WEBVTT - Top stock picks for 2026 (with Jun Bei Liu) 

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. Welcome aboard everybody now if you've just tuned in.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>We started the year earlier this week with the edition

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Your Shares in twenty twenty six, and we had Mark

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Jocum take us on a panoramic view really of global

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>investment markets and what we might reasonably expect in the

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>year ahead. Today we're going to look at individual shares. Specifically,

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to look at Australian shares on the A six,

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>which means we're talking about stock picking. And joining me

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>on the show is jun Belu of Tedcap. If you

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>recall she did this exercise with me last year. She

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>had just started her fund actually this time last year,

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly as in its current formation, and in that twelve

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>month period, I think we can say that she's become

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the best known, high profile certainly stock pickers

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in the market. Very good to have you on again.

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>How are you, JB.

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I am great, Hi James, thank you so much for

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 2>having you. Always love to have chat about the stock market.

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, we are ready to roll. As I say, we

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>did an exercise earlier in the week where we just

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 1>looked at the broader market and they sort of conditions

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>out there, just to refresh for everybody. You know, our

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>own market, the US did about seventeen eighteen percent, and

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we in the end almost got to ten percent, thankfully

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>due to as always the dividend kicker of three and

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a half percent or so, which has come down it

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>used to be about four and a half percent. We'll

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>come back to that as the show goes on, but

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we want to look at first of all the outlook

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>for the AX. Tough question, but clear question for you.

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the ASEX can do it again this year?

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Can it do double digits?

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a SEX definitely is going to get to the

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 2>double digit if anything, potentially a little bit of upside.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you why. There's a couple of tailwinds. One

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 2>is that we started seeing our corporate earnings doing a

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 2>little bit better. You know, in the last few years,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 2>we have had a lot of downgrades and now looking

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, looking forward next twelve months, we're looking at

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 2>the corporate earnings growth between eight to twelve percent. That's

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 2>actually pretty good. And then if you look at some

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest sector actually you know, one of the

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 2>biggest sector, which is mining for Australia, they are having

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 2>they are on fire. That sector is projected to do

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 2>pretty well again this year, of course, will be more selective,

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 2>will be more supported by some of the structural commodity

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>like copper and others, but that sector should do pretty well.

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.799
<v Speaker 2>They paid pretty big dividends and that should drive quite

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of growth in terms of earnings as well.

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>So our market, I think it will get to the

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>ten percent potentially with a little bit more, you know.

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess there's a bit of expectation for US market

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 2>to do so much better, as people always do. I

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 2>think the one thing that sort of held holding us

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 2>back is that, you know, the back of the mind

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 2>question of what's going to happen to our interest rate.

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>We're going to get a height towards the end of

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the year potentially. I don't think it's coming soon, but

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 2>I do think potentially there is a chance. But that

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 2>is still going to see us see our market have

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 2>a pretty good return.

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So just to give you some context there, it's not

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.119
<v Speaker 1>that we have strong earnings this year so much as

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>we have earnings this year, right, So it's actually been

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty dull hasn't it in terms of earnings and perhaps

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>behind all the noise, the inability to have strong earnings

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on the axis is really what explains why we were

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>dragging our heads compared to the US in recent times.

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 2>That's right, so recent US because the index is very

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 2>dominated by a lot of those growth businesses and they

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 2>have done incredibly well. And the challenge is that for

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 2>next year is you know, there is a bit of

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 2>investor skepism with evaluation, you know, and now they're getting

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 2>returns and they are becoming cabinets heavy companies now. So

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 2>now in a way that our market may see, Ernie Swarth,

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>that's actually not too bad.

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that people have been concerned. There's

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>two sort of outstanding, obvious, in your face headwinds for

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the AX all things been equal, who knows, of course

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the international markets and if we wake up in the

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>morning and Wall Street has a ten percent correction, where

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we are going to follow that for sure absolutely probably

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 1>exceeded history would suggest. So let's put that on the table.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>But as we stand, and as you say, twelve months

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is a long time, so we're talking over twelve month

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>pero that we could do this double digit. But you

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned one thing first of all already, which is the

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>prospect of rising rates. So the consensus is that we're

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>going to have rising rates now that is surely going

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to work against sentiment in the market. And the second

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>thing that I just alluded to at the start is

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:55.119
<v Speaker 1>our great concushion has always been dividends. The dividend yields,

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>which was about four and a half percent, it's actually

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>sliding and sliding. It's now about three and a half.

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So how do you bake in those two factors? JB.

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good question. I think it's very true.

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 2>First of all, with the interest rate, it's very interesting

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the expectations for rate rise has changed very rapidly, literally

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 2>within the last few weeks of December, that market start

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 2>expecting a rate rise in February, rate rise in May,

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 2>and you know, instead of ray cards previously. So now

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 2>my view is that because market is very fast in

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 2>sort of pricing in the expectations, which you know, economic

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.679
<v Speaker 2>seems to have moved together. I do think that what's

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 2>been priced in which we saw a lot of selling

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 2>in the ur retailers, is now actually perhaps way too pessimistic.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 2>My view that we're not getting a rate rise in February.

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Even May is very skeptical because you know some of

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.239
<v Speaker 2>the data stats coming through. Normally for RBA, they called

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 2>for the board. The key thing is to do nothing

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>usually is the first step, and then it takes a

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 2>really high hurdle to move from raate card to suddenly

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 2>rate right. So that is going to be very negative.

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 2>So for me is that I don't think it's coming

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 2>in the first half of the year. Yes, you'll be negative,

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 2>you know when it does come that part of the year,

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 2>and that's assuming inflation stays very strong. We only just

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 2>really have a one data point, you know, in September

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 2>quarter that was that was stronger than expected. So you know,

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 2>we're just still too early to call. Yes, c it

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 2>is negative for the share market, but right now market

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 2>is pricing in quite a lot of rate rise already,

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 2>so from here on you know in a way that

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>we won't be surprised. So I think it's been pricing

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 2>at least one rise for this year, and I think

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 2>if anything, timing could be extended out so that if anything,

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of on the positive front. So for the

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:39.799
<v Speaker 2>market valuation, before.

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>You talk about dividend, Yeald, that's very interesting. So your

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>theory to some extent is that the sell off in

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the role of the Christmas was actually because of the

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>change of sentiment about rates and the market and the

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>analysts and the journalists are all running wareheaded themselves in

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of how quickly this would and THERBA would never

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>be seen to flip flop quite so dramatically. Is that

0:06:57.920 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>basically what where you're coming from.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I think the pricing is essentially being in and

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 2>now we actually if you've seen some of the rediscretionary sector,

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>they started performing a little bit better just in the

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 2>last few weeks because the probability for raate rise is

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 2>already moving back from you know, something like eighty percent

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 2>in February now down to twenty five. So, you know,

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 2>just the market's got too way ahead of themselves.

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>So but consumer sentiment is it's pretty poor, Yeah, I

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>think so.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I think consumer the actual consumer sector for this year

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>will be a bit challenged because we heard the Christmas

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 2>was okay, you know, November was strong, but the challenges

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of discounting and because of the headline

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>was being discussed in the media. You know, Ray Rice rayhike.

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Consumer just don't spend. And on top of that, we

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>also had the tragedy at Boondai shooting, you know, hearing

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 2>your South Wales that has really caused a lot of

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 2>traffic to disappear from shopping centers and others. You know,

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 2>this has happened previously, any of those similar sort of

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 2>events that you know, consumer just don't feel they want

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 2>to be shopping, they want to don't Yeah, they don't

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 2>to spend. So we definitely seen that full back discounting

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>is very heavy at the moment. We already have a

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 2>couple of retailers came out already downgraded, not on the

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 2>revenue front, but more so on the march because they

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 2>have to discount. So I do think that will become

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 2>a theme for this year because retailers are sitting at

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 2>very big margins for the last couple of years because

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 2>things been good. You know, they do have to give

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 2>some of that back.

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>This year, okay, and on the dividend yield. So the

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>point we were making is that cushion is fading for

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Australian stocks. That the ability that you could always say,

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>well you're going to get four and a half percent

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever happens, but you're only going to get three and

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a half percent. Now, that puts more pressure on the

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 1>stocks to grow, doesn't it.

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 2>In a way. So I think part of the reason

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the dividend has been steadily falling is one is that

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, clearly our banks is already sort of peaked

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 2>in terms of their earning, so it's not growing in

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 2>terms of dividend. And two is the last few years

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 2>that resources company which normally pay big dividend, has been

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:08.119
<v Speaker 2>really tough. But we just started seeing those commodity prices

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 2>turning around significantly. If you look at just take PHPO

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 2>or Real as an example, both of them are sitting

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 2>there with thirty percent earnings upgrade to come in this

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 2>reporting season because how much commodity price has moved. Just

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 2>this month, the commodity prices all up double digit. So

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that means these companies normally pay out quite a lot

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 2>of dividends and that should see the dividend improved for

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 2>this year. But definitely they will put pressure on companies

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 2>because the Australian investors always demanded higher dividends.

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So do you think the big miners the mining sector

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in it it could actually revive the dividend yield across

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:48.599
<v Speaker 1>the market, it's self a structural decline.

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 2>I think they will pay more, but one of my

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>concerns for the Big Mind at the moment is that

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 2>they're making so much cash flow at the moment, almost

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 2>like a windfall, and they historically have being very bad

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 2>in paying out shareholder and they'll hold on to the

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 2>cash then normally would like to go out and buy

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 2>things to grow. You know, managements sit around the table

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 2>going how do we grow in next year? And we're

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 2>already started seeing a.

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Bit of that.

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 2>So the challenge is that hopefully they don't go out

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 2>and slowly spend all the money. But I think it

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>looks they will be a bit disciplined because you know,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 2>shareholder room punish these sort of nowsal quite quickly.

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, very interesting now, folks, what we're going to do

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is we're going to we're going to deep dive. Now,

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go and have a look at first

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of all, and I think this is going to be

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. We're going to look at the miners. We're

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>going to look the mining shares of what risks and

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunities you have in front of you, which as JB.

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Has said it is red hot, and it is red hot.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of the time. I think you'd have

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to go back nearly twenty years two four to two

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>o seven to see to see the sort of momentum

0:10:45.600 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in the big miners. We'll be back in a moment. Hello,

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. Okay, this

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is the second of our Outlook shows four twenty twenty

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>sixties are always very popular and if you can, I

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>recommend you actually listen to them in sequence because you'll

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 1>really get a broad picture for investing in the year

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>ahead and it is very useful.

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the secrets of investing is not what you

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>think is going to happen. It's knowing what everyone else

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is thinking is going to happen. And this is what

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>these shows are about. They do really give you a

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>guide if you use them in that fashion. My guest

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>today is Jun Belu of ten Cap. Ten Cap is

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a one point five billion dollar fund. It is an

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>active manager. It is long short, which is very interesting.

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>That is they have the ability to short should they

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>wish to do so. It started basically it has a

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>net return ruffling of about eleven point two percent since

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>its inception. That's against the air six two hundred of

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>eight point nine percent over the same period of time.

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to know more about my guest today,

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>We've had a show that was very popular that Juliane

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Sprague did with JB earlier in the year, which is

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>called Secrets of a one point five billion Investor. Have

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a look at that if you want to know more

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>about her today, I just want to concentrate on what

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>she knows about the market and what she's thinking. Okay,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>now the miners, Okay, where will we start? The big

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 1>three BHP, Rio and Forteskew. As you say, they've been

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>somewhat dormant, but boy, they were kicking at the end

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 1>of last year. It takes a hell of a lot

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to lift those stocks. They're up about twenty five percent

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>so far in the twelve month period. That is a

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>bhp in Rio. And when they deliver dividends, they deliver

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>gigantic dividends, don't they. They just blow it out of

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that They blow the banks out of the water when

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>they're at the top of the cycle. So where do

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you think we are with these big miners just now?

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean is there is there more to come? Are

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we are they? Where are they in their own cycle?

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Because they are notoriously cyclical.

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely certainly, Minus are not what you buy and

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 2>hold and your bottom drawer sort of thing. Look at

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 2>they are still looking at having a pretty good year,

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 2>But it really depends on what type of commodity is.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 2>So for if our commodity outlook, if you look at

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the support, you know, the structural names such as copper

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 2>or certainly some cases gold and maybe even al aminium

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 2>has some of the structural supports. In terms of copper,

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's electrification and the demand globally, demand for

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 2>copper has really increased, and then the supply just hasn't

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 2>been there and we all know that's going to create

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 2>price this location. And we're seeing copper going to have

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 2>another strong yet because there's just a supply with it.

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Iron ore is a bit harder because a big consumer

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of iron oil is actually China, and China hasn't really

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 2>revived that much. It's just not doing any worse. So

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 2>China is steady, and then we're looking at globally the

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.719
<v Speaker 2>demand is actually picking up a little bit. So yeah,

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I think all these commodities are well supported, so our

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 2>minus probably still another good year. You know, probably not

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 2>going to see that twenty thirty percent range for the

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 2>large miners, particularly because we are now already seeing a

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 2>lot of earnings upgrade coming through. In February this year,

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 2>we're going to see something like twenty thirty percent earnings

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>upgrade for a company for these large miners, FORTESQ, if

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>you like, actually here looking at even bigger upgrades, so

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's quite a lot of earnings upgrade, big

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 2>dividend to come through for them. You know, this reporting

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 2>season and I think next reporting season August we're going

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 2>to see an even larger name. But then posta we

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 2>really have to see whether globally, you know, where we

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 2>stand in terms of the global bombers, But certainly first

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 2>half they're going to continue to do pretty well.

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>It sounds to me like you're saying that to some

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>extent it's priced in the Big three, But there is

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>such a huge mining sector and we can look further

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>down the line at what is available out there. So

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>if copper is like this year's thing right this year

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is hot metal, so to speak, where could we enter

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>as an investor? What sort of stocks are you looking

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>at beyond those big three? And Fortescue isn't even in

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the game here, is it? Really? It's iron or almost

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and real with very heavily iron or BHP is more diversified.

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>But beyond those big three, what's the next layer of stocks?

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's start talking about individual stocks. Yeah.

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, there's a lot of interesting names. So in terms

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 2>of copper, you want to play pure play slightly larger.

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 2>One is the sam Fire. It has you know, has

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 2>a really good copper exposure, but said by is very expensive.

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Then you go even smaller. The next one you can

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 2>look at is Capstole. It's due listed in Canada and

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>then also you know in Australia it's got a really

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 2>good production growth as well. Because one of the things

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 2>about minor is there not only commodities, you get a

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>right each by company actually growing production and also can

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>benefit from high prices right now, So I think Capstole

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 2>is a really good one to look at. What's also

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 2>interesting is so if you look at the copper price

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 2>that's gone really well, there is the next derivative. So

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 2>when usually globally where copper price go really high, there's

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 2>some sectors they started moving into some substituting effects. So

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 2>instead of copper, it might be to use al aminium.

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 2>So if you look at the prices of aluminium, normally

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>they trace copper, and so far at the moment aluminium

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 2>actually underperformed comper Now I'm not a mining specialist, but

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 2>you know if you look at what that means is

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 2>that potentially, you know, with strong copper, alominium will have

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 2>it stay in the sun.

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's like a like a reliable ratio like LPG

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>two oil or whatever.

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Very reliable ratio. That's right.

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Who are the players in that space?

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the easiest purest play is our CoA And

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 2>clearly the share price actually gone incredibly well. And that's

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 2>again Julis said, it's not just pure here and then

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, obviously it's and it's for a cousin which

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 2>has had many production issues, which is South thirty two. Now,

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 2>being mindful mining companies, you do really need to know

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 2>what's happening in total mind production. South thirty two has

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of issues. It's one of those companies

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 2>people always say you buy it before the result or

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>after the result, but not during the result because they're

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 2>always disappoint So just be bringing mindful when you move

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 2>away from the large chap the smaller ones they generally

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 2>have issues and you just got to do the homework.

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Be very careful with those things.

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you in your own fund beyond the

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>big three bhp real and for the SKU, what would

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the peer ibor was looking at your fund and looking

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>at the biggest holdings.

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 2>Sure, so aside from the larger so larger ones, we

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 2>actually have more PHV than the real because you know

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 2>we go through later on, we have that, we have

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 2>the capsule, we have the same fire, we have the

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 2>alcohol as well, a little bit of self rearly to

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 2>smaller position because a little bit, you know, it needs

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 2>to be careful with those socks.

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Operational risk as they call.

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 2>It, operational risk, it's very large, that's right, it's really therefore,

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 2>you know for a period where you've seen that aluminium

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 2>price catch up. And also one thing we haven't talked

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 2>about is the gold set, that goal set.

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do. I don't think I have a

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>little of gold. Let's do it. Let's do it. Just

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>before we do it, folks. Something that JB has pointed

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>out and it's so true and it's just extraordinary. Don't

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:08.239
<v Speaker 1>for one moment think that because a company owns a

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>gold mine and gold is rising at its fastest pace

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>since the nineteen eighties, don't for one moment think they

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 1>can't blow it. They can blow it every time, it

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. They can be sitting on a gold mine,

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, with the most marvelous external macro conditions,

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and unbelievably they can blow it. And one of the

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>things in this market, and people regret that Newcrest, which

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>was our biggest goal miner, was sold back in twenty

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty three to Numont and it was a giveaway and

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it was an exquisitely time purchased by Numont and a

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>terrible loss for Australia. But what people forget is that

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Newcrest was the greatest disappointer on operational risk. Talk about

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>things going wrong every time. So with that preamble, jombat

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. Let's let's set the ground here.

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Gold is running extraor in extraordinary run, and it's entirely

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>understandable and rational because of the mounting risks in world economy,

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>primarily in the US, primarily off the back of the

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration's behavior. Now, on that basis, I think we

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>can be confident that it will keep going. Gold is

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>up about very roughly, up about sixty percent in the

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>last felve months. Gold miners who tend to lag gold

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>itself for commodity, they are up. That is our own

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>ASX gold sector is up about one hundred and forty

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>percent twice as fast as goes. So we can put

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it on the table. There's a enormous opportunity and I'm

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>still excellent opportunity left foreign investors in gold stocks. Where

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>do we start?

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 2>You're absolutely right, I think where do we start? So

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 2>with the goal companies, And you know one reason for

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 2>why goal companies always lack the goal prices. First of all,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 2>goal prices can be affected by so many things, and

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 2>often it trends in directions that we don't expect. Now,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 2>So with the so when people forecast gold equity prices,

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 2>people don't expect the current spot. So most of the

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 2>gold companies, you know, when others do their evaluation, it

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 2>assumes it's going to fall. It's been like other commodities

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 2>as well. And at the same time, most of the

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 2>larger gold companies, they actually are contracted all their volumes

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 2>has been contracted with their customers, so they don't actually

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 2>get the highest price until they.

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're working on long term contracts, which which don't

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily reflect the red heart lift in gold.

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's right, that's right, and so that's the second reason.

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Now the last reason of why it's always lack is

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 2>because gold companies, if you do, a risk customer. So

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 2>we have a model we look at all the companies

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>risk their volatile. They are relative to share market, gold

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 2>is four times of volatility goal shares, goal gold equities.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 2>They're very volatile. The reason being is that most of

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the gold company always need to raise money to dig

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 2>out all the goal because gold is hard to dig out.

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 2>You have a lot of operational risks, so they always

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 2>come equity raising, particularly smaller names. So when the market

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 2>so often when the market goes through free four, when

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 2>people worry about the world, the goal price will go up,

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 2>but goal shares, goal equity will fall a lot because

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 2>people think, oh, they can't raise money anymore. They can't

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 2>dig those goals out. So it is very interesting dynamics.

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 2>So it's not exactly like your goal bus. It's actually

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 2>works as a very extreme volatility measure of the market.

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 2>But normally market in the normal condition, they will go

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 2>up rasually over the goal prices. So these are the

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 2>key reason why they don't they always be cheaper. But

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I do think the goal sector is really interesting because

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 2>in the last four month, we actually have gone to

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of smaller gold companies. So when we talk

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 2>about the big goal company, you know, they have contracts

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 2>and everything takes a long time to benefit from the thing.

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 2>And some of the bigger ones and we both know,

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, particularly Northern Start has had a lot of

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 2>production issues exactly.

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, just like Luclest added their day.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that's right, the weather and everything else, and

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 2>most of them they're pretty good in telling us about it.

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 2>It's just that market don't remember. So by the time

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 2>the market don't adjust their number until suddenly they report

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 2>and they said, we told you, and then the market

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>have been put into their numbers because they got too

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 2>carried away with high prices. So we moved into some

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>of the mid tier mid caps, so smaller names, and

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 2>they are the one that actually has been doing really well.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Not only they growing production, they actually don't have long

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 2>term contracts, so they just they started benefiting much higher

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 2>prices and get all these cash flow. That's why you're

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 2>seeing them doing so much better than the larger names.

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:35.959
<v Speaker 2>So you know, so the names we sit in are

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the likes of Catalysts and the names of Genesis, Capricorn.

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 2>They're all doing really well now. They all actually gradually,

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, going from small cap small ordinary index into

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 2>larger index just because they actually are benefiting so much

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 2>more than the larger like the Northern Star and.

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>US fourteen of the top twenty performers last year were

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>gold miners. That's right, a goal that is the extraord

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we have a similar reflection in this

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six?

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it will be harder, but of course, look

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>if the goal continued with the way Trump operates it,

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 2>the world is still very uncertain. There is a possibility,

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 2>but I think hargely for that gold reray is they

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 2>distruggle for many years. The part of the reray is

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the market recognized your cryptocurrency is not the true diversification

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 2>from the money from the you know, over stimulus. You know,

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 2>all these world and wash with money. So you know,

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>because that has become quite a problem towards the end

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 2>of the year. So now the gold you see just

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 2>see investors moving back into gold at the same time

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 2>you see all the central banks buying gold China in

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 2>your emergency market. They're not buying what they might be

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 2>buying some cryptal currency. But it's just it's the gold

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 2>has now restored its title as the story value.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>That's very interesting and I certainly I actually did something

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a few prior to Christmas on this. It is certainly

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>from my point of view, digitally goal. It's over really

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the story about whether crypto is digital gold. It's not

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>goldles gold. But I'm going to ask you two questions.

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>They're not easy questions. They're relating to gold. One is

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>on the gold rally. I don't know if you're a

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>buler bear on gold, but I wonder one thing. If

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing about gold is that it was a

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>non correlated asset and in theory it went down when

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>markets went up, then what's going on because markets are

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>going up and gold is going up, and so what

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? I mean, if what does it mean

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>it's becoming I don't know if it's becoming correlated sufficiently

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>that mathematically that the analysts are convinced but does that concern.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 2>You in a way because it's like you said, it's

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 2>becoming very correlated, right, So it's possibly correlated. So it's

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 2>been like the bond and equity when they move together,

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 2>which do these days, it's almost that reduces its effect

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 2>as diversification. I think what with gold is a bit

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 2>different at the moment. It's look, that's why it kind

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 2>of feels okay, is it going higher? You know, it's

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 2>harder to see it down from here now. But so

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 2>the goal is a little bit different. I do think

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 2>that investors or you know, insitutions or countries around the world,

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 2>there is so much demand they realize how much under

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>owned of the goal it is, so there is this

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.479
<v Speaker 2>rush to buy them. So it's actually demand for you know,

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 2>from real demand. It's not actually more you know, sort

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 2>of financial you know, sort of structuring demand. It's actually

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 2>different countries positioning, for whatever reason, a real demand for

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 2>this asset class. So I think it's well supported that

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 2>it still is enough support to support that. And given

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, crypto is a little bit unsure of where

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 2>it stands at the moment, I think that's at least

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 2>for the next twelve month. You think this price is

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 2>well supported, you know, very hard to see it collapsing,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 2>particularly given the Trump administration. What's happening.

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I suppose the factors that have driven it to

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this point remain very much in place, if not, if

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>not enhanced. Really Okay, it's interesting you mentioned about being

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 1>under owned. There is there is speculation, hard to prove

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>this at the big superfunds. Australian super funds are way

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>behind on glow delocation and if they are, then that's

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>another sort of demand that would come through from that

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 1>under ownership. Okay, shortbreak, folks. Back in the moment, we're

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about what you might avoid. Hello, Welcome

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>back to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. James Kirby here

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>talking to June Beileu of ten Cap, regular on the show,

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a much better known as a staff picker now

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>then we started talking to her earlier and I'm sure

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that will continue in this year. She's great to talk

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to and I think particularly for fund managers, she's talks

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 1>in detail and takes a stand and there's nothing more frustrating,

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you on a podcast show than someone

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>who's humming and haweiing and beating around the bush. Not

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>everything works for you, you always have I mean, as

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a staff picker, it's hard, right every year something goes right,

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>something goes wrong. I mean most things go right. I

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>mean I think the last time we talked, the one

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that the one that I thought had let you down

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was Ramsey. Maybe they're turning a bit now this time

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>around Premier Investments. How do you that didn't work out

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>for your heart? I mean do you just say that

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like doing karate? You do karate every now and again,

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>A punch lands and you just keep going. Is that

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>your approach or what is your approach?

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, when we look at the company and we

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 2>have a thesis, you know, what is expected to return,

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 2>what are some of the catalysts, and then when the

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 2>catalysts come along, we look at it and say, look

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 2>that's just way too tough. And so in a case

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 2>of Ramsey, I remember many years ago, you know, it

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.239
<v Speaker 2>was a case where we're waiting for the reopening trade, right,

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 2>I remember when the you know, post COVID had a

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of issues. We're waiting for people to finally start

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 2>using you know, egos of doctors, and they're like, now

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>we are seeing it now, but it's two more years

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 2>then expected, and they had all these extra inflation in

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 2>terms of nursing stuff and others. That's been very tricky, so,

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, but Ramsey, to be honest, it's actually now

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 2>finally looking a little bit better. We know, health scopes

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 2>go through these challenges, but the market seems to be turning.

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 2>We'll do double digit return. So this is what we see.

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.959
<v Speaker 2>We want to see our thesis. We're constantly testing our

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 2>thesis to say if it's a still it is a

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 2>still intact. If it's perhaps the money should be allocated elsewhere.

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 2>So it's kind of all, well, we always look at

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 2>in the case of the retailers. Yet last year was

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 2>looking as a good year to start with that, with

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 2>the rake cards, you know, with the you know many

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 2>ray car on the car that's coming through, with the

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>consumer not doing too badly, you know, things were looking

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. However, the challenge is now that we just

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 2>you know that we all see now are we getting

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 2>a rad cards? Probably not, Probably is more likely to

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 2>stay on hold for some time. And then in the

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 2>environment also where consumers a bit more picky, not collapsing,

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 2>just a little bit more picky, there might be a

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.719
<v Speaker 2>little bit of challenges for some of those companies in

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 2>that sector.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so looking at docs that may let you down.

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>They were so good for so long, and Combank obviously

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>was I've been talking to people all week about this

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about Combank, and there's almost like a mystery as to

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>just how it got to the sort of extraordinary levels

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that it get to, and when it had a valuation,

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and when it had an intrinsic value of allegedly one

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred bucks or so and it was trading at one

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty or whatever, of course it couldn't hold up.

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So the question this year with banks, we have the

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>four banks now sitting with you know, possible rate rises,

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>possible soft consumer sentiment, struggling with the fact that they

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>were clearly overvalued in twenty twenty five, and they are

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the big sector that often we would be talking half

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the show on. But we'll take it. I don't know

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>if you agree, but I would take it that the

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>best we can expect from the banks would be a

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of market average return.

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 2>What's your view, I think, Magie is that it probably

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 2>will be market average, a little bit less in terms

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 2>of written and the return delivered from the banks will

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 2>be quite you know different, So within the banks, you know,

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 2>also into outperform and then the disparity will be still

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 2>quite large compared to last year, so that would be

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 2>quite large. And I do think the banks will be,

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, in terms of performance, will be a whole

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 2>lot worse than you know, the lives of resources and

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 2>a few other sectors, just because they don't have earnings

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 2>growth and they're previously their earnings upgrade was because people

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 2>were expecting very bad, bad their cycle. And now all

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 2>the expectation has been re rated, so people don't expect

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 2>that cycle. So there's no earnings upgrade to come through,

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 2>and there's not much earnings growth. And then now it's

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 2>all about cost out, so revenue environment benign, you know,

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 2>it's really just about cost out. Then who can do

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the cost out? So we saw A and Z already

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 2>talk about cost out. I think it's got a little

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 2>more rude to go, you know, West Pide potentially a

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 2>bit more. And CBA is the one that doesn't you know,

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 2>never really does cost out. They invest, so you know,

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 2>that's the one I think will be probably struggled more,

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, for the next twelve month because they're not

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 2>going down the path where they will control costs and

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 2>they will probably want to invest ahead of the pus.

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so banks as a sector, the big four, you say,

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe average or less than average. And when we know

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we have one, we're talking about a very good year

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that put that on the table, folks. And I suppose

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.479
<v Speaker 1>part of the message here is always be diversified. So

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Bank's not looking great, ordinary at best, with some diversity

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>within the four. After that, I think we're going to

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>start basically we're going to get random here, folks. Okay,

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to just I'm just going to spray JB.

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>But also as the questions that you probably have in

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>your mind. So let's go CSL extraordinary disappointment. This great stock,

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>once the biggest stock in Australia. Can you believe this?

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Bigger than CBA, bigger than BHP. Now what has happened?

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>It's down thirty five percent, but it's got an ROI

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of about sixteen percent, which is magnificent. What do you

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>think is going to happen to it this year?

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 2>I think by the end of the year seer Priss

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 2>should be higher, but it will betail two hearts again,

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, because the reason they sounds so much is

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 2>because it's perpetual disappointment. It's disappointed market again and again.

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Last year. I think with something like two three downgrades.

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Now the risk is there's one more. There's one more downrade. Look,

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the operating environment is still very tough. Sounds like the

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>core business has lost really lost, you know, lost its

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 2>structural growth driver. Now you know, the ig business, it

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 2>seems to be in oversupply. That's why the competition is

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 2>being severe. They're losing share and they say they don't

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 2>want to compete on price, but clearly the market is

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 2>very competitive. So that's tough. We're not seeing that turning

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 2>around yet. And then the other product category, you know,

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing the album is doing really poorly in China.

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 2>That's another headway to come through. Flu is not great,

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 2>but I think that's in people's numbers now, So I

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 2>think the next six months there's still numbers to be

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 2>notched out. But look, it is cheaper compared to what

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 2>it was. It will never go back to the heydays

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 2>because it's not a growth structural grower now because it

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have a big pipeline to grow it but cyclically

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 2>should do better less than twenty times. It is cheaper

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 2>for what it was. So I think second half the year,

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 2>once the earning is really cleared through a weekend, you

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 2>know confidently say it will grow from here. It will

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 2>definitely you should outperform.

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You're not exactly calling it all the way back right, Okay,

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. I had no idea what you're going to

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>tell me on that one. Okay, that's CSL. Let's take

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a look at and talking about potential areas that may

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>not thrill, shall we say in the year ahead, the

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>things that might let you down, things of where there

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are distinct risks. Tell me if I'm I mean, tell

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>me what you think. If there's any area I'm guessing here,

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>where are we standing on for instance, Reads and the

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>big If we have rising interest rate environment, then the

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>textbook would say keep away from Reads. That is a

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>property trust. Where are you on that.

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Property trust? That you're right? They underperform leading up to

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the rate rise, and then you're probably looking at again

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:54.959
<v Speaker 2>the second half names. I think with the Reads they

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 2>will do okay. For the first part of the year,

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 2>earning is still pretty strong. Now this is as a sector,

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 2>but this as a sector because the earnings just started turning.

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 2>All of them has been come upgrades. Retail property is

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 2>doing really well and they all probably have earnings upgrades.

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 2>So your center group, your vicinity, that's doing pretty well.

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Even some of the office space, which you know Childhol's

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:20.280
<v Speaker 2>doing is not too bad. Dexus is a different story.

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.879
<v Speaker 2>That's just going to be tough. And then the residential

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 2>space is actually doing pretty good. You know, we like

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 2>the retirement some of the retirement living space where you know,

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the recent listing of gem Life is doing very well.

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 2>So we kind of prefer company that more have the

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 2>self help right, so they are building all these properties

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 2>in the area highly desirable. You know, they're going to

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 2>do very good earning growth regardless you know, whether they

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 2>might be build a micro pressure. So I think the

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 2>reason will do okay, but it's more on neutral stands

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:49.879
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of the year because once the great

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 2>they usually start underperforming as a sector. You know, when

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 2>they don't have a proper growth for the company itself,

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 2>they tend to underperform five month leading up to the

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 2>first rate hike. So if we say the the year's

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 2>ray high, so second half the year, that's pretty much

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 2>it or the rebrates is pretty much done. So that's

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 2>how it is more neutral. I think the housing is

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 2>still looking okay, but it's you know, it's the other

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the some Yeah, it's the other face.

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you something there. Goodman being in

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>theory a property trust but in practice priced as an

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>AI play with an extraordinarly ambitious agenda, one would naturally

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.479
<v Speaker 1>be skeptical except for the fact that Greg Goodman has

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>an impeccable record through decades of getting it right in

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the end again and again. Are you comfortable with the

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>price that's at now?

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I am. I hold Goodman. I think it's an incredible company,

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 2>and I think what they're doing there is a disclaimer coming.

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I think what they're doing is great because they're repurposing

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of their industrial property, right and they just

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 2>keep them another leg of growth and you're delivering double

0:35:57.680 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 2>did you return? It is great? You know into the

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 2>data like it's great now, I do have, But rather saying,

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, Russia for all your eggs and buying lots

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 2>of goodment, I'm a little bit skeptical, and you know,

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:13.879
<v Speaker 2>unsure about this whole data center space, whether there will

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 2>be enough return to be generated in five years time, right,

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.800
<v Speaker 2>So you know, because there's hyperscalers putting so much money

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 2>into the data center and evaluation going through the roof,

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 2>we just don't know who's going to be the ultimate buyer,

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 2>like saying ten years, who's going to buy them, and

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.760
<v Speaker 2>then whether there will be enough technology if the data

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 2>center is still going to be in the current form,

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 2>So maybe there's no terminal value for those and Goodmen

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 2>instead of just buy and sell it, they want to

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 2>hold it because normally with their other industrial property that's

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 2>what they do. So they will manage. They will put

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 2>them into a fund and the fund will manage it

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 2>so they will be the owner of this property. So

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a little bit challenging for me to see ultimate

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 2>value of data center. But for Goodmen, I do think

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 2>they underperform the sector enormously last year. You know, I

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 2>think it does look pretty good from the industrial perspective

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 2>and the money they can make right now from those

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 2>data center.

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Do you say Goodman underperformed the sector last year?

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they did, so the sectors down If you compare

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Goodman and Charta Hall, I think something like thirty percent

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 2>or more difference now Obviously the year before Goodman did

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 2>really well because the data center. But it's just it

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 2>does look like there's a bit of catch up to do,

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and industrial property is still doing pretty well, demand strong,

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and then meanwhile they're making good profit out of those

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 2>making building those data center So you know, so I

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 2>think it's it's something that I do like. I think

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 2>for the time being, it's good. But I'm still working

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 2>out this whole data center centeris because our portfolio can

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 2>hold it and we can show other companies, so you know,

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 2>we can take how that data center uncertainty.

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I certainly tune into your notion, your concept that the

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>technology itself could change, and then you know, maybe data

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>centers as we know them will not look anything like

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>data centers that have been planned to be built right

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>now that are getting such valuations. One last thing, and

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a kind of a reflection really of our market

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>and its absence of tech and AI that we leave

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it to last, because there isn't really a part. I mean,

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Goodman has become a proxy AI play in the blue

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:17.439
<v Speaker 1>chip space, or at least the top of the market,

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and within the market, there is very little else. NEXTDC

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>has been seems to be a very disappointing company in

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>many ways. Is what do you think of a NEXTDC

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and do you of in recent times has been disappointing.

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Do you see any AI play within the ASX.

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 2>I think, first of all NEXTDC again, it comes down

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 2>I think it's done very well. If you want to

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 2>have exposure to data center, it's just one all the

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 2>contracts and everything's great. My thing is that again, I'm

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 2>just not sure about ultimate value of those data center.

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if by building it today in five

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 2>years you know who's going to be the next person

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 2>to buy those assets. You know it's going to be

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 2>harder to see. And then when I talk about technology

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 2>goal change, you know what if there's a breakthrough that

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 2>you can have data center in the middle of the forest,

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 2>like in the middle of the.

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>A data center in your basement.

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Yeah, why what if you just put something

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:14.280
<v Speaker 2>out of the building. So I think it's just really

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, because the technology changing so fast. So

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 2>that's the thing. So I like it as a data

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 2>center exposure, but I'm just not sure if I want that.

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I seen the exposure at the moment. Goodman gives me

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 2>a quasi it's still got other assets in that sort

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 2>of exposure in terms of the AI player and everything.

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I really think this is the year when you actually,

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 2>rather than just AI exposure, it's the company that benefit

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 2>from the AI. You know, it's the costs out. It's

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the secer for example. You know what is the sector

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 2>that has the highest labor cost? You know, where there's healthcare,

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.439
<v Speaker 2>where there's banks, there's a lot of cost efficiency coming through.

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're hearing chatters overseas now, you know people

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 2>talking about overseas banks. You know, one of the JP

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Morgan Stanley cheap Ecommas said that they think the banks

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 2>is the growth stock of the future because there's so

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 2>much cost that can come through with the AI efficiency.

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 2>So I think this is a year people will distinguish

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 2>on also win there a loser. People still trying to

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 2>work it out of the AI, the development of the

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 2>AI rather than just go to the physical AI exposure.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, I would actually say some of the company

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 2>tech companies be sold off recently. It potentially is the

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 2>benefit beneficiary of those AI because they you know, they

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 2>have big database RAA for example, big database, the proprietary database.

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, they actually working with some of the AI model,

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, so that is the beneficiary. And but the

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:34.919
<v Speaker 2>market at the moment is selling your tech not sure

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 2>what it is, and then just all buy just direct

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 2>chip exposure. So for me, it's the companies that will benefit.

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 2>And then there's a lot I think companies will start

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 2>talking about it in the next six months.

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So hard one just wrap. We're going to say at

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the start stock you really like stock you think you

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>could avoid top of your head.

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the things that the stoker would avoid, it's

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 2>probably temple on website this stage. I'm a little bit worried.

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 2>One is it's expensive and that we're heading into a

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 2>somewhat slow down sort of environment. Lots of expectations. I know,

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 2>shampires fallen, just a little bit caret cautious on that front.

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 2>The thing that's soccer like is actually you know what

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 2>flight center. Yeah, because of the companies downwhere look at

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Godfrey's challenges and everything. Then we had the war last year,

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 2>so now it's heading into an environment where you know,

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 2>the travel is normalizing. Austria faced Australia as we love

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to travel overseas, so you know, demand environments put not

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 2>too bad. And and then you're cycling some really weak coms.

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 2>That means you're earning growth will come through at the

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:36.319
<v Speaker 2>same time. Corporate travel. The problem with corporate travel, and

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 2>it's going through review of some of the you know,

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 2>dodgy accounting and the like has now created, you know,

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for other corporate travel service provider like flight center.

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, in a way that you know, all the

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 2>large companies that we great speed to, they're all now

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 2>revising their corporate travel contracts. So you know, I think

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the next six month growth for travel or flight Center

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 2>is going to be enormous.

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting. Parently convinced by both those calls, might I

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>say especially the travel one. Yeah, absolutely, well, well you've

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 1>got two extraordinary stories there. One obviously the extraordinary story

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of corporate travel being so bad that they left it.

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>They've just basically left a big gap in the market,

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't they, And every corporate and every government department is

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>going to have to review. Terrific. All right, Thank you

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:20.359
<v Speaker 1>very much for being on the show. Always great. We'll

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again during the year, I hope, but

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:23.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you for today.

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for having me and Best of

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Black with twenty twenty six.

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. That was Jim Baylor of ten Cap Folks.

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Terrific to talk to us always. So now you've got it. Okay,

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You've got Mark Jocum of Global XCTFS, who talked about

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the global markets. Then we talked specifically today about Australian

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>share opportunities stop picks. Next week, we're going to talk

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>about property opportunities in twenty twenty six, and we're going

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to wrap it over Will Hamilton at the end of

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>next week. Talk to you soon.