WEBVTT - The U.S. Report | 14 November

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the US Report.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the program. I'm Caroline Marcus

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 2>coming up tonight. The longest government shut down finally comes

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 2>to an end, But at what cost? The White House

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 2>fires Backer calls for the Epstein files to be released.

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Plus Kamala Harris claims she outsmarted Trump in last year's election.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, she's still that deluded.

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 2>That's all next, But first, the BBC has taken the

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary but correct step of apologizing to US President Donald

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump for doctoring his January sixth speech to make it

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 2>look like he was directly inciting violence among his supporters.

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 2>The corporation admitted the edit had given the mistaken impression

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action,

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>and vowed not to show the program again. But the

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 2>British broadcaster has rejected the President's demands for financial compensation,

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 2>leaving it open still to the mother.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Of all lawsuits.

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 2>It said, while the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 2>is a basis for a defamation claim. Trump had threatened

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 2>to sue the BBC for one billion US dollars. That's

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 2>one and a half Australian unless the corporation issued a retraction,

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>apologized and compensated him. Here's what the BBC Panorama program

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>showed and what Trump actually said.

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 3>We're going to walk down to the capital and I'll

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>be there.

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 4>With you, and we fight.

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 5>We fight like hell.

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to walk down to the Capitol.

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 4>And we're going to cheer on.

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 6>Senators and congressmen and women.

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 2>It truly is indefensible and it's little wonder that two

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 2>BBC executives had no choice but to resign over that fiasco.

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 2>The President is vowing to pursue damages in the eight

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 2>figures unless the broadcaster fully retracts the false, defamatory, disparaging

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 2>and inflammatory statements and and this is the kicker appropriately

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 2>compensates the president. Now, the claim has been filed in

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>a Florida court with the deadline of Saturday morning Australian time.

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Trump has claimed on social media the report interfered in

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the US election, having aired only a week before voting.

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>But as my colleague Chris Kenny has exposed, the BBC

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 2>is far from the only fake news channel to borrow

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 2>a Trump ism when it comes to this subject. Our

0:02:55.480 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>own public broadcaster, the ABC also misrepresented that January sixth speech.

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 2>This is how the Four Corners program cut and paced

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Trump's words back in twenty twenty one, which had I'd

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 2>argue the similar effect of implying he had directly inside

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 2>of the riots.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 3>After this, We're going to walk down, and I'll be

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 3>there with you, because you'll never take back our country

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 3>with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 3>to be strong.

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Both public broadcasters, paid for with taxpayer dollars had selectively

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 2>omitted the part of the speech where Trump had told

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the crowd to cheer on their brave senators and congressmen

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and women.

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>But unlike the.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 2>BBC, which has at least taken some accountability with that

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>apology and the exits of two senior staff, ABC managing

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 2>director Hugh Marx has stood by his network's report, denying

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the program misrepresented Trump's comments, saying he was proud of

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>its journalism. Former ABC journalist turned Liberal Senator Sarah Henderson

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 2>called for a Senate inquiry into this and other examples

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 2>of the ABC's impartial and inaccurate reporting.

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 7>I remind everyone that the ABC has a statutory obligation

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 7>to report news and information. Impartially and accurately. There have

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 7>been too many times when it has breached that obligation,

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 7>and I think it's got so serious, Chris, that we

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 7>need a Senate inquiry into these really serious incidents.

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>But the left media were added again later this week,

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 2>again exposed for misrepresenting Trump, this time in relation to

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 2>pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. At White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>blasted them for so faithfully lapping up what she called

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the Epstein hoax. Now this all relates to a tranche

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 2>of emails selectively released bi Democrats in recent days. It

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 2>purporting to show Trump spent hours with an underage Epstein victim.

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 2>The email from Epstein to accomplish Gislaine Maxwell mentions Trump

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 2>by name, but the Democrats redacted the name of the

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 2>victim when it released the documents. The email reads, I

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.239
<v Speaker 2>want you to realize that the dog that hasn't barked

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 2>is Trump. Victims spent hours at my house with him.

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 2>He has never once been mentioned. Now you can imagine

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 2>how some of those journalists must have been salivating over

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 2>the idea of such incriminating dirt on Trump. But the

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 2>redacted name was vitally important. Because the victim being referred

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 2>to here was Virginia Jeffree, the Australian Epstein accuser who

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>committed suicide this year. Now why that's important is that

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Jeffree repeatedly has said Trump was not involved in any

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 2>wrongdoing and in fact, he couldn't have been.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I said to her.

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 8>In this email you refer to with the name of

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 8>a victim that was unredacted now and has since been

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.119
<v Speaker 8>reported on in this room. So I will go ahead

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 8>and say it Virginia Guffrey. And it was CBS's own

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 8>reporting WIJA that recently wrote that missus Guffrey maintained and

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 8>God rest her soul, that she maintained that there was

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 8>nothing inappropriate. She ever witnessed that President Trump was always

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 8>extremely professional and friendly to her. And so I think

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 8>it's a question worth asking the Democrat Party, and you

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 8>should all go ask them after this briefing of why

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 8>they chose to redact that name.

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:38.359
<v Speaker 2>Levitt even reminded lists how Trump had actually kicked Epstein

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 2>out from his Mara Laga resort for being well a creep,

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 2>including to Jeffree, who Trump had given a job there.

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 2>But just like the Russia hoax, the temptation to smeared

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump as some Epstein style child sex offender proved all

0:06:56.160 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 2>too irresistible for much of mainstream media, and aimfully Australia's

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 2>own ABC was again among the culprits. It's America's editor

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 2>John Lyons failing to disclose the victim here was Jeffree,

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 2>even though that had already been made public by the

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 2>time he filed his report.

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 9>He mentions the name of a particular victim and says

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 9>that she spent hours at my house with him with

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 9>Donald Trump. Now that's quite dramatic.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, this is the same reporter who prompted a royal

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 2>bollocking from Trump when he recently suggested the.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>President was involved in financial corruption.

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 9>That a president in offers should be engaged in so

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 9>much fitter's activity.

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm really not.

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 3>My kids are running the business.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Where are you from.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm from the Australian Broadcasting.

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Rape and fullthorn and provoke the Australia's You're hurting Australia.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>In my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks right now, never mind a Senate inquiry, the ABC

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 2>should be watching this potential billion dollar BBC lawsuit.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Very carefully.

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now is The New York Post's editor at large,

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Kelly Jane Torrence.

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Kelly, thanks so much for joining me.

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 2>The US House of Representatives has finally passed a vote

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 2>to end the longest government shut down in America's history.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, this vote allows.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 2>A short term bill to reopen the government after a

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 2>record forty three days.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Take a look as the.

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 2>President blasted the Democrats as he signed off on the bill.

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 3>They deprived more than one million government workers from their

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 3>paychecks and cut off foodstamp benefits for millions and millions

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 3>more Americans in need. They caused tens of thousands of

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 3>federal contractors and small businesses to go unpaid, and the

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 3>total effect of the damage her antics cause will take

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 3>weeks and probably months to really calculate accurately. I just

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 3>want to tell the American people you should not forget

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 3>this when we come up to midterms and other things.

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget what they've done to our country.

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Kelly. It's finally over.

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 10>But what happens now, Well a great question, Caroline, and

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 10>everybody here seems to be saying our long national nightmare

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 10>is over. But I think your average American it wasn't

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 10>as obsessed with this drama as everybody in New York,

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 10>where I am, of course in Washington, d C. Where

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 10>it is going to take some time to get back

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 10>to normal, the pre shutdown normal obviously with the flights

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 10>being canceled, delayed, that sort of thing that has a

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 10>domino effect, And so it's still going to be days

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 10>more of delays. And of course Thanksgiving coming up towards

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 10>the end of the month here in America, so they

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 10>should have it wrinkled out by then, but certainly the

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 10>next few days are still going to be a bit crazy.

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And then of.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 10>Course, you know, getting the food stamp money to the beneficiaries,

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 10>paying the government workers and stuff all takes time. But politically,

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 10>where we go next is the question. The Democrats, you know,

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 10>really were trying to play chicken and utterly failed. They

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 10>did this, They shut down the government, creating a certain

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 10>amount of chaos just because they were upset at the

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 10>ending of Obamacare subsidies that were actually put into place

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 10>temporarily during COVID supposed to be temporarily, but that never

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 10>happens when you expand a government program, does it. And

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 10>also talking about giving up subsidies to people here, you know,

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 10>from other countries, possibly legally. So the Dems really have

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 10>egg on their face. They didn't get anything out of

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 10>this except headlines.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Democrats on the Republicans, they've both been at

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 2>loggerheads for weeks over who was to blame. It seems

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 2>to me like it's pretty clear, like point out, the

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Democrats were the ones that dragged this out for some

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 2>unpernownes to us, at at least it's not obvious political reason.

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 2>And it does seem like it was the Republicans who

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 2>finally got the job done and ended all of this.

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>How did they manage to do that?

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, Timing was part of it, Caroline, and that's when

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 10>the Democrats were finally willing to give in, And that

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 10>was after the elections last Tuesday. We had a bunch

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 10>of elections, not obviously not presidential, but there were some

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 10>seats up for grabs, some governorship up for grabs, and

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 10>of course the Democrats wanted to use this shutdown in

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 10>the hopes that it would help them, and it actually did,

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 10>but that made me a very short term gain. And

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 10>we don't know if how much the shutdown really had

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 10>to do with their wins given that you know, in

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 10>some cases the Republicans didn't have the greatest candidates in

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 10>some races. Others it was going to be an uphill

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 10>battle for Republicans to win anyway. So it's it's unclear

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 10>really how much that had an effect. But that's after

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 10>the elections. The Democrats were a little more willing to

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 10>give in and once you saw this travel chaos getting

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 10>worse and worse, and if it was going to bother Thanksgiving,

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 10>you know, American Thanksgiving the biggest travel days of the year.

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 11>Here.

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 10>I think more people I know go to visit their

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.839
<v Speaker 10>family for Thanksgiving than even do on Christmas. And so

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 10>they certainly didn't want that chaos ruining the holidays for

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 10>millions of Americans.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that wouldn't have been much goodwill for the Democrats

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>if they had led that impact the holidays. Kelly, it

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 2>seems like there's growing pressure nowt for Chuck Sherman to

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 2>step down and Senate Minority lead.

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that could happen?

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 2>And can you explain why he is facing that kind

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>of pressure.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's funny, Caroline, because he's you know, anger a

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 10>lot of different Democrats. He's angered some on the more

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 10>left blank that wanted him to stay strong and keep

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 10>going with the shutdown, and then he has angered the

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 10>more moderates who said, this shutdown is not good for Americans,

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 10>It's not good for my constituents, everyone's constituents. Why was

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 10>he playing these games? You're Senator John Fetterman, who's you know,

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 10>really the holds a mantle of the moderate Democrats now

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.479
<v Speaker 10>saying that there was no point at all to the shutdown.

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 10>And then you have people like aoc of course and

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 10>other members of the squad who really wanted the shutdown

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 10>to just go on and on until who knows what,

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 10>because Republicans were not giving in on this one, and

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 10>they had no reason to. Really. The things that the

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 10>Democrats were fighting for were not even the things that

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 10>most Americans would have wanted them to fight for, and

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 10>it was just hurting, you know, those who really did

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 10>need the government open, like those on food stamps.

0:13:56.000 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, if Chuck Shaima doesn't last as seneatem and already

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>is there a suitable replacement within the party, who do

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 2>you think could it could be?

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 10>There's going to be a lot of action there, and

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 10>it's really going to show that there's huge divisions in

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 10>the party. You know, you've got the AOC types, Bernie Sanders,

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 10>who's not a Democratic, caucuses with them. Of course, you've

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 10>got the squad Jasmine Crockett, who's doesn't hasn't you know,

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 10>there's no TV that she can't find, TV camera, she

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 10>can't find on Capitol Hell, she's been trying to get

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 10>her name out everywhere. Those are the more people on

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 10>the left now to me. You know, John Fetterman would

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 10>would certainly be someone who can work much better with Republicans,

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 10>and Chuck Schumer had and than any of those would.

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 10>But mostly, you know, the lot of the party just

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 10>thinks he's too moderate for the party. And so it's

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 10>going to be quite an interesting thing to watch. And

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 10>that's why I say don't count out Chuck Schumer just yet.

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 10>You know, it's very possible he'll be going down, but again,

0:14:57.840 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 10>you need to find a replacement for him. And we

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 10>saw how long that took the Republicans. I mean, there's

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 10>been talk about Mitch McConnell talking them stepping down for

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 10>years and it took quite a while going to find

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 10>someone who they thought could be willing to do the

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 10>job and do a good job of it.

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, It's interesting you mentioned Chasmin Crockett because she features

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 2>on the show a.

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Couple of times as few as we'll see.

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 2>She's quite a character, look, as I referred to at

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 2>the top of the show. The White House has responded

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 2>after twenty thousand new Jeffrey Epstein emails and documents were

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>released with direct references to Donald Trump.

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Now Congress in the US is.

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Pushing forward on a vote to force the justice system

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to release all its files related to Epstein, but the

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 2>measure still faces an uphill battle. Kelly, the President has

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 2>always denied any wrongdoing in regards to Epstein, But it

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 2>seems like this is a story that just won't go away.

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 10>It really does. Just when you think maybe it'll have

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 10>gone away, and you know, it rears it's ugly head again.

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 10>And of course, you know, I was talking to her

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 10>friend last night and he said, well, I guess the

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 10>big news of the day was, you know, the Donald

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 10>Trump stuff in the Epstein emails. And I said, but

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 10>they turned out to be nothing. What are you talking about?

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 10>And he just saw the headlines everywhere. He hadn't actually,

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 10>you know, spent the time reading the story.

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 10>And then when you dig deeper. When you actually read

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 10>those emails, there was no you know, there was nothing

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 10>salacious really about Donald Trump. I certainly found out some

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 10>stuff about some other people, including the man formerly known

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 10>as Prince Andrew, but honestly, if there was something really

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 10>juicy about Trump, that would have gotten out a long

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 10>time ago. But the Democrats are using this now as

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 10>a political weapon, which is funny because it had had

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 10>been the Republicans for a while and now the Democrats

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 10>are using it. I just you know, released the files.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 10>You know, take some care for the victims. Release the

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 10>file so we can all move on. And the conspiracoris

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 10>rain on this one.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's interesting you talked about those emails, and I

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 2>spoke at the top of the show about how it

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 2>seemed really cynical of the Democrats to release that particular

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 2>email where Trump was referenced but redact the name of

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the victim, which was Virginia Jeffrey, of course, who has

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 2>repeatedly denied that Trump had been anything but nice and

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 2>good to her. So what did you make of the

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 2>decision from the Democrats to release the emails like that

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 2>in such a way as to I guess, perpetuate this hoax.

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 10>It really shows Caroline just how dirty Democrats are willing

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 10>to play. And of course it's not like they also

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 10>could say, well, we had to redact her name, you know,

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 10>we didn't want her to be known. I mean, she's

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 10>written a book and she course ended her own life

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 10>this year, so there was absolutely no reason. And of

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 10>course they must have known that it would come out

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 10>who she was and how dirty the trick they played.

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 10>But what do they care. They got the headlines they wanted.

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 10>How more people saw those headlines than read the ones

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 10>explaining that actually what the Democrats said was in there

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 10>was really nothing. So they, you know, their media enablers

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 10>were happy to do the job for the Democrats. And

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 10>it really just shows you how dirty they play in

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 10>Washington these days. It's it's gone beyond you know, parody.

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 10>And you know, again, the government's been shut down, they've

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 10>been really doing nothing, and then to come up with

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 10>this while the American people really have a lot, a

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 10>lot bigger things that they would like the representatives in

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 10>Washington to be worried about.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's been a particularly bad way for the Democrats.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I'd say, Kelly Jane Tarnes, thank you very much.

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>For joining me, Thank you for having me.

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now is the Federalists Elections correspondent Brianna Lyman. Brianna,

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 2>thanks for joining me, Thanks for having me. Well, you're

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 2>joining us from New York, where it's been one week

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 2>since soor On maum Donnie was elected the city's new mayor.

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 2>In his latest interview, m'm donnie says he plans to

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 2>call President Trump ahead of taking office.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I will be reaching.

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 3>Out to the White House, and as we prepare to

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 3>actually take office, I will.

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Be proactive in the work that I do.

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 12>And I think that is because the responsibility I hold

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 12>to eight and a half million people of being their mayor.

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 12>It is important that you are open to working with anyone,

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 12>no matter what disagreements.

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>You may have, Brianna.

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 2>The President has called maum Donnie his quote, little communist.

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>How do you see that call playing out?

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, well, mom, Donnie is doing this because New York

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 13>City has a very unique relationship both with New York

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 13>State and with the federal government, and President Trump has

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 13>made it very clear he is willing to cut off

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 13>funding to New York City if it descends into a

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 13>communist chaos regime, which I think a lot of us

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 13>believe it will give in Mom Donnie's policy. So I

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 13>think Mom Donnie is trying to put a good foot

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 13>forward with the President to try and you know, maybe

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 13>buy some political capital. But I don't think President Trump

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 13>will buy it. That being said, I think gets a

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 13>smart maneuver on Mom Donnie's part, because he doesn't just

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 13>represent liberals and progressives. He does represent, you know, hundreds

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 13>of thousands of Republicans in New York City. So having

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 13>a good relationship with the President wouldn't hurt.

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Look, I guess it's better than not having one.

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 2>But he did tell him in his victory speech you know,

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 2>listen to what I have to say, and he was

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 2>aggressive himself, so it'll certainly be interesting. Look, I want

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 2>to stay with New York and the grandson of former

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 2>President John F. Kennedy, Jack Schlosberg, announced this week he

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 2>will run for the congressional seat of Manhattan. And this

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 2>is just some of him in his campaign launch.

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 12>He's stripping citizens of their civil rights and silencing his critics.

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 12>The worst part is it doesn't have to be this way,

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 12>and it wasn't always. We deserve better and we can

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 12>do better, and it starts with the Democratic Party when

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 12>back control of the House of Representatives. With control of Congress,

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 12>there's nothing we can't do without it, we're helpless to

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 12>a third term. My name is Jack Schlossburg and I'm

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 12>running for Congress Brianna.

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.479
<v Speaker 2>It seems like Schlosberg has taken a leaf out of

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 2>mom Donnie's anti establishment playbook.

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think he'll be successful?

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 14>I think he has a good chance.

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 13>You know, he'd be running for the seat currently held

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 13>by Jerry Nadler, who is just as far left as Schlosberg,

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 13>or you know whoever else would be taking that seat,

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 13>So it's not far fetched to think that this Kennedy

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 13>descended could win the election. That doesn't mean he's going

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 13>to be able to help bring the House back for Democrats,

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 13>even though I do think Democrats have a shot at

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 13>winning the House back next year. Something else that's jfkse

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 13>Granson said that was just really despicable. As he called

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 13>out RFK Junior. You don't attack family like that, especially

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 13>in public. And this isn't the first time we've seen

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 13>RFK Junior attack like this by his relatives, and I

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 13>think it just goes to show you that these people

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 13>have no shred of decency or humanity, because someone with

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 13>both of those things would not publicly criticize a family member.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 13>It's such a horrible way.

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've seen that before, obviously, as you say, including

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 2>with our ambassador here to Australia, Caroline Kennedy. Look, I

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.959
<v Speaker 2>spoke about this a bit in my editorial, but the

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 2>BBC is in turmoil this week after top executives resigned

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 2>following revelations that the broadcaster had docted a speech by

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump given on January sixth before protesters storm the Capitol.

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 2>The BBC has now apologized to Trump, but it says

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 2>that it won't pay him the compensation he wants. Brianna,

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 2>you've written a piece this week on The Federalist about

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 2>this whole saga and why maybe some of the same

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 2>detractors in the US should follow suit.

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>What did you.

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 13>Say, Yeah, BBC executives. Now, mind you, they're taking the

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 13>least amount of accountability that they should be taking, but

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 13>it's still more accountability than broadcasters here in America have

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 13>taken over the past decade. Right, We've seen American broadcasters

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 13>spread the Russia collusion hoax, the Kavanaugh repe hokes, the

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 13>children in cages, the ice agents whipping migrants. The list

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 13>goes on about hoaxes they perpetuated to try and harm

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 13>President Donald Trump or his legacy, and never are they fired.

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 13>In fact, most of them are winning Polzer Prizes, they're

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 13>getting promotions, raises, so they're actually rewarded for improper journalism.

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 2>It's very similar to here in Australia, as I also

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 2>pointed out at the top of the show, but our

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 2>own public broadcaster, who hasn't taken responsibility for some of

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 2>the fake news narratives they've been pushing.

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's likely.

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 2>That Trump will follow through with this one billion dollar

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 2>lawsuit that he's threatening. Given he's got the apology but

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 2>hasn't got the compensation from the BBC.

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 14>I would like to see him do it.

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 13>I think these left wing progressive media outlets and the

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 13>BBC's you know, kind of equivalent to our NPR PBS,

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 13>but it really toes the line of being the progressive

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 13>wing of the media over there.

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 14>And I think there needs to be accountability.

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 13>They can't just get away with this defamation and the

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 13>slanderous actions and things that they can just say, oh, sorry,

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 13>my bad we're not going to do it again. That's

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 13>not enough because they've done it for so long.

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 14>So I hope he goes forward with it.

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it would certainly send a very strong message to

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the media, wouldn't it. Look speaking of

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.479
<v Speaker 2>lefty media, take a look here at CNN host Abbe

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Phillips and what she has to say about dealing with conservatives.

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 15>Conservatives are living in a completely different information world.

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely and liberals, and.

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 15>Breaking that down needs to be done because when you

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 15>don't ever even hear the facts, it's hard to.

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Even know that you're wrong.

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 15>And that happens a lot.

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 15>Half my job sometimes is knowing what the latest conspiration is. Yeah,

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 15>so that if it comes up, I'm ready to address it,

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 15>because it happens a lot where people don't even know

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 15>that what they're saying or what they've seen and believe

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 15>is not true. I think that one time that that

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 15>person brings up something that is debunked and false and

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 15>I debunk it at the table might be the very

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 15>first time that, if they wanted out there, has heard

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 15>an alternative point of view.

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 2>This seems very condescending, but Branda, you've appeared on Samon

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 2>many times with Abby Phillips as a host. What do

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 2>you make of her comments here?

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 13>I would simply say I can count on my hand.

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 13>There is one instance in which the chiron on her

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 13>show told me that young black children were being zip

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 13>tied by Ice agents. That turned out to be a hoax.

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.479
<v Speaker 13>It's actually a police officer father arresting his adorable two

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 13>year old for being too cute.

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 14>But they told me that that was happening.

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 13>And then another time, and then another time there was

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 13>a fellow guest, Ryan James Dusky on there. You talked

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 13>about the Ferguson effect. Aby Phillips didn't know what that was,

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 13>neither did the rest of the panel. So it's almost

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 13>like we're actually informing them when they're locked in their

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 13>echo chamber.

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think she may may need a bit of

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 2>a lesson in misinformation by the sounds about herself. Brianna Lyman,

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for joining me having me now

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 2>get a load of this. Donald Trump caused quite the

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 2>stir on Veteran's Day in the US after making a

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 2>surprise call in to an ESPN show. The President was

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 2>asked to lead a group of New Marines enchanting urah,

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 2>a longtime battle cry for the US Marine Corps, and

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 2>of course he was only too happy to oblige.

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 3>Mister President, have you ever done an oohrah to a

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 3>bunch of marines?

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 6>Not the kind that I just heard.

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 3>I just heard a level of professionalism with the way

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 3>they did it that I don't think anybody can mack you.

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 3>To be honest, it's very impressive.

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 6>Why don't you drop an urrah real quick?

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I will urrah?

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 6>Yes, okay, we love everything about that.

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 2>And Trump actually dropped an ura twice more during that

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 2>twenty minute call. And while some humorless critics did have

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 2>a crack at host Pat McAfee for giving Trump such

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 2>a big chunk of time on the day, good on

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 2>McAfee for standing his ground and pointing out the obvious

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 2>he's the commander in chief.

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Back with more after the break.

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>As we told you earlier, President Trump has signed a

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 2>bill ending the longest running government shutdown in US history

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>forty three days. The bill is expected to bring back

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 2>federal workers idoled by the shutdown from as early as

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 2>today now. Part of the reason for the delay in

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>a resolution to all this was because Democrats claimed they

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 2>were refusing to back a funding bill without renewed and

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 2>enhanced healthcare subsidies, but Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson reckons

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>it has more to do with internal politics and attamspy

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 2>New York Democrats like Chuck Schumer to get political cover

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 2>from the Marxists taking over the party.

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 9>It was a selfish political stunt. It yielded nothing but

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 9>pain for the American people, and I think the people

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 9>are it's going to be a long time before they

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 9>forget this.

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 2>So Sparah thought for the pain of poor Texas Democratic

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Representative Jasmine Crockett, who voted for the shutdown but still

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 2>complained about her flight delay.

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 11>Because I want to jump on as my flight has

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 11>been delayed yet again. But it's agur I am not

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 11>mad at air traffic controllers whatsoever. I am very happy.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 16>Access, We're good.

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 11>I'm not mad at air traffic controllers. I'm not mad

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 11>at any federal workers, except for the ones that have

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 11>continued to get paid, which means it is like me

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 11>and my coworkers, but that's a whole other issue. I'm

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 11>obviously not mad in myself either.

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I reckon we could find a few people, though, who

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 2>are mad at you, Jasmine Crockett, because let's remind ourselves

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 2>of the full cost of this historic shutdown.

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 8>Hundreds of thousands of federal employees have missed their paychecks

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 8>and estimated five point two million travelers have had their

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 8>flights disrupted over the course of the Democrat shutdown, and

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 8>our economy has lost billions and billions of dollars in

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 8>economic activity.

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 2>But according to these Democrats, it was all worth it.

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 6>Shutdown worth it? Yeah, I think so.

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I hate it, but yeah, it was worth it.

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Definitely.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 2>We got people to pay attention to the fact that

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 2>this is a traumatic in many case, this is life

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 2>for just situation for people all over this country.

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a shutdown worth it.

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 12>I think it worth.

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Billions in economic activity, millions prevented from traveling to see

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 2>their families or go to work, and thousands of families

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 2>going hungry. But to these people, some abstract political point

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 2>was worth it. Joining me now is president at the

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Center for the American Experiment, John Heindereker. John, thanks for

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 2>joining me. I just mentioned off the top there. How

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 2>some Democrats are boasting that the shutdown was worth it.

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this was the longest shutdown in history, cost

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 2>the country millions of dollars and impacted everyday Americans for

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 2>more than forty days. What do you make of that

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 2>take that it was all worth it?

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 17>Well, the shutdown is over. The Democrats seemingly gained nothing,

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 17>and so a lot of people here in America are

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 17>asking what was the point? What were they really trying

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 17>to accomplish? And there is a school of thought that

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 17>the Democrats never really intended to obtain anything tangible, and

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 17>all they were really trying to do was rile up

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 17>their base for the sake of the elections that were

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 17>going on in New Jersey and Virginia. And if that

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 17>was their goal, I think it succeeded. They got their

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 17>base riled up, they won those elections by substantial margins,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 17>and maybe that that's all they ever really intended. And

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 17>if that's the case, Caroline, we're going to see the

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 17>same thing next year. This may have been a trial

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 17>run for a government shut down in the months leading

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 17>up to the big twenty twenty six mid term elections.

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>It's quite the election tactic, isn't it.

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Along those same lines, I showed Mike Johnson's take that

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 2>New York Democrats Chuck Schumer and Jeffries. Well, they were

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 2>thinking more about internal politics in voting against ending the shutdown.

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 2>What sort of pressure do you think this whole fiasco

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 2>has put on them?

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 17>You know, it's very hard to say. I mean again,

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 17>it may have been kabuki theater. Chuck Schumer is regarded

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 17>as week by some of the real fanatics in the base,

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 17>but I don't see any real opposition to his status

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 17>as minority leader in the Senate. And it may be

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 17>that Schumer was doing exactly what his party wanted him

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 17>to do.

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Look, I want to move now to energy.

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 2>You've written a great piece this week on your power

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Line blog about the ongoing dangers of renewable energy, and

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:46.719
<v Speaker 2>I bring this up because you even mentioned Australia and

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 2>how reckless hour renewables pushes. Meantime, you've gone California Governor

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Gavin Newsom trashing the Trump administration but not showing up

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 2>to last week's COP thirty climate summit in Brazil.

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Take the look, I.

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Literally came out here.

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 9>I'm just I'm stunned. I'm just stunned.

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 18>I got four kids. The hell's going on in my

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 18>country now?

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 4>One person from the administration show any respect to any

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 4>of you, forget politics, disrespect.

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 2>We're in Brazil, John, it seems like Newsom is really

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 2>pushing hard here to contend for the twenty twenty eight

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 2>presidential race. Do you think climate and energy will be

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 2>a key issue over these next three years.

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 17>I think there will be, Caroline so in Brazil, Gavin

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 17>Newsom was preaching the old time climate religion, and I'm

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 17>not sure he understands that the wind has shifted on

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 17>that issue. Donald Trump is withdrawing the United States from

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 17>these green commitments. He openly denounces the green scam, as

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 17>he calls it. And you know, Bill Gates wrote that

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 17>long and really influential memo about the need to step

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 17>back from climate alarmism and instead focus on global human

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 17>well being, a very controversial concept, of course on the left.

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 17>But I think that the winds are blowing in Trump's

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 17>direction and not Gavin Newsom's. And as you mentioned a

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 17>moment ago, renewable projects are failing all around the world.

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 17>You had a big one in Australia, this billion dollar

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 17>battery project that was derailed by transformer failures. There's a

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 17>big backlog and trying to get transformers either either built

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 17>or repaired. It could be years before all those transformers

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 17>are back on line, and it's the kind of thing

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 17>that we're seeing all around the world. Meanwhile, of course,

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 17>you Australians are getting your electricity from coal, which actually works.

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 17>And in my opinion, what we're seeing is that this

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 17>so called energy transition just isn't happening. There's more coal

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 17>being burned than at any time in human history, there's

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 17>more natural gas being used than at any time in

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 17>human history. And if we ever do see a transition,

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 17>it's going to be a transition to nuclear, not to

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 17>wind and solar.

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, we certainly have the resources here, the coal, the gas,

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 2>the uranium. The problem is we just export the coal

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 2>and uranium elsewhere and we don't want to use it ourselves.

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 2>I like your part about the winds shifting, because over

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 2>here we've just.

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Had our coalition.

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I will write leaning party say that they're going to

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 2>abandon this net zero target emission. So not quite as

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 2>far as your president has gone and calling all of

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 2>this out, but I'm moving that direction.

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Look, let's take a look at former.

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 2>US Vice President Kamala Harris claiming she outsmarted Trump in

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 2>last year's election race.

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:53.439
<v Speaker 6>And I wasn't about to fall pre or fall into

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 6>those traps. And part of his strategy and those around

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 6>him was to try and take me off our gang

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 6>and message. And I wasn't about to be distracted by

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 6>those little, those flames that he was trying to throw

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 6>to get me away from one of my highest priority,

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 6>which was talking to people about the economy and their

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 6>well being in terms of their financial well being. And

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 6>that's so I was. I understood the game that was

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 6>being played, and I made a decision that I wasn't

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 6>gonna get played. And checkers, checkers, Yeah, three dimensional jests.

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm telling you, you.

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Know, John, I mean, this woman could have been your president.

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.399
<v Speaker 2>She is just delusional at this point, isn't she?

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 17>Well, she's delusional. The fact is, Caroline, she is not

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 17>an intelligent person. She just isn't. And this came through

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 17>loud and clear during the presidential campaign. All through her career,

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 17>she's been able to hide the fact she really has

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 17>no idea what she's doing. But you can't hide in

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 17>a presidential campaign, and everybody saw it. And so I

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 17>don't want to beat up on poor Kamala Harris, but

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 17>the idea that she is somehow outsmarting President Trump by

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 17>losing to him massively is delusional at best.

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe that was her plan all along.

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 2>That's smart cookie. The White House announced this week it

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 2>would consider a fifty year mortgage repayment plan to address

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the nation's housing crisis. The Federal Housing Finance Agency director

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 2>said it was a complete game changer for home buyers,

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 2>while Trump downplayed the hysteria, describing it as quote no

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 2>big deal, John. Look, we face our own housing crisis

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 2>here in Australia as well.

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you think this plan would work?

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 17>I don't think it's a good idea. And the reason

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.720
<v Speaker 17>is with a fifty year mortgage, I di'd be years

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 17>and years and years before you have any equity in

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 17>your house. I mean, nobody buys a house intending to

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 17>live in it for fifty years. And a home buyer

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 17>could buy a house, pay the mortgage for ten years,

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 17>fifteen years, go to sell the house and realize he

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:20.720
<v Speaker 17>hardly has any equity. All he's been paying his interest

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 17>because of the amorganization schedule. But let's get to the

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 17>real point. America does have a housing shortage. There are

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 17>fewer houses in the United States than there were in

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 17>two thousand and eight, and since then we brought in

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 17>something like who knows fifteen million or more immigrants. So yes,

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 17>we have a housing shortage. Why is that there are

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 17>some areas of the United States where they're building houses

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 17>like crazy, like for example, Texas, and like Florida, and

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.800
<v Speaker 17>like Tennessee. There's other places where they can't build houses

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 17>at all, like California and Illinois and New York. And

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 17>what's going on there is the taxes and regular relations

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 17>and fees in those blue states are making it impossible

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:09.720
<v Speaker 17>to construct affordable housing. And it's in the red states

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:13.359
<v Speaker 17>where you can still build affordable housing. That's where the

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 17>houses are being built, and that's where the people are moving.

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, it'll be interesting to see because, as I say,

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 2>we have our own housing supply issue. If it does work,

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:27.800
<v Speaker 2>then we could be following in Trump the Trump administration's footsteps.

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 2>John Heinerecher, thank you for joining me.

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 17>Great to be with you.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Now, don't go anywhere because we have a lot more

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 2>coming up. But first take a look here. As Illinois

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Speaker of the House Democrat Chris Welch demanded people stop

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:48.839
<v Speaker 2>calling illegal aliens illegal aliens because he says it's like

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 2>calling African Americans slaves.

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:55.320
<v Speaker 5>Telling you I don't believe anyone is an illegal alien.

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 5>That's a terrible term to use about anyone. It's illegal,

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 5>it's a legal term. It's not a legal term. They

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 5>used to call black people slaves legally, and it was wrong.

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Wait, weren't their black slaves?

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 2>So we're now supposed to deny that ugly chapter of

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 2>US history happened. It's a bizarre comparison and one that

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 2>won't get a single person to stop using the term.

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's all say it together, are legal aliens.

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 1>But back with more.

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Next joining me now is a great friend of the

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 2>program and political journalist John Fund.

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining me.

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 2>I want to start with Democrat Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut,

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:46.399
<v Speaker 2>who was this week asked whether or not he would

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 2>run for president in twenty twenty eight.

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, this was his response.

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:55.279
<v Speaker 4>What a fool any of us would be to be

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 4>planning to run in an election that may not happen.

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Serious about that. All of our energy right now, all

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 4>of our energy has to be on this project of

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:12.359
<v Speaker 4>saving our democracy. None of us should presume that there's

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 4>going to be again a free and fair election where

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 4>any Democrat has a shot to win in twenty twenty years.

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 1>John, Yes, that is right.

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Trump is so bad for Democrats that he is going

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 2>to get rid of elections altogether.

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 18>Well, Donald Trump has certainly been guilty of rhetorical excesses

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 18>over the years, but this is pure fear mongering. I mean,

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 18>we tell students that we're supposed to tell students in

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 18>school that we're a democracy, that there's civics that we

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 18>should master, that we're all citizens, and this is corrosive

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 18>in the extreme of any kind of unity in the country. So, yes,

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 18>Donald Trump has gone too far many times rhetorically. But

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:00.280
<v Speaker 18>this Trump's so to speak, even what.

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 2>He does, it's it's insanity. But I guess they have

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 2>to take it to the next extreme somehow. Let's move

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 2>to Chicago, where violent crime has fallen sharply since the

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 2>start of a federal crackdown known as Operation Midway Blitz.

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.839
<v Speaker 2>As the President noted on Truth Socials, shootings are down

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty five percent, robbery is down forty one percent, and

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 2>carjackings nearly fifty percent since the operation began several weeks ago.

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 2>And John, it seems like Trump and his team were

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 2>were able to do this even in the face of

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 2>opposition from Illinois, the Illinois governor and the Chicago mayor.

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 18>Well, one of the things that criminologists will tell you

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 18>is if people are literally giving up on the local

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 18>police department and they think nothing can be done, that

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:58.280
<v Speaker 18>means crimes don't get reported. People don't you know, intercede

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 18>on the street. They don't want to get involved. So

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 18>what happens is you have a spiraling social condition in

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.240
<v Speaker 18>which things get worse and worse. Talking about the problem,

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 18>elevating it, encouraging people that something can be done about it,

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:16.240
<v Speaker 18>showing that the federal government cares can have a positive effect.

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 18>And I think that's what we're seeing in Chicago. And

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 18>the mayor should be humiliated by this because for two

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 18>years he's been saying everything is fine, everything is fine. Well, clearly,

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 18>if everything was fine, why is crime down thirty five percent?

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Look, it was only a few months ago where rapper

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Bad Bunny was announced as next year NFL Super Bowl

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 2>halftime act. It drew controversy as he's repeatedly voiced his

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:48.759
<v Speaker 2>anger at the Trump administration and ice agents. However, take

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 2>a look here, as one of the co owners of

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 2>the Dallas. Cowboy is one of the biggest franchises in

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the NFL. Defended the move.

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 19>We have a mixed culture. I mean our whole our

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 19>whole society is based on immigrants that have come here

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:06.799
<v Speaker 19>and founded our country, and I think we can celebrate that,

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:09.240
<v Speaker 19>and I think the show is going to be amazing.

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 19>I don't think our game is about politics. I don't

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 19>think people tune in to look at politics. We do

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 19>everything we can to avoid politics, and I think in

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 19>that moment that people will be watching the game, they'll

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 19>be celebrating music, and nobody will be thinking about who

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 19>what's comments on the left side, what comments on the

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 19>right side? That this is about bringing people together?

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>John? Do you agree with those comments?

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that Bad Bunny has now alienated a significant.

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Portion I would imagine of the NFL audience.

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 18>Well, in this day and age, almost anyone will alienateively population.

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:48.799
<v Speaker 18>I would just say to that co owner, Fine, I

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 18>have no problem with Bad Bunny, a citizen of a US,

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 18>citizen of Puerto Rico performing and I don't think any

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 18>of the criticism of him stems from that. I think

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 18>it's about politics. But I only have one question for her.

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 18>Please give me the name of the last halftime performer

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 18>at such a game who was a clearly identified conservative.

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 18>I'm waiting, please give me the name.

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:16.439
<v Speaker 1>You could be waiting for quite a while.

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 18>That performers are all coming from one side of the spectrum, of.

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Course, yeah, I mean they do seem to fool that way,

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 2>don't they just entertainers generally? But yeah, you raise a

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 2>good point. I do think you'll be waiting a long time, though.

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:31.879
<v Speaker 2>I want to go now to California, where students at

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Point Loma University have been denied an attempt to establish

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 2>a school supported Turning Point USA chapter on their campus.

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Fox News reports the university expressed concerns over the organization's

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Professor watch List. According to tpusa's website, the Professor watch

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:57.720
<v Speaker 2>List aims to expose and document professors who discriminate against

0:45:57.840 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 2>conservative students.

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Now, John Charlie Kirk, he.

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 2>Fought for nonviolent, thoughtful political debate on college campuses. What

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 2>do you think it says now about these colleges that

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:12.320
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to fight that exactly?

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 18>Well, it used to be that this university was proud

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 18>to be called Point Lowman Nazarene University, because it's a

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 18>school of faith. In fact, James Dobson, the great evangelical Christian,

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 18>graduated from it. Well, things have moved on a lot.

0:46:27.440 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 18>I guess now they not only don't play faith and

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 18>they celebrate all kinds of alternative clubs on campus, including

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:40.239
<v Speaker 18>various gay and lesbian support groups, but they now want

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:43.880
<v Speaker 18>to shut down the First Amendment. The First Amendment is

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 18>all about commenting, and if professors are seeing certain things

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 18>in class, they should be accountable for them. It's called transparency.

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:54.800
<v Speaker 18>Apparently they don't want anyone to know what the professors

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 18>are saying in class because I suspect some of the

0:46:57.200 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 18>donors and alumni wouldn't be happy. Well, you know, it's

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 18>all about consumer choice, and consumer choice requires information. Obviously

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 18>the university doesn't want that to get out.

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Well it's so typical, isn't it.

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.400
<v Speaker 2>They want free speech for themselves and their academics, but

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 2>not free speech for those who may have a problem

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.319
<v Speaker 2>with what they said. John Fun, thank you so much

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 2>for joining me.

0:47:19.000 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 18>Pleasure.

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, before we go to a break.

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump has expertly trolled both Barack Obama and Joe

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Biden during a tour of his presidential Walk of Fame

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:32.839
<v Speaker 2>with Fox News Laura Ingram.

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the presidential Walk of Fame.

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 16>Now, whose idea was my idea?

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Everything's my idea, everything's your idea?

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, sadly, Okay, that's Barcas and Obama. Okay, this is

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Biden right here.

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 16>Wait a second, the Worst file the profile of Biden.

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So he's the.

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Worst president in the history of our country, and Barcus

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 3>and Obama's top five meaning bad?

0:47:59.360 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 18>Are you going to?

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I sat with his actual photo. I don't think so.

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:06.360
<v Speaker 2>It looks like that auto pen portrait is here to

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:14.359
<v Speaker 2>stay back next with Only in America and now it's

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 2>time for a little segment we like to call Only

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:26.440
<v Speaker 2>in America. A lefty radio host has proudly shared photos

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:31.600
<v Speaker 2>of herself literally licking the boots of a Democrat congresswoman

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 2>while kissing her shoes anyway. Stephanie Miller posted the photos

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 2>on x and wrote, why Yes, I did kiss the

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 2>sneakers of jasmine for us, and I do worship the

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:47.319
<v Speaker 2>ground she walks on and she was lovely about it.

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh the fawning. It's so cringe.

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 2>And to make matters even more awkward, Miller also posted

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 2>this and can.

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 14>You confirm it.

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:03.360
<v Speaker 16>I just kissed your sneakers. This is a future senator

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 16>of the great State of Texas. Have a missed Tad

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:07.440
<v Speaker 16>cru so much, He's so likable.

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 2>It's not even the first time the sycophantic host has

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:16.320
<v Speaker 2>laid it on thick with Jasmine Crockett. Last year, Miller

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 2>shed another groveling clip after the pair met at the

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Democratic National Convention A.

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:25.399
<v Speaker 16>Warren representative Crockett, I'm gonna start.

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 11>She is not going to cry out.

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 14>I love you so much, seriously to thank you so much.

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:35.399
<v Speaker 16>You are teaching the world how to alpha liberal. I'm

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:38.280
<v Speaker 16>telling you that Harris campaign has taken a page from your.

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Book, and how did that work out for the Kamala

0:49:41.680 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Harris campaign.

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>That's all for tonight.

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll see you back here next week for the US Report.

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Now it's time for left.

0:49:48.200 --> 0:49:52.400
<v Speaker 2>He's losing it with Rita Panahee.