Speaker 1: On Skyland's Australia.
Speaker 2: This is the Wider Panalty Show.
Speaker 1: Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panehy Show. Coming
Speaker 1: up tonight, Thousands of furious farmers and firefighters descend on
Speaker 1: Melbourne's CBDs victorious dead Royal government expands the emergency services tax.
Speaker 1: Patrick Carlin will have more on that shortly. John Persudo
Speaker 1: breaks his silence after being ordered to pay over two
Speaker 1: million dollars in legal fees. Sephanibastian weighs in on efforts
Speaker 1: to save the former Liberal leader from bankruptcy. British Prime
Speaker 1: Minister Kis Starmer morphing into Donald Trump with tough talk
Speaker 1: about borders, foreign labor and English language requirements. Kosher Gator
Speaker 1: will be here with the details, and later in the
Speaker 1: hour Alex Stein will have the latest from the US.
Speaker 1: And Tonight's Left is losing. It is heavy on a
Speaker 1: list celebrities, including this clown.
Speaker 3: America's philistine president has had himself appointed head of one
Speaker 3: of our premier cultural institutions.
Speaker 1: But first volunteer firefighters and farmers gathered in huge numbers
Speaker 1: in Melbourne, CBD today to protest the state government's expanded
Speaker 1: emergency services tax. They travel to the steps of Parliament
Speaker 1: in convoy from all corners of the state demand just
Speaker 1: center Alan scrapped the controversial tax amid the disastrous drought
Speaker 1: that is crippling many parts of the state.
Speaker 4: Is this another expense we don't need? I mean, the
Speaker 4: problem of we've got now risk fite profile is huge.
Speaker 4: I've really these fixed costs and this is just another
Speaker 4: big fixed cost we don't need. I mean, the flow
Speaker 4: on effect is going to be huge, hecause, I mean,
Speaker 4: this money's going to leave leave our districts. It's going
Speaker 4: to end up down here. And now, if it was
Speaker 4: going back into our CFA, back where we are, wouldn't
Speaker 4: be quite so bad. But we know for a fact
Speaker 4: it's coming down here to filter center Allen's big black
Speaker 4: hole in the budget.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: The outcry comes as farmers in draft to ravaged areas
Speaker 1: are being forced to send thousands of dairy cows to
Speaker 1: be slaughtered as they don't have sufficient feed to keep
Speaker 1: them alive and healthy. The cost of hay has gone
Speaker 1: up considerably in the last week alone. Farmers say that
Speaker 1: the Alan government has failed to provide adequate support, instead
Speaker 1: slugging them with yet another tax. Joining me now for
Speaker 1: more on This is News Corps senior writer Patrick Carli
Speaker 1: and Patrick, the farmers and indeed many in regional areas
Speaker 1: are furious. There does seem to be this divide between
Speaker 1: the city and regional areas, and people out there are
Speaker 1: doing it tough.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. Look, the farmers have got the triple whammy today.
Speaker 2: Basically they've got a draft, they've raising rising feed prices,
Speaker 2: and they've got this ridiculous new tax which who knows
Speaker 2: who came up with this idea to this tax. I mean,
Speaker 2: let's just punish the people who are doing it tough.
Speaker 2: It's tinued, it's ridiculous, it should be scrapped, and you'd like, look,
Speaker 2: I welcome the farmers coming out in four They've got
Speaker 2: some very legitimate grip.
Speaker 1: It takes a lot for them to leave their farms,
Speaker 1: travel hours in some cases to go to the steps
Speaker 1: of Parliament. They're not people who protest at the drop
Speaker 1: of a hat. But things are pretty grim, as you said,
Speaker 1: and we've got the Victorian state budget today, biggest debt
Speaker 1: in the country, bigger state debt, and an annual interest
Speaker 1: bill that's hitting ten billion dollars shortly. That is frightening
Speaker 1: and all they seem to have is property taxes, and
Speaker 1: this is yet another one.
Speaker 2: Well, look, the taxes are gone up. If you look
Speaker 2: at the budget today, the taxes have gone up from
Speaker 2: thirty one billion dollars in twenty two to twenty three
Speaker 2: to forty one billion dollars in twenty eight.
Speaker 1: Twe and they say there's no new taxes.
Speaker 2: And at the same time, we've got this debt going
Speaker 2: up to I think one hundred and ninety four billion dollars.
Speaker 2: That works out it's ten billion dollars in interest per year.
Speaker 2: That works out to a million dollars an hour in
Speaker 2: interest repayment. It's crazy.
Speaker 1: You said, you hope that just into Allen government will
Speaker 1: scrap this tax. Is there any likelihood of that happening
Speaker 1: given the distraits therein financially.
Speaker 2: Look, what I get upset about is the naked gouging
Speaker 2: that this government does. They just attack people who are
Speaker 2: asset rich to try and pay down on those debts
Speaker 2: that they created over the course of the last nine years.
Speaker 2: They're not cutting spending, They're just whacking Victorians who have
Speaker 2: been whacked over and over in so many different ways
Speaker 2: over so many years.
Speaker 1: Now to the other big news today, the coalition is
Speaker 1: no more. Nationals leader David Little Proud announcing earlier today
Speaker 1: that the Nationals will not be reinstating a coalition agreement
Speaker 1: with the Liberals at this time. Here's what you have
Speaker 1: to say.
Speaker 5: Our party room has got to a position where we
Speaker 5: will not be re entering a coalition agreement with the
Speaker 5: Liberal Party after this election. What we have got to
Speaker 5: a position is that the National Party will sit alone
Speaker 5: on a principal basis their need to we discover who
Speaker 5: they are and what they want to be. We're very
Speaker 5: clear about who we are and why we're here.
Speaker 1: Patrick. Is this heading for divorce or is it just
Speaker 1: a trial separation and they're going to kiss and make
Speaker 1: up before the next election.
Speaker 2: I think it's a time out, you'd call it at
Speaker 2: this stage. Look, the Nationals did pretty well at the election.
Speaker 1: They did.
Speaker 2: I think they've lost one seat, and over the last
Speaker 2: two elections the Liberals got smashed. The Liberals don't know
Speaker 2: who they are or what they want to be. They
Speaker 2: don't know how they're going to appeal to particularly young
Speaker 2: people and to women in those electorates where they did
Speaker 2: so poorly. The Nationals, in contrast, actually did very well
Speaker 2: they want to prosecute the policies that they took to
Speaker 2: the election and those policies which won over electorates in
Speaker 2: a very successful way. So look, I think you can
Speaker 2: assume they probably get back together at some point. They
Speaker 2: have split three times previously, which I didn't realize. It
Speaker 2: does happen from time to time, and it probably is
Speaker 2: a good time for a time out.
Speaker 1: Well, the Nationals seem to have a much firmer idea
Speaker 1: of who they are, what they stand for, and it
Speaker 1: speaks to the electorate because as you said, they did
Speaker 1: pretty well in an election campaign that was disastrous for
Speaker 1: the coalition. Overall, there's only I think five or six
Speaker 1: seats between them. The Nationals could be the lead opposition,
Speaker 1: which would mean the Prime Minister or the alternative prime
Speaker 1: Minister could come from them, So it's quite a different
Speaker 1: set of circumstances to what we've seen in the past.
Speaker 2: Look, I think it just emphasizes that regional city divide,
Speaker 2: which has been really growing rapidly, especially over the last
Speaker 2: ten years. What the Bush is talking about and what
Speaker 2: the Bush cares about is dramatically different to the retoric
Speaker 2: coming out of camera and out of the Capital cities.
Speaker 2: They have their own interests and they did good. The
Speaker 2: Nationals did a good job of representing those interests, and
Speaker 2: it'll be interesting to see. Look, I don't know how
Speaker 2: you change that divide. I don't know how you bring
Speaker 2: it back together, but it's there.
Speaker 1: The issue of net zero is going to be crucial
Speaker 1: energy policy. If Susan Lee wants to go down this
Speaker 1: renewables road and stick with net zero, then perhaps this
Speaker 1: reconciliation is not going to be as amicable as you
Speaker 1: would like because the Nationals, and they certainly have people
Speaker 1: within that party who are outspoken on this one, this
Speaker 1: policy abandoned. They see it as holding the party back.
Speaker 1: And you've got to say, since they embraced net zero
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty one, they've lost two elections in devastating circumstances.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, Look, the Nationals are realistic. They're saying we need nuclear.
Speaker 2: The renewables is not going to work. And I think
Speaker 2: time will tell and I think that will be shown
Speaker 2: to be so that nuclear has to be on the table.
Speaker 2: They haven't sort of run away from that. The coalition
Speaker 2: together sort of brought forward this nuclear idea, then the
Speaker 2: Liberals sort of ran backwards from it a million miles
Speaker 2: an hour, whereas the Nationals said, well we need this,
Speaker 2: this is what we need. So look, the Liberals need
Speaker 2: to do a lot of soul over many months to
Speaker 2: actually work out who they are and what they're going
Speaker 2: to do. The National is an entity unto themselves, and
Speaker 2: they're doing pretty well.
Speaker 1: They are. They're certainly doing better than the Liberals of
Speaker 1: the moment. Now to the other side of the isle
Speaker 1: and Anthony Albanize is welfare working group known as the
Speaker 1: Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee what a name, is pushing for
Speaker 1: Labor to end its six point eight billion dollar power
Speaker 1: bill rebate scheme and instead redirect that money to more
Speaker 1: solar panel and battery subsidies, more money for the renewable
Speaker 1: sector from your taxes, Patrick, what do you think of
Speaker 1: this suggestion.
Speaker 2: Look, there's a standout statistic in this discussion. Power prices
Speaker 2: across Australia have gone up forty seven percent this year,
Speaker 2: out of pocket prices at forty seven percent. There's no
Speaker 2: way in the world politically this government is going to
Speaker 2: drop out the rebate. They need the rebates just to
Speaker 2: keep everything going. And I just seems so pine in
Speaker 2: the sky. I mean low income people subsidizing soular batteries
Speaker 2: on their rooms. How are they going to find the
Speaker 2: difference which is ten thousand dollars to try and save
Speaker 2: the planet.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, and a lot of low income people have rent,
Speaker 1: so how are they going to be getting subsidies for this?
Speaker 1: It is so hair brained. But then so is the
Speaker 1: whole notion that renewables are cheaper. And we keep pumping
Speaker 1: money into renewables and our power bills keep going up.
Speaker 1: I wonder at some point we're going to sort of realize, well,
Speaker 1: maybe the renewables aren't that cheap after all. Now to
Speaker 1: the insane costs of real estate in this country, including
Speaker 1: parking spots. Six parking spots in Sydney's CBD have sold,
Speaker 1: for get this, six hundred and eight thousand each at auction,
Speaker 1: each supposed to be patrick a record price per per space.
Speaker 1: That is crazy. In most countries, they would look at
Speaker 1: that and would refuse to believe that six hundred thousand
Speaker 1: in whatever currency that transfer transfers to would buy you
Speaker 1: a substantial house in most countries.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. Look, I think there was there was ninety two
Speaker 2: inquiries for these car parks. It is prime real estate
Speaker 2: it's near Circular Key in Sydney. It is if you've
Speaker 2: got a parking spot, it is a parking spot. They
Speaker 2: had thirty bids. They went past the reserve after four bids.
Speaker 2: I think there is still money around and something like that. Look,
Speaker 2: that is very desirable to have those car parks.
Speaker 6: Oh.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. Now I know you're a footy fan, so before
Speaker 1: you go, I want to get your input on this story.
Speaker 1: The AFL has been lobbied in recent years to make
Speaker 1: it mandatory for each club to recruise at least one
Speaker 1: Indigenous player. What do you make of this proposal? The
Speaker 1: number of Indigenous players on AFL list has reduced in
Speaker 1: recent years, but do we really need to have quotas
Speaker 1: and mandatory recruitment.
Speaker 2: Look like quotas in every aspect of industry across the board,
Speaker 2: they don't work and it's not going to work in
Speaker 2: an elite sport context, is it. Look the numbers are sad.
Speaker 2: I think there's eighty seven Indigenous players playing AFL five
Speaker 2: years ago. It's down to sixty two the.
Speaker 1: Akill there's an overrepresentation though, I mean, obviously a lot
Speaker 1: of Indigenous players are hugely popular. Some of the best
Speaker 1: players in the league and they've always been overrepresented. So
Speaker 1: the rationale for quota or a mandatory recruitment requirement seems
Speaker 1: a bit odd.
Speaker 2: Well, it simply wouldn't work those players if they were
Speaker 2: recruited as a quota sort of deal, they're not going
Speaker 2: to get games, They're not going to play AFL. It's
Speaker 2: not going to work. I mean, a lot of things
Speaker 2: need to be done. There are systemic issues here in
Speaker 2: terms of getting great players to the AFL playing field,
Speaker 2: and there's lots that needs to be done. But quotas
Speaker 2: he's not going to fix anything.
Speaker 1: Patrick Carline, thanks for it time tonight. Joining me now
Speaker 1: is Women's Forum Australia's head of advocacy, Stephanie Bastian Stephanie.
Speaker 1: Former Victorian opposition leader John Pursuito is in danger of
Speaker 1: being declared bankrupt and losing his seat after being ordered
Speaker 1: to cover Mora Deemings two point three million dollar legal bill.
Speaker 1: John Pursuito has conceded an interview with The Herald Son
Speaker 1: that there is a part of me that thinks, geez,
Speaker 1: if only I had taken a moment, I could have
Speaker 1: done things differently or better. But in the same interview,
Speaker 1: also said I did everything that I possibly could to
Speaker 1: settle the matter, and that I've always acted then as
Speaker 1: now in the best interest of the party. Stephan I've
Speaker 1: got to ask, is he delusional or dumb? It's hard
Speaker 1: to think of another option. There were plenty of opportunities
Speaker 1: for him to do a U turn here before he
Speaker 1: got to this point.
Speaker 7: Absolutely, it's on the public record that he he didn't
Speaker 7: even respond to Mora's last letter of offer to settle
Speaker 7: the case for one hundred grand. But one thing that
Speaker 7: Pursuito hasn't mentioned is the one big lesson that he
Speaker 7: and his faction should learn, and that is to stop
Speaker 7: the witch hunt against Conservatives. What happened to Moira follows
Speaker 7: a plethora of women, particularly within the Victorian Division, that
Speaker 7: had been demonized by his faction. There was Cynthia Watson
Speaker 7: in Ringwood, whose husband had attended a big event in
Speaker 7: Queensland with an afarious character, and despite the fact that
Speaker 7: she was mayor and an elected local counselor, she was
Speaker 7: somehow unfit to run for the seat of Ringwood. And
Speaker 7: this whole story came from within the division. Renee heat
Speaker 7: almost didn't sit in the party room because her father,
Speaker 7: and you were a pastor in a Muslim country and
Speaker 7: he was too conservative, once again damaged by association.
Speaker 8: Of course, then she was dragged through the MUDs.
Speaker 7: After she refused to fix the minutes to make Vesudo's
Speaker 7: story fit.
Speaker 8: But one after another, these women have been mistreated.
Speaker 7: Moira as the first woman to actually stand up and
Speaker 7: push back say no, and that is cost Purseudo at
Speaker 7: this point, it looks like it's costing his seat.
Speaker 8: He's up for.
Speaker 7: Millions of dollars in damages. But the shoe is now
Speaker 7: on the other foot. So I think the lesson here
Speaker 7: is for them to stop demonizing conservatives and to start
Speaker 7: working as a broad shirts that they should be.
Speaker 1: Now let's turn our attention to an author want to
Speaker 1: be Pirate and husband of Lisa Wilkinson, Peter fitz Simon's
Speaker 1: who posted these comments about Mara Deeming and they're still up.
Speaker 1: This was posted back in twenty twenty three. I can't
Speaker 1: believe it's still up on x in It Fitzimon's response
Speaker 1: to a post praising John Pursudo for expelling Deeming from
Speaker 1: the party room, and Fitzimon writes, if we Australians don't
Speaker 1: draw a line in the sand on Nazis, Where does
Speaker 1: it stop? Charlottesville, Stephanie is a shocking thing to put
Speaker 1: out there about Mora Deeming who was there to protect
Speaker 1: women's right. I know Moura is absolutely shattered about that post.
Speaker 1: How is it still up today? How do they have
Speaker 1: a license to defame this poor woman despite everything she's
Speaker 1: done to clear her name.
Speaker 7: Well, I think that's probably a question for her lawyers.
Speaker 7: I hope they write him a strongly worded letter to
Speaker 7: enforce him to take that down. But I mean, Peter
Speaker 7: Fitzgibbons is a nasty man. He has constantly mocked women
Speaker 7: who have expressed concern about women playing in sport. And
Speaker 7: the fact that he didn't go and fact check this situation,
Speaker 7: I think it probably didn't suit him to do so.
Speaker 7: But this just shows the ramifications of what pursudo did.
Speaker 8: He went out with this story with these lies that a.
Speaker 7: Court found to be incredibly damaging, he didn't fact check
Speaker 7: and he probably didn't want to. And the consequences of
Speaker 7: his Pursuito's actions is that people like Fitzgibbons, who also
Speaker 7: have large followings, have furthered the damage by spreading it
Speaker 7: around on social media.
Speaker 1: And if you're pandering to the likes of FitzSimons then
Speaker 1: you're kind of losing the fight. He's supposed to be
Speaker 1: a conservative leader. This was such a lost opportunity by
Speaker 1: Pursuito to actually lay a glove on the Dan Andrews
Speaker 1: government and speak for the eighty percent. This is an
Speaker 1: eighty twenty issue. You might even argue it's a ninety
Speaker 1: ten issue. But sadly we've got Labor, the Liberals, the
Speaker 1: Greens all siding with a ten to twenty percent activist
Speaker 1: class now fast for FitzSimons, he's a typical lefty losing it.
Speaker 1: He's triggered now by the Australian flag. He posted this
Speaker 1: in recent days. He said, it really is weird how
Speaker 1: the OS flag these days on Twitter is the surest
Speaker 1: sign of mad, bad and dangerous to know Cookers, I
Speaker 1: mean really, Now, let's turn our attention to the Abortion
Speaker 1: Access Bill, which has now passed the New South Wales
Speaker 1: Parliament after the Greens did the deal with the Chris
Speaker 1: Means government. Steph, tell me about your concerns about this legislation.
Speaker 1: Surely if it's expanding women's rights, it's a good thing.
Speaker 8: Well, that's the way they've pitched it.
Speaker 7: But the problem with the remnants of this bill, and
Speaker 7: it has been wound back significantly, is that women in
Speaker 7: regional areas will be given access to the pill without
Speaker 7: the necessary medical support in the case of adverse events.
Speaker 7: There was a big study out with over eight hundred
Speaker 7: thousand participants earlier this year. One in ten women have
Speaker 7: had serious adverse health events to taking the medical Abortion
Speaker 7: Bill sorry abortion pill, including hemorrhaging and needing hospitalization. There's
Speaker 7: been a range of adverse events.
Speaker 1: Now to the US where the Trump Department of Justice
Speaker 1: has reallocated federal funding for groups that support transgenderism and
Speaker 1: DEI policies diversity equity inclusion, and they've diverted that funding
Speaker 1: step to boost law enforcement efforts. It's precisely the sort
Speaker 1: of being that your group advocates for, and I would
Speaker 1: think most people would be in support of this sort
Speaker 1: of action because that is something that is again another
Speaker 1: eighty twenty issue, and for too long the twenty percent
Speaker 1: has had disproportionate power and influence.
Speaker 7: Absolutely, I think the austrained public would be shocked at
Speaker 7: the millions of dollars that are put into these activist
Speaker 7: lobby groups. Acon's one single organization that receives over sixteen
Speaker 7: million dollars. Every local council across the country now are
Speaker 7: implementing these LGBTI Advisory Board. State governments are rolling out programs.
Speaker 7: You've got programs and schools, millions and millions of tax
Speaker 7: funded dollars being poured into these activist groups that are
Speaker 7: wreaking havoc on society and taking away the rights of
Speaker 7: women and girls. I think it's extraordinary, and this is
Speaker 7: money that could be going to good use to address
Speaker 7: domestic violence, boosting domestic violence shelters and support networks for women,
Speaker 7: dealing with the mental health crisis in our schools, for kids,
Speaker 7: providing more counseling. I think that it would be great
Speaker 7: to have a review into just how much waste is
Speaker 7: going into these organizations, because they're wreaking a lot more
Speaker 7: havoc than they are adding a benefit to our society.
Speaker 1: And at tax payers expense. Deevanie Bastion, thank you for
Speaker 1: your time tonight, still to calm lefties losing it? Plus,
Speaker 1: why is kiss starmas slowly morphing into Donald Trump? Kosher
Speaker 1: Gata has the details You're watching. The reader Paney Show,
Speaker 1: and it's time for Left is losing it. Let's go
Speaker 1: to the caln't feel first of all that the uber,
Speaker 1: rich and famous gather to congratulate themselves about how special, brave,
Speaker 1: humble and inclusive they are, and how they are at
Speaker 1: the forefront of fighting fascism. Here is a once great
Speaker 1: actor turned teds sufferer, Robert de Niro.
Speaker 3: In my country, we're fighting like hell for the democracy
Speaker 3: we once took for granted, and that affects all of us.
Speaker 3: That affects all of us here because the art art,
Speaker 3: democratic art is inclusive. It brings people together tonight. Art
Speaker 3: looks for truth. Art embraces diversity, and that's why art
Speaker 3: is a threat. That's why we are a threat to
Speaker 3: autocrats and fascists.
Speaker 1: Yes, the film industry is so inclusive, Robert, You actors
Speaker 1: have such a perfect moral compass with your sick, sordid
Speaker 1: personal lives. Did you notice global warming? Hysterically and out
Speaker 1: of dicaprion stage there were DeNiro, the dude who flies
Speaker 1: around the world in private jets and seals in massive yachts,
Speaker 1: but is really really concerned about emissions. And as for
Speaker 1: being inclusive, well, the fifty year old is not very
Speaker 1: inclusive of women over twenty five, not in his dating
Speaker 1: life anyway. But let's get back to Robert de Niro
Speaker 1: as a mad rant. Here he lies with gay abandon.
Speaker 3: America's philistine president has had himself appointed head of one
Speaker 3: of our premier cultural institutions. He has cut funding and
Speaker 3: support to the arts, humanities, and education. All these attacks
Speaker 3: are unacceptable, and this isn't just an American problem, It's
Speaker 3: a global one. Unlike a film, we can't just all
Speaker 3: sit back and watch. We have to act, and we
Speaker 3: have to act now.
Speaker 1: We have to act. We have to act now. It's
Speaker 1: amazing that Donald Trump, the fascist dictator, allows DeNiro to
Speaker 1: defame him so easily. Why isn't he arresting him, putting
Speaker 1: him in jail. Isn't that what dictators do? And isn't
Speaker 1: that what we were told would happen. Remember when De
Speaker 1: Niro and fellow Teds sufferer Bill Maher was saying before
Speaker 1: the election, what would happen if Trump won?
Speaker 3: If he is he wins the election, you won't be
Speaker 3: on the show anymore.
Speaker 1: He'll come looking for me.
Speaker 3: There'll be things that happened that none of us can imagine.
Speaker 3: That's what happens in that kind of a dictatorship, which
Speaker 3: is what he says. Let's believe him. Take him at
Speaker 3: his work.
Speaker 1: I did from the beginning.
Speaker 9: Yeah, I mean, I said from the very beginning, this
Speaker 9: guy is never going to concede power.
Speaker 1: No, he hasn't conceded power. He's your president. And once
Speaker 1: you're dining with him at the White House, Bill Maher
Speaker 1: and somehow Robert de Niro is still not locked up.
Speaker 1: Here's another lefty losing it, actor Ben Stiller, who also
Speaker 1: has crazy fever dreams about Trump coming after him.
Speaker 10: It's impossible not to be aware of the fact that
Speaker 10: people feel this, You know that, oh wow, you know
Speaker 10: there can be retribution from the government if you say
Speaker 10: something wrong, and that's really scary. So just to even
Speaker 10: be thinking that way is you know. Of course I'm
Speaker 10: aware of it. I think everybody's aware of it.
Speaker 1: Can someone tell Ben Stiller that it was the previous
Speaker 1: administration that went after grandmothers for posting funny memes and
Speaker 1: sought to have school moms concerned about trans indoctrination in classrooms,
Speaker 1: sought to have them labeled domestic terrorists. All these clowns
Speaker 1: do is life he was really genuinely worried about repercussions
Speaker 1: from the Trump administration. I can tell you Ben Stiller
Speaker 1: would be keeping his mouth shut. One thing you can
Speaker 1: say about Hollywood, they ain't brave. Here's another actor, Europe, Pascal,
Speaker 1: And when he's not signing letters accusing Israel of genocide,
Speaker 1: he's eager to tell you that being against the deportation
Speaker 1: of illegal immigrants means he's on the right side of history.
Speaker 11: I want people to be safe and to be protected,
Speaker 11: and and I want very much to live on the
Speaker 11: right side of history. And I'm an immigrant. My parents
Speaker 11: are refugees from Chile. I myself was a refugee. We
Speaker 11: fled a dictatorship, and I was privileged enough to grow
Speaker 11: up in the US.
Speaker 1: You know, in a world of miserable, hysterical clowns like
Speaker 1: de Niro and Stilla, pays to be a Jerry. Here
Speaker 1: is Jerry Seinfeld treating the loopy left with the disdain
Speaker 1: they richly deserve.
Speaker 12: You, Jerry Seinfeld, Paline, he was the genocideplicide.
Speaker 1: Joy, you're the Jennie.
Speaker 3: You ran it.
Speaker 12: Resized read Holifide.
Speaker 1: I love the kid blowing a kiss there at the end.
Speaker 1: You know who is much funnier than many of these
Speaker 1: triggered comics. It's forty five and forty seven.
Speaker 12: Yes.
Speaker 1: Potus was again cracking jokes earlier today describing how he
Speaker 1: came to secure the Olympics for America after his twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen election triumph.
Speaker 13: When I spoke to this gentleman who was obviously Scandinavian,
Speaker 13: seriously Scandinavian and very nice, I couldn't get him off
Speaker 13: the phone because he was so starved for love. He
Speaker 13: just kept I must have had him for two hours.
Speaker 13: I couldn't. I said, sir, I have to go on
Speaker 13: President elect. Yes all I said to him, yes, yes, yes,
Speaker 13: we will take good care. They wanted to know that
Speaker 13: if they choose us for the Olympics, will they will
Speaker 13: we treat them nicely? And I said, We're going to
Speaker 13: treat you like so well, like you've never been treated.
Speaker 1: But it didn't stop at the Olympics. Trump also secured
Speaker 1: the World Cup for America, and because of the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty election shenanigans, he'll be president when both events take place.
Speaker 10: And we got the World Cup.
Speaker 13: I got them both, and I said, man, I won't
Speaker 13: be president. I got the Olympics and the World Cup,
Speaker 13: and I won't be president and they're going to forget
Speaker 13: that I got them. Nobody's going to mention it, because
Speaker 13: you know a little bit, that's the way life is.
Speaker 13: And then they rigged the election. And then I said,
Speaker 13: you know what I'll do. I'll run again and I'll
Speaker 13: shove it up their ass. I then realized, I said,
Speaker 13: you know what, I got the Olympics, I got the
Speaker 13: World Cup, and I got the two hundred and fifties.
Speaker 13: Look at the way this works out. So if they
Speaker 13: would have left us alone and wouldn't have cheated on
Speaker 13: the election and wouldn't have rigged it, I would have
Speaker 13: been retired right now. I would have been happily doing
Speaker 13: something else. And instead they have me for four more years.
Speaker 13: Can you learn?
Speaker 1: And when it comes to Trump, we know that the
Speaker 1: opinion polls always understate his popularity. But the polls are
Speaker 1: nevertheless turning, and even CNN is forced to acknowledge that
Speaker 1: unhappy news unhappy for them.
Speaker 14: I think it's time for a bit of a reality check.
Speaker 14: Right we were going to late April Donald Trump's approval ratings.
Speaker 14: That approval seemed to be falling. He seemed to be audios, amigos.
Speaker 14: People were writing his political obituary.
Speaker 15: He is rising from the dead.
Speaker 14: Look at this, Hello, Trump's not approval rating among voters.
Speaker 14: This is the Reuters Episodes polling.
Speaker 8: Look at this.
Speaker 14: In late April, he was eight points underwater. But look
Speaker 14: at where he was in the most recent poll among voters.
Speaker 14: He's up seven points.
Speaker 1: Let's bring in Sky and his contributor Kosher Gaida Kosher.
Speaker 1: It's not just the Ibsoce poll. A CNN noted in
Speaker 1: that segment. His approval rating is up across numerous polls,
Speaker 1: and you can kind of see why. With the Middle
Speaker 1: East trip and some of these trade deals that are
Speaker 1: being struck.
Speaker 15: He just does this ball of energy and he doesn't stop.
Speaker 15: He's just getting one thing done after the other after
Speaker 15: it seems like eight years of or four years Underbiden
Speaker 15: of just like nothing getting done. So just the contrast
Speaker 15: in there. His policy positions are very popular, They've always
Speaker 15: been popular. His personality is something that was always polarizing
Speaker 15: and that shows through in these poll numbers. But now
Speaker 15: even that gap seems to be closing, where the people
Speaker 15: who loved him still love him, and a lot of
Speaker 15: people who didn't love him. I think do respect him,
Speaker 15: even if they don't admit it anymore, whether it's the
Speaker 15: assassination attempts or just the way he's approaching this rule.
Speaker 15: All of that, I think just call Ussis into these
Speaker 15: poll numbers. They won't last forever, but he is certainly
Speaker 15: riding high.
Speaker 1: Now to James Comy has gone on MSNBC to defend
Speaker 1: himself after he was questioned over what was seen as
Speaker 1: a threat to President Domald truck. He posted this image
Speaker 1: saying eighty six forty seven. He claims he had no
Speaker 1: idea what those numbers meant.
Speaker 9: You were back in the middle of a political firestorm.
Speaker 16: Yeah, for walking on the beach with my wife, So
Speaker 16: I don't know how we ended up here. Never occurred
Speaker 16: to me that it was any kind of controversial thing,
Speaker 16: but that's the time.
Speaker 4: We live in.
Speaker 1: Kosher really, I mean, he's claiming hered that eighty six
Speaker 1: forty seven is just a clever way to express a
Speaker 1: political viewpoint, and he didn't know of the violent meaning
Speaker 1: behind the number eighty six. Explain to my audience why
Speaker 1: that post caused such concern.
Speaker 15: So forty seven obviously Trump so forty president in eighty
Speaker 15: six in American slaying. It can mean something milder like
Speaker 15: canceling an order at a diner, to something much more
Speaker 15: sinister like ordering it.
Speaker 1: Certainly in recent times it's been to kill for sure,
Speaker 1: and theed rid of is the softer version.
Speaker 15: But yes, and the point is it's not so much
Speaker 15: the code, Like I don't even think people are alleging
Speaker 15: that he's issuing some secret command off X. It is
Speaker 15: that you are the former FBI director, so your position
Speaker 15: carries weight, Your words carry weight, your tweets and ex
Speaker 15: posts carry weight. And to just casually throw that thing
Speaker 15: out there, even if he was doing it to be funny,
Speaker 15: which I don't think people think of him as somebody
Speaker 15: who'd be doing comedy on there. But even if he
Speaker 15: were doing that, it's just irresponsible and that's why it
Speaker 15: created this whole firestorm. And also it's a new day
Speaker 15: where the Trump administration wants to be on offense and
Speaker 15: go after these kinds of innuendos and insinuations from the
Speaker 15: other side in a way that maybe they would not
Speaker 15: have last time.
Speaker 1: It's just an incredible thing for a former FBI director
Speaker 1: to do, particularly against a president who's already had two
Speaker 1: assassination attempts, and we always know there's threats against his life.
Speaker 1: Just astonishing work.
Speaker 15: There.
Speaker 1: Now to another example of no one being above the law.
Speaker 1: Introm Us Attorney Elena Haba has announced today that her
Speaker 1: office has charged congress Woman Makaiva with violation of Title eighteen.
Speaker 1: This is for our allegedly assaulting, impeding, and interfering with
Speaker 1: law enforcement. Here is some footage of that incident. The
Speaker 1: Democrat congresswoman is in red. In this footage. Those antiques
Speaker 1: kosher are outside an ice facility in New Jersey immigration
Speaker 1: detention center. Incredible. The Democrats think they can behave like
Speaker 1: that with cameras there, with law enforcement and not had
Speaker 1: some sort of an investigation or possible charges.
Speaker 15: I think they believe that because it's never happened like
Speaker 15: the other side. This never ever goes after anything like this.
Speaker 15: And it started with words where they say, you know,
Speaker 15: we will resist or I think it was the governor
Speaker 15: of New Jersey or Connecticut or both of them who
Speaker 15: said that they're hiding somebody on top of their garage.
Speaker 15: Then it moved into trespassing. So the mayor of Newark,
Speaker 15: in that same incident over there, was actually charged with trespassing,
Speaker 15: and then those charges were dropped, and then it went
Speaker 15: further where she's putting her hands on an officer, which
Speaker 15: if anybody else of you or I did that, there
Speaker 15: very well could and should be consequences to it. So
Speaker 15: she thinks she's above the system because this is a
Speaker 15: clashing of different branches of government, and the executive branch
Speaker 15: with a congressional representative. However, nobody is above the law.
Speaker 15: We've been told this for four years, and I think
Speaker 15: they're finding out.
Speaker 1: And there's calls for her to step down because when
Speaker 1: there has been precedents with Republicans facing charges being forced
Speaker 1: to step down before there was any trial or verdict.
Speaker 1: I doubt that's going to happen, but we are seeing
Speaker 1: the administration take these matters seriously. First with COMI with this,
Speaker 1: they are not going to just let things go through
Speaker 1: to the keeper as Republicans have in the past.
Speaker 15: Definitely playing offense. And the other thing too, is so
Speaker 15: the law maybe on their side, and the statute court
Speaker 15: is still being you can find a law against anybody
Speaker 15: if you want to bring it, and prosecutors can bring discretion.
Speaker 15: They're bringing this discretion with offense because the other side
Speaker 15: crossed the rubicon first. And for everybody crying that it's
Speaker 15: politically motivated, I think the Countra argument to that is,
Speaker 15: so what even if it is politically motivated, it has
Speaker 15: been on the other side as well, and you've got
Speaker 15: to play dirty and fight fire with fire is what
Speaker 15: the Trump administration is called.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, you had people connected with Trump people part of
Speaker 1: the administration go to jail for things that people will
Speaker 1: never really charged with. And so the appetite is there,
Speaker 1: certainly within the Trump camp. If they want to play
Speaker 1: these games, then we're going to play it by their
Speaker 1: rules and it's going to come back to them. It's
Speaker 1: not going to be a one way straight Yeah.
Speaker 15: I think this is just the beginning, but it is
Speaker 15: going to mushroom into a big issue right now and
Speaker 15: it's certainly creating another political firestorm.
Speaker 1: So we shall see.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: Before we switched to the UK, and gosh, we've had
Speaker 1: some developments there in recent days, what did you make
Speaker 1: of Trump's Middle East tour? It was astonishing on so
Speaker 1: many levels, the way he was faded, the speech he
Speaker 1: gave basically saying the interventionist and neo cons got it
Speaker 1: wrong and they caused a great deal of damage in
Speaker 1: pursuing regime change, and it seemed to be one where
Speaker 1: they were going to focus on the shared interest of
Speaker 1: prosperity as well as peace. It seemed to be as
Speaker 1: much about making business deals as it was about creating
Speaker 1: long lasting piece.
Speaker 15: It was really remarkable on so many levels. I call
Speaker 15: it a deal making diplomacy because that is his way,
Speaker 15: and bringing trillions of dollars of investment into the country,
Speaker 15: at least on peoper and the diplomacy was about it
Speaker 15: really was shunning his own party, the Republican Party, and
Speaker 15: what they did in the Bush years and forever war
Speaker 15: was kind of giving a nod or paying respects to
Speaker 15: this very complex culture, imperfect as it may be, but
Speaker 15: saying it is not the West's job to go and
Speaker 15: impose themselves on that. And it was also notable, of course,
Speaker 15: because he did not visit Israel and that controversy is
Speaker 15: part of that region. But he was there for these
Speaker 15: three countries and to have his mission of bringing money
Speaker 15: back to the US.
Speaker 1: And again people missed this in this country in particular.
Speaker 1: But a lot of Trump's policy positions is what the
Speaker 1: old school left used to have maybe a decade or
Speaker 1: two ago. So it's hard for someone the left to
Speaker 1: condemn this, given it's what they've been advocating for for
Speaker 1: a long time. Now, let's switch to the UK and
Speaker 1: Kiirs starma. He seems to be morphing into some new
Speaker 1: age Trump. Let's have a look at some of the
Speaker 1: stuff he's been posting online in recent times. This is
Speaker 1: his late work. He said, if you work here illegally
Speaker 1: or employ people who do, we're coming for you. Illegal
Speaker 1: working raids are up forty percent and we won't stop there.
Speaker 1: He posted that on Sunday. The day before he posted this,
Speaker 1: For too long Britain has been addicted to cheap overseas labor,
Speaker 1: while one in eight of our own young people aren't
Speaker 1: in education, employment or training. I'm putting our young people first,
Speaker 1: Britain first, oh, investing in skills they need, and ending
Speaker 1: our dependence on foreign labor. A week earlier, he posted this.
Speaker 1: This is kir Starmer, the British Prime Minister. He said,
Speaker 1: if you want to live in the UK, you should
Speaker 1: speak English. That's common sense. So we're raising English language
Speaker 1: requirements across every main immigration route. And this settlement in
Speaker 1: the UK is a privilege that is earned not a right. Again,
Speaker 1: this isn't Donald Trump saying, this is Kirs Starman. And
Speaker 1: finally this he said, the Tories lost control of our
Speaker 1: borders and let net migrations saw to record levels, undercutting
Speaker 1: hard working Brits. I won't stand for it. I promised
Speaker 1: to restore control and cut migration and I'm delivering with
Speaker 1: tough new measures British workers. I've got your back, Kosher.
Speaker 1: What is going on? How is this open borders leftist
Speaker 1: morphing into Donald Trump? If you didn't tell me that
Speaker 1: was a Keir Starmer And he asked me which world
Speaker 1: leader had posted those tweets, I'd say Donald Trump.
Speaker 15: Talkcolate, a metamorphosis, and that is some weapons grade cajones
Speaker 15: as they say, for him to just go and do
Speaker 15: that one eedy. And I think the reason is those
Speaker 15: are extremely popular positions. They have been for the better
Speaker 15: part of forty years in the UK, in Australia, in America,
Speaker 15: in Canada, in the West. And it was a wide
Speaker 15: opening in the field that the right side of the
Speaker 15: aisle for the most part failed to take in country
Speaker 15: after country. And so he's taking it because it's a
Speaker 15: wide opening and he knows his pop bel it's politically
Speaker 15: expedient and on some level you've got admire it because
Speaker 15: the left place to win and they will do what
Speaker 15: the other side failed to.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I mean words are cheap, The redtric is there.
Speaker 1: Whether it's actually be backed up by action is another thing.
Speaker 1: Whether they've got the appetite to follow through. But they're
Speaker 1: worried about reform. Nigel Farage. We hear so much here
Speaker 1: about how Donald Trump costs the Liberals the election, despite
Speaker 1: the fact that they went in with a labor like policy.
Speaker 1: Farage is fine about closing up to Trump, copying some
Speaker 1: of that ideology, and he's doing brilliantly. He's polling and
Speaker 1: also just the recent council elections and by elections he
Speaker 1: did particularly well.
Speaker 15: And that's the other reason for this is politically expedient,
Speaker 15: as you say, and I think he Starmer's trying to
Speaker 15: neutralize Frage as much as he can. But you're right,
Speaker 15: words are cheap, and if they don't follow through, they
Speaker 15: might do a token move here and there. But if
Speaker 15: they don't follow through, that issue Forrage owns. So I
Speaker 15: think it'll be hard for Stromer to take.
Speaker 1: That away from it, and really shame on the Tories.
Speaker 1: They were in government for so long and they governed
Speaker 1: like labor. Were talking about the Liberals here having labor
Speaker 1: like policies. We have Tories governments who thought they were
Speaker 1: the Labor party. Now, before you go leftist activists and
Speaker 1: football broadcaster Gary Lineker will no longer be a presenter
Speaker 1: for the BBC after reposting on Instagram a story about
Speaker 1: Zionism which featured a picture of a rat, an image
Speaker 1: widely perceived as virulently anti Semitic. Kosher Linka is the
Speaker 1: BBC's highest paid presenter, is getting paid more than two
Speaker 1: point six million a year and he's got a long
Speaker 1: track record of this sort of activism. This is at
Speaker 1: new He seems to be a leftist activist first and
Speaker 1: football commentator second.
Speaker 15: Indeed, this is a big scalp though, and I think
Speaker 15: this is a bridge too far. So there are other
Speaker 15: examples of darlings of the left like Mehdi Hassan comes
Speaker 15: to mind. For example, was fired for making not similar
Speaker 15: but topics comments around the same topic and especially Israel
Speaker 15: and Gaza and then veering into anti Semitism. So you
Speaker 15: reap what you saw, as they say, in that case,
Speaker 15: there is a little bit where people say, as you
Speaker 15: point out that he was saying all sorts of controversial
Speaker 15: political things for years against the rage against other groups
Speaker 15: and never had his scalp taken. This though, is the
Speaker 15: bridge too far and he probably didn't see it coming.
Speaker 1: And you know what, you would feel sorry for someone who,
Speaker 1: you might say, in this case has been a victim
Speaker 1: of canceled culture. But Gary Ldeker was such an enthusiastic
Speaker 1: backer of cancel culture that there ain't no sympathy here.
Speaker 1: Kosher Gaina, thank you so much for your time. Today,
Speaker 1: still to come, experts raise concerns about the timing of
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's cancer diagnosis. Alex Stein has the details back,
Speaker 1: joining me now as comedian and host of Primetime with
Speaker 1: Alex Stein on Blaze TV. Alex Stein himself, let's start
Speaker 1: with the curious timing of former President Joe Biden's cancer diagnosis,
Speaker 1: and there have been no shortage of experts coming out
Speaker 1: to dispute the claims that the cancer was discovered just
Speaker 1: in recent days.
Speaker 16: I'm a prostate cancer patient. I work on the bard
Speaker 16: of the Prostate Cancer Foundation. I know a lot about
Speaker 16: this illness. I've treated it for forty years and when
Speaker 16: I saw them say, hey, we found a nodule, already,
Speaker 16: my spidy sense was up because we really don't do
Speaker 16: the digital rectal exam anymore. We follow the PSA and
Speaker 16: we found this nodule, and oh, my goodness, he's got
Speaker 16: metastatic disease. I thought, no, it does not pass the
Speaker 16: sniff test. If indeed he was diagnosed to a couple
Speaker 16: of years ago and he has metastatic disease, he would
Speaker 16: be subjected to something called androgen deprivation therapy. That's the
Speaker 16: treatment for his condition. And they're trying to avoid saying
Speaker 16: that he's been on there for a while because some
Speaker 16: of the common side effects include muscular wasting and muscular
Speaker 16: instability and falls and cognitive slowing and fatigue. We've seen
Speaker 16: that Eve all over the last two years, and so
Speaker 16: my suspicion is he's been on andgrim deprivation therapy and
Speaker 16: they've known about this for a long time, Alex.
Speaker 1: We really to believe that the President of the United
Speaker 1: States was not having regular checkups, regular blood tests, and
Speaker 1: they discovered this cancer at this late stage.
Speaker 6: Well, Rita, I think it's pretty obvious that they had
Speaker 6: to have some sort of prior knowledge about you know,
Speaker 6: this terrible diagnosis for President Biden. And I think it
Speaker 6: was actually Laura Lumer who reported that they might have
Speaker 6: you found this cancer diagnosis when he was on Air
Speaker 6: Force One heading from I think it was Las Vegas
Speaker 6: back to Washington, d C. Now, I know that's not confirmed,
Speaker 6: but I think it's obvious that they probably had prior
Speaker 6: knowledge of this cancer.
Speaker 1: And I don't know how long I would think it bad.
Speaker 1: Try knowledge well before that, Alex. I mean, from what
Speaker 1: I'm understanding from experts in the field, these sort of
Speaker 1: regular blood tests would show this up many years ago.
Speaker 1: And we played a video last night from around two
Speaker 1: years ago when Joe Biden said on stage about having cancer,
Speaker 1: and his people said he was a gaff but it
Speaker 1: seemed to be a pretty clear statement. He even attributed
Speaker 1: the cause. He was talking about the pollution in the
Speaker 1: area where he grew up. But already, Alex, the pushes
Speaker 1: on from Democrats and their propaganda arm to go easy
Speaker 1: on Joe Biden given this diagnosis. Let's have a look
Speaker 1: at CNN.
Speaker 9: His medical condition. Now he's announced medical condition. Now do
Speaker 9: you believe that silences or delays a lot of conversations
Speaker 9: about his you know, last year and a half for now, yeah.
Speaker 16: Well, I mean I think those conversations are going to happen,
Speaker 16: but they should be more muted.
Speaker 14: And set aside for now as he's struggling through this.
Speaker 1: Alex, do you agree that conversations about Biden's cognitive issues
Speaker 1: should be muted now?
Speaker 6: Well, I think we should have these tough conversations. But Rita,
Speaker 6: you know, the real elephant in the room is I
Speaker 6: wouldn't have been surprised if they didn't want, you know,
Speaker 6: something tragic to happen to Joe Biden, so they could
Speaker 6: have put Kamala Harris in. I think it is very weird,
Speaker 6: you know that they were talking about this two years
Speaker 6: ago and then now they magically bring it up. So
Speaker 6: I think we just need to talk about the presidency,
Speaker 6: honestly about you know, what he just did for the
Speaker 6: past four years, but also be respectful of this horrible
Speaker 6: thing that's happened happening to him. So it's a delicate,
Speaker 6: you know, tightrope to walk, but I think we can
Speaker 6: walk it, and we should be able to criticize his
Speaker 6: presidency while also being empathetic to this horrible diagnosis.
Speaker 1: Now let's have a look at this character. This is
Speaker 1: doctor Kevin O'Connor, Joe Biden's White House physician. He repeatedly
Speaker 1: declared the president was fit and well, mentally and physically
Speaker 1: fit to serve. He probably has some questions to answer their, Alex,
Speaker 1: But what are the decisions that Joe Biden made when
Speaker 1: he was cognitively unsound, perhaps depleted even further due to
Speaker 1: intensive treatments in his final days. We know he pardoned
Speaker 1: a bunch of people, including his son Hunter and doctor
Speaker 1: Anthony Fauci. The head of the Justice Department's Weaponization Working
Speaker 1: Group at Martin, posted this. He said, the integrity of
Speaker 1: the American pardon system requires that we examine the Biden
Speaker 1: pardons and who did what We will get to the
Speaker 1: bottom of it. Count on us. Are those pardons in
Speaker 1: in peril now?
Speaker 6: Alex Well, from the research that I've done, it's very
Speaker 6: hard to overturn a pardon. But they had an auto
Speaker 6: pen presidency. Joe Biden was not in control. They had
Speaker 6: a signature, They had the ability to put it on
Speaker 6: any sort of document or any sort of pardon that
Speaker 6: they wanted. So will we get any retribution? I highly
Speaker 6: doubt it, but some of the judges that were getting
Speaker 6: kickbacks and putting juveniles in prison, those judges whose crow
Speaker 6: judges should have never been pardoned. So it's a horrible
Speaker 6: injustice of what they did with the Parton system.
Speaker 1: And the bizarre Hunter Biden pardon which went into the
Speaker 1: future dates. I mean, that was something that Biden pledged
Speaker 1: he would not do, and he did it. Now, I
Speaker 1: want to play you a clip of a female soccer star.
Speaker 1: Got to say, I've never heard of this character before.
Speaker 1: Her name is Ashlyn Harris, and apparently she is an
Speaker 1: exceptional person.
Speaker 17: Just know what it's like to live at the top
Speaker 17: and the air is very thin, and I choose to
Speaker 17: be exceptional every single day, Like it is literally a choice.
Speaker 17: Like I wake up and I'm like, I don't know
Speaker 17: what it's like just to choose to be average, Like
Speaker 17: I don't with average people. They make me uncomfortable. I
Speaker 17: don't like to be in the same rooms, in the
Speaker 17: same spaces. I think, like, it's contagious.
Speaker 1: Wow, Alex, I thought that will satire, but apparently it's serious.
Speaker 1: What else can you tell me about this one? Because
Speaker 1: I'm suddenly fascinating. She seems to be just cringe on steroids.
Speaker 6: No, she's a genius. Now listen, if you're not on
Speaker 6: her level, if you're not one hundred percent any amateurs
Speaker 6: around Mayad, I agree, get out of here. I don't
Speaker 6: like to be I don't like to interact with anybody
Speaker 6: unless they're a millionaire. So, no, she's on the right.
Speaker 6: Everything that she's doing exactly right. If you're not a millionaire,
Speaker 6: if you're not grinding every single day, you're not my friends.
Speaker 6: So I like where her head is that I'm going
Speaker 6: to go follow her right now, Rita, we need more
Speaker 6: people that are more cutthroat like that. That's a problem
Speaker 6: in America. We're all too soft. We need some more
Speaker 6: vicious killers like Ashland.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, a goalkeeper. But apparently she's just one of
Speaker 1: the most exceptional people in the country. And I can
Speaker 1: see why you like her. She's kind of got that
Speaker 1: same sticky do you but you do it as satire.
Speaker 1: She's doing it seriously. Alex, I'm going to say, I'm
Speaker 1: a little bit concerned.
Speaker 6: No, you're exactly right. Obviously she's an athlete and she
Speaker 6: probably had the big ego, but you know, the women's
Speaker 6: soccer team, it wasn't that long ago where they got
Speaker 6: beaten by a bunch of under sixteen men's players. So
Speaker 6: you know, these are under sixteen years old. So I
Speaker 6: think I wanted to be a little check their ego
Speaker 6: a little bit. But she's a good player, you know what,
Speaker 6: She's competitive. I'll let I'll let it slide this time.
Speaker 1: Just pretend to be humble, Alex. Just pretend to be humble,
Speaker 1: even if you're not Alex Stein. Thank you so much
Speaker 1: for your time tonight. And that's it from me. I'll
Speaker 1: see you at eleven tomorrow and I I don't go anywhere.
Speaker 1: New's Night is up next