WEBVTT - Read This: John Rebus Will Outlive Ian Rankin

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Hi there, It's Daniel James and I'm back to share

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>another episode of Read This Schwartz Meetia's weekly books podcast.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Hosted by editor of the Monthly Michael Williams. It features

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>conversations with some of the most talented writers from Australia

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and around the world. This week, Michael is chatting with

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>best selling crime writer Ian Rankin. As always, Michael is

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>here to tell us a little bit more about the episode.

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 2>Hi Michael, Daniel James.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello, So Michael, today's guest is one of the most

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>well regarded crime fiction writers in the world, and you

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>were lucky enough to chat with him at the Sydney

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Writers Festival.

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Before we talk.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>About Ian Rankin, can you share a little bit about

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>when your love for a good crime novel began.

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've always been a crime fiction tragic. I think

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 2>when I was a teenager and us first learning to read,

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I was reading kind of classics that were foisted upon

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>me and ran out of age appropriate stuff pretty quickly,

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>and then got onto Agatha Christie or the Sherlock Holmes

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 2>books and found myself completely hooked. So those earliest ones

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 2>were definitely in that puzzle box tradition. The mystery that

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 2>is resolved at the end and you get the twist

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 2>or you get the reveal. And that was a lot

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 2>of fun. But the more I read, the more the

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 2>capaciousness of the crime novel struck me. So that it

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>could be like an English country town cozy, or it

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 2>could be a hard boiled el a noir, and the

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 2>contrast between them. You know, you could go Raymond Chandler

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 2>on the one hand, or you could go PD James

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>or Ruth Rendell on the other, and so that mix

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 2>really appeal. The other thing that was great is if

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>you found a crime writer you liked, there was generally

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 2>a reasonable chance that there was a dozen books in

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 2>their backlist and a kind of new book each year

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>by them that could keep you going. So for a

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 2>voracious reader, it was this wonderful promise that not only

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 2>was it a world that you liked, but it was

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>one that you could return to again and again and again.

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 2>And amongst those there were a couple in particular that

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 2>really grabbed me. One was a British writer called Reginald

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Hill who wrote these procedurals set in Yorkshire that were

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 2>really great. But the other one that I really loved

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 2>was Ian Rankin.

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>And Rekon has become a household name now, isn't he.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I believe he's especially well known for his

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>character Detective John Reebis, who features him more than twenty

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of his novels. What happens in this latest one?

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. One of the things Rankin often reflects on was

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 2>that it took him seven books to become an overnight success.

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, once your series is in the kind of

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty odd book territory, you know that it's just going

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 2>and going and going. There was a point at which

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to get this slightly wrong, but there's a

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 2>point of which I think eight of the ten books

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>on the bestseller list in the Scottish Times were by

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 2>arn Rankin, and I think it was like something insane

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>like ten percent of all crime fiction being sold in

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 2>the UK was by him. You know, he's a phenomenon.

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>He sold forty million books to date, He's been translated

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 2>into thirty seven languages. He's got a knighthood. He's Ian

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Rankin now, and this newest book is the twenty fifth

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 2>in the series. Well, Midnight in Blue and John ReBs,

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the last book was arrested. He's

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 2>in jail and he's been called on to assist in

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:11.119
<v Speaker 2>solving the ultimate crime novel scenario, the Locked Room Mystery.

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty great and it's just very nice to know

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 2>that John Reavers is not done yet. And just quickly

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 2>before we get to Sir ar Ragan and John Reebs

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and all things crime and wonder, I did want to say,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Daniel to anyone who's enjoyed listening to read this in

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 2>their seven am feed, We're coming to an end. It's

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 2>tumultuous times, but I read this will no longer be

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 2>happening with Schwartz Media. There is a chance it will return,

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 2>and so I would encourage you, if you'd enjoyed listening

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 2>to it in seven Am, subscribe to the read this

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>feed separately. That's where you'll find that if it's going

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>to come back to life in the weeks and months ahead.

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Coming up in just a moment, John Reebis will outlive

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in Raken.

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I was lucky enough to sit down with Rankin Sorry

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>sir Ian at this year's Sydney Writer's Festival just a

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks ago. I have to say I came

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>to Midnight and Blue and my first thought was that

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the title immediately evoked for me the eighth book in

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 2>the Rebis series, Black and Blue. An extraordinary book, but

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 2>a book where Rebus was laid as low, really as

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 2>you'd cast him at any point, and it was the

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 2>first in a sequence in several books where every time

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>you thought he couldn't go lower, you really did give

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 2>him another kicking. So, knowing that he was in prison

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 2>in Midnight and Blue, seeing this residence in the title,

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I assumed to find a broken man, and instead Rebus

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>is almost as jaunty as we've seen him for years.

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 2>The man's enjoying prison? Is he in?

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if he's enjoying prison. I think the structure.

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 3>He likes his life to have a structure. And when

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>he had to leave the police force because he was

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 3>of an age where he had to go, suddenly his

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 3>life hud no structure, and he still felt he ought

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 3>to be useful. Did he still have a purpose in

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the world? Could he still be useful in prison? He

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 3>has a purpose. His purpose is to avoid being murdered

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 3>by the many bad men in there who don't like

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 3>the fact that a cop is in jail with them.

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 3>And then he's given another purpose, which is there is

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 3>a lot to sell mystery. Someone has been killed in

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 3>a cell, and he is best placed to solve this

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 3>before the prison explodes, because the cons all think it

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 3>must be a warder. Warder, I'll think it must be

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:30.119
<v Speaker 3>a con. So they're getting ready to clash and into

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 3>this kind of powder keg you throw Rabus, so suddenly

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 3>he's up in fun while also watching his front on

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>his back for people about to stab him or throttle

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 3>him or kill him. And it was the one thing

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 3>that you know, I do a lot of research. I

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 3>don't do a lot of research. I do enough research

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 3>that I can persuade the reader. I do a lot

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 3>of research. But a friend of mine's a photographer. He

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 3>knew the governor in Edinburgh Prison, who thankfully, as it

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 3>turns out, was about to retire, so he was much

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 3>more open and receptive to my questions and might otherwise

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 3>be the case. And he took me around the prison

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 3>and showed me and everything else. But the first thing

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 3>he said was Rebus wouldn't come here. There's no way

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 3>you would take an ex Edinburgh cop and put him

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 3>in the Edinburgh prison because he would be surrounded by

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 3>people he would know who would want ill done to him.

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 3>So I said, well, I don't want him to be

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 3>anywhere else. He's got to come here. So we discussed

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 3>that for a while and we found a way. He said,

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 3>well he would come into the Kindese segregation wing, and

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>I went, okay, that's good. And then I found a

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 3>way to get him from the segregation went into the

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 3>general population, and I was happy. And when the governor

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 3>eventually read the book, it was a couple of tiny

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.799
<v Speaker 3>things he thought I'd got wrong, But there was nothing

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 3>major that you thought I'd got wrong.

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 2>You did set yourself in this book, and it's the

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.559
<v Speaker 2>nature of crime in a prison, but you set yourself

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the crime writer's greatest challenge, which is the locker room mystery.

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Not only do you have this kind of pressure cooker environment,

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 2>but you actually have somewhat unusually for one of your

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Rabis books, a puzzle box element to it as well.

0:06:57.880 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Was a fun putting that together.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 3>Okay, first thing that happened was the previous book, Heartfully Headstones,

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 3>I thought was the last book. Now I've thought this before,

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 3>but I thought this is a last book. He's on trial,

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 3>he's in the dock, sentences about to be pronounced the end.

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 3>It's a lovely riking back falls moment. And of course

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 3>I will only ever be the second best crime writer

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 3>to come out of Edinburgh because Conan Doyle was born

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 3>and brought up in Edinburgh. So I thought it's a

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 3>lovely thing to end the Rebis series with a raking

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>back falls. But then people start to say, well, what

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 3>happened next? And I started to think, what would happen next?

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 3>He would be found guilty. If he's found guilty, he's

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 3>going to go to prison. That's interesting that immediately you've

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 3>got tension and drama, and it's a new setting. It's

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 3>a new challenge for me. It's a new setting for

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Reebis and a new set of challenges for me. This guy,

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 3>who's in his seventies with health issues is going to

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>go to an alien environment, and in that alien environment,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 3>I can have a discussion with him about good and evil,

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>because Reebis in the earlier books especially thought they were

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 3>just these polarized things that were good and evil. If

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 3>you were a bad person, you were irredeemably a bad person.

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 3>In jail, some of the prisoners say to him, what

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 3>do you think you're here now? Are we really the

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 3>monsters you thought we were when you put us in here.

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 3>So that was great to be able to have that

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 3>discussion with him and possibly change his mind. So all

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 3>that was going on, and then I thought, well, what's

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 3>he going to do in prison? He's going to have

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 3>to solve a murder. And then because people are locked

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 3>up for large parts of the day, I thought, Okay,

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm murdering a lot sell. How is it possible? I

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 3>have no idea who did it? I don't know, but

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 3>let's start and see. So when I started the book,

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 3>I had no idea how this would happen. I had

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 3>a vague idea because I've been given a tour of

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 3>the cells, so I knew certain things about the layout

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 3>of the cells and how certain things it happened.

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Can I ask, just on the topic of not knowing

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>when you started, is it true that when you were

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 2>was it Hanging Garden, you finished your first draft and

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 2>you still hadn't worked out who the killer was?

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I mean this is often roughly the case. I'll

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 3>be typing away and I'll put a nice, big capitalized

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>note to myself, fix this letter, you know, And towards

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 3>the end of the first draft of the Hanging Garden.

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 3>I still didn't know who the killer was. And then

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 3>I read the first draft. I sat and read it

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 3>through and went, oh, hang on a minute, it must

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 3>be you. So it was really this the beginning of

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 3>the it was the second draft.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm fascinated by that. I'm in a book like The

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Hanging Garden where the themes and the crime are so

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 2>deeply embedded in each other. You know, the ideas as

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 2>you say that question about good and evil that permeates

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 2>the series, those kind of binaries of the different sides

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 2>of not just Rabist, but of all the characters in

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>the crime. It seems remarkable to me that it's almost

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 2>incidental who's responsible for the inciding incident.

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's incidental. I think you've got a

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 3>range of possible suspects and motives, and I wait for

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 3>the book to tell me which one is most relevant

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 3>or is going to be most surprising to the reader

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 3>while still being credible. Yeah, I do trust to that.

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like the story is up there, swirling around,

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 3>and it descends and decides I'm the person to write

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 3>this story down and tell this story, and it will

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 3>tell me where to go. And almost always if I've

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 3>got a fixed idea of where a book should go,

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the novel says differently. The novel says no, no, no.

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 3>There was a what was let me think what was it?

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 3>It was set in darkness, was going to be the

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 3>first book of a trilogy within the series, and it

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 3>would look at the formation of the Scottish Parliament. So

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 3>in book one there would be a guy who is

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 3>running to be a member of Parliament in the new

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Scottish Parliament. In book two, the parliament is up and running.

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>In book three the new building is complete and everything

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 3>in there. So this character would be in all three books.

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.839
<v Speaker 3>He was dead by page fifty, and I didn't want

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that to happen. This was going to be a trilogy

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 3>with this guy in it. But the book just said,

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 3>this guy is extraneous, you know. And so I went, well,

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I've got yet another body, and I don't know who

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 3>did it, you know. So I'll wait and hope that

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 3>the book will tell me. And every time I've gone

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 3>along with the book's idea of what is going to

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 3>make a more interesting story or a meteor story, the

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 3>book has been correct.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Has that always been approached to writing, or is that

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 2>a trust in process that comes only with time and

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 2>success and saying that it works for you.

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, I've tried teaching creative writing and

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it can be done. I mean, I

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>think you can make a good writer better, but I

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 3>don't think you can turn someone into a writer. I

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 3>just I've always you know, I've always written, ever since

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 3>I was a little kid. I've written stories and made

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 3>stuff up for my own satisfaction and without thinking too

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 3>hard about the craft that comes later on. You know,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 3>the second and third draft is when you try and

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 3>make elegant sentences, and you try and add some flesh

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 3>to the bones of the characters and solidify the theme

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>that you're trying to explore in the book. But the

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 3>first draft is a ragged beast, very much so, which

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 3>is why nobody sees it except me. And that's always

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 3>worked for me. That has always worked. I know other

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 3>writers do it. I mean what my near neighbor as

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 3>was in Edinburgh until I moved because I couldn't take

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the competition. Alexander McCall smith only writes one draft. That's it.

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not allowed to be edited, and it's you know,

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 3>and he writes quick as well, and yet somehow it works.

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 3>So everybody's different. But I found a way that worked

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 3>for me quite early on, and I've stuck to it.

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>I have to digress briefly. Your former neighbor alex Anna

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 2>McCall smith wrote you into one of his books, So

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>you're going to get revenge? Yeah, have him appeard.

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 3>He's actually written me into more than one. He's sitting

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.719
<v Speaker 3>in my hot tub in Edinburgh when I used to

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 3>have a hot tub. He had me getting hit by

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 3>an arrow that was fired from some archers and the meadows.

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 3>He had my books appear in the wind of a

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 3>second hand bookshop. He's and every time he does it,

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 3>I see revenge. Sandy is a dish served very cold.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 2>I look forward to that. I'm surprised in prison.

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Nemesis is coming. Shit, I should have done that.

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the idea of the moment before this book

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 2>being one of many possible finishing points for Reebis and

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the Rackenbach Falls idea, and one of the things that

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 2>made that seem possible at the end of the last

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 2>book was the death of Big jer Cafferty. And I'm

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 2>sorry that's a spoiler for anyone who hasn't read it,

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 2>but it's a book ago, it's time to catch up.

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 2>But you know, Cafferty was such a key figure since

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 2>he first appeared, I think in the fourth book in

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the series, and had only grown in stature, only grown

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 2>as a kind of counterweight and almost close to Rebus's

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of significant other by these later books. How hard

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 2>was it to let him go?

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you're correct. Cafferty first appears in book three as

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 3>a very minor character. I needed Rebis to be in

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Glasgow to find a clue. Why was he in Glasgow?

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 3>He's giving evidence in a court case. Who's he giving

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 3>evidence against a Glasgow gangster? In book three, Cafferty is

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 3>a Glasgow gangster, and he kind of got under my

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 3>skin and I thought, oh, he's a useful can as

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 3>you say, a useful sort of almost like kenan Abel

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 3>or Jacqueline Hyde, or he's the devil tempting Reebis to

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 3>come to the dark side.

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Nolan Laam, Yeah, Nolan layam.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 3>It were which one is, which we'll discuss later on.

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 3>And so I brought him back after a few books,

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 3>but I'd forgotten he was a Glasgow gangster. So he

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 3>actually has two completely different life stories. In book three

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 3>he grew up in Glasgow. By book seven or eight

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 3>he grew up in Edinburgh and as an Edinburgh gangster.

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 3>This is how much research I do before I write

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 3>the books. But he was very useful to me. Is

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 3>that sort of devil whispering in Reebus's ear. And also

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 3>they're from very similar backgrounds. They understand each other very well.

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Either one of them their life could have gone in

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 3>a different way that would have made them more like

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 3>the other. So all of that has going on with them,

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 3>and he represents all the bad stuff. Cafferty can represent

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 3>all the bad stuff that's happening in Edinburgh, in Scotland

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 3>and the world. But Reebus and he have this empathy.

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 3>They understand each other so well that you're never sure

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 3>if they're going to end up being best friends or

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 3>destroy each other throughout the series. And to answer your question, eventually,

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 3>when I handed the manuscript over to my agent of

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Heartfully heads Owes, Cafferty survived, He didn't die, and it

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 3>was my agent who said, I think it's time. He said,

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 3>go back and look at that final scene. I think

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 3>he dies. And I went back and looked at it

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 3>and went it's a big deal. But okay, So for

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 3>the first time in my life, I took my agent's

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 3>advice and it was traumatic. And the nice thing about

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 3>putting Rebis in prison in this new book is we

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 3>don't have to dwell on the aftermath of it too much.

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 3>There's too much other stuff going on that Rebis isn't

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 3>sitting in his flat at dead of night thinking too

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 3>much about Cafferty. That is for possibly a future book.

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Coming up after the Break and Chees, the genesis of

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 2>his lead Detective's nine, and why he never tires of

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 2>writing about Edinburgh.

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back.

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Ian Rankin had never planned to become a crime writer.

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Back in nineteen eighty seven. He was a young Muriel Sparks,

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 2>scholar of all things, and very earnestly trying to rewrite

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Robert Louis Stevenson to have his own go a Doctor

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Jekyl and Mister Hyde. Despite the fact that this first novel,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Knots and Crosses made relatively little waves at the time,

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the Crime Writers' Association wrote to Ann and asked him

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 2>to join, and he noticed increasingly as he went into

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>bookshops in Edinburgh. His debut novel wasn't on the shelf

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 2>in the Scottish literature section, despite his deepest hopes. Instead

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 2>it sat in the crime section, beside Ruth Rendell and P. D. James.

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 2>And that was the moment that Ann thought he'd better

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 2>start reading this stuff.

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm still the only crime writer I know

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 3>who wasn't a fan of the genre before they started

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 3>writing it. I had the only crime novel I remember

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 3>reading I was maybe twelve or thirteen, was Shaft, and

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 3>I only read it because I wasn't all enough to

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 3>see the movie.

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Is he John raebis because of John Shaft?

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, John Shaft. John riebis definitely, and Riebus because

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 3>of Riebus is a picture puzzle. It's a little series

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 3>of drawings with letters taken away or added. So, for example,

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 3>if you had a drawing of an ear and above

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 3>it was the E with a line through it, that

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 3>meant all you wanted was a R. And then someone

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 3>rowing a boat row that gives you r RO and

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 3>you went on from there. So when he was getting

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 3>sent these little picture puzzles in book one, I thought,

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 3>being an English literature student studying semiotics and deconstruction, I'll

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 3>give him a name that means puzzle.

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 2>So if you started the series now, he could be

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 2>called John Sadoka.

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well John Tetris.

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it doesn't have a ring to it. I've got

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 2>to be and.

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I've told this story before, but I

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 3>love it. I mean, having invented that name, I then

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 3>spent years explaining to people because it's not a Scottish name,

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 3>how I came up with it. We had spent ten

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 3>years away from Edinburgh. My wife and I lived in London,

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 3>then lived in France, went back and I met a

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 3>second hand bookseller and he said, oh, come and have

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a drink with me and my mates on Friday night.

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 3>So I went to this pub and his mates included

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.479
<v Speaker 3>an ex police officer and a guy called Joe Riebis

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 3>And I said to him, really, and he pronounced it

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Rebus and he said, it's a Polish surname. So from

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 3>that book eleven or twelve on, I suddenly mentioned Riebus,

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 3>halving Polish roots. I didn't know until then.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 2>There's that research again.

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And Joe said to me, he said, I thought

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 3>you got my name from the phone directory And I said, no,

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 3>I didn't think of Riebus was even a real name.

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 3>So he got the telephone directory from the barman and

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 3>we went through the Edinburgh phone directory. Rebus j for Joe,

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 3>his address genuinely rank and drive.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Good, serendipitous.

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 3>You could not make that up. You couldn't make it up.

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 2>That is wildly good. It does strike mean. You mentioned

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 2>that it was about a decade that you and your

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 2>wife lived out of Scotland, and that decade the overlay

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 2>is best. I understand that. I think some of those books,

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 2>the portrait of Edinburgh in particular, is particularly acute, and

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious about the difference for you of writing about

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 2>it as a place from a distance as opposed to

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 2>writing about it when you were there.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. The very first Rebus book, nottson Crosses, was written

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 3>in Edinburgh in the National Library of Scotland while I

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 3>was supposedly doing a PhD on Murial Spark. Then we

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 3>moved to London because the money ran out for the PhD,

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 3>and my wife got a job in London as a

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 3>civil servant, so she supported me while I tried to

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 3>write books two, three and four. And that's why book

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 3>three is set in.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 2>London and Rabis hates it.

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, I thought, I'm hating it here, I'll channel

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 3>that hate to him and he can load on my behalf.

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 3>And then we moved to France and we were there

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 3>for six years. So quite a lot of the books

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 3>were written in this French farmhouse, and yeah, it was

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Edinburgh then became a city of the imagination. I couldn't

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 3>just walk out my front door and do the research.

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 3>I didn't remember remembering stuff, and I would go back.

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 3>I'd go back to Scotland once or twice a year

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 3>and do the research, look at places and make sure

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 3>I'd described them properly. But it was useful, I think

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 3>to that distance. When I got worried was when we

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 3>were moving back. You know, haven't been away for ten years.

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 3>A though, if I go back to Edinburgh, can I

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 3>still write about the place or will it be more

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 3>like journalism or reportage? Can I write about it imaginatively

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 3>when I'm living there? And I think the first book

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 3>I wrote when I got back was the one to

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Hanging Garden, which was partly setting well had the story

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 3>behind it was a story of something that happened in

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 3>or a door in France during World War Two, a

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 3>place near where we lived. So I was kind of

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 3>reaching back to France in a way in that book,

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 3>as well as making sure that I was it was

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 3>an Edinburgh book. I don't know how important it is

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 3>to be living in Edinburgh and writing about Edinburgh. It's

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 3>such an interesting city to me. It's a it's so

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 3>much bigger on the inside than it is on the outside.

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 3>You can walk around it in a day, as you know,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 3>you can walk around it in a day, but you

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 3>could spend your whole life trying to understand it.

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't in one of your books that I read the

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 2>phrase that Edinburgh was.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 3>All for name for no nickers. That's I mean, that's

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 3>a that's a yeah, that's a that's a Glasgow saying

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 3>about Edinburgh. It's all for coton no nickers, or is

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 3>one historian of Edinburgh put it as a place of

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 3>public probity and private vice, which brings us back to

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Jack l and Hyde again. So anyway, so that was

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 3>what I thought I was doing with the book, was

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 3>trying to do this sort of social history of Edinburgh

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 3>and at the same time take on some pretty pretty big,

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 3>hopefully I thought, pretty big questions about good and evil,

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 3>and a detective is a perfect means of investigating the

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 3>city from top to bomb.

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, your detective can be in a politician's house one

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 2>minute and a commission flats the next.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. I mean a journalist can do that. But

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 3>a journalist you can see no.

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 2>To them, and you tend to kill off your journalists.

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 3>I do. Yeah, Wow, I don't always kill off my journalists.

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 3>But you're right, You're right they have. Yeah. One of

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 3>the many Earily books didn't last too long, did they?

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Coming back again to that idea of public probity private

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 2>vice is by setting the books around a police officer

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 2>and around the system, you get to tell a pretty

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 2>comprehensive story about the failures of that system, the ways

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 2>in which it's corrupted or perverted or doesn't do what

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 2>it professes to do. Has your attitude to law enforcement

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 2>a crime to those kind of stories shifted in there

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>now almost.

0:23:55.200 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Forty years Yeah, I mean, I think crime in general. Now,

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 3>if you're writing about a police officer, you're very conscious

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 3>of the fact that the public don't necessarily see them

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 3>as the Clint Eastwood figure riding into a lawless place

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 3>and bringing order from chaos. You know, the public general

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 3>public see them as being conflicted corrupted, covering up for

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 3>one another being part of the problem, and a lot

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 3>of younger crime writers are not using cops as their heroes,

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 3>and those of us who still do use cops as

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 3>our heroes, like Michael Connolly and me, are very conscious

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 3>we write about corruption. And the previous Reabis book was

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.959
<v Speaker 3>about bad things he had done in his younger days

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 3>as part of this kind of group of police officers

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 3>and had got away with because in the past you

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 3>could get away with stuff that you couldn't get away

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 3>with today because of the technology and the surveillance and

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 3>the mobile phones and the cameras and everything else. The

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 3>stuff you could get away with in the past, and

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 3>you know would he feels bad about it. I think

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Reabis does feel guilty about the fact that he didn't

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 3>always use the correct legal procedures to get a result,

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 3>but he feels he did usually get the right person.

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 3>He usually put manage to put someone away for something.

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 3>But he feels bad about that. But that is something

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 3>I think the people who write about police officers have

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 3>really taken on board.

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Policing keeps changing. I mean, it really annoys me how

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 3>much the nomenclature changes. So Malcolm Fox when we first

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 3>met him was working for Complaints and conduct. That was

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 3>what internal affairs was called. Then it changed it morphedin

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 3>is something else, I think maybe even internal affairs. Then

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 3>it morphedin, it is something else, and now it's something

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 3>else again. So in this new book, when Riebis is

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 3>talking to him, he said, so what you call this week?

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 3>You know? And I've got to keep on top of

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 3>that because the people who read my books know that

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 3>these things are policing is changing.

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 2>It's time the Joe Rabis story. You just write what

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 2>you like and it'll come true.

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that has happened in the past that I've written about,

0:25:58.560 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 3>something that has come true.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Weirdly, I'm glad you mentioned Malcolm Fox because he is

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>a kind of embodiment of that idea of working within

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the system or not. And you introduced him in the

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Complaints after the first time you attempted to finish writing

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 2>about Rebus unsuccessfully, and it seems to me that you

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 2>set him up, introduced him a potential new protagonist, and

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 2>either you wound up not liking Malcolm very much, or

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 2>the ribus in you just couldn't help yourself. And so

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm moved pretty quickly from a potential new protagonist to

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 2>an antagonist. And I'm curious about how deliberate that was.

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I you know, haven't decided that Rebus would have

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 3>to retire. My wife said, great, you've got freedom not

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 3>to write any Kenny book you want to rate. What

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 3>do you want to write about? I said, what a

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 3>rate book? Cops? So I'm going to have another cop,

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 3>but I don't want anybody to think they're getting Rebus

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 3>two point zero or Ribus Light. He's got to be

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 3>a very different kind of cop from Rebus. So internal Affairs.

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 3>I thought that's interesting, because the kind of cop who

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 3>makes a good internal affairs detective is the antithesis of Rebus.

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 3>So Malcolm Fox came along. Now the problem is, if

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 3>you are working that job, you've got to be cleaner

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 3>than clean, whiter than white, never cross the line. Boring, right,

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 3>fairly boring. So book two he's trying to be a maverick,

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 3>but he's not very good at it. And then I

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 3>got an idea for a cold case novel. And there

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 3>was a unit in Edinburgh staff by retired detectives that

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 3>investigated cold cases, and I thought, oh, that's what Rebus

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 3>is doing. He would not go gentle into that good night.

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 3>He would not retire from the police and open a

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 3>bar or a bed and breakfast or move to Marbea.

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 3>He would want to still feel like a detective. So

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 3>I brought him back for standing in another man's grave.

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 3>And then I thought, the one person who wouldn't want

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 3>to see Rebus back on the force is Malcolm Fox.

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 3>So Fox did go from being protagonist to antagonist because

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 3>suddenly it was Reebus's story. And the more that I

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 3>continue to write about Raebus, the more Fox became the antagonist.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 3>And that was an interesting turnaround. He's tried several times

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 3>to be a man of action, to be a frontline

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 3>police officer, and he's not very good at it. He's

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 3>a yes man, a toady, a pen pusher. He's a

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 3>very good administrator. But the fact that he always tries

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 3>to be a man of action becomes kind of hilarious

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 3>to me. He's just not very good at it.

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Just but that I would rate a series about Rabis

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 2>managing a bid and breakfast and handling Alexander McCole smith

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 2>as a guest.

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Now now you're talking maybe a short story I could

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 3>get a short story of that.

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a whole thing now.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 3>I keep thinking, you know, the ribis now in his dotage.

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 3>All I can do really is hand him over to

0:28:55.520 --> 0:29:00.719
<v Speaker 3>Richard Osman, who you know, to just say move him

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 3>into your care home. Richard, does you know you've got

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 3>an ex spy, You've got this, You've got that, have

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 3>an ex cop.

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 2>So you've been living with John Rabis for almost forty

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 2>years now, more than once you've tried to shake him

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 2>off or you've tried to move on, but it's proved

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 2>very difficult. I think we can see how he's changed

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 2>in the pages over the years. How has writing him

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 2>changed you?

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's I mean he's made me a good living,

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 3>which is amazing to me. I've known him longer than

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I've known most of my friends. He lives inside my head.

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 3>He's in a little compartment there, and every now and

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 3>again he pops out of a conversation with me and

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 3>we have a conversation about the way the world is.

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 3>He's gone through because he's older than me, he's going

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 3>through all the eggs and pains that I will have

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 3>to go through eventually, and so that's been interesting for

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 3>me as I've aged, he's aged as well. Do I

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 3>like him? I think I like him better than he

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 3>would like me. I think he would find me pretty

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 3>boring and wishy washy. He likes a challenge, and I

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 3>don't think I would present him with any sort of

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 3>a challenge. But the world has moved on and cops

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 3>like Riebis don't exist anymore. There's no room for them

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 3>in the modern world. Maybe there shouldn't have been room

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>for them in the first instance, but I've enjoyed it.

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, who knows what would have happened if I'd

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 3>let him. You know, the first draft of the first novel,

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 3>he died. He was shot and killed at the end

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 3>of the first book, and for some reason I brought

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 3>him back in the second draft. He survived. You know what,

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 3>He's going to survive longer than me. You know, when

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 3>I shuffle off this mortal coil, when there's nothing of

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 3>me left in secondhand bookshops around the globe, there will

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 3>charity shops. There will still be John Raebis.

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Ian Rangan's latest novel, Midnight and Blow, is available everywhere now.

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for this to another special episode of

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Read This. As always, if you want to dive further

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>into the show, you can search for it wherever you

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts. There are more than ninety episodes in

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the Read this archive for you to enjoy. See you

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>next week.