WEBVTT - Episode 34: A Cautionary Tale

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Listeners are advised that this podcast series Brown contains course

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>language and adult themes. This podcast series is brought to

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you by me Headley Thomas and The Australian Michael Drury

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>was the undercover cop they Couldn't Corrupt, a plain clothes

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>detective with a relentless determination to expose organized crime in

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Sydney's underworld. His name is synonymous in Australian police and

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>crime circles.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Ray had morning onto GB.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 3>It was ten past six in the evening on June sixth,

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 3>nine eighty four on the North side of Sydney, and

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 3>the unbelievable happened. A serving police officer who'd been undercover

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 3>about to testify in a giant drug case. We shot

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 3>in his own home in front of his wife and

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 3>two small children. When the undercover drug squad officer woke

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 3>for his CAMA twelve days later, he was in no

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 3>doubt that a fellow officer, Roger Rogerson, was involved in

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 3>that assassination attempt.

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>My colleague Matt Condon told me that his friend Michael

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Drury had been paying a lot of attention to the

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>evidence in our podcast investigation into Bromin's disappearance. Matt confided

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that the long retired detective had focused his still sharp

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>inquisitive brain on some of the angles in the case.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Mick Drury also knows Lennox Head well. The force's most

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>bent cop was Roger Rogerson in the nineteen eighties. A

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>skilled detective but a sociopathic killer who had crossed the

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>dark side. Rogerson ordered the execution of his fellow officer,

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Michael Drury. Many years later, The Sixty Minutes reporter Liz

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Hayes took Mick Drury back to his old home in

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>which he was shot twice and almost died.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 4>This is the kitchen and the kitchen window, of course,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 4>and unfortunately this is where it all happened. The first

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 4>shot hit me straight through the stomach, into the area

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 4>just next to the backbone and lodged between the ribs,

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 4>and the second shot hit me alongside the heart and

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 4>underneath the shoulder blade.

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>He has been living in northern New South Wales for years.

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to pick his investigative brain. We caught up

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>at a roadside cafe. One of the first things Mick

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>confided to me there was his awe at the potential

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 1>for true crime podcast investigations to solve old cold cases.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 5>And when you've got exposure Australia wide and even overseas

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 5>for that matter, you've got tens and tens and tens

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 5>of thousands of people listening to it, that one a

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 5>positive and truthful outcome, and someone out there may have

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 5>a fresh idea. Why would a loving, dedicated mother, for

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 5>no reason whatsoever, after one so called private phone call

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 5>in the bedroom, come out the front and say to

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 5>John Winfield, oh, by the way, I'm off see you later,

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 5>A wave to him, close the door and off into

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 5>the never never and be never seen later. Absolute bullshit.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 5>That is not correct. I state my entire career on that.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 5>It just does not ring true. I would love to

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 5>interview him to get his version of the store.

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Mick Drury zeroed in on a crucial period of fewer

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>than twenty four hours, the period from when John arrived

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in Lennox Head after the flight from Sydney on Sunday

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>evening May sixteenth, until the Monday afternoon when he turned

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>up at Andy and Michelle's house in the Shire.

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 5>On that Sunday, he was awake for most of the day,

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 5>had short notice. He caught a plane from Sydney to Ballana.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 5>I find this interesting. He went to the police station

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 5>and forecast them that he was going to his house

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 5>with some pending, perhaps a verbal drama with his wife

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 5>because they weren't on good terms. John Winfel was a

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 5>dedicated surfboard rider. He brings the surfboard up by plane

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 5>from Sydney, which would indicate is coming home for several days,

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 5>and he leaves later that night. There is no doubt

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 5>in my mind that something very disturbing happened that night

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 5>after driving almost non stop back to Sydney that night

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 5>with amazing stamina and fatigue that I would suggest zero notice.

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 5>He's requested that the mother in law take care of

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 5>the two children, and that freed him up with the

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 5>motor car to do whatever he wanted, unobserved and unsupervised.

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 5>Now that worries me, because then that means he's got

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 5>freedom of use of the motor car whatever may be

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 5>disturbing in the car. I would suggest he was concealed

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 5>in the boot in the hysterics of the moment that

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 5>he must have been going through through in scooping up

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 5>the children, in leaving the house in an extremely untidy condition,

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 5>when he's realized whatever this disaster may be, he has

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 5>jumped in his car and driven non stop to Sydney.

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 5>Something very serious has happened. He has taken flight away

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 5>from the area.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>What about the risk of driving a vehicle that's unregistered

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>some eight hundred odd kilometers with a body in the boot.

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 5>As you put it, If there was a body in

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 5>the boot, there is a risk involved. But I would

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 5>suggest Sunday night at twelve midnight, one, two, three, four,

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 5>five in the morning. You don't have that many highway

0:06:55.320 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 5>patrol in those days on the old wading, very slow

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 5>driving Pacific Highway.

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And in those days, would an unregistered vehicle have been

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>immediately obvious to a highway patrol.

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 5>No, he would have known that. He's a man of

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 5>a high degree of intellect. I've got to give him that,

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 5>and he's got more opportunity and flexibility of doing something

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 5>sinister like disposing of a body in the Sydney area.

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>That's where John flourished a receipt for petrol purchased for

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the overnight drive from Sandstone Crescent to Sydney with the

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>two girls. He produced it to Andy Reid and Michelle Reid.

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 5>I think it's very disturbing behavior. When you're the suspect

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 5>of a crime and you have this ridiculous example of

0:07:54.800 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 5>alibi construction on the balance of probability does not work

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 5>in your favor. It is a mark against you. It's

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 5>alibi construction by someone who's trying to cover their tracks.

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 5>Bromlin actually had a little bit of a background in banking,

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 5>et cetera, so she would understand the format of a check.

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 5>Back to front. There he is, five years later, being

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 5>interviewed by the police to do a formal statement or interview.

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 5>John Winfield produces this check and claims he founded on

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 5>the kitchen table five years earlier when he went up

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 5>there the second time with her signature on it, and

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 5>it should not have been her signature. Is that correct?

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Didn't need her signature? Correct?

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 5>Correct? Why would he keep that check for five years?

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 5>Why would he keep a petrol docket five years? This

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 5>is what's called alibi construction at its finest. It takes

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 5>my breath away. This is nonsense.

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're seeing now a pattern of alibi constructions. Oh yes, yes,

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Mick Drury circled back to John's hasty departure from the

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>house at Sandstone Crescent, on Sunday night, and then John's

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>telephone call from Sydney to his neighbor Murray Nolan two

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>days later, asking Murray to break into the house.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 5>John was very obsessive with the hygiene and placement of

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 5>things around the house that he owned at Lennox Head. Yes,

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.599
<v Speaker 5>now this is important. I believe that he is obsessive

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 5>compulsive in his behavior in that regard. The next door

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 5>neighbor is instructed by John Winfield to go and knock

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 5>on the door of the house and if there's no answer,

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 5>if they be break in, and it's a bit of

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 5>a mess here there and everywhere, the children's bedrooms, the

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 5>kitchen area, and John some days earlier has driven back

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 5>to Sydney and left his house in a mess. I

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 5>find leaving the house in that state or condition diametrically

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 5>opposed to the normality of John Winfield, which is obsessive

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 5>compulsive in that regard what was going through his mind.

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 5>It is so ridiculous that it is, in my opinion humble,

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 5>as it is absolutely compelling evidence of a very disturbing nature.

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Turning to that Monday in Sydney, he has dropped his

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>daughters off at his ex wife's house, where his mother

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>in law answers the door, and no doubt a bit bewildered,

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>agrees to accept the children for several hours. We then

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>surmise in the podcast that John may have gone directly

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to this building site at a place called Illawong in

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the Shire where he had been working as a brick

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>lath and part of our suspicion over Illawong is based

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on a fairly recent discovery which the police and the

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>coroner didn't know about many years ago, and that discovery

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>being council documents from nineteen ninety three showing that the

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 1>inspectors of the council had approved just days before Bromwin

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>disappeared the pouring of concrete for the patio and the

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:54.359
<v Speaker 1>garage slab.

0:11:54.440 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 5>And that's wonderful evidence about the date for approval the

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 5>pouring of the concrete.

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that Bromwin was put underneath the plastic and

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the rio that was all there ready for the concrete pause,

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and then the paws have occurred and she remains there entombed.

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 5>It's far easier to dig a hole in an area

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 5>like that than it is somewhere around Lennox Head. The

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 5>grave only has to be twelve inches deep and from

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 5>their backfill, was Sad put the plastic over in the

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 5>rio and it's done. It wouldn't be the first time

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 5>our body's been located in that type of location.

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that a site that you, if you're a detective

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>on this case, would regard as low, medium, or high

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:56.599
<v Speaker 1>priority based on the circumstantial evidence you've heard in the podcast.

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 5>My view is when I look at the movement to

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 5>John Winfield from that fabled Sunday night, it is absolutely

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 5>critical to find out what may be happening underneath. That

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 5>is a vital area of consideration for intense forensic examination.

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Listening to the podcast as closely as you do as

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a retired detective of impeccable standing and knowing the area

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Lenox and Ballana surrounding beaches, do you feel a connection

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to this case that has led you to volunteer this.

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 5>Help Look Podcasts are very very new forms of educational

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 5>entertainment in this modern day for everyone in the community.

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 5>It gives an opportunity for those tens of thousands of

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 5>people out there in Australia and perhaps overseas to send

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 5>you emails or ring you up or one of your

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 5>staff members and say what about this?

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>What about that?

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 5>We're doing a process of critically analyzing the facts that

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 5>we're aware of. You have an investigational team of ten

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 5>thousand or more. That's one hell of a team. This

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 5>is a twenty first century version of Sherlock Holmes before.

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>You read the final chapter. When investigations go bad at

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>an early stage, there's a tendency for people to speculate

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that it must have been because of corruption.

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 5>With the benefit of hindsight, it's very easy to be

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 5>critical of an individual or what may or may not

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 5>or should or should not have been done. We're not

0:14:56.080 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 5>dealing with a shoplifting from the local corner store. We're

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 5>dealing with a suspected murder. It doesn't come more serious

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 5>than a suspected murder. I happen to know retired Detective

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Sergeant Graham Diskin personally. He actually joined the cops with

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 5>me the same class. I haven't seen him for forty

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 5>years or more. I won't go into the way his

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 5>mind works. I don't want to be unfairly critical of anyone,

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 5>but I can tell you now something very disturbing happened

0:15:42.360 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 5>on that Sunday night.

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>We do not know whether the owners of the Illawong

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>house share our suspicions and the suspicions of thousands of listeners.

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>For all we know, those owners have never heard of

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bromwin podcast. But I have talked to Cariina and

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Andy about whether perhaps we should visit, introduce ourselves to

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the owners and just tell them about everything.

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 6>I was just thinking back to what Maddie said one day.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 6>I think you and Maddie and Andy Hedley were in

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 6>the car driving away from Illowong, and Maddie said, can

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 6>you imagine if someone came up to your door and Toddy,

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 6>this may be a person underneath your what?

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 7>I don't know if i'd like to hear that.

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 6>How would you even approach that? I guess I worry

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 6>that we might cause them some angst and concern at

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 6>a time when we can't do anything much to alleviate that.

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it would be transparent of us and

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>talked so much about this property to talk to the

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>owners without putting any pressure on them. We can just

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>talk to them on background, just a conversation to fill

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in any gaps they might have.

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 6>We don't know what the current state of play is

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 6>with the police, so we can't really give them particularly

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 6>up to date information or tell them what the lie

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 6>of the land is at the moment. I mean, obviously

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 6>they could turn us away. That's not the end of

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 6>the world for us. But I'm a bit worried about

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 6>the effect that it could have on them as a family,

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 6>especially if they have children. If they know nothing at

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 6>the minute and we sort of go and burst that bubble,

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 6>then it could potentially cause them quite a lot of

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 6>stress and anxiety, I think.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>But if we're assuming that the police will go there

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to search, then that bubble is going to be burst anyway.

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it will. But again I think there's a difference

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 6>between having your bubble burst by law enforcement. They could

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 6>really welcome contact from us and might have been say, oh,

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 6>we've been waiting for you to get in touch. But

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 6>on the other hand, it might just come completely out

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 6>of the blue and be a real shock.

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>But what if nothing's going to happen despite the letter

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to the state coroner, despite the new evidence pointing to Illowong,

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>nothing happens. Let's hypothetically say that we have chosen to

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>avoid the family at Illowong, to knock go and knock

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>on the door and introduce ourselves in good faith, and

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>then the promin series comes to an end. The police

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>keept diverted elsewhere. You and I are diverted elsewhere onto

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>another murder investigation, and Illawong goes completely overlooked, and we

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>never ever spoke to the family, who may say, look,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>if the police have no interest in searching our property.

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 6>Will you and I see what you mean about the

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 6>fact that people might move on and get distracted by

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 6>other things. But it is something we could revisit down

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 6>the track if there was no police action ultimately taken.

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree that it's more likely than not the

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>family living there knows about the history of that property.

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 6>There's definitely a possibility that they know about it.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>What is the worst thing could happen by us going

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>there and introducing ourselves and just offering to answer questions

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and telling them that in the event police don't search,

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we'd like to come back and talk to them.

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 6>The worst thing that can happen is that we approach

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 6>the owners at the Llowong house now at this stage

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 6>when there's not a real need to go there, and

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 6>they are unhappy about that contact from us, And then

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.479
<v Speaker 6>down the track the authorities might decide not to go

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 6>to Illawong, and we really do need to go in

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 6>at that point if we want to try to bring

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 6>about a search of the site, and the owners might

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 6>be less inclined to engage with us at that time

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 6>if we've sort of irritated them now through an unnecessary approach.

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I was going to stand right behind you when you

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>knocked on the door, just.

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 8>Time it off and made it my responsibility.

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Andy was going about his own building job when I

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>reached him to talk about it. The owners of that

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>house in Illawong must now know that it's their house

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that has been discussed in the podcast as being a

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>possible burial ground.

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 9>For Bromwind thinks, so, yeah, don't don't know that.

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 10>It wouldn't surprise me. Yeah, it wouldn't surprise me.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Your all, how did you feel about you and I am,

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>possibly Karina going up to that property and offering to

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>answer any of their questions based on the that they

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>do know and we're not trying to cause them trouble,

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and we have the one to identify the property really

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>just as a good will gesture, and we'll ask them,

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>how would you feel about the police coming here? If

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that's their decision, but we won't be saying to them

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we want to do it ourselves. We wouldn't be interfering

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>with the site in doing that, we wouldn't be contaminating anything.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>We'd simply be knocking on the door and offering to

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>have a chat to them about what's been unfolding, but

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>not asking them for their permission to do anything subterranean.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>This is based on that assumption that they must know

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>about it.

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 9>How would we find out whether they know about it,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 9>because you'd be pretty confronting for them if they didn't

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 9>and we turned up there, Well.

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>We can't find out whether they know. We just have

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to front up. But what are the chances they don't?

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>And he clearly feels for the people living at that

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>address in Illawong if the police are going to visit

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and do a proper search under concrete there, and his

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>view is that it should be done quietly.

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 9>I've long thought that it would be beneficial to that

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 9>family that you've siftly turn up there and you've put

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 9>a building shine out in the front, as if that

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 9>family's doing some renovations, and you'd go in there and

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 9>quietly do the work you're playing close. Why would you

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 9>turn up there with all the fans there and crap?

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 9>So make a song and dance about it.

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>You really acknowledge that, but made that ship has sailed.

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Neighbors will just put on social media. Word'll get out

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and then about half an hour you'll have TV crews

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>there because they'll realize what's going on. It's just not

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>possible anymore to do this quietly. In view, I reckon, Yeah,

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just a show, all right, mate, I'll let you go.

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You're on a building site, yep. Yeah, make sure you

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>get the levels right of course.

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 9>Mate.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Before we reconstructed the five days of the two thousand

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and two Inquest with episodes that were faithful to the evidence,

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you heard a lot from John Winfield's nineteen ninety eight

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>record of interview with the then detective Sergeant Glenn Taylor.

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>That interview was held in the Ballaner police station, right

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>near the start of Glenn's reinvestigation of Bromwin's disappearance. You'll

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>recall that over multiple episodes, Glenn re enacted his questions

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>from the official transcript of that interview, and a voice

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>actor for John Winfield read the answers, which the real

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>John gave. Here's a reminder of the very start of

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that interview. It's from episode fourteen.

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 10>The interview has commenced at eight fifty two AM. For

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 10>the purpose of the tape record, Can everyone present state

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 10>their full name on Detective Sergeant Glenn William Taylor.

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Detective Senior Constable Wayne Tembe introduced himself, and John followed.

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 5>Suit Jonathan Winfield.

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 10>Mister Winfield. As I've already explained to you, Detective Temby

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 10>and I are making inquiries in relation to the disappearance

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 10>of your wife Broman Joey Winfield on or about the

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 10>sixteenth of May nineteen ninety three from Lennox Head. We're

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 10>going to ask you some further questions about this matter.

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 10>These questions and any answers that you care to give

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 10>to those questions will be recorded electronically, both on video

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 10>and audio cassette tapes as the interview takes place. Do

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 10>you understand that?

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now, some former and serving police and several lawyers

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>with experience in criminal defense work have been in touch

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>since the interview between John and Glenn Taylor featured heavily

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in the podcast. They wanted to raise something that is

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>troubling if true. They are concerned that the formal interview

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>which John did might not be admissible evidence in the

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>event of any prosecution. The reason for their concern revolves

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>around something known as a caution. A suspect needs to

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>be alerted to his or her rights, one of which

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 1>is the right to silence, the right to say nothing

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>at all. The record shows that Glenn did not caution John,

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>did not tell him that he had the right to

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>say nothing at all. As you'll hear later, that was

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a deliberate decision by Glenn. He had his reasons for

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>omitting the caution, and he explains those reasons. Ultimately, it

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>could be up to a judge to determine. Karina Burgers

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>spoke to Rachel Fisher, a lawyer experienced in criminal defense cases,

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>about the caution, why it is important, and what can

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>happen under certain circumstances if no caution is given.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 8>Can you explain what a caution is?

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 6>What does that mean?

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 11>So a caution is a legal requirement that is to

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 11>be given to an individual who is in police custody

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 11>being interviewed. It is a phrase of wording that essentially

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 11>is critical and very important to make sure the person

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 11>being interviewed understands that they essentially don't have to participate

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:38.719
<v Speaker 11>in the process, and they don't have to answer any questions,

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 11>and if they choose to do that, or if they

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 11>choose to participate in the interview, that anything that they

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 11>say can and usually is used in any proceedings against them.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 6>In what circumstances should a person be given a caution?

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 6>If they're being interviewed by police, in every circumstance they

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 6>should be cautioned.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Rachel works with Street and Lawyers in Sydney. In twenty

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, she was recognized by members of the profession

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>as a criminal law rising star in what's called the

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Doyle's Guide.

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 8>As a defense solicitor, Rachel, would you make an application

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 8>to exclude an interview in which a caution wasn't given

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 8>to a person? Would you do that? As a matter

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 8>of course.

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.479
<v Speaker 11>It would really come down to whether or not I

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 11>was at the view that the interview or anything that

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 11>was contained within the interview was essentially problematic or against

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 11>my client's interests. If my client is sitting down with

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 11>police and making what we refer to as admissions, which

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 11>is statements that go against their interest, then absolutely it

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 11>would be the first thing that I do. My first

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 11>question is did you participate in an interview? And if

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 11>they say yes, well, one of the first things that

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 11>I check in the transcript or the recording of that

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 11>interview is whether or not they were given a caution,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 11>because if they weren't given a caution, it is very

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 11>standard for me to make an application to exclude it. Obviously,

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 11>I'll make the strategic call to not make the application

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 11>if the interview is from my perspective, something that assists

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 11>them or makes them look better, or provides explanations for

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 11>things that I think are helpful or in their interests.

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 11>But that is quite rare.

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 6>And if someone isn't a suspect at the time of

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 6>their interview, let's say they're being treated as a witness, would.

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 8>You expect that person to be cautioned.

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 11>They don't have to be cautioned necessarily in the same

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 11>way that someone who is a protected suspect or someone

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 11>who's been arrested is. But I think it's quite important

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 11>for police to tell people that they don't have an

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 11>obligation to speak to them.

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 8>But that's as high as it's taken.

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 11>They don't have to caution them in the way because

0:28:55.920 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 11>they're not necessarily talking to police whilst being expected of

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 11>committing a crime, so they don't necessarily have the right

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 11>to silence. But they are not in the same position

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 11>as someone who's been charged or is being suspected of

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 11>committing an offense.

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 6>And hypothetically, if you were acting for someone who's interviewed

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 6>in the capacity of a witness, So they're not a

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 6>suspect at that stage, but they later go on to

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 6>become a suspect in say a murder investigation, and they

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 6>hadn't been cautioned in their initial witness interview. What do

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 6>you think you might do in that situation as a

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 6>defense solicitor for them, Well, I would absolutely look at

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 6>putting on an application to exclude it. And one of

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 6>the basis upon which to do that is to try

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 6>to ascertain and understand whether or not the police actually

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 6>did have a reasonable suspicion or a suspicion that they

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 6>were involved in some way. Police can often speak to

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 6>people and say, I just want to hear your side

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 6>of the story. I don't necessarily think that you've done

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 6>anything wrong, and treat them like a witness, speak to

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 6>them as if they are a witness and haven't given

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 6>them their rights, whereas the police state of mind and

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 6>the reason that they're doing certain things is critical. So

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 6>if there is anything that I would discover, usually through

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 6>a subpoena of police notebooks, police indices, that would indicate

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 6>that there might be some reason that the police have

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 6>a suspicion about this individual and they haven't treated them

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 6>like they are a suspect and they haven't given them

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 6>their rights, but there could be something in the back

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 6>of their mind that might be raising that suspicion. I

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 6>would absolutely be putting on an application to exclude it

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 6>on the basis that the police have improperly obtained an interview.

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.719
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't necessarily mean if they're not cautioned that anything

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 6>that they say is automatically excluded.

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 11>There's no guarantee because that application is balancing test. The

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 11>law says that sometimes the desirability of admitting evidence that

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 11>is improperly or unlawfully obtained outwighs the undesirability of losing

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 11>evidence that's what we refer to is really probative or

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 11>really strong. So it's a balancing exercise by the court.

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 8>And why is.

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 6>A police caution during an interview so important.

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 11>That requirement is underpinned by a fundamental principle in our

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 11>criminal law system, which is the right to silence. People

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 11>need to understand that if they are being investigated or

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 11>suspected of committing a crime, that they have a right

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 11>to silence. They don't have to answer police questions, and

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 11>they don't have to essentially assist the authorities who are

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 11>looking to investigate whether or not they have committed an offense.

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 11>The caution is essentially the practical way in which those

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 11>rights are secured.

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, every case is different with unique circumstances. At

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the time of the interview in Ballana Police Station, Glenn

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Taylor was an experienced detective. He had investigated and helped

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>solve murders while working for the homicide squad in the

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>city of Newcastle, north of Sydney. As you'll hear, Glenn

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>still believes that it was appropriate for him to not

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>caution John because of the interview occurring at a very

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>early stage of Glenn's investigation. However, he acknowledges that a

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>criminal defense lawyer would possibly try to bring a challenge

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>about it and seek to knock all the evidence from

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>John's interview out of a possible future prosecution.

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 12>Joel winf was the very first person that was the

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 12>interview just to commit aversion from him, And that's why

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 12>I did an issue a cause. If you've got a suspect,

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 12>you may have enough evidence to charge a person early

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.719
<v Speaker 12>in the interview, you would administer a formal call that

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 12>they don't have to say anything unless they wished to,

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 12>as anything they say may later be given in evidence.

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 12>So we didn't use that caution because at that point

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 12>in time we simply didn't have any formal statements taken

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 12>and we had very little information other than what was

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 12>in the running sheets of Detective Sergeant Diskin. There's a

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 12>little bit of a fine line administering a caution that

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 12>this stage we were not at that level. I mean,

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 12>we didn't have not one statement from the previous investigation

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 12>with all we had was running sheets from Diskin to

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 12>say they'd spoken to him and they've spoken to the

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:47.719
<v Speaker 12>neighbor and she hadn't touched the bank accounts. But we

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 12>didn't have anything concrete or been written for that would

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 12>want him getting a caution. So that's why the commencement

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 12>of the interview I still wanted him to be legally

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 12>bound to say what he's going to say, to the

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 12>best of his knowledge is the truth.

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Glenn is talking here about what he read to John

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>at the start of the interview. Here's another reminder from

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 1>episode fourteen.

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 10>I'm just going to read this onto the record here

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 10>and if you understand it, I'll just get you to

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 10>acknowledge that the statement made by you accurately sets out

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.840
<v Speaker 10>the evidence which you will be prepared, if necessary, to

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 10>give in court as a witness. The statement is true

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 10>to the best of your knowledge and belief, and you

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 10>make it knowing that if it is tended in evidence,

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 10>you shall be liable to prosecution if you are rawfully

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 10>stated in it anything which you know to be false

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 10>or do not believe to be true to you give

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 10>an undertaking to tell the truth in his interview.

0:34:55.320 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, yeah, so that paradought read out to him is

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 12>like a declaration by any witness. When you interviewed in

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 12>New South Wales and when you take a statement from somebody,

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 12>you're saying that what you're going to say in the

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 12>statement is the truth, and you know you could be

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 12>prosecuted if you're telling deliberate laws. But in a legal sense,

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 12>you have not made up your mind at that point

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 12>that they're sufficient to.

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Charge without a caution. Is that record of your interview

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>with him admissible in a murder prosecution?

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 12>Hypothetically, Well, that would be opened to a court a

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 12>judge to decide that at the time that was taken

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 12>in good faith. I believe it would be admissible because

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 12>as an investigator, we had not made up our mind

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 12>that there was sufficient evidence at that point, because we

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 12>vientually hadn't interviewed anyone. And then, when a detective trained,

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 12>you should only administer a caution when you believe there's

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 12>sufficient evidence that crime's been committed and you have sufficient

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 12>evidence to wright this person being charged. When we interviewed him,

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 12>he was like everyone else we're interviewing early an investigation.

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:23.240
<v Speaker 12>He was a witness. There's something myself and Wayne Tenby

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 12>would have considered before we even brought him into the

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 12>police station. Okay, what do we know to this point?

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 12>There was certainly a lot of things we didn't know.

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 12>It's sometimes good to get someone committed to a version

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 12>early in the peace, before we've interviewed all the other witnesses,

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 12>and after you've got a person committed to a version

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 12>you can come back to them later. But by the

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 12>time we finished the investigation, it was clearly of the

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 12>view that he's either got to charge with murder now

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 12>and that was considered, or let's test all the evidence

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 12>before a coroner and then put a submission to the

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 12>coroner that the coroner referred to the DPP, which we

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 12>thought would be the more appropriate way to go about it.

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.240
<v Speaker 12>We could have invited him back for a second interview,

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 12>but we strongly believe by that time that he would

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 12>have had legal representation and said no, I'm not willing

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 12>to be interviewed, not willing to answer any further questions.

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 12>Because we would have then had to give him a caution.

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 12>He would know then that he's no longer just being

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 12>able to be treated as a weakness. He's going to

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 12>be treated as a suspect. There's no set thing in

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:44.720
<v Speaker 12>police rules and instructions as to who should interview first.

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 12>There's benefits probably both ways. If we had gone the

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 12>other way around and interviewed everyone else and then invited

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 12>him in for an interview, I feel pretty confident that

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 12>he would have been legally represented or advised was solicitor

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 12>not to answer any questions we would get no version

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 12>from him whatsoever. That's my belief. You were to closed

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 12>up shop and said no, I'm not going to answer

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 12>anything because you clearly think I've murdered Bromlin. I believe

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 12>myself personally it could be it should be still admissible,

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 12>because we had not come to any reasonable belief that

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 12>we're going to charge him. Even at that point or

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 12>even later, we needed to gather evidence. We certainly had

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 12>some suspicion because there was red flags flying everywhere that

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 12>this is more than just a missing person.

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Retired New South Wales homicide detective Stuart Wilkins played a

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>key role in the investigation of the serial killer Ivan Malatt.

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>But I spoke to Stuart in December twenty seventeen about

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the Chris Dawson matter because in January nineteen ninety one,

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Stuart Wilkins was a relatively junior detective and he went

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Gold Coast with the season Detective Sergeant Paul

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Mager to conduct a formal recorded interview with Chris Dawson

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:34.439
<v Speaker 1>over his wife Lynn's disappearance eight years earlier. Stuart went

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>on to help solve many murders in the homicide squad

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in New South Wales. Here's what he told me shortly

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>before Christmas twenty seventeen, as we sat at the kitchen

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>table in his home and he recounted that nineteen ninety

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>one interview with Chris Dawson.

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 13>And you'll see during the interview he was cautioned did

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:57.280
<v Speaker 13>he need not answer any further questions and the rules

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 13>of evidence are quite clear our minds we had potentially

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 13>enough evidence to heading down a criminal path.

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:08.720
<v Speaker 1>The caution was given at around the half way mark

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of the police interview. The then detective Sergeant Paul Magar.

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.760
<v Speaker 14>Says, Chris, I'm going to ask you questions, a series

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 14>of questions now, but before I do, I want you

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 14>to understand that you're not obliged to answer these questions

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 14>unless you wish to do so, because anything you do

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 14>say will be recorded and may later be used in

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 14>evidence at court. I'm not saying that it will be,

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 14>but it may be. Do you understand that.

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So, anything that he said after that time was

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 13>given to us after a caution was given to him,

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 13>and the caution years, of course, that anything you say

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 13>will be used or will or can be used an

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:46.479
<v Speaker 13>interview for court.

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 15>Lord.

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>The video recording and transcript from that interview which Chris

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Dawson did in nineteen ninety one with detectives Stuart Wilkins

0:40:56.560 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and Paul Magar, were admissible in Dawson's Murder Trap in

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, and those documents were important parts of

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution's evidence all those years later.

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 13>The law expects us as investigators to ensure that if

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 13>we think we've got enough evidence to at least put

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.240
<v Speaker 13>a charge or put someone before a court in any format,

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 13>that we should caution them before we actually speak to them.

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 13>And I've been in a number of homicide investigations where

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 13>unfortunately that caution wasn't delivered prior to police asking questions

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 13>of suspects, and the actual information and the answers to

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.720
<v Speaker 13>those questions have been precluded from being accepted the court

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:38.800
<v Speaker 13>because of the very rules of evidence.

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 1>It is very difficult and it gets frustrated.

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 13>I remember another case where there was the execution murder

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:48.399
<v Speaker 13>of an X and his partners actually had taken out

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 13>a contract and actually killed at Porchat. We interviewed the

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 13>suspect and whilst he wasn't a suspect at the time,

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.280
<v Speaker 13>the law and the legal process was that we should

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 13>afford that he was a suspect no matter what information

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 13>we had of so we lengthy in detailed interview of

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 13>him that unfortunately got precluded to evidence.

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I told Andy Reid and his wife Michelle of the

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>potential complications with the nineteen ninety eighth interview of John

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Winfield at Ballana Police Station. It's giving them that notification

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>up front, the caution words like the words that you

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have to use you have the right to ride silent

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:33.399
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that what is said in that interview can

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:37.839
<v Speaker 1>be admissible. Otherwise defense lawyers will say, well, can't use it.

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I asked a former police officer with legal qualifications.

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 12>To read the record of interview.

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It is possible that despite there being what we believe

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is evidence of deceptive answers and lies in the interview,

0:42:57.440 --> 0:43:00.839
<v Speaker 1>they may not actually be admissible at all in the

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>event of any case. Maybe that was part of the

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>consideration of the original DPP.

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 16>Well, we didn't actually get a specific reason. We only

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 16>just got a very generalized reason that they weren't going

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 16>for it. You might be quite aware that anything he

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 16>said in that interview is not going to be able

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 16>to be used anyway. This might be the reason he

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 16>says things like the little or blow over. That's a

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 16>bit of a bummer.

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 13>It's just my knowing.

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a double edged sword, isn't it. Yeah, it's just ridiculous.

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Andy and Michelle have given me a copy of a

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>letter they received from Glenn Taylor in two thousand and three,

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:51.879
<v Speaker 1>one year after the inquest. At that time, Glenn had

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>recently retired as Ballina's Detective Sergeant of Police. Glenn has

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>not been able to let Bromin's case go. He is

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 1>still offering help and advice, even where it throws a

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>poor light on police and on the badge that he

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:12.439
<v Speaker 1>wore with pride. Glenn has been challenged in Ballina by

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>serving police who are unhappy that he has spoken his

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 1>mind in the podcast, but he has also been congratulated

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>by retired and serving police who hope that it will

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 1>make a difference. Glen agreed to read some of his

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three letter. It was sent soon after

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:34.280
<v Speaker 1>he had visited his old workplace at Ballena Police Station.

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 1>He went there about giving evidence in court for another case,

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:42.240
<v Speaker 1>but what he saw prompted him to write to Andy

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and Michelle.

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 12>To my disappointment, I found that all of my old investigations,

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:53.319
<v Speaker 12>including Broman's disappearance, have been thrown into a storage room

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:58.320
<v Speaker 12>with other old court briefs. I found four boxes relating

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 12>to Broman's disappearance scattered all over the room. I've now

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 12>put them all into one area of the storage room

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 12>to try to keep them together, but I am not

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 12>sure what will happen now that I'm no longer there.

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:16.839
<v Speaker 12>Another detective should have been assigned the investigation in case

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 12>further information comes to hand, and to keep the police

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 12>brief intact, but it is obvious that this hasn't happened.

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 12>I have obtained some documents out of the four boxes,

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 12>and I have enclosed a copy here for you. It

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 12>beggars belief that criminal investigation files for unsolved cases as

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 12>serious as alleged murder was thrown in police stations with

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 12>such a cavalier disregard for victims of crime and their

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 12>loved ones.

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Taylor quit shortly after the two thousand and two

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 1>inquests run by Karl Milavanovitch, as he disclosed to Andy

0:45:57.920 --> 0:45:59.399
<v Speaker 1>and Michelle read in his.

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 12>Letter, Unfortunately I couldn't continue in the near Southwelles Police

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:07.800
<v Speaker 12>after twenty seven years aden of them. As a detective,

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:12.840
<v Speaker 12>I was just mentally burnt out. I will leave in

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 12>hope for you that one day justice will be done

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 12>and John Winfield will be brought to account. Hopefully Bromlin's

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 12>remains will one day be found.

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:30.279
<v Speaker 1>The preservation of evidence from unsolved homicide should be one

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the most important priorities for every police force, but

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 1>there have been some lamentable failures. In Romlin's case, documents disappeared,

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and it also happened in the case of Lynn Dawson

0:46:44.440 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>now known as Lynn Simms. In late twenty seventeen, during

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:52.839
<v Speaker 1>interviews with Lynn's brother Greg Simms and his wife Marilyn,

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they disclosed the loss of important evidence in the original

0:46:57.040 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>homicide investigation we were.

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 17>Interview Dug I would say about nineteen eighty eight, eighty

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 17>nine here and.

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Then the Regial Chrome Squad was disbanded and all their

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 1>paperwork and everything went to different areas. A year or

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 1>two after that.

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 7>Our original statements we had taken were lost.

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:20.280
<v Speaker 12>They went to Missing Persons and got lost from there.

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 17>And we didn't have copies of those.

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:24.359
<v Speaker 15>It's been a miss.

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 6>The whole thing's been at real miss.

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Five years after I spoke to Greg and Maryland. A

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>retired homicide squad detective gave evidence at Chris Dawson's murder

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 1>trial in the New South Wales Supreme Court about the

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:40.720
<v Speaker 1>loss of evidence at an early stage in the case.

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It got little attention at the time. These are the

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 1>retired detective's words. It's not his voice.

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 18>When we relocated from the Chatswit office into the centralized

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 18>system over in Surrey Hills, all our records, all our briefs,

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 18>everything was boxed up and taken into storage. And I

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:02.240
<v Speaker 18>had later visited warehouse to try to find something else,

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 18>and what I found was quite a disaster. There were

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 18>boxes of records stacked four and five high cardboard boxes

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 18>from all of the crime squads and they'd been there

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:15.479
<v Speaker 18>on this concrete floor for so many months. The weight

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 18>at the top had started to collapse the bottom boxes

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 18>and the damp had come through the concrete. It was

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 18>just a mess. Really, trying to find stuff was almost impossible.

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Taylor's experience and the disclosures like those you just

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 1>heard from a retired detective who was giving testimony under

0:48:33.120 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>oath begs a couple of questions, how many cases of

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 1>vital importance to hundreds of people will be forever unsolved

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>because the evidence has been lost or destroyed due to

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:50.280
<v Speaker 1>thoughtless or incompetent handling. Do the families of the victims

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:55.240
<v Speaker 1>even know that the historical records are gone. The loss

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>or destruction of evidence from unsolved cold cases is more

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>often than not swept under the carpet. Fortunately, the problem

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 1>has been formally recognized.

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 19>An eight eighth month inquiry into the police investigations of

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 19>unsolved gay hate deaths revealed police files were missing or lost.

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:22.759
<v Speaker 19>Some exhibits, including the murder weapon in a number of cases,

0:49:23.040 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 19>had been lost as well.

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty two and twenty twenty three in New

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:35.800
<v Speaker 1>South Wales, a special Commission of Inquiry investigated unsolved LGBTIQ

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>murders and assaults and the unresponsiveness of police in many

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of these cases. The inquiry was led by the then

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court Justice John Sacer, he has since retired. In

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:53.880
<v Speaker 1>his final report, Justice Sacca called out.

0:49:54.000 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 20>The historical legacy of poor record and exhibit management practices

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:03.280
<v Speaker 20>concerning unsolved homicides, and he wrote in some cases entire

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 20>sections of investigative files appeared to be missing, with limited

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:09.840
<v Speaker 20>evidence from which to discern whether records had been lost

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:14.320
<v Speaker 20>or never made. Significant exhibits had often been lost or destroyed.

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 20>It became apparent that there were long standing problems with

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 20>exhibit and documentary record management within the New South Wales

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 20>Police Force.

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Justice Sakker questioned Detective Chief Inspector David Laidlaw of the

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Unsold Homicide Unit during the inquiry. We have relied on

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a voice actor to read out the now retired Judge Sackers' findings,

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 1>but we do have the actual audio from the exchange

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 1>with Inspector laid Law during the inquiry.

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 21>Has it ever occurred to anyone in the New South

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 21>Wales Police Force at a specially funded project be in

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:54.799
<v Speaker 21>urgently to take place, by way of audit of all

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:58.920
<v Speaker 21>unsolved matters to find out where the records are such

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 21>that do exist, whether exhibits are sitting in boxes somewhere untested,

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 21>which may be. These are all people's lives and people's.

0:51:07.840 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 22>Families are so I appreciate that and as anyone, as

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 22>far as you know, ever put to the Commissioner, a

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 22>current one or any chronic commissioner, some specially funded project

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:20.840
<v Speaker 22>is urgently needed to get a grip on all of

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:22.880
<v Speaker 22>these unsold cases on aware.

0:51:24.000 --> 0:51:28.880
<v Speaker 1>The inquiri's report, including recommendations, was delivered in December twenty

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:31.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and it ran to almost three and a

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:36.879
<v Speaker 1>half thousand pages. Recommendation ten was that the New South

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Wales Police.

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 20>Force conduct a systematic review or audit of all unsolved

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 20>homicides pertaining to the period nineteen seventy to twenty ten,

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 20>including an audit of what exhibits have been retained in

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 20>relation to each death and their current location.

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:56.480
<v Speaker 1>This is very significant because it recommends a review of

0:51:56.760 --> 0:52:01.879
<v Speaker 1>all unsold homicides and is not limited to unsolved suspected

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:07.280
<v Speaker 1>hate crime deaths. The Police Commissioner Karen Webb said sorry

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to victims and families who had been failed by New

0:52:10.400 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 1>South Wales Police, including for.

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 6>The gaps in those investigative processes where records and exhibits

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:19.480
<v Speaker 6>were lost or not examined with enough rigor.

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Our research suggests there may be more than two hundred

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:28.799
<v Speaker 1>unsolved homicides requiring auditing, and that twenty five detectives have

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>been assigned to help. Michelle and Andy have forged what

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>they believe will be long and deep connections with people

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:40.880
<v Speaker 1>who have come forward in the podcast to help and

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 1>give them moral support, but this series is still coming

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:48.800
<v Speaker 1>at a heavy personal cost. Their connection to their niece,

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Bromman's eldest daughter, Crystal, who is siding with Lauren and

0:52:53.360 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>John and Jody, was frayed before we took the break.

0:52:57.000 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>At the end of episode thirty two, connection appears to

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:05.719
<v Speaker 1>be severed, at least for now. Can you just paraphrase

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 1>what Crystal told you, Andy?

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:10.920
<v Speaker 9>She said, Look, I can't be in contact at the

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 9>moment because I don't agree with your version of events,

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 9>and I need to be there for my family, meaning

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:23.839
<v Speaker 9>she needs to be there for the Lena's Head side

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:26.760
<v Speaker 9>of the family more than the Sydney side of the family,

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:30.399
<v Speaker 9>which I thought was pretty confronting. Now obviously feeling rather

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:31.239
<v Speaker 9>that way, mate.

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:38.280
<v Speaker 1>So she's rejecting the arguments and the facts and narrative

0:53:38.360 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast series.

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 9>She refers to them as a version, when all we're

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:47.799
<v Speaker 9>doing is following the facts and the statements and the

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:52.359
<v Speaker 9>information that's on public records. So I'm not sure why

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:56.080
<v Speaker 9>you refer to it as a version, because this isn't fiction,

0:53:56.239 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 9>you know what I mean. We're not making this stuff up.

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:02.799
<v Speaker 9>But I firmly believe that's because of the pressure that's

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 9>put on her and the parrot that's sort of always forever.

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:10.759
<v Speaker 9>They're being dangled about having a relationship, but it's not

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 9>really a true relationship.

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Crystal's in her early forties and you've known her since

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:23.600
<v Speaker 1>well since she was a baby, yep. At times as

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:28.200
<v Speaker 1>an adult, have you observed her having a very different

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:33.560
<v Speaker 1>perspective and view about her stepfather John and his alleged conduct.

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:38.280
<v Speaker 9>Yes, well, look at her statement and her evidence given.

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:42.319
<v Speaker 9>There's some fairly damning sort of evidence there and in

0:54:42.360 --> 0:54:43.319
<v Speaker 9>her testimonial.

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 1>But is it the case that when you telephone her

0:54:46.440 --> 0:54:47.680
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't pick up the phone.

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:49.640
<v Speaker 10>No, she doesn't want at all.

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:54.479
<v Speaker 9>She's even taken Mel off Facebook. He's taken Mel off

0:54:54.520 --> 0:54:57.200
<v Speaker 9>Socialism isn't in touch with Mel anymore.

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Mel's mum, deb told me that yesterday. Melanie Taylor has

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:06.200
<v Speaker 1>shared memories and observations of Bromwyn and John from the

0:55:06.280 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties when Mel and Crystal were close friends and

0:55:11.360 --> 0:55:15.759
<v Speaker 1>childhood neighbors in Sandstone Crescent. Mel saw Bromwin and her

0:55:15.800 --> 0:55:19.640
<v Speaker 1>girls leave the house as part of Bromwin's termination of

0:55:19.680 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the marriage with John. Mel was there when Crystal, Lauren,

0:55:24.360 --> 0:55:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and Bromwin returned to the house while John was living

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 1>away and working in the shire in May nineteen ninety.

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:35.480
<v Speaker 15>Three to got back to that home to give the

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 15>kids a house rather than will be unit and be

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:43.279
<v Speaker 15>the mum And for all I know is that's what she.

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Ever wanted, And over the years it's been suggested that

0:55:47.880 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Bromwin just went off to, as John said, start a

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:56.640
<v Speaker 1>new live. No way. Mel's candor has led to her

0:55:56.760 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>being attacked on social media by Bromwin's youngest daughter, Lauren.

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Lauren and Jody remain staunchly loyal to their father John.

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid believes that Crystal's recent cutting of her ties

0:56:10.400 --> 0:56:14.440
<v Speaker 1>with him and also with Mel on social media pleases

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the Winfields. Tell me how you feel about the side

0:56:19.160 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that she's picked.

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:23.640
<v Speaker 9>I can understand in a sense. So I can understand

0:56:23.680 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 9>because h's flutching extrawtion. She doesn't want to lose the

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 9>relationship with her sister. I think her relationship with Lauren

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:37.839
<v Speaker 9>is more important than anything else. That's what she clings to. Yeah,

0:56:37.840 --> 0:56:40.480
<v Speaker 9>it's disappointing, but anyway, I can't do any about it.

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 9>I can't do any about it. It's more important to

0:56:43.760 --> 0:56:47.280
<v Speaker 9>get justice for Bromlan than to worry about my feelings.

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 17>We don't know you from a bar of soap. You've

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:53.799
<v Speaker 17>never stepped foot in our household or our shoes, So

0:56:53.920 --> 0:56:56.280
<v Speaker 17>what right exactly do you have to make these claims

0:56:56.280 --> 0:56:57.359
<v Speaker 17>and assumptions on here?

0:56:58.560 --> 0:57:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Lauren has expressed heartfelt criticisms speaking art against her uncle

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid, as well as some of the listeners who

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:10.600
<v Speaker 1>are part of an ongoing conversation about what possibly happened

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:14.239
<v Speaker 1>to Bromwyn. We have always wanted Lauren to have her

0:57:14.320 --> 0:57:16.280
<v Speaker 1>say within respectful boundaries.

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:20.600
<v Speaker 17>Most educated people know that just because the media publishes something,

0:57:20.640 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 17>it doesn't deem it factual or truthful accusations, speculations, opinions, gossip, judgments,

0:57:28.000 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 17>condescending acts, bullying tactics, stalking, filthy staes, doxing, harassment, intimidating approaches,

0:57:36.000 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 17>threats to safety. Should I continue my list of what

0:57:39.520 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 17>people are doing to us daughters and our families.

0:57:42.800 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>There is always a standing invitation to her, Jody, Crystal,

0:57:46.920 --> 0:57:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and John to sit down for an interview in person

0:57:50.880 --> 0:57:55.320
<v Speaker 1>or over an online platform like zoom. Lauren has been

0:57:55.320 --> 0:57:58.480
<v Speaker 1>assured that she can say much more in an interview

0:57:58.520 --> 0:58:02.480
<v Speaker 1>than she could say on the Facebook discussion group page.

0:58:02.720 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Her father John has declined to be interviewed since day one.

0:58:07.360 --> 0:58:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to Bromwin's cousin Megan about this.

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:13.000
<v Speaker 2>From what I've heard from Crystal and I speak to

0:58:13.000 --> 0:58:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Crystal every day, Lauren has been going through a dreadful time.

0:58:17.520 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 2>But as I said, this had to come out eventually,

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and I wish I was close to her like I

0:58:23.120 --> 0:58:26.520
<v Speaker 2>am to Crystal. She looks so much like Bronwyn, a

0:58:26.600 --> 0:58:27.840
<v Speaker 2>burst in a cheese and Isiah.

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:29.800
<v Speaker 10>She walks like Bromwen.

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 2>She's got Bromwin's eyes, It's the Bromin's physique.

0:58:33.040 --> 0:58:35.560
<v Speaker 7>She's just so much like Bromwin. It's like a double ganger.

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:36.800
<v Speaker 6>It's like coming back.

0:58:38.280 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Crystal's antipathy about the podcast became apparent in some of

0:58:42.560 --> 0:58:46.720
<v Speaker 1>her social media writings months before this episode.

0:58:47.000 --> 0:58:52.600
<v Speaker 7>The podcast only ever shares part of statements, comments, fabrications

0:58:52.640 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 7>and stories that serve their agenda. I'm not turning a

0:58:57.680 --> 0:59:01.600
<v Speaker 7>blind eye to anything, However, there is always two sides

0:59:01.640 --> 0:59:05.720
<v Speaker 7>to every story. I'm sorry, but I'm just not convinced

0:59:05.760 --> 0:59:09.440
<v Speaker 7>in this story. Mum would have always put her children's

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:13.320
<v Speaker 7>happiness first, just like I would for my child. I

0:59:13.440 --> 0:59:15.000
<v Speaker 7>wish she were here, Mum.

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:17.960
<v Speaker 9>I feel for it terribly, you know that. I think

0:59:18.120 --> 0:59:24.080
<v Speaker 9>she's burnt shrung along a bit to help their cause anyway. Disappointing,

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:27.440
<v Speaker 9>but this is already our time and see if she

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 9>comes around.

0:59:42.080 --> 0:59:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Bronwyn is written and investigated by me Headley Thomas as

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a podcast production for The Australian. If anyone has information

0:59:51.160 --> 0:59:54.960
<v Speaker 1>which may help solve this cold case, please contact me

0:59:55.120 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>confidentially by emailing Bronwyn at the Australian dot au. You

1:00:02.320 --> 1:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>can read more about this case and see a range

1:00:05.520 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of photographs and other artwork at the website Bromwyn podcast

1:00:10.680 --> 1:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Our subscribers and registered users here episodes first.

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>The production and editorial team for bromwin includes Claire Harvey,

1:00:21.160 --> 1:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Kristin Amiot, Joshua Burton, Bridget, Ryan Bianca, far Marcus, Katie Burns,

1:00:27.400 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Liam Mendez, Sean Callen and Matthew Condon, Karina Verger and

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>David Murray, with assistance from Isaac Iron's. Audio production for

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this podcast series is by Wasabi Audeo and original theme

1:00:41.160 --> 1:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>music by Slade Gibson. We have been assisted by Madison Walsh,

1:00:45.760 --> 1:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a relation of Bromwyn Winfield. We can only do this

1:00:49.640 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of journalism with the support of our subscribers and

1:00:53.040 --> 1:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>our major sponsors like Harvey Norman. For all of our

1:00:56.960 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>exclusive stories, videos, maps, timeline and documents about this podcast

1:01:02.520 --> 1:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and other podcasts including The Teacher's Pet, The Teacher's Trial,

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>The Teacher's Accuser, Shandy's Story, Shandy's Legacy, and The Night Driver.

1:01:11.560 --> 1:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Go to the Australian dot com dot au and subscribe.