WEBVTT - Finals Race Heats Up

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Welcome to the Daily Telegraph in or podcast from

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>joined Brent Reed John by Fatima Tyson Jackson. How are

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we kids? We're good, good kids. It was a bit.

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>To us.

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm an old man cook a great here to prove it.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>How did you play footy? On the Buzz said he

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>went and watched you play? Is that right?

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes? He did.

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>He said you were very good.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate that. From the Big said you lost? Yeah,

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 3>we lost by try. Yeah, it went down, went down

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 3>to the wire, last player of the game.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>We had a.

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 3>Shift down now being made a breaking scan to put a.

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Kick back on the inside and it's it's gone over

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 2>the side.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Were there any inspirational words from Buzz before the game

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>or any motivational speeches from the Great Man? Oh?

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Look, you just looked to his credit, he came for

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 3>reserve grade, washed all the way up to a grade

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 3>and year before before I ran out and just tapped

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 3>me on the shoulder and said go hard and good luck.

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 4>So wait, did he literally go specifically to watch you?

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, let's not say that, but he was there.

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>He was there to support my great club carrying bar.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, So it was down in the Shire Okay.

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're playing Como though, which is like real inland

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>for Buzz. Buzz is more on the water.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, truly, Buzz had nothing to do on.

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Sunday, Saturday, Yeah, giving at three o'clock in the afternoon

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 3>kickoff and he was there and yeah, he was there

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 3>for a long time.

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>And it sounds he was a real He said death

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for you because you're lost a bit like pe on

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. I know, it's stunning, upset the camera. Are

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>they in trouble? Do we think they're in trouble to

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth now play Melbourne first week of the row.

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 4>They do have a favorable run home, but I think

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 4>they do look a little bit shaky and there's a

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 4>lot going on right and we sort of know that

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Nathan could be back for that first week of the finals,

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 4>but it's not like a return date that's set in stone.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 4>Dylan Edwards is clearly playing hampered. You know. I wrote

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 4>about it in the tackle. There was a moment there

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 4>where he was just completely just beaten defensively by Albert Hoppa.

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 4>White just blew past him and that's not something that

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 4>you normally see from Edwards. You can see he's got

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 4>no power in his knee. He has play a ground

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 4>final with the broken foot, so you know, in terms

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 4>of that, like he's a tough guy. But what I

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:33.119
<v Speaker 4>find and obviously not having Nathan Cleary is a massive.

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Impact significant but he goes all right, that kid.

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 4>He does and you know if he does come back

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 4>all of a sudden, whether they finish fourth or not,

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Like you rate their chances right, but.

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>The issue for Nathan is when he comes back, whether

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>he's what sort of shape is with that shoulder. So yeah,

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but I mean only are raving lunatic would write off Penrothal,

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>would think regardless of where they finished, each.

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 4>Time Nathan's come back from injury, he hasn't skipped a beat.

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 4>So and it's one of those ones where I mean

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 4>you think back to Jerome the way the last years,

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 4>going from last year's grandfl playing with that shoulder injury

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 4>twenty minutes ago, it comes out. So there's always that

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 4>risk that that will happen to Nathan. So they have

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 4>to sort of pick the perfect time to bring him back.

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 4>But if you watch the week before against the Storm,

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 4>like Craig Bellamy had a pretty good blueprint and how

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 4>to beat them, you know they targeted to they kicked

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 4>a toto on the last they tested him under the

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 4>highball and that and with Edward's already impacted with that knee,

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 4>they really blunted the impact of their back three. And

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 4>I think Cambo tried to replicate that a little bit

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 4>yesterday and had some success. So that worries me more

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 4>than their injuries. The fact that teams are beginning to

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 4>sort of figure out how you can stop Penrith.

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>When was the last time they lost two in a row?

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 4>The study, Yeah, shut, I don't know if there is

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 4>a blueprint blueprint to beating and I know Melbourne targeted.

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>The teams have been targeting Brian Tye for how long

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>have you? I mean, he's a small man for a winger, right.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.839
<v Speaker 4>Just in terms of the high ballreadio. I mean by

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 4>going to him for the first tackle, they rubbed him

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 4>out from place two and three, which impacted his yardage game.

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 4>So that's where they figured that out. So they doubled

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 4>his kick run meters pretty much in that game. And

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying that's the reason why. Like obviously, you

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 4>know they've had guys who've been in and out of

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 4>the side, guys playing injured. You know, but there's still

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 4>two weeks to go and they still have nothing clearer

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 4>to come back, So you're not putting.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot I reckon twice you're worried about.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Him, like like you said, you'd have to be mad

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 3>to count Penrith out there. Yeah, they're playing busted at

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the moment, but it's sides like this, and I guess

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>times like this that you can really see what a

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 3>team's made of. And yeah, I mean Penrith, they've seen

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 3>adversity before, and Nathan back. You got the likes of

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Paul Alamoni who hurting through New Southwest Cup, who could

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>come back, Scott Soris and Soney Tara is not playing

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 3>at the moment. These are all guys that have been there, done.

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 3>They're not all the money yet, but he's proved this

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 3>year that he's capable of being in that team. And

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 3>when they come back, you know, and Edwards gets a

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 3>bit more minutes, Yeah, everything will starts fall into place.

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 3>So I can see I'm finishing top four and then finals.

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Is their bread and butter. They know what to do

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 2>on the big stage.

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting in the top four. It's funny you say,

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I could see them finishing top four. I mean even

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the mere fact that you say that suggests. You know, look,

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I think if they finish out to the top four,

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 1>they can't win it. If you're in the top four

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and Nathan comes back, I mean there are it's Penrith, right,

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So but the top four is really interesting because now

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the Rusters are in second and I were talking before

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the show, I mean by staying second of Coronella are

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>now and third. If the Rusters play Cronella, it really

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>works in their favorite because they've got a horrific record

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>against the p and a horrific record that won one

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of the last twenty against Melbourne and Penrith. So if

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>they avoid them a week one of the finals, they

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>won't have to meet them till the pre lem So

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it really counts. I think it's a huge

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. And look, Melbourne of minor Premier has

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>done dusted, but I think it's crucial for that those

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>next three spots because Canterbury in the mix as well. Right,

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you know that's going to be huge. How that plays out,

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I reckon because the Roosters look really good.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 4>At the moment, but that top four spot might be

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 4>in terms of Canary because they play the Seagulls, so

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 4>they that might help that decide whether or not they're

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 4>going to be a chance for the top four in

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 4>that final round.

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>But yet we're even talking about Canniby making the top four.

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 4>Wait did you have them with? No?

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have them last Who did you have that?

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember. I'm pretty sure I didn't have them.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 4>Was it the dragons?

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 2>The dragons?

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>It might have been the dragons. I don't know, I

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>can't remember. It was a long time ago.

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't long to d I think the dragon.

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, the dragons. Actually can't remember my head. Drag it out,

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>don't we?

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Well you don't you drink the drinks the tigers. So yeah,

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 4>but it's the same with the dragons sort of, you know,

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 4>who would have a lot of people said they had

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 4>the quote unquote worst roster, the least fancy roster of

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 4>the season. But yeah, Canabary. I mean, what they've done

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 4>this year, the way they've managed to turn it around

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 4>has been incredible.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Sort of player. You look at that top four though,

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's hard to see the roosters go Canvas South.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>They should win both those games, right, the sharksko Warriors mainly, well,

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll beat the what they should beat the Warriors mainly's

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>But if I think that games is a game of

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>brook At Games of Brooklyn or sorry four Points Park

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and Pendy goes South Titans, they should win both them.

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So look, I mean, Cannaby's top four hoes for lot

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>probably rely on the Sharks losing that last game. To me,

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and I can't remember what they're folling against the like that.

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would have thought the top four is

0:07:58.320 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>probably going to stay as is.

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 2>What's it's hard to beat Manly in Manly.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then you look at the Sharks game this week.

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Sean Johnson should be playing. That will be his last

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 3>game ever. You know, they turn up there at Shark Park.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 3>We've seen it happen before, the Warriors at that same ground.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 3>They just you know, they flick a switch. They can

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 3>play good footy and that can really disrupt everything for

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 3>the Sharks.

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>From the Sharks, it's been very good.

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Dan Atkinson, I mean, has been a great find this year.

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you do when Nico comes back, because.

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I know you have to put him in the top

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 3>you have to put him in the team.

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>But how good a bench?

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, is that you going to take a forward

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 3>off the bench to play Atkinson.

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 2>In the top seventeen?

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Probably I'd probably stick him on. Well, fitz he's talked

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>him up yesterday after the after the game and said

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>he deserves to hold his spots. So yeah, but Nico

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>walks straight back.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Definitelyause you would have to say you'd probably find a

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 3>spot for Atkinson in their best seventeen. He can be

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 3>a real game breaker. You can play almost anywhere on

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 3>the field, So I think you just stick.

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>Him on the bench and move on. Right.

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 4>But the way they're like, their forwards have been playing

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 4>the last couple of weeks and dominated the Dragons yesterday

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 4>at the same time that that contributed a lot to

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 4>their victory. So you wonder if FITZI is reluctant to

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 4>change that forward protection do you know what I mean?

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Like Oregon is paying some good foot do you know

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 4>what I mean? So they've got that forward pack has

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 4>a good rhythm going at the moment, So it's.

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 2>You're not Brailey off at all.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Brayley's probably been He's not been spoken about very much,

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 3>but he's been He's been very very good for the Sharks,

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 3>and yeah he was. He caused the Dragons all source problems,

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 3>especially at the start of that game.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>We disappointed that. We'll look at the bottom mate, now,

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>were you disappointed with the Dragons or what do we

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think performance? I just think they're not in the same

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>class as that. They're not the top team.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 3>It depends what week you're asking, because one week they

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 3>look like world be and the next week into the plane.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the problem, but the recordings from the good teams.

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know they beat Melbourne a few weeks ago,

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>but the Rooster put the cleaners through the Carnelius put

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the cleaners through them. I can't have the audience Penrith

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this year.

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 4>I can't remember, but because yeah, it's they had a

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 4>big game against the Dogs. This was another big game

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 4>at home, both of them important for their top eight ramifications,

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 4>and I just felt like energy wise, they just weren't.

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 4>They didn't match the opposition on both occasions, and I

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 4>think that's been part of their problem, just that inconsistency.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Having said that, we know that they tend to bounce back,

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 4>so while they were, they're probably you know, you know,

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 4>you look at them if they do squeeze into the eight.

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 4>They're probably one of the teams that are making up

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 4>the numbers, so to speak. But they're definitely improved, like

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 4>you said, but there is a massive I think in general,

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 4>like there's still a class that you know, there's the

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 4>top four. Maybe you can add Cannery in there now,

0:10:57.880 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 4>but the rest of the top eight is the other

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 4>the teams are a class above them.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, they're one year into a rebuild, right, they make

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>huge strides this year and they'll be and they'll be

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>they'll be better next year.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 4>I've looked this up.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, then they come.

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 4>So you went Dragons would and Spiron?

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Wow?

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 4>You know he went with the premiers, right, the Broncos

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 4>always Yeah, I think a lot of people did.

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>They have been duds anyway, it's a chance perps, God

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>blessing Joe, Yeah, okay, anyway, from four that's pretty good.

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's play good foot pas.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 4>You went Dragons wouldn't Spiron spin as well? We all

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 4>can them Daly m Nathan Cleary probably not going to happen,

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 4>can I vine? Dom Young.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>He's going No?

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Is that Pereira He's in the mixed.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 2>So absolutely the Tigers making the top eight as well.

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>What about that at the bottom of the act. That's

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a great little tussle on there. That lost for the Dragons.

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>They can't afford another slip up. They've got par of

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>Camera next two weeks, and I wouldn't have thought they're

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>shootings to win both those games. Well, they will start

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>both those games as favorites, but I would have thought, Look,

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I think look, Paramount had been really poor for the

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>last couple of months, but on their day, they're capable

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of beating the Dragons in my opinion. Well, I don't

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>think they're laid down the Dragons.

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 3>Dragons, I've said it all. Ye, they can't win two

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 3>games in a row for some reason. It just doesn't happen.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 3>They play really well one week and the next week

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 3>they fall off. So as someone who's watching, I'm confident

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 3>that they'll be paramounta next week.

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 2>But then it's that Raiders game.

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 3>That last round where where you're like, oh, that's probably

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 3>the one that they'll slip.

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, they have a shocking record against Camera.

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think if they stum, I think they miss

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>out because if you look at the three teams chase.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 4>They've got, they've got to be the Els because they've.

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Got They've got to win both those games because the Broncos,

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Go Dolphins, Storm Dolphins are in an absolute hole. They're

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>gon Ski absolutely gone. And maybe I know Melburning arrest

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>players this week, but it wouldn't surprise me if they

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>rest some other players in the final round and maybe

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 1>Reese Walsh's back, then this talk will be back, maybe

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>pain maybe pains back.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 4>And then again if they lose the Dolphins, do you,

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 4>I guess it depends on the other results whether you

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 4>bring them.

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Back for if they win this week, and I can

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 3>guarantee you if those guys can play, even if it's

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 3>not at one hundred percent, they'll be on the field and.

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Not the other ones. Thes have got Titans, Dolphins make

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.599
<v Speaker 1>you win both those games, So Dragons can't afford to

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>slip up. They got to win. But they've got to

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>win both their games or they'll potentially miss out because

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>they can't. Mean what's what's the four and a gamest log?

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>We got it there and they don't have it. I

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have it, but it's pretty poor. Member.

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 4>They are pretty pig of those five teams and like

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 4>minus one hundred or something. Yeah, yeah, so they can't

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 4>rely on their points different pretty much.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Do we, So we think that we think they'll be paramatta.

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think cameras a danger game.

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 4>I think Camera is a danger game because of the record,

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 4>which I don't know if the top of my head,

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 4>but I think, you know, they've only won maybe two

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 4>or three or from the last twelve or something like that,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 4>but that's just been something like that's one of those

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 4>it's they're a bogy team for them.

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I have a lot to play for though.

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Now soon it's all of a sudden become like the

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 3>spoon Balls, become just as big as any game coming up.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, like I mean, it's probably of our fault

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 3>because we're the ones hyping it up, but they're not

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 3>going to want.

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 4>To get We're going to be a good game to watch, though, yeah,

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 4>for the wrong reasons. If you're a Hills or a Tigers.

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>As a Tiger.

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Support, everyone will be hoping that they can get the

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 3>job done. That is why Adam Mobs is not here,

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 3>by the way, everyone he's.

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Didn't want to talk about the speed, but he's bunkering away.

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 2>He's fearful, but we don't hold that against him.

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you have to put your money on someone

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>now running eighth, who you got.

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 4>I think? So as we are tour king, I'm just saying,

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 4>if there's that head to head here, I still think

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 4>it'll be the Dragons. They've got a two point buffer

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 4>if they can pick up one game, and you have

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 4>to remember the four other teams below them all play

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 4>each other. So I think if they can drag one more, oh,

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. Oh no, you know what when I

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 4>maybe maybe the Knights, but then they would need the

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Dragons to lose both of their games because that that

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 4>will take them to thirty.

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>No, look, they could lose one. They got a better

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>four and against I think the Dragons, so they will

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>get in. So yeah, it's the Dragon the Dragons. Just

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>if the Dragons lose one, they're in all sorts. What

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>do you reckon? Te So you've got.

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I have either the Dragons or the Broncos. I think,

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 3>do you think I think the Broncos need a miracle?

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>You can't take them both. You've got to take one.

0:15:52.800 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay for one if the Dragons beat the Dragons.

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I did the Bronx yelling at me because we

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>saw some footage there before some of the high tackles

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in the week. And I'm still waiting as we talk

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>about this for Jared's a change come down for Jabbuary

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>or hard Graves and the roosters. Guys, it's a bit

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>all over the shop. People are people don't know what's

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the sinmn, what is the sinmin at the moment. Look,

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the word I hate most regularly consistency because you're never

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get it because humans are inconsistent. What you

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>think is a sin binning and you think are sin

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>being different? I necessarily think is a sinbinning, but I

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>reckon at the moment the variance is too great between

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>sin binnings. Do we have what's your view? Drama is

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a drama two weeks for the finals.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Look, obviously it's a hot topic at the moment and

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 4>you can't avoid it.

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I just.

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Okay, if direct contact to the head is going to

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 4>be a symbin, then let's agree that it's a symbin

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 4>you have to have scope for. And Tyson and I

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 4>were talking about this off air, for you know, when

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 4>things are an accident because you are because there's a

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 4>difference between the tackle being careless and something being purely accidental.

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 4>But the rest of it, where we're talking about, you know,

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 4>what is moderate force, what is mild? If it was

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 4>mild or low force. We heard heavy contact at the

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 4>start of the year, and now we're hearing about mitigating circumstances.

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Just you know, and I know it's hard because no

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 4>two tackles are the same, So it's hard to have

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 4>a blanket black and white rule. But it's just and

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 4>like you said, it's people in the bunker and they

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 4>all might have their own interpretation of what moderate forces

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 4>and what mitigating is. So I don't know. There's just

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 4>so that there's so many shades of gray that I

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 4>think that's why we're getting the so called variances or

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 4>the inconsistencies. But yeah, I don't know. If we're going

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 4>to make any sort of contact to the head symbin,

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 4>then at least let's try and remain consistent with that.

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's go through a film on the weekend. Right, So

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>the Steve Kreiman wasn't a synbin should have been.

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 3>It's apparently costs an official his job for the rest

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 3>of Yeah.

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 4>But you have to remember so that the stupid Cridon

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 4>incident was after the manly game, right.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well Corey were down in that game with symbin and.

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Then there were people blowing up about hamole and the

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 4>rest of it. And then so it makes I agree.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought I can cop.

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Got away with in that same tackle to the head.

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't two blokes have a one tackle head. You

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>can't sit for one tackle.

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 4>There's like a double concussion.

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought they got the wrong bike and.

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Flush in the nose. So and I don't know, and

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 4>there was, you know, lots of controversy about that. So

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 4>it makes me think was the you know, the bunker

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 4>gun shy after the controversy have three symbins and there

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 4>was one for like a professional foul or whatever it was,

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 4>and then everyone blew up about the Stephen Crichton not

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 4>being a symbin, and then all of a sudden the

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 4>symbings were back like the following day.

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I didn't see the Sebastians saw one. I

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>saw the camp Murray one. Do we think that was

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a symbyes? Yes?

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 4>Happy again And that's it. That's the thing. There are

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 4>people on social media saying it will here's the crime one.

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't even look like there's like an attempt to put

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 2>it's almost.

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, something I think that you when they don't, when

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>there's no even attempt to use the arm and you

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>hit someone with the shoulder, for me, that's an instant symbing.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Just been on straight off.

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I feel as well though.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 4>To agree. I tend to agree when and when we

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 4>talk about this. You know, what is the accident, what

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 4>if a play is falling, But there's also needs to

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 4>be some owners on the defender to lower.

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>The on the defend to not hit someone in the head,

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>understand something. You're playing the game. I understand sometimes it's

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>harder because blokes do drop a little bit, but you've

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just got to be.

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, you've got it. You've got to put your best

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 2>foot forward.

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 3>But I think at times, so especially when it comes

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 3>to the bunker, the bunker is judging.

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 2>Off how the player on the floor looks as well,

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 2>like there could be an act.

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Like you said, we should be taking you know, whether

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 3>it's an accident, intentional direct force, We should be taking

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 3>all that into account. But I think the number one

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 3>thing they do take into account is if a blow

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 3>clays on the floor for too long or not if

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 3>he gets up straight away.

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Most of the time, it's play on. Referees don't call it.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 4>But that was a suert example, right, So so that's

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 4>just so I hit David Moaly like flush, like across

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 4>the face, Mowley shows gets up, plays it, no symptoms,

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 4>one to none of those categories or whatever it was.

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 4>About six seconds later, try to score. The bunkers looked

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 4>at it, they're call him back and they go direct

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 4>with some force, tend to bin. And that's something that's

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 4>also a new thing, like are we going to do

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 4>that from now on? And if we are going to

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 4>do that, then I mean, you've at least decided that

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 4>that's the path that we're going to take.

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 3>What I have with Jared as well, he's happened and

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 3>then they played on a little bit and then they

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 3>called him.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 4>And again I think someone was a symbol as well.

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 4>But if we're going to do that, then we've got

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 4>to do that for every time we see direct contact

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 4>of the head, because we've seen examples where somebody's put

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 4>on report retrospectively and that's it and it's play on

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 4>their penalty, no symbin nothing, And that's another thing that

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 4>creates variances and frustration.

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Did you think Jared was like the by the law book. Yeah,

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 3>but I guess I'd be more inclined to talk. Depending

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 3>on what charge you get. I think the charge will

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 3>will be if that's fair, definitely symbin. But depending on

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 3>what he gets after it. I don't think it's you know,

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 3>I've seen some people on line, so he deserves six

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 3>weeks or something for that. I don't think that's the

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 3>sixth what's going to kill him is his record.

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 4>His records, Yeah, hasn't He had just come back from

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 4>four weeks.

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So well, there's your there's your double hit. That's the

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>wordell one. Yeah, I didn't. I didn't have an issue

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>with this one.

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 4>I think he hits him and that's nobody saw that

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 4>one initially, right, so we all thought, so would you

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 4>have that one?

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I wasn't sure that was a sinding. I

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily think he got him in the head.

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 2>He get the chest first, he ends up touching the head.

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 2>But you're playing on a fine line if.

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 3>If anything, you end up making a tackle and your

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 3>head gets touched all the time. Most when I when

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 3>I was playing foot walk into the office most mondays

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 3>with the black eye like but I didn't get a

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 3>bad high tackle penalties or game you know, like it happens.

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 2>It's a contact sport.

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but nobody's trying to take the contact or the

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 4>physicality out of the sport. We're just saying, I don't know,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, yeah, yeah, And it might just be anecdotally

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 4>that we feel like there's all of a sudden like

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 4>in that Roosters rister's game, it felt like there was

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 4>a penalty every five minutes for head high contact. So

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 4>and there's a lot of and we're speaking about this,

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of different factors. It's fatigue involved, you know,

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 4>your technique sort of you know falters. So it's never

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 4>going to be perfect, but at least, you know, let's

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 4>find some consistency the word that word.

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, I mean, I don't I don't have an issue

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>with them just get I don't have an issue with

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>them submitting what God keep symbitting them, keep blokes in

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the head sent of the bin because we're in this

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>era of CTE and legal action all that sort of stuff.

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't have a great problem with it, but

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>they just they just need to get it right. More

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>often they get it wrong. And at the moment it

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's about even they get it wrong as

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>often as they get it right. That's the problem I

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>think we have at the moment.

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I was saying it a team early.

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Do you feel really that, like as much the game

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 3>is entertaining at sever bin, do you almost feel that

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 3>the game's a bit too fast that either you've got

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 3>the defensive line rushing up and you know, trying to

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 3>just put a shot on as quick as possible, which

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 3>means the defense is the attack isn't running as much.

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 3>So then tackle technique is going a bit out the

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 3>window to just ensure that you push them back as

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 3>far as you can.

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's that's a kind of mitigating or not mitigating.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 3>But that's a factor in why there's so many head

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 3>highs because they're trying to get that quick tackle because

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 3>if you line the ruck too much, you know, you

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 3>get six Again. Your side susk crucified in just letting

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 3>the attack run and run and run and run.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 4>And so when we're talking about this, because we were

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 4>saying again and it don'tly, it feels like a lot

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 4>of them are happening where the defenders sort of upright,

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, they aren't necessarily really like low going into

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 4>the tackle that you see, and that's why they're getting

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 4>like heads into shoulders.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, So I want to be an interesting case study

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the average height of the player who gets charged.

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 4>That's not because that homoag is would be that example, right,

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 4>because Heath Mason isn't.

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Jared's a big guy, right, Jared's a huge guy. So

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see how many of those how many

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>boats over six foot? How many boats under six foot

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of being charged?

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean Crichton is a pretty tall guy too, so you.

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Know, but there are But Criten's was just a pure

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>like a technique.

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Surely he was going in he was going to put

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 3>a put a shot on. Yeah, like yeah that this

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 3>plane is simple, that's why it happened.

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, anyway, we need to solve it.

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 4>That means it.

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Needs to there needs to be some form of clarity

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>around what's going on.

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 4>See, that's the thing. It's it's one of those ones

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 4>like you said, there is obviously there was a rule book,

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 4>but all the rules that kind of the bunker uses

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 4>has you know, is open to interpretation. Like it's up

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 4>to the bunker to decide if something how forceful something

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 4>is you know, what, are there any mitigating factors and

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 4>having to do that on the run because there's time

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 4>pressure on them too. Like if we were to delay

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 4>every time there's a head high for like two or

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.959
<v Speaker 4>three minutes so somebody can come up with, you know,

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 4>try and find less severiances in the outcome. People would

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 4>be blowing up about that too. So there's no perfect

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 4>solution for it. So you know, I wrote in the

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 4>tackle that, and I know this would never happen, but

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 4>I tend to agree with you. If there's direct contact

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 4>to the head, the replace show it, take them off.

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 4>Leave that the force stuff and the mitigating stuff for

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 4>the Mattriviute committee to decide when they hand down the tape.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the force needs to be taken into

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>consideration because sometimes blakes just graze someone there, you know,

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they just touch them.

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 4>You're not going to You're not going to sim in

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 4>somebody for them.

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>If you had a blanket rule, every contact with the

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>head goes the bin, then you would be simming for that.

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 2>So I just need to be it changes.

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 3>It changes the game, like having players off the field

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 3>changes the game. And heading into final.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Didn't help the tit.

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 2>Lost p sixty.

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 4>Well, I helped the Tigers because they played what fifty

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 4>minutes with against twelve.

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but having players off the field, especially leading into finals,

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 3>is something that we don't want.

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 2>So I would love for the hour of a Graham and.

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 3>As he talks today this afternoon, if he would just

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 3>come out and like you guys said, if he comes

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 3>out and goes, yeah, anything any head contact, you're in

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 3>the pin, that will be better because then teams can say,

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 3>all right, guys, avoid that area at all costs. You'll

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 3>find players making that extra effort to go a little

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 3>bit lower because it's it will be the difference between

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 3>winning and winning and losing a semi or a Grand final.

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's have a look at what you're watching. What

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>are you watching at the moment?

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 4>I am watching. Oh no, sorry, I'm not watching. I'm

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 4>still watching Billions because there's seven. Yeah, it's not bad.

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 4>It's not bad. It's it's got that element reference. No,

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 4>it's it's so I'm up to season three and it's

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 4>getting to a point where it's getting a bit sort

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 4>of same same, and we're not four seasons to go,

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 4>four seasons to go.

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Come here every weekend begins.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 4>It's just been three seasons of this mouse chase between

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 4>the US federal attorney and the billionaire guy, do you

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 4>know what I mean? So I'm like, there's they keep

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 4>sort of building to this climate accent never actually happened. Okay,

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 4>But once I do finish that, I'm going to watch

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Emily in Paris. Oh my god, I knew we're almost

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 4>going to throw up Emily in Paris.

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Want me to throw up Emily in Paris? I said,

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no one in the world on throwing up Emily

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in Paris. No way, even though I just been to Paris.

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not throwing up Emily in Paris.

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.959
<v Speaker 4>Watch and tell us if it's really you know, this

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 4>is when you're married.

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got some shows you watch, some show your wife watches.

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>My wife and I watch a lot of stuff together.

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>One show I will not be watching.

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 4>In a nutshell. So this is up to season four,

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 4>I haven't that's.

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It's also looks you can't wait to watch.

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 4>So basically, it's about this American cheek who you know,

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 4>has like a quarter life crisis, and the packs up

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.719
<v Speaker 4>her life and moves to Paris. And there's a lot

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 4>of like fashion that's about it.

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>All sounds of cracking show.

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, honestly, I just watch it because it's easy viewing.

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sort of attached to it. It's got kind

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 4>of way and there's a lot of very there's a

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 4>lot of attractive people in it. It's very easy on

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 4>night and it's in Paris.

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Lovely, I'm watching Friday night Lights. Yeah, all my TV shows.

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 2>A hoot year old.

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I've never watched the TV series I've watched.

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I've watched.

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 3>I've actually watched the TV series before. I'm just rewatching

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 3>it because I was a bit younger. But yeah, I

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 3>love my my sports stuff and it's it's an easy watch.

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 2>You just chuck it on before you go.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 3>To bed, and you know, wake up the next morning

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 3>really to write stories because you just watch so much

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 3>rooting television.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I keep falling asleep on the couch at home because

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm still a bit after Paris, I'm still a bit right,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So I keep having started watching anything new. But my

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>wife recommended this show called Bank of Dave. Okay, it's

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix. I think it's about I think it's about

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a community bank some guys. It's based on a true story.

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe some guys started the community bank. She got

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>recommended by a friend of hers. She watched her again

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to show. I'm not watching with her because it doesn't

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>interest me at all. But it's very good, very good.

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 4>You're actually watching anything right now?

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Though?

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, what, I've got some shows in my that I'm

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>lying off that I'm going to watch. Well, I'm actually

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned last I'm watching Hard Knocks at the moment.

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 4>About yeah and how we're going to pitch a.

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Very good I watched another Another episode came out the

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>other day of Hard Knocks. It was a really good

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a very good show. I mentioned last week that

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>one of them is going out with some balls say that.

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we all know that someone Barles's husband.

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that.

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 4>That's how we all know him. He's only a smile,

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 4>bous smile. He's got a name that's in there.

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't member his name. This is a hard knock,

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Hard knock Chicago Bears.

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 4>That was the one who spoke about last week last week.

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, very good, very good. Yeah, the Bears and that start.

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>The NFL starts in two weeks, so a lot of

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy comes to the moment. Doing a lot of drafting,

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>got a draft going on right now, actually draft camp.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>So on pick number three. It's just riveting television and

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take a show you to think about it.

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I won't take any thinking about taking taking debo, Samuel taken.

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Just draft.

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 4>You're number three? Who was one and two? What did

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 4>they pick?

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, we're three rounds. In three rounds, there's a

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>few footballers and a few players exciting.

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 4>It was a scene one pick.

0:31:54.600 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>People's Christian Welch from the Melbourne Storm Superstar. He took Range.

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh no he didn't. He took Christian McCaffrey. That's very predictable.

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us. I'll keep you informed about my

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>pixels for next week. I'll sum up my team and

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>give you.

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 4>A complete Find something you need to watch?

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, find something need to watch. Thanks for joining us.

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks christ cheers.

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Thanks