WEBVTT - After the 'no' vote: Advance’s plan to destroy the Greens

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>From Schwartz Media. I'm Ruby Jones.

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:12.159
<v Speaker 2>This is seven am. The hard right group behind the

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>No campaign is amassing a multi million dollar war chest

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>to take down its next opponent, the Australian Greens. Advance

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 2>has called the Greens the single biggest threat to freedom,

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>security and prosperity in Australia and they have big plans

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>to target their voters ahead of the next election. Today,

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 2>special correspondent for the Saturday Paper Jason Kotsukus on who

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 2>is behind Advance and why they believe they can flip

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>progressive women to the hard right.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>It's Monday, August nineteen, So, Jason.

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 2>The lobby group that calls themselves Advance, we first heard

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 2>about them last year. They were a key force behind

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>the No campaign in the lead up to the Voice referendum.

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Since they're a huge success in that campaign, what have

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 2>they been doing.

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, quite a lot actually, Ruby. Right now Advance is

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 3>getting ready for the next federal election, which we're expecting

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.839
<v Speaker 3>between March and May next year. So far, Advance says

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>they've raised one point five million dollars of a five

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 3>million dollar fundraising target ahead of the election. If you

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 3>log onto their website, they say they've got three hundred

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 3>and six thousand online supporters and thirty two thousand donors.

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>They've hired twenty three full time staff, and they've expanded

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the permanent campaign infrastructure to include things like data analytics,

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 3>creative department, digital communications, fundraising, political strategy, even a call center.

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Jay Tonight, it is outside to welcome our special guest,

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Matthew Shan, the CEO of Advanced Australia, and our topic

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 4>tonight is value based powerful campaigning.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>And in a recent presentation to the Australian Jewish Association,

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 3>advance's CEO Matthew Shan described Advance's goal as wanting to

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 3>defend the fruits of the Judeo Christian West.

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 5>Was we wanted to defend the fruits of the Judeo

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 5>Christian West and for the purposes of our organization, that

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 5>was three things, so freedom, security, and prosperity.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 3>He says. That's what they do all year round, every day.

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 5>We don't campaign on any other issue. We exist solely

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 5>to defend and promote those three things.

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>He says. They recently did research into the biggest threat

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 3>to freedom, security and prosperity and landed on the Australian Greens.

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 3>According to to Matthew, she advances entire focus from now

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 3>until the election will be to try to inflict damage

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 3>on the Greens brand. He even said, we're actually doing

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 3>nothing else between now and the next federal election, but

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 3>this campaign his main aim is to shrink the Greens

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 3>vote back to where they were in twenty sixteen.

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, And obviously the Greens have grown as a political

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 2>force since twenty sixteen. At the last election they did

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 2>particularly well. They won six Senate seats. They now have

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 2>eleven Senators and four MPs in the House of Representatives.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Clearly Advance sees them as a threat. So tell me

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a bit more about advances research into the Greens.

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 3>So Matthew, She said that he instructed the polling researchers

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 3>that Advance wanted to understand what the Australian people thought

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 3>about the political parties from a breat point of view,

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 3>and he was very careful to say that he didn't

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 3>want to know about what people thought about the policies

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>or the politicians. He wanted to get voters in a

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>room and start thinking about how did their political parties

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 3>make voters feel. What the research came back showing was

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 3>that For both the major parties, roughly a quarter of

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 3>people said that they believe that those parties stand for nothing.

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>For the Nationals, they're in even worse trouble, with almost

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.559
<v Speaker 3>half of people saying that they think the National Party

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 3>stands for nothing. But when it comes to the Greens,

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Advances research showed that nearly eighty percent of people surveyed

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 3>and that's not just Green's voters, but all voters think

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 3>that the party stands for action on climate change or

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 3>protecting the environment, and gives them enormous credibility in the

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 3>minds of voters. And that's why they have the most

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 3>trusted political brand in the country. And the thing that

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>really irks Matthew Sheen about that is that he believes

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally that the Greens present themselves as a party that

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>is primarily concerned about the environment, and that voters have

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 3>swallowed that.

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So it sounds like Advance is going for the

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Greens because of what they represent from a political standpoint,

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 2>but also because of the trust that people have in them.

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>So how do they plan to dislaunche that level of support.

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Matthew she And characterized most voters as being low information voters.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 3>That most voters are going into the polling booth saying

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 3>to themselves, I don't really want to be here. I'm

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 3>not that interested in politics. But if I vote for

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 3>the Greens at least in the number one position, well

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 3>then you know, at least I'm going to feel good

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 3>about something that I did today. The group that Advances

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 3>identifying as being the most persuadable are predominantly women, age

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 3>between thirty three and forty nine. According to the research,

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 3>they're the ones that think that the Greens are doing

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 3>the right thing by the environment, but they don't don't

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 3>really know much else about the party, And I think

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:17.239
<v Speaker 3>Advance believes that if they can reveal to that age

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 3>group just who the Greens are, that they might not

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 3>be prepared to vote for them again.

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 5>So women are twice as likely to vote Green or

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 5>Tel or Greens the men. So as of a few

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 5>weeks ago, eighteen percent of all women in this country

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 5>intended to vote Green. Tell me about eight percent of males.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 3>And the other thing that he's taken from the Greens

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 3>having such a strong political brand is that instead of

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 3>attacking the party head on as a group that wants

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 3>to enact radical change, the first step in Advances campaign

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 3>has to be trying to take a different approach and

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 3>try to meet voters where they are with the message

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 3>that the Greens are not what they used to be.

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 5>If we came out and said, you know, the Greens

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 5>are this the Greens so that they're bad, you know,

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 5>they want to breach the US alliance, they wouldn't actually hear.

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 5>Confidentive dissonance would kick in, they'd say, and we saw

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 5>it in focus group. The shutters would go up. So

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 5>we've got to be a bit more softly softly in

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 5>the beginning. And this is the message that tested the

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 5>best out of the research. They're not they used to be.

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 3>And the message that Advance wants voters to hear is

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I haven't changed, it's the Greens that have changed. And

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 3>the idea here is that it leads voters off the

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 3>hook and saves face for changing their position.

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 5>The Greens party is a party of hatred of Western civilization,

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 5>which wants to destroy every tradition we've been built on

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 5>the Greens.

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 3>The campaign that the Greens aren't who they used to be.

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 3>They've given it a name, Green's Truth. On our current trajectory,

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 3>there is absolutely no reason why next ten to twenty

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 3>years we're not going to see a Greens government. And

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 3>the centerpiece of that campaign will be a documentary film

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.239
<v Speaker 3>that Advance says has a three hundred and seventeen thousand

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 3>dollars production budget that promises to tell the full story

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 3>of how and why the Greens have fallen so far.

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 3>According to a fundraising pitch that was emailed to support

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 3>us on Thursday, this documentary will not only inform and

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 3>motivate voters on its own, they're also going to use

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 3>it as the basis for all of their advertising going forward,

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 3>so social media, television and all the other campaign material

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>that they're blarning to put out trying to paint the

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Greens as a scary left wing.

0:08:47.120 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Party coming up, Jason goes looking for the people behind Advance. Jason,

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 2>you've been looking into the lobby group Advance, and you've

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>found that their entire focus ahead of the next election

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 2>will be on bringing down the Greens. So at this

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 2>point we know a lot about who they don't like,

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 2>what they're opposing, and what their plan is, but we

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>know less about the group itself, about Advance, So tell

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 2>me about them.

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think the thing that struck me most about

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 3>this group in writing this story was just how elusive

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 3>it is as an organization, and we don't really know

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 3>all that much about it. We know that it was

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 3>founded in twenty eighteen with about two hundred and eighty

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars in seed funding that was contributed by a

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 3>retired Sydney fund manager named Simon Fennick, but I don't

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 3>really know much about Simon. We also know that there's

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people who were attached to the Liberal

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Party that are quite close to this group. Tony Abbott,

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 3>the former Liberal leader and former Prime Minister, is on

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 3>as advisory board. There's a couple of act Liberal politicians

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 3>who are also on that advisory board. We know that

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Advance as spokesperson before the twenty twenty two election was

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 3>just Enterprise. She's now, of course, Senator Justiner Price. So

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 3>while the Advance claims to be independent, they do have

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of ties to the Liberal Party. When it

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 3>comes to Matthew Shean, I wasn't really able to find

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 3>out that much about him. You know, he really just

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 3>came onto the scene as the executive director of Advance,

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 3>but his working life prior to that was difficult for

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 3>me to uncover anything really substantial.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, given that then, and given a certain sense

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 2>of mystery surrounding Advance and who belongs to the group

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and where the money comes from, what was it like

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 2>as a report trying to get information about them?

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 3>It was quite difficult. There's an address an email address

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 3>on the website for media inquiries. I sent through a

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 3>few requests for interviews with mister Shean and I got

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 3>a couple of replies saying look, we're happy to answer questions.

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Those emails weren't signed or it wasn't clear who who

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 3>those replies were coming from. For an organization with twenty

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 3>three staff, I thought, well, I'll go and visit their headquarters,

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 3>which are listed on the website as being at Level

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>four at fifteen More Street in Civic, the main civic

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 3>center here in Canberra. So I went there to just

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 3>knock on the door and see if I could talk

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 3>to anyone that way.

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Was anyone there?

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 3>When the elevator door opened on level four, I quickly

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 3>realized that this was a co working space. When I

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>asked for Matthew Sheen somewhere there, the reception has said, well,

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 3>do you mean the Advanced guy, and I said yes,

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 3>and then I just got the reply that, well, Matthew

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 3>comes in here sometimes, but not very often. So it

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 3>turns out that they don't actually have an office there.

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 3>They just list this place as their office, and I

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 3>guess they come to some sort of hot desk arrangement,

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 3>or perhaps they have a meeting there from time to time.

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 3>So it really does raise a few questions as to,

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, who are these twenty three staff they supposedly have,

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 3>where are they spending all the money they raise? And

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, even things like the website you strike me

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 3>as being a little bit elusive because you look through

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 3>some of the photographs they have of all these very

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 3>enthusiastic volunteers that they have supporting them. But if you

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 3>sort of look behind the images, you quickly realize that

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 3>these are just stock images that Advances are brought from

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 3>an agency and are not representing real people that support

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the organization. And I think there's also some questions about

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 3>where they get all their money, because if you look

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 3>at the Australian Electoral Commission declarations on money raised and

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 3>spent during the referendum campaign, you see that Advance collected

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 3>one point three million in donations ahead of the referendum,

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 3>but they spent ten point four million on the No campaign.

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So where is that nine point one from then.

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 3>That's not clear. There was an affiliate group that was

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 3>essentially a part of Advance called Australians for Unity. They

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 3>also spend eleven point eight million after raising about ten

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 3>point eight million in donations. So it might be a

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 3>situation where Australians for Unity has given money to Advance.

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 3>But it's difficult to actually work that out because Advance

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 3>is so secretive when it comes to the source of

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 3>its money. And I even called Matthew she to ask

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 3>him about it, and he said to me that he

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 3>couldn't talk because he was going through airport security. Now

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 3>that might well be true, but it certainly seemed to

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 3>be the world's quietest airport security I've ever heard.

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So, even without speaking directly to Matthew Sheer, tell

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 2>me where you arrived at the end of your reporting

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 2>on this in terms of how successful you think Advance

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 2>is going to be ahead of this election in targeting

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the Greens. Do you think that they can do what

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>they're setting out to do.

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 3>It's difficult to really know. I guess all we can

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 3>go on advances past performance. The effort to promote the

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 3>no campaign during the Voice referendum last year was, by

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Advances measure successful. Sixty percent of people voted no, and

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Advance has taken a lot of credit for that. But

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of other political analysts say, well, as soon

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 3>as you had the main opposition parties coming out against

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 3>the Voice, then the yes vote was doomed and it

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't have mattered what a group like Advance was doing.

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 3>What I call Adam Band's office on Thursday morning, they

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 3>were very happy to put Adam in front of me

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 3>and talk about how he thinks the Australian Greens will

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 3>be best plays to respond to this campaign that Advance

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 3>is planning, and that seemed pretty unfazed by the threat

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 3>posed by Advance. He thinks that voters trust the Greens

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 3>because it consistently fights for the things that the people

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 3>care about, while Advance may have a few wealthy donors

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 3>who want to defend their obscene wealth. According to him,

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 3>a key question to ask of the group why are

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.479
<v Speaker 3>they doing what they're doing? In his view, the Conservatives

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 3>are attacking the Greens and not Labor because it's the

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Greens that is the progressive alternative. So for Adam Bound,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 3>whatever Advance does or is planning to do, isn't really

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 3>going to change his strategy or the strategy of his party.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, Jason, thank you so much for your time today.

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Ruby, it's a pleasure to talk with you as always.

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Also in the news today, Government frontbencher Ed Husick has

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 2>accused Peter Dutton of playing politics with one of the

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 2>worst humanitarian crises we've ever seen. Mister Dutton has been

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 2>calling on a band for visas for Palestinians escaping the war,

0:16:55.400 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 2>citing security risks. His comments sparked outrage in Parliament, with

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Independent MP Zali Stegel calling mister Dutton racist. Sky News

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 2>is now reporting that mister Dutton is seeking legal advice

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 2>against Miss Stegel and former Prime Minister John Howard has

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 2>said the Northern Territory intervention was totally justified. His comments

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 2>come weeks after the territory's Police Commissioner, Michael Murphy apologized

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 2>for the force's involvement. Mister Murphy had acknowledged that many

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Indigenous Australians viewed the intervention as racist, but mister Howard

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 2>defended the measures, including restrictions on alcohol and pornography, and

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the control of welfare through the Basics Card. The Liberal

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 2>government's intervention Laws suspended the Racial Discrimination Act. I'm Ruby Jones.

0:17:42.680 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 2>This is seven am. Thanks for listening.