Speaker 1: Les General, Welcome to the Late Basell.
Speaker 2: It's great to have your company. I'm James Macpherson with
Speaker 2: Liz Storer and Caleb Bond coming up. I know a
Speaker 2: dog is a man's best friend, but would you spend
Speaker 2: one hundred and seventy five dollars on perfume for your pooch?
Speaker 2: Some people are and will show you the commercial that's
Speaker 2: encouraging them to do so. Plus, when we look at
Speaker 2: the papers, councils raking in millions of dollars from ticketless
Speaker 2: parking fines and training colleges being shut down over links
Speaker 2: to sex trafficking. But first, Queensland Premier Stephen Miles's latest
Speaker 2: election promise has been described as his dumbest ever. And
Speaker 2: that's saying something because outdoing himself for stupidity cannot be easy.
Speaker 2: Miles has promised to open twelve government run petrol stations
Speaker 2: across Queensland to bring the price of fuel down. Can
Speaker 2: you imagine it? Government run petrol stations staffed by public
Speaker 2: servants working from home, attended by just one operator, probably
Speaker 2: supported by the CFMU, earning two hundred thousand dollars a year.
Speaker 2: It's just what Queenslanders need. But It gets even crazier
Speaker 2: than that. He admitted today that his petrol station plan
Speaker 2: was not based on any research or any modeling at all.
Speaker 2: In fact, it's just pure gas.
Speaker 3: Have a listen.
Speaker 2: Have you done your own modeling or an own research
Speaker 2: or have you relied on ourcqs.
Speaker 4: This is our election commitment for what we will do
Speaker 4: for Queenslanders to drive down the price of fuel going forward.
Speaker 2: You haven't done any research. You described an idea from
Speaker 2: the Racques that might help with the election.
Speaker 4: Not at all. This is a detailed package of initiatives
Speaker 4: designed to address what we know from Queenslanders is one
Speaker 4: of their biggest concerns.
Speaker 5: So what research is the government done on this?
Speaker 4: This is an election commitment and it's a commitment that
Speaker 4: I am making to Queenslanders.
Speaker 6: Here here's a question, have you done model it or not?
Speaker 4: Well, this is an election committment.
Speaker 1: What does that mean or not?
Speaker 4: This is an election commitment. So it hasn't been produced
Speaker 4: by the public service.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but he's standing in front of a sign that
Speaker 2: says driving down fuel prices, so it must be true.
Speaker 2: Except that industry leaders and the lnp's deputy leader warn
Speaker 2: that government funded petrol stations will push independent operators out
Speaker 2: of the market and drive prices up.
Speaker 7: Stephen Miles is on the side of multinationals, and he
Speaker 7: will wipe out independent retailers, therefore creating less competition in
Speaker 7: the marketplace, in the marketplace, therefore driving up petrol prices
Speaker 7: for Queenslanders. It will have the complete opposite effect that
Speaker 7: he thinks this will have.
Speaker 2: My favorite part of that Stephen Miles interview Caleb was
Speaker 2: where he's asked, you know, so is there research? Is
Speaker 2: there any study backing this plan up? And he says no,
Speaker 2: it's an election commitment.
Speaker 5: Who needs to actually take any numbers into account when
Speaker 5: you may making promises, just say whatever you want.
Speaker 1: I was trying to get vote. I think you misunderstand.
Speaker 5: Example, money is your power bill is going to go
Speaker 5: down by two hundred and seventy five dollars. I mean
Speaker 5: that number was just plucked out of thin air. It
Speaker 5: certainly hasn't come into being.
Speaker 2: The Gabba redevelopment dollars thin air.
Speaker 5: It has totally made that number up and then commissioned
Speaker 5: a report to tell them that they shouldn't build it,
Speaker 5: but it said that they should do the gabber up anyway,
Speaker 5: So they just ignored that bit. You know, we accept
Speaker 5: the you know what, was it forty odd recommendations in
Speaker 5: that report. We accept thirty nine of them. The one
Speaker 5: they didn't accept was the most important one, which was
Speaker 5: redeveloped a gabba for goodness sake. And look, there's a
Speaker 5: couple of things here. As I explained last night, I
Speaker 5: sort of agree with the opposition that it would lead
Speaker 5: to overall higher petrol prices, because if you can only
Speaker 5: put your prices up by five cents a day, which
Speaker 5: is what Miles is suggesting, then it means the market
Speaker 5: will equalize and you'll never have lower petrol is because
Speaker 5: if you can only put them up by five cents
Speaker 5: a day, well you're not going to go down to
Speaker 5: the lows and then go to the tops as you
Speaker 5: have in the normal price cycle with petrol. The one
Speaker 5: good thing that could come out of this, though, is
Speaker 5: that if the union gets involved in a publicly owned
Speaker 5: petrol station system, they will want as many jobs involved
Speaker 5: in that as possible. And maybe this is the way
Speaker 5: that we can bring back bowser attendants who you pull
Speaker 5: up and they put the petrol in the car for you,
Speaker 5: because you know, the unions will be in there, demanding
Speaker 5: that we must have as many customer service jobs here
Speaker 5: as possible. Maybe we could get some proper service at
Speaker 5: a service station for once in our lives.
Speaker 2: They would have got on all of that. Whole thing's
Speaker 2: observed the good old days, it was like doing a
Speaker 2: Formula one pit stop. You'd have someone put the fuel in,
Speaker 2: they'd wash the windows, they'd check your tire pressure.
Speaker 1: I don't know how armac, but I think you're showing
Speaker 1: it because I can't remember a time when this ever happened.
Speaker 1: I've seen it on all the school American movies, but other.
Speaker 3: Than that, I've never even known this has existed.
Speaker 1: But obviously what Stephen Miles's show is just how desperate
Speaker 1: he is.
Speaker 3: I mean, in that video you can see his sweating bullets.
Speaker 1: This is an extremely uncomfortable man who has been caught
Speaker 1: out in we can't quite call it a lie, but
Speaker 1: here he has. He promised everyone a pony and a
Speaker 1: pony for their pony, and he's just been asked.
Speaker 3: Outright, or what's the modeling? How much is this going
Speaker 3: to cost you? And when are you going to.
Speaker 1: Roll this out? And in what timeframe? No details whatsoever.
Speaker 1: I've worked for government for almost a decade and one
Speaker 1: of the favorite things to do if you've lost an election.
Speaker 1: And the Libs did in wa very painfully what they
Speaker 1: love to do. Then, when Labor was expected to deliver
Speaker 1: on their election promises and were falling over themselves unable
Speaker 1: to do so, all the Libs, the handful of them
Speaker 1: that were left in the chamber, I'd love to laughingly
Speaker 1: chant together, fully costed, fully funded, fully costed, fully funded,
Speaker 1: because at least that's what Labor had promised when they
Speaker 1: took these certain promises to the election.
Speaker 3: Miles hasn't even bothered.
Speaker 1: There's no fully costed, fully funded, there's no plan behind
Speaker 1: this whatsoever.
Speaker 3: The guy's desperate. Three weeks ago, the Yugov polling showed.
Speaker 1: That he was on twenty nine percent preferred premiere, with
Speaker 1: Chriso fully sitting on forty percent. We know that all
Speaker 1: the polls in the lead up have been a resounding
Speaker 1: thumbs up for the Libs. He is now simply they've
Speaker 1: done all the polling, they've realized, oh my goodness.
Speaker 8: Cost of living is top of mind for everyone. So
Speaker 8: let's do fifty cent fares on public transport. Let's tell
Speaker 8: them we're getting petrol involved in how.
Speaker 3: There's going to be cheap at chips. We're cramping down
Speaker 3: on all these people charging you.
Speaker 1: Too much for petrol, trying to hit all the right
Speaker 1: moles on their head.
Speaker 3: But unfortunately no election is a whack them all. Otherwise
Speaker 3: it'd be working splendidly.
Speaker 1: But what this kind of thing goes to show, and
Speaker 1: I actually love it when it happens because it awakens
Speaker 1: the public to the fact that these promises that these
Speaker 1: guys make you, just because they're trying to shill for
Speaker 1: your vote, doesn't mean they're actually going to deliver or
Speaker 1: even have any intention of delivering on what they're promising.
Speaker 3: You just need your favor on the.
Speaker 5: Dat hasn't he heard of the Parliamentary Budget Office? Like
Speaker 5: there is literally a place you can go to and
Speaker 5: ask them to do the modeling for you.
Speaker 3: That's the point.
Speaker 5: You get them to do the modeling and then you say,
Speaker 5: look it is, we've sort of it all out. It's
Speaker 5: going to work. But also, how does Stephen Miles get
Speaker 5: over the problem in his head that he would then
Speaker 5: be going or his government would then be going into
Speaker 5: the fossil fuel business. I mean, after all this time,
Speaker 5: it's happen over fossil fuels. We're literally going to become
Speaker 5: a petrol company. Now, how do you do those two things?
Speaker 2: The other stupid part of this is as if twelve
Speaker 2: petrol stations in a state as vast as Queensland is
Speaker 2: going to make any difference to prices at all. What
Speaker 2: he would be better off doing is restoring the fuel
Speaker 2: re excise rebate. That and a bly removed back in
Speaker 2: I think it was twenty fourteen. It was about eight
Speaker 2: and a half cents eliter that she removed from Queenslanders.
Speaker 2: If he'd said, look, we're going to reinstate that excise rebate,
Speaker 2: I reckon people would be thrilled with him. He doesn't
Speaker 2: want ideas, he wants an announcement. He got his announcement.
Speaker 2: And the other thing that this proves is after helln've
Speaker 2: Labour been empowering Queensland.
Speaker 3: This would be their fourth term. They're trying for their fourth.
Speaker 2: Thirteen right, So do you think that's an example of
Speaker 2: a politician who's become very comfortable with getting a good
Speaker 2: run from the media. And it's only more in recent
Speaker 2: times that the career mails really turned against the Labor government.
Speaker 2: But he's so used to getting a good ride. He's
Speaker 2: expecting I can stand up, I can say whatever I
Speaker 2: want and not be challenged, and now he's shocked when
Speaker 2: journalists are really pushing.
Speaker 5: But it's also got a bit of the disinter Allen's
Speaker 5: about him, right, like he's had to follow a reasonably
Speaker 5: strong labor premiere and he's just not up to the job.
Speaker 5: Like you know, Justina Allen, ain't no Daniel Andrews and
Speaker 5: Stephen Miles ain't no Anastasia Paliche right like they were
Speaker 5: very strong leaders. What have you thought of them? They
Speaker 5: were strong leaders and so trying to live up to
Speaker 5: that and have the same sort of sway and cut
Speaker 5: through with the public following on from that is a very.
Speaker 2: When your nickname is giggles, but strength, but.
Speaker 5: Good good luck with you. It's good good luck with
Speaker 5: your petrol station, Stephen Miles, you may well need one
Speaker 5: to be there for you to go and work in
Speaker 5: when you get turfed out in October. Let's go to
Speaker 5: more of the craziness in the UK at the moment.
Speaker 5: We talked about it last night. You've seen it on
Speaker 5: if you've been watching the channel tonight, You've seen it
Speaker 5: on other programs otherwise you've seen it elsewhere. The rioting
Speaker 5: that has been going on in the UK, which of
Speaker 5: course was sparked by the killing of three girls last
Speaker 5: week and the belief that the guy who killed them
Speaker 5: was an asylum seeker. Of course he wasn't, but by
Speaker 5: the time that was confirmed it was much too late
Speaker 5: and people had started rioting and looting and carrying on
Speaker 5: across the UK. Well, the Prime Minister, Sir Kiir Starmer
Speaker 5: has made yet another statement condemning the violence as well.
Speaker 5: He ought to it is thuggery. But would you believe
Speaker 5: his concern only seems to be on one side. Now,
Speaker 5: let's be clear here. The violence has been perpetrated both
Speaker 5: by people who are demonstrating against mass migration and also
Speaker 5: by migrants, particularly Muslim migrants. So you'd think everyone would
Speaker 5: be up for a bit of criticism, not from Sir Kia.
Speaker 5: He put a statement on Twitter or x as it
Speaker 5: is now called, with a video and accompanying that with
Speaker 5: the words this is not protest, it is pure violence.
Speaker 5: We will have a standing army of public duty officers.
Speaker 5: We will ramp up criminal justice. We will apply criminal
Speaker 5: law online as well as offline. Now, if it's simply
Speaker 5: finished there, you'd say, yep, exactly, that's all what we
Speaker 5: want the prime ministers to say, except he goes on
Speaker 5: to write, we will not tolerate attacks on mosques or
Speaker 5: on Muslim communities. I mean, yeah, that's a given, But
Speaker 5: what about the attacks that have also been carried out
Speaker 5: by Muslims on other Brits. That doesn't come in for
Speaker 5: a mention from Cerquire and Elon Musk, the proprietor of
Speaker 5: X pointed this out himself in a reply to Cerquire,
Speaker 5: saying shouldn't you be concerned about attacks on all communities?
Speaker 5: If you're trying to lead the country, you'd think you
Speaker 5: would be. And if they seriously want to stand up
Speaker 5: and do something about this violence, as well, they should
Speaker 5: because it is outrageous in any democratic country that that
Speaker 5: is the way you deal with political issues. But as
Speaker 5: we're talking about last night, the reason it has got
Speaker 5: to this boiling point is because no one's been able
Speaker 5: to have a legitimate discussion about mass migration because every
Speaker 5: time they try to, they're torn down and told that
Speaker 5: they're racist, etc. So that the natural consequence of all
Speaker 5: of that is that eventually people lash out. But the
Speaker 5: lashing out has been on both sides. The government only
Speaker 5: seems to be interested in one version of that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and the post from the Prime Minister only aggravates
Speaker 2: the situation. You've got white Brits predominantly who feel like
Speaker 2: they're being pushed out by migrants, so then feeling that
Speaker 2: when you read something like that from the Prime Minister,
Speaker 2: who's concerned seemingly about only one side, only aggravates the
Speaker 2: feelings that led to this violence, which, as you said,
Speaker 2: is unacceptable, but it just aggravates that situation rather than
Speaker 2: doing what the Prime Minister needs to do is to
Speaker 2: go hard against everybody who's writing and just calm things
Speaker 2: down a bit so they can get control again.
Speaker 1: Instead, he is gas lighting the Brits. So is his
Speaker 1: home section. But Terry, we're about to get to her
Speaker 1: in a minute, and this, you're quite right, this is
Speaker 1: going to enrage the situation.
Speaker 3: Keep in mind, this is nothing new.
Speaker 1: The Brits have been putting up with mass migration year
Speaker 1: in year out. Right now they don't even know how
Speaker 1: many illegals are in their country. It's estimated somewhere between
Speaker 1: eight hundred thousand and one point two million. But that
Speaker 1: just goes to show how undocumented these guys are even.
Speaker 3: The Home Office does not know.
Speaker 1: And in March of this year it reached an all
Speaker 1: time high of people coming across the Channel. It's up
Speaker 1: twenty three percent on the same time.
Speaker 3: The previous year.
Speaker 1: So Brits are just rightly saying, you guys are doing
Speaker 1: absolutely nothing about this.
Speaker 3: We have seen crime skyrocket.
Speaker 1: The death of these three beautiful young girls, of course,
Speaker 1: has just been a lit match in an entire nation
Speaker 1: of gunpowder. At this point, these guys were ready to
Speaker 1: blow and to see the man that they have elected
Speaker 1: that they now call Prime Minister standing up for seemingly
Speaker 1: only one side. And much as we've noted during our
Speaker 1: pro Palestinian protesters, the Brits are seeing the same thing.
Speaker 1: It's all over Twitter, first hand accounts of people saying
Speaker 1: it's the Brits who are being laid into very hard
Speaker 1: by the cops during the riots, again on both sides.
Speaker 1: But the others, the ones yelling ali wakba and running
Speaker 1: down white people in the streets, will show you a
Speaker 1: grab of that soon, singling them out to beat up
Speaker 1: on them.
Speaker 3: They're not the ones.
Speaker 1: That we're seeing accosted by the police. We seem to
Speaker 1: be seeing a two tiered policing system here, and we've
Speaker 1: witnessed much the same here when we've gone Hang on
Speaker 1: a minute, why is it when someone Jewish rocks up,
Speaker 1: we're bearing an Israeli flag, being a bit like counter protest.
Speaker 3: They're the ones ferried away. Get out of here, You're
Speaker 3: not welcome. You can't do this.
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, the pro Palestinian protesters can march in their thousands,
Speaker 1: yelling from the river to the sea, and that's quite
Speaker 1: okay by the cops. So this is something that is
Speaker 1: only going to detonate further if this administration keeps up
Speaker 1: this approach. And good on Elan and Musk for coming out,
Speaker 1: because I think it bears mentioning. If it weren't for X,
Speaker 1: I don't think we'd even know about what is happening
Speaker 1: in the UK right now. I'm not seeing reports of
Speaker 1: it on the mainstream media, on the regime media. It
Speaker 1: doesn't make anyone look any good. And as I said
Speaker 1: last night, this administration is now using this as an
Speaker 1: excuse to be like, oh, islamophobia and people are anti immigration,
Speaker 1: and using these riots on one side to denounce and
Speaker 1: denner grade guys who have literally just had enough of it.
Speaker 1: They're saying, where Brits, this is England. We have had
Speaker 1: it up to here and we will not take it anything.
Speaker 2: So the opportunity that Keith Keir Starmer has got here
Speaker 2: is to is to regain law and order, to come
Speaker 2: down hard on all the violence, and he's got to
Speaker 2: be color blind as he does it. If he can
Speaker 2: do that, then he immediately gets rid of the allegations
Speaker 2: of two tiered policing, which of course are as hot
Speaker 2: as you can imagine. And Nigel Farage pointed this out
Speaker 2: the other night. We quoted him. And when you've got
Speaker 2: this feeling that there's a different system for one group
Speaker 2: of people as opposed to another, that's what causes the angst.
Speaker 2: And people have got good memories. They remember during Black
Speaker 2: Lives Matter protests, two days after they became violent, twenty
Speaker 2: seven I think it was maybe twenty four British police
Speaker 2: officers were injured in riots, and two days later Keith
Speaker 2: Starmer took a knee for Black Lives Matter. Now people
Speaker 2: remember things like that and that's caused some of the ants.
Speaker 2: But he does have an opportunity if he and the
Speaker 2: police force can come down hard on everybody who is
Speaker 2: acting this way with no reference to race, background color, Well,
Speaker 2: that will restore some faith in the justice system and
Speaker 2: calm things down. But if he doesn't do that, all
Speaker 2: he's going to do is create even more angst and
Speaker 2: more violent and.
Speaker 5: Of course that is what they should do. I mean,
Speaker 5: you have to maintain order, right, especially the public order,
Speaker 5: and once you've done that, you then have to move
Speaker 5: on to the discussion that has led to all of this,
Speaker 5: or the lack of the discussion that has led to
Speaker 5: all of this, and that is the one about mass migration.
Speaker 5: But it is not just Sir Keir, of course, who
Speaker 5: is running this line that everything is being perpetrated against Muslims.
Speaker 5: It's also the UK Home Secretary adding fuel to the fire.
Speaker 9: The government has put in place new emergency security arrangements
Speaker 9: to support mosques across the country. The targeted attacks that
Speaker 9: we have seen on mosques in the last few days
Speaker 9: have been a total disgrace.
Speaker 3: It's part of criminal and violence.
Speaker 9: That we have seen in some towns and cities that
Speaker 9: we simply cannot stand for. We cannot tolerate far right extremism,
Speaker 9: racism or Islamophobia in our country.
Speaker 5: So it's all far right extremism, racism or Islamophobia that
Speaker 5: is going on according to the government in the UK. Well,
Speaker 5: let's just show you some of what is going on
Speaker 5: on the other side. For instance, Sky News UK our
Speaker 5: compatriots over there trying to do a simple report from
Speaker 5: the scene of some of these rights. Take a look.
Speaker 5: Do these look like the far right islamophobic protesters to you?
Speaker 9: Community leaders have been speaking to the police as well, because.
Speaker 6: I think, apologies for the language you're.
Speaker 3: Hearing, but.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think Becky apologize.
Speaker 1: We need to leave you there.
Speaker 5: Yes, they're all white far right protesters. Clearly. The sky
Speaker 5: News crew was then followed by a man who took
Speaker 5: out his anger on a car.
Speaker 3: No, no, no.
Speaker 5: Can do sense to us that Sky newses van by
Speaker 5: the way, so in since he is by them simply
Speaker 5: reporting on what is going on.
Speaker 3: And then over at.
Speaker 5: The BBC when people have simply tried to raise questions
Speaker 5: about how all of this started. And this is a
Speaker 5: former chief superintendent at the met by the way, a
Speaker 5: man who knows what he's talking about. He's simply trying
Speaker 5: to say, look, there's more going on here than just
Speaker 5: far right protesters taking to the street. He gets cut off.
Speaker 10: It's my colleagues and my family members are in front
Speaker 10: line dealing with this. They're taking the rip backs. What
Speaker 10: I'm saying is you cannot You have to be very
Speaker 10: careful now with tempers the way they are and people's
Speaker 10: sense of answer to what had gone on in the
Speaker 10: preceding couple of days where you'd had an army officer
Speaker 10: stabbed in the back, the misleading representation in the Northwest
Speaker 10: where this is.
Speaker 3: That's a different case, Kevin, So we'll leave it there.
Speaker 3: That's Kevin Hurley.
Speaker 10: They're not you're missing the point. All If you're missing
Speaker 10: the point, people conflate this and they make.
Speaker 9: Listening that conflation by mentioning the two cases together here.
Speaker 3: So we'll leave it there. Thank you, Kevin Hurley.
Speaker 5: Yet again, we're simply trying to talk about what's actually
Speaker 5: going on here. No, no, it's only the far right
Speaker 5: white protest as well. Yet again, here's some non white,
Speaker 5: non far right protesters going after a white man. And
Speaker 5: we cannot show you the worst of this footage, but
Speaker 5: it does give you some idea. It is an absolute
Speaker 5: lie to portray this as simply far right white protesters
Speaker 5: taking to the street and causing these riots. It is
Speaker 5: happening on both sides. And as we were all saying before,
Speaker 5: by leaning into that, this simply inflaming the riots, if
Speaker 5: you want to calm it down, they're going about it
Speaker 5: exactly the wrong one.
Speaker 1: And the media, of course is being completely complicit. The BBC,
Speaker 1: the national broadcaster over there last night the riots in Birmingham,
Speaker 1: their report failed to mention just completely omitted who.
Speaker 3: The perpetrators were. Oh, Rights in Birmingham, Rights in Birmingham.
Speaker 1: Yeah, totally left out the fact which side instigated what
Speaker 1: had happened the night before in Birmingham.
Speaker 3: And there they are cutting.
Speaker 1: Off that fellow who's trying to expand on the fat
Speaker 1: that hey, this is just the tip of the iceberg. Okay,
Speaker 1: this is now exploding. And he was only going back
Speaker 1: to a few days prior. He could easily go back
Speaker 1: to years prior and the heenus crimes that the Brits
Speaker 1: have watched play out in their streets for far too
Speaker 1: many years. Now, that is what is exploding, and nobody
Speaker 1: wants to talk about it. They're being gas lit by
Speaker 1: the media, they're being gas lit by their own government.
Speaker 1: Is it any wonder that this isn't going to let
Speaker 1: up anytime soon because protests other language of the disenfranchise.
Speaker 1: Riots are the language of the disenfranchise, and these guys
Speaker 1: are sick and tired of these trees and as treacherous
Speaker 1: administrations telling them, no, you guys don't matter. We're putting
Speaker 1: minorities first, not the natives.
Speaker 3: We're putting them first.
Speaker 2: But the irony of this is at Kirstarmer's right hand woman,
Speaker 2: Rachel Reeves, who's the UK Chancellor. She said back in
Speaker 2: twenty sixteen that unless they addressed the issue of immigration,
Speaker 2: they were sitting on a quote tinderbox with bubbling tensions.
Speaker 2: And so she predicted this eight years ago, and she
Speaker 2: certainly wasn't justifying it. She was just snipping the wind
Speaker 2: and saying, if we keep going down the way we
Speaker 2: are going, we're going to end up with exactly what
Speaker 2: we've now got. So she was saying this in twenty
Speaker 2: sixteen and bravely. So now if you say it, you're
Speaker 2: in trouble. But of course police are certainly cracking down
Speaker 2: with comments online and while they're failing to get control
Speaker 2: of the streets, they're very determined to get control of
Speaker 2: the internet. Here's a police officer coming into someone's home
Speaker 2: and arresting them for comments they made on Facebook.
Speaker 1: Okay, the Times twenty three, fourteen forty and arresting you
Speaker 1: a suspicion of improper use of the electronics communications networkak
Speaker 1: So you do not have to say that that may
Speaker 1: harmon defense?
Speaker 10: Do you not mention one question?
Speaker 3: Sup?
Speaker 10: That Jenata iron core? Anything you do you see, maybe
Speaker 10: get an evidence. Do you understand that? So I'm actually
Speaker 10: being arrested.
Speaker 4: To be arrested?
Speaker 8: Okay, that's a police station.
Speaker 1: Okay, this is in relation to some comments that you've
Speaker 1: made on a Facebook page.
Speaker 5: Oh real Facebook?
Speaker 3: Prime is that.
Speaker 2: The first thing the government have got to do is
Speaker 2: get control of the streets. That's number one, and so yeah,
Speaker 2: and then they've got to show leadership and have a
Speaker 2: conversation about some of the issues that have created this angst.
Speaker 2: Doesn't justify what's happened, but it has contributed to it.
Speaker 2: But how do you have an honest conversation? And you
Speaker 2: pointed this out earlier when you start cracking down on speech,
Speaker 2: So everybody's too afraid to speak honestly about what is happening.
Speaker 3: It's just afrasy. They're just not allowed to.
Speaker 2: And they're afraid to because the don't want to be arrested.
Speaker 2: So it's a lot easier just to blame the far right,
Speaker 2: paper over the cracks and carry on until the next
Speaker 2: riot happens.
Speaker 3: They can't do that.
Speaker 2: They've got to show leadership and part of that is
Speaker 2: leading a honest discussion. I don't know whether Kirstarma's got
Speaker 2: the ability to do that well.
Speaker 3: Watching that video is just harrowing. You're like, is this
Speaker 3: Britain or the Soviet Union? The Gestapo have a new accent?
Speaker 3: What is going on here?
Speaker 1: It would surprise most people to learn that last year
Speaker 1: alone there were over three thousand, three hundred arrests due
Speaker 1: to posts on social media in the UK, police coming
Speaker 1: to people's doors, knocking on their doors, and usually it
Speaker 1: was anti immigration. It is something they'd seen or heard.
Speaker 1: Remember what they had to put up with on their
Speaker 1: Memorial Days and their absolute everyone flying the wrong flag,
Speaker 1: denigrating their statues.
Speaker 3: Again, Brits have just had to sit.
Speaker 1: Down and take this because the government keeps taking the
Speaker 1: wrong side. So they take to social media to share
Speaker 1: their experiences and their frustrations.
Speaker 3: No, you get arrested for that.
Speaker 1: Three thousand, three hundred plus Brits got arrested last year
Speaker 1: because they were very frustrated and rightly venting on social media.
Speaker 1: This is again all part and parcel of what we're
Speaker 1: seeing the pushback on in the streets now. I mean,
Speaker 1: what do you expect and they have been warned. It's
Speaker 1: not just that brilliant what was their name.
Speaker 3: Rachel Rachel Reeves? Yes, and we all remember.
Speaker 1: It at the time and applauded her at the time,
Speaker 1: but no one has listened. All the conservative commentators have
Speaker 1: been saying the same, Douglas Murray, Brendan O'Neil, all the
Speaker 1: well known Brits have been saying, this is where identity
Speaker 1: politics is going to take you, and here we are.
Speaker 3: So they can't say they weren't warned.
Speaker 1: They knew exactly what was going to come about as
Speaker 1: a part of this, and even now they're just playing
Speaker 1: into it.
Speaker 2: The other funny part about it's not funny but challenging
Speaker 2: part for Kiirstarma is he's from the progressive left. They're
Speaker 2: traditionally soft on crime. Right. They shut down police stations,
Speaker 2: put money into soft welfare programs. They're going to have
Speaker 2: to get some of that money back now and start
Speaker 2: putting officers on the ground in police stations to regain orders.
Speaker 2: So that's another contradiction.
Speaker 3: Well, I don't know about soft on crime.
Speaker 1: The Home Office did a post on X today saying
Speaker 1: for rioting you can get up to ten years people
Speaker 1: for violent discord, five years in prison. For you inciting
Speaker 1: racial hatred up to seven years in prison. So these
Speaker 1: guys are talking a big talk, but like you said
Speaker 1: last night, Mac, they don't have room in their prisons
Speaker 1: to actually do what they're threatening to do. And I
Speaker 1: bet the Brits know that just as much as the
Speaker 1: pro Palestinian or the radical Islamists who are causing trouble
Speaker 1: on the alls, they would all know that actually your
Speaker 1: hands are tied.
Speaker 3: You don't have enough room to lock us all lot.
Speaker 2: Well, as I said last night, I was quoting the
Speaker 2: UK Times. They said there was only seven hundred vacancies
Speaker 2: for male prisoners right across the UK, and as a
Speaker 2: result of these riots, the arrests are well over four
Speaker 2: hundred people now, So they're rapidly reaching a point where
Speaker 2: I don't know what they're going to do. Speaking of
Speaker 2: people who don't know what they're going to do, Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris is getting close to her Democrat convention and she
Speaker 2: still hasn't figured out who her vice president will be.
Speaker 2: Although a lot of people suggesting Josh Shapiro would be
Speaker 2: a very good choice, in the irony is that a
Speaker 2: lot of Republicans are suggesting he'd be a good choice
Speaker 2: as VP as well. He is in favor of school vouchers,
Speaker 2: which will enable people to choose which school they send.
Speaker 3: Their kids to.
Speaker 2: He used to be anti fracking, but now appears to
Speaker 2: be pro oil and gas. He's been a critic of
Speaker 2: Benjamin Nette Yahoo, but has been very staunch in his
Speaker 2: defense of Israel and it's right to defend itself. He's
Speaker 2: been tough on pro Palestinian protesters and on college campus protests.
Speaker 2: But maybe that's part of the problem. You see, he
Speaker 2: himself is Jewish, and so now many of the Democrats
Speaker 2: are saying he might not be the best VP pick
Speaker 2: because he's going to upset the progressive left. Here's one
Speaker 2: of his colleagues explaining just that.
Speaker 11: Those in the overly online left who are attacking Josh
Speaker 11: Shapiro's pro Israel positions in a different way than they
Speaker 11: are attacking non Jewish contender's positions. They're just telling on themselves.
Speaker 11: There is a strong undercurrent of anti semitism to that
Speaker 11: it's unacceptable.
Speaker 2: It'd never imagined that anti Semitism would now be a
Speaker 2: defining factor in choosing the vice potential Vice president of
Speaker 2: the United States list.
Speaker 1: This is definitely tricky for her because of course half
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party didn't rock up to Netanyahu's congressional speech
Speaker 1: the week before last, opposing the true She didn't rock
Speaker 1: it in Gaza, she didn't rock up, but then she
Speaker 1: had a one on one meeting with him later. So
Speaker 1: I was like, h virtue signaling, but having you cake
Speaker 1: and eating it too. So this Shapiro would be a
Speaker 1: very interesting pick for her to make, but also a
Speaker 1: good compliment. You don't want too much of the same
Speaker 1: when you're talking about a presidential nominee, end a VP
Speaker 1: pick you want you want, kind of like a Yin
Speaker 1: and Yang situation going on, And in that respect, Shapiro
Speaker 1: could be very complimentary to her. My question is more
Speaker 1: like who on earth would want to be this woman's VP.
Speaker 6: No, we have to stay woke, like everybody needs to
Speaker 6: be woke, and you can talk about if you're the
Speaker 6: wokest or woke her. But just stay more woke than
Speaker 6: less woke.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you could not pay me enough, I reckon.
Speaker 3: It's Shapiro himself who.
Speaker 1: Has asked the Republicans to say ground how about you
Speaker 1: guys pitch in, say what a great VP I'll make?
Speaker 1: So then they won't pick me because I want to dodge.
Speaker 2: This for Can we just can we play that clip
Speaker 2: one more time? But this time when you watch it,
Speaker 2: don't listen to Kamala Harris so much as watch the
Speaker 2: blonde woman sitting beside her and look at the expression
Speaker 2: on her face as Kamala Harris speaks.
Speaker 6: Have a look, No, we have to stay woke, like
Speaker 6: everybody needs to be woke, and you can talk about
Speaker 6: it if you're the wokest or woker.
Speaker 3: Just stay more woke than less woke. Yeah, cayleb I reckon.
Speaker 2: She's sitting there thinking, I wonder if Kamala Harris really
Speaker 2: did fall out of the coconute.
Speaker 5: Yeah, quite right, seriously, and that was twenty seventeen, right,
Speaker 5: So it's every time that it's brought up that she
Speaker 5: was the most liberal senator. I mean, so she can't
Speaker 5: deny it. Oh, everybody should be woke Ian and who's
Speaker 5: having a debate over whether they're woke her or the
Speaker 5: woe caist. I mean, I didn't know that this was
Speaker 5: something she would kick measure in contest. But we're going
Speaker 5: to work out who's woker than the other, because of course,
Speaker 5: when they come for you with the social credit score,
Speaker 5: they will be checking your wokery and where you sit
Speaker 5: on the scale in order to continue living in the country.
Speaker 3: But it is.
Speaker 5: Absurd that we are at a point where someone's viability
Speaker 5: as a vice president could be based on whether or
Speaker 5: not they are Jewish. Like, almost on that and I
Speaker 5: know Kamala would feel very differently, but almost on principle alone,
Speaker 5: that would be enough for me to say, well, he's
Speaker 5: my guy, because if the people in the party hate
Speaker 5: him that much there were some people in the party
Speaker 5: hate him meant that much, it proves he's doing the
Speaker 5: right thing. I mean, you can't just go around saying well,
Speaker 5: you cannot possibly be the candidate for vice president because
Speaker 5: you're a Jew and shock horror, you've supported Israel. I mean,
Speaker 5: what do they expect him to do? Roll over and
Speaker 5: just forget about his ancestry. It's bloody obvious there are
Speaker 5: other things you could say he is not suitable for VP.
Speaker 5: I mean, the fact that he's only been the governor
Speaker 5: of Pennsylvania since last year they have might disqualify him
Speaker 5: from the opportunity to be VP. But no, they're going
Speaker 5: after his ancestry in the fact he supported Israel. As
Speaker 5: you said, Liz, generally, and this is why. In the
Speaker 5: Labor Party, and I know it's a bit different at
Speaker 5: the moment, but in general you've had a Labor Right
Speaker 5: leader and then a Labor Left deputy leader, and part
Speaker 5: of that comes out of the fact that the factions
Speaker 5: do have to share some stuff and make decisions about
Speaker 5: divvying up who gets certain ministries and whatever. But in general,
Speaker 5: you have someone that comes from one side of the
Speaker 5: party at the top, and then their right hand man
Speaker 5: or woman these days, in the equal opportunity world comes
Speaker 5: from the other side of the party, and you are
Speaker 5: served much better in that kind of arrangement, both in
Speaker 5: terms of playing to the public and smoothing things over
Speaker 5: in your own party when you've kind of got both sides,
Speaker 5: and so having Kamala and Shapiro would achieve that. But
Speaker 5: as we were saying to Paul Off, Air Eliza I
Speaker 5: were anyway saying to pull off air earlier. If she
Speaker 5: does go with Shapiro, the crazies will all turn up
Speaker 5: to the DNC and then they will turn it into
Speaker 5: an absolute you know what show, And that's something she
Speaker 5: would want to avoid because if the DNC goes really well,
Speaker 5: it gives her another boost, and the more boost she
Speaker 5: can get leading up to November, the better.
Speaker 1: But speaking of boost, because he is the governor of Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: everybody wants a boost in Pennsylvania because it's one of
Speaker 1: those knife edged states. So if she were to pic
Speaker 1: Shapiro for VP, well maybe.
Speaker 3: That would get Pennsylvania across the line.
Speaker 5: Who knows.
Speaker 1: But this recent stock market a tumble, shall we say,
Speaker 1: getting everyone very very worried about their stocks. Trump has
Speaker 1: gone ahead and brilliantly dubbed this the Krmala crash, and
Speaker 1: it didn't take long for the Internet to kick in
Speaker 1: with a parody video saying, no, no, is this Kamala
Speaker 1: crash or Biden economics at work, which she's been talking
Speaker 1: up for years.
Speaker 12: Here we go, look at them go down what some
Speaker 12: would call history of the don't say that I've never.
Speaker 3: Been down a thousand points. Ever, not even enter day
Speaker 3: on the now step.
Speaker 6: Bidonomics is working.
Speaker 3: It's working.
Speaker 11: The stock market has just taken a big old nosedive
Speaker 11: this morning.
Speaker 3: Ol Jones is down about one thousand and ten points.
Speaker 3: That is calmed fidnymics.
Speaker 5: The Dow fell more than six hundred points Friday on
Speaker 5: a weaker than expected.
Speaker 2: Jobs are for five percent, Meta, six percent, Amazon, six percent,
Speaker 2: Apple nine percent down.
Speaker 3: Tidonomics is working.
Speaker 1: Next move is the great depression of twenty twenty four,
Speaker 1: Trumpez warned. But of course, if you vote for him,
Speaker 1: it won't get that bad. Although while everyone's laughing about
Speaker 1: this new dubbed Kamala crash, it's all her fault. I
Speaker 1: think we found the legitimate source of the Kamala crash
Speaker 1: in the White House's Economic Advice as a Jared Bernstein.
Speaker 1: Here he is struggling to answer the most basic question.
Speaker 5: Like you said, they print the dollar, so why does
Speaker 5: the government even.
Speaker 3: Borrow well.
Speaker 13: The so the I mean again, some of this stuff
Speaker 13: gets some of the language that the some of the
Speaker 13: language and concepts are just confusing. I mean, the government
Speaker 13: definitely prints money, and it definitely lends that money, which
Speaker 13: is why the government definitely prints money, and then it
Speaker 13: lends that money by selling bonds.
Speaker 3: Is that what they do?
Speaker 5: They they.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they.
Speaker 13: They sell bonds. Yeah, they sell bonds.
Speaker 1: Mister Bernstein, you literally have absolutely no idea what you're
Speaker 1: talking about, do you. That interview actually started with her saying, well,
Speaker 1: hang in a minute. You just said the government can't
Speaker 1: go bankrupt because it prints the money. He sits there
Speaker 1: with the US in thirty five trillion dollars debt, so rightly,
Speaker 1: she says, well, hang on a minute. So if you're
Speaker 1: printing the money, why do you need to loan money
Speaker 1: at all? He could not even answer. The way the
Speaker 1: system works. It did my head in. Then you have
Speaker 1: to watch the entire length of that interview. You will
Speaker 1: be either laughing or crying by the end of it.
Speaker 3: Maybe both.
Speaker 2: I think you're being unkind to the guy. He managed
Speaker 2: to do something very, very remarkable. He made Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: sound articulate. We're going to go to a break when
Speaker 2: we come back for look at What's making News in
Speaker 2: Tomorrow's Papers.
Speaker 3: Welcome back.
Speaker 2: Let's take a look at what's making news in tomorrow's papers.
Speaker 2: And if you've been watching the show for a while,
Speaker 2: you'll know that Caleb Bond loves a good anti council story.
Speaker 2: The Telegraph.
Speaker 5: I got one, that's right, stuffham, I say a polish
Speaker 5: A lot of them, You useless Bastard's one thing they
Speaker 5: are good at, though he's getting money out of you.
Speaker 5: As the Daily Telegraph points out tomorrow, it says, sneaky
Speaker 5: councils to fire the state on parking tickets. Stop this
Speaker 5: fine mess. Gritty suburban councils raked in more than one
Speaker 5: hundred and fifty five million dollars from ticketless parking, finds
Speaker 5: last financial year for an explosion in ranges issuing fines
Speaker 5: without leaving a ticket, despite being ordered by the Men's
Speaker 5: government to stop the practice months ago. So basically what
Speaker 5: happens is you rock up to your parking spot, you overstay,
Speaker 5: you're welcome, you get a fine, but instead of it
Speaker 5: being slipped under the windscreen wiper, it turns up in
Speaker 5: the mail weeks later, which means you don't have the
Speaker 5: opportunity to collect any evidence that may well prove that
Speaker 5: you hadn't overstayed the time there, or that the sign
Speaker 5: was confusing, or that you had parked within the rules
Speaker 5: given and of course the councils know this. The whole
Speaker 5: thing is set up to disadvantage you, so you just go,
Speaker 5: oh bug it, I'll just pay the fine to get
Speaker 5: the thing out of the way. But it has resulted
Speaker 5: in a forty seven percent increase in the fines being issued,
Speaker 5: or there's certainly been such an increase in the ticketless
Speaker 5: fines being issued, because the councils.
Speaker 3: Will love it.
Speaker 5: They don't give us stuff whether you're in the right
Speaker 5: or not. They just want to get as much money
Speaker 5: out of you as possible by whatever means possible.
Speaker 3: Fifty two million last financially.
Speaker 1: Fifty two million is what they wrong out of our
Speaker 1: basically called dead hands, due to the fact that we're
Speaker 1: already living at a cost of living crisis of their making,
Speaker 1: and yet they're ringing every penny out of us just
Speaker 1: to park the cars that we pay extortionate fees to have,
Speaker 1: especially if you're in Sydney and on.
Speaker 3: The roads that we already paid to belt.
Speaker 1: It does my head in I recently got a three
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty dollars parking fine for parking.
Speaker 3: On my own street.
Speaker 1: Now I have my own park, but being neighborly and
Speaker 1: my neighbor was moving out. I said, yeah, you can
Speaker 1: have my part. That's fine, I'll park on the street.
Speaker 1: There is no signage on this street saying that there's
Speaker 1: anything special about the yellow line. Yes, everyone has to
Speaker 1: listen to me on my soapbox right now. No signage whatsoever.
Speaker 1: What kind of a parking fine is three hundred and
Speaker 1: twenty dollars? I can cop eighty or maybe one hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty, but three hundred and twenty. So I wrote
Speaker 1: into the council very kindly, zero abuse, and simply explain
Speaker 1: the situation.
Speaker 3: I was just being neighborly.
Speaker 1: By the way, if you're going to whack people, maybe
Speaker 1: you need to put some signage on the street indicating
Speaker 1: that there's something special about this yellow line and people
Speaker 1: can't park there. Otherwise they will cop an extortionate feet
Speaker 1: because who would risk a three hundred and twenty dollar
Speaker 1: parking fine?
Speaker 3: Nobody?
Speaker 5: Did you park on the yellow line?
Speaker 1: Yes?
Speaker 5: I thought everyone knew not to park on yellow line.
Speaker 3: Well, I'm not from Sydney.
Speaker 1: Is it also not true that hire I lived previously,
Speaker 1: there was no yellow line.
Speaker 2: Was half your car in like a a garden bed
Speaker 2: or something like that?
Speaker 3: Someone's driveway.
Speaker 2: No, you don't.
Speaker 5: Park on yellow lines. There's a yellow line there at
Speaker 5: means there was.
Speaker 8: No signage on the street the point of the yellow
Speaker 8: So what happened.
Speaker 2: Did you get a response from the council.
Speaker 1: No response from the council, just another fine with sixty
Speaker 1: five bucks on top on because you haven't paid it.
Speaker 5: And I'm like, I didn't even get I thought yellow
Speaker 5: lines were a universal language for you can't park, because
Speaker 5: nor do they put them in.
Speaker 3: From w way, you can't. It should be a red line.
Speaker 5: Of course there is. But I take your point.
Speaker 3: Do you guys have yellow lines in Adelaide?
Speaker 5: Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah on on into like at the
Speaker 5: corners of intersections and stuff.
Speaker 3: So okay, but you guys.
Speaker 1: Were weird when you were live there, where you were
Speaker 1: living in Melbourne.
Speaker 3: When you were living in Melbourne, were that yellow lines?
Speaker 3: I can't remember. I just know that you.
Speaker 5: Don't park on a yellow line.
Speaker 1: But I take your perth, no yellow lines, Queen's no
Speaker 1: yellow lines.
Speaker 3: I moved to Sydney. They're like, oh, yellow line means
Speaker 3: three hundred and twenty.
Speaker 5: I take it out. The three hundred and twenty dollars
Speaker 5: is insane, though, and I remember doing a story when
Speaker 5: I was in Adelaide about a council where they had
Speaker 5: gone through and changed the parking rules on some particular
Speaker 5: street right, but everyone just continued parking on the street
Speaker 5: because they had not been informed by the council that
Speaker 5: the rules were changing. But they just came through one
Speaker 5: day and put up some signs or something. Right then
Speaker 5: they went through and they find literally every vehicle that
Speaker 5: was parked on the street because the residents didn't know
Speaker 5: that they now had to apply for a permit or something.
Speaker 5: And so someone wrote to me and was like, Caleb
Speaker 5: Helpers bleeds is like ninety of us have received three
Speaker 5: hundred and twenty dollars fines. Anyway, I managed to get
Speaker 5: that problem fixed up. It's amazing how quickly councils do
Speaker 5: things when the media gets involved, because they're like, oh, no,
Speaker 5: it's some bad publicity. The three hundred and twenty dollar
Speaker 5: was insane.
Speaker 1: You're hurting nobody. I don't even know why there is
Speaker 1: a yellow line there. Literally I have studied it from
Speaker 1: every angle trying to figure it out out.
Speaker 5: How you literally get less of the punching someone in
Speaker 5: the face's ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Thank you, also, can you please write into the council
Speaker 1: since you're so affected, Well.
Speaker 5: Well you should have just done it on the show
Speaker 5: that night.
Speaker 3: Never get stored, counsel.
Speaker 2: They showing you even more money after them to.
Speaker 3: The front page of the odds Now.
Speaker 1: If rates pain persists, please.
Speaker 3: See doctor Chalmers.
Speaker 1: I don't think he's going to fix anything, but Reserve
Speaker 1: Bank Governor Michelle Bullock has pushed back the prospect of
Speaker 1: interest rate cuts until next year and revealed quote very
Speaker 1: serious end quote consideration was given to a hike on Tuesday,
Speaker 1: with the Central Bank acknowledging that government spending was keeping
Speaker 1: inflation higher for long.
Speaker 8: Go ah, tell us something we don't know.
Speaker 1: So the cause of our pain isn't doing anything except
Speaker 1: for funneling out more forms of hey, free money, because
Speaker 1: we know you guys are in pain. Therefar prolonging the pain.
Speaker 3: There's just no end in.
Speaker 1: Sight because I have not seen, and I said this
Speaker 1: last week, any state premiere or any of our federal
Speaker 1: government say anything along the lines of, Okay, we've got
Speaker 1: to be a bit frugal. Everyone tight in your belts.
Speaker 1: We've got to get our spending under control. In order
Speaker 1: to get this under control. It's just not happening.
Speaker 5: Dr Chalmers is just bloody lucky that we're probably not
Speaker 5: going to get an interest rate rise now on the
Speaker 5: on the back of what's been happening overseas, particularly in
Speaker 5: the fact that we are effectively in recession. They don't
Speaker 5: want to lean into that any further. So bloody lucky
Speaker 5: in that respect.
Speaker 2: The headline if pain persists, see doctor Chalmers. The first
Speaker 2: thing I thought of.
Speaker 3: Was, here's the pain.
Speaker 2: What's the the doctor on the Simpsons who you go
Speaker 2: in with a sore arm and you come out with
Speaker 2: a leg having been imitated. That's the kind of doctor
Speaker 2: he is. It just makes everything worse.
Speaker 1: To the second splash in the front of the Ods,
Speaker 1: sex slavery fraud trigger crackdown on colleges. Dozens of dodgy
Speaker 1: training providers have been shut down over ties to organized crime,
Speaker 1: fraud and bogus qualifications as cash staffd universities threatened to
Speaker 1: sack staff. Home affairs officials have revealed that sex trafficking
Speaker 1: and slavery among international students, along with the housing shortages,
Speaker 1: are the main reasons the Albanese government is rationing enrollments
Speaker 1: of international students in Australian universities, training colleges and schools. Well, well, well,
Speaker 1: it's the first we've heard of that angle.
Speaker 5: Well, I don't know that just the first we've heard,
Speaker 5: but I think it's been going on for a long time.
Speaker 5: It's the first time something's actually been done about it,
Speaker 5: thank god. And now the unis are jumping up and
Speaker 5: down and complaining we're going to sack staff if you
Speaker 5: cut the number of foreign enrollments. We're allowed to add
Speaker 5: that the universities are basically acting like organized crime gangs themselves.
Speaker 5: They're making the argument for them to be shut down.
Speaker 2: Indeed, we're going to go to a break. Would you
Speaker 2: buy perfume for your dog? Would you buy luxury perfume
Speaker 2: for your dog? Coming up in a second, welcome back. Well,
Speaker 2: we all know that Caleb's got cats and he certainly
Speaker 2: pampers them. But Caleb, would you pamper a dog?
Speaker 5: Well, I've always thought that dog people are a bit weird, right,
Speaker 5: and they're certainly very entitled. They think their dogs should
Speaker 5: be able to crap anywhere it likes. I don't have
Speaker 5: to pick it up. I should be able to take
Speaker 5: it on the train. I should be able to take
Speaker 5: it to the pub.
Speaker 3: I should be able to let it.
Speaker 5: Yap all night in the backyard. Well it just goes
Speaker 5: one step further, like you are doing nothing to dissuade
Speaker 5: me from thinking you are a bunch of widows. Because
Speaker 5: dog chain Gabbana has decided that there is a market
Speaker 5: for one hundred and seventy five Australian dollar perfume for dogs.
Speaker 5: Take a look.
Speaker 10: Fast, one thick flour.
Speaker 12: I am delicate, authentic, charismatic, sensitive, enigmatic, rebel, fresh, irresistible
Speaker 12: clean because I'm not just a dog. I'm the new
Speaker 12: alcohol free freaks missed for dogs.
Speaker 5: I mean, seriously, look, there may actually be an argument
Speaker 5: for it, because of course dogs sometimes absolutely bloody stink.
Speaker 5: Cat's just clean themselves up. Dogs you've got to have
Speaker 5: them washed and shampooed, and you've got his spray perfume
Speaker 5: on them so they don't bloody stink. Why did people
Speaker 5: persist with this?
Speaker 3: Not?
Speaker 2: Who knows that, tilly what I persist with? I hit
Speaker 2: the same pothole almost every night on my way home
Speaker 2: from these studios. But some people in the Victorian town
Speaker 2: of Inverlock have found a clever way, a creative way
Speaker 2: of getting the council to fix the roads. Some guy
Speaker 2: painted an image of a giant penis over the pothole.
Speaker 2: That was so annoying locals. Now there's the image there
Speaker 2: now that went viral on social media. Here's some of
Speaker 2: the comments that people made. Someone said, seeing that image,
Speaker 2: let me guess that's Ala Thorne's road. I've been dodging
Speaker 2: this for a while now the whole I mean. Someone
Speaker 2: else wrote, made my day. That pothole is awful. Another
Speaker 2: person wrote I had a laugh driving over this and
Speaker 2: was grateful that it stood out.
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 2: Guess what, just a few days after that image was
Speaker 2: painted all over the road where the pothole is. Have
Speaker 2: a look at what council did. They managed not only
Speaker 2: to remove the image of the dried penis, but the
Speaker 2: pothole is magically filled. So if you've got a pothole
Speaker 2: out the front of your place. I don't know if
Speaker 2: there's enough paint in New South Wales to fix all
Speaker 2: the potholes, but creative idea got council's attention. That's it
Speaker 2: from us stick around. Coming up is the read a
Speaker 2: Penalty show