WEBVTT - Australia’s biggest mystery: Dan Box Pt.2

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The public has had a long held fascination with detectives.

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Detective sy a side of life the average person is

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>never exposed to. I spent thirty four years as a cop.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five of those years, I was catching killers.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for a living. I was a

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 1>The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of the content and language might be confronting. That's because

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Join me now as I take you into this world.

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, then, welcome back Part two. Are we still

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>friends at this stage? I suppose we're still friends, threatening

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're not going to have friendship. I can be

0:00:55.480 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>very fitable with my friends. Look, it's interesting sitting there

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and talking about William Tyrell, and I know you know

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>how much emotion that invokes in me and I and

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not on my own. I'm sure you've spoken to

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different people in researching the podcast, and

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that it is just something that really triggers, is a

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>triggering thing for so many people who have you had

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>access to whilst doing the podcast.

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Look, we've tried to speak to everybody. That's what that's

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>our job. Try and speak to everybody and then and

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 2>then go away and work out how to tell the

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 2>story from there. So William's biological family, Williams Foster family,

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.199
<v Speaker 2>cops who worked on it at the time, the lead detectives,

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>We've tried to speak to them, with mixed success. People

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>who were in the street at the time, people who

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>became persons of interest, people who were caught up in

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>the investigation and charged with other offenses like Bill Spedding,

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>subsequently found not guilty. It's almost like you know that

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 2>old thing about dropping a stone into water and then

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the ripples spread out. William went missing, and then the

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 2>ripples started to spread out, and the sheer number of

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>people who are affected either really close to where the

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 2>ripples start or just further and further and further out.

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 2>The sheer number of people involved is extraordinary, and all

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 2>of them have been hurt in some way either by

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the fact that William went missing, and it is upsetting

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 2>or by what has followed since.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>What's the saints of the community up there at the

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Kendle is that.

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's interesting. As time has gone on, I

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>think it's changed, and I've spoken to people up there,

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 2>and we were up there most recently around the tenth anniversary,

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>so that was a few weeks ago now and very

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 2>much which the feeling I got was people just didn't

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about it anymore. It's a small it's

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>a village really, and it had been dominated by this

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 2>event for the past ten years, so that when people

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>say I'm from Kendall, oh, that's where that William Tior

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 2>went missing, and people without willing to meaning any disrespect

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 2>to his families, but they just kind of wanted that

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 2>to no longer be hanging over them, but of course

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 2>it is. And the other thing that's really surprised me

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 2>is that there was a sense of anger, not from many,

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>but from some, particularly who lived on Benner and Drive

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 2>at the time William went missing, so that's the road

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 2>where he was staying that weekend. A sense of anger

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 2>about maybe what happened, but also about what has followed

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 2>because for different reasons, you know, you get quite a

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of people who go to Benerom drive effectively as

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 2>tourists sightseeing. People turn up and take photos or turn

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>up and film videos of themselves. And I'll be honest,

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 2>I did that as a reporter, but I didn't do

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 2>it for fun. And there's a lot of that and

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 2>it still happens, and you get people who turned up

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>at the time. Remember speaking to one of the neighbors

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and he was angry. He talked about that first search

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 2>when you had hundreds, literally hundreds of people coming in

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 2>to look for William, and he was talking about how

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 2>stuff went missing from his property, like in his car

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 2>overnight that first night, and he thinks people were searching

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 2>for William and Nick stuff and others. A couple of

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 2>people have told me about how some of those searchers

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 2>were drinking and we're kind of not having a good

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anyone's having a good time, but weren't

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>treating it with maybe the respect it deserved. And there's

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of anger about that, and I didn't expect

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 2>any of that.

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>The way you describe it, I can almost picture what

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. I can see how it would be

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>disrespectful when a three year old child the families. I

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>haven't spoken to the families, but biological or foster families

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in a long time. How are they caping with this?

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Our relationship, if I'm really honest with you, our relationship

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 2>with the two families is different. And this goes back.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I think we talked a bit about how people have

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 2>become quite partisan with this case. You're either for the

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 2>foster parents or you're against them, and it feels like,

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, the two families have almost become two camps.

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 2>So we've spoken to both more than once quite a

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 2>few times. I've not spoken to William's biological mum. We've tried, really,

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 2>we've tried, and you can hear in the podcast some

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of the work that's gone into trying to contact her.

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 2>And I've not spoken to Williams's biological dad directly, and

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 2>again you can hear some of the work that's gone

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>into trying to contact him. And we're definitely if they

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted to contact us, I think they know how to

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 2>do it, or at least I hope they do. And

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I've said it in the podcast. If you do want

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 2>to talk about anything, even if it's just to criticize me,

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>please do so. Spoken to other members of that family, though,

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 2>how are they feeling. I don't think you ever recover

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 2>from there, this kind of a loss of a child.

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 2>And remember, for them, it's a double loss. So William's

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 2>taken into foster care, so who's taken away from that family?

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 2>And then they're told the state is effective going to

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 2>look after him, the state, the minister becomes his parent,

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 2>and then he goes missing. So to have that double loss,

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of anger, and there's a lot of trauma,

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's complicated and it makes that relationship difficult.

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 2>The only thing we can do with everyone, and we

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 2>do with them as well, is just try and be

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>as honest about what we're doing and why we're doing.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 2>And we do try and reflect what they're feeling and

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>what they say in the podcast very much so. And

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 2>then there's the foster family, and the relationship with them

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>is different, and it's almost funny. I've met the foster

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 2>parents quite a few times over the years, and we

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>meet in safe houses or we meet in pubs, and

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 2>when we meet, we turn our phones off. And all

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 2>of that might sound paranoid if it wasn't for the

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 2>fact that they do know they've been under police surveillance.

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 2>They know that they've had listening devices in their house,

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>They've had COVID cameras outside their house, They've had people

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>listening to their phone calls. They've had listening devices in

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 2>their car, They've had undercovered police officers sent in to

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 2>try to talk to them. They know all of that

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>has happened, so they've got every reason to be paranoid.

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 2>It might still be happening now. So when we have

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 2>those conversations, it feels a bit cloak and dagger, but

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>also got to say, I can see why they want

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>to do that, but when it comes to how they're responding,

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's some of the same emotions. It's loss

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 2>and trauma. I mean, I've seen I've seen them in

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 2>tears a lot, and I've seen them grappling with the

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 2>loss and the effect it's had on them, and then

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 2>the loss of essentially becoming Certainly Williams foster mother has

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>become the suspect. The police have said that in court

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 2>they believe she had something to do with William's disappearance,

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and the pressure that must come with that must be immense.

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>She's an incredibly strong and tough woman, But I've seen her.

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I've seen her cry and I've seen her broken, and

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 2>she might not. She's also very private and probably wouldn't

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 2>appreciate me saying any of this, but I've seen the

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 2>emotions she must be feeling almost take control. And the

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 2>same with Williams foster dad. And you know, I'm never

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 2>going to know what it's like to lose a three

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 2>year old child, at least I hope I never know.

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.359
<v Speaker 2>I can't imagine what it's like to be in that positions.

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 2>But they keep turning up and they keep talking, and

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 2>same goes for biological family. We keep talking as best

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 2>we can, and you've got to give credit to both

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 2>of them for that.

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I look the sadness and why I ask about both

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>families is that I understand the impact that a disappearance

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>or a crime of the nature of William's disappearance has

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>on families and people with connections with the child. And

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>then that coupled with all the controversy and turmoil surrounding

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the investigation, and I can't separate myself from that because

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm embedded in the content and I just feel like

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>it's it's so unfair, Like the one thing that you

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>would hope as families, as with the bearable kids, when

0:10:55.840 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the barable kids disappeared, that everyone would be united heading

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>like as in law enforcement, the governments whatever, united in

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>finding out what's happened to what's happened to their loved ones.

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, with the William case, they see the two

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of them frow in the arguments, the internal conflict within

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the police. What's happened to me? And that must give

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>must not give them a great deal of confidence And.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, and I look, there's a part of me

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 2>that really hopes the police have got this right. So

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 2>the current detectives when they come out, and I've seen

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 2>them say it in court, we believe that the foster

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 2>mother had something to do with what happened to William.

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean bluntly. They believe that William maybe fell from

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 2>the verandah in the house, there was some kind of accident,

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 2>and that she chose to cover that up, almost a

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 2>snap decision to cover it up, and that she drove

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 2>his body away and disposed of it. There's a crossroads

0:11:58.240 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 2>a few hundred meters away and we can get in

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to all of that. But that's what the police think

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 2>as far as we can know, and that's what they've said.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 2>And there's a part of me that hopes they've got

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 2>it right, because, well, A, then we know what happened,

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 2>and we know who's responsible, and maybe we can find

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 2>where William is in the grieving process, can move forward

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 2>for all those people. But also because if the police

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>have got it right, then everything they've done to that family,

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the Foster family, is kind of justified. And I'm talking

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:35.239
<v Speaker 2>about their lives have been destroyed by the police investigation.

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 2>They've been on the front page of newspapers identified as

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the suspect. Their friends, their neighbors, their families must be

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 2>looking at them and thinking, did you dispose of a

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 2>child's body? Did you do kind of the worst kind

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 2>of crime you can do. Everyone must be questioning them.

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I know they've lost work. I know that their lives

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 2>have I mean, they haven't just kind of hit the buffers.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>They've been crumpled. But if the police have got it right,

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 2>then that's kind of justified. And so there's a part

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 2>of me that hopes the police have got it right.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 2>But if they have, nobody's been charged. We haven't seen

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 2>any of that evidence. There's nothing public yet to back

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 2>up what the police are.

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Saying, Dan, can I make the point and I hear

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying there. I was always considered someone that

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 1>played hardball when I go after investigations. I make no

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>excuses for that whatsoever. But there's lines that you don't cross.

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>What I've seen occur in relation to the foster mother,

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the Foster family, I think it's been absolutely brutal. And

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I asked the question. I asked the question, what if

0:13:58.120 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they got it wrong?

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we go back to in the first part of

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 2>this conversation, we said that your investigation of William Til's disappearance,

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 2>part of that was described as the worst case of

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 2>malicious prosecution in the state. If the police have got

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 2>it wrong, and it is a big if, but if

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 2>they have, then I think you're looking at the same

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:27.479
<v Speaker 2>kind of judgment here, partly because it's the same tactics.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 2>So you've talked about how you go in hard when

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 2>you were detective, and you know, as I understand it,

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of thinking, was I've got this person of interest,

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>there's some evidence that means that they're worth looking at.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to do everything it takes to either establish

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 2>their innocence or their guilt and it doesn't matter which,

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 2>but at least I can tick them off the list then,

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 2>And you would go in as hard as you knew

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>how because you we're trying to catch a killer, to

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 2>solve a homicide, and you'd use pressure tactics. So put

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 2>them under surveillance, pressure them, see if they would break.

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>The same tactics have been used against William's foster power.

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Put them under pressure, see if they will break, use surveillance.

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 2>It's exactly the same approach. And if yours was found

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 2>to be wrong, and if theirs is wrong, then it

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.119
<v Speaker 2>absolutely deserves the same kind of public inquiry.

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I'll just address that, and I understand the

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>concept of what you're saying, but there's levels and degrees

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in regards to Bill Spedding situation. There were charges laid

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and I was comfortable. And when I say charges laid,

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't investigate it. I had specialists investigated. And I

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want the drag Bill Spedding back into this, but

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>so we're just I'll just say it in a very

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>general term. It was investigated, evidence was obtained. Legal services

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>say there's enough to charge a person, the person's charge

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and the courts acquitted the person. Okay, And I'll ask

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you this because I want to keep it on track

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>with the podcast that you've got with the foster parents.

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I sat in court when they were charged with the

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>assault matters, which was very public, and I saw the

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>whole investigative team sit there, and I'll make these comments,

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and I've earned the right to make these comments. That's

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>not how I'd manage an investigation, having all those people

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the local court matter. When you're looking for

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a three year old job.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 2>You're talking about the detectives from the strike from US.

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so yeah, but we can talk about that. That's

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>just me venting because I'm really at the point with

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this whole investigation that there's so many things that need

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to be said that haven't been said. And I'm asking

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you on your podcast. I sat in court during that

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and I saw a senior detective giving evidence saying we

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>know where William Tyrell is. And then the question was asked,

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>well where is he yea to which the person didn't

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have a I don't think a reasonable explanation. He's saying

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>under oath, we know where William Tyrell is. Then in

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that same and correct me if I'm wrong, because I

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>was in there as an observer, you're in there as

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a journalist reporting on it, that they in fact told

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>William's foster mother that they know what's happened to William,

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>they know where William is and again acknowledge that under oath.

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and both of these things happen, and if they don't,

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 2>then it's extraordinary because you're right. What did happen was

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 2>to the detectives on the strike force go to Williams

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>foster mother to serve with the summons to give evidence

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 2>at the Crime Commission, which is this hugely powerful, very

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 2>secretive body. You're not even allowed to tell anyone you've

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>received a summon. So they turn up, they give her

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 2>this thing and they say to her, you'll have to

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 2>live with it. We know what happened to William, we

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 2>know how, we know why they're telling her. We know

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 2>as a fact what you did to William. And that's

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 2>one thing. So I hope they've got the evidence to

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 2>back it up. But then in court, this detective he's asked,

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 2>do you know what happened to William? And he says yes,

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and then he's asked, well, have you found William's body

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 2>and he says no, and he's asked again, but you

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 2>said you know what happened to William and he says, yes,

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I do, Well have you found him? No, And the

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 2>two things just seem to be in like stark contrast.

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 2>But then later at a different court hearing, that same

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 2>detective is asked, so you know what happened to William

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 2>and he says something different. He says, well, that was

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 2>one of the theories, so point he says, yep, we

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 2>know what happened to William. And then later he says,

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 2>this is one of the theories. And those two things

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 2>seem in stark contrast as well, and you're just left thinking,

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 2>I really hope you guys have got the evidence to

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 2>back this up.

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>People that listen to the podcast, the upcoming episodes, and

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>are they are you going to take them into a

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>deep dive in those those sort of things that we're

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about, because I found I found that watching quite remarkable,

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that it wasn't reported on the way

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought it would have been. So I'm sitting there

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was gobsmacked what was coming out, but it

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't really get it.

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Didn't get reported, reported on and that. Okay, so I

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.959
<v Speaker 2>had the same thought process. But but when you're in

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 2>court as a daily news reporter, you've got maybe four

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred words to describe everything from that day in court,

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 2>and all the other reporters in there were daily court reporters,

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 2>and for them, maybe that aspect that you're talking about

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and I picked up on, it wasn't the big news

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 2>from the day, or maybe not. All of them have

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 2>followed the case for as long as you have and

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I have, or as closely, and so maybe it just

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 2>didn't stand out to them. But I remember hearing that

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and thinking that's a big deal, and then it wasn't

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 2>reported the next day. But that is what the podcast

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 2>can do. So we're telling this story differently. We've got

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 2>way more than four hundred words, but also we get

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 2>part of what the podcast does is go back to

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of the investigation, so the moment of that

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:40.719
<v Speaker 2>triple zero call where William's foster mother says he's gone missing,

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 2>and then we walk the investigation through from that point

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 2>over the years that followed, saying this was what was

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 2>done right and this was what was done wrong, and

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 2>there's both, but it allows people to understand it differently

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 2>because most people, like everyone over the past ten years,

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 2>have followed the William Tyrell disappearance in headlines or things

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.719
<v Speaker 2>they've seen on their phone, or there's something on the radio,

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 2>or there's a bit on TV which is talking about

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 2>some evidence that came out today, But that evidence is

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 2>actually something that happens three years ago, and everything is

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of in short bursts and is out of sequence.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 2>No one before now has said, right, We're going to

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 2>go right from the beginning the whole way through, put

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 2>everything in the order in which it happened, and let

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 2>you understand it differently. And when you do that, so

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.479
<v Speaker 2>I talked about this timeline we've drawn up. When you

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 2>see things put in that kind of order, it completely

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>changes the way you look at it.

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting the longer I stay out of the cops,

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to look at it from a media point

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of view rather than the policing point of view. Probably

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>still drift back into the policing point of view more

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>more not, But yeah, I see so many things come up.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I know when I gave and this is whine in

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the back four years or so ago, when I gave

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>evidence at my criminal hearing I was saying things that

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>became public record on the reason I was looking at

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a particular person, and I think that was very significant

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>what was out there. And to balance out where you've

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>got the Commissioner of Police orce soon you're police saying

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>there's only one suspect, and then some of the things

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that I said on public record that I was looking

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>at when I was heading up the investigation, and that

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 1>just again, that just seems to be forgotten, just a brushstroke.

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You're going to take the listener in this podcast into

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that type of.

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 2>Depth we are. And the other thing we're going to

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 2>do is there's a whole bunch of different names that

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>have come up in this investigation as what you guys

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 2>in the cops called persons of interest, which basically meant

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 2>someone who requires further investigation. There's a whole bunch of

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 2>names that have come up, and we've heard stuff about

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 2>them in the public, and then we've just heard nothing,

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, the inquest and the cops have stopped talking

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 2>about them. We're going to go back to those and say, okay,

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 2>so why did we start to hear about these people

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 2>and why has it stopped? Because to my knowledge, they

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 2>haven't been ruled out. No, there's no official body, not

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 2>the coroner, not the cops, have ever said this is

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 2>why we stopped looking at these people. And if there

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 2>isn't a reason why they stop looking at those people.

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 2>But the police are now saying it must be the

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 2>foster mother, which they seem to be saying, then how

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 2>can they be so sure if we don't know for sure,

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 2>they haven't ruled those people out. And we're going to

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>look at those people, and I promise you in more

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 2>depth than they've been reported on before, because we've got

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the time, and we've got the resources, and we've also

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 2>got evidence that just hasn't been made public before from

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 2>different sources that we've collected over the years. But there's

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 2>a whole lot of information out there that's never really

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 2>been reported on.

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd be interested to see that, and I think that's

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>been been my frustration that over the years. And it's

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>been about two years now since the foster mother was identified.

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>It's been longer how long it's been, it's been about

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 2>three and a bit years. And I can remember when

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 2>it happened. I wasn't in the country, but I remember

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.719
<v Speaker 2>the news breaking and my first thought was well, they

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 2>must have got something because they were so confident. Front

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 2>page of the paper, police quoted saying basically, we're close

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 2>to cracking this case. I remember thinking, well, they must

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 2>have got something to be that confident, but we still

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 2>haven't heard what.

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>It is and exactly. And I think I've made a comment,

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>or I'm starting to make public comments. It's time to

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>put up or shut up. You can't, yeah, throw like that,

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 1>not present some evidence to back it up. But my

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>concern has been in when I was running the investigation,

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>people that I considered we call them person persons of interest,

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and the interpretation might be a suspect, but the bar

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is very low to be a person of interest. It's

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>just someone we've got to have a little look.

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 2>A little further, look a thousand of people on that list.

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And so we've got those persons of interest,

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>and I look at opportunity, capability motive. Motive is a

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>subjective thing. Opportunity is the one that I look at

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a great deal when you've got no forensic evidence. And

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>this has taken you into the world of homicide detective thinking.

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>When you've got no forensic evidence, opportunities is quite often

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that you can eliminate a person by,

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>as in, they didn't have the opportunity because they weren't

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>in the location. So a lot of these people that

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I call persons of interest, they would have been very

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to eliminate. And to say definity that person hasn't

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>done it, well, I need the evidence to show they

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have done it because they are with someone. Okay,

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>if that makes sense. That's what's worried me about this narrative,

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that there's only one person. We're focusing on this one

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>person and being the being the foster mother.

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you've got to think if you were a

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 2>defense barrister, if if she ever were to get caught,

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 2>and she's not been charged with anything, but if she

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 2>ever were, then it's almost the first thing your defense

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 2>barrister looks at is, well, what about person X, person Y,

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 2>person's ed all of whom we know the police have

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 2>looked at, all of whom we've heard this evidence against.

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Have you ruled them out?

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>How have you eliminated?

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you haven't, then there's no way you can

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 2>say it's this other person. So we are we are

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be looking at that and the other thing

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 2>that's happening is because we've now released some of the

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.959
<v Speaker 2>episodes and done some of the reporting for news dot

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 2>Com dot AUE are contacting us with tips and things

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 2>that they've seen or heard or tried to report to

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 2>crime stoppers at the time. And there's been a couple

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 2>of those so far that I've looked at and thought, ah, okay,

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 2>that should probably get passed on to the coroner, because

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 2>there's stuff that's come into us that I've not heard

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.719
<v Speaker 2>as far as I know, hasn't come out publicly, but

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>it seems like the kind of thing you'd definitely want

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 2>to follow up. So we're actually passing stuff onto the

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 2>coroner at the moment, and maybe, you know, maybe those

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 2>aren't the key bit of evidence that will make a difference,

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 2>but what it does show is there's still things out

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 2>there that haven't been tied down. And until you've done

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 2>all of that, I don't see how you can be

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>so certain it's this other person unless you've got witness evidence,

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 2>forensic evidence, something as solid as that. And if you have,

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.199
<v Speaker 2>why haven't you charged her? Of course, we've got to say.

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 2>She protests her innocence one hundred percent, has always said

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 2>she has nothing to do with what happened to.

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Any Well, it's when it was leaked, and I say

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>leaked the information that a brief of evidence has been

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>provided to the DPP. Again, I've lost track of how

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>long that was, probably twelve months ago, maybe longer. We

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>call them in policing sufficiency advising, so you present all

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the evidence, so you go to the DPP on complex

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>matters or gray area type matters and they come back

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and say, yeah, there's sufficient evidence to proceed with this

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of a safeguard to check. I've never seen any

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>take that long, and I've sent some very very complicated

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>sufficiency advisings to the DPP and they come back a

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>lot quicker than a lot quicker than that. So I

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>met a loss why it's taken so long. I also

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>want to address I've seen articles that flowed on so

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you not just the podcasts articles going out and I

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>think the headlines were and coreact me if I'm wrong

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>with something like four witnesses of William to all matter

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't been spoken to by police or about sightings or

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>four sightings.

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was five at that point, yees, so people

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 2>who had that we'd spoken to, who had contacted crime Stoppers,

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 2>where you can report information to the police. Contacted crime

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 2>stoppers with different sightings or different bits of potential evidence.

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Some of them sightings are William at different times, or

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 2>people they thought were William. There was one other who

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 2>had seen a car and a driver that matched that

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 2>in a TV appeal for information. I think the same

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 2>day or the night before. They'd contacted crime Stoppers and

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 2>said here's this information, and they've just never heard back.

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 2>I've spoken to all I've spoken to all five of them,

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and they seemed credible, like they didn't seem like they

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 2>were making this up. They might be wrong, or it

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 2>might not be important, but it struck me as the

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing that'd be worth following up. So have

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 2>things fallen through the gaps. But the thing about those

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 2>five is that it's now eight So three more people

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 2>have got in touch with us and said I saw

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 2>this or here's something that I knew at the time,

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and I contacted crime stoppers and I never heard back.

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And two of those are the information that we've passed

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 2>on to the coroner, which I've looked at and I've said, Okay,

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 2>not only does that person sound credible, but that actually

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 2>sounds like it might be important, like massively, the odds

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 2>are massively weighed against it being that important. I get that,

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 2>But if they weren't followed up at the time, how

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 2>can the police be certain they're not missing something important.

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I read that article with interest because just prior

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to me being taken off the investigation, I completely a

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>comprehensives are in charge statement to present to the coroner,

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>detailing everything that was done with the investigation, why we

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>made these decisions, how the sightings were treated, like we

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>had like a matrix of how the sightings would be treated.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And if someone phones up and says I saw a

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>boy in Spider Man suit five years after William disappeared,

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't get excited about that. So there was a rating,

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a way that we assess the information, which ones need

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.479
<v Speaker 1>to be followed up, which ones don't, and we're in

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>undated with information. I would be more comfortable, and I'm

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>saying this is a member of the public now, if

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>an article goes out to the media along those lines,

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that the police address those issues, Because when I was

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>running the investigation, if things like that came out, I

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>would address, explain the situation, give the public confidence. But

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>when you did that article, and I'm not sure if

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you were even the author of the article, but the

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>did the police respond to the we're explain what they're doing.

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 2>No, they're not going to comment because the Kate willing

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Tiller's disappearances before the inquest. So I get your point

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 2>with that kind of thing, where we're saying, well, here's

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 2>some potential problems. It can cause the public to lose

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 2>faith in the police, and the police aren't coming out

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 2>and saying well, actually, you should have faith in us

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 2>because of this and this and this and this is

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 2>how we dealt with it. Yeah, they haven't said anything

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 2>at all. The other thing that struck me about to

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 2>be really candid about this was we got in touch

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 2>with crime Stoppers about that before the article went out,

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 2>and I said, here are the names of the people

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 2>we've spoken to and an outline of what they've said.

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 2>They told crime Stoppers at the time. I think I

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 2>gave them the dates in terms of the years at least,

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 2>and I said, do you want to you know, say anything,

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to correct us, do you want to this,

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 2>do you wist to have a chat off the record,

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 2>or do you want to make any kind of comment,

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 2>and the comment we got back from crime Stoppers was look,

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 2>forgive me. I can't remember the exact words. We was

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 2>basically saying, we can't comment on stuff that is impossible

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 2>for us to prove whether or not it's true, and

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 2>these people might have got it wrong. And I just

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 2>remember looking at it and thinking, but I gave you

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 2>the name, and I gave you an outline of what

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 2>they were saying, and don't you keep records? But that

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 2>was it. We just got, you know, we get a

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 2>few lines written down in an email. There's not an

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 2>attempt to actually engage and say, what's the greater good here?

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to be saying to make sure

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 2>this is reported accurately and people understand what's going on.

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 2>It's very defensive the journalist police relationship on this story,

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 2>accepting those cases where stuff has been leaked to the

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 2>media and then it's it's right.

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Look, it might be an explanation on that. Just as

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you're talking like there's a degree of people that provide

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>information that crime Stoppers can do it on an anonymous basis.

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>That might be part of it, that wishy washy message,

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>But that's something that could probably be if someone explained

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the situation. We can't give out the details, but yeah

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>they can confirmed perhaps, But see again, this is all

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this misinformation. So what I'm hoping, without putting pressure on

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>your dan, is the definitive story of what happened to

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Wim Turl comes out. Not to not because I've got

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a vested interest in it, It's because it's what needs

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:46.879
<v Speaker 1>to be done. There is too many people theorizing, speculating

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>and lives being destroyed about this whole investigation, and if

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>it's been done wrong, we all need to be held

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>accountable and make sure this doesn't happen again.

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look we do, and I say we because the

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 2>media do as well, because we've got a part in that.

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 2>And that is what we're attempting with this podcast is

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 2>the definitive telling, but also a fair telling, an honest telling.

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 2>That's all that we're interested in doing with this version

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 2>of it. But the one thing we can't do is

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 2>tell the definitive story or what happened to William. And

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I've said this to everyone, to his foster family, biological family.

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I said, we're not going to find William better people

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:33.399
<v Speaker 2>than us have tried, Cops have tried. The inquest team

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 2>are trying still. But what we can do is give

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 2>the definitive story of the investigation to find William, So

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 2>right back to the beginning, what was done and not done.

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 2>So that's our job is to look at what was

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 2>done to find William and tell that story. Because the

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:55.839
<v Speaker 2>sad truth of it is ten years on, I don't

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 2>think anybody has any evidence of what happened to William.

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Well you can take this and people listening can take

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it for what it is. Look deeply in the evidence.

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>It was already available when I was running the investigation,

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think you might find this answers.

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 2>That's what a lot of cops say, isn't it that

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the answer is always in the files and you look

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 2>at other cases. So Daniel Morcambe, the boy went missing

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 2>up in Queensland tragically, so years later the police do

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 2>identify and do arrest and do convict the person responsible

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:37.839
<v Speaker 2>for his abduction. I think that person's name was in

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the file. But these investigations is you know better than me.

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 2>You are dealing with so much information and managing that

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 2>and processing that and pulling out of it, which is

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 2>your job and the other cops job. Is to pull

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 2>out that thread that matters and then follow that one.

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 2>That's a high pressure.

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>It's a high pressure job, but it's a job that

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>you evolve into. You don't get leading. You don't lead

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>an investigation of that nature unless you've got the experience.

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think I've said this to you in just

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 1>off the cuff comments that if I didn't think I

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was up to the task, I would have stepped away

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>from that investigation because of the pressure. But twenty years

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of experience doing this, so I felt right for it.

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And this is not me justifying my position when I

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 1>say the answers might be in there. My concern is if,

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>as you've quite rightly pointed out, if the police have

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>got it wrong with the foster mother. Where I'm looking

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>at the extent of the surveillance that's been done and

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 1>what's come out in court, that would occupy a lot

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>of police time. What's happened to the other people, the

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>people who I were looking at, the people that are

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>before I was taken off that I wanted explored through

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the inquest are you going to touch on that or

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a will that come out?

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? We are, yeah, because some of those names that

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 2>you were looking at are names where that have become

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:05.879
<v Speaker 2>publicquently and through different means, Like when you were put

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 2>on trial and convicted, we heard a lot of evidence

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 2>about the people or the person you were looking at

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 2>at the time, and in the inquest other names have

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 2>come up that actually, thinking about it, the strikeforce, when

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 2>you were leading it was starting to look at one

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 2>or two other people. We're going to look at those

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 2>names and say, well, what's the evidence that has been collected,

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.800
<v Speaker 2>and what's the reason, if any, that we can establish

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 2>that people have stopped looking at them? Because and this

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 2>is something the foster mother, William's foster mother said, so

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 2>she released she's basically said nothing since she became identified

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 2>as a suspect. So she released a written statement. But

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 2>her point is in that statement she says basically, if

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 2>the police have been because she says she's innocent, if

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.879
<v Speaker 2>the police have been wrongly looking at me, then who

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 2>have they missed over the last five years? And that

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.720
<v Speaker 2>becomes really important. And I know there's a couple of ifs,

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 2>like if the police have got it wrong, then who

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:17.240
<v Speaker 2>have they missed? But if the police have got it wrong,

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 2>that means the person who is responsible for William's disappearance

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 2>is still out there somewhere, maybe with someone the police

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 2>were looking at at some point because there were so

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 2>many people as a thousand people on your persons of

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 2>interest list, and maybe the opportunity to gather the evidence

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 2>against that person has now been lost because memories fade,

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 2>forensic evidence can be destroyed, witnesses die, people get old.

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 2>And if that's the case, oh that's a tragedy.

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd say it's beyond the tragedy. It's unforgivable. If that's happened,

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>then I'm going to sit and say strongly on this.

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>If people that I were following up haven't been followed

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>up merely on the basis that I was following up

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 1>those people, I think it's disgraceful.

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 2>That is something that it did strike me. So when

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:21.800
<v Speaker 2>you left the police, and you left the police because

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 2>let's not beat around the bush, you were investigating someone

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 2>in relation to Williams Seal's disappearance and recorded conversations with

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 2>that person, which you say you had every right to do,

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 2>which the police force said you didn't, and so they

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 2>took you off the investigation. At that point, it very

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 2>much felt as an outsider looking in that you were

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 2>just about to start the inquest. You'd got your investigation

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 2>focused on very few people. The inquest was also focusing

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the same way as the police were thinking. And then

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:04.280
<v Speaker 2>you were taken off the investigation and suddenly the focus

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 2>of the inquest under the police investigation that followed swerved

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 2>away to other people. So things stopped and things changed.

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 2>You got to hope that that was done with good reason.

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, the inquest was at my request that I was

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>prepping for the inquest. That's why I did the statement.

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Prepping for the inquest with a very clear strategy in mind.

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 1>That search, I think it was twenty eighteen, the forensic

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>search that was done so I could give evidence before

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the coroner and say that based on all this information,

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I can say that William's disappearance wasn't through misadventure, that's

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>human intervention. That was the purpose of a forensic search.

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Great deal of money was spent making sure everything was

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:55.439
<v Speaker 1>documented and recorded and we went there and so that's

0:41:55.480 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 1>been my concern, Dan, And this is why I'm happy

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that you're doing the podcast, because I think these things

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>can be sometimes lost because I don't have the faith

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in the media fully comprehending and these reasons, as you said,

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the amount of words you can put in an article

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 1>when you attend the court. Are you for me with

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the case from the start? I saw this with bearable.

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>These long protracted investigations tend to get points amissed, and

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>when you can tied all together, the picture is a

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>lot clearer.

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is.

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:30.919
<v Speaker 1>So I'm hoping with your podcast. I'm glad you're doing

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the podcast because I'm anytime I speak about William Tyrol,

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm setting myself up to be criticized

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just trying to justify my position.

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, and I'll be blunt. You are going to

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 2>get criticized a bit in the podcast as well, because

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't agree with everything you did. And again, it's

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 2>very easy as the armchair critics to say, well, that

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 2>could have been done differently or better. So, yeah, you know,

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 2>you might not be quite as happy with it when

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 2>it comes out, but that is the intention to try

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 2>and say, look, this is the best version of what

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 2>has happened, and one hundred percent doing it has changed

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:10.839
<v Speaker 2>the way I've looked at that investigation, So I think

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 2>listening to it will change the way other people listen.

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'd be a coward if I didn't say that,

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>if I said, I know, I don't want it exposed.

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's just move on. Let's forget about the week. My

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 1>life's pretty good at the moment, like I don't need

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to be dragged back into the whim to all matter.

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 1>And I know we had conversations on the tenth anniversary.

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to you and just get your advice as

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a friend and someone that understands the media. When I've

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 1>been reached out to make comments on the tenth anniversary,

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and I had one night when the TV network contacted

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>me and said would you like to make a comment,

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>And I said no, And then I thought about it,

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sitting at home thinking, you're not the type

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of person you thought you were, Gary, if you haven't

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 1>got the tenacity to stand up and make comments that

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you think need to be made. And I came to

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the realization that if I don't speak up, no one

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.400
<v Speaker 1>else is going to speak up. So instead of saying no,

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do a stand up, I end up.

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I had five TV crews in my house

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 1>at week.

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:13.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I love the fact that you said you asked

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:15.799
<v Speaker 2>my advice as a friend, because I'm pretty sure you

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:17.319
<v Speaker 2>have never taken.

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:18.879
<v Speaker 1>My I don't take your friendly or not.

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I would have tried to say, don't do.

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, let's the issue, the issue I have

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 1>with this, So with your podcast, whatever comes out needs

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to come out. We can't sweep this under the carpet.

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Look just on that point. So during the timeline, you

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 2>do notice that William's foster mother publicly at your trial

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 2>supports you and publicly criticizes senior New South Wales police officers.

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 2>And subsequent to that you do see that she becomes

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 2>a focus of the police investigation and then is publicly

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 2>identified as their suspect. But you know, it's like that thing,

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 2>correlation is not causation. I've got no evidence to suggest that,

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, the one thing led to the other, but

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:20.359
<v Speaker 2>certainly one thing followed another, and there was a complete

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 2>shift of focus in who the police were looking at

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 2>between your time on it and between the police investigation

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 2>now And the other thing that's interesting is that you

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 2>had the inquest which ran for period of years and

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:38.240
<v Speaker 2>identified a number of people who we hadn't heard about publicly.

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 2>But even the inquest wasn't looking at William's foster parents

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 2>as potential people who might be involved. The lawyer who's

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 2>leading that inquest stands up at the beginning and he

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 2>says something to the effect of, you know, it's very

0:45:56.160 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 2>very few cases where child goes missing and it's who's involved,

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:05.319
<v Speaker 2>something like it's a few percent, but this might be

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 2>one of those cases. So even the inquest isn't looking

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 2>at Williams foster parents, but the police are now, So

0:46:16.239 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I really hope they have got the evidence to back

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 2>that up, because it's a It's the worst kind of

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:25.240
<v Speaker 2>thing you could say about a person.

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>We looked at the prospect of William being involved in

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the excellent and someone cover of that. But why cover that?

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And the theory can correct me if I'm wrong. That

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>seems to be being need to beer at the moment

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>wim fill off the balcony, and then in a yeah,

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a moment of I can't even articulate why personally if

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the child fill off that balcony there, I can I'm

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 1>going to cover.

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:54.919
<v Speaker 2>This up, you know what? This is where you start

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 2>to get into like the misinformation and the speculation that

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 2>surrounds this because there's both. There's a lot so we

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:06.799
<v Speaker 2>know that Williams. We do know for a fact that

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 2>William's foster mother has become the focus of police attention

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 2>because it was on the front page of the Daily

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:18.879
<v Speaker 2>Telegraph newspaper with a police source basically saying that, And

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 2>we know that the police have pretty much confirmed that

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 2>in court that this is what they think happened, or

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 2>we've heard evidence in court that seems to confirm that.

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 2>But we've heard no suggestion as to why she might

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 2>have done that, like what's the motive for doing it.

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:43.800
<v Speaker 2>We have heard a lot of speculation in the mainstream

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 2>media and on social media, which wild speculation, but in

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 2>both we've heard speculation about possible motives, but we've also

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:55.840
<v Speaker 2>heard speculation about all kinds of other things to do

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 2>with this case. There was one article shortly after Williams's

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 2>fosterman was identified as kind of the lead suspect. There

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 2>was an article on the headline was something like inside

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the police thinking on William's disappearance, and it was the

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 2>idea was, here's the big scoop on what the police

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 2>have got that makes them think William's foster mother is responsible.

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things was that the last known

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 2>photograph of William, so the last time we know for

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 2>a fact he was alive. He was barefoot in the photo.

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 2>Yet William's foster mother's evidence to police was that he

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 2>was wearing shoes at the time he went missing, and

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:38.319
<v Speaker 2>that she'd said to him, put your shoes on. It

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 2>was Bindi season. So Bindi's those spiky little things you

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 2>see in the grass. But according to this article, it

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 2>wasn't Bindi season. Go her story is not true and

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:54.960
<v Speaker 2>therefore she must be responsible. So when we went up

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 2>to where William went missing on the tenth anniversary, so

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:02.240
<v Speaker 2>this is ten years to the day since he went missing,

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 2>we stood outside the house that he disappeared from and

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 2>we tried to walk through what had happened to him

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 2>and what the police think happened. And my colleague Nina,

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:16.359
<v Speaker 2>she looks down at the grass at the moment I'm

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 2>talking about this bindi and she says, oh, what's that,

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 2>And it's a Bindi on the grass. So this whole

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna like, yeah, it is. It's speculation, this whole

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:32.399
<v Speaker 2>thing about shoes not shoes, Bindi's not bindy season. Well,

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 2>there was a Bindi on the grass ten years to

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:36.879
<v Speaker 2>the day since he went missing. And the other thing

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:38.799
<v Speaker 2>is William knew how to put his own shoes on,

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:42.240
<v Speaker 2>so none of it seems to matter.

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Then, just on the Bindi, it's called the Bindi situation.

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I had a conversation, off the record, friendly conversation with

0:49:51.080 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a journalist I respect, and this journalist said to me,

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>because I was arguing the toss on, yeah, why of

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the police suspect the foster mother and that story was

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>relaid to me, but the Bindi the Bindi story, so

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it was more than one journalist. Yeah, so this is

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this is how it was told to me to convince

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>me that I've got it wrong. It's a foster mother

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is not verbatim, but my recollection of the

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:21.799
<v Speaker 1>conversation was, but Gary, guess what the foster mother said

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that she told William to put his shoes on because

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>there's Bindi's And I'm going, yeah, it wasn't Bindy Susan

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and I've gone wow, like sarcastically wow. But there's more,

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thinking, Okay, well, hopefully there's something, because that's nothing.

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>She also said put your shoes on because you might

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 1>tread in dog Purr and guess what, Gary, they didn't

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>have a dog. The dog had died six months ago.

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Now this is the person I respect. But this is

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 1>irrational thinking. When this narrative comes in about about William

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:55.840
<v Speaker 1>tyrol Ca.

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 2>It's irrational because you know what bannermuin Drive looks like,

0:50:58.760 --> 0:51:02.280
<v Speaker 2>and I do. There's not much in the way offenses

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:05.360
<v Speaker 2>between properties. There are dogs they could be.

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's also irrational what you say to a three

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:12.360
<v Speaker 1>year old child like I would tell, yeah, there's a thousand,

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 1>put your shoe on, they'll give you a lully like.

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:19.879
<v Speaker 2>It's I Look, honestly, I've thought about this. I can't

0:51:19.880 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 2>see how anything turns on the shoes.

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Well that's not proof, I'm saying. Here, you put it

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in effect sheet and see what.

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 2>But you know, what is significant from what you've said

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:35.920
<v Speaker 2>isn't so much that the police might have said, you know,

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:38.320
<v Speaker 2>to a court that that's their key bit of evidence.

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 2>But it's what they're telling journalists, or at least somebody's

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:46.440
<v Speaker 2>telling journalists. There's the piece that I read in the paper,

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:49.320
<v Speaker 2>and you've got another journalist who's said this to you, Like,

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 2>who's telling the journalists what evidence the police have got

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:58.319
<v Speaker 2>in a live homicide investigation. Well, because they shouldn't be

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:00.799
<v Speaker 2>doing that. Well, I mean, as a journalist, I love

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 2>it when they do, but they shouldn't.

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And I know, and I would say within the journalistic

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 1>circles that I mix in, I'm saying, why isn't there

0:52:09.320 --> 0:52:12.399
<v Speaker 1>any inquiry about who released the information about the brief

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of evidence coming to the DP.

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Because everyone thinks you were releasing evidence?

0:52:17.320 --> 0:52:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well I I as I said, And the challenges

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:24.280
<v Speaker 1>here bring someone forward that has evidence that I released

0:52:24.440 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 1>any information When I was heading up investigations, I actually

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:31.799
<v Speaker 1>had someone reported and for releasing information in one of

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the very early homicide investigations I was on, and that

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was going against a culture within the cops because I

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 1>put in a complaint against someone for releasing information.

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess anyone listening to this podcast who was

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 2>leaked to by yourself can put it in the comments

0:52:47.760 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 2>to this podcast.

0:52:48.719 --> 0:52:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, put the calls out. Can I say sorry?

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:55.400
<v Speaker 1>One other thing? And I apologize when I talk William

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Troll because it does evoke emotions. But I want to

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:03.040
<v Speaker 1>make this other comment. Take homicide had away media head way,

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the foster mother, Yeah, is a let's say a person

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of interest in a murder investigation. I've never in all

0:53:12.960 --> 0:53:15.680
<v Speaker 1>my time as a homicide detective, and I asked the

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:18.839
<v Speaker 1>public to think this through. Had someone complain that the

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:21.840
<v Speaker 1>investigation has made shut down the flower of the person responsible?

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:24.880
<v Speaker 2>All right? See, that's interesting about the foster monk because

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 2>she has campaigned publicly and privately for more police attention

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:37.799
<v Speaker 2>on this case. So probably anyone listening to this who

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 2>was in Australia at the time will remember the Where's

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 2>William campaign which was massive, like billboards on the side

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 2>of the road, like you drive from Sydney to Kendall

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and you'd go past two or three of them. I

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:53.360
<v Speaker 2>remember being in pubs up that way and you be

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 2>a matt would have William's face and a little thing

0:53:55.840 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 2>saying you know, if you know anything, contact crime stuff

0:53:58.160 --> 0:54:03.840
<v Speaker 2>is TV stuff, social media like a huge campaign which

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 2>you were involved in a bit is a cop at

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:09.520
<v Speaker 2>the time, and the foster parents were heavily involved in

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 2>basically saying if you know anything, please come forward. And

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 2>we now know that she was also over the years

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:22.960
<v Speaker 2>privately writing letters to the police commissioner and others saying

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:28.600
<v Speaker 2>put more resources onto this, not just asking nicely. One

0:54:28.640 --> 0:54:32.640
<v Speaker 2>of those letters has been made public and she's basically

0:54:32.719 --> 0:54:35.400
<v Speaker 2>threatening him, you are not doing enough on this case.

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:38.439
<v Speaker 2>If you don't do more, we will get in touch

0:54:38.480 --> 0:54:40.960
<v Speaker 2>with the politicians. You know. The wording is much more

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:44.440
<v Speaker 2>polite there, but you can read between the lines like

0:54:44.520 --> 0:54:47.040
<v Speaker 2>she's saying, if you don't do more, we will get

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:54.879
<v Speaker 2>on your case. If she actually is responsible, then she's

0:54:55.000 --> 0:54:59.640
<v Speaker 2>playing a very clever, dangerous game of double bluff, because

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:03.560
<v Speaker 2>that's not what most guilty people would do in that case.

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen someone And people might argue, we've all

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:10.640
<v Speaker 1>seen the husband that has murdered the wife and gets

0:55:10.680 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on the TV see that and implied for we need

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to catch the killer. I've seen that in homicide. But

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking five years down the track, so the foster

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:25.719
<v Speaker 1>mother could quite easily have just drifted off in the

0:55:25.719 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 1>background say it. Look, I appreciate the effort the police

0:55:29.200 --> 0:55:31.799
<v Speaker 1>have done. Sadly we haven't got results, and no one

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:35.400
<v Speaker 1>would think anything of it five years down the track.

0:55:35.880 --> 0:55:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Her concern was the investigation was going to be shut

0:55:40.000 --> 0:55:44.280
<v Speaker 1>down under resource and all that. She wanted it investigated thoroughly.

0:55:44.440 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>She wanted answers. Okay, I'm doing what I've criticized other people.

0:55:49.160 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm speculating, but these are the things that you've got

0:55:51.600 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to take in take into account. I just find it

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:57.879
<v Speaker 1>extremely unusual, and it was someone that said it to

0:55:57.920 --> 0:56:01.440
<v Speaker 1>me when I was talking about just in a casual conversation.

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:04.439
<v Speaker 1>But why would she be asking for it to be

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:07.960
<v Speaker 1>ramped up? And I'm thinking that's a good point, right.

0:56:08.760 --> 0:56:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is a good point. And at this point,

0:56:13.320 --> 0:56:16.120
<v Speaker 2>only one of two things can be true, which is

0:56:17.239 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 2>either the police are right, in which case she has

0:56:22.920 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 2>misled the entire country for the best part of a

0:56:25.719 --> 0:56:31.319
<v Speaker 2>decade by calling for more attention on this case, or

0:56:31.680 --> 0:56:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the police have got it wrong, in which case they

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:42.719
<v Speaker 2>have wrongly targeted her and her family. And only one

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:45.919
<v Speaker 2>of those two things can be true, and either one

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:53.200
<v Speaker 2>of them is a pretty unsettling prospect. And this case,

0:56:53.680 --> 0:56:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the inquest is going to conclude this year, so November

0:56:57.120 --> 0:57:03.880
<v Speaker 2>December is the last two scheduled public cares, so everything's

0:57:03.880 --> 0:57:05.960
<v Speaker 2>got to come to a head. Like at the end

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:09.120
<v Speaker 2>of that, you'd hope we know which of those versions

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:13.600
<v Speaker 2>is true, because only one of them can be the

0:57:13.840 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 2>true story. And the podcast we're doing will run through

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:20.280
<v Speaker 2>and we'll report on those in quest hearings as well.

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:23.120
<v Speaker 2>So as part of this series, we are going back

0:57:23.120 --> 0:57:26.040
<v Speaker 2>to the beginning of the investigation, saying, here's what happened

0:57:26.080 --> 0:57:29.600
<v Speaker 2>and what was done right and what was done missed.

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:32.640
<v Speaker 2>But we're going to be there for those inquest hearings

0:57:32.640 --> 0:57:37.640
<v Speaker 2>and we'll report on what comes out there. And I'm

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:44.960
<v Speaker 2>expecting it to be shocking, actually, because there's so much

0:57:45.040 --> 0:57:48.720
<v Speaker 2>that's now weighing on this. And at the end of

0:57:48.760 --> 0:57:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the day, the thing that gets lost and this is

0:57:52.200 --> 0:57:55.080
<v Speaker 2>a couple of people have said this to me, and

0:57:55.160 --> 0:57:57.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm guilty of it, and maybe we're guilty of it

0:57:57.480 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 2>in this conversation because we're talking about, oh, what about

0:58:00.360 --> 0:58:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the police, and what about the media, and what about

0:58:02.200 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the foster parents? And the thing that gets lost is

0:58:06.360 --> 0:58:10.720
<v Speaker 2>William himself. You know, there's a line in one of

0:58:10.720 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the episodes in the podcast where someone says that it's

0:58:13.720 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 2>almost like William's become an absence in his own story.

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:19.959
<v Speaker 2>And probably the person we haven't actually really spoken about

0:58:20.000 --> 0:58:23.600
<v Speaker 2>enough in this conversation is William himself. And we are

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 2>going to get to the end of the year, and

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 2>one of these two accounts of what happened to him

0:58:29.000 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 2>will hopefully be the one we realize is the true one,

0:58:32.960 --> 0:58:35.280
<v Speaker 2>and then maybe at that point we can actually stop

0:58:35.320 --> 0:58:38.840
<v Speaker 2>and start thinking about the boy himself who went missing.

0:58:39.040 --> 0:58:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well said then, because I know what you're saying,

0:58:44.480 --> 0:58:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and I feel uncomfortable talking about that. It's always poked

0:58:48.320 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the beer when they talk to me about William Tyrell.

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's a three year old kid that sis and

0:58:54.160 --> 0:58:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the lives that's impacted on the lives of the Buron

0:58:57.160 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 1>shaded these biological Foster family. Cute little kid, and I

0:59:01.080 --> 0:59:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think perhaps that's why it's in the psyche of the

0:59:04.360 --> 0:59:07.920
<v Speaker 1>whole country, and because you see those angelic fatos of

0:59:08.000 --> 0:59:10.720
<v Speaker 1>him running around plane and in the Spider Man suit,

0:59:10.840 --> 0:59:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we can all relate and his life is Yeah, we

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:16.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's happened to him, so we need to

0:59:16.640 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 1>get answers. I'm hoping your podcast will assist and not

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:24.840
<v Speaker 1>just encourage people to come forward with information, put the

0:59:24.840 --> 0:59:27.920
<v Speaker 1>spotlight on the people that are involved in the investigation

0:59:28.480 --> 0:59:31.600
<v Speaker 1>where the cards lie. If I'm due for criticism, we

0:59:31.680 --> 0:59:35.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want the situation like this happening again. But we've

0:59:35.320 --> 0:59:38.400
<v Speaker 1>got to accept the responsibility that comes not just the police,

0:59:38.480 --> 0:59:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the coroner. Everyone that's involved in the media on a

0:59:41.920 --> 0:59:44.480
<v Speaker 1>situation like this, we need to bring an a game

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to it, So hopefully your podcast delivers.

0:59:48.680 --> 0:59:49.040
<v Speaker 2>I hope.

0:59:49.080 --> 0:59:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So I've seen you looking tired on different times. I'm saying,

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:56.400
<v Speaker 1>here is a friend Dan, I can see the pressure

0:59:56.520 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 1>on you working on this case. And a shout out

0:59:59.720 --> 1:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to her too, because she's good. There's been putting in

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the big effort, but you need that type of effort

1:00:07.160 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to get to the bottom of what this is all about.

1:00:10.640 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think I've actually worked this hard on

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:17.400
<v Speaker 2>anything before, and it does feel relentless and like it's

1:00:17.440 --> 1:00:20.280
<v Speaker 2>definitely having an effect. And but you know this is

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:22.760
<v Speaker 2>true of everyone who's worked on it, isn't it. Like

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:29.760
<v Speaker 2>you take these cases on because they're important and they're

1:00:29.800 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>worth doing, but they take something out of you in return.

1:00:34.560 --> 1:00:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I've worked on each of the last three weekends. I've

1:00:38.000 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>currently got four ulcers in my mouth because my body's

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:44.640
<v Speaker 2>trying to tell me that I'm a bit run down. Like,

1:00:44.800 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>my wife's been great and the kids have been really supportive,

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>but like we're on this until Christmas now, because that's

1:00:52.000 --> 1:00:57.320
<v Speaker 2>how long the inquest is running for. And I'm already thinking, oh,

1:00:57.440 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be a long trip. But you do

1:01:02.080 --> 1:01:05.280
<v Speaker 2>it because it's important, and you do it because you

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:07.560
<v Speaker 2>know there is a little three year old kid and

1:01:07.800 --> 1:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>something happened, and there are other people who got involved,

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 2>not out of choice, but got involved in everything that followed,

1:01:16.200 --> 1:01:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and they are important. So I really hope that we

1:01:20.640 --> 1:01:22.320
<v Speaker 2>can get to the end of this year. And I

1:01:22.360 --> 1:01:25.960
<v Speaker 2>say we, I mean collectively, like we the public, we

1:01:26.280 --> 1:01:29.640
<v Speaker 2>the media, we the police, we the Inquest, and we

1:01:29.720 --> 1:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>can say we gave that our best shot.

1:01:33.240 --> 1:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the right person's doing it. The effort

1:01:36.280 --> 1:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you're putting into it, that needs that effort. And I

1:01:38.760 --> 1:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>say this not naively, like if it comes back and

1:01:42.320 --> 1:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>bites me, so be it. But we need answers and

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that hopefully this will help in some way, and we'll

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>get answers for how can people listen to the podcast?

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:56.120
<v Speaker 2>You can listen to this podcast anywhere you get your podcasts.

1:01:57.400 --> 1:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>The podcast is out. We're releasing episodes weekly when the

1:02:01.160 --> 1:02:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Inquest is on. We might end up doing more than

1:02:03.080 --> 1:02:07.160
<v Speaker 2>one a week just to report on what's happening. You

1:02:07.200 --> 1:02:11.240
<v Speaker 2>can google it witness William Tyrrell and the reportings in

1:02:11.360 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>news Dot com dot Au. So it's out there and

1:02:16.040 --> 1:02:17.080
<v Speaker 2>it's pretty easy to find.

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, I'm just going to say, as someone that

1:02:19.520 --> 1:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>was involved in the investigation, there's more to this investigation

1:02:23.440 --> 1:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that's been reported in the media.

1:02:25.160 --> 1:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, if you're this than I ever.

1:02:27.720 --> 1:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Thought so many later yeap, So good luck with it.

1:02:31.480 --> 1:02:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Thank you for your time.

1:02:33.040 --> 1:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're still friends. I'll wait the rest of

1:02:36.920 --> 1:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the need to wait until you've heard the episodes about you.

1:02:39.880 --> 1:02:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is actually the one I'm writing today.

1:02:42.480 --> 1:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, all right, great timing, all right, thanks then,

1:02:47.480 --> 1:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I always find it difficult talking about the

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>William tool case. Obviously I'm heavily invested in it. But

1:02:57.560 --> 1:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope the podcast is Den Bock and Nina Young

1:03:02.040 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>as working on, called Witness William Tyrell, will provide answers

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>about all the issues that have gone on with this investigation,

1:03:09.520 --> 1:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and also the main focus needs to be that we've

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>got a three year old child that's disappeared and no

1:03:14.840 --> 1:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>one's been called into account.