Speaker 1: Late Welcome to the Late base.
Speaker 2: Good even great to have your company.
Speaker 3: I'm James Macpherson with Liz Storer and Caleb Bond coming up.
Speaker 3: Jockey suspended after a rank Outsider wins by.
Speaker 2: Twenty two lengths. How do you explain that?
Speaker 3: But more importantly, how do you explain that our good
Speaker 3: friend Caleb Bond didn't give us a heads up about
Speaker 3: this twenty eight to.
Speaker 2: One r.
Speaker 4: I didn't have any money on it either, so we
Speaker 4: can all feel sorry for it.
Speaker 5: We believe you.
Speaker 3: Caleb will fill us in on that one a little
Speaker 3: later when we get to the papers. Plans to have
Speaker 3: indigenous people co design Brisbane Olympic facilities and the Albenezy
Speaker 3: government using the Future Fund to invest in green energy projects. Well,
Speaker 3: of course all of that when we look at the papers.
Speaker 3: But first, just when you thought local government in this
Speaker 3: country could not possibly get any worse, along came the
Speaker 3: Adelaide City Council. They're proposing to have a blanket speed
Speaker 3: limit of thirty kilometers an hour throughout the CBD have
Speaker 3: listened to Lord Mayor Jane Lomax Smith tell ABC Radio
Speaker 3: that improving safety came down to two options. Either a
Speaker 3: thirty k speed limit, or getting motorists to wear helmets.
Speaker 6: I mean, we will be much safer if we were
Speaker 6: padded around our seats and all will crash helmets inside
Speaker 6: a car, But it's not going to take off because
Speaker 6: that's going too far. The speed limits are important because
Speaker 6: ninety percent you're going to die if you're hit by
Speaker 6: a car at fifty kilometers an hour, and it's down
Speaker 6: to ten percent if you're only going thirty.
Speaker 3: So, following this logic, if the car is doing thirty
Speaker 3: ks an hour and hits a pedestrian, there's only a
Speaker 3: ten percent likelihood of that person dying. Why not just
Speaker 3: make it a fifteen k speed limit and reduce the
Speaker 3: likelihood of death to five percent or better yet, have
Speaker 3: motorists disassemble their cars when they reach the city and
Speaker 3: carry them on their backs. Or they could introduce the
Speaker 3: UK's red flag policy for eighteen sixty five, where motorists
Speaker 3: were required to have a pedestrian walk in front of them,
Speaker 3: waving a red flag to warn bystanders that a vehicle
Speaker 3: was approaching. Or they could just tell pedestrians to get
Speaker 3: off their phones when they're crossing the road. This is
Speaker 3: a council that has eat scooters shooting down pathways without
Speaker 3: regard for pedestrian safety. But they're trying to stop drivers
Speaker 3: from driving at a reasonable speed.
Speaker 2: Caleb.
Speaker 3: This may save the life of a pedestrian, but it
Speaker 3: will totally killed trade within the CBD, won't it.
Speaker 4: They've already tried this well, actually not quite as bad.
Speaker 4: They didn't try thirty.
Speaker 1: Kilometers an hour.
Speaker 4: But under these turchip of Stephen Yarwood when he was
Speaker 4: the Lord Mayor some teen odd years ago, he was
Speaker 4: driving around in an electric vehicle back then as well,
Speaker 4: it should be noted, must be one of the first
Speaker 4: blokes who ever did so. But quite proudly he always
Speaker 4: had it parked out at the front of the town hall.
Speaker 1: But they reduced the speed limit to.
Speaker 4: Forty kilometers an hour, and I think that lasted about
Speaker 4: a year and then everyone got the urates with it
Speaker 4: and away it went. Because you know, you want people
Speaker 4: to come to the CBD, right, you want them to
Speaker 4: come into the city and shop.
Speaker 1: What a great way.
Speaker 4: To turn people away, say oh, you've got to go
Speaker 4: thirty kilometers an hour through the whole thing. Now, this
Speaker 4: is a proposal that's come back to the staff. I
Speaker 4: mean It's stipped more and more ridiculous the more you
Speaker 4: look at it. So the last council, this council was
Speaker 4: elected in twenty twenty two, I think so the last
Speaker 4: council commissioned this work to be done. So it has
Speaker 4: taken years for the staff to come back and say
Speaker 4: to the councilors, here's some proposals about what we could
Speaker 4: do with the speed limit. You know what they've spent
Speaker 4: on doing all of that, one hundred and thirty thousand dollars.
Speaker 4: The Council's been one hundred and thirty thousand dollars to
Speaker 4: come back and say that they should reduce the speed
Speaker 4: limit to thirty k. It is simply anti car. They
Speaker 4: don't want people to drive cars. But the problem is
Speaker 4: particularly in a city like Adelaide. Like even in Sydney,
Speaker 4: you can get away with public transport and whatever. Adelaide
Speaker 4: just doesn't have the same public transport network.
Speaker 1: Let's help people get around in cars.
Speaker 4: Can you believe you can even park your car in
Speaker 4: the CBD in Adelaide for a reasonable price, that's how
Speaker 4: the city operates. You put it down to thirty k
Speaker 4: an hour. No one will go there. I'm telling you
Speaker 4: no one will go there.
Speaker 7: Look, honestly, I just think this is pure rage bait.
Speaker 7: They've had a workshop, that's all. So actually to say
Speaker 7: that the council is proposing fake news as city councilor myself, No,
Speaker 7: Actually the work was outsourced to a firm called Standtech,
Speaker 7: which is an engineering firm, so even the council themselves
Speaker 7: hadn't done the works.
Speaker 2: Most of the councilors are in favor of.
Speaker 5: This super come back with three three options.
Speaker 7: Because we're reviewing the CBD speed limits, this is one
Speaker 7: of the three options. Whether it will get up or not,
Speaker 7: I don't think it is very likely at all.
Speaker 2: Solids.
Speaker 7: One of us used to be a city councilor and
Speaker 7: it happens to be me.
Speaker 5: These workshops.
Speaker 1: Do you attend them the time?
Speaker 5: Yes, but this is the inner workings. You attend them
Speaker 5: all the time.
Speaker 7: Proposals come across your desk constantly, and yes, it's your
Speaker 7: job to be across them and vet the stupid ones,
Speaker 7: which I'm sure unless these guys have rocks in their heads,
Speaker 7: they will do. I wouldn't get too excited about it.
Speaker 7: Adeladians do not listen to these.
Speaker 5: Guys who are clearly just trying to freak you out.
Speaker 7: This is rage bait and nothing more until there's actually
Speaker 7: a proposal before counsel.
Speaker 5: It's going to a council.
Speaker 7: Meeting, which all of these counselors would know the outcry
Speaker 7: from the public if it actually went that.
Speaker 3: I can I just say it's not rage baite because
Speaker 3: the Lord mayor herself you heard her, went on radio
Speaker 3: and said this is a serious proposal. They spent an
Speaker 3: hour and a half last night looking at it, and
Speaker 3: the majority of counselors, according to the Adelaide Advertiser, like
Speaker 3: the idea, there wasn't.
Speaker 7: The majority of counselors at all. Also, they wouldn't reveal
Speaker 7: that there was one quoted in the article you said
Speaker 7: he was completely against it. Nowhere in the article does
Speaker 7: it say the majority of counselors are.
Speaker 5: On board at all.
Speaker 2: I think you did.
Speaker 7: Very rarely, the councilors very rarely flag how they're going
Speaker 7: to vote on anything, especially when it's not actually going
Speaker 7: to counsel.
Speaker 4: Just you wait, will it will just you wait, just
Speaker 4: you wait. Something tells me something bad is going to happen.
Speaker 4: Bad things that are happening with Once upon a time,
Speaker 4: Jaguar was basically the picture of a beautiful English car, right,
Speaker 4: I mean you think of the mark too. I think
Speaker 4: that was Inspector Morse's vehicle, the x J six. I
Speaker 4: mean they were beautiful pieces of metal. You could look
Speaker 4: at them and go, yes, that is something I would
Speaker 4: want to drive around him. Well, Jaguar, these days you've
Speaker 4: got some lovely example. I mean, look at that. That
Speaker 4: is when cars were great. Make cars great again. There's
Speaker 4: something for Donald Trump to take up. But the once
Speaker 4: great brand that was Jaguar has now decided they're getting
Speaker 4: out of the petrol market altogether. They've ceased selling new vehicles.
Speaker 4: They're going to come back in twenty twenty six with
Speaker 4: all electric vehicles. They thought, right, we need a new
Speaker 4: campaign and we need a new logo to announce ourselves
Speaker 4: to the world as the brand new Jaguar.
Speaker 1: Watch this ad and tell.
Speaker 8: Me is there anything missing?
Speaker 1: Did you see a car? There?
Speaker 2: No car, nor did I.
Speaker 4: Jaguar is advertising themselves as some sort of I don't know.
Speaker 1: Woke, trendy old look at us.
Speaker 4: We've got some weird outfits in our ads.
Speaker 1: Not literally, not one car to be seen now.
Speaker 4: Of course, The response was swift online, with people making
Speaker 4: exactly that point. Where is the car? Why do you
Speaker 4: think that this is the appropriate way.
Speaker 1: To sell a car?
Speaker 4: It smacks so much of when bud Light, of course
Speaker 4: signed up per Dylan Mulvaaney the transgender TikToker, to promote
Speaker 4: their beer, and then of course sales plummeted directly after
Speaker 4: that because people said, oh, hang on a minute, men
Speaker 4: generally drink beer, and here we are trying to market
Speaker 4: beer to men with a transgender woman who is actually
Speaker 4: a man but not actually a woman. I mean, what
Speaker 4: on earth do they think they are playing it? Go woke,
Speaker 4: go broke, And I suspect that is exactly what will
Speaker 4: happen with Jacob.
Speaker 7: I wish I was sat at the marketing meetings. When
Speaker 7: I see an ad like this, I'm just like, Okay,
Speaker 7: how did this happen? You're sitting there and no doubt
Speaker 7: the mahogany walled officers of Jaguar, and you say, he's
Speaker 7: bear with me.
Speaker 9: Here.
Speaker 7: We're going to have a pile of androgynous looking people.
Speaker 7: You won't be able to tell whether they are male
Speaker 7: or female, wearing dresses that certainly no woman would wear dead,
Speaker 7: and they're just going to kind of walk out.
Speaker 5: Of a lift, stand around for a bit.
Speaker 7: At the very end they'll be sitting down, then get
Speaker 7: up and walk off.
Speaker 5: What do you reckon?
Speaker 7: And we're going to have just completely ambiguous meaning things
Speaker 7: flashing up on the screenlight, live, vivid, delete, ordinary, break, mould, copy,
Speaker 7: nothing except Jaguar. You look like you've copied every single
Speaker 7: woke company who has tried this and failed for years.
Speaker 7: Remember last year, Seafolly was like, oh, we're going to
Speaker 7: have a trans ambassador.
Speaker 5: Now, this is a.
Speaker 7: Marketing ploy for women's bikinis, and they decided to have
Speaker 7: a trans ambassador that had a full beard and very obvious.
Speaker 7: Genitalia failed miserably. Remember in twenty nineteen where Jillette We're like,
Speaker 7: we're going to create a heartwarming scene of a man
Speaker 7: teaching his trans son how to shave, although by virtue
Speaker 7: of being a girl there was nothing to actually shave.
Speaker 7: I mean, this has never gone well. You use the
Speaker 7: example of bud Light. Absolutely, that's a very famous recent one.
Speaker 7: Now the same goes for all the woke movies. The
Speaker 7: Rainbow Mafia get into these institutions, somehow market these ideas,
Speaker 7: but it never ever has once gone well for any
Speaker 7: company Why why would Jag you go for this? I
Speaker 7: wonder if, although this would be a very late apology,
Speaker 7: if this has anything to do with the trans employee
Speaker 7: who who successfully sued them back in twenty because they
Speaker 7: felt that they hadn't been supported enough transitioning.
Speaker 5: At work, their work being Jaguar.
Speaker 7: It's just a hunch, but I'm like, this would be
Speaker 7: a very late mea culper if it's got anything to
Speaker 7: do with that.
Speaker 5: I'm just trying to come up with a reason, pretty.
Speaker 4: Good way to just like trash the entire brand that
Speaker 4: is Jaguar. Like that is the most bizarre thing about
Speaker 4: this to me is that Jaguar, like I was saying before,
Speaker 4: used to be a picture of class.
Speaker 1: It was a status symbol.
Speaker 4: You know, I'm driving around in a Jag right, and
Speaker 4: now it's just going to be like every other work
Speaker 4: corporate Oh look, I'm driving around in my vehicle in
Speaker 4: a weird dress and a funny haircut.
Speaker 1: Like, what does that tell the world.
Speaker 4: I'm driving around in an electric Jaguar belonging to a
Speaker 4: company that once upon a time was a Titan, a
Speaker 4: British manufacturer.
Speaker 3: I just love their slogan copy nothing Well, they're going
Speaker 3: to sell nothing. It's like they typed into an AI bot,
Speaker 3: you know, create a thirty second commercial that will absolutely
Speaker 3: destroy our and the.
Speaker 2: AI bot made good.
Speaker 3: Someone wrote in the comments to one of the articles
Speaker 3: on this, this makes me want to sell my Jaguar,
Speaker 3: and I don't even have a Jaguar, which I think
Speaker 3: many of us can identify. Within the sixties and the seventies,
Speaker 3: Jaguar advertise themselves as grace, space and pace.
Speaker 2: That's good, but this going bold copying nothing.
Speaker 3: They're going electric nine years before the EU have mandated it.
Speaker 2: They are copying everything.
Speaker 3: The people I feel sorry for, however, are not so
Speaker 3: much the Jaguar drivers who will frankly be embarrassed driving
Speaker 3: their Jaguar after seeing that ad. But it's the thousands
Speaker 3: of employees who work for Jaguar who rely upon Jaguar
Speaker 3: for their income to be able to put food on
Speaker 3: the table, whose jobs will be imperiled based on this commercial.
Speaker 3: If it goes anything like bud Light, sales will go
Speaker 3: through the floor and will all laugh at Jaguar. But
Speaker 3: there's good people who work for the company whose jobs
Speaker 3: are jeopardized because they go woke and put stupid ads
Speaker 3: like this.
Speaker 7: Well, it sounds like the already jeopardized. With Jagua going
Speaker 7: one hundred percent electrics so quickly, the demand for electric
Speaker 7: cars has not been very high.
Speaker 5: Do you guys pay any attention to the markets to.
Speaker 7: Capitol Hill now, where the war over biological men in
Speaker 7: women's bathrooms and locker rooms and other private spaces has
Speaker 7: just kicked off a new Can you believe it? We
Speaker 7: actually do have a brand new Democratic rep in the
Speaker 7: House after.
Speaker 5: The red wave that we just saw.
Speaker 7: However, this time, Sarah McBride, her name is, She's a
Speaker 7: Democrat from Delaware, has just been elected. And this is
Speaker 7: the first transgender congress person ever in the history.
Speaker 5: Of the Capital. And so Nancy Nancy Mace.
Speaker 1: Rep.
Speaker 5: Nancy Mace.
Speaker 7: I always got to call them MPs, but they're reps
Speaker 7: over there.
Speaker 1: Rep.
Speaker 7: Nancy Mace has wasted no time whatsoever putting up a
Speaker 7: motion to ensure that there will be no biological men
Speaker 7: in the bathrooms on Capitol Hill.
Speaker 5: Here she is explaining her decision. I'm not going to
Speaker 5: stand for a man.
Speaker 9: You know, if someone with the penis is in the
Speaker 9: women's locker room, that's not okay. And I'm a victim
Speaker 9: of abuse myself. I'm a rape survivor. I have PTSD
Speaker 9: from the abuse I've suffered at the hands of a man.
Speaker 9: I'm absolutely, one hundred percent going to stand in the
Speaker 9: way of any man who wants to be in a
Speaker 9: women's restroom, in our locker rooms, in our changing rooms.
Speaker 5: I love this woman. She is absolutely fearless.
Speaker 7: This has gone completely viral because it's taken this well
Speaker 7: known locker room fight in the States to the very
Speaker 7: heart of Capital Hill.
Speaker 5: And she's not standing for anything.
Speaker 7: She's already copped a lot of flak, but the vast
Speaker 7: majority of support from what I can see on social media,
Speaker 7: and of course nothing brings out the crazies like declarations
Speaker 7: as unapologetic as hers. Here's just one of the people
Speaker 7: online now threatening to take her.
Speaker 10: Life, Congresswoman Nancy Mace. I hope that one day I
Speaker 10: do find through in that woman's bathroom and I grab
Speaker 10: you're ready looking hair and drag your face down to
Speaker 10: the floor while I repeatedly bash it and until the
Speaker 10: blood's everywhere.
Speaker 7: He's in fifty million not to have biological men in
Speaker 7: women's change rooms. Of course, I'm not suggesting that that's
Speaker 7: every trans woman, but that was one of many videos
Speaker 7: that we could have showed you tonight, directly meant for
Speaker 7: the congress woman and to make.
Speaker 5: Her back down.
Speaker 7: It was utterly disgusting to be watching these today. I mean,
Speaker 7: if you want to be in female bathrooms so bad
Speaker 7: you're willing to kill for it. Wow, okay, way to
Speaker 7: tell us you do not belong in female bathrooms at all.
Speaker 7: And Nancy wasn't backing down when she was accosted. This
Speaker 7: is one of many reporters who tried it on with
Speaker 7: her today and once again she wasn't giving an inch.
Speaker 9: Should legislation be created targeted at one specific person, it
Speaker 9: doesn't mention anyone in the legislation, but you've said it,
Speaker 9: it was aimed at her. Now I have said it's
Speaker 9: a result of this, I'm not going to allow biological
Speaker 9: men into women's private spaces. I will stand in the
Speaker 9: brain and stand in the way of anyone on the
Speaker 9: radical laugh who thinks that it's okay for a penis
Speaker 9: to be in a women's locker room.
Speaker 5: I love it.
Speaker 7: Zero apology, zero acquiescence. Every capitulation to the left emboldens it.
Speaker 5: She will not back down.
Speaker 7: Strength to your arm, Nancy, I don't care what gender
Speaker 7: people identify as. What repulses me every single time when
Speaker 7: this debate comes up, whether it's biological men in female
Speaker 7: sports or something like this where we're talking about women's
Speaker 7: private spaces.
Speaker 5: What I find utterly revolting.
Speaker 7: Is that anyone can be so entitled, so disconcerned with
Speaker 7: the discomfort you are causing so many others, being the
Speaker 7: vast majority of women, and especially a rape survivor like Nancy,
Speaker 7: someone who knows that and just goes, I don't care.
Speaker 7: This is my right, and I will be in your spaces.
Speaker 7: I don't care that it makes you uncomfortable. This is
Speaker 7: about me and my rights and making me feel uncomfortable
Speaker 7: that just fills me with revulsion.
Speaker 5: Nothing to do with someone's gender.
Speaker 7: Anyone who treats other people with such utter contempt just
Speaker 7: absolutely repulfully.
Speaker 3: And the way languages manipulated and emotions are manipulated in
Speaker 3: this debate is quite fascinating. Serah McBride, who is the
Speaker 3: transgendered Democrats, said that in going to Capitol Hill. Sera McBride, so,
Speaker 3: I hope you black kind. Well, it's not kind to
Speaker 3: ignore biology. It's not kind to ignore the traumatic experiences.
Speaker 3: Of women who have been raped and disregard their fears
Speaker 3: and anxieties. It's not kind to ignore women's safety. But
Speaker 3: all of these terms get manipulated and twisted in this
Speaker 3: attempt to appeal to people's better angels in order to
Speaker 3: get them to do what you want them to do
Speaker 3: out of your selfish ambition. Sarah McBride, before she went
Speaker 3: to the Capitol Hill, she was a human rights activists,
Speaker 3: which also always amuses me that human rights activists seem
Speaker 3: to know nothing about human rights at all, just wanting
Speaker 3: to bully their way through things. Mike Johnson, who's the
Speaker 3: speaker at the Capitol he was asked, so is Sarah
Speaker 3: McBride actually a man or a woman?
Speaker 2: This was his response, Din's freshman elect Sarah mcbridel.
Speaker 6: Or a woman.
Speaker 11: Look, I'm not going to get into this. We welcome
Speaker 11: all new members with open arms who are duly electric
Speaker 11: representatives of the people. I believe it's a command we
Speaker 11: treat all persons with dignity and respect that we will
Speaker 11: and I'm not going to engage in silly debates about this.
Speaker 3: So he's asked a pretty straightforward question, is this person
Speaker 3: a male or a female? And he responds with I'm kind.
Speaker 3: No one's questioning whether you're kind or unkind. They're just
Speaker 3: asking is a male or a female. Now, obviously he
Speaker 3: got a call, probably from Donald Trump that afternoon, because
Speaker 3: a few hours later he clarified what he believes.
Speaker 11: I was asked a question this morning at the leadership gaggle,
Speaker 11: and I rejected the premise because the answer is so
Speaker 11: obvious for anybody who doesn't know my well established record
Speaker 11: on this issue. Let me be unequivocally clear. A man
Speaker 11: is a man, and a woman is a woman, and
Speaker 11: a man cannot become a woman. That said, I also
Speaker 11: believe that's what scriptful teachers, what I just said, but
Speaker 11: I also believe that we treat everybody with dignity, and
Speaker 11: so we can do and believe all those things.
Speaker 3: At the same time, noticing he did it again, A
Speaker 3: man is a man, a woman as a woman. A
Speaker 3: man can't become a woman. That said, I'm kind. People
Speaker 3: need to stop doing this thing where you know what,
Speaker 3: but I'm still a nice person, even though I subscribe
Speaker 3: to biology. Forget doing that, because the more you insist
Speaker 3: but I'm a kind person, the more you play into
Speaker 3: this narrative. Just state the facts and take it for granted.
Speaker 3: In stating the facts, I'm not being unkind or disrespectful.
Speaker 2: I don't need to prove.
Speaker 4: That Mike Johnson looks so uncomfortable in that clip there, right, like,
Speaker 4: because he's walking this final and we're going to get
Speaker 4: in trouble if I say this.
Speaker 1: It's you don't get in trouble apart.
Speaker 4: From lunatics for stating obvious facts, right. And the point
Speaker 4: here is that you are allowed to make people feel
Speaker 4: mentally uncomfortable.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: If you're walking down the streets in a public space
Speaker 4: and someone sees a transgender person, they go, oh.
Speaker 1: I don't like that. That's a public space, that's fine.
Speaker 4: What we're talking about is a bathroom, a locker room,
Speaker 4: a change room, a place where your physical safety can
Speaker 4: be under threat. It is entirely reasonable for biological women
Speaker 4: to say I don't want someone with a penis walking
Speaker 4: into my bathroom. Now, the argument from the other side is, oh,
Speaker 4: but you know, I feel more comfortable as a transgender
Speaker 4: woman going into that bathroom. It makes me feel uncomfortable
Speaker 4: in these situations, it's not about what makes you comfortable,
Speaker 4: it's about the safety of others.
Speaker 1: And as a bloke.
Speaker 4: If someone walks into a bathroom who looks like a
Speaker 4: woman and has a penis, as a man into the men's.
Speaker 1: Bathroom, I couldn't give a hoot, right because it's different
Speaker 1: for men. Men and women are different.
Speaker 4: I couldn't care who comes into the bathroom with me
Speaker 4: because I'm a man and I have a different level
Speaker 4: of physical safety and comfortableness about the people I'm around
Speaker 4: than a woman obviously would. And to not take notice
Speaker 4: of that yourself and say, well, I should have access
Speaker 4: to a woman's bathroom even though I have a penis,
Speaker 4: as you said before, is the height of selfishness and entitlement.
Speaker 7: It's utterly revolting. And to see Mike Johnson, who is
Speaker 7: he kept quoting the Bible and did so in both
Speaker 7: those clips.
Speaker 5: I don't think Trump called him.
Speaker 7: His base is the Bible belt basically of America. They
Speaker 7: would have been absolutely disgusted by that apologetic, limpriested response.
Speaker 7: He had to face the press again to be like,
Speaker 7: oh okay, so just to be clear, and then basically
Speaker 7: did the same thing.
Speaker 5: We need to bottle.
Speaker 7: Matt Gates, who hopefully will be Attorney General as he
Speaker 7: is Trump's pick.
Speaker 5: You may remember the clip of him that we showed.
Speaker 7: You some nights ago where a reporter said, you said
Speaker 7: this and people are offended.
Speaker 5: Do you have a problem with that? Response was be offended.
Speaker 5: I don't care.
Speaker 7: I back myself. I meant what I said. I'm sticking
Speaker 7: with it. I'm not going to capitulate to you. So
Speaker 7: even when we have Mike Johnson coming out saying, well,
Speaker 7: I'm saying the right thing, but I'm doing so in
Speaker 7: such a way that I'm still trying to, you know,
Speaker 7: tickle the fancies of both sides, it's just pathetic. That
Speaker 7: doesn't work with the left. And notice they never try
Speaker 7: that with us. They're never trying to play fair with us.
Speaker 7: They're never trying to keep everyone happy. No, it's their
Speaker 7: way or the high way.
Speaker 3: The thing that made me laugh about Mike Johnson is
Speaker 3: he said, you know, men and men, women are women.
Speaker 2: That's what the Bible teaches.
Speaker 3: Why are you quoting the Bible as evidence for biology?
Speaker 2: The Bible is irrelevant on the point of biology knows
Speaker 2: this base.
Speaker 3: He knows they in the USA, a week before the election,
Speaker 3: there was a poll in The Independent that found ninety
Speaker 3: five percent of Democrats feared that Trump would not accept
Speaker 3: the result if he lost the election. Well, Trump won
Speaker 3: the election. Democrats who won't accept the result.
Speaker 12: This is for President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and
Speaker 12: all the Democrats that are in office. Do something.
Speaker 5: Stop this. You tell us for months what a.
Speaker 12: Danger this man is, and now he is proving it
Speaker 12: to everybody, and you guys are nowhere to be found
Speaker 12: and nothing is being done.
Speaker 5: We stood by.
Speaker 12: You, we did everything you asked us to do, and
Speaker 12: then you just conceded and disappeared. And now we are
Speaker 12: all facing the hell that is coming.
Speaker 3: So the Democrats want their representatives to do something. Well,
Speaker 3: in Pennsylvania, the Democrats are doing something about the election result.
Speaker 3: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that mail in ballots which
Speaker 3: were not properly dated or.
Speaker 2: Signed could not be counted.
Speaker 3: But the Pennsylvania Electoral Commission, which is dominated by Democrats,
Speaker 3: took a vote and decided they're going to ignore the
Speaker 3: Supreme Court ruling and count those invalid votes.
Speaker 2: Anyway.
Speaker 6: Look, we reject all three categories of these ballots.
Speaker 13: The emotion is to reject or dismiss the challenges in
Speaker 13: this category in.
Speaker 14: Front of you.
Speaker 15: Correct, yep, not going to second, that mostly because I
Speaker 15: think we all know that precedent by a court doesn't
Speaker 15: matter anymore in this country, and people violate laws anytime
Speaker 15: they want. So for me, if I violate this law,
Speaker 15: it's because I want a court to pay attention to it.
Speaker 3: But held on a second, didn't We spend weeks, months,
Speaker 3: a few years hearing how Donald Trump didn't care about
Speaker 3: the law at all, that he didn't care about fairness
Speaker 3: or playing by the rules. And now the Democrats are
Speaker 3: straight out saying, well, that's just what the court said,
Speaker 3: but we don't care what the court says.
Speaker 2: We'll make our own rules.
Speaker 3: They said that to discard ballots because of a clerical
Speaker 3: error was to deny people their constitutional rights. And maybe
Speaker 3: you could argue about a clerical error and whether that
Speaker 3: should be counted or not, but the bottom line is,
Speaker 3: if the court says it shouldn't be care mounted, well.
Speaker 2: You either have laws or you don't have laws.
Speaker 3: And you can't accuse Trump of being a law breaker
Speaker 3: and then boast when it doesn't go your way that
Speaker 3: you're going to ignore the law.
Speaker 4: You're not telling me that the Dems are a threat
Speaker 4: to democracy.
Speaker 1: Are you? Oh my god.
Speaker 4: I cannot believe it, Like, seriously, these people don't even
Speaker 4: know the irony of what they're doing here to said oh, well,
Speaker 4: you know, people just break the law all the time,
Speaker 4: so we don't Why don't we just break the law. Well,
Speaker 4: you can't in one breath say that we must uphold
Speaker 4: the law and then in the other say, well, because
Speaker 4: other people are breaking the law, that now means I
Speaker 4: want to do it. They carried on about, oh, you know,
Speaker 4: last time Donald Trump said those stole real lurkum that
Speaker 4: it was potently not true. Well, that's exactly what they're
Speaker 4: trying to do now, and they were doing it three
Speaker 4: months before the election even kicked off. As we talked
Speaker 4: about many times, the states, multiple states tried to remove
Speaker 4: from their electoral roles or asked for just basic details
Speaker 4: about who we're on their electoral roles so they could
Speaker 4: remove illegal immigrants and whatever so that they couldn't vote
Speaker 4: in the election, and the Department of Justice, the DOJ
Speaker 4: came along and took the states to court and said, no,
Speaker 4: you can't do that because you missed the cutoff day
Speaker 4: by two days or some nonsense. They tried absolutely everything
Speaker 4: on to make sure their people could get over the line,
Speaker 4: and they are still doing it long.
Speaker 7: And this really matters because that commission that you just
Speaker 7: told shift us defying the Supreme Court in Pennsylvania. This
Speaker 7: really matters because Pennsylvania, in their specific county is having
Speaker 7: a recount because in that part of the world, if
Speaker 7: you win by less than zero point five percent of
Speaker 7: total votes counted, there has to be recount, and that
Speaker 7: costs the county a million dollars to do. But because
Speaker 7: it's so close, they want to be careful. So the
Speaker 7: Supreme Court, having seen their defiance, has now handed down
Speaker 7: another written order saying you cannot count these and have
Speaker 7: actually demanded Pennsylvania stop counting all together.
Speaker 5: So whether they'll stick with that or not, who knows.
Speaker 7: But check out what's happening in California, as there's this
Speaker 7: seat that seems to be suddenly changing from red to blue.
Speaker 7: Despite the fact that the incumbent Republican was looking well.
Speaker 5: In the lead, they are still counting. So the first
Speaker 5: question here is, what the heck.
Speaker 7: Are you still doing counting ballots in California? Who are
Speaker 7: you getting to count these for you? How is this
Speaker 7: possible in the twenty first century? What is taking so long?
Speaker 7: But it hasn't escaped. The Hawkeyes of certain Republicans in
Speaker 7: the area are going, hang on a minute, look at
Speaker 7: the ridiculous trajectory of the guy running for the Blue team.
Speaker 7: So did you just stop counting Republicans votes because our
Speaker 7: guy was in the lead, our lady rather in this instance,
Speaker 7: and then all of a sudden, you've got thousands more to.
Speaker 5: Vote and they're only going to the Blue team. What
Speaker 5: are the odds? What are the odds? And now the Democrats.
Speaker 7: Look set to win the forty fifth congressional seat of
Speaker 7: California off the back of this absolute sham.
Speaker 3: I think it's pretty obvious what they do. They just
Speaker 3: keep counting until they're candidate wins, and then they stop counting.
Speaker 3: And as he said, it's amazing how the more they count,
Speaker 3: the more the votes seem to go in only one.
Speaker 1: You know, we're James. We've got to stop the steal.
Speaker 1: We had to stop the steal right now.
Speaker 2: I'm awesome.
Speaker 7: I know it sounds insiety, This sounds pretty insighting.
Speaker 1: Terrible, terrible, terrible.
Speaker 4: One bloke who's worried he might have his job stolen
Speaker 4: from him, of course, is Kevin rad former Prime Minister
Speaker 4: now our ambassador over in the US, and we know
Speaker 4: what he posted online about Donald Trump that he then
Speaker 4: quickly deleted when Trump became president elect. We've seen a
Speaker 4: new video just about every day come out of his
Speaker 4: former comments about Donald Trump. Well, today he's put out
Speaker 4: a statement saying, don't worry, We're ready to deal with Trump.
Speaker 13: Here at the Embassy, we've been working hard through the
Speaker 13: course of the last year to ensure that we were
Speaker 13: well prepared for this moment, and the bottom line is
Speaker 13: we're ready. The team here at the Embassy and the
Speaker 13: Government of Australia are ready to work closely with the
Speaker 13: new Trump administration to continue to realize the benefits of
Speaker 13: what is a very strong economic and security partnership.
Speaker 1: They've been preparing for a year to deal with a
Speaker 1: new president. How much work do you possibly need to do?
Speaker 7: They have delete a lot of tweets Kayler's calling him
Speaker 7: the worst threat to democracy, dragging the US through the mud,
Speaker 7: all the sledgers that he has leveled at Donald Trump,
Speaker 7: thinking he was safe as houses the Democrats were going
Speaker 7: to get in. Trump was none of his concerned baby. Well,
Speaker 7: now he's been forced to eat humble pie.
Speaker 5: I still hope they get rid of him.
Speaker 7: I genuinely do, and I said it earlier this evening
Speaker 7: on Chris Kenny.
Speaker 5: Dutton should add getting.
Speaker 7: Rid of Rudd out of the policy to his election promises.
Speaker 7: I think it would go very well with the vast
Speaker 7: majority of Australians. The Stautz was like, you vote in
Speaker 7: a coalition government, I will get us a better ambassador
Speaker 7: in our closest allies a country.
Speaker 3: It's a hilarious to hear Kevin Rudd saying I am
Speaker 3: ready to work with Donald Trump. That's not the issue.
Speaker 3: The issue is Donald Trump ready to work with Kevin Rudd.
Speaker 3: Kevin Rudd went on to say Australia's relationship with the
Speaker 3: USA has never been more important exactly, that's why someone
Speaker 3: else should be advocating for it. And if it was
Speaker 3: that important, then Kevin Rudd should never have made those
Speaker 3: comments calling Trump a village idiot and the most destructive
Speaker 3: president in history. Let's go to the UK quickly, with
Speaker 3: thousands of farmers have protested over an inheritance tax. That's
Speaker 3: tax that's going to be introduced on farms worth a
Speaker 3: million pounds or more. Now this will be a twenty
Speaker 3: percent inheritance tax.
Speaker 2: That will be charged.
Speaker 3: Farmers are calling it a bankrupt tax because of course
Speaker 3: farms are well asset rich, but you don't make a
Speaker 3: lot of money in farming. In fact, they reckon they
Speaker 3: make less than one percent of the value of the
Speaker 3: property per year in the actual farming. So if you're
Speaker 3: paying twenty percent of the value of the property over
Speaker 3: ten years but you're only making one percent, you are
Speaker 3: going backwards at a fast rate of nots. Jeremy Clarkson,
Speaker 3: who's well known around the world, he attended the protest
Speaker 3: and he spoke to protests.
Speaker 2: I want to show you him.
Speaker 3: Speaking at the rally about how bad this is and
Speaker 3: saying the government must change their mind.
Speaker 2: I want to show the grab where he's yes, this
Speaker 2: is the one, let's go.
Speaker 4: I beg of the government.
Speaker 3: To be big, to accept that this was rushed through,
Speaker 3: it wasn't throught out, and it's a mistake.
Speaker 1: That's the big thing to do. Admit it and back down.
Speaker 3: He's exactly right, colored this hasn't been thought through because
Speaker 3: if they force farmers off the land, these are farmers
Speaker 3: whose families have been farming for generations.
Speaker 2: They won't be replaced because do you.
Speaker 3: Know anybody who when you ask them when they're a
Speaker 3: little kid, they're living in a city, what do you
Speaker 3: want to do.
Speaker 2: When you grow up? I want to go and zaf farm.
Speaker 2: It's either in your blood or it's not.
Speaker 3: And Andrew Lloyd Webber makes this point, and we might
Speaker 3: go to him in a moment, that if farmers are
Speaker 3: removed from their land, they won't be replaced who feeds the.
Speaker 4: Country precisely because it's been exempt. Farms have been exempt
Speaker 4: because exactly as you say, farmers are asset rich in
Speaker 4: that they own the land, but they're cash poor.
Speaker 1: They don't have cash on hand. So if you're going
Speaker 1: to charge the kids twenty percent of.
Speaker 4: The value of the farm for the farm to go
Speaker 4: into their hands and they don't have the money, well
Speaker 4: then they have to sell the farm, right Andrew Lloyd
Speaker 4: Webber is as James just mentioned. Of course, Douan of
Speaker 4: Musical Theater went down to the protest and pointed out
Speaker 4: exactly that.
Speaker 16: What is the fear, Andrew, What would your fear be
Speaker 16: should this tax impact these farms in the longer term.
Speaker 14: In the longer term, what will happen is they'll all
Speaker 14: be bought by probably foreigners, outsiders, people who don't buy
Speaker 14: it are not buying it for the love of the countryside.
Speaker 14: They're buying it purely as a long term investment. Many many,
Speaker 14: many people hovering around at the moment, rubbing their hands
Speaker 14: in glee about all of this, you know, and they
Speaker 14: I can shure you they're not British.
Speaker 4: And if I go back to Jeremy Classon for a second,
Speaker 4: he was being questioned by a BBC reporter who seemed
Speaker 4: to be running government lines essentially, and it went as
Speaker 4: well as you would expect with class So it's not
Speaker 4: about you.
Speaker 7: It's not about your farm and the fact that you
Speaker 7: bought a farm to a boid inheritance.
Speaker 2: Tax classic BBC.
Speaker 5: Then classic, Oh yeah, where should they get the money from?
Speaker 8: It's not.
Speaker 1: Where that everyone you say that you should be paying
Speaker 1: for everything.
Speaker 4: And I think this is really important that Clarkson is there.
Speaker 4: It's a bit like the Donald Trump thing, right.
Speaker 1: Clarkson has plenty of cash.
Speaker 4: If he wants to give his farm to his kids,
Speaker 4: they're going to have the money to pay the inheritance tax.
Speaker 1: It's of no.
Speaker 4: Concern to him except that he believes in what he
Speaker 4: is saying. He is a rich man standing up saying
Speaker 4: you are getting a raw deal from the government, and
Speaker 4: it is no coincidence that it is farmers that are
Speaker 4: getting a raw deal from the government because they don't
Speaker 4: want people landholders to actually contribute anything to the world,
Speaker 4: because oh, could be carbon emissions involved.
Speaker 7: I think it's very naive to say that, oh, this
Speaker 7: just hasn't been thought through.
Speaker 5: They've rushed through the legislation. Are you kidding me? Where
Speaker 5: have you been? For years? The war on farmers have
Speaker 5: ravaged Germany, who shut down in airport.
Speaker 7: They brought hundreds of their tractors to protest in Germany.
Speaker 7: In France, the farmers all charged in and famously were
Speaker 7: dumping manure into the houses of Parliament because.
Speaker 5: They too were being persecuted.
Speaker 7: In the Netherlands, again there were thousands of tractors holding
Speaker 7: entire cities besieged because they too were being persecuted. Ireland
Speaker 7: farmers standing in their fields crying saying, the government is
Speaker 7: taking my land, it is making my living just unlivable.
Speaker 5: I can't do it anymore.
Speaker 7: They're either making the fertilizer too expensive, etc.
Speaker 5: Etc.
Speaker 7: Each and every one of these countries comes up with
Speaker 7: some bogus excuse to make life unlivable for their farmers.
Speaker 5: You've got to ask yourself what the heck is going on.
Speaker 7: Surely no one is more important to the flourishing of
Speaker 7: any country. But if you control the food, you control
Speaker 7: the people like nothing else. And in my having read
Speaker 7: some about this legislation, I feel like Kiirs Starmer's gone
Speaker 7: full stalin. I mean, it is just absolutely unthinkable and
Speaker 7: sadly in this country we don't treat our Aussie farmers
Speaker 7: any better. If you know some, you know that I'm
Speaker 7: telling the gospel truth. It is utterly shameful, and I
Speaker 7: genuinely think there is something far more nefarious behind it.
Speaker 7: People snaffling up farmland after making farmers just go, I
Speaker 7: can't do this anymore. You've literally made it impossible to me.
Speaker 7: It seems very nefarious.
Speaker 2: Indeed, we're going to go to a break.
Speaker 3: When we come back, we'll look at what's making news tomorrow,
Speaker 3: including suggestions that Indigenous people should co design Brisbane's twenty
Speaker 3: thirty two Olympic facilities.
Speaker 2: That's coming up in tomorrow. Welcome back.
Speaker 3: Let's check out what's making news in tomorrow's papers Lives.
Speaker 3: You've got the Career Mail and the Brisbane Games are
Speaker 3: still quite a number of years away, but it's just
Speaker 3: looking like a mess.
Speaker 7: Center of games plan, the splash reads, the First Nation's
Speaker 7: Cultural Center, museum and permanent evening overwater drone shows telling
Speaker 7: dream time stories have been proposed as ways Brisbane twenty
Speaker 7: thirty two can deliver a legacy for reconciliation. Cameron Costello,
Speaker 7: the deputy chair of the twenty thirty two Legacy Committee,
Speaker 7: also challenged organizers to lead the world and have every
Speaker 7: games venue co designed by First Nations people, to make
Speaker 7: Brisbane a city where, like Florence and Paris, you're overwhelmed
Speaker 7: by the integration of culture within their architecture. End quote
Speaker 7: like Florence in Paris, really, I mean those buildings are
Speaker 7: hundreds of years old and they're absolutely stunning. But how
Speaker 7: about we just settle, Cameron Costello for any kind of
Speaker 7: comprehensive games at all. We're building a new stadium. We're
Speaker 7: not building a new stadium or just kinda give us
Speaker 7: faithlift to these stadiums.
Speaker 5: No where not we've changed.
Speaker 7: Do we even have a comprehensive plan in place yet Brisbane?
Speaker 7: Before we start worrying about the trimmings.
Speaker 3: Serious, is he serious that the Olympic stadium, which as
Speaker 3: you rightly pointed out, we don't even have one yet,
Speaker 3: needs to be co designed by an Indigenous person.
Speaker 2: That's absolute madness.
Speaker 3: And as for this idea of leaving a legacy for reconciliation,
Speaker 3: I just reckon some gold medals would be good. And
Speaker 3: an Olympic Games that doesn't embarrass us or you know,
Speaker 3: slam Christians at the opening ceremony, that would be pretty good.
Speaker 3: Why do we need a legacy for reconciliation?
Speaker 2: It's a sporting event.
Speaker 4: But what the hell's the Olympics going to do for
Speaker 4: reconciliation anyway? I don't think of the billions and billions
Speaker 4: of dollars that will be spent on a sporting event
Speaker 4: that could have been spent on, I don't know, improving
Speaker 4: the lives of people in indigenous communities.
Speaker 2: Like seriously, Oh.
Speaker 4: We're going to fix the whole thing up through the
Speaker 4: Olympic Games and so oh, we'll send in some Indigenous
Speaker 4: people to help design the Okay, so that will help
Speaker 4: out a small number of Indigenous people who will get
Speaker 4: some money by there.
Speaker 5: What does it do for.
Speaker 4: Anyone else who's going to walk in to to q
Speaker 4: sack or wherever it is and go, oh, yes, I
Speaker 4: can tell by looking at this place that it must
Speaker 4: have been co designed by an indigenous person.
Speaker 3: What it doesn't make sense the velodrome has to be
Speaker 3: co designed by an indigenous.
Speaker 1: Oh that's good, that's the safe.
Speaker 4: Genuinely, just give us an Olympic Games like they can't
Speaker 4: take their mind up about anything. Actually, there will be
Speaker 4: seventeen more reports to come down before they can decide
Speaker 4: who they can appoint to be the indigenous co designer.
Speaker 4: Let's go to the front of the Australian tomorrow, it
Speaker 4: says Charmers. Future Funnel Jim Charmers is overhauling the investment
Speaker 4: mandate of the two hundred and thirty billion dollar Future
Speaker 4: Fund to drive capital into Labour's agenda on affordable housing,
Speaker 4: green energy projects and critical infrastructure, in a major shift
Speaker 4: in the role of the Sovereign Wealth Fund established by
Speaker 4: the Howard government.
Speaker 1: Nearly to decay AIDS AGO.
Speaker 4: Now, the point of the Future Fund, as I understand it,
Speaker 4: is to deliver the best return for taxpayers as possible.
Speaker 1: But now the federal governments are all shivers. What can
Speaker 1: we do here? Because we love this.
Speaker 4: Surplus that we've had for the last couple of years,
Speaker 4: and we desperately want to hang on to the surplus
Speaker 4: to say that we did it and the Libs didn't.
Speaker 4: So what can we do to fudge the numbers to
Speaker 4: actually spend government money without spending government money?
Speaker 1: I know, we'll take it out of an investment fund.
Speaker 4: That is actually about making sure we've got money in
Speaker 4: the bank.
Speaker 1: And spend it on our pet projects instead. Brilliant idea.
Speaker 3: And for charmers to claim that you can go for
Speaker 3: maximum return while investing in all your pet fetishers is
Speaker 3: just a fiction. Judah Sloan makes a great point in
Speaker 3: her column in The Australian Tomorrow that if these projects
Speaker 3: were such good investments, the government would have invested in
Speaker 3: them already. I know the fact that they haven't proved
Speaker 3: the point. They're not the maximum returns. They're trying to
Speaker 3: do both, and of course walking both sides of the
Speaker 3: street never works.
Speaker 1: Good luck to them, Good luck to them. Another story
Speaker 1: on the Ostermoo. This one's quite funny.
Speaker 4: Alp Link Law firm sued over pay row. One of
Speaker 4: Australia's most prominent workplace compensation law firms, has been accused
Speaker 4: of deliberately miscalculating staff leav entitlements, failing to immediately reconcile
Speaker 4: the under payments, and sacking the human resources boss who
Speaker 4: blew the whistle on the alleged scandal. Slater and Gordon
Speaker 4: is the firm that we are shame. I mean, you know,
Speaker 4: karma eventually comes to bite you on the bum and
Speaker 4: they are allegations.
Speaker 1: We should say at this point.
Speaker 4: But seriously, how would you like to be the leading
Speaker 4: workplace law firm in the country. And then someone goes,
Speaker 4: hang on a minute, the HR boss.
Speaker 1: No, Liz, hang on a minute. I think you've been
Speaker 1: under paying the staff. You're well done, it says.
Speaker 7: The firm first announced in July that it had underpaid
Speaker 7: about three hundred thousand dollars to more than one hundred
Speaker 7: employees after workers who took leave at half pay from
Speaker 7: twenty eleven to last year had they leave a cruel
Speaker 7: calculated on a pro rata basis.
Speaker 5: Rather than a full time basis.
Speaker 7: I mean, it's worth a read the whole article. It
Speaker 7: is an absolute nightmare. I do hope these guys get
Speaker 7: their money.
Speaker 5: They are just allegations.
Speaker 7: At the moment, we must say, but the whole thing
Speaker 7: is quite an entertaining read.
Speaker 5: And it's funny how so many of my lawyer.
Speaker 7: Friends speak of not being paid properly but similar complaints
Speaker 7: which they wouldn't talk about obviously publicly. But I've heard
Speaker 7: that law firms are some of the worst when it comes.
Speaker 5: To just pink.
Speaker 2: Do tell you what, They never missed their clients, that's
Speaker 2: for sure.
Speaker 1: Llawyers money ask go.
Speaker 3: To the front page of the Newcastle Herald. Of course,
Speaker 3: there's massive pro tests planned by environmental groups over the weekend,
Speaker 3: ramping up. Police laid down law to protestable because they're
Speaker 3: combining a protest with a rock concert. Peter Garrett is
Speaker 3: one of the people playing. Police say public safety is
Speaker 3: their top concern as they roll out a high visibility
Speaker 3: response to rising tides Protestable in Newcastle over the next
Speaker 3: few days. Now the protest is expected to attract thousands
Speaker 3: of people. They're combining a sort of festival atmosphere in
Speaker 3: the park. As I said, Peter Garrett from Midnight Oil
Speaker 3: will be playing, and then protesters are also going to
Speaker 3: take to the water. In previous years they've blocked shipping channels. Well,
Speaker 3: a court has ruled that there'll be a restricted area
Speaker 3: where they'll be police patrolling. Anyone in that area on
Speaker 3: the water will be fined, but police will have a.
Speaker 2: High presence there. And this just goes on and on.
Speaker 3: Cal We're getting used to these things in Newcastle unfortunately.
Speaker 4: I mean, the only reason they're going to do it
Speaker 4: is to create disruption and to be a pain in
Speaker 4: the ass. Right Knowing that they can't go and will
Speaker 4: allegedly can't go and disrupt the ships, we'll just hang
Speaker 4: around on the perimeters, which means all the police resources
Speaker 4: have to be spent stopping them going from beyond those perimeters.
Speaker 4: If they weren't already in the water, I'd say get
Speaker 4: the water cannons out. This should just be stopped all together.
Speaker 4: It's even if they're not going to go in and
Speaker 4: stop the ships coming in. The point they are making
Speaker 4: is to use public resources for their own ends.
Speaker 1: Just stop it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, we're going to go to a break. When
Speaker 3: we come back, Caleb is going to explain to us
Speaker 3: why he didn't give us the tip a rank outside
Speaker 3: a winds by a mile and jockeys are suspended. Because
Speaker 3: the whole thing is a little bit suss.
Speaker 2: It's coming up at a moment. All right, welcome back.
Speaker 3: Well, Liz, you've got a story about something you would
Speaker 3: never expect to see in a candy store.
Speaker 7: Your wooden shoplifting is pretty common in the States. I mean,
Speaker 7: thirty eight of the states don't consider shoplifting a felony.
Speaker 7: Whatever your shoplift is under a thousand dollars worth of merchandise.
Speaker 7: So this particular shoplifter had nothing to worry about when
Speaker 7: he wandered into a lolly store in Tennessee and just
Speaker 7: stood there, not even trying to hide what he was
Speaker 7: up to, in front of everyone taking the merch.
Speaker 5: How could you begrudge him any tree.
Speaker 2: He's so cute.
Speaker 7: I love it.
Speaker 5: Nobody's screaming or running around.
Speaker 7: They're all just chatting in the background like nothing's happening. Here.
Speaker 2: Was quite safe because he was pretty occupied and looked
Speaker 2: pretty happy about it.
Speaker 4: As you pointed out James earlier, you were saying was
Speaker 4: eating gummy bees because I'm happy that you would be cannibalism. Now,
Speaker 4: imagine you're having a bit on the first race at
Speaker 4: Lingfield in the UK, which is in Surrey. He'd say
Speaker 4: two mile race for a princeice jockeys only, and you
Speaker 4: happen to be on the twenty eight to one outside
Speaker 4: favorite in a five horse race, and this happens.
Speaker 16: Two purlongs to go. Terms in Grand Duchess. Olga is
Speaker 16: still at the moment holding second position with on the
Speaker 16: outside gold Aura and countering in front. Is certain Style
Speaker 16: handed a huge advantage by the others and is never
Speaker 16: going to be caught or even challenged. So Certain Style
Speaker 16: didn't quite make call, took it up after about one
Speaker 16: hundred of yards, never saw anything else in the race.
Speaker 16: Is a huge battle of a second place, but this
Speaker 16: is only for second place, and gold Ura might have
Speaker 16: got second to you.
Speaker 4: Certain Style there at twenty eight to one, winning by
Speaker 4: twenty two lengths. At six furlongs he had six lengths
Speaker 4: sorry undred and six lengths, forty lengths. I should say
Speaker 4: the princes, the apprentice jockeys were all called in and
Speaker 4: given a ten day suspension because they said, oh, we
Speaker 4: bagged it up. We didn't really know what we were
Speaker 4: doing because we were apprentices. But I mean, honestly, I'd
Speaker 4: be checking a few bidding accounts if I were the stewards.
Speaker 1: Because that's one hell of a win for it doing.
Speaker 2: Don't you just point and go well.
Speaker 4: Apparently one of the jockey's actually loaded his horse into
Speaker 4: the wrong stall began the race, So it may have
Speaker 4: been amateur hour, but that would have been if I'd
Speaker 4: known that that was going to happen. I wish I'd
Speaker 4: been on it, Like seriously, surely if you're going to
Speaker 4: set up.
Speaker 5: A steal, you do it in such a way that
Speaker 5: would have the meeting.
Speaker 3: Yes, well, next time, Caleb, we expect the hot tip
Speaker 3: before the race. We could have done very well from that.
Speaker 3: That's it from us, thanks to your company. Tonight stick around.
Speaker 3: Coming up is the readA Penhingra