Speaker 1: On scolds Oscodia.
Speaker 2: This is the Reader Paney Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Reader Panney Show. Coming
Speaker 3: up tonight. The ABC disgraces itself again with bias that
Speaker 3: are shocked and angered members of the Jewish community. Labor
Speaker 3: ministers and premiers embarrassed themselves with increasingly bizarre stunts on
Speaker 3: social media. We'll have a look at a few examples.
Speaker 3: The latest from the US with the always entertaining Alex
Speaker 3: Stein and Kinsey Schofield will tell us which big names
Speaker 3: fear being named and shamed in the p Diddy scandal
Speaker 3: and we never forget left he is losing its people
Speaker 3: in prison. But first to the latest news. Poll data
Speaker 3: and voter discontent with the Albanezi government is obvious, with
Speaker 3: Labour's primary vote falling to a historic law of thirty
Speaker 3: percent in New South Wales. The state by state data
Speaker 3: is fascinating. That thirty percent primary vote in New South
Speaker 3: Wales is three points lower than what Labor achieved when
Speaker 3: voters ditch the Rudd Gillard government back in twenty thirteen.
Speaker 3: That tells you how badly they're doing right now. The
Speaker 3: situation is not much better in Victoria, with Labour's primary
Speaker 3: down to thirty one percent. In Queensland it's at thirty
Speaker 3: The coalition's primary in those three states is at thirty
Speaker 3: eight percent. But it's not all good news for the opposition.
Speaker 3: Labor isn't bleeding votes primarily to them. Rather it's going
Speaker 3: to independence minor parties. So with the vote now more
Speaker 3: fractured than ever, political analysts are predicting a hung parliament
Speaker 3: is the most likely election outcome and that is not
Speaker 3: going to be good news for the country.
Speaker 2: For more on this, let's bring in Daniel.
Speaker 3: Wild, Deputy Executive director of the Institute of Public Affairs.
Speaker 2: Dan, what do these numbers tell you, Well, they.
Speaker 4: Tell me that the Coalition can win the next election,
Speaker 4: and they should aim to win, not just in minority,
Speaker 4: but in their own right. I think you're right to
Speaker 4: point out that basically Australians are marking down this government
Speaker 4: because it's a very bad government, but they haven't as
Speaker 4: yet been willing to switch over to the Coalition and
Speaker 4: that's the challenge now that the Coalition faces over the
Speaker 4: next few months. When we look at the policy issues, well,
Speaker 4: it's obvious why mainstream Australians have had enough of this
Speaker 4: very bad government. Whether it's the Voice to Parliament which
Speaker 4: is an attempt to divide us by race, whether it's
Speaker 4: mass migration which is making us poorer and dividing our society,
Speaker 4: whether it's the energy system bills keep going up with
Speaker 4: the net zero program, and much much more. I think
Speaker 4: the key here is for Peter Dutton and the Coalition
Speaker 4: to keep providing the leadership. We've seen their very strong
Speaker 4: opposition to these bad misinformation laws, with Peter Dutton saying
Speaker 4: that these laws have no place in a democracy like Australia.
Speaker 4: And I think Australians see that and they support it,
Speaker 4: and they want to see more of it, and that's
Speaker 4: going to be the question over the next few months.
Speaker 3: Now, let's talk about the AFL Grand Final. It was
Speaker 3: an easy win for the Brisbane Lines over the Sydney Swans,
Speaker 3: but then we saw politicians trying to use the game
Speaker 3: as a means to make themselves appear more relatable. This
Speaker 3: is happening a lot, but they seem to miss the
Speaker 3: mark more often than not. Have a look at this
Speaker 3: output from the Victorian and Queensland premieres. It looks like
Speaker 3: Chris Mins was a little too clever to get himself
Speaker 3: involved in this cringe fest.
Speaker 1: Trimier, who are American for this weekend?
Speaker 2: Oh that's a tough call.
Speaker 3: Can they just center at Stephen Miles coming to you
Speaker 3: from AFL heartland Queensland, I'm sure you'll be barracking for
Speaker 3: our Lions.
Speaker 5: One thing that ignites Queensland and Victoria, it's.
Speaker 6: Our hatred of those spears from New South Wales.
Speaker 2: Gavalaians all at Stephen.
Speaker 3: You've made your point, but really aren't they both Victorian
Speaker 3: teams at up Dan. It's just painful and I just
Speaker 3: keep seeing more and more of this content made at
Speaker 3: our tax payers expense. I'm sure they've all got social
Speaker 3: media teams that are putting this rubbish together.
Speaker 2: But why does that speak to any voters?
Speaker 7: No?
Speaker 1: I don't think it does.
Speaker 4: I think that the key thing in today's world is authenticity,
Speaker 4: particularly amongst younger Australians, because we're barraged with you know,
Speaker 4: boring corporate spin and spin from politicians that people can
Speaker 4: see right through this. I don't think it endears those
Speaker 4: leaders to any voters. I'm surprised actually that Anthony Abernezi
Speaker 4: wasn't in the change rooms of the Brisbane Lions after
Speaker 4: the game. He's worn pretty much every other scaff so
Speaker 4: why not chuck on the line scarf while he's at it?
Speaker 8: You know?
Speaker 4: But I think people basically see through this and they're
Speaker 4: pretty sick of politicians hijacking these events, and like I say,
Speaker 4: I think it actually ends up being a net negative
Speaker 4: for these politicians rather than a positive.
Speaker 3: I'm with you completely and interested in your thoughts about
Speaker 3: the treatment of Chris Fagan, the Lions coach. An enormous
Speaker 3: triumph for him after he endured a horror period where
Speaker 3: he was maligned, falsely maligned after that so called Hawthorne
Speaker 3: racism report. He was accused of all sorts of nonsense.
Speaker 3: After that flawed report was leaked to the ABC, he
Speaker 3: was forced to step down for a period as coach
Speaker 3: and there was a lot of conjecture that it would
Speaker 3: never coach again, and the feckless football media slanted him widely,
Speaker 3: and they've seemed to memory hold that entire period, Dan
Speaker 3: and they're all his best friend again.
Speaker 1: Well that's right.
Speaker 4: I mean, the AFL really is a swamp of political
Speaker 4: correct bureaucrats, many of whom have never played a game
Speaker 4: of footy in their life and are totally disconnected from
Speaker 4: the football community. I mean the victory of the Brisbane
Speaker 4: lines when it comes to the coach is one of
Speaker 4: the great comeback stories. Like you say, he was basically
Speaker 4: buried and we've had all these claims of racism that
Speaker 4: you and I have talked about before, and I just
Speaker 4: think footy fans are over it. They've just had a gutfull.
Speaker 4: I mean, we see welcome to country. We see politics
Speaker 4: this never ending for a you know, by the political class,
Speaker 4: to turn sport and to turn AFL in particular into
Speaker 4: a weapon of politics rather than something to unite the community. So,
Speaker 4: you know, I think this is a great comeback story
Speaker 4: and good on him for persevering. It must have been
Speaker 4: tough when you're facing all of these commentators in the media,
Speaker 4: but he kept on going and got the job done.
Speaker 3: Now let's go to some ugly scenes in our big
Speaker 3: cities Melbourne and Sydney.
Speaker 2: Over the weekend we.
Speaker 3: Had protesters waiving has Balla flags, some of them, some
Speaker 3: of them chanting terrible things, including.
Speaker 2: Death to Jews.
Speaker 3: This was all a rally that was incredibly endorsed by
Speaker 3: members of the Greens and following the death of Hazballah
Speaker 3: leader say it her son Nasraeli in an Israeli air strike.
Speaker 3: The Coalition has denounced the rallies and called out the
Speaker 3: lack of law enforcement. Here is shadow Home Affairs Minister
Speaker 3: James Patterson.
Speaker 1: On his watch, the law has been failed to be enforced,
Speaker 1: which then repeated instances of breaches of the law, whether
Speaker 1: it's incitement to violence against groups on the basis of
Speaker 1: their religion or ethnicity, or the public display of terrors
Speaker 1: and symbols like the haspull of flag, but also Hamas
Speaker 1: logos logos of the al Casan Brigades, which is the
Speaker 1: militant wing of Himas. And this Prime Minister has done
Speaker 1: nothing to ensure that the laws of the land of
Speaker 1: this country are enforced and unsurprisingly people have been emboldened
Speaker 1: by that. Their behavior is escalating, it is getting worse
Speaker 1: and it will continue to fly to the Prime Minister
Speaker 1: actually does something about it.
Speaker 3: Dan the Prime Minister has called for a cease firing
Speaker 3: Lebanon and has worn those who are involved in the
Speaker 3: protests if they step over a line, they will have
Speaker 3: their visas canceled if it's appropriate and Australian Federal Police referrals.
Speaker 2: But I can't help.
Speaker 3: But wonder what's happening with our police forces. How could
Speaker 3: they see that happen? People waving the flags of a
Speaker 3: recognized terror group, chanting all sorts of things that sound
Speaker 3: like threats to me, and no arrests. And you compare
Speaker 3: that to how they behaved during the COVID era, You
Speaker 3: compare that to them arresting pregnant women in their kitchens
Speaker 3: for Facebook posts, it seems incredible.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you're right, reader, I think that Senator Patterson's spot
Speaker 4: on with that. If the laws are on the books,
Speaker 4: the laws should be enforced in a fair manner. I'm
Speaker 4: not in fair of having a big plethora of so
Speaker 4: called hate speech laws, but if they're on the books,
Speaker 4: they need to be enforced fairly and impartially those symbols
Speaker 4: are the symbols of a terrorist organization. How they can
Speaker 4: be used freely in our country, I don't understand. It
Speaker 4: also shows the Greens in giving their support to the
Speaker 4: so called protesters operating outside the boundaries of the Australian
Speaker 4: way of life. They are an insurgency operation, not something
Speaker 4: that wants to work to better the country. But it's
Speaker 4: dividing the country. And I agree with your point about
Speaker 4: the double standards. That's one of the worst parts of
Speaker 4: this is, as you say, the Black Lives Matter protesters
Speaker 4: during COVID, they are allowed to go out there and protest,
Speaker 4: in fact encouraged by police to protest lockdowns. Those who
Speaker 4: didn't want them they were brutally set upon. And now
Speaker 4: we're seeing that double standard yet again.
Speaker 3: And let's look at the way the ABC covered this story.
Speaker 3: The buyas here is astonishing, the ABC standards, this is deplorable.
Speaker 3: Many protesters also marked the death of Hezbala's leader, Hassam Israla.
Speaker 6: Hah God let it all.
Speaker 9: All around the country.
Speaker 2: Thousands poured onto the streets, angry over the.
Speaker 9: Rising death door in Gaza and now Lebanon.
Speaker 2: I'm just horrified.
Speaker 7: But what's happening.
Speaker 6: The war has been going on for a year, it's
Speaker 6: only escalating.
Speaker 4: We're not sure why our our children, our women, our
Speaker 4: men don't matter, why the government want to speak up
Speaker 4: in our favor and demand that Israel stops.
Speaker 9: But one loss loomed especially large over the crowds.
Speaker 1: Today.
Speaker 3: We mourn the death of Saying.
Speaker 7: Hassan las Llah.
Speaker 2: He was the mother who was the father of Lebanon.
Speaker 2: He brought comfort, he brought security. Were you when when
Speaker 2: you wanted answers we turned to him?
Speaker 9: After nearly a year of rallies supporting Gaza and now Lebanon,
Speaker 9: many of these protesters say they are sick and tired
Speaker 9: of Israel's acts on Arab lands and there are again
Speaker 9: calling on the Australian government to apply more diplomatic pressure
Speaker 9: and sanction Israel.
Speaker 3: Now I can assure you the full report was just
Speaker 3: more of the same people condemning Israel. Not one word
Speaker 3: of condemnation of terror group has Bola, those who are
Speaker 3: marching seemingly for them, Not one word from a coalition MP,
Speaker 3: not one word from an Israeli advocate.
Speaker 2: It ended with this, you are again then forever on
Speaker 2: the wrong side of history.
Speaker 10: Damn Australian policies when it comes to the Middle East.
Speaker 9: A sentiment they'll project even louder next week as to
Speaker 9: complete a year of weekly protests.
Speaker 3: Dana, what do you make of that ABC report? Am
Speaker 3: I being too harsh? Being so shocked by the incredible bias?
Speaker 3: Because it is a news report. This isn't an opinion
Speaker 3: show from the ABC. This is supposed to be an
Speaker 3: unbiased news report.
Speaker 4: What just shows that the line between news and opinion
Speaker 4: is blue more and more every day. I think it's
Speaker 4: a shame the ABC is no longer an institution of
Speaker 4: cultural importance that it once was. Australians are tuning out
Speaker 4: of it. You can see the ratings on its key
Speaker 4: marquee programs continue to plumb it and go down, and
Speaker 4: that's because they just reinforce the inner city bias. You know,
Speaker 4: if you go out to the regions and you listen
Speaker 4: to the ABC, it's not too bad. But the problem
Speaker 4: is that the corporate headquarters, run out of Ultimo and
Speaker 4: South Bank in Melbourne, reflects a very narrow view. Whether
Speaker 4: it's on this critical issue, or whether it's on climate
Speaker 4: change or immigration or the voice to Parliament or lockdowns,
Speaker 4: You'll never get a balanced debate or discussion, which is
Speaker 4: what Australians want, is what they expect from a public broadcaster,
Speaker 4: and we're not getting it and that's why Australians are
Speaker 4: tuning out.
Speaker 2: Dan Wild, thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 2: Joining me now is.
Speaker 3: Leading geologist and author Professor In Plymer, and thank you
Speaker 3: so much for being the studio. Let's start with that,
Speaker 3: Senator Fatoma payment who seems to be a little bit
Speaker 3: confused about what the government gives to fossil fuel companies.
Speaker 2: Have a listen to this.
Speaker 8: You're telling me that we could raise jobs. He could
Speaker 8: buy five and fifty dollars a fortnight and it would
Speaker 8: still cost less than what the government gives to fossil
Speaker 8: fuel companies through the fuel tax credit.
Speaker 2: Yet the government isn't brave enough to do it.
Speaker 7: Make it make sense?
Speaker 2: And would you like to help her out?
Speaker 7: Oh, we can help her out a lot. She might
Speaker 7: actually look at how much money the government gives wind
Speaker 7: and solar companies to provide unreliable power, which is extraordinary
Speaker 7: expensive and for many occasions it doesn't work. And if
Speaker 7: we didn't have fossil fuels, we wouldn't have energy at all.
Speaker 7: We wouldn't have any electricity. The second thing is the
Speaker 7: fossil fuel rebate that she's talking about is a rebate
Speaker 7: that goes to farmers, fishermen, and miners who use their
Speaker 7: own roads or waterways, and therefore the moneies that are
Speaker 7: raised are not used to repair government funded roads own road.
Speaker 3: So it's not taxpayer largest going to fossil fuel companies
Speaker 3: is basically acknowledging, as with farmers and others, that if
Speaker 3: they're using their own roads, the taxpayer isn't maintaining those roads.
Speaker 2: They're maintaining them.
Speaker 3: Yes, but yeah, that's I think you need to have
Speaker 3: a coffee with the senator there and goh enlighten enlightened
Speaker 3: on her.
Speaker 7: At the bottom of the barrel for labor to put
Speaker 7: her on the ticket, and that shows you the level
Speaker 7: of their thinking, not her thinking.
Speaker 3: Well, it's going to be interesting to see if she's
Speaker 3: reelected now that she's walked away from labor. Now, the
Speaker 3: Earth's historical temperature changes for the last four hundred and
Speaker 3: eighty five million years have been in the news. The
Speaker 3: Washington Poster published some surprising results, not surprising for you
Speaker 3: for as a climber, because you're a geologist. You know
Speaker 3: this data already, and it does seem to show if
Speaker 3: you look at the full data, the green circle is
Speaker 3: where we are roughly now.
Speaker 2: It's not historically warm. It doesn't look like we've got.
Speaker 3: Global warming that's going to be catastrophic, that's going to
Speaker 3: destroy the world.
Speaker 7: No, not at all. But we're geologists have only known
Speaker 7: this for one hundred years, and we look back in time,
Speaker 7: and we see that we've had great ice ages and
Speaker 7: peerioge where it's been warmer, and the rate of shift
Speaker 7: out of a warm climate into a cold climate, or
Speaker 7: from cold into warm is very very rapid, far more
Speaker 7: rapid than most people would imagine. The second thing is
Speaker 7: that what that graph shows us very clearly is there
Speaker 7: is no relationship between carbon dioxide and temperature. So end
Speaker 7: of story. Now, we geologists have known that for a
Speaker 7: long while. There are a couple of geolos and you
Speaker 7: can count them on a saw miller's hand who live
Speaker 7: in government agencies who have a somewhat different view and
Speaker 7: don't look at the evidence. The third thing that diagram
Speaker 7: tells us is that we are in an ice age,
Speaker 7: and we are in one of the few times in
Speaker 7: the history of the planet where we've got ice on
Speaker 7: the poles, and we've been in an ice age for
Speaker 7: thirty four million years. We are still cooling down. We
Speaker 7: have been cooling down for a very long period of time,
Speaker 7: and maybe that will change when Antarctica finally breaks up
Speaker 7: and moves into a little sub continents going elsewhere.
Speaker 3: But there have we experienced a little bit of warming.
Speaker 3: I'm not talking about astronomical levels. But how can we
Speaker 3: be in an ice age and cooling if we've had
Speaker 3: even a little bit of warming.
Speaker 7: Well, during an ice age, we get spikes when it's
Speaker 7: warm and spikes when it's very cold. So on one scale,
Speaker 7: we've had the latest glaciation which finished about fourteen thousand
Speaker 7: years ago, and then it start to warm up. Then
Speaker 7: it started to cool down about four thousand years ago.
Speaker 7: That's exactly what you expect. That's quite normal. During that
Speaker 7: cooling period, we've had warm spikes such as the Meno
Speaker 7: and warming, the Roman warming and the Medieval warming, and
Speaker 7: cool spikes such as in the Dark Ages, and that
Speaker 7: it was ice age. Now we're coming out of the
Speaker 7: Little Ice Age. It's no surprise that we've warmed up
Speaker 7: a little bit. But during that period coming out of
Speaker 7: the Little Ice Age, we've had three periods of warming,
Speaker 7: two of cooling, and one where nothing has happened. So
Speaker 7: there just hasn't been constant warming related to a slight
Speaker 7: increase in carbon dioxide, which may or may not be
Speaker 7: due to human activity. There might be the ocean's de
Speaker 7: gassing as they always do when we're coming too a
Speaker 7: natural warm period.
Speaker 3: Well, again, I think you need to have a coffee
Speaker 3: with our environment and climate change on the stuff.
Speaker 2: Because Chris Bowen has.
Speaker 3: Been very busy on social media posting more nonsense in
Speaker 3: recent days. Here he is mocking at Peter Dutton's calls
Speaker 3: for new clear power in Australia, even has birthday cake
Speaker 3: as a prop.
Speaker 2: Someone has obviously made a trip to Woollies for this.
Speaker 11: Well, it's been one hundred days since Peter Dutton announced
Speaker 11: his seven nuclear reactor sites. That's the longest any Australian
Speaker 11: political leader has gone with a policy with no details. So,
Speaker 11: Peter Dutton, it's time, after one hundred days to level
Speaker 11: with the Australian people, come clean on your plans. What
Speaker 11: are the details, what are the costs? How much electricity
Speaker 11: would it produce? Peter Dutton, You seriously haven't thought this through?
Speaker 2: Does he have a point there, Professor?
Speaker 3: Are Dutton's nuclear plans short on detail high on cost?
Speaker 7: Well, firstly, we've had nuclear power in Australia since the
Speaker 7: nineteen fifties and we have a reactor in the minister's
Speaker 7: own city. He doesn't seem to be aware of that.
Speaker 7: The second thing is we've had.
Speaker 2: We haven't used it for energy.
Speaker 7: We've used twenty megawatches used to keep things going at
Speaker 7: Lucas Heights, but we've used it for medical lysotopes. But
Speaker 7: anyone who's ever had cancer must be pro nuclear. The
Speaker 7: second thing is that we've waited nearly nine hundred days
Speaker 7: for this government to give costings on solar and wind.
Speaker 7: We still haven't got the costings for these transmission lines
Speaker 7: cutting through virgin forest, destroying farmlands. So it's a rather
Speaker 7: amusing birthday that just the bone is celebrating, where everyone's
Speaker 7: rolling around laughing.
Speaker 2: And just one more on Chris Bowen. He's been busy
Speaker 2: on social media.
Speaker 3: He posted this clip boasting about green energy in Victoria.
Speaker 11: I'm at the Portland Smelter today where I've just announced
Speaker 11: so I've issued the first feasibility license for the Southern
Speaker 11: Ocean wind Zone. One point six billion dollars of local
Speaker 11: economic benefit, enough energy for six hundred and fifty thousand homes,
Speaker 11: ten percent of Victoria's energy needs right here in this
Speaker 11: one offshore wind zone.
Speaker 3: He does love a prop He's got their hard hat happening.
Speaker 3: There is this promising news for Victoria because we keep
Speaker 3: getting warnings about blackouts, having a gas shortage, So as
Speaker 3: this wind farm going to be the solution to all that.
Speaker 7: Or want to see a politician with a hard hat
Speaker 7: or high vis gear on, then you have to be very,
Speaker 7: very wary. The second thing is that in the Otway
Speaker 7: basin underneath the Portland smelter is a huge amount of gas.
Speaker 7: That's a much much better way to run a smelter
Speaker 7: than having occasional wind bursts giving you electricity. The third
Speaker 7: thing is that the whole Portland smelter was built based
Speaker 7: on a power line coming from Gippsland, and that was
Speaker 7: a long term contract to provide cheap power and to
Speaker 7: provide Gippsland the ability to build its power stations. And
Speaker 7: why would that beautiful coastline want to have these monstrosities
Speaker 7: out there to see, which are going to be killing
Speaker 7: a Bird's a hazard to av a hazard to shipping.
Speaker 7: He's got to come up with something better than that,
Speaker 7: and I suggest the gas beneath the smelter is the
Speaker 7: place to go.
Speaker 3: But as we know, the Victorian government is anti gas
Speaker 3: exploration and then the Libs aren't much better profer seeing Plyma,
Speaker 3: thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 2: Thank you still to come.
Speaker 3: Lefties Losing ED plus the latest from the US.
Speaker 2: With Alex Stein. Welcome back. Now it's time for lefties
Speaker 2: Losing ED.
Speaker 3: Let's start with more daft celebrity advice, this time from
Speaker 3: pop star Billie Eilish and some dude I don't know
Speaker 3: who is saying if you don't vote Democrat, your life
Speaker 3: will be over.
Speaker 2: These people are nuts.
Speaker 8: We are a voting for Kamala Harris and Tim Walls
Speaker 8: because they are fighting to protect our reproductive freedom or
Speaker 8: planet to our democracy.
Speaker 12: We can't let extremists control our lives, our freedoms, and
Speaker 12: our future. The only way to stop them and the
Speaker 12: dangerous Project twenty twenty five agenda is to vote and
Speaker 12: elect Kamala Harris.
Speaker 8: Vote like your life depends on it, because it does.
Speaker 2: Your life depends on it.
Speaker 3: Project twenty five lies demented, hysteria, doomsday predictions. They really
Speaker 3: do count on their fans to be low infote dim wits.
Speaker 2: Talking about unsolicited advice.
Speaker 3: Here is LGBTQIAA plus plus activist Jeffrey Marsh again advising
Speaker 3: folks to end contact with family members were toxic.
Speaker 6: When I went to contact with my mom, this was
Speaker 6: a few years ago. All all I could do at
Speaker 6: the time was text her and say, I'm not coming
Speaker 6: home for the holidays and you won't be seeing me
Speaker 6: for a while. And she texted back in all caps,
Speaker 6: what the does that mean?
Speaker 2: And I blocked her.
Speaker 1: That was it.
Speaker 6: That's the last thing that I remember we ever said
Speaker 6: to each other.
Speaker 3: I hope you have a bucket, handy because this next
Speaker 3: clip of MSNBC's Jensaki interviewing Kamala Harris's husband Doug may
Speaker 3: make you nauseous.
Speaker 13: Important part of an interesting part of how people have
Speaker 13: talked about your role here is how your role has
Speaker 13: reshaped the perception of masculinity. And I'm not sure you've
Speaker 13: planned on that, but you are an incredibly supportive spouse.
Speaker 13: Has that been an evolution for you? And do you
Speaker 13: think that's part of the role you might play as
Speaker 13: first gentleman.
Speaker 7: It's funny.
Speaker 2: I've started to think a lot about this.
Speaker 7: I've always been like this.
Speaker 3: My dad was like this, you have reshaped the perception
Speaker 3: of masculinity.
Speaker 2: She actually said that. Did you circle back to your
Speaker 2: bucket yet?
Speaker 3: Just to remind up with those who don't know, this
Speaker 3: is the same man who was sleeping with a nanny
Speaker 3: while his first wife was at work, even got the
Speaker 3: nanny pregnant. Yeah, that sounds like the type of masculine
Speaker 3: every Gale Craves. Let's cross now to Gaza or is
Speaker 3: it Flujah or kabul on Hodes, Melbourne, Australia, where scenes
Speaker 3: like this are becoming commonplace.
Speaker 2: People supporting Hazbullah.
Speaker 3: Nothing to worry about there, and sadly there were similar
Speaker 3: scenes and chants in Sydney as well.
Speaker 2: Don't worry.
Speaker 3: The anti Israeli zealotry is spread across all our capital cities.
Speaker 3: And it's not just immigrants from those regions that are
Speaker 3: chanting this ugly stuff. It's the local lefties we're produced
Speaker 3: in this country who are pushing this toxic agenda. Is
Speaker 3: absolutely appalling.
Speaker 2: Now Here is proof that even the dimmest of dim.
Speaker 3: Doults can somehow become a billionaire. Let's look at some
Speaker 3: of the Mark Cuban's work. This is from a few
Speaker 3: years back, with the devastatingly unfunny Stephen Colbert and I
Speaker 3: apologize in advance with the extreme levels of cringe you're
Speaker 3: about to experience.
Speaker 9: Donald, Do you know do you have to be a billionaire?
Speaker 2: You have to have a billion part and your bank account.
Speaker 14: Not just the air.
Speaker 1: You just found in the shark tank.
Speaker 6: Donald, I know you have no shot.
Speaker 9: With Hispanics because there's no way in hell you're kidding enough.
Speaker 3: Can you ben vote?
Speaker 12: Donald?
Speaker 9: The only way you're worth ten billions is the five
Speaker 9: page you nine and a half billion two wash.
Speaker 2: Mine, oh dear.
Speaker 3: And it appears make Cuban has learned nothing from embarrassing
Speaker 3: himself in front of the world. He is a source
Speaker 3: of amusement constantly on x where he tweets the most
Speaker 3: absurd stuff and if that's not enough humiliation, he took
Speaker 3: that same absurdity on sin BC, only to be slapped
Speaker 3: down with facts and logic.
Speaker 7: When she was unable to answer the question about are
Speaker 7: you better off now than four years ago?
Speaker 1: I think that was.
Speaker 7: Illustrated four years ago. Literally you can answer, we can
Speaker 7: look at exactly what happened. He's already been president, and
Speaker 7: we can look at what happened when she was vice president,
Speaker 7: and it's not good.
Speaker 9: The comparison to President Joe, as you know, is different
Speaker 9: than being vice president.
Speaker 7: It's not so so she can take she can she
Speaker 7: can take credit for the good things that happened with Biden,
Speaker 7: but she didn't have anything to do with about it.
Speaker 3: Now, this is delicious, This lefty losing it Gal approaches
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk and Vivet Gramaswami with what she thinks is
Speaker 3: a brilliant got your question that will leave them exposed
Speaker 3: as immoral fools.
Speaker 2: But sadly for her, she's the one who looks like
Speaker 2: an utter imbecile.
Speaker 11: I just have a simple yes or no question.
Speaker 8: If the only way to ban abortion forever would be
Speaker 8: to bring back slavery, would you do it?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 1: No, No, I wouldn't bring back slavery to try to
Speaker 1: limit murder.
Speaker 8: No. Okay, what kind of outrageous question is that?
Speaker 12: By the way, if the only way to limit human
Speaker 12: suffering is to ban abortion, would you ban abortion?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 9: It was an honest answer.
Speaker 2: It was an honest answer.
Speaker 3: Better luck next time, lover. That did not go as planned.
Speaker 3: It's been a while since we had a look at
Speaker 3: the climate cultist of Just Stop Oil. Here they protest
Speaker 3: human progress and the fact that a couple of their
Speaker 3: fellow lawless idiots have just been jailed by YEP attacking
Speaker 3: a great piece of art with cans of soup.
Speaker 2: Listen to the reaction of the other people in the gallery.
Speaker 10: I worry active people in prison demanding an entity oiling
Speaker 10: gu something which is now a government policy after sustained
Speaker 10: it's talked about friends, colorless headlines and the resulting political pressure,
Speaker 10: and we'll have.
Speaker 2: Plenty more lefties with my next special guest.
Speaker 3: Wouldn't be nice if school's focused on academic excellence rather
Speaker 3: than leftist indoctrination. Watch this parent confront a teacher running
Speaker 3: a Kamala Harris day at school.
Speaker 2: How does that make sense if you guys are having
Speaker 2: a more Hairstan.
Speaker 6: Spirit week.
Speaker 9: Okay, but you're making a political I think that's that's
Speaker 9: black history.
Speaker 1: It's you're making this.
Speaker 7: You're making a political.
Speaker 1: State and making alertal stem hairy stage.
Speaker 2: She's the current vice president of the United States.
Speaker 7: I think.
Speaker 10: Myself to make a week up a further conversation is
Speaker 10: inappropriate rost America.
Speaker 9: I'm not saying that a disagree with you.
Speaker 7: I'm just doing what I have to do in the
Speaker 7: opposition in Okay, Sorry, you're.
Speaker 2: The one making this decision.
Speaker 3: Yes, so it was her decision after all. Glad she
Speaker 3: eventually cleared that out. Let's bring in the encourageable Texan
Speaker 3: himself host of Prime Time with Alex Stein on Blaze TV.
Speaker 2: Alex Stein, Alex has.
Speaker 3: A lot of that going on, but I want to
Speaker 3: get your thoughts on an issue that is just absolutely shocking.
Speaker 3: This this stuff that has come out over the weekend.
Speaker 3: The Immigration and Customs Enforcement Authority ICE has released a
Speaker 3: damning reporter as to what has been going on that
Speaker 3: Southern border. IS Deputy Director Patrick Lechliner has revealed that
Speaker 3: more than four hundred and twenty five thousand convicted criminals
Speaker 3: have been released from custody waiting for the immigration proceedings,
Speaker 3: as well as more than two hundred and twenty two
Speaker 3: thousand who have got pending criminal charges.
Speaker 14: They're currently tracking four hundred and twenty five thousand non
Speaker 14: citizens who have been convicted of a crime. Of that number,
Speaker 14: over thirteen thousand non citizens have convictions for homicide and
Speaker 14: are on the none to teen docket, meaning they're roaming
Speaker 14: the country right now. On top of that, there are
Speaker 14: another fifteen thousand, eight hundred and eleven non citizens convicted
Speaker 14: of sexual assault who are roaming the country right now
Speaker 14: on isa's non detained docket.
Speaker 3: Alex, to me, this is tantamount to treeson even if
Speaker 3: ten percent, one percent of those numbers were being released
Speaker 3: into the community, it would be a scandal.
Speaker 5: Well, it's scary enough that thirteen thousand of those illegal
Speaker 5: immigrants have a conviction for homicide, but I mean, personally,
Speaker 5: I think sexual assault is even scarier than murder. And
Speaker 5: considering now we have fifteen thousand people that are in
Speaker 5: our country and those are the ones that are documented,
Speaker 5: it's incredibly scary. And I don't think people here in
Speaker 5: America really understand how important this next election is because
Speaker 5: our border is an absolute mess. And I just recently
Speaker 5: I went on a cruise. I recently went to Haiti.
Speaker 5: Right now, Haiti's beautiful, there's hardly anybody there. I mean,
Speaker 5: those places are safe. But New York City or the
Speaker 5: southern border, it's terrible right now.
Speaker 2: Well, I'm sure.
Speaker 3: And how little coverage this data that has been released
Speaker 3: by Immigration and Customs enforcement is receiving in the mainstream
Speaker 3: media in America. It's not a palatable topic. It goes
Speaker 3: against the narrative. A lot of networks like MSNBCCNN push
Speaker 3: But you would think that data is so compelling that
Speaker 3: they would be telling their viewers about it.
Speaker 2: But it seems to be well, it seems to be
Speaker 2: ignored by many of them.
Speaker 5: Well, they consider it advantageous because they know that they're
Speaker 5: going to figure out a way where these people can
Speaker 5: vote and future elections and hopefully, you know, make it
Speaker 5: so that the Liberals win every election by having these
Speaker 5: illegal immigrants vote for them. So this is not an accident.
Speaker 5: And you know, it wasn't that long ago after September eleventh,
Speaker 5: where the country you know, tried to pride itself on
Speaker 5: protecting its citizens. Now it's the opposite. Now people are
Speaker 5: more interested in protecting illegal immigrants. And you look at
Speaker 5: all the devastation in Florida and see right now that
Speaker 5: we still want to give billions of dollars to the Ukraine.
Speaker 5: It's absurd.
Speaker 3: Now, despite the obvious border policy failures that those stats
Speaker 3: point to, we had Kamala Harris go to the border.
Speaker 3: She has previously compared border authorities to the KKK and
Speaker 3: slave owners, but now she's pretending she supports strong borders
Speaker 3: and she's supporting the workers down There is anyone buying
Speaker 3: this in the States, Alex.
Speaker 5: Well sadly, Rita, I just spoke at the University of Washington,
Speaker 5: and I was speaking there for Turning Point USA, Charlie
Speaker 5: Kirk's organization, and we had some people that were a
Speaker 5: little combative, and you know, I asked them about the border,
Speaker 5: and they literally even though Kimbla Harris has been the
Speaker 5: vice president for the past three years, they think that
Speaker 5: she actually cares about the border. Yet it's been her
Speaker 5: job literally basically for the last four years almost to
Speaker 5: fix our border. And they admit these are left just
Speaker 5: on campus and admit that we have a border issue,
Speaker 5: but they think all of a sudden, when Kammela becomes
Speaker 5: president that she can fix this. So people are deeply
Speaker 5: confused and they're acting like Kamila Harris is some new candidate.
Speaker 7: She's not.
Speaker 5: She's been in the upper echelon of power and she
Speaker 5: could stop this border crisis, but she chooses not to.
Speaker 5: So it's just you know, proof that she's a phony
Speaker 5: and she's a fraud saying now she all of a
Speaker 5: sudden cares about the border.
Speaker 3: Well, she's just on the record over the years talking
Speaker 3: about this issue at length, and she has said that
Speaker 3: she doesn't think illegal immigration is a crime. She wants
Speaker 3: to have free health care for illegal immigrants, even supported
Speaker 3: sex change operations at the taxpayer's expense for illegal immigrants
Speaker 3: who are convicted of a crime and are in jail
Speaker 3: in America. So I mean, all of this is on
Speaker 3: public record. Let's see what Donald Trump was up to.
Speaker 3: He had a very good reception at a football game
Speaker 3: college football game between Alabama and Georgia. Let's have a look,
Speaker 3: roll Tied Alex. They seem to be pretty happy to
Speaker 3: say him because it's dangerous as a politician to go
Speaker 3: to any sporting event.
Speaker 2: You normally met with booze, but not on this occasion.
Speaker 5: Well, I graduated from LSU, which is in the Southeastern
Speaker 5: Conference at SEC, the same conference as Alabama, and I've
Speaker 5: been to Bryant Denny Stadium and trust me, in ninety
Speaker 5: nine percent of the people in that stadium were voting
Speaker 5: for Donald Trump. You know, if he was at a
Speaker 5: different university, it might not be the same outcome. They
Speaker 5: might not be cheering as loud, but trust me, he
Speaker 5: was in a stadium full of supporters. But sadly, I
Speaker 5: don't know if it's enough Bryan Denny Stadium goers to
Speaker 5: sway this election. And I'm really worried. You know, he
Speaker 5: has a lot of support there, but in other stadiums.
Speaker 5: You're right, he probably could possibly get burned.
Speaker 3: Now, let's have a look at a bit of a
Speaker 3: controversy in Pittsburgh, a famous sandwich restaurant. They've been there myself.
Speaker 3: It's a bit overrated, I've got to tell you. They've
Speaker 3: been slammed because of their unequal treatment of the two
Speaker 3: political candidates. They allowed Kamala Harris to bust in her
Speaker 3: people there, even throughout their diners, so they could film
Speaker 3: a little bit in there.
Speaker 2: But when JD.
Speaker 3: Vance showed up, well, they denied him entry and he
Speaker 3: was instead forced to have his meet and greet with
Speaker 3: supporters in the restaurant's parking lot. The restaurant is pretending
Speaker 3: none of that actually happened. They claimed everyone's welcome, their
Speaker 3: doors are open to all. It was just a innocent mistake,
Speaker 3: a bit of confusion. But Republicans are not buying this, Alex.
Speaker 3: I've seen some of the comments online are saying, that's it.
Speaker 2: We all dining here anymore.
Speaker 3: We don't want to give out money to a business
Speaker 3: that has such contempt for us and our values and
Speaker 3: our candidates.
Speaker 5: Well, what's even worse is they lied, They misrepresented what
Speaker 5: happens supposedly according to the Vance campaign, they got approved before.
Speaker 5: And not only that, when Kamala went there, she had
Speaker 5: the diners kicked out and put in basically plants, people
Speaker 5: that were supportive of her to go into the diner
Speaker 5: and be there while she was eating. So they did
Speaker 5: whatever Kamala Harris wanted, but they did not do that
Speaker 5: with JD.
Speaker 3: Vance.
Speaker 5: So it shows, you know that they obviously want to
Speaker 5: Kamala to be the winner of this next election and
Speaker 5: do not eat at Primanti Brothers. They are overrated.
Speaker 1: You know, they used to be.
Speaker 5: Very very very famous. They've tried to expand in other
Speaker 5: states and have not done so well. So you know,
Speaker 5: it's just kind of sad that they won't give the
Speaker 5: same sort of treatment to JD. Vance that they would
Speaker 5: give to Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: Now, finally, Alex second Gentleman.
Speaker 3: I guess that would be his official title of the
Speaker 3: United States. Doug Ermov has been hailed a revolutionary when
Speaker 3: it comes to what it means to be a man.
Speaker 3: This is by MSNBC's host Jensaki.
Speaker 13: Important part of an interesting part of how people have
Speaker 13: talked about your role here is how your role has
Speaker 13: reshaped the perception of masculinity. And I'm not sure you've
Speaker 13: planned on that, but you are an incredibly supportive spouse.
Speaker 2: Has that been an evolution for you?
Speaker 13: And do you think that's part of the role you
Speaker 13: might play as first gentleman.
Speaker 1: It's funny.
Speaker 2: I've started to think a lot about this.
Speaker 7: I've always been like this.
Speaker 2: My dad was like this, Oh, come on, Alex, I'm
Speaker 2: going to let you have first, go on this one.
Speaker 1: Go for it.
Speaker 5: Well, when they call him the first gentleman, rita, this
Speaker 5: sounds like a conspiracy, but this is true, and it
Speaker 5: goes to our education system. It's the feminization of men.
Speaker 5: They want men to be more feminine, and Doug Emoff
Speaker 5: is as feminine as it gets. And just him sitting there,
Speaker 5: totally emasculated by his wife and Jinsaki trying to give
Speaker 5: him a softball interview. It's just sad that he's about
Speaker 5: to be the first husband. I mean, I mean, I
Speaker 5: guess he would technically be the first gentleman. I mean,
Speaker 5: it's absurd. It's kind of like using these weird pronouns.
Speaker 5: I'm still confused on how it works.
Speaker 3: Well, I just don't know how he's revolution revolutionizing masculinity
Speaker 3: when he's got a track record of cheating on his
Speaker 3: first wife with the nanny, getting the nanny pregnant. That's
Speaker 3: about as toxic as it can get in most people's books.
Speaker 3: But Alex Stein always a pleasure.
Speaker 2: Thanks for your time this evening.
Speaker 5: Thank you, Rita, talk to you again soon still to come.
Speaker 2: Kinsey's Schofield will tell us.
Speaker 3: Which big names fear being named and shamed in the
Speaker 3: he did he saga? Welcome Back Joining Me Now celebrity
Speaker 3: and royal commentator A Kinsey Schofield.
Speaker 2: Kinsey fresh footage of.
Speaker 3: Madonna celebrating the Milano Fashion Week with adults in gabana
Speaker 3: has prompted some concern, some criticism, but mainly concern amongst fans.
Speaker 2: She does look not herself. Is she okay?
Speaker 3: Someone would say she's looking remarkably fit given her age.
Speaker 7: But.
Speaker 3: She seems to just have had an excessive amount of
Speaker 3: work done, and you do worry about just where she's
Speaker 3: at with all that.
Speaker 8: I mean, i'd ask you to find okay. I am
Speaker 8: grateful that she's no longer trying to show us her
Speaker 8: b hole on Instagram. You know that's an improvement, But
Speaker 8: you know when your boyfriend is twenty eight years old
Speaker 8: and you're nearly seventy. I guess you have to wear
Speaker 8: multiple pairs of underwear. I agree it's a bizarre look.
Speaker 8: She's acting a little weird, but and it's very much
Speaker 8: Pickne energy. But she's got to do what she's got
Speaker 8: to do to keep up with the Olivia Rodriguez and
Speaker 8: Sabrina Carpenters of the world.
Speaker 3: I didn't realize her boyfriend was in his twenties and
Speaker 3: she's around seventy. Wow, okay, I would draw my Criticism'm
Speaker 3: actually quietly impressed.
Speaker 2: Now, now let's go to Netflix.
Speaker 3: Boss's being a little bit unhappy about the lack of
Speaker 3: personal footage that's included in a new documentary produced by
Speaker 3: Harry and Meghan Cold Polo. I've done a documentary on
Speaker 3: Polo that's going to be fascinating. This is part of
Speaker 3: the Sussex's massive deal with Netflix, reportedly worth over one
Speaker 3: hundred and fifty million dollars. The five part documentary series
Speaker 3: about Harry's passion for Polo is hardly has any personal
Speaker 3: information or footage, and Netflix are.
Speaker 2: Regretting signing this steal.
Speaker 3: It seems Kinsey, Well, I would have thought that would
Speaker 3: be regretting it after that first documentary, which had plenty
Speaker 3: of personal footage, but it was so mind numbingly boring.
Speaker 7: It was.
Speaker 8: And this is not their first failure when it comes
Speaker 8: to Netflix. They canceled Megan's Pearl before it even started production,
Speaker 8: Lived to Lead fell on its face. Prince Harry's Archworld
Speaker 8: documentary I'm Sorry, Invictus documentary Heart of Invectors completely bombed,
Speaker 8: and so they are worried about this because they were
Speaker 8: desperate to get something from Prince Harry. Spotify couldn't, so
Speaker 8: they gave Prince Harry his FOLO show and he barely
Speaker 8: shows up in it. He barely allows them any sort
Speaker 8: of access to him, and that's what people would be
Speaker 8: tuning in for. So this is a huge loss for Netflix.
Speaker 8: I do imagine that they regret this relationship, and I
Speaker 8: imagine that they if they're putting all the eggs in
Speaker 8: the Meghan Markle cooking show basket. Let's just start the
Speaker 8: prayer circle now, and.
Speaker 3: Poor Meghan's got more reports about her short fuse. Flores
Speaker 3: Is told of the time that Meghan screamed down the
Speaker 3: phone at her for a solid thirteen minutes. That's a
Speaker 3: lot of screaming Kinsey, How many more negative Meghan stories
Speaker 3: can they be?
Speaker 2: It seems we've got a different one every single week.
Speaker 8: Well, look, I will, I will name my first born
Speaker 8: after Trevor Ingolson, Meghan Markles first ex husband. If he will,
Speaker 8: if he'll come out and tell us all his bad stories.
Speaker 8: Remember she ghosted in.
Speaker 2: That's how That's how he found out.
Speaker 8: That they were getting a divorce. She threw her rings
Speaker 8: in a fed xbox and shipped him off to him
Speaker 8: back in California, you know, and her best friend that
Speaker 8: she no longer talks to her best friend because of that.
Speaker 8: So there are plenty of more stories out there. They're
Speaker 8: more personal, they're more damaging. The clock is ticking.
Speaker 3: Now, just on Harry. He is hoping to have a
Speaker 3: bit of a reinvention, become a statesman type figure. But
Speaker 3: that effort to reinvent himself is apparently being impacted by
Speaker 3: dramas surrounding his wife.
Speaker 2: What can you tell me about this story?
Speaker 8: Absolutely, I mean, just around the stories we've just discussed.
Speaker 8: Prince Harry in New York with the Clintons, hanging out
Speaker 8: with the Clintons, giving speeches on online safety for children,
Speaker 8: he wants to be a thought leader, he wants to
Speaker 8: be respected in this space. But are you and I
Speaker 8: having that conversation. Absolutely not. We're talking about demon Meghan Markle,
Speaker 8: dictator and Heal's psycho outbursts, and that is what we're
Speaker 8: talking about today instead of talking about Prince Harry having
Speaker 8: a semi successful trip to New York. So the New
Speaker 8: York Post has come out and said, we talked to
Speaker 8: people that used to work with President Obama. They saw
Speaker 8: Prince Harry in New York moving and shaken, and his trip,
Speaker 8: the success of his trip was negatively affected by Megan's
Speaker 8: insistence on that US Weekly ego driven you know, puff piece,
Speaker 8: where everybody called her the world's greatest boss. So, I mean,
Speaker 8: it's selfish. It's horrible.
Speaker 2: It is selfish.
Speaker 3: And before you go talk a little bit about Beyonce,
Speaker 3: she had her venture into country music, country and western music,
Speaker 3: but she won zero People's Choice Country awards.
Speaker 2: Tell me about that. What has been the reaction to
Speaker 2: that Queen Bee just expects to pick up awards. Was
Speaker 2: this a surprise?
Speaker 8: I mean this she was nominated seventeen times, so I
Speaker 8: think it was a surprise because you think that she
Speaker 8: would get something. She was nominated for zero Country Music Awards,
Speaker 8: and they were very upset about that. But my argument
Speaker 8: is go the post Malone route. You need to get
Speaker 8: in with Nashville. You need to respect the artists that
Speaker 8: is that created this genre, that you know are that
Speaker 8: loved this genre, and she just this was a revenge album.
Speaker 8: She just kind of went and did her own thing,
Speaker 8: and I think that that's why she's not getting the
Speaker 8: reception she really wanted.
Speaker 3: It's it's pretty pretty awful. As someone who loves country
Speaker 3: music yet that ain't country. And I don't mind messing
Speaker 3: with country a little bit.
Speaker 2: Modernizing it if you if you will, but no, not that,
Speaker 2: not like that. Before you go.
Speaker 3: We don't have long, But just tell me Sean Diddy
Speaker 3: Comb's we having more information comad reports of fifty alleged
Speaker 3: victims going to a law firm, talk about some of
Speaker 3: them being minors.
Speaker 2: Are there any celebrities.
Speaker 3: Speaking at who's worried about being named and shamed in
Speaker 3: this saga?
Speaker 8: Well, what this attorney has said that's brand new is
Speaker 8: that there was one prominent figure that was there at
Speaker 8: the scene for one of the victims. One of the
Speaker 8: alleged victims, I should say, so, you know, when is
Speaker 8: that name going to come up? I think that that's
Speaker 8: what everybody, everybody is waiting to see and the idea
Speaker 8: that Sean's attorney is telling people he's excited to testify
Speaker 8: to defend himself. Rita, I'm telling you that is a threat.
Speaker 8: That is not just Diddy saying I look forward to
Speaker 8: defending myself. That is a threat to everybody that might
Speaker 8: testify or tell on him.
Speaker 2: Kinsey Schofield, thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 2: That's it from May.
Speaker 3: I'll see you at eleven tomorrow. Next is Newsnight.