WEBVTT - Off Air | The WORST Celebrities Jodie & Hayesy Have Interviewed

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Jodie and Hazes Affair Podcast Friends.

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the podcast.

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>A little special edition, just a little behind the scenes

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 1>type setup. We're just talking story. It's just having a

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of a yack, having some fun because why not.

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we were discussing the greatest pills that we've ever interviewed.

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Pills, you mean absolute deals, pills people who were just knobs.

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, just people who just don't want to be there. Yeah,

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 4>you know what I mean.

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Can you go, have you got a top three for us?

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>If you had a rule, go to biggest dick that

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you've interviewed.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 4>You grant you grant absolute winkers.

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Seems like a wanker.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Two.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just a fumbling.

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Did you see when he was on the Oscars a

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks ago and he did that interview and

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 3>he gave that poor girl nothing on the on the

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 3>worldwide stage.

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 4>That's what he's like.

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know, he was promoting some movie and

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 3>it was just like absolutely pushing shis and uphill. He

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 3>didn't want to talk to us, and I think we

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>just ended it early. But just obnoxious rude, couldn't be bothered,

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Like it was an absolute pain for him to have

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>to do the interview.

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>This is shocking because let's go back to the day.

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about William Thacker and Anna Scott.

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm also just a girl standing in front of a

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 4>boy asking him to love.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm terrible.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I must apologize my house mate. He is a discussing Welshman. Yeah,

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 1>you're telling me he's not quite as charming and lovely.

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Definitely not quite the opposite we did.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so I'm not going to name who this is,

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 3>but she's a terrible interview, like, just talks and talks

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and talks and talks and doesn't take a breath and

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 3>goes off on these weird tangents. I'm not going to

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 3>say who it is. A friend of mine interviewed this woman.

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 3>She's an Australian singer back in the day and it

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 3>was what we call down the line. So she was

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 3>saying a studio in Sydney and he was back here

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 3>in Adelaide. The interview ends, he thought she's disconnected and

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 3>he said that obnoxious which will never be on this

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 3>radio station ever again. And he hears the words still

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 3>here and she went absolutely nights, tried to get him

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 3>fired and completely refused to go on that radio network. Ever, again,

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to say who it is, but I've

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 3>had interviewed her a few times and it's exhausting.

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine Jess Malbour in that situation. It's definitely

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>not Jess Mabo por She's absolutely lovely.

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 3>And there was also one more that sticks out. So

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 3>this guy, I'll just name him. It was Nick Jernopolos.

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.399
<v Speaker 3>So he had done an interview when I was working

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 3>in another radio station. He'd done an interview here at Nova,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 3>but he'd had a blow up with Fitzi in the morning,

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 3>and Fitzi, who's the nice spoke on the planet, had

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 3>just mid interview, a mate, what is this wrong with you?

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Like you've had attitude ever since you walked in. This

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 3>all went to air, so I'm not talking out of school.

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 3>But then Nick came to our studio after that blot.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 3>He can only imagine the hostinness that we encountered after

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 3>he'd had a fight with Fitzy on air.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's true though, I mean to piss off Fitzy,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>what have you done?

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 3>I know, I know that was a big one. So yeah,

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 3>they're top three that stand out. Something the worst I

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>got to.

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>My scn D as we interviewed Craig McDermott. Yeah, you

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>actually would know as well. Yeah, because you got inducted

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>into the Australian Cricket Hall of Fame. And tell me

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if this is an inappropriate or just not a very

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>good question? I said, look, Craig, you've done it all.

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>You've achieved pretty much everything he achieved as an Astralian cricketer.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>If you had to choose one highlight, what would it be?

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Should have heard the response I got got, oh, really

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going with that actually question?

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>So I'm looking over it. So it was with Cane

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Corns at the time.

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Caane's giggling on what's going on here?

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And he's on the line still regard did you piss

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>off Craig McDermott in a previous life or something? What's

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>something here that what was wrong with that question?

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, it turns out Craig just was a little bit

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>sick of the media roots and didn't like that question.

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>You've been asked a few times. But good news for

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Craig is he probably will never get hassled by the

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>media ever again from him.

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 4>No, they'll probably leave him alone for perpetuity.

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Now, But isn't that a shame when you've got such

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 3>good guys in cricket, Like you've got your Gillies and

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 3>your Darren Leman's and all those blokes, you know, Ian Heally,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 3>all those lovely, lovely guys, and then you get that.

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's very strange. It's quite confronting.

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's a bit of a different cat. Have you

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 3>had any others that.

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Actually I do have one. You don't listen, So yeah,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I love some of the work from the listening SA.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>One of my first radio interviews, I he viewed one

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of the boys. Yeah, he was not into it on

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like I think it was probably the same as Nick Jenopolis,

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just not up for a chat at that particular moment. Yeah,

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it was the worst thing that he possibly could have

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>been doing in his life.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 2>Right now.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I was doing a radio different right, okay, And I

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>remember we asked a questions one word responses, yes, no, maybe,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and then I finally said, and.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Of course it was coming.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, oh, look, do you have a relationship and

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys all friends with like say the hillton up woods,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the hilltops in these parts of the

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>word are absolute gods, and I got the oh, here

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it is. Yep, knew that was coming. Adelaide question about

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Hilltop Woods. Yeah, finally, I was wondering when that was

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. We have going, I'll just let we'll

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>just let you go, mate, Appreciate your time.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, have a good one, thanks anyway.

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then we played this and spoke over it

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 2>the whole

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Time and listen, so we're never to be played again

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 3>on the network.