Speaker 1: This is Paul Murray Live, geta where the man Cave
Speaker 1: is in Brisbane tonight, two days away from the Queensland election.
Speaker 2: We've got a lot on that front tonight as well.
Speaker 1: As a debate about the other issues that are around today.
Speaker 2: Remember you can always send.
Speaker 1: Me an email Paulitsgunnews dot com dot AU. Let's get
Speaker 1: straight into it. Yes, I'm going to talk about Lydia Thorpe,
Speaker 1: but slightly different than everyone else, and then I'll get
Speaker 1: onto other stuff. Okay, Now we know Lydia Thorpe yelled
Speaker 1: at the King this week. We know that Lydia Thorpe
Speaker 1: got what she wanted because of course she got all
Speaker 1: of the attention that.
Speaker 2: Came with that.
Speaker 1: She's also out there and about today saying.
Speaker 2: I'm not going anywhere. I'm not going anywhere.
Speaker 1: And you have heard about the inconsistencies between what she's
Speaker 1: using as her excuses today that are different than yesterday.
Speaker 1: And it all goes back to how she was sworn
Speaker 1: in as a senator. Now you remember at the time
Speaker 1: that we noted that she clearly was being sworn in
Speaker 1: with two fingers behind her back because she had read
Speaker 1: the oath and the Oath says that, of course you
Speaker 1: are committed to their majesties and their heirs and successes. Now,
Speaker 1: I wanted to show you in full, but Lydia Thorpe
Speaker 1: didn't just take one go at this.
Speaker 2: She tried to get away with not.
Speaker 1: Giving the oath, but the President of the Senate at
Speaker 1: the time when no, no, you've got to do it
Speaker 1: properly or you're not formally sworn in as a senator.
Speaker 2: Again, you've heard a lot of people talk about this.
Speaker 2: I want to show.
Speaker 1: You the full clip of how she tried to get
Speaker 1: around the oath that decides whether she is or isn't
Speaker 1: a senator. This is the whole idea that will be
Speaker 1: battled over in the next few weeks.
Speaker 3: Senator Thought, I'm going.
Speaker 2: To wait for quiet, patently.
Speaker 4: Just listen, Senator Thought, you are required to recite the
Speaker 4: oath as printed on the card.
Speaker 3: So please recite the oath words.
Speaker 2: Read what's there.
Speaker 1: None of us right away?
Speaker 2: Turn around? Read the damn piece of paper.
Speaker 5: Their true allegiance to the colonizing her Majesty Queen Elizabeth,
Speaker 5: that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to
Speaker 5: her Majesty Queen Elism and the second, her hairs and
Speaker 5: successes according to law.
Speaker 1: Okay, important, important, important, important, right important. Now, obviously it's
Speaker 1: very clear she didn't want to read the words as written.
Speaker 1: It's very obvious that she clearly tries to miss pronounce
Speaker 1: or not read correctly the words heirs and successes. Now,
Speaker 1: heirs doesn't have an eight in it, but clearly you
Speaker 1: heard her doing that. Now, if she's not properly sworn
Speaker 1: in in the same way that if you are a
Speaker 1: dual citizen, you can't remain a senator. Now there is
Speaker 1: going to be like a Zebruta film jfk assassination style
Speaker 1: analysis of exactly what words she said. Now, remember when
Speaker 1: she was on TV earlier this week, she was open
Speaker 1: that she didn't read the words as instructed multiple times.
Speaker 2: Instead, she did it her way.
Speaker 6: I read the card. It said hers, which you know
Speaker 6: is now is heirs. I'm no expert on the English language.
Speaker 6: That's part of the process of colonization.
Speaker 1: So she thought, ah, I found a clever way around this.
Speaker 1: And then somebody's clearly whispered in her ear if you
Speaker 1: don't take the oath properly, whether you mean it.
Speaker 2: Or not, Okay, nobody can know what's going on inside somewhere.
Speaker 1: But if you don't read it properly, word for word,
Speaker 1: letter for letter, then maybe you're not qualified to be
Speaker 1: a senator. Now, remember this is a person who came
Speaker 1: in under the cover of the Greens and then walked
Speaker 1: away from them very quickly into the Parliament, knowing that
Speaker 1: she would have a full six year term, meaning even
Speaker 1: after the next election, we've got to put up with
Speaker 1: her for another three years. Well, clearly worried that her
Speaker 1: first defense, which was I didn't really mean it, might
Speaker 1: see her booted out of the Senate. We got this
Speaker 1: version today.
Speaker 7: You know, my English grammar isn't as good as others,
Speaker 7: and I spoke what I read, so I misspoke.
Speaker 1: Okay, all again, too clever, Right, You don't have to
Speaker 1: have an awareness of grammar. You don't have to be
Speaker 1: someone who speaks the Queen's English. You need to be
Speaker 1: able to read and repeat every single word of the Oath. Now,
Speaker 1: unless her third defense is going to be that she's dyslexic,
Speaker 1: but her saying oh my understanding of grap no no no, no,
Speaker 1: no no. Take this from a high functioning dyslexic. If
Speaker 1: you've got problems reading the words because for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: your brain can sometimes jumble them.
Speaker 2: That is its own thing.
Speaker 1: What you did, because we saw in the original video
Speaker 1: she tried not.
Speaker 2: To deliver that part of the oath.
Speaker 1: She then turns around the second time. She's been ordered
Speaker 1: by the President of the Senate to read it directly,
Speaker 1: and she clearly didn't read it directly, and she certainly
Speaker 1: didn't annunciate the words properly.
Speaker 2: Will this means she can get booted out of the Senate? Now?
Speaker 1: You would think that Labor, Greens and the cross Bench
Speaker 1: will probably come to defend her, because they always do
Speaker 1: when it comes to lefties. But is there a procedure
Speaker 1: that it won't matter what her side of politics thinks.
Speaker 1: I can't wait to talk to Bromin Bishop of course,
Speaker 1: a former senator, seven Conroy, a former Leader of the Senate,
Speaker 1: about what the procedure is here, what happens next? They
Speaker 1: know the institution. Do they think that she can get
Speaker 1: booted or we're going to put up with her for
Speaker 1: another however many years.
Speaker 2: We get to that a little later in the show.
Speaker 1: As I mentioned, two days to go here in Queensland
Speaker 1: until that state election, lots of people have already voted.
Speaker 1: The expectation is after early voting wraps up tomorrow that
Speaker 1: a good chunk, maybe even half of all people may
Speaker 1: well have voted early now. Last night, of course, Queensland
Speaker 1: was very focused on what we had to say, and
Speaker 1: thank you to the huge reaction that we've had to
Speaker 1: my comments at the start of the show about why
Speaker 1: Queensland matters as much to me as it does. I
Speaker 1: don't say that as a panda to Queensland, as I
Speaker 1: say it as I explained last night about why I
Speaker 1: love the place because it's the place that I, when
Speaker 1: I'm not at home, most choose to be in Australia.
Speaker 1: It is a place that deserves better than its current government.
Speaker 1: But we'll all find out in the next couple of
Speaker 1: days whether or not there is about to be a
Speaker 1: change of government. And if I sound slightly wobblier compared
Speaker 1: to guaranteed absolute the sun will rise tomorrow and the
Speaker 1: government will change on Saturday, well, I'll get to why
Speaker 1: you should always be skeptical of what could be a
Speaker 1: fifty to fifty result. For his part, the potential future
Speaker 1: Premier and current Opposition leader David Cruci fully out and
Speaker 1: about today trying to keep the focus hard and fast
Speaker 1: on law and order issues in this state. The Palichet government,
Speaker 1: at the same time as they were claiming to tighten
Speaker 1: up a whole collection of laws, as you know, changed
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of other laws that mean possession of
Speaker 1: drugs is not automatically a crime. As I said at
Speaker 1: the time, this was overtly done because it went about
Speaker 1: a certain percentage of the whole youth crime was possession
Speaker 1: of drugs. If you suddenly say it's not a crime anymore,
Speaker 1: magically the numbers start to fall, and funnily enough, Stephen
Speaker 1: Miles is using that exact argument about youth crime and
Speaker 1: crime overall that is falling. In part that is because
Speaker 1: of what was a crime, drug possession in this state
Speaker 1: currently is considered not to be. The whole collection of
Speaker 1: diversionary programs. David Chruso Foley says, no, we go back
Speaker 1: to the way that it used to be, which is,
Speaker 1: if you caught with drugs, regardless of how much there
Speaker 1: will be a problem for you in Queen's Lake.
Speaker 8: We don't believe a soft on drugs approach works, but
Speaker 8: I don't believe rolling out the welcome mat to drugs
Speaker 8: and saying that drugs are acceptable here and not here.
Speaker 2: I just don't believe.
Speaker 1: That's the right way.
Speaker 2: For his part.
Speaker 1: The potential and hopefully outgoing Premiere, Stephen Miles is doing
Speaker 1: what he's done all campaign, which is a stunt that
Speaker 1: the media will like, a headline that produces things like
Speaker 1: the Premier to visit thirty six states in thirty six
Speaker 1: hours and Jesus, isn't he working really hard and he
Speaker 1: wants it more than everybody else. Of course, it's a
Speaker 1: last ditched effort to make the most of his taxpayer
Speaker 1: funded travel. Which remember this bloke during this election campaign
Speaker 1: used a taxpayer funded jet to fly ten minutes so
Speaker 1: he could go to a birthday party for one of
Speaker 1: his own MPs. This is the same bloke who took
Speaker 1: his own private jet to North Queensland while the Police
Speaker 1: commissioner took his private jet. You couldn't possibly get on
Speaker 1: the same private two private jets. These people other people's money.
Speaker 1: They've had their snout in the trough for too long.
Speaker 1: I desperately hope there's going to be a change. There
Speaker 1: was some other silliness that took place today, including a
Speaker 1: Deputy leader's debate where the deputy leader of the LMP
Speaker 1: didn't turn up, so Cameron Dick of course had the
Speaker 1: opportunity to pretend that he could debate a person who
Speaker 1: wasn't there. This is part of it they played out
Speaker 1: here at the Korea Male Today.
Speaker 9: We're going through one of the biggest growth periods in
Speaker 9: our state's history. Now, we always pay our debts in Queensland,
Speaker 9: you know, issue our bonds three five thirty is we
Speaker 9: always pay them and Queensland never retires, so we will
Speaker 9: always be able to service our debs.
Speaker 1: Well, the deputy LMP leader wasn't there, but we'll be
Speaker 1: here on this program tonight. I'll ask him some of
Speaker 1: the questions that clearly weren't able to be asked then,
Speaker 1: and why he didn't turn up at that debate. We'll
Speaker 1: get to that a little bit later tonight. Now we
Speaker 1: know that the great battle at the federal level, of course,
Speaker 1: is between an unpopular Prime minister and the rising popularity
Speaker 1: of our guests last night, Peter Dutton.
Speaker 2: We also know that they have.
Speaker 1: Two very different views when it comes to the energy
Speaker 1: solution for our country in the many years going forward.
Speaker 1: We know the Prime Minister is obsessed. We're doubling down
Speaker 1: on billions and billions of dollars on renewable projects. Peter
Speaker 1: Dutton says that you could spend less that he's planned
Speaker 1: on the renewables, and of course back in on nuclear power.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: Of course the automatic scare that the Labor Party has
Speaker 1: brought into play, and they wanted to play during the
Speaker 1: Queensland election. Of course they started that abortion lie, which
Speaker 1: again I debunked and destroyed and gave you the reasons
Speaker 1: why they were doing it last night. That video is
Speaker 1: now up at sky news dot com. If you're in Queensland,
Speaker 1: please share it well. Of course, the scare manger that
Speaker 1: they wanted to do. If it wasn't abortion, it was
Speaker 1: going to be will a nuclear reactor be in your backyard?
Speaker 1: Nuclear power is the most expensive form of new energy.
Speaker 1: Renewables are the cheapest.
Speaker 2: A nuclear powered Australia.
Speaker 1: Could it work?
Speaker 10: Question mark here as a plan for nuclear reactors where
Speaker 10: he won't tell you how much it'll cost.
Speaker 3: Nuclear takes longer, it costs more, and it would waste
Speaker 3: Australia's unique combination of geological, geographical, geopolitical and meteorological advantages.
Speaker 1: Now, I've always argued that the model for big changes
Speaker 1: in Australia is the way John Howard argued the GST
Speaker 1: in the nineteen ninety eight election, and it simply was, yes,
Speaker 1: there will be a new GST. However all of these
Speaker 1: other taxes will be removed, Australians having a sense that
Speaker 1: they get something for the change. So my argument has
Speaker 1: always been that whatever local government area or federal electorate,
Speaker 1: you work out how it works that is willing to
Speaker 1: host a nuclear power plant that that area should receive
Speaker 1: free energy, you will see many a hand go up,
Speaker 1: you will see unanimous votes for councils, you will see
Speaker 1: people fighting for these things to be built in their area.
Speaker 1: I've argued that position for many months and I hope
Speaker 1: that that's something that the Opposition leader and the opposition
Speaker 1: generally take to the next federal election, because I think
Speaker 1: it truly does blunt many or most.
Speaker 2: Of the fear campaigns.
Speaker 1: And we know that this government's got very little to
Speaker 1: run on in terms of its own defense, so they're
Speaker 1: going to be trying to scare, scare, scare. Well, prominent
Speaker 1: Australian business person may well be a viewer of this program,
Speaker 1: or just two people can have the same idea. At
Speaker 1: the same time, Ryan Stokes was addressing the media today
Speaker 1: in Perth, where he has of course involved in the
Speaker 1: ownership structure of the West Australian newspaper Channel seven and
Speaker 1: mining companies in Western Australia. Well, he says, yes, what
Speaker 1: a good way to make sure that nuclear power gets
Speaker 1: over the nimbis is to offer it for free to
Speaker 1: some people, including the people who of course would be
Speaker 1: in and around where one of these things would be built.
Speaker 1: Nuclear is a carbon free power source, so it makes
Speaker 1: sense to be talking about that to reduce carbon emissions.
Speaker 2: Common sense.
Speaker 1: Mister Stokes thinks there's a solution to deal with the
Speaker 1: rest of the population who remain nuclear nimbi's which is
Speaker 1: not in my backyard. And to deal with this nimbiasm,
Speaker 1: it's easy. You find ways to incentivize people to live
Speaker 1: around nuclear power. Put simply, you make it free for
Speaker 1: the people who live within a certain distance, as I say,
Speaker 1: local council, area, federal electorate. You watch, you watch country
Speaker 1: towns in this country shove their hands in the end
Speaker 1: and say, yes, sign us up, we're ready, let's do it.
Speaker 1: If the trade off is free power, I think that
Speaker 1: would be a very good idea. Meantime, when he talks
Speaker 1: about the renewable revolution, that we are forced to endure
Speaker 1: something that along with the building of the turbines and
Speaker 1: the solar panels that of course all are out of
Speaker 1: date within a couple of decades, and the wiring of
Speaker 1: all of this making the wires a two way street
Speaker 1: when it comes to power that will cost about a
Speaker 1: trillion dollars. Polie says that no one can possibly believe
Speaker 1: that renewable energy is free. There's no such thing as
Speaker 1: free for a free lunch, there's no such thing as
Speaker 1: free energy. There's no pot of gold at the end
Speaker 1: of the rainbow. I agree, and as we spoke about
Speaker 1: with Peter Dutton on the program last night, even the
Speaker 1: people who are in charge of the energy grid are
Speaker 1: telling us that even after all of the windmills have
Speaker 1: been built, all of the solar panels have been rolled out,
Speaker 1: power may not actually be cheaper than what we are
Speaker 1: paying now.
Speaker 11: Chris Bowen, I think, has been misleading the Australian people,
Speaker 11: along with Anthony Ibneasy for years now. The penny has
Speaker 11: dropped for a lot of Australians. A lot people have
Speaker 11: been well ahead of this debate, and the frustration is
Speaker 11: building in the community because when the Prime ministers promised
Speaker 11: on ninety seven occasions he'd reduced power bills both two
Speaker 11: hundred and seventy five dollars, so most people have gone
Speaker 11: up by one thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: Now, what do these three things have in common. A
Speaker 1: spokesperson for the New Muslim Votes political movement, the CCP
Speaker 1: in China, and lefty Laura Tingle from the ABC.
Speaker 2: Well, all three of them think.
Speaker 1: That Australia is racist, a racist country. Now we know
Speaker 1: that Lefty Laura Tingle has said this, and she did
Speaker 1: it at a Ritus festival where a whole bunch of people.
Speaker 2: Will clutch their pearls in agreement.
Speaker 1: We are in a racist.
Speaker 12: Campulen's face that we always have been, and it is
Speaker 12: very depressing to give a license like that. I find
Speaker 12: profoundly depressing and a terrible prospect for the next election.
Speaker 1: And of course we can never forget her incredible four
Speaker 1: D chess and X ray vision that she was able
Speaker 1: to look around the corner at a dystopian future for
Speaker 1: Australia that because we're so racist, and because the racist
Speaker 1: flames are being fanned because of the problems of immigration,
Speaker 1: which as we know, is not about where people are from,
Speaker 1: what they look like, what they believe, but how many
Speaker 1: people join the queue for things like ambulances, where again
Speaker 1: in places like Queensland, there's a chance if you call
Speaker 1: her below, the ambulance may not turn up, or if
Speaker 1: you sit in the back of the ambulance you may
Speaker 1: well end up being there for hours because there's no
Speaker 1: bed for you in a hospital.
Speaker 2: No, no, let's add another million people on top of
Speaker 2: all of that.
Speaker 1: Well, she believed the dystopian future is that as soon
Speaker 1: as now, people who are new to the country, whatever
Speaker 1: that means, who look like people who are new to
Speaker 1: the country, whatever that means, will of course be set
Speaker 1: upon by a racist mob of people who won't like
Speaker 1: when they're bidding for a house or trying to get
Speaker 1: a rental property. For a major point the.
Speaker 12: Collity that us be saying, as Nicky says, you know,
Speaker 12: everything that's going wrong in this country is because of migrants.
Speaker 12: And you know, I had sudden flash of people turning
Speaker 12: up to try to rent a property or at an auction,
Speaker 12: and they look a bit different. What have you defined
Speaker 12: different as basically he has given them license.
Speaker 10: To be abused.
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure that's racist what she said. But because
Speaker 1: she said, here's one hundred walkleys and an oam is
Speaker 1: coming your way, of course none of that is happening
Speaker 1: and none of that will be happening in the country.
Speaker 1: But that's the first person who is as straight as racist.
Speaker 1: The second a spokesperson for this Muslim Votes movement. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't talk much about the Muslim Votes movement because ultimately,
Speaker 1: even if they're able to successfully move ten to twenty
Speaker 1: percent of labor voters for them to be able to
Speaker 1: get the teal effect, they need the preferences of the
Speaker 1: Liberal Party. That's not going to happen. So I don't
Speaker 1: talk about it much. But one of the spokespeople for it, well,
Speaker 1: guess what they say, Australia is racist.
Speaker 13: Those two sentences triggered the poor sensibilities of the white
Speaker 13: exceptionalist establishment. She's absolutely one hundrescent right. This country is racist.
Speaker 13: Its whole origin as a modern state is built on racism,
Speaker 13: and it continues to be racist today. But that racism
Speaker 13: now extends to others with a vigor.
Speaker 8: Right.
Speaker 13: The response to any issue dealing with Islam with Muslims
Speaker 13: and now Palestine, it's not even hidden racism any longer.
Speaker 13: It's overt, it's loud.
Speaker 1: And then China, well, China had the hide to come
Speaker 1: out today. And because Australia is trying to point out
Speaker 1: the human rights issues that are taking place in China,
Speaker 1: the handsome boy and the president, well, of course they'll
Speaker 1: cuddle up at any opportunity they possibly can. Otherwise there's
Speaker 1: a trade war and we know how all of that goes,
Speaker 1: and we must reset the relationship. But an official with
Speaker 1: the Foreign Affairs Department has turned around and said this
Speaker 1: about Australia. Australia or China has been accused, has accused
Speaker 1: Australia of systemic racism and hate crimes at hypocrisy. After
Speaker 1: an Australian diplomat raised international concerns about human rights abuses
Speaker 1: in the area where the Vegas are and Tibet at
Speaker 1: the UN, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lee we are
Speaker 1: and I think it is, says quote, out of their
Speaker 1: ideological bias, Australia, the US and a handful of other
Speaker 1: Western countries stoked confrontation and multilateral platforms for their selfish
Speaker 1: political interests. Well what do you do with the US
Speaker 1: and what do you do when it comes to the
Speaker 1: World Health Organization because they were not all that good
Speaker 1: in being able to hold you accountable for the WUFLU
Speaker 1: getting around anyway, let's get to the why Australia's racist bit.
Speaker 1: Australia long plague by systemic racism and hate crimes, have
Speaker 1: severely violated the rights of refugees and immigrants and left
Speaker 1: indigenous people with vulnerable living conditions. All they go on,
Speaker 1: Australian soldiers have committed a borren crimes in Afghanistan and
Speaker 1: other countries during their military operations. Well, Powe, let's push
Speaker 1: the ball right back into your half of the court.
Speaker 1: A million people are currently working in slave labor camps
Speaker 1: because they believe what the government does not allow them
Speaker 1: to believe. Uigas are being put into slave labor camps.
Speaker 1: They are being physically, psychologically and sexually abused.
Speaker 2: A million of these people.
Speaker 1: The abuse is absolutely disgraceful happening right now.
Speaker 2: But what about back in history.
Speaker 1: You have to go about that far to when China
Speaker 1: had a one child policy rule. It meant that, as
Speaker 1: The Washington Post reported in nineteen eighty five, that people
Speaker 1: were killing their baby girls because the one child they
Speaker 1: wanted was a son. Official position, of course to the
Speaker 1: Chinese government, how dare they try to high horse us?
Speaker 1: But look at the fellow the bedfellows, the extreme left
Speaker 1: of the media and emerging identitarian form of politics based
Speaker 1: in and around religion, and China all using the same
Speaker 1: weapon against us to pretend that this country is racist. Please,
Speaker 1: I find it extraordinary that the racism was displayed by
Speaker 1: Laura Tingle about people who look different being set upon,
Speaker 1: the apparent racism that exists in a country that you
Speaker 1: are trying to convince people via the ballot box to
Speaker 1: vote for you, and China trying to pretend that they
Speaker 1: have the moral high ground on any of these issues
Speaker 1: is a disgrace. Now, I want to talk about our
Speaker 1: mates in Broken Hill. They've had a tough week this week.
Speaker 1: Hopefully many of them are starting to watch us again
Speaker 1: via powered devices, but I know plenty of people have
Speaker 1: been listening to us via their phones or DAB Radio
Speaker 1: has lots of different ways to get Sky News.
Speaker 2: I love Broken Hill.
Speaker 1: We were there not that long ago doing an outtown,
Speaker 1: an absolutely spectacular part of Australia. If you get the
Speaker 1: chance to go, go and have a look at some
Speaker 1: of the mines, but also go and look at the stars.
Speaker 2: Beautiful part of Australia. Well guess what they've been without power.
Speaker 1: In fact, about fourteen hundred homes, which a big chunk
Speaker 1: of the town is probably not going to have electricity
Speaker 1: for weeks.
Speaker 2: You see.
Speaker 1: It all took place because there was a giant storm
Speaker 1: out in far western New South Wales. Brokenhill blackout pushes
Speaker 1: the town to the brink. Miners are being stood down
Speaker 1: and schools are being closed. There was a generator that
Speaker 1: brought in to try to replace power, particularly for the
Speaker 1: local hospital. Well that overheated. That's shut down. So I'm
Speaker 1: pleased to say we've got an update. Firstly, we see
Speaker 1: you about the problems you've been having in a Broken Hill.
Speaker 1: Shout out to all of our mates we've met and
Speaker 1: have been watching the show for years.
Speaker 2: But also the new supplers.
Speaker 1: Government, well they say they are helping. In fact they
Speaker 1: are doing so as we speak.
Speaker 8: I've come here today with the first round of a
Speaker 8: government support package. Two hundred dollars for households in Broken
Speaker 8: Hill and surrounding communities, four hundred dollars to small businesses.
Speaker 8: I realize that's not going to make everybody whole, and
Speaker 8: there's been significant into disruption and interruption in power, but
Speaker 8: it's the first step in us working with the local
Speaker 8: community to get businesses up on their feet and get
Speaker 8: the community going again.
Speaker 2: Yeah, good on him.
Speaker 1: Good on the local mayor all the rest of it.
Speaker 1: For going out, having the face to face, bringing the
Speaker 1: media with them. That's good stuff. I really like Chris Mins.
Speaker 1: I think that he's the perfect example of what lay
Speaker 1: should be. Of course, Albo has no interest in doing
Speaker 1: any of that. He knows better than everyone else. But
Speaker 1: I'm more than happy to have supported that bloke becoming
Speaker 1: the premiere, and more than happy to say that this
Speaker 1: bloke is doing a very good job. If any of
Speaker 1: this is falling flat place and men, email pulitsgoingews dot
Speaker 1: com dot if you're in or around Brokenhill, shout out
Speaker 1: to everyone watching us. There now to the United States,
Speaker 1: less than a couple of weeks to go.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: Now, remember Kamala Harris when she was doing better than
Speaker 1: she currently is in the opinion polls. What was the
Speaker 1: word they were using over and over again to describe
Speaker 1: their political movement.
Speaker 14: Let's not be afraid of having a little joy to
Speaker 14: the point of, you know, what gives you, what makes
Speaker 14: you feel good about your work.
Speaker 15: I find joy in the American people. I find joy
Speaker 15: in optimism. I find joy in the ambition of the people.
Speaker 15: I find joy in the dreams of the people. I
Speaker 15: find joy in building community. I find joy in building coalitions.
Speaker 1: Oh well, that was then, and now is now, and
Speaker 1: she is losing in the polls, and every prediction is
Speaker 1: that she will lose the presidency. We'll find out in
Speaker 1: the next couple of weeks if something magically is going
Speaker 1: to change. But the Joy and Vibes candidate is now.
Speaker 14: This should never again have the privilege of standing behind
Speaker 14: the seal of the.
Speaker 1: President of the United States.
Speaker 14: And that man calls himself the father of IVF.
Speaker 1: I mean, what does.
Speaker 2: That even mean.
Speaker 1: He has no idea what he's talking about.
Speaker 14: The American people are exhausted with his gas lighting.
Speaker 1: But it seems to me that the Trump campaign is
Speaker 1: now the Joy and Vibes campaign. You have a man
Speaker 1: who's remember the stakes for him, he will become leader.
Speaker 2: Of the free world, or if he loses, he'll go
Speaker 2: to jail.
Speaker 1: Because the system is absolutely ready to put him in
Speaker 1: jail on some of those federal charges, let alone what's
Speaker 1: playing out in New York right now. Yet, how is
Speaker 1: he behaving. He's dancing on the stage, he's smiling and
Speaker 1: laughing when he's leaning out of a window. When it
Speaker 1: comes to McDonald's. That's not a guy who looks like
Speaker 1: he's playing a losing hand. And the stakes for him
Speaker 1: way higher than any of us talking about it, for
Speaker 1: his personal safety.
Speaker 2: It's presidency or jail.
Speaker 1: I think he's currently the Joy candidate, and today he
Speaker 1: addressed a mega rally in Georgia. This looks like a
Speaker 1: Joy campaign to me. Kamale is even losing on Joy
Speaker 1: right now. Trump has got her covered. They're the supporters
Speaker 1: as well, because they look like they are headed in
Speaker 1: the direction of the White House. So in the past
Speaker 1: couple of days, there has been every attempt possible from
Speaker 1: all of their mates in the media, that being the Democrats,
Speaker 1: to try to find that one story that will disqualify
Speaker 1: Trump as the next president of the United States.
Speaker 2: There are two stories I want to tell you about.
Speaker 1: One dropped via The Guardian with a story of a
Speaker 1: woman who claims at a party where Jeffrey Epstein had
Speaker 1: some connection to Donald Trump, that Donald Trump had groped her.
Speaker 1: The story is from the early nineteen nineties. The second
Speaker 1: is a much nastier piece, which was a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of unconfirmed sources, among other things, telling a terrible story.
Speaker 1: The terrible stories around this lady, a beautiful woman who
Speaker 1: was viciously murdered on an army base during Trump's presidency.
Speaker 1: The family ended up coming to the White House spending
Speaker 1: time with the president. The president said that he would
Speaker 1: pay if needed, for the funeral. The bill turned up,
Speaker 1: and the unnamed sources was that he apparently blew up
Speaker 1: at the size and then made some sort of racial
Speaker 1: reference because she was quote unquote Mexican. Now everyone in
Speaker 1: the room who remembers the conversation says, no, that didn't happen.
Speaker 1: The family of the woman tweeted this in response to
Speaker 1: the article that the media have just ignored that. The
Speaker 1: family came out and said, Wow, I don't appreciate how
Speaker 1: you're exporting my sister's death for politics. It's harmful, disrespectful.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump did showed nothing but respect to my family.
Speaker 1: In fact, I voted for President Trump today, So that
Speaker 1: story is rubbish. But you watch them trying to push
Speaker 1: it everywhere, and every time you hear it, I want
Speaker 1: you to remember the family themselves say it's garbage. The
Speaker 1: second one is this person who was sacked by Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and has hated it ever since, and it was
Speaker 1: spent every day since being sacked. Is his chief of
Speaker 1: staff tipping a bucket on him. But suddenly, two weeks
Speaker 1: before the election, of all of the stories that have
Speaker 1: been told, he just happened to remember, two weeks before
Speaker 1: an election, a conversation about Hitler and the good things
Speaker 1: quote unquote that he did. I don't believe that happened
Speaker 1: in the same way that I don't believe the other
Speaker 1: thing happened. And all of this is happening because of
Speaker 1: the pressure that is on Democrats. They can't run on
Speaker 1: their record, and they can't run on their promise of
Speaker 1: the next four years, so instead they're in the Trump
Speaker 1: derangement syndrome phase. But those people were already voting for
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris. But today Kamala Harris spoke from the Naval Observatory,
Speaker 1: which is.
Speaker 2: Her equivalent of the White House.
Speaker 1: It's her residence in DC, and she was laying it
Speaker 1: on with two troughs.
Speaker 14: It is deeply troubling and incredibly dangerous that Donald Trump
Speaker 14: would invoke Adolf Hitler, the man who is responsible for
Speaker 14: the deaths of six million Jews. All of this is
Speaker 14: further evidence for the American people of who Donald Trump
Speaker 14: really is.
Speaker 1: Honestly, the whole three minutes is a disgrace, an absolute disgrace.
Speaker 1: But we'll see whether it works with people or not.
Speaker 1: I would suspect not. I think they've been crying wolf
Speaker 1: for eight years. They've had it at eleven since the
Speaker 1: second he came down on the escalators. So I just
Speaker 1: think there's a level of noise. In the same way
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty, the American people wanted to turn down
Speaker 1: and off on Donald Trump. I think the American people
Speaker 1: want to turn down and.
Speaker 2: Off the left.
Speaker 1: He's pretending the sky is going to fall in by
Speaker 1: real life, acting the president who did a much better
Speaker 1: job than what the Democrats have done when it came
Speaker 1: to the economy or the border.
Speaker 2: In the past four years.
Speaker 1: So as we go into the second last weekend, a
Speaker 1: weekend where Donald Trump will give an interview to Joe Rogan,
Speaker 1: I think that's going to produce some big news and
Speaker 1: potentially not great News because Joe Rogan isn't a huge
Speaker 1: fan of Donald Trump and may well ask some pretty
Speaker 1: direct questions nobody else will, but WE'LLI find out together.
Speaker 1: And he's got a giant rally at Madison Square Garden,
Speaker 1: the same site as WrestleMania and the Knicks playing. It'll
Speaker 1: be home to a Donald Trump rally this weekend. Of course,
Speaker 1: that means the joy message versus the wild message will
Speaker 1: be what he's trying to push. As for tonight, when
Speaker 1: the betting market's currently sixty forty the chances of Donald
Speaker 1: Trump becoming president, their suggestion current in the betting markets
Speaker 1: is that he wins every swing state. In a more
Speaker 1: left winging left wing leaning Nate Silver, he turns around
Speaker 1: and says that Trump is now favorite to be the president,
Speaker 1: only just, but the assumption is he will win Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: North Carolina, Georgia, and Nevada. If he does that, then
Speaker 1: sorry in Arizona. If he does that, he will maintain
Speaker 1: a path of the presidency. And if all the polls
Speaker 1: are locked in place and are true, Trump wins every
Speaker 1: swing state and gets three.
Speaker 2: Hundred and twelve electoral votes.
Speaker 1: So Harris, again getting desperate, trying to play as many
Speaker 1: home games as she possibly can between now and that
Speaker 1: inevitable election. She was on the ultimate home turf, which
Speaker 1: of course was CNN, but she even stuffed that up.
Speaker 1: Have listened to this question and this appalling answer. Is
Speaker 1: there something you can point to in your life, political life,
Speaker 1: or in your life in the last four years that
Speaker 1: you think is a mistake that you have learned from.
Speaker 14: I mean, I've made many mistakes, and they range from
Speaker 14: you know, if you've ever parented a child, you know
Speaker 14: you make lots of mistakes too. In my role as
Speaker 14: vice president, I mean, I've probably worked very hard at
Speaker 14: making sure that I am well versed on issues, and
Speaker 14: I think that is very important. It's a mistake not
Speaker 14: to be well versed on an issue and feel compelled
Speaker 14: to answer a question.
Speaker 2: Wait, didn'tmit it.
Speaker 1: That's her answer any mistakes. I try too hard. It's
Speaker 1: like a job interview. What do you think your waitness
Speaker 1: is up? I'm just too committed to the job. Even
Speaker 1: Democrats trying to spin for her in the postgame show
Speaker 1: on CNN, they didn't buy it.
Speaker 16: The things that would concern me is when she doesn't
Speaker 16: want to answer a question. Her habit is to kind
Speaker 16: of go to world word salad city, and she did
Speaker 16: that on a couple of answers. One was on Israel,
Speaker 16: Anderson asked a direct question, would you be stronger on
Speaker 16: Israel than Trump? And there was a seven minute answer,
Speaker 16: but none of it related to the question he was
Speaker 16: asking on immigration. I thought she missed an opportunity because
Speaker 16: she would acknowledge no concerns about any of the administration's policies.
Speaker 16: And that's a mistake. Sometimes you have to concede things.
Speaker 1: Time is running out, especially for Kamala Harris. Quick break
Speaker 1: back with bare looking forward to Stephen Conroy and Bromwin Bishop.
Speaker 2: They know the rules of the Senate.
Speaker 1: Is there a way to get rid of Lydia Thorpe politically?
Speaker 2: We will do so in a moment here on Paul
Speaker 2: Murray Law, Welcome back to Brisbane.
Speaker 1: Just a couple of days away from the Queensland election.
Speaker 1: A news poll has just dropped on The Australian's website.
Speaker 1: There has been a change in who they think is
Speaker 1: going to win and by what margin since the campaign started.
Speaker 1: I'll get to the details in a moment or two time,
Speaker 1: but first, always here to help is Stephen Conroy carry
Speaker 1: out a champions always Bromwin, Bishop Bromin, I want to
Speaker 1: use your expertise as a senator Stephen yours is a
Speaker 1: former leader of the Senate. Is there a way to
Speaker 1: get rid of Lydia Thorpe And if people got Zabruta
Speaker 1: film about it, if she didn't take the oath properly,
Speaker 1: can that disqualify her as a senator?
Speaker 4: Bromwin, Well, mars would initially be probably not, but I'll
Speaker 4: put a caveat on that. I think people would have
Speaker 4: thought the same thing when all that flurry of people
Speaker 4: coming up against Section forty four and people who were
Speaker 4: said to have dual citizenship and were thrown out of
Speaker 4: the Senate. I don't think anybody anticipated that that's the
Speaker 4: way it would end up. So there is every possibility
Speaker 4: that this could end up in the High Court and
Speaker 4: it could be deliberated upon as to whether or not
Speaker 4: she did conform with Section forty two Constitution. So I
Speaker 4: think this has got a long way to travel. I
Speaker 4: mean her duplicity, not only in trying to avoid properly
Speaker 4: taking the oath in the first place, today talking about grammar,
Speaker 4: which has got nothing to do with it at all.
Speaker 1: I think just maybe.
Speaker 4: Were very very angry. I know when I looked at her,
Speaker 4: I just thought, here's this exhibitionist woman put there by
Speaker 4: the Greens. Understand, she's there because she was a Green
Speaker 4: on the Green ticket, she was deputy leader of the Greens,
Speaker 4: and they have to be responsible for putting her there
Speaker 4: and not let off the hook. But her own behavior
Speaker 4: is something that she does on a regular basis, and
Speaker 4: it doesn't matter whether it's lying down in Mardi Gras
Speaker 4: and the street, or whether it's having a fight with
Speaker 4: a bike or whatever it is. It's all done for
Speaker 4: publicity for herself, which has got nothing to do with
Speaker 4: any cause. It's just exhibitionism. But it is possible to
Speaker 4: end up in the High Court. I think.
Speaker 2: Stevid Is is a fight worth having.
Speaker 17: No, Seriously, Romin's first instincting on this is right, Okay,
Speaker 17: she's an exhibitionist who just demands attention, and she's going
Speaker 17: to keep lifting the bar because it gets more boring
Speaker 17: each time, has got to be more outrageous.
Speaker 2: Bob Brown.
Speaker 17: Interjected on George W. Bush at a Federal Joint sitting,
Speaker 17: and I think he attempted to do it again. She
Speaker 17: within a couple of days later and there was all
Speaker 17: this outrage about it should be kicked out. It's like,
Speaker 17: just stop talking about her. She revels in the attention
Speaker 17: on Bromin's Section forty four. Bro when it's never actually
Speaker 17: been tested. Jackie Kelly not kicked out of Parliament on
Speaker 17: the basis of section forty four. And more importantly, Graham
Speaker 17: Campbell remember for cal Gooley said yeah, I'm a British citizen.
Speaker 2: Team someone wants to take me to court. Go your hardest.
Speaker 4: But Stephen, all those.
Speaker 17: Resignations, all those resignations, Stephen.
Speaker 1: Wise, forty four was tested in court.
Speaker 4: Section forty two has not been tested in court.
Speaker 1: Sorr, are you just wrong? So a wrong resign No
Speaker 1: one was expelled, No one was expelled. I had to go,
Speaker 1: did you? I mean, can I talk about Okay, guys,
Speaker 1: can I need to jump into you because we're all
Speaker 1: in different spots, so forgive me. I've got to take
Speaker 1: the wheel here. Interesting opinion pieces came out today from
Speaker 1: a lefty over in the Sydney Morning Herald doing a
Speaker 1: bit of reporting but also a bit of opinion here
Speaker 1: that basically Anthony Aberaneze's control over the Labor Party and
Speaker 1: its members ship in the Parliament is so strong that
Speaker 1: MPs are not in a position to be able to
Speaker 1: pull him back when he's making the obvious mistakes that
Speaker 1: he's been making for some time. Stephen, I'll ask you
Speaker 1: it this way. Is this like right in his observation?
Speaker 17: He is wrong in his analysis. Okay, whether albo is
Speaker 17: the Prime Minister of the day has authority over the
Speaker 17: caucus and the parliamentary Party, absolutely is analysis is wrong.
Speaker 17: The reason that people don't change the least now, it's
Speaker 17: not the sixty five or seventy percent rule. It's actually
Speaker 17: because you've then got to have a ballot of the
Speaker 17: full full membership of the party, an insane rule. I
Speaker 17: opposed it to Rudd's face. I've opposed it when people
Speaker 17: talked about it previously. I would urge our parliamentary colleagues
Speaker 17: to repeat it.
Speaker 2: It won't happen.
Speaker 17: Because there's a whole range of self interested reasons why
Speaker 17: it won't happen. But it should be dumped. But that's
Speaker 17: the real reason. It's the party membership vote. You'd have
Speaker 17: no prime Minister of the country for three months, a
Speaker 17: completely untenable position.
Speaker 2: That's the real problem.
Speaker 17: You can blast someone out has been demonstrated repeatedly over time.
Speaker 17: By simply having orchestrating and string of resignations people you
Speaker 17: know coming out every day, you.
Speaker 1: Build the pressure up.
Speaker 17: Nick mentioned did it brilliantly orchestrated it against Malcolm term
Speaker 17: All the first time, and it's happened against labor leaders
Speaker 17: as well. As you know, people resign, people resign, people resign.
Speaker 17: It becomes an untenable position. So the real problem is
Speaker 17: not the percent of the parliamentary party, it's the actual
Speaker 17: rules that follow from it. So Albo, as any Prime
Speaker 17: minister should have, has a lot of authority, but the
Speaker 17: analysis was flawed because his reasoning and understanding of the
Speaker 17: parliamentary rules was flawed.
Speaker 1: In Queensland, of course, you know which way? Where would
Speaker 1: you like to comment about what Steven can?
Speaker 4: I just say the idea that anybody would be fearful
Speaker 4: of Albanesi in that caucus is laughable. I mean, the
Speaker 4: man is quite plainly totally unable to carry out the job.
Speaker 4: You've got three people at least in their counting heads
Speaker 4: and Stephen, I'm not going to argue about your rules.
Speaker 4: But my understanding was if they want to change the rules,
Speaker 4: all they need is fifty percent plus one in the caucus,
Speaker 4: and if they only have one candidate, they can do it.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 17: No, I made sure that rule of fifty percent plus
Speaker 17: one in caucus stayed as a national rule. So I'm
Speaker 17: very familiar with this process. But I repeat, no one
Speaker 17: in the caucus, no one will I repeat. I offered
Speaker 17: to move it. I offered to walk into the caucus
Speaker 17: and actually repeal it, but there wasn't enough support to
Speaker 17: be to do it. And there still remains enough support.
Speaker 17: I think it should be done. I think it's a
Speaker 17: bad rule. I think, and that's got nothing to with
Speaker 17: Albanese right or anyone else.
Speaker 2: Is just a bad rule. I want to talk about
Speaker 2: Queensland in this poll that's just dropped.
Speaker 1: We're all going to be learning about it together here now,
Speaker 1: stop teasing. Now, we're going to show you here that
Speaker 1: are numbers from the start of the campaign versus the
Speaker 1: end of the campaign. Let's get some of these slides
Speaker 1: up now and we'll talk our way through it here
Speaker 1: where what seems to have happened over the campaign is
Speaker 1: that right now, fifty two forty seven would mean that,
Speaker 1: of course you'd end up with a majority LNP government,
Speaker 1: but it's not going to be particularly large.
Speaker 2: One.
Speaker 1: People have told me that they have to basically be
Speaker 1: at fifty five to forty five for them to actually
Speaker 1: really blast past that majority point.
Speaker 2: And if you actually and if.
Speaker 1: You have a look at that, but we can compare
Speaker 1: to the next slide hopefully that I've got for you here,
Speaker 1: well it will show you that, yeah, that there has
Speaker 1: been a change. Will maybe go without the slides because
Speaker 1: forgive me, I've sent those in a very hurried fashion
Speaker 1: to our production team. But at the start of the
Speaker 1: campaign it was fifty five to forty five. At the
Speaker 1: end of the campaign it is fifty two to forty seven. Okay,
Speaker 1: the preferred premiere. I don't have a comparison number, but
Speaker 1: it is currently Stephen Miles forty five to crucif Fooley's
Speaker 1: forty two.
Speaker 2: That's changed.
Speaker 1: During the campaign for Steven Miles going in, there were
Speaker 1: forty eight percent of Queenslanders who were dissatisfied with his performance. Sorry,
Speaker 1: that higher number was fifty one. It is now forty eight.
Speaker 1: The number four David Cruci Foley was thirty seven, compared
Speaker 1: thirty seven to satisfied to forty nine dissatisfied.
Speaker 2: That has now become.
Speaker 1: Forty six percent to forty three percent, with more people
Speaker 1: dissatisfied than satisfied. And as for the overall primary vote,
Speaker 1: at the start of the campaign, LABOR on thirty percent,
Speaker 1: the LMP at forty two.
Speaker 2: At the end of the.
Speaker 1: Campaign Labor on thirty three, the LMP on forty two.
Speaker 1: Stephen a lot of numbers, but it clearly shows that
Speaker 1: Labor did.
Speaker 2: Make ground during the campaign. What do you think?
Speaker 17: Yeah, look, I think that Stephen has absolutely shocks certainly
Speaker 17: you Paul by demonstrating that he's a good campaigner. I
Speaker 17: think he's won the campaign so far. I don't think
Speaker 17: he's winning it in no, I think he's shameless. The
Speaker 17: lineup anywhere wrong.
Speaker 1: I think he's shameless, and I think he's spent and
Speaker 1: look and he's and he's played some pretty low cards
Speaker 1: like the abortion one. Here we've got the debut leader
Speaker 1: of the LMP standing by.
Speaker 17: I think the levels have played that one on them.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, Bromwin, give me the thirty second version of
Speaker 1: what you think of the polling here, which clearly shows
Speaker 1: LNP is still in front, LMP is still in an
Speaker 1: election winning position, but they have come back during the
Speaker 1: campaign I.
Speaker 4: Think this that the LNP should win, but I put
Speaker 4: this a second caveat for the night that I do
Speaker 4: remember mister Borbidge said that when he lost, he still
Speaker 4: got fifty four percent of the vote. There is a
Speaker 4: conventional wisdom about Queensland that the Conservative side needs to
Speaker 4: have something like fifty five fifty six to be absolutely
Speaker 4: rock solid. But equally there are the Catter Party and
Speaker 4: One Nation and I think that one way or another
Speaker 4: there'll be exchange of government.
Speaker 1: My view is and again I look forward to this
Speaker 1: being played at some certain point in time. Best case
Speaker 1: scenario for the LMP is going to be fifteen seats
Speaker 1: to win. They need twelve. I wouldn't be if there
Speaker 1: is a chance of them falling below the twelve but
Speaker 1: still having more than labor and them becoming the next government.
Speaker 1: Thank you guys, do appreciate it. Let's talk to the
Speaker 1: Deputy leader of the LMP next. As the breaking news
Speaker 1: shows that the polls they always get tighter, but there
Speaker 1: has been some substantial movement, including.
Speaker 2: On the priority of issues.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what has now finally become the number
Speaker 1: one issue of the campaign for in a sect. Jared
Speaker 1: blay Is of course the deputy leader of the LMP.
Speaker 1: In a couple of days time he may will be
Speaker 1: the debut Premier of the great State of queens And
Speaker 1: he joins us now from beautiful Bunderberg. You heard the
Speaker 1: breaking news in and around that pole, so forgive me.
Speaker 1: We don't have as much time as I expected tonight
Speaker 1: to talk. But what is your feeling going into the night.
Speaker 1: Do you have an expectation of a clear majority or
Speaker 1: given the abortion lie and other issues, we might be
Speaker 1: talking about a much closer result than anyone was thinking.
Speaker 10: Well, Hi Paul, and welcome from Bunderberg. Great to be
Speaker 10: in regional Queensland. Look, we always knew it was going
Speaker 10: to be tough and we don't have the Union movement.
Speaker 10: We knew the Labour Party was so desperate they were
Speaker 10: going to have the fear of the scare mongering, and
Speaker 10: we've seen that in the campaigns. They have spent millions
Speaker 10: of dollars lying to Queenslanders. But the real reality is this,
Speaker 10: And I've just been on a from Far North Queensland
Speaker 10: last two days, Far North Queensland, North Queensland, Central Queensland,
Speaker 10: in Bunderberg now heading south and there's a real sense
Speaker 10: in the community for a fresh start. People do I
Speaker 10: think want to change the government. You'll imagine if we
Speaker 10: wake up Sunday morning and Steven Miles is re elected
Speaker 10: as the Premier and you're going to have two billion
Speaker 10: dollars on school lunches, Steve O, the sparky Steve O
Speaker 10: the service owner, Doctor Giggles running GP clinics and then
Speaker 10: doctor Giggles Stephen Miles being the touch shop convener. Like
Speaker 10: it's scary but believable. And that's It's always going to
Speaker 10: be a tough election. We've said that from the outset
Speaker 10: and that's why we just need to encourage people, no
Speaker 10: matter where they are in Queensland to get out vote
Speaker 10: one LMP for change, for a fresh start, all right?
Speaker 1: In terms of issues number one issue according to this
Speaker 1: pole fifty one percent cost of living, twenty percent crime,
Speaker 1: ten percent health and hospitals.
Speaker 2: Does that make the case for.
Speaker 1: Change or if the numbers are like that about cost
Speaker 1: of living the bloke with the sort of t shirt
Speaker 1: canon of cash, is that going to throw a wrench
Speaker 1: into what we all thought was to be a referendum
Speaker 1: on the performance of the government.
Speaker 10: Well, certainly in regional Queensland. At the polling booths I've
Speaker 10: been to in the recent few days and looking forward
Speaker 10: to Bunderberg tomorrow, certainly crime and cost of living is
Speaker 10: still the two biggest issues people are coming in and
Speaker 10: talking to our candidates about. Now. It doesn't surprise me.
Speaker 10: Costs of living crime is still they have been the
Speaker 10: two biggest issues during this election campaign. But the real
Speaker 10: question is to people think they're going to get cost
Speaker 10: of living relief by Steven Miles making sandwiches in touch
Speaker 10: shops at every primary school in Queensland. It's over two
Speaker 10: billion dollars and ultimately Queenslanders will pay, and they're going
Speaker 10: to pay by bigger labor taxes. The only way the
Speaker 10: Labour part if they get re elected, can pay for
Speaker 10: all these billions of dollars of promises of owning service stations,
Speaker 10: retail energy outlets and Sager's tuch shops in primary schools
Speaker 10: is biggert labor taxes and Labor Party aren't telling Queenslanders
Speaker 10: that's how they're going to fund these after the election
Speaker 10: if they get re elected. So unfortunately Queenslanders need to
Speaker 10: know that that if they re elect the Labor government,
Speaker 10: they're going to see bigger labor taxes because of all
Speaker 10: these promises that Stephen Miles has made. And it's like
Speaker 10: Oprah Winfrey Show, everyone gets a car, you get a car,
Speaker 10: you get a car. Everybody knows there's no such thing
Speaker 10: as a free lunch under the Labor Party. And I
Speaker 10: just hope they see that and vote for change, vote
Speaker 10: for a fresh start.
Speaker 2: On Saturday.
Speaker 1: I'm confident you got to think about the entire four years,
Speaker 1: not the past four weeks, not the tricks, not the
Speaker 1: rest of it when it comes to hospitals, crime, all
Speaker 1: the rest of it, all of this for the weekend.
Speaker 1: I'll see you as part of things on Saturday night.
Speaker 1: We'll talk again next week. Thank you, Jared, Thanks Paul,
Speaker 1: thank you.
Speaker 2: That's Jared in Bundy.
Speaker 1: I'm here in Brucebane and I look forward to being
Speaker 1: part of the election night coverage on Saturday night, stand
Speaker 1: by for the late debate.