880
Speaker 6: Sue Butlin, the wife of a guy called Ray Butlin.

129
00:08:20,160 --> 00:08:24,920
Speaker 6: Ray Butlin was a rugby league coach on the Central

130
00:08:24,960 --> 00:08:29,000
Speaker 6: Coast and he got to know and coach the Dawson twins,

131
00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:32,800
Speaker 6: Christ and Paul after they'd finished their professional careers with

132
00:08:32,880 --> 00:08:37,160
Speaker 6: the Newtown Jets. The version that we have from either

133
00:08:37,240 --> 00:08:42,880
Speaker 6: Chris Dawson or Ray Butlin, is that Sue Butlin saw

134
00:08:43,200 --> 00:08:48,000
Speaker 6: a woman she believed was Lynn Simms in a vehicle

135
00:08:48,440 --> 00:08:52,480
Speaker 6: at a fruit barn on the Central Coast shortly after

136
00:08:53,840 --> 00:08:58,040
Speaker 6: the Crown says Chris Dawson murdered Lynn in the home

137
00:08:58,080 --> 00:09:02,319
Speaker 6: at Bayview on the Northern Beaches. Now, we don't have

138
00:09:02,480 --> 00:09:07,520
Speaker 6: any direct evidence from Sue Butlin about that. What we

139
00:09:07,880 --> 00:09:13,880
Speaker 6: do know because Ray Butlin disclosed this in the inquest

140
00:09:13,960 --> 00:09:20,160
Speaker 6: where he was questioned about his wife's purported sighting of Lynn,

141
00:09:20,559 --> 00:09:25,319
Speaker 6: and Ray Butlin said of his own wife, who had

142
00:09:25,320 --> 00:09:28,760
Speaker 6: been dead for some years, that she did have a

143
00:09:28,840 --> 00:09:34,800
Speaker 6: tendency to exaggerate things and she might.

144
00:09:34,840 --> 00:09:37,640
Speaker 4: Have embellished the story.

145
00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:40,480
Speaker 6: However, he felt sure that if she were on the stand,

146
00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:44,959
Speaker 6: she would say, yeah, I saw Lynn. Now, the problem

147
00:09:45,280 --> 00:09:50,119
Speaker 6: here is that the police investigation in the early nineties

148
00:09:50,640 --> 00:09:55,240
Speaker 6: stopped as a result of Chris Dawson telling homicide detectives

149
00:09:55,600 --> 00:10:00,080
Speaker 6: that his mate's wife saw Lynn. But there's no no

150
00:10:00,440 --> 00:10:06,200
Speaker 6: evidence of any attempt by those homicide detectives to try

151
00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:12,280
Speaker 6: to corroborate Chris's claims that his mate's wife saw Lynn.

152
00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:16,760
Speaker 6: So the police didn't go directly to Sue Butler, who

153
00:10:16,880 --> 00:10:20,400
Speaker 6: was still alive in nineteen ninety two, to take any

154
00:10:20,480 --> 00:10:21,640
Speaker 6: kind of statement from her.

155
00:10:21,720 --> 00:10:23,040
Speaker 4: So there's nothing in writing.

156
00:10:23,120 --> 00:10:26,480
Speaker 6: There's just this hearsay account, and this is being held

157
00:10:26,600 --> 00:10:29,920
Speaker 6: up as one of the pieces of evidence that was

158
00:10:30,040 --> 00:10:33,960
Speaker 6: crucial to Chris Dawson's defense and should have been obtained.

159
00:10:34,920 --> 00:10:39,120
Speaker 6: And I think that many people who have followed this

160
00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:43,240
Speaker 6: case close he would think that, yes, the police should

161
00:10:43,240 --> 00:10:48,120
Speaker 6: have got a statement, but that the police failures in

162
00:10:48,160 --> 00:10:50,680
Speaker 6: this case early on cut both ways.

163
00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:53,920
Speaker 4: It is strongly arguable.

164
00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:56,480
Speaker 6: In my view that if police had done a much

165
00:10:56,520 --> 00:11:01,240
Speaker 6: better job in the early stages after Lynn's disappearedearrance, then

166
00:11:01,800 --> 00:11:05,559
Speaker 6: Chris Dawson would have been prosecuted and convicted of murder

167
00:11:05,880 --> 00:11:10,240
Speaker 6: very early on. So it doesn't necessarily follow that he

168
00:11:10,280 --> 00:11:13,720
Speaker 6: has been denied justice. It may be that he's actually

169
00:11:13,960 --> 00:11:17,920
Speaker 6: experienced freedom because of the police failures and the delays

170
00:11:17,960 --> 00:11:18,679
Speaker 6: in doing things.

171
00:11:21,400 --> 00:11:24,640
Speaker 1: The application argues there's no onus on Chris Dawson to

172
00:11:24,760 --> 00:11:29,160
Speaker 1: establish the delay certainly caused him a significant forensic disadvantage,

173
00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:32,120
Speaker 1: only that there's a real possibility that it did.

174
00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:37,160
Speaker 8: It is unnecessary that each individual lost witness or document

175
00:11:37,280 --> 00:11:41,360
Speaker 8: singly would have demonstrated innocence, but rather that collectively for

176
00:11:41,480 --> 00:11:45,480
Speaker 8: lost evidence would have likely strengthened the applicant's position at trial.

177
00:11:46,520 --> 00:11:49,520
Speaker 1: John Paul Cashen is a partner at law firm Thompson Gear,

178
00:11:49,679 --> 00:11:51,280
Speaker 1: which advises the Australian.

179
00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:54,920
Speaker 9: It's an interesting one because in Australia we don't have

180
00:11:55,120 --> 00:11:59,440
Speaker 9: a statute of limitations. Here someone's committed murder or any

181
00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:04,000
Speaker 9: serious efets, really we can bring a charge against them ten, twenty, thirty,

182
00:12:04,040 --> 00:12:07,520
Speaker 9: forty fifty years after the fact, and I think courts

183
00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:11,200
Speaker 9: are reluctant to say that the mere fact that there's

184
00:12:11,240 --> 00:12:13,960
Speaker 9: a delay means that someone can't be brought to justice.

185
00:12:14,480 --> 00:12:16,480
Speaker 9: And what happened was in the late nineteen eighties there

186
00:12:16,520 --> 00:12:19,160
Speaker 9: was a case called Longman where the charges has been

187
00:12:19,200 --> 00:12:23,360
Speaker 9: brought about twenty years after the alleged defending and in

188
00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:25,880
Speaker 9: that case the court warned the jury that there was

189
00:12:25,920 --> 00:12:30,120
Speaker 9: a real risk that the evidence was unreliable and that

190
00:12:30,200 --> 00:12:32,560
Speaker 9: led to an acquittal. And there was a feeling after

191
00:12:32,640 --> 00:12:36,600
Speaker 9: that case that it shifted the boundary too much in

192
00:12:36,640 --> 00:12:40,000
Speaker 9: the favor of acquittals, and so they changed the law

193
00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:43,160
Speaker 9: to bring it back a little more in favor of

194
00:12:43,520 --> 00:12:46,160
Speaker 9: the policy of well, just because there's a delay doesn't

195
00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:49,880
Speaker 9: mean you can't face trial. And that's what this appeal

196
00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:53,280
Speaker 9: is really all about. In this case, there's no doubt

197
00:12:53,440 --> 00:12:59,160
Speaker 9: that Dawson has suffered some prejudice because of certain evidence

198
00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:01,640
Speaker 9: going missing, and so he said, well, he was never

199
00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:04,360
Speaker 9: able to truly test that, and the Court of Appeal

200
00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:07,200
Speaker 9: ultimately has to draw a line and say, well, did

201
00:13:07,240 --> 00:13:10,800
Speaker 9: you suffer a significant forensic disadvantage because of these things?

202
00:13:11,160 --> 00:13:12,960
Speaker 9: And the Court of Appeal said no, it was just

203
00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:15,680
Speaker 9: speculative that these things would have helped him. There wasn't

204
00:13:15,679 --> 00:13:19,360
Speaker 9: an actual prejudice, and he's upset about that. He says, now, no,

205
00:13:19,520 --> 00:13:21,960
Speaker 9: that puts the test too high, that shifts the burden

206
00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:25,920
Speaker 9: too far in favor of conviction, and that's really the

207
00:13:26,040 --> 00:13:28,080
Speaker 9: essence of this appeal before the High Court. Now where

208
00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:29,000
Speaker 9: do we draw that line?

209
00:13:32,600 --> 00:13:35,360
Speaker 1: Chris Dawson also says the Court of Criminal Appeal got

210
00:13:35,400 --> 00:13:38,439
Speaker 1: it wrong when it upheld Justice Harrison's reliance on lies

211
00:13:38,480 --> 00:13:42,000
Speaker 1: allegedly told by him as evidence of consciousness of guilt

212
00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:44,480
Speaker 1: because he had other reasons to lie.

213
00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:48,800
Speaker 9: One of the key parts of the first appeal was

214
00:13:48,840 --> 00:13:53,280
Speaker 9: that Justice Harrison had incorrectly looked at the lies told

215
00:13:53,320 --> 00:13:56,840
Speaker 9: by Chris Dawson. So one of the key ways a

216
00:13:56,840 --> 00:14:00,120
Speaker 9: person gets convicted is when they led to police, and

217
00:14:00,679 --> 00:14:03,440
Speaker 9: those lies are evidence of what we call consciousness of guilt.

218
00:14:03,960 --> 00:14:08,520
Speaker 9: And sometimes a lie will be strong consciousness of guilt,

219
00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:11,480
Speaker 9: but sometimes people lie for other reasons. And indeed, in

220
00:14:11,559 --> 00:14:15,000
Speaker 9: Dawson's case, there was a suggestion that he might have

221
00:14:15,040 --> 00:14:18,160
Speaker 9: been lying about certain things, not because he'd killed Lynette,

222
00:14:18,760 --> 00:14:21,680
Speaker 9: but because he was embarrassed or trying to hide the

223
00:14:21,680 --> 00:14:25,920
Speaker 9: fact that he was having a relationship with his former student.

224
00:14:26,400 --> 00:14:29,800
Speaker 9: And the Court of Appeal found that Justice Harrison didn't

225
00:14:29,840 --> 00:14:33,480
Speaker 9: deal with those lies and that consciousness of guilt appropriately,

226
00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:36,240
Speaker 9: So they did find that he'd made an error in

227
00:14:36,280 --> 00:14:40,080
Speaker 9: relation to those questions, but they have a broad discretion

228
00:14:40,240 --> 00:14:42,960
Speaker 9: to say, well, even if the trial judge made an error,

229
00:14:43,240 --> 00:14:46,800
Speaker 9: we're not going to overturn his decision unless we find

230
00:14:46,800 --> 00:14:50,440
Speaker 9: that a substantial miscarriage of justice occurred, and in this

231
00:14:50,480 --> 00:14:53,800
Speaker 9: particular case, they found that there wasn't a substantial miscarriage

232
00:14:53,840 --> 00:14:57,600
Speaker 9: of justice. So that will also form part of the

233
00:14:57,880 --> 00:15:00,160
Speaker 9: High Court judgment. And it sort of rolls into that

234
00:15:00,280 --> 00:15:03,600
Speaker 9: same question about well, what is the total cumulative amount

235
00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:07,920
Speaker 9: of prejudice suffered by the accused in this case? Is

236
00:15:07,960 --> 00:15:10,240
Speaker 9: it enough to overturn his conviction?

237
00:15:14,200 --> 00:15:14,760
Speaker 2: Coming up?

238
00:15:14,960 --> 00:15:34,400
Speaker 1: Why this isn't Chris Dawson's first High Court rodeo. This

239
00:15:34,520 --> 00:15:37,240
Speaker 1: isn't the first time Chris Dawson has made an application

240
00:15:37,400 --> 00:15:41,560
Speaker 1: to the High Court after his arrest. Applications for a

241
00:15:41,600 --> 00:15:45,040
Speaker 1: permanent stay of proceedings were dismissed by Justice Elizabeth Fulton

242
00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:47,880
Speaker 1: in the Supreme Court of New South Wales and later

243
00:15:48,040 --> 00:15:51,360
Speaker 1: by the Court of Criminal Appeal. Here's Headley Thomas.

244
00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:57,320
Speaker 6: Well before the murder trial in twenty twenty two, Chris

245
00:15:57,400 --> 00:16:01,440
Speaker 6: Dawson was determined to try to avoid trial altogether, and

246
00:16:01,520 --> 00:16:05,400
Speaker 6: he wanted to persuade the courts that he could not

247
00:16:05,600 --> 00:16:09,520
Speaker 6: get a fair trial as a result of failures of

248
00:16:09,800 --> 00:16:14,040
Speaker 6: police to find evidence that he says, would have been

249
00:16:14,320 --> 00:16:18,680
Speaker 6: in his favor that would have shown in his claims

250
00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:23,040
Speaker 6: that his wife Lynn had not been murdered, that in fact,

251
00:16:23,120 --> 00:16:26,320
Speaker 6: she had probably started a new life. And secondly, he

252
00:16:26,360 --> 00:16:28,880
Speaker 6: claimed that he couldn't get a fair trial because too

253
00:16:28,960 --> 00:16:32,680
Speaker 6: many people had listened to or heard about the Teacher's

254
00:16:32,760 --> 00:16:36,600
Speaker 6: pet and had a fixed view of his guilt. Now

255
00:16:36,960 --> 00:16:42,120
Speaker 6: he failed in those attempts to get a permanent stay

256
00:16:42,160 --> 00:16:45,720
Speaker 6: of proceedings and his final bid was to the High

257
00:16:45,840 --> 00:16:50,640
Speaker 6: Court and that was denied shortly before the murder trial

258
00:16:50,840 --> 00:16:54,960
Speaker 6: in twenty twenty two. When Chris Dawson was trying to

259
00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:59,800
Speaker 6: avoid trial altogether, he relied on a leading criminal defense lawyer,

260
00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:04,680
Speaker 6: Phillip Bolton, and then for the criminal trial, Philip Bolton

261
00:17:05,119 --> 00:17:09,560
Speaker 6: was not in that. In fact, that was run for

262
00:17:09,680 --> 00:17:13,600
Speaker 6: christ Dawson by a defense lawyer called Pauline David, and she.

263
00:17:13,680 --> 00:17:16,280
Speaker 4: Had known Dawson many years earlier.

264
00:17:16,359 --> 00:17:20,600
Speaker 6: In fact, when Chris Dawson was interviewed by homicide detectives

265
00:17:20,800 --> 00:17:24,840
Speaker 6: in nineteen ninety two on the Gold Coast and much younger,

266
00:17:24,880 --> 00:17:30,720
Speaker 6: Pauline David was Chris Dawson's solicitor during that interview. Then

267
00:17:30,760 --> 00:17:34,720
Speaker 6: we go forward thirty years. Philip Bolton didn't get involved

268
00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:38,280
Speaker 6: in the murder trial to our knowledge. However, Pauline David

269
00:17:38,560 --> 00:17:40,639
Speaker 6: at the end of the trial was appointed to the

270
00:17:40,680 --> 00:17:43,919
Speaker 6: District Court of New South Wales as a judge. So

271
00:17:44,240 --> 00:17:48,520
Speaker 6: Philip Bolton has returned and he's running this appeal to

272
00:17:48,800 --> 00:17:52,160
Speaker 6: the High Court, and in documents that have been filed

273
00:17:52,200 --> 00:17:57,080
Speaker 6: he has highlighted what he says were numerous errors by

274
00:17:57,160 --> 00:18:01,960
Speaker 6: the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal in its findings,

275
00:18:02,160 --> 00:18:06,639
Speaker 6: which said that Chris Dawson should not succeed with his

276
00:18:06,760 --> 00:18:15,160
Speaker 6: bid for freedom.

277
00:18:15,200 --> 00:18:18,840
Speaker 1: Headley Thomas is The Australian's national Chief correspondent. You can

278
00:18:18,880 --> 00:18:21,640
Speaker 1: listen to the Teacher's pet and access the nation's best

279
00:18:21,720 --> 00:18:24,720
Speaker 1: journalism anytime at the Australian dot com dot au