Speaker 1: Lot's outside. Good morning, and welcome to Outsiders, the show
Speaker 1: that is to woke identity politics and leftist feminist culture
Speaker 1: on steroids, what the new Disney movie Snow White is
Speaker 1: to packed movie theaters.
Speaker 2: Yes, here's a screenshot that appeared on Twitter reporting to
Speaker 2: show only one booking.
Speaker 3: For the new Disney movie Snow White.
Speaker 2: Well, which is hardly surprising when you consider this was
Speaker 2: the publicity campaign launched.
Speaker 3: Last year by its star.
Speaker 2: They insufferably woke Rachel Zegler no.
Speaker 4: Longer nineteen thirty seven.
Speaker 3: It's not going to be ihaved by the Prince.
Speaker 5: It's not going to be the prince.
Speaker 4: And she's not going to be dreaming about true love.
Speaker 4: She's dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be,
Speaker 4: and the leader that her relief father told her that
Speaker 4: she could be if she were fearless, fair, braving true.
Speaker 4: The original cartoon came out in nineteen thirty seven, and
Speaker 4: very evidently so there's a big focus on her love
Speaker 4: story with the guy who literally stalks her.
Speaker 5: Weird.
Speaker 4: Weird, So we didn't do that this time?
Speaker 6: Well, okay, but you know.
Speaker 7: Critics have described the film as lazy and visually repellent.
Speaker 6: And also exhaustingly awful.
Speaker 7: But you know, with that, poor old Disney stands to
Speaker 7: lose over three hundred million dollars.
Speaker 6: But I don't know is it really going to be
Speaker 6: that bad. Let's have a look.
Speaker 4: If I'm going to stand there for eighteen hours in
Speaker 4: a press of an iconic Disney Princess Hido Therapy paid
Speaker 4: for every hour that it is streamed online.
Speaker 1: Yes, she wants every cent she can get you while
Speaker 1: we are waiting in vain for Disney to make a
Speaker 1: non woke movie that normal people actually want to go
Speaker 1: and watch, let's grab the latest outside this news, So
Speaker 1: Rita and Jane. Suddenly Alba's throwing.
Speaker 6: More money around Moly.
Speaker 1: For energy bills.
Speaker 7: James, this is absolutely disgraceful. This morning, the Prime Minister
Speaker 7: stood up at a press conference and he announced that
Speaker 7: through the great light and generosity of the Australian Labor Party,
Speaker 7: Australians are going to for the next two quarters enjoy
Speaker 7: the princely sum of seventy five dollars taken off their
Speaker 7: energy bills. Let's have a little look at what he
Speaker 7: had to say.
Speaker 8: What we've seen is that in twenty twenty four power
Speaker 8: prices fell twenty five point two percent. They would have
Speaker 8: fallen just one point six percent without rebates. So this
Speaker 8: is energy bell relief, cost of living support that will
Speaker 8: also have an effect of putting downward pressure on inflation.
Speaker 6: But here's the thing.
Speaker 7: What the Prime Minister has left out of this equation
Speaker 7: is that this money he's handing you back, it didn't
Speaker 7: come off the magic money tree. This money is your money.
Speaker 7: You've already paid it in taxes. So the Albanizi strategy
Speaker 7: right now he's actually running with this to an election
Speaker 7: is number one, make everyone's power bills higher through renewable
Speaker 7: energy and all the other crispo and nonsense. Two, wind
Speaker 7: up increasing the Australian Commonwealth's tax take. That's the money
Speaker 7: they take out of your pocket through income tax every
Speaker 7: single pay packet, and then three.
Speaker 6: Handback a tiny little sliver.
Speaker 7: Of that of your money to try and make you
Speaker 7: feel like, hey, what a great deal we're getting here,
Speaker 7: because actually, rather than jacking up our energy bills and
Speaker 7: rather than taking money away from us, this Albanzi.
Speaker 6: Government they're doing wonderful things for us.
Speaker 7: It is a fraud, It is a nonsense, and I
Speaker 7: was very disappointed to hear that the coalition apparently is
Speaker 7: going to back this ridiculous?
Speaker 3: Are we surprised? Are we surprised?
Speaker 2: Just a couple of weeks ago, we saw them within
Speaker 2: minutes match the Albanezy government's Medicare pledge extra nine billion
Speaker 2: just out.
Speaker 3: Of thin air. And this we need a coalition.
Speaker 2: We need a conservative option in this country that is
Speaker 2: a real choice that actually stands for something, that isn't
Speaker 2: scared to articulate a position that's different to labor and
Speaker 2: take that to an election and say this is what
Speaker 2: our platform is, this is why this is good for
Speaker 2: the country, and let the Australian people choose like we
Speaker 2: did with the referendum, where we had two clear choices.
Speaker 2: Right now we've got this Uni party craziness and we
Speaker 2: just had Jim Chalmers on Sky News the treasure I'm
Speaker 2: making all sorts of absurd claims about how.
Speaker 3: He's overseen energy costs drop.
Speaker 2: What planet is he living on, because I don't know anybody,
Speaker 2: including myself, whose energy costs of going down in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four, that's what he claimed, and giving us a
Speaker 2: subsidy which is basically taxing us, wasting some of that
Speaker 2: money in the bureaucracy and then giving the rest of
Speaker 2: it back as a cost saving of having your energy
Speaker 2: bills reduced. I mean, you have to be economically illiterate.
Speaker 3: To accept that.
Speaker 2: And sadly, I think this is what the government is
Speaker 2: counting on. People just not looking at the detail, having
Speaker 2: their handout for some relief when in the long run
Speaker 2: that relief is going to cost all of us in
Speaker 2: the country a lot more.
Speaker 7: It's inflationary. This is more in the whole camera model. Now,
Speaker 7: the whole later model is take your money, clip the ticket,
Speaker 7: give it back to It is inflationary and we will
Speaker 7: never ever get out of the hole that we're into
Speaker 7: if we do not do something about productivity. And right now.
Speaker 7: There was another thing earlier. Jim Chalmers was just on
Speaker 7: Andrew Clenell and he was being quizzed about immigration and
Speaker 7: you know, why do we need so many mirgrants. He
Speaker 7: did have a good answered. It's so well, we're going
Speaker 7: to kind of bring it down a bit. But everybody,
Speaker 7: I think instinctively knows that we're in this low productivity
Speaker 7: situation now because government settings on migration and tax are
Speaker 7: screwing productivity down. So we're going to wind up with inflation,
Speaker 7: low productivity, and a lost decade.
Speaker 2: So much of the inflation we're are seeing is being
Speaker 2: caused by the government, by the mad spending, so they're
Speaker 2: causing the issue. Then they're railing against the Reserve Bank
Speaker 2: for not dropping interest rates, which they can't really drop
Speaker 2: because the inflation numbers aren't where they need to be
Speaker 2: because of the government over spending. So it's this vicious
Speaker 2: cycle we're in. And at the same time we're seeing
Speaker 2: a sharp drop in the living standards of Australians. We're
Speaker 2: seeing all sorts of economic data that's deeply disturbing, and
Speaker 2: yet the treasure lives in some parallel universe where.
Speaker 3: All these figures are just delightful.
Speaker 2: I mean, the things are going so well that they're
Speaker 2: offering three thousand dollar loans for people to buy appliances
Speaker 2: and pay their medical bills. Does that sound like a
Speaker 2: thriving aunt?
Speaker 6: This thing exactly right?
Speaker 7: And you're talking about this program that they announced three
Speaker 7: thousand bucks for household goods. I mean, it's like suddenly
Speaker 7: we're turning into kind of a government revolving credit kind
Speaker 7: of situation here. I don't know how this is going
Speaker 7: to work, but it is an indictment of how bad
Speaker 7: this economy is right now. And let's remember, you know,
Speaker 7: living standards have gone backwards under the Albanese government. They've
Speaker 7: gone back much further than they did during you know,
Speaker 7: the Keating recession or anything else that anybody out there
Speaker 7: in living memory might have. It's an economic disaster and
Speaker 7: every single thing they're going to do here and watch
Speaker 7: this budget because on Tuesday, you know, Jim Chalmers is
Speaker 7: gonna come and he's going to come smiling up there
Speaker 7: and he's going to give his budget and you know,
Speaker 7: give you the puppy dog guys and say, oh, come on,
Speaker 7: you believe me. I'm just doing this great job. I
Speaker 7: have this wonderful treasure and there's gonna be all sorts
Speaker 7: of things in there. More off the book, spending on
Speaker 7: these various future funds slash funds, which the OECD also
Speaker 7: warned last year relationary always deeply ideological to try and
Speaker 7: impose more and more of government control into the economy.
Speaker 7: We see this through the bogus made in Australia Future fund,
Speaker 7: which is all about you know, giving money to selected
Speaker 7: industries for political influence. It's all about politics. It's not
Speaker 7: about the economy, it's not about the Australian people.
Speaker 1: Well, the reality is it's a massive admission of failure. Yes,
Speaker 1: So the Albanzi government and Jim Charmers have admitted that
Speaker 1: after three years with Chris Bowen in charge of energy,
Speaker 1: that this government has completely and utterly failed. It had
Speaker 1: one promise that it took to the twenty twenty two
Speaker 1: election with which it won that election, and that was
Speaker 1: the repeated promise to cut energy bills by two hundred
Speaker 1: and seventy five dollars.
Speaker 9: Have a listen, reducing power prices by two hundred and
Speaker 9: seventy five dollars two hundred and seventy five dollars a year,
Speaker 9: There'll be a reduction for household of two hundred and
Speaker 9: seventy five dollars.
Speaker 1: So what has happened this morning is that Anthony Albanesi
Speaker 1: has admitted to complete and to failure as a Prime minister,
Speaker 1: Jim Chalmers has admitted to complete and utter failure as
Speaker 1: a Treasurer, and Chris Bowen has admitted to complete and
Speaker 1: utter failure as an energy minister. This country is absolutely
Speaker 1: think of a polite word to say, but I can't
Speaker 1: think of one. Are left in dire, dire straits because
Speaker 1: of the mismanagement of the economy by these clowns, and
Speaker 1: it is an absolute tragedy. The people of Australia must
Speaker 1: wake up very very quickly. I've only got about six
Speaker 1: weeks or less possibly to get rid of these this
Speaker 1: mob who are destroying our economy. Giving you money, as
Speaker 1: James and Rita were saying, is not the same as
Speaker 1: creating a productive environment where prices come down. Because the
Speaker 1: economic settings are so good they are chalk and cheese,
Speaker 1: and this government's only solution is to give you more
Speaker 1: money to keep these thieves in power.
Speaker 2: Reta, well, it's your own money they're giving back to you.
Speaker 2: But as we know, when you give the government your money,
Speaker 2: the bureaucracy eats up a fair chunk of it and
Speaker 2: whatever's left comes back to you. So you're much better
Speaker 2: off holding onto your own money and spending it as
Speaker 2: you see fit, rather than having this sort of socialist,
Speaker 2: hard left philosophy that we're under. But again it comes
Speaker 2: back to you talked about Tuesday and the budget and
Speaker 2: what we expect to see. I'm just as worried about
Speaker 2: Wednesday and the budget reply because I want to see
Speaker 2: real choice. I want to see a coalition that's got
Speaker 2: the guts, that's got the backbone, that has the principles
Speaker 2: to actually stand for something and give Australians a choice,
Speaker 2: because you say, Rowan, we've got to make the right choices.
Speaker 2: We can't keep going down this road of economic doom
Speaker 2: and gloom.
Speaker 3: But what if we don't have that choice that we.
Speaker 1: Got a problem here.
Speaker 6: There's a bigger problem here.
Speaker 7: You know, if you listen to Anthony Albanezi this morning,
Speaker 7: he was going through all the talking points right, you know,
Speaker 7: Peter Dutton is going to cut this. Peter Dutton is
Speaker 7: going to cut that, he is going to cut public servants,
Speaker 7: he's going to cut all of the largests.
Speaker 1: That we're giving you.
Speaker 7: And the big bet that Anthny Albinizi has made here
Speaker 7: is that more people in this country want to be
Speaker 7: dependent in some way on the government than want to
Speaker 7: be independent economic actors. And you know, it's the sort
Speaker 7: of thinking that's gotten Victoria into a huge amount of trouble.
Speaker 7: Reading you would know about this. You know, you've got
Speaker 7: the huge public service, You've got everybody dependent on this
Speaker 7: thing or the other thing, and so anything that sort
Speaker 7: of threats to threatens to bring some economic rationalism and
Speaker 7: discipline into the equation suddenly becomes this kind of existential
Speaker 7: threat to people. And this is why Peter Dutton needs
Speaker 7: to have I think, much more courage to say we
Speaker 7: are going to oppose this stuff. This is a road
Speaker 7: to ruin Australia. Is I am not being hyperbolic here.
Speaker 7: Australia is on an economic road to rute if we
Speaker 7: keep down these present settings.
Speaker 2: Talk about that in and my editorial after the break.
Speaker 2: If you want to preview of what Australia will look
Speaker 2: like after a second, a third, perhaps a fourth labor term,
Speaker 2: then just look at Victoria, because that's where it's been
Speaker 2: in practice.
Speaker 3: And here's a new splashirt. It's a bit of a spoiler.
Speaker 3: It ain't going well.
Speaker 2: We are in dire straights down there, economically and in
Speaker 2: so many other ways. Because when economically you're broken, so
Speaker 2: many other things societal things break as well, and that's
Speaker 2: what we're seeing in Victoria. It's not a happy camping
Speaker 2: ground and we don't want that for the country we
Speaker 2: want to have. We want to be a prosperous, peaceful
Speaker 2: country and it's absurd that we're even talking about this
Speaker 2: that we're talking about these exorbitant energy costs and how
Speaker 2: we control them, or we should have the most prosperous country,
Speaker 2: the cheapest energy rates anywhere in the world, because unlike
Speaker 2: the rest of the world, most of the rest of
Speaker 2: the world, we have been blessed with natural resources more
Speaker 2: than we can ever use, hundreds of years of reserves.
Speaker 3: We've got cold, we've got gas, we've got uranium.
Speaker 2: We should bear the richest country, our citizens should never
Speaker 2: have to worry about costs of living pressures.
Speaker 3: But we have done this to ourselves.
Speaker 2: And it's not just labor Coalition governments have been complicit
Speaker 2: in this by saying no, no, no, we want to
Speaker 2: ignore our natural resources. We're not going to do gas
Speaker 2: exploration to an extent that would actually benefit the country.
Speaker 2: We're going to have gas shortages instead, we're going to
Speaker 2: invest in renewables and push up energy prices. All of
Speaker 2: this is self inflicted.
Speaker 7: And you know, the thing is the thing that also
Speaker 7: really really gets me about this. We have all of
Speaker 7: these incredible resources, as you say, the call the gas, uranium,
Speaker 7: all of it under the ground, and when we do
Speaker 7: dig it up, we don't use it.
Speaker 6: We've already disused.
Speaker 7: We send it overseas and that's fine and good on,
Speaker 7: good on them for the exports, but we also don't
Speaker 7: use that energy to make anything anymore. And this is
Speaker 7: where I think we're also in a real danger. I mean,
Speaker 7: we had a bit of talk about you know this
Speaker 7: during COVID and oh wow, you know, we really got
Speaker 7: to be able to make things for ourselves because we
Speaker 7: can get cut off. Well, you know, the day where
Speaker 7: we could get cut off is coming closer and c
Speaker 7: we've seen this with the tensions with China and so on.
Speaker 7: But also just to be able to add value. So
Speaker 7: instead we take the raw materials and then we send
Speaker 7: them overseas and we just do like a bunch of
Speaker 7: sewers economy stuff and try and create some productivity out
Speaker 7: of that and then buy back the goods that those
Speaker 7: things make.
Speaker 1: JD.
Speaker 2: Mans gave an absolute master class on the failures of
Speaker 2: globalization during the week.
Speaker 3: It really was quite a remarkable speech. Look it up.
Speaker 2: And he talked about this theory of globalization where you
Speaker 2: get the developing nations to make things and the rich
Speaker 2: countries just consume it, presuming that's going to be good
Speaker 2: for everybody. But it's not because the countries that make things,
Speaker 2: that manufacture, they start to learn how to innovate and
Speaker 2: they are now the ones who are winning.
Speaker 6: And you're going to eat our lunch.
Speaker 7: And there was a moment here on this work globalization,
Speaker 7: and I was fascinated to see this in the New
Speaker 7: York Times vault places that they were having a big
Speaker 7: old attack on, you know, the advanced economic agenda of
Speaker 7: bringing manufacturing back to those seats, and they were still
Speaker 7: running with the line. And I couldn't believe it that
Speaker 7: they're seeing this with a straight face. Well, you know,
Speaker 7: globalization is great because the overall economy does better even
Speaker 7: if some individuals lose out, which is code for you
Speaker 7: get a cheaper fridge, but you can't afford to buy it.
Speaker 1: That's it.
Speaker 2: And when when they say some, they mean the working class,
Speaker 2: the middle class, pretty much everybody except the very top
Speaker 2: who benefit enormously.
Speaker 3: And this is why Donald Trump's economic.
Speaker 2: Policies they're not straight out conservative center right right wing.
Speaker 2: If you actually look at it, there is a lot
Speaker 2: of what was traditionally leftist philosophy in there, about protecting workers,
Speaker 2: about boosting manufacturing, boosting the salaries of lower paid workers,
Speaker 2: and yeah, there's an.
Speaker 3: Element of.
Speaker 1: James is that we have the blueprint, the Trump blueprint.
Speaker 10: It's sitting there.
Speaker 1: We can pick it up off the shelf and have
Speaker 1: the most successful economy in the world if we had
Speaker 1: a coalition, as Rita was saying, that was as single
Speaker 1: minded as it was during the voice and is determined
Speaker 1: to oppose. As James was saying, everything that labor touches,
Speaker 1: everything that labor touches, it turns to ashes, turns, it destroys,
Speaker 1: it ruins, it's turning us into a socialist country. The
Speaker 1: coalition has to oppose every single element of what labor
Speaker 1: are proposing, not copy it, and copy the Donald Trump blueprint.
Speaker 1: Make Australia. I've got here, MAGA, make Australia great again.
Speaker 1: I've got a hat. Make Albo go away. That is
Speaker 1: MAGA and Australia, make Albow go away. Thanks to Phil
Speaker 1: for sending me that hat. But the point is that
Speaker 1: the Donald Trump blueprint is there for Australia. Make us
Speaker 1: the wealthiest nation on the planet. We have all the resources,
Speaker 1: as Rita was saying, we have a workforce that is
Speaker 1: there if it be galvanized. Get rid of the red tape,
Speaker 1: get rid of the green tape, incentivize small business, get
Speaker 1: them up and work, and again give people the opportunity
Speaker 1: to set up their own companies and get going. And
Speaker 1: the key thing is to use the Donald Trump revolution,
Speaker 1: not oppose it, not run away scared from it, which
Speaker 1: is what both sides of politics here are doing.
Speaker 7: And we will be the poorer because of it. James, Well,
Speaker 7: you know, there's so many things that they can do.
Speaker 7: They can get rid of the capacity mechanism, which is
Speaker 7: the basically the carbon tax on the one hundred big estimeters.
Speaker 7: That's the first thing they should do. Just say that
Speaker 7: is gone, do that at sea, industry thrive.
Speaker 1: And also let's talk about net zero, because I'll be
Speaker 1: talking about it later in the show. But the reality
Speaker 1: is the coalition by staying in Paris and staying with
Speaker 1: net zero, it's literally like they're standing they're going to
Speaker 1: swim the fifty meters and at the last moment they've gone, oh,
Speaker 1: let's tie some five kilo weights around our ankles and
Speaker 1: see how we go. Net zero will cripple this country.
Speaker 1: Look at America, Drill, baby, drill. As you were saying, Rita,
Speaker 1: that is what Australia should be doing to make ourselves wealthy.
Speaker 1: Every Australian could be so wealthy. We don't need this
Speaker 1: welfare mentality, we don't need this socialism. We could be
Speaker 1: the most thriving, economically powerful nation on Earth if we
Speaker 1: chose to galvanize our people and if we and our resources.
Speaker 1: And to do that we need a coalition that is
Speaker 1: committed to the Trump Revolution. Don't be scared of tariffs.
Speaker 1: Use tariffs to build up our own economy. We should
Speaker 1: be an independent economy capable of having the independent military
Speaker 1: that is self funded and self financed and has because
Speaker 1: we have the cheapest resources on the planet if we
Speaker 1: chose to use them.
Speaker 6: Reata we do.
Speaker 2: But here we are, and again look at Victoria as
Speaker 2: an example of how far this lunacy can go. Victoria,
Speaker 2: sitting on just enormous amounts of gas, has changed its constitution.
Speaker 3: We changed it a couple of years ago to ban fracking.
Speaker 2: It's in the Victorian constitution thanks for the support of
Speaker 2: the feckless Victorian Libs. So even if we do have
Speaker 2: a liberal government that's sane and says okay, we can
Speaker 2: pay down our debt perhaps by fracking, you can't because
Speaker 2: you will need three fifths of both houses to change
Speaker 2: the constitution back and do you think Labor and the
Speaker 2: Greens are going to vote to change the constitution to
Speaker 2: allow fracking.
Speaker 3: Not a chance in hell.
Speaker 2: So the vic Libs have been complicit in engineering this
Speaker 2: disaster for Victoria. And we again, we are just so,
Speaker 2: I don't know, insane when it comes to things like fracking.
Speaker 2: Barack Obama fracked extensively under his adminisons.
Speaker 7: Crashing under Donald Trump, the hydraulic Shelle extraction and all
Speaker 7: of that under Donald Trump's first administration achieved energy independence
Speaker 7: for the United States.
Speaker 1: Why are we not We could do it tomorrow, absolutely.
Speaker 2: James, j Victoria the constitution rather exactly.
Speaker 1: We know, well, let's let's maybe Victoria, we've talked about
Speaker 1: this before, can break away your separate socialist state. In fact,
Speaker 1: the rest of Australia is running to join the socialist mentality,
Speaker 1: which is so so dangerous. And the Coalition has to
Speaker 1: understand that Donald Trump is not the enemy. Don't embrace
Speaker 1: their Trump Revolution. They seem to be scared of the media.
Speaker 1: They're scared. For example, why James, are the American taxpayers
Speaker 1: sending money to Australian universities so one of the things
Speaker 1: that dog has come out. They did this brilliant thing.
Speaker 1: They sent a letter to at least tell us about it.
Speaker 7: Basically, you know, and suddenly it's all we go like,
Speaker 7: oh my god, the United States is interfering with our
Speaker 7: research here. And you know, they've said, well, apparently America
Speaker 7: is giving research grass for Australian universities. Okay five, maybe
Speaker 7: it's for supportive work, maybe it's for I doubt what.
Speaker 7: But they said these questionnaires and they said, well, you know,
Speaker 7: what are your university's policies on two genders, on DEI
Speaker 7: and all of these sorts of things, pretty reasonable stuff.
Speaker 7: And you know, this has become this whole huge freak
Speaker 7: out that, oh, America is interfering with our independence by
Speaker 7: threatening to take away money that they're giving us.
Speaker 6: So I don't even understand how that works.
Speaker 7: But the crazy thing is the great thing is actually
Speaker 7: about what Donald Trump has done to universities in America right.
Speaker 6: Now is phenomenal.
Speaker 7: And this is he is taking an absolute fire hose
Speaker 7: through these institutions that have been allowed to become these
Speaker 7: entirely politicized institutions. Columbia has now come to the table
Speaker 7: and said all right, we're going to do a deal
Speaker 7: because our funding is at stake. I think his next
Speaker 7: move is going to be starting to move against the
Speaker 7: accreditation of a lot of universities that aren't going along
Speaker 7: with things like you know, not using racial discrimination in
Speaker 7: their hiring and in their admissions policies, which is a huge,
Speaker 7: huge issue in America. So this is the sort of
Speaker 7: thing that we need to be doing, because we're talking
Speaker 7: about it later in the show. But you know, we
Speaker 7: see a Macquarie University. What's been going on there with
Speaker 7: all the welcome to country nonsense. So yeah, we need
Speaker 7: to do this to the universities here in Australia.
Speaker 2: And we know the lefts march through the institutions started
Speaker 2: in academia is now spread like a cancer throughout all
Speaker 2: of society. It's in private institutions and every facet of life.
Speaker 2: And Donald Trump, unlike ninety nine percent of conservative or
Speaker 2: right wing leaders, whatever you want to call, is actually
Speaker 2: using power and tackling the cancer at its root. And
Speaker 2: if you want to change all the stuff that everyone
Speaker 2: complains about incessantly, how did we get here? How do
Speaker 2: we have like five hundred genders? Why do we have
Speaker 2: this in our schools. Why are we so destructive and degenerate? Well,
Speaker 2: you actually need to support policies like this, and it's
Speaker 2: not always pretty. It's going to have an enormous amount
Speaker 2: of resistance. The left, who have just had their own way,
Speaker 2: whether the Coalition or Labor are in charge, are going
Speaker 2: to our cup and they're going to have a mass
Speaker 2: tantrum And you've just got to withstandard.
Speaker 3: US is doing that, they are, We.
Speaker 2: Stand the tantrum, but I don't think our politicians have
Speaker 2: the guts or the backbone.
Speaker 1: Well, the trouble is we are at a fork in
Speaker 1: the road, James, and over the next eighteen months to
Speaker 1: two years, America is going to serge your head. There's
Speaker 1: no question of that. It's going to serge your head
Speaker 1: and Australia is going to be left behind. Certainly we're
Speaker 1: left way way behind if Albanesian coastand power. But even
Speaker 1: if the Coalition get into power, and which I hope
Speaker 1: they will, but carry on with this kind of oh
Speaker 1: we're not quite sure, we're going to be a bit labourish. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: The Coalition have to get in. They have to cut hard,
Speaker 1: they have to cut the bureaucracy hard. They have to.
Speaker 1: There's so many things they need to do, particularly getting
Speaker 1: rid of red and green and black tape. This country
Speaker 1: is worried to welcome to country ceremonies when we're not
Speaker 1: focusing on the real issues, which is how to get
Speaker 1: this economy thriving, which we can do.
Speaker 7: But the key thing here then is for Peter Dutted
Speaker 7: and the entire coalition team to go out with the
Speaker 7: United message about cost of living as everything that goes
Speaker 7: with it, and opposing layer and no front bench shadow
Speaker 7: minister should be getting up, no backbencher and not the opposition.
Speaker 7: They should be getting up without just repeating simple key
Speaker 7: messages about how labor has made the cost of living
Speaker 7: worse at every turn.
Speaker 2: They need three four key messages, that's all, and just
Speaker 2: keep that needs to be what the so called culture was,
Speaker 2: because that's where they're all on solid ground. The media
Speaker 2: will again have a mass tantrum, and as well the
Speaker 2: activists and academics, but the overwhelming majority of Australians are
Speaker 2: on the same page when it comes to this lunacy.
Speaker 2: They want a choice, they want someone who resists it,
Speaker 2: and thus far we haven't had that save the cold So.
Speaker 7: This is a thing, so like like the thing that
Speaker 7: Trump has done really really well, and like it's almost
Speaker 7: a superpower. Right, he can figure out what the eighty
Speaker 7: twenty issues are, like eighty percent of people agree with this,
Speaker 7: twenty percent don't, and he picks them and then forces
Speaker 7: all of the left to go defend that twenty fe
Speaker 7: percent there, So we see this time again. We see
Speaker 7: this first of all, you know, with of course transgender sports.
Speaker 6: And all that. You know, we see this now.
Speaker 7: Trump's like, hey, I'm deporting Venezuelan narco gang bankers. And
Speaker 7: people are like, yeah, good, we don't want them in
Speaker 7: our cities, We don't want them in their task.
Speaker 6: But then the Left has to.
Speaker 7: Go, no, the Venezuelan gang bankers, they have rights that
Speaker 7: they need a judge to keep them in the country.
Speaker 6: Even though they're here illegally, And everybody looks at the
Speaker 6: Left like, what are you on about?
Speaker 7: So this is the thing, So Button needs to find
Speaker 7: the colis just to five the equivalent eighty twenty issues
Speaker 7: here force Albanezi and Labor to defend their badness.
Speaker 1: Unfortunately, James, they had all of those and had they
Speaker 1: been watching this show for the last eighteen months, we've
Speaker 1: given them every one of those transgenderism, women and men
Speaker 1: and women's sports, all of these issues, particularly the waste
Speaker 1: of money on indigenous issues. Now, the Coalition have been
Speaker 1: great on that. They've stepped up and said we'll only
Speaker 1: had one flag. Am I going to tone down and
Speaker 1: welcome to country assemities? But there's so much more they
Speaker 1: could be doing. I want to see just Centi Price
Speaker 1: out there every single day doing what they've done, what
Speaker 1: Elon Musk has done in America and said, look at
Speaker 1: the waist. We've shown it on this show. It's there.
Speaker 1: The figures are there. The millions and millions of dollars
Speaker 1: are wasted on big bureaucracies in Canberra where they sit around,
Speaker 1: you know, spending money on supposedly solving closing the gap
Speaker 1: and doing nothing of the sort. There are so many issues,
Speaker 1: obviously net zero, obviously, the culture wars on transgender and
Speaker 1: so on are issues that the Coalition should be right
Speaker 1: up in front and center, and instead they're kind of
Speaker 1: holding back reta they are.
Speaker 2: They're refusing to lean into things where they've got the
Speaker 2: overwhelming majority of voters behind them, including majority of labor voters.
Speaker 2: And that's what I don't understand because those promises don't
Speaker 2: actually cost money. If you say we're going to install
Speaker 2: meritocracy at universities, we're not going to have all these
Speaker 2: DEI style programs because it undermines what we're doing in
Speaker 2: academia that doesn't actually cost money. Saying that we're going
Speaker 2: to get rid of all the acknowledgment, welcome of countries
Speaker 2: and all this messaging that somehow we're not a legitimate country,
Speaker 2: that we're visitors on our own land doesn't cost any money.
Speaker 2: And its it sells values, and people care about values,
Speaker 2: even the cost of living crisis.
Speaker 3: People care about the values.
Speaker 1: Its values that motivate people. I was amused. Reta and
Speaker 1: Jams that's a conservative cir called conservative columnist wrote an article.
Speaker 1: You see, the media in this country don't understand Donald
Speaker 1: Trump at all. Not a politicians don't exactly. Most conservatives
Speaker 1: in this country don't understand Trump. But this was the headline.
Speaker 1: Trump can dismantle, but he cannot build. Trump can dismandle,
Speaker 1: but he cannot build was the headline. Ah, Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is a builder.
Speaker 6: That's what he is.
Speaker 1: That's where he made all his money, building towers, building
Speaker 1: TV shows, building all sorts of things. He's a builder,
Speaker 1: that's what we can do. Taking a short break back
Speaker 1: with reach is raality checked. David Adler here on Outsiders
Speaker 1: in anti.
Speaker 6: Welcome back.
Speaker 2: You're watching Outsiders with your hosts Rowan Drill, Baby Drill
Speaker 2: Dean and James Fracking Fun Times Morrow and I'm readA pane.
Speaker 2: You may know me from such programs as the reader pane.
Speaker 2: He's showing Monday to Thursdays at eleven pm and Left
Speaker 2: is losing at nine pm each and every Friday. And
Speaker 2: I've got a spectacular trio of Left his losing it
Speaker 2: coming up in a second.
Speaker 3: But first to Victoria.
Speaker 2: And if you want to know what a second or
Speaker 2: third term of the Albanezy government will do to Australia,
Speaker 2: we'll just take a look at Victoria, where a hard
Speaker 2: left labor government has caused the sort of damage and
Speaker 2: destruction that is almost unquantifiable. What is quantifiable is the
Speaker 2: record debt in Victoria, the highest of any state, and
Speaker 2: buy some margin with forecast net debt of one hundred
Speaker 2: and eighty seven point eight billion that has seen the
Speaker 2: labor government launch a war on property investors, Mum and
Speaker 2: Dad landlords investing in brix and mortar to try to
Speaker 2: get ahead up being hit with sky high land tax,
Speaker 2: a costly and ever expanding list of minimum standards, and
Speaker 2: a raft of reforms that diminished property owners' rights. And
Speaker 2: this week, yet another new tax. The decent Alan government
Speaker 2: plans to charge investors a high rate under its new
Speaker 2: levee to fund Victoria's emergency.
Speaker 3: Services and to add insult to injury.
Speaker 2: The Victorian Treasurer just and Slimes was so dismissive of
Speaker 2: this latest impulst that you just claim that landlords can
Speaker 2: afford to pay more. And that was her defense of
Speaker 2: this new tax. Now, if this Treasurer I had any
Speaker 2: economic credentials, any business now, or just experience in a
Speaker 2: role outside of being a political staffer and a politician,
Speaker 2: she'd note that the additional costs will be passed on
Speaker 2: to rentors or add further pressure on property investors to
Speaker 2: sell their asset, which wh will shrink the pull of
Speaker 2: rental properties further and lead to high rents. Either way,
Speaker 2: rents are going up and mom and dad investors will
Speaker 2: be under increased financial pressure. It is another lose lose situation,
Speaker 2: a specialty of state labor, and it comes at a
Speaker 2: time when experts warn that rents are about to sow
Speaker 2: further across Melbourne with hikes of up to two hundred
Speaker 2: dollars a week forecasts.
Speaker 3: All of this appears to be lost on the.
Speaker 2: Treasurer, who is so out of her depth in the
Speaker 2: portfolio that staff communicating with her were reportedly told to
Speaker 2: avoid using economic lingo. As The Herald Sun reported last month,
Speaker 2: staff are instructed to stop using economic terms and phrases
Speaker 2: in all communications with the Treasurer, as she doesn't have
Speaker 2: any clue what they are talking about. And it's one
Speaker 2: thing for the Victorian Treasurer to be ignorant of economic terms,
Speaker 2: but she also appears to be profoundly ignorant of basic
Speaker 2: economic concepts. Victoria cannot afford to have an economically illiterate Treasurer,
Speaker 2: but sadly that's precisely what we have in Jacelin Slimes.
Speaker 2: And if you want that sort of gross incompetence on
Speaker 2: the national level, then by all means turned Anthony Albanezi
Speaker 2: for a second term now to a little lefties losing
Speaker 2: a content. And there's nothing sadder than a comic who
Speaker 2: was once funny, once cutting edge, but has become so
Speaker 2: broken by leftist ideology that they jump the shark, and
Speaker 2: instead of bringing the laughs, they bring the sort of
Speaker 2: cringe worthy.
Speaker 3: Antiques that they used to mock.
Speaker 2: The latest comic to be clown himself is Bill Burr,
Speaker 2: once brave for a family on PC and most importantly hilarious,
Speaker 2: he has been reduced to appearing on the View and
Speaker 2: trying to outcringe the crazy cat Lady panelists listen to
Speaker 2: this rant about Elon Musk. Apparently Musk is just a
Speaker 2: nerd who doesn't know how to talk to hot women.
Speaker 11: Any particularly anybody getting your ir up these days more
Speaker 11: than usual.
Speaker 12: Nerds, the nerds that own the politician, all these tech
Speaker 12: nerds that want to build robots because they know know
Speaker 12: how to talk to hot women. They're gonna take all
Speaker 12: in a world they're gonna take off.
Speaker 1: They are literally going to replace us. They were like
Speaker 1: Beta right.
Speaker 12: Now and they're coming out with like the BCR.
Speaker 13: And I think Elon has got the rockets going because
Speaker 13: they realize there's other earths out there and they're gonna
Speaker 13: they're going to trash this one and because they don't
Speaker 13: have any concern for it, and they're going to move
Speaker 13: on to the next Earth.
Speaker 2: Now, you can say plenty about Elon, but I would
Speaker 2: have thought the man with over a dozen children from
Speaker 2: at least seven different women has little trouble talking to
Speaker 2: two girls hot girls. Frankly, I like him to speak
Speaker 2: to less women. But the Elon muster arrangement is a
Speaker 2: fever pitch in the US, so much so that it's
Speaker 2: rivaling tedious trumped arrangement syndrome. Watch here as this Unitic
Speaker 2: democrat Jamal Bowman claims that Elon is a thief and
Speaker 2: a Nazi.
Speaker 3: This is on CNN.
Speaker 14: Elon Musk is incompetent in his position, and how do
Speaker 14: we know because they fired tens of thousands of people.
Speaker 15: It was challenging court.
Speaker 14: The court said that people have to go back, and
Speaker 14: now the people are coming back. He's incompetent, he's a thief,
Speaker 14: he's a Nazi, and people don't trust him.
Speaker 2: I do hope CNN have excellent lawyers because that's defamation.
Speaker 2: It's very clear, and Elon Musk has had enough. Yesterday
Speaker 2: he posted that a lawsuit is in coming.
Speaker 3: CNN are in all sorts of trouble if he follows
Speaker 3: through with that.
Speaker 2: But it's not just CNN who are spreading hysteria and
Speaker 2: lies in order to damage the Trump administration. This week,
Speaker 2: MSNBC had to issue a number of humiliating apologies after
Speaker 2: they somehow mixed up the Indian Prime Minister Modi with
Speaker 2: Vladimir Putin in.
Speaker 1: Order to.
Speaker 16: Last night, The Last Word reported on excerpts of an
Speaker 16: interview between the Director of National Intelligence Telsa Gabbard and
Speaker 16: an Indian TV news network in which she said Trump
Speaker 16: was good friends with.
Speaker 1: The world leader.
Speaker 16: Now we said that world leader was Vladimir Putin, but
Speaker 16: the full interview was subsequently released and it showed that
Speaker 16: Gabbard was refused what was referring to Donald Trump and
Speaker 16: the Indian Prime Minister Narendra.
Speaker 2: Mody I see mistake to meg. That's dishonest and incompetent.
Speaker 2: Let's have just one more groveling correction from MSNBASI.
Speaker 11: Last night, we reported on excerpts of an interview between
Speaker 11: the Director of National Intelligence, Telsa Gabbard and an Indian
Speaker 11: TV news network in which she said that Trump was
Speaker 11: good friends with a world leader. We said that world
Speaker 11: leader was Vladimir Putin, but the full interview shows that
Speaker 11: Gabart was referring to Trump an Indian Prime Minister Mody,
Speaker 11: clear that up.
Speaker 1: Fantastic, thanks for you. They're extraordinary, unbelievable. No such errors
Speaker 1: here on outside as obviously, we're going straight now to
Speaker 1: David Adler, who joins us here on the desk on
Speaker 1: outside as president of the Australian Jewish Association. David, great
Speaker 1: to have you here. You're only here briefly because you're
Speaker 1: about to hop on a plane and head over to Israel.
Speaker 1: You have been honored, I might add, to have been
Speaker 1: selected to participate in an anti Semitism conference that's taking
Speaker 1: place there people from all around. There are some controversy
Speaker 1: around it. We'll get onto that in a second. But
Speaker 1: what intrigues me, and I think you can tell me
Speaker 1: the answer is why when they're sitting in Israel and
Speaker 1: they're thinking we need people to discuss anti Semitism which
Speaker 1: is out of control.
Speaker 17: Oh, Australia, thanking Rowan, and yes, I have been invited
Speaker 17: by the Israeli government to participate in their anti Semitism
Speaker 17: summit which is in the middle of the week coming up,
Speaker 17: and I plan as to give an Australian perspective and
Speaker 17: briefing at a number of levels in a closed session
Speaker 17: of the conference, as well as to members of the Knesset,
Speaker 17: and obviously under our current far left Labor government, there
Speaker 17: have been radical changes which have tanked Australia's reputation amongst
Speaker 17: the Jewish community worldwide, particularly in the United States and Israel,
Speaker 17: and they want to be brought up to speed. Israel
Speaker 17: feels a sense of responsibility for the Jewish community worldwide.
Speaker 17: If anything goes pear shaped, then it provides an ultimate sanctuary.
Speaker 17: And I can tell you, jumping ahead a bit, if
Speaker 17: we are unfortunate to have in a few weeks time
Speaker 17: a Labor tells Green government, we will lose some of
Speaker 17: our best and brightest from Australia. We will lose some
Speaker 17: of our best contributors to Australian society and the Australian economy.
Speaker 17: I don't know the quantity, but there are people making plans.
Speaker 1: That doesn't surprise me at all. And would you point
Speaker 1: the finger of blame squarely at Penny Wong Anthony Albanisi
Speaker 1: for the anti Semitism in this country? Is that what
Speaker 1: you'll be telling the conference or is it Australia's immigration policies,
Speaker 1: where what has fueled anti semitism in Australia.
Speaker 17: I have made a public a document where we have
Speaker 17: put together the top twenty hostile decisions of Penny Wong
Speaker 17: and the Labor government. But you're right, the responsible ministers
Speaker 17: are the Foreign Minister, Penny Wong obviously the Prime Minister
Speaker 17: Anthony Albanesi. And then we've got contributors like Tony Burke
Speaker 17: with the crazy immgrans policy and bringing thousands of people
Speaker 17: in from Gaza on visitor visas when we learn that
Speaker 17: over seventy percent of them have now applied for asylum,
Speaker 17: and Jason Claire, the missing in action Education Minister who's
Speaker 17: done nothing about anti semitism on the University of campuses.
Speaker 7: Well, David, I just want to go back to this
Speaker 7: prospect of a Labor minority government and that they may
Speaker 7: have to make some sort of deal. And I know
Speaker 7: Anthony Albanzi always performatively stands up in Parliament and you
Speaker 7: know gives a kicking to the Greens, but when push
Speaker 7: comes to shove, we know that if he needs to, he'll.
Speaker 6: Do a deal.
Speaker 7: How concerned are you that there could be a deal
Speaker 7: in a minority government where a Green got a seat
Speaker 7: at the cabinet table, potentially one dealing with a portfolio
Speaker 7: dealing with national security matters.
Speaker 17: Julian Lisa, in the last couple of days has said
Speaker 17: publicly that the Greens are Australia's anti Semitic political party.
Speaker 17: Alexander Downer, our former Foreign minister, has said very similar
Speaker 17: and I agree that we will have someone at the
Speaker 17: cabinet table if that horrible eventuality unfolds. That is particularly
Speaker 17: hostile to the Jewish community, and frankly, I would say
Speaker 17: hostile to Australian values generally. I mean Australia is a
Speaker 17: liberal democracy. It's supposed to be based on freedoms, on
Speaker 17: Judeo Christian values. Whether you're religious or not, it's not
Speaker 17: the issue. But we do have a set of values
Speaker 17: and a lot of what the Greens stand for and
Speaker 17: do the contrary to the interests of Australia and country
Speaker 17: to Australian values. So I think it's broader than the
Speaker 17: Jewish community, but we have a lot to fear if
Speaker 17: that eventuality.
Speaker 2: There'd be increased pressure on Anthony albani Is in labor
Speaker 2: in general when it comes to preference stills, because every
Speaker 2: election give each other preferences. They're in this unofficial coalition
Speaker 2: and it seems to be something that really doesn't seem
Speaker 2: to damage labor, aligning itself with this radical, destructive, hard
Speaker 2: left force within the Greens.
Speaker 17: One hundred percent reader the Greens should be put last
Speaker 17: by every responsible voter. In fact, we don't tell people
Speaker 17: who to vote for, but we certainly say it comes
Speaker 17: to the Greens, don't put them anywhere near the upper
Speaker 17: part of your ballot paper. And I think there is
Speaker 17: pressure being brought to there. I think Advance Australia has
Speaker 17: a focused campaign ready to roll out once the election
Speaker 17: is announced, and I know also there are some grassroots
Speaker 17: community activists who are ready to go in certain seats,
Speaker 17: including the seat of McNamara, where Josh Burns got over
Speaker 17: the line on Green's preferences at the last election, so
Speaker 17: he particularly could in the Jews.
Speaker 2: Josh Burns is a member of the Jewish community and
Speaker 2: he has spoken out about anti Semitism in the past.
Speaker 2: But then I do know there are many within Melbourne's
Speaker 2: Jewish community, many who are absolutely appalled by what they
Speaker 2: have seen.
Speaker 3: Tell me about that, because on.
Speaker 2: Paper you'd think he'd be a member that you would
Speaker 2: back out of labor because he has been outspoken and
Speaker 2: he is himself Jewish.
Speaker 17: I suspect his heart is in the right place, but
Speaker 17: he's caught between the typical rock and hard place where
Speaker 17: the labor strategy is determined by people senior to him,
Speaker 17: and what happens in that seat in terms of preferences
Speaker 17: will be particularly an interesting one to watch.
Speaker 3: And also interesting is that he is.
Speaker 2: Dating someone who attends a Victorian politician who's very active
Speaker 2: in attending pro Palestinian rallies and being involved in all
Speaker 2: sorts of activism that I think members of the Jewish
Speaker 2: community are appalled by.
Speaker 15: That's raised eyebrows.
Speaker 2: Red, that's putting it nicely.
Speaker 6: David.
Speaker 1: I want to ask you about the controversy that's around
Speaker 1: the anti Semitism conference, and there's a bit of cognitive
Speaker 1: kind of dissonance here because the Chief Rabbi of Britain
Speaker 1: has pulled out of the conference and he's saying, oh,
Speaker 1: there's all these right wingers there at the conference. Sorry,
Speaker 1: there is all these right wingers at an anti Semitism conference.
Speaker 1: I'm struggling with it where the chief Rabbi is a
Speaker 1: kind of landing on this one. What is the controversy,
Speaker 1: Is it serious? And why is it that even still
Speaker 1: within the Jewish community there's I understand why that there's
Speaker 1: deep suspicion of the terms right and left wing or
Speaker 1: right wing going back to World or two. Understand that
Speaker 1: fully obviously, but why is there still this ingrained suspicion
Speaker 1: of the more conservative side of politics for many left
Speaker 1: wing Jews.
Speaker 17: Grown I think what the Rabbi has done is very
Speaker 17: bad decision, and a number of prominent Israel advocates have
Speaker 17: written to him explaining why it is a bad decision.
Speaker 15: It would be a bit like.
Speaker 17: Saying that Germany and Japan were our enemies in World
Speaker 17: War Two, therefore we should have nothing to do with
Speaker 17: them in twenty twenty five. And yes, by all means
Speaker 17: treat some of these people with a degree of caution
Speaker 17: because they do come from institutions that have a problematic
Speaker 17: background but decades ago. But if someone expresses an interest
Speaker 17: in Israel and expresses an interest in learning more about
Speaker 17: anti Semitism, it can only do good in repairing those
Speaker 17: sort of attitudes with knowledge and education and mixing with
Speaker 17: the people who can help them onto the proper path.
Speaker 1: So your advice to the Chief Rabbi of England would
Speaker 1: be rethink come along to the conference.
Speaker 17: One hundred percent. It hasn't affected my decision. And we
Speaker 17: often participate in conferences and meetings where there are people
Speaker 17: around who have views that we don't agree with. Every
Speaker 17: time you go to a parliamentary event, for example, there
Speaker 17: may well be from one nation to the Greens representatives present.
Speaker 17: What are we supposed to do? Brought God every parliamentary event, it's.
Speaker 1: None, David Adla, have a great time there in Israel
Speaker 1: and proud that you're there representing Australia. That's great news.
Speaker 5: Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Coming up after the break. Lots more net Zany, wakademia
Speaker 1: in a tech you're on outsiders. Yes, Look what happens
Speaker 1: when you take your fiercely pro Palestinian message right up
Speaker 1: to the cops and put it into their face. Doesn't
Speaker 1: always work out?
Speaker 5: Well no, no, no, no, I.
Speaker 6: Love it.
Speaker 1: There you go. Be careful if you're a work young
Speaker 1: credit the kids love. Yes, yes, around exactly.
Speaker 3: She got the in the f O.
Speaker 6: Definitely, yes, not first officer.
Speaker 1: That's right. Net Zany, of course. One of our favorite
Speaker 1: topics Zany quite crazy insane world in net zero policies, James.
Speaker 1: We had the head of Mitsubishi coming out this week
Speaker 1: and oh, what a surprise, Hey, electric vehicles not performing
Speaker 1: quite out Chris Bowen Homistice.
Speaker 7: They would well, I mean, you know, if only somebody
Speaker 7: had warned the government about what was going to happen,
Speaker 7: if anybody, say, the government had been watching outsiders reading
Speaker 7: my reporting in the Daily Telegraph when all of the
Speaker 7: EV mandates were being debated and come in and we
Speaker 7: all said at the time, this is going to cause
Speaker 7: a huge market dislocation. Australians want their petrol cars. They're
Speaker 7: not sold on EV's for a whole variety of reasons.
Speaker 7: And well, now Mitsubishi, the head of Mitsubishi locally has said,
Speaker 7: we're going to wind up with lots full of EV's
Speaker 7: that nobody here actually wants to buy, where the petrol
Speaker 7: cars that people do want to buy are going to
Speaker 7: have their prices jacked up artificially by the whole emissions
Speaker 7: reduction thing where you have to sell evs to balance
Speaker 7: out your fleet of petroledgy're.
Speaker 2: Already having that, and we're having all sorts of subsidies offered.
Speaker 2: And there was research that came out last week saying
Speaker 2: the beneficiaries of these subject cities are high income earners.
Speaker 2: So you've got lower income earners paying more foot cars
Speaker 2: and subsidized ry.
Speaker 3: These benefits that are going there's.
Speaker 7: A bigger thing that's more sinister than that. I mean,
Speaker 7: giving a bit of subcity to high income owner. Well
Speaker 7: that's bad enough, But the real place all of this
Speaker 7: money is going to is China, right of course, So
Speaker 7: all of this is about, you know, giving China's EV
Speaker 7: market a huge boost their EV production. You know, all
Speaker 7: they're going to start flooding the market with very cheap
Speaker 7: evs here. It's already starting to happen here, and all
Speaker 7: of this labor policy, you know, seems to somehow why
Speaker 7: are not always China and James.
Speaker 1: It also gets worse than that because what the policy
Speaker 1: actually does this is Chris Bowen lunatic. It finds the
Speaker 1: dealers if they don't sell enough evs. So the dealers
Speaker 1: already they're distorting the markets. The dealers have to sell
Speaker 1: more evs otherwise they pay a fine down the road.
Speaker 1: So this is going to put dealers either on the
Speaker 1: back foot of lying to customers to kind of say, oh,
Speaker 1: come on, do this or offering sweetness or whatever deals
Speaker 1: or pushing them into that or paying fines or going
Speaker 1: broke or you know, it's the complete reverse of how
Speaker 1: a healthy economy works. And this is this is just
Speaker 1: one of the many, many ways in which net zero
Speaker 1: is far worse than any tariffs. Net zero at every
Speaker 1: aspect of the chain is another tariff put on by
Speaker 1: the government, by Bowen and Albanezi onto your cost of living.
Speaker 1: You drive down to the shops, you go to the movies,
Speaker 1: you go on holidays, you are being hit with net
Speaker 1: zero tariffs by this government and everything.
Speaker 6: Think they do too, you know, think about this. You're
Speaker 6: creating this.
Speaker 7: Whole new network of evs, right, so they need charges,
Speaker 7: so those then they want the government to buy new
Speaker 7: charge as well. What you know, the motorcar came round,
Speaker 7: you didn't have the government having to go put in
Speaker 7: a network of petrols to just because there was a
Speaker 7: market to do that. There's not a market to do this.
Speaker 7: Every single thing along the way. They are trying to
Speaker 7: force the market, to force people to do something that
Speaker 7: they don't want.
Speaker 2: And then you have the media lying to people saying
Speaker 2: there's this demand for evs, when all it is is
Speaker 2: market manipulation. It is distorting the market. It's to engineer
Speaker 2: a result like this and it's not working. You mentioned Mitsubishi.
Speaker 2: Mercedes has also done a U turn on its EV
Speaker 2: politics big time because they've had to accept reality. The
Speaker 2: reality is this just isn't feasible even if people wanted it.
Speaker 3: It's not feasible.
Speaker 6: Wire making the grid less stable.
Speaker 1: And you've got in the Brossa Valley the locals are
Speaker 1: protesting against the wind farm project. There in a hot
Speaker 1: tourist hotspots in the Barossa Valley. They're protesting against that.
Speaker 1: So they're going no, no, no, we don't want this. I
Speaker 1: don't blame this is the Twin Creek wind farm. They
Speaker 1: don't want that. You've got in fire to meet turbine.
Speaker 1: No one wants these things. You've got to sol the
Speaker 1: farms shutting down in Victoria. This is a joke because
Speaker 1: of the bush fire risks, because they haven't been properly
Speaker 1: cared for. No surprises there the O A thing these
Speaker 1: people touch turns to garbage everything they touched.
Speaker 3: What country are the owners?
Speaker 1: China? China gets rich, China gets rich, Australia gets poor
Speaker 1: and the poorest as I will be explaining later on
Speaker 1: get hit the hardest. It is completely insane. It is
Speaker 1: net zany and seriously, the coalition should it's sitting there.
Speaker 1: You should be opposing this stuff and you would be
Speaker 1: grabbing the voters. They would be flocking towards you. What
Speaker 1: can I say? We'll be back in a tick here
Speaker 1: on Outsiders after this short break. Hello, you're watching Outsiders
Speaker 1: with Rita up the pointy end, Panahee, James prepare for
Speaker 1: landing Morrow and myself Rowan, there has been a slight delay.
Speaker 1: Welcome to Heathrow, Dean. Yes, it's known as one of
Speaker 1: the world's busiest airports, the hub of global traffic travel,
Speaker 1: once nicknamed Thiethrow by London cabbes because of its legendary
Speaker 1: light fingered baggage handlers, and now it has a new title,
Speaker 1: net zero Heathrow. This week, Europe's most famous airport had
Speaker 1: net zero flights for over twenty four hours, over one thousand,
Speaker 1: three hundred flights being canceled, throwing hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: passengers around the world into absolute chaos because of yes,
Speaker 1: you guessed it, climate change. Yes, a fire rage through
Speaker 1: an electrical substation. But the scandal is to do with
Speaker 1: the claims that there was no suitable backup power because
Speaker 1: of Heathrow's commitment to net zero. Heathrow denies his claims,
Speaker 1: as the backup worked as planned.
Speaker 18: Hmmm maybe, And I can exclusively reveal this morning to you,
Speaker 18: your viewers and your listeners. Having spoken to an industry expert,
Speaker 18: it appears that he Throw had changed its backup systems
Speaker 18: in order to be wait for it, net zero compliant,
Speaker 18: and therefore they had got rid of their diesel generators
Speaker 18: and had moved towards a biomass generator that was designed
Speaker 18: not to completely replace the grid, but work alongside the grid,
Speaker 18: and therefore basically their net zero compliant backup system has
Speaker 18: completely failed in its core function. At the first time
Speaker 18: of asking, I mean it beggars belief?
Speaker 1: Beggars belief or does it? That was Richard Tice, who
Speaker 1: was deputy the leader of Nigel Parger's Reform Party was
Speaker 1: doing an outstanding job in the UK Parliament. There are,
Speaker 1: of course, many aspects of this story that are deeply alarming,
Speaker 1: not least of which is the cause of the fire itself,
Speaker 1: which is being investigated by counter terrorism police. But even
Speaker 1: more alarming how vulnerable the West may have made itself
Speaker 1: due to the insane fantasy of making our energy systems
Speaker 1: free of carbon emissions. The complete closure of Heathrow due
Speaker 1: to the loss of just one electrical substation is unprecedented
Speaker 1: and it raises major questions for Heathrow and for the governments,
Speaker 1: wrote The Daily Mail. It has also left many stranded
Speaker 1: travelers raging and reduced to tears. For what I think
Speaker 1: should be leaving people raging and reduced to tears is
Speaker 1: not so much the temporary closure of the airport authol
Speaker 1: that that is, but rather the mass betrayal of the
Speaker 1: everyday man and woman in Europe, America, Great Britain, Canada,
Speaker 1: Australia and New Zealand by a reckless group of pampered,
Speaker 1: climate obsessed globalist political and business elites. As Bjorn Lomborg
Speaker 1: writes in The Australia this weekend, quote, UN Secretary General
Speaker 1: Antonio Guterrist has made it clear that urgent climate action
Speaker 1: means a race to net zero, extremist economy punishing policies, yes,
Speaker 1: economy punishing, including rich countries paying poor countries huge sums
Speaker 1: for climate reparations, Sweeping new climate taxes, they're coming and
Speaker 1: ending fossil fuels entirely within twenty five years, and then
Speaker 1: Bjorn makes this damning pronouncement quote the un is ignoring
Speaker 1: the inconvenient truth that there are many important ongoing debates
Speaker 1: among climate scientists and economists. Even after decades of extensive research,
Speaker 1: huge uncertainty remains on how much the world would warm
Speaker 1: from a doubling of CO two, And this is the
Speaker 1: key point. The entire climate alarmism dogma is built on
Speaker 1: a series of theories, assumptions, and assertions, and my view,
Speaker 1: they're spurious, they're unproven, and they're unprovable. Let's just briefly
Speaker 1: remind ourselves, shall we. The entire clim climate change belief
Speaker 1: system is based on the widely accepted but still not
Speaker 1: scientifically proven hypothesis.
Speaker 10: Of the greenhouse effect.
Speaker 1: Under this hypothesis, increases in man made carbon dioxide act
Speaker 1: as a blanket around the Earth's atmosphere, thereby warming the planet,
Speaker 1: cooking it even wreaking havoc with our climate patterns, and
Speaker 1: that unless we reduce CO two emissions in this will
Speaker 1: increase to the point where the Arctic poles melt.
Speaker 6: The sea levels rise, the heat becomes.
Speaker 1: Tolerable, storms and bushfires rage out of control and a
Speaker 1: tire Ecosystems and species are wiped out, and life on
Speaker 1: Earth collapses. Had I come up with this hypothesis as
Speaker 1: a school kid in the late sixties, I would have
Speaker 1: won the sixth Form Science Fiction Prize. But by the
Speaker 1: mid nineteen seventies this concept of a climate apocalypse was
Speaker 1: taken very seriously with a twist see if you can
Speaker 1: spot it.
Speaker 19: What scientists are coming us now is that the threat
Speaker 19: of an eye age is not as remote as they
Speaker 19: once thought. During the lifetime of our grandchildren, Arctic cold
Speaker 19: and perpetual snow could turn most of the inhabitable portions
Speaker 19: of our planet into a polar desert, and weather stations
Speaker 19: in the far North temperatures have been dropping for thirty years.
Speaker 1: Sea courts, long free of summer ice are.
Speaker 5: Now blocked a year round.
Speaker 15: According to some climatologists.
Speaker 19: Within a lifetime, we might be living in the next
Speaker 19: ice age.
Speaker 1: Yes, many scientists in the seventies believe we're facing global
Speaker 1: cooling of global warming. Some still do regardless. In Built
Speaker 1: into the modern climate change scare is the premise that
Speaker 1: man made carbon dioxide is the culprit, and the only
Speaker 1: solution is to reduce our so called carbon footprint. What
Speaker 1: this PREMI signal was rightly or wrongly, is the fact
Speaker 1: that in geological records, increases in carbon dioxide often come
Speaker 1: after a period of warming, not before. As far as
Speaker 1: I'm concerned, this suggests that warming caused those CO two increases,
Speaker 1: not the other way round. What the doomsday theory also
Speaker 1: ignores is that, and this we do know for a fact,
Speaker 1: increases in carbon dioxide may have a beneficial impact using
Speaker 1: some measures. The evidence to date shows the planet has
Speaker 1: been greening over recent decades, not turning into a desert.
Speaker 1: Given that plant life is not only food for us,
Speaker 1: but critical for increased ecosystems and life on Earth, then
Speaker 1: it seems to me that a greener planet, biologically speaking,
Speaker 1: not politically, is a very good thing. So to recap,
Speaker 1: before you begin to think about tackling climate change, you
Speaker 1: as a rational human possessed with your own intelligence and
Speaker 1: critical thinking powers, have to first accept, without questioning, all
Speaker 1: of the following assumptions that the world's climate is changing
Speaker 1: in a manner is historically and geologically abnormal, That we
Speaker 1: as human beings have the intellectual and technological capacity to
Speaker 1: control those changes. That man made carbon emissions, largely due
Speaker 1: to the burning fossil fuels, acts as a greenhouse or
Speaker 1: a blanket around the atmosphere, and that the abnormal warming
Speaker 1: of the planet you believe to be occurring is due
Speaker 1: to the smaller amount of man made carbon emissions in
Speaker 1: the atmosphere, not the much larger percentage of naturally occurring
Speaker 1: carbon emissions. That the result of this perceived warming is
Speaker 1: overwhelmingly destructive as opposed to benign or even positive. That
Speaker 1: the result of what you believe to be destructive abnormal
Speaker 1: warming will result in a doomsday scenario with a measure
Speaker 1: but within a measurable period of decades or centuries, unless
Speaker 1: specific remedial action is undertaken. That the way to reverse
Speaker 1: or mitigate this doomsday scenario is to reduce central between
Speaker 1: carbon emissions to zero percent, recognizing that you have no
Speaker 1: control over the rest of the emissions. Got it Okay.
Speaker 1: Now that you've convinced yourself of all of that, and I,
Speaker 1: for one, do not accept they have all been sufficiently proven,
Speaker 1: you now have to make a whole other series of
Speaker 1: assumptions around the efficacy of so called renewable sources of
Speaker 1: energy to replace the fossil fuels you hold responsible for
Speaker 1: the doomsday scenario that may or may not happen, including
Speaker 1: this particular claim from this particular snake oil salesman.
Speaker 20: And yes, the modeling commission by the Labor part of
Speaker 20: the opposition is very important because it underlines the fact
Speaker 20: that renewable energy is the cheapest form of energy, mister speaker,
Speaker 20: by shifting our energy system to renewable so it's the
Speaker 20: cheapest form of energy. So by taking our energy market
Speaker 20: to eighty two percent renewables by twenty thirty, we will
Speaker 20: reduce emissions, increase jobs and reduce power bills. As we've said,
Speaker 20: the passage of this bill sends a message to investors
Speaker 20: in renewable energy and transmission and storage around the world
Speaker 20: that Australia is open for business to become a renewable
Speaker 20: energy powerhouse.
Speaker 1: Which is just nonsense. We have no hope of being
Speaker 1: a renewable energy superpower because such thing does not exist
Speaker 1: other than in my science fiction novels from the nineteen sixties,
Speaker 1: and because renewable energy cannot compete economically. It's a fantasy.
Speaker 1: As Bu and Lomboard writes quote, the un also repeats
Speaker 1: the oft told lie that renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels.
Speaker 1: He goes on and explains wide as a lie, and
Speaker 1: then says the fact is no country with significant solar
Speaker 1: and wind had low electricity costs. Indeed, on average electricity
Speaker 1: costs are two or three times higher than for countries
Speaker 1: with little solar and wind end of quote. In other words,
Speaker 1: another assumption that is yet to be shown to be true.
Speaker 1: Another assumption. So as well as putting your faith in
Speaker 1: a group of climate scientists, you also have to put
Speaker 1: your faith in the unproven assertions of a group of
Speaker 1: client salesman. And you have to do all of that
Speaker 1: in order to buy into the global brand known as
Speaker 1: net zero. Writing in the UK Telegraph this week, the
Speaker 1: climate skeptic science writer Matt Ridley says about net zero quote,
Speaker 1: it has made some people richer, for sure. Dale Vince,
Speaker 1: an eco tycoon, has made a fortune out of building
Speaker 1: unreliable energy. So have lots of fat cats in the
Speaker 1: city of London, lots of big landowners in the highlands
Speaker 1: of Scotland, and lots of manufacturers in China. I have
Speaker 1: lost count says Matt Ridley, who's a viscount by the
Speaker 1: way of the number of times wealthy people have told
Speaker 1: me I am wrong to criticize the unreliable energy industry
Speaker 1: because quote why Son talk Will's fund has done rather
Speaker 1: well net zero. Crony capitalism, says Ridley is efficient at
Speaker 1: one thing, transferring money from poor people to rich people.
Speaker 1: And this week Britain's learned that the viscount may be correct.
Speaker 1: The Sun newspaper published an explosive leaked document from the
Speaker 1: bureaucrats of Whitehall that was damning about zero, including warning
Speaker 1: that poorer people are those who suffer the most from
Speaker 1: net zero. Here's Richard Tice again in the Commons.
Speaker 18: In my constituents in Boston and Skegness will be concerned
Speaker 18: by reports in the media this morning about a government
Speaker 18: report that shows that the costs of net zero will
Speaker 18: impact negatively on GDP by twenty thirty by some ten percent,
Speaker 18: will increase national debt, increase the risk of a financial crisis,
Speaker 18: and will hit the poorest the hardest.
Speaker 1: Hit the poorest the hardest, a financial crisis lower GDP
Speaker 1: by ten percent.
Speaker 6: What sort of.
Speaker 1: Cruel sick people are so blinded by their own climate
Speaker 1: dogma and corrupted by the greed of the renewables industry
Speaker 1: that they would betray what should be the most fundamental
Speaker 1: duty of any politician not to do no harm, and
Speaker 1: in particular not to harm the poorest and most vulnerable
Speaker 1: people in society. Well, I'll show you what sort of people.
Speaker 21: We cannot ignore net zero. It's not just important for
Speaker 21: the climate, but it's absolutely critical to lowering jobs. Sorry,
Speaker 21: I correct that lowering bills, creating jobs, creating the NAC
Speaker 21: security that we need.
Speaker 1: Yes, did you catch the Freudian slip lowering jobs? And
Speaker 1: then she burst out laughing, ha ha, what a jolly joke,
Speaker 1: before retreating the meaningless climate platitudes. That's our politicians, that's
Speaker 1: an English one. And her final comment energy security don't
Speaker 1: make me laugh. Mass chaos and either all thanks acording
Speaker 1: to some to net zero, you expect dults like Chris
Speaker 1: Bowen and Anthony Albanezi to buy into the climate dogma
Speaker 1: unthinkingly because well, as far as I can tell, they
Speaker 1: don't do much thinking at all. But it is deeply
Speaker 1: dispiriting when you get the Dutton Coalition also buying into
Speaker 1: the entire net zero scare. Ultimately, Australia will be the
Speaker 1: big loser. And here's the irony. We only signed up
Speaker 1: to net zero because Boris Johnson hoodwinked Scott Morrison into
Speaker 1: doing so on the promise that he would be a
Speaker 1: hero at the Glasgow Cop conference. Scott Morrison wasn't. Scott
Speaker 1: Morrison looked like a fool standing there, and he lost
Speaker 1: the election only a few months later. So it is
Speaker 1: more than ironic that this week Boris Johnson's successor, Tory
Speaker 1: Party leader Kemmy Badenock, a former true believer in net zero,
Speaker 1: she's now ditched it.
Speaker 22: I call myself a net zero skeptic model plans on
Speaker 22: realistic targets and deadlines, over reliance on China. We have
Speaker 22: got to start acknowledging what is in plain sight. Net
Speaker 22: zero makes us dangerously dependent on countries who don't share
Speaker 22: our values, and it is risking our energy security. It
Speaker 22: is time to stop pretending everything will be fine. Net
Speaker 22: zero by twenty fifty is impossible. I don't say that
Speaker 22: with pleasure. I want a better future and a better
Speaker 22: environment for our children, but we have to get real.
Speaker 22: Anyone who has done any serious analysis knows it cannot
Speaker 22: be achieved. Without a significant drop in our living standards,
Speaker 22: or worse, by bankrupting.
Speaker 1: Us, bankrupting us hitting the poorest the hardest, lowering our GDP.
Speaker 1: Let me be very blunt. The majority of Australians, a
Speaker 1: clear sixty to forty majority at the very least, would
Speaker 1: in my opinion vote for Peter Dutton if he did
Speaker 1: what Keem bad Knock has just done and came out
Speaker 1: and admitted that the policy of net zero by twenty
Speaker 1: fifty is a disaster and that it must be abandoned.
Speaker 1: It is unforgivably reckless in terms of our prosperity, our kids' futures,
Speaker 1: our energy security, and it harms above and beyond anyone else,
Speaker 1: the poorest Australians. If this imminent election were fought with
Speaker 1: Chris Bowen and Albanisi on the one hand defending the
Speaker 1: insanity of net zero against a dedicated coalition on the
Speaker 1: other side fighting against the crippling costs, the cruelty and
Speaker 1: the woke stupidity of net zero, I know who would win,
Speaker 1: and so do you. In a landslide, it would be
Speaker 1: the voice all over again. What a shame We're not
Speaker 1: going to get that election. World of Wacademia. So the
Speaker 1: good news that I bring James and Reta this morning
Speaker 1: is that we're going to decolonize shakespeareansm when somebody decolonized
Speaker 1: Shakespeare had too.
Speaker 2: Good for too long, that Shakespeare that imperialist colonialists, not
Speaker 2: just that, you know, here's the problem.
Speaker 6: It's not just about the colonialism.
Speaker 7: No, the problem is that people are concerned on the
Speaker 7: left that because Shakespeare is too good and he's been
Speaker 7: so famous and had it, as you say, for too
Speaker 7: good too long, that he could be used as a
Speaker 7: beacon for wait for it, not white supremacy. So there's
Speaker 7: Shakespeare on Stratford on a video irony was the.
Speaker 1: Master of white supremacy. I mean we look at the
Speaker 1: flat see I think.
Speaker 7: I think there's a I think it was into a
Speaker 7: bigger thing which we see coming out of England, but
Speaker 7: frankly we see it here in Australia too. This idea
Speaker 7: that you know, anything that is Anglo Celtic culture is
Speaker 7: that is good you cannot be proud of because you know,
Speaker 7: if you're proud of hey, Shakespeare, that makes you a
Speaker 7: white supremacist.
Speaker 2: But it goes it's worse than that because the left
Speaker 2: in its demented obsession with.
Speaker 3: Rice has actually trying to make white supremacy cool.
Speaker 2: Anything that is positive, whether it's if you're obsessed with, say, fitness,
Speaker 2: that's white supremacy. Say if you enjoy Shakespeare and opera,
Speaker 2: white supremacy. If you're punctual and diligent in your work,
Speaker 2: that's been described as white supremacy. So they actually are
Speaker 2: taking things that most normal people see as positive and
Speaker 2: somehow associating it with white supremacy, which is the dumbest
Speaker 2: thing you can do, because not only is it not accurate,
Speaker 2: it's actually giving white supremacists a big platform, a selling points.
Speaker 2: I don't know what they're trying to achieve here, but
Speaker 2: like much of what the left does, but I love this.
Speaker 7: So I love this because it's like, you know, we
Speaker 7: see this whole thing now where young people, especially young men,
Speaker 7: are getting really rebellious against all the PC cancel culture, good,
Speaker 7: anti male, toxic you're a toxic male, toxic masculinity stuff.
Speaker 7: So you know, we could wind up just this whole
Speaker 7: rebellion where we've got young people doing things like you know,
Speaker 7: liking classical music and Shakespeare and high culture and everything.
Speaker 6: I think it'd be wonderful, that's great.
Speaker 1: But what really, you know, the double standards. We've discussed
Speaker 1: it many times before, but we are you know, us
Speaker 1: to respect, for example, indigenous culture. We're asked to respect
Speaker 1: smoking gum leaves or whatever for traditional reasons. We're asked
Speaker 1: to respect Islam and mis mythical dream serpents were asked
Speaker 1: to respect certain you know, cultural activities that you might find,
Speaker 1: for example, in the Muslim world, which we may not
Speaker 1: particularly like, but we're told, no, no, no, it's traditional.
Speaker 1: You've got to live, You've got to respect their traditions.
Speaker 1: They've been doing that forever. Why are we not allowed
Speaker 1: to be proud of and respect Anglo culture and Anglo art,
Speaker 1: traditional things that the Anglo people have brought to the world,
Speaker 1: such as Shakespeare.
Speaker 7: Well, I mean, I think even to talk about it
Speaker 7: in those terms is to kind of legitimize the left here,
Speaker 7: because you know, our Western civilization, you know, it's a
Speaker 7: gift to the world, it is, Shakespeare is a gift
Speaker 7: to the world, and so to racialize in those terms
Speaker 7: is to do exactly what the left wants and what
Speaker 7: there is though, and we talked about colonization before. It
Speaker 7: all starts with this idea that basically the entire Western
Speaker 7: project is illegitimate. So it is about delegitimizing absolutely everything.
Speaker 1: So but that's why you have to defend it to
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, you have to defend it on all its basis, tradition, cultural,
Speaker 1: the Anglo don't play their game, don't know, No, sorry,
Speaker 1: I will. I will be proud of the Anglo hack
Speaker 1: Saxon heritage and that is not playing their game. That
Speaker 1: has been proud of my own heritage. Now, Columbia University,
Speaker 1: we talked about this earlier, have come out and that
Speaker 1: Trump is using the power that he has of money
Speaker 1: to defund these outfits and organizations, including Australian universities, which
Speaker 1: is great because they are pushing a work agenda. But
Speaker 1: what about this one, James Top lawyers at Mcquarie University.
Speaker 1: We've seen this whole thing where the legal fraternity at
Speaker 1: mcquarie University have been pushing this idea that welcome the
Speaker 1: country is the key part of well illegal course.
Speaker 6: Yeah, just not just that.
Speaker 7: It's that they've been going and saying, you know, for
Speaker 7: kids to get a good assessment, they have to give
Speaker 7: a big, an enthusiastic welcome to country and it's likely
Speaker 7: a quarter or a third of their mark on their
Speaker 7: final presentation, final assignment, so you know their grade goes
Speaker 7: like that. But the other thing too is that the
Speaker 7: Australian newspapers that's really interesting pieces from people submitted anonymously,
Speaker 7: professors and students who said, we actually can't speak out
Speaker 7: against this stuff because it will negatively affect our careers.
Speaker 6: And this is you know, that's the legal.
Speaker 7: Industry by the way, it's about to have AI go
Speaker 7: through it with a hose and for them to be
Speaker 7: teaching these kids this stuff rather than you know, how
Speaker 7: to get ahead in a very competitive legal market is insane.
Speaker 2: I'm talking about AI. I just started using Grock a
Speaker 2: little bit. Yes, yeah, I am blown away by I
Speaker 2: knew it was going to be impressive. I knew it
Speaker 2: was going to be able to bring information from around
Speaker 2: the world world instantly.
Speaker 3: But it's more than that.
Speaker 2: It thinks it's got intuitions.
Speaker 3: It's incredible.
Speaker 2: I was literally just like like I couldn't speak. I
Speaker 2: still can't speak about it because I encourage you Rock
Speaker 2: and ask good questions and see how it works.
Speaker 1: Because we ask it about zeron climate change fantastically.
Speaker 2: No, no, I've been using it for things other than
Speaker 2: professional purposes and it's fascinating. But just quickly on the
Speaker 2: Crow University, not only are they requiring students to give
Speaker 2: these elaborate acknowledgment of countries or they can fail their course,
Speaker 2: but they're making them also these law students do what
Speaker 2: they call a privileged walk, where they explore how privileged
Speaker 2: or oppressed they are. Again, all the units. If you're
Speaker 2: sending your kids to that university, be fully aware of
Speaker 2: what you're paying for. And you're right, it's not just
Speaker 2: the academics and the professionals who us get to speak out.
Speaker 2: The students know if they challenge this, they're going to
Speaker 2: be marked down. And you've got to work very hard
Speaker 2: to get into this course. The last thing you want
Speaker 2: to do is affect your Marx adversely, affect your career
Speaker 2: prospects because I.
Speaker 1: Think it's criminal.
Speaker 7: It is, it's a dereliction it is. But again it
Speaker 7: is about, you know, undermining our Western legal system, you know,
Speaker 7: and saying that that well, it's illegitimate. And we've got
Speaker 7: another story here.
Speaker 1: About Macquarie University is in riots. James around the actually going.
Speaker 7: To talk about this other story here though about British
Speaker 7: schools now canceling Easter due to other religious beliefs. Now
Speaker 7: you can imagine what those other religious beliefs might be.
Speaker 7: But it is again the I think it's James. I
Speaker 7: think it's James or the Zoroastross, but anyway, whoever it is,
Speaker 7: the point is is that, you know, the Christian British
Speaker 7: heritage is being undermined at every turn. We see this
Speaker 7: here in New South Wales. We've seen this with the
Speaker 7: canceling of Christmas and Christmas brackets and things like this,
Speaker 7: which they're talking about maybe bringing back. But you know,
Speaker 7: it is this idea to get anything traditional, anything Christian,
Speaker 7: anything Christmas, anything that's related to our shared heritage has
Speaker 7: to be undermined because it is to the left, it
Speaker 7: is deeply illegitimate.
Speaker 6: What do they want to replace it with? Well think
Speaker 6: about it there you go.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Well I mentioned Ryde. There's a Ride Pride poster
Speaker 1: that somebody an outside has a fan sent to me.
Speaker 1: A Ride Pride City of Ride.
Speaker 23: LGBTQQI the for open to all lgbtqplus community members and
Speaker 23: their allies aged twelve to twenty four.
Speaker 6: Ages twelve tw allies.
Speaker 2: And you're going to have an age limit and it's twelve,
Speaker 2: then there's a problem there is because if it's inappropriate
Speaker 2: for a ten year old, it's probably going to be
Speaker 2: inappropriate for anyone who's twelve or thirteen.
Speaker 1: I agree with you totally.
Speaker 2: As we have said over and over again, members of
Speaker 2: this activist group make life hard for themselves and their
Speaker 2: community by continuously targeting people who they should be leaving alone.
Speaker 2: This is up to the parents to talk about this
Speaker 2: these sorts of issues.
Speaker 3: And we've seen Victoria.
Speaker 2: The State Library has been given this tool kit where
Speaker 2: you're gonna have kids as young as five being asked
Speaker 2: about pronouns leave the kids alone.
Speaker 3: For the love of God, you were kids alone.
Speaker 1: What you said earlier in the show reata about the
Speaker 1: importance of the cultures because this affects every family, every
Speaker 1: mom and dad out there with kids. This is the
Speaker 1: sort of stuff the Coalition should be absolutely hammering Labor
Speaker 1: on because they've allowed this culture to to take hold.
Speaker 6: Isn't it ironic?
Speaker 7: You know, like the old sixties, anth was teacher, leave
Speaker 7: those kids alone, and hey.
Speaker 1: Kids, also, I thought this story amused me. Believing in
Speaker 1: meritocracy is a racist microaggression. I think this is from
Speaker 1: some lunatic left wing outfit. No, this was from some
Speaker 1: scientists at the South Pole who at Antarcta, a research
Speaker 1: station at Antigo.
Speaker 2: Decided to go to the place on Earth and they're
Speaker 2: talking about races.
Speaker 1: I would not want to be stuck in Antarctica with
Speaker 1: someone who wasn't the very very best at their job.
Speaker 7: Well, with those white supremacist polar bears running around all
Speaker 7: over the place, they're pretty scary.
Speaker 1: After the break, more James's donkey votes. We've got Aiden
Speaker 1: mclendon's chat to what's happened to him. That'll be fascinating.
Speaker 1: He on outside of.
Speaker 7: Tim, Hello, you're watching out ciders. I'm James Morrow here
Speaker 7: as always with Rowan Torched, the Tesla's dean and rita
Speaker 7: mostly peaceful protest pantaheap. Well, let's start out today with
Speaker 7: a bit of fun, shall we, Courtesy of the New
Speaker 7: York City subway system, where a young female leftist and
Speaker 7: believer in the left wing doctrine of tolerance and freedom
Speaker 7: of expression, Well, she tried to rip off a guy's
Speaker 7: MAGA cap and comped an instant tariff from reality.
Speaker 24: That's why that is who.
Speaker 6: Wow.
Speaker 7: I haven't seen a continuous camera shot like that since Goodfellas,
Speaker 7: But judging from the reactions of other passengers, it sounds
Speaker 7: like there's more support for the First Amendment and freedom
Speaker 7: of speech in your average New York City subway car
Speaker 7: than there is on your average American university campus. Fancy that,
Speaker 7: But I'll tell you what that young woman got me thinking,
Speaker 7: because she was a perfect example encapsulation of what the
Speaker 7: left has become. They're no longer a political movement based
Speaker 7: on what they saw as trying to build a better world,
Speaker 7: even if the path to their utopia so often winds
Speaker 7: upstream with blood.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 7: Instead, the left is now simply a movement based on
Speaker 7: anger and we have, as we've increasingly seen tearing down
Speaker 7: any and everything based on their grievance of the day.
Speaker 7: This was brought home to me by this headline which
Speaker 7: I saw in the left wing Sydney Morning Herald this week.
Speaker 7: It said, thanks to Trump, Canadians like me have become
Speaker 7: flag waving patriots. Well, you know, I'm sorry, but it
Speaker 7: seems to me that if you only love your country
Speaker 7: because the bad arch man said something mean about it,
Speaker 7: well you never really loved your country. That much at all,
Speaker 7: and what you call patriotism is really nothing more than
Speaker 7: anger and resentment about Trump redirected.
Speaker 6: But then since Trump.
Speaker 7: Came back to office, we have seen this phenomenon playing
Speaker 7: out everywhere. Trump has so fried the left's brains, so
Speaker 7: distorted their reality that they will flip positions on absolutely anything,
Speaker 7: defend any evil or idiocy, simply to be on the
Speaker 7: other side of Trump. Like, I mean, remember when once
Speaker 7: upon a time, and by once upon a time, I
Speaker 7: mean two seconds ago, driving and Tesla was the number
Speaker 7: one way to show you were hip and with it
Speaker 7: when it came to saving the planet. Well, now the
Speaker 7: left is of course out torching Tesla dealerships, and Minnesota
Speaker 7: Governor Tim Waltz, remember him, the manly man who almost
Speaker 7: became America's vice president, is celebrating its share price tanking.
Speaker 25: Saying on my phone, I don't some of you know
Speaker 25: this on the iPhone. They've got that little stock app.
Speaker 25: I added Tesla tude to get me a little boost
Speaker 25: during the day.
Speaker 1: Two twenty five and dropping.
Speaker 7: So and.
Speaker 25: If you own one, if you own one, we're not
Speaker 25: blaming you. You can you can take dental floss and
Speaker 25: pull the Tesla thing off, you know, and take out
Speaker 25: of just telling you, oh.
Speaker 6: How they laughed.
Speaker 7: But what makes Waltz doubly ridiculous here? I mean, he
Speaker 7: wasn't ridiculous enough, but this is a great cell phone.
Speaker 7: His own state of Minnesota's pension retirement fund holds one
Speaker 7: point six million shares in Tesla, So great work there, governor,
Speaker 7: sharing your own pension fund's demise. Meanwhile, I think on
Speaker 7: another example, most people would think that's say, arresting illegal
Speaker 7: Venezuelan migrants who are part of one of the most
Speaker 7: deadly narco syndic gangs in the world and kicking them
Speaker 7: out of the country. Well to say nothing of, of course,
Speaker 7: all the other millions of more on documented aliens who
Speaker 7: slipped into the US during the Biden administration. You'd think
Speaker 7: that once upon a time, this was such Democrat orthodoxy.
Speaker 7: It was kicking them out that Barack Obama was even
Speaker 7: talking about it on his campaign trail in two thousand
Speaker 7: and seven.
Speaker 15: I think we should have strong border security. It doesn't
Speaker 15: make sense for US to allow.
Speaker 16: Hundreds of thousands of people coming through our borders without
Speaker 16: us knowing who they are.
Speaker 7: Hundreds of thousands, tried ten million, now but you know, again,
Speaker 7: with the left, it's one way or the other. And
Speaker 7: that was then, this is now, and in Trump's America,
Speaker 7: of course, border control is now considered yes, racist.
Speaker 26: The Europeans that come here that overstay their visas are undocumented,
Speaker 26: but they don't come across the southern border. So I
Speaker 26: think there's a very clear message as to what this
Speaker 26: president wants the look of a criminal migrant to look
Speaker 26: like what an undocumented migrant.
Speaker 6: And I think that's racist.
Speaker 7: Ah. Yes, there's always a view clip, isn't there. And now,
Speaker 7: of course a left wing Obama appointed judge has been
Speaker 7: trying to set up a constitutional crisis because the Trump
Speaker 7: administration didn't turn around planeloads full of trend Aranagua gang
Speaker 7: members in middle of the ear to try and bring
Speaker 7: them back to the United States. Funny that, But again,
Speaker 7: these people claim on the left to be the real patriots.
Speaker 7: They say, oh, we're the opponents of Donald Trump, but
Speaker 7: they are backing in an agenda that is in fact
Speaker 7: terribly destructive of the America they claim.
Speaker 6: To love, because that's all they know how to do.
Speaker 7: Now, it was the same thing that happened to remember
Speaker 7: at Trump's address to Congress, when the Democrats were refusing
Speaker 7: to even so much as stand when Trump talked all
Speaker 7: about his achievements closing the southern border and ending illegal immigration,
Speaker 7: something that again, once upon a time would have been
Speaker 7: support by the left. Again, as I say, the left, well,
Speaker 7: right now they're angry. They cannot be happy about anything.
Speaker 7: They cannot celebrate anything, even something that is objectively good
Speaker 7: for the country that they claim to love. But most importantly,
Speaker 7: the modern left cannot be consistent because they have ceded
Speaker 7: all their principles to the support of power. Free speech
Speaker 7: long ago gave way to cancel culture and internet censorship.
Speaker 7: Sexual liberation on the left has now become a censorious puritanism.
Speaker 7: And you can think of your own examples, I'm sure.
Speaker 7: But for a while there, the left did seem to
Speaker 7: be about building. I mean, FDR did build the Hoover Dam.
Speaker 7: JFK kicked off the project to put a man on
Speaker 7: the moon. But now that it's Elon Musk putting rockets
Speaker 7: into space and catching them with chopsticks, the left is
Speaker 7: burning the guy's cars. And that's because all the left
Speaker 7: now has is gaition, destruction, and revolution, and they don't
Speaker 7: even know what they're aiming for anymore.
Speaker 1: That was brilliant, James. And yet the Tedos sufferers say
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't know how to build anything.
Speaker 2: The man who has created three industries, not just products.
Speaker 1: Actual industries.
Speaker 2: The managers this week went into add a space SpaceX
Speaker 2: not not necessary.
Speaker 1: The people cavalry.
Speaker 3: Astronauts and.
Speaker 2: Offered to rescue those astronauts under the Biden administration, and
Speaker 2: Biden said no because he thought it would be a boost.
Speaker 3: For Musk and Trump.
Speaker 2: So these poor astronauts were supposed to be there for
Speaker 2: a week were therefore close to ten months have been
Speaker 2: brought back.
Speaker 3: This is heroic.
Speaker 1: Yes, it's incredible, absolutely worse quart brilliant. Now you might remember,
Speaker 1: many of you will remember back on a Australia Day
Speaker 1: we had a terrific guest, Aiden mcclindon, who is the
Speaker 1: mayor of Whittlesey. Now many of you wrote to us
Speaker 1: afterwards and said, what a great guy, he was, terrific,
Speaker 1: what a great interview. Please get him back on Outsiders,
Speaker 1: which we have been intending to do. We did not
Speaker 1: realize it would be under these circumstances an extraordinary story.
Speaker 1: Aiden is the independent mayor of Whittlesey, the CEO of
Speaker 1: the Council has locked the mayor out of the council.
Speaker 1: It is bizarre stuff, and Aidan is suggesting it's probably
Speaker 1: to do with that appearance here on Outsiders. Aidan, great
Speaker 1: to have you back on Outsiders under any circumstances, but
Speaker 1: tell us about the circumstances surrounding what has been going
Speaker 1: on at Whittlesea since you appeared on Outsiders.
Speaker 27: No worries, Good morning Rita, James and Dean and I
Speaker 27: tend to get in trouble going on this program, so
Speaker 27: we'll see what it eventuates from this one. I will
Speaker 27: have to start from the outset again that these when
Speaker 27: it's up my own personal opinions and views and not
Speaker 27: as a mayor of the Council of Whittlesey. So obviously
Speaker 27: we're having a bit of a standoff between the CEO
Speaker 27: and myself in terms of some of the instructions that
Speaker 27: have been handed to me. But effectively I've been banned
Speaker 27: from the council premises, from the council chambers, from talking
Speaker 27: to my colleagues, counselors and of course to staff, and
Speaker 27: I've had no resources, no personal assistant. So I've been
Speaker 27: in the dark for the best part of four weeks
Speaker 27: now and this is unprecedented and as I see it,
Speaker 27: this is democracy on the line in Victoria in local government.
Speaker 2: Well, how can the CEO, who's a bureaucrat do this
Speaker 2: to someone who is an elected by the public, by
Speaker 2: your constituents in wittle c to ban you from the
Speaker 2: council premises deactivating your card so you can't even access
Speaker 2: the building and taking away resources like staff member.
Speaker 3: How is that even possible?
Speaker 2: I mean, as you said, on its face, this looks
Speaker 2: like something that is democracy denial. You were elected by
Speaker 2: the constituents and yet you can't perform your role.
Speaker 15: Now, well, that's right.
Speaker 27: So what's happened even earlier in the outset during election
Speaker 27: time as a candidate, I had a bit of a
Speaker 27: witch hunt from the Labor Party towards me. I was
Speaker 27: running a team of independence just to get the to
Speaker 27: do the basics brilliantly, and that was and also to
Speaker 27: freeze rates because I could see an extraordinary amount of
Speaker 27: money going in places that are not local government issues.
Speaker 27: I ran on that and I've got a huge overwhelming
Speaker 27: majority and within four or five months I've obviously raddled
Speaker 27: a few feathers, and I've asked a lot of questions
Speaker 27: about where the money's going. We've had some fifty organizations
Speaker 27: and committees that have community organizations that have been created
Speaker 27: in the last four years of administration. I'm simply asking
Speaker 27: where's the money going. And of course, as a result
Speaker 27: of that, I've had a whole array of false eelle delegations.
Speaker 15: I've had a fraudulent petition lodged.
Speaker 27: Against me where seventy five percent of the signatures were
Speaker 27: not even within the council. And these are the games
Speaker 27: I've had to try and duck and weave to try
Speaker 27: and run the city. And I really feel sorry for
Speaker 27: the people, the two hundred and thirty thousand residents who
Speaker 27: have just want to see the basics get done. But
Speaker 27: what we're seeing here, I think is symptomatic of a
Speaker 27: lot of what's happening on a lot of mayors and
Speaker 27: councilors called me from across the state.
Speaker 2: But on what grounds have you been banned from the
Speaker 2: council buildings? What is the justification for that?
Speaker 27: Yeah, there were several allegations that've been coming hot and fast,
Speaker 27: probably since the Belsen's program. One of them is there's
Speaker 27: psychological damage to staff because of my policy positions in.
Speaker 15: The public arena.
Speaker 27: I did call for the rainbow flags to be taken
Speaker 27: out of childcares and kindis and primary schools, which I
Speaker 27: think is just a reflection of the majority, particularly.
Speaker 15: In the city of Whittlesey.
Speaker 27: And I've seen obviously political machines mobilized that are not
Speaker 27: in agreeentce with my narrative. But as democratically elected mayor,
Speaker 27: I'm there to represent the views of the people and
Speaker 27: I've got overwhelming support as I ran on a platform
Speaker 27: of creating child friendly spaces. Unfortunately, there's an element of
Speaker 27: the socialist left particularly and the Labour Party. They've mobilized
Speaker 27: against me in Wittlesey. What I've had to put through.
Speaker 27: I've had a death threat, I've had you know, the
Speaker 27: cars ramsacked. I've had that much hate and slur put
Speaker 27: against me and stand in the public arena. It's gotten
Speaker 27: to the point where it's quite desperate, and unfortunately the
Speaker 27: bureaucratic machine that faces in the background has been less
Speaker 27: than supportive, in fact complicit in terms of blocking.
Speaker 15: Me out of the People's Chamber.
Speaker 27: The people built it and today I will be calling
Speaker 27: on both sides of the political sphere to instigate a
Speaker 27: raw commission in local government in Victoria.
Speaker 7: James, So do you think then that there needs to
Speaker 7: be a broader reform of local government in Australia, Because frankly,
Speaker 7: this is something You're not the only or mayor who
Speaker 7: I have heard this from. And it seems to me
Speaker 7: like local government across Australia is broken. We have so
Speaker 7: many fiftoms in New South Wales where I've heard the
Speaker 7: exact same stories. Is there a major government reform needed
Speaker 7: for the way we deal with these councils that should
Speaker 7: be about picking up the trash. My own council can't
Speaker 7: even do that, but they do all sorts of ridiculous
Speaker 7: far left cultural nonsense.
Speaker 27: Absolutely, And I think what's happened is the Local Government
Speaker 27: Act of twenty twenty in Victoria shifted the power balance
Speaker 27: heavily into the bureaucratics court. But what we've seen is
Speaker 27: massive cough shifting from the state government to local government jurisdiction.
Speaker 27: So we're picking up the tab left, right and center
Speaker 27: for issues that are state government. So there's this duplication,
Speaker 27: there's this lack of clarity in the roles of local
Speaker 27: state and federal governments right across Australia, but particularly in Victoria.
Speaker 27: And what I've seen now is you've got these little
Speaker 27: pseudo business models where you've got seventy nine minipacilities right
Speaker 27: across the state, where the Labor Party are treating them
Speaker 27: like their own pseudo Labor Party branches for the best part,
Speaker 27: and unfortunately, there is no clear distinction between local and
Speaker 27: state issues. There is obviously, Look, when you look at
Speaker 27: a pyramid, the base of the pyramid when it comes
Speaker 27: to stenching corruption in Victoria is local government. And you
Speaker 27: see it, and you're talking about fifteen billion dollar industry
Speaker 27: with these falsely elected officials that have very little say,
Speaker 27: and if they do, if they step outside of the
Speaker 27: code of conduct or what they can and can't say,
Speaker 27: then they're quickly dismissed. They're silenced, they're segregated, they're smeared
Speaker 27: into the community, they're told that they're a big, bad.
Speaker 15: Evil person.
Speaker 27: And to the extent where I've actually been blocked and
Speaker 27: my card has been deactivated. Now this is actually critical
Speaker 27: and I will be contacting the governor, and I have
Speaker 27: contacted the local government minister, and I will be calling
Speaker 27: on the major parties. As I said, for a wall commission,
Speaker 27: because this is not just isolated to Whittlesey. From what
Speaker 27: I'm hearing right across the date is that there's a
Speaker 27: lot of people with a lot of conflicts of interests,
Speaker 27: and there's good counselors trying to say the right thing.
Speaker 15: But at the minute they step out of.
Speaker 27: Line of what the narrative is of the left, then
Speaker 27: unfortunately you do get squeezed out and going to I'm
Speaker 27: not going to get squeezed out.
Speaker 15: I'm going to double down. I'm going to let the
Speaker 15: people know exactly what's happening.
Speaker 27: And blow the lid on this. And I really think
Speaker 27: this is time where all seventy nine CEOs should be
Speaker 27: put on notice. And if they've got nothing to hide,
Speaker 27: they've got nothing to worry about. But a raw commission,
Speaker 27: I think in the in the stension the corruption right
Speaker 27: across this state needs to blow the lid on it.
Speaker 27: If it takes me to be able to walk the
Speaker 27: plank in that process, and so be it. But I
Speaker 27: will not sit back and let unelected officials do this.
Speaker 1: Congratulations, Aiden, We've got to cut it off there. Thanks
Speaker 1: so much, Aiden McClinton mayor of we don't see their
Speaker 1: great words. Thanks so much for coming on outside. This
Speaker 1: up after the break, I'm tech. Roll up, Roll up.
Speaker 1: It's the wackiest show in town, ladies and gentlemen, boys
Speaker 1: and girls. It's the Canra Clown Show, starring our very
Speaker 1: own orator, extraordinary mangler of the vowels, killer of the consonants,
Speaker 1: legendary exponents of the art of annunciation, Albozo himself.
Speaker 8: What I see is his relentless negativity, all the.
Speaker 9: Carping and the negativity to those open two of more
Speaker 9: negativity under Peter Dutton, Peeda Dutton another day, another bit
Speaker 9: of negativity.
Speaker 1: Ah, yes, so much negativity from visc gun in three.
Speaker 1: But what is mister Dutton's famous negativity all about? Turns out,
Speaker 1: the man who's hopefully Australia's next Prime Minister is calling
Speaker 1: out Alboso and the Labor Party for being secretly run
Speaker 1: by that bunch of circus musclemen at the CFMU. Here's
Speaker 1: Alboso back in the day playing pantomime villains with CFM members,
Speaker 1: and here's one of these construction clowns practicing his persuasion
Speaker 1: moves on a member of the opposite sex, as seen
Speaker 1: on the damning sixty minutes special last week.
Speaker 28: It's a coward attack on a woman carried out by
Speaker 28: a CFMIU Health and Safety representative while on his lunch
Speaker 28: break from a Victorian government rail project.
Speaker 1: The coalition we're quick to jump and up and down
Speaker 1: and right this, so call this criminality out for what
Speaker 1: it is.
Speaker 29: We've essentially got organized crime figures running the construction sector
Speaker 29: in this country. This is the biggest corruption scandal in
Speaker 29: our country's history because we are talking about billions of dollars,
Speaker 29: billions of dollars that are being paid by ultimately Australian
Speaker 29: taxpayers through the Victorian government, through the Elban easy government.
Speaker 6: For bloated prices.
Speaker 29: Project times are being blown out, the costs are escalating,
Speaker 29: and for every kilometer of road that's being built, every
Speaker 29: hospital it's being built, there's a thirty percent CFMAU tax
Speaker 29: at least.
Speaker 1: Indeed, it's easy to criticize the union movement, but what
Speaker 1: the public don't see is the easy camaraderie that exists
Speaker 1: between the union movement and every day Melbourne construction workers,
Speaker 1: as can be seen in this ad for union membership
Speaker 1: will be a favor.
Speaker 13: Huh.
Speaker 6: Hold this, I know that was coming.
Speaker 1: Oh sorry, that was a scene from the Sopranos. Technical mistake,
Speaker 1: and not how that happened. Here's an actual CFMEU ad. Ah. Yes,
Speaker 1: the CFMEU slogan you work hard for it. In fact,
Speaker 1: that's an uncannily accurate ad. You see everyday Australians do
Speaker 1: or work bloody hard so that union bosses and overpaid
Speaker 1: union members can bludge around and go fishing on our money.
Speaker 1: That's how I read that ad. At any rate, since
Speaker 1: Alboso took over running the labor circus, sorry caucus, labor
Speaker 1: has been the beneficiary of over eleven and a half
Speaker 1: million dollars worth of election funding support from the CFMEUM
Speaker 1: little wondrous cynic might say that the Prime Minister refuses
Speaker 1: to run a Royal commission into the Shenanigans of the CFMEU. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: not to be outdone, Jimbo the Clown getting ready for
Speaker 1: next week's budget pantomime show, where he'll do his best
Speaker 1: to disguise the fact that Australia's debt blowout is the
Speaker 1: worst in the developed world. No doubt he'll blame Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and climbate change. But anyway, speaking of allegations against
Speaker 1: Labor and accusations of dodgy goings on. The recently re
Speaker 1: elected Cook Labor government in Wa is now facing a
Speaker 1: media storm over the way the election was run, or
Speaker 1: rather run badly.
Speaker 24: There are calls for the Corruption and Crime Commission to
Speaker 24: investigate the running of the state's state election or Saturday's
Speaker 24: election comes as revelation as the company awarded the contract
Speaker 24: had previously donated tens of thousands of dollars to the
Speaker 24: Labor party.
Speaker 1: Oh well, there are allegations that people were waiting long
Speaker 1: queues at the polling booths, that there weren't enough staff,
Speaker 1: even that people were fainting, and worse that certain polling
Speaker 1: booths ran out of ballots so people didn't get to votes.
Speaker 30: If the Commission can't ensure that every voter gets to
Speaker 30: have their say when they rock up at a booth,
Speaker 30: they failed. They've got one job every four years. Now
Speaker 30: they can't do that one job every four years. They've
Speaker 30: got serious questions to answer.
Speaker 1: The Wa Electoral commissioners said that no one was refused
Speaker 1: the opportunity to vote, but still how depressing our very
Speaker 1: own election fraud allegations and there's a federal election right
Speaker 1: around the corner. And speaking of which, who should pop
Speaker 1: up in the news this week.
Speaker 31: Other than Princess alegra Empress of the Holy Lands of Wentworth,
Speaker 31: Queen of virtue signaling and climate kookiness herself, who somehow
Speaker 31: or other forgot to declare her role as a director
Speaker 31: of some seven companies almost a year after some were created.
Speaker 1: Yes, why is it always those who loved to lecture
Speaker 1: the rest of us about our appalling behavior who always
Speaker 1: managed to forget the rules themselves? And speaking of Wentworth,
Speaker 1: mister Trumbull popped up again this week on the Project
Speaker 1: where he suddenly discovered the virtues of free speech.
Speaker 27: Dubin would like you to shut up, and so would
Speaker 27: Elbow presumably.
Speaker 1: Well so would you presumably. But you shouldn't have asked
Speaker 1: me to come on the project.
Speaker 11: You know.
Speaker 1: Listen, we believe in free speech in Australia. Every Australian
Speaker 1: is entitled to free speech, even former prime ministers hmm.
Speaker 1: Really put aside the fact that the Turnbull government liked
Speaker 1: the Avid government before it talked big on free speech,
Speaker 1: but when it came to the crunch, both pms failed
Speaker 1: to repeal the vile section eighteen c of the Racial
Speaker 1: Discrimination Act, the biggest disaster for free speech in this
Speaker 1: country and arguably the law that contributed to the death
Speaker 1: of my friend Bill Leak. The tragic truth is that
Speaker 1: we do not have free speech in Australia, as Malcolm claims,
Speaker 1: and it's getting worse, not better. Here is the Labor
Speaker 1: Premiere of New South Wales proudly defending the absence of
Speaker 1: free speech in New South Wales as he refuses to
Speaker 1: listen to calls to nullify his so called hate speech
Speaker 1: anti free speech laws.
Speaker 32: There's been some that have been agitating in the Parliament
Speaker 32: to nullify the laws, to remove them off the statute books.
Speaker 32: Think about what kind of toxic message that would send
Speaker 32: to the New South Wales community. And I think the
Speaker 32: advocates for those changes need to explain what do they
Speaker 32: want people to have the right to say? What kind
Speaker 32: of racist abuse do they want to see or be
Speaker 32: able to lawfully see on the streets of Sydney. I recognize,
Speaker 32: and I've fully said from the beginning that we don't
Speaker 32: have the same freedom of speech laws that they have
Speaker 32: in the United States, and the reason for that is
Speaker 32: that we want to hold together our multicultural community and
Speaker 32: have people live in peace free from the kind of
Speaker 32: vilification and hatred that we do see around the world.
Speaker 1: So there you have it, in men's's own words. In
Speaker 1: order to protect the myth of peaceful multiculturalism, which has failed,
Speaker 1: every day, Australians are forced by law to not have
Speaker 1: free speech. So let me answer mister mins his question.
Speaker 1: I want to be able to criticize certain ethnic and
Speaker 1: cultural communities because I do not believe that certain aspects
Speaker 1: of their culture are beneficial to Australia, and I believe
Speaker 1: some of their customs and ancient hatreds have no place
Speaker 1: in this country and should never have been allowed in
Speaker 1: the first place. Now, if I put a name to
Speaker 1: that criticism, am I guilty of your hate speech? Mister mens,
Speaker 1: you tell me, because if I am, then your laws
Speaker 1: are completely unacceptable. When did Australians ever agree that along
Speaker 1: with sacrificing our national culture on the alter of multiculturalism,
Speaker 1: we would also accept government censorship of our right to
Speaker 1: speak our minds freely about the failure of certain ethnic
Speaker 1: communities to assimilate. Are we a successful melting pot or
Speaker 1: a powder keg about to explode?
Speaker 10: Don't ask blue mink.
Speaker 1: And that's it for this week's Outsiders. Thank you so
Speaker 1: much for watching. We really do appreciate it. Did you
Speaker 1: see this amazing footage of Donald Trump? Drones put up
Speaker 1: in the air and there he is up in the sky.
Speaker 1: Fantastic Florida. God love Florida. Fantastic stuff. Now lots more
Speaker 1: to watch during the week. You've got James's Campaign Confidential
Speaker 1: tonights at six pm. And then during the week you've
Speaker 1: got the Rita Panehe Show at eleven every evening, plus
Speaker 1: Friday you've got The World according to Rowandine at seven.
Speaker 1: Then you've got the Reewers reported a. Then you've got
Speaker 1: Rita pane He at nine o'clock. So much and we'll
Speaker 1: see you next Sunday at nine am. See