Speaker 1: This is the US Report.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the program. I'm Caroline Marcus
Speaker 2: coming up tonight. The longest government shut down finally comes
Speaker 2: to an end, But at what cost? The White House
Speaker 2: fires Backer calls for the Epstein files to be released.
Speaker 2: Plus Kamala Harris claims she outsmarted Trump in last year's election.
Speaker 1: Yes, she's still that deluded.
Speaker 2: That's all next, But first, the BBC has taken the
Speaker 2: extraordinary but correct step of apologizing to US President Donald
Speaker 2: Trump for doctoring his January sixth speech to make it
Speaker 2: look like he was directly inciting violence among his supporters.
Speaker 2: The corporation admitted the edit had given the mistaken impression
Speaker 2: that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action,
Speaker 2: and vowed not to show the program again. But the
Speaker 2: British broadcaster has rejected the President's demands for financial compensation,
Speaker 2: leaving it open still to the mother.
Speaker 1: Of all lawsuits.
Speaker 2: It said, while the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in
Speaker 2: which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there
Speaker 2: is a basis for a defamation claim. Trump had threatened
Speaker 2: to sue the BBC for one billion US dollars. That's
Speaker 2: one and a half Australian unless the corporation issued a retraction,
Speaker 2: apologized and compensated him. Here's what the BBC Panorama program
Speaker 2: showed and what Trump actually said.
Speaker 3: We're going to walk down to the capital and I'll
Speaker 3: be there.
Speaker 4: With you, and we fight.
Speaker 5: We fight like hell.
Speaker 1: We're going to walk down to the Capitol.
Speaker 4: And we're going to cheer on.
Speaker 6: Senators and congressmen and women.
Speaker 2: It truly is indefensible and it's little wonder that two
Speaker 2: BBC executives had no choice but to resign over that fiasco.
Speaker 2: The President is vowing to pursue damages in the eight
Speaker 2: figures unless the broadcaster fully retracts the false, defamatory, disparaging
Speaker 2: and inflammatory statements and and this is the kicker appropriately
Speaker 2: compensates the president. Now, the claim has been filed in
Speaker 2: a Florida court with the deadline of Saturday morning Australian time.
Speaker 2: Trump has claimed on social media the report interfered in
Speaker 2: the US election, having aired only a week before voting.
Speaker 2: But as my colleague Chris Kenny has exposed, the BBC
Speaker 2: is far from the only fake news channel to borrow
Speaker 2: a Trump ism when it comes to this subject. Our
Speaker 2: own public broadcaster, the ABC also misrepresented that January sixth speech.
Speaker 2: This is how the Four Corners program cut and paced
Speaker 2: Trump's words back in twenty twenty one, which had I'd
Speaker 2: argue the similar effect of implying he had directly inside
Speaker 2: of the riots.
Speaker 3: After this, We're going to walk down, and I'll be
Speaker 3: there with you, because you'll never take back our country
Speaker 3: with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have
Speaker 3: to be strong.
Speaker 2: Both public broadcasters, paid for with taxpayer dollars had selectively
Speaker 2: omitted the part of the speech where Trump had told
Speaker 2: the crowd to cheer on their brave senators and congressmen
Speaker 2: and women.
Speaker 1: But unlike the.
Speaker 2: BBC, which has at least taken some accountability with that
Speaker 2: apology and the exits of two senior staff, ABC managing
Speaker 2: director Hugh Marx has stood by his network's report, denying
Speaker 2: the program misrepresented Trump's comments, saying he was proud of
Speaker 2: its journalism. Former ABC journalist turned Liberal Senator Sarah Henderson
Speaker 2: called for a Senate inquiry into this and other examples
Speaker 2: of the ABC's impartial and inaccurate reporting.
Speaker 7: I remind everyone that the ABC has a statutory obligation
Speaker 7: to report news and information. Impartially and accurately. There have
Speaker 7: been too many times when it has breached that obligation,
Speaker 7: and I think it's got so serious, Chris, that we
Speaker 7: need a Senate inquiry into these really serious incidents.
Speaker 2: But the left media were added again later this week,
Speaker 2: again exposed for misrepresenting Trump, this time in relation to
Speaker 2: pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. At White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt
Speaker 2: blasted them for so faithfully lapping up what she called
Speaker 2: the Epstein hoax. Now this all relates to a tranche
Speaker 2: of emails selectively released bi Democrats in recent days. It
Speaker 2: purporting to show Trump spent hours with an underage Epstein victim.
Speaker 2: The email from Epstein to accomplish Gislaine Maxwell mentions Trump
Speaker 2: by name, but the Democrats redacted the name of the
Speaker 2: victim when it released the documents. The email reads, I
Speaker 2: want you to realize that the dog that hasn't barked
Speaker 2: is Trump. Victims spent hours at my house with him.
Speaker 2: He has never once been mentioned. Now you can imagine
Speaker 2: how some of those journalists must have been salivating over
Speaker 2: the idea of such incriminating dirt on Trump. But the
Speaker 2: redacted name was vitally important. Because the victim being referred
Speaker 2: to here was Virginia Jeffree, the Australian Epstein accuser who
Speaker 2: committed suicide this year. Now why that's important is that
Speaker 2: Jeffree repeatedly has said Trump was not involved in any
Speaker 2: wrongdoing and in fact, he couldn't have been.
Speaker 1: I said to her.
Speaker 8: In this email you refer to with the name of
Speaker 8: a victim that was unredacted now and has since been
Speaker 8: reported on in this room. So I will go ahead
Speaker 8: and say it Virginia Guffrey. And it was CBS's own
Speaker 8: reporting WIJA that recently wrote that missus Guffrey maintained and
Speaker 8: God rest her soul, that she maintained that there was
Speaker 8: nothing inappropriate. She ever witnessed that President Trump was always
Speaker 8: extremely professional and friendly to her. And so I think
Speaker 8: it's a question worth asking the Democrat Party, and you
Speaker 8: should all go ask them after this briefing of why
Speaker 8: they chose to redact that name.
Speaker 2: Levitt even reminded lists how Trump had actually kicked Epstein
Speaker 2: out from his Mara Laga resort for being well a creep,
Speaker 2: including to Jeffree, who Trump had given a job there.
Speaker 2: But just like the Russia hoax, the temptation to smeared
Speaker 2: Trump as some Epstein style child sex offender proved all
Speaker 2: too irresistible for much of mainstream media, and aimfully Australia's
Speaker 2: own ABC was again among the culprits. It's America's editor
Speaker 2: John Lyons failing to disclose the victim here was Jeffree,
Speaker 2: even though that had already been made public by the
Speaker 2: time he filed his report.
Speaker 9: He mentions the name of a particular victim and says
Speaker 9: that she spent hours at my house with him with
Speaker 9: Donald Trump. Now that's quite dramatic.
Speaker 2: Yes, this is the same reporter who prompted a royal
Speaker 2: bollocking from Trump when he recently suggested the.
Speaker 1: President was involved in financial corruption.
Speaker 9: That a president in offers should be engaged in so
Speaker 9: much fitter's activity.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm really not.
Speaker 3: My kids are running the business.
Speaker 1: Where are you from.
Speaker 4: I'm from the Australian Broadcasting.
Speaker 3: Rape and fullthorn and provoke the Australia's You're hurting Australia.
Speaker 3: In my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much.
Speaker 2: Thanks right now, never mind a Senate inquiry, the ABC
Speaker 2: should be watching this potential billion dollar BBC lawsuit.
Speaker 1: Very carefully.
Speaker 2: Joining me now is The New York Post's editor at large,
Speaker 2: Kelly Jane Torrence.
Speaker 1: Kelly, thanks so much for joining me.
Speaker 2: The US House of Representatives has finally passed a vote
Speaker 2: to end the longest government shut down in America's history.
Speaker 1: Now, this vote allows.
Speaker 2: A short term bill to reopen the government after a
Speaker 2: record forty three days.
Speaker 1: Take a look as the.
Speaker 2: President blasted the Democrats as he signed off on the bill.
Speaker 3: They deprived more than one million government workers from their
Speaker 3: paychecks and cut off foodstamp benefits for millions and millions
Speaker 3: more Americans in need. They caused tens of thousands of
Speaker 3: federal contractors and small businesses to go unpaid, and the
Speaker 3: total effect of the damage her antics cause will take
Speaker 3: weeks and probably months to really calculate accurately. I just
Speaker 3: want to tell the American people you should not forget
Speaker 3: this when we come up to midterms and other things.
Speaker 3: Don't forget what they've done to our country.
Speaker 1: Kelly. It's finally over.
Speaker 10: But what happens now, Well a great question, Caroline, and
Speaker 10: everybody here seems to be saying our long national nightmare
Speaker 10: is over. But I think your average American it wasn't
Speaker 10: as obsessed with this drama as everybody in New York,
Speaker 10: where I am, of course in Washington, d C. Where
Speaker 10: it is going to take some time to get back
Speaker 10: to normal, the pre shutdown normal obviously with the flights
Speaker 10: being canceled, delayed, that sort of thing that has a
Speaker 10: domino effect, And so it's still going to be days
Speaker 10: more of delays. And of course Thanksgiving coming up towards
Speaker 10: the end of the month here in America, so they
Speaker 10: should have it wrinkled out by then, but certainly the
Speaker 10: next few days are still going to be a bit crazy.
Speaker 1: And then of.
Speaker 10: Course, you know, getting the food stamp money to the beneficiaries,
Speaker 10: paying the government workers and stuff all takes time. But politically,
Speaker 10: where we go next is the question. The Democrats, you know,
Speaker 10: really were trying to play chicken and utterly failed. They
Speaker 10: did this, They shut down the government, creating a certain
Speaker 10: amount of chaos just because they were upset at the
Speaker 10: ending of Obamacare subsidies that were actually put into place
Speaker 10: temporarily during COVID supposed to be temporarily, but that never
Speaker 10: happens when you expand a government program, does it. And
Speaker 10: also talking about giving up subsidies to people here, you know,
Speaker 10: from other countries, possibly legally. So the Dems really have
Speaker 10: egg on their face. They didn't get anything out of
Speaker 10: this except headlines.
Speaker 2: Well, the Democrats on the Republicans, they've both been at
Speaker 2: loggerheads for weeks over who was to blame. It seems
Speaker 2: to me like it's pretty clear, like point out, the
Speaker 2: Democrats were the ones that dragged this out for some
Speaker 2: unpernownes to us, at at least it's not obvious political reason.
Speaker 2: And it does seem like it was the Republicans who
Speaker 2: finally got the job done and ended all of this.
Speaker 2: How did they manage to do that?
Speaker 10: Well, Timing was part of it, Caroline, and that's when
Speaker 10: the Democrats were finally willing to give in, And that
Speaker 10: was after the elections last Tuesday. We had a bunch
Speaker 10: of elections, not obviously not presidential, but there were some
Speaker 10: seats up for grabs, some governorship up for grabs, and
Speaker 10: of course the Democrats wanted to use this shutdown in
Speaker 10: the hopes that it would help them, and it actually did,
Speaker 10: but that made me a very short term gain. And
Speaker 10: we don't know if how much the shutdown really had
Speaker 10: to do with their wins given that you know, in
Speaker 10: some cases the Republicans didn't have the greatest candidates in
Speaker 10: some races. Others it was going to be an uphill
Speaker 10: battle for Republicans to win anyway. So it's it's unclear
Speaker 10: really how much that had an effect. But that's after
Speaker 10: the elections. The Democrats were a little more willing to
Speaker 10: give in and once you saw this travel chaos getting
Speaker 10: worse and worse, and if it was going to bother Thanksgiving,
Speaker 10: you know, American Thanksgiving the biggest travel days of the year.
Speaker 11: Here.
Speaker 10: I think more people I know go to visit their
Speaker 10: family for Thanksgiving than even do on Christmas. And so
Speaker 10: they certainly didn't want that chaos ruining the holidays for
Speaker 10: millions of Americans.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that wouldn't have been much goodwill for the Democrats
Speaker 2: if they had led that impact the holidays. Kelly, it
Speaker 2: seems like there's growing pressure nowt for Chuck Sherman to
Speaker 2: step down and Senate Minority lead.
Speaker 1: Do you think that could happen?
Speaker 2: And can you explain why he is facing that kind
Speaker 2: of pressure.
Speaker 10: Well, it's funny, Caroline, because he's you know, anger a
Speaker 10: lot of different Democrats. He's angered some on the more
Speaker 10: left blank that wanted him to stay strong and keep
Speaker 10: going with the shutdown, and then he has angered the
Speaker 10: more moderates who said, this shutdown is not good for Americans,
Speaker 10: It's not good for my constituents, everyone's constituents. Why was
Speaker 10: he playing these games? You're Senator John Fetterman, who's you know,
Speaker 10: really the holds a mantle of the moderate Democrats now
Speaker 10: saying that there was no point at all to the shutdown.
Speaker 10: And then you have people like aoc of course and
Speaker 10: other members of the squad who really wanted the shutdown
Speaker 10: to just go on and on until who knows what,
Speaker 10: because Republicans were not giving in on this one, and
Speaker 10: they had no reason to. Really. The things that the
Speaker 10: Democrats were fighting for were not even the things that
Speaker 10: most Americans would have wanted them to fight for, and
Speaker 10: it was just hurting, you know, those who really did
Speaker 10: need the government open, like those on food stamps.
Speaker 2: Well, if Chuck Shaima doesn't last as seneatem and already
Speaker 2: is there a suitable replacement within the party, who do
Speaker 2: you think could it could be?
Speaker 10: There's going to be a lot of action there, and
Speaker 10: it's really going to show that there's huge divisions in
Speaker 10: the party. You know, you've got the AOC types, Bernie Sanders,
Speaker 10: who's not a Democratic, caucuses with them. Of course, you've
Speaker 10: got the squad Jasmine Crockett, who's doesn't hasn't you know,
Speaker 10: there's no TV that she can't find, TV camera, she
Speaker 10: can't find on Capitol Hell, she's been trying to get
Speaker 10: her name out everywhere. Those are the more people on
Speaker 10: the left now to me. You know, John Fetterman would
Speaker 10: would certainly be someone who can work much better with Republicans,
Speaker 10: and Chuck Schumer had and than any of those would.
Speaker 10: But mostly, you know, the lot of the party just
Speaker 10: thinks he's too moderate for the party. And so it's
Speaker 10: going to be quite an interesting thing to watch. And
Speaker 10: that's why I say don't count out Chuck Schumer just yet.
Speaker 10: You know, it's very possible he'll be going down, but again,
Speaker 10: you need to find a replacement for him. And we
Speaker 10: saw how long that took the Republicans. I mean, there's
Speaker 10: been talk about Mitch McConnell talking them stepping down for
Speaker 10: years and it took quite a while going to find
Speaker 10: someone who they thought could be willing to do the
Speaker 10: job and do a good job of it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, It's interesting you mentioned Chasmin Crockett because she features
Speaker 2: on the show a.
Speaker 1: Couple of times as few as we'll see.
Speaker 2: She's quite a character, look, as I referred to at
Speaker 2: the top of the show. The White House has responded
Speaker 2: after twenty thousand new Jeffrey Epstein emails and documents were
Speaker 2: released with direct references to Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Now Congress in the US is.
Speaker 2: Pushing forward on a vote to force the justice system
Speaker 2: to release all its files related to Epstein, but the
Speaker 2: measure still faces an uphill battle. Kelly, the President has
Speaker 2: always denied any wrongdoing in regards to Epstein, But it
Speaker 2: seems like this is a story that just won't go away.
Speaker 10: It really does. Just when you think maybe it'll have
Speaker 10: gone away, and you know, it rears it's ugly head again.
Speaker 10: And of course, you know, I was talking to her
Speaker 10: friend last night and he said, well, I guess the
Speaker 10: big news of the day was, you know, the Donald
Speaker 10: Trump stuff in the Epstein emails. And I said, but
Speaker 10: they turned out to be nothing. What are you talking about?
Speaker 10: And he just saw the headlines everywhere. He hadn't actually,
Speaker 10: you know, spent the time reading the story.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 10: And then when you dig deeper. When you actually read
Speaker 10: those emails, there was no you know, there was nothing
Speaker 10: salacious really about Donald Trump. I certainly found out some
Speaker 10: stuff about some other people, including the man formerly known
Speaker 10: as Prince Andrew, but honestly, if there was something really
Speaker 10: juicy about Trump, that would have gotten out a long
Speaker 10: time ago. But the Democrats are using this now as
Speaker 10: a political weapon, which is funny because it had had
Speaker 10: been the Republicans for a while and now the Democrats
Speaker 10: are using it. I just you know, released the files.
Speaker 10: You know, take some care for the victims. Release the
Speaker 10: file so we can all move on. And the conspiracoris
Speaker 10: rain on this one.
Speaker 2: Well, it's interesting you talked about those emails, and I
Speaker 2: spoke at the top of the show about how it
Speaker 2: seemed really cynical of the Democrats to release that particular
Speaker 2: email where Trump was referenced but redact the name of
Speaker 2: the victim, which was Virginia Jeffrey, of course, who has
Speaker 2: repeatedly denied that Trump had been anything but nice and
Speaker 2: good to her. So what did you make of the
Speaker 2: decision from the Democrats to release the emails like that
Speaker 2: in such a way as to I guess, perpetuate this hoax.
Speaker 10: It really shows Caroline just how dirty Democrats are willing
Speaker 10: to play. And of course it's not like they also
Speaker 10: could say, well, we had to redact her name, you know,
Speaker 10: we didn't want her to be known. I mean, she's
Speaker 10: written a book and she course ended her own life
Speaker 10: this year, so there was absolutely no reason. And of
Speaker 10: course they must have known that it would come out
Speaker 10: who she was and how dirty the trick they played.
Speaker 10: But what do they care. They got the headlines they wanted.
Speaker 10: How more people saw those headlines than read the ones
Speaker 10: explaining that actually what the Democrats said was in there
Speaker 10: was really nothing. So they, you know, their media enablers
Speaker 10: were happy to do the job for the Democrats. And
Speaker 10: it really just shows you how dirty they play in
Speaker 10: Washington these days. It's it's gone beyond you know, parody.
Speaker 10: And you know, again, the government's been shut down, they've
Speaker 10: been really doing nothing, and then to come up with
Speaker 10: this while the American people really have a lot, a
Speaker 10: lot bigger things that they would like the representatives in
Speaker 10: Washington to be worried about.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's been a particularly bad way for the Democrats.
Speaker 2: I'd say, Kelly Jane Tarnes, thank you very much.
Speaker 1: For joining me, Thank you for having me.
Speaker 2: Joining me now is the Federalists Elections correspondent Brianna Lyman. Brianna,
Speaker 2: thanks for joining me, Thanks for having me. Well, you're
Speaker 2: joining us from New York, where it's been one week
Speaker 2: since soor On maum Donnie was elected the city's new mayor.
Speaker 2: In his latest interview, m'm donnie says he plans to
Speaker 2: call President Trump ahead of taking office.
Speaker 1: I will be reaching.
Speaker 3: Out to the White House, and as we prepare to
Speaker 3: actually take office, I will.
Speaker 1: Be proactive in the work that I do.
Speaker 12: And I think that is because the responsibility I hold
Speaker 12: to eight and a half million people of being their mayor.
Speaker 12: It is important that you are open to working with anyone,
Speaker 12: no matter what disagreements.
Speaker 1: You may have, Brianna.
Speaker 2: The President has called maum Donnie his quote, little communist.
Speaker 1: How do you see that call playing out?
Speaker 13: Yeah, well, mom, Donnie is doing this because New York
Speaker 13: City has a very unique relationship both with New York
Speaker 13: State and with the federal government, and President Trump has
Speaker 13: made it very clear he is willing to cut off
Speaker 13: funding to New York City if it descends into a
Speaker 13: communist chaos regime, which I think a lot of us
Speaker 13: believe it will give in Mom Donnie's policy. So I
Speaker 13: think Mom Donnie is trying to put a good foot
Speaker 13: forward with the President to try and you know, maybe
Speaker 13: buy some political capital. But I don't think President Trump
Speaker 13: will buy it. That being said, I think gets a
Speaker 13: smart maneuver on Mom Donnie's part, because he doesn't just
Speaker 13: represent liberals and progressives. He does represent, you know, hundreds
Speaker 13: of thousands of Republicans in New York City. So having
Speaker 13: a good relationship with the President wouldn't hurt.
Speaker 1: Look, I guess it's better than not having one.
Speaker 2: But he did tell him in his victory speech you know,
Speaker 2: listen to what I have to say, and he was
Speaker 2: aggressive himself, so it'll certainly be interesting. Look, I want
Speaker 2: to stay with New York and the grandson of former
Speaker 2: President John F. Kennedy, Jack Schlosberg, announced this week he
Speaker 2: will run for the congressional seat of Manhattan. And this
Speaker 2: is just some of him in his campaign launch.
Speaker 12: He's stripping citizens of their civil rights and silencing his critics.
Speaker 12: The worst part is it doesn't have to be this way,
Speaker 12: and it wasn't always. We deserve better and we can
Speaker 12: do better, and it starts with the Democratic Party when
Speaker 12: back control of the House of Representatives. With control of Congress,
Speaker 12: there's nothing we can't do without it, we're helpless to
Speaker 12: a third term. My name is Jack Schlossburg and I'm
Speaker 12: running for Congress Brianna.
Speaker 2: It seems like Schlosberg has taken a leaf out of
Speaker 2: mom Donnie's anti establishment playbook.
Speaker 1: Do you think he'll be successful?
Speaker 14: I think he has a good chance.
Speaker 13: You know, he'd be running for the seat currently held
Speaker 13: by Jerry Nadler, who is just as far left as Schlosberg,
Speaker 13: or you know whoever else would be taking that seat,
Speaker 13: So it's not far fetched to think that this Kennedy
Speaker 13: descended could win the election. That doesn't mean he's going
Speaker 13: to be able to help bring the House back for Democrats,
Speaker 13: even though I do think Democrats have a shot at
Speaker 13: winning the House back next year. Something else that's jfkse
Speaker 13: Granson said that was just really despicable. As he called
Speaker 13: out RFK Junior. You don't attack family like that, especially
Speaker 13: in public. And this isn't the first time we've seen
Speaker 13: RFK Junior attack like this by his relatives, and I
Speaker 13: think it just goes to show you that these people
Speaker 13: have no shred of decency or humanity, because someone with
Speaker 13: both of those things would not publicly criticize a family member.
Speaker 13: It's such a horrible way.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we've seen that before, obviously, as you say, including
Speaker 2: with our ambassador here to Australia, Caroline Kennedy. Look, I
Speaker 2: spoke about this a bit in my editorial, but the
Speaker 2: BBC is in turmoil this week after top executives resigned
Speaker 2: following revelations that the broadcaster had docted a speech by
Speaker 2: Donald Trump given on January sixth before protesters storm the Capitol.
Speaker 2: The BBC has now apologized to Trump, but it says
Speaker 2: that it won't pay him the compensation he wants. Brianna,
Speaker 2: you've written a piece this week on The Federalist about
Speaker 2: this whole saga and why maybe some of the same
Speaker 2: detractors in the US should follow suit.
Speaker 1: What did you.
Speaker 13: Say, Yeah, BBC executives. Now, mind you, they're taking the
Speaker 13: least amount of accountability that they should be taking, but
Speaker 13: it's still more accountability than broadcasters here in America have
Speaker 13: taken over the past decade. Right, We've seen American broadcasters
Speaker 13: spread the Russia collusion hoax, the Kavanaugh repe hokes, the
Speaker 13: children in cages, the ice agents whipping migrants. The list
Speaker 13: goes on about hoaxes they perpetuated to try and harm
Speaker 13: President Donald Trump or his legacy, and never are they fired.
Speaker 13: In fact, most of them are winning Polzer Prizes, they're
Speaker 13: getting promotions, raises, so they're actually rewarded for improper journalism.
Speaker 2: It's very similar to here in Australia, as I also
Speaker 2: pointed out at the top of the show, but our
Speaker 2: own public broadcaster, who hasn't taken responsibility for some of
Speaker 2: the fake news narratives they've been pushing.
Speaker 1: Do you think it's likely.
Speaker 2: That Trump will follow through with this one billion dollar
Speaker 2: lawsuit that he's threatening. Given he's got the apology but
Speaker 2: hasn't got the compensation from the BBC.
Speaker 14: I would like to see him do it.
Speaker 13: I think these left wing progressive media outlets and the
Speaker 13: BBC's you know, kind of equivalent to our NPR PBS,
Speaker 13: but it really toes the line of being the progressive
Speaker 13: wing of the media over there.
Speaker 14: And I think there needs to be accountability.
Speaker 13: They can't just get away with this defamation and the
Speaker 13: slanderous actions and things that they can just say, oh, sorry,
Speaker 13: my bad we're not going to do it again. That's
Speaker 13: not enough because they've done it for so long.
Speaker 14: So I hope he goes forward with it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it would certainly send a very strong message to
Speaker 2: the rest of the media, wouldn't it. Look speaking of
Speaker 2: lefty media, take a look here at CNN host Abbe
Speaker 2: Phillips and what she has to say about dealing with conservatives.
Speaker 15: Conservatives are living in a completely different information world.
Speaker 1: Absolutely and liberals, and.
Speaker 15: Breaking that down needs to be done because when you
Speaker 15: don't ever even hear the facts, it's hard to.
Speaker 1: Even know that you're wrong.
Speaker 15: And that happens a lot.
Speaker 1: I mean.
Speaker 15: Half my job sometimes is knowing what the latest conspiration is. Yeah,
Speaker 15: so that if it comes up, I'm ready to address it,
Speaker 15: because it happens a lot where people don't even know
Speaker 15: that what they're saying or what they've seen and believe
Speaker 15: is not true. I think that one time that that
Speaker 15: person brings up something that is debunked and false and
Speaker 15: I debunk it at the table might be the very
Speaker 15: first time that, if they wanted out there, has heard
Speaker 15: an alternative point of view.
Speaker 2: This seems very condescending, but Branda, you've appeared on Samon
Speaker 2: many times with Abby Phillips as a host. What do
Speaker 2: you make of her comments here?
Speaker 13: I would simply say I can count on my hand.
Speaker 13: There is one instance in which the chiron on her
Speaker 13: show told me that young black children were being zip
Speaker 13: tied by Ice agents. That turned out to be a hoax.
Speaker 13: It's actually a police officer father arresting his adorable two
Speaker 13: year old for being too cute.
Speaker 14: But they told me that that was happening.
Speaker 13: And then another time, and then another time there was
Speaker 13: a fellow guest, Ryan James Dusky on there. You talked
Speaker 13: about the Ferguson effect. Aby Phillips didn't know what that was,
Speaker 13: neither did the rest of the panel. So it's almost
Speaker 13: like we're actually informing them when they're locked in their
Speaker 13: echo chamber.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think she may may need a bit of
Speaker 2: a lesson in misinformation by the sounds about herself. Brianna Lyman,
Speaker 2: thank you so much for joining me having me now
Speaker 2: get a load of this. Donald Trump caused quite the
Speaker 2: stir on Veteran's Day in the US after making a
Speaker 2: surprise call in to an ESPN show. The President was
Speaker 2: asked to lead a group of New Marines enchanting urah,
Speaker 2: a longtime battle cry for the US Marine Corps, and
Speaker 2: of course he was only too happy to oblige.
Speaker 3: Mister President, have you ever done an oohrah to a
Speaker 3: bunch of marines?
Speaker 6: Not the kind that I just heard.
Speaker 3: I just heard a level of professionalism with the way
Speaker 3: they did it that I don't think anybody can mack you.
Speaker 3: To be honest, it's very impressive.
Speaker 6: Why don't you drop an urrah real quick?
Speaker 3: I will urrah?
Speaker 6: Yes, okay, we love everything about that.
Speaker 2: And Trump actually dropped an ura twice more during that
Speaker 2: twenty minute call. And while some humorless critics did have
Speaker 2: a crack at host Pat McAfee for giving Trump such
Speaker 2: a big chunk of time on the day, good on
Speaker 2: McAfee for standing his ground and pointing out the obvious
Speaker 2: he's the commander in chief.
Speaker 1: Back with more after the break.
Speaker 2: As we told you earlier, President Trump has signed a
Speaker 2: bill ending the longest running government shutdown in US history
Speaker 2: forty three days. The bill is expected to bring back
Speaker 2: federal workers idoled by the shutdown from as early as
Speaker 2: today now. Part of the reason for the delay in
Speaker 2: a resolution to all this was because Democrats claimed they
Speaker 2: were refusing to back a funding bill without renewed and
Speaker 2: enhanced healthcare subsidies, but Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson reckons
Speaker 2: it has more to do with internal politics and attamspy
Speaker 2: New York Democrats like Chuck Schumer to get political cover
Speaker 2: from the Marxists taking over the party.
Speaker 9: It was a selfish political stunt. It yielded nothing but
Speaker 9: pain for the American people, and I think the people
Speaker 9: are it's going to be a long time before they
Speaker 9: forget this.
Speaker 2: So Sparah thought for the pain of poor Texas Democratic
Speaker 2: Representative Jasmine Crockett, who voted for the shutdown but still
Speaker 2: complained about her flight delay.
Speaker 11: Because I want to jump on as my flight has
Speaker 11: been delayed yet again. But it's agur I am not
Speaker 11: mad at air traffic controllers whatsoever. I am very happy.
Speaker 16: Access, We're good.
Speaker 11: I'm not mad at air traffic controllers. I'm not mad
Speaker 11: at any federal workers, except for the ones that have
Speaker 11: continued to get paid, which means it is like me
Speaker 11: and my coworkers, but that's a whole other issue. I'm
Speaker 11: obviously not mad in myself either.
Speaker 2: I reckon we could find a few people, though, who
Speaker 2: are mad at you, Jasmine Crockett, because let's remind ourselves
Speaker 2: of the full cost of this historic shutdown.
Speaker 8: Hundreds of thousands of federal employees have missed their paychecks
Speaker 8: and estimated five point two million travelers have had their
Speaker 8: flights disrupted over the course of the Democrat shutdown, and
Speaker 8: our economy has lost billions and billions of dollars in
Speaker 8: economic activity.
Speaker 2: But according to these Democrats, it was all worth it.
Speaker 6: Shutdown worth it? Yeah, I think so.
Speaker 1: I hate it, but yeah, it was worth it.
Speaker 4: Definitely.
Speaker 2: We got people to pay attention to the fact that
Speaker 2: this is a traumatic in many case, this is life
Speaker 2: for just situation for people all over this country.
Speaker 1: It was a shutdown worth it.
Speaker 12: I think it worth.
Speaker 2: Billions in economic activity, millions prevented from traveling to see
Speaker 2: their families or go to work, and thousands of families
Speaker 2: going hungry. But to these people, some abstract political point
Speaker 2: was worth it. Joining me now is president at the
Speaker 2: Center for the American Experiment, John Heindereker. John, thanks for
Speaker 2: joining me. I just mentioned off the top there. How
Speaker 2: some Democrats are boasting that the shutdown was worth it.
Speaker 2: I mean, this was the longest shutdown in history, cost
Speaker 2: the country millions of dollars and impacted everyday Americans for
Speaker 2: more than forty days. What do you make of that
Speaker 2: take that it was all worth it?
Speaker 17: Well, the shutdown is over. The Democrats seemingly gained nothing,
Speaker 17: and so a lot of people here in America are
Speaker 17: asking what was the point? What were they really trying
Speaker 17: to accomplish? And there is a school of thought that
Speaker 17: the Democrats never really intended to obtain anything tangible, and
Speaker 17: all they were really trying to do was rile up
Speaker 17: their base for the sake of the elections that were
Speaker 17: going on in New Jersey and Virginia. And if that
Speaker 17: was their goal, I think it succeeded. They got their
Speaker 17: base riled up, they won those elections by substantial margins,
Speaker 17: and maybe that that's all they ever really intended. And
Speaker 17: if that's the case, Caroline, we're going to see the
Speaker 17: same thing next year. This may have been a trial
Speaker 17: run for a government shut down in the months leading
Speaker 17: up to the big twenty twenty six mid term elections.
Speaker 1: It's quite the election tactic, isn't it.
Speaker 2: Along those same lines, I showed Mike Johnson's take that
Speaker 2: New York Democrats Chuck Schumer and Jeffries. Well, they were
Speaker 2: thinking more about internal politics in voting against ending the shutdown.
Speaker 2: What sort of pressure do you think this whole fiasco
Speaker 2: has put on them?
Speaker 17: You know, it's very hard to say. I mean again,
Speaker 17: it may have been kabuki theater. Chuck Schumer is regarded
Speaker 17: as week by some of the real fanatics in the base,
Speaker 17: but I don't see any real opposition to his status
Speaker 17: as minority leader in the Senate. And it may be
Speaker 17: that Schumer was doing exactly what his party wanted him
Speaker 17: to do.
Speaker 1: Look, I want to move now to energy.
Speaker 2: You've written a great piece this week on your power
Speaker 2: Line blog about the ongoing dangers of renewable energy, and
Speaker 2: I bring this up because you even mentioned Australia and
Speaker 2: how reckless hour renewables pushes. Meantime, you've gone California Governor
Speaker 2: Gavin Newsom trashing the Trump administration but not showing up
Speaker 2: to last week's COP thirty climate summit in Brazil.
Speaker 1: Take the look, I.
Speaker 4: Literally came out here.
Speaker 9: I'm just I'm stunned. I'm just stunned.
Speaker 18: I got four kids. The hell's going on in my
Speaker 18: country now?
Speaker 4: One person from the administration show any respect to any
Speaker 4: of you, forget politics, disrespect.
Speaker 2: We're in Brazil, John, it seems like Newsom is really
Speaker 2: pushing hard here to contend for the twenty twenty eight
Speaker 2: presidential race. Do you think climate and energy will be
Speaker 2: a key issue over these next three years.
Speaker 17: I think there will be, Caroline so in Brazil, Gavin
Speaker 17: Newsom was preaching the old time climate religion, and I'm
Speaker 17: not sure he understands that the wind has shifted on
Speaker 17: that issue. Donald Trump is withdrawing the United States from
Speaker 17: these green commitments. He openly denounces the green scam, as
Speaker 17: he calls it. And you know, Bill Gates wrote that
Speaker 17: long and really influential memo about the need to step
Speaker 17: back from climate alarmism and instead focus on global human
Speaker 17: well being, a very controversial concept, of course on the left.
Speaker 17: But I think that the winds are blowing in Trump's
Speaker 17: direction and not Gavin Newsom's. And as you mentioned a
Speaker 17: moment ago, renewable projects are failing all around the world.
Speaker 17: You had a big one in Australia, this billion dollar
Speaker 17: battery project that was derailed by transformer failures. There's a
Speaker 17: big backlog and trying to get transformers either either built
Speaker 17: or repaired. It could be years before all those transformers
Speaker 17: are back on line, and it's the kind of thing
Speaker 17: that we're seeing all around the world. Meanwhile, of course,
Speaker 17: you Australians are getting your electricity from coal, which actually works.
Speaker 17: And in my opinion, what we're seeing is that this
Speaker 17: so called energy transition just isn't happening. There's more coal
Speaker 17: being burned than at any time in human history, there's
Speaker 17: more natural gas being used than at any time in
Speaker 17: human history. And if we ever do see a transition,
Speaker 17: it's going to be a transition to nuclear, not to
Speaker 17: wind and solar.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Well, we certainly have the resources here, the coal, the gas,
Speaker 2: the uranium. The problem is we just export the coal
Speaker 2: and uranium elsewhere and we don't want to use it ourselves.
Speaker 2: I like your part about the winds shifting, because over
Speaker 2: here we've just.
Speaker 1: Had our coalition.
Speaker 2: I will write leaning party say that they're going to
Speaker 2: abandon this net zero target emission. So not quite as
Speaker 2: far as your president has gone and calling all of
Speaker 2: this out, but I'm moving that direction.
Speaker 1: Look, let's take a look at former.
Speaker 2: US Vice President Kamala Harris claiming she outsmarted Trump in
Speaker 2: last year's election race.
Speaker 6: And I wasn't about to fall pre or fall into
Speaker 6: those traps. And part of his strategy and those around
Speaker 6: him was to try and take me off our gang
Speaker 6: and message. And I wasn't about to be distracted by
Speaker 6: those little, those flames that he was trying to throw
Speaker 6: to get me away from one of my highest priority,
Speaker 6: which was talking to people about the economy and their
Speaker 6: well being in terms of their financial well being. And
Speaker 6: that's so I was. I understood the game that was
Speaker 6: being played, and I made a decision that I wasn't
Speaker 6: gonna get played. And checkers, checkers, Yeah, three dimensional jests.
Speaker 6: I'm telling you, you.
Speaker 2: Know, John, I mean, this woman could have been your president.
Speaker 2: She is just delusional at this point, isn't she?
Speaker 17: Well, she's delusional. The fact is, Caroline, she is not
Speaker 17: an intelligent person. She just isn't. And this came through
Speaker 17: loud and clear during the presidential campaign. All through her career,
Speaker 17: she's been able to hide the fact she really has
Speaker 17: no idea what she's doing. But you can't hide in
Speaker 17: a presidential campaign, and everybody saw it. And so I
Speaker 17: don't want to beat up on poor Kamala Harris, but
Speaker 17: the idea that she is somehow outsmarting President Trump by
Speaker 17: losing to him massively is delusional at best.
Speaker 1: Well maybe that was her plan all along.
Speaker 2: That's smart cookie. The White House announced this week it
Speaker 2: would consider a fifty year mortgage repayment plan to address
Speaker 2: the nation's housing crisis. The Federal Housing Finance Agency director
Speaker 2: said it was a complete game changer for home buyers,
Speaker 2: while Trump downplayed the hysteria, describing it as quote no
Speaker 2: big deal, John. Look, we face our own housing crisis
Speaker 2: here in Australia as well.
Speaker 1: How do you think this plan would work?
Speaker 17: I don't think it's a good idea. And the reason
Speaker 17: is with a fifty year mortgage, I di'd be years
Speaker 17: and years and years before you have any equity in
Speaker 17: your house. I mean, nobody buys a house intending to
Speaker 17: live in it for fifty years. And a home buyer
Speaker 17: could buy a house, pay the mortgage for ten years,
Speaker 17: fifteen years, go to sell the house and realize he
Speaker 17: hardly has any equity. All he's been paying his interest
Speaker 17: because of the amorganization schedule. But let's get to the
Speaker 17: real point. America does have a housing shortage. There are
Speaker 17: fewer houses in the United States than there were in
Speaker 17: two thousand and eight, and since then we brought in
Speaker 17: something like who knows fifteen million or more immigrants. So yes,
Speaker 17: we have a housing shortage. Why is that there are
Speaker 17: some areas of the United States where they're building houses
Speaker 17: like crazy, like for example, Texas, and like Florida, and
Speaker 17: like Tennessee. There's other places where they can't build houses
Speaker 17: at all, like California and Illinois and New York. And
Speaker 17: what's going on there is the taxes and regular relations
Speaker 17: and fees in those blue states are making it impossible
Speaker 17: to construct affordable housing. And it's in the red states
Speaker 17: where you can still build affordable housing. That's where the
Speaker 17: houses are being built, and that's where the people are moving.
Speaker 2: Well, it'll be interesting to see because, as I say,
Speaker 2: we have our own housing supply issue. If it does work,
Speaker 2: then we could be following in Trump the Trump administration's footsteps.
Speaker 2: John Heinerecher, thank you for joining me.
Speaker 17: Great to be with you.
Speaker 2: Now, don't go anywhere because we have a lot more
Speaker 2: coming up. But first take a look here. As Illinois
Speaker 2: Speaker of the House Democrat Chris Welch demanded people stop
Speaker 2: calling illegal aliens illegal aliens because he says it's like
Speaker 2: calling African Americans slaves.
Speaker 5: Telling you I don't believe anyone is an illegal alien.
Speaker 5: That's a terrible term to use about anyone. It's illegal,
Speaker 5: it's a legal term. It's not a legal term. They
Speaker 5: used to call black people slaves legally, and it was wrong.
Speaker 1: Wait, weren't their black slaves?
Speaker 2: So we're now supposed to deny that ugly chapter of
Speaker 2: US history happened. It's a bizarre comparison and one that
Speaker 2: won't get a single person to stop using the term.
Speaker 2: Let's all say it together, are legal aliens.
Speaker 1: But back with more.
Speaker 2: Next joining me now is a great friend of the
Speaker 2: program and political journalist John Fund.
Speaker 1: Thanks for joining me.
Speaker 2: I want to start with Democrat Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut,
Speaker 2: who was this week asked whether or not he would
Speaker 2: run for president in twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 1: Well, this was his response.
Speaker 4: What a fool any of us would be to be
Speaker 4: planning to run in an election that may not happen.
Speaker 4: Serious about that. All of our energy right now, all
Speaker 4: of our energy has to be on this project of
Speaker 4: saving our democracy. None of us should presume that there's
Speaker 4: going to be again a free and fair election where
Speaker 4: any Democrat has a shot to win in twenty twenty years.
Speaker 1: John, Yes, that is right.
Speaker 2: Trump is so bad for Democrats that he is going
Speaker 2: to get rid of elections altogether.
Speaker 18: Well, Donald Trump has certainly been guilty of rhetorical excesses
Speaker 18: over the years, but this is pure fear mongering. I mean,
Speaker 18: we tell students that we're supposed to tell students in
Speaker 18: school that we're a democracy, that there's civics that we
Speaker 18: should master, that we're all citizens, and this is corrosive
Speaker 18: in the extreme of any kind of unity in the country. So, yes,
Speaker 18: Donald Trump has gone too far many times rhetorically. But
Speaker 18: this Trump's so to speak, even what.
Speaker 2: He does, it's it's insanity. But I guess they have
Speaker 2: to take it to the next extreme somehow. Let's move
Speaker 2: to Chicago, where violent crime has fallen sharply since the
Speaker 2: start of a federal crackdown known as Operation Midway Blitz.
Speaker 2: As the President noted on Truth Socials, shootings are down
Speaker 2: thirty five percent, robbery is down forty one percent, and
Speaker 2: carjackings nearly fifty percent since the operation began several weeks ago.
Speaker 2: And John, it seems like Trump and his team were
Speaker 2: were able to do this even in the face of
Speaker 2: opposition from Illinois, the Illinois governor and the Chicago mayor.
Speaker 18: Well, one of the things that criminologists will tell you
Speaker 18: is if people are literally giving up on the local
Speaker 18: police department and they think nothing can be done, that
Speaker 18: means crimes don't get reported. People don't you know, intercede
Speaker 18: on the street. They don't want to get involved. So
Speaker 18: what happens is you have a spiraling social condition in
Speaker 18: which things get worse and worse. Talking about the problem,
Speaker 18: elevating it, encouraging people that something can be done about it,
Speaker 18: showing that the federal government cares can have a positive effect.
Speaker 18: And I think that's what we're seeing in Chicago. And
Speaker 18: the mayor should be humiliated by this because for two
Speaker 18: years he's been saying everything is fine, everything is fine. Well, clearly,
Speaker 18: if everything was fine, why is crime down thirty five percent?
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 2: Look, it was only a few months ago where rapper
Speaker 2: Bad Bunny was announced as next year NFL Super Bowl
Speaker 2: halftime act. It drew controversy as he's repeatedly voiced his
Speaker 2: anger at the Trump administration and ice agents. However, take
Speaker 2: a look here, as one of the co owners of
Speaker 2: the Dallas. Cowboy is one of the biggest franchises in
Speaker 2: the NFL. Defended the move.
Speaker 19: We have a mixed culture. I mean our whole our
Speaker 19: whole society is based on immigrants that have come here
Speaker 19: and founded our country, and I think we can celebrate that,
Speaker 19: and I think the show is going to be amazing.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 19: I don't think our game is about politics. I don't
Speaker 19: think people tune in to look at politics. We do
Speaker 19: everything we can to avoid politics, and I think in
Speaker 19: that moment that people will be watching the game, they'll
Speaker 19: be celebrating music, and nobody will be thinking about who
Speaker 19: what's comments on the left side, what comments on the
Speaker 19: right side? That this is about bringing people together?
Speaker 1: John? Do you agree with those comments?
Speaker 3: So?
Speaker 2: Do you think that Bad Bunny has now alienated a significant.
Speaker 1: Portion I would imagine of the NFL audience.
Speaker 18: Well, in this day and age, almost anyone will alienateively population.
Speaker 18: I would just say to that co owner, Fine, I
Speaker 18: have no problem with Bad Bunny, a citizen of a US,
Speaker 18: citizen of Puerto Rico performing and I don't think any
Speaker 18: of the criticism of him stems from that. I think
Speaker 18: it's about politics. But I only have one question for her.
Speaker 18: Please give me the name of the last halftime performer
Speaker 18: at such a game who was a clearly identified conservative.
Speaker 18: I'm waiting, please give me the name.
Speaker 1: You could be waiting for quite a while.
Speaker 18: That performers are all coming from one side of the spectrum, of.
Speaker 2: Course, yeah, I mean they do seem to fool that way,
Speaker 2: don't they just entertainers generally? But yeah, you raise a
Speaker 2: good point. I do think you'll be waiting a long time, though.
Speaker 2: I want to go now to California, where students at
Speaker 2: Point Loma University have been denied an attempt to establish
Speaker 2: a school supported Turning Point USA chapter on their campus.
Speaker 2: Fox News reports the university expressed concerns over the organization's
Speaker 2: Professor watch List. According to tpusa's website, the Professor watch
Speaker 2: List aims to expose and document professors who discriminate against
Speaker 2: conservative students.
Speaker 1: Now, John Charlie Kirk, he.
Speaker 2: Fought for nonviolent, thoughtful political debate on college campuses. What
Speaker 2: do you think it says now about these colleges that
Speaker 2: they're trying to fight that exactly?
Speaker 18: Well, it used to be that this university was proud
Speaker 18: to be called Point Lowman Nazarene University, because it's a
Speaker 18: school of faith. In fact, James Dobson, the great evangelical Christian,
Speaker 18: graduated from it. Well, things have moved on a lot.
Speaker 18: I guess now they not only don't play faith and
Speaker 18: they celebrate all kinds of alternative clubs on campus, including
Speaker 18: various gay and lesbian support groups, but they now want
Speaker 18: to shut down the First Amendment. The First Amendment is
Speaker 18: all about commenting, and if professors are seeing certain things
Speaker 18: in class, they should be accountable for them. It's called transparency.
Speaker 18: Apparently they don't want anyone to know what the professors
Speaker 18: are saying in class because I suspect some of the
Speaker 18: donors and alumni wouldn't be happy. Well, you know, it's
Speaker 18: all about consumer choice, and consumer choice requires information. Obviously
Speaker 18: the university doesn't want that to get out.
Speaker 1: Well it's so typical, isn't it.
Speaker 2: They want free speech for themselves and their academics, but
Speaker 2: not free speech for those who may have a problem
Speaker 2: with what they said. John Fun, thank you so much
Speaker 2: for joining me.
Speaker 18: Pleasure.
Speaker 1: Thank you, before we go to a break.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump has expertly trolled both Barack Obama and Joe
Speaker 2: Biden during a tour of his presidential Walk of Fame
Speaker 2: with Fox News Laura Ingram.
Speaker 1: This is the presidential Walk of Fame.
Speaker 16: Now, whose idea was my idea?
Speaker 3: Everything's my idea, everything's your idea?
Speaker 1: Okay, sadly, Okay, that's Barcas and Obama. Okay, this is
Speaker 1: Biden right here.
Speaker 16: Wait a second, the Worst file the profile of Biden.
Speaker 1: So he's the.
Speaker 3: Worst president in the history of our country, and Barcus
Speaker 3: and Obama's top five meaning bad?
Speaker 18: Are you going to?
Speaker 1: I sat with his actual photo. I don't think so.
Speaker 2: It looks like that auto pen portrait is here to
Speaker 2: stay back next with Only in America and now it's
Speaker 2: time for a little segment we like to call Only
Speaker 2: in America. A lefty radio host has proudly shared photos
Speaker 2: of herself literally licking the boots of a Democrat congresswoman
Speaker 2: while kissing her shoes anyway. Stephanie Miller posted the photos
Speaker 2: on x and wrote, why Yes, I did kiss the
Speaker 2: sneakers of jasmine for us, and I do worship the
Speaker 2: ground she walks on and she was lovely about it.
Speaker 1: Oh the fawning. It's so cringe.
Speaker 2: And to make matters even more awkward, Miller also posted
Speaker 2: this and can.
Speaker 14: You confirm it.
Speaker 16: I just kissed your sneakers. This is a future senator
Speaker 16: of the great State of Texas. Have a missed Tad
Speaker 16: cru so much, He's so likable.
Speaker 2: It's not even the first time the sycophantic host has
Speaker 2: laid it on thick with Jasmine Crockett. Last year, Miller
Speaker 2: shed another groveling clip after the pair met at the
Speaker 2: Democratic National Convention A.
Speaker 16: Warren representative Crockett, I'm gonna start.
Speaker 11: She is not going to cry out.
Speaker 14: I love you so much, seriously to thank you so much.
Speaker 16: You are teaching the world how to alpha liberal. I'm
Speaker 16: telling you that Harris campaign has taken a page from your.
Speaker 2: Book, and how did that work out for the Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris campaign.
Speaker 1: That's all for tonight.
Speaker 2: I'll see you back here next week for the US Report.
Speaker 1: Now it's time for left.
Speaker 2: He's losing it with Rita Panahee.