WEBVTT - The Budget Special Edition

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Australians Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby, Wealth editor at The Australian, and welcome to

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>our Budget Special Budget Special Edition, which I do each

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>year and have done now for some years with Will

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton of Hamilton Wealth Partners.

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>How are you, Will, I'm very well, James, Thank you.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I like that we do this forty eight hours after

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>the budget because we get to see not just what

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>every sort of the knee jerk reaction on the evening

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>or the next morning, but we get to see a

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of distillation of the analysis of it where everybody

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>has a chance to actually sit down and take a

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>proper look at it. I think, I mean, we're going

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk, folks about what the budget is for investors,

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>right and what it means for investors, and don't be

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>don't ever be of the opinion I think anyway that

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the budgets don't matter. Every budget matters, and there is

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>enormous information inside the budget if you know where to look.

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And people will often say, oh, there's nothing in the budget.

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Not true. Not true this year either, even in the

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>way that some things didn't happen is actually news in

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and of itself and explain that as we go into it.

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>But first of all, I suppose on the headlines, on

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the big picture, for any investor, people want to know, well,

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with rates? They were supposed to drop

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 1>now they're drifting. Looking at this budget, which is our

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>window into the local economy. Does it suggest the rates

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>will still drop or will will they actually move higher?

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's linked with inflation. Is it an inflationary budget?

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So question one for Will Hamilton is it an inflationary budget?

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 2>My view is the cost of living support is diametrically

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 2>opposed to inflation control. And I think everyone is focusing

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 2>on the three hundred dollars.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that every household is going to get for

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>energy bits.

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Correct spread over each quarter, seventy five dollars, And now

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 2>they're saying, you know, if you've got multiple households, it

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 2>could be that there's not enough talk about the tax

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 2>cuts and the tax cuts coming in as well, and

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I think if that is meaningful, their meaningful. I actually

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 2>think the three hundred dollars you spread across four quarters,

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's going to have any meaningful impact,

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 2>but the tax cuts do have a meaningful impact, and

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 2>people are saying it's the equivalent of two rate cuts

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 2>and putting that disposable income into the system. Is it

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 2>saved or is it spent. If it's spent, the inflationary

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>impact on that. So I think it's a gamble on inflation.

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I really do. And I think that's what the Eussie

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>dollar is telling us.

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Why what's the dollar was telling us?

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>The dollars you know, it was mildly strong yesterday, it's

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 2>strengthened a little bit over nigh. We're sitting there around

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 2>sixty seven. I think what they're telling you is, whilst

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 2>we are the figures that came out last night with

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 2>respect to retail sales and CPI and the US people

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 2>are talking about now ninety six percent chance of a

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 2>cut in September, what the Aussie dollar is telling us

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 2>is there's probably very little chance of a cut here

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 2>in Australia. So that's all on the back of inflation.

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so there's very little chance, according to the markets,

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of a cut in Australia. Frost part second part is

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that there is an attempt for There is a big

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>attempt in the budget to support and support all levels

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of society, which is very useful, particularly at the lower end,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, but there's also this very broad Commonwealth Rent

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Assistant Energy Bill support and the government said they're not

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>inflationary because technically technically they suspend inflationary pressure. But some

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>very top economists, I mean a list of economists are saying, look,

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>this may this does not bring down inflation. It simply

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>holds it for a period, and the minute those supports

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>are over, it goes back up again, or the awkward

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>pressure goes back up again. Warwick mckibbon, for instance, former

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>RBA board manager, what do you think of that argument?

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>And I also think the fact that it's spread over

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 2>the full year or four quarters, I agree on that.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 2>I think that it's it's more of the fact that

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 2>it's it's going to halt us rather than say that

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>coming down. And I think that as the same economists

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 2>are saying, is the RBA will look through this, They

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 2>will fact that on the back of a headline if

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>this is how it's artificially it has had an effect,

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 2>which I doubt they will look through this and take

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 2>this into account.

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>They have to, yeah, they have to. So basically does

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>some makes sense. It's politically death that you the measure

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>of inflation that we all talk about will be affected

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>by these But in terms of the market pressures, when

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>when when these supports are taken away unless they leave

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>them in forever and then the inflation just basically comes

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>pouring back outs.

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Like it's reported in The Australian this afternoon that Chris

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Bowen on radio interview yesterday said well we're doing this

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 2>to create a headline in inflation. Well is admitted what

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to do and the RBA will take that

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 2>into account.

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, very good. So folks, we're going to talk

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>about the about what the investor should know about this

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>budget and this new financial leader, which obviously the budget

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>papers personage. Now, the big thing, as Will says, the

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing of all by a mile for investors is

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the tax cuts, and I just everyone should keep it

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in mind that how it works. Basically, the amount you pay,

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, no tax upon. Interestingly, you think this

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter, perhaps as an investor, it really does. They're

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen thousand, two hundred a year. The first eighteen thousand,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred you make per year, there's no tax paid

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>on that, and it hasn't changed, even though the other

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>bands have changed, and there are tax cuts across the bands.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>What I'm alluding to here with the course is that

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>people might start taking money out of super for various

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>reasons in the future, and maybe that was one of

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the reasons the government held it at that, just to

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>finish on the tax folks. So the starter band for

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>tax will be eighteen thousand to forty five thousand, right,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the rate will be sixteen percent, down from nineteen percent,

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and after that thirty two and a half percent rate

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>will drop to thirty for forty five thousand two one

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>three five thousand. Okay, have you with me so far?

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>The thirty seven percent rate will kick in at one

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty five thousand, used to be one hundred

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and twenty, and the forty five percent rate now cuts

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in at one ninety up from one to eighty to

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>which a lot of peop if we would say big deal.

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We thought it was going to be better than that.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>The implicit promise was that the top end would get

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>these tax cuts as well, but across the government rearrange

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>them a few months ago, and politically that has gone

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>down well, and so I think we'll see more of

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this sort of engineering in the future. But basically, the

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>new tax cuts are there. Everyone should be aware of them.

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>They should be aware of their new tax ability. If

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you like with the new bands, familiar rize yourself with

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>those bands. What do you think it means for investors generally?

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Will on the tax cuts? Now put out a survey

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>saying that people are more likely to save than spend

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the tax cuts. I thought that was interesting. That would

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>also mean investing them.

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well that's the case. You will reduce that inflationary impact,

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>there's no doubt about that. But no individual with taxable

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 2>income of one hundred and thirty five thousand or lace

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 2>is going to have a natural text right of more

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>than thirty It seems to be this magical race that

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>the government seems to be aiming everything at. You know,

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 2>we've talked about the proposed to perinuation changes, et cetera.

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>So what they're trying to do is look at this

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 2>thirty percent seems to be this rate that they seem

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 2>to be aiming at. I think that seems to be

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 2>the big thing.

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>The flat rate as such, if they were to bring

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in a flat rate, and originally the original plan of

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>course was that would be larger the group in that,

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>but they rearrange things. Okay, interesting, so keep that in mind, folks.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Now after that, then there is an enormous amount of

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>money going into housing. Most of it is social housing

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Commonwealth to rent assistance, but it's an enormous figure. And

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>there's also initiatives for the construction industry at various levels.

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean the specifically, there's ten billion alone going into

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>social housing, and I think I want to just point

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>out from an investor's point of view again, will do

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you think that if this housing comes to pass, does

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it take some pressure off the vacancy rateing property which

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 1>is currently one percent in residential property, which is one

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons people saw investors at least be so

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>secure in property because you can rent anything and you

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>can get rent increases each year.

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 2>We need to design the houses, we need to get

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 2>planning for the houses. Then we need to build the houses,

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 2>and we need the people. I think they've allowed is

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 2>it seventeen hundred on a migration basis to builders to

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 2>come in, but we need but they're saying that, then

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the master build associations not saying that is enough. So

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 2>we need the people to build the houses and yeah,

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 2>the lag it's fantastic that they're doing this, but it's

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 2>not going to happen. We're not going to wake up

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow and it's.

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Happened, right. So you think the vacancy rates so are

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be where they are super tight for the

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>foresee of the future.

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Correact, Yeah, because I said you can design, planning and

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 2>then build. Yes, so you're probably looking three years to

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 2>be optimistic.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm, okay, very interesting, that is. I think that's

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>very important folks for property investors to keep that in mind.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>That really for us in property investment, the big dynamics

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>were around rates immigration, which of course kept the market

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly tight, and the forecast is for immigration to fall,

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's an important part part for property investors to

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>know that. Look, the signals are that what will change

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>will ease vacancy rates going forward, but they will be

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>slow and we will have to see how they pan out,

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>but there are signals at least that they will that

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the vacancy rate will ease. By that, I mean it

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>will increase from its one percent, but it's not going

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to go to five or ten. Sorry, we'll be the

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>regular one.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>The big issue and the need to reduce the red

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 2>type so we can get these things built. That's and

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 2>that that then gets down to state governments and local governments. Yeah,

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 2>and that hasn't.

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Been Yes, okay, just before we talk about some individual

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>measures that every investor should know, I think we might

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>just take a look at on Super. So there was

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a few things that everyone should know on Super. The

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>first thing is that your compulsory super moves up, of course,

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to eleven and a half percent in July one, on

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>its way to twelve percent a year later. That's important.

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>The amount you can contribute into Super is changing. That

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is the amount you can contribute on a pre tax

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>basis what they call concession and moves from twenty seven

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand now twenty seven five hundred now to thirty thousand

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and July one. But that only brings us back to

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>where we were a long time ago. Well, isn't that right?

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>You used to be higher than thirty correct.

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that listeners have heard me so many times.

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 2>The issue is not a super, it's getting money into Super,

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's very difficult to get in soupent on a

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 2>non concessional basis of lifting that from one hundred and

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>ten and twenty thousand, so that's the issue. These changes

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 2>were brought in actually by the coalition government. They made

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 2>it harder to get into SUPER, and I think that's

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the biggest issue.

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And these these increases in the amount you can

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>put in, they're not structural. They are index indexing for inflation.

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>They are only matching the inflation changes. So in real terms,

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the amount you can put in hasn't changed in any

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>significant fashion.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Correct. And also the transfer balance cap balance cap sorry,

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>increases to one point nine million.

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, it increases to one point nine million. That is,

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that is the amount you can happen Super before you

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 1>pay the first tax band, which is fifteen percent. It's

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>hard to keep all this in mind, folks, I know,

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>but you need to learn it if you want to

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>play the system in Super. You are not taxed on

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>your earnings in SUPER when you retire up to one

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>point nine million. And then there is a new plan,

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, to bring in a second band

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>at three million from the first of July twenty twenty five.

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Very controversial for the simple reason that it's not just

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>another tax, it's taxed in a different way on realized

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>gains it's about to be really kicked around in Parliament.

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Alegraspender has moved in motion today and I think it

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>will be It will be debated, but I don't know

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>because the Senate signed it off absolutely unchanged. That is

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the Senate inquiry. So what do you think the realistic

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>chances are that it will be amended in anty fashion?

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Will I said that it wouldn't be changed, then I

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 2>was hoping it more. Yeah, when I heard about the

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Senate inquiry, that they would see common sense and then

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 2>we wouldn't be texting unrealized gains. I think that is

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 2>just unconscionable. I really do.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And just explain why, because someone who isn't very familiar

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>with tax and investments might say, hey, listen, someone's got

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>three million in super what's their problem and why are they?

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's wrong with them? That this new tax?

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>What's wrong with it?

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think everyone's been concentrating on property, but I

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 2>think Robert god Libson's really talked about private equity and

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that's probably a really good example. You've got

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 2>a liquid growth investment in there, so it's growth without

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 2>returning income, and the value of that goes from three

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 2>million two let's say four million, but you're going to

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 2>get taxed. That's thirty percent on that if you're three

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand without any cash flow from it. But you

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 2>have to find that cash flow pay that tax, by

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the way. But when backwards you don't get a refund,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>you get it only a credit. And that's it's just

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 2>when I think everyone needs to pay taxes. I think,

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 2>and in life everything needs to be fair. But this

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>just is not fair.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's not fair because it's on unrealized paper gains.

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>It's on paper gains, right. So to make it simple,

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>if I invested in a company with my super and

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it was a great little company, and I loved everybody

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in it, and I thought that we're brilliant. The thing is,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and if they went up in value each year, though

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't get any money out, I'd be taxed on

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the amount of value increase that they are managing. Okay,

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's completely that's just out the window in terms

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of how the tax system works. So we've never seen

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that before.

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 2>And I think in investment we all would agree that

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 2>profit is not a profit until it's realized. Yeah, but

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 2>they're telling you, well, hey, guys. Every year we're going

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 2>to we want you to revalue your asset, and your

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 2>unrealized game will be taxed.

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I wonder will though that's an interesting angle. The numbers

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>suggest there isn't much investment in private enterprise and startups

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>by so managed super funds. It's all in property. I

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's in property. It's really going to pinch.

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but I think we're robbed. God Libsin's coming on

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 2>this angle. It's vibate. Equity and startups have a broad

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 2>effect because they're growth and that's what the economy needs.

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 2>And if you're starting the economy yes of growth, that

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 2>has far far reaching consequences.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>It chokes off incentives, which is which is the problem

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that's all across this budget. I think people are saying,

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no incentives. There's an incentive to go on the pension,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there's an incentive, there's an incentive you know for this

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and that, But but they're not incentives as such. They

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>are incentives to to take part in social welfare, which

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is miles away from what we're talking about.

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Investor incentives aspiration that they're absolutely choking at and I

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 2>think that's the problem.

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Also, look folks to cover off on on Super.

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that has come in is, of course

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>parental leave. If you're talking about this for so long

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that you might think it's already done, it's not. It's

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>finally confirmed. And how it works is that the superannuation

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>will be paid on parental leave, government funded parental leave

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for twenty six weeks and it begins, it actually doesn't

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>begin to July one, two, two five for all the headlines,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but in any event, there it is coming through. That's

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>another piece of news on Super. Okay, that's a bit

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to digest. We'll, we'll, we'll, we'll let everybody have a

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>break and we'll be back to you with some very

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting parts of the budget that probably haven't been aired

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:33.959
<v Speaker 1>as much and you might find very interesting. Hello, welcome

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>back to the Australians Budget Special. I'm James Kirkby, the

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Wealth editor at The Australian. I'm talking to Will Hamilton

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of Hamilton Wealth Partners and we are doing our budget

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>special which we do each year. Okay, Will, here's some random,

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>random thoughts and observations on the budget that are really unusual.

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to talk to about first of all,

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about social welfare or helping people. The three hundred

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar energy rebate, of course, that goes to every house

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in the country. That would include every single person on

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the rich list, that would include all the billionaires, Anthony Pratt,

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Gina Reinhardt. They'll all get their three hundred dollars rebate,

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>which would seem daft, but obviously giving them the benefit

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of the doubt, it's just they sound. It sounds like

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it would be very difficult to administer it in a

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in a more precise fashion. But the other caught my

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>eye was the tax credits for the miners, seven billion

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars into tax credits for critical minerals lithium and nickel

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in particular, and the shares immediately moved on this. So

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we have we have the government through the prism of

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>made in Australia and protecting things and all that sort

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of thing. But they're picking winners. Is that from an

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>investor point of view? What do you think of a

0:18:56.359 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>government picking winners and apportioning billions of dollars into areas

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>like the quantum computing as well, which of course is

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a spectacular example of it.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think governments have a good track record in

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 2>picking winners, and I think pumping money into things where

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 2>I think private enterprise otherwise I think has played a

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 2>far better role and a far more efficient role, and

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 2>they've taken the risk on I think that there's over

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the over history, there's plenty of reasons we can sort

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 2>of bring up things where they've made a mistake. Now

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't agree with that at all.

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, you don't agree with with the provision of picking

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a sector and giving it special treatment, No.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't. But on the other hand, I do see

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 2>what I know why they've picked critical, critical minerals in particular.

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 2>There is a defense reason around a lot of this,

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 2>and especially with Orcus and with the agreements we've got

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 2>with you Outed States. There are some agreements there that

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 2>that's the reasons why, uh, certain minerals have you got

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 2>benefits there.

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But I mean the US themselves are doing it, aren't

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>They will to be fair then that's the ultimate free market.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But they're actually doing it too. So there is an

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>element of national security here on this way. But at

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, you're giving special treatment to

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>stock market, this to the companies, and hey, uh, is

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it any surprise that there was immediate action on the

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>market this week, folks. On those stocks that we're getting

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>government help, I'll name them. So of course it's at

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the margins because they're so big, like BHP or West Farmers,

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Pilbur Minerals will get money. But as you get smaller,

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>linetown Resources, et cetera, as the companies get smaller, they

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>are more directly pumped, if you like, by by this,

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>by this move by the government. Okay, Now I wanted

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>to talk quickly about a couple of things that didn't happen.

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Often in a budget there is news in what didn't happen.

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you remember, at the start of the show,

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we was talking about inflation and we were mentioning how

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the inflation indexing has changed some things already in the budget.

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>For instance, you'll be able to put in thirty thousand

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>pre tax into your super because of inflation, because it's

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>been adjusted up from twenty seven and a half. Now

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing the government, it's entirely random how they index.

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>They can index whatever they want. There's no rules, and

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the index one thing and they don't index the other.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So for instance, there's two interesting things for older Australians.

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Deeming is the mechanics by which you can access the

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>pension or how much you get in the pension. A

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 1>part pension is deeming, and what deeming is is how

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the government makes a deemed assessment of how much you've

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>made on your investments. They apply that and it is

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>then will dictate your access to to to the pension.

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It might reduice it would it would reduce it. For instance,

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the top rates two and a half to the quarter

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>percent to a quarter, yeah, to in a quarter. The

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>bank built cash rate in the r b A is

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>four point three five. This this rate was screaming to

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to be raised. I talked to the Association of Independent

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Retirees Wayne strad Quist on Monday. He said, we have us,

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we have we assume it's going up, and it didn't move.

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>It didn't move. So what does that mean for investors? Well,

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>could you explain why what why it's a curiosity, but

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>also why it's useful in some ways.

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, so it's the government's assumed return on your on

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 2>your investments and you've just talked about Yeah, the resksk

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 2>fray right, So people only need to take into account

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 2>two point twenty five is the deeming as opposed to

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 2>what they're actually returning, so it's got a positive effect

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 2>for so I've heard five hundred thousand pensioners.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so basically you're going to be off on this.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It'll be better off because it was in the natural

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>order of things, it should have gone up and it

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 1>should be considerably higher than that. But they've left it

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>alone for one more year. So keep that in minded

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for older Australians. And similarly, similarly, in a very similar

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of non event that turns out to be news

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>because it didn't happen. The government's reverse mortgage scheme, the

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>wome Ekery Access scheme. The lending rate on that is

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>three point ninety five percent and in the commercial market

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>all the rates are about eight or nine and they

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't move that either. Do you think they just forgot

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to move it?

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Will Well, I just need to remind people that we're

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 2>going to add with the next twelve months as there's

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 2>going to be an election. And I said the two

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand people have been positively acted from the daming rate,

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 2>let alone those that you just mentioned as well.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so look, what can I say, folks, It's there

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to be used. As I say, it's always worth reading

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>budget and budget coverage because opportunities arise right left and center.

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>If I knew across them that there are some of

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the some of the some of the bigger issues in

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the budget in terms of how the government played this.

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 1>But what would you like to have seen? Will? That

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there?

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I suppose the biggest thing is I for me was this.

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the biggest issue out there at a federal

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 2>level is this unrealized capital gains. And I was and

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 2>there were just wasn't a mention of that three million level.

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think when it comes to super was it's

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 2>about what wasn't discussed And as you rightly said, amendments

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 2>and then you put forward in the last twenty four

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 2>hours by the tials.

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>By the tials, Yeah, they're hoping to get amendments. So

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>specifically folks for trying to get in terms of amendments,

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>And as Will says, it's it's important. It's not so

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 1>much that it's a particular tax on super at a

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>particular level. It's the nature of the tax that if

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you start taxing paper gains, where does it stop. How

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.719
<v Speaker 1>would we invest or make any plans long term? This

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is the argument against it. So the two two key amendments,

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as I understand alec Rispender has pushed for em Parliament today,

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is that it is not only on realized gains. And

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the second one is that it's indexed. Because funnily enough,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>as I said, as I said in a minute ago,

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the index whatever they like and it don't index other things,

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and that they plan not to index this new tax.

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>What have you heard of any alternative mechanism that you

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>could introduce this new supertax that doesn't involve on realized gains?

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 2>Will Now, I think that there was well flagged what

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 2>was coming in. And it's amazing how when it was

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 2>brought in the number of our clients that have said, okay,

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 2>we'll accept it. It's only fair, you know, we've had

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 2>it so good for so long. But when the fine

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 2>print was seen it should be a thirty percent above

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>that level on realized gains like it is on everything

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 2>else within in companies, on your own personal taxation, et cetera.

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 2>As anyway, and then to index it. You're right because

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, what's three million? I think Alan chris Bender said,

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 2>what's three million going to be worth in twenty sixty four?

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 2>I think they were the very words.

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Year yes, right, or even five years time. Yeah, sure

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>of course. And the other I suppose absurdity here is

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that the lower band super tax being fifteen percent. Ah,

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not indexed. Is indexed, I'm sorry, it is index

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's just going to swell year and get bigger

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and bigger. So already got from one point six.

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've had a view on this that what's happening

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 2>is they're going to let that just get to the

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 2>three million level and then you're going to have zero

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and thirty.

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Percent, right, yes, I see, and then you'll.

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Then start seeing a being indexed after that. I think

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 2>that's probably what the long term game game is.

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, yeah, yeah, it's a real curiosity. We'll see,

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>as I understand from a parliamentary voting point of view,

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be very hard to stop this, and

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the Senate committee that examined it signed it off unchallenged

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>without any amendments. There is some the teals David Pocock

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>is it's apparently he's important. It's not clear of where

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>he's coming from. It's clear where a legal spender at

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.199
<v Speaker 1>least is coming from, and perhaps some other teals so

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that will play out in the days ahead. Okay, very interesting.

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh anything you think that we didn't cover their will

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>for investors in the budget. I know it was a

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>very technical session, folks, but that's the nature of it.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for small businesses, they get the they're extending the

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty thousand dollars instant right off for small business. Again,

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 2>I think that's important. I didn't expect that, and I thought,

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm pleased to see that they're doing that,

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 2>of course, you know, and so it's up. It's for

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 2>businesses that have a turnover of less than ten million dollars.

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing, which actually I think is fair,

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 2>which was pre announced, and that text relief. So yes,

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>the lower of CPI or what the average average wage increases,

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 2>and I do think that is actually a fair thing

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 2>to do. But again the government's calling this cost of

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 2>reliving relief. Doesn't change what you actually pay you back,

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's not cost a living, it's not cost of

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 2>living relief. It's just that's a matter of fairness.

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the reason I didn't actually even mention

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the heck's there in that list was it's not any

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:58.959
<v Speaker 1>restructuring of hects in any substantial degree. I know we've

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of headlines because it was leaked in advance,

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>but really this is only the smallest variation in how

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you apply indexation. I hope nobody's under the illusion that

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they've made major changes to HEX, because I don't think

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they have. And actually the Minister justin Claire, he said

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>when they announced it's that Sunday afternoon that he said

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>there would be more about HEX coming down the line.

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>But I don't see another thing actually, So it's a folks.

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>All you can say is that you know there'll be

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a slightly fair there'll be a fairer method of indexing

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>HEX for inflation, which should have been there all the time,

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but I would be careful not to say that it's

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>been greatly improved in any fashion. Okay, all right, we'll

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>take a short break. We've got some questions which you

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>do want to deal with. Though it's a special show.

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>People love the questions, so we'll be back to you

0:29:53.920 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. Hello, welcome back to the Australians Money

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Puzzle podcast. I'm James Kirby, the will editor at The Australian,

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and we have been talking about the budget and if

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you are now utterly sort of weighed down and swamped

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>with budget detail, we'll give you some light relief with

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>our weekly segment where we deal with the listeners questions.

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And there's some great questions, so I just want to

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>put them to Will. Ben says in a recent podcast,

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>your guest was looking for government support for people who

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>retired at sixty in the budget. Get me the world's

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>smallest violin, He says, I think the last thing we

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 1>should be doing is incentivizing people to retire at sixty. Well,

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Ben and all the Bens out there, I did make

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the point that the incentives and the budget tend to be,

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, to take up more social welfare, and the

0:30:55.120 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>incentives to invest are missing, and in fact, as Will says,

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>there's active disincentive built into the plans for the new

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>super tax. So thank you for that, Ben. I thing

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to add to that one, Will, it's.

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 2>A brave government that goes out there to increase the

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 2>retirement age, especially in France.

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, absolutely, yes, indeed. Okay, Steve asks, do you

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>want toy? Can you see those questions?

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:28.959
<v Speaker 2>Will would? Yeah? Yeah, So Steve, perhaps the most crucial

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 2>component of anyone's investment strategy is the performance of our

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 2>super fund. Because these funds are so big and so diverse.

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it a situation similar to a broad market ETF

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 2>or managed fund where in a normal year, the best

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 2>result one could hope for would be a return somewhere

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 2>around the return of the market, or would it be

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 2>a fair fair target to aspire to In reviewing one's

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 2>super performance, it's not about just the market, you know,

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 2>the super funds. These super funds invest in inequities, develop

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 2>market equities, emerging market equities, private equity, diversified credit, direct

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 2>property bonds, cash, defensive alternatives. So it's about a blended benchmark,

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 2>so that each one of these asset classes has a

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 2>benchmark or several benchmarket benchmarks within those components, and so

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 2>it's about the blended benchmark all the basket of investments

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 2>that it has.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I suppose also keep an eye on what you know,

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>super big super is achieving. They're doing about eight percent

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a year in recent times. The big funds the best funds,

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and in a way you want to you you would

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>like to see that you match that, and you might

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>allow for some fee difference if you were exclusively in

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>ETFs by that I mean, the ETFs pay charge you lespies,

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's in terms of a target to aspire to

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in reviewing your performance. That's the thanks Steve. And also

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you can also go on my super of course, so

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you can go on the ATO website and see how

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the super funds perform against each other. And though that

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is an exercise which is imperfect, it is marvelous that

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it actually exists. And for many years there was nothing

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>at all to be in a way to compare one

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>super fund to another. So that's very useful, I hope.

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And remember, folks, this is always information. It's not advice,

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's safe to say to someone like

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Steve that you should have been able to measure a

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>super performance or targets quite easily. Now with that, with

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the ability to look at the heat maps, et cetera

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on super and you get the public figures from the

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>big funds, and you get ETF returns quite easily as well.

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, final question from Martin. If you had two

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>options to give five thousand dollars to an eighteen year

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>old living at home and studying, what would be your choice.

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Pay it into HEX or pay it into SUPER or

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that's such a great question, especially that we are all

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>alert to HEX all of a sudden, because well, the

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>average HEX bill is twenty six thousand dollars. The average

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>HEX bill is twenty six thousand dollars, and lots and

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>lots of our listeners would have HEX bills of fifty

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy one hundred thousand dollars. I ask people all the

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>time when I meet them monster hexill, especially younger people,

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's really quite serious what their bills are

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>are becoming. So will million dollar question, what does a

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>person in Martin's position do?

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Normally, I would be saying supers could always put it

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 2>into super IF for the long term. But I think

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that has changed with HEX in

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the last five years or so is this restricts in

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 2>individuals your balance, restricts in individual's ability to borrow.

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, in the bank, at the bank from a mortgage, Yes,

0:34:57.480 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, correct.

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 2>So I I think that's in fairness to the fact

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 2>that this individual is eighteen and the in ten years

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 2>time will definitely want to have purchased a property and

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.879
<v Speaker 2>this is going to have a negative effect on their

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 2>borrowing ability. I think that's something you need to take

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 2>into a camp as well.

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like you go awfully close to saying HEX over

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>super you are. Yeah, yeah, very interesting, and it's a

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 1>killer point, I think folks that will have just made that.

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>People say, oh, it doesn't matter, you know, it's on hex.

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:36.439
<v Speaker 1>It's okay. There's no interest on that. Yeah, yeah, sure,

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 1>but there's an inflation indexing on it. And they say, yeah, yeah,

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's okay. You know, it doesn't really get in

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the way of other things. It does is a success

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>when you go to the bank. Let me tell you

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>something interesting. Well, on the show, I said once or

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>twice Appra demanded the banks include the assessment of HEX

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>your HEX bill in their assessment of your ability to

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>take a home loan. And APRA came on to me

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and said, you have to correct that. It's not true.

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>We expect, we expect the banks, we don't demand the banks.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 1>And I will leave with that our listeners to make

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>this semantic difference there, because it's very important to OPRA,

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, So you know what I'm saying. In any event, folks,

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 1>HEX has become terribly important, So keep an eye on

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it if you can pay it back due. And it's interesting.

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I thought Will's answer very very interesting. Shows that X

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>has become the bills have become bigger and their impact

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>has become wider because they affect your ability to get

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage. If you learned one thing from the show

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>today that would be well worth taking home with you.

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much, Will. Terrific to have you as always

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Budget show. I don't know how many times

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 1>have we done it, three or four or five. Well,

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much and I hope you have me.

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>You'll be with me the next time and terrific as always.

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>That was Will Hamilton of Hamilton Wealth Partners. Okay, folks,

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, I have a shortage of questions.

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I had too many for too long, and now I

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>have the capacity to answer more. Send them in. Surely

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>there's questions on what we just covered the architecture of

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the tax system as we know it from the Budget.

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Here's the email the Money Puzzle at the Australian dot

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:22.879
<v Speaker 1>com dot au. Talk to you soon.