WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 30 May

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>From the Skyinging Center. This is Paul Murray Life. Hello mate,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a big Thursday night together. Thank you very

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>much for watching us. So your rights, you would think

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that there was a right to free speech, a right

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to relate all of these things, but of course in

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Australia we don't have a bill of rights. Now. One

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of the problems with writing a bill of rights is,

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>as we see in places of the United States, what

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>might be okay a couple hundred years ago, like a

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>right to own a gun, when a gun wasn't a

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>machine gun becomes a machine gun. So the people who

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>put Ustradia together never believed that we should have a

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>bill of rights. But we assume that we have things

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>like that right to free speech. Where the reality is

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is that there's no piece of paper anywhere that actually

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>gives us that legal protection. It is assumed. It has

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>been sort of fiddled with by courts over the years.

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But as we saw during COVID, if a government wants

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to turn around and start to change what you can say,

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>there's no thing in the constitution that fights back against

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it like it would be in the United States. So

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, our freedom of speech is in the

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>hands of the people that we elect. And today there

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>was a group of people who wanted to make a

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of changes to the laws and Australia in

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and around human rights. Now, interestingly, this was a cross

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>party that mainly lefties group of people who got together

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and among other things, have demanded all sorts of things

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>like right to education and right to housing. And that

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>was written up in all the lefty press today that

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the inquiry had asked for rights like a right to privacy,

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a right to health, environment, a right to social and

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>economic rights like adequate housing, a right to education, a

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>right to hold an express one's religion. Now, we can

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have a very long chat all night about how much,

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>what and where, but at least there is an acknowledgment

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>here that there are people who believe that laws need

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to be changed to tighten up what are your rights

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to make them clearer now, particularly things like the environment

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is something that's a collection of school kids have been

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to take to courts, and courts have often ruled well,

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing in the law that says that there is

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>part of the duty of care of a government when

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it's looking at something like a coal mine is its

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>effect on the environment when it pretends to future generations.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.119
<v Speaker 1>So they're coming at this from a very lefty perspective.

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>But here is what Josh Burns, who is the chair

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of the committee, the Labour Party representative, a bloke who's

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>apparently on his way to the ministry, should they ever

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>do a reshuffle sometime soon about the ideas behind more

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>rights for Australians or seen royal commissions where frankly, human

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>rights have been disregarded and the human rights are vulnerable

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>as aliens have been disregarded by decision makers in this country.

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>We need better protections for.

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 2>That, we need better training, and we need to ensure

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 2>that we are monitoring human rights as well.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, in amongst all of those other things that they

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>want to include into laws, forcing governments to take those

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>rules into consideration as they make other decisions, let's get

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>back to where we started free speech. Now. Interestingly, in

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the pages and pages and pages of the report and

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the pages and pages and pages of recommendations, there's nothing

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>about a want to strengthen the right to free speech

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and expression. As Josh Burns just said there that over

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the past recent years, many people's rights have been infringed

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>upon Well, is there no greater example of that than

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the lady who was arrested for posting something on the

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>internet that was not violent, that was not racist, it

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>just was not to the government's liking when it came

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to protest against the decisions of the government. Nothing in

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this Instead, the closest you can see is in and

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>around protests, because the left believe that, particularly in places

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>like New South Wales, the rules against protest like you

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>have to ask for permission first, and if you break

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the agreement that you have with the police then they

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>can therefore shut down the protest. All of that is

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>an infringing of rights. Of course, nobody cared when it

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>was the COVID rights. But what we are seeing here

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>is a very interesting conversation that normally the center and

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the center right should be in favor of anything that

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>strengthens your rights. But interestingly, it is the center left

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and far left that of course are in control of

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Parliament at the moment, and will have even

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>greater control after the next election if most likely the

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>government goes into minority, and they don't see freedom of

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>speech as something that needs to be strengthened now this

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>will not be on the front page of the paper tomorrow.

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>It didn't lead the six pm Yews tonight. But right

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>now we're in the middle of conversations about censoring the Internet,

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 1>about what the government declares to be misinformation. That is

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a very big step from a country that has freedom

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of speech. Now. Again, while I am somebody who is

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a little more on the libertarian side of freedom of

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>speech and generally speaking, you know, I'm not quite the

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>full absolutist, I do think there are plenty of times

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>when people's people who go too far should feel a

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>sanction for it. And generally speaking, I think that when

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you say something well, you can't expect there will be

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>no reaction to it, and people reacting to it and debating.

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a good and open society. Do I think that

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>hate preachers should be able to say the horrific things

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that they do without any national security implications, No, of

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>course not. Do I think that people should be able

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to abuse Jews in Australia because of the decisions of

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a government is of course not right. So there are limits.

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>And I understand what defamation means, and I understand what

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>discrimination means, and I understand all of those necessary things

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that yes, probably do hem us in a little bit

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>more than the right to free speech in the United States.

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>That means you can say whatever you want at any time,

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, and it'll be protected by the law. But

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>all of this effort, all of this study, all of

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this discussion, all of this power, and none of it

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>includes your rights to speech, your rights to express your

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 1>own opinion that may well be contrary to what the

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>government believes is the truth of the day. We're seeing

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>on multiple fronts, from the misinformation to this scenario, through

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to crackdowns on violent content put up by social media.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But slowly but surely, there are lots of attacks coming

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>towards your ability to say what the government doesn't want

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 1>you to say. Every now and then, someone needs to

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>point out what is happening, because the reality is that

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the Parliament as it is constituted right now, and the

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>assumption of the people who are in our parliament right now,

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't matter. You don't matter because their coalition of

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the left and far left gives them passage through the

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>lower House and passage through the Upper House. Yet you

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>should know what's going on. You should contact your local

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>politician to see if they understand what's going on, and

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the people who were in part behind this report should

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>come onto a program like this and explain to us

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>why speech wasn't one of the things that they thought

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>had been eroded over the past few years. Now, what

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are coincidents? I mean, just a few little coincidences happen,

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And of course you know, nobody believes in conspiracy theories here,

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know, amazing what happens just at the same

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.559
<v Speaker 1>time right now. Of course, a few weeks ago, Channel

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Line breaks the story about the Australian chopper that was

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>interfered with by China. If it was not for the pilot,

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>potentially they could have crashed into the ocean and died.

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>The reporting at the time from Channel nine was pretty

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>clear that Australia had responded to this. Richard Marles says

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Australia has formally registered its deep concern about the incident,

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>telling Beijing it's completely unacceptable and the Prime Minister said

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>this That clearly left the impression with the Australian people

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that everything had been done to voice displeasure at a

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>potentially deadly incident. Not the first, by the way, we have.

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Made very strong representations at every level to China about

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 3>this incident, which we regard as unprofessional and unacceptable.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>At every level we we, of course includes he that

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>being the Prime Minister. But whatever, that's details because as

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we told you last night, Senate estimates and god love

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>sen it estimates for being able to get into some

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>details here, they showed that officials admitted no phone call

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>between the Prime Minister and the President, the Prime Minister

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Premier, the Defense Minister and the Defense Minister,

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>no phone callse whatsoever. Instead, some of the things that

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>we said, including press conferences at Beefweek, were counted as

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>voicing displeasure with China. Well, as we told you that

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>story last night, it started to build a little bit

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of attention. I got plenty of messages from people in

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the media going really, okay, can you send me this

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and that details? Right? And generally speaking, that's the beginning

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of something becoming an issue tomorrow. But guess what magically

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>happened today a biggest story for the media that they

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>decided to of course report from the government's perspective, which

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>was a win for the Albenezy government because of its

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>new relationship with China. The tara On beef are to

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>be removed in the next little while, made it all

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the way to CNN. But just isn't that convenient that

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>less than twenty four hours after Australia lying about confronting China,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>China turns around and does a favor for the Australian government,

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>who of course did a favor for China, but not

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>really blowing up at all about a scenario involving our

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>defense force that could have killed the people on that helicopter.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what is nothing to see here? Oh yeah. Also,

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it was a story that covered over something that happened

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>this week which does have serious implications for the electoral

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>fortunes of the Abernese government. Not in New Town, not

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in Marrickville, nowhere in the Yarra Council, but it does

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in Western Australia the live sheep exporting industry. Remember the

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>government a few weeks ago said that they were going

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to start to come up with the system to turn

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it off by twenty twenty eight. Well, the laws have

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>now shown their face in a beginning the process of

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>going through the Parliament. Now, of course they will make

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it through because the center left are in charge of downstairs,

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and then we start to go quite to the left,

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>including the Greens and Door Matt Pocock and Lambee and

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Thorpe and all of them will of course sail this

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>thing through. So it is going to probably end up

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>becoming law. But good on the people of Western Australia

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and the sheep farmers of Western Australia who are starting

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to fire up. Now. Remember in Western Australia, the Labour

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Party won four seats. If they lost just two of

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>those seats, the government would be making its way towards

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>minority government. Which is why it's important to see here

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that while the government defends the live sheep exports via

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>their announcements that they have made this week in Western Australia,

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they're fighting back. Keep the sheep dot com dot au,

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Keep the sheep dot com dot au. You might see

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>this truck in and around Well and many others in

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:58.599
<v Speaker 1>and around Western Australia. If you want to support it,

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to keep the trade alive, if you

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>want to get the government to pay a price for

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>what they're about to do to hundreds of families destroying

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>their livelihoods to make people feel better in the woke

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.479
<v Speaker 1>bits of the city. Keep the Sheep dot com dot Au.

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Now again Senate Estimates, Thank you gives us a little

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>bit more detail. And as this show has grown over

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the years, we are even more focused on data and

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>we try to show you things firsthand because so easily

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the people who would like us off the air would

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.599
<v Speaker 1>like to pretend that we are the Peanut Gallery or

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the morons or the people who don't follow the details.

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>We're just making it up as we go along and

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 1>thankfully showing you things like reports that I try to

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>show you every night, data that I try to show

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>every night, and the people in their own words every

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>night helps tell the stories that we then go off

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and have the opinions about. But again in Senate Estimates,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a shocking amount of detail came out about a potential

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>major security hole in Australia that looks like it could

0:12:59.920 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>be exploited by unfriendly nations like China. Now, yes, the

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>prime ministers all get along, and the premiers all get along,

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>and the upper diplomats get along, but of course China

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>spies on Australia. It tries to interfere in our universities,

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it tries to intimidate those students by threatening their families

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>back home. It has stolen the plans to the AZO building,

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and of course in the past has been accused of

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>hacking the infrastructure of Parliament House and many of the

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>political parties which make up the people who represent us

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in Canberra. Well, fascinating statement here about some problems that

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>are seemingly showing the head of the moment, about the

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>number of people who work for the politicians who we

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.719
<v Speaker 1>are not doing enough security checks on, and as has

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>been the case in other states, the pressure is put

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>onto the staffers as a way of eventually putting pressure

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>onto ptitians. As says, it's potentially all sides of politics,

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>so let's view it in that way. Well, the head

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of the National Intelligence Agency is told Senate Estimates hearing

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday that Australia faces a serious and sustained threat

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>from foreign spies in response to claims that there were

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundred operatives already in Australia. Direct quote from a

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>bloke called doctor William Stoltz is from the Australian National

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>University's a national security expert. Political staff are essentially hired

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and fired at the discretion of the member of parliament.

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>They do not have to undergo basic police checks, but

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>there is no security clearance process. How does that work now?

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>It may well be when it comes to a minister

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>or a particular level of government, but somebodyho's a staffer

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>for a backbench senator or a backbench member of parliament,

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>where's a security check? It's highly concerning for a country

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of Australia's sophistication, and given the seriousness of MPs and

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>senators being targeted, it is no longer we're appropriate. The

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>political staff are not better vetted and security cleared. Again,

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this will not be the front page of the paper tomorrow,

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>but when something terrible happens, you can remember that you

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>were told about what the threat may be. It means

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>every now and then when we come up with the

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>random question of people in power, such as should there

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>be better security checks for MPs? That's why we're asking

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the question, same as we're asking the question about okay, cool,

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and you go right to a house and all of

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>these things. But again, where is the greater legal framework

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>around your right to free speech? Because again, right now

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and then, this happens every single day. Remember that you

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>wake up thinking that we've got to have a discussion

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>or a debate or push back against something that we

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>just took for granted the day before. For example, that

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>every single person working around every single MP at the

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>state and federal level is on the up. How can

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>there not be greater security clearance in and around those people.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Now we learned something today as well from the Treasury

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Boss bracket creep is good. Now you are living the

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>cost of living crisis. We as a country are in

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the multiple quarters of a per capita recession. Put simply,

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the Australian economy the real world is in recession, but

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the government economy it's just ticking alive, which means you're

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>struggling to pay your bills at the moment, no matter

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>what kind. And where as I talk about almost every

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>night about your insurance bills on top of your petrol

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and your power and all of those other things. Well,

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a blow by the name of Stephen Kennedy is the

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary and he's also on the Reserve Bank, so

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>he is one of the decision makers about whether we

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>go up or down when it comes to interest rates.

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>But he's also the bloke who's helping put the budget

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>together and well under the herald for picking this up.

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Not like it, but back bracket creep gee whizho for

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>todd Anyway, bracket creep is aiding the inflation fight. So

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that of course means when you pay more tax, it's

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>better because you have less money to spend in the economy,

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>because if you spent your money then it would push

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>up inflation. He said that in Australia over the past

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>three years, bracket creep had helped reduce inflationary pressures which

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would have amplified if tax thresholds had been pushed up. Quote,

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>bracket creep has been a helpful stabilizing force over the

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>past three years, contributing significantly to the automatic stabilizing influence

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of the tax system. Now, let me again put that

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>into normal people speak. If they take more of your money,

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you have less money to spend. Now, despite the fact

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that if you had more of your money you might

0:17:56.119 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>save it or yes, put it on bills, or yes,

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>put it into renovations, because you know, you're allowed to

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>live a life. But instead the government turns around and says,

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>give us a gold star because we're keeping more of

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 1>your money.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>This is despite the fact that they'll turn around and say, oh,

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>there's some average tax cuts thirty six bucks, but they're

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>so small that they get replaced by the people who

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>end up earning more money and being pushed into a

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>new tax bracket. And if you think the government is poor,

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>how a look at this. The Australian Bureau Statistics, you

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>know that far right wing think tank. They put out

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a list this week of just how much taxation money

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>including the GSD, the federal government has made over the

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>past few years. Just before the pandemic was four hundred

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and forty seven billion. During the pandemic it was four

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty one billion, and then five hundred and

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion first year out of the pandemic, and upon

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a change of government, six hundred and eighteen bo billion dollars.

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So they can talk about the tax cuts as much

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>as they like. They're getting more revenue than ever before,

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so they're not even robbing Peter to pay per. They're

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>taking some cream, but then expecting you to earn a

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit more money, which means you start adding to

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the cake of how much money that comes through. In fact,

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Samantha Maiden one of her stories, she was trying to

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>get up, and she wrote a few days about it,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but not too many people picked up on it. Was

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the amount of people that are going to be affected

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>by bracket creep into the next few years shows that

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>on this hand we're giving, but on the other hand,

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>we're taking, and we're going to take a fair amount.

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Jim Charmers, big, bigger, better tax cuts also

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>increase personal income tax receipts by twenty eight billion dollars.

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Why because people move up a tax bracket. When they

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>redefine the tax bracket, you go up the tax bracket,

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you end up paying more tax, which apparently is great

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to fight inflation. Meantime, on the overall issues, the only

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>issue that people care about in Australia, of course, that

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>being certainly in terms of the economy, the cost of living, inflation.

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>It's flow on when it comes to paying off your

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>house and the deserve bank rates, which are clear there now.

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Last night I told you that hotter than expected figures

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>when it came to inflation. I went through those for

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you saw that people were now starting to suggest that

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the first time that there's going to be any sort

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of easy give interest rates is not going to be

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>until November twenty twenty five. Repeat November twenty twenty five.

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>That's where we are right now. Of course, at the

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>first of July is when the tax cut scenario starts

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to kick in, the power rebate for mansions kicks in,

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and a whole bunch of other brand new government spending. Well.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>The suggestion there is that that, of course will also

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>add to inflation. Financial review they put this about why

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>we are now looking at interest rates going up before

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 1>they start to go down. The suggestion they don't go

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>down until November twenty five. Now, I won't bore you

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>with all of the details there, but put simply their

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>suggestion now is we have gone from twenty percent chance

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>of a rise to a twenty seven percent chance of

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a rise now, and that to happen by September this year.

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So already you are being squeezed by interest rates. There's

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a chance the squeeze will get worse, then gets slightly better,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and I mean slightly better, but you are still choking.

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's the scenario that the government thinks they will

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>get re elected for now. Of course, when they came

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to office, one interest rate rise, so yeah, bit of

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>pressure for some, but twelve interest rate rises, potentially thirteen

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>interest rate rises. And remember the Reserve Bank has said

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that even best case scenario, you will be paying seventy

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the increases that you have on interest

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>rates by twenty twenty six. So it feels like it

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>may get worse before it gets better. But does that

0:21:53.600 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>surprise you under a Labor government now, to speculate was

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>and we sat here on budget night thinking my, hang on,

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>are they starting to put something together that looks like

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 1>they could get towards an early election. I also remember

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>saying in and around that time that the real giveaway

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>about when they will give the tools to the Prime

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Minister to go for an election will be when they

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>start to change the numbers in the Senate. Now, the

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>way this works was that the Labor Party had a

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>review into the last election. It came up with things

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>like banning the amount of money the Teals could raise

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and that the Teals could spend, and that every single

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>party would be capped in every single seat. And as

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 1>I told you, that also is advantaging the Labor Party

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>because unions are completely independent from the Labor Party, despite

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they are half of the Labor Party's constitution.

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>The other thing was that they wanted to add extra

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>senators to the Parliament. They wanted to add an extra

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>two senators to the Northern Territory and to the Act

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>because currently they only have two each. So Don Farrell

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>was the man who was trying to put this new

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>system in place, and he's had a bit to say

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in the past couple of days, including that he's been

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to engineer a deal between the major parties for

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>it to double the number of senators in each territory

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>from two to four and bring the total number of

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the Upper House to eighty. Now, based on the current population,

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the Northern Territory has two senators fore hundred and fifty

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 1>thousand people. The Act has two two senators for three

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifteen thousand people. Tasmani has twelve because it's

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a state for four hundred and two thousand. So territories

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have smaller numbers because they aren't states. But of course,

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>as I have said to you before, the real reason

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>they want to do this is not about improving the

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>representation of people in the Parliament from the Act or

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the Northern Territory. It is to permanently change the way

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the Senate works that if not at this election, maybe

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the next election, maybe the next election after that, maybe

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the election who knows. But at some point in time

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>when the Labor Party loses government, they have to the

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>coalition would have to deal with a hostile Senate. Now,

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>remember when Tony Abbott won in two thousand and seven,

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the very clear sorry twenty thirteen, the very clear direction

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>was stop the boats, kill the carbon tax. Well, the

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>carbon tax was of course not killed until the following

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>July when a more favorable Senate was put in place.

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>So immediately conservative governments will be blocked by more left

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>wing senates. And if you actually have a look at

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the way that the Northern Territory has voted, there is

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>a good chance that it would end up that there

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>would end up being two Alp senators, one Country Liberal

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>Senator and maybe one Green Senator. So it would of

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>course improve the overall standing of the center left in

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the ACTI. Where currently it is a Labor Senator or

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a Teal Senator, you would probably end up with a

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Green Senator and a second Teal Senator maybe maybe maybe

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>on the outfring of Liberal senator. But all of that

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>means the numbers in the Parliament would blow out. Let

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>me explain right now, thirty one members of the Senate

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>are from the coalition, twenty six are from the Labor Party.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>You need thirty nine votes in the current parliament to

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>actually pass anything. Now. To do that, you need all

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>of Labor, all of Green's. That gets you to thirty seven.

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Then you need two more to get you to thirty nine.

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And that is an option where Lamby will say yes,

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>or Pocock will say yes, or Thorpe will say yes,

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>or Yrrall will say yes. Get two of them together. Bang,

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you get the piece of legislation through. If you have

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>two extra Labor senators, an extra Teal senator, a couple

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of extra Green senators that it's an almost permanent block

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:03.479
<v Speaker 1>that sits on the center left. I'm being polite to

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the far left, and they all would be able to

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>kill dead anything that a coalition government would like to

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>potentially do into the future. In a couple of hours time,

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump will make his way back to court where

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>again the jury is currently deliberating his future. That's a

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>live shot right now. What's happening in New York City.

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's only about seven thirty in the morning

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>right now about nine point thirty. When he turns up

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>at about ten o'clock in the morning, which is around

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>midnight Australian time, is when Judge Mershon, who is the

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>judge in this case, of course, brings everyone back in

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and for a second day they start to deliberate. Now

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.239
<v Speaker 1>they have thirty four separate charges in front of them.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>They don't just take one vote, They've got to take

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty four separate votes. They have not made a decision

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>within a couple of hours. So either they are going

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>through every single one very slowly in debating all of it,

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>or somebody's holding out, or who knows what's happening. But

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump was a little different this time, talking outside

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the court when the jury had been sent away after

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>hearing how the judge had framed the case for the jury.

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>This sounded like a guy who knew what's coming and

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>listening to the judges.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 4>From the judges, as you know, very conflicted and corrupt.

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Because of the confliction, very very corrupt. Mother Theresa could

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 4>not be these judges. These judges are rigged. The whole

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 4>thing is rigged.

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 5>The whole country is of mass between the borders and

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 5>fake elections, and you have a trial like this where

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 5>the judges so conflicted he can't breathe.

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Now, this is because at the end, when the defense

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>opposite defense, the prosecution doubles down on its case, it

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is all down to the judge. So then turn to

0:27:55.960 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the jury and say, okay, his basically the ruler under

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>which you have to have a look at these charges

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to decide whether somebody is guilty or not. And there

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>were plenty of people on Fox last night who were

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>saying that the options that he put on the table

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for the jury was so low that how could they

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>not find guilty?

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 6>Listening to the jury charges was concerning, To be honest,

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 6>I think that they were, and it's been widely reported

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 6>since we came out of the jury charges that there

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.239
<v Speaker 6>is clearly any of the four underlying crimes that he

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 6>could have done. They don't care what it was. The

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 6>judge said, basically, all you have to do is figure

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 6>out whether there was intent or not, and there has

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.239
<v Speaker 6>been no proof of that. But the judge gave a

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 6>very very generous bandwidth to the prosecution, and I think

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 6>that's why the president's comments and sentiments are exactly accurate.

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course, that is a Trump attorney who is

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>not part of this case but clearly is speaking on

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>behalf of the team. And I think that these things

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like they always have, but they get quite specific. I'm

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to bore you the specifics. But then over on

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>left wing television they are just sliding off the chairs

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with excitement because the bar is being put so low.

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>The case from the prosecution has have been allowed to

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>wander wherever it wants, and any defense at times that

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the Trump people have put up has been objected and

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>sustained constantly, constantly, constantly, so their legal analysts think just

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a countdown to guilty.

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 7>As you've noted with respect to Judge Mushan, I mean,

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 7>I am, I am like now you know, I have

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 7>like a man.

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Crashed on him.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 7>He is such a great judge that it's hard to

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 7>see that the jurors wouldn't have the same impression. And

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 7>he is just you just keep on thinking. If you

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 7>looked in a dictionary for judicial temperament, that's what you get.

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.959
<v Speaker 1>Creepy, really creepy. All right, quick break back with more

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll find it. Who's the winner and loser of the week,

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And looking forward to no soooks no lefties. Thanks for

0:29:54.760 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>watching on a Thursday. Thank you very much for watching.

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>We are no sicks, no lefties tonight. How good is that?

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And because I know what's a night for the hard course,

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>None other than two wonderful hardcore, big brain people joining

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>us now from Melbourne, but they're fair enough away. Social

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>distancing relax. Everyone. None other than Christy McSweeney is here,

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>along with the wonderful Michael Kroger. Now, Michael, I'm going

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to start with you, and yes we're going to talk

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>about Andrew Giles, but can we come at this from

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different way than everyone else's conversation about Andrew Giles.

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>His incompetence is obvious, his failures are obvious, The responsibility

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Prime Minister is obvious. But it seems that

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Albanese is trying to do the Daniel Andrews and Anastasia

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Paliche play, which is be absolutely shameless, never admit to

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a fault, ignore all criticism and just push through. Will

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it work for Albow the way that it worked for Alberanizi?

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Or is federal politics different?

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 8>You're one hundred percent correct, that's exactly what he's trying

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 8>to do. It's not going to quite work for him,

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 8>because there's a much more media Federally. I mean, a

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 8>state minister could get away with in confidence and no

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 8>one would notice. Federally, there's so much concentration on what

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 8>this guy has done. Everyone knows he's a dud. But

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 8>here's the thing that no one's yet worked out, mate,

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 8>No one's yet worked this out. There are about one

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 8>hundred and four members of the federal over caucus. There

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 8>are about forty two cabinet ministers, ministers and assistant ministers,

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 8>meaning there's over sixty backbenches. Sixty backbenches, so mate, knowing

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 8>how the wheels of Canberra works, you've got sixty two.

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 8>I think it is exactly to be exact, sixty two

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 8>backbenches sitting there thinking why am I not being promoted?

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 8>I'm not being promoted because this Prime Minister is sticking

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 8>to this dud. And so in Canberra you always need

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 8>a turnover of ministers because otherwise the backbench don't see

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 8>any future, no hope. And then of course they're local

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 8>branch members say, oh, friend's never been promoted. You know,

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 8>Friend's obviously not as good as Andrew Giles, otherwise he'd

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 8>be promoted and so when you have no movement like this,

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 8>when a prime minister sticks to a minister that everyone

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 8>in the country knows should have been sacked last year,

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:16.959
<v Speaker 8>it actually does enormous damage. Internally. There will be sixty

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 8>two backbenches, There'll be out of ministers and assistant ministers

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 8>who are all throwing darts at Albanizi day, blaming him

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 8>for them not being promoted and blaming him to sticking

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 8>to a bloke who should have been sacked.

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Christy, it feels like the Prime Minister is trying

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to play horse whispery here where he thinks he can

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>turn the bucking bronco of responsibility into the placid little

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>horse that does nothing but what the order from the

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>boss comes from. Do you think it's going to work?

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've just been realistic. It's a Thursday night

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>conversation where, let's be honest, any other government, any other minister,

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the level of pressure by this point in time and

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the proven amount of problems would result in them going.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's something magical. Does let's be you know,

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a hard marker, but does he have some special

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>superpower in his four D tittery winks that I'm not seeing.

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 9>Well.

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 2>What everybody's says to ignore here is that there's a

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 2>ministerial code of conduct which surely has been breached again

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 2>and again and again by Andrew Jarles. And if we

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 2>compare it to Howard, Howard sacked eleven ministers in his term,

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 2>starting all the way back from when he came into

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 2>government in nineteen ninety six, he sacked two of his

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 2>best mates in his first year. We know that Andrew

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Giles and Albanezi are very closely aligned. The other minister

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.719
<v Speaker 2>in Bold, Clara O'Neil, is from the right faction, and

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 2>everybody is forgetting This begins at the supply chain, beginning

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 2>with the Attorney General, Mark Dreyfus, who either didn't ask for,

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't read, probably didn't think warranted further investigations, the advice

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 2>from the Australian Government solicitor.

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 9>Around the High Court, that's his job.

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't doing that because creating legislation for a referendum

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 2>that was never going to come to pass was his

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 2>main priority at that time.

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:17.280
<v Speaker 9>So there's actually three.

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Ministers in this mess, not just Andrew Giles, but of

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 2>course in politics, you know you pick on the weakest Lincoln.

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 9>He has so far proved himself to be just that.

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of in an interview with our dear friend Kieran

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Gilbert today, the minister proved himself to be not up

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>to it. But what about this line, Trust me to

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>fix the mess that I made.

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 10>Have a look, there's a lot of political arguments out

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 10>there that always happens in this building.

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I've got a job to do.

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 9>I'm relentlessly focused on that job.

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Laura Tingle for a moment of two

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>his time, because of course they're all out there to

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 1>defend her, because she's a high Priestess of the ABC

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and she's beyond commentary, beyond ridicule. Her statement yesterday was

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that any sort of criticist of her calling the country

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>racist or more importantly, in my view, this fantasy that

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in the suburbs, evil white people are going to turn

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 1>on people who look different, whatever that means when they're

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>bidding at auctions because of Peter Dutton and his cuts

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to immigration, which are racist, but Albo's cuts to immigration

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>completely fine, makes sense, right. Peter Dutton understandably responded in

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the way that he should have with Ray Hadley this

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>morning onto Jubet.

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 11>Laura Tingles outed herself now as somebody who is a

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 11>part of san She's a green slash labor supporter. She

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 11>is political in nature, and therefore her credibility as a

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 11>journalist really is shot.

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And surprise, surprise, her boss is giving her a cuddle

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>because she did nothing wrong. Well, she did nothing wrong.

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 10>A mature nation, regardless of political views, should be able

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 10>to discuss such issues in a respectful and intelligent way.

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 10>The ABC's role and the work of our journalists, it's

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 10>like Miss Tingle, is to help facilitate those debates on

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 10>our platforms. Finally, Miss Tingle does not deserve the ferocity

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 10>and frankly vicious attacks that we've seen this week.

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Michael later incident estimates, which has been happening tonight.

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a news court pile on all of that garbage, right,

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that it's been covered by every media outlet.

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>But whatever, Right, we know it's everything that's wrong with

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the institution. But again, it's another example about how the

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>institutions of the left who are happy to criticize and

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>tear apart anyone else to be the serious umpire and

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the comedic gestures about the people that they don't like

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>at times. But if you dare push back on them, oh,

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not helpful to me. It's not helpful to the

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>national debate. As my boss often says to me, if

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 1>you lead with your chin, somebody is going to have

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:54.879
<v Speaker 1>a swing at it. Right, so she leads with her chin,

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the same thing is going to take place. So you

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>either say bugging you or yep, fair cop. That's that's

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the two options. Not you know I'm the victim here.

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, firstly, mate, David Anderson, as we've said on this

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 8>show before, he's he's just a number eleven batsman. He's

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 8>a night watchman. He's gone in the couple of there's

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 8>a couple down, it's five to six. You just send

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 8>David in with a few lines. He never troubles a scorer.

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 8>He bats everything, He bats everything away. He's nothing. David's

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 8>not running that show. He's a cork in the ocean.

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>David.

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:36.919
<v Speaker 8>David would go home to his family and say, listen,

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 8>there's nothing I do at the ABC. I had to

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 8>front up of the Senate thing today and I just

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 8>battered them away with a few a few words. The

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 8>staff for running the Aavy. So the happy years they

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 8>have when I was on the board, I think what's

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 8>happened here is this Laura has, for once and for all,

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 8>for anyone who was an in doubt, proved herself to

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 8>be a member of the left. She's her politics are

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:01.240
<v Speaker 8>probably between the left of the party in the Greens,

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:04.879
<v Speaker 8>and people look at her now on the seventh Thiry

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 8>report and think, you're not impartial. You're just part of

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 8>the hard left at the ABC. It's one of the

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 8>reasons why no one you know who watches politics seriously

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 8>thinks of the ABC as anything like impartial or independent.

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 8>Of course, they've got their cheer squad, the Friends of

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 8>the ABC, et cetera, and they coterie around them with

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 8>the hard left that always want to defend the ABC.

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 8>But the bottom line is mate, the ABC not impartial.

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 8>Everybody knows that. It's one of the reasons their ratings

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 8>have gone down successively, that disastrous Q and A program,

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 8>ABC News and Current Affairs ABC Radio. It's all deteriorating

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 8>because people don't trust the ABC's independence and impartiality. And

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.919
<v Speaker 8>Laura just proved that, and David Anderson proved just once

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 8>again in the Senate whilst he's not up to the

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:51.720
<v Speaker 8>job of being managing director.

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Because I completely agree with what Peter Dunnin said today.

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with that Michael just said about David Anderson.

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you need to win Teal seats back, don't

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 1>tell voters listen to the ABC, and the Liberal Party

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>has to be careful about how it goes after criticism

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 1>of the high processes of the ABC. I just say

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 1>that as if you are planning on getting anywhere in

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>your seventy six seats. There are some that are watching

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the institutions that are as corrupted intellectually as that one.

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's true, and there's a debate. Paul and I

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 2>often have this discussion.

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 9>There's true schools of thought the Liberal Party.

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 2>One is, let's forsake the till vote and will win

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 2>seats in Western Sydney and we'll win Mike Ewan here

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 2>in Melbourne, will win other out of metropolitan and regional

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:48.360
<v Speaker 2>seats that we don't already hold.

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 9>There's another school of thought, the moderate.

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 2>View, which is there's no path to government unless we

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 2>win back the Teal seats, and that is the nexus

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 2>of how far the coalition's discourse can go in attacking institutions,

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 2>which wholeheartedly. If you've got journalists masquerading and spokespeople for

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 2>their own views, everybody knows the caveat took places.

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 9>These are my personal views.

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Likewise, if you want to transition out of being a

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 2>journalist and out of adhering to the journalistic code of ethics,

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 2>become a commentator and you're more than free to express

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:27.959
<v Speaker 2>your own views in that role.

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 9>So there are a number of.

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Avenues here for the journalists in question.

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 9>There's a number of avenues for the ABC.

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 2>But of course, yes, you are entirely correct in your

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 2>assessment that there is a deep faction in the coalition

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 2>saying let's not go too hard, let's not be too aggressive,

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 2>let's not speak aggressively it alienates women. And then there

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 2>are others that say, let's go for Broke, will win

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Western Sydney. They all voted know for the voice who

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 2>knows where the answer is somewhere in the middle.

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, I think Michael. The middle in all

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 1>of this is that you should always appear in as

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 1>many places as possible. Right. One of the reasons why

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>politicians love FM radio is because that's compulsory vod Land, right.

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I love the people of the left who will engage

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:16.439
<v Speaker 1>with Sky News. It's important, as Bill Maher talks about

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in the United States about going on Fox News. Right. Conversely,

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it's important that people of the center right go on

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Radio National and go and Okay, they might be beaten

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>up and all the rest of it, but you've got

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, I'm not here for the host, I'm here

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for the audience. Right. So I think I think that, Okay,

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Peter Duton should always continue to engage with the ABC,

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But if he wants to give them a little smack

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 1>every now and then, we're saying, well, obviously you'll ask

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 1>me that question. Well, well, we all know what your

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>view is. If he says something like that, then that's okay.

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But I wouldn't be I wouldn't be in the band.

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Never go on, never take their calls, don't go on

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>their air waves kind of camp.

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, I just add that's a Daniel Andrews trick here

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 2>in Victoria. I doub does implement bands labor leaders important?

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>How did that?

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 8>How did that work? By the way, How did that work?

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 8>By the way, not a great point, How did that work?

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we did win a few, yes, well left, yeah, but.

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 8>Well Landers might have won a few more. The bottom

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 8>line is, you're right, you shouldn't you shouldn't ignore or

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 8>boycott any ABC program except Q and A. There's no

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 8>point going on Q and A. Long story, but there's

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 8>absolutely there's no point, right, there's no point. But but

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 8>you know, Laura has damaged yourself. Why by the way,

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 8>the ABC lets its presenters go to these far left

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 8>what's the point? Right side gigs don't go to no more,

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 8>no more, no more going to these hard left, these

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 8>extreme left writers' festivals, which is just which is just

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:46.800
<v Speaker 8>sort of our old you know, Vietnam brigade, all dressed

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 8>up with scarves and in their seventies and eighties, all

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 8>howard hats, all the phil about as, all the people

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 8>that used to buy Jim Knn's books. It's the same

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 8>old mob that's been going to these hard left writers'

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:00.919
<v Speaker 8>festivals for decades. Time for the see people to stop

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:01.720
<v Speaker 8>attending them.

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:02.839
<v Speaker 9>It's a gray hair.

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Q and I, all right, quick break, let's taken take

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>one and then we'll get back with who is the

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>winner and loser of the week. We'll talk a little

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of the Trump trial we'll talk a whole bunch

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of other things. Just stand by. We're almost done for

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the week, but plenty more to debate between now and then.

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:23.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to a winner and loser of the week

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in a moment or two time. We're here with Nosook

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 1>snow Left is the Way You Like It? On a Thursday,

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and another than Michael Kroger, and here of course with

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Christy McSweeney. Michael, what about this University of Sydney professor

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>who says that the accounts of the sexual assault on

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:41.280
<v Speaker 1>October the seventh fake news? How is this person still

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in a classroom? And whose opportunity is it to say, Okay,

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:49.919
<v Speaker 1>that's it, You're gone, mate.

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 8>I read that article tonight and I honestly couldn't believe it.

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:43:54.920 --> 0:44:01.280
<v Speaker 8>It is horrific, It's horrendous. It's disgusting that a lecturer

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 8>at Sydney University can hold those views. What a profoundly

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 8>ignorant individual she is. What a grotesquely ignorant person you know?

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 8>As you know, mate, I've seen the video right of

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 8>the forty seven minutes which are taken from cameras, right

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.280
<v Speaker 8>from dead her mass fighters, right, So it's the body

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:25.399
<v Speaker 8>camera of them going into these kibutzeem and you can

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 8>see them shooting people.

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't.

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 8>I don't want to describe what I've seen of what

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 8>happened to the women and the girls there. It's so horrific.

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 8>But I am disgusted by this woman. You are a

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 8>disgrace to your university. And as I've said, mate, and

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 8>as others have said, where is Mark Scott? Where is

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 8>is it Belinda Hutchinson the chancellor of Sydney University and

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 8>David thirty who's about to be chancellor? Where are you people?

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 8>Where are you people? You know, in moments of great

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 8>crisis you look for leadersh what we see at three people?

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 8>You couldn't You couldn't, You can't see them for the dust?

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Mate?

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 8>What hopeless leadership? And I suppose, finally, mate, the credibility

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 8>of Sydney University is in tatters, not only the home

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 8>of Jewish hate speech, of Jewish hatred, of these extremists

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 8>running rampant, making the safe on campus for Jews. Now

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 8>you've got these extreme lecturers and nothing so far from

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 8>Sydney Versity. So on the world rankings of universities, you

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 8>expect Sydney University to Plummet because it is not a

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:35.440
<v Speaker 8>place you would want to send any of your kids.

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Again, the officer has got the story. It's up there

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 1>right now. There's also versions of it. It's got news

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:43.279
<v Speaker 1>dot com dot au. Christy, no doubt you feel the same.

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you about the Senate changes, which

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:47.439
<v Speaker 1>look like they're on their way. If they can punch

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this through by December, it helps give the government well

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the rules by which they will fight the next election,

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 1>which is all of the money stuff relating to the

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Teals and that expenditure it's put off for this election.

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>That goes one election into the future, and we increase

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 1>the number of center left or hard left people in

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Senate so that eventually, if there is ever not

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a Labor government, they will only ever be able to

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 1>pay a past cent legislation.

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 2>And of course this follows the pattern of almost gerrymandering

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the Upper House. Roger Cook has just done it in

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 2>Western Australia too by almost eliminating the representational voting of

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 2>regional electorates which are traditionally conservative. The Labor Party is

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 2>now doing it in federal Parliament. I don't know, Paul,

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:40.279
<v Speaker 2>but it all smells like an election to me. Everyone's

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 2>rallying their bases. I think we've got a second surplus

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:47.879
<v Speaker 2>and a mountain of debt that comes after. We're being

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 2>very risk averse on every single issue that's presented itself.

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 2>We're refusing to sack Andrew Giles, and here we are

0:46:56.560 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 2>making sure that we can do our best continue on

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 2>as the party of government in the Senate. If we

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 2>get to close to a minority government, it's an installation

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 2>policy for Labor as they look down the barrel of

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 2>minority government or if not a loss, where they're going.

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 2>But I think minority is more likely, and should that

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 2>minority position.

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 9>Continue, this is their way of helping themselves well.

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And I've certainly seen the Greens. And if the Greens

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:26.360
<v Speaker 1>are in charge upstairs and there are downstairs, then we

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>know what the consequences of that's going to be. And

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we can a bitch and mon when it happens,

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 1>or you can tell your mates that it's going on

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. All right, Winners and Losers the Week Michael Krager,

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>who gets the up or down from you.

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 8>Losers of the Week to Ovius Ones, Tingle and Giles.

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 8>So let's go someone a bit more sophisticated than that, you,

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 8>siner Ad, because it's all her fault, as we now know,

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 8>of the week, when of the week it has to

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:57.320
<v Speaker 8>be kea Starmer, mates, a Kia Starmer is just wandering

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 8>along Piccadilly, walking there. He's probably up to the Ritz

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 8>by now, he's probably bumped into here Grand on his

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 8>way into the Ritz. He's just walking towards number ten

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 8>Downing Street. No one's there to stop him. He's having

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 8>a wonderful time and it'll be the easiest win the

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 8>British Labor Party he's ever had. So he continues to

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 8>be the winner of the week.

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:19.399
<v Speaker 1>In nice Sgarbo of the Ritz. By the way, now

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 1>let's say, Christy, you're a winner and loser of the week.

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:25.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start with a loser of the week.

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to get back on my hobby horse against

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 2>the Andrews government. This is the story that deserves a

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 2>front page and an absolute investigative expose.

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 9>Eight was buried deep into the age.

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 2>By a junior court reporter who has brought to light

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 2>that in the Supreme Court of Victoria at the moment,

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Robbie Williams and his event organizer organizers her Robbie was

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:52.440
<v Speaker 2>supposed to play on the eve of the Grand Prix,

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 2>which was very quickly and swiftly shut down, leaving organizers

0:48:57.600 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 2>ticket holders in the lurch. They are sue them for

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 2>millions and millions and millions. Now somebody with real money

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 2>who isn't scared of the labor party in Victoria has

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 2>taken them to the Supreme Court.

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 9>And I'm going to be watching this.

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So closely, me too, my producers screaming in my years.

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So thank you very much to appreciate it. Have a

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>great weekend everyone, Go Tigers, Go Yankee season